宏碁掠夺者Helios 300回顾。超频的游戏笔记本,有一个好的显示屏
已经过去 两年了自从我们测试了上一个17英寸Helios 300,所以现在是时候了。去年,只有15-Zoll-Variante中的15英寸版本的捕食者Helios 300护士到达我们的测试台,当时它仍然使用Comet Lake CPU和 RTX 3070.现在,17英寸版本配备了Alder Lake CPU和 RTX 3070 Ti具备150瓦的功率。
为了比较,我们让目前的Helios与它的15英寸前辈竞争,我们还包括 Razer Blade 17,以及 HP Omen 17,以及Aorus 17(X),以及 MSI Vector GP76.
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
86.5 % v7 (old) | 11 / 2022 | Acer Predator Helios 300 (i7-12700H, RTX 3070 Ti) i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU | 3 kg | 27.65 mm | 17.30" | 2560x1440 | |
83.8 % v7 (old) | 09 / 2021 | Acer Predator Helios 300 PH315-53-786B i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU | 2.2 kg | 22.9 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
90.1 % v7 (old) | 05 / 2022 | Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti) i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU | 2.8 kg | 19.9 mm | 17.30" | 2560x1440 | |
86.3 % v7 (old) | 09 / 2022 | HP Omen 17-ck1075ng i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU | 2.8 kg | 31 mm | 17.30" | 1920x1080 | |
85.2 % v7 (old) | 04 / 2022 | Aorus 17 XE4 i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU | 2.6 kg | 27 mm | 17.30" | 1920x1080 | |
86.7 % v7 (old) | 05 / 2022 | MSI Vector GP76 12UGS-434 i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU | 2.9 kg | 25.9 mm | 17.30" | 1920x1080 |
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
外壳 - 顶部为金属,底部为塑料
目前的Helios 300仍然显示出与两年前的祖先有许多相似之处,但也有一些区别。保持不变的是亚光黑的颜色和材料。虽然底座的顶部和显示屏是由金属制成的,但显示屏边框和底板是由塑料制成的。
显示器盖子内外的 "捕食者 "标签消失了,现在你只能看到这个符号。另一个消失的东西是显示屏盖子上细长的LED条。
总的来说,现在的设计略显谦虚,即使新的捕食者仍然没有真正隐藏其游戏野心,其蓝色的色彩点缀,前面的细长LED条,以及后面伸出来的冷却系统。
金属使显示器和底座相当坚固,它们都保持着相当的硬度,在我们试图翘起的时候只产生了最小的吱吱声。另一方面,显示屏的嘎吱声更大一些。
我们没有注意到材料之间有任何不寻常的缝隙,而且做工也处于良好水平。
17英寸笔记本电脑当然比它的15英寸兄弟姐妹更重、更深,但它也有近5毫米(约0.2英寸)的厚度。它的冷却系统在后面伸出来,类似于 伸出来的冷却系统与Alienware机型类似。,它的深度明显增加,这使得它比其他17英寸游戏笔记本更大。
就重量而言,它也比竞争对手至少重100克(约3.5盎司)。
设备 - 一些连接被移到后面
两年前,17英寸的Predator在后面没有任何连接。现在这种情况改变了,这也在侧面创造了更多的空间。然而,连接的数量保持不变。其中一个USB-A端口略有更新,而Thunderbolt USB-C端口现在支持DisplayPort。仍然没有SD卡读卡器。
沟通
除了局域网连接外,该设备还提供了杀手Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i无线局域网模块,它也允许你在6GHz网络内冲浪。
虽然传输率还算不错,但仍比使用该模块可能的平均速度慢10%左右。该刀锋17也要快10%左右。另一方面,性能是恒定的。
网络摄像头
同样新的是带有面部识别功能的1080p网络摄像头,在良好的照明条件下,在室内产生相当不错的照片。然而,其色彩并不那么令人印象深刻。
安全问题
支持Kensington锁和TPM 2.0。另一方面,缺少一个指纹传感器,但我们可以原谅这一点。更难接受的是缺少一个网络摄像头快门。
配件和保修
宏碁对配件很贪婪,没有一个配件是包括在内的。在德国,保修期为两年,有运输服务。
维护
你必须卸下11颗类似长度的飞利浦螺丝,才能取下机箱的底部。但即使如此,机箱底部仍然固定得很紧,极难撬开。 最好的方法是从前面的角落开始,因为不清楚底板在后面的尽头。由于塑料底板很软,你还必须非常小心地使用合适的撬动工具。
一旦你取下底板,你就可以接触到固态硬盘、风扇、Wi-Fi模块和电池。也可以接触到DDR5-RAM,但它位于一个额外的金属盖子下面,你必须用另一个螺丝钉拆掉。
输入设备 - 可在Helios 300中使用
键盘
宏碁使用了带有数字块和 "Pulsar "背景照明的键盘,还可以对每个键进行单独调整。数字块还包括一个特殊的键,它是为打开Predator Sense软件而保留的,其功能是某种控制中心。
键盘本身有一个相当短到中等的行程,但它们提供了一个清晰的压力点,从而产生了良好的反馈。键盘可以让你相当快地、舒适地打字。打字的噪音非常适中,但空格键的声音略大。
在压力下,键盘的中心会向下弯曲,但在正常打字时不会出现这种情况。
触摸板
两年前我们曾批评过的触摸板得到了彻底的整改。
在大约12.15 x 8.3厘米(约4.8 x 3.3英寸)的地方,触摸板提供了良好的滑动特性,集成的按键也有一个舒适且容易注意的压力点。这里的点击噪音也很适中。
显示屏 - 明亮且具有良好的色彩空间覆盖
宏碁使用京东方的哑光IPS显示屏,分辨率为2560×1440像素(16:9),刷新率为165赫兹。替代选项仅适用于15英寸的Predator(全高清)。
在340尼特的亮度下,该面板不仅超过了它的前辈,而且还超过了 刀锋17.亮度分布相对均匀,达到85%。
黑值和对比度对应于一个良好的等级平均水平。然而,我们无法证实广告中所说的只有3毫秒的响应时间,相反,我们测量到从黑色到白色的变化大约为11毫秒。该面板并没有受到PWM的影响。
|
Brightness Distribution: 85 %
Center on Battery: 365 cd/m²
Contrast: 1181:1 (Black: 0.31 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.56 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92, calibrated: 3.31
ΔE Greyscale 2.84 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
84.8% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.9% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
96.8% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.29
Acer Predator Helios 300 (i7-12700H, RTX 3070 Ti) BOE0A1A, IPS, 2560x1440, 17.3" | Acer Predator Helios 300 PH315-53-786B Sharp LQ156M1JW09, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti) BOE CQ NE173QHM-NZ1 (BOE09F9), IPS, 2560x1440, 17.3" | HP Omen 17-ck1075ng BOE09EE, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3" | Aorus 17 XE4 Sharp LQ173M1JW12, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3" | MSI Vector GP76 12UGS-434 AUO B173HAN05.4, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | -16% | 1% | -26% | -15% | -15% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 96.8 | 68.4 -29% | 97.9 1% | 59.03 -39% | 69 -29% | 70.09 -28% |
sRGB Coverage | 99.9 | 99.4 -1% | 99.9 0% | 87.46 -12% | 99.4 -1% | 98.98 -1% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 84.8 | 70.4 -17% | 85.5 1% | 61.04 -28% | 71.2 -16% | 70.91 -16% |
