Notebookcheck Logo
Samsung Galaxy S25+ (image source: Manuel Masiero)

三星Galaxy S25+ 评测:尽管创新停滞不前,但仍是最好的Android 智能手机之一

一个安全的赌注

三星Galaxy S25+ 拥有一系列高端功能,并将高品质设计与强悍的性能、强大的显示屏和超长的电池续航时间结合在一起。此外,它还拥有 7 年的更新和更多的人工智能功能。不过,与Galaxy S24+ 相比,我们的测试显示它并没有太大的变化。
Manuel Masiero, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
5G AI Android Galaxy S Samsung Smartphone Touchscreen

三星Galaxy S25+ 的评价:与其说是新版本,不如说是改头换面

三星Galaxy S25+ 是目前市场上功能和性能最好的智能手机之一。不过,与前代产品相比,它的改进非常有限--基本上仅限于更快的处理器、更多的人工智能、WiFi 7(而不是 WiFi 6)以及更新的Android 版本。

不过,在测试过程中,Galaxy S25+ 明亮的 LPTO 显示屏、出色的做工、三摄功能和超长的电池续航时间还是给我们留下了深刻印象。与Galaxy S24+ 一样,其 7 年的升级服务也是锦上添花,目前几乎没有其他制造商能提供这样的服务。

Download your licensed rating image as SVG / PNG

当然,三星的大型 S-Class 也不是完全没有缺点。我们不得不批评它的蓝牙支持不佳,甚至缺乏 LC3。它的 PWM 调光功能也非常保守,而且与Galaxy S25 Ultra 相比,它只配备了 3 倍光学变焦。

Pros

+ 明亮的 LTPO 显示屏
+ 高质量外壳
+ 电池续航时间长
+ 非常高的性能
+ 出色的三摄像头
+ 7 年更新
+ UWB、Auracast 和 WiFi 7
+ IP68 认证

Cons

- 少数蓝牙编解码器
- PWM 调光频率仅为 480 Hz
- 与Galaxy S24+ 相比,新功能不多

价格和供应情况

通过三星在线商店购买Galaxy S25+,存储容量为 256 GB,售价为 999.99 美元。此外,在亚马逊上也能以低 100 多美元的价格买到这款设备。

可能的替代品比较

Image
Model / Review
Price
Weight
Drive
Display
1.
88.4%
Samsung Galaxy S25+
Samsung Galaxy S25+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy ⎘
Qualcomm Adreno 830 ⎘
12 GB Memory, 256 GB 
Amazon:
1. $6.99
firtstnow 3 Pack Glass Scree...
2. $7.98
Ailun Glass Screen Protector...
3. $16.99
Super Fast Charger Type C, 2...
List Price: 1149 Euro
190 g256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash6.70"
3120x1440
513 PPI
Dynamic AMOLED 2X
2.
88.6%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
Apple A18 Pro ⎘
Apple A18 Pro GPU ⎘
8 GB Memory, 256 GB NVMe
Amazon:
1. $37.99
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max Clea...
2. $1,439.96
iPhone 16 Pro Max / 256GB / ...
3. $8.98
Ailun 3 Pack Screen Protecto...
List Price: 1449€
227 g256 GB NVMe6.90"
2868x1320
458 PPI
Super Retina XDR OLED
3.
86%
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL
Google Tensor G4 ⎘
ARM Mali-G715 MP7 ⎘
16 GB Memory, 256 GB 
Amazon:
1. $1,199.00
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL - Unlo...
2. $9.99
OMOTON 3+2 Pack for Google P...
3. $8.99
LK 2 Pack for Google Pixel 9...
List Price: 1299€
221 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.80"
2992x1344
482 PPI
OLED
4.
89.2%
Honor Magic7 Pro
Honor Magic7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite ⎘
Qualcomm Adreno 830 ⎘
12 GB Memory, 512 GB 
Amazon:
1. $12.68
Puccy 3 Pack Screen Protecto...
2. $11.99
Ibywind Screen Protector For...
3. $14.99
Vaxson Privacy Screen Protec...
List Price: 1300€
223 g512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash6.80"
2800x1280
453 PPI
OLED
5.
89.8% v7 (old)
Samsung Galaxy S24+
Samsung Galaxy S24+
Samsung Exynos 2400 ⎘
Samsung Xclipse 940 ⎘
12 GB Memory, 512 GB 
Amazon:
List Price: 1149€
196 g512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash6.70"
3120x1440
513 PPI
AMOLED
6.
89.9%
Xiaomi 15 Pro
Xiaomi 15 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite ⎘
Qualcomm Adreno 830 ⎘
16 GB Memory, 1024 GB 
Amazon:
1. $7.99
Aiziki 2 Pack for Xiaomi 15 ...
2. $6.99
Natbok 2 Pack 3D Compatible ...
3. $10.29
Anbzsign (2+2 Pack for Xiaom...
List Price: 810€
213 g1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash6.73"
3200x1440
521 PPI
AMOLED

就功能和性能而言,三星Galaxy S25+ 介于Galaxy S25 和 S25 Ultra 之间。 Galaxy S25 Ultra.就价格而言,它正好位于其上一代产品 Galaxy S24+-的起点。

Galaxy S25+ 的最小存储容量为 256 GB,MRSP 为 999.99 美元。最大存储配置为 512 GB 的价格则高出 120 美元(MRSP 1119.99 美元)。

与Galaxy S24+ 相比,Galaxy S25+ 只做了一些改进。除其他外,这款智能手机略微更薄、更轻,采用了更快的 SoC,即 骁龙 8 精英版Galaxy, and launches withAndroid 15 includingGalaxy AI 2.0.

规格

Samsung Galaxy S25+ (Galaxy S25 Series)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy 8 x 3.5 - 4.5 GHz, Oryon Gen 2
Graphics adapter
Qualcomm Adreno 830, Core: 1200 MHz
Memory
12 GB 
, LPDDR5x
Display
6.70 inch 19.5:9, 3120 x 1440 pixel 513 PPI, capacitive touchscreen, Dynamic AMOLED 2X, QHD+, 16 mio. colors, Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2, glossy: yes, HDR, 120 Hz
Storage
256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash, 256 GB 
, 219 GB free
Connections
1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: USB-C, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: Accelerometer, Barometer, Gyro Sensor, Geomagnetic Sensor, Hall Sensor, Proximity Sensor, UWB, USB-OTG, Wi-Fi Direct
Networking
Wi-Fi 7 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz be = Wi-Fi 7), Bluetooth 5.4, 2G (850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz), 3G (Band 1, 2, 4, 5, 8), 4G (Band 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66), 5G (Band 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 75, 77, 78), Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 7.3 x 158.4 x 75.8
Battery
4900 mAh Lithium-Ion, 45W wired charging, 15W wireless charging, reverse wireless charging supported
Charging
wireless charging, fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 15
Camera
Primary Camera: 50 MPix (f/1.8, OIS) + 12 MP ultrawide (f/2.4) + 10 MP tele (f/2.2, 3x optical zoom), video recording up to 8K@30fps; Camera2-API-Level: Level 3
Secondary Camera: 12 MPix (f/2.2, AF); video recording up to 4K@60fps
Additional features
Speakers: Dual, Keyboard: Onscreen, USB-C Cable, SIM Tool, One UI 7.0, 24 Months Warranty, Armor Aluminum body, IP68; HDR compatibility: HDR10, HDR10+, HLG; GNSS: GPS (L1, L5), Glonass (L1), BeiDou (B1, B1C, B2a), Galileo (E1, E5a), QZSS (L1, L5); Head SAR 1.257 W/kg, Body SAR 1.257 W/kg; Bluetooth Codecs supported: AAC, aptX, LDAC, Samsung Seamless Codec, SBC , fanless, waterproof
Weight
190 g
Price
1149 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

