沃尔玛Gateway GWTN141笔记本电脑评论。潜在的500美元甜蜜点
虽然超预算笔记本电脑很多,但它们的性能水平和制造质量可能是有问题的。像Chuwi这样鲜为人知的制造商的机型往往有硬件问题,否则你可能不会在联想、戴尔或惠普的同价位笔记本上发现这些问题。我们在这里要看的笔记本电脑是沃尔玛的14.1英寸Gateway GWTN141,零售价低于500美元。这个特殊的系统值得注意的是,它搭载了最新的英特尔第11代酷睿U系列CPU,拥有宽敞的16GB和512GB的内存和存储空间。它的规格对于这个价格来说是一个真正的便宜货,但让我们看看它下面还隐藏着什么。
直接竞争对手包括其他经济型笔记本电脑,如 惠普14s或Pavilion 系列。 戴尔Inspiron系列。 联想IdeaPad 3或5系列,或 创维CoreBook X.
更多沃尔玛笔记本电脑评论。
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
potential competitors in comparison
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
79.2 % v7 (old) | 09 / 2021 | Gateway GWTN141-10GR i5-1135G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs | 1.6 kg | 19.1 mm | 14.10" | 1920x1080 | |
76.9 % v7 (old) | 09 / 2021 | HP 14s-fq1357ng R5 5500U, Vega 7 | 1.5 kg | 17.9 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1080 | |
74.2 % v7 (old) | 08 / 2021 | Blackview AceBook 1 Celeron N4120, UHD Graphics 600 | 1.3 kg | 16.8 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1080 | |
87.6 % v7 (old) | 08 / 2021 | ADATA XPG Xenia 14 i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 996 g | 15 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1200 | |
79 % v7 (old) | 08 / 2021 | Chuwi CoreBook X i5-8259U, Iris Plus Graphics 655 | 1.5 kg | 20.6 mm | 14.00" | 2160x1440 | |
74.5 % v7 (old) | 06 / 2020 | Dell Inspiron 14 3493-4KWCF i7-1065G7, GeForce MX230 | 1.8 kg | 21 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1080 |
案例
机箱的外盖使用了铝,而键盘甲板和底座是塑料的。在处理底座或调整盖子的角度时,有相当多的吱吱声,这也反映了该系统的低价。
在尺寸和重量方面,Gateway比许多最新的14英寸笔记本电脑(如惠普14s或Xenia 14s)更厚、更重。 14s或Xenia 14由于其屏幕周围的边框较厚。对于这个尺寸来说,它是一个很重的系统,有1.6公斤,比华硕Zenbook 14重约400克。 华硕Zenbook 14.
连接性
在这样一个廉价的系统上有比预期更多的端口,包括2个USB-A、USB-C、HDMI、MicroSD,甚至还有一个Kensington锁。这里不支持Thunderbolt。
USB-C端口支持充电和视频输出,如果你丢失了专有的桶形充电器,它就会派上用场。然而,值得一提的是,我们设备上的USB-C端口在为我们的外部固态硬盘供电和输出到外部显示器上时出现了问题。我们的外置硬盘会不断断开和重新连接,而我们的外置显示器上的图片会不稳定。
SD卡阅读器
弹簧式MicroSD读卡器的速度非常慢,远低于20MB/s。将1GB的文件从我们的UHS-II测试卡移动到桌面上需要将近70秒。
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
ADATA XPG Xenia 14 (AV Pro V60) | |
HP 14s-fq1357ng (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60) | |
Chuwi CoreBook X (AV PRO V60) | |
Blackview AceBook 1 (AV Pro V60) | |
Gateway GWTN141-10GR (AV Pro V60) | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
ADATA XPG Xenia 14 (AV Pro V60) | |
HP 14s-fq1357ng (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60) | |
Chuwi CoreBook X (AV PRO V60) | |
Blackview AceBook 1 (AV Pro V60) | |
Gateway GWTN141-10GR (AV Pro V60) |
沟通
包括英特尔9461是一个旧的Wi-Fi 5模块,只能达到433 Mbps的1x1速度。虽然远不及目前的Wi-Fi 6笔记本电脑快,但传输速率至少是稳定和可靠的。
网络摄像头
标准的100万像素网络摄像头,没有隐私快门或红外功能。
维护
底部面板需要用飞利浦螺丝刀和锋利的边缘来拆卸。用户最多可以安装两个M.2 SATA III固态硬盘,而内存和WLAN都是固定的。
配件和保修
除了专有的桶装交流适配器和文件之外,盒子里没有任何额外的东西。如果你丢失了桶装充电器,该系统可以通过第三方USB-C适配器进行充电。
如果从沃尔玛购买,标准的一年保修期适用。通过零售商申请保修应该比从海外制造商如Chuwi或Blackview那里申请要容易得多。
输入设备
键盘
键盘上的按键有坚定而统一的反馈,但代价是相对较响的咔哒声。不幸的是,回车键是不可靠的,因为它经常不记录输入。你必须直接按回车键的中心,而不是其边缘,这在打字时通常不是这样的。
触摸板
与键盘不同,支持Precision 的点击板实际上是可靠的,没有任何问题。快速移动时滑行流畅,而慢速到中速会有一点粘滞。光标绝不会无意中跳动,使双击更加舒适。
显示
GWTN141使用相同的1080p熊猫1402L01 IPS面板,在预算中发现的 Blackview AceBook 1他们之间有类似的观看体验。不幸的是,这意味着它们有类似的缺点,包括昏暗的背光和有限的色彩空间,这在预算笔记本电脑上都很常见。值得庆幸的是,考虑到这个价格,对比度非常好,几乎达到1000:1。
