HTC U23 pro 智能手机评测--重振雄风？

Name: HTC U23 pro
Brand: HTC

上流社会的回归？

HTC 一直很低调，但现在推出了 HTC U23 pro。HTC 希望通过这款新机型在中高端市场留下深刻印象。它带来了过去的状态指示灯、microSD 卡和音频插孔。

Benedikt Winkel, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy), Published 09/01/2023 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

5G Android Smartphone Touchscreen

HTC 在欧洲市场推出 U23 pro。U 在以往的 HTC 机型中代表高端。前一年的 HTC Desire 22 Pro有一个不同的昵称：我们批评过它的高零售价和平庸的更新支持。HTC 在德国只推出了 U23 pro 一个版本，配备 12 GB 内存和 256 GB 存储空间。购买者可以选择雪白和咖啡黑两种颜色。

Test device courtesy of HTC Germany

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

HTC U23 pro (U Series)

Processor

Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 8 x 1.8 - 2.4 GHz, Cortex-A710 / A510

Graphics adapter

Qualcomm Adreno 644

Memory

12 GB

Display

6.70 inch 20:9, 2400 x 1080 pixel 393 PPI, OLED, OLED, glossy: yes, HDR, 120 Hz

Storage

256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash, 256 GB

, 214 GB free

Connections

1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: 3,5 mm, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: accelerometer, gyro, proximity, barometer, compass, OTG

Networking

Wi-Fi 6E (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz), Bluetooth 5.2, 2G (850/900/1800/1900 MHz), 3G (2100/1900/850/900 (B1/B2/AWS/B5/B8 with 2100/850/AWS/900 Diversity), 4G (Band 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41), 5G (n1, n3, n7, n20, n28, n41, n78), Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 8.9 x 166.6 x 77.1

Battery

4600 mAh Lithium-Ion

Charging

wireless charging, fast charging / Quickcharge

Operating System

Android 13

Camera

Primary Camera: 108 MPix (f/1.7, OIS) + 8 MPix (Ultrawide, f/2.4) + 5 MPix (Macro, f/2.2) + 2 MPix (depth, f/2.4)
Secondary Camera: 32 MPix f/2.45

Additional features

Speakers: stereo, Keyboard: Onscreen, Keyboard Light: yes, USB cable (USB-C to USB-C), SIM needle, 24 Months Warranty, SAR-Head: 0.67 W/kg, SAR-Body: 0.95 W/kg; GNSS: GPS (L1, L5), Glonass (L1), Galileo (E1, E5a), Beidou (B1, B1c, B2a), IP67; Camera2API: Level 3; DRM Widevine L1, fanless, waterproof

Weight

205 g

Price

600 Euro

Links

HTC homepage

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating	Date	Model	Weight	Drive	Size	Resolution
83.6 % v7 ^(old)	09 / 2023	HTC U23 pro SD 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644	205 g	256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	6.70"	2400x1080
86 % v7 ^(old)	08 / 2023	Honor 90 5G SD 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644	183 g	512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	6.70"	2664x1200
86.4 % v7 ^(old)	04 / 2023	Xiaomi 13 Lite SD 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644	171 g	256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	6.55"	2400x1080
86.8 % v7 ^(old)	07 / 2023	Motorola Edge 40 Dimensity 8020, Mali-G77 MP9	171 g	256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	6.55"	2400x1080
86 % v7 ^(old)	05 / 2023	Samsung Galaxy A54 5G Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5	202 g	128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	6.40"	2340x1080

表壳 - HTC，金属边框，塑料后壳

HTC U23 pro 采用了多种材料。边框由金属制成，背面是塑料，显示屏则由大猩猩玻璃 Victus 保护。虽然边框给人的感觉非常优质，但背面却给人留下了比较简单的印象--很容易按进去。智能手机在用力时很容易弯曲，音量摇杆也有一些弹力。不过，在测试期间，我们没有在设备上发现任何划痕。

6.7 英寸显示屏很平整，额头和下巴处的显示屏边缘略宽。前置摄像头位于一个冲孔中。四个镜头突出于背面的外壳，这使得设备在平面上打字时会轻微晃动。

尺寸比较

装备 - U23 专业型，具有多种特殊功能

HTC 在 U23 pro 中增加了一些目前智能手机中很少见的功能，如状态 LED、通过 microSD 卡扩展内存和耳机音频插孔。不过，目前的传输标准还支持 NFC、WiFi 6E 和蓝牙 5.2。HTC 还安装了一个 USB-C 端口，支持 USB 3.2（Gen.1）。

U23 pro 具有一个混合插槽：可接受两张 nano-SIM 卡或一张 SIM 卡和一张存储卡；不支持 eSIM 卡。

microSD 读卡器

HTC U23 pro 可以处理最大 1 TB 的 SD 卡。它还支持 exFAT 文件系统。在我们使用 Angelbird AV PRO V60 128 GB 参考卡进行的拷贝测试中，传输速率显然没有达到顶级水平。A 三星Galaxy A54在这项测试中，它的速度大约是后者的两倍。

SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash (Angelbird AV Pro V60)	57.33 MB/s +130%
HTC U23 pro Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash (Angelbird AV Pro V60)	24.98 MB/s

Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)

HTC U23 pro Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø37.2 (25.6-48.9)

Samsung Galaxy A54 5G Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø41.4 (32.1-55.6)

HTC U23 pro Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB: Ø77.9 (67.5-83.9)

Samsung Galaxy A54 5G Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø78.6 (43.7-98)

软件 - HTC 保留Android ，但无更新计划

HTC U23 pro 上的软件几乎是原版Android 。值得肯定的是，制造商没有安装第三方应用程序。只预装了常见的谷歌应用程序和来自 Vive 的软件--HTC 属于提供 VR 产品的 Vive 集团。虽然系统如此纤薄，但出厂时却占用了 42 GB 的存储空间。

在设置过程中，可以发现解锁方法中并非所有文字都翻译成了德文。在设置面部解锁时，英文段落也很明显。HTC 并没有在 U23 pro 中使用单手模式或特殊手势。

这款智能手机装有Android 13，测试时安全补丁是最新的。宏达电希望在两年内为 U23 pro 提供安全更新，但目前还没有关于该设备是否会获得重大更新以及更新次数的声明。

通信和全球导航卫星系统 - U23 pro，带 WiFi 6E

在使用我们的参考路由器华硕 ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000 进行的网络测量中，HTC U23 pro 在 5 GHz 范围内显示出与对比设备相当的稳定速率。只有小米 13 Lite 的速度明显快于其他智能手机。

不过，U23 pro 也支持 Wi-Fi 6E，在使用相应路由器的情况下，智能手机的速度明显快于 5 GHz 网络。在测试中，连接也能快速建立并保持稳定。在测试中，移动接收效果并不明显。智能手机支持各种 4G 频段和一些 5G 频段，但带宽达不到Honor 90.

Networking
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Xiaomi 13 Lite Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	1440 (1312^min - 1540^max) MBit/s +54%
HTC U23 pro Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	934 (910^min - 949^max) MBit/s
Honor 90 5G Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	910 (839^min - 954^max) MBit/s -3%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	843 (813^min - 856^max) MBit/s -10%
Motorola Edge 40 Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 8020, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	839 (774^min - 879^max) MBit/s -10%
Average of class Smartphone (34.8 - 1875, n=184, last 2 years)	714 MBit/s -24%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Xiaomi 13 Lite Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	1757 (1611^min - 1817^max) MBit/s +125%
Motorola Edge 40 Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 8020, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	942 (912^min - 964^max) MBit/s +21%
Honor 90 5G Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	939 (470^min - 967^max) MBit/s +20%
HTC U23 pro Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	780 (729^min - 846^max) MBit/s
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	750 (546^min - 831^max) MBit/s -4%
Average of class Smartphone (40.5 - 1810, n=186, last 2 years)	729 MBit/s -7%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
HTC U23 pro Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	1832 (908^min - 1888^max) MBit/s
Average of class Smartphone (229 - 1902, n=75, last 2 years)	1451 MBit/s -21%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
HTC U23 pro Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	1607 (1564^min - 1627^max) MBit/s
Average of class Smartphone (668 - 1864, n=75, last 2 years)	1368 MBit/s -15%

HTC U23 pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Qualcomm Adreno 644; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1802 (908-1888)

HTC U23 pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Qualcomm Adreno 644; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1607 (1564-1627)

HTC U23 pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Qualcomm Adreno 644; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø933 (910-949)

Samsung Galaxy A54 5G Samsung Exynos 1380, ARM Mali-G68 MP5; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø842 (813-856)

HTC U23 pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Qualcomm Adreno 644; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø779 (729-846)

Samsung Galaxy A54 5G Samsung Exynos 1380, ARM Mali-G68 MP5; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø750 (546-831)

HTC U23 pro 支持所有常见卫星系统的双全球导航卫星系统。连接建立得很快，而且足够精确。我们将这款智能手机与 Garmin Venu 2 智能手表一起进行了一次自行车旅行。智能手机记录的路线与地图上显示的路线基本一致。

不过，Garmin 手表的精确度更高，尤其是在显示半径方面。安装的 GNSS 解决方案在日常使用中令人信服，各种导航程序都能顺利运行。

电话功能和语音质量 - HTC，传输清晰

HTC 依靠 Google Phone 应用程序。U23 pro 支持 WLAN 电话和 VoLTE。这款智能手机的通话质量很好：语音传输清晰，没有噪音。

通过扬声器拨打电话时，U23 pro 的声音会非常大。HTC 应该更好地过滤掉背景噪音。

相机 - U23 专业型，带五个镜头

HTC 为 U23 pro 配备了五个镜头，四个在背面，一个在正面。在中档手机中，只有背面的主摄像头能让人信服。它的最大分辨率为 108MPix，但智能手机通常使用像素分档将分辨率提高到 12MPix。色彩还原自然，有时有点暗，照片通常清晰细腻。

超广角摄像头的照片质量明显落后于主摄像头。照片的清晰度较低，还存在图像噪点，照片边缘变形。数码变焦也没有增加多少价值，因为照片失去了很多清晰度。微距摄像头在强光下的效果尚可。

