三星Galaxy Tab S9+ (Plus) 5G 评测--昂贵的高品质 12.4 英寸平板电脑

Name: Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+
Brand: Samsung

中庸之道

如果三星Galaxy Tab S9 的存储空间太小，Tab S9 Ultra 又太贵，三星还提供了存储空间高达 512 GB、显示屏为 12.4 英寸的另一款Galaxy Tab S9+。这是 "黄金分割点 "吗？我们将在测试中揭晓答案。

Florian Schmitt, 👁 Florian Schmitt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy), Published 10/13/2023 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

5G Android ARM Tablet

三星的顶级平板电脑今年也取得了不俗的成绩：我们已经测试了三星Galaxy Tab S9和 Tab S9 Ultra并都非常喜欢。

三星Galaxy Tab S9+ 是介于上述两款产品之间的一款平板电脑。它比 Tab S9和 12.4 英寸更大的显示屏，但也要多支付约 100 欧元（约合 106 美元）。

另一方面，它比三星Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra相比，您还能获得快速 SoC、高分辨率 AMOLED 屏幕和笔支持。现在我们来仔细看看Galaxy Tab S9 系列的中间型号，看看所有这些是否也能带来一款好的平板电脑。

Test device courtesy of notebooksbilliger.de

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+ (Galaxy Tab S9 Series)

Processor

Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy 8 x 2 - 3.4 GHz, Cortex-X3 / A715 / A710 / A510 (Kryo)

Graphics adapter

Qualcomm Adreno 740

Memory

12 GB

Display

12.40 inch 16:10, 2800 x 1752 pixel 266 PPI, capacitive touchscreen, native pen support, AMOLED, Corning Gorilla Glass 5, glossy: yes, HDR, 120 Hz

Storage

256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash, 256 GB

, 230 GB free

Connections

1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 DisplayPort, 1 Docking Station Port, Audio Connections: audio via USB-C, Card Reader: microSDXC (bis 1TB, dedicated), Brightness Sensor, Sensors: position sensor, acceleration sensor, hall sensor

Networking

Wi-Fi 6E (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz), Bluetooth 5.3, GSM (850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz); UMTS (band 1, 2, 4, 5, 8), LTE (band 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 40, 41, 66); 5G (band N1, N3, N5, N7, N8, N20, N28, N38, N40, N41, N66, N77, N78), LTE, 5G, GPS

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 5.7 x 285.4 x 185.4

Battery

10090 mAh Lithium-Ion, 45 Watt charging

Charging

fast charging / Quickcharge

Operating System

Android 13

Camera

Primary Camera: 13 MPix flash, AF, f/2.0 (camera 1), 8 MP, wide angle lens, AF, f/2.2 (camera 2)
Secondary Camera: 12 MPix wide angle lens, face detection, flash, AF, f/2.4

Additional features

Speakers: four speakers, pen, USB cable, SIM tool, 24 Months Warranty, eSIM support, IP68 certified, fanless, waterproof

Weight

586 g

Price

1269 Euro

Links

Samsung notebook section

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating	Date	Model	Weight	Height	Size	Resolution
91.3 % v7 ^(old)	10 / 2023	Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+ SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740	586 g	5.7 mm	12.40"	2800x1752
89.1 % v7 ^(old)	04 / 2022	Lenovo Tab P12 Pro SD 870, Adreno 650	565 g	5.6 mm	12.60"	2560x1600
91.8 % v7 ^(old)	11 / 2022	Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 M2, M2 10-Core GPU	682 g	6.4 mm	12.90"	2732x2048
88.3 % v7 ^(old)	04 / 2022	Samsung Galaxy Tab S8+ 5G SD 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730	572 g	5.7 mm	12.40"	2800x1752
88.8 % v7 ^(old)	08 / 2023	Xiaomi Pad 6 SD 870, Adreno 650	490 g	6.51 mm	11.00"	2880x1800

外壳 - IP 认证的超薄外壳

三星Galaxy S9+ 的铝制外壳防水防尘等级达到 IP68。虽然理论上你也可以带着Galaxy Tab S9+ 在水下浮潜，但由于水压的原因，水深不宜超过 1 米（约 3 英尺）。

这款平板电脑有两种颜色可供选择：深灰色和浅米色，附带的 S Pen 在颜色上也很协调。与三星Galaxy Tab S8+前代产品相比，尺寸几乎没有变化。Galaxy Tab S9+ 在宽度和高度上的增长微乎其微，但厚度仅为 5.7 毫米（约 0.22 英寸），仍然是一款非常纤薄的平板电脑。

虽然背面的两个摄像头明显突出，但三星仍然成功地防止了平板电脑平放在桌面上时的晃动。

四边的显示屏边框非常纤薄，只有 8 毫米（约 0.3 英寸），使平板电脑看起来非常时尚。同时，你还可以舒适地将它握在手中，而不会总是不小心触发触摸屏。屏幕由大猩猩 5 号玻璃保护。

平板电脑的做工非常出色，边缘圆润，即使在材料过渡处也几乎不会变形。按压时也不会产生任何嘎吱声。

尺寸比较

Lenovo Tab P12 Pro Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+ Samsung Galaxy Tab S8+ 5G Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 Xiaomi Pad 6 DIN A4 ❌

