
三星Galaxy S25+ 评测:尽管创新停滞不前,但仍是最好的Android 智能手机之一
一个安全的赌注
三星Galaxy S25+ 拥有一系列高端功能,并将高品质设计与强悍的性能、强大的显示屏和超长的电池续航时间结合在一起。此外,它还拥有 7 年的更新和更多的人工智能功能。不过,与Galaxy S24+ 相比,我们的测试显示它并没有太大的变化。Manuel Masiero, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
三星Galaxy S25+ 的评价:与其说是新版本,不如说是改头换面
三星Galaxy S25+ 是目前市场上功能和性能最好的智能手机之一。不过,与前代产品相比,它的改进非常有限--基本上仅限于更快的处理器、更多的人工智能、WiFi 7(而不是 WiFi 6)以及更新的Android 版本。
不过,在测试过程中,Galaxy S25+ 明亮的 LPTO 显示屏、出色的做工、三摄功能和超长的电池续航时间还是给我们留下了深刻印象。与Galaxy S24+ 一样,其 7 年的升级服务也是锦上添花,目前几乎没有其他制造商能提供这样的服务。
当然,三星的大型 S-Class 也不是完全没有缺点。我们不得不批评它的蓝牙支持不佳,甚至缺乏 LC3。它的 PWM 调光功能也非常保守,而且与Galaxy S25 Ultra 相比,它只配备了 3 倍光学变焦。
Pros
Cons
可能的替代品比较
Image | Model / Review | Price | Weight | Drive | Display |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung Galaxy S25+ Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 830 ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 256 GB | Amazon: 1. $6.99 firtstnow 3 Pack Glass Scree... 2. $7.98 Ailun Glass Screen Protector... 3. $16.99 Super Fast Charger Type C, 2... List Price: 1149 Euro | 190 g | 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash | 6.70" 3120x1440 513 PPI Dynamic AMOLED 2X | |
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max Apple A18 Pro ⎘ Apple A18 Pro GPU ⎘ 8 GB Memory, 256 GB NVMe | Amazon: 1. $37.99 Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max Clea... 2. $1,439.96 iPhone 16 Pro Max / 256GB / ... 3. $8.98 Ailun 3 Pack Screen Protecto... List Price: 1449€ | 227 g | 256 GB NVMe | 6.90" 2868x1320 458 PPI Super Retina XDR OLED | |
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL Google Tensor G4 ⎘ ARM Mali-G715 MP7 ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 256 GB | Amazon: 1. $1,199.00 Google Pixel 9 Pro XL - Unlo... 2. $9.99 OMOTON 3+2 Pack for Google P... 3. $8.99 LK 2 Pack for Google Pixel 9... List Price: 1299€ | 221 g | 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 6.80" 2992x1344 482 PPI OLED | |
Honor Magic7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 830 ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 512 GB | Amazon: 1. $12.68 Puccy 3 Pack Screen Protecto... 2. $11.99 Ibywind Screen Protector For... 3. $14.99 Vaxson Privacy Screen Protec... List Price: 1300€ | 223 g | 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash | 6.80" 2800x1280 453 PPI OLED | |
Samsung Galaxy S24+ Samsung Exynos 2400 ⎘ Samsung Xclipse 940 ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 512 GB | Amazon: List Price: 1149€ | 196 g | 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash | 6.70" 3120x1440 513 PPI AMOLED | |
Xiaomi 15 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 830 ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 1024 GB | Amazon: 1. $7.99 Aiziki 2 Pack for Xiaomi 15 ... 2. $6.99 Natbok 2 Pack 3D Compatible ... 3. $10.29 Anbzsign (2+2 Pack for Xiaom... List Price: 810€ | 213 g | 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash | 6.73" 3200x1440 521 PPI AMOLED |
Table of Contents
- 三星Galaxy S25+ 的评价:与其说是新版本,不如说是改头换面
- 规格
- 保护套 -Galaxy S25+ 具有 IP68 防护等级和三种特殊颜色
- 连接性 - 配备 UWB 和快速 USB 端口的三星手机
- 软件 -Galaxy S25+ 7 年每月更新
- 通信和全球导航卫星系统 - WiFi 7 和精确的全球定位系统
- 电话功能和通话质量 - 2x eSIM 和实时翻译
- 摄像头 - 带有 3 倍光学变焦的三摄像头
- 配件和保修 -Galaxy S25+ 可选装防盗保险
- 输入设备和操作 - 快速超声波指纹传感器
- 显示屏 - 明亮的 LTPO AMOLED 显示屏,采用半调谐 PWM 调光功能
- 性能 -Galaxy S25+ 配备了 Snapdragon 8 Elite 处理器。Galaxy
- 游戏 - 最大 FPS 是规则
- 排放 - 大幅降低负载时的功率
- 电池寿命 - 充电功率高达 45 瓦
- Notebookcheck 总评分
就功能和性能而言,三星Galaxy S25+ 介于Galaxy S25 和 S25 Ultra 之间。 Galaxy S25 Ultra.就价格而言,它正好位于其上一代产品 Galaxy S24+-的起点。
Galaxy S25+ 的最小存储容量为 256 GB,MRSP 为 999.99 美元。最大存储配置为 512 GB 的价格则高出 120 美元(MRSP 1119.99 美元)。
与Galaxy S24+ 相比,Galaxy S25+ 只做了一些改进。除其他外,这款智能手机略微更薄、更轻,采用了更快的 SoC,即 骁龙 8 精英版Galaxy, and launches withAndroid 15 includingGalaxy AI 2.0.
