Honor 90 5G 智能手机评测：显示屏和存储巨头

Name: Honor 90 5G
Brand: Honor

优雅的设计

Honor 90 的目标是在中端市场赢得新的拥趸。512 GB 的存储空间、12 GB 的内存、200 MP 的摄像头和 120 Hz 的 OLED 面板听起来一点也不小。此外，这款智能手机的设计无疑在众多产品中脱颖而出。我们的评测将澄清 90 是否是一款完美的全能型手机。Honor Honor

Benedikt Winkel, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy), Published 08/26/2023 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Android 5G Smartphone Touchscreen

Honor 发布了出色的高端设备Magic5 Pro和 Vs之后，该制造商又推出了中端产品Honor 90。在这里，Honor 重点关注显示屏和摄像头。其前身 Honor 70在这些方面已经赢得了我们的青睐。不过，扬声器、无线局域网功能和软件方面还存在不足。

Honor 90 的零售价略高于 500 美元，与去年的顶级设备同属一个价格区间，因此人们对它的期望也相应较高。

Test device courtesy of Honor

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Honor 90 5G (90 Series)

Processor

Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 8 x 1.8 - 2.4 GHz, Cortex-A710 / A510

Graphics adapter

Qualcomm Adreno 644

Memory

12 GB

Display

6.70 inch 20:9, 2664 x 1200 pixel 436 PPI, capacitive, AMOLED, glossy: yes, HDR, 120 Hz

Storage

512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash, 512 GB

, 489 GB free

Connections

1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: USB-C, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, OTG

Networking

802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.2, GSM: 850/900/1800/1900 MHz; 3G: bands 1,2,4,5,6,8,19; LTE: bands 1,2,3,4,5,7,8,12,13,17,18,19,20,25,26,28,32,66,34,38,39,40,41; 5G: bands 1,2,3,5,7,8,20,28,38,40,41,66,77,78, Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 7.8 x 161.9 x 74.1

Battery

5000 mAh Lithium-Ion

Charging

fast charging / Quickcharge

Operating System

Android 13

Camera

Primary Camera: 200 MPix (f/1.9) 1/1.4-inch CMOS size, 12 Mpix Ultra-wide/ Makro (f/2.2), 2 Mpix Depth Camera (f/2.4)
Secondary Camera: 50 MPix

Additional features

Speakers: Mono, Keyboard: Onscreen, 66W charging cradle, Case, SIM-eject-Tool, Magic OS 7.1, 24 Months Warranty, DRM Widevine L1; Camera 2API Level 3; SAR-Head: 0.85, SAR-Body: 1.26; GNSS: GPS (L1), Glonass (L1), Galileo (E1), Beidou (B1), fanless

Weight

183 g

Price

600 Euro

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating	Date	Model	Weight	Drive	Size	Resolution
86 % v7 ^(old)	08 / 2023	Honor 90 5G SD 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644	183 g	512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	6.70"	2664x1200
86 % v7 ^(old)	05 / 2023	Samsung Galaxy A54 5G Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5	202 g	128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	6.40"	2340x1080
86.4 % v7 ^(old)	04 / 2023	Xiaomi 13 Lite SD 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644	171 g	256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	6.55"	2400x1080
86.8 % v7 ^(old)	07 / 2023	Motorola Edge 40 Dimensity 8020, Mali-G77 MP9	171 g	256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	6.55"	2400x1080
88.5 % v7 ^(old)	11 / 2022	Google Pixel 7 Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7	197 g	128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	6.30"	2400x1080

表壳 -Honor 90 上的塑料和圆形边缘

Honor 90 使用了大量塑料。边框和背面都采用了塑料材质，这清楚地表明了与高端产品的差距。反观正面，纤薄的显示屏边缘给人留下了深刻印象，显示屏侧面的弧形边缘也凸显了这一点。背面两侧也采用了弧形设计，，称之为 "四曲面"。

Honor

智能手机的平整度令人愉悦，拿在手中可以感觉到，而圆润的侧面则进一步加深了这种印象。不过，由于机身纤薄，摄像头驼峰从机壳中凸出得更多。这导致设备在桌面等平面上放置时摇摆不定。在装上附带的保护盖后，这种晃动依然存在。

电源按钮和音量摇杆位于右侧。电源键和音量减小键很容易触及，但测试者的拇指需要伸长很多才能触及音量增大键。我们测试设备上的音量摇杆比较松，但电源键很紧。

Honor 这款智能手机有三种颜色：翡翠绿、午夜黑和钻石银。我们的测试机是银色的，根据环境光线的不同，颜色会变成金色，但也会出现蓝色、绿色和珍珠色的反光。设备的上部三分之一是光滑的亮面，下部三分之二是纹理，这种纹理也有一种特殊的感觉。

智能手机的做工令人赏心悦目。它不能弯曲或扭曲，缝隙均匀。不过，背面在没有盖子的情况下非常容易沾染指纹。没有说明 90 的 IP 认证。SIM 卡插槽上的橡胶密封条表明它至少可以防止溅水。Honor

尺寸比较

设备 -Honor 仅提供一种版本的 90

Honor 在德国市场上推出的这款 90 采用了最大的内存配置，即高达 12 GB 的内存和 512 GB 的存储空间。它无法通过 microSD 卡扩展存储空间，而且没有插孔连接。此外，90 只有一个单声道扬声器，USB-C 端口仅支持 2.0。

Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 用作 SoC。据称，这是 "加速版"，时钟频率略高。NFC 功能已经搭载，因此可以使用智能手机进行支付。还支持双卡双待。可以使用两张实体 SIM 卡，也可以安装 eSIM 卡。 Honor

软件 - Magic UI 和Honor 90 的两大更新

Honor 90 随Android 13 发布，并提供更新保证。该智能手机在三年内应获得两次主要版本更新和安全更新。不过，Honor 90 的界面与原版Android 不同，Honor 使用自己的 Magic UI 用户界面。在这个用户界面中没有应用程序抽屉。相反，Honor 依赖于文件夹、地图和小部件。