设备 -Galaxy Tab S9+ 的两个存储版本

由于三星Galaxy Tab S9+ 代表了Galaxy Tab S9 系列中的中间选项，因此在存储方面也获得了两个中间版本。以下是可供选择的设备版本，我们也列出了每个版本的官方建议零售价：

256 GB 存储 / 12 GB RAM / WiFi：1119 欧元（约合 1184 美元）
512 GB 存储空间/12 GB 内存/WiFi：1,239 欧元（约合 1,311 美元）
256 GB 存储空间/12 GB 内存/5G：1,269 欧元（约合 1,342 美元）
512 GB 存储空间/12 GB 内存/5G：1,389 欧元（约合 1,470 美元）

配备蓝牙 5.3，使用最新的蓝牙技术。

USB-C 端口指定为 USB 3.2 Gen 1，由于 USB 联盟的标签混乱，该端口对应的是 USB 3.0。数据传输速率最高可达 5 Gbit/s。Galaxy Tab S9+ 还集成了 DisplayPort 功能，可以使用 USB-C 连接线轻松连接外部显示器。不提供 NFC 功能。

该平板电脑的 5G 版本包括一个 Nano SIM 卡插槽，还支持 eSIM 卡，这样就可以实现双 SIM 卡。

microSD 读卡器

与许多其他昂贵的平板电脑相比，三星 Tab S9 系列还包括一个 microSD 卡插槽。除了 SIM 卡插槽外，还可以使用它。

三星Galaxy Tab S9+ 的速度与其前代产品大致相同，我们在使用 Angelbird V60 参考 microSD 卡进行的测试中可以发现这一点。

SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8+ 5G Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash (Angelbird AV Pro V60)	53.8 MB/s +4%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+ Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash (Angelbird V60)	51.6 MB/s
Lenovo Tab P12 Pro Adreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash (Angelbird V60)	31.4 MB/s -39%

Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)

Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+ Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø42.5 (27.8-54.4)

Samsung Galaxy Tab S8+ 5G Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø39.9 (32.7-51)

Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+ Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø75.7 (49.7-93.4)

Samsung Galaxy Tab S8+ 5G Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø73.1 (43.7-86.2)

软件 - 三星承诺较长的更新周期

Android 13 预装在平板电脑上，并覆盖了三星内部的 OneUI 5.1.1。在测试时，安全补丁是从 2023 年 8 月开始的，因此它们也是相当及时的。制造商承诺会进行四次大型软件更新，因此该平板电脑应该还会收到 17。此外，它还会在 5 年内（即 2028 年之前）获得季度安全更新。Android

三星的系统并不纯粹，它预装了许多第三方应用程序，包括一些来自商业供应商的应用程序，如 Spotify 或 Netflix。此外，三星还安装了大量自己的应用程序，其中一些还兼具谷歌应用程序的功能，如自己的浏览器或消息应用程序。不过幸运的是，如果你不喜欢这些应用，很多都可以轻松卸载。

三星 DeX 还允许你使用桌面模式，通过鼠标和键盘对平板电脑进行优化操作。这样，你还可以将平板电脑用作笔记本电脑的替代品。

通信和全球导航卫星系统 - 可靠的无线局域网

Wi-Fi 6E 是三星Galaxy Tab S9+ 支持的最快的互联网标准。在使用华硕 ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000 参考路由器进行的测试中，这款平板电脑的传输速率非常快。根据测试结果，1-Gbit 的网络连接在任何时候都能得到充分利用。

加载和滚动网站的速度非常快，在靠近路由器的地方也能获得充分的接收强度。但是，在 10 米（约 33 英尺）的距离和穿过 3 面墙时，信号强度只有 50%。这一点在网页渲染速度上也变得非常明显，尽管速度仍然快如闪电。

5G 版平板电脑支持多种不同的频段，因此在旅行时也能使用移动互联网。在持续约两周的测试期间，我们不断测试各种情况下的接收质量，结果令人非常满意。三星Galaxy Tab S9+ 通常在非常困难的地方也能提供可接受的接收信号。

Networking
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Xiaomi Pad 6 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	932 (727^min - 966^max) MBit/s
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8+ 5G Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	831 (779^min - 861^max) MBit/s
Lenovo Tab P12 Pro Adreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	719 (644^min - 771^max) MBit/s
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe	442 (222^min - 528^max) MBit/s
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8+ 5G Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	896 (774^min - 935^max) MBit/s
Xiaomi Pad 6 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	880 (791^min - 925^max) MBit/s
Lenovo Tab P12 Pro Adreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	851 (475^min - 925^max) MBit/s
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe	486 (175^min - 591^max) MBit/s
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8+ 5G Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1797 (920^min - 1830^max) MBit/s +18%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+ Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	1518 (1344^min - 1577^max) MBit/s
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe	747 (145^min - 917^max) MBit/s -51%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8+ 5G Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1598 (1441^min - 1641^max) MBit/s +59%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+ Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	1006 (859^min - 1153^max) MBit/s
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe	702 (225^min - 834^max) MBit/s -30%

Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1518 (1344-1577)

Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1006 (859-1153)

该平板电脑的 5G 版和 Wi-Fi 版都有定位模块。虽然它可以与所有大型卫星网络结合使用，但并不支持 SBAS 以实现更精确的定位。

在室内很难获得卫星信号，因此大多数情况下都是借助已知的 WLAN 连接使用谷歌服务来确定大致位置。然而，当你走出室外时，卫星上行链路很快就能工作，我们的定位精度可达 3 米（约 10 英尺）。但即便如此，平板电脑也找不到很多卫星。