规格
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
保护套 -Galaxy S25+ 具有 IP68 防护等级和三种特殊颜色
Galaxy S25+ 与前代产品一样,采用了哑光铝合金边框,但厚度减少了 0.4 毫米,重量减轻了 6 克,仅重 190 克。其制造质量无可挑剔,智能手机拿在手上轻巧舒适,极具质感。
今年有四种颜色可供选择:冰蓝、银影、薄荷和海军蓝--我们测试设备的颜色就是海军蓝。此外,还有三种独家配色:蓝黑色、珊瑚红色和粉金色,仅在三星商店有售。
Galaxy S25+ 的显示屏和后盖使用了大猩猩玻璃 Victus 2 作为保护玻璃。后者略微磨砂,但对指纹痕迹有些敏感。由于获得了 IP68 认证,Galaxy S25+ 可以防尘防水。
连接性 - 配备 UWB 和快速 USB 端口的三星手机
Galaxy S25+ 提供全面的连接选项,包括 WiFi 7、蓝牙 5.4、NFC、UWB 和 USB-C 3.2 Gen 1。其支持 OTG 的 USB 端口可通过线缆输出图像,并支持三星 DeX 桌面模式。连接到我们的外置测试固态硬盘 三星便携式固态硬盘 T7USB 端口的数据吞吐量达到了 381.1 MB/s。
软件 -Galaxy S25+ 7 年每月更新
三星为Galaxy S25+ 配备了包括 OneUI 7.0 在内的Android 15,并与Galaxy S25 系列的其他智能手机一样,将为其提供持续到 2032 年 1 月 31 日的 7 年更新。根据三星的移动安全网站Android 安全补丁将每月推出。
三星扩展了Galaxy S24 系列推出的人工智能功能。现在,这些功能更深入地融入了操作系统,并可跨应用程序使用,从而使它们的使用更加灵活。三星将这些功能归纳为AI Agents(人工智能代理)。您可以在我们对 S25 Ultra 的评测中了解新人工智能功能的概况。 Galaxy S25 Ultra.