专有的 Yoyo 助手旨在根据用户数据在开始页面上提供合适的应用程序建议。该助手还能识别和复制应用程序中的文本。如果将Honor 90 插入电脑，就可以安装Honor Suite，用于在电脑和智能手机之间同步和复制数据。

附近具有相同Honor ID 的其他Honor 设备应能通过Honor Connect 轻松地相互连接。在测试中，Honor 90 会自动检测到智能手机附近的Honor X5 耳机。

通信和全球导航卫星系统 -Honor 90，连接稳定

Honor 90 支持当前的移动电话标准，包括 5G-Sub6 标准。该设备的频段覆盖范围很广，包括 23 个 LTE 频段和 14 个 5G 频段。因此，在德国或欧洲，网络覆盖应该不成问题。在日常使用中，该设备的接收效果并不明显。

在使用华硕 ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000 参考路由器进行的 Wi-Fi 传输测试中，Honor 90 表现稳定，与对比设备不相上下。只有小米 13 Lite在同类产品中处于领先地位。

我们尤其喜欢传输的稳定性。Honor 90 在这方面比三星Galaxy A54更稳定，明显优于 Honor 70 的前身。虽然Honor 90 支持 WiFi6，但它并没有提供所有的可能性。

Networking
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Xiaomi 13 Lite Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	1440 (1312^min - 1540^max) MBit/s +58%
Honor 90 5G Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	910 (839^min - 954^max) MBit/s
Google Pixel 7 Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	904 (816^min - 917^max) MBit/s -1%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	843 (813^min - 856^max) MBit/s -7%
Motorola Edge 40 Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 8020, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	839 (774^min - 879^max) MBit/s -8%
Average of class Smartphone (34.8 - 1875, n=191, last 2 years)	711 MBit/s -22%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Xiaomi 13 Lite Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	1757 (1611^min - 1817^max) MBit/s +87%
Motorola Edge 40 Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 8020, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	942 (912^min - 964^max) MBit/s 0%
Honor 90 5G Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	939 (470^min - 967^max) MBit/s
Google Pixel 7 Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	936 (863^min - 963^max) MBit/s 0%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	750 (546^min - 831^max) MBit/s -20%
Average of class Smartphone (40.5 - 1810, n=193, last 2 years)	725 MBit/s -23%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
Google Pixel 7 Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1716 (845^min - 1757^max) MBit/s
Average of class Smartphone (229 - 1945, n=80, last 2 years)	1443 MBit/s
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
Google Pixel 7 Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1757 (1694^min - 1797^max) MBit/s
Average of class Smartphone (668 - 1864, n=80, last 2 years)	1387 MBit/s

Honor 90 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Qualcomm Adreno 644; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø909 (839-954)

Samsung Galaxy A54 5G Samsung Exynos 1380, ARM Mali-G68 MP5; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø842 (813-856)

Honor 90 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Qualcomm Adreno 644; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø923 (470-967)

Samsung Galaxy A54 5G Samsung Exynos 1380, ARM Mali-G68 MP5; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø750 (546-831)

在卫星通信方面，Honor 90 给人留下了良好的印象。虽然该设备只能建立单个 GNSS 连接，但却能提供稳定可靠的跟踪。它支持所有常见的卫星系统。

我们将Honor 90 与 Garmin Venu 2 一起进行了一次自行车旅行。路线得到了可靠的记录，半径也得到了很好的再现。

电话和语音质量 -Honor 90 没有问题

Honor 使用自己的手机应用程序。软件排列清晰，不会造成混乱。两张 SIM 卡均可单独设置呼叫转移、来电显示和语音信箱。 90 还可以进行 Wi-Fi 通话。

通话双方的通话质量都很好。没有传输干扰，但背景噪声不断传播，几乎没有过滤。免提通话时，听筒和扬声器都有足够的音量。Honor

相机 -Honor 90 在弱光环境下的表现令人惊喜

Honor 据说，90 年代的相机非常重要。从外观上看，由于背面的两个圆圈，它们非常显眼。主摄像头显然是主角，其最大分辨率为 2 亿像素。主摄像头两侧是一个 1200 万像素的超广角镜头，该镜头还能进行微距拍摄。

200 万像素的深度信息传感器为三重摄像头画上了圆满的句号。双 LED 闪光灯占据了第二圈的剩余空间。在正面，使用了一个位于打孔中的 5000 万像素镜头。这样，，与前代产品相比，摄像头的设置完全改变了。。

在我们的测试中，主摄像头尤其给人留下了良好的印象。其工作速度令人满意；快门按钮动作迅速，图像处理迅速。软件还提供了许多附加功能，允许用户拍摄全分辨率照片，应用程序还提供了可手动调节 ISO、曝光时间、光圈和白平衡的专业模式。

HDR 拍摄必须通过菜单单独激活。变焦只能通过 90 以数字方式实现，这不是该设备的强项之一。使用 5 倍变焦拍摄的照片会明显失去细节，而且防抖也很困难。

前置摄像头效果不错。图像清晰，色彩还原自然。人像模式在大多数情况下也能正常工作。 90 还提供多种滤镜和美颜模式。

所有相机都能以最高 30 FPS 的速度拍摄 4K 视频，90 还能以 60 FPS 的速度拍摄 1080p 分辨率的视频。其他功能包括慢动作，以及在横向模式下录制视频时，应用程序可以在纵向模式下录制第二个视频。照片故事也可以通过照片软件直接制作成视频。

Honor Honor

Honor

视频录制的质量令人印象深刻。虽然没有使用光学防抖动功能，但仍能拍摄出稳定的照片。自动对焦也很快，只是自动亮度调节有点不稳定。录音质量很好，还提供了一个过滤器来减少背景噪音。Honor Honor

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Plush toy rabbit Lake Ultra wide angle 5x zoom Low light

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images

使用主摄像头拍摄的照片非常漂亮，即使是细节部分也非常清晰。只有在边缘处清晰度才会下降。该相机还能在弱光环境下拍照。在只有 1 lux 的亮度下，测试图上的所有细节都清晰可见，只有轻微的噪点。

