Notebookcheck Logo

三星Galaxy Tab S9 FE+ (Plus) 评测--配备 S Pen 和明亮显示屏的 XXL 防水平板电脑

最好的中端平板电脑？

IP 认证和扩展升级使Galaxy Tab S9 FE Plus 在中高端平板电脑中脱颖而出。大显示屏和可选的 5G 支持也是它的一大特色。在测试报告中了解三星在 Tab S9 FE+ 上节省了多少成本。
5G Android Tablet
三星Galaxy Tab S9 FE+ (Plus) 评测

经过两年的等待，三星发布了继 Galaxy Tab S7 FE推出了新的 Galaxy Tab S9 FE+.与Galaxy Tab S9 Plus 相比，这款 "粉丝版 "依然是更实惠的选择，它放弃了 AMOLED 显示屏，选择了性能相对较弱的 Exynos 1380而不是 高通骁龙 8 代 2的高通骁龙 8 代 2 处理器。12.4 英寸 TFT 面板现在拥有更快的 90 Hz 刷新率，可选的 5G 版本支持 eSIM 功能。

后者 128 GB 内存和 8 GB RAM 的零售价约为 549 美元。顶级版本（12 GB、256 GB）的售价约为 649 美元。

Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE Plus (Galaxy Tab S9 FE Series)
Processor
Samsung Exynos 1380 8 x 2 - 2.4 GHz, ARM Cortex-A55 / A78
Graphics adapter
ARM Mali-G68 MP5
Memory
8 GB 
Display
12.40 inch 16:10, 2560 x 1600 pixel 243 PPI, capacitive Touchscreen , native pen support, TFT LCD, HDR10, HGL, glossy: yes, HDR, 90 Hz
Storage
128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash, 128 GB 
, 105 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: USB-C, Card Reader: microSD (up to 1TB, exFAT-Support), 1 Fingerprint Reader, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: hall sensor, acceleration sensor, OTG, Miracast
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.3, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 6.5 x 285.4 x 185.4
Battery
10090 mAh Lithium-Ion
Operating System
Android 13
Camera
Primary Camera: 8 MPix (f/1.9) + 8 MPix (f/2.2, wide angle), camera2 API: Limited
Secondary Camera: 12 MPix (f/2.4)
Additional features
Speakers: Stereo, Keyboard: Onscreen, USB cable, sPen, info material, One UI 5.1, 24 Months Warranty, widevine L1, GNSS: GPS, Glonass, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS (5G-Version), fanless, waterproof
Weight
627 g
Price
649 Euro
Links
Samsung notebook section
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Price
87 %
v7 (old)
11 / 2023
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE Plus
Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5		627 g6.5 mm12.40"2560x1600
85.8 %
v7 (old)
03 / 2023
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G
SD 750G 5G, Adreno 619		608 g6.3 mm12.40"2560x1600
91.3 %
v7 (old)
10 / 2023
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+
SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740		586 g5.7 mm12.40"2800x1752
83.3 %
v7 (old)
09 / 2023
Amazon Fire Max 11
MT8188J, Mali-G57 MP2		490 g7.5 mm11.00"2000x1200
85.2 %
v7 (old)
09 / 2023
Lenovo Tab P12
Dimensity 7050, Mali-G68 MP4		615 g6.9 mm12.70"2944x1840

保护套 -Galaxy Tab S9 FE+，IP 防护等级

Galaxy Tab S9 FE Plus 的颜色选择
Galaxy Tab S9 FE Plus 的颜色选择

Galaxy Tab S9 FE+ 外观几乎与 Galaxy Tab S9+而价格更低的三星设备甚至获得了 IP68 认证，这在同价位产品中并不多见。Galaxy Tab S9 FE+ 则重 627 克。

FE 版的制造质量非常出色，与Galaxy Tab S 系列不相上下。金属外壳由铝合金制成，有四种颜色可供选择，散发出高品质的气息。

三星Galaxy Tab S9 FE+ (Plus) 评测
三星Galaxy Tab S9 FE+ (Plus) 评测
三星Galaxy Tab S9 FE+ (Plus) 评测
三星Galaxy Tab S9 FE+ (Plus) 评测
三星Galaxy Tab S9 FE+ (Plus) 评测
三星Galaxy Tab S9 FE+ (Plus) 评测
三星Galaxy Tab S9 FE+ (Plus) 评测
三星Galaxy Tab S9 FE+ (Plus) 评测

尺寸比较

❌
293.37 mm 190.76 mm 6.9 mm 615 g285.4 mm 185.4 mm 6.5 mm 627 g284.8 mm 185 mm 6.3 mm 608 g285.4 mm 185.4 mm 5.7 mm 586 g259.1 mm 163.7 mm 7.5 mm 490 g297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g

连接性 - 带 USB 2.0 接口的三星平板电脑

在我们的测试样品中，128 GB UFS 3.1 内存的容量为 105 GB，包括操作系统和一些预装的应用程序。内置 USB 2.0 端口支持通过 USB OTG 连接存储介质。与Galaxy Tab 9+ 相比，数据传输速度明显较慢，而且该端口不能用于向外部显示器传输图像信号。M.2 SSD 硬盘只能与外部电源一起使用。Galaxy 平板电脑支持 exFAT 文件系统（读/写）和 NTFS（读），后者是微软系统的首选。