不过，U23 pro 也可以拍摄全分辨率的照片。不过，拍摄对象必须光线充足才能拍出好照片。此外，这款智能手机还有一个专业模式，可以手动设置 ISO、曝光时间、光圈、白平衡和对焦。不过，该模式只能与主摄像头一起使用。

前置摄像头的最大分辨率为 3200 万像素，但拍摄效果往往不够清晰。反之，人像模式却非常可靠。HTC 还为弱光环境提供了特殊的夜间模式。图像噪点很少，但照片整体仍然很暗。

U23 pro 在前端可录制最高分辨率为 1080p 的 60 FPS 视频。背面也可以录制 4K，但只能达到 30 FPS。HTC 仅支持 1080p 分辨率的视频防抖动功能。U23 pro 对光线变化反应迅速，自动对焦也令人信服。不过，声音录制有背景噪音。在不同相机模式之间切换时，缓慢的操作速度令人讨厌。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Main camera Main camera Ultra wide-angle 5x zoom Low Light

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images

配件和保修 - U23 pro 仅配备最基本的配件

除了智能手机之外，HTC U23 pro 的包装中只有一条 USB-C 数据线和一个打开 SIM 卡插槽的工具。制造商没有提供电源适配器、手机壳或保护膜。HTC 在德国为 U23 pro 提供 24 个月的保修服务。

输入设备和操作 - HTC 指纹读取器中的错误输入

HTC U23 pro ex-works 上安装了谷歌键盘。输入非常流畅，不会出现错误输入。触摸屏的滑动性能良好，在所有区域都能可靠地识别输入。

HTC 智能手机可以通过电源按钮上的指纹识别器或 2D 人脸识别解锁。手指只需放在按钮上即可。不过，传感器需要一秒钟才能做出反应并激活显示屏。此外，并非每次触摸都能被识别。

面部解锁更可靠，即使在光线不足的情况下也能很好地完成解锁。不过，它不能通过举起智能手机或轻触显示屏来激活，而必须始终按下电源按钮。

显示屏 - U23 pro 缺乏亮度

HTC 在 U23 pro 中使用了宽高比为 20:9 的 6.7 英寸 OLED 面板，最大刷新率为 120 Hz。与许多其他制造商不同，HTC 不允许软件决定刷新率。只能使用 60、90 或 120 Hz 的固定值。

与其他同类设备相比，U23 pro 的显示屏亮度远远达不到最高值。在我们的测试中，U23 pro 的最大亮度为 724 cd/m²，而三星三星Galaxy A54达到了 935 尼特，而 Honor 90甚至达到了 1202 cd/m²。在色彩匹配方面，HTC 也是 "红灯笼"，但与其他设备的差距要小得多。

在测试过程中，我们测得显示屏的闪烁频率为 120 Hz。这可能是 OLED 闪烁。遗憾的是，HTC 并没有在 U23 pro 中使用永远在线的显示屏。


709 cd/m²	716 cd/m²	751 cd/m²
710 cd/m²	710 cd/m²	749 cd/m²
709 cd/m²	708 cd/m²	753 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3

Maximum: 753 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 723.9 cd/m² Minimum: 7.88 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 94 %
Center on Battery: 710 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.9 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 3.6 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
100% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.25

	HTC U23 pro OLED, 2400x1080, 6.7"	Honor 90 5G AMOLED, 2664x1200, 6.7"	Xiaomi 13 Lite AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.6"	Motorola Edge 40 OLED, 2400x1080, 6.6"	Samsung Galaxy A54 5G Super AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.4"
Screen		34%	34%	28%	27%
Brightness middle	710	1180 66%	905 27%	1023 44%	940 32%
Brightness	724	1202 66%	904 25%	1042 44%	935 29%
Brightness Distribution	94	88 -6%	99 5%	90 -4%	99 5%
Black Level *
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	2.9	1.5 48%	1 66%	1.6 45%	2.4 17%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	5.3	4.8 9%	3 43%	4.3 19%	3.2 40%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	3.6	2.8 22%	2.2 39%	2.8 22%	2.2 39%
Gamma	2.25 ^98%	2.25 ^98%	2.23 ^99%	2.27 ^97%	2.05 ^107%
CCT	7267 ^89%	6489 ^100%	6382 ^102%	6457 ^101%	6422 ^101%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

120.2 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 120.2 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 120.2 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8746 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

具有固定缩放级别和不同亮度设置的测量系列

根据卡尔曼的 2D 测量，HTC U23 pro 的显示屏覆盖了 100%的 sRGB 色彩空间。色彩还原尚可，但存在偏差，尤其是在灰度方面。该级别其他设备的屏幕部分校准较好，但 HTC U23 pro 的结果也不差。

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
1.25 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 0.682 ms rise
1.25 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 0.569 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 4 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
8.47 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 0.724 ms rise
8.47 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 7.746 ms fall
The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 18 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

在室外，面板的最大亮度较低，在光线较强的日子里会比较明显。面板亮度足以看清内容。不过，与同类产品相比，反光较多。亮度传感器工作迅速而准确。

显示屏的视角稳定性非常好。内容可以很好地识别，即使从锐角观看也不会变形。

性能 - 采用当前骁龙处理器的 HTC

HTC 安装了骁龙 7 代 1作为 SoC，由 12 GB 内存支持。在日常使用中，HTC 智能手机的性能令人信服。应用程序打开速度很快，即使是游戏等计算密集型软件也能流畅运行。

