Notebookcheck Logo
(Photo: Daniel Schmidt, edited generatively)

Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max 评测--顶级智能手机的众多微小改进

啊，照相机按钮！

iPhone 16 Pro Max 是Apple 最大的智能手机。它的显示屏再次增大，而且今年还在 iPhone 上安装了专用的拍照按钮。不过，尽管Apple Intelligence 尚未在欧盟上市，但它的功能远不止于此。
Daniel Schmidt, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
5G Apple iPhone iOS Smartphone Touchscreen

iPhone 16 Pro Max 是继去年的 iPhone 15 Pro Max.除其他方面外，这款智能手机还采用了更先进的 SoC，为新的Apple 智能奠定了重要基础。遗憾的是，Apple 的人工智能功能暂时还不会登陆欧盟市场，即使是美国市场，也会在晚些时候推出。

除了新的芯片组外，iPhone 的摄像头也采用了新的超广角传感器，Wi-Fi 7 终于登场，它还采用了改进的陶瓷屏蔽，并有一个专用的拍照按钮。此外，据说 iPhone 的可持续发展能力更强了，因为它现在更容易维修，并使用更多可回收材料制造。

今年的价格保持稳定，Apple ，存储版本阵容也没有任何变化：

存储 价格（MRSP）
256 GB 美元 1,199
512 GB 美元 1,399
1,024 GB 美元 1,599 美元
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max (iPhone 16 Series)
Processor
Apple A18 Pro 6 x - 4 GHz
Graphics adapter
Apple A18 Pro GPU
Memory
8 GB 
, LPDDR5
Display
6.90 inch 19.55:9, 2868 x 1320 pixel 458 PPI, Capacitive, Super Retina XDR OLED, Ceramic Shield, LTPO 1 - 120 Hz, Fingerprint-resistant oleophobic coating, glossy: yes, HDR, 120 Hz
Storage
256 GB NVMe, 256 GB 
, 238 GB free
Connections
1 USB 3.1 Gen2, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: USB-C, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer, Face ID, OTG
Networking
Wi-Fi 7 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz be = Wi-Fi 7), Bluetooth 5.3, 2G (850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz), 3G (850, 900, 1700/2100, 1900, 2100 MHz), LTE (Band 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 48, 53, 66, 71), 5G-Sub6 (Band 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 14, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 41, 48, 53, 70, 71, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79), Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 8.25 x 163 x 77.6
Battery
18.169 Wh, 4685 mAh Lithium-Polymer, 3.878 V
Charging
wireless charging, fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Apple iOS 18
Camera
Primary Camera: 48 MPix (f/1.78, 24 mm, second‑generation sensor‑shift optical image stabilization) + 12 MPix (5x optical zoom, f/2.8, 120 mm, SSOIS) + 48 MPix (f/2.2, 13 mm, 120°) + LiDAR-Scanner
Secondary Camera: 12 MPix (f/1.9, 23 mm, AF)
Additional features
Speakers: Dual, Keyboard: OnScreen, USB-C-Cabel, SIM-Tool, 12 Months Warranty, Class 5 Titanium, UWB, iBeacon microlocation, Crash Detection, IP68, IEC standard 60529, Dual-Band-GNSS: GPS, Glonass, BeiDou, Galileo, QZSS, NavIC; Bluetooth Audio-Codecs: SBC, AAC; HDR: HLG, HDR10, Dolby Vision; Body-SAR: 1.45 W/kg, Head-SAR: 1.22 W/kg, fanless, waterproof
Weight
227 g
Price
1449 Euro
Links
Apple homepage
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating
Version
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Price
88.6 %v8
10 / 2024
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
A18 Pro, A18 Pro GPU		227 g256 GB NVMe6.90"2868x1320
90.6 %
v7 (old)		v7 (old)
05 / 2024
Honor Magic6 Pro
SD 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750		229 g512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash6.80"2800x1280
91.1 %
v7 (old)		v7 (old)
05 / 2024
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750		232 g256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash6.80"3120x1440
89.2 %
v7 (old)		v7 (old)
04 / 2024
Xiaomi 14 Ultra
SD 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750		219.8 g512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash6.73"3200x1440
81.8 %v8
07 / 2024
Huawei Pura 70 Ultra
Kirin 9010, Maleoon 910		226 g1 TB UFS 3.1 Flash6.80"2844x1260
84.6 %v8
07 / 2024
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra
SD 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735		197 g1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash6.70"2712x1220
86.3 %v8
08 / 2024
Sony Xperia 1 VI
SD 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750		192 g256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash6.50"2340x1080

请注意：我们更新了评级系统，第 8 版的结果与第 7 版的结果不可比。更多信息 请点击此处.

外壳 - 16 Pro Max 的新颜色

Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max 依然采用了钛合金材质的边框，重量为 227 克，稍重一些。根据制造商的说法，它的厚度为 8.25 毫米，而我们测量的厚度为 8.3 毫米。摄像头的驼峰也增加了一些，现在增加了 4.3 毫米（约合 1.5 英寸）。15 Pro Max: 4.1 毫米），因此最厚处的机身高度为 12.6 毫米。

即便如此，iPhone 16 Pro Max 并没有头重脚轻的感觉，尽管它的尺寸很大，但拿起来还是很舒服。它的制造质量非常好，材料的手感也非常出色。所有缝隙都紧密均匀。只有在试图扭动时才会听到轻微的吱吱声。SIM 卡槽盖与边框齐平，甚至 nano-SIM 卡的托盘也是金属制造的。

Apple 智能手机通过了 IP68 认证，因此具有防尘和防水功能。它还符合 IEC 60529 标准，这意味着它可以在 6 米深的水中浸泡至少 30 分钟而不会出现任何问题。iPhone 16 Pro Max 有自然钛色、白色、黑色和沙漠钛色可供选择。后者是我们测试设备的颜色。

(照片：丹尼尔-施密特）
(照片：丹尼尔-施密特）
(照片：丹尼尔-施密特）
(照片：丹尼尔-施密特）
(照片：丹尼尔-施密特）
(照片：丹尼尔-施密特）
(照片：丹尼尔-施密特）
(照片：丹尼尔-施密特）
(照片：丹尼尔-施密特）

尺寸比较

❌
162.5 mm 75.8 mm 8.9 mm 229 g163 mm 77.6 mm 8.25 mm 227 g162.6 mm 75.1 mm 8.4 mm 226 g162.3 mm 79 mm 8.6 mm 232 g161.4 mm 75.3 mm 9.2 mm 219.8 g162 mm 74 mm 8.2 mm 192 g161.1 mm 72.4 mm 8.6 mm 197 g159.9 mm 76.7 mm 8.25 mm 221 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g

连接功能 - iPhone 16 系列配备拍照按钮

iPhone 16 Pro Max 配备了快速 USB 3.2 端口（Gen 2），在我们与连接的三星 980 Pro（华硕 ROG Strix Arion 机箱，USB 3.2 Gen 2）进行的复制测试中，传输速率高达 498.85 MB/s。外部数据载体可格式化为Apple 常用的所有文件系统，也支持 FAT32 和 exFAT。接口还支持每秒 60 帧的超高清有线图像输出和 HDR。