Galaxy Tab S9 FE+ 的其他功能包括兼容的 S Pen、立体声扬声器和蓝牙 5.3。无线传输通过 Miracast 实现。

microSD 读卡器

Tab S9 FE+ 5G 版的卡槽一侧可容纳 microSD 卡，另一侧可容纳 nano-SIM 卡。由于支持 exFAT 文件系统，因此还可以存储较大的数据内容。结合我们的参考卡（AV PRO V60），三星平板电脑在跨平台磁盘测试中表现出了值得称赞的 microSD 性能，复制速度也达到了很好的水平。

SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE Plus
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
57.72 MB/s
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash (Angelbird V60)
51.6 MB/s -11%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G
Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
40.34 MB/s -30%
Lenovo Tab P12
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
14.28 MB/s -75%
Amazon Fire Max 11
Mali-G57 MP2, MT8188J, 64 GB eMMC Flash (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
11.83 MB/s -80%

Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)

0102030405060708090100Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE Plus Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø40.8 (26.7-53.3)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+ Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø42.5 (27.8-54.4)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE Plus Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø80 (40.6-105)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+ Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø75.7 (49.7-93.4)

软件 -Galaxy Tab S9 FE+，提供长期支持

三星在 5.1 版本中将Android 系统与其专有的 One UI 用户界面配对使用。在测试期间，Galaxy Tab S9 FE+ 的用户界面基于Android 13，具有从 2023 年 8 月开始的安全更新。三星承诺提供四次主要的Android 更新和长达五年的安全补丁--这在中高端平板电脑中实属罕见。

三星Galaxy Tab S9 FE+ (Plus) 评测
三星Galaxy Tab S9 FE+ (Plus) 评测
三星Galaxy Tab S9 FE+ (Plus) 评测
三星Galaxy Tab S9 FE+ (Plus) 评测

通信和全球导航卫星系统 - 配备 WiFi 6 的三星平板电脑

三星平板电脑连接到家庭 Wi-Fi 网络时支持标准 Wi-Fi 6。当与我们的参考路由器华硕 ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000 结合使用时，其典型传输速度超过 800 MBit/s。选择Galaxy Tab S9 FE+ 的 5G 选件可享受额外的优惠，如接入多个频段的移动互联网和 eSIM 功能。它还配备了用于跟踪的 GNSS 模块。在测试过程中，我们的 WiFi 版本无法连接到卫星网络，尽管事实上它应该配备用于定位的 GNSS 模块（根据该公司的说法）。

Networking
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE Plus
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000
859 (min: 837) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
860 (min: 811) MBit/s ∼93%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G
Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
iperf3 transmit AX12
630 (min: 597) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AX12
655 (min: 601) MBit/s ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1518 (min: 1344) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1006 (min: 859) MBit/s ∼100%
Amazon Fire Max 11
Mali-G57 MP2, MT8188J, 64 GB eMMC Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000
391 (min: 385) MBit/s ∼46%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
499 (min: 483) MBit/s ∼54%
Lenovo Tab P12
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000
814 (min: 759) MBit/s ∼95%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
928 (min: 909) MBit/s ∼100%
050100150200250300350400450500550600650700750800850900Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE Plus Samsung Exynos 1380, ARM Mali-G68 MP5; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø858 (837-879)
Lenovo Tab P12 MediaTek Dimensity 7050, ARM Mali-G68 MP4; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø812 (759-840)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE Plus Samsung Exynos 1380, ARM Mali-G68 MP5; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø860 (811-921)
Lenovo Tab P12 MediaTek Dimensity 7050, ARM Mali-G68 MP4; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø928 (909-950)

摄像头 -Galaxy 配备双摄像头的 Tab S9 FE+

Galaxy Tab S9 FE+ 自拍
Galaxy Tab S9 FE+ 自拍
Galaxy Tab S9 FE+ 肖像模式
Galaxy Tab S9 FE+ 肖像模式

嵌入显示屏上方边框的 1200 万像素摄像头采用 f/2.4 光圈，在光线充足的条件下也能提供不错的效果。有趣的是，前置镜头可以录制 UHD 画质的视频，而背面的主摄像头最大只能录制 FHD 画质的视频。

后置双摄像头解决方案的分辨率均为 800 万像素，非常适合捕捉文档图像，但在拍摄更复杂的照片时就显得力不从心了。虽然在图像处理中采用了 HDR 技术，但广角和超广角照片的动态范围还有待大幅提高，细节不够丰富。不过，我们对色彩还原的分析并没有发现任何值得批评的地方，而且内置自动对焦功能也很可靠，这在这个价位的平板电脑中并不多见。

超广角
超广角
广角
广角
2 倍变焦
2 倍变焦
4 倍变焦（最大值）
4 倍变焦（最大值）
三星Galaxy Tab S9 FE+（Plus）评测
三星Galaxy Tab S9 FE+ (Plus) 评测
三星Galaxy Tab S9 FE+ (Plus) 评测
三星Galaxy Tab S9 FE+ (Plus) 评测