在基准测试中，这款智能手机的性能与对比设备基本相当。不过，不同的基准测试成绩差别很大。U23 pro 在 Geekbench 6.1 中排名最后，但在 BaseMark OS II 中却获得了第一名。平均而言，U23 pro 与其他搭载 Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 的智能手机取得了类似的好成绩。

Geekbench 6.3
Single-Core
Average of class Smartphone (193 - 3479, n=160, last 2 years)	1443 Points +39%
Motorola Edge 40 MediaTek Dimensity 8020, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192	1120 Points +8%
Honor 90 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 12288	1119 Points +8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 (1016 - 1119, n=6)	1062 Points +2%
HTC U23 pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 12288	1038 Points
Multi-Core
Average of class Smartphone (845 - 10401, n=160, last 2 years)	4025 Points +55%
Motorola Edge 40 MediaTek Dimensity 8020, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192	3617 Points +39%
Honor 90 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 12288	3261 Points +25%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 (2601 - 3261, n=6)	2954 Points +14%
HTC U23 pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 12288	2601 Points

Antutu v9 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (99654 - 1650926, n=104, last 2 years)	798401 Points +47%
Motorola Edge 40 MediaTek Dimensity 8020, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192	687619 Points +26%
Honor 90 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 12288	593635 Points +9%
Xiaomi 13 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 8192	581838 Points +7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 (544011 - 593635, n=5)	568349 Points +4%
HTC U23 pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 12288	544011 Points
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 8192	507481 Points -7%

PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Motorola Edge 40 MediaTek Dimensity 8020, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192	16611 Points +31%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 8192	13024 Points +3%
Average of class Smartphone (4609 - 24088, n=189, last 2 years)	12976 Points +3%
HTC U23 pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 12288	12632 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 (10389 - 15189, n=7)	12330 Points -2%
Honor 90 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 12288	12265 Points -3%
Xiaomi 13 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 8192	11890 Points -6%

CrossMark - Overall
Average of class Smartphone (187 - 1517, n=156, last 2 years)	882 Points +26%
Honor 90 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 12288	704 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 8192	703 Points +1%
HTC U23 pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 12288	699 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 (662 - 704, n=5)	683 Points -2%
Xiaomi 13 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 8192	662 Points -5%
Motorola Edge 40 MediaTek Dimensity 8020, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192	620 Points -11%

BaseMark OS II
Overall
Average of class Smartphone (1196 - 11976, n=150, last 2 years)	6288 Points +31%
HTC U23 pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 12288	4795 Points
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 8192	4666 Points -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 (4296 - 4805, n=6)	4653 Points -3%
Xiaomi 13 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 8192	4539 Points -5%
Honor 90 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 12288	4296 Points -10%
Motorola Edge 40 MediaTek Dimensity 8020, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192	4153 Points -13%
System
Average of class Smartphone (2368 - 16475, n=150, last 2 years)	10177 Points +1%
HTC U23 pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 12288	10067 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 (8634 - 10293, n=6)	9495 Points -6%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 8192	8961 Points -11%
Xiaomi 13 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 8192	8797 Points -13%
Honor 90 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 12288	8634 Points -14%
Motorola Edge 40 MediaTek Dimensity 8020, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192	6136 Points -39%
Memory
Average of class Smartphone (962 - 12716, n=150, last 2 years)	6745 Points +50%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 8192	4857 Points +8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 (3640 - 4970, n=6)	4533 Points +1%
HTC U23 pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 12288	4488 Points
Motorola Edge 40 MediaTek Dimensity 8020, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192	4404 Points -2%
Xiaomi 13 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 8192	4385 Points -2%
Honor 90 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 12288	3640 Points -19%
Graphics
Average of class Smartphone (1017 - 58651, n=150, last 2 years)	16876 Points +120%
Motorola Edge 40 MediaTek Dimensity 8020, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192	8229 Points +7%
Honor 90 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 12288	8150 Points +6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 (7612 - 8150, n=6)	7747 Points +1%
HTC U23 pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 12288	7670 Points
Xiaomi 13 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 8192	7612 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 8192	7108 Points -7%
Web
Average of class Smartphone (841 - 2145, n=150, last 2 years)	1561 Points +2%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 8192	1533 Points +1%
HTC U23 pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 12288	1525 Points
Xiaomi 13 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 8192	1445 Points -5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 (1330 - 1525, n=6)	1413 Points -7%
Motorola Edge 40 MediaTek Dimensity 8020, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192	1337 Points -12%
Honor 90 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 12288	1330 Points -13%

UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Xiaomi 13 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 8192	29413 Points +234%
Motorola Edge 40 MediaTek Dimensity 8020, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192	21840 Points +148%
Average of class Smartphone (1267 - 74958, n=142, last 2 years)	16706 Points +90%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 (7374 - 29413, n=5)	12886 Points +46%
HTC U23 pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 12288	8801 Points
Honor 90 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 12288	7374 Points -16%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 8192	5835 Points -34%

