三星Galaxy Tab S9 5G 平板电脑评测：功能强大的 OLED 全能型平板电脑

Name: Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 5G
Brand: Samsung

进化而非革命。

与前代产品相比，三星只对Galaxy Tab S9 5G 进行了精心的重新设计。新功能包括市场上最强大的 Snapdragon 处理器和改用 OLED 技术的显示屏。Tab S9 仍然配备了 S-Pen，可以同时处理工作和娱乐。它与平板电脑精英相比如何？

Benedikt Winkel, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy), Published 10/10/2023 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

5G Android Galaxy S Tablet Touchscreen

Galaxy Tab S9 系列是三星现代化的高端平板电脑组合。与往常一样，新的Galaxy S 平板电脑有三种尺寸可供选择。除了本次评测的普通 11 英寸Galaxy Tab S9 之外，三星还提供更大的 12.4 英寸Galaxy Tab S9+ 和 14.6 英寸Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra.

这三款设备都有 Wi-Fi 和 5G 版本。Galaxy Tab S9 有两种配置，一种是 128GB 存储空间和 8GB 内存，另一种是 256GB 存储空间和 12GB 内存。更大的存储空间留给更大的兄弟姐妹。三星提供两种颜色的平板电脑，即石墨色和米色。我们的测试设备采用的是较大的存储配置、5G 和石墨色。

Galaxy Tab S9 的起价为 764.15 美元（128 GB，仅限 Wi-Fi）。

Test device courtesy of notebooksbilliger.de

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 5G (Galaxy Tab S9 Series)

Processor

Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy 8 x 2 - 3.4 GHz, Cortex-X3 / A715 / A710 / A510 (Kryo)

Graphics adapter

Qualcomm Adreno 740

Memory

12 GB

, LPDDR5x

Display

11.00 inch 14.4:9, 2560 x 1600 pixel 274 PPI, Capacitive, native pen support, Dynamic AMOLED 2x, glossy: yes, HDR, 120 Hz

Storage

256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash, 256 GB

, 216 GB free

Connections

1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 0 USB 3.2 Gen 2x2 20Gbps, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Docking Station Port, Audio Connections: USB-C, Card Reader: microSD up to 1 TB (FAT, FAT32, exFAT), 1 Fingerprint Reader, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, OTG, Wireless Samsung DeX

Networking

Wi-Fi 6E (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz), Bluetooth 5.3, GSM (850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz); UMTS (Band 1, 2, 4, 5, 8), LTE (Band 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 40, 41, 66); 5G (Band N1, N3, N5, N7, N8, N20, N28, N38, N40, N41, N66, N77, N78), Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 5.9 x 254.3 x 165.8

Battery

8400 mAh Lithium-Polymer

Charging

fast charging / Quickcharge

Operating System

Android 13

Camera

Primary Camera: 13 MPix (f/2.0, 26 mm, 1.0 µm)
Secondary Camera: 12 MPix (f/2.4)

Additional features

Speakers: Stereo, Keyboard: OnScreen, USB-Cable (USB-C to USB-C), SIM-Needle, S Pen, One UI 5.1.1, 24 Months Warranty, SAR-Body: 0.657 W/kg; GNSS: GPS (L1); Glonass (L1); Galileo (E1); Beidou (B1, B1C); SBAS (L1), IP68, fanless, waterproof

Weight

500 g

Price

1169 Euro

Amazon

Links

Samsung notebook section

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating	Date	Model	Weight	Height	Size	Resolution
90.9 % v7 ^(old)	10 / 2023	Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 5G SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740	500 g	5.9 mm	11.00"	2560x1600
90.2 % v7 ^(old)	06 / 2022	Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G SD 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730	507 g	6.3 mm	11.00"	2560x1600
92.5 % v7 ^(old)	11 / 2022	Apple iPad Pro 11 2022 M2, M2 10-Core GPU	466 g	5.9 mm	11.00"	2388x1668
91.7 % v7 ^(old)	03 / 2022	Apple iPad Air 5 2022 M1, M1 8-Core GPU	461 g	6.1 mm	10.90"	2360x1640
89.3 % v7 ^(old)	09 / 2023	Google Pixel Tablet Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7	493 g	8.1 mm	10.95"	2560x1600
89.1 % v7 ^(old)	04 / 2022	Lenovo Tab P12 Pro SD 870, Adreno 650	565 g	5.6 mm	12.60"	2560x1600

保护套 - 三星Galaxy Tab S9 纤薄稳定

Galaxy Tab S9 系列采用铝制机身，边缘由天线条分割。背面有一个小凹槽，附带的 S-Pen 可通过磁力吸附在凹槽中充电。

与较大的同类产品不同，普通 Tab S9 背面只有一个摄像头。摄像头明显突出于纤薄的机身。尽管如此，当平板电脑放在桌面上时，输入还是可以实现的；只有在左下角输入时才会出现晃动。

四个扬声器位于设备的两个短边。外壳感觉非常优质和稳定。平板电脑无法弯曲，即使在负载情况下也不会发出任何噪音。外壳棱角分明，在同时玩游戏和手持平板电脑时尤其明显。三星将显示屏边缘做得窄而平整，令人赏心悦目。

电源键和音量摇杆位于顶部。两个按钮都有舒适的按压点，但电源按钮有些松动。底部提供了相应的三星配件接口。显示屏由康宁大猩猩 5 号玻璃保护。

尺寸比较

Lenovo Tab P12 Pro Google Pixel Tablet Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 5G Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G Apple iPad Air 5 2022 Apple iPad Pro 11 2022 DIN A4 ❌

设备 - IP68 适用于Galaxy Pad S9

三星安装了高通公司目前速度最快的 SoC，即骁龙 8 代 2GalaxyGalaxy Tab S9。我们的测试设备还配备了 12GB RAM 和 UFS 4.0 存储。

机载蓝牙 5.3，USB-C 端口支持 USB 3.1 Gen 1，支持 exFAT 格式，但只能读取 NTFS。Galaxy Tab S9 没有内置 NFC 功能。相反，三星首次对这款平板电脑进行了 IP68 认证。Tab S9 配备了 S-Pen，可以进行笔输入。除了纯粹的笔功能外，S-Pen 还能通过蓝牙传输手势。

microSD 读卡器

与Apple iPad 11 Pro 或谷歌 Pixel 平板电脑等许多竞争对手不同，三星Galaxy S9 的存储空间可以扩展。该平板电脑支持最大 1 TB 的存储卡，并支持 exFAT 格式。配合我们的 AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60 参考卡，S9 Pro 可达到与其前代产品 Tab S8 相同的传输值。Galaxy 平板电脑 S8.