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

WeitwinkelWeitwinkelLow LightUltraweitwinkelZoom 5x
ColorChecker
4.6 ∆E
5.9 ∆E
5.4 ∆E
12.9 ∆E
4.4 ∆E
7.3 ∆E
4.9 ∆E
4.4 ∆E
11 ∆E
1.7 ∆E
9.1 ∆E
5.1 ∆E
3.3 ∆E
12.7 ∆E
10.1 ∆E
4 ∆E
3 ∆E
8.1 ∆E
5.3 ∆E
2.7 ∆E
4.6 ∆E
3.5 ∆E
3.4 ∆E
5.3 ∆E
ColorChecker Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE Plus: 5.94 ∆E min: 1.65 - max: 12.94 ∆E
ColorChecker
29.9 ∆E
54.8 ∆E
40.1 ∆E
36.8 ∆E
45.6 ∆E
62.4 ∆E
53.7 ∆E
36.1 ∆E
43.4 ∆E
28.4 ∆E
65.7 ∆E
64.3 ∆E
31.4 ∆E
49 ∆E
37.6 ∆E
76.7 ∆E
43.6 ∆E
44.5 ∆E
92.9 ∆E
71.4 ∆E
52.5 ∆E
37.5 ∆E
24.5 ∆E
14 ∆E
ColorChecker Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE Plus: 47.37 ∆E min: 14.02 - max: 92.93 ∆E

配件和保修 - SamsungGalaxy Tab S9 FE+ 不含电源适配器

三星Galaxy Tab S9 FE+ 薄型书本封面键盘
三星Galaxy Tab S9 FE+ 薄型书本封面键盘

在拆开包装时，薄薄的包装盒表明三星Galaxy Tab S9 FE+ 不包括电源适配器。除了 USB 数据线和 S Pen 外，送货包装盒中只有一些信息资料。三星为其中档平板电脑提供了可选配件，包括 Book Cover Keyboard Slim 或 S Pen Creator Edition。

三星为其平板电脑提供 12 个月的保修服务。

输入设备和操作 - 配备 S Pen 的三星平板电脑

手指在 12.4 英寸 TFT 面板上的输入非常迅速。与前代产品相比，帧频提高到了 90 Hz。 相比因此，动画效果非常流畅。但值得注意的是，该机没有安装振动电机。

Tab S9 FE+ 附带的 S Pen 让手写笔记变得轻而易举。虽然三星没有说明 "普通 "S Pen 或兼容的 S Pen Creator Edition 的延迟时间，但我们的体验显示延迟时间极短。一个实用的功能是，Tab S9 FE+ 的三星手写笔不需要充电。不过，Galaxy Tab S9+ 的某些功能（如手势控制）无法使用。

由于指纹识别器位于 12.4 英寸平板电脑的上边框，因此与开关机按钮集成在一起的指纹识别器并不是最方便的。尽管如此，它在日常使用中仍有不错的识别率。通过人脸识别进行生物识别时，可通过前置摄像头实现解锁功能。遗憾的是，它只支持一个用户配置文件。

三星Galaxy Tab S9 FE+ (Plus) 评测
三星Galaxy Tab S9 FE+ (Plus) 评测

显示屏 -Galaxy Tab，带 TFT 显示屏

子像素阵列的表示（RGB 矩阵）
子像素阵列的表示（RGB 矩阵）

Galaxy Tab S9 FE+ 的 TFT 面板拥有 1600p 分辨率，像素密度达到 243 ppi，刷新率高达 90 Hz。在我们的亮度测量中，这款三星平板电脑的最高亮度达到了 790 cd/m²，对于这个价位的产品来说非常具有吸引力。令人惊讶的是，我们的 APL18 测量值最高为 691 cd/m²，表明亮度低于全白显示屏。

从Galaxy Tab S9 换成 FE 型 OLED 显示屏后，对 PWM 比较敏感的用户将继续在Galaxy Tab S Cosmos 上找到他们想要的东西，因为在 Tab S9 FE+ 上测不到低频屏幕闪烁。

771
cd/m²		790
cd/m²		762
cd/m²
740
cd/m²		789
cd/m²		727
cd/m²
763
cd/m²		769
cd/m²		749
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 790 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 762.2 cd/m² Minimum: 7.14 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 92 %
Center on Battery: 789 cd/m²
Contrast: 1096:1 (Black: 0.72 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.3 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 2.8 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
97.6% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.31
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE Plus
TFT LCD, HDR10, HGL, 2560x1600, 12.4"		Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G
LCD IPS, 2560x1600, 12.4"		Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+
AMOLED, 2800x1752, 12.4"		Amazon Fire Max 11
TFT LCD, 2000x1200, 11"		Lenovo Tab P12
LTPS, 2944x1840, 12.7"
Screen
9%
-10%
-27%
-4%
Brightness middle
789
619
-22%
574
-27%
564
-29%
435
-45%
Brightness
762
593
-22%
551
-28%
509
-33%
407
-47%
Brightness Distribution
92
91
-1%
89
-3%
86
-7%
89
-3%
Black Level *
0.72
0.22
69%
0.4
44%
0.58
19%
Contrast
1096
2814
157%
1410
29%
750
-32%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
2.3
2.6
-13%
2.01
13%
4
-74%
1.5
35%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
4.2
6.6
-57%
4.93
-17%
7.1
-69%
3.2
24%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
2.8
4
-43%
2.8
-0%
5
-79%
2.4
14%
Gamma
2.31 95%
2.17 101%
2.066 106%
2.07 106%
2.2 100%
CCT
6722 97%
6973 93%
6566 99%
1168 557%
6546 99%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 61100 Hz ≤ 14 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 61100 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 14 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 61100 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8746 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