|
Brightness Distribution: 83 %
Center on Battery: 195.6 cd/m²
Contrast: 978:1 (Black: 0.2 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.78 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 1.95
ΔE Greyscale 1.2 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
42.7% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
61.7% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
41.3% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.25
Gateway GWTN141-10GR Panda 1402L01, IPS, 14.1", 1920x1080 | HP 14s-fq1357ng AUO403D, IPS, 14", 1920x1080 | Blackview AceBook 1 Panda 1402L01, IPS, 14", 1920x1080 | ADATA XPG Xenia 14 BOE NE140WUM-N63, IPS, 14", 1920x1200 | Chuwi CoreBook X Chi Mei P140ZKA-BZ1, IPS, 14", 2160x1440 | Dell Inspiron 14 3493-4KWCF Chi Mei 140HCA, IPS, 14", 1920x1080 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | -8% | 1% | 66% | 61% | 1% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 41.3 | 38.11 -8% | 41.6 1% | 70 69% | 67.2 63% | 41.84 1% |
sRGB Coverage | 61.7 | 57 -8% | 62.4 1% | 99.1 61% | 98 59% | 62.3 1% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 42.7 | 39.37 -8% | 43 1% | 72 69% | 68.8 61% | 43.33 1% |
Response Times | 5% | -16% | -12% | 140% | 8% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 36.4 ? | 41 ? -13% | 30.8 ? 15% | 50 ? -37% | 36.4 ? -0% | 41 ? -13% |
Response Time Black / White * | 35.2 ? | 27 ? 23% | 25.6 ? 27% | 30.4 ? 14% | 26.4 ? 25% | 31 ? 12% |
PWM Frequency | 2016 ? | 201.6 ? -90% | 10000 ? 396% | 2500 ? 24% | ||
Screen | -4% | 3% | 40% | -48% | -31% | |
Brightness middle | 195.6 | 220 12% | 249.9 28% | 344.6 76% | 355.3 82% | 226 16% |
Brightness | 183 | 223 22% | 226 23% | 321 75% | 344 88% | 214 17% |
Brightness Distribution | 83 | 85 2% | 80 -4% | 89 7% | 94 13% | 92 11% |
Black Level * | 0.2 | 0.225 -13% | 0.17 15% | 0.22 -10% | 0.34 -70% | 0.17 15% |
Contrast | 978 | 978 0% | 1470 50% | 1566 60% | 1045 7% | 1329 36% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 3.78 | 4.16 -10% | 3.89 -3% | 1.51 60% | 6.2 -64% | 5.21 -38% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 16.69 | 7.43 55% | 16.39 2% | 4.1 75% | 10.96 34% | 22.15 -33% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.95 | 1.72 12% | 0.52 73% | 1.23 37% | 4.43 -127% | |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.2 | 2.35 -96% | 2.4 -100% | 1.9 -58% | 7.9 -558% | 3.27 -173% |
Gamma | 2.25 98% | 2.62 84% | 2.26 97% | 2.17 101% | 2.02 109% | 2.36 93% |
CCT | 6541 99% | 6389 102% | 6772 96% | 6787 96% | 7450 87% | 6538 99% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 40 | |||||
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 62 | |||||
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -2% /
-3% | -4% /
-1% | 31% /
38% | 51% /
12% | -7% /
-17% |
* ... smaller is better
色域仅限于sRGB的62%,而大多数中端到高端超极本的色域都超过95%。用户在进行任何形式的图形编辑时,都希望连接一个外部显示器。
尽管起价低,色彩空间窄,但色彩和灰度实际上并不差。然而,由于上述有限的色彩空间,在较高的饱和度水平上的色彩并不那么准确。
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
35.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 21.2 ms rise | |
↘ 14 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 92 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
