联想 Tab P12 评测--功能强大的 XXL 平板电脑，配件丰富

Name: Lenovo Tab P12
Brand: Lenovo

价格低廉的 12 英寸平板电脑。

如果你正在寻找一款大而便宜的全能平板电脑，那么联想 Tab P12 将是你的最佳选择。这款 12.7 英寸的平板电脑售价约为 435 美元，配备 3K 分辨率、快速八核 SoC 和四扬声器。此外，它还支持主动输入手写笔和扩展坞键盘。

Manuel Masiero, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy), Published 09/02/2023 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Android Tablet Touchscreen

联想更新了其中档平板电脑，并对其进行了不少改动。这不仅涉及平板电脑的内部结构，其外观也发生了变化。你一定不会错过它现在更大的尺寸：与 11.5 英寸Tab P11 2022（第二代）Tab P12 现在的尺寸为 12.7 英寸。Tab P12 的分辨率为 2,044 x 1,840 像素，也高于其姊妹机型，而且现在的屏幕比例为 16:10，而不是 5:3。

制造商还为这一代平板电脑选择了不同的 SoC。Tab P12 采用了仍然相对较新的联发科 Dimensity 7050在纸面上）比 Tab P11 2022（第二代）的联发科 Helio G99.

不变的是它的多功能性--通过手写笔和键盘等配件，Tab P12 的用途继续得到扩展。在这篇评测中，您可以了解到这款全套产品是否物有所值。

Test device courtesy of Lenovo Deutschland

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Lenovo Tab P12 (Tab P Series)

Processor

MediaTek Dimensity 7050 8 x 2 - 2.6 GHz, Cortex-A78 / A55

Graphics adapter

ARM Mali-G68 MP4

Memory

8 GB

, LPDDR4

Display

12.70 inch 16:10, 2944 x 1840 pixel 273 PPI, capacitive, native pen support, LTPS, 3K, 1 billion colors (8-bit + 2-bit), 400 nits brightness, glossy: yes, HDR, 60 Hz

Storage

128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash, 128 GB

, 107 GB free

Connections

1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: USB-C, Card Reader: microSD up to 1 TB, exFAT supported, 1 Fingerprint Reader, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: Accelerometer, RGB Sensor, Hall-Sensor, E-Compass, Gyroscope, DRM Widevine L1, Camera2 API Full, WiFi Direct, WiFi Display, 3-pin Pogo Pin for Keyboard Connection

Networking

802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.1, GPS

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 6.9 x 293.37 x 190.76

Battery

10200 mAh Lithium-Ion

Charging

fast charging / Quickcharge

Operating System

Android 13

Camera

Primary Camera: 8 MPix f2.2, Autofocus, LED flash
Secondary Camera: 13 MPix fixed focus, RGB sensor, Ultra-wide FOV

Additional features

Speakers: Quad speakers with Dolby Atmos, Keyboard: virtual, Lenovo Tab Pen Plus, 20W Charging Adapter (10V/2A), USB-C 2.0 Charging Cable, MicroSD Tray Pin, Quick Start Guide, Safety & Warranty information, ZUI 15, 24 Months Warranty, fanless

Weight

615 g, Power Supply: 59 g

Links

Lenovo homepage

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating	Date	Model	Weight	Height	Size	Resolution
85.2 % v7 ^(old)	09 / 2023	Lenovo Tab P12 Dimensity 7050, Mali-G68 MP4	615 g	6.9 mm	12.70"	2944x1840
88.6 % v7 ^(old)	11 / 2022	Apple iPad 10 A14, A14 Bionic GPU	477 g	7 mm	10.90"	2360x1640
81.7 % v7 ^(old)	11 / 2022	Honor Pad 8 SD 680, Adreno 610	520 g	6.9 mm	12.00"	2000x1200
82.4 % v7 ^(old)	04 / 2023	Lenovo Tab P11 (Gen 2) Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2	520 g	7.4 mm	11.50"	2000x1200
89.3 % v7 ^(old)	04 / 2023	OnePlus Pad Dimensity 9000, Mali-G710 MP10	552 g	6.5 mm	11.61"	2800x2000
88.8 % v7 ^(old)	08 / 2023	Xiaomi Pad 6 SD 870, Adreno 650	490 g	6.51 mm	11.00"	2880x1800

外壳 - Tab P12 采用 6.9 毫米厚的铝制外壳

12.7 英寸 Tab P12 采用铝制外壳，厚度为 6.9 毫米，双色后盖设计让人联想到联想的商务笔记本电脑。

这款 XXL 平板电脑重 690 克，虽然不是最轻的，但手感不错。8 毫米的边框环绕整个设备。这使平板电脑的显示屏与表面的比例达到了 87%，这意味着设备可以舒适地握在手中，而不会不小心触碰到显示屏。

显示屏、边框和后盖之间几乎无缝的过渡给联想 Tab P12 带来了真正的高品质感觉。同时，它的稳定性足以承受作为家庭平板电脑使用。如果你出于某种原因想要弯曲，你可以很容易地弯曲外壳，这样就会产生一些嘎吱嘎吱的声音。在实际使用中，平板电脑可能不会承受这么大的压力。这款平板电脑没有 IP 认证。

平板电脑的四个扬声器支持杜比全景声（Dolby Atmos），每两个一组，分布在平板电脑的两个短边之间。设备底部是 Pogo PIN 连接，有 3 个接触点，可用作选配键盘的基座。

尺寸比较

连接性 - 通过 Miracast 流媒体传输到电视

联想为 Tab P12 提供了不同的存储版本。在测试时，只有配备 8GB LPDDR4 内存和 128GB UFS-2.2 存储空间的版本。其他存储配置包括 4/128 GB 和 8/256 GB。你可以通过最大容量为 1 TB 的 microSD 卡扩展平板电脑的内部存储空间，该卡还可以以 exFAT 文件格式格式化。

支持 OTG 的 USB-C 端口以 USB 2.0 的速度运行，你可以通过适配器连接耳机等音频设备。作为一款多媒体平板电脑，Tab P12 支持 DRM Widevine L1，这意味着它还能以高清质量播放 Netflix 等网站的流媒体内容。您还可以使用 Miracast 将流媒体传输到电视等兼容的终端设备上。

microSD 读卡器

Tab 12 使用我们的 microSD 参考卡 Angelbird AV Pro V60 实现了稳定的传输速率。不过，在连续读取和复制测试中，Tab 12 的平均传输速率分别为 69.6 MB/s和 14.3 MB/s，略微落后于其姊妹机型--联想 Tab P11 2022（Gen 2）。联想 Tab P11 2022（第二代）.

SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Lenovo Tab P11 (Gen 2) Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash (Angelbird V60)	26.3 MB/s +84%
Lenovo Tab P12 Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash (Angelbird AV Pro V60)	14.28 MB/s

Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)

Lenovo Tab P12 Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø25.1 (16-51.7)

Lenovo Tab P11 (Gen 2) Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø40.1 (27.4-50.2)

Lenovo Tab P12 Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø69.6 (39.2-83.8)

Lenovo Tab P11 (Gen 2) Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø73.8 (44.3-80.2)

软件 - 儿童模式、窗口视图和分屏视图

Tab P12 使用Android 13 和联想用户界面 ZUI 15 运行。与标准的Android 相比，最大的变化体现在设计上。

最显著的用户界面变化是显示屏底部的应用程序栏，它可以显示上次打开的应用程序。此外，每个应用程序都可以在自己的窗口中打开，然后可以在屏幕上移动或改变大小。此外，平板电脑还具有分屏视图功能，可同时使用两个应用程序，并可通过滑块在两个视图之间调整分屏。

窗口模式和分屏视图可能并不适用于所有应用程序，但 Tab P12 上预装的所有应用程序都是兼容的，包括为联想输入手写笔定制的应用程序，即 MyScript Calculator 2 和 Nebo（笔记）。

全屏、窗口模式和分屏视图之间的切换可以通过兼容应用中的三点菜单完成，在这里可以切换到相应的视图。如果要打开某个应用，可以用手指或触控笔按住应用图标打开菜单。三点菜单显示在已打开的应用程序标题栏中央。

通过 Tab P12 的帐户管理可以创建多个用户，这也使平板电脑适合家庭使用。此外，Tab P12 还配备了儿童空间应用程序，家长可以用它为孩子提供适合儿童的内容。联想承诺在平板电脑上市后的四年内为其提供两次操作系统升级和安全更新。

通信和全球导航卫星系统 - WiFi 6，但无 LTE 选项

虽然联想宣传 Tab P12 是一款高效的平板电脑，但它没有蜂窝网络选项。这意味着你在路上和家里只能通过 WiFi 6 上网。此外还支持蓝牙 5.1。

连接到我们的参考路由器华硕 ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000，Tab P12 实现了非常好的稳定传输速率，峰值达到 928 MBit/s。联想联想 Tab P11 2022（第二代）要慢得多，传输速率约为 500 MBit/s。

Networking
iperf3 receive AXE11000
OnePlus Pad Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000	1696 (1635^min - 1722^max) MBit/s +108%
Xiaomi Pad 6 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	932 (727^min - 966^max) MBit/s +14%
Lenovo Tab P12 Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	814 (759^min - 840^max) MBit/s
Apple iPad 10 A14 Bionic GPU, A14, 64 GB SSD	741 (621^min - 759^max) MBit/s -9%
Lenovo Tab P11 (Gen 2) Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	409 (366^min - 434^max) MBit/s -50%
Honor Pad 8 Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	345 (326^min - 357^max) MBit/s -58%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
OnePlus Pad Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000	1710 (1696^min - 1724^max) MBit/s +84%
Lenovo Tab P12 Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	928 (909^min - 950^max) MBit/s
Xiaomi Pad 6 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	880 (791^min - 925^max) MBit/s -5%
Apple iPad 10 A14 Bionic GPU, A14, 64 GB SSD	816 (764^min - 851^max) MBit/s -12%
Lenovo Tab P11 (Gen 2) Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	493 (433^min - 516^max) MBit/s -47%
Honor Pad 8 Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	357 (323^min - 366^max) MBit/s -62%

Lenovo Tab P12 MediaTek Dimensity 7050, ARM Mali-G68 MP4; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø812 (759-840)

Lenovo Tab P11 (Gen 2) Mediatek Helio G99, ARM Mali-G57 MP2; iperf3 receive AXE11000: Ø408 (366-434)

Lenovo Tab P12 MediaTek Dimensity 7050, ARM Mali-G68 MP4; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø928 (909-950)

Lenovo Tab P11 (Gen 2) Mediatek Helio G99, ARM Mali-G57 MP2; iperf3 transmit AXE11000: Ø493 (433-516)

Tab P12 通过卫星导航服务 GPS（L1）、Glonass（L1）和伽利略确定自己的位置。Tab P12 对我们 10 公里自行车之旅路线的记录不如用于直接对比的 Garmin Venu2 健身追踪器准确。即便如此，这款平板电脑仍然比较适合导航任务。

照相机 - 可用于拍摄快照

在大型平板电脑中，摄像头是一个相当被忽视的话题。联想 Tab P12 也不例外。

它背面有一个 800 万像素摄像头，配备 LED 闪光灯和自动对焦功能，可以每秒 30 帧的速度录制全高清视频。其拍摄质量对于快照来说还算可以。不过，你必须接受的是，照片的颜色很淡，无法显示太多细节，而且在弱光环境下几乎无法使用。

1300 万像素的自拍摄像头也取决于良好的光线条件，但在光线良好的情况下，它也能拍出不错的照片。它最高可录制每秒 30 帧的 4K 视频。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Daylight - 1 Daylight - 2 5x zoom Low light

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images

我们在测试实验室再次仔细观察了主摄像头。在最佳照明条件下（最大 Delta-E 值为 21.25），它能够相当准确地再现 ColorChecker 测试图中的色彩，而且还能相当清晰地显示测试图。而在 1 勒克斯的残余光线下，结果却完全相反：色彩准确度和图像锐利度完全下降，再也看不到测试图上的任何内容。