保护套 -Galaxy S25+ 具有 IP68 防护等级和三种特殊颜色

Galaxy S25+ 与前代产品一样,采用了哑光铝合金边框,但厚度减少了 0.4 毫米,重量减轻了 6 克,仅重 190 克。其制造质量无可挑剔,智能手机拿在手上轻巧舒适,极具质感。

今年有四种颜色可供选择:冰蓝、银影、薄荷海军蓝--我们测试设备的颜色就是海军蓝。此外,还有三种独家配色:蓝黑色、珊瑚红色粉金色,仅在三星商店有售。

Galaxy S25+ 的显示屏和后盖使用了大猩猩玻璃 Victus 2 作为保护玻璃。后者略微磨砂,但对指纹痕迹有些敏感。由于获得了 IP68 认证,Galaxy S25+ 可以防尘防水。

三星Galaxy S25+(图片来源:Manuel Masiero)
三星Galaxy S25+(图片来源:Manuel Masiero)
三星Galaxy S25+(图片来源:Manuel Masiero)
三星Galaxy S25+(图片来源:Manuel Masiero)
三星Galaxy S25+(图片来源:Manuel Masiero)
三星Galaxy S25+(图片来源:Manuel Masiero)
三星Galaxy S25+(图片来源:Manuel Masiero)
海军蓝三星Galaxy S25+(图片来源:三星)
冰蓝色的三星Galaxy S25+(图片来源:三星)
银影版三星Galaxy S25+(图片来源:三星)
Mint 版三星Galaxy S25+(图片来源:三星)
蓝黑色的三星Galaxy S25+(图片来源:三星)
三星Galaxy S25+ Coralred(图片来源:三星)
粉金色的三星Galaxy S25+(图片来源:三星)

尺寸比较

162.7 mm 77.1 mm 8.8 mm 223 g162.8 mm 76.6 mm 8.5 mm 221 g163 mm 77.6 mm 8.25 mm 227 g161.3 mm 75.3 mm 8.7 mm 213 g158.5 mm 75.9 mm 7.7 mm 196 g158.4 mm 75.8 mm 7.3 mm 190 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g

连接性 - 配备 UWB 和快速 USB 端口的三星手机

Galaxy S25+ 提供全面的连接选项,包括 WiFi 7、蓝牙 5.4、NFC、UWB 和 USB-C 3.2 Gen 1。其支持 OTG 的 USB 端口可通过线缆输出图像,并支持三星 DeX 桌面模式。连接到我们的外置测试固态硬盘 三星便携式固态硬盘 T7USB 端口的数据吞吐量达到了 381.1 MB/s。

左:没有连接(图片来源:Manuel Masiero)
左:没有连接(图片来源:Manuel Masiero)
右:音量摇杆、功能按钮(图片来源:Manuel Masiero)
右:音量摇杆、功能按钮(图片来源:Manuel Masiero)
顶部:麦克风(图片来源:Manuel Masiero)
顶部:麦克风(图片来源:Manuel Masiero)
底部:扬声器、USB-C 3.1 Gen 1、麦克风、双 SIM 卡(图片来源:Manuel Masiero)
底部:扬声器、USB-C 3.1 Gen 1、麦克风、双 SIM 卡(图片来源:Manuel Masiero)

软件 -Galaxy S25+ 7 年每月更新

三星为Galaxy S25+ 配备了包括 OneUI 7.0 在内的Android 15,并与Galaxy S25 系列的其他智能手机一样,将为其提供持续到 2032 年 1 月 31 日的 7 年更新。根据三星的移动安全网站Android 安全补丁将每月推出。

三星扩展了Galaxy S24 系列推出的人工智能功能。现在,这些功能更深入地融入了操作系统,并可跨应用程序使用,从而使它们的使用更加灵活。三星将这些功能归纳为AI Agents(人工智能代理)。您可以在我们对 S25 Ultra 的评测中了解新人工智能功能的概况。 Galaxy S25 Ultra.

三星Galaxy S25+
三星Galaxy S25+
三星Galaxy S25+
三星Galaxy S25+
三星Galaxy S25+
三星Galaxy S25+

可持续性

三星在其年度《可持续发展报告》(2024 年版点击此处)中提供了有关其可持续发展工作的全面信息。).该制造商还提供生命周期评估,列出每款智能手机在生产、使用和处置过程中对环境的影响。遗憾的是,在测试时,三星Galaxy S25+ 还没有相关数据。

产品包装使用了回收材料,电池使用了回收钴。后者已用于Galaxy S24 系列。不过,钴现在还可以从以前使用过的Galaxy 设备和在生产过程中已作为废物处理的电池中提取。

通信和全球导航卫星系统 - WiFi 7 和精确的全球定位系统

Galaxy S25+ 支持 WiFi 7 作为其最快的 Wi-Fi 标准,在我们的测试中提供了快速稳定的数据传输。当连接到我们的参考路由器(华硕 ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000)时,三星手机在 5 GHz 频段的峰值约为 1,200 MBit/s,而在 6 GHz 频段则高达 1,400 MBit/s。