在实践测试中，我们这次使用的是汽车。虽然Galaxy 平板电脑能够大致跟踪我们的路线，但有时它往往会将我们定位在道路旁边，或者显示我们穿过建筑物或树木。尽管我们以前看到过更好的导航效果，但只要你对精确度的要求不是太高，Galaxy Tab S9+ 仍然可以用于导航。

相机 - 包括广角镜头

如果只是为了相机，您可以为自己节省额外的保费，购买三星Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra，因为Galaxy Tab S9+ 除了感光度更高的第二前置摄像头外，还配备了相同的设备。

在主摄像头方面，仍然是Galaxy Tab S8 系列的 1300 万像素传感器。对于平板电脑来说，该镜头的拍摄效果相当不错，但感光度一般，尤其是在光线条件较差的情况下，会成为一个问题。而在日光下，色彩和细节的还原则相当扎实。

无论选择全高清还是 4K 分辨率，视频都只能以 30 帧/秒的速度录制。自动对焦和亮度调节工作没有任何延迟，因此在光线良好的条件下，视频的细节相当丰富。

此外，背面还有一个 800 万像素广角镜头。遗憾的是，你不能用它进行混合变焦，只能在背面的两个摄像头之间直接切换。广角照片很吸引人，不过放大后只能显示很少的细节，部分照片还略显模糊。

前置摄像头拍摄的自拍照可以接受，但放大后颗粒感很强，暗部几乎看不到任何细节。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Hauptkamera Blume Hauptkamera Umgebung Hauptkamera Low Light Weitwinkelkamera

click to load images

Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+

Apple iPhone 14

Honor Magic5 Pro

Canon EOS 600D

click to load images

Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+

Apple iPhone 14

Honor Magic5 Pro

Canon EOS 600D

click to load images

Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+

Apple iPhone 14

Honor Magic5 Pro

Canon EOS 600D

click to load images

Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+

Apple iPhone 14

Honor Magic5 Pro

Canon EOS 600D

在我们的照相馆中，我们在预定的光线条件下再次对主相机进行了测试。在照相馆的全光照条件下，测试图看起来非常清晰，甚至在边缘区域也是如此。在仅有一勒克斯的光照条件下，物体仍然清晰可辨，但看起来颗粒感很强。

ColorChecker Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+: 12.24 ∆E min: 2.37 - max: 20.25 ∆E

配件和保修 - 包装盒中不包括充电器

虽然平板电脑纤薄的包装盒已经让人在购买时兴奋不已，让人对其超薄设计充满期待，但同时也可以看出，三星Galaxy Tab S9+ 的包装盒中并不包含充电器。除了 USB 数据线和 SIM 卡工具外，包装盒中只有一个配件，但这确实是一个亮点：S Pen。

这款输入笔可以通过磁力吸附到Galaxy 平板电脑背面的凹槽中，同时也可以在这里充电。它通过蓝牙与平板电脑连接，也可用于手势输入。此外，笔上还有一个按钮，默认情况下可打开快速访问菜单，但也可用于兼容应用程序的其他功能。

即使在电池电量耗尽的情况下，你仍然可以使用输入笔，但这样你就失去了所有需要蓝牙连接的功能。

三星为其平板电脑提供 24 个月的保修服务。如果将保修期延长至 Samsung Care+，还能在平板电脑发生意外或失窃时提供保护。

输入设备和操作 - 出色的指纹传感器

除了使用输入笔进行可靠流畅的操作外，Galaxy Tab S9+ 的触摸屏也可以使用手指进行非常精确的操作。由于刷新率高达 120 Hz，因此可以非常快速流畅地执行输入操作。

横屏模式下，指纹传感器集成在平板电脑右侧的显示屏中。用拇指很容易就能触碰到传感器区域，即使拇指没有完全放在正确的位置，拇指指纹也能被识别。传感器能够可靠、快速地解锁显示屏。

你还可以选择通过前置摄像头进行人脸识别解锁。不过，这只是二维识别，并不十分安全，因此我们不能排除第三方通过照片进行操控的可能性。

▶ load Youtube video

显示屏 - 明亮的 AMOLED，响应速度快

三星Galaxy Tab S9+ 配备了一块对角线为 12.4 英寸、纵横比为 16:10 的 AMOLED 显示屏。三星平板电脑的分辨率为 2,800 x 1,752 像素，具有相当高的分辨率，使显示内容看起来非常清晰，细节丰富。

在最大亮度方面，Tab S9+ 在全白显示屏下的平均亮度为 551 cd/m²，比前代产品亮度明显提高。在小区域（APL18），甚至可以达到 900 cd/m²，足以正常显示 HDR 内容。

在最低亮度下，我们测得的连续闪烁频率为 120 Hz，这与屏幕的刷新率相符。三星可能在这里相应地调整了 PWM 频率，以方便更敏感的用户。不过，在购买之前，容易因屏幕闪烁而头疼的用户还是应该先看看显示屏，以确保自己没有问题。


543 cd/m²	568 cd/m²	542 cd/m²
555 cd/m²	574 cd/m²	546 cd/m²
552 cd/m²	512 cd/m²	568 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 574 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 551.1 cd/m² Minimum: 1.6 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 89 %
Center on Battery: 574 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.01 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93
ΔE Greyscale 2.8 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
98.5% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.066

	Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+ AMOLED, 2800x1752, 12.4"	Lenovo Tab P12 Pro AMOLED, 2560x1600, 12.6"	Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 Mini-LED, 2732x2048, 12.9"	Samsung Galaxy Tab S8+ 5G Super AMOLED, 2800x1752, 12.4"	Xiaomi Pad 6 IPS LCD, 2880x1800, 11"
Screen		-14%	17%	-11%	25%
Brightness middle	574	552 -4%	611 6%	459 -20%	541 -6%
Brightness	551	555 1%	605 10%	462 -16%	494 -10%
Brightness Distribution	89	97 9%	92 3%	97 9%	89 0%
Black Level *					0.65
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	2.01	3.43 -71%	1.4 30%	2.2 -9%	0.9 55%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	4.93	7.25 -47%	3.3 33%	4.9 1%	1.8 63%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	2.8	2 29%	2.3 18%	3.6 -29%	1.4 50%
Gamma	2.066 ^106%	2.253 ^98%	2.22 ^99%	2.09 ^105%	2.26 ^97%
CCT	6566 ^99%	6417 ^101%	6930 ^94%	6558 ^99%	6710 ^97%
Contrast					832

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

120 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 120 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 120 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

在不同亮度设置下，以固定变焦水平进行系列测量

在使用光谱光度计和 CalMAN 软件进行的测量中，我们确定色彩还原相当准确。即使在显示纯白色时有极小的偏差，但所有的色彩值都显示出非常好的再现效果，因此您可以使用该屏幕相当可靠地评估印刷色彩。

响应时间很短，游戏玩家或其他要求苛刻的用户在使用显示器时应该不会有任何明显的延迟。

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
1.5 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 0.8 ms rise
1.5 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 0.7 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 5 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
2.1 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 1.1 ms rise
2.1 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 1 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 7 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

在室外，尽管阳光直射会带来一些问题，但这款平板电脑在日光条件下仍然相当好用。

无论视角如何，显示内容始终清晰可辨。

性能--几乎没有其他平板电脑能达到如此快的速度

采用高通骁龙 8 第二代处理器Galaxy，三星在 2023 年为其旗舰智能手机和平板电脑推出了自己的 SoC，尽管它与普通的高通骁龙 8 代 2在很大程度上相同。唯一的区别是主频稍高的主频。

实际上，Tab S9+ 配备的这颗 SoC 能提供真正的高端性能，目前在基准测试中只有以下产品能超越它 iPad Pro.无论是处理器的性能还是人工智能应用的能力，Galaxy ，这款平板电脑都快如闪电，即使同时运行多个应用程序，在日常操作中也不会表现出任何弱点。

Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022	1890 Points +21%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+	1566 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy (1542 - 1598, n=7)	1561 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8+ 5G	1182 Points -25%
Xiaomi Pad 6	1003 Points -36%
Lenovo Tab P12 Pro	955 Points -39%
Average of class Tablet (140 - 1890, n=71, last 2 years)	704 Points -55%
Multi-Core
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022	8524 Points +64%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+	5198 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy (4906 - 5198, n=7)	5020 Points -3%
Xiaomi Pad 6	3328 Points -36%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8+ 5G	3293 Points -37%
Lenovo Tab P12 Pro	3215 Points -38%
Average of class Tablet (312 - 8624, n=71, last 2 years)	2450 Points -53%

Antutu v9 - Total Score
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022	1416727 Points +13%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+	1255800 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy (1086936 - 1286774, n=8)	1181107 Points -6%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8+ 5G	821646 Points -35%
Lenovo Tab P12 Pro	707685 Points -44%
Xiaomi Pad 6	581322 Points -54%
Average of class Tablet (92766 - 1416727, n=51, last 2 years)	479711 Points -62%

PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+	17267 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy (15270 - 17267, n=8)	16185 Points -6%
Xiaomi Pad 6	13728 Points -20%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8+ 5G	13711 Points -21%
Lenovo Tab P12 Pro	13565 Points -21%
Average of class Tablet (3195 - 20841, n=71, last 2 years)	9556 Points -45%

CrossMark - Overall
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022	1584 Points +24%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+	1277 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy (1120 - 1332, n=8)	1239 Points -3%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8+ 5G	999 Points -22%
Average of class Tablet (172 - 1944, n=63, last 2 years)	762 Points -40%
Xiaomi Pad 6	754 Points -41%
Lenovo Tab P12 Pro	732 Points -43%