可持续性
三星在其年度《可持续发展报告》(2024 年版点击此处)中提供了有关其可持续发展工作的全面信息。).该制造商还提供生命周期评估,列出每款智能手机在生产、使用和处置过程中对环境的影响。遗憾的是,在测试时,三星Galaxy S25+ 还没有相关数据。
产品包装使用了回收材料,电池使用了回收钴。后者已用于Galaxy S24 系列。不过,钴现在还可以从以前使用过的Galaxy 设备和在生产过程中已作为废物处理的电池中提取。
通信和全球导航卫星系统 - WiFi 7 和精确的全球定位系统
Galaxy S25+ 支持 WiFi 7 作为其最快的 Wi-Fi 标准,在我们的测试中提供了快速稳定的数据传输。当连接到我们的参考路由器(华硕 ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000)时,三星手机在 5 GHz 频段的峰值约为 1,200 MBit/s,而在 6 GHz 频段则高达 1,400 MBit/s。
在移动网络中,Galaxy S25+ 可以使用的频率范围很广,因此几乎在任何地方都能接收到智能手机的信号。
电话功能和通话质量 - 2x eSIM 和实时翻译
Galaxy S25+ 提供与 Galaxy S24+.其中包括双 SIM 卡支持,用户可以选择使用 eSIM 卡而不是第二张 SIM 卡。您还可以使用 2 个 eSIM 卡操作手机。
Galaxy S25+ 拥有出色的通话质量。只要声音不是太大,三星手机就能清晰地再现声音,并有效过滤背景噪音。在我们的测试中,即使在扬声器启动的情况下,所有通话参与者的清晰度仍然很高。Galaxy S25+ 也支持Galaxy S24+ 已有的人工智能实时翻译功能。
摄像头 - 带有 3 倍光学变焦的三摄像头
Galaxy S25+ 的 1200 万像素自拍摄像头采用自动对焦,可在日光下拍摄精美的人像照片。这些照片可以通过相机应用中的滤镜来增强效果,还可以通过人像工作室转化为 AI 图像--您可以选择漫画、水彩或素描等风格。自拍摄像头能以每秒 60 帧的速度录制高达 4K 的视频。
从纸面上看,它的三后置摄像头与 Galaxy S24+.反过来,这也意味着 S25 系列的摄像头层次分明:S25 Galaxy S25 UltraGalaxy 和Galaxy S25+ 则采用三摄像头配置:5000 万像素主摄像头、1200 万像素超广角摄像头和 1000 万像素变焦摄像头。
手机的主摄像头采用 4 合 1 像素二进制技术,可拍摄出 1200 万像素的照片,照片色彩逼真,弱光下的表现令人印象深刻。不过,在图像细节和清晰度方面,照片还没有达到顶级水平,因为拍摄对象有时会显得苍白和/或模糊。也许未来的软件更新可以纠正这一问题。
在光线条件良好的情况下,其超广角摄像头也能拍摄出不错的照片,但边缘会出现一些模糊。我们更喜欢其 1000 万像素长焦摄像头,它具有 3 倍无损变焦,即使放大 5 倍也能拍摄出清晰的图像。
主摄像头在可靠的图像稳定功能支持下,能以高达 8K 和每秒 30 帧的速度录制高质量视频。人工智能工具音频消除器可用于消除背景噪音,如声音或风声。还可以日志模式录制视频,动态范围更广,可用于视频编辑。
Image Comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
Daylight photo 1Daylight photo 2Ultra-wide angle5x zoomLow-light photo在受控的照明条件下,主摄像头证明了它可以非常自然地捕捉色彩,即使在 1 勒克斯的残余光下也不会出现任何严重的异常值。测试图中的各个元素在极弱的光照下也依然易于辨认。


配件和保修 -Galaxy S25+ 可选装防盗保险
Galaxy S25+ 只配备了一条 USB-C 连接线和一个 SIM 卡工具。其他配件可通过三星在线商店购买,包括配套的 45 瓦电源。
在美国,这款手机享有 12 个月的标准保修服务,可选择三星 Care+ 保险延长保修期。保险期最长为 2 年,还包括失窃险,Galaxy S25+ 的保险费在 50 美元到 200 美元之间,具体取决于所选的套餐。
输入设备和操作 - 快速超声波指纹传感器
显示屏 - 明亮的 LTPO AMOLED 显示屏,采用半调谐 PWM 调光功能
Galaxy S25+ 的 6.7 英寸屏幕可直接显示 1080p 分辨率,但也可切换为 720p 分辨率,还可像Galaxy S25 Ultra 一样切换为 1440p 分辨率。利用 LTPO 技术,AMOLED 面板可以动态调整刷新率,从 1 到 120 Hz 不等。除了 HDR10 和 HDR10+,该屏幕还支持 HLG。
在显示纯白背景时,该面板的平均亮度为 1,370 cd/m²,在显示均匀分布的明暗图像区域(APL18)时,亮度最高可达 2,695 cd/m²。在 HDR 模式下,亮度甚至高达 2,900 cd/m²。
与 Galaxy S24+相比,该机型的显示屏并没有变得更亮。但 Galaxy S25 Ultra也没有做到更亮。在最低亮度下,我们测试设备的屏幕可调暗至 1.02 cd/m²,在黑暗中也能轻松护眼。
AMOLED 面板没有使用高频 PWM 调光。在最低亮度时,它的闪烁频率相对较低,为 240 赫兹,随着亮度的增加,闪烁频率几乎恒定在 480 赫兹。虽然信号振幅相当平缓,但显示屏的闪烁仍可能导致敏感人群的眼睛不适。
|
Brightness Distribution: 96 %
Center on Battery: 1371 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.7 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.89
ΔE Greyscale 2 | 0.5-98 Ø5.1
96.8% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.03
Samsung Galaxy S25+ Dynamic AMOLED 2X, 3120x1440, 6.7" | Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max Super Retina XDR OLED, 2868x1320, 6.9" | Google Pixel 9 Pro XL OLED, 2992x1344, 6.8" | Honor Magic7 Pro OLED, 2800x1280, 6.8" | Samsung Galaxy S24+ AMOLED, 3120x1440, 6.7" | Xiaomi 15 Pro AMOLED, 3200x1440, 6.7" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Screen | -5% | 51% | 29% | -8% | 5% | |
Brightness middle | 1371 | 1055 -23% | 2148 57% | 1607 17% | 1358 -1% | 1016 -26% |
Brightness | 1370 | 1061 -23% | 2050 50% | 1609 17% | 1358 -1% | 1017 -26% |
Brightness Distribution | 96 | 93 -3% | 86 -10% | 95 -1% | 92 -4% | 98 2% |
Black Level * | ||||||
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2.7 | 1.5 44% | 0.5 81% | 0.9 67% | 3 -11% | 1.15 57% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 4.2 | 4.7 -12% | 1.4 67% | 1.8 57% | 4.4 -5% | 3.57 15% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2 | 2.3 -15% | 0.8 60% | 1.7 15% | 2.5 -25% | 1.9 5% |
Gamma | 2.03 108% | 2.21 100% | 2.23 99% | 2.24 98% | 1.98 111% | 2.2 100% |
CCT | 6450 101% | 6625 98% | 6582 99% | 6346 102% | 6656 98% | 6677 97% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM detected | 240 Hz Amplitude: 14.18 % Secondary Frequency: 480 Hz | ||
The display backlight flickers at 240 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) . The frequency of 240 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8564 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
固定缩放级别和不同亮度设置下的测量系列(最低亮度下的振幅曲线看起来很平,但这是缩放造成的。信息框显示的是最小亮度下的振幅放大图)。
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
1.71 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.9155 ms rise | |
↘ 0.7905 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 7 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.8 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
1.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.759 ms rise | |
↘ 0.637 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 4 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.6 ms). |