此外，手机还再次配备了操作按钮，并在手机长边的另一侧增加了一个专用的拍照按钮。就其本身而言，这并没有什么新意，因为你也可以在其他手机上找到这一功能，如 Xperia 1 VI.不过，Apple 有了一些新的想法，因为这个按钮也是一个传感器表面，可以识别压力和轻扫手势，并有蓝宝石玻璃保护。使用这个按钮可以直接启动相机--长按即可开始视频录制，还可以使用轻扫手势来改变景深等。即将推出的更新还将允许识别不同的压力水平，以便更有效地控制自动对焦和曝光。这个按钮是否具有附加价值可能取决于个人喜好。无论如何，它已经非常好用了。

此外，这款手机还配备了第二代超宽带芯片（UWB）、蓝牙 5.3 和 NFC。

返回顶部
返回顶部
左：SIM 卡、音量、操作按钮
左：SIM 卡、音量、操作按钮
右：电源、摄像机控制
右：电源、摄像机控制
底部：扬声器、麦克风、USB、麦克风
底部：扬声器、麦克风、USB、麦克风

软件 - iPhone 16 Pro Max 预装 iOS 18

iPhone 16 Pro Max 配备了 iOS 18，在我们的测试中，它使用的是 18.0.1 版本。iOS 18 为Apple 添加了大量自定义选项，并为Apple 智能奠定了基础。

这些人工智能功能旨在实现智能图像和视频编辑，例如删除图像中不需要的物体或人物。AppleSiri 的人工智能还可以总结、撰写或更正文本。Siri 还能过滤口误或回答后续问题。第一个版本将随 iOS 18.1 在美国推出，其他英语地区将在年底前跟进。到目前为止，只有欧盟被冷落，Apple ，理由是《欧洲数字市场法案》（DMA）存在不确定性。因此，它可能不会在 2025 年第一季度之前推出，但Apple 希望届时能建立语言基础。为什么三星和谷歌等公司已经能够在欧洲提供非常类似甚至更多的人工智能功能，这可能还是加利福尼亚人的秘密。

可持续性

iPhone 16 Pro Max 的包装完全不使用塑料，而且据Apple 称，这款智能手机由超过 25% 的可回收材料制成，具有很高的回收利用率。您可以在Apple 网站上找到所有详细信息，包括有关其大部分产品的详细可持续发展报告。的可持续发展报告。

Apple 此外，正如我们在 iFixit 的同事所证实的，iPhone 的可修复性也得到了提高。https://www.ifixit.com/News/100693/more-modular-than-ever-before-iphone-16-pro-and-pro-max-teardown.现在，许多部件都更容易接近，可以在不损坏设备的情况下进行更换。不过，Apple ，仍然不向个人出售备件。

与 15 Pro Max 相比，我们的 256GB 版本在整个生命周期内的二氧化碳排放量仅从 75 千克CO2e略微减少到 74 千克。1 TB 版本则减少了 3 千克。

通信和全球导航卫星系统 - Wi-Fi 7，不含 320 MHz

iPhone 不支持 320 MHz，使其潜在数据传输速率减半。
iPhone 不支持 320 MHz，使其潜在数据传输速率减半。

起初，大家都非常高兴：Wi-Fi 7 终于出现了！但随后又有些失望，因为 iPhone 16 Pro Max 最高仅支持 160 MHz，因此与使用 Wi-Fi 6E 网络时的速度一样快。

与我们的参考路由器华硕 ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000（Wi-Fi 6E，6 GHz）相比，iPhone 16 Pro Max 与 AVM Fritz!Box 5690 Pro（Wi-Fi 7，MLO，6 GHz）之间的传输速率达到了 1435 MBit/s。比较：小米 小米 14在同一 AVM 路由器上实现了 2,382 MBit/s，而路由器的 2.5 GBit 端口是瓶颈所在，因为小米甚至在 TP-Link 射手 BE800.不过，iPhone 的传输性能依然稳定，而且还支持 MLO。

在移动通信方面，Apple 智能手机堪称典范，因为它支持所有标准的大量频段，因此应该能够在全球范围内建立最佳连接。

Networking
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
iperf3 receive AXE11000
762 (min: 726) MBit/s ∼94%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
887 (min: 567) MBit/s ∼95%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1418 (min: 1324) MBit/s ∼78%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1258 (min: 1190) MBit/s ∼84%
Honor Magic6 Pro
iperf3 receive AXE11000
806 (min: 404) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
904 (min: 308) MBit/s ∼97%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
iperf3 receive AXE11000
801 (min: 397) MBit/s ∼99%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
556 (min: 253) MBit/s ∼60%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1553 (min: 815) MBit/s ∼85%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1461 (min: 1284) MBit/s ∼98%
Xiaomi 14 Ultra
iperf3 receive AXE11000
797 (min: 400) MBit/s ∼98%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
928 (min: 642) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1814 (min: 939) MBit/s ∼99%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1495 (min: 1227) MBit/s ∼100%
Huawei Pura 70 Ultra
iperf3 receive AXE11000
795 (min: 677) MBit/s ∼98%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
781 (min: 710) MBit/s ∼84%
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
863 (min: 748) MBit/s ∼47%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
719 (min: 637) MBit/s ∼48%
Sony Xperia 1 VI
iperf3 receive AXE11000
792 (min: 399) MBit/s ∼98%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
879 (min: 842) MBit/s ∼94%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1824 (min: 1765) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1438 (min: 1193) MBit/s ∼96%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
iperf3 receive AXE11000
810 (min: 793) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
931 (min: 893) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1534 (min: 1415) MBit/s ∼84%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1345 (min: 1298) MBit/s ∼90%
Average of class Smartphone
iperf3 receive AXE11000
714 (min: 34.8) MBit/s ∼88%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
729 (min: 40.5) MBit/s ∼78%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1440 (min: 229) MBit/s ∼79%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1371 (min: 668) MBit/s ∼92%
090180270360450540630720810900990108011701260135014401530162017101800Tooltip
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max Apple A18 Pro, Apple A18 Pro GPU; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1419 (1324-1435)
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Qualcomm Adreno 750; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1526 (815-1800)
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max Apple A18 Pro, Apple A18 Pro GPU; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1258 (1190-1287)
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Qualcomm Adreno 750; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1461 (1284-1543)
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max Apple A18 Pro, Apple A18 Pro GPU; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø762 (726-784)
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Qualcomm Adreno 750; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø786 (397-819)
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max Apple A18 Pro, Apple A18 Pro GPU; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø887 (567-946)
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Qualcomm Adreno 750; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø548 (253-611)

在定位方面，iPhone 16 Pro Max 支持所有卫星网络的双频全球导航卫星系统。因此，即使在建筑物之间，也能非常快速、精确地定位。

在一次骑行中，我们比较了Apple 手机和 Garmin Venu 2 的路线记录能力。两款设备都运行得很好，只是健身智能手表记录路线的效果更好一些。

全球导航卫星系统测试之旅：环湖之旅
全球导航卫星系统测试之旅：环湖之旅
全球导航卫星系统测试之旅：转折点
全球导航卫星系统测试之旅：转折点
全球导航卫星系统测试之旅：总结
全球导航卫星系统测试之旅：总结