在分析色彩表现时，Honor 90 的色调明显偏暖。这一点在白色和深绿色中尤为明显。另一方面，暗部的色彩还原效果出人意料地好，但图像有明显的偏红。

ColorChecker Honor 90 5G: 7.43 ∆E min: 2.19 - max: 14.63 ∆E

附件和保修 -Honor 提供保护套和铝箔纸

Honor 90 包括一个透明硅胶套，并在显示屏上贴有保护膜。包装盒内还有一根 USB 线（USB-A 转 USB-C）和一根用于打开 SIM 卡插槽的针。

我们的评测样品还配有一个 66 瓦的电源适配器，Honor ，在德国为智能手机提供 24 个月的保修服务。其他国家的保修期可能有所不同，因此买家在购买前应仔细确认。

输入设备和操作 - 在 90 上快速解锁

Honor 它使用微软的 SwiftKey 键盘。显示屏会对输入做出迅速反应，长时间键入也不成问题。不过，键盘布局与两侧的圆角会导致一开始输入错误。另外值得注意的是，横向键盘占用了大量空间。除了键盘，几乎看不到任何东西，特别是在激活附加栏的情况下。

90 可以通过二维面部识别和指纹识别器解锁。光学指纹识别器位于显示屏下方，工作可靠性很高。不过，操作速度可以再快一点，位置可以再高一点。

Honor

不过，通过摄像头解锁时几乎用不到指纹识别器，因为通过前置摄像头解锁既快速又流畅。抬起智能手机即可激活该功能，如果需要，还可以跳过锁屏。因此，只需抬起手机并注视 90 即可直接访问应用程序。

触摸屏能可靠地识别所有输入，尽管贴有保护膜，但滑动性能良好。 90 具有单手操作模式，但显示屏较大，单手操作比较困难。该智能手机还支持手势操作，例如用指关节轻敲两下即可截屏。Honor

▶ load Youtube video

显示屏 - AMOLED 面板明亮

显示屏是Honor 90 的亮点之一。6.7 英寸 AMOLED 面板侧面呈圆形，支持最高 120 Hz 的刷新率。刷新率可设置为 60、90 或 120 Hz；另外，软件还可确保根据显示内容动态调整电平。

在最大亮度方面，90 以 1461 cd/m² 的亮度在对比设备中名列前茅，甚至比三星Galaxy A54(940 尼特)、谷歌谷歌 Pixel 7(979 尼特）或摩托罗拉 Edge 40(在此测量中，环境光传感器被激活并显示 HDR 内容。不过，我们在测试中并没有达到Honor 所宣传的 1600 尼特。在没有环境光传感器的情况下，面板的最大亮度仅为 592 cd/m²。

Honor 显示屏不得不在照度方面做出让步，照度的均匀度只有 88%。所有同类产品在这方面都更胜一筹，但在日常使用中，这种不均匀性并不明显。Honor 90 的一大特色是频率高达 3840 Hz 的 PWM 调光。高频率的目的是大幅减少屏幕闪烁。我们在正常模式下测得的频率为 728 Hz。

Honor 90 还提供不同级别的蓝光过滤器。滤光片可以全天使用，也可以定时使用。这样做的目的是根据昼夜节律调整蓝光量，减少睡眠困难--Honor 称之为昼夜节律夜间显示。


1160 cd/m²	1192 cd/m²	1297 cd/m²
1153 cd/m²	1180 cd/m²	1293 cd/m²
1137 cd/m²	1150 cd/m²	1253 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3

Maximum: 1297 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 1201.7 cd/m² Minimum: 2.68 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 88 %
Center on Battery: 1180 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.5 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 2.8 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
99.7% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.25

	Honor 90 5G AMOLED, 2664x1200, 6.7"	Samsung Galaxy A54 5G Super AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.4"	Xiaomi 13 Lite AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.6"	Motorola Edge 40 OLED, 2400x1080, 6.6"	Google Pixel 7 OLED, 2400x1080, 6.3"
Screen		-6%	9%	-4%	12%
Brightness middle	1180	940 -20%	905 -23%	1023 -13%	936 -21%
Brightness	1202	935 -22%	904 -25%	1042 -13%	947 -21%
Brightness Distribution	88	99 13%	99 13%	90 2%	95 8%
Black Level *
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	1.5	2.4 -60%	1 33%	1.6 -7%	1.3 13%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	4.8	3.2 33%	3 37%	4.3 10%	2.7 44%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	2.8	2.2 21%	2.2 21%	2.8 -0%	1.4 50%
Gamma	2.25 ^98%	2.05 ^107%	2.23 ^99%	2.27 ^97%	2.25 ^98%
CCT	6489 ^100%	6422 ^101%	6382 ^102%	6457 ^101%	6664 ^98%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

728 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 728 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 728 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8706 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

在固定变焦级别和不同亮度设置下的测量系列

虽然屏幕的最大亮度很稳定，但在色彩匹配方面仍有改进的余地。Honor 90 的显示偏离目标值，尤其是在灰度方面。不过，平均色彩偏差尚可。

在没有测量或对比设备的情况下，这些偏差在日常使用中并不明显。在 Calman 2D 测量中，sRGB 色彩空间的覆盖率为 99.7%，表现良好。

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
1.45 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 0.7455 ms rise
1.45 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 0.707 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 5 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
1.7 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 0.7715 ms rise
1.7 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 0.927 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 5 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

在户外，Honor 90 在最大亮度下的大容量显示屏让人眼前一亮。即使在明亮的阳光下，智能手机的显示屏也非常明亮，内容清晰易读。

可视角度也很好。虽然在锐角处显示的内容稍暗，但内容仍然清晰可辨，不会出现任何颜色变化。

性能 -Honor 90 中的骁龙 7 代 1 加速版

Honor 使用骁龙 7 代 1加速版 "的 90。根据制造商的说法，与普通 7 Gen 1 相比，其区别在于最高主频从 2.4 GHz 提高到了 2.5 GHz。

