小米 Pad 6 Max 14 平板电脑评测 - 价格仅为三星Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra 的一半的替代品
大型平板电脑的粉丝们正在寻找一种廉价的平板电脑替代品。三星Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra或联想 Tab Extreme的平板电脑爱好者将大饱眼福。Pad 6 Max 是小米迄今为止最大的平板电脑，配备 14 英寸 IPS 显示屏，刷新率高达 120Hz。
这款小米平板电脑配备高通骁龙 8+ 第一代处理器。最高可配备 16 GB 内存和 1 TB UFS 3.1 存储空间。小米 Pad 6 Max 的基本版本配备 8 GB DDR5x 内存和 256 GB 闪存，进口售价约为 670 美元。这款 XXL 平板电脑不太可能在全球上市。
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 89.1 % v7 (old) | 09 / 2023 | Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14 SD 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730 | 750 g | 6.53 mm | 14.00" | 2880x1800 | |
| 90.6 % v7 (old) | 09 / 2023 | Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740 | 732 g | 5.5 mm | 14.60" | 2960x1848 | |
| 88.8 % v7 (old) | 08 / 2023 | Lenovo Tab Extreme Dimensity 9000, Mali-G710 MP10 | 740 g | 7.2 mm | 14.50" | 3000x1876 | |
| 91.8 % v7 (old) | 11 / 2022 | Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 M2, M2 10-Core GPU | 682 g | 6.4 mm | 12.90" | 2732x2048 |
案例 - 采用大猩猩玻璃的小米平板电脑
与 Pad 6 相比，小米并未对该设备的设计进行任何大的改动。Pad 6.由于采用了一体式机身设计，Max 版平板电脑给人一种高品质的感觉，尽管它的厚度略高于Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra.Pad 6 Max 厚度为 6.53 毫米，重 750 克，没有官方 IP 认证。
正面全部采用康宁大猩猩 5 号玻璃，与金属边框平滑过渡。14 英寸 IPS 显示屏侧面的边框大小适中，这也体现在该设备 87% 的良好显示屏尺寸比上。
连接性 - 小米 Pad 6 Max 配备 USB 3.2
小米平板 6 Max 可以使用快速 USB 3.2 连接（第一代）。在适配器的帮助下，您还可以使用该端口将图片输出到外部屏幕。在我们使用已连接的 M.2 固态硬盘（三星 980 Pro）进行的复制测试中，USB 连接的传输速率达到了 292 MB/s。Pad 6 Max 支持 exFAT 和 NTFS 数据系统，后者是微软系统的首选。
小米平板电脑的存储空间无法扩展，因此在选择存储空间大小时应注意这一点。不过，如果使用平板电脑底部的 USB Type-C 接口，可以通过 U 盘读取数据。例如，这可以用来播放视频。
软件 - 配备Android 13 的小米平板电脑
Pad 6 Max 的操作系统基于谷歌的Android （13 版），在测试时，最新的安全补丁已经更新（2023 年 9 月）。制造商在上面运行自己的 MIUI for Pad（版本 14）。目前尚不清楚这款中国独有的小米平板电脑将在多长时间内提供安全更新和Android 版本。
由于 Pad 6 Max 专为中国市场打造，因此软件不支持任何谷歌服务，系统语言也只能选择中文和英文。不过，在购买该设备后，你可以安装包括 PlayStore 在内的所有谷歌应用程序。
通信 - 小米 Pad 6 Max 配备 WiFi 6
当连接到家庭 WLAN 时，小米平板电脑支持快速 WiFi 6。结合我们的参考路由器（华硕 ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000），平均传输速率超过 900 MBit/s。
在无线连接方面，这款平板电脑支持蓝牙（5.3 版）--这款笔记本电脑没有 NFC 芯片，也无法购买 5G 版本。GNSS 模块也是如此。
| Networking | |
| Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| Lenovo Tab Extreme | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
摄像头 - 拥有 5000 万像素的小米平板电脑
显示屏的上边框装有一个 2000 万像素的前置摄像头。安装的索尼 IMX596 传感器采用 f/2.2 光圈，只能进行全高清视频录制，而主摄像头则可以选择 4K30。Pad 6 Max 的自拍效果有些过于平滑，而且光照效果也不尽如人意。
小米平板电脑的背面配备了一个高分辨率的 5000 万像素镜头，光圈为 f/1.8。对于这个价位的平板电脑来说，它能拍出不错的照片，尤其是在光线条件好和使用全分辨率的情况下。遗憾的是，照片边缘的锐度稍有下降，动态效果也可能更好一些。
Image Comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
Wide-angleWide-angleZoom 5xLow light
交货和保修范围 - 小米 Pad 6 Max 随附电源
输入设备和操作 - 小米平板电脑具有 FaceUnlock 功能
在 14 英寸 IPS 面板上，手指输入的识别速度非常快。由于采用了 120Hz 的刷新率，触摸屏可以精确操作，动画显示流畅。此外，Pad 6 Max 还可以通过手写笔进行操作，手写笔可以识别 8192 级压力和倾斜度。
通过生物指纹识别技术解锁小米平板电脑既快速又可靠。机身左侧的开/关机按钮位置有点不同寻常。你还可以使用前置摄像头和 ToF 传感器通过面部识别来验证用户身份。在日常使用和光线条件良好的情况下，它的工作非常可靠，但并不那么安全（2D 方法）。
显示屏 - 刷新率达 120Hz 的小米平板电脑
Pad 6 Max 的对角线长度为 14 英寸，宽高比为 16:10。约 35.5 厘米的 IPS 面板像素密度为 243 PPI，在我们的测量中，其最大亮度为 630 cd/m²。我们的实际 APL18 测量（模拟面板上亮区和暗区的均匀分布）得出的数值几乎相同，均为 628 cd/m²。所提供的亮度非常好，但 HDR 内容在认证显示屏上的显示效果并不理想。
在示波器下，我们发现了持续的高频闪烁。由于其频率极高，即使是对 PWM 敏感的用户也不会有问题。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 85 %
Center on Battery: 630 cd/m²
Contrast: 768:1 (Black: 0.82 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 0.6 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 1 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
97.5% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.2
| Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14 IPS LCD, 2880x1800, 14" | Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra Dynamic AMOLED, 2960x1848, 14.6" | Lenovo Tab Extreme OLED, 3000x1876, 14.5" | Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 Mini-LED, 2732x2048, 12.9" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | -103% | -189% | -81% | |
| Brightness middle | 630 | 621 -1% | 479 -24% | 611 -3% |
| Brightness | 591 | 620 5% | 456 -23% | 605 2% |
| Brightness Distribution | 85 | 98 15% | 90 6% | 92 8% |
| Black Level * | 0.82 | |||
| Contrast | 768 | |||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 0.6 | 1.9 -217% | 3.2 -433% | 1.4 -133% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 1 | 4.6 -360% | 6.82 -582% | 3.3 -230% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1 | 1.6 -60% | 1.8 -80% | 2.3 -130% |
| Gamma | 2.2 100% | 2.12 104% | 2.28 96% | 2.22 99% |
| CCT | 6624 98% | 6602 98% | 6794 96% | 6930 94% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 130500 Hz |  | |