电话功能和通话质量

将 iPhone 16 Pro Max 举到耳边时，它能发出自然的语音，还能很好地抑制恼人的环境噪音--只要声音不是太大。在扬声器模式下，iPhone 的表现也不错，但用户听起来会有些闷。

Apple 智能手机在进行测试的德国仍然支持实体 nano SIM 卡，也可以使用 eSIM 卡进行扩展。双卡双待功能也只能通过 eSIM 卡实现。在美国，手机不再配备实体 SIM 卡插槽。

双 SIM 卡功能可在设置过程中进行大量配置：必须定义主呼叫线路，稍后可为每个联系人单独调整。如果需要，两个电话号码都可用于 FaceTime。移动数据可以设置到一张 SIM 卡上，但如果主线路太弱，手机可以选择切换到另一条线路。一个小缺点是不支持双应用程序。虽然可以通过 App Store 上的应用程序来弥补，但总是要付费的。

摄像头 - 全新超广角和 120fps 超高清图像

使用 iPhone 16 Pro Max 的纵向模式自拍
使用纵向模式自拍
使用 iPhone 16 Pro Max 的拍照模式自拍
使用拍照模式自拍

iPhone 16 Pro Max 的前置摄像头保持不变，再次配备了自动对焦功能。照片看起来很棒，而且有很多设置选项。你可以在最佳状态下录制超高清视频（60fps，杜比视界）。

主摄像头采用 4800 万像素传感器，通过传感器位移（第 2 代）实现光学防抖。三维传感器位移还能稳定变焦，再次实现 5 倍光学放大和 25 倍数字放大。而 4800 万像素超广角传感器则是一项新功能，它还可用作微距镜头。

主摄像头采用像素分档，通常以 2400 万像素拍摄照片（也可拍摄 1200 万像素和 4800 万像素的照片）。拍摄出来的照片整体效果不错，如果需要，还可以通过摄影风格单独或使用预定义设置进行定制。不过，与竞争对手相比，它在湖泊场景中的动态范围明显略低。iPhone 在弱光环境下的表现也很出色。

iPhone 16 Pro Max 的三摄像头
iPhone 16 Pro Max 的三摄像头

主镜头标称拍摄焦距为 24 毫米。不过，通过传感器裁剪，也可以使用 28 毫米和 35 毫米的镜头，而不会有任何损失。5 倍光学变焦可用于更长的焦距，也可通过数字技术放大至 10 倍。最大可实现 25 倍变焦，其效果可在后期处理中看到，但只要使用范围不超出社交媒体，基本上还是可以的。图像防抖效果非常好，即使在较长的焦距下也能保持稳定。不过，在这种情况下几乎不能使用相机按钮，因为它的按压点非常坚硬，在变焦时会很快导致相机抖动。

视频最多可录制成超高清格式，帧频从 24 到 120fps，包括 25、50 和 100fps 的 PAL 格式。杜比视界（Dolby Vision）也再次加入。如果需要，只要将外部数据载体连接到 iPhone 16 Pro Max，就能以 ProRes 格式录制视频。你甚至可以以高帧率进行录制。这些 10 位 HDR 录像可以在超高清格式下以高达 120fps 的速度进行，但由于压缩率较低，需要更多的存储空间，而且时间限制为 8 分钟。新的 120fps 拍摄技术使令人印象深刻的慢动作视频成为可能，包括杜比视界（Dolby Vision）。还可以录制 Vision Pro 的空间视频（1,080p @ 30fps）。

Apple 在我们的测试中，这些麦克风被证明噪音非常低。有了新的音频混合工具，视频的声音后期处理非常广泛，您甚至可以抑制图像外不需要的噪音，这也可以分级，在日常生活中效果极佳。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Main cameraMain cameraUltra-wide angle5x zoomLow-light

在可控的照明条件下，我们的测试图在使用 4800 万像素时细节非常丰富，但可以看出图像经过了锐化处理。

色彩还原非常准确，在深绿色和青色方面，DeltaE 偏差仅大于 10。

ColorChecker
7.5 ∆E
6.7 ∆E
8.2 ∆E
12.1 ∆E
7.3 ∆E
7.7 ∆E
3.9 ∆E
7.2 ∆E
6.4 ∆E
3.5 ∆E
7.4 ∆E
3.3 ∆E
5.6 ∆E
9.9 ∆E
6.8 ∆E
2.3 ∆E
5.7 ∆E
11.4 ∆E
2.6 ∆E
3.6 ∆E
8.5 ∆E
8.5 ∆E
4.4 ∆E
1.7 ∆E
ColorChecker Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max: 6.35 ∆E min: 1.71 - max: 12.15 ∆E
ColorChecker
18.5 ∆E
18.9 ∆E
18.7 ∆E
18.3 ∆E
22.4 ∆E
23.1 ∆E
23.8 ∆E
14.5 ∆E
17.9 ∆E
16.8 ∆E
20.3 ∆E
30 ∆E
15.1 ∆E
21 ∆E
15.3 ∆E
17.8 ∆E
22.9 ∆E
27.1 ∆E
17.7 ∆E
16.2 ∆E
23.1 ∆E
25 ∆E
23.3 ∆E
13.9 ∆E
ColorChecker Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max: 20.07 ∆E min: 13.91 - max: 29.98 ∆E

配件和保修 - 现在没有贴纸了

Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max 的供货范围进一步缩小，但仍配备了 SIM 卡工具和 USB-C 数据线。USB-C 数据线同样采用织物包裹。不过，不再附带 贴纸。

Apple

可选配件的范围在继续扩大，这主要归功于 Beats 的 保护套（49 美元），它也兼容 MagSafe。如果您还需要一个合适的电源装置（30 瓦），您必须投资 39 美元购买相当笨重的 原装型号 。

它的保修期只有 12 个月。您还可以选择购买名为 Care+ 的保险套餐。该套餐一次性收费 199 美元，包括意外损坏情况下的无限次维修、快速更换服务和优先支持。根据损坏情况，可能会收取额外费用。此外，您还可以花 269 美元购买失窃和丢失保险，每年最多承保两起案件。如果您愿意，也可以按月支付服务费（9.99 美元或 13.49 美元），服务期限最短为两年，也可以更长。

(照片：丹尼尔-施密特）
节拍箱是一种极具吸引力的选择。(照片：丹尼尔-施密特）
(照片：丹尼尔-施密特）
30 瓦电源采用模块化结构。(照片：丹尼尔-施密特）
iPhone 16 Pro Max 的织物线缆（摄影：丹尼尔-施密特）

输入设备和操作 - iPhone 的新操作按钮

iPhone 16 Pro Max 配备了大尺寸电容式触摸屏，能快速、准确地响应输入。陶瓷屏蔽层非常漂亮、光滑；显然，它现在的抗磨损能力提高了 50%。得益于 120 Hz 的面板，系统运行如天鹅绒般顺滑。

Apple Face ID 3D 面部识别被认为是非常安全的，但它仍然完全依赖于 Face ID。设备上没有指纹传感器。使用 Face ID 解锁手机非常可靠和快速，即使在黑暗环境中也是如此。如果需要，还可以存储带眼镜或面具的附加配置文件。