不过，在基准测试中，两个版本之间的差异很小。Honor 90 的表现与采用该 SoC 的所有智能手机的平均表现类似。小米小米 13 Lite的表现也差不多。总体而言，Honor 90 的性能接近同类产品的平均水平。对比设备的性能都差不多；只有谷歌 Pixel 7配备了张量 G2在某些测试中明显领先。

只有在 UL 的 Procyon AI Inteference 基准测试中，Honor 90 才明显落后于其他设备。但在日常生活中，这款智能手机的流畅性能始终令人信服。大型应用程序的打开速度很快，而且由于配备了 12GB RAM，许多应用程序都可以在后台保持打开状态。

Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Google Pixel 7 Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 8192	1050 Points +27%
Average of class Smartphone (126 - 2437, n=175, last 2 years)	1040 Points +26%
Motorola Edge 40 MediaTek Dimensity 8020, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192	835 Points +1%
Honor 90 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 12288	826 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 (775 - 826, n=4)	793 Points -4%
Xiaomi 13 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 8192	791 Points -4%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 8192	783 Points -5%
Multi-Core
Average of class Smartphone (473 - 8816, n=175, last 2 years)	3474 Points +12%
Motorola Edge 40 MediaTek Dimensity 8020, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192	3310 Points +7%
Google Pixel 7 Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 8192	3265 Points +6%
Honor 90 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 12288	3094 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 (2854 - 3094, n=4)	2943 Points -5%
Xiaomi 13 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 8192	2894 Points -6%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 8192	2817 Points -9%

Geekbench 6.3
Single-Core
Average of class Smartphone (193 - 3479, n=173, last 2 years)	1494 Points +34%
Motorola Edge 40 MediaTek Dimensity 8020, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192	1120 Points 0%
Honor 90 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 12288	1119 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 (1016 - 1119, n=6)	1062 Points -5%
Multi-Core
Average of class Smartphone (845 - 10401, n=173, last 2 years)	4189 Points +28%
Motorola Edge 40 MediaTek Dimensity 8020, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192	3617 Points +11%
Honor 90 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 12288	3261 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 (2601 - 3261, n=6)	2954 Points -9%

Antutu v9 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (99654 - 2056989, n=104, last 2 years)	810694 Points +37%
Google Pixel 7 Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 8192	773655 Points +30%
Motorola Edge 40 MediaTek Dimensity 8020, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192	687619 Points +16%
Honor 90 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 12288	593635 Points
Xiaomi 13 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 8192	581838 Points -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 (544011 - 593635, n=5)	568349 Points -4%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 8192	507481 Points -15%

PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Motorola Edge 40 MediaTek Dimensity 8020, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192	16611 Points +35%
Average of class Smartphone (4609 - 27169, n=197, last 2 years)	13174 Points +7%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 8192	13024 Points +6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 (10389 - 15189, n=7)	12330 Points +1%
Honor 90 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 12288	12265 Points
Xiaomi 13 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 8192	11890 Points -3%
Google Pixel 7 Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 8192	10530 Points -14%

CrossMark - Overall
Average of class Smartphone (187 - 2485, n=165, last 2 years)	917 Points +30%
Google Pixel 7 Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 8192	898 Points +28%
Honor 90 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 12288	704 Points
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 8192	703 Points 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 (662 - 704, n=5)	683 Points -3%
Xiaomi 13 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 8192	662 Points -6%
Motorola Edge 40 MediaTek Dimensity 8020, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192	620 Points -12%

BaseMark OS II
Overall
Average of class Smartphone (1196 - 12993, n=158, last 2 years)	6499 Points +51%
Google Pixel 7 Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 8192	6247 Points +45%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 8192	4666 Points +9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 (4296 - 4805, n=6)	4653 Points +8%
Xiaomi 13 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 8192	4539 Points +6%
Honor 90 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 12288	4296 Points
Motorola Edge 40 MediaTek Dimensity 8020, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192	4153 Points -3%
System
Average of class Smartphone (2368 - 17953, n=158, last 2 years)	10346 Points +20%
Google Pixel 7 Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 8192	9601 Points +11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 (8634 - 10293, n=6)	9495 Points +10%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 8192	8961 Points +4%
Xiaomi 13 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 8192	8797 Points +2%
Honor 90 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 12288	8634 Points
Motorola Edge 40 MediaTek Dimensity 8020, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192	6136 Points -29%
Memory
Average of class Smartphone (962 - 18911, n=158, last 2 years)	7058 Points +94%
Google Pixel 7 Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 8192	5392 Points +48%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 8192	4857 Points +33%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 (3640 - 4970, n=6)	4533 Points +25%
Motorola Edge 40 MediaTek Dimensity 8020, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192	4404 Points +21%
Xiaomi 13 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 8192	4385 Points +20%
Honor 90 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 12288	3640 Points
Graphics
Average of class Smartphone (1017 - 58651, n=158, last 2 years)	17998 Points +121%
Google Pixel 7 Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 8192	16001 Points +96%
Motorola Edge 40 MediaTek Dimensity 8020, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192	8229 Points +1%
Honor 90 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 12288	8150 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 (7612 - 8150, n=6)	7747 Points -5%
Xiaomi 13 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 8192	7612 Points -7%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 8192	7108 Points -13%
Web
Google Pixel 7 Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 8192	1838 Points +38%
Average of class Smartphone (841 - 2363, n=158, last 2 years)	1578 Points +19%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 8192	1533 Points +15%
Xiaomi 13 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 8192	1445 Points +9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 (1330 - 1525, n=6)	1413 Points +6%
Motorola Edge 40 MediaTek Dimensity 8020, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192	1337 Points +1%
Honor 90 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 12288	1330 Points

UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Google Pixel 7 Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 8192	42556 Points +477%
Xiaomi 13 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 8192	29413 Points +299%
Motorola Edge 40 MediaTek Dimensity 8020, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192	21840 Points +196%
Average of class Smartphone (1267 - 81594, n=150, last 2 years)	17814 Points +142%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 (7374 - 29413, n=5)	12886 Points +75%
Honor 90 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 12288	7374 Points
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 8192	5835 Points -21%