HTC U23 pro 的图形性能非常稳定，安装了 Adreno 644图形处理器。在基准测试中，这款智能手机始终位于对比设备列表的中场。即使是《PUBG Mobile》等当前流行的游戏，也能在 HDR 下以最高帧率在该设备上稳定运行。

3DMark: Wild Life Extreme Unlimited | Wild Life Extreme | Wild Life Unlimited Score | Wild Life Score | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7: T-Rex Onscreen | 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
GFXBench 3.0: on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
GFXBench 3.1: on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
GFXBench: on screen Car Chase Onscreen | 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | 3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Motorola Edge 40 Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 8020, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1228 Points +48%
Honor 90 5G Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	854 Points +3%
Xiaomi 13 Lite Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	829 Points 0%
HTC U23 pro Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	829 Points
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	799 Points -4%

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Motorola Edge 40 Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 8020, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1262 Points +53%
Honor 90 5G Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	854 Points +4%
Xiaomi 13 Lite Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	838 Points +2%
HTC U23 pro Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	823 Points
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	813 Points -1%

3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Motorola Edge 40 Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 8020, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	4405 Points +38%
HTC U23 pro Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	3184 Points
Honor 90 5G Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	3137 Points -1%
Xiaomi 13 Lite Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	3035 Points -5%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2853 Points -10%

3DMark / Wild Life Score
Motorola Edge 40 Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 8020, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	4490 Points +43%
Honor 90 5G Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	3146 Points 0%
HTC U23 pro Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	3133 Points
Xiaomi 13 Lite Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	3095 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2826 Points -10%

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics
Xiaomi 13 Lite Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	3335 Points +14%
HTC U23 pro Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2934 Points
Honor 90 5G Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	2933 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2771 Points -6%
Motorola Edge 40 Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 8020, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	Points -100%

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics
Honor 90 5G Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	6897 Points +3%
HTC U23 pro Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	6675 Points
Xiaomi 13 Lite Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	6053 Points -9%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	4915 Points -26%
Motorola Edge 40 Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 8020, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	Points -100%

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited
Honor 90 5G Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	5304 Points +2%
HTC U23 pro Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	5201 Points
Xiaomi 13 Lite Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	5125 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	4194 Points -19%
Motorola Edge 40 Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 8020, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	Points -100%

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Motorola Edge 40 Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 8020, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	5415 Points +21%
Honor 90 5G Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	4501 Points 0%
HTC U23 pro Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	4485 Points
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	4227 Points -6%
Xiaomi 13 Lite Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	3325 Points -26%

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Motorola Edge 40 Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 8020, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	8601 Points +22%
Honor 90 5G Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	7388 Points +5%
HTC U23 pro Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	7023 Points
Xiaomi 13 Lite Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	6767 Points -4%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	5129 Points -27%

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Motorola Edge 40 Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 8020, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	7606 Points +22%
Honor 90 5G Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	6466 Points +4%
HTC U23 pro Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	6238 Points
Xiaomi 13 Lite Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	5501 Points -12%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	4897 Points -21%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Motorola Edge 40 Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 8020, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	139 fps +23%
Xiaomi 13 Lite Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	113 fps 0%
HTC U23 pro Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	113 fps
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	94 fps -17%
Honor 90 5G Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	60 fps -47%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Motorola Edge 40 Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 8020, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	202 fps +36%
Honor 90 5G Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	158 fps +7%
HTC U23 pro Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	148 fps
Xiaomi 13 Lite Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	147 fps -1%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	119 fps -20%

GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Xiaomi 13 Lite Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	76 fps +1%
HTC U23 pro Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	75 fps
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	69 fps -8%
Honor 90 5G Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	60 fps -20%
Motorola Edge 40 Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 8020, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	44 fps -41%

GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Honor 90 5G Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	94 fps +9%
Xiaomi 13 Lite Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	88 fps +2%
HTC U23 pro Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	86 fps
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	80 fps -7%
Motorola Edge 40 Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 8020, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	49 fps -43%

GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Xiaomi 13 Lite Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	59 fps 0%
HTC U23 pro Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	59 fps
Honor 90 5G Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	55 fps -7%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	47 fps -20%
Motorola Edge 40 Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 8020, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	41 fps -31%

GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Honor 90 5G Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	67 fps +3%
HTC U23 pro Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	65 fps
Xiaomi 13 Lite Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	63 fps -3%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	52 fps -20%
Motorola Edge 40 Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 8020, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	45 fps -31%

GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Motorola Edge 40 Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 8020, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	40 fps +18%
Xiaomi 13 Lite Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	34 fps 0%
HTC U23 pro Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	34 fps
Honor 90 5G Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	32 fps -6%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	26 fps -24%

GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Motorola Edge 40 Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 8020, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	43 fps +13%
Honor 90 5G Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	40 fps +5%
HTC U23 pro Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	38 fps
Xiaomi 13 Lite Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	37 fps -3%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	31 fps -18%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Motorola Edge 40 Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 8020, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	33 fps +38%
Xiaomi 13 Lite Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	24 fps 0%
HTC U23 pro Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	24 fps
Honor 90 5G Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	23 fps -4%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	20 fps -17%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Motorola Edge 40 Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 8020, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	21 fps +24%
Honor 90 5G Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	18 fps +6%
HTC U23 pro Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	17 fps
Xiaomi 13 Lite Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	16 fps -6%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	13 fps -24%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Motorola Edge 40 Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 8020, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	46 fps +21%
Xiaomi 13 Lite Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	39 fps +3%
HTC U23 pro Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	38 fps
Honor 90 5G Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	37 fps -3%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	30 fps -21%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Motorola Edge 40 Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 8020, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	50 fps +6%
Honor 90 5G Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	49 fps +4%
HTC U23 pro Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	47 fps
Xiaomi 13 Lite Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	46 fps -2%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	34 fps -28%

GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Motorola Edge 40 Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 8020, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	9.2 fps +23%
Honor 90 5G Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	7.9 fps +5%
HTC U23 pro Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	7.5 fps
Xiaomi 13 Lite Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	7.3 fps -3%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	5.9 fps -21%

HTC U23 pro 在浏览器基准测试中表现出色。在五项基准测试中，该设备有三项获得了第一名。在日常使用中，这款智能手机的浏览体验也非常愉快和流畅。

Jetstream 2 | Speedometer 2.0 | WebXPRT 4 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=160, last 2 years)	120.5 Points +9%
HTC U23 pro (chrome 116)	110.89 Points
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G (Chrome 112)	94.611 Points -15%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 (64.3 - 115.8, n=5)	90.3 Points -19%
Xiaomi 13 Lite (Chrome 111.0.5563.115)	74.161 Points -33%
Motorola Edge 40 (Chrome 114.0.5735.57)	67.258 Points -39%
Honor 90 5G (chrome 115)	64.3 Points -42%

Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 569, n=146, last 2 years)	136.2 runs/min +56%
HTC U23 pro (chrome 116)	87.4 runs/min
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G (Chrome 112)	70.5 runs/min -19%
Motorola Edge 40 (Chrome 114.0.5735.57)	69.9 runs/min -20%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 (61.5 - 87.4, n=5)	69.5 runs/min -20%
Xiaomi 13 Lite (Chrome 111.0.5563.115)	67.2 runs/min -23%
Honor 90 5G (chrome 115)	61.8 runs/min -29%

WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Average of class Smartphone (22 - 271, n=151, last 2 years)	113.8 Points +24%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G (Chrome 112)	97 Points +5%
HTC U23 pro (chrome 116)	92 Points
Xiaomi 13 Lite (Chrome 111.0.5563.115)	79 Points -14%
Motorola Edge 40 (Chrome 114.0.5735.57)	78 Points -15%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 (58 - 92, n=5)	77.8 Points -15%
Honor 90 5G (Chrome 115)	58 Points -37%

Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=202, last 2 years)	37036 Points +6%
HTC U23 pro	34866 Points
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G (Chrome 112)	33801 Points -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 (21143 - 34866, n=7)	28984 Points -17%
Motorola Edge 40 (Chrome 114.0.5735.57)	28282 Points -19%
Xiaomi 13 Lite (Chrome 111.0.5563.115)	27804 Points -20%
Honor 90 5G (chrome 115)	21143 Points -39%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Honor 90 5G (chrome 115)	2686.1 ms * -119%
Motorola Edge 40 (Chrome 114.0.5735.57)	1738.9 ms * -42%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 (1208 - 2686, n=5)	1574 ms * -28%
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=159, last 2 years)	1574 ms * -28%
Xiaomi 13 Lite (Chrome 111.0.5563.115)	1384.1 ms * -13%
HTC U23 pro (chrome 116)	1225.2 ms *
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G (Chrome 112)	1208.8 ms * +1%

* ... smaller is better

HTC 为 U23 pro 提供了 256 GB 内部 UFS 2.2 存储空间。测试中的传输速率约为中场水平。U23 pro 的速度明显快于三星Galaxy A54.不过，存储速度也明显慢于 Honor 90或摩托罗拉 Edge 40在连续读写方面也明显慢于 90 或摩托罗拉 Edge 40。

	HTC U23 pro	Honor 90 5G	Xiaomi 13 Lite	Motorola Edge 40	Samsung Galaxy A54 5G	Average 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	Average of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5		36%	8%	39%	-45%	-12%	45%
Sequential Read 256KB	992.81	1831.4 84%	1001.82 1%	1876.88 89%	528.32 -47%	887 ?(482 - 1009, n=32) -11%	1839 ?(226 - 4512, n=191, last 2 years) 85%
Sequential Write 256KB	886.2	1444.1 63%	871.96 -2%	1587.93 79%	335.39 -62%	694 ?(369 - 913, n=32) -22%	1426 ?(57.5 - 3908, n=191, last 2 years) 61%
Random Read 4KB	231.78	226.5 -2%	277.33 20%	235.66 2%	236.23 2%	228 ?(99.7 - 291, n=32) -2%	277 ?(22.2 - 483, n=191, last 2 years) 20%
Random Write 4KB	267.41	260 -3%	301.41 13%	229.44 -14%	70.52 -74%	238 ?(99.2 - 319, n=32) -11%	308 ?(9.4 - 753, n=191, last 2 years) 15%

排放 - HTC 的最高温度过高

温度 - 日常使用时冷，负载时热

在日常使用中，HTC 保持良好的散热性能。U23 pro 还能顺利处理多个已打开的应用程序。不过，当设备处于最大负载时，温度会大幅升高--我们最近为此使用了 Burnout 基准测试。我们在正面测得的最高温度为 49.6 摄氏度。