The display backlight flickers at 130500 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) . The frequency of 130500 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
Pad 6 Max 的色彩描绘比Pad 6.您无法用肉眼识别色彩偏差，我们测量了理想的灰度 DeltaE 值(<3)。我们使用 "Original Color Pro "配置文件实现了这一色彩精确度。
显示屏的黑色值并不出众，平均对比度低于 1:1000。APL18 中的黑色值甚至更高，为 0.85 cd/m²
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 13.89 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 3.856 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 10.03 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 31 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 28.76 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 9.342 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 19.42 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 34 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
在室外，你通常可以很好地阅读小米平板电脑。如果天气非常晴朗，屏幕的清晰度可能会有些问题，因为 Pad 6 Max 的最大亮度虽然不错，但并没有足够的储备来压制反光。
屏幕的视角稳定性非常好，即使是平视也只会导致亮度略有下降。色彩没有出现任何倒置现象。
性能 - 小米平板电脑采用高通 SoC 芯片
该设备配备功能强大的Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1配备Adreno 730在日常使用中，系统运行速度快，操作流畅。我们的基准测试结果表明，这款平板电脑的性能非常强劲，有时甚至比联想 Tab Extreme 还要好。联想 Tab Extreme采用 联发科 Dimensity 9000特别是在 GFXBench 的熄屏率测试中，甚至比联想 Tab Extreme 的骁龙 8 代 2Galaxy在三星Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra由于 Pad 6 Max 的高一致性，有时不得不认输。
| AImark - Score v3.x | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (887 - 147801, n=11) | |
| Average of class Tablet (84 - 156427, n=50, last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra | |
| UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (3291 - 84787, n=21) | |
| Lenovo Tab Extreme | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra | |
| Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14 | |
| Average of class Tablet (1662 - 74821, n=56, last 2 years) | |
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7: T-Rex Onscreen | 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
GFXBench 3.0: on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
GFXBench 3.1: on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
GFXBench: on screen Car Chase Onscreen | 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | 3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
| 3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited | |
| Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra | |
| Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14 | |
| Lenovo Tab Extreme | |
| 3DMark / Wild Life Extreme | |
| Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra | |
| Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14 | |
| Lenovo Tab Extreme | |
| 3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score | |
| Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra | |
| Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14 | |
| Lenovo Tab Extreme | |
| 3DMark / Wild Life Score | |
| Lenovo Tab Extreme | |
| Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 | |
| 3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra | |
| Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14 | |
| 3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra | |
| Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14 | |
| 3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra | |
| Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14 | |
| GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen | |
| Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra | |
| Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14 | |
| Lenovo Tab Extreme | |
| GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen | |
| Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 | |
| Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra | |
| Lenovo Tab Extreme | |
| GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL | |
| Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 | |
| Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra | |
| Lenovo Tab Extreme | |
| GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen | |
| Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 | |
| Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra | |
| Lenovo Tab Extreme | |
| GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | |
| Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 | |
| Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra | |
| Lenovo Tab Extreme | |
| GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen | |
| Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 | |
| Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra | |
| Lenovo Tab Extreme | |
| GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen | |
| Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra | |
| Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14 | |
| Lenovo Tab Extreme | |
| GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen | |
| Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra | |
| Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14 | |
| Lenovo Tab Extreme | |
| GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | |
| Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra | |
| Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14 | |
| Lenovo Tab Extreme | |
| GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | |
| Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra | |
| Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14 | |
| Lenovo Tab Extreme | |
| GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | |
| Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra | |
| Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14 | |
| Lenovo Tab Extreme | |
| GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | |
| Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra | |
| Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14 | |
| Lenovo Tab Extreme | |
| GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | |
| Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra | |
| Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14 | |
| Lenovo Tab Extreme | |
| Jetstream 2 - Total Score | |
| Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 (Safari Mobile 16.1) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra (Chrome 116) | |
| Lenovo Tab Extreme (Chrome 115) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (76.2 - 204, n=23) | |
| Average of class Tablet (19.9 - 334, n=68, last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14 (Mi Browser V14) | |
| WebXPRT 4 - Overall | |
| Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 (Safari Mobile 16.1) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra (Chrome 116) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (69 - 159, n=21) | |
| Average of class Tablet (21 - 315, n=67, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Tab Extreme (Chrome 115) | |
| Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14 (Mi Browser V14) | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score | |
| Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 (Safari Mobile 16.1) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra (Chrome 116) | |
| Lenovo Tab Extreme (Chrome 115) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (17622 - 61536, n=24) | |
| Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14 (Mi Browser V14) | |
| Average of class Tablet (763 - 105178, n=85, last 2 years) | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
| Average of class Tablet (319 - 34733, n=73, last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14 (Mi Browser V14) | |
| Lenovo Tab Extreme (Chrome 115) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (665 - 1707, n=22) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra (Chrome 116) | |
| Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 (Safari Mobile 16.1) | |
* ... smaller is better
| Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14 | Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra | Lenovo Tab Extreme | Average 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | Average of class Tablet | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | 8% | -11% | -26% | -54% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB | 1983.47 | 3367.33 70% | 1914.4 -3% | 1749 ? -12% | 1055 ? -47% |
| Sequential Write 256KB | 1873.45 | 1891.49 1% | 1585 -15% | 1163 ? -38% | 692 ? -63% |
| Random Read 4KB | 374.54 | 449.37 20% | 330.7 -12% | 286 ? -24% | 191 ? -49% |
| Random Write 4KB | 446.71 | 174.32 -61% | 380.6 -15% | 319 ? -29% | 191.4 ? -57% |
排放 - 小米平板电脑不节流
温度
小米平板电脑的外壳在日常使用中几乎不会发热，即使在负载情况下，温度也不会急剧上升。为了检查设备内部的发热情况，我们使用了 3DMark 进行测试。Wild Life 压力测试完美运行，一致性超过 99%。有趣的是，Pad 6 Max 的性能水平与三星Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra的骁龙 8 代 2的性能水平差不多。
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 44.1 °C / 111 F, compared to the average of 33.7 °C / 93 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 44 °C / 111 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 31.1 °C / 88 F, compared to the device average of 30 °C / 86 F.