BaseMark OS II
Overall
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+	8886 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy (8541 - 9337, n=8)	8859 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8+ 5G	6283 Points -29%
Lenovo Tab P12 Pro	5865 Points -34%
Xiaomi Pad 6	5289 Points -40%
Average of class Tablet (444 - 9147, n=57, last 2 years)	3887 Points -56%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022	Points -100%
System
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+	13730 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy (1374 - 14401, n=8)	12462 Points -9%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8+ 5G	9273 Points -32%
Lenovo Tab P12 Pro	9124 Points -34%
Xiaomi Pad 6	8463 Points -38%
Average of class Tablet (1103 - 14097, n=57, last 2 years)	6898 Points -50%
Memory
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+	8890 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy (8467 - 9212, n=8)	8823 Points -1%
Lenovo Tab P12 Pro	7365 Points -17%
Xiaomi Pad 6	6127 Points -31%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8+ 5G	5739 Points -35%
Average of class Tablet (916 - 10977, n=57, last 2 years)	4599 Points -48%
Graphics
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+	31688 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy (21505 - 31928, n=8)	28672 Points -10%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8+ 5G	22283 Points -30%
Lenovo Tab P12 Pro	11754 Points -63%
Xiaomi Pad 6	11263 Points -64%
Average of class Tablet (580 - 31738, n=57, last 2 years)	7340 Points -77%
Web
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy (1460 - 2032, n=8)	1768 Points +10%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+	1612 Points
Lenovo Tab P12 Pro	1452 Points -10%
Xiaomi Pad 6	1336 Points -17%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8+ 5G	1291 Points -20%
Average of class Tablet (10 - 1907, n=57, last 2 years)	1237 Points -23%

AImark - Score v3.x
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+	156427 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy (1216 - 156427, n=6)	27143 Points -83%
Average of class Tablet (84 - 156427, n=49, last 2 years)	5184 Points -97%
Xiaomi Pad 6	Points -100%

UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Xiaomi Pad 6	16501 Points +2%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+	16134 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy (1267 - 16702, n=8)	14423 Points -11%
Average of class Tablet (1662 - 44323, n=55, last 2 years)	8992 Points -44%

Legend

Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+ Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Qualcomm Adreno 740, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash

Lenovo Tab P12 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Qualcomm Adreno 650, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 Apple M2, Apple M2 10-Core GPU, 128 GB NVMe

Samsung Galaxy Tab S8+ 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Qualcomm Adreno 730, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

Xiaomi Pad 6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Qualcomm Adreno 650, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy

Average of class Tablet

在图形计算方面，三星平板电脑的速度也非常快，甚至在 GFXBench 的 4K 基准测试中仍能达到 29 帧/秒。全高清分辨率下的应用对 SoC 来说完全没有问题，甚至可以达到明显超过 120 帧/秒的速度。

同样 Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022配备Apple的 M2的 iPad Pro 12.9 2022 显示出更高的性能，但只有在要求非常苛刻的应用中才能明显看出差异。

3DMark: Wild Life Extreme Unlimited | Wild Life Extreme | Solar Bay Score | Solar Bay Unlimited Score
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7: T-Rex Onscreen | 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
GFXBench 3.0: on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
GFXBench 3.1: on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
GFXBench: on screen Car Chase Onscreen | 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | 3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe	6909 Points +88%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+ Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	3684 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8+ 5G Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	2493 Points -32%
Xiaomi Pad 6 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1233 Points -67%
Lenovo Tab P12 Pro Adreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1225 Points -67%

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe	6919 Points +86%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+ Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	3710 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8+ 5G Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	2473 Points -33%
Xiaomi Pad 6 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1246 Points -66%
Lenovo Tab P12 Pro Adreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1232 Points -67%

3DMark / Solar Bay Score
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+ Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	5630 Points

3DMark / Solar Bay Unlimited Score
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+ Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	5623 Points

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe	120 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+ Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	120 fps
Lenovo Tab P12 Pro Adreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	119 fps -1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8+ 5G Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	119 fps -1%
Xiaomi Pad 6 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	109 fps -9%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe	873 fps +77%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+ Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	493 fps
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8+ 5G Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	334 fps -32%
Lenovo Tab P12 Pro Adreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	226 fps -54%
Xiaomi Pad 6 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	181 fps -63%

GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe	120 fps +1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+ Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	119 fps
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8+ 5G Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	90 fps -24%
Lenovo Tab P12 Pro Adreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	78 fps -34%
Xiaomi Pad 6 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	59 fps -50%

GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe	494 fps +54%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+ Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	321 fps
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8+ 5G Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	163 fps -49%
Lenovo Tab P12 Pro Adreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	132 fps -59%
Xiaomi Pad 6 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	118 fps -63%

GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe	115 fps +10%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+ Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	105 fps
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8+ 5G Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	59 fps -44%
Lenovo Tab P12 Pro Adreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	49 fps -53%
Xiaomi Pad 6 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	33 fps -69%

GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe	340 fps +50%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+ Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	226 fps
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8+ 5G Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	121 fps -46%
Lenovo Tab P12 Pro Adreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	95 fps -58%
Xiaomi Pad 6 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	81 fps -64%

GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe	89 fps +39%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+ Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	64 fps
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8+ 5G Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	43 fps -33%
Lenovo Tab P12 Pro Adreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	30 fps -53%
Xiaomi Pad 6 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	21 fps -67%

GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe	214 fps +62%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+ Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	132 fps
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8+ 5G Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	72 fps -45%
Lenovo Tab P12 Pro Adreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	58 fps -56%
Xiaomi Pad 6 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	49 fps -63%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe	70 fps +37%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+ Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	51 fps
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8+ 5G Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	32 fps -37%
Lenovo Tab P12 Pro Adreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	20 fps -61%
Xiaomi Pad 6 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	17 fps -67%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe	90 fps +41%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+ Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	64 fps
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8+ 5G Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	37 fps -42%
Lenovo Tab P12 Pro Adreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	22 fps -66%
Xiaomi Pad 6 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	20 fps -69%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe	89 fps +14%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+ Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	78 fps
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8+ 5G Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	44 fps -44%
Lenovo Tab P12 Pro Adreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	32 fps -59%
Xiaomi Pad 6 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	22 fps -72%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe	241 fps +52%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+ Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	159 fps
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8+ 5G Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	92 fps -42%
Lenovo Tab P12 Pro Adreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	57 fps -64%
Xiaomi Pad 6 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	53 fps -67%

GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe	48 fps +66%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+ Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	29 fps
Xiaomi Pad 6 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	9.7 fps -67%

在上网时，Galaxy Tab S9+ 的速度也非常快。网站加载速度很快，大多数情况下在滚动时就能看到照片。即使是带有大量 HTML-5 效果的高要求网页，也不会拖慢平板电脑的运行速度。

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 (Safari Mobile 16.1)	225.315 Points +15%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+ (Chrome 117)	196.271 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy (152.9 - 196.3, n=8)	173.4 Points -12%
Lenovo Tab P12 Pro (Chrome 98)	108.3 Points -45%
Average of class Tablet (19.9 - 334, n=69, last 2 years)	107.9 Points -45%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8+ 5G (Samsung Browser V16)	95.424 Points -51%
Xiaomi Pad 6 (Chrome 115)	86.985 Points -56%

WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 (Safari Mobile 16.1)	227 Points +21%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+ (Chrome 117)	187 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy (145 - 187, n=8)	165.5 Points -11%
Average of class Tablet (21 - 315, n=68, last 2 years)	102.6 Points -45%
Xiaomi Pad 6 (Chrome 115)	94 Points -50%

WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 (Safari Mobile 16.1)	342 Points +41%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+ (Chrome 117)	243 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy (183 - 243, n=3)	219 Points -10%
Lenovo Tab P12 Pro (Chrome 98)	155 Points -36%
Average of class Tablet (34 - 435, n=47, last 2 years)	152.6 Points -37%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8+ 5G (Samsung Browser V16)	151 Points -38%
Xiaomi Pad 6 (chrome 115)	134 Points -45%

Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 (Safari Mobile 16.1)	376 runs/min +93%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+ (Chrome 117)	195 runs/min
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy (136 - 197, n=6)	168.7 runs/min -13%
Average of class Tablet (2.59 - 572, n=63, last 2 years)	114.9 runs/min -41%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8+ 5G (Samsung Browser V16)	99.7 runs/min -49%
Xiaomi Pad 6 (Chrome 115)	68.93 runs/min -65%
Lenovo Tab P12 Pro (Chrome 98)	65.5 runs/min -66%

Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 (Safari Mobile 16.1)	74614 Points +15%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+ (Chrome 117)	64715 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy (49582 - 64715, n=8)	59058 Points -9%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8+ 5G (Samsung Browser V16)	41829 Points -35%
Lenovo Tab P12 Pro (Chrome 98)	41256 Points -36%
Xiaomi Pad 6 (Chrome 115)	30783 Points -52%
Average of class Tablet (763 - 105178, n=86, last 2 years)	28263 Points -56%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Average of class Tablet (319 - 34733, n=74, last 2 years)	3807 ms * -499%
Xiaomi Pad 6 (Chrome 115)	1532.1 ms * -141%
Lenovo Tab P12 Pro (Chrome 98)	1055 ms * -66%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8+ 5G (Samsung Browser V16)	936.3 ms * -47%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy (634 - 1533, n=8)	795 ms * -25%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+ (Chrome 117)	635.1 ms *
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 (Safari Mobile 16.1)	450.9 ms * +29%

* ... smaller is better

由于采用了 UFS-4.0 闪存，因此在速度方面也没有问题，恰恰相反，高传输速率部分是其他平板电脑的两倍，从而实现了快速加载和流畅的数据传输。

	Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+	Lenovo Tab P12 Pro	Samsung Galaxy Tab S8+ 5G	Xiaomi Pad 6	Average 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	Average of class Tablet
AndroBench 3-5		-37%	-29%	-17%	40%	-49%
Sequential Read 256KB	3413.8	1782 -48%	1726.34 -49%	1673.97 -51%	3596 ?(3249 - 4384, n=24) 5%	957 ?(163 - 3466, n=72, last 2 years) -72%
Sequential Write 256KB	2528.2	758 -70%	1374.65 -46%	745.32 -71%	2594 ?(1014 - 3348, n=24) 3%	646 ?(78.2 - 3154, n=72, last 2 years) -74%
Random Read 4KB	450.3	232.5 -48%	202.35 -55%	298.45 -34%	417 ?(367 - 483, n=24) -7%	185.8 ?(18.4 - 451, n=72, last 2 years) -59%
Random Write 4KB	161.3	189.2 17%	218.02 35%	304.34 89%	418 ?(152.9 - 730, n=24) 159%	178.1 ?(8.23 - 511, n=72, last 2 years) 10%

游戏 - 游戏速度高达 90 fps

Galaxy Tab S9+ 即使不用于工作，也能给你带来乐趣。这款高品质平板电脑的游戏性能相当强大。

在低设置下，《PUBG Mobile》可以达到非常流畅的 90 帧/秒，甚至可以达到 40 帧/秒的 UHD 分辨率。在《暗黑破坏神：不朽》中，即使在最高设置下也能顺利达到 60 fps。

操作反应立即而准确。不过，大显示屏不太适合小手使用。

Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+; PUBG Mobile; Smooth; 2.8.0: Ø89.7 (86-91)

Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+; PUBG Mobile; HD; 2.8.0: Ø59.8 (58-60)

Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+; PUBG Mobile; Ultra HD; 2.8.0: Ø39.9 (37-41)

Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+; Diablo Immortal; Medium Mobile Low; 2.1.0: Ø59.9 (57-60)

Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+; Diablo Immortal; Ultra Mobile Very High; 2.1.0: Ø59.7 (56-60)

排放 - 几乎没有变暖，但有所节制

温度

在最大负载情况下，平板电脑会略微升温，最高温度可达 41.4 °C（106.5 °F）。但这种升温是局部的，虽然明显，但并不严重。

不过，正如我们在 3DMark 压力测试中看到的那样，SoC 在长时间负载后仍会出现节流。基准测试运行 20 次后，性能下降达 23%。不过，由于平板电脑的性能水平很高，在日常操作中应该很难察觉到这一点。

Max. Load

Idle


37.6 °C	32.6 °C	28.4 °C
31.8 °C	31.1 °C	28.5 °C
30.4 °C	31.4 °C	29.1 °C

Maximum: 37.6 °C
Average: 31.2 °C


30 °C	40.5 °C	41.4 °C
29.5 °C	31.1 °C	34.1 °C
29.9 °C	31.5 °C	32.2 °C

Maximum: 41.4 °C
Average: 33.4 °C

Power Supply (max.) 42.2 °C | Room Temperature 21 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260

(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 31.2 °C / 88 F, compared to the average of 30 °C / 86 F for the devices in the class Tablet.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 37.6 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 33.7 °C / 93 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 41.4 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.7 °C / 78 F, compared to the device average of 30 °C / 86 F.

3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+ Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø68.1 (60.6-78.8)

Lenovo Tab P12 Pro Adreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø25.2 (25.1-25.3)

Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø97.9 (82.8-119)

Samsung Galaxy Tab S8+ 5G Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø40.5 (35-55.1)

Xiaomi Pad 6 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø21.5 (21.1-25.4)

Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+ Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø22.2 (20.5-23.4)

Lenovo Tab P12 Pro Adreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.8.1: Ø7.3 (7.29-7.33)

Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test: Ø29.8 (27.1-41.5)

Samsung Galaxy Tab S8+ 5G Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.9.1: Ø11.8 (9.93-14.9)

Xiaomi Pad 6 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø6.27 (6.1-7.39)

Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability: Ø124.5 (113.6-152.4)

3DMark
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Lenovo Tab P12 Pro	99.5 (7.29^min - 7.33^max) % +14%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+	87.4 (20.5^min - 23.4^max) %
Xiaomi Pad 6	82.5 (6.1^min - 7.39^max) % -6%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8+ 5G	66.7 (9.93^min - 14.9^max) % -24%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022	65.1 (27.1^min - 41.5^max) % -26%
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Lenovo Tab P12 Pro	99.4 (25.1^min - 25.3^max) % +29%
Xiaomi Pad 6	83.1 (21.1^min - 25.4^max) % +8%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+	76.9 (60.6^min - 78.8^max) %
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022	69.6 (82.8^min - 119^max) % -9%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8+ 5G	63.6 (35^min - 55.1^max) % -17%
Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022	74.6 (113.6^min - 152.4^max) %

Legend

Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+ Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Qualcomm Adreno 740, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash

Lenovo Tab P12 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Qualcomm Adreno 650, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 Apple M2, Apple M2 10-Core GPU, 128 GB NVMe

Samsung Galaxy Tab S8+ 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Qualcomm Adreno 730, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

Xiaomi Pad 6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Qualcomm Adreno 650, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

发言人

三星Galaxy Tab S9+ 共有四个扬声器，如果以横向模式使用平板电脑，还能产生一些立体声效果。扬声器的音量相当大。它们能产生平衡的高音和中音，甚至不时还能听到一些低频。

四个扬声器发出的音乐听起来非常宽敞。电影中的声音非常细腻，有时甚至会让人起鸡皮疙瘩。

耳机的外置扬声器可以通过 USB-C 和蓝牙连接，这两种方式都能正常工作。只是支持的蓝牙编解码器选择有限，特别是在高保真音效方面，SBC、AAC、aptX、LDAC 和三星的无损编解码器都是可用选项。

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+ audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 12.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (11.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 11% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 85% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 7% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 91% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Xiaomi Pad 6 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 19.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 25% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 73% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 15% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 82% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电源管理 -Galaxy Tab S9+ 可以更加高效

耗电量

在功耗测试中，Galaxy Tab S9+ 的最低功耗值为 3.4 瓦，相当高。我们已经在前代产品中看到了类似的高基本功耗趋势。在最大负载情况下，平板电脑的功耗也很高，尽管这与其高性能是分不开的。

电池充电功率最高可达 45 瓦，需要 3 个小时才能完全充满。使用其他制造商生产的充电器也能顺利地为平板电脑充电。

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.2 / 0.3 Watt
Idle	3.4 / 3.6 / 3.9 Watt
Load	11.7 / 15.8 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+ 10090 mAh	Lenovo Tab P12 Pro 10200 mAh	Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 10702 mAh	Samsung Galaxy Tab S8+ 5G 10090 mAh	Xiaomi Pad 6 8840 mAh
Power Consumption		29%	-79%	16%	1%
Idle Minimum *	3.4	2.2 35%	2.54 25%	3.08 9%	0.96 72%
Idle Average *	3.6	2.6 28%	11.24 -212%	3.69 -3%	4.91 -36%
Idle Maximum *	3.9	3.2 18%	11.48 -194%	3.76 4%	5.07 -30%
Load Average *	11.7	7.1 39%	12.97 -11%	7.72 34%	11.8 -1%
Load Maximum *	15.8	11.5 27%	16.6 -5%	9.87 38%	15.9 -1%

