三星Galaxy M33 5G智能手机评论--120赫兹在中档手机中是否足够?
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Drive | Size | Resolution | Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
81 % v7 (old) | 07 / 2022 | Samsung Galaxy M33 5G Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4 | 198 g | 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | 6.60" | 2408x1080 | |
78.6 % v7 (old) | 02 / 2022 | Samsung Galaxy M32 Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2 | 180 g | 128 GB eMMC Flash | 6.40" | 2400x1080 | |
83.2 % v7 (old) | 07 / 2022 | Samsung Galaxy A33 5G Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4 | 186 g | 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | 6.40" | 2400x1080 | |
84.1 % v7 (old) | 03 / 2022 | OnePlus Nord CE 2 5G Dimensity 900, Mali-G68 MP4 | 173 g | 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | 6.43" | 2400x1080 | |
81.7 % v7 (old) | 07 / 2022 | Motorola Moto G82 5G SD 695 5G, Adreno 619 | 173 g | 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash | 6.60" | 2400x1080 |
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
案例和特点 - 稳定和漂亮
三星的M系列今年更谨慎一些。因此,Galaxy M33 5G配备了一个简单的哑光反射背面,颜色相当柔和,如棕色、深蓝色和绿色。镜面效果实际上相当漂亮,但背面几乎神奇地吸引了指纹。
塑料外壳的稳定性几乎无可挑剔:它的结构非常坚固,很难扭曲。显示器也受到大猩猩5号玻璃的保护。然而,198克的重量是相当高的。
与前代产品相比 Galaxy M32现在终于有了更快的大容量存储,而且128GB的容量也不错。三星希望它比去年的349欧元多得多,但在互联网上的价格已经大幅下降,例如在amazon.de在测试的时候。
插入两张SIM卡后还可以使用microSD插槽。它实际上处于平均速度水平,正如我们用参考卡Angelbird V60所显示的那样。然而,CPDT基准显示,在连续读取时,数据速率明显波动。
SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
Samsung Galaxy M32 (Angelbird V60) | |
Samsung Galaxy M33 5G (Angelbird V60) | |
OnePlus Nord CE 2 5G (Angelbird V60) | |
Average of class Smartphone (7.7 - 77, n=78, last 2 years) | |
Motorola Moto G82 5G (Angelbird V60) |
Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)
通信、软件和操作--三星迅捷的指纹识别传感器
虽然有一个Galaxy M32 5G,但它从未到达我们欧洲。现在我们也得到了5G版本的Galaxy M33。这款智能手机可能无法在世界任何地方使用4G和5G网络,但频率多样性应该足以满足一些目的地的需要。
Wi-Fi模块支持WiFi 5标准。然而,在我们与参考路由器华硕ROG AXE11000的测试中,它在传输方向上有点弱,而在接收方向上,它至少可以跟上大多数竞争的智能手机。
OneUI 4.1是三星自己的操作系统,基于Android 12。它也预装在Galaxy M33中,包括相当多的第三方应用程序,这些应用程序填满了内存,如果用户不喜欢它们,应该卸载。
在我们的测试中,我们收到了更新到2022年7月1日的安全补丁,这在测试时是非常最新的。到目前为止,这款手机每2个月收到一次安全更新,根据制造商的说法,这应该在上市后至少4年内保持不变。关于Android 的更新没有可靠的说法,但手机应该还是会得到Android 13。
120赫兹的屏幕使操作非常流畅,尽管永久的120赫兹是不可能的。在较长的剧照或在键盘上打字时,屏幕会切换到60帧。正如我们在刷新率显示中发现的那样,这一点运行良好且可靠。
指纹传感器位于待机按钮的右侧。当你按下按钮或只是把手指放在上面时,它几乎可以立即解锁手机。通过面部识别解锁也是可能的,但这只是通过软件解决方案进行2D解锁,因此并不十分安全。
Networking | |
iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
Samsung Galaxy M32 | |
iperf3 receive AX12 | |
Samsung Galaxy M32 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
OnePlus Nord CE 2 5G | |
Motorola Moto G82 5G | |
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G | |
Samsung Galaxy M33 5G | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
OnePlus Nord CE 2 5G | |
Samsung Galaxy M33 5G | |
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G | |
Motorola Moto G82 5G |