首次在iPhone 15 Pro Max 中使用的动作按钮也重新登场，并被赋予了两项附加功能：现在，它可以直接启动 Shazam 进行音乐识别，无需先安装该应用，因为它已集成到Apple Music 中。搜索和曲目显示通过动态岛显示。此外，现在还可以直接启动实时翻译器。

触觉引擎负责振动。这是一个电磁线性马达，可提供清晰灵敏的触觉反馈。辅助触控（AssistiveTouch）、单手模式和背部点击手势等功能也得到了保留。

显示屏 - iPhone 16 Pro Max 配备明亮、精确的 120 Hz OLED 显示屏

子像素阵列
子像素阵列

由于边框更加纤薄，iPhone 的面板增大到 6.9 英寸（17.53 厘米），分辨率也有所提高，从而保持了高像素密度。LTPO OLED 可在 1 到 120 Hz 之间动态调节刷新率，而触摸屏的采样率为 240 Hz。

与 15 Pro Max相比，它在显示纯白色时的亮度大致相同，照明也很均匀。在显示较小的白色摘录（APL20）时，其峰值亮度可达 2,357 cd/m²，而在显示 HDR 视频时，其亮度甚至会升至 2,600 cd/m²。当然，这并不是业内的最高值，但仍然非常出色。

说到 OLED 闪烁，iPhone 16 Pro Max 显示的频率仅为 240 Hz，在最低亮度下振幅相当平缓均匀。如果亮度稍有增加，频率就会上升到 480 赫兹。因此，敏感的人肯定会有一些抱怨。

1045
cd/m²		1061
cd/m²		1100
cd/m²
1034
cd/m²		1055
cd/m²		1097
cd/m²
1025
cd/m²		1039
cd/m²		1095
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 1100 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 1061.2 cd/m² Minimum: 1.57 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 93 %
Center on Battery: 1055 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.5 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 2.3 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
99.6% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.21
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
Super Retina XDR OLED, 2868x1320, 6.9"		Honor Magic6 Pro
OLED, 2800x1280, 6.8"		Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Dynamic AMOLED 2X, 3120x1440, 6.8"		Xiaomi 14 Ultra
AMOLED, 3200x1440, 6.7"		Huawei Pura 70 Ultra
OLED, 2844x1260, 6.8"		Motorola Edge 50 Ultra
P-OLED, 2712x1220, 6.7"		Sony Xperia 1 VI
OLED, 2340x1080, 6.5"		Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
OLED, 2796x1290, 6.7"
Screen
15%
-17%
6%
14%
41%
2%
17%
Brightness middle
1055
1575
49%
1317
25%
997
-5%
1095
4%
1326
26%
1305
24%
1102
4%
Brightness
1061
1508
42%
1365
29%
1002
-6%
1094
3%
1312
24%
1319
24%
1102
4%
Brightness Distribution
93
89
-4%
94
1%
96
3%
96
3%
90
-3%
98
5%
98
5%
Black Level *
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
1.5
1.7
-13%
3.4
-127%
1.6
-7%
1.1
27%
0.51
66%
2.8
-87%
1.1
27%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
4.7
3.9
17%
5
-6%
3.3
30%
2.4
49%
1.85
61%
4.5
4%
3.1
34%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
2.3
2.4
-4%
2.8
-22%
1.8
22%
2.3
-0%
0.6
74%
1.4
39%
1.6
30%
Gamma
2.21 100%
2.22 99%
2 110%
2.19 100%
2.28 96%
2.191 100%
2.19 100%
2.19 100%
CCT
6625 98%
6398 102%
6458 101%
6493 100%
6500 100%
1355 480%
6361 102%
6555 99%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 240 Hz
Amplitude: 26.44 %

The display backlight flickers at 240 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 240 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

最低显示亮度
分钟
25 % 显示屏亮度
25 %
显示屏亮度为 50
50 %
75 % 显示亮度
75 %
最大手动显示亮度
100 %

固定缩放级别和不同亮度设置下的测量系列（最低亮度下的振幅曲线看起来很平，但这是缩放造成的。信息框显示的是最小亮度下的振幅放大图）。

在关闭 "真实色调 "功能后，我们注意到在显示浅灰度时有轻微的绿色偏差。即便如此，这在日常使用中也不会很明显。肉眼几乎感觉不到偏差，只有在旁边有参照物时才会出现这种情况。不过，这只适用于橙色色调。

在激活默认的真实色调后，显示的色调通常会偏暖一些。

灰度（"真实色调 "已停用，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
灰度（"真实色调 "已停用，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
色彩（"真实色调 "已停用，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
色彩（"真实色调 "已停用，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
色彩空间（"真实色调 "已停用，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
色彩空间（"真实色调 "已停用，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
饱和度（"真实色调 "已停用，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
饱和度（"真实色调 "已停用，目标色彩空间：sRGB）

Display Response Times

ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
   ↔    Response Time Black to White
1.03 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.473 ms rise
↘ 0.56 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 2 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
   ↔    Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
1.78 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.899 ms rise
↘ 0.877 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 6 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

iPhone 16 Pro Max 的显示屏在户外表现出色，在大多数光线条件下都清晰易读。甚至反光也不是太大的问题。不过，在特别炎热的天气里，最大亮度可能只能使用很短的时间。

Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max 外观
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max 外观

Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max 的视角稳定性非常好。在非常平的角度下，亮度最多会有轻微下降。

Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max 的视角稳定性
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max 的视角稳定性

性能 -Apple A18 Pro 拥有无与伦比的 CPU 性能

与较小的 iPhone 16 Pro一样，iPhone 16 Pro Max 的核心部件是 Apple A18 Pro它可以访问 8 GB 内存。

该处理器在 Geekbench 测试中击败了竞争对手，是测试时智能手机中速度最快的。系统速度也相应较高，在日常使用中像黄油一样流畅。

iPhone 也是执行人工智能任务的理想设备，在 Geekbench AI 测试中取得了高分，但在 AIMark 测试中，采用Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 的竞争对手有时要快得多。