因此，数据传输速度明显快于联想 Tab P12 Pro。此外，传输速度保持稳定，在测试中没有出现任何停顿。

SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash (Angelbird AV Pro V60)	52.6 MB/s 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 5G Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash (Angelbird AV Pro V60)	52.5 MB/s
Lenovo Tab P12 Pro Adreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash (Angelbird V60)	31.4 MB/s -40%

Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)

Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 5G Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø41.1 (28.4-52)

Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø39.2 (28.5-49.8)

Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 5G Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø71.5 (37.9-82.2)

Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø80.6 (46.7-90.1)

软件 - 长期支持三星平板电脑

三星Galaxy Tab S9 预装了Android 13。三星使用自己的 One UI 界面，其中 5.1.1 是我们评测期间的最新版本。下载所有预装应用程序后，存储空间为 40 GB。

三星、谷歌和微软的许多应用程序都已预装，包括日历或照片显示等重复的应用程序。除了这些大公司的软件外，只有 Spotify 预装了
。

与Galaxy S 智能手机一样，三星也承诺为Galaxy S 平板电脑提供四次重大更新和五年的安全更新。不过，这些设备并非每月都会收到安全更新，而是每季度一次。我们的测试设备上安装了 2023 年 8 月的安全补丁。

Galaxy Tab S9 支持三星 DeX，可以让设备进入桌面模式。与屏幕连接后，平板电脑的使用效率会更高。结合鼠标和键盘，Tab S9 就成了一台功能强大的工作设备。工作速度非常快，在 DeX 模式下可以通过触摸屏或 S-Pen 进行操作，而且无需连接其他输入设备。

通信和全球导航卫星系统 -Galaxy Pad S9 上的 5G 和 WiFi 6E

三星Galaxy Tab S9 配备了最新的无线连接，支持 WiFi 6E 和蜂窝 5G。传输速率也令人印象深刻。结合我们的华硕 ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000 参考路由器，Tab S9 在 5 GHz 范围内处于同类产品的领先地位。

虽然平板电脑支持 Wi-Fi 6E，但在我们的测试中却无法与参考路由器建立 Wi-Fi 6 连接。软件更新后，问题可能很快就会得到解决。移动数据接收良好。Galaxy Tab S9 支持多个 LTE 频段和 5G 频段。在移动过程中，例如在火车上，平板电脑的信号接收也很稳定。支持双卡双待，即一个物理 SIM 卡和一个 eSIM 卡。

Networking
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 5G	951 (929^min - 960^max) MBit/s
Google Pixel Tablet	881 (690^min - 925^max) MBit/s -7%
Apple iPad Air 5 2022	769 (744^min - 780^max) MBit/s -19%
Lenovo Tab P12 Pro	719 (644^min - 771^max) MBit/s -24%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G	715 (339^min - 767^max) MBit/s -25%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Apple iPad Air 5 2022	959 (486^min - 977^max) MBit/s +2%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 5G	944 (474^min - 970^max) MBit/s
Lenovo Tab P12 Pro	851 (475^min - 925^max) MBit/s -10%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G	843 (599^min - 944^max) MBit/s -11%
Google Pixel Tablet	690 (241^min - 849^max) MBit/s -27%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G	1802 (884^min - 1853^max) MBit/s
Apple iPad Pro 11 2022	949 (941^min - 958^max) MBit/s
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G	1611 (1577^min - 1636^max) MBit/s
Apple iPad Pro 11 2022	943 (903^min - 949^max) MBit/s

Apple iPad Pro 11 2022 Apple M2, Apple M2 10-Core GPU; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø949 (941-958)

Apple iPad Pro 11 2022 Apple M2, Apple M2 10-Core GPU; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø942 (903-949)

Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Qualcomm Adreno 740; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø951 (929-960)

Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Qualcomm Adreno 740; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø929 (474-970)

三星在Galaxy Tab S9 中安装了一个适用于所有常见卫星系统的全球导航卫星系统模块。不过，该设备只能建立单声道连接，而且连接速度很快，在室内和室外都足够精确。
。

为了测试这款平板电脑的实际跟踪能力，我们将它与 Garmin Venu 2 放在一起骑车。Tab S9 记录了所走的路线，但在弯道处差异尤为明显。不过，通过谷歌地图等进行导航还是没有问题的。

摄像头 - 最小巧的 S9 平板电脑单摄像头

与较大的同胞兄弟不同，普通的Galaxy Tab S9 背面只有一个摄像头。它的最大分辨率为 1300 万像素，两侧配有 LED 闪光灯。在相机应用中无法更改分辨率。另一方面，三星提供了人像模式、各种滤镜、AR 功能和专业模式等选项。

您还可以手动设置白平衡、光圈和 ISO。虽然前置摄像头配备了 1200 万像素的分辨率，但专业模式和 AR Zone 只能在主摄像头上使用。

在日常使用中，这两款相机的效果非常稳定，尤其是在光线条件良好的情况下，非常适合拍摄快照。人像模式也运行可靠。软件能可靠地识别和处理文本和二维码。不过，在放大和拍摄夜景时，相机的性能会达到极限。光线不足会导致图像噪点，而且图像的某些区域仍然太暗。但对于平板电脑来说，摄像头的性能确实不错。

平板电脑能以最高 UHD 清晰度录制视频，所有分辨率和两个摄像头的 FPS 都限制在 30。我们特别喜欢的是，视频的声音录制清晰，音质饱满，没有任何背景噪音。在超高清视频中，当视频有移动时会出现轻微的图像噪点，而在高清视频中则不会出现这种情况。视频防抖效果良好，自动对焦也快速可靠。