36.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 17.6 ms rise | |
↘ 18.8 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 48 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM detected | 2016 Hz | ≤ 21 % brightness setting | |
The display backlight flickers at 2016 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 21 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 2016 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
由于昏暗的背光和光亮的显示屏无法避免的眩光,户外能见度有限。价格较高的笔记本电脑,如 XPS 13可以比我们的Gateway的亮度高两倍,在明亮的环境条件下更容易看到。然而,在室内时,Gateway的亮度是足够的。
业绩
处理器
多线程性能大约比我们数据库中配备相同的笔记本电脑慢10%到20%。 酷睿i5-1135G7CPU。这种差距足够大,某些第十代Ice Lake 笔记本电脑,如 英飞凌INBook X1 Pro酷睿i7-1065G7可以略微超过我们Gateway中的第11代酷睿i5 CPU的性能。虽然有点令人失望,但从旧的第八代或第七代系统升级的用户仍然会看到显著的性能提升。
Cinebench R15 Multi Loop
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 -mmt1 | 7z b 4
Geekbench 5.5: Single-Core | Multi-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14ALC05 82HU002YUS | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7-14ARE | |
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TM420IA | |
ADATA XPG Xenia 14 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ARE05 | |
HP 14s-fq1357ng | |
Average Intel Core i5-1135G7 (979 - 2382, n=62) | |
Infinix INBook X1 Pro | |
Gateway GWTN141-10GR | |
Acer Spin 3 SP314-54N-56S5 | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX434FL-DB77 | |
Kuu LeBook 12.6 Core i7-8550U |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
ADATA XPG Xenia 14 | |
Gateway GWTN141-10GR | |
Average Intel Core i5-1135G7 (375 - 527, n=62) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14ALC05 82HU002YUS | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7-14ARE | |
Infinix INBook X1 Pro | |
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TM420IA | |
HP 14s-fq1357ng | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ARE05 | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX434FL-DB77 | |
Acer Spin 3 SP314-54N-56S5 | |
Kuu LeBook 12.6 Core i7-8550U |
Cinebench R23 / Multi Core | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14ALC05 82HU002YUS | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7-14ARE | |
HP 14s-fq1357ng | |
ADATA XPG Xenia 14 | |
Average Intel Core i5-1135G7 (2786 - 6136, n=55) | |
Infinix INBook X1 Pro | |
Gateway GWTN141-10GR | |
Acer Spin 3 SP314-54N-56S5 | |
Kuu LeBook 12.6 Core i7-8550U |
Cinebench R23 / Single Core | |
ADATA XPG Xenia 14 | |
Gateway GWTN141-10GR | |
Average Intel Core i5-1135G7 (1062 - 1373, n=53) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14ALC05 82HU002YUS | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7-14ARE | |
Infinix INBook X1 Pro | |
HP 14s-fq1357ng | |
Acer Spin 3 SP314-54N-56S5 | |
Kuu LeBook 12.6 Core i7-8550U |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7-14ARE | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14ALC05 82HU002YUS | |
HP 14s-fq1357ng | |
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TM420IA | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ARE05 | |
ADATA XPG Xenia 14 | |