在移动网络中,Galaxy S25+ 可以使用的频率范围很广,因此几乎在任何地方都能接收到智能手机的信号。

Networking
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Samsung Galaxy S25+
Wi-Fi 7
1094 (655min - 1214max) MBit/s
Average Wi-Fi 7
  (556 - 1806, n=58)
1021 MBit/s -7%
Honor Magic7 Pro
Wi-Fi 7
981 (886min - 1008max) MBit/s -10%
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL
Wi-Fi 7
965 (943min - 995max) MBit/s -12%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
Wi-Fi 7
887 (567min - 946max) MBit/s -19%
Samsung Galaxy S24+
Wi-Fi 6E
859 (401min - 943max) MBit/s -21%
Average of class Smartphone
  (49.8 - 1806, n=189, last 2 years)
725 MBit/s -34%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Samsung Galaxy S25+
Wi-Fi 7
1154 (1048min - 1191max) MBit/s
Average Wi-Fi 7
  (565 - 1875, n=58)
1005 MBit/s -13%
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL
Wi-Fi 7
915 (852min - 926max) MBit/s -21%
Honor Magic7 Pro
Wi-Fi 7
829 (758min - 853max) MBit/s -28%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
Wi-Fi 7
762 (726min - 784max) MBit/s -34%
Average of class Smartphone
  (52 - 1857, n=187, last 2 years)
707 MBit/s -39%
Samsung Galaxy S24+
Wi-Fi 6E
648 (582min - 790max) MBit/s -44%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
Honor Magic7 Pro
Wi-Fi 7
1884 (928min - 1907max) MBit/s +44%
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL
Wi-Fi 7
1852 (911min - 1895max) MBit/s +41%
Samsung Galaxy S24+
Wi-Fi 6E
1581 (1247min - 1658max) MBit/s +21%
Average Wi-Fi 7
  (563 - 1945, n=45)
1536 MBit/s +17%
Average of class Smartphone
  (521 - 1945, n=82, last 2 years)
1436 MBit/s +10%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
Wi-Fi 7
1418 (1324min - 1435max) MBit/s +8%
Samsung Galaxy S25+
Wi-Fi 7
1311 (984min - 1422max) MBit/s
Xiaomi 15 Pro
Wi-Fi 7
816 (564min - 966max) MBit/s -38%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL
Wi-Fi 7
1864 (1828min - 1880max) MBit/s +55%
Honor Magic7 Pro
Wi-Fi 7
1569 (1486min - 1593max) MBit/s +30%
Xiaomi 15 Pro
Wi-Fi 7
1520 (1364min - 1602max) MBit/s +26%
Average Wi-Fi 7
  (451 - 1864, n=45)
1510 MBit/s +25%
Average of class Smartphone
  (451 - 1864, n=82, last 2 years)
1367 MBit/s +14%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
Wi-Fi 7
1258 (1190min - 1287max) MBit/s +4%
Samsung Galaxy S25+
Wi-Fi 7
1204 (1187min - 1213max) MBit/s
Samsung Galaxy S24+
Wi-Fi 6E
1117 (1031min - 1173max) MBit/s -7%
050100150200250300350400450500550600650700750800850900950100010501100115012001250130013501400Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy S25+ Wi-Fi 7; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1311 (984-1422)
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max Wi-Fi 7; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1419 (1324-1435)
Samsung Galaxy S25+ Wi-Fi 7; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1202 (1187-1213)
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max Wi-Fi 7; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1258 (1190-1287)
Samsung Galaxy S25+ Wi-Fi 7; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1072 (655-1214)
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max Wi-Fi 7; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø887 (567-946)
Samsung Galaxy S25+ Wi-Fi 7; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1153 (1048-1191)
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max Wi-Fi 7; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø762 (726-784)
室内 GPS 接收
室内 GPS 接收
户外 GPS 接收
户外 GPS 接收

在我们的测试中,Galaxy S25+ 被证明是一款精确的导航设备。它通过双频 GNSS 与所有主要的卫星导航服务进行通信,并能快速接收定位信号。在 4 公里的步行测试中,Galaxy S25+ 比我们的对比设备 Garmin Venu 2(一款以 GPS 定位精度高而著称的健身智能手表)略微精确一些。

GPS 测试:总结
GPS 测试:总结
GPS 测试:路线
GPS 测试:路线
GPS 测试:池塘
GPS 测试:池塘

电话功能和通话质量 - 2x eSIM 和实时翻译

Galaxy S25+ 提供与 Galaxy S24+.其中包括双 SIM 卡支持,用户可以选择使用 eSIM 卡而不是第二张 SIM 卡。您还可以使用 2 个 eSIM 卡操作手机。

Galaxy S25+ 拥有出色的通话质量。只要声音不是太大,三星手机就能清晰地再现声音,并有效过滤背景噪音。在我们的测试中,即使在扬声器启动的情况下,所有通话参与者的清晰度仍然很高。Galaxy S25+ 也支持Galaxy S24+ 已有的人工智能实时翻译功能。

摄像头 - 带有 3 倍光学变焦的三摄像头

使用自拍相机拍摄的照片
使用自拍相机拍摄的照片

Galaxy S25+ 的 1200 万像素自拍摄像头采用自动对焦,可在日光下拍摄精美的人像照片。这些照片可以通过相机应用中的滤镜来增强效果,还可以通过人像工作室转化为 AI 图像--您可以选择漫画水彩素描等风格。自拍摄像头能以每秒 60 帧的速度录制高达 4K 的视频。

从纸面上看,它的三后置摄像头与 Galaxy S24+.反过来,这也意味着 S25 系列的摄像头层次分明:S25 Galaxy S25 UltraGalaxy 和Galaxy S25+ 则采用三摄像头配置:5000 万像素主摄像头、1200 万像素超广角摄像头和 1000 万像素变焦摄像头。

手机的主摄像头采用 4 合 1 像素二进制技术,可拍摄出 1200 万像素的照片,照片色彩逼真,弱光下的表现令人印象深刻。不过,在图像细节和清晰度方面,照片还没有达到顶级水平,因为拍摄对象有时会显得苍白和/或模糊。也许未来的软件更新可以纠正这一问题。

在光线条件良好的情况下,其超广角摄像头也能拍摄出不错的照片,但边缘会出现一些模糊。我们更喜欢其 1000 万像素长焦摄像头,它具有 3 倍无损变焦,即使放大 5 倍也能拍摄出清晰的图像。

主摄像头在可靠的图像稳定功能支持下,能以高达 8K 和每秒 30 帧的速度录制高质量视频。人工智能工具音频消除器可用于消除背景噪音,如声音或风声。还可以日志模式录制视频,动态范围更广,可用于视频编辑。

使用主相机拍摄的照片
使用主相机拍摄的照片
使用超广角相机拍摄的照片
使用超广角相机拍摄的照片
使用长焦相机(3 倍光学变焦)拍摄的照片
使用长焦相机(3 倍光学变焦)拍摄的照片

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Daylight photo 1Daylight photo 2Ultra-wide angle5x zoomLow-light photo
orginal image
click to load images

在受控的照明条件下,主摄像头证明了它可以非常自然地捕捉色彩,即使在 1 勒克斯的残余光下也不会出现任何严重的异常值。测试图中的各个元素在极弱的光照下也依然易于辨认。