AImark - Score v3.x
Honor 90 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 12288	46207 Points
Xiaomi 13 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 8192	44527 Points -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 (668 - 47384, n=4)	34697 Points -25%
Average of class Smartphone (82 - 307528, n=143, last 2 years)	25319 Points -45%
Motorola Edge 40 MediaTek Dimensity 8020, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192	11860 Points -74%
Google Pixel 7 Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 8192	1002 Points -98%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 8192	622 Points -99%

GPU 基准测试的结果同样均衡。Honor 90 配备了Adreno 644 图形处理器因此，它的性能既没有达到最高值，也没有逊色。在所有对比设备中，它几乎完全处于中间位置。

3DMark: Wild Life Extreme Unlimited | Wild Life Extreme | Wild Life Unlimited Score | Wild Life Score | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7: T-Rex Onscreen | 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
GFXBench 3.0: on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
GFXBench 3.1: on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
GFXBench: on screen Car Chase Onscreen | 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | 3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Google Pixel 7 Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1800 Points +111%
Motorola Edge 40 Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 8020, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1228 Points +44%
Honor 90 5G Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	854 Points
Xiaomi 13 Lite Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	829 Points -3%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	799 Points -6%

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Google Pixel 7 Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1841 Points +116%
Motorola Edge 40 Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 8020, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1262 Points +48%
Honor 90 5G Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	854 Points
Xiaomi 13 Lite Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	838 Points -2%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	813 Points -5%

3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Google Pixel 7 Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	6660 Points +112%
Motorola Edge 40 Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 8020, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	4405 Points +40%
Honor 90 5G Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	3137 Points
Xiaomi 13 Lite Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	3035 Points -3%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2853 Points -9%

3DMark / Wild Life Score
Google Pixel 7 Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	6513 Points +107%
Motorola Edge 40 Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 8020, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	4490 Points +43%
Honor 90 5G Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	3146 Points
Xiaomi 13 Lite Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	3095 Points -2%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2826 Points -10%

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics
Xiaomi 13 Lite Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	3335 Points +14%
Honor 90 5G Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	2933 Points
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2771 Points -6%
Motorola Edge 40 Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 8020, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	Points -100%

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics
Honor 90 5G Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	6897 Points
Xiaomi 13 Lite Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	6053 Points -12%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	4915 Points -29%
Motorola Edge 40 Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 8020, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	Points -100%

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited
Honor 90 5G Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	5304 Points
Xiaomi 13 Lite Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	5125 Points -3%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	4194 Points -21%
Motorola Edge 40 Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 8020, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	Points -100%

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Motorola Edge 40 Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 8020, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	5415 Points +20%
Honor 90 5G Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	4501 Points
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	4227 Points -6%
Google Pixel 7 Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	4086 Points -9%
Xiaomi 13 Lite Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	3325 Points -26%

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Google Pixel 7 Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	11491 Points +56%
Motorola Edge 40 Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 8020, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	8601 Points +16%
Honor 90 5G Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	7388 Points
Xiaomi 13 Lite Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	6767 Points -8%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	5129 Points -31%

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Google Pixel 7 Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	8192 Points +27%
Motorola Edge 40 Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 8020, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	7606 Points +18%
Honor 90 5G Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	6466 Points
Xiaomi 13 Lite Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	5501 Points -15%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	4897 Points -24%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Motorola Edge 40 Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 8020, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	139 fps +132%
Xiaomi 13 Lite Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	113 fps +88%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	94 fps +57%
Google Pixel 7 Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	90 fps +50%
Honor 90 5G Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	60 fps

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Google Pixel 7 Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	249 fps +58%
Motorola Edge 40 Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 8020, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	202 fps +28%
Honor 90 5G Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	158 fps
Xiaomi 13 Lite Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	147 fps -7%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	119 fps -25%

GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Google Pixel 7 Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	90 fps +50%
Xiaomi 13 Lite Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	76 fps +27%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	69 fps +15%
Honor 90 5G Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	60 fps
Motorola Edge 40 Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 8020, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	44 fps -27%

GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Google Pixel 7 Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	132 fps +40%
Honor 90 5G Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	94 fps
Xiaomi 13 Lite Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	88 fps -6%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	80 fps -15%
Motorola Edge 40 Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 8020, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	49 fps -48%

GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Google Pixel 7 Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	88 fps +60%
Xiaomi 13 Lite Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	59 fps +7%
Honor 90 5G Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	55 fps
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	47 fps -15%
Motorola Edge 40 Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 8020, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	41 fps -25%

GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Google Pixel 7 Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	89 fps +33%
Honor 90 5G Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	67 fps
Xiaomi 13 Lite Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	63 fps -6%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	52 fps -22%
Motorola Edge 40 Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 8020, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	45 fps -33%

GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Google Pixel 7 Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	62 fps +94%
Motorola Edge 40 Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 8020, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	40 fps +25%
Xiaomi 13 Lite Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	34 fps +6%
Honor 90 5G Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	32 fps
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	26 fps -19%

GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Google Pixel 7 Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	68 fps +70%
Motorola Edge 40 Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 8020, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	43 fps +8%
Honor 90 5G Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	40 fps
Xiaomi 13 Lite Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	37 fps -7%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	31 fps -22%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Google Pixel 7 Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	48 fps +109%
Motorola Edge 40 Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 8020, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	33 fps +43%
Xiaomi 13 Lite Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	24 fps +4%
Honor 90 5G Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	23 fps
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	20 fps -13%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Google Pixel 7 Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	33 fps +83%
Motorola Edge 40 Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 8020, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	21 fps +17%
Honor 90 5G Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	18 fps
Xiaomi 13 Lite Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	16 fps -11%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	13 fps -28%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Google Pixel 7 Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	65 fps +76%
Motorola Edge 40 Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 8020, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	46 fps +24%
Xiaomi 13 Lite Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	39 fps +5%
Honor 90 5G Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	37 fps
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	30 fps -19%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Google Pixel 7 Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	71 fps +45%
Motorola Edge 40 Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 8020, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	50 fps +2%
Honor 90 5G Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	49 fps
Xiaomi 13 Lite Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	46 fps -6%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	34 fps -31%

GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Google Pixel 7 Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	14 fps +77%
Motorola Edge 40 Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 8020, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	9.2 fps +16%
Honor 90 5G Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	7.9 fps
Xiaomi 13 Lite Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	7.3 fps -8%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	5.9 fps -25%

浏览器基准测试的结果则完全不同：Honor 90 在所有基准测试中均排名最后，但与最接近的对比设备的差距都很小。使用不同浏览器的进一步运行证实了这些结果。不过，日常生活中的网页浏览功能还是完美无缺的。

Jetstream 2 | Speedometer 2.0 | WebXPRT 4 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=169, last 2 years)	124.4 Points +93%
Google Pixel 7 (Chrome 106)	96.314 Points +50%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G (Chrome 112)	94.611 Points +47%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 (64.3 - 115.8, n=5)	90.3 Points +40%
Xiaomi 13 Lite (Chrome 111.0.5563.115)	74.161 Points +15%
Motorola Edge 40 (Chrome 114.0.5735.57)	67.258 Points +5%
Honor 90 5G (chrome 115)	64.3 Points

Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 569, n=152, last 2 years)	143.9 runs/min +133%
Google Pixel 7 (Chrome 106)	100 runs/min +62%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G (Chrome 112)	70.5 runs/min +14%
Motorola Edge 40 (Chrome 114.0.5735.57)	69.9 runs/min +13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 (61.5 - 87.4, n=5)	69.5 runs/min +12%
Xiaomi 13 Lite (Chrome 111.0.5563.115)	67.2 runs/min +9%
Honor 90 5G (chrome 115)	61.8 runs/min

WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Average of class Smartphone (22 - 271, n=159, last 2 years)	117.1 Points +102%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G (Chrome 112)	97 Points +67%
Google Pixel 7 (Chrome 106)	93 Points +60%
Xiaomi 13 Lite (Chrome 111.0.5563.115)	79 Points +36%
Motorola Edge 40 (Chrome 114.0.5735.57)	78 Points +34%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 (58 - 92, n=5)	77.8 Points +34%
Honor 90 5G (Chrome 115)	58 Points

Octane V2 - Total Score
Google Pixel 7	45158 Points +114%
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=210, last 2 years)	38550 Points +82%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G (Chrome 112)	33801 Points +60%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 (21143 - 34866, n=7)	28984 Points +37%
Motorola Edge 40 (Chrome 114.0.5735.57)	28282 Points +34%
Xiaomi 13 Lite (Chrome 111.0.5563.115)	27804 Points +32%
Honor 90 5G (chrome 115)	21143 Points

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Honor 90 5G (chrome 115)	2686.1 ms *
Motorola Edge 40 (Chrome 114.0.5735.57)	1738.9 ms * +35%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 (1208 - 2686, n=5)	1574 ms * +41%
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=167, last 2 years)	1523 ms * +43%
Xiaomi 13 Lite (Chrome 111.0.5563.115)	1384.1 ms * +48%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G (Chrome 112)	1208.8 ms * +55%
Google Pixel 7 (Chrome 106)	1021.8 ms * +62%

* ... smaller is better

在存储方面，Honor 不仅为 90 提供了 512 GB 的超大存储空间，而且读写速度也令人印象深刻。只有摩托罗拉的 Edge 40的连续读写速度可以跟上。

UFS 3.1 存储的随机读写速度与同类产品的平均水平相当。首次启动后，可用存储空间略低于 489GB。

	Honor 90 5G	Samsung Galaxy A54 5G	Xiaomi 13 Lite	Motorola Edge 40	Google Pixel 7	Average 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	Average of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5		-54%	-12%	1%	-20%	10%	12%
Sequential Read 256KB	1831.4	528.32 -71%	1001.82 -45%	1876.88 2%	1280.81 -30%	1846 ?(1023 - 2023, n=27) 1%	1894 ?(226 - 4512, n=197, last 2 years) 3%
Sequential Write 256KB	1444.1	335.39 -77%	871.96 -40%	1587.93 10%	879.39 -39%	1199 ?(575 - 1876, n=27) -17%	1476 ?(57.5 - 3908, n=197, last 2 years) 2%
Random Read 4KB	226.5	236.23 4%	277.33 22%	235.66 4%	210.47 -7%	282 ?(208 - 386, n=27) 25%	278 ?(22.2 - 483, n=197, last 2 years) 23%
Random Write 4KB	260	70.52 -73%	301.41 16%	229.44 -12%	253.92 -2%	338 ?(221 - 532, n=27) 30%	312 ?(9.4 - 753, n=197, last 2 years) 20%

游戏 -Honor 90 提供稳定的帧速率

Honor 90 的性能也足以应付当前的游戏，如《PUBG Mobile》。最多只能在 HDR 设置下玩游戏。通过我们的合作伙伴GameBench 进行的测试表明，这款智能手机在游戏时的性能保持稳定。无论选择哪种设置，都不会出现掉帧现象。Honor 90 的帧速率不仅比三星Galaxy A54还更高。

在《死亡扳机 2》等简单的游戏中，帧率甚至更高，但无论选择何种设置，Honor 90 的帧率都不会超过 60 FPS。在游戏过程中，智能手机提供了全面的视听体验。虽然 90 只有一个单声道扬声器，但音质还是很吸引人的。

在游戏过程中，扬声器也不会被手指遮挡。另一个值得注意的功能是Honor 的游戏模式，它可以用来屏蔽通知和访问不同的性能模式。

Honor 90 5G Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Dead Trigger 2; 1.9.1: Ø60.4 (59-61)

Samsung Galaxy A54 5G Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Genshin Impact; lowest 120 fps; 3.6.0_13833164_13951843: Ø56.7 (31-61)

Samsung Galaxy A54 5G Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Genshin Impact; medium 120 fps; 3.6.0_13833164_13951843: Ø43.1 (26-58)

Samsung Galaxy A54 5G Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Genshin Impact; highest 120 fps; 3.6.0_13833164_13951843: Ø36.5 (23-53)