Geekbench 6.3 | Antutu v10 | CrossMark | AImark | Geekbench AI
Geekbench 6.3
Single-Core
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
Apple A18 Pro, A18 Pro GPU, 8192
3479 Points
Average Apple A18 Pro
  (3443 - 3479, n=2)
3461 Points -1%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
Apple A17 Pro, A17 Pro GPU, 8192
2930 Points -16%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
2287 Points -34%
Xiaomi 14 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
2254 Points -35%
Sony Xperia 1 VI
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
2250 Points -35%
Honor Magic6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
2127 Points -39%
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 16384
2012 Points -42%
Average of class Smartphone
  (193 - 3479, n=162, last 2 years)
1454 Points -58%
Huawei Pura 70 Ultra
HiSilicon Kirin 9010, Maleoon 910, 16384
1446 Points -58%
Multi-Core
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
Apple A18 Pro, A18 Pro GPU, 8192
8568 Points
Average Apple A18 Pro
  (8524 - 8568, n=2)
8546 Points 0%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
Apple A17 Pro, A17 Pro GPU, 8192
7244 Points -15%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
7102 Points -17%
Xiaomi 14 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
6933 Points -19%
Sony Xperia 1 VI
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
6804 Points -21%
Honor Magic6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
6765 Points -21%
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 16384
5284 Points -38%
Huawei Pura 70 Ultra
HiSilicon Kirin 9010, Maleoon 910, 16384
4484 Points -48%
Average of class Smartphone
  (845 - 10401, n=162, last 2 years)
4049 Points -53%
Antutu v10 - Total Score
Honor Magic6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
2050639 Points +18%
Xiaomi 14 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
1987321 Points +14%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
1837994 Points +6%
Sony Xperia 1 VI
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
1812093 Points +4%
Average Apple A18 Pro
  (1739816 - 1867306, n=2)
1803561 Points +4%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
Apple A18 Pro, A18 Pro GPU, 8192
1739816 Points
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 16384
1553057 Points -11%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
Apple A17 Pro, A17 Pro GPU, 8192
1487075 Points -15%
Average of class Smartphone
  (142748 - 3015111, n=98, last 2 years)
1232320 Points -29%
Huawei Pura 70 Ultra
HiSilicon Kirin 9010, Maleoon 910, 16384
968434 Points -44%
CrossMark - Overall
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
Apple A18 Pro, A18 Pro GPU, 8192
1517 Points
Average Apple A18 Pro
  (1455 - 1517, n=2)
1486 Points -2%
Honor Magic6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
1474 Points -3%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
1443 Points -5%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
Apple A17 Pro, A17 Pro GPU, 8192
1408 Points -7%
Sony Xperia 1 VI
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
1350 Points -11%
Xiaomi 14 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
1239 Points -18%
Huawei Pura 70 Ultra
HiSilicon Kirin 9010, Maleoon 910, 16384
1031 Points -32%
Average of class Smartphone
  (187 - 1517, n=157, last 2 years)
884 Points -42%
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 16384
820 Points -46%
AImark - Score v3.x
Honor Magic6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
245629 Points +643%
Average Apple A18 Pro
  (33044 - 33743, n=2)
33394 Points +1%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
Apple A18 Pro, A18 Pro GPU, 8192
33044 Points
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
Apple A17 Pro, A17 Pro GPU, 8192
29087 Points -12%
Average of class Smartphone
  (82 - 307528, n=135, last 2 years)
25873 Points -22%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
1518 Points -95%
Xiaomi 14 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
1491 Points -95%
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 16384
1321 Points -96%
Sony Xperia 1 VI
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
1320 Points -96%
Huawei Pura 70 Ultra
HiSilicon Kirin 9010, Maleoon 910, 16384
1051 Points -97%
Geekbench AI
Single Precision Core ML Neural Engine
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
Apple A18 Pro, A18 Pro GPU, 8192
4564 Points
Average Apple A18 Pro
  ()
4564 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2278 - 4564, n=2, last 2 years)
3421 Points -25%
Half Precision Core ML Neural Engine
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
Apple A18 Pro, A18 Pro GPU, 8192
32340 Points
Average Apple A18 Pro
  ()
32340 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (12378 - 32340, n=2, last 2 years)
22359 Points -31%
Quantized Core ML Neural Engine
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
Apple A18 Pro, A18 Pro GPU, 8192
44858 Points
Average Apple A18 Pro
  ()
44858 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (13254 - 44858, n=2, last 2 years)
29056 Points -35%

A18 Pro GPU Apple A18 Pro GPU确保最高级别的图形计算，支持所有通用标准，包括基于硬件的光线追踪。

它在基准测试中获得了很高的分数，但在大多数情况下不得不向 Adreno 750 认输。不过，由于 iOS 具有更好的性能扩展性，这并不是一个缺点。

3DMark: Wild Life Extreme Unlimited | Wild Life Extreme | Wild Life Unlimited Score | Solar Bay Score | Solar Bay Unlimited Score | Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score | Steel Nomad Light Score
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7: T-Rex Onscreen | 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
GFXBench 3.0: on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
GFXBench 3.1: on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
GFXBench: on screen Car Chase Onscreen | 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | 3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Honor Magic6 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
5167 Points +9%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
4804 Points +1%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
4739 Points
Xiaomi 14 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
4690 Points -1%
Sony Xperia 1 VI
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
4381 Points -8%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
3879 Points -18%
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
3332 Points -30%
Huawei Pura 70 Ultra
Maleoon 910, Kirin 9010, 1 TB UFS 3.1 Flash
1539 Points -68%
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Honor Magic6 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
5177 Points +9%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
5040 Points +6%
Xiaomi 14 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
4937 Points +4%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
4752 Points
Sony Xperia 1 VI
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
4458 Points -6%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
3765 Points -21%
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
3424 Points -28%
Huawei Pura 70 Ultra
Maleoon 910, Kirin 9010, 1 TB UFS 3.1 Flash
1573 Points -67%
3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
20068 Points +9%
Honor Magic6 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
19545 Points +6%
Sony Xperia 1 VI
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
19022 Points +4%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
18368 Points
Xiaomi 14 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
16691 Points -9%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
15260 Points -17%
Huawei Pura 70 Ultra
Maleoon 910, Kirin 9010, 1 TB UFS 3.1 Flash
5656 Points -69%
3DMark / Solar Bay Score
Honor Magic6 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
8677 Points +7%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
8146 Points
Sony Xperia 1 VI
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
7697 Points -6%
Xiaomi 14 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
7523 Points -8%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
7510 Points -8%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
6478 Points -20%
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
5045 Points -38%
3DMark / Solar Bay Unlimited Score
Honor Magic6 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
8679 Points +5%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
8620 Points +4%
Sony Xperia 1 VI
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
8360 Points +1%
Xiaomi 14 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
8289 Points 0%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
8264 Points
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
6106 Points -26%
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
4886 Points -41%
3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
1715 Points
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1629 Points -5%
Sony Xperia 1 VI
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1369 Points -20%
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
1030 Points -40%
3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Score
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
2069 Points
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1796 Points -13%
Sony Xperia 1 VI
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1570 Points -24%
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
1073 Points -48%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps +100%
Xiaomi 14 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps +100%
Honor Magic6 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps +100%
Sony Xperia 1 VI
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps +100%
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps +100%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
60 fps 0%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
60 fps
Huawei Pura 70 Ultra
Maleoon 910, Kirin 9010, 1 TB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps 0%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
549 fps +2%
Honor Magic6 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
544 fps +1%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
536 fps
Xiaomi 14 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
529 fps -1%
Sony Xperia 1 VI
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
522 fps -3%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
444 fps -17%
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
380 fps -29%
Huawei Pura 70 Ultra
Maleoon 910, Kirin 9010, 1 TB UFS 3.1 Flash
342 fps -36%
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps +100%
Xiaomi 14 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps +100%
Honor Magic6 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps +100%
Sony Xperia 1 VI
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps +100%
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
117 fps +95%
Huawei Pura 70 Ultra
Maleoon 910, Kirin 9010, 1 TB UFS 3.1 Flash
61 fps +2%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
60 fps 0%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
60 fps
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
339 fps +5%
Xiaomi 14 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
328 fps +1%
Honor Magic6 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
327 fps +1%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
324 fps
Sony Xperia 1 VI
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
320 fps -1%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
262 fps -19%
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
234 fps -28%
Huawei Pura 70 Ultra
Maleoon 910, Kirin 9010, 1 TB UFS 3.1 Flash
183 fps -44%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Honor Magic6 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps +100%
Sony Xperia 1 VI
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps +100%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
117 fps +95%
Xiaomi 14 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
117 fps +95%
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
101 fps +68%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
60 fps 0%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
60 fps
Huawei Pura 70 Ultra
Maleoon 910, Kirin 9010, 1 TB UFS 3.1 Flash
59 fps -2%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Honor Magic6 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
261 fps +16%
Sony Xperia 1 VI
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
256 fps +14%
Xiaomi 14 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
250 fps +11%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
247 fps +10%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
225 fps
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
180 fps -20%
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
149 fps -34%
Huawei Pura 70 Ultra
Maleoon 910, Kirin 9010, 1 TB UFS 3.1 Flash
129 fps -43%
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Sony Xperia 1 VI
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
119 fps +98%
Honor Magic6 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
101 fps +68%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
83 fps +38%
Xiaomi 14 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
81 fps +35%
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
61 fps +2%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
60 fps 0%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
60 fps
Huawei Pura 70 Ultra
Maleoon 910, Kirin 9010, 1 TB UFS 3.1 Flash
38 fps -37%
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Honor Magic6 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
162 fps +13%
Xiaomi 14 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
156 fps +9%
Sony Xperia 1 VI
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
155 fps +8%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
143 fps
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
142 fps -1%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
110 fps -23%
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
80 fps -44%
Huawei Pura 70 Ultra
Maleoon 910, Kirin 9010, 1 TB UFS 3.1 Flash
55 fps -62%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Sony Xperia 1 VI
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
111 fps +85%
Honor Magic6 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
92 fps +53%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
72 fps +20%
Xiaomi 14 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps 0%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
60 fps
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
56 fps -7%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
55 fps -8%
Huawei Pura 70 Ultra
Maleoon 910, Kirin 9010, 1 TB UFS 3.1 Flash
32 fps -47%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Honor Magic6 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
90 fps +61%
Sony Xperia 1 VI
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
81 fps +45%
Xiaomi 14 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
79 fps +41%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
71 fps +27%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
61 fps +9%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
56 fps
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
46 fps -18%
Huawei Pura 70 Ultra
Maleoon 910, Kirin 9010, 1 TB UFS 3.1 Flash
30 fps -46%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Honor Magic6 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps +100%
Sony Xperia 1 VI
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps +100%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
114 fps +90%
Xiaomi 14 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
104 fps +73%
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
83 fps +38%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
60 fps
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
59 fps -2%
Huawei Pura 70 Ultra
Maleoon 910, Kirin 9010, 1 TB UFS 3.1 Flash
52 fps -13%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Honor Magic6 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
228 fps +24%
Sony Xperia 1 VI
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
203 fps +10%
Xiaomi 14 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
192 fps +4%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
187 fps +2%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
184 fps
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
136 fps -26%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
117 fps -36%
Huawei Pura 70 Ultra
Maleoon 910, Kirin 9010, 1 TB UFS 3.1 Flash
82 fps -55%
GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Honor Magic6 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
42 fps +40%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
40 fps +33%
Sony Xperia 1 VI
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
38 fps +27%
Xiaomi 14 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
37 fps +23%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
30 fps
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
25 fps -17%
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
20 fps -33%
Huawei Pura 70 Ultra
Maleoon 910, Kirin 9010, 1 TB UFS 3.1 Flash
13 fps -57%