背面温度略低，最高温度为 45.3 摄氏度。因此，该设备的温度会让人不舒服。不过，尽管温度很高，它在压力测试中仍然保持稳定。

Max. Load

Idle


49.3 °C	49.2 °C	46.3 °C
49.6 °C	48.9 °C	48.5 °C
47.7 °C	49.1 °C	46.9 °C

Maximum: 49.6 °C
Average: 48.4 °C


40.7 °C	43.3 °C	43.9 °C
40.5 °C	42.2 °C	45.3 °C
41.3 °C	43.7 °C	44.9 °C

Maximum: 45.3 °C
Average: 42.9 °C

Room Temperature 22 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 48.4 °C / 119 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 49.6 °C / 121 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 45.3 °C / 114 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.9 °C / 86 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
HTC U23 pro Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	99.1 %
HTC U23 pro Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	99.1 % 0%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	98.8 % 0%
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	99.5 % +2%
HTC U23 pro Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	97.1 %

Samsung Galaxy A54 5G Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø4.85 (4.84-4.87)

HTC U23 pro Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø18.7 (18.6-18.7)

Samsung Galaxy A54 5G Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø16.9 (16.8-17)

HTC U23 pro Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø18.8 (18.7-18.9)

Samsung Galaxy A54 5G Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability: Ø17 (17-17.1)

扬声器 - U23 pro，带音频插孔

HTC 在 U23 pro 中安装了立体声扬声器。当需要时，扬声器会变得非常响亮，当音量较大时，智能手机背面会强烈震动。当音乐播放得很大声时，上方的扬声器也会失真。

U23 pro 的中音和高音很强，但低频或低音即使对于智能手机来说也相当弱。不过，在音量设置不太高的情况下，游戏和视频的音质还可以。

有些用户可能会对顶部的插孔感到满意，因为它还能提供 82.02 dBFS 的良好噪音值。HTC 还能顺利连接蓝牙耳机。它支持多种编解码器：SBC、AAC、Qualcomm aptX、aptX HD、LDAC、LC3、Opus、aptX Adaptive Audio 和 aptX TWS+。

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

HTC U23 pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.1% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 35% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 57% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 55% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 38% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Samsung Galaxy A54 5G audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 6.4% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (2.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 11% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 81% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 32% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 60% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电池寿命 - U23 pro 的耗电量很高

耗电量 - U23 pro 无线充电

在我们的测试中，U23 pro 显示出较高的能耗，与 90 Pro 大致相当。 Honor 90.小米小米 13 Lite采用相同的 SoC，能耗要低得多。这款智能手机的有线充电功率可达 30 瓦，无线充电功率可达 15 瓦。

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.03 / 0.25 Watt
Idle	1.1 / 2.05 / 2.18 Watt
Load	4.36 / 10.97 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	HTC U23 pro 4600 mAh	Honor 90 5G 5000 mAh	Xiaomi 13 Lite 4500 mAh	Motorola Edge 40 4400 mAh	Samsung Galaxy A54 5G 5000 mAh	Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1	Average of class Smartphone
Power Consumption		-6%	28%	26%	18%	-5%	7%
Idle Minimum *	1.1	1.19 -8%	0.74 33%	0.62 44%	0.75 32%	1.012 ?(0.74 - 1.23, n=5) 8%	0.894 ?(0.4 - 2.37, n=152, last 2 years) 19%
Idle Average *	2.05	1.71 17%	1.56 24%	1.78 13%	1.51 26%	2.19 ?(1.2 - 4.44, n=5) -7%	1.456 ?(0.6 - 4.26, n=152, last 2 years) 29%
Idle Maximum *	2.18	1.82 17%	1.59 27%	1.85 15%	1.62 26%	2.3 ?(1.4 - 4.49, n=5) -6%	1.616 ?(0.83 - 4.45, n=152, last 2 years) 26%
Load Average *	4.36	6.8 -56%	3.33 24%	3.02 31%	4.91 -13%	5.84 ?(3.33 - 11.2, n=5) -34%	6.45 ?(2.3 - 16.5, n=147, last 2 years) -48%
Load Maximum *	10.97	10.93 -0%	7.59 31%	8.23 25%	8.93 19%	9.26 ?(5.5 - 11.3, n=5) 16%	9.8 ?(3.53 - 20.8, n=147, last 2 years) 11%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

HTC U23 pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø4.7 (1.205-8.88)

Samsung Galaxy A54 5G Samsung Exynos 1380; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø5.7 (1.081-12.5)

HTC U23 pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.312 (1.234-1.47)

Samsung Galaxy A54 5G Samsung Exynos 1380; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.084 (1.034-1.265)

Power consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

HTC U23 pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø4.39 (4.26-5.46)

Samsung Galaxy A54 5G Samsung Exynos 1380; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø4.32 (4.08-4.55)

HTC U23 pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.312 (1.234-1.47)

Samsung Galaxy A54 5G Samsung Exynos 1380; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.084 (1.034-1.265)