Response Times | 13% | 4% | 13% | 4% | 53% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 16.4 ? | 15.2 ? 7% | 15.2 ? 7% | 14 ? 15% | 15.2 ? 7% | 4 ? 76% |
Response Time Black / White * | 11.2 ? | 9.2 ? 18% | 11.2 ? -0% | 10 ? 11% | 11.2 ? -0% | 8 ? 29% |
PWM Frequency | 23580 ? | 100 ? | ||||
Screen | -4% | -26% | 10% | 10% | 3% | |
Brightness middle | 366 | 312 -15% | 341 -7% | 321 -12% | 274 -25% | 274 -25% |
Brightness | 340 | 290 -15% | 308 -9% | 302 -11% | 267 -21% | 264 -22% |
Brightness Distribution | 85 | 87 2% | 82 -4% | 84 -1% | 82 -4% | 87 2% |
Black Level * | 0.31 | 0.32 -3% | 0.45 -45% | 0.41 -32% | 0.25 19% | 0.25 19% |
Contrast | 1181 | 975 -17% | 758 -36% | 783 -34% | 1096 -7% | 1096 -7% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 3.56 | 3.03 15% | 4.16 -17% | 1.62 54% | 2.07 42% | 2.53 29% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 5.66 | 6.81 -20% | 8.14 -44% | 4.08 28% | 4.89 14% | 6.76 -19% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 3.31 | 0.71 79% | 3 9% | 1.93 42% | 0.83 75% | 0.98 70% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.84 | 4.7 -65% | 5.09 -79% | 1.24 56% | 3 -6% | 3.49 -23% |
Gamma | 2.29 96% | 2.177 101% | 2.48 89% | 2.41 91% | 2.207 100% | 2.31 95% |
CCT | 6835 95% | 6676 97% | 6884 94% | 6261 104% | 6999 93% | 6714 97% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -2% /
-4% | -7% /
-16% | -1% /
3% | -0% /
3% | 14% /
6% |
* ... smaller is better
覆盖的色彩空间相当好,能够与之竞争的是 Razer Blade.除了完整的sRGB色彩空间外,DisplayP3也覆盖了近97%,而AdobeRGB仍然覆盖了约85%。
显示器在交付状态下被调整得相当好,用我们的Portrait Display Calman色彩校准工具进行校准只会带来最小的改善。这使得用户真的没有必要进行校准。
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
11.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 5.8 ms rise | |
↘ 5.4 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 27 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
16.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 7.8 ms rise | |
↘ 8.6 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 27 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8746 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
在户外,340尼特的亮度和哑光的显示表面会带来一些优势。然而,你还是应该寻找一个阴凉的地方,避免阳光直射。
性能--超频后的掠夺者Helios
配备一个酷睿i7-12700H和 RTX 3070 TiHelios可以被放在游戏类的中高端位置。这些处理器配有充足的32GB DDR5-RAM和1TB存储解决方案。有了这些,这款笔记本电脑应该能够以原生分辨率流畅地重现几乎所有当前游戏。
测试条件
Predator Sense软件作为控制中心软件被预装了。为了获得最佳的基准测试结果,我们选择了 "极限 "性能模式,其中CPU和GPU可能被稍微 "超频 "了。除了 "极速",还有一个 "涡轮 "模式,为此还有一个额外的键来激活或停用。然而,风扇总是以全速运行,所以对我们来说,极限模式也不是真正的安静,应该是足够了。
该软件还允许你对风扇控制、性能等进行各种调整,此外还可以配置RGB背景照明。因此,用户应该仔细看一下这个软件。
处理器
ǞǞǞ英特尔酷睿i7-12700H经常参加我们的游戏笔记本电脑测试。来自英特尔桤木湖一代的CPU提供6个性能和8个效率核心,有20个线程,时钟速度为1.8至4.7GHz。它应该能够很好地处理所有的游戏。
由于采用了极限模式,CPU的性能非常好,达到了明显高于普通的 i7-12700H由于轻微超频--至少在我们的Cinebench R15循环中。在约120瓦的TDP下,非常稳定的性能也是令人信服的。
在这一点上,我们的测试装置击败了对比设备,而只有 微星Vector能够勉强跟上。Helios击败了 在多线程方面,Helios比前代产品的Comet Lake在多线程任务中几乎是100%。然而,单核性能只是一般。
如果你切换到更安静的标准模式,TDP只在第一次运行时达到120瓦的满分。之后,在一次运行中,它的范围多在85瓦左右。之后,Helios无法像极限模式那样保持2840分的最高分,但在最初的几次运行后下降到约2230分。
在电池模式下,性能受到了极大的限制。尽管TDP短暂地达到了约40瓦,但一秒钟后,它总是结束在只有约21瓦。
Cinebench R15 Multi Constant Load Test
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
CPU Performance Rating | |
Average of class Gaming | |
MSI Vector GP76 12UGS-434 | |
Aorus 17 XE4 | |
Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H | |
Acer Predator Helios 300 (i7-12700H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng | |
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH315-53-786B |
Cinebench R23 / Multi Core | |
Average of class Gaming (5668 - 36249, n=193, last 2 years) | |
MSI Vector GP76 12UGS-434 | |
Acer Predator Helios 300 (i7-12700H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
Aorus 17 XE4 | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (4032 - 19330, n=63) | |
Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng | |
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH315-53-786B |
Cinebench R23 / Single Core | |
Average of class Gaming (1088 - 2235, n=191, last 2 years) | |
Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
Aorus 17 XE4 | |
MSI Vector GP76 12UGS-434 | |
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (778 - 1826, n=62) | |
Acer Predator Helios 300 (i7-12700H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH315-53-786B |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
Average of class Gaming (2179 - 13832, n=191, last 2 years) | |