ColorChecker
2.8 ∆E
4.4 ∆E
1.9 ∆E
2.8 ∆E
2.4 ∆E
4.9 ∆E
4.3 ∆E
3.3 ∆E
4 ∆E
3.1 ∆E
4 ∆E
2.6 ∆E
3 ∆E
4.5 ∆E
4.8 ∆E
1.5 ∆E
1.8 ∆E
8.4 ∆E
3.2 ∆E
3.9 ∆E
5 ∆E
3.4 ∆E
1.7 ∆E
4.9 ∆E
ColorChecker Samsung Galaxy S25+: 3.61 ∆E min: 1.47 - max: 8.4 ∆E
ColorChecker
12 ∆E
12.8 ∆E
15.5 ∆E
14.5 ∆E
18 ∆E
18.3 ∆E
13.2 ∆E
12.6 ∆E
11.1 ∆E
11.9 ∆E
12.9 ∆E
16.8 ∆E
11.7 ∆E
16.1 ∆E
6.5 ∆E
10.8 ∆E
13.6 ∆E
21.7 ∆E
16.6 ∆E
13.1 ∆E
14.8 ∆E
19.1 ∆E
15.7 ∆E
11.7 ∆E
ColorChecker Samsung Galaxy S25+: 14.21 ∆E min: 6.51 - max: 21.66 ∆E

配件和保修 -Galaxy S25+ 可选装防盗保险

Galaxy S25+ 只配备了一条 USB-C 连接线和一个 SIM 卡工具。其他配件可通过三星在线商店购买,包括配套的 45 瓦电源。

在美国,这款手机享有 12 个月的标准保修服务,可选择三星 Care+ 保险延长保修期。保险期最长为 2 年,还包括失窃险,Galaxy S25+ 的保险费在 50 美元到 200 美元之间,具体取决于所选的套餐。

输入设备和操作 - 快速超声波指纹传感器

Galaxy S25+ 可通过反应灵敏的触摸屏进行超级流畅的操作。点击显示屏时,智能手机的线性振动电机会产生精确的触觉反馈,其强度可在Android 设置中调整。功能键也可以在这里进行配置。在默认设置下,长按可启动谷歌助手,双击可启动相机应用。

位于显示屏下方的超声波指纹传感器可以快速解锁智能手机,在我们的测试中识别率达到了 100%。用户还可以通过自拍摄像头使用安全性较低的 2D 面部识别技术进行生物认证。

直立式键盘
直立式键盘
水平键盘
水平键盘

显示屏 - 明亮的 LTPO AMOLED 显示屏,采用半调谐 PWM 调光功能

子像素
子像素

Galaxy S25+ 的 6.7 英寸屏幕可直接显示 1080p 分辨率,但也可切换为 720p 分辨率,还可像Galaxy S25 Ultra 一样切换为 1440p 分辨率。利用 LTPO 技术,AMOLED 面板可以动态调整刷新率,从 1 到 120 Hz 不等。除了 HDR10 和 HDR10+,该屏幕还支持 HLG。

在显示纯白背景时,该面板的平均亮度为 1,370 cd/m²,在显示均匀分布的明暗图像区域(APL18)时,亮度最高可达 2,695 cd/m²。在 HDR 模式下,亮度甚至高达 2,900 cd/m²。

Galaxy S24+相比,该机型的显示屏并没有变得更亮。但 Galaxy S25 Ultra也没有做到更亮。在最低亮度下,我们测试设备的屏幕可调暗至 1.02 cd/m²,在黑暗中也能轻松护眼。

AMOLED 面板没有使用高频 PWM 调光。在最低亮度时,它的闪烁频率相对较低,为 240 赫兹,随着亮度的增加,闪烁频率几乎恒定在 480 赫兹。虽然信号振幅相当平缓,但显示屏的闪烁仍可能导致敏感人群的眼睛不适。

1380
cd/m²
1356
cd/m²
1346
cd/m²
1396
cd/m²
1371
cd/m²
1344
cd/m²
1401
cd/m²
1381
cd/m²
1351
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 1401 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 1369.6 cd/m² Minimum: 1.02 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 96 %
Center on Battery: 1371 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.7 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.89
ΔE Greyscale 2 | 0.5-98 Ø5.1
96.8% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.03
Samsung Galaxy S25+
Dynamic AMOLED 2X, 3120x1440, 6.7"
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
Super Retina XDR OLED, 2868x1320, 6.9"
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL
OLED, 2992x1344, 6.8"
Honor Magic7 Pro
OLED, 2800x1280, 6.8"
Samsung Galaxy S24+
AMOLED, 3120x1440, 6.7"
Xiaomi 15 Pro
AMOLED, 3200x1440, 6.7"
Screen
-5%
51%
29%
-8%
5%
Brightness middle
1371
1055
-23%
2148
57%
1607
17%
1358
-1%
1016
-26%
Brightness
1370
1061
-23%
2050
50%
1609
17%
1358
-1%
1017
-26%
Brightness Distribution
96
93
-3%
86
-10%
95
-1%
92
-4%
98
2%
Black Level *
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
2.7
1.5
44%
0.5
81%
0.9
67%
3
-11%
1.15
57%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
4.2
4.7
-12%
1.4
67%
1.8
57%
4.4
-5%
3.57
15%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
2
2.3
-15%
0.8
60%
1.7
15%
2.5
-25%
1.9
5%
Gamma
2.03 108%
2.21 100%
2.23 99%
2.24 98%
1.98 111%
2.2 100%
CCT
6450 101%
6625 98%
6582 99%
6346 102%
6656 98%
6677 97%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 240 Hz
Amplitude: 14.18 %
Secondary Frequency: 480 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 240 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 240 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8564 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

最低显示亮度
分钟
25 % 显示屏亮度
25 %
显示屏亮度为 50
50 %
75 % 显示亮度
75 %
最大手动显示亮度
100 %

固定缩放级别和不同亮度设置下的测量系列(最低亮度下的振幅曲线看起来很平,但这是缩放造成的。信息框显示的是最小亮度下的振幅放大图)。

在我们使用卡尔曼和光分光计进行测量时,AMOLED 显示屏显示出了一些小误差。该屏幕使用 "自然 "图像模式显示出最佳画质但在色彩和灰度方面仍未达到理想水平(Delta-E < 3),并产生了轻微的偏黄现象。不过,这在日常使用中应该不会很明显。

色彩精度(图像模式自然,目标色彩空间 sRGB)
色彩精度(图像模式自然,目标色彩空间 sRGB)
色彩空间(图像模式自然,目标色彩空间 sRGB)
色彩空间(图像模式自然,目标色彩空间 sRGB)
灰度(图像模式自然,目标色彩空间 sRGB)
灰度(图像模式自然,目标色彩空间 sRGB)
色彩饱和度(图像模式自然,目标色彩空间 sRGB)
色彩饱和度(图像模式自然,目标色彩空间 sRGB)

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
1.71 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.9155 ms rise
↘ 0.7905 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 7 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.8 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
1.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.759 ms rise
↘ 0.637 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 4 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.6 ms).