电池续航时间--相比之下，HTC 缺乏续航能力

高能耗已经表明电池的运行时间比对比设备短。这与 4600 毫安时的电池容量无关，小米 13 Lite（4500 毫安时）和摩托罗拉 Edge 40（4400 毫安时）的电池容量甚至更低。不过，在我们的实际 Wi-Fi 测试中，这两款设备的续航时间要长三分之一。

在我们的 Wi-Fi 上网测试中，U23 pro 仍能达到约 10 小时的续航时间。在不进行大量游戏的情况下，该设备可以轻松使用一天。使用 33 瓦的电源，U23 pro 可以在 75 分钟内将电量从 0 充至 100%。

Battery Runtime


WiFi Websurfing (Chrome 116)		10h 07min

	HTC U23 pro 4600 mAh	Honor 90 5G 5000 mAh	Xiaomi 13 Lite 4500 mAh	Motorola Edge 40 4400 mAh	Samsung Galaxy A54 5G 5000 mAh
Battery Runtime
WiFi v1.3	607	901 48%	822 35%	924 52%	941 55%

Pros

+ 可扩展内存

+ 音频插孔

+ 无线充电

+ WiFi 6E

+ IP67

Cons

- 显示亮度

- 支持短时间更新

- 触觉

结论 - 装备齐全但缺乏个性的 U23 职业球员

一鸣惊人重返智能手机世界？HTC 的 U23 pro 并没有做到这一点。它并不是一款糟糕的智能手机：SoC 的性能足以胜任所有任务，主摄像头拍摄的照片也很吸引人，OLED 面板可以以 120 Hz 的频率显示内容。不过，许多其他智能手机也能做到这一点。

HTC 的优势在于细节。它有 256 GB 的内部存储空间，可以通过 microSD 卡进行扩展。它支持多种蓝牙编码，并配有音频插孔。得益于 WiFi 6E，它的传输速率也不错，状态 LED 指示灯几乎是它的一个独特卖点。同样，软件也非常整洁，但软件支持时间较短，没有更多 HTC 的典型功能。

U23 pro 的设备清单很长。这款智能手机收集了许多小的加分项，但缺乏亮点。

此外，还配备了 NFC、无线充电和立体声扬声器。U23 pro 的设备非常齐全，但给人的感觉并不特别有价值。考虑到其 550 欧元（约合人民币 550 元）的建议零售价，这种感觉尤其令人讨厌，但将 U23 pro 放进手机套后，这种感觉就不明显了。

与同类产品相比，U23 pro 的电池续航时间也很一般，但仍能使用一天。此外，对比设备的显示屏都更亮。遗憾的是，HTC 没有提供始终在线的显示屏，而且在录制视频时音轨有基本的噪音。

Honor 90 的显示屏亮度更高，内存也是原来的两倍，但Android 界面却经过了大量定制。三星Galaxy A54 上市时间更长，因此价格要便宜得多。它还提供可扩展的存储空间，并可更新多年。

价格和供应情况

HTC 将 U23 pro 的建议零售价定为 550 欧元（约合 596 美元）。制造商在自己的网上商店销售这款智能手机。用户也可以通过美国亚马逊订购。

HTC U23 pro - 08/28/2023 v7 ^(old)
Benedikt Winkel

Chassis

82%

Keyboard

67 / 75 → 89%

Pointing Device

91%

Connectivity

51 / 70 → 72%

Weight

88%

Battery

88%

Display

89%

Games Performance

57 / 64 → 89%

Application Performance

82 / 86 → 95%

Temperature

82%

Noise

100%

Audio

72 / 90 → 80%

Camera

63%

Average

72%

84%

Smartphone - Weighted Average

Price comparison

Editor of the original article: Ninh Ngoc Duy - Editorial Assistant - 458020 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008

contact me via: Facebook

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > HTC U23 pro 智能手机评测--重振雄风？

Benedikt Winkel, 2023-09- 1 (Update: 2023-09- 1)

HTC U23 pro 智能手机评测--重振雄风？

上流社会的回归？

潜在的竞争对手比较

表壳 - HTC，金属边框，塑料后壳

尺寸比较

装备 - U23 专业型，具有多种特殊功能

microSD 读卡器

Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)

软件 - HTC 保留Android ，但无更新计划

通信和全球导航卫星系统 - U23 pro，带 WiFi 6E

电话功能和语音质量 - HTC，传输清晰

相机 - U23 专业型，带五个镜头

配件和保修 - U23 pro 仅配备最基本的配件

输入设备和操作 - HTC 指纹读取器中的错误输入

显示屏 - U23 pro 缺乏亮度

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Display Response Times

性能 - 采用当前骁龙处理器的 HTC

排放 - HTC 的最高温度过高

温度 - 日常使用时冷，负载时热

3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

扬声器 - U23 pro，带音频插孔

HTC U23 pro audio analysis

Samsung Galaxy A54 5G audio analysis

电池寿命 - U23 pro 的耗电量很高

耗电量 - U23 pro 无线充电

Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

Power consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

电池续航时间--相比之下，HTC 缺乏续航能力

Pros

Cons

结论 - 装备齐全但缺乏个性的 U23 职业球员

价格和供应情况

More articles related to this device

Transparency

Price comparison