对于视频，三星还为主摄像头提供了专业模式，其功能范围与照片相同。此外，还有慢动作拍摄和人像视频等附加功能。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Plush toy rabbit Lake 5x zoom Low light

click to load images

Samsung Galaxy Tab S9

Honor Magic5 Pro

Samsung Galaxy S23

Canon EOS 90D

click to load images

Samsung Galaxy Tab S9

Honor Magic5 Pro

Samsung Galaxy S23

Canon EOS 90D

click to load images

Samsung Galaxy Tab S9

Honor Magic5 Pro

Samsung Galaxy S23

Canon EOS 90D

click to load images

Samsung Galaxy Tab S9

Honor Magic5 Pro

Samsung Galaxy S23

Canon EOS 90D

Galaxy Tab S9 的照片清晰度不错。虽然照片边缘区域的锐度有所下降，但仍处于可用水平。色彩偏差也还可以，至少在光线良好的条件下是这样。三星软件将色彩提亮过多，这在深绿色中尤为明显。

在可控弱光（1 勒克斯）条件下，相机性能急剧下降。色彩几乎无法辨别，清晰度也无法评估，因为图像太暗了。

ColorChecker Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 5G: 9.15 ∆E min: 4.09 - max: 16.26 ∆E

配件和保修 - Samsung 未提供电源

三星Galaxy Tab S9 的交货范围非常直接。除平板电脑外，包装内还包括 S Pen、USB-C 数据线、快速入门指南和 SIM 卡针。缺少电源和 S Pen 的替换笔尖。

三星为Galaxy Tab S9 提供Samsung Care+ 。该服务提供意外损坏（如跌落、泼溅和机械故障）保险，有两种付款方式：5 美元/月（随时取消）或 79 美元/两年。该服务还可升级为Samsung Care+ 盗窃和丢失服务，价格为 10 美元/月或 189 美元/两年。纽约州居民的条款和条件略有不同，应通过提供的链接仔细核实。

在德国，三星免费为平板电脑提供 24 个月的保修服务。这不包括电池，电池的保修期为 12 个月。这些条款在其他国家可能有所不同，因此感兴趣的买家应在购买前仔细确认。

输入设备和操作 -Galaxy Tab S9（带振动电机

三星使用了适用于Galaxy Tab S9 的三星键盘。这使得在横向和纵向模式下都能顺利地在设备上输入数据，而且不会出现任何错误输入。触摸屏的可用性堪称典范，令人印象深刻：滑动性能良好，操作速度也不错。触摸屏的所有区域都能识别输入内容。

S-Pen 的许多功能也令人印象深刻。通过简短的菜单可以访问链接的应用程序和操作。活动笔上还有一个按钮，可以链接到各种附加功能和应用程序。还支持在锁屏上书写。在分屏模式下打开多个应用程序时，还可以使用更多应用程序。不过，由于没有盖子，笔放在平板电脑背面得不到保护，很容易丢失。

Galaxy Tab S9 可以使用屏内指纹识别器或 2D 面部识别解锁。光学指纹扫描仪工作可靠，但市场上还有更快的读取器。不过，无论是纵向还是横向，无论手指放在哪个位置，都能轻松解锁平板电脑。用脸部解锁速度更快，而且仍然非常可靠，但安全性较低。

Galaxy Tab S9 的振动马达声音很大，反馈也很松散。在这个价位上，我们更倾向于线性振动电机，而不是 ERM。

▶ load Youtube video

显示屏 - 11 英寸Galaxy Tab 采用 OLED 显示屏

与前代产品相比，Tab S8 的显示屏有了很大的变化。Galaxy 三星为 Tab S9 采用了长宽比为 16:10 的 11 英寸 AMOLED 面板。三星在Galaxy Tab S9 上使用了长宽比为 16:10 的 11 英寸 AMOLED 面板。该显示屏还支持最高 120 Hz 的刷新率。不过，在刷新率方面，用户只能在自适应和固定 60 Hz 之间进行选择。根据 DRM Info 应用程序，Tab S9 支持 30、60 和 120 Hz。

清晰度和最大亮度都非常不错。Tab S9 的亮度为 579 cd/m²，比上一代产品更亮。在亮暗区域均匀分布的情况下，显示屏亮度达到 770 cd/m²（APL18）。关闭环境光传感器后，面板亮度最高可达 363 尼特。只有Apple iPad Pro 11才能在最大亮度下击败三星平板电脑。三星平板电脑的均匀亮度也非常好。

不过，在测试过程中，我们发现屏幕闪烁频率为 240 Hz。从 30% 的屏幕亮度开始，频率下降到 120 Hz，与刷新率相对应。


583 cd/m²	582 cd/m²	583 cd/m²
575 cd/m²	576 cd/m²	576 cd/m²
575 cd/m²	582 cd/m²	577 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3

Maximum: 583 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 578.8 cd/m² Minimum: 1.95 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 99 %
Center on Battery: 576 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.5 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 2.3 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
98.3% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.02

	Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 5G Dynamic AMOLED 2x, 2560x1600, 11"	Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G LCD, 2560x1600, 11"	Apple iPad Pro 11 2022 IPS, 2388x1668, 11"	Apple iPad Air 5 2022 IPS, 2360x1640, 10.9"	Google Pixel Tablet IPS, 2560x1600, 11"	Lenovo Tab P12 Pro AMOLED, 2560x1600, 12.6"
Screen		10%	11%	11%	18%	-15%
Brightness middle	576	551 -4%	620 8%	529 -8%	521 -10%	552 -4%
Brightness	579	536 -7%	611 6%	490 -15%	508 -12%	555 -4%
Brightness Distribution	99	93 -6%	93 -6%	86 -13%	89 -10%	97 -2%
Black Level *		0.6	0.37	0.37	0.51
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	2.5	1.4 44%	1.49 40%	1.35 46%	1.2 52%	3.43 -37%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	4.6	5.6 -22%	3.67 20%	2.45 47%	2.6 43%	7.25 -58%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	2.3	1.1 52%	2.3 -0%	2.1 9%	1.3 43%	2 13%
Gamma	2.02 ^109%	2.15 ^102%	2.211 ^100%	2.183 ^101%	2.2 ^100%	2.253 ^98%
CCT	6585 ^99%	6621 ^98%	6849 ^95%	6939 ^94%	6696 ^97%	6417 ^101%
Contrast		918	1676	1430	1022