视角稳定的 AMOLED 面板在户外表现非常出色,即使在阳光直射下也能清晰地显示内容。不过,Galaxy S25+ 的户外性能还无法与 Galaxy S25 UltraS25 Ultra 的屏幕由大猩猩装甲 2 玻璃保护。由于采用了防反射涂层,它比Galaxy S25+ 安装的大猩猩玻璃 Victus 2 反光更少。

室外使用
室外使用
室外使用
室外使用
视角
视角

性能 -Galaxy S25+ 配备了 Snapdragon 8 Elite 处理器。Galaxy

Galaxy S25+ 采用目前最快的Android SoC,即 骁龙 8Galaxy和 12GB LPDDR5x 内存。后缀 "forGalaxy"表示该处理器的时钟频率高于标准的 骁龙 8 精英版.

虽然Galaxy S25+ 的纯性能无法超越其他高端智能手机,但它在几乎所有合成基准测试中都略胜一筹。只有 Apple A18 ProGalaxy 的部分性能超过了骁龙 8 Elite,例如在 AImark v3 和 Geekbench 6 单核基准测试中。

Geekbench 6.4
Single-Core
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
Apple A18 Pro, A18 Pro GPU, 8192
3479 Points +11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy
  (3136 - 3200, n=2)
3168 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy S25+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
3136 Points
Xiaomi 15 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
3089 Points -1%
Honor Magic7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
3050 Points -3%
Samsung Galaxy S24+
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 12288
2066 Points -34%
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL
Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384
1950 Points -38%
Average of class Smartphone
  (196 - 3479, n=189, last 2 years)
1502 Points -52%
Multi-Core
Samsung Galaxy S25+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
10029 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy
  (10020 - 10029, n=2)
10025 Points 0%
Xiaomi 15 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
9404 Points -6%
Honor Magic7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
9019 Points -10%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
Apple A18 Pro, A18 Pro GPU, 8192
8568 Points -15%
Samsung Galaxy S24+
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 12288
6534 Points -35%
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL
Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384
4741 Points -53%
Average of class Smartphone
  (830 - 10401, n=189, last 2 years)
4256 Points -58%
Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy
  (2214 - 2227, n=2)
2221 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy S25+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
2214 Points
Xiaomi 15 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
2189 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy S24+
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 12288
1567 Points -29%
Average of class Smartphone
  (139 - 2437, n=169, last 2 years)
1073 Points -52%
Multi-Core
Samsung Galaxy S25+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
8203 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy
  (8041 - 8203, n=2)
8122 Points -1%
Xiaomi 15 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
7570 Points -8%
Samsung Galaxy S24+
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 12288
5871 Points -28%
Average of class Smartphone
  (512 - 8816, n=169, last 2 years)
3605 Points -56%
Antutu v10 - Total Score
Xiaomi 15 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
2611586 Points +15%
Honor Magic7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
2474369 Points +9%
Samsung Galaxy S25+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
2271821 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy
  (2262067 - 2271821, n=2)
2266944 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy S24+
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 12288
1777871 Points -22%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
Apple A18 Pro, A18 Pro GPU, 8192
1739816 Points -23%
Average of class Smartphone
  (142748 - 3015111, n=124, last 2 years)
1310811 Points -42%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy
  (20673 - 20764, n=2)
20719 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy S25+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
20673 Points
Honor Magic7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
20630 Points 0%
Xiaomi 15 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
18231 Points -12%
Samsung Galaxy S24+
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 12288
17534 Points -15%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4507 - 27169, n=194, last 2 years)
13566 Points -34%
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL
Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384
13235 Points -36%
CrossMark - Overall
Xiaomi 15 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
2674 Points +16%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy
  (2309 - 2354, n=2)
2332 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy S25+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
2309 Points
Honor Magic7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
2259 Points -2%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
Apple A18 Pro, A18 Pro GPU, 8192
1517 Points -34%
Samsung Galaxy S24+
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 12288
1290 Points -44%
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL
Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384
1081 Points -53%
Average of class Smartphone
  (187 - 2674, n=165, last 2 years)
956 Points -59%
BaseMark OS II
Overall
Honor Magic7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
13729 Points +4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy
  (13223 - 13325, n=2)
13274 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy S25+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
13223 Points
Samsung Galaxy S24+
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 12288
9467 Points -28%
Xiaomi 15 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
9067 Points -31%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1196 - 13729, n=160, last 2 years)
6608 Points -50%
System
Honor Magic7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
19891 Points +14%
Samsung Galaxy S25+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
17481 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy
  (17171 - 17481, n=2)
17326 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy S24+
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 12288
15253 Points -13%
Xiaomi 15 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
14976 Points -14%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2368 - 19891, n=160, last 2 years)
10420 Points -40%
Memory
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy
  (16264 - 17355, n=2)
16810 Points +3%
Samsung Galaxy S25+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
16264 Points
Honor Magic7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
15541 Points -4%
Samsung Galaxy S24+
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 12288
10178 Points -37%
Xiaomi 15 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
7873 Points -52%
Average of class Smartphone
  (962 - 18911, n=160, last 2 years)
7221 Points -56%
Graphics
Honor Magic7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
51041 Points +12%
Samsung Galaxy S25+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
45691 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy
  (45562 - 45691, n=2)
45627 Points 0%
Xiaomi 15 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
44154 Points -3%
Samsung Galaxy S24+
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 12288
25796 Points -44%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1017 - 58651, n=160, last 2 years)
18693 Points -59%
Web
Samsung Galaxy S25+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
2353 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy
  (2322 - 2353, n=2)
2338 Points -1%
Honor Magic7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
2252 Points -4%
Samsung Galaxy S24+
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 12288
1998 Points -15%
Average of class Smartphone
  (841 - 2363, n=160, last 2 years)
1592 Points -32%
Xiaomi 15 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
1278 Points -46%
UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy
  (23141 - 23281, n=2)
23211 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy S25+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
23141 Points
Xiaomi 15 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
21254 Points -8%
Honor Magic7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
20782 Points -10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1267 - 81594, n=151, last 2 years)
18072 Points -22%
Samsung Galaxy S24+
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 12288
11342 Points -51%
AImark - Score v3.x
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
Apple A18 Pro, A18 Pro GPU, 8192
33044 Points +1647%
Average of class Smartphone
  (82 - 307528, n=143, last 2 years)
27025 Points +1329%
Xiaomi 15 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
1987 Points +5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy
  (1891 - 1923, n=2)
1907 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy S25+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
1891 Points
Honor Magic7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
1796 Points -5%
Samsung Galaxy S24+
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 12288
1121 Points -41%
Geekbench AI
Single Precision TensorFlow NNAPI 1.2
Xiaomi 15 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
722 Points +3%
Samsung Galaxy S25+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
700 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy
  (670 - 700, n=2)
685 Points -2%
Honor Magic7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
669 Points -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (51 - 1501, n=30, last 2 years)
439 Points -37%
Half Precision TensorFlow NNAPI 1.2
Average of class Smartphone
  (51 - 9453, n=30, last 2 years)
1188 Points +70%
Xiaomi 15 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
716 Points +3%
Samsung Galaxy S25+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
697 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy
  (661 - 697, n=2)
679 Points -3%
Honor Magic7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
663 Points -5%
Quantized TensorFlow NNAPI 1.2
Average of class Smartphone
  (123 - 13084, n=30, last 2 years)
1919 Points +22%
Xiaomi 15 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
1698 Points +8%
Samsung Galaxy S25+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
1567 Points
Honor Magic7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
1560 Points 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy
  (1430 - 1567, n=2)
1499 Points -4%
AI Benchmark
Score V5
Average of class Smartphone
  (46.4 - 3219, n=35, last 2 years)
953 Points +289%
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL
Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384
800 Points +227%
Honor Magic7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
248 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy S25+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
245 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy
  (240 - 245, n=2)
243 Points -1%
Score V6
Honor Magic7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
10742 Points +2%
Xiaomi 15 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
10739 Points +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy
  (10534 - 10621, n=2)
10578 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy S25+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
10534 Points
Average of class Smartphone
  (68.9 - 10957, n=33, last 2 years)
4033 Points -62%
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL
Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384
1057 Points -90%