最小显示亮度
分钟
25 % 显示屏亮度
25 %
显示屏亮度为 50
50 %
75 % 显示亮度
75 %
最大手动显示亮度
100 %

具有固定缩放级别和不同亮度设置的测量系列

我们使用 CalMAN 分析软件对 TFT 面板的色彩校准进行了评估。我们测得的 sRGB 色彩空间 DeltaE 值在目标范围内（<3），与参考色彩的差异几乎不明显。0.72 cd/m² 的黑色值只能产生约 1,000:1 的适度对比度，这在上一版本中得到了更好的解决。

色彩精确度（目标色彩空间：sRGB；配置文件：自然色）
色彩精确度（目标色彩空间：sRGB；配置文件：自然色）
色彩精确度（目标色彩空间：sRGB；配置文件：自然色）
色彩精确度（目标色彩空间：sRGB；配置文件：自然色）
灰度（目标色彩空间：sRGB；配置文件：自然色）
灰度（目标色彩空间：sRGB；配置文件：自然色）
色彩饱和度（目标色彩空间：sRGB；配置文件：自然色）
色彩饱和度（目标色彩空间：sRGB；配置文件：自然色）

Display Response Times

ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
   ↔    Response Time Black to White
20.43 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 5.501 ms rise
↘ 14.93 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 42 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
   ↔    Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
35.94 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 9.339 ms rise
↘ 26.6 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 46 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Tab S9 FE+ 在冬季室外依然清晰易读。在盛夏，大猩猩玻璃 3 表面的反光可能会让人感到困扰。如果您打算在户外使用这块 12.4 英寸的屏幕，几乎没有必要通过手动控制来牺牲亮度，因为在此设置下最高亮度也可达 661 cd/m²。

TFT 面板的视角稳定性值得称赞，在正常观看时也能始终保持色彩逼真度。

三星Galaxy Tab S9 FE+ (Plus) 评测
三星Galaxy Tab S9 FE+ (Plus) 评测
三星Galaxy Tab S9 FE+ (Plus) 评测
三星Galaxy Tab S9 FE+ (Plus) 评测

性能 - 配备自制 SoC 的三星平板电脑

在正常使用过程中，Tab S9 FE+ 表现出轻微的延迟和卡顿，让人难以放心操作。虽然它比前一代 前代产品在我们的基准软件包中，内置的 Exynos 1380的性能并不强劲，明显落后于速度更快的Galaxy Tab S9+。

内置 Mali-G68 MP5在图形处理方面表现不佳。 联想 Tab P12配备了 Mali-G68 MP4总的来说，Tab S9 FE+ 并不适合高帧率（HFR）游戏，正如我们对 Galaxy A54 5G像素密度较低。应用程序加载时间适中，但 UFS 2.1 内存对小数据块的写入率可以更高一些。

Geekbench 5.5 | Geekbench 6.3 | Antutu v9 | PCMark for Android | CrossMark | BaseMark OS II | AImark | UL Procyon AI Inference for Android
Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+
1566 Points +103%
Average Samsung Exynos 1380 (771 - 788, n=5)
781 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE Plus
771 Points
Lenovo Tab P12
738 Points -4%
Average of class Tablet (140 - 1887, n=71, last 2 years)
707 Points -8%
Amazon Fire Max 11
702 Points -9%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G
656 Points -15%
Multi-Core
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+
5198 Points +91%
Average Samsung Exynos 1380 (2719 - 2817, n=5)
2761 Points +2%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE Plus
2719 Points
Average of class Tablet (312 - 8624, n=71, last 2 years)
2496 Points -8%
Amazon Fire Max 11
2070 Points -24%
Lenovo Tab P12
1973 Points -27%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G
1885 Points -31%
Geekbench 6.3
Single-Core
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+
2107 Points +106%
Average of class Tablet (185 - 3715, n=68, last 2 years)
1093 Points +7%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE Plus
1023 Points
Average Samsung Exynos 1380 (1011 - 1023, n=4)
1016 Points -1%
Lenovo Tab P12
958 Points -6%
Amazon Fire Max 11
949 Points -7%
Multi-Core
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+
5652 Points +95%
Average of class Tablet (493 - 14690, n=68, last 2 years)
3518 Points +21%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE Plus
2899 Points
Average Samsung Exynos 1380 (2858 - 2906, n=4)
2882 Points -1%
Lenovo Tab P12
2422 Points -16%
Amazon Fire Max 11
2363 Points -18%
Antutu v9 - Total Score
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+
1255800 Points
Average Samsung Exynos 1380 (505141 - 518476, n=4)
510383 Points
Average of class Tablet (92766 - 1286774, n=49, last 2 years)
464403 Points
Lenovo Tab P12
442871 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G
356422 Points
Amazon Fire Max 11
311846 Points
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+
17267 Points +48%
Average Samsung Exynos 1380 (11259 - 13488, n=5)
12568 Points +8%
Lenovo Tab P12
12131 Points +4%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE Plus
11637 Points
Average of class Tablet (3195 - 20841, n=73, last 2 years)
9812 Points -16%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G
8897 Points -24%
Amazon Fire Max 11
7249 Points -38%
CrossMark - Overall
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+
1277 Points +92%
Average of class Tablet (172 - 1944, n=63, last 2 years)
772 Points +16%
Lenovo Tab P12
682 Points +3%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE Plus
665 Points
Average Samsung Exynos 1380 (637 - 703, n=5)
665 Points 0%
Amazon Fire Max 11
587 Points -12%
BaseMark OS II
Overall
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+
8886 Points +99%
Average Samsung Exynos 1380 (4416 - 4666, n=5)
4501 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE Plus
4473 Points
Average of class Tablet (444 - 11721, n=59, last 2 years)
4210 Points -6%
Lenovo Tab P12
4158 Points -7%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G
3608 Points -19%
Amazon Fire Max 11
3263 Points -27%
System
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+
13730 Points +54%
Average Samsung Exynos 1380 (8843 - 9016, n=5)
8932 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE Plus
8900 Points
Average of class Tablet (1103 - 16435, n=59, last 2 years)
7279 Points -18%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G
7162 Points -20%
Amazon Fire Max 11
6786 Points -24%
Lenovo Tab P12
6610 Points -26%
Memory
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+
8890 Points +90%
Amazon Fire Max 11
6055 Points +30%
Lenovo Tab P12
5807 Points +24%
Average of class Tablet (916 - 10977, n=59, last 2 years)
4874 Points +4%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE Plus
4673 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G
4637 Points -1%
Average Samsung Exynos 1380 (4301 - 4857, n=5)
4607 Points -1%
Graphics
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+
31688 Points +345%
Average of class Tablet (580 - 57192, n=59, last 2 years)
9171 Points +29%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE Plus
7126 Points
Average Samsung Exynos 1380 (7031 - 7126, n=5)
7072 Points -1%
Lenovo Tab P12
4975 Points -30%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G
4022 Points -44%
Amazon Fire Max 11
2501 Points -65%
Web
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+
1612 Points +21%
Lenovo Tab P12
1566 Points +17%
Average Samsung Exynos 1380 (1334 - 1533, n=5)
1409 Points +6%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE Plus
1334 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G
1283 Points -4%
Average of class Tablet (10 - 2051, n=59, last 2 years)
1269 Points -5%
Amazon Fire Max 11
1103 Points -17%
AImark - Score v3.x
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+
156427 Points +24077%
Average of class Tablet (84 - 156427, n=51, last 2 years)
7152 Points +1005%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE Plus
647 Points
Average Samsung Exynos 1380 (545 - 647, n=5)
605 Points -6%
Lenovo Tab P12
456 Points -30%
Amazon Fire Max 11
Points -100%
UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Amazon Fire Max 11
17202 Points +180%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+
16134 Points +162%
Average of class Tablet (1662 - 74821, n=57, last 2 years)
11329 Points +84%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G
8436 Points +37%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE Plus
6152 Points
Average Samsung Exynos 1380 (5835 - 6152, n=5)
6012 Points -2%
Lenovo Tab P12
5315 Points -14%