在浏览器基准测试中，iPhone 依然是衡量一切的标准，与前代产品相比，iPhone 再次取得了巨大进步。 前代产品.

Jetstream 2 | Speedometer 2.0 | Speedometer 3.0 | WebXPRT 4 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Average Apple A18 Pro (354 - 387, n=2)
370 Points +5%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 18.0.1)
353.735 Points
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 17)
254.048 Points -28%
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra (Chrome 126)
235.397 Points -33%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra (Chrome 121)
209.919 Points -41%
Sony Xperia 1 VI (Chrome 127.0.6533.64)
183.071 Points -48%
Huawei Pura 70 Ultra (Chrome 125)
157.304 Points -56%
Xiaomi 14 Ultra (Chrome 123)
146.13 Points -59%
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=161, last 2 years)
120.4 Points -66%
Honor Magic6 Pro (Chrome 122)
117.078 Points -67%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average Apple A18 Pro (557 - 569, n=2)
563 runs/min +1%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 18.0.1)
557 runs/min
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 17)
445 runs/min -20%
Sony Xperia 1 VI (Chrome 127.0.6533.64)
270 runs/min -52%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra (Chrome 121)
265 runs/min -52%
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra (Chrome 126)
243 runs/min -56%
Huawei Pura 70 Ultra (Chrome 125)
223 runs/min -60%
Xiaomi 14 Ultra (Chrome 123)
220 runs/min -61%
Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 569, n=146, last 2 years)
136.2 runs/min -76%
Honor Magic6 Pro (Chrome 122)
134 runs/min -76%
Speedometer 3.0 - Score
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 18.0.1)
33.5 runs/min
Average Apple A18 Pro (33.5 - 33.5, n=2)
33.5 runs/min 0%
Sony Xperia 1 VI (Chrome 127.0.6533.64)
16.2 runs/min -52%
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra (Chrome 126)
13.6 runs/min -59%
Huawei Pura 70 Ultra (Chrome 125)
13 runs/min -61%
Xiaomi 14 Ultra (Chrome 123)
11 runs/min -67%
Average of class Smartphone (1.03 - 34, n=58, last 2 years)
10.7 runs/min -68%
Honor Magic6 Pro (Chrome 122)
4.3 runs/min -87%
WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 18.0.1)
271 Points
Average Apple A18 Pro (267 - 271, n=2)
269 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra (Chrome 121)
195 Points -28%
Sony Xperia 1 VI (Chrome 127.0.6533.64)
189 Points -30%
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra (Chrome 126)
185 Points -32%
Xiaomi 14 Ultra (Chrome 123)
156 Points -42%
Average of class Smartphone (22 - 271, n=152, last 2 years)
113.8 Points -58%
Honor Magic6 Pro
112 Points -59%
Huawei Pura 70 Ultra
Points -100%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 18.0.1)
100368 Points
Average Apple A18 Pro (98997 - 100368, n=2)
99683 Points -1%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 17)
86270 Points -14%
Sony Xperia 1 VI (Chrome 127.0.6533.64)
72665 Points -28%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra (Chrome 121)
72011 Points -28%
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra (Chrome 126)
66369 Points -34%
Xiaomi 14 Ultra (Chrome 123)
60574 Points -40%
Huawei Pura 70 Ultra (Chrome 125)
49290 Points -51%
Honor Magic6 Pro (Chrome 122)
37221 Points -63%
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=203, last 2 years)
37161 Points -63%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=160, last 2 years)
1568 ms * -461%
Honor Magic6 Pro (Chrome 122)
1153.9 ms * -313%
Huawei Pura 70 Ultra (Chrome 125)
779.1 ms * -179%
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra (Chrome 126)
700.9 ms * -151%
Xiaomi 14 Ultra (Chrome 123)
688 ms * -146%
Sony Xperia 1 VI (Chrome 127.0.6533.64)
606.4 ms * -117%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra (Chrome 121)
599 ms * -114%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 17)
388.3 ms * -39%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 18.0.1)
279.4 ms *
Average Apple A18 Pro (277 - 279, n=2)
278 ms * +1%