Galaxy S25+ 是图形运算速度最快的智能手机之一,图形运算由 骁龙 8Galaxy's Adreno 830.不过,它在 GPU 基准测试中并不总是名列前茅,这可能是热引起的降频造成的。

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy S25+
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
6885 Points
Xiaomi 15 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
6521 Points -5%
Honor Magic7 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
5933 Points -14%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
4739 Points -31%
Samsung Galaxy S24+
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
4235 Points -38%
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2605 Points -62%
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Samsung Galaxy S25+
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
7029 Points
Xiaomi 15 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
6567 Points -7%
Honor Magic7 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
5800 Points -17%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
4752 Points -32%
Samsung Galaxy S24+
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
4256 Points -39%
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2548 Points -64%
3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Samsung Galaxy S25+
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
26616 Points
Xiaomi 15 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
25431 Points -4%
Honor Magic7 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
23837 Points -10%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
18368 Points -31%
Samsung Galaxy S24+
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
13098 Points -51%
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
9452 Points -64%
3DMark / Solar Bay Score
Samsung Galaxy S25+
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
12400 Points
Xiaomi 15 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
11654 Points -6%
Honor Magic7 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
10066 Points -19%
Samsung Galaxy S24+
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
8774 Points -29%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
8146 Points -34%
3DMark / Solar Bay Unlimited Score
Samsung Galaxy S25+
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
12747 Points
Xiaomi 15 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
11589 Points -9%
Honor Magic7 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
10634 Points -17%
Samsung Galaxy S24+
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
8765 Points -31%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
8264 Points -35%
3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score
Xiaomi 15 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
2602 Points +3%
Samsung Galaxy S25+
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
2525 Points
Honor Magic7 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
2248 Points -11%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
1715 Points -32%
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1050 Points -58%
3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Score
Samsung Galaxy S25+
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
2698 Points
Xiaomi 15 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
2576 Points -5%
Honor Magic7 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
2272 Points -16%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
2069 Points -23%
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1031 Points -62%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Xiaomi 15 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
8571 Points +14%
Samsung Galaxy S25+
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
7545 Points
Samsung Galaxy S24+
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
7199 Points -5%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Xiaomi 15 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
39675 Points +9%
Samsung Galaxy S25+
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
36415 Points
Samsung Galaxy S24+
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
23545 Points -35%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Xiaomi 15 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
21898 Points +11%
Samsung Galaxy S25+
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
19681 Points
Samsung Galaxy S24+
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
15675 Points -20%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Xiaomi 15 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy S25+
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps
Honor Magic7 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy S24+
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
119 fps -1%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
60 fps -50%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Xiaomi 15 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
763 fps +9%
Samsung Galaxy S25+
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
697 fps
Honor Magic7 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
631 fps -9%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
536 fps -23%
Samsung Galaxy S24+
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
378 fps -46%
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Xiaomi 15 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy S25+
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps
Honor Magic7 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy S24+
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
119 fps -1%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
60 fps -50%
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy S25+
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
450 fps
Xiaomi 15 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
423 fps -6%
Honor Magic7 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
368 fps -18%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
324 fps -28%
Samsung Galaxy S24+
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
310 fps -31%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Xiaomi 15 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy S25+
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps
Honor Magic7 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy S24+
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
119 fps -1%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
60 fps -50%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Xiaomi 15 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
308 fps +9%
Honor Magic7 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
294 fps +4%
Samsung Galaxy S25+
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
283 fps
Samsung Galaxy S24+
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
244 fps -14%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
225 fps -20%
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Xiaomi 15 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy S25+
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps
Honor Magic7 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
114 fps -5%
Samsung Galaxy S24+
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
68 fps -43%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
60 fps -50%
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Xiaomi 15 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
209 fps +17%
Samsung Galaxy S25+
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
178 fps
Honor Magic7 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
166 fps -7%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
143 fps -20%
Samsung Galaxy S24+
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
139 fps -22%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy S25+
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps
Xiaomi 15 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
106 fps -12%
Honor Magic7 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
102 fps -15%
Samsung Galaxy S24+
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
68 fps -43%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
60 fps -50%
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
45 fps -62%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi 15 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
112 fps +5%
Samsung Galaxy S25+
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
107 fps
Honor Magic7 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
90 fps -16%
Samsung Galaxy S24+
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
75 fps -30%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
56 fps -48%
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
44 fps -59%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Xiaomi 15 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy S25+
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps
Honor Magic7 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy S24+
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
83 fps -31%
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
70 fps -42%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
60 fps -50%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy S25+
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
286 fps
Xiaomi 15 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
276 fps -3%
Honor Magic7 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
257 fps -10%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
184 fps -36%
Samsung Galaxy S24+
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
176 fps -38%
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
118 fps -59%
GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy S25+
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
52 fps
Xiaomi 15 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
48 fps -8%
Honor Magic7 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
44 fps -15%
Samsung Galaxy S24+
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
34 fps -35%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
30 fps -42%
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
20 fps -62%

Galaxy S25+ 在浏览器基准测试中也取得了类似的优异成绩,甚至达到了 Apple iPhone 16 Pro MaxApple A18 Pro是这方面的衡量标准。