Average Intel Core i5-1135G7 (431 - 941, n=65) | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX434FL-DB77 | |
Infinix INBook X1 Pro | |
Acer Spin 3 SP314-54N-56S5 | |
Gateway GWTN141-10GR | |
Kuu LeBook 12.6 Core i7-8550U |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
ADATA XPG Xenia 14 | |
Gateway GWTN141-10GR | |
Average Intel Core i5-1135G7 (141.4 - 205, n=61) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14ALC05 82HU002YUS | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7-14ARE | |
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TM420IA | |
Infinix INBook X1 Pro | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX434FL-DB77 | |
HP 14s-fq1357ng | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ARE05 | |
Acer Spin 3 SP314-54N-56S5 | |
Kuu LeBook 12.6 Core i7-8550U |
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
Kuu LeBook 12.6 Core i7-8550U | |
Acer Spin 3 SP314-54N-56S5 | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX434FL-DB77 | |
Gateway GWTN141-10GR | |
Infinix INBook X1 Pro | |
Average Intel Core i5-1135G7 (499 - 1044, n=60) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ARE05 | |
ADATA XPG Xenia 14 | |
HP 14s-fq1357ng | |
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TM420IA | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7-14ARE | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14ALC05 82HU002YUS |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
ADATA XPG Xenia 14 | |
Gateway GWTN141-10GR | |
Average Intel Core i5-1135G7 (3924 - 4921, n=62) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14ALC05 82HU002YUS | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7-14ARE | |
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TM420IA | |
Infinix INBook X1 Pro | |
Kuu LeBook 12.6 Core i7-8550U | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ARE05 | |
HP 14s-fq1357ng | |
Acer Spin 3 SP314-54N-56S5 | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX434FL-DB77 |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7-14ARE | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14ALC05 82HU002YUS | |
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TM420IA | |
HP 14s-fq1357ng | |
ADATA XPG Xenia 14 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ARE05 | |
Average Intel Core i5-1135G7 (14745 - 24873, n=62) | |
Infinix INBook X1 Pro | |
Gateway GWTN141-10GR | |
Acer Spin 3 SP314-54N-56S5 | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX434FL-DB77 | |
Kuu LeBook 12.6 Core i7-8550U |
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
Average Intel Core i5-1135G7 (1147 - 1428, n=58) | |
Acer Spin 3 SP314-54N-56S5 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14ALC05 82HU002YUS | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX434FL-DB77 | |
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TM420IA | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7-14ARE | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7-14ARE | |
HP 14s-fq1357ng | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ARE05 |