MSI Vector GP76 12UGS-434 | |
Aorus 17 XE4 | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (1576 - 7407, n=63) | |
Acer Predator Helios 300 (i7-12700H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng | |
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH315-53-786B |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
Average of class Gaming (427 - 856, n=191, last 2 years) | |
Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
Acer Predator Helios 300 (i7-12700H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
Aorus 17 XE4 | |
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng | |
MSI Vector GP76 12UGS-434 | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (300 - 704, n=63) | |
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH315-53-786B |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
Average of class Gaming (905 - 5663, n=198, last 2 years) | |
Acer Predator Helios 300 (i7-12700H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
MSI Vector GP76 12UGS-434 | |
Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
Aorus 17 XE4 | |
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng | |
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (1379 - 2916, n=69) | |
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH315-53-786B |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
Average of class Gaming (176.6 - 318, n=195, last 2 years) | |
Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
Aorus 17 XE4 | |
MSI Vector GP76 12UGS-434 | |
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng | |
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng | |
Acer Predator Helios 300 (i7-12700H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (113 - 263, n=64) | |
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH315-53-786B |
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH315-53-786B | |
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng | |
Aorus 17 XE4 | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (168 - 732, n=62) | |
Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
Acer Predator Helios 300 (i7-12700H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
MSI Vector GP76 12UGS-434 | |
Average of class Gaming (87 - 555, n=186, last 2 years) |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
Average of class Gaming (23795 - 140932, n=190, last 2 years) | |
Acer Predator Helios 300 (i7-12700H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
MSI Vector GP76 12UGS-434 | |
Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (22844 - 73067, n=62) | |
Aorus 17 XE4 | |
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng | |
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH315-53-786B |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
Average of class Gaming (4168 - 7581, n=190, last 2 years) | |
Aorus 17 XE4 | |
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng | |
Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
Acer Predator Helios 300 (i7-12700H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (2743 - 5972, n=62) | |
MSI Vector GP76 12UGS-434 | |
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH315-53-786B |
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
Average of class Gaming (4557 - 23194, n=191, last 2 years) | |
Acer Predator Helios 300 (i7-12700H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
Aorus 17 XE4 | |
Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
MSI Vector GP76 12UGS-434 | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (5144 - 13745, n=63) | |
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng | |
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH315-53-786B |
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
Average of class Gaming (986 - 2210, n=191, last 2 years) | |
Aorus 17 XE4 | |
Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
MSI Vector GP76 12UGS-434 | |
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (803 - 1851, n=63) | |
Acer Predator Helios 300 (i7-12700H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH315-53-786B |
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
Average of class Gaming (6.72 - 38.9, n=190, last 2 years) | |
MSI Vector GP76 12UGS-434 | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (4.67 - 21.8, n=63) | |
Acer Predator Helios 300 (i7-12700H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
Aorus 17 XE4 | |
Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng | |
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH315-53-786B |
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
Acer Predator Helios 300 (i7-12700H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
Average of class Gaming (31.4 - 96.6, n=187, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (34.2 - 95.3, n=62) | |
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH315-53-786B | |
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng | |
MSI Vector GP76 12UGS-434 | |
Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
Aorus 17 XE4 |
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH315-53-786B | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (0.4441 - 1.052, n=62) | |
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng | |
MSI Vector GP76 12UGS-434 | |
Acer Predator Helios 300 (i7-12700H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
Aorus 17 XE4 | |
Average of class Gaming (0.3609 - 0.759, n=191, last 2 years) |
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Performance Rating | |
Average of class Gaming | |
Acer Predator Helios 300 (i7-12700H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H | |
MSI Vector GP76 12UGS-434 | |
Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
Aorus 17 XE4 | |
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH315-53-786B |
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
Average of class Gaming (4986 - 60169, n=187, last 2 years) | |
Acer Predator Helios 300 (i7-12700H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (2585 - 17957, n=62) | |
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH315-53-786B | |
MSI Vector GP76 12UGS-434 | |
Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
Aorus 17 XE4 |
AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
Average of class Gaming (25360 - 252486, n=187, last 2 years) | |
Acer Predator Helios 300 (i7-12700H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (12439 - 90760, n=62) | |
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH315-53-786B | |
MSI Vector GP76 12UGS-434 | |
Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
Aorus 17 XE4 |
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
Average of class Gaming (1339 - 10389, n=187, last 2 years) | |
Acer Predator Helios 300 (i7-12700H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng | |
MSI Vector GP76 12UGS-434 | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (833 - 4242, n=62) | |
Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
Aorus 17 XE4 | |
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH315-53-786B |
AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
Average of class Gaming (50699 - 200651, n=187, last 2 years) | |
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng | |
Acer Predator Helios 300 (i7-12700H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
Aorus 17 XE4 | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (57923 - 103202, n=62) | |
MSI Vector GP76 12UGS-434 | |
Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH315-53-786B |
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
Average of class Gaming (4800 - 32988, n=187, last 2 years) | |
Acer Predator Helios 300 (i7-12700H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
MSI Vector GP76 12UGS-434 | |
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng | |
Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (3249 - 9939, n=62) | |
Aorus 17 XE4 | |
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH315-53-786B |
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
Average of class Gaming (12321 - 134044, n=187, last 2 years) | |
Acer Predator Helios 300 (i7-12700H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (7135 - 44760, n=62) | |
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH315-53-786B | |
MSI Vector GP76 12UGS-434 | |
Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
Aorus 17 XE4 |
AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng | |
Average of class Gaming (19065 - 328679, n=187, last 2 years) | |
MSI Vector GP76 12UGS-434 | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (31839 - 144360, n=62) | |
Acer Predator Helios 300 (i7-12700H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
Aorus 17 XE4 | |
Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH315-53-786B |
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