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

240 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 240 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 240 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8710 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

在固定变焦级别和不同亮度设置下进行的系列测量

得益于这种设计，黑色值和对比度都堪称完美。不过，在色彩搭配方面，Tab S9 不得不承认输给了前代产品和一些对比设备。Tab S8 Galaxy Tab S8和谷歌像素平板电脑在灰度显示等方面的校准更为准确。

在整个测试区域，偏差都处于较高水平。三星在设置中提供了显示鲜艳或自然色彩的选项。此外，还可以根据个人喜好调整白平衡。

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
1.71 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 0.8255 ms rise
1.71 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 0.8815 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 7 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
2.17 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 1.113 ms rise
2.17 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 1.058 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 7 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

Galaxy Pad S9 的 OLED 面板亮度很高，可以在户外使用。不过，从陡峭的视角看，显示屏在阳光下的可读性会明显下降。窄边视角比长边视角受到的影响更大。

三星显示屏的可读性很好。不过，从锐利的角度看，设备最远的一角会有阴影。尽管如此，几个人同时观看内容还是很容易的。

性能 - Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 为Galaxy 提供顶级性能

三星使用高通公司最新的顶级处理器骁龙 8 代 2Galaxy ，用于Galaxy Tab S9。该版本的 SoC 工作频率最高可达 3.36 GHz。我们的测试设备还配备了高达 12 GB 的 RAM。这款平板电脑的运行速度令人印象深刻：输入立即执行，用户可以快速浏览菜单和子菜单。即使是较大的应用程序也能立即打开。

这种性能在基准测试中也很明显，因为Galaxy Tab S9 明显落后于所有其他Android 设备。只有 Pixel Tablet 能在 UL Procyon AI Inference 中取得好成绩。在所有其他基准测试中，Tab S9 和 iPad 均名列第一。

Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Apple iPad Pro 11 2022	1892 Points +22%
Apple iPad Air 5 2022	1719 Points +11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy (1542 - 1598, n=7)	1561 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 5G	1550 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G	1226 Points -21%
Google Pixel Tablet	1078 Points -30%
Lenovo Tab P12 Pro	955 Points -38%
Average of class Tablet (140 - 1887, n=71, last 2 years)	707 Points -54%
Multi-Core
Apple iPad Pro 11 2022	8491 Points +69%
Apple iPad Air 5 2022	7034 Points +40%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 5G	5036 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy (4906 - 5198, n=7)	5020 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G	3269 Points -35%
Lenovo Tab P12 Pro	3215 Points -36%
Google Pixel Tablet	3212 Points -36%
Average of class Tablet (312 - 8624, n=71, last 2 years)	2494 Points -50%

Antutu v9 - Total Score
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 5G	1286774 Points
Apple iPad Pro 11 2022	1257986 Points -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy (1086936 - 1286774, n=8)	1181107 Points -8%
Apple iPad Air 5 2022	1040908 Points -19%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G	927884 Points -28%
Lenovo Tab P12 Pro	707685 Points -45%
Google Pixel Tablet	635893 Points -51%
Average of class Tablet (92766 - 1286774, n=48, last 2 years)	469872 Points -63%

PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy (15270 - 17267, n=8)	16185 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 5G	16172 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G	13740 Points -15%
Lenovo Tab P12 Pro	13565 Points -16%
Google Pixel Tablet	10638 Points -34%
Average of class Tablet (3195 - 20841, n=73, last 2 years)	9847 Points -39%

CrossMark - Overall
Apple iPad Pro 11 2022	1585 Points +30%
Apple iPad Air 5 2022	1266 Points +4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy (1120 - 1332, n=8)	1239 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 5G	1222 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G	1069 Points -13%
Google Pixel Tablet	889 Points -27%
Average of class Tablet (172 - 1944, n=63, last 2 years)	773 Points -37%
Lenovo Tab P12 Pro	732 Points -40%

BaseMark OS II
Overall
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy (8541 - 9337, n=8)	8859 Points +2%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 5G	8673 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G	6908 Points -20%
Google Pixel Tablet	6419 Points -26%
Lenovo Tab P12 Pro	5865 Points -32%
Average of class Tablet (444 - 11721, n=59, last 2 years)	4205 Points -52%
System
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 5G	14097 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy (1374 - 14401, n=8)	12462 Points -12%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G	10926 Points -22%
Lenovo Tab P12 Pro	9124 Points -35%
Google Pixel Tablet	8938 Points -37%
Average of class Tablet (1103 - 16435, n=59, last 2 years)	7265 Points -48%
Memory
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy (8467 - 9212, n=8)	8823 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 5G	8702 Points
Lenovo Tab P12 Pro	7365 Points -15%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G	6940 Points -20%
Google Pixel Tablet	6548 Points -25%
Average of class Tablet (916 - 10977, n=59, last 2 years)	4862 Points -44%
Graphics
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 5G	31626 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy (21505 - 31928, n=8)	28672 Points -9%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G	18998 Points -40%
Google Pixel Tablet	16372 Points -48%
Lenovo Tab P12 Pro	11754 Points -63%
Average of class Tablet (580 - 57192, n=59, last 2 years)	9168 Points -71%
Web
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy (1460 - 2032, n=8)	1768 Points +21%
Google Pixel Tablet	1721 Points +18%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G	1581 Points +8%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 5G	1460 Points
Lenovo Tab P12 Pro	1452 Points -1%
Average of class Tablet (10 - 2051, n=59, last 2 years)	1269 Points -13%

AImark - Score v3.x
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy (1216 - 156427, n=6)	27143 Points +1975%
Average of class Tablet (84 - 156427, n=50, last 2 years)	7290 Points +457%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 5G	1308 Points
Google Pixel Tablet	887 Points -32%

UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Google Pixel Tablet	44323 Points +176%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 5G	16088 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy (1267 - 16702, n=8)	14423 Points -10%
Average of class Tablet (1662 - 74821, n=57, last 2 years)	11323 Points -30%

Legend

Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Qualcomm Adreno 740, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash

Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Qualcomm Adreno 730, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