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7-14ARE | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7-14ARE | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14ALC05 82HU002YUS | |
HP 14s-fq1357ng | |
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TM420IA | |
Average Intel Core i5-1135G7 (3475 - 5472, n=58) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ARE05 | |
Acer Spin 3 SP314-54N-56S5 | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX434FL-DB77 |
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7-14ARE | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14ALC05 82HU002YUS | |
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TM420IA | |
ADATA XPG Xenia 14 | |
HP 14s-fq1357ng | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ARE05 | |
Average Intel Core i5-1135G7 (3.57 - 7.6, n=57) | |
Infinix INBook X1 Pro | |
Gateway GWTN141-10GR | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX434FL-DB77 | |
Acer Spin 3 SP314-54N-56S5 | |
Kuu LeBook 12.6 Core i7-8550U |
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
Kuu LeBook 12.6 Core i7-8550U | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX434FL-DB77 | |
HP 14s-fq1357ng | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14ALC05 82HU002YUS | |
Gateway GWTN141-10GR | |
Acer Spin 3 SP314-54N-56S5 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ARE05 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7-14ARE | |
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TM420IA | |
Infinix INBook X1 Pro | |
Average Intel Core i5-1135G7 (44.2 - 62.9, n=60) | |
ADATA XPG Xenia 14 |
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX434FL-DB77 | |
Kuu LeBook 12.6 Core i7-8550U | |
Acer Spin 3 SP314-54N-56S5 | |
Infinix INBook X1 Pro | |
Average Intel Core i5-1135G7 (0.619 - 0.727, n=59) | |
Gateway GWTN141-10GR | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ARE05 | |
HP 14s-fq1357ng | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7-14ARE | |
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TM420IA | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14ALC05 82HU002YUS | |
ADATA XPG Xenia 14 |
* ... smaller is better
系统性能
PCMark 10 / Score | |
ADATA XPG Xenia 14 | |
HP 14s-fq1357ng | |
Average Intel Core i5-1135G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs (4026 - 4952, n=53) | |
Gateway GWTN141-10GR | |
Chuwi CoreBook X | |
Dell Inspiron 14 3493-4KWCF | |
Blackview AceBook 1 |
PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
ADATA XPG Xenia 14 | |
Average Intel Core i5-1135G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs (8149 - 9917, n=53) | |
HP 14s-fq1357ng | |
Gateway GWTN141-10GR | |
Dell Inspiron 14 3493-4KWCF | |
Chuwi CoreBook X | |
Blackview AceBook 1 |
PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
ADATA XPG Xenia 14 | |
Dell Inspiron 14 3493-4KWCF | |
HP 14s-fq1357ng | |
Chuwi CoreBook X | |
Average Intel Core i5-1135G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs (5040 - 6619, n=53) | |
Gateway GWTN141-10GR | |
Blackview AceBook 1 |
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
ADATA XPG Xenia 14 | |
HP 14s-fq1357ng | |
Average Intel Core i5-1135G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs (3548 - 5255, n=53) | |