配件和保修 - 套装更便宜

联想 Tab P12 随附 20 瓦电源（10V/2A）、USB-C 2.0 充电器（Type-A 转 Type-C）、microSD 卡插槽工具和快速入门指南。

与平板电脑配套的其他配件包括联想 Tab Pen Plus 数字输入手写笔（约 64 美元）、保护套（约 30 美元）以及联想键盘包（140 美元）。后者包括一个磁性基座键盘、一个触摸板和一个带折叠脚的盖子。

联想提供以下捆绑产品：

平板电脑 + 手写笔：约 435 美元
平板电脑、笔和键盘：约 545 美元

联想为本次测试提供了由平板电脑、笔和键盘组成的大型捆绑包。加上键盘和盖子，平板电脑的总重量从 615 克增加到 1200 克左右。

联想为其平板电脑提供标准的 1 年保修服务，如果额外付费，保修期可延长至 3 年。此外，还包括更好的服务，如电话支持。

输入设备和操作 - 借助触控笔和基座键盘灵活使用

Tab P12 对手指或笔的输入响应非常快，即使同时打开多个应用程序也不会拖慢速度。不过，显示屏的流畅度不如 120 赫兹的联想 Tab P12 Pro。联想 Tab P12 Pro那样流畅。

单独提供的联想 Tab Pen Plus 支持 4096 个压力和倾斜检测级别，并通过蓝牙与平板电脑连接。这支 13 克重的笔非常适合握在手中，可以轻松地在平板电脑上绘图或书写。选配的键盘包包括一个带触摸板的键盘和一个带折叠式支架的键盘盖。不过，键盘没有照明功能。

Tab P12 可通过指纹传感器和二维面部识别进行生物解锁。后者效果不错，但要获得较高的识别率，还需要足够的环境和显示屏亮度。集成在电源按钮中的指纹传感器可提供更高的安全性，而且运行顺畅。

▶ load Youtube video

显示屏 - 联想 Tab P12 配备 3K 面板

Tab P12 的 12.7 英寸 LTPS 显示屏刷新率为 60 Hz，显示 2944 x 1840 像素的 3K 分辨率，相当于 16:10 的宽高比，像素密度为 273 PPI。

联想规定 Tab P12 的显示亮度为 400 尼特。我们在测试中测得的最大亮度为 435 cd/m²。显示屏的平均亮度略低于 407 cd/m²，因此与其姊妹机型大致相当。在最低亮度设置下，LTPS 面板仍然达到了 3.58 cd/m²。

我们无法从平板电脑上看到任何值得注意的 PWM 闪烁。因此，它非常适合敏感用户使用。


396 cd/m²	388 cd/m²	397 cd/m²
406 cd/m²	435 cd/m²	424 cd/m²
408 cd/m²	403 cd/m²	405 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3

Maximum: 435 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 406.9 cd/m² Minimum: 3.58 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 89 %
Center on Battery: 435 cd/m²
Contrast: 750:1 (Black: 0.58 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.5 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 2.4 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
98.6% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.2

	Lenovo Tab P12 LTPS, 2944x1840, 12.7"	Apple iPad 10 IPS, 2360x1640, 10.9"	Honor Pad 8 IPS, 2000x1200, 12"	Lenovo Tab P11 (Gen 2) IPS, 2000x1200, 11.5"	OnePlus Pad IPS, 2800x2000, 11.6"	Xiaomi Pad 6 IPS LCD, 2880x1800, 11"
Screen		10%	-62%	-63%	-3%	21%
Brightness middle	435	467 7%	379 -13%	423 -3%	474 9%	541 24%
Brightness	407	468 15%	382 -6%	396 -3%	447 10%	494 21%
Brightness Distribution	89	92 3%	84 -6%	88 -1%	89 0%	89 0%
Black Level *	0.58	0.49 16%	0.3 48%	0.29 50%	0.32 45%	0.65 -12%
Contrast	750	953 27%	1263 68%	1459 95%	1481 97%	832 11%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	1.5	1.4 7%	4.76 -217%	5.32 -255%	3.16 -111%	0.9 40%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	3.2	3.3 -3%	9.25 -189%	9.87 -208%	5.37 -68%	1.8 44%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	2.4	2.3 4%	6.7 -179%	6.6 -175%	2.5 -4%	1.4 42%
Gamma	2.2 ^100%	2.21 ^100%	2.234 ^98%	2.159 ^102%	2.09 ^105%	2.26 ^97%
CCT	6546 ^99%	6852 ^95%	8468 ^77%	7979 ^81%	7112 ^91%	6710 ^97%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

280300 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 280300 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 280300 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8746 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

要调整图像参数，您可以选择标准和脉动两种色彩模式。同时，还可以通过三个预设值或色轮手动设置色温。当色彩模式和色温保持在标准设置时，Tab P12 可提供最佳画质。

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
19.89 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 8.464 ms rise
19.89 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 11.43 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 39 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
38.25 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 17.49 ms rise
38.25 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 20.76 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 54 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

由于亮度储备不足，联想 Tab P12 并不适合在户外使用。在阳光直射的情况下，你或许仍能从该设备视角稳定的显示屏上进行部分阅读，但由于反光较多，这肯定不是一件容易的事。反过来，在有遮挡或半遮挡的地方从显示屏上进行阅读则效果不错。

性能 - 中段动力强劲

联想 Tab P12 是首批采用联发科 Dimensity 7050 芯片的移动设备之一。联发科 Dimensity 7050- 联发科 Dimensity 7050 是 2023 年 5 月推出的一款用于中端移动设备的 ARM SoC。Dimensity 7050 带来了不俗的性能，确保应用程序在日常使用中流畅运行。在内部，ARM SoC 结合了 2 个主频为 2.6 GHz 的 ARM Cortex A78 性能内核和 6 个主频高达 2 GHz 的 ARM Cortex A55 效率内核。该平板电脑采用ARM Mali-G68 MC4图形芯片。

在合成基准测试中，Tab P12 与对比设备相比取得了平均成绩。它明显优于联想 Tab P11 2022（第二代），但还不能完全接近小米平板 6的骁龙 870 5G.iPadApple iPad 10和OnePlus Pad的速度更快。Tab P12 难以通过 AIMark 的 KI 计算，因此得分较低。

Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Apple iPad 10	1580 Points +114%
OnePlus Pad	1279 Points +73%
Xiaomi Pad 6	1003 Points +36%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7050 (738 - 835, n=4)	791 Points +7%
Lenovo Tab P12	738 Points
Average of class Tablet (140 - 1887, n=71, last 2 years)	707 Points -4%
Lenovo Tab P11 (Gen 2)	490 Points -34%
Honor Pad 8	377 Points -49%
Multi-Core
Apple iPad 10	4027 Points +104%
OnePlus Pad	3998 Points +103%
Xiaomi Pad 6	3328 Points +69%
Average of class Tablet (312 - 8624, n=71, last 2 years)	2496 Points +27%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7050 (1973 - 2335, n=4)	2163 Points +10%
Lenovo Tab P12	1973 Points
Lenovo Tab P11 (Gen 2)	1797 Points -9%
Honor Pad 8	1522 Points -23%

Geekbench 6.3
Single-Core
Xiaomi Pad 6	1299 Points +36%
Average of class Tablet (185 - 3715, n=68, last 2 years)	1093 Points +14%
Lenovo Tab P12	958 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7050 (947 - 964, n=5)	957 Points 0%
Multi-Core
Average of class Tablet (493 - 14690, n=68, last 2 years)	3518 Points +45%
Xiaomi Pad 6	3357 Points +39%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7050 (2397 - 2517, n=5)	2430 Points 0%
Lenovo Tab P12	2422 Points

Antutu v9 - Total Score
OnePlus Pad	935522 Points +111%
Apple iPad 10	691084 Points +56%
Xiaomi Pad 6	581322 Points +31%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7050 (426859 - 530929, n=3)	466886 Points +5%
Average of class Tablet (92766 - 1286774, n=49, last 2 years)	464403 Points +5%
Lenovo Tab P12	442871 Points
Lenovo Tab P11 (Gen 2)	312314 Points -29%
Honor Pad 8	274001 Points -38%

PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
OnePlus Pad	15951 Points +31%
Xiaomi Pad 6	13728 Points +13%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7050 (12131 - 14561, n=5)	13288 Points +10%
Lenovo Tab P12	12131 Points
Average of class Tablet (3195 - 20841, n=73, last 2 years)	9812 Points -19%
Lenovo Tab P11 (Gen 2)	9578 Points -21%
Honor Pad 8	6655 Points -45%

CrossMark - Overall
OnePlus Pad	1114 Points +63%
Apple iPad 10	987 Points +45%
Average of class Tablet (172 - 1944, n=63, last 2 years)	772 Points +13%
Xiaomi Pad 6	754 Points +11%
Lenovo Tab P12	682 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7050 (575 - 706, n=4)	655 Points -4%
Lenovo Tab P11 (Gen 2)	568 Points -17%
Honor Pad 8	407 Points -40%

BaseMark OS II
Overall
OnePlus Pad	7453 Points +79%
Xiaomi Pad 6	5289 Points +27%
Average of class Tablet (444 - 11721, n=59, last 2 years)	4210 Points +1%
Lenovo Tab P12	4158 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7050 (3965 - 4158, n=4)	4084 Points -2%
Lenovo Tab P11 (Gen 2)	2855 Points -31%
Honor Pad 8	2621 Points -37%
Apple iPad 10	Points -100%
System
OnePlus Pad	10635 Points +61%
Xiaomi Pad 6	8463 Points +28%
Average of class Tablet (1103 - 16435, n=59, last 2 years)	7279 Points +10%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7050 (6342 - 9315, n=4)	7250 Points +10%
Lenovo Tab P12	6610 Points
Honor Pad 8	5817 Points -12%
Lenovo Tab P11 (Gen 2)	5261 Points -20%
Memory
OnePlus Pad	6873 Points +18%
Xiaomi Pad 6	6127 Points +6%
Lenovo Tab P12	5807 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7050 (4939 - 6915, n=4)	5747 Points -1%
Average of class Tablet (916 - 10977, n=59, last 2 years)	4874 Points -16%
Lenovo Tab P11 (Gen 2)	3454 Points -41%
Honor Pad 8	3361 Points -42%
Graphics
OnePlus Pad	22155 Points +345%
Xiaomi Pad 6	11263 Points +126%
Average of class Tablet (580 - 57192, n=59, last 2 years)	9171 Points +84%
Lenovo Tab P12	4975 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7050 (4655 - 5160, n=4)	4892 Points -2%
Lenovo Tab P11 (Gen 2)	2762 Points -44%
Honor Pad 8	2098 Points -58%
Web
OnePlus Pad	1906 Points +22%
Lenovo Tab P12	1566 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7050 (1315 - 1566, n=4)	1397 Points -11%
Xiaomi Pad 6	1336 Points -15%
Lenovo Tab P11 (Gen 2)	1325 Points -15%
Average of class Tablet (10 - 2051, n=59, last 2 years)	1269 Points -19%
Honor Pad 8	1151 Points -27%

AImark - Score v3.x
OnePlus Pad	27367 Points +5902%
Average of class Tablet (84 - 156427, n=51, last 2 years)	7152 Points +1468%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7050 (456 - 9646, n=4)	4957 Points +987%
Lenovo Tab P11 (Gen 2)	877 Points +92%
Lenovo Tab P12	456 Points
Xiaomi Pad 6	Points -100%

UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
OnePlus Pad	29879 Points +462%
Xiaomi Pad 6	16501 Points +210%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7050 (5266 - 23122, n=4)	14002 Points +163%
Average of class Tablet (1662 - 74821, n=57, last 2 years)	11329 Points +113%
Lenovo Tab P11 (Gen 2)	9218 Points +73%
Lenovo Tab P12	5315 Points
Honor Pad 8	4627 Points -13%

Legend

Lenovo Tab P12 MediaTek Dimensity 7050, ARM Mali-G68 MP4, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash

Apple iPad 10 Apple A14 Bionic, Apple A14 Bionic GPU, 64 GB SSD

Honor Pad 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Qualcomm Adreno 610, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash

Lenovo Tab P11 (Gen 2) Mediatek Helio G99, ARM Mali-G57 MP2, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash

OnePlus Pad MediaTek Dimensity 9000, ARM Mali-G710 MP10,

Xiaomi Pad 6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Qualcomm Adreno 650, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

Average MediaTek Dimensity 7050

Average of class Tablet

在图形处理方面，Tab P12 也比其姊妹机型更快，仅次于小米 Pad 6.作为一款中端设备，它的 GPU 性能还算不错，这在游戏测试中也有所体现。

3DMark: Wild Life Extreme Unlimited | Wild Life Extreme | Wild Life Unlimited Score | Wild Life Score | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7: T-Rex Onscreen | 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
GFXBench 3.0: on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
GFXBench 3.1: on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
GFXBench: on screen Car Chase Onscreen | 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | 3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
OnePlus Pad Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000	2310 Points +278%
Apple iPad 10 A14 Bionic GPU, A14, 64 GB SSD	2124 Points +248%
Xiaomi Pad 6 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1233 Points +102%
Lenovo Tab P12 Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	611 Points
Lenovo Tab P11 (Gen 2) Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	330 Points -46%
Honor Pad 8 Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	122 Points -80%

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
OnePlus Pad Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000	2377 Points +282%
Apple iPad 10 A14 Bionic GPU, A14, 64 GB SSD	2250 Points +261%
Xiaomi Pad 6 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1246 Points +100%
Lenovo Tab P12 Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	623 Points
Lenovo Tab P11 (Gen 2) Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	342 Points -45%
Honor Pad 8 Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	123 Points -80%

3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Apple iPad 10 A14 Bionic GPU, A14, 64 GB SSD	8539 Points +282%
OnePlus Pad Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000	8497 Points +280%
Xiaomi Pad 6 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	4252 Points +90%
Lenovo Tab P12 Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2237 Points
Lenovo Tab P11 (Gen 2) Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	1109 Points -50%
Honor Pad 8 Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	445 Points -80%

3DMark / Wild Life Score
OnePlus Pad Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000	7933 Points +268%
Xiaomi Pad 6 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	4293 Points +99%
Lenovo Tab P12 Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2156 Points
Lenovo Tab P11 (Gen 2) Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	1242 Points -42%
Honor Pad 8 Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	447 Points -79%
Apple iPad 10 A14 Bionic GPU, A14, 64 GB SSD	Points -100%

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
OnePlus Pad Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000	9689 Points +125%
Xiaomi Pad 6 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	7363 Points +71%
Lenovo Tab P12 Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	4307 Points
Honor Pad 8 Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	1356 Points -69%

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
OnePlus Pad Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000	12658 Points +194%
Xiaomi Pad 6 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	8593 Points +100%
Lenovo Tab P12 Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	4301 Points
Honor Pad 8 Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	1184 Points -72%

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
OnePlus Pad Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000	5321 Points +24%
Xiaomi Pad 6 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	4882 Points +13%
Lenovo Tab P12 Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	4307 Points
Honor Pad 8 Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2751 Points -36%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Xiaomi Pad 6 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	109 fps +118%
Apple iPad 10 A14 Bionic GPU, A14, 64 GB SSD	60 fps +20%
OnePlus Pad Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000	60 fps +20%
Lenovo Tab P11 (Gen 2) Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	58 fps +16%
Lenovo Tab P12 Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	50 fps
Honor Pad 8 Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	35 fps -30%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Apple iPad 10 A14 Bionic GPU, A14, 64 GB SSD	317 fps +217%
OnePlus Pad Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000	246 fps +146%
Xiaomi Pad 6 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	181 fps +81%
Lenovo Tab P12 Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	100 fps
Lenovo Tab P11 (Gen 2) Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	64 fps -36%
Honor Pad 8 Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	41 fps -59%

GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Apple iPad 10 A14 Bionic GPU, A14, 64 GB SSD	60 fps +114%
OnePlus Pad Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000	60 fps +114%
Xiaomi Pad 6 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	59 fps +111%
Lenovo Tab P11 (Gen 2) Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	38 fps +36%
Lenovo Tab P12 Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	28 fps
Honor Pad 8 Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	19 fps -32%

GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
OnePlus Pad Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000	177 fps +177%
Apple iPad 10 A14 Bionic GPU, A14, 64 GB SSD	171 fps +167%
Xiaomi Pad 6 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	118 fps +84%
Lenovo Tab P12 Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	64 fps
Lenovo Tab P11 (Gen 2) Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	40 fps -37%
Honor Pad 8 Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	22 fps -66%

GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Apple iPad 10 A14 Bionic GPU, A14, 64 GB SSD	58 fps +263%
OnePlus Pad Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000	51 fps +219%
Xiaomi Pad 6 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	33 fps +106%
Lenovo Tab P11 (Gen 2) Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	23 fps +44%
Lenovo Tab P12 Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	16 fps
Honor Pad 8 Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	13 fps -19%

GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
OnePlus Pad Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000	128 fps +198%
Apple iPad 10 A14 Bionic GPU, A14, 64 GB SSD	120 fps +179%
Xiaomi Pad 6 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	81 fps +88%
Lenovo Tab P12 Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	43 fps
Lenovo Tab P11 (Gen 2) Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	25 fps -42%
Honor Pad 8 Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	15 fps -65%

GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Apple iPad 10 A14 Bionic GPU, A14, 64 GB SSD	45 fps +355%
OnePlus Pad Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000	32 fps +223%
Xiaomi Pad 6 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	21 fps +112%
Lenovo Tab P11 (Gen 2) Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	13 fps +31%
Lenovo Tab P12 Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	9.9 fps
Honor Pad 8 Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	7.2 fps -27%

GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Apple iPad 10 A14 Bionic GPU, A14, 64 GB SSD	75 fps +188%
OnePlus Pad Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000	73 fps +181%
Xiaomi Pad 6 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	49 fps +88%
Lenovo Tab P12 Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	26 fps
Lenovo Tab P11 (Gen 2) Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	15 fps -42%
Honor Pad 8 Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	8.3 fps -68%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Apple iPad 10 A14 Bionic GPU, A14, 64 GB SSD	34 fps +379%
OnePlus Pad Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000	26 fps +266%
Xiaomi Pad 6 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	17 fps +139%
Lenovo Tab P11 (Gen 2) Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	9.5 fps +34%
Lenovo Tab P12 Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	7.1 fps
Honor Pad 8 Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	4.9 fps -31%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
OnePlus Pad Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000	37 fps +236%
Apple iPad 10 A14 Bionic GPU, A14, 64 GB SSD	32 fps +191%
Xiaomi Pad 6 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	20 fps +82%
Lenovo Tab P12 Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	11 fps
Lenovo Tab P11 (Gen 2) Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	5.9 fps -46%
Honor Pad 8 Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	3.2 fps -71%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Apple iPad 10 A14 Bionic GPU, A14, 64 GB SSD	47 fps +327%
OnePlus Pad Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000	36 fps +227%
Xiaomi Pad 6 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	22 fps +100%
Lenovo Tab P11 (Gen 2) Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	14 fps +27%
Lenovo Tab P12 Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	11 fps
Honor Pad 8 Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	8.4 fps -24%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Apple iPad 10 A14 Bionic GPU, A14, 64 GB SSD	94 fps +224%
OnePlus Pad Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000	93 fps +221%
Xiaomi Pad 6 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	53 fps +83%
Lenovo Tab P12 Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	29 fps
Lenovo Tab P11 (Gen 2) Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	16 fps -45%
Honor Pad 8 Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	9.6 fps -67%

GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
OnePlus Pad Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000	17 fps +262%
Apple iPad 10 A14 Bionic GPU, A14, 64 GB SSD	16 fps +240%
Xiaomi Pad 6 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	9.7 fps +106%
Lenovo Tab P12 Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	4.7 fps
Lenovo Tab P11 (Gen 2) Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2.5 fps -47%
Honor Pad 8 Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	1.4 fps -70%

与 CPU 和 GPU 测试类似，联想 Tab P12 在浏览器基准测试中也表现出色。它没能创造任何新纪录，但即便如此，它的日常性能也相当稳定。网站加载速度很快，而且可以快速滚动浏览。

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Apple iPad 10 (Safari Mobile 16.1)	178.932 Points +136%
OnePlus Pad (Chrome 112)	148.115 Points +95%
Average of class Tablet (19.9 - 334, n=69, last 2 years)	108.7 Points +43%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7050 (75.9 - 108.8, n=4)	89.2 Points +17%
Xiaomi Pad 6 (Chrome 115)	86.985 Points +15%
Lenovo Tab P12 (Chrome 115.0.5790.166)	75.924 Points
Lenovo Tab P11 (Gen 2) (Chrome 112)	55.947 Points -26%
Honor Pad 8 (Chrome 106.0.5249.126)	46.797 Points -38%

WebXPRT 4 - Overall
OnePlus Pad (Chrome 112)	158 Points +103%
Apple iPad 10 (Safari Mobile 16.1)	147 Points +88%
Average of class Tablet (21 - 315, n=68, last 2 years)	104.3 Points +34%
Xiaomi Pad 6 (Chrome 115)	94 Points +21%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7050 (66 - 107, n=4)	87.8 Points +13%
Lenovo Tab P12 (Chrome 115.0.5790.166)	78 Points
Lenovo Tab P11 (Gen 2) (Chrome 112)	57 Points -27%
Honor Pad 8 (Chrome 106.0.5249.126)	48 Points -38%

WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Apple iPad 10 (Safari Mobile 16.1)	214 Points +116%
Average of class Tablet (34 - 435, n=45, last 2 years)	149.6 Points +51%
Xiaomi Pad 6 (chrome 115)	134 Points +35%
Lenovo Tab P12 (Chrome 115.0.5790.166)	99 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7050 (81 - 113, n=3)	97.7 Points -1%
Lenovo Tab P11 (Gen 2) (Chrome 112)	80 Points -19%
Honor Pad 8 (Chrome 106.0.5249.126)	70 Points -29%

Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Apple iPad 10 (Safari Mobile 16.1)	272 runs/min +249%
OnePlus Pad (Chrome 112)	119 runs/min +53%
Average of class Tablet (2.59 - 572, n=63, last 2 years)	115.5 runs/min +48%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7050 (77.5 - 100, n=4)	88.8 runs/min +14%
Lenovo Tab P12 (Chrome 115.0.5790.166)	78 runs/min
Xiaomi Pad 6 (Chrome 115)	68.93 runs/min -12%
Honor Pad 8 (Chrome 106.0.5249.126)	40.54 runs/min -48%
Lenovo Tab P11 (Gen 2) (Chome 112)	31 runs/min -60%

Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPad 10 (Safari Mobile 16.1)	59963 Points +92%
OnePlus Pad (Chrome 112)	50429 Points +61%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7050 (31245 - 37214, n=5)	33346 Points +7%
Lenovo Tab P12 (Chrome 115.0.5790.166)	31245 Points
Xiaomi Pad 6 (Chrome 115)	30783 Points -1%
Average of class Tablet (763 - 105178, n=86, last 2 years)	28653 Points -8%
Lenovo Tab P11 (Gen 2) (Chrome 112)	17239 Points -45%
Honor Pad 8 (Chrome 106.0.5249.126)	13831 Points -56%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Average of class Tablet (319 - 34733, n=74, last 2 years)	3789 ms * -160%
Honor Pad 8 (Chrome 106.0.5249.126)	2873.8 ms * -97%
Lenovo Tab P11 (Gen 2) (Chrome 112)	2268.5 ms * -55%
Xiaomi Pad 6 (Chrome 115)	1532.1 ms * -5%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7050 (1264 - 1656, n=4)	1474 ms * -1%
Lenovo Tab P12 (Chrome 115.0.5790.166)	1460.1 ms *
OnePlus Pad (Chrome 112)	797.7 ms * +45%
Apple iPad 10 (Safari Mobile 16.1)	547 ms * +63%