Legend

 
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE Plus Samsung Exynos 1380, ARM Mali-G68 MP5, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Qualcomm Adreno 619, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+ Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Qualcomm Adreno 740, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
 
Amazon Fire Max 11 MediaTek MT8188J, ARM Mali-G57 MP2, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Lenovo Tab P12 MediaTek Dimensity 7050, ARM Mali-G68 MP4, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
 
Average Samsung Exynos 1380
 
Average of class Tablet
3DMark: Wild Life Extreme Unlimited | Wild Life Extreme | Wild Life Unlimited Score | Wild Life Score | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7: T-Rex Onscreen | 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
GFXBench 3.0: on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
GFXBench 3.1: on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
GFXBench: on screen Car Chase Onscreen | 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | 3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3684 Points +339%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE Plus
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
839 Points
Lenovo Tab P12
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
611 Points -27%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G
Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
334 Points -60%
Amazon Fire Max 11
Mali-G57 MP2, MT8188J, 64 GB eMMC Flash
310 Points -63%
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3710 Points +339%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE Plus
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
845 Points
Lenovo Tab P12
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
623 Points -26%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G
Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
330 Points -61%
Amazon Fire Max 11
Mali-G57 MP2, MT8188J, 64 GB eMMC Flash
320 Points -62%
3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE Plus
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2955 Points
Lenovo Tab P12
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2237 Points -24%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G
Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
1099 Points -63%
Amazon Fire Max 11
Mali-G57 MP2, MT8188J, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1078 Points -64%
3DMark / Wild Life Score
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE Plus
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2983 Points
Lenovo Tab P12
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2156 Points -28%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G
Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
1101 Points -63%
Amazon Fire Max 11
Mali-G57 MP2, MT8188J, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1101 Points -63%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE Plus
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
5002 Points
Lenovo Tab P12
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
4307 Points -14%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G
Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2938 Points -41%
Amazon Fire Max 11
Mali-G57 MP2, MT8188J, 64 GB eMMC Flash
2525 Points -50%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE Plus
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
5323 Points
Lenovo Tab P12
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
4301 Points -19%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G
Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2738 Points -49%
Amazon Fire Max 11
Mali-G57 MP2, MT8188J, 64 GB eMMC Flash
2310 Points -57%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE Plus
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
4375 Points
Lenovo Tab P12
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
4307 Points -2%
Amazon Fire Max 11
Mali-G57 MP2, MT8188J, 64 GB eMMC Flash
3747 Points -14%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G
Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
3523 Points -19%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps +56%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE Plus
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
77 fps
Amazon Fire Max 11
Mali-G57 MP2, MT8188J, 64 GB eMMC Flash
63 fps -18%
Lenovo Tab P12
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
50 fps -35%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G
Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
44 fps -43%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
493 fps +314%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE Plus
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
119 fps
Lenovo Tab P12
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
100 fps -16%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G
Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
55 fps -54%
Amazon Fire Max 11
Mali-G57 MP2, MT8188J, 64 GB eMMC Flash
54 fps -55%
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
119 fps +138%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE Plus
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
50 fps
Amazon Fire Max 11
Mali-G57 MP2, MT8188J, 64 GB eMMC Flash
37 fps -26%
Lenovo Tab P12
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
28 fps -44%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G
Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
25 fps -50%
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
321 fps +306%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE Plus
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
79 fps
Lenovo Tab P12
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
64 fps -19%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G
Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
43 fps -46%
Amazon Fire Max 11
Mali-G57 MP2, MT8188J, 64 GB eMMC Flash
34 fps -57%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
105 fps +262%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE Plus
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
29 fps
Amazon Fire Max 11
Mali-G57 MP2, MT8188J, 64 GB eMMC Flash
23 fps -21%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G
Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
16 fps -45%
Lenovo Tab P12