Apple iPad Pro 11 2022 Apple M2, Apple M2 10-Core GPU, 128 GB NVMe

Apple iPad Air 5 2022 Apple M1, Apple M1 8-Core GPU, 64 GB SSD

Google Pixel Tablet Google Tensor G2, ARM Mali-G710 MP7, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

Lenovo Tab P12 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Qualcomm Adreno 650, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy

Average of class Tablet

GPU 性能也有类似的表现。三星安装了Adreno 740图形处理器。游戏等高要求图形应用程序可以在最高设置下运行。在基准测试中，Galaxy Tab S9 始终名列前茅，只是被迫输给了 iPad Pro 11不时让位于 iPad Pro 11。目前还没有其他Android 平板电脑拥有更强大的性能。

3DMark: Wild Life Extreme Unlimited | Wild Life Extreme | Wild Life Unlimited Score | Wild Life Score | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7: T-Rex Onscreen | 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
GFXBench 3.0: on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
GFXBench 3.1: on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
GFXBench: on screen Car Chase Onscreen | 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | 3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Apple iPad Pro 11 2022 M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe	5328 Points +39%
Apple iPad Air 5 2022 M1 8-Core GPU, M1, 64 GB SSD	4144 Points +8%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 5G Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	3826 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	2205 Points -42%
Google Pixel Tablet Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1839 Points -52%
Lenovo Tab P12 Pro Adreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1225 Points -68%

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Apple iPad Pro 11 2022 M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe	5137 Points +33%
Apple iPad Air 5 2022 M1 8-Core GPU, M1, 64 GB SSD	4913 Points +27%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 5G Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	3857 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	2287 Points -41%
Google Pixel Tablet Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1803 Points -53%
Lenovo Tab P12 Pro Adreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1232 Points -68%

3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Apple iPad Pro 11 2022 M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe	21302 Points +47%
Apple iPad Air 5 2022 M1 8-Core GPU, M1, 64 GB SSD	18309 Points +26%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 5G Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	14527 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	9052 Points -38%
Google Pixel Tablet Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	6599 Points -55%
Lenovo Tab P12 Pro Adreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	4199 Points -71%

3DMark / Wild Life Score
Apple iPad Air 5 2022 M1 8-Core GPU, M1, 64 GB SSD	10018 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	8630 Points
Google Pixel Tablet Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	6649 Points
Lenovo Tab P12 Pro Adreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	4211 Points

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 5G Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	14235 Points
Google Pixel Tablet Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	8948 Points -37%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	8945 Points -37%
Lenovo Tab P12 Pro Adreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	8365 Points -41%

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 5G Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	24605 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	14871 Points -40%
Google Pixel Tablet Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	11589 Points -53%
Lenovo Tab P12 Pro Adreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	10321 Points -58%

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 5G Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	5751 Points
Lenovo Tab P12 Pro Adreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	5265 Points -8%
Google Pixel Tablet Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	4983 Points -13%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	3735 Points -35%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	120 fps 0%
Apple iPad Pro 11 2022 M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe	120 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 5G Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	120 fps
Lenovo Tab P12 Pro Adreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	119 fps -1%
Apple iPad Air 5 2022 M1 8-Core GPU, M1, 64 GB SSD	60 fps -50%
Google Pixel Tablet Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	60 fps -50%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Apple iPad Pro 11 2022 M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe	697.9 fps +90%
Apple iPad Air 5 2022 M1 8-Core GPU, M1, 64 GB SSD	557 fps +52%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	381 fps +4%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 5G Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	367 fps
Google Pixel Tablet Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	305 fps -17%
Lenovo Tab P12 Pro Adreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	226 fps -38%

GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Apple iPad Pro 11 2022 M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe	120 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 5G Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	120 fps
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	115 fps -4%
Lenovo Tab P12 Pro Adreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	78 fps -35%
Apple iPad Air 5 2022 M1 8-Core GPU, M1, 64 GB SSD	60 fps -50%
Google Pixel Tablet Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	60 fps -50%

GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Apple iPad Pro 11 2022 M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe	449.5 fps +81%
Apple iPad Air 5 2022 M1 8-Core GPU, M1, 64 GB SSD	317 fps +27%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 5G Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	249 fps
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	209 fps -16%
Google Pixel Tablet Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	175 fps -30%
Lenovo Tab P12 Pro Adreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	132 fps -47%

GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Apple iPad Pro 11 2022 M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe	118.3 fps +22%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 5G Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	97 fps
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	88 fps -9%
Apple iPad Air 5 2022 M1 8-Core GPU, M1, 64 GB SSD	60 fps -38%
Google Pixel Tablet Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	56 fps -42%
Lenovo Tab P12 Pro Adreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	49 fps -49%

GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Apple iPad Pro 11 2022 M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe	277 fps +49%
Apple iPad Air 5 2022 M1 8-Core GPU, M1, 64 GB SSD	229 fps +23%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 5G Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	186 fps
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	146 fps -22%
Google Pixel Tablet Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	113 fps -39%
Lenovo Tab P12 Pro Adreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	95 fps -49%

GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Apple iPad Pro 11 2022 M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe	94.5 fps +48%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 5G Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	64 fps
Apple iPad Air 5 2022 M1 8-Core GPU, M1, 64 GB SSD	60 fps -6%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	47 fps -27%
Google Pixel Tablet Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	39 fps -39%
Lenovo Tab P12 Pro Adreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	30 fps -53%

GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Apple iPad Pro 11 2022 M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe	171.4 fps +43%
Apple iPad Air 5 2022 M1 8-Core GPU, M1, 64 GB SSD	153.5 fps +28%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 5G Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	120 fps
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	83 fps -31%
Google Pixel Tablet Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	67 fps -44%
Lenovo Tab P12 Pro Adreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	58 fps -52%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Apple iPad Pro 11 2022 M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe	97.3 fps +57%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 5G Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	62 fps
Apple iPad Air 5 2022 M1 8-Core GPU, M1, 64 GB SSD	60 fps -3%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	34 fps -45%
Google Pixel Tablet Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	30 fps -52%
Lenovo Tab P12 Pro Adreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	20 fps -68%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Apple iPad Pro 11 2022 M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe	77 fps +12%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 5G Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	69 fps
Apple iPad Air 5 2022 M1 8-Core GPU, M1, 64 GB SSD	60.9 fps -12%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	35 fps -49%
Google Pixel Tablet Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	31 fps -55%
Lenovo Tab P12 Pro Adreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	22 fps -68%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Apple iPad Pro 11 2022 M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe	111 fps +17%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 5G Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	95 fps
Apple iPad Air 5 2022 M1 8-Core GPU, M1, 64 GB SSD	60 fps -37%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	50 fps -47%
Google Pixel Tablet Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	43 fps -55%
Lenovo Tab P12 Pro Adreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	32 fps -66%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Apple iPad Pro 11 2022 M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe	278.6 fps +66%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 5G Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	168 fps
Apple iPad Air 5 2022 M1 8-Core GPU, M1, 64 GB SSD	149 fps -11%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	87 fps -48%
Google Pixel Tablet Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	77 fps -54%
Lenovo Tab P12 Pro Adreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	57 fps -66%

GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Apple iPad Pro 11 2022 M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe	35.6 fps +11%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 5G Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	32 fps
Google Pixel Tablet Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	14 fps -56%

Galaxy Tab S9 在浏览器基准测试中的性能主要取决于所选浏览器。虽然谷歌 Chrome 浏览器的数值有时会比较低，但 Tab S9 在 Edge 浏览器下的性能却非常突出。在日常使用中，无论选择哪种浏览器，浏览体验都非常好。

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Apple iPad Pro 11 2022 (Safari 16)	220.382 Points +44%
Apple iPad Air 5 2022 (Safari 15)	184.3 Points +21%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy (152.9 - 196.3, n=8)	173.4 Points +13%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 5G (chrome 117)	152.9 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G (Chrome 101.0.4951.41)	121.695 Points -20%
Google Pixel Tablet (Chrome 115)	117.838 Points -23%
Average of class Tablet (19.9 - 334, n=70, last 2 years)	111.2 Points -27%
Lenovo Tab P12 Pro (Chrome 98)	108.3 Points -29%

WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Apple iPad Pro 11 2022 (Safari 16)	223 Points +25%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 5G (chrome 117)	179 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy (145 - 187, n=8)	165.5 Points -8%
Average of class Tablet (21 - 315, n=69, last 2 years)	106.9 Points -40%
Google Pixel Tablet (Chrome 115)	98 Points -45%

WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Apple iPad Pro 11 2022 (Safari 16)	342 Points +48%
Apple iPad Air 5 2022 (Safari 15)	254 Points +10%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 5G (chrome 117)	231 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy (183 - 243, n=3)	219 Points -5%
Average of class Tablet (34 - 435, n=45, last 2 years)	155.2 Points -33%
Lenovo Tab P12 Pro (Chrome 98)	155 Points -33%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G (Chrome 101.0.4951.41)	155 Points -33%
Google Pixel Tablet (Chrome 115)	134 Points -42%

Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Apple iPad Pro 11 2022 (Safari 16)	363 runs/min +84%
Apple iPad Air 5 2022 (Safari 15)	255 runs/min +29%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 5G (chrome 117)	197 runs/min
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy (136 - 197, n=6)	168.7 runs/min -14%
Google Pixel Tablet (Chrome 115)	134 runs/min -32%
Average of class Tablet (2.59 - 572, n=64, last 2 years)	121.9 runs/min -38%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G (Chrome 101.0.4951.41)	116 runs/min -41%
Lenovo Tab P12 Pro (Chrome 98)	65.5 runs/min -67%

Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPad Pro 11 2022 (Safari 16)	72484 Points +46%
Apple iPad Air 5 2022 (Safari 15)	66974 Points +35%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy (49582 - 64715, n=8)	59058 Points +19%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 5G (Edge 117)	49582 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G (Chrome 101.0.4951.41)	48205 Points -3%
Google Pixel Tablet (Chrome 115)	47939 Points -3%
Lenovo Tab P12 Pro (Chrome 98)	41256 Points -17%
Average of class Tablet (763 - 105178, n=87, last 2 years)	29371 Points -41%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Average of class Tablet (319 - 34733, n=75, last 2 years)	3734 ms * -144%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 5G (chrome 117)	1532.5 ms *
Lenovo Tab P12 Pro (Chrome 98)	1055 ms * +31%
Google Pixel Tablet (Chrome 115)	930.2 ms * +39%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G (Chrome 101.0.4951.41)	864.6 ms * +44%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy (634 - 1533, n=8)	795 ms * +48%
Apple iPad Air 5 2022 (Safari 15)	499 ms * +67%
Apple iPad Pro 11 2022 (Safari 16)	466.8 ms * +70%

* ... smaller is better

Galaxy Tab S9 的存储速度令人印象深刻。三星在平板电脑中安装了 UFS 4.0 内存，因此 Tab S9 的写入和读取速度大约是谷歌 Pixel 平板电脑的两倍。谷歌 Pixel 平板电脑, 联想 Tab P12 Pro和三星Galaxy Tab S8。只有在随机写入时，这些值才处于同一水平。

128 GB 版本可能使用 UFS 3.1 内存，因为 UFS 4.0 内存没有生产这种规格的产品。三星通常在Galaxy S23 智能手机上采用这种方法。

	Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 5G	Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G	Google Pixel Tablet	Lenovo Tab P12 Pro	Average 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	Average of class Tablet
AndroBench 3-5		-23%	-31%	-36%	44%	-45%
Sequential Read 256KB	3355.97	1517.98 -55%	1473.3 -56%	1782 -47%	3608 ?(3249 - 4384, n=26) 8%	1045 ?(163 - 3912, n=74, last 2 years) -69%
Sequential Write 256KB	2188.2	1026.82 -53%	307.57 -86%	758 -65%	2530 ?(555 - 3348, n=26) 16%	686 ?(78.2 - 3154, n=74, last 2 years) -69%
Random Read 4KB	451.18	263.23 -42%	219.43 -51%	232.5 -48%	406 ?(218 - 483, n=26) -10%	189.4 ?(18.4 - 451, n=74, last 2 years) -58%
Random Write 4KB	160.96	256.83 60%	274.59 71%	189.2 18%	421 ?(152.9 - 730, n=26) 162%	189.9 ?(8.23 - 555, n=74, last 2 years) 18%