Samsung Galaxy A54 5G Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; PUBG Mobile; Smooth; 2.5.0: Ø30 (29-31)

Honor 90 5G Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; PUBG Mobile; Balanced; 2.7.0: Ø39.6 (37-41)

Samsung Galaxy A54 5G Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; PUBG Mobile; Balanced; 2.5.0: Ø30 (29-31)

Honor 90 5G Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; PUBG Mobile; HD; 2.7.0: Ø39.7 (37-41)

Samsung Galaxy A54 5G Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; PUBG Mobile; HD; 2.5.0: Ø30 (29-31)

Samsung Galaxy A54 5G Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Diablo Immortal; 1.8.0: Ø55.5 (39-61)

排放 -Honor 90 上的高温

温度 - 90 在负载情况下会发热

Honor 90 在日常使用中保持良好的冷却状态，但在负载情况下会发热。我们测得背面最高温度为 44.4 度，正面最高温度为 47.4 度。这让使用智能手机时感到不舒服，但并无大碍。我们最近使用 Burnout 基准进行了测量，因此这些数值与旧版测试的数值无法直接比较。
。

不过，只有在极端负载情况下，如基准测试或复杂的应用程序和游戏，才会达到这些高值。该设备在日常使用中保持凉爽，因此可以在炎热的夏天毫不犹豫地使用。尽管发热量很高，但Honor 90 在我们的压力测试中非常稳定。

Max. Load

Idle


46.2 °C	46.6 °C	42.2 °C
46.5 °C	47.7 °C	46 °C
46.2 °C	46.1 °C	45.7 °C

Maximum: 47.7 °C
Average: 45.9 °C


40.8 °C	43 °C	43.5 °C
41.1 °C	42.8 °C	44.4 °C
39.4 °C	40.2 °C	43.5 °C

Maximum: 44.4 °C
Average: 42.1 °C

Power Supply (max.) 29 °C | Room Temperature 22 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 45.9 °C / 115 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 47.7 °C / 118 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 44.4 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 34.3 °C / 94 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Honor 90 5G Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	99.6 %
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	98.8 % -1%
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Honor 90 5G Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	99.7 %
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	99.5 % 0%

Samsung Galaxy A54 5G Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø4.85 (4.84-4.87)

Honor 90 5G Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø18.8 (18.8-18.9)

Samsung Galaxy A54 5G Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø16.9 (16.8-17)

Honor 90 5G Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø18.9 (18.7-18.9)

Samsung Galaxy A54 5G Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability: Ø17 (17-17.1)

扬声器 -Honor 中音部分只有单声道扬声器

Honor 只在 90 的底部安装了一个单声道扬声器。然而，扬声器的音量却出奇地大，而且智能手机在全音量时也不会震动。此外，该设备的中高音调谐相当线性，表现出色。

虽然 90 几乎没有低频或低音，但这些频率是线性的。总的来说，尽管只有一个扬声器，但这款智能手机的音质还是不错的。测试过程中没有发现噪音干扰。

Honor 90 的购买者不得不放弃插孔连接。不过，蓝牙耳机很容易识别。支持 SBC、AAC、LDAC、aptX 和 aptX HD 等常见编解码器。

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Honor 90 5G audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (91.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.6% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (5.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 6.2% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.4% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (2.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 19% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 71% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 40% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 52% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Samsung Galaxy A54 5G audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 6.4% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (2.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 11% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 81% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 33% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 60% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电池寿命 - 电池容量大，耗电量高Honor 90

耗电量 -Honor 90 耗电量大

与对比设备相比，可以立即看出Honor 90 在所有方面的功耗都高于平均水平。与小米 13 Lite 相比，功耗（尤其是在负载情况下）明显偏高。小米 13 Lite相比，功耗明显偏高，尤其是在负载情况下。

如果将所有采用骁龙 7 代 1.不过，我们使用 Burnout 基准来确定负载功耗。在与旧版本的测量结果进行比较时应考虑到这一点。

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.18 / 0.39 Watt
Idle	1.19 / 1.71 / 1.82 Watt
Load	6.8 / 10.93 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Honor 90 5G 5000 mAh	Samsung Galaxy A54 5G 5000 mAh	Xiaomi 13 Lite 4500 mAh	Motorola Edge 40 4400 mAh	Google Pixel 7 4355 mAh	Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1	Average of class Smartphone
Power Consumption		21%	28%	25%	40%	-2%	13%
Idle Minimum *	1.19	0.75 37%	0.74 38%	0.62 48%	0.89 25%	1.012 ?(0.74 - 1.23, n=5) 15%	0.883 ?(0.4 - 2.37, n=161, last 2 years) 26%
Idle Average *	1.71	1.51 12%	1.56 9%	1.78 -4%	1.07 37%	2.19 ?(1.2 - 4.44, n=5) -28%	1.467 ?(0.6 - 4.36, n=161, last 2 years) 14%
Idle Maximum *	1.82	1.62 11%	1.59 13%	1.85 -2%	1.2 34%	2.3 ?(1.4 - 4.49, n=5) -26%	1.621 ?(0.83 - 4.46, n=161, last 2 years) 11%
Load Average *	6.8	4.91 28%	3.33 51%	3.02 56%	3.27 52%	5.84 ?(3.33 - 11.2, n=5) 14%	6.58 ?(2.3 - 16.5, n=155, last 2 years) 3%
Load Maximum *	10.93	8.93 18%	7.59 31%	8.23 25%	5.5 50%	9.26 ?(5.5 - 11.3, n=5) 15%	9.91 ?(3.53 - 20.8, n=155, last 2 years) 9%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

Honor 90 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø5.76 (1.974-11)

Samsung Galaxy A54 5G Samsung Exynos 1380; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø5.7 (1.081-12.5)

Honor 90 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.609 (1.472-2.15)

Samsung Galaxy A54 5G Samsung Exynos 1380; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.084 (1.034-1.265)

Power consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

Honor 90 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø4.82 (4.53-5.76)

Samsung Galaxy A54 5G Samsung Exynos 1380; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø4.32 (4.08-4.55)