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
16 fps -45%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
226 fps +335%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE Plus
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
52 fps
Lenovo Tab P12
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
43 fps -17%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G
Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
32 fps -38%
Amazon Fire Max 11
Mali-G57 MP2, MT8188J, 64 GB eMMC Flash
22 fps -58%
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
64 fps +276%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE Plus
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
17 fps
Amazon Fire Max 11
Mali-G57 MP2, MT8188J, 64 GB eMMC Flash
13 fps -24%
Lenovo Tab P12
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
9.9 fps -42%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G
Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
9.8 fps -42%
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
132 fps +326%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE Plus
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
31 fps
Lenovo Tab P12
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
26 fps -16%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G
Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
18 fps -42%
Amazon Fire Max 11
Mali-G57 MP2, MT8188J, 64 GB eMMC Flash
14 fps -55%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
51 fps +292%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE Plus
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
13 fps
Amazon Fire Max 11
Mali-G57 MP2, MT8188J, 64 GB eMMC Flash
8.7 fps -33%
Lenovo Tab P12
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
7.1 fps -45%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G
Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
6.7 fps -48%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
64 fps +357%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE Plus
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
14 fps
Lenovo Tab P12
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
11 fps -21%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G
Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
7.3 fps -48%
Amazon Fire Max 11
Mali-G57 MP2, MT8188J, 64 GB eMMC Flash
5.5 fps -61%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
78 fps +290%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE Plus
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
20 fps
Amazon Fire Max 11
Mali-G57 MP2, MT8188J, 64 GB eMMC Flash
14 fps -30%
Lenovo Tab P12
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
11 fps -45%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G
Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
10 fps -50%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
159 fps +354%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE Plus
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
35 fps
Lenovo Tab P12
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
29 fps -17%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G
Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
19 fps -46%
Amazon Fire Max 11
Mali-G57 MP2, MT8188J, 64 GB eMMC Flash
15 fps -57%
GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
29 fps +383%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE Plus
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
6 fps
Lenovo Tab P12
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
4.7 fps -22%
Amazon Fire Max 11
Mali-G57 MP2, MT8188J, 64 GB eMMC Flash
2.3 fps -62%
Jetstream 2 | WebXPRT 4 | WebXPRT 3 | Speedometer 2.0 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+ (Chrome 117)
196.271 Points +88%
Average of class Tablet (19.9 - 334, n=69, last 2 years)
108.7 Points +4%
Average Samsung Exynos 1380 (94.6 - 119.6, n=5)
107.2 Points +3%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE Plus (Chrome 118)
104.234 Points
Lenovo Tab P12 (Chrome 115.0.5790.166)
75.924 Points -27%
Amazon Fire Max 11 (Chrome 116.0.5845.114)
74.31 Points -29%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G (Chrome91)
55.3 Points -47%
WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+ (Chrome 117)
187 Points +73%
Average Samsung Exynos 1380 (97 - 123, n=5)
109.6 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE Plus (Chrome 118)
108 Points
Average of class Tablet (21 - 315, n=68, last 2 years)
104.3 Points -3%
Lenovo Tab P12 (Chrome 115.0.5790.166)
78 Points -28%
Amazon Fire Max 11 (Chrome 116.0.5845.114)
75 Points -31%
WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+ (Chrome 117)
243 Points
Average of class Tablet (34 - 435, n=45, last 2 years)
149.6 Points
Average Samsung Exynos 1380 (124 - 145, n=3)
131.3 Points
Amazon Fire Max 11 (Chrome 116.0.5845.114)
122 Points
Lenovo Tab P12 (Chrome 115.0.5790.166)
99 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G (Chrome91)
83 Points
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+ (Chrome 117)
195 runs/min
Average of class Tablet (2.59 - 572, n=63, last 2 years)
115.5 runs/min
Average Samsung Exynos 1380 (70.5 - 104, n=4)
86.7 runs/min
Lenovo Tab P12 (Chrome 115.0.5790.166)
78 runs/min
Amazon Fire Max 11 (Chrome 116.0.5845.114)
65.6 runs/min
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G (Chrome91)
43.09 runs/min
Octane V2 - Total Score
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+ (Chrome 117)
64715 Points +86%
Average Samsung Exynos 1380 (33801 - 36155, n=5)
35093 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE Plus (Chrome 118)
34758 Points
Lenovo Tab P12 (Chrome 115.0.5790.166)
31245 Points -10%
Average of class Tablet (763 - 105178, n=86, last 2 years)
28653 Points -18%
Amazon Fire Max 11 (Chrome 116.0.5845.114)
24222 Points -30%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G (Chrome91)
17823 Points -49%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Average of class Tablet (319 - 34733, n=74, last 2 years)
3789 ms * -223%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G (Chrome91)
2403 ms * -105%
Amazon Fire Max 11 (Chrome 116.0.5845.114)
1831.1 ms * -56%
Lenovo Tab P12 (Chrome 115.0.5790.166)
1460.1 ms * -25%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE Plus (Chrome 118)
1172.3 ms *
Average Samsung Exynos 1380 (1099 - 1209, n=5)
1159 ms * +1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+ (Chrome 117)
635.1 ms * +46%