* ... smaller is better

在读写性能方面，联想 Tab P12 表现出典型的 UFS 2.2 存储性能。总体而言，数据吞吐量略高于联想 Tab P11 2022（第二代）略高。

	Lenovo Tab P12	Honor Pad 8	Lenovo Tab P11 (Gen 2)	OnePlus Pad	Xiaomi Pad 6	Average 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	Average of class Tablet
AndroBench 3-5		-16%	-20%	81%	31%	-25%	-11%
Sequential Read 256KB	956.07	833.56 -13%	822.4 -14%	1866.48 95%	1673.97 75%	728 ?(303 - 1038, n=71) -24%	1045 ?(163 - 3912, n=74, last 2 years) 9%
Sequential Write 256KB	776.24	708.51 -9%	490.6 -37%	1616.83 108%	745.32 -4%	527 ?(103.2 - 903, n=71) -32%	684 ?(78.2 - 3154, n=74, last 2 years) -12%
Random Read 4KB	241.23	189.57 -21%	204.8 -15%	341.39 42%	298.45 24%	191.7 ?(89.3 - 297, n=71) -21%	189.2 ?(18.4 - 451, n=74, last 2 years) -22%
Random Write 4KB	234.58	186.95 -20%	201.3 -14%	420.93 79%	304.34 30%	185.8 ?(62.6 - 419, n=71) -21%	189.5 ?(8.23 - 555, n=74, last 2 years) -19%

游戏 - 限制为 60-FPS 的高速游戏

联想 Tab P12 可以流畅地运行游戏，在四个环绕声扬声器的帮助下，它可以营造出极具吸引力的音频体验。在运行《PUBG Mobile》时，我们在高清/超清设置下测得了稳定的 40 FPS（最高可选 HDR/超清）。在玩《Armajet》和《Subway Surfers》等对 GPU 要求稍低的游戏时，我们也测得了超过 60 FPS 的帧率，但遗憾的是，60Hz 显示屏不允许这样做。

我们使用测试工具Gamebench 测得了这些游戏帧率。

Lenovo Tab P12; Armajet; 1.61.6: Ø59.7 (56-60)

Lenovo Tab P12; PUBG Mobile; 2.7.0: Ø39.8 (36-41)

Lenovo Tab P12; Subway Surfers; 3.16.1: Ø59.9 (58-60)

Emissions - 低音强劲的扬声器四重奏

温度

在使用过程中，联想 Tab P12 的发热并不明显；满载情况下的平均温度为 33.3 °C，触摸起来甚至不热。在 3DMark 的 Wild Life 压力测试中，平板电脑的温度也不高。即使在运行了 20 次压力基准测试后，Tab P12 仍能发挥几乎全部性能（99.4%）。在日常使用中，确实不应该出现因温度过高而导致 SoC 性能下降的情况。

3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

Lenovo Tab P12 Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø12.9 (12.9-12.9)

Apple iPad 10 A14 Bionic GPU, A14, 64 GB SSD; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø42.4 (41.9-48.6)

Honor Pad 8 Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø2.68 (2.67-2.68)

Lenovo Tab P11 (Gen 2) Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø7.45 (7.44-7.47)

OnePlus Pad Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø41.2 (35.1-48.8)

Xiaomi Pad 6 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø21.5 (21.1-25.4)

Lenovo Tab P12 Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø3.71 (3.7-3.72)

Apple iPad 10 A14 Bionic GPU, A14, 64 GB SSD; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test: Ø11.8 (11.6-13.5)

Honor Pad 8 Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø0.737 (0.728-0.748)

Lenovo Tab P11 (Gen 2) Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø2.06 (2.05-2.07)

OnePlus Pad Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø12.5 (12-14.1)

Xiaomi Pad 6 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø6.27 (6.1-7.39)

Apple iPad 10 A14 Bionic GPU, A14, 64 GB SSD; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability: Ø43.4 (42.4-51.8)

Max. Load

Idle


38 °C	37.7 °C	31.8 °C
33.8 °C	31.9 °C	30.9 °C
32.7 °C	33.9 °C	33.2 °C

Maximum: 38 °C
Average: 33.8 °C


32.1 °C	38 °C	32.8 °C
31.9 °C	33.3 °C	33 °C
30.4 °C	31.6 °C	31.2 °C

Maximum: 38 °C
Average: 32.7 °C

Power Supply (max.) 32.5 °C | Room Temperature 22 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 33.8 °C / 93 F, compared to the average of 30 °C / 86 F for the devices in the class Tablet.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 38 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 38 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 33.3 °C / 92 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.7 °C / 85 F, compared to the device average of 30 °C / 86 F.

发言人

借助四个兼容杜比全景声（Dolby Atmos）的扬声器，Tab P12 可以营造出良好的环绕音效。低音在音效组合中可能略显不足，但总的来说，还是比其他大多数同类平板电脑更有存在感。

在 Dolby Atmos 设置中，你可以选择电影、音乐和动态模式。在动态模式下，平板电脑会根据播放的内容自动调整声音设置。

外部音频设备可以通过蓝牙 5.1 或 USB-C 适配器连接到联想 Tab P12。它的蓝牙编解码器选择有点少，仅限于 SBC、AAC、LDAC、aptX 和 aptX HD。

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Lenovo Tab P12 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.6% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 22% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 74% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 13% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 84% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Lenovo Tab P11 (Gen 2) audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 18.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.9% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 42% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 52% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 36% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 56% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电源管理 - 耗电的平板电脑

耗电量

联想 Tab P12 的充电功率可达 30 瓦。不过，随机提供的电源并不能完全满足这一要求，因为它最多只能提供 20 瓦的功率。在我们的测试中，10,200 毫安时的电池需要 2:35 小时才能充满。

在功耗方面，Tab P12 的表现也不尽如人意。事实证明，在空闲模式和负载情况下，它都比其姊妹机型更耗电。与OnePlus Pad是个例外，其他所有对比设备都更省电。