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 18.0.1)
353.735 Points +6%
Samsung Galaxy S25+ (Chrome 133.0.6943.137)
334.386 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy (315 - 334, n=2)
325 Points -3%
Honor Magic7 Pro (Chrome 131)
284.674 Points -15%
Xiaomi 15 Pro (Chrome 132)
276.321 Points -17%
Samsung Galaxy S24+ (Chrome 121)
139.087 Points -58%
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=170, last 2 years)
130.3 Points -61%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 18.0.1)
557 runs/min +25%
Samsung Galaxy S25+ (Chrome 133.0.6943.137)
446 runs/min
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy (425 - 446, n=2)
436 runs/min -2%
Honor Magic7 Pro (Chrome 131)
419 runs/min -6%
Samsung Galaxy S24+ (Chrome 121)
260 runs/min -42%
Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 569, n=150, last 2 years)
155.5 runs/min -65%
Speedometer 3.0 - Score
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 18.0.1)
33.5 runs/min +16%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy (29 - 29.3, n=2)
29.2 runs/min +1%
Samsung Galaxy S25+ (Chrome 133.0.6943.137)
29 runs/min
Xiaomi 15 Pro (Chrome 132)
28.9 runs/min 0%
Honor Magic7 Pro (Chrome 131)
26.1 runs/min -10%
Average of class Smartphone (1.03 - 34, n=84, last 2 years)
12.4 runs/min -57%
WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 18.0.1)
271 Points +13%
Xiaomi 15 Pro (Chrome 132)
255 Points +7%
Samsung Galaxy S25+ (Chrome 133.0.6943.137)
239 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy (236 - 239, n=2)
238 Points 0%
Honor Magic7 Pro (Chrome 131)
196 Points -18%
Samsung Galaxy S24+ (Chrome 121)
176 Points -26%
Average of class Smartphone (22 - 271, n=160, last 2 years)
122.3 Points -49%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 18.0.1)
100368 Points +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy (98817 - 99202, n=2)
99010 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy S25+ (Chrome 133.0.6943.137)
98817 Points
Honor Magic7 Pro (Chrome 131)
89248 Points -10%
Xiaomi 15 Pro (Chrome 132)
84676 Points -14%
Samsung Galaxy S24+ (Chrome 121)
63452 Points -36%
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL (Chrome 129)
61885 Points -37%
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=208, last 2 years)
40624 Points -59%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=169, last 2 years)
1469 ms * -278%
Samsung Galaxy S24+ (Chrome 121)
630.8 ms * -62%
Honor Magic7 Pro (Chrome 131)
429.4 ms * -10%
Xiaomi 15 Pro (Chrome 132)
423.11 ms * -9%
Samsung Galaxy S25+ (Chrome 133.0.6943.137)
388.7 ms *
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy (377 - 389, n=2)
383 ms * +1%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 18.0.1)
279.4 ms * +28%

* ... smaller is better

Galaxy S25+ 的 UFS 4.0 存储有助于实现极短的加载时间,但在我们的测试中,它在随机读写操作方面被证明相对较弱。

Samsung Galaxy S25+Google Pixel 9 Pro XLHonor Magic7 ProSamsung Galaxy S24+Xiaomi 15 ProAverage 256 GB UFS 4.0 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-24%
1%
-28%
27%
6%
-29%
Sequential Read 256KB
4057.35
1850.5
-54%
3910.81
-4%
2450.9
-40%
3998.65
-1%
3657 ?(3249 - 4384, n=32)
-10%
Sequential Write 256KB
3311.02
1280.56
-61%
3683.81
11%
1523.87
-54%
3673.38
11%
2665 ?(555 - 3361, n=32)
-20%
Random Read 4KB
294.51
310.88
6%
282.34
-4%
387.42
32%
409.67
39%
Random Write 4KB
351.16
398.27
13%
357.04
2%
176.19
-50%
555.55
58%

游戏 - 最大 FPS 是规则

立体声扬声器、 Adreno 830GPU 的强大性能和 120Hz 显示屏都让Galaxy S25+ 成为一款强大的游戏智能手机。在我们使用Gamebench 进行的测试中的测试中,S25+ 的帧率几乎始终保持在上限,在某些情况下甚至达到了 120fps。

在我们选择的少量游戏中,只有《Asphalt 9: Legends》能让智能手机摆脱束缚。在这款游戏中,帧率在最高细节处的波动比平时要大一些,但平均帧率仍远高于每秒 100 帧。

源泉冲击
源泉冲击
PUBG Mobile
PUBG Mobile
0102030405060708090100110120Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy S25+; Asphalt 9: Legends; 24.4.0h: Ø107.9 (91-120)
Samsung Galaxy S25+; Genshin Impact; lowest 120 fps; 5.4.0_30057195_30231699: Ø59.9 (57-60)
Samsung Galaxy S25+; Genshin Impact; highest 120 fps; 5.4.0_30057195_30231699: Ø59.9 (58-60)
Samsung Galaxy S25+; PUBG Mobile; Smooth; 3.6.0: Ø119.8 (117-120)
Samsung Galaxy S25+; PUBG Mobile; HD; 3.6.0: Ø59.8 (54-60)
Samsung Galaxy S25+; PUBG Mobile; Ultra HD; 3.6.0: Ø40 (39-41)

排放 - 大幅降低负载时的功率

温度

Galaxy S25+ 的表面温度高达 44.1 °C,在我们的压力测试中变得相当热,这对于如此快速的智能手机来说并不罕见。

在负载情况下,内部节流很快就出现了。在 3DMark 压力测试中 骁龙 8 精英版Galaxy在 3DMark 压力测试中,骁龙 8 精英版的性能在第一次运行后就崩溃了,在某些情况下几乎降低了一半。所有对比设备的运行都比较稳定,包括 Galaxy S24+的前代机型。

Max. Load
 43.6 °C42.2 °C40.5 °C 
 43.5 °C42.2 °C40.2 °C 
 43.2 °C41.8 °C39.8 °C 
Maximum: 43.6 °C
Average: 41.9 °C
39.6 °C41.2 °C43.3 °C
38.7 °C41.4 °C44.1 °C
37.4 °C39.4 °C42.3 °C
Maximum: 44.1 °C
Average: 40.8 °C
Room Temperature 20.9 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 41.9 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 43.6 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 44.1 °C / 111 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.5 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

3DMark Steel Nomad stress test

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
94.6 % +77%
Samsung Galaxy S24+
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
82.1 % +54%
Xiaomi 15 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
75.3 % +41%
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
69.5 % +30%
Honor Magic7 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
57.6 % +8%
Samsung Galaxy S25+
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
53.4 %
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Samsung Galaxy S24+
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
81.5 % +59%
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
79.3 % +55%
Xiaomi 15 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
75.8 % +48%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
65.5 % +28%
Samsung Galaxy S25+
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
51.3 %
Solar Bay Stress Test Stability
Xiaomi 15 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
83.8 % +42%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
72.6 % +23%
Samsung Galaxy S24+
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
59.5 % +1%
Samsung Galaxy S25+
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
58.9 %
Honor Magic7 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
% -100%
Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
82.1 % +23%
Xiaomi 15 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
76.5 % +15%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
73.4 % +10%
Honor Magic7 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
68.4 % +3%
Samsung Galaxy S25+
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
66.5 %
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy S25+ Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø23.5 (19.9-38.9)
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 256 GB NVMe; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test: Ø20.8 (19.3-29.5)
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø14.6 (12.4-15.7)
Samsung Galaxy S25+ Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø84.2 (71.3-133.4)
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 256 GB NVMe; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø58.5 (56.7-59.9)
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø46.3 (36.8-52.9)
Samsung Galaxy S25+ Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø114.4 (89.3-165.7)
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 256 GB NVMe; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability: Ø76.8 (70.5-109.8)
Samsung Galaxy S25+ Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 1.0.11.1: Ø26.8 (23-41.1)
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 256 GB NVMe; Solar Bay Unlimited Stress Test Stability: Ø21.2 (20.6-28.9)
Samsung Galaxy S25+ Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.11.1: Ø24.9 (21.4-36.3)
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 256 GB NVMe; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability: Ø20.8 (20.2-27.7)
Samsung Galaxy S25+ Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.1.1.3: Ø12 (10.9-16.3)
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 256 GB NVMe; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability: Ø10.9 (10.6-14.4)
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.0.0.15: Ø7.49 (6.32-7.69)
三星Galaxy S25+
三星Galaxy S25+