Average of class Gaming (373 - 2409, n=187, last 2 years) | |
Acer Predator Helios 300 (i7-12700H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
MSI Vector GP76 12UGS-434 | |
Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (305 - 1171, n=62) | |
Aorus 17 XE4 | |
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH315-53-786B |
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
Average of class Gaming (2540 - 31796, n=187, last 2 years) | |
Acer Predator Helios 300 (i7-12700H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (1437 - 9692, n=62) | |
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH315-53-786B | |
MSI Vector GP76 12UGS-434 | |
Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
Aorus 17 XE4 |
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
Average of class Gaming (10805 - 60161, n=188, last 2 years) | |
Acer Predator Helios 300 (i7-12700H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (12863 - 52207, n=62) | |
Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
MSI Vector GP76 12UGS-434 | |
Aorus 17 XE4 | |
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH315-53-786B |
系统性能
在PCMark 10中,我们的Helios 300 PH317测试装置也比我们数据库中具有相同CPU的所有笔记本电脑的平均运行速度快。其性能优势在3-10%之间。然而,微星的 微星Vector仍然能够排名第一,勉强领先于Helios。
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
PCMark 10 / Score | |
MSI Vector GP76 12UGS-434 | |
Acer Predator Helios 300 (i7-12700H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
Average of class Gaming (5776 - 9852, n=168, last 2 years) | |
Aorus 17 XE4 | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (6941 - 7947, n=11) | |
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng | |
Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH315-53-786B |
PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
Average of class Gaming (9057 - 12334, n=167, last 2 years) | |
Aorus 17 XE4 | |
Acer Predator Helios 300 (i7-12700H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
MSI Vector GP76 12UGS-434 | |
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (9892 - 10935, n=11) | |
Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH315-53-786B |
PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
MSI Vector GP76 12UGS-434 | |
Acer Predator Helios 300 (i7-12700H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
Average of class Gaming (6662 - 14612, n=167, last 2 years) | |
Aorus 17 XE4 | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (9024 - 10638, n=11) | |
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng | |
Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH315-53-786B |
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
Acer Predator Helios 300 (i7-12700H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
MSI Vector GP76 12UGS-434 | |
Average of class Gaming (6703 - 18475, n=167, last 2 years) | |
Aorus 17 XE4 | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (10165 - 12546, n=11) | |
Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng | |
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH315-53-786B |
CrossMark / Overall | |
Aorus 17 XE4 | |
MSI Vector GP76 12UGS-434 | |
Average of class Gaming (1247 - 2344, n=151, last 2 years) | |
Acer Predator Helios 300 (i7-12700H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (974 - 2000, n=12) | |
Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti) |
CrossMark / Productivity | |
Aorus 17 XE4 | |
MSI Vector GP76 12UGS-434 | |
Average of class Gaming (1299 - 2204, n=151, last 2 years) | |
Acer Predator Helios 300 (i7-12700H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (907 - 1962, n=12) | |
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng | |
Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti) |
CrossMark / Creativity | |
Average of class Gaming (1275 - 2660, n=151, last 2 years) | |
Acer Predator Helios 300 (i7-12700H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng | |
Aorus 17 XE4 | |
Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
MSI Vector GP76 12UGS-434 | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (1027 - 2057, n=12) |
CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
Aorus 17 XE4 | |
MSI Vector GP76 12UGS-434 | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (1029 - 2142, n=12) | |
Acer Predator Helios 300 (i7-12700H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
Average of class Gaming (1030 - 2330, n=151, last 2 years) | |