* ... smaller is better

游戏 - 动力充沛，可实现绚丽的图形效果和 120fps 速率

iPhone 16 Pro Max 能以最高质量处理游戏，没有任何问题。
iPhone 16 Pro Max 能以最高质量处理游戏，没有任何问题。

A18 Pro GPU Apple A18 Pro GPUA18 Pro GPU 是无限游戏乐趣的基础，即使是要求最苛刻的游戏，如《生化危机村》的游戏机移植版，也能流畅运行。

我们使用GameBench 查看了智能手机上的其他经典游戏。查看了智能手机上的其他经典游戏，所有这些游戏都能以高达 120fps 的速度运行。但是，当涉及到《PUBG Mobile》时，我们不得不选择最低的细节，而《使命召唤》也要求至少降低一个级别。要求最苛刻的游戏之一仍然是《源氏冲击》，但即使是这款游戏也能以高达 120fps 的速度运行，而无需降低显示质量。由于散热量较高，系统仍会下调帧频，但仍保持在较高水平。在动荡的场景中，有时会出现卡顿。

总的来说，iPhone 16 Pro Max 非常适合玩游戏，尤其是因为它拥有大尺寸显示屏和音质出色的扬声器。唯一令人讨厌的是，动态岛遮挡了一些内容。

0102030405060708090100110120Tooltip
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max; Call of Duty Mobile; high; 1.0.47: Ø116.8 (89-120)
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max; Call of Duty Mobile; very high; 1.0.47: Ø58.4 (45-60)
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max; Genshin Impact; lowest 120 fps; 5.1.0: Ø115.4 (81-120)
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max; Genshin Impact; medium 120 fps; 5.1.0: Ø106.9 (73-120)
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max; Genshin Impact; highest 120 fps; 5.1.0: Ø85.7 (55-112)
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max; PUBG Mobile; Smooth; 3.4.0: Ø116.5 (88-120)
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max; PUBG Mobile; HD; 3.4.0: Ø57.1 (45-59)
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max; PUBG Mobile; Ultra HD: Ø38.4 (29-40)

排放--不像 iPhone 16 Pro 那样节流

温度

iPhone 16 Pro Max 的表面温度始终保持稳定，即使在持续负载的情况下，也仅有个别地方超过 40 度大关。

我们在 3DMark 压力测试中发现了性能下降。不过，Max 机型似乎得益于其较大的表面积，并没有像较小的 iPhone 16 Pro.尽管如此，它的性能依然很高，但游戏专家如 ROG Phone 8 Pro等游戏专家提供了更有效的散热，因此帧数明显更高。

Max. Load
 37 °C38.1 °C35.9 °C 
 38.4 °C39.7 °C34.9 °C 
 37.7 °C40.1 °C34 °C 
Maximum: 40.1 °C
Average: 37.3 °C
35.9 °C38.1 °C38.9 °C
36.7 °C42 °C41 °C
33.3 °C41.6 °C40.9 °C
Maximum: 42 °C
Average: 38.7 °C
Power Supply (max.)  26.5 °C | Room Temperature 21.4 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 37.3 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 40.1 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 42 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.3 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

3DMark Stress Tests

3DMark
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Huawei Pura 70 Ultra
Maleoon 910, Kirin 9010, 1 TB UFS 3.1 Flash
99.4 % +52%
Xiaomi 14 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
75.5 % +15%
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
72.1 % +10%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
65.5 %
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
65.4 % 0%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
56.4 % -14%
Sony Xperia 1 VI
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
51.5 % -21%
Honor Magic6 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
48.1 % -27%
Solar Bay Stress Test Stability
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
72.6 %
Xiaomi 14 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
72.1 % -1%
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
70.4 % -3%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
66.1 % -9%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
53.9 % -26%
Honor Magic6 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
47.8 % -34%
Sony Xperia 1 VI
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
41.9 % -42%
Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
76.6 % +4%
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
73.4 %
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
71.3 % -3%
Sony Xperia 1 VI
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
65.1 % -11%

3DMark Stress Tests - Onscreen

051015202530Tooltip
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 256 GB NVMe; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test: Ø20.8 (19.3-29.5)
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø21.3 (17.6-31.2)
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø29.5 (28.4-31.3)
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø26.9 (24.5-31)
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 256 GB NVMe; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability: Ø20.8 (20.2-27.7)
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.5: Ø17.6 (13.8-25.6)
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.5: Ø26.6 (24.1-28.9)
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 256 GB NVMe; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability: Ø10.9 (10.6-14.4)
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.0.0.15: Ø9.47 (9.01-11.8)

3DMark Stress Tests - Unlimited

0102030405060708090100110120Tooltip
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 256 GB NVMe; Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Stress Test Stability: Ø11 (10.4-14.9)
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 1.0.0.15: Ø10.2 (9.07-13.5)
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 256 GB NVMe; Solar Bay Unlimited Stress Test Stability: Ø21.2 (20.6-28.9)
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.5: Ø21.1 (16.3-31.3)
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.5: Ø26.7 (24.3-29.1)
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max A18 Pro GPU, A18 Pro, 256 GB NVMe; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability: Ø76.8 (70.5-109.8)
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability: Ø87.8 (72-121.8)

发言人

这两个扬声器在中等音量下听起来不错--虽然音量不够大，但这只有在音量较大时才会明显感觉到，因为此时高音过于突出。

USB-C 端口可用于有线声音输出。可使用无线蓝牙，但它仅支持几种音频编解码器，而且不支持高保真音频。Apple 也尚未提供蓝牙 LE 和 Auracast。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2033.243.82526.842.83123.643.94022.341.75027.544.66320.541.78020.747.410019.348.812515.750.816013.662.520016.26125015.56031515.160.340010.964.15009.969.163012.170.480014.171.1100014.274.7125012.975.6160014.276.1200012.780.3250012.781.1315013.581.9400013.182.8500013.184630013.484.2800012.782.51000013.480.91250013.474.61600013.166.1SPL25.492.6N0.793.6median 13.4median 74.7Delta1.18.936.246.130.739.625.643.926.742.836.743.624.644.317.64618.743.218.245.715.956.617.356.115.260.214.160.413.461.313.866.514.367.713.774.912.478.112.778.612.177.212.981.612.584.612.284.112.88413.18413.578.513.176.913.7741466.813.36425.2930.792.2median 13.5median 74.91.210.7hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseApple iPhone 16 Pro MaxSamsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (92.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17.5% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.8% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (1.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 2% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 20% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 76% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (93 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.2% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.6% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.3% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 10% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 83% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 31% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 61% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电池使用时间 - iPhone 16 Pro Max 超过 18 Wh

耗电量

与 15 Pro Max 相比，iPhone 16 Pro Max 的功耗大大降低。 15 Pro Max相比有了很大提升，尤其是在关机状态下。与竞争对手相比，它在最大手动显示亮度下的耗电量较高，但这是由于其亮度较高所致。

iPhone 可以在 4.5 至 30 瓦的功率下充电，但实际上效果并不理想。使用Apple 提供的 30 瓦电源，4,685 毫安时电池可在 30 分钟内充至 54%，一小时后达到 80%，iPhone 还需要 64 分钟才能充满剩余的 20%。总之，充电时间非常长，但同时也节省了电池电量。