* ... smaller is better

Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE PlusSamsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5GSamsung Galaxy Tab S9+Amazon Fire Max 11Lenovo Tab P12Average 128 GB UFS 2.1 FlashAverage of class Tablet
AndroBench 3-5
74%
424%
-66%
136%
30%
108%
Sequential Read 256KB
537.33
861
60%
3413.8
535%
299.4
-44%
956.07
78%
760 ?(427 - 1011, n=113)
41%
1045 ?(163 - 3912, n=74, last 2 years)
94%
Sequential Write 256KB
245.73
512
108%
2528.2
929%
78.21
-68%
776.24
216%
297 ?(13.6 - 719, n=113)
21%
684 ?(78.2 - 3154, n=74, last 2 years)
178%
Random Read 4KB
228.19
192
-16%
450.3
97%
81.85
-64%
241.23
6%
152.9 ?(92.6 - 239, n=113)
-33%
189.2 ?(18.4 - 451, n=74, last 2 years)
-17%
Random Write 4KB
68.58
167.5
144%
161.3
135%
8.23
-88%
234.58
242%
131.6 ?(18.2 - 290, n=113)
92%
189.5 ?(8.23 - 555, n=74, last 2 years)
176%

排放 -Galaxy Tab S9 FE+ 保持冷静

温度

无论是在闲置模式下还是在负载状态下，三星平板电脑的外壳都没有出现明显的发热现象。此外，我们在 3DMark 压力测试中也没有发现性能下降，这表明 Exynos 芯片组能保持稳定的性能水平。

Max. Load
 39.9 °C34.3 °C29.2 °C 
 33.7 °C30.4 °C29.7 °C 
 30.9 °C30 °C28.9 °C 
Maximum: 39.9 °C
Average: 31.9 °C
30.6 °C38.3 °C40.3 °C
30.4 °C32.4 °C33.7 °C
29.2 °C31.5 °C31.2 °C
Maximum: 40.3 °C
Average: 33.1 °C
Room Temperature 21.1 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260
(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 31.9 °C / 89 F, compared to the average of 30 °C / 86 F for the devices in the class Tablet.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 39.9 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 40.3 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 33.3 °C / 92 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.7 °C / 76 F, compared to the device average of 30 °C / 86 F.

3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

01234567891011121314151617Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE Plus Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø17.7 (17.6-17.8)
Amazon Fire Max 11 Mali-G57 MP2, MT8188J, 64 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø6.6 (6.58-6.62)
Lenovo Tab P12 Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø12.9 (12.9-12.9)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE Plus Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø5.05 (5.04-5.08)
Amazon Fire Max 11 Mali-G57 MP2, MT8188J, 64 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø1.924 (1.907-1.936)
Lenovo Tab P12 Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø3.71 (3.7-3.72)
3DMark
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Lenovo Tab P12
99.4 (3.7min - 3.72max) % 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE Plus
99.2 (5.04min - 5.08max) %
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G
98.5 (332min - 337max) % -1%
Amazon Fire Max 11
98.5 (1.907min - 1.936max) % -1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+
87.4 (20.5min - 23.4max) % -12%
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Lenovo Tab P12
99.7 (12.9min - 12.9max) % +1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G
99.5 (1093min - 1099max) % +1%
Amazon Fire Max 11
99.5 (6.58min - 6.62max) % +1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE Plus
98.8 (17.6min - 17.8max) %
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+
76.9 (60.6min - 78.8max) % -22%
Solar Bay Stress Test Stability
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+
99.8 (18.2min - 18.3max) %

Legend

 
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE Plus Samsung Exynos 1380, ARM Mali-G68 MP5, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Qualcomm Adreno 619, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+ Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Qualcomm Adreno 740, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
 
Amazon Fire Max 11 MediaTek MT8188J, ARM Mali-G57 MP2, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Lenovo Tab P12 MediaTek Dimensity 7050, ARM Mali-G68 MP4, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash

发言人

Tab S9 FE+ 使用两个扬声器，最大音量超过 86 分贝。我们对三星平板电脑的测量结果显示，中音的频率曲线呈线性，但高音在粉红噪声中出现了明显的衰减。虽然声音中存在低音，但并不特别明显。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2036.938.32529.625.13123.720.14035.626.25038.638.56324.225.98018.938.110018.941.612515.74616013.961.420014.761.525015.26531512.96640011.466.250012.771.463012.268.880011.570.5100011.673.4125013.677.6160012.875.620001375.3250012.773.4315012.775.3400012.974.9500013.473.3630013.471.8800013.971.81000013.6651250013.656.31600013.753.2SPL25.185.9N0.668.2median 13.4median 70.5Delta0.75.430.934.522.326.623.221.525.420.131.128.42021.617.826.817.536.317.348.41562.115.161.916.365.413.569.313.965.613.467.713.369.511.774.81480.41475.913.375.81375.713.570.714.36513.47314.772.813.67114.165.21464.614.25813.853.925.885.80.766median 14median 67.70.75.1hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseSamsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE PlusLenovo Tab P12
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE Plus audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 13.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (12.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 16% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 79% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 10% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 88% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Lenovo Tab P12 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.6% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 22% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 74% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 13% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 84% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