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng | |
Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti) |
PCMark 10 Score | 7899 points | |
Help |
AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
Average of class Gaming (21842 - 94222, n=187, last 2 years) | |
Acer Predator Helios 300 (i7-12700H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (25615 - 80511, n=62) | |
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng | |
Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
Aorus 17 XE4 | |
MSI Vector GP76 12UGS-434 | |
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH315-53-786B |
AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
Average of class Gaming (23681 - 99713, n=187, last 2 years) | |
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng | |
Acer Predator Helios 300 (i7-12700H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (25586 - 79442, n=62) | |
Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
Aorus 17 XE4 | |
MSI Vector GP76 12UGS-434 | |
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH315-53-786B |
AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
Average of class Gaming (22986 - 108954, n=187, last 2 years) | |
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng | |
Acer Predator Helios 300 (i7-12700H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (23679 - 88660, n=62) | |
Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
MSI Vector GP76 12UGS-434 | |
Aorus 17 XE4 | |
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH315-53-786B |
AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng | |
Average of class Gaming (59.5 - 259, n=187, last 2 years) | |
MSI Vector GP76 12UGS-434 | |
Aorus 17 XE4 | |
Acer Predator Helios 300 (i7-12700H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (76.2 - 133.9, n=60) | |
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH315-53-786B | |
Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti) |
* ... smaller is better
DPC延迟
虽然在打开浏览器或我们主页上的各种标签时没有问题,但在播放我们的4K/60-fps YouTube视频时,问题开始出现。尽管它完成了零掉帧,但有一些延迟,在比较中发现平均很高。
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng | |
MSI Vector GP76 12UGS-434 | |
Aorus 17 XE4 | |
Acer Predator Helios 300 (i7-12700H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH315-53-786B |
* ... smaller is better
存储解决方案
宏碁使用了快速的三星980 Pro,有1TB的存储空间,支持PCIe 4.0 x4。在我们的 固态硬盘排名表中,该机型排名第十。
在我们的测试中,这款固态硬盘在比较中达到了良好的数值,但不幸的是,尽管有冷却垫和强大的冷却性能,它还是无法在恒定负载测试中保持这些数值。由于这对我们来说是一个惊喜,我们后来又重复了三次测试,但总是收到类似的结果。
* ... smaller is better
Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
图形卡
作为显卡,有一个 Nvidia Geforce RTX 3070 TiTGP目标为150瓦,包括动态提升。
在3DMarks中,Helios能够在整体上排名第一,仅在Fire Strike ,被Vector 17超越了1-2%。 矢量17和刀锋17.
如果Helios在电池运行时,3D性能会大大降低。在Fire Strike ,28,088个GPU点中,然后只剩下13,938个点。
3DMark 11 Performance | 33193 points | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 62873 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 24043 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 11693 points | |
Help |
* ... smaller is better
游戏性能
在TheWitcher 3 ,Helios与微星Vector 进行了正面竞争。由于采用了极限模式,它在游戏中的整体表现非常好,平均达到比普通RTX 3070 Ti高10%左右。在游戏过程中,准前辈被超越了约30%(然而:极限模式与正常模式)。该设备似乎只不喜欢《DOTA2重生》。
在标准模式下,《Witcher 3 》的帧率最终降低了约10 fps(约110 vs 100 fps)。
GTA V | |
2560x1440 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x | |
Average of class Gaming (36.9 - 160.6, n=113, last 2 years) | |
Acer Predator Helios 300 (i7-12700H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (72.7 - 108.7, n=22) | |
1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x | |
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng | |
Aorus 17 XE4 | |
Average of class Gaming (12.1 - 167.7, n=171, last 2 years) | |
Acer Predator Helios 300 (i7-12700H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
MSI Vector GP76 12UGS-434 | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (44 - 123.9, n=36) | |
Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH315-53-786B | |
1920x1080 High/On (Advanced Graphics Off) AA:2xMSAA + FX AF:8x | |
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng | |
Acer Predator Helios 300 (i7-12700H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
Aorus 17 XE4 | |
Average of class Gaming (24.2 - 187.1, n=146, last 2 years) | |
MSI Vector GP76 12UGS-434 | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (80 - 181.9, n=28) | |
Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH315-53-786B |