照相机 - 你不应该喜欢它太尖锐
你必须应对摄像头中较少的像素:事实上,主摄像头中只有5000万像素,而在M32中则是6400万像素。 Galaxy M32比起广角镜头从800万像素下降到500万像素,这应该更容易被接受。
主摄像头的传感器来自三星,它是经常用于廉价中档和入门级手机的ISOCELL JN1。它并不完全以其细节和动态的清晰度而闻名,Galaxy M33在这些方面也有轻微的弱点。特别是周围的图像在阴天时看起来非常阴暗,放大后也很模糊。
在弱光下,暗处的细节不再可见。在画面的明亮部分,相机尽力而为,但在重新对焦时产生了像素伪影,否则就相当模糊。
主摄像头甚至可以录制30帧的4K视频,但广角摄像头只能录制30帧的全高清视频。如果你期望在录制过程中进行混合变焦,你会感到失望。你只能在镜头之间切换,而智能手机为此需要一个短暂的停顿。亮度调节通常工作得相当快,但自动对焦在风景变化时喜欢抽风。
广角摄像头拍摄的照片细节很少,在阴天时亮度也相对较低。
在前面,有一个800万像素的摄像头。即使在较暗的地方,它也能拍出不错的照片,细节尚可。
Image Comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
Main cameraMain cameraLow LightUltra wide-angle显示屏 - IPS,亮度稍低
如前所述,Galaxy M33只提供全高清分辨率的IPS屏幕,但至少有120赫兹刷新率。否则,在这个价格范围内通常会安装AMOLED屏幕。
这不是一个问题,因为IPS屏幕也可以提供很好的画质,而且Galaxy M33的屏幕不会出现PWM闪烁的情况。然而,黑色水平、亮度和色彩再现都落后于竞争对手。灰度显示出明显的蓝色偏移,响应时间对游戏玩家来说可能太慢。
|
Brightness Distribution: 92 %
Center on Battery: 545 cd/m²
Contrast: 1090:1 (Black: 0.5 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.02 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 5.8 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
99.8% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.399
Samsung Galaxy M33 5G IPS, 2408x1080, 6.6" | Samsung Galaxy M32 Super AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.4" | Samsung Galaxy A33 5G Super AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.4" | OnePlus Nord CE 2 5G OLED, 2400x1080, 6.4" | Motorola Moto G82 5G OLED, 2400x1080, 6.6" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Response Times | 59% | 94% | 59% | 42% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 31 ? | 10 ? 68% | 1.303 ? 96% | 6 ? 81% | 13 ? 58% |
Response Time Black / White * | 16 ? | 8 ? 50% | 1.25 ? 92% | 10 ? 37% | 12 ? 25% |
PWM Frequency | 362.3 ? | 366.2 | 354.6 | 119.4 | |
Screen | 39% | 46% | 16% | 17% | |
Brightness middle | 545 | 712 31% | 693 27% | 601 10% | 635 17% |
Brightness | 530 | 720 36% | 695 31% | 596 12% | 640 21% |
Brightness Distribution | 92 | 95 3% | 98 7% | 98 7% | 96 4% |
Black Level * | 0.5 | ||||
Contrast | 1090 | ||||
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 5.02 | 1.94 61% | 1.3 74% | 3.35 33% | 2.96 41% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 7.9 | 5.81 26% | 3.5 56% | 6.72 15% | 7.63 3% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 5.8 | 1.5 74% | 1.3 78% | 4.6 21% | 4.8 17% |
Gamma | 2.399 92% | 2.089 105% | 2.14 103% | 2.363 93% | 2.214 99% |
CCT | 7942 82% | 6593 99% | 6530 100% | 7372 88% | 6970 93% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 49% /
44% | 70% /
58% | 38% /
27% | 30% /
23% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
16 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 10 ms rise | |
↘ 6 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 33 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
31 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 17 ms rise | |
↘ 14 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 37 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