7.通过 Qi 可以无线使用 5 瓦的功率，使用 Qi2 可以使用 15 瓦的功率。使用 MagSafe 充电器，功率可达 25 瓦。iPhone 可以通过 USB-C 以高达 4.5 瓦的功率为其他设备充电。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.08 / 0.16 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 0.42 / 1.55 / 1.58 Watt
Load midlight 3.41 / 11.82 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
4685 mAh		Honor Magic6 Pro
5600 mAh		Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
5000 mAh		Xiaomi 14 Ultra
5000 mAh		Huawei Pura 70 Ultra
5200 mAh		Motorola Edge 50 Ultra
4500 mAh		Sony Xperia 1 VI
5000 mAh		Average Apple A18 Pro
 		Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-60%
-92%
-29%
-6%
-30%
-20%
-14%
-36%
Idle Minimum *
0.42
0.8
-90%
0.73
-74%
0.8
-90%
0.6
-43%
0.9
-114%
0.4
5%
0.41 ?(0.4 - 0.42, n=2)
2%
0.894 ?(0.4 - 2.37, n=152, last 2 years)
-113%
Idle Average *
1.55
1.32
15%
1.22
21%
0.89
43%
1.23
21%
1.2
23%
0.81
48%
1.075 ?(0.6 - 1.55, n=2)
31%
1.456 ?(0.6 - 4.26, n=152, last 2 years)
6%
Idle Maximum *
1.58
1.37
13%
1.34
15%
0.91
42%
1.3
18%
1.4
11%
0.85
46%
1.29 ?(1 - 1.58, n=2)
18%
1.616 ?(0.83 - 4.45, n=152, last 2 years)
-2%
Load Average *
3.41
11.62
-241%
16.52
-384%
8.99
-164%
4.54
-33%
6.5
-91%
9.25
-171%
7.21 ?(3.41 - 11, n=2)
-111%
6.45 ?(2.3 - 16.5, n=147, last 2 years)
-89%
Load Maximum *
11.82
11.65
1%
16.58
-40%
9.01
24%
10.84
8%
9.2
22%
14.99
-27%
13.1 ?(11.8 - 14.4, n=2)
-11%
9.8 ?(3.53 - 20.8, n=147, last 2 years)
17%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

012345678910111213141516Tooltip
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max Apple A18 Pro; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø3.94 (0.796-12.6)
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø7.63 (0.966-16.1)
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max Apple A18 Pro; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.638 (0.615-0.789)
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.98 (0.924-1.218)

Power consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

0123456789101112131415Tooltip
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max Apple A18 Pro; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø11.3 (10.5-12.1)
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø12.1 (9.83-15.6)
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max Apple A18 Pro; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.638 (0.615-0.789)
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.98 (0.924-1.218)

运行时间

Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max 的续航时间非常出色，这也是其充电时间较长的原因。

在我们以 150 cd/m² 的调整后显示屏亮度进行的测试中，它的表现优于大多数竞争对手，只有 Magic6 Pro在某些情况下运行时间明显更长。

在适度使用的情况下，你可以期待长达三天的时间无需充电。不过，如果你经常使用相机，最迟两天后就得插上电源。

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
70h 26min
WiFi Websurfing (Safari Mobile 18.0.1)
20h 49min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
33h 10min
Load (maximum brightness)
5h 57min
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
4685 mAh		Honor Magic6 Pro
5600 mAh		Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
5000 mAh		Xiaomi 14 Ultra
5000 mAh		Huawei Pura 70 Ultra
5200 mAh		Motorola Edge 50 Ultra
4500 mAh		Sony Xperia 1 VI
5000 mAh		Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
4422 mAh
Battery Runtime
-7%
-25%
-51%
-17%
-38%
-3%
-4%
Reader / Idle
4226
3519
-17%
2227
-47%
1983
-53%
3229
-24%
2006
-53%
5143
22%
3514
-17%
H.264
1990
2027
2%
1922
-3%
1055
-47%
1648
-17%
1086
-45%
1850
-7%
2013
1%
WiFi v1.3
1249
1548
24%
1148
-8%
751
-40%
1152
-8%
953
-24%
1267
1%
1163
-7%
Load
357
223
-38%
202
-43%
131
-63%
297
-17%
249
-30%
253
-29%
384
8%

Pros

+ 卓越性能
+ 电池续航时间长
+ 出色的三摄像头
+ 精确明亮的 120 Hz 显示屏
+ 宽频支持

Cons

- 无 320 MHz 的 Wi-Fi 7
- SoC 在负载情况下会出现节流
- 蓝牙音频编解码器数量少
- 保修期仅为 12 个月

结论 - 标准再次提高

Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max 评测
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max 评测

Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max 的整体性能不错。虽然与去年的机型相比，它仅有一些微小的改进，但如果你使用的是 iPhone 13 Pro或旧机型的用户来说，它的飞跃还是很大的。这款智能手机拥有亮丽的显示屏、出色的性能和多功能的摄像头设置。

Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max 显然不便宜，但它是一款真正的强机。

从硬件的角度来看，Apple ，它做了很多正确的事情，唯独缺少 320-MHz 频段的 Wi-Fi 7 有点令人困惑。我们还希望蓝牙至少有一个高分辨率编解码器。

它的充电速度不是特别快，但这是因为Apple 把重点放在了储能单元的使用寿命上。即便如此，我们还是可以做得更多一些。

为什么新的Apple 智能功能没有直接在欧洲发布，这仍然是个问题。到那时，三星的Galaxy AI 已经上市一年多了。

在Apple 的世界里，iPhone 16 Pro Max 是衡量一切的标准；如果你喜欢更小的智能手机，那么 iPhone 16 Pro可能是一个可行的选择。如果你想立即使用人工智能功能，那么你应该看看 Galaxy S24 Ultra或 Magic6 Pro后者也有很多优点。

Download your licensed rating image as SVG / PNG

价格和供应情况

您可以直接从以下网站购买新款Apple iPhone 16 Pro MaxApple以及包括亚马逊在内的大多数主要在线零售商处购买。

请注意：我们更新了评级系统，第 8 版的结果与第 7 版的结果不可比。更多信息 请点击此处.

Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max - 10/24/2024 v8
Daniel Schmidt

Chassis
92%
Keyboard
67 / 75 → 89%
Pointing Device
97%
Connectivity
66 / 69 → 95%
Weight
88%
Battery
92%
Display
91%
Games Performance
39 / 55 → 71%
Application Performance
87 / 85 → 100%
AI Performance
95%
Temperature
90%
Noise
100%
Audio
81 / 90 → 90%
Camera
87%
Average
83%
89%
Smartphone - Weighted Average
CO2 Emissions
86.6%
Materials
50%
Packaging
95%
Power Use
97%
Repairability
71%
Software Updates
83.5%
Recycle Logo Total Sustainability Score: 80.5%

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was freely purchased by the author at his/her own expense. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max 评测--顶级智能手机的众多微小改进
Daniel Schmidt, 2024-10-14 (Update: 2024-10-14)