3DMark Wild Life Stress Test
| 3DMark | |
| Wild Life Extreme Stress Test | |
| Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14 | |
| Lenovo Tab Extreme | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra | |
| Wild Life Stress Test Stability | |
| Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14 | |
| Lenovo Tab Extreme | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra | |
发言人
平板电脑的八个立体声扬声器由四个低音扬声器和高音扬声器组成，提供了非常好的声音体验。低音大部分听不到，但 Pad 6 Max 强劲的低音和均匀的中音给人留下了深刻印象。高音也得到了很好的强调。
有些用户会怀念平板电脑上没有 3.5 毫米音频输出的遗憾。相反，音频内容必须使用转接器通过 USB-C 端口输出。通过蓝牙 5.3，可无线使用多种音频编解码器：SBC、AAC、aptX、aptX HD、aptX Adaptive 以及 LDAC 和 LHDC (V5)。
Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 13.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 4% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 94% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 9.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (8.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 2% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 2% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
电源管理 - 小米 Pad 6 Max 具有快速充电功能
耗电量
Pad 6 Max 的充电功率为 67 瓦，但也可以将智能手机连接到平板电脑的 USB 端口，并以高达 33 瓦的功率为其充电。在闲置模式下，它的耗电量并不是最高效的。
| Off / Standby |   0.04 / 0.14 Watt |
| Idle |  2.57 / 8.65 / 8.71 Watt |
| Load |
14.98 / 14.99 Watt |
    
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14 10000 mAh | Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra 11200 mAh | Lenovo Tab Extreme 12300 mAh | Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 10702 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 15% | 30% | -12% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 2.57 | 3.17 -23% | 2.6 -1% | 2.54 1% |
| Idle Average * | 8.65 | 3.68 57% | 3 65% | 11.24 -30% |
| Idle Maximum * | 8.71 | 3.91 55% | 3.4 61% | 11.48 -32% |
| Load Average * | 14.98 | 15.83 -6% | 9.5 37% | 12.97 13% |
| Load Maximum * | 14.99 | 15.84 -6% | 16.9 -13% | 16.6 -11% |
* ... smaller is better
Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)
Power consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)
运行时间
在我们的 Wi-Fi 测试中，Pad 6 Max 在调整显示屏亮度为 150 cd/m² 的情况下持续了 15 个小时。使用附带的充电器，10,000 毫安时电池可在约 80 分钟内快速充满。
| Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14 10000 mAh | Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra 11200 mAh | Lenovo Tab Extreme 12300 mAh | Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 10702 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | ||||
| WiFi v1.3 | 898 | 623 -31% | 664 -26% | 671 -25% |
Pros
Cons
小米平板 6 Max 的评价
小米平板 6 Max 的性价比很高，尽管感兴趣的买家在购买进口设备时会遇到一些常见问题（没有本地 GMS、语言选项有限......）。与竞争对手的 XXL 平板电脑相比，小米平板电脑的优势在于运行时间长--即使是一台iPad Pro 12.9也跟不上。在质量和音频体验方面，小米 Tab 也毫不逊色。
其安装的Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1可能不是高通公司最新的高端 SoC，但它有足够的储备来提供流畅的日常使用，甚至比昂贵得多的联想 Tab Extreme在我们的基准测试中表现也不如它。此外，小米平板电脑的性能甚至与Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra在负载情况下的表现与 Tab S9 Ultra 相似，这要归功于其良好的系统散热和稳定的电力传输。
如果你有兴趣购买一款 XXL 平板电脑，但又不准备花费 1000 美元，那么小米 Pad 6 Max 可能是一个非常有趣的选择。
这家中国制造商在设备的连接性方面节省了一些成本。它既不支持 5G 也不支持 GPS。Pad 6 Max 的另一个弱点是其 IPS 面板的黑度较高。
价格和供应情况
小米 Pad 6 Max 的售价约为 670 美元，可从Trading Shenzhen 等网站购买。.
Xiaomi Pad 6 Max 14
- 09/27/2023 v7 (old)
Marcus Herbrich
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.
Price comparison