Gateway GWTN141-10GR | |
Chuwi CoreBook X | |
Dell Inspiron 14 3493-4KWCF | |
Blackview AceBook 1 |
PCMark 10 Score | 4377 points | |
Help |
DPC延时
LatencyMon显示了在我们的主页上打开多个浏览器标签时的延迟问题。在我们长达1分钟的视频测试中,4K视频在60FPS下的播放非常流畅,只有2个丢帧。
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
HP 14s-fq1357ng | |
Blackview AceBook 1 | |
Chuwi CoreBook X | |
Gateway GWTN141-10GR | |
ADATA XPG Xenia 14 |
* ... smaller is better
存储设备
该系统没有配备NVMe或PCIe固态硬盘,可能是为了节省成本。相反,它配备了一个不太知名的 w800s m.2 sata iii固态硬盘具有良好的连续读取和写入率,每个都超过450MB/s,考虑到其周围的硬件,这应该是绰绰有余。
Gateway GWTN141-10GR W800S W800SHMQ 512GB SSD | HP 14s-fq1357ng Micron 2210 MTFDHBA512QFD | Blackview AceBook 1 SCY C500 SNS1N3G12800D M.2 SATA | ADATA XPG Xenia 14 ADATA XPG Gammix S50 Lite 512GB | Chuwi CoreBook X Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ | Dell Inspiron 14 3493-4KWCF Toshiba KBG40ZNS512G NVMe | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AS SSD | 199% | -35% | 383% | 175% | 179% | |
Seq Read | 477.4 | 1784 274% | 446.6 -6% | 3043 537% | 1393 192% | 2074 334% |
Seq Write | 453.5 | 742 64% | 276.8 -39% | 1462 222% | 954 110% | 775 71% |
4K Read | 15.62 | 58.3 273% | 8.95 -43% | 66.6 326% | 39.51 153% | 37.81 142% |
4K Write | 48.04 | 141.9 195% | 50.2 4% | 217.6 353% | 98.9 106% | 101.3 111% |
4K-64 Read | 172.6 | 582 237% | 145 -16% | 732 324% | 834 383% | 1265 633% |
4K-64 Write | 243.4 | 1047 330% | 173.5 -29% | 1706 601% | 687 182% | 383.5 58% |
Access Time Read * | 0.13 | 0.052 60% | 0.5 -285% | 0.039 70% | 0.066 49% | 0.081 38% |
Access Time Write * | 0.703 | 0.046 93% | 0.232 67% | 0.063 91% | 0.044 94% | 0.263 63% |
Score Read | 236 | 819 247% | 199 -16% | 1103 367% | 1013 329% | 1510 540% |
Score Write | 337 | 1263 275% | 251 -26% | 2069 514% | 881 161% | 562 67% |
Score Total | 697 | 2469 254% | 545 -22% | 3678 428% | 2399 244% | 2781 299% |
Copy ISO MB/s | 375.3 | 1067 184% | 360.9 -4% | 3306 781% | 983 162% | 716 91% |
Copy Program MB/s | 317.1 | 597 88% | 115.1 -64% | 1087 243% | 643 103% | 335.4 6% |
Copy Game MB/s | 327.8 | 1019 211% | 306.8 -6% | 1988 506% | 920 181% | 484.8 48% |
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 | 174% | -7% | 388% | 126% | 212% | |
Write 4K | 67 | 94.8 41% | 66.3 -1% | 182.5 172% | 130.5 95% | 159.6 138% |
Read 4K | 23.12 | 48.93 112% | 26.3 14% | 69.4 200% | 38.72 67% | 53.5 131% |
Write Seq | 286.7 | 1059 269% | 231.9 -19% | 2171 657% | 709 147% | 1174 309% |
Read Seq | 372.9 | 1620 334% | 466.8 25% | 2924 684% | 717 92% | 1648 342% |
Write 4K Q32T1 | 266.3 | 400 50% | 117.3 -56% | 486.5 83% | 510 92% | 420.8 58% |
Read 4K Q32T1 | 292.5 | 377.2 29% | 138.1 -53% | 506 73% | 554 89% | 564 93% |
Write Seq Q32T1 | 401.8 | 1136 183% | 427.6 6% | 2832 605% | 1037 158% | 1231 206% |
Read Seq Q32T1 | 436.6 | 2073 375% | 546 25% | 3177 628% | 1609 269% | 2274 421% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 187% /
190% | -21% /
-25% | 386% /
385% | 151% /
157% | 196% /
191% |
* ... smaller is better
Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
GPU性能