游戏 -Galaxy Tab S9 性能超越前代产品

三星Galaxy Tab S9 性能非常出色，因此为当前的游戏提供了良好的基础。即使是要求苛刻的游戏，如《PUBG Mobile》，在最高设置--图形超 HDR、帧速率超高--下也能流畅运行，不会掉帧。与其前代产品Galaxy Tab S8 相比，性能的飞跃是巨大的：在相同设置下，Tab S9 的 FPS 为 60，而不是 30，我们使用GameBench 进行的测量显示了这一点。显示。

对于这款高性能平板电脑来说，简单的游戏完全不成问题。高对比度显示屏和大功率扬声器也为成功的游戏体验做出了贡献。三星安装了Game Launcher 应用程序，可以显示自己的游戏和其他游戏。

制造商还提供游戏加速器。它允许记录会话、分析设备性能和静音通知。

Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Armajet; 1.61.6: Ø60 (58-61)

Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 5G Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Asphalt 9: Legends; Standard / low; 4.3.0h: Ø58.4 (39-61)

Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 5G Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Asphalt 9: Legends; High Quality; 4.3.0h: Ø58.4 (39-61)

Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 5G Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; PUBG Mobile; HD; 2.8.0: Ø59.9 (58-61)

Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; PUBG Mobile; HD; 1.9.0: Ø30 (29-31)

Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 5G Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; PUBG Mobile; Ultra HD; 2.8.0: Ø40 (39-41)

排放 - 对于Galaxy Pad S9 而言，热量不是问题

温度 -Galaxy Pad S9 在节流的情况下仍能高速运行

在日常使用中，三星Galaxy Tab S9 几乎不会发热。在无负载的情况下，平均温度为 29.2 摄氏度。在压力下，温度会升高，尤其是摄像头周围。在压力测试中，我们测得背面最高温度为 43.6 摄氏度。与旧款设备的对比值应谨慎对待，因为我们已改用 Burnout 基准进行压力测试。

即使在满负荷状态下，设备也能流畅运行，握持舒适。虽然在 Wild Life Stress Test Stability（野外生命压力测试稳定性）中性能明显下降，但Galaxy Tab S9 的速度仍然明显快于前代产品，即 Galaxy Pad S8或谷歌 Pixel 平板电脑.

Max. Load

Idle


41.3 °C	36.1 °C	31.1 °C
43.6 °C	36 °C	32.8 °C
38.8 °C	35.8 °C	36.8 °C

Maximum: 43.6 °C
Average: 36.9 °C


33.1 °C	38.2 °C	42.9 °C
33.1 °C	36.9 °C	43.9 °C
35.3 °C	35.9 °C	39.1 °C

Maximum: 43.9 °C
Average: 37.6 °C

Room Temperature 22 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 36.9 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 30 °C / 86 F for the devices in the class Tablet.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 43.6 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 33.7 °C / 93 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 43.9 °C / 111 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.2 °C / 85 F, compared to the device average of 30 °C / 86 F.

3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 5G Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø66.2 (58.8-82.1)

Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø40.1 (37.3-50)

Google Pixel Tablet Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø38.8 (37.8-39.7)

Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 5G Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø21.6 (19.8-23.3)

Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.9.1: Ø10.9 (10.2-13.4)

Google Pixel Tablet Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø11.1 (11-11.1)

3DMark
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Lenovo Tab P12 Pro	99.5 (7.29^min - 7.33^max) % +17%
Google Pixel Tablet	98.8 (11^min - 11.1^max) % +16%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 5G	84.9 (19.8^min - 23.3^max) %
Apple iPad Pro 11 2022	77.3 (26.6^min - 34.4^max) % -9%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G	76.3 (10.2^min - 13.4^max) % -10%
Apple iPad Air 5 2022	67.4 (20^min - 29.7^max) % -21%
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Lenovo Tab P12 Pro	99.4 (25.1^min - 25.3^max) % +39%
Google Pixel Tablet	95.3 (37.8^min - 39.7^max) % +33%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G	74.6 (37.3^min - 50^max) % +4%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 5G	71.6 (58.8^min - 82.1^max) %
Apple iPad Pro 11 2022	65.3 (77.5^min - 118.7^max) % -9%
Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability
Apple iPad Air 5 2022	62.9 (68.7^min - 109^max) %

Legend

Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Qualcomm Adreno 740, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash

Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Qualcomm Adreno 730, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

Apple iPad Pro 11 2022 Apple M2, Apple M2 10-Core GPU, 128 GB NVMe

Apple iPad Air 5 2022 Apple M1, Apple M1 8-Core GPU, 64 GB SSD

Google Pixel Tablet Google Tensor G2, ARM Mali-G710 MP7, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

Lenovo Tab P12 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Qualcomm Adreno 650, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

扬声器 - 三星平板电脑，具有丰富的立体声音效

三星Galaxy Tab S9 的四个扬声器带来的绝佳音效令人印象深刻。这款平板电脑能产生优美清晰的立体声音效，还可以激活杜比全景声（Dolby Atmos）。与前代产品相比，Tab S9 的音效显然更加均衡。中频更加线性，低频也有所改善。虽然Galaxy Tab S9 没有真正的低音，但听起来仍然很丰富。

音量较大时，背面和边框都能感觉到振动。三星平板电脑没有插孔。不过，蓝牙耳机可以顺利配对。Galaxy Tab S9 支持以下编解码器：SBC、AAC、aptX、LDAC 和 SSC。

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 5G audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 13.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 91% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 16.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.4% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 22% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 75% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 12% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 84% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

能源管理 -Galaxy Pad 中的高基数消耗

功耗 - 三星平板电脑的基本负载较高

三星Galaxy Pad S9 的功耗在同类产品中处于平均水平。三星平板电脑在基本负载和最大负载时的功耗仅高于对比设备。不过，我们现在使用 Burnout 基准来测量最大功耗，因此这些值不能直接比较。