* ... smaller is better

Power Consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+: Ø8.88 (3.4-15.7)

Power Consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø14.5 (11.7-15.8)

Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø3.72 (3.61-3.96)

电池寿命

Galaxy Tab S9+ 的运行效率并不高，这一点我们已经在功耗方面有所体现。容量为 10,090 毫安时的电池只能带来一般的运行时间，尽管至少比 Galaxy Tab S8+的前代产品要好得多。

在 WLAN 测试中，9:44 小时是一个可以接受的数值，但在小米平板 6还表明，即使电池容量小得多，也能获得更好的电池续航时间。

根据我们的测量，在电池充满电的情况下，你应该可以玩 6 个小时的游戏。在关闭 WLAN 的情况下，播放硬盘中的视频时长将近 11:33小时，你几乎可以一口气看完三部《指环王》电影的加长版。

Battery Runtime

Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)		16h 36min
WiFi Websurfing		9h 44min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		11h 33min
Load (maximum brightness)		6h 05min

	Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+ 10090 mAh	Lenovo Tab P12 Pro 10200 mAh	Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 10702 mAh	Samsung Galaxy Tab S8+ 5G 10090 mAh	Xiaomi Pad 6 8840 mAh
Battery Runtime		1%	16%	-17%	34%
Reader / Idle	996	1034 4%	1839 85%	846 -15%	2154 116%
H.264	693	892 29%	816 18%	607 -12%	741 7%
WiFi v1.3	584	627 7%	671 15%	437 -25%	823 41%
Load	365	236 -35%	173 -53%	309 -15%	265 -27%

Pros

+ 纤薄的高品质外壳

+ 防水防尘

+ 极高性能

+ 快速存储

+ microSD 读卡器

+ 附带输入笔

+ 精确的指纹传感器

+ 适合游戏

+ 精确色彩 HDR AMOLED

Cons

- 昂贵

- 耗电量大

- 不包括充电器

- 许多预装应用程序

结论 - 同样是中型平板电脑中的佼佼者

三星Galaxy Tab S9+ 评测。测试机由 NBB.com (notebooksbilliger.de) 提供

由于已经 Galaxy Tab S9和 Tab S9 Ultra一样，三星Galaxy Tab S9+ 也是一款非常出色的高品质平板电脑，其极快的处理器、良好的照相设备、附带的手写笔和高品质扬声器都能给人留下深刻印象。

显示屏亮度足以支持 HDR 内容，色彩还原度也很高。在游戏领域，这款平板电脑还能在《PUBG Mobile》中以高达 90 Hz 的频率运行。

快速的 UFS 4.0 存储是 Tab S9+ 区别于其他高端平板电脑的地方，几乎没有其他厂商能提供类似的快速存储。 WLAN 的速度很快，5G 版本能让你以可靠的信号访问移动互联网，甚至还能打电话。

不过，三星在某些方面仍有改进的余地：首先是续航能力，虽然这款平板电脑配备了大功率电池，但续航能力仍然相当一般。

考虑到高昂的价格，包装盒中不包括充电器也是个问题，而且定位也可以更准确一些。虽然摄像头做得还不错，但对于如此高价的平板电脑来说，它们还可以提供更多的功能。

三星Galaxy Tab S9+ 是一款高品质的 12.4 英寸平板电脑，具有极高的性能、良好的显示效果和出色的音响系统。但其效率还有待提高。

如果您对尺寸稍小的平板电脑感到满意，您还可以选择节省 100 欧元（约合 105 美元）的 Galaxy 平板电脑 S9.对Apple 操作系统不反感的人，可以选择速度更快的平板电脑 Apple iPad Pro 12.9.

价格和供应情况

三星Galaxy Tab S9+ 目前正在销售，由制造商直接提供存储容量为 512 GB，售价为 999 美元。

例如，亚马逊上也有这款平板电脑，起价约为 954 美元，5G 版本的起价为 1149 美元。

Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+ - 2023-10-12 10/12/2023 v7 ^(old)
Florian Schmitt

Chassis

91 / 98 → 92%

Keyboard

71 / 80 → 89%

Pointing Device

97%

Connectivity

67 / 70 → 95%

Weight

82 / 40-88 → 87%

Battery

88%

Display

90%

Games Performance

71 / 78 → 91%

Application Performance

93 / 92 → 100%

Temperature

93%

Noise

100%

Audio

90 / 91 → 99%

Camera

64 / 85 → 76%

Average

84%

91%

Tablet - Weighted Average

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Price comparison

Editor of the original article: Mark Riege - Translator - 534 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2018

Translator: Ninh Ngoc Duy - Editorial Assistant - 452583 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008

contact me via: Facebook

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 三星Galaxy Tab S9+ (Plus) 5G 评测--昂贵的高品质 12.4 英寸平板电脑

Florian Schmitt, 2023-10-13 (Update: 2024-08-15)