图形性能比一般的Iris Xe 80 EUs要慢10%左右。 平均Iris Xe 80 EUs在我们的数据库中。像《DOTA 2》或《火箭联盟》这样的轻量级游戏,对于这样一个廉价的系统来说,运行效果仍然好于预期。与旧版的Iris Xe相比,图形的提升 UHD Graphics 620是巨大的。
3DMark 11 Performance | 5363 points | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 13980 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 2931 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 1196 points | |
Help |
Witcher 3 FPS Chart
low | med. | high | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 56.4 | 38.7 | 20.6 | 10.2 |
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 76.4 | 50.2 | 34.8 | 33.2 |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 27.3 | 15.5 | 12.5 | |
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 35.3 | 24.9 | 22.3 |
Emissions
系统噪音
在大多数情况下,包括游戏,风扇的噪音都很安静。运行时 Witcher 3将引起仅31.1 dB(A)的风扇噪音,而CoreBook X或Inspiron 14则为37 dB(A)或更高。我们的Gateway随后成为我们迄今为止测试的最安静的Tiger Lake-U笔记本电脑之一。
Gateway GWTN141-10GR Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1135G7, W800S W800SHMQ 512GB SSD | HP 14s-fq1357ng Vega 7, R5 5500U, Micron 2210 MTFDHBA512QFD | ADATA XPG Xenia 14 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, ADATA XPG Gammix S50 Lite 512GB | Chuwi CoreBook X Iris Plus Graphics 655, i5-8259U, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ | Dell Inspiron 14 3493-4KWCF GeForce MX230, i7-1065G7, Toshiba KBG40ZNS512G NVMe | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | -24% | -16% | -16% | -34% | |
off / environment * | 24.4 | 26 -7% | 25.2 -3% | 24.9 -2% | 30.3 -24% |
Idle Minimum * | 24.4 | 26 -7% | 25.2 -3% | 25.5 -5% | 30.3 -24% |
Idle Average * | 24.4 | 26 -7% | 26.5 -9% | 25.5 -5% | 30.3 -24% |
Idle Maximum * | 24.4 | 31.6 -30% | 26.5 -9% | 29.1 -19% | 30.3 -24% |
Load Average * | 25.8 | 41 -59% | 30.9 -20% | 36.8 -43% | 42.9 -66% |
Load Maximum * | 31.1 | 41 -32% | 46.7 -50% | 37.1 -19% | 43.3 -39% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 37.4 | 37.2 |
* ... smaller is better
Noise Level
Idle |
| 24.4 / 24.4 / 24.4 dB(A) |
Load |
| 25.8 / 31.1 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 24.4 dB(A) |
温度
系统左半部分的表面温度明显比右半部分高。在运行游戏等高负荷时,WASD键和底部通风口附近的热点可以分别达到42℃和48℃。这些温度可与 氙气灯14但我们更希望热点在机箱后部更远的地方,因为手指和皮肤不太可能接触到。
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 35.9 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.4 to 59 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 47.6 °C / 118 F, compared to the average of 39.4 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.7 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 30.8 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 25 °C / 77 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(+) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.3 °C / 82.9 F (+3.3 °C / 5.9 F).
压力测试
当运行Prime95对CPU施加压力时,在最初的20秒左右,时钟速率将提升到2.7GHz,直到达到72C的核心温度。然后时钟速率将下降到1.9GHz,以保持60C的较低核心温度。
用电池供电运行不会限制性能。在电池上进行3DMark 11测试,物理和图形分数分别为8055和5123分,而在主电源上则为7963和5332分。
CPU时钟(GHz) | GPU时钟(MHz) | CPU平均温度(℃) | |
系统空闲 | -- | -- | 34 |
Prime95压力 | 1.8 - 1.9 | -- | 61 |
Prime95 + FurMark压力 | 1.1 - 1.3 | 600 - 700 | 59 |
Witcher 3 Stress | 2.0 | 1100 - 1151 | 61 |
发言人