视角稳定的 AMOLED 面板在户外表现非常出色,即使在阳光直射下也能清晰地显示内容。不过,Galaxy S25+ 的户外性能还无法与 Galaxy S25 UltraS25 Ultra 的屏幕由大猩猩装甲 2 玻璃保护。由于采用了防反射涂层,它比Galaxy S25+ 安装的大猩猩玻璃 Victus 2 反光更少。
性能 -Galaxy S25+ 配备了 Snapdragon 8 Elite 处理器。Galaxy
Galaxy S25+ 采用目前最快的Android SoC,即 骁龙 8Galaxy和 12GB LPDDR5x 内存。后缀 "forGalaxy"表示该处理器的时钟频率高于标准的 骁龙 8 精英版.
虽然Galaxy S25+ 的纯性能无法超越其他高端智能手机,但它在几乎所有合成基准测试中都略胜一筹。只有 Apple A18 ProGalaxy 的部分性能超过了骁龙 8 Elite,例如在 AImark v3 和 Geekbench 6 单核基准测试中。
UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy (23141 - 23281, n=2) | |
Samsung Galaxy S25+ | |
Xiaomi 15 Pro | |
Honor Magic7 Pro | |
Average of class Smartphone (1267 - 81594, n=151, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy S24+ |
Geekbench AI | |
Single Precision TensorFlow NNAPI 1.2 | |
Xiaomi 15 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy S25+ | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy (670 - 700, n=2) | |
Honor Magic7 Pro | |
Average of class Smartphone (51 - 1501, n=30, last 2 years) | |
Half Precision TensorFlow NNAPI 1.2 | |
Average of class Smartphone (51 - 9453, n=30, last 2 years) | |
Xiaomi 15 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy S25+ | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy (661 - 697, n=2) | |
Honor Magic7 Pro | |
Quantized TensorFlow NNAPI 1.2 | |
Average of class Smartphone (123 - 13084, n=30, last 2 years) | |
Xiaomi 15 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy S25+ | |
Honor Magic7 Pro | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy (1430 - 1567, n=2) |
Galaxy S25+ 是图形运算速度最快的智能手机之一,图形运算由 骁龙 8Galaxy's Adreno 830.不过,它在 GPU 基准测试中并不总是名列前茅,这可能是热引起的降频造成的。
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7: T-Rex Onscreen | 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
GFXBench 3.0: on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
GFXBench 3.1: on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
GFXBench: on screen Car Chase Onscreen | 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | 3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited | |
Samsung Galaxy S25+ | |
Xiaomi 15 Pro | |
Honor Magic7 Pro | |
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max | |
Samsung Galaxy S24+ | |
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL |
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme | |
Samsung Galaxy S25+ | |
Xiaomi 15 Pro | |
Honor Magic7 Pro | |
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max | |
Samsung Galaxy S24+ | |
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL |
3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score | |
Samsung Galaxy S25+ | |
Xiaomi 15 Pro | |
Honor Magic7 Pro | |
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max | |
Samsung Galaxy S24+ | |
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL |
3DMark / Solar Bay Score | |
Samsung Galaxy S25+ | |
Xiaomi 15 Pro | |
Honor Magic7 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy S24+ | |
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max |
3DMark / Solar Bay Unlimited Score | |
Samsung Galaxy S25+ | |
Xiaomi 15 Pro | |
Honor Magic7 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy S24+ | |
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max |
3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score | |
Xiaomi 15 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy S25+ | |
Honor Magic7 Pro | |
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max | |
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL |
3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Score | |
Samsung Galaxy S25+ | |
Xiaomi 15 Pro | |
Honor Magic7 Pro | |
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max | |
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL |
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics | |
Xiaomi 15 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy S25+ | |
Samsung Galaxy S24+ |
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics | |
Xiaomi 15 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy S25+ | |
Samsung Galaxy S24+ |
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited | |
Xiaomi 15 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy S25+ | |
Samsung Galaxy S24+ |
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen | |
Xiaomi 15 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy S25+ | |
Honor Magic7 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy S24+ | |
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max |
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen | |
Xiaomi 15 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy S25+ | |
Honor Magic7 Pro | |