Honor 90 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.609 (1.472-2.15)

Samsung Galaxy A54 5G Samsung Exynos 1380; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.084 (1.034-1.265)

电池寿命 - 90 分贝（A）时运行时间较短

高能耗率已经表明Honor 90 的电池续航时间不会很出色。不过，这款智能手机在我们的实际 Wi-Fi 测试中表现尤为出色。在负载情况下或连续循环播放视频时，其耗电率尚可，但对比设备的耗电率仍然更胜一筹。

幸运的是，

Honor 在 90 中安装了 5000 毫安时的大容量电池。因此，如果不运行CPU密集型应用程序或玩游戏，这款智能手机在日常使用中可以达到约1.5天的续航时间。不过三星Galaxy A54同样大小的电池在低负载情况下的运行时间是它的两倍。如果使用合适的 66 瓦电源，90 可以在一小时内从 0 充至 100%。不支持无线充电。

Battery Runtime

Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)		20h 39min
WiFi Websurfing (chrome 115)		15h 01min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		16h 30min
Load (maximum brightness)		4h 07min

	Honor 90 5G 5000 mAh	Samsung Galaxy A54 5G 5000 mAh	Xiaomi 13 Lite 4500 mAh	Motorola Edge 40 4400 mAh	Google Pixel 7 4355 mAh
Battery Runtime		45%	31%	34%	3%
Reader / Idle	1239	2591 109%	2240 81%	2272 83%	1063 -14%
H.264	990	1508 52%	1185 20%	1235 25%	1230 24%
WiFi v1.3	901	941 4%	822 -9%	924 3%	731 -19%
Load	247	284 15%	321 30%	304 23%	302 22%

Pros

+ 宽大明亮的 AMOLED 显示屏

+ 纤薄设计

+ 强大的主摄像头

+ 低光性能

Cons

- 单声道扬声器

- 高消耗率

- 支持更新

- 无无线充电功能

评价 -Honor 90，优点多，缺点少

Honor 在中档产品方面又有了新的突破。 70 已经给我们留下了深刻的印象，但它也暴露出了一些弱点。其中一些弱点在 90 上得到了改进：无线局域网连接稳定，存储速度慢的问题也已不复存在。

Honor

我们还喜欢前代产品面板的最大亮度和摄像头的良好质量（尤其是在弱光环境下）。显示屏和摄像头系统仍然是制造商在 90 上重点关注的两个方面。面板在最大亮度下的表现尤为抢眼，并具有 PWM 调光和经认证的蓝光过滤器等功能，旨在减少眼睛疲劳。

在摄像头设置方面，主摄像头尤其令人印象深刻。在光线不足的条件下，清晰度和性能都特别令人满意。自拍摄像头同样表现出色。而变焦和超广角拍摄则稍显薄弱。

90 所搭载的骁龙 7 代 1 虽然标有 "加速版 "字样，但在性能上却无法超越搭载普通 7 代 1 的设备。90 的性能非常稳定，可确保在日常生活和当前游戏中流畅运行。考虑到其建议零售价，90 的 SoC 速度应该会更快。

Honor

大电池、大内存、大相机传感器-- ，在许多方面都下足了功夫。Honor

在负载情况下，智能手机的性能保持稳定，但设备会变得非常热。 90 的负载功耗明显高于同类设备。得益于 5000 毫安时的大容量电池，运行时间尚可。

智能手机的高耗电量是一个值得批评的地方。对于这个价格，我们还希望能有立体声扬声器和无线充电功能。同样令人遗憾的是，与诸如Honor Honor Magic5 Pro.

尽管如此，这款手机的整体配置还是非常可靠的。90 是一款配置很高的智能手机，但价格却很高。谷歌谷歌 Pixel 7的性能更高，但存储空间却小得多。三星的 Galaxy A54.

价格和供应情况

Honor 90 目前在美国亚马逊的售价为525 美元。

Honor 90 5G - 08/22/2023 v7 ^(old)
Benedikt Winkel

Chassis

86%

Keyboard

67 / 75 → 89%

Pointing Device

89%

Connectivity

51 / 70 → 73%

Weight

90%

Battery

90%

Display

91%

Games Performance

58 / 64 → 91%

Application Performance

80 / 86 → 93%

Temperature

82%

Noise

100%

Audio

75 / 90 → 83%

Camera

75%

Average

80%

86%

Smartphone - Weighted Average

Price comparison

Editor of the original article: Jacob Fisher - Translator - 1427 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2022

Translator: Ninh Ngoc Duy - Editorial Assistant - 471132 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008

contact me via: Facebook

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > Honor 90 5G 智能手机评测：显示屏和存储巨头

Benedikt Winkel, 2023-08-26 (Update: 2024-08-15)

Honor 90 5G 智能手机评测：显示屏和存储巨头

优雅的设计

潜在的竞争对手比较

表壳 -Honor 90 上的塑料和圆形边缘

尺寸比较

设备 -Honor 仅提供一种版本的 90

软件 - Magic UI 和Honor 90 的两大更新

通信和全球导航卫星系统 -Honor 90，连接稳定

电话和语音质量 -Honor 90 没有问题

相机 -Honor 90 在弱光环境下的表现令人惊喜

附件和保修 -Honor 提供保护套和铝箔纸

输入设备和操作 - 在 90 上快速解锁

显示屏 - AMOLED 面板明亮

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Display Response Times

性能 -Honor 90 中的骁龙 7 代 1 加速版

游戏 -Honor 90 提供稳定的帧速率

排放 -Honor 90 上的高温

温度 - 90 在负载情况下会发热

3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

扬声器 -Honor 中音部分只有单声道扬声器

Honor 90 5G audio analysis

Samsung Galaxy A54 5G audio analysis

电池寿命 - 电池容量大，耗电量高Honor 90

耗电量 -Honor 90 耗电量大

Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

Power consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

电池寿命 - 90 分贝（A）时运行时间较短

Pros

Cons

评价 -Honor 90，优点多，缺点少

价格和供应情况

More articles related to this device

Transparency

Price comparison