能源管理 - 功耗较高的三星平板电脑

耗电量

就功耗而言，三星平板电脑在闲置期间非常经济。不过，在峰值负载条件下（使用烧毁基准）测得的 15 瓦功耗相对较高。使用合适的电源箱（PD 3.0，100 瓦），Tab S9 FE+ 的 1,080 毫安时电池可在大约 150 分钟内充满。根据制造商的说法，最大功率为 32 瓦。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.15 / 0.57 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 1.37 / 5.37 / 5.44 Watt
Load midlight 15.75 / 15.89 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE Plus
10090 mAh		Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G
10090 mAh		Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+
10090 mAh		Amazon Fire Max 11
7500 mAh		Lenovo Tab P12
10200 mAh
Power Consumption
15%
-12%
31%
-17%
Idle Minimum *
1.37
1.06
23%
3.4
-148%
1.04
24%
1.91
-39%
Idle Average *
5.37
6.25
-16%
3.6
33%
4.25
21%
7.94
-48%
Idle Maximum *
5.44
6.3
-16%
3.9
28%
4.3
21%
8.12
-49%
Load Average *
15.75
8.76
44%
11.7
26%
7.62
52%
10.68
32%
Load Maximum *
15.89
9.54
40%
15.8
1%
9.69
39%
12.69
20%

* ... smaller is better

Power Consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

0123456789101112Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE Plus Samsung Exynos 1380: Ø7.1 (2.43-12.5)
Lenovo Tab P12 MediaTek Dimensity 7050: Ø6.66 (3.76-11.1)

Power Consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

01234567Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE Plus Samsung Exynos 1380; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø6.04 (5.7-7.45)
Lenovo Tab P12 MediaTek Dimensity 7050; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø5.8 (5.4-6.3)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE Plus Samsung Exynos 1380; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø2.42 (2.35-2.81)
Lenovo Tab P12 MediaTek Dimensity 7050; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø3.85 (3.8-4.02)

电池寿命

Galaxy 平板电脑在实际 Wi-Fi 测试中的运行时间非常令人满意，显示屏亮度调整为 150 cd/m²。在 Tab S9 FE+ 停止工作之前，我们已经使用了大约 16 个小时。

Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing (Chrome 118)
15h 47min
Battery Runtime - WiFi v1.3 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE Plus
10090 mAh
947 min
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G
10090 mAh
1020 min
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+
10090 mAh
584 min
Amazon Fire Max 11
7500 mAh
988 min
Lenovo Tab P12
10200 mAh
675 min

Pros

+ 长期更新
+ 高品质防水外壳
+ 可选的 5G 和 eSIM 支持
+ 无 PWM 的明亮 IPS 面板
+ 无节流
+ 附带 S Pen

Cons

- 慢速 SoC
- USB 2.0
- 无电源
- 高黑电平

三星Galaxy Tab S9 FE+ 的评价

三星Galaxy Tab S9 FE+ 评测。由德国三星公司提供。
三星Galaxy Tab S9 FE+ 评测。由德国三星公司提供。

Galaxy Tab S9 FE+ 定位中高端，凭借 IP 认证、出色的 S Pen 以及长期更新的保证，不可否认在平板电脑领域占有一席之地。然而，用户是否还能享受到 12.4 英寸 Tab S9 FE+ 集成的 Exynos 1380的 12.4 英寸 Tab S9 FE+，至少在 2028 年软件支持结束时，用户是否还能享受到它的乐趣还是个问题。毕竟，这款性能相对较弱的自家芯片组并不是三星平板电脑阵营中的旗舰产品，即使是中端竞争产品，如联想 Tab P12，性能也并不明显更强。

三星在许多方面增强了其 FE 机型，并通过消除 PWM 闪烁，为 OLED 竞争对手提供了一种替代方案。

有了 Tab S9 FE+，大型平板电脑爱好者将获得一款具有整体竞争力的设备。对于那些不怕进口的人来说，小米小米 Pad 6 Max是一个引人入胜的选择，它采用了 骁龙 8+ 1 代和 14 英寸显示屏，售价约为 600 美元。

价格和供应情况

三星Galaxy Tab S9 FE+ 在亚马逊的售价约为 649 美元。

Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE Plus - 11/22/2023 v7 (old)
Marcus Herbrich

Chassis
89 / 98 → 91%
Keyboard
70 / 80 → 88%
Pointing Device
91%
Connectivity
42 / 70 → 60%
Weight
81 / 40-88 → 86%
Battery
91%
Display
87%
Games Performance
51 / 78 → 65%
Application Performance
78 / 92 → 85%
Temperature
93%
Noise
100%
Audio
89 / 91 → 98%
Camera
52 / 85 → 61%
Average
78%
87%
Tablet - Weighted Average

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 三星Galaxy Tab S9 FE+ (Plus) 评测--配备 S Pen 和明亮显示屏的 XXL 防水平板电脑
Marcus Herbrich, 2023-11-23 (Update: 2023-11-23)