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max | |
Samsung Galaxy S24+ |
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL | |
Xiaomi 15 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy S25+ | |
Honor Magic7 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy S24+ | |
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max |
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen | |
Samsung Galaxy S25+ | |
Xiaomi 15 Pro | |
Honor Magic7 Pro | |
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max | |
Samsung Galaxy S24+ |
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | |
Xiaomi 15 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy S25+ | |
Honor Magic7 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy S24+ | |
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max |
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen | |
Xiaomi 15 Pro | |
Honor Magic7 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy S25+ | |
Samsung Galaxy S24+ | |
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max |
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen | |
Xiaomi 15 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy S25+ | |
Honor Magic7 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy S24+ | |
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max |
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen | |
Xiaomi 15 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy S25+ | |
Honor Magic7 Pro | |
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max | |
Samsung Galaxy S24+ |
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | |
Samsung Galaxy S25+ | |
Xiaomi 15 Pro | |
Honor Magic7 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy S24+ | |
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max | |
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL |
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | |
Xiaomi 15 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy S25+ | |
Honor Magic7 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy S24+ | |
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max | |
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL |
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | |
Xiaomi 15 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy S25+ | |
Honor Magic7 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy S24+ | |
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL | |
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max |
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | |
Samsung Galaxy S25+ | |
Xiaomi 15 Pro | |
Honor Magic7 Pro | |
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max | |
Samsung Galaxy S24+ | |
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL |
GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | |
Samsung Galaxy S25+ | |
Xiaomi 15 Pro | |
Honor Magic7 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy S24+ | |
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max | |
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL |
Galaxy S25+ 在浏览器基准测试中也取得了类似的优异成绩,甚至达到了 Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max的 Apple A18 Pro是这方面的衡量标准。
Jetstream 2 - Total Score | |
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 18.0.1) | |
Samsung Galaxy S25+ (Chrome 133.0.6943.137) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy (315 - 334, n=2) | |
Honor Magic7 Pro (Chrome 131) | |
Xiaomi 15 Pro (Chrome 132) | |
Samsung Galaxy S24+ (Chrome 121) | |
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=170, last 2 years) |
Speedometer 2.0 - Result | |
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 18.0.1) | |
Samsung Galaxy S25+ (Chrome 133.0.6943.137) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy (425 - 446, n=2) | |
Honor Magic7 Pro (Chrome 131) | |
Samsung Galaxy S24+ (Chrome 121) | |
Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 569, n=150, last 2 years) |
Speedometer 3.0 - Score | |
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 18.0.1) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy (29 - 29.3, n=2) | |
Samsung Galaxy S25+ (Chrome 133.0.6943.137) | |
Xiaomi 15 Pro (Chrome 132) | |
Honor Magic7 Pro (Chrome 131) | |
Average of class Smartphone (1.03 - 34, n=84, last 2 years) |
WebXPRT 4 - Overall | |
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 18.0.1) | |
Xiaomi 15 Pro (Chrome 132) | |
Samsung Galaxy S25+ (Chrome 133.0.6943.137) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy (236 - 239, n=2) | |
Honor Magic7 Pro (Chrome 131) | |
Samsung Galaxy S24+ (Chrome 121) | |
Average of class Smartphone (22 - 271, n=160, last 2 years) |