尽管《Witcher 3 》中的帧率也随着时间的推移而保持非常稳定,但Helios似乎并没有得到任何特别的优势。 刀锋17在这方面有任何特别的优势。
GPU的时钟速度相当稳定地保持在1.6GHz左右,GPU升温到71℃(160°F)的温度。显卡几乎全程消耗150瓦,但这也是它的设计目的。
The Witcher 3 FPS Chart
low | med. | high | ultra | QHD | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
GTA V (2015) | 175.8 | 112.9 | 103 | ||
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 210 | 119 | |||
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 163.1 | 148.2 | 138.1 | 132.8 | |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 154.8 | 116.8 | 85.4 | ||
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 126.2 | 111.2 | 92.4 | ||
Far Cry 5 (2018) | 136 | 126 | 111 | ||
Strange Brigade (2018) | 241 | 209 | 151.4 | ||
Dying Light 2 (2022) | 101 | 85.5 | 60 |
排放--声音大,但在上面很酷
噪声水平
明确地说,在极限模式下,Helios 300是我们测试过的最吵的设备之一。即使在空闲状态下,风扇的转速已经超过了40分贝,非常响亮。在游戏或压力测试期间,噪音水平会增加到60分贝以上同样强大的 微星Vector已经达到56分贝,但其余的竞争对手明显更安静,在50分贝左右。
因此,对于更敏感的耳朵,我们建议使用标准模式,在Witcher 3 ,我们测量 "只有 "50dB,而不是62dB。在空闲运行时,这种模式仍然非常安静,在某些情况下,风扇甚至完全关闭,或者以25.6分贝的速度安静地呼呼作响。在我们看来,在极限模式下,性能的小幅提升几乎不值一提,因为它的噪音水平极高。
Noise Level
Idle |
| 23 / 25.92 / 40.67 dB(A) |
Load |
| 42.7 / 62.67 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 23 dB(A) |
Acer Predator Helios 300 (i7-12700H, RTX 3070 Ti) GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR | Acer Predator Helios 300 PH315-53-786B GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-10750H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR | Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti) GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR | HP Omen 17-ck1075ng GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, WDC PC SN810 1TB | Aorus 17 XE4 GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10 | MSI Vector GP76 12UGS-434 GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFK | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | 4% | 15% | -1% | -0% | -4% | |
off / environment * | 23 | 25 -9% | 23 -0% | 25.4 -10% | 24 -4% | 25.6 -11% |
Idle Minimum * | 23 | 25 -9% | 23 -0% | 28 -22% | 30 -30% | 27 -17% |
Idle Average * | 25.92 | 27 -4% | 23 11% | 28 -8% | 31 -20% | 27 -4% |
Idle Maximum * | 40.67 | 35 14% | 23 43% | 31.2 23% | 34 16% | 30.1 26% |
Load Average * | 42.7 | 46 -8% | 36.92 14% | 52.2 -22% | 44 -3% | 54.4 -27% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 62.48 | 49 22% | 50 20% | 52.2 16% | 51 18% | |
Load Maximum * | 62.67 | 51 19% | 50 20% | 52.2 17% | 49 22% | 56.2 10% |
* ... smaller is better
温度
至少,冷却系统的高噪音水平也有一个优势,即使在高负荷下,设备也保持相对凉爽。特别是机箱顶部即使在游戏过程中也保持在40°C(104°F)以下,这一壮举只有 HP Omen 17能够做到的。
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 35 °C / 95 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 53 °C / 127 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.3 °C / 78 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.8 °C / 86 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 26 °C / 78.8 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(+) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (+2.9 °C / 5.2 F).
Acer Predator Helios 300 (i7-12700H, RTX 3070 Ti) Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU | Acer Predator Helios 300 PH315-53-786B Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU | Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti) Intel Core i7-12800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU | HP Omen 17-ck1075ng Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU | Aorus 17 XE4 Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU | MSI Vector GP76 12UGS-434 Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | -19% | -4% | -2% | -12% | -12% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 35 | 50 -43% | 43 -23% | 31.3 11% | 50 -43% | 46.3 -32% |
Maximum Bottom * | 53 | 63 -19% | 44 17% | 43.3 18% | 58 -9% | 45 15% |
Idle Upper Side * | 29 | 32 -10% | 32 -10% | 31.3 -8% | 30 -3% | 34.2 -18% |
Idle Bottom * | 34 | 35 -3% | 34 -0% | 43.3 -27% | 32 6% | 38.3 -13% |
* ... smaller is better
压力测试
这些核心以高达3.8 GHz的速度开始我们的压力测试。大约2分钟后,它们达到了100℃(212°F)的温度,导致TDP从100-110瓦下降到只有65瓦。相应地,时钟速度也下降到2.1GHz左右,其中效率核心的速度明显快于更强大的性能核心(约1.5GHz),约为2.9GHz。CPU的温度约为85°C(185°F)。
在测试期间,GPU时钟速度在1.1和1.8 GHz之间变化,存储速度也略有变化(1.5 - 1.8 GHz)。但温度没有那么高,约为71℃(160°F),最高为75℃(167°F)。平均而言,GPU只消耗118瓦特的功率。
CPU时钟速度(GHz) | GPU时钟速度(MHz) | CPU平均温度(℃) | GPU平均温度(℃) | |
Prime95 + FurMark压力 | 2.1 | 1.4 | 85 | 71 |
Witcher 3 应力 | 3 GHz | 1.6 GHz | 71 | 71 |
发言人