性能、排放和电池寿命 - 功率大,运行时间短
的 Exynos 1280被用作今年三星许多中档手机的SoC,例如在 Galaxy A33或 Galaxy A53.Galaxy M33也使用了它,因此在其价格范围内提供了体面的性能率,与前代产品相比,性能有了明显的飞跃。
内存的速度也比在 Galaxy M32然而,SoC的慢速内存控制器阻碍了更好的速度。该 一加北方CE 2显示了它如何能做得更好。
智能手机在低负荷下不会明显变热,但当你长时间运行复杂的应用程序时,外壳温度在某些方面会上升到近43℃。这也就差不多了,但已经很明显了。我们也是在室温下得到的结果,所以在室外温暖的温度下可能会导致明显更高的废热。
底部边缘的单声道扬声器可以变得相当响亮,但有些偏重高音。你可以听音乐,但你更应该通过3.5毫米插孔或蓝牙连接耳机或扬声器,以获得真正悦耳的声音。三星在aptX蓝牙编解码器方面遇到了困难。支持基本形式,但不支持更现代和更高质量的编解码,如aptX HD。相反,有三星自己的可扩展编解码器和LDAC,但同样不是高清变体。
这款手机的最大充电功率为25瓦,但Galaxy M33 5G不包括充电器。这款手机在完全充电的情况下需要不到2个小时才能充满。凭借5000毫安时的电池,Galaxy M33在其价格范围内的定位并不差,但仍不得不接受运行时间的损失:在我们的WLAN测试中,它的持续时间比前代产品少得多,在同类产品比较中无法真正脱颖而出。它应该足够在没有电源插座的情况下使用一到两天,但如果能有更高的能源效率,就可以使用更多的时间。
Samsung Galaxy M33 5G | Samsung Galaxy M32 | Samsung Galaxy A33 5G | OnePlus Nord CE 2 5G | Motorola Moto G82 5G | Average 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AndroBench 3-5 | -32% | 60% | 121% | 36% | 64% | 226% | |
Sequential Read 256KB | 505.2 | 297.3 -41% | 512.84 2% | 999 98% | 473.4 -6% | 728 ? 44% | 1839 ? 264% |
Sequential Write 256KB | 396.6 | 178.7 -55% | 487.66 23% | 857 116% | 445.7 12% | 527 ? 33% | 1425 ? 259% |
Random Read 4KB | 89.3 | 98 10% | 216.48 142% | 253.4 184% | 180.8 102% | 191.7 ? 115% | 277 ? 210% |
Random Write 4KB | 113.8 | 68.8 -40% | 194.12 71% | 212.9 87% | 155.5 37% | 185.8 ? 63% | 309 ? 172% |
温度
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42.9 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 42.9 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
演讲者
Samsung Galaxy M33 5G audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.8% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.4% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (9.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 48% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 44% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 66% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 28% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Motorola Moto G82 5G audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.1% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 27% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 64% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 47% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 44% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
电池寿命
Pros
Cons
结论 -Galaxy M33的光和影
三星的Galaxy M33 5G跃升到新的移动时代,并提供了比其前辈更多的动力。存储速度终于令人信服,智能手机的制造质量也令人满意。此外,这款手机在很长一段时间内都有更新供应。
相机在这个价格范围内比较一般,显示屏比较暗,反应时间长。当你将该手机与价格相近的智能手机进行比较时,电池运行时间也不完全令人信服,而且手机在负载下会发热。
Galaxy M33 5G是一款造型别致、价格低廉的5G手机,其已经大幅下降的价格使其具有吸引力。三星将不得不在一些方面改进继任者,如电池寿命和屏幕。
喜欢AMOLED屏幕的用户在Galaxy M33的价位上有广泛的选择,而且不必没有5G:内部的 Galaxy A33 5G或 一加北方CE 2都可以使用。
价格和可用性
甚至三星,将价格降至到299欧元。如果你喜欢从值得信赖的互联网零售商那里购买,在测试时你可以得到250欧元起的优惠。
另外amazon.de和我们的借阅者notebooksbilliger.de都有这款手机。
Samsung Galaxy M33 5G
- 07/25/2022 v7 (old)
Florian Schmitt