Octane V2 - Total Score | |
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 18.0.1) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy (98817 - 99202, n=2) | |
Samsung Galaxy S25+ (Chrome 133.0.6943.137) | |
Honor Magic7 Pro (Chrome 131) | |
Xiaomi 15 Pro (Chrome 132) | |
Samsung Galaxy S24+ (Chrome 121) | |
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL (Chrome 129) | |
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=208, last 2 years) |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=169, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy S24+ (Chrome 121) | |
Honor Magic7 Pro (Chrome 131) | |
Xiaomi 15 Pro (Chrome 132) | |
Samsung Galaxy S25+ (Chrome 133.0.6943.137) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy (377 - 389, n=2) | |
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 18.0.1) |
* ... smaller is better
Galaxy S25+ 的 UFS 4.0 存储有助于实现极短的加载时间,但在我们的测试中,它在随机读写操作方面被证明相对较弱。
Samsung Galaxy S25+ | Google Pixel 9 Pro XL | Honor Magic7 Pro | Samsung Galaxy S24+ | Xiaomi 15 Pro | Average 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AndroBench 3-5 | -24% | 1% | -28% | 27% | 6% | -29% | |
Sequential Read 256KB | 4057.35 | 1850.5 -54% | 3910.81 -4% | 2450.9 -40% | 3998.65 -1% | 3657 ? -10% | 1971 ? -51% |
Sequential Write 256KB | 3311.02 | 1280.56 -61% | 3683.81 11% | 1523.87 -54% | 3673.38 11% | 2665 ? -20% | 1586 ? -52% |
Random Read 4KB | 294.51 | 310.88 6% | 282.34 -4% | 387.42 32% | 409.67 39% | 392 ? 33% | 280 ? -5% |
Random Write 4KB | 351.16 | 398.27 13% | 357.04 2% | 176.19 -50% | 555.55 58% | 422 ? 20% | 321 ? -9% |
游戏 - 最大 FPS 是规则
立体声扬声器、 Adreno 830GPU 的强大性能和 120Hz 显示屏都让Galaxy S25+ 成为一款强大的游戏智能手机。在我们使用Gamebench 进行的测试中的测试中,S25+ 的帧率几乎始终保持在上限,在某些情况下甚至达到了 120fps。
在我们选择的少量游戏中,只有《Asphalt 9: Legends》能让智能手机摆脱束缚。在这款游戏中,帧率在最高细节处的波动比平时要大一些,但平均帧率仍远高于每秒 100 帧。
排放 - 大幅降低负载时的功率
温度
Galaxy S25+ 的表面温度高达 44.1 °C,在我们的压力测试中变得相当热,这对于如此快速的智能手机来说并不罕见。
在负载情况下,内部节流很快就出现了。在 3DMark 压力测试中 骁龙 8 精英版Galaxy在 3DMark 压力测试中,骁龙 8 精英版的性能在第一次运行后就崩溃了,在某些情况下几乎降低了一半。所有对比设备的运行都比较稳定,包括 Galaxy S24+的前代机型。
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 43.6 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 44.1 °C / 111 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.5 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
3DMark Steel Nomad stress test
3DMark | |
Wild Life Stress Test Stability | |
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max | |
Samsung Galaxy S24+ | |
Xiaomi 15 Pro | |
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL | |
Honor Magic7 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy S25+ | |
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test | |
Samsung Galaxy S24+ | |
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL | |
Xiaomi 15 Pro | |
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max | |
Samsung Galaxy S25+ | |
Solar Bay Stress Test Stability | |
Xiaomi 15 Pro | |
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max | |
Samsung Galaxy S24+ | |
Samsung Galaxy S25+ | |
Honor Magic7 Pro | |
Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability | |
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL | |
Xiaomi 15 Pro | |
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max | |
Honor Magic7 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy S25+ |
发言人
Galaxy S25+ 的立体声扬声器可产生低音但总体均衡的声音,在我们的测试中,它的最大音量甚至达到了约 90 dB(A),而不会失真。
外接音频设备可通过 USB-C 和蓝牙 5.4 连接。除了蓝牙 LE,Galaxy S25+ 还支持 Auracast。不过,支持的蓝牙编解码器不多,仅包括 SBC、AAC、aptX、LDAC 和三星无缝编解码器 (SSC)。
Samsung Galaxy S25+ audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (90.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 18.3% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.3% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.7% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 7% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 87% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 36%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 27% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 66% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (92.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17.5% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.8% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (1.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 3% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 36%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 20% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 76% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
电池寿命 - 充电功率高达 45 瓦
耗电量
Galaxy S25+ 在空载时耗电量很小,但在负载情况下耗电量就会增加。不过,总的来说,它的耗电量并不比其他配备了 骁龙 8 精英版.