Gateway GWTN141-10GR audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (77.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 29.1% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 82% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 14% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 73% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 21% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Energy Management
消耗功率
Gateway比许多ULV同行更省电,部分原因可能是其较低的涡轮增压潜力和相对较暗的显示屏。在桌面上空闲时,根据亮度和电源配置文件,消耗3W到7W,而游戏只消耗27W左右,而Xenia 14则是45W。
在运行极端负载时,我们能够从小型(约6.6 x 6.6 x 2.9厘米)的交流电适配器中测得42.4瓦的临时最大功耗。
Off / Standby | 0.47 / 0.86 Watt |
Idle | 3.2 / 5.2 / 6.9 Watt |
Load |
25.9 / 42.4 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Gateway GWTN141-10GR i5-1135G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs, W800S W800SHMQ 512GB SSD, IPS, 1920x1080, 14.1" | HP 14s-fq1357ng R5 5500U, Vega 7, Micron 2210 MTFDHBA512QFD, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | Blackview AceBook 1 Celeron N4120, UHD Graphics 600, SCY C500 SNS1N3G12800D M.2 SATA, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | ADATA XPG Xenia 14 i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, ADATA XPG Gammix S50 Lite 512GB, IPS, 1920x1200, 14" | Chuwi CoreBook X i5-8259U, Iris Plus Graphics 655, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ, IPS, 2160x1440, 14" | Dell Inspiron 14 3493-4KWCF i7-1065G7, GeForce MX230, Toshiba KBG40ZNS512G NVMe, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -10% | 23% | -33% | -62% | -44% | |
Idle Minimum * | 3.2 | 4.2 -31% | 3.5 -9% | 2.9 9% | 6.2 -94% | 4.7 -47% |
Idle Average * | 5.2 | 6.3 -21% | 5.6 -8% | 5.5 -6% | 10.7 -106% | 6.6 -27% |
Idle Maximum * | 6.9 | 7 -1% | 6.2 10% | 5.9 14% | 12.5 -81% | 5.9 14% |
Load Average * | 25.9 | 27.7 -7% | 8.3 68% | 44.4 -71% | 40.5 -56% | 56 -116% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 28 | 27.7 1% | 46.6 -66% | 39.4 -41% | ||
Load Maximum * | 42.4 | 42 1% | 19.6 54% | 76.4 -80% | 39.2 8% | 60.2 -42% |
* ... smaller is better
Power Consumption Witcher 3 / Stresstest
电池寿命
电池容量还不错,为51Wh,WLAN运行时间超过9小时,令人尊敬。然而,从空电到满电需要整整三个小时,这比大多数其他笔记本电脑要长两倍。
Gateway GWTN141-10GR i5-1135G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs, 51 Wh | HP 14s-fq1357ng R5 5500U, Vega 7, 41 Wh | Blackview AceBook 1 Celeron N4120, UHD Graphics 600, 45 Wh | ADATA XPG Xenia 14 i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 53 Wh | Chuwi CoreBook X i5-8259U, Iris Plus Graphics 655, 46.2 Wh | Dell Inspiron 14 3493-4KWCF i7-1065G7, GeForce MX230, 42 Wh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | -7% | 3% | 8% | -27% | -29% | |
WiFi v1.3 | 548 | 507 -7% | 565 3% | 592 8% | 400 -27% | 390 -29% |
Reader / Idle | 675 | 830 | ||||
Witcher 3 ultra | 89 | |||||
Load | 98 |
Pros
Cons
结论 - 令人惊讶的安静和长的电池寿命
廉价的Gateway GWTN141在最大限度地提高每美元的性能方面表现出色,有大量的内存和存储空间,超级安静的风扇,以及长的电池寿命。它甚至可以容纳两个M.2固态硬盘,这是我们对这样一个廉价系统的期望。然而,我们的测试设备上的键盘和USB-C端口的可靠性不稳定,这意味着用户在购买后应立即仔细检查这些潜在问题。
考虑到低廉的价格,性能、端口和电池寿命都比预期的要好。然而,如果你在键盘或USB端口上遇到任何问题,你可能想坚持保修,以防万一。
昏暗的显示屏,狭窄的色彩空间,缺乏键盘照明,以及相对较重的重量是用户在这个特定的价格范围内不得不接受的缺点。惠普14s 惠普14s和 联想IdeaPad 5是潜在的替代品,但前者比我们的Gateway更难维修,而后者则明显更贵。
价格和可用性
Gateway GWTN141-10GR
- 09/06/2021 v7 (old)
Allen Ngo