发言人

Galaxy S25+ 的立体声扬声器可产生低音但总体均衡的声音,在我们的测试中,它的最大音量甚至达到了约 90 dB(A),而不会失真。

外接音频设备可通过 USB-C 和蓝牙 5.4 连接。除了蓝牙 LE,Galaxy S25+ 还支持 Auracast。不过,支持的蓝牙编解码器不多,仅包括 SBC、AAC、aptX、LDAC 和三星无缝编解码器 (SSC)。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2038.437.82530.633.93119.2354021.534.35036.939.16324.4338019.739.710015.840.912514.144.616015.255.620012.455.22509.560.13159.762.340010.563.45009666309.869.38008.974.410009.477.2125011.580.9160011.278.120001281.6250011.780.731501279.640001282.1500012.580.3630012.977.3800013.371.41000013.567.71250013.568.41600013.664.1SPL23.990.9N0.584median 12median 71.4Delta1.59.633.243.826.842.823.643.922.341.727.544.620.541.720.747.419.348.815.750.813.662.516.26115.56015.160.310.964.19.969.112.170.414.171.114.274.712.975.614.276.112.780.312.781.113.581.913.182.813.18413.484.212.782.513.480.913.474.613.166.125.492.60.793.6median 13.4median 74.71.18.9hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseSamsung Galaxy S25+Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Samsung Galaxy S25+ audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (90.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 18.3% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.3% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.7% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 7% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 87% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 36%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 27% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 66% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (92.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17.5% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.8% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (1.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 3% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 36%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 20% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 76% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

电池寿命 - 充电功率高达 45 瓦

耗电量

Galaxy S25+ 在空载时耗电量很小,但在负载情况下耗电量就会增加。不过,总的来说,它的耗电量并不比其他配备了 骁龙 8 精英版.

Galaxy S25+ 可通过线缆充电,最大功率为 45 瓦,无线充电最大功率为 15 瓦。此外还支持反向无线充电。在我们的测试中,一个完整的充电周期需要 70 分钟(电源装置:Ugreen 2C1A,65 瓦)。仅用了 38 分钟,电池电量就达到了 80%。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.03 / 0.17 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 0.45 / 1.09 / 1.13 Watt
Load midlight 14.41 / 16.37 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Samsung Galaxy S25+
4900 mAh
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
4685 mAh
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL
5060 mAh
Honor Magic7 Pro
5270 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S24+
4900 mAh
Xiaomi 15 Pro
6100 mAh
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
6%
-37%
-27%
19%
17%
3%
-15%
Idle Minimum *
0.45
0.42
7%
0.48
-7%
0.94
-109%
0.43
4%
0.6
-33%
Idle Average *
1.09
1.55
-42%
1.53
-40%
1.5
-38%
0.84
23%
0.9
17%
0.967 ?(0.77 - 1.09, n=3)
11%
Idle Maximum *
1.13
1.58
-40%
1.86
-65%
1.57
-39%
0.95
16%
1.1
3%
Load Average *
14.41
3.41
76%
11.03
23%
6.76
53%
6.7
54%
Load Maximum *
16.37
11.82
28%
11.68
29%
16.42
-0%
9.5
42%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

012345678910111213141516Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy S25+ Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø7.19 (0.617-16.3)
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max Apple A18 Pro; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø3.94 (0.796-12.6)
Xiaomi 15 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø5.51 (0.64-9.38)
Samsung Galaxy S25+ Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.664 (0.631-0.897)
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max Apple A18 Pro; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.638 (0.615-0.789)
Xiaomi 15 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.622 (0.528-0.962)

Power consumption: GFXbench (150 cd/m²)

012345678910111213141516Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy S25+ Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø14.4 (9.58-16.3)
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max Apple A18 Pro; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø11.3 (10.5-12.1)
Xiaomi 15 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø9.37 (9.34-9.41)
Samsung Galaxy S25+ Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.664 (0.631-0.897)
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max Apple A18 Pro; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.638 (0.615-0.789)
Xiaomi 15 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.622 (0.528-0.962)

运行时间

Galaxy S25+ 的电池容量为 4,900 毫安时,虽然相对较小,但仍能提供非常不错的续航时间。在模拟网上冲浪时,它能持续近 20 个小时,而在连续循环播放视频时,我们注意到它能持续 30 多个小时。

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
56h 38min
WiFi Websurfing
19h 49min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
30h 04min
Load (maximum brightness)
4h 00min
Samsung Galaxy S25+
4900 mAh
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
4685 mAh
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL
5060 mAh
Honor Magic7 Pro
5270 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S24+
4900 mAh
Xiaomi 15 Pro
6100 mAh
Battery Runtime
22%
-16%
-3%
-15%
11%
Reader / Idle
3398
4226
24%
2527
-26%
3093
-9%
H.264
1804
1990
10%
1806
0%
2226
23%
WiFi v1.3
1189
1249
5%
998
-16%
1481
25%
1009
-15%
1444
21%
Load
240
357
49%
217
-10%
264
10%

Notebookcheck 总评分

三星Galaxy S25+ 是一款非常出色的高端智能手机,拥有明亮的显示屏、超快的处理器、出色的摄像头和超长的电池续航时间。不过,与上一代产品相比,这款手机几乎没有什么变化。

Samsung Galaxy S25+ - 03/14/2025 v8
Manuel Masiero

Chassis
94%
Keyboard
67 / 75 → 89%
Pointing Device
94%
Connectivity
67 / 69 → 98%
Weight
89%
Battery
92%
Display
91%
Games Performance
39 / 55 → 72%
Application Performance
86 / 85 → 100%
AI Performance
37%
Temperature
87%
Noise
100%
Audio
76 / 90 → 84%
Camera
84%
Average
82%
88%
Smartphone - Weighted Average
CO2 Emissions
90.3%
Materials
70%
Packaging
95%
Power Use
97.9%
Repairability
80%
Software Updates
100%
Recycle Logo Total Sustainability Score: 88.9%

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 三星Galaxy S25+ 评测:尽管创新停滞不前,但仍是最好的Android 智能手机之一
Manuel Masiero, 2025-03-15 (Update: 2025-03-15)