对于17英寸的外形尺寸,扬声器的安静程度令人失望。虽然高频很好,但中音甚至低音至少仍是平均水平。一个3.5毫米格式的耳机接口可供模拟音频设备使用。
Acer Predator Helios 300 (i7-12700H, RTX 3070 Ti) audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (73.83 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 12.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 35% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 58% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 21% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 74% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti) audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.67 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 6.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 4% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 94% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
电源管理--大电池掩盖了高耗电。
消耗功率
相比之下,耗电量略高于竞争对手。至少在游戏时,Helios也以其良好的性能消耗了最多的电力。即使是同样速度的 矢量在玩《Witcher 3 》时也会少消耗大约30瓦的电量。
我们测量的短暂消费峰值为290瓦。在游戏时,消耗量约为230瓦。非常宽大但也很纤细的电源被指定为280瓦,所以它应该总是能够给笔记本电脑充电。
Idle | 15 / 20 / 22.3 Watt |
Load |
133 / 290 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Acer Predator Helios 300 (i7-12700H, RTX 3070 Ti) i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, IPS, 2560x1440, 17.3" | Acer Predator Helios 300 PH315-53-786B i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti) i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, IPS, 2560x1440, 17.3" | HP Omen 17-ck1075ng i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, WDC PC SN810 1TB, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3" | Aorus 17 XE4 i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3" | MSI Vector GP76 12UGS-434 i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFK, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3" | Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU | Average of class Gaming | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | 33% | 7% | 11% | -6% | -1% | 1% | 6% | |
Idle Minimum * | 15 | 4 73% | 14.4 4% | 12.2 19% | 20 -33% | 13.5 10% | 14.2 ? 5% | 13.5 ? 10% |
Idle Average * | 20 | 11 45% | 20 -0% | 18 10% | 23 -15% | 15.6 22% | 19.9 ? -0% | 18.9 ? 5% |
Idle Maximum * | 22.3 | 24 -8% | 21.5 4% | 19.4 13% | 28 -26% | 20.6 8% | 26.2 ? -17% | 26.7 ? -20% |
Load Average * | 133 | 91 32% | 119 11% | 128 4% | 120 10% | 198 -49% | 125.8 ? 5% | 106.6 ? 20% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 231 | 164 29% | 218 6% | 209 10% | 196 15% | 199 14% | ||
Load Maximum * | 290 | 220 24% | 248 14% | 266 8% | 257 11% | 319 -10% | 248 ? 14% | 249 ? 14% |
* ... smaller is better
Power Consumption The Witcher 3 / Stress Test
Power Consumption With External Monitor
电池寿命
宏碁在这里使用90瓦时的电池,所以除了Aorus之外,所有的竞争对手都使用较小的电池。
根据屏幕亮度的不同,电池可以持续5到6个小时的冲浪或大约6个小时的视频播放。在竞争对手中,只有惠普Omen在这里做得稍好,所以电池寿命还可以。另一方面,Blade 17 ,也以较小的电池(82Wh)实现了类似的电池寿命。
顺便说一下,由于标准模式和静音模式都没有将刷新率自动降至60赫兹,我们的电池测量是基于165赫兹的默认刷新率。
Acer Predator Helios 300 (i7-12700H, RTX 3070 Ti) i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, 90 Wh | Acer Predator Helios 300 PH315-53-786B i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, 58.75 Wh | Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti) i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, 82 Wh | HP Omen 17-ck1075ng i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, 78 Wh | Aorus 17 XE4 i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, 99 Wh | MSI Vector GP76 12UGS-434 i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, 65 Wh | Average of class Gaming | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 3% | -5% | 14% | -7% | -11% | 0% | |
H.264 | 354 | 406 15% | 295 -17% | 366 3% | 408 ? 15% | ||
WiFi v1.3 | 362 | 386 7% | 353 -2% | 371 2% | 308 -15% | 307 -15% | 376 ? 4% |
Load | 105 | 91 -13% | 108 3% | 131 25% | 94 -10% | 99 -6% | 85.3 ? -19% |
Reader / Idle | 633 | 532 | 513 | 440 | 565 ? | ||
Gaming | 62 |
Pros
Cons
判决--桀骜不驯的掠夺者
掠夺者很大、很重、很吵,但根据游戏玩家的说法,也提供了足够的性能。然而,良好的性能并不是全部,相当好的显示屏也让我们感到惊讶,它对DisplayP3色彩空间的覆盖率高达97%。它也能够战胜Blade 17的面板。
一台超频的游戏笔记本--或其用户--也不得不与我们上面提到的通常的缺点作斗争。另一方面,超频是可选的,那些喜欢更安静并能忍受每秒少几帧的人也可以切换到明显更温和的标准模式。那么Helios 300就不会比竞争对手的声音大了。
宏碁掠夺者Helios 300 PH317提供了良好的显示效果,甚至有两种超频模式,性能也相应强大。尽管这是在通常的缺点下实现的,但这些模式是可选的。
在竞争对手中, Razer Blade 17推荐自己。虽然它没有提供同样多的蛮横性能,但它也保持了相对安静和冷静。如果它必须是类似的高性能,你也可以看看 微星Vector,它在几乎类似的高性能下消耗的电量略少。
价格和可用性
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317可以在Acer商店配置,起价1250美元和亚马逊也列出了多种配置.
Acer Predator Helios 300 (i7-12700H, RTX 3070 Ti)
- 11/14/2022 v7 (old)
Christian Hintze