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.04 / 0.17 Watt
Idle	2.58 / 3.24 / 3.39 Watt
Load	7.02 / 15.86 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 5G 8400 mAh	Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G 8000 mAh	Apple iPad Pro 11 2022 7538 mAh	Apple iPad Air 5 2022 mAh	Google Pixel Tablet 7020 mAh	Lenovo Tab P12 Pro 10200 mAh
Power Consumption		7%	-20%	-58%	-20%	13%
Idle Minimum *	2.58	1.19 54%	1.1 57%	1.65 36%	1.33 48%	2.2 15%
Idle Average *	3.24	4.38 -35%	6 -85%	8.1 -150%	4.67 -44%	2.6 20%
Idle Maximum *	3.39	4.45 -31%	6.1 -80%	9.4 -177%	4.78 -41%	3.2 6%
Load Average *	7.02	7.85 -12%	9.1 -30%	9.5 -35%	9.81 -40%	7.1 -1%
Load Maximum *	15.86	6.67 58%	10.2 36%	10.4 34%	19.76 -25%	11.5 27%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 5G: Ø8.87 (3.26-15.7)

Power consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø12.3 (9.05-14.4)

Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø9.97 (6.63-14.8)

Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø3.31 (3.25-3.39)

Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø2.14 (2.07-3.63)

电池续航时间 -Galaxy Tab S9 明显落后于前代产品

在电池续航时间方面，三星Galaxy Pad S9 有两副面孔。与其他设备相比，我们的标准化测量值很一般，尤其是与它的前代产品Galaxy Pad S8 相比。Galaxy Pad S9 的高基数消耗在这里很明显。也许三星可以通过更新来提高电池性能。

在日常使用中，这款平板电脑以良好的运行时间令人信服。Galaxy 这款平板电脑甚至能很好地应对七小时的火车旅行，包括不断变化的蜂窝频率、永久激活的热点和游戏间歇。

毕竟，这款平板电脑的充电速度很快。三星建议使用 15 至 45 瓦的充电器。在测试中，我们测得的最大充电功率为 27 瓦，这意味着Galaxy Pad S9 从 0 充到 100%只需 90 分钟。

Battery Runtime

Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)		15h 20min
WiFi Websurfing (chrome 117)		8h 59min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		11h 43min
Load (maximum brightness)		4h 22min

	Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 5G 8400 mAh	Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 5G 8000 mAh	Apple iPad Pro 11 2022 7538 mAh	Apple iPad Air 5 2022 mAh	Google Pixel Tablet 7020 mAh	Lenovo Tab P12 Pro 10200 mAh
Battery Runtime		65%	57%	7%	87%	11%
Reader / Idle	920	2170 136%	2198 139%		2202 139%	1034 12%
H.264	703	831 18%	941 34%		1239 76%	892 27%
WiFi v1.3	539	966 79%	846 57%	646 20%	992 84%	627 16%
Load	262	331 26%	256 -2%	245 -6%	391 49%	236 -10%

Pros

+ 工作速度

+ 更新供应

+ 明亮的 OLED 面板

+ 出色的扬声器

+ 快速内存

+ 附带 S Pen

+ IP68 防护等级

Cons

- 电池续航能力相对较弱

- 无 WiFi7

- 海绵状振动电机

结论：市场上最好的 11 英寸Android 平板电脑

回顾：三星Galaxy Pad S9 5G。测试设备由 Notebooksbilliger.de 提供。

Galaxy Pad S9 是三星公司推出的一款非常出色的Android 平板电脑。几乎没有什么可抱怨的，尤其是 5G 版本。材料质量高，制作精良。设备结构紧凑，握持舒适，屏幕边框小巧美观。三星首次为Galaxy S 平板电脑提供 IP68 认证。主动式 S-Pen 手写笔仍在使用中。

即使与前代产品相比，S Galaxy Pad S8的变化不大，但它们还是存在的。其中一项升级就是当前的骁龙处理器。这意味着Galaxy Pad S9 的运行速度极快，在游戏等要求较高的任务中性能提升尤为明显。该设备能快速通过不同的应用程序，多任务处理不成问题。

新的 OLED 面板亮度增加，也给人留下了深刻印象；Galaxy Tab S9 可以在户外使用。只是显示屏的视角灵活性没有那么好。出色的立体声扬声器与显示屏配合使用，确保了绝佳的视听体验。

至少在光线条件良好的情况下，相机拍照也非常出色。快照和视频会议效果良好。录音质量尤其出色。

5G 双卡双待和 Wi-Fi 6E 可确保快速数据传输。虽然 Wi-Fi 传输速率不错，但我们希望看到更新，因为Galaxy Pad S9 在 6GHz 频段无法与我们的路由器配合使用。

三星Galaxy Pad S9 是一款拥有先进软件的优秀硬件。它几乎无可挑剔，在高效使用、游戏和流媒体方面都令人印象深刻。

三星Galaxy Pad S9 几乎无可挑剔。它的软件和硬件都很成熟，工作速度快，令人印象深刻。通过三星的 DeX 模式，可以进一步提高工作效率。然而，如此强大的平板电脑还能做些什么呢？我们不得不对电池的运行时间提出批评，因为对比设备在这方面要好得多。

根据应用场景的不同，限制并不局限于Galaxy Tab S9 的内置硬件--这取决于所需的程序和工作环境。有些程序可用于Apple's iPad Pro 11、例如，Android cosmos 中就缺少这些程序。

其他替代方案包括配备更多软件的 Windows 平板电脑，如微软 Surface Pro 9或华硕 ROG Flow Z13这两款产品的价格都要贵得多。如果不那么注重生产力，而更注重娱乐，那么谷歌 Pixel 平板电脑可能是一个有趣的选择。

Download your licensed rating image as SVG / PNG

价格和供应情况

目前，只有 Wi-Fi 版本的三星Galaxy Tab S9 在美国有售，亚马逊的起售价为 764.15 美元。

Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 5G - 10/09/2023 v7 ^(old)
Benedikt Winkel

Chassis

91 / 98 → 93%

Keyboard

69 / 80 → 87%

Pointing Device

96%

Connectivity

72 / 70 → 100%

Weight

83 / 40-88 → 90%

Battery

87%

Display

89%

Games Performance

72 / 78 → 92%

Application Performance

93 / 92 → 100%

Temperature

88%

Noise

100%

Audio

89 / 91 → 98%

Camera

55 / 85 → 64%

Average

77%

91%

Tablet - Weighted Average

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.