Galaxy S25+ 可通过线缆充电,最大功率为 45 瓦,无线充电最大功率为 15 瓦。此外还支持反向无线充电。在我们的测试中,一个完整的充电周期需要 70 分钟(电源装置:Ugreen 2C1A,65 瓦)。仅用了 38 分钟,电池电量就达到了 80%。
Off / Standby | ![]() ![]() |
Idle | ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Load |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | |
Key:
min: ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Samsung Galaxy S25+ 4900 mAh | Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max 4685 mAh | Google Pixel 9 Pro XL 5060 mAh | Honor Magic7 Pro 5270 mAh | Samsung Galaxy S24+ 4900 mAh | Xiaomi 15 Pro 6100 mAh | Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy | Average of class Smartphone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | 6% | -37% | -27% | 19% | 17% | 3% | -15% | |
Idle Minimum * | 0.45 | 0.42 7% | 0.48 -7% | 0.94 -109% | 0.43 4% | 0.6 -33% | 0.49 ? -9% | 0.869 ? -93% |
Idle Average * | 1.09 | 1.55 -42% | 1.53 -40% | 1.5 -38% | 0.84 23% | 0.9 17% | 0.967 ? 11% | 1.444 ? -32% |
Idle Maximum * | 1.13 | 1.58 -40% | 1.86 -65% | 1.57 -39% | 0.95 16% | 1.1 3% | 1.037 ? 8% | 1.591 ? -41% |
Load Average * | 14.41 | 3.41 76% | 11.03 23% | 6.76 53% | 6.7 54% | 13.9 ? 4% | 6.92 ? 52% | |
Load Maximum * | 16.37 | 11.82 28% | 11.68 29% | 16.42 -0% | 9.5 42% | 16.5 ? -1% | 10.3 ? 37% |
* ... smaller is better
Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)
Power consumption: GFXbench (150 cd/m²)
运行时间
Galaxy S25+ 的电池容量为 4,900 毫安时,虽然相对较小,但仍能提供非常不错的续航时间。在模拟网上冲浪时,它能持续近 20 个小时,而在连续循环播放视频时,我们注意到它能持续 30 多个小时。
Samsung Galaxy S25+ 4900 mAh | Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max 4685 mAh | Google Pixel 9 Pro XL 5060 mAh | Honor Magic7 Pro 5270 mAh | Samsung Galaxy S24+ 4900 mAh | Xiaomi 15 Pro 6100 mAh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 22% | -16% | -3% | -15% | 11% | |
Reader / Idle | 3398 | 4226 24% | 2527 -26% | 3093 -9% | ||
H.264 | 1804 | 1990 10% | 1806 0% | 2226 23% | ||
WiFi v1.3 | 1189 | 1249 5% | 998 -16% | 1481 25% | 1009 -15% | 1444 21% |
Load | 240 | 357 49% | 217 -10% | 264 10% |
Notebookcheck 总评分
三星Galaxy S25+ 是一款非常出色的高端智能手机,拥有明亮的显示屏、超快的处理器、出色的摄像头和超长的电池续航时间。不过,与上一代产品相比,这款手机几乎没有什么变化。
Samsung Galaxy S25+
- 03/14/2025 v8
Manuel Masiero
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.