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.07 / 0.14 Watt
Idle	1.91 / 7.94 / 8.12 Watt
Load	10.68 / 12.69 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Lenovo Tab P12 10200 mAh	Apple iPad 10 7606 mAh	Honor Pad 8 7250 mAh	Lenovo Tab P11 (Gen 2) 7500 mAh	OnePlus Pad 9510 mAh	Xiaomi Pad 6 8840 mAh
Power Consumption		14%	60%	58%	-9%	18%
Idle Minimum *	1.91	1.34 30%	1.1 42%	0.9 53%	3.64 -91%	0.96 50%
Idle Average *	7.94	7.78 2%	1.5 81%	1.3 84%	6.84 14%	4.91 38%
Idle Maximum *	8.12	7.89 3%	2.1 74%	1.5 82%	7.15 12%	5.07 38%
Load Average *	10.68	9.05 15%	4.4 59%	5 53%	8.98 16%	11.8 -10%
Load Maximum *	12.69	9.98 21%	7.2 43%	10.1 20%	11.9 6%	15.9 -25%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

Lenovo Tab P12 MediaTek Dimensity 7050: Ø6.66 (3.76-11.1)

Honor Pad 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G: Ø4.56 (2.69-7.24)

Lenovo Tab P11 (Gen 2) Mediatek Helio G99: Ø5.24 (2.22-10.1)

Power consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

Lenovo Tab P12 MediaTek Dimensity 7050; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø5.8 (5.4-6.3)

Honor Pad 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø4.44 (3.56-4.75)

Lenovo Tab P11 (Gen 2) Mediatek Helio G99; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø4.61 (4.1-5.78)

Lenovo Tab P12 MediaTek Dimensity 7050; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø3.85 (3.8-4.02)

Honor Pad 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.232 (1.132-1.477)

Lenovo Tab P11 (Gen 2) Mediatek Helio G99; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.063 (0.873-1.552)

运行时间

在 WLAN 测试中，我们将显示屏亮度设置为 150 cd/m²，联想 Tab P12 运行了 11 个多小时。在飞行模式下，10,200 毫安时电池在播放循环视频时可持续运行 10 小时。

这两个值都是稳定的（但不是惊人的）运行时间--特别是由于 Tab P12 的高能耗造成的。效率更高的Lenovo Tab P11 2022 (Gen 2) 尽管电池容量较小，但仍能多运行几个小时。

Battery Runtime

Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)		26h 32min
WiFi Websurfing		11h 15min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		10h 00min
Load (maximum brightness)		3h 51min

	Lenovo Tab P12 10200 mAh	Apple iPad 10 7606 mAh	Honor Pad 8 7250 mAh	Lenovo Tab P11 (Gen 2) 7500 mAh	OnePlus Pad 9510 mAh	Xiaomi Pad 6 8840 mAh
Battery Runtime		3%	25%	29%	19%	24%
Reader / Idle	1592	1729 9%	2448 54%	2096 32%	1345 -16%	2154 35%
H.264	600	740 23%	838 40%	1002 67%	963 61%	741 24%
WiFi v1.3	675	647 -4%	733 9%	879 30%	648 -4%	823 22%
Load	231	191 -17%	225 -3%	204 -12%	310 34%	265 15%

Pros

+ 12.7 英寸 3K 分辨率显示屏

+ 高品质铝合金外壳

+ 性能卓越

+ 配件齐全

+ 可使用主动手写笔输入

+ 指纹传感器

+ 良好的扬声器

Cons

- 电池寿命一般

- 无蜂窝电话

- 相机性能一般

- 只有标准蓝牙编解码器

联想 Tab P12 的评价

联想对其中档平板电脑进行了一次很好的升级。其更大的 12.7 英寸显示屏（与联想 Tab P11 2022（第二代）相比联想 Tab P11 2022（第二代）的 11.5 英寸）以及更高的分辨率为多媒体爱好者带来了绝佳的体验。适合家庭使用的 Tab P12 对于某些儿童的手来说可能有点太大了。

联想 Tab P12 的最大显示亮度为 435 cd/m²，特别适合室内使用。由于其快速联发科 Dimensity 7050，它甚至能够完成强大的任务，此外，它的杜比 Atmos 扬声器更是锦上添花。事实证明，玩高细节级别的游戏对这颗八核 SoC 来说也不成问题。不过，由于受到 60Hz 面板的限制，帧率无法超过 60 FPS。

联想 Tab P12 结合了 12.7 英寸显示屏和相对较低的价格。此外，这款平板电脑还配备了多种配件，包括扩展坞键盘和触控笔。

Tab P12 的一大亮点是其丰富的配件。通过可选的手写笔输入和扩展坞键盘，该平板电脑可以迅速变身为高效设备。此外，还有窗口视图和分屏等操作系统功能。

联想 Tab P12 的运行时间并不令人印象深刻。虽然该平板电脑配备了 10,200 毫安时电池，但该设备非常耗电，导致总的电池续航时间一般。与 Tab P11 2022（第二代）相比，它也不再配备蜂窝网络选项。遗憾的是，这也影响了平板电脑的生产力。

Tab P12 的替代产品包括联想 Tab P11 2022 (Gen 2)、OnePlus Pad 和Xiaomi Pad 6 。后两者不仅价格相近，而且都采用了 120 赫兹的面板。

价格和供应情况

联想 Tab P12 尚未在美国上市。它的零售价可能在 435 美元左右（平板电脑 + 手写笔）。

联想 Tab P11（第二代）在亚马逊的售价为 259 美元。

Lenovo Tab P12 - 08/30/2023 v7 ^(old)
Manuel Masiero

Chassis

83 / 98 → 85%

Keyboard

70 / 80 → 88%

Pointing Device

91%

Connectivity

47 / 70 → 67%

Weight

81 / 40-88 → 86%

Battery

86%

Display

87%

Games Performance

45 / 78 → 58%

Application Performance

78 / 92 → 85%

Temperature

92%

Noise

100%

Audio

82 / 91 → 90%

Camera

56 / 85 → 66%

Average

77%

85%

Tablet - Weighted Average

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Price comparison

Editor of the original article: Daisy Dickson - Translator - 337 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2023

Translator: Ninh Ngoc Duy - Editorial Assistant - 458020 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008

contact me via: Facebook

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 联想 Tab P12 评测--功能强大的 XXL 平板电脑，配件丰富

Manuel Masiero, 2023-09- 2 (Update: 2024-08-15)