Honor 50 Lite评论。入门级的智能手机，拥有厚实的64MP摄像头
Honor 50 Lite是华为分拆后的第一款中档智能手机，尽管如此，它仍然与后者的 新星8i但它配备了所有谷歌服务，并且不受中美贸易战对华为施加的任何限制。
这款智能手机的标称价格略低于300欧元（约338美元），只在德国有售，配备6GB内存和128GB内部存储。
Possible contenders in comparison
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Drive | Size | Resolution | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 76.9 % v7 (old) | 02 / 2022 | Honor 50 Lite SD 662, Adreno 610 | 192 g | 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash | 6.67" | 2376x1080 | |
| 79.5 % v7 (old) | 12 / 2021 | Gigaset GS5 Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2 | 210 g | 128 GB eMMC Flash | 6.30" | 2340x1080 | |
| 81.5 % v7 (old) | 11 / 2021 | Motorola Edge 20 Lite Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3 | 185 g | 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash | 6.70" | 2400x1080 | |
| 85.9 % v7 (old) | 05 / 2021 | Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G SD 780G 5G, Adreno 642 | 159 g | 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | 6.55" | 2400x1080 |
外壳 -Honor 50 Lite的时尚色彩
Honor
50 Lite有共鸣的午夜黑（黑色）和深海蓝（蓝色）两种颜色。由于背面有大的中央摄像头驼峰，它在平面上不会来回晃动。金属框架为Honor 智能手机提供了某种质量，干净的做工也令人印象深刻。背部由塑料制成，但它看起来仍然很有质量。此外，对指纹的易感性也很有限。显示屏玻璃没有详细的规格，另外还有工厂贴的薄膜保护。
卡槽可以容纳两张nano SIM卡。没有特别的防尘或防水保护。
连接性 -Honor 没有microSD插槽的智能手机
Honor
50 Lite提供了一个体面的连接包。USB 2.0端口支持OTG。此外，还有一个音频插孔（3.5毫米），连接的耳机可作为FM接收器的天线。唯一缺少的是通过microSD卡扩展存储的选项。
软件 -Android 11与Magic UI 4.2
Honor 50 Lite搭载了Android 11和专有的Magic UI 4.2。在测试时，安全补丁是从2021年10月1日开始的，不再是最新的。Honor 还没有透露更新频率，也没有透露是否会更新到Android 12。但由于这款智能手机并没有出现在该公司的路线图上，情况看起来相当暗淡。
Honor 预装了一些第三方应用程序，但所有这些都可以卸载。然而，没有DRM认证，这意味着相应的受保护内容只能以SD质量消费。
通信和GNSS - 良好的定位和稳定的Wi-Fi
Honor
50 Lite可以使用Wi-Fi 5（IEEE 802.11a/b/g/n/ac），支持2.4和5.0 GHz网络。使用我们的Netgear Nighthawk AX12测试路由器的传输速率在两个方向上是恒定的，但不是特别高。Honor 智能手机最多可以通过LTE接入移动互联网 - 不支持5G。覆盖的频段范围包括德国最重要的频段，但也不多。
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G | |
| Gigaset GS5 | |
| Honor 50 Lite | |
| Motorola Edge 20 Lite | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G | |
| Gigaset GS5 | |
| Motorola Edge 20 Lite | |
| Honor 50 Lite | |
卫星在室外的固定速度相当快，但需要一段时间才能更精确地确定我们的位置。在室内也可以确定位置，但不是很精确。
Honor 50 Lite不得不面对与Garmin Venu 2的比较。Garmin Venu 2短暂的试驾过程中。虽然智能手表更加精确，但智能手机仍然提供了体面的定位。
电话和通话质量
Honor
50 Lite的通话质量相当好，但一旦加入背景噪音，用户的声音就会变得有点拘谨和鼻音。总的来说，环境噪音的抑制效果相当平庸。扬声器有轻微的混响，但它有一个体面的麦克风范围。这款智能手机有空间容纳两张纳米SIM卡，支持VoLTE和WLAN通话。
Honor 50 Lite的四机位设置应进行调整
Honor
50 Lite的前置摄像头并没有引起人们的热情。图片看起来很苍白，缺乏动态范围。锐度和细节精度也相当平庸。尽管有6400万像素，主摄像头也不太令人满意。色彩再现略微偏红，缺乏动态范围，精细的细节被捕捉到的方式略显冲淡。变焦时可以实现8倍的数字放大，但同样，Honor ，很难利用传感器的高分辨率。该装置由一个超广角镜头完成，其中的失真校正应该被停用，因为实际的直线边缘往往看起来是弯曲的。微距镜头和深度镜头是规格表上很好的附加功能，但不幸的是，它们不过如此。
视频只能以全高清分辨率和每秒30帧的速度录制。
Image Comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
Main cameraMain cameraUltra-wide angle5x zoomLow light
配件和保修 - 盒子里有强大的充电器
Honor 50 Lite有一个24个月的保修期，不能延长。除了智能手机之外，还包括一个66瓦的模块化电源适配器。制造商还提供了一条USB线，一个透明的硅保护壳，以及一个SIM卡工具。
输入设备和处理 - 指纹识别器集成在电源按钮中
Honor
50 Lite有一个电容式触摸屏，一次最多可以识别8次触摸。输入可以快速而准确地实现。所应用的保护膜的滑行性能很好，但不能与玻璃相比。集成在电源按钮上的指纹传感器负责安全。它能非常可靠地识别存储的指纹，而且速度足够快。另外，还有一个不太安全的面部识别系统，使用前置摄像头，而且速度更快。
显示器 - 无闪烁的60赫兹液晶显示器
Honor 50 Lite的LC显示屏尺寸为6.67英寸（16.94厘米），由于其全高清Plus分辨率，它具有很高的像素密度。考虑到价格范围，该面板的亮度很好，在有和没有传感器以及APL50测试中都是恒定的。
黑色水平相当好，可以实现强大的对比度。在均匀分布的亮区和暗区中，它只稍微增加到0.46cd/m²（对比度：1,044:1）。
较低的最低亮度，无闪烁的显示，以及可选的护眼模式，很好地完善了Honor 智能手机。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 92 %
Center on Battery: 477 cd/m²
Contrast: 1163:1 (Black: 0.41 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 3.2 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
98.2% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.14
| Honor 50 Lite TFT-LCD, 2376x1080, 6.7" | Gigaset GS5 IPS, 2340x1080, 6.3" | Motorola Edge 20 Lite AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.7" | Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.6" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | -59% | -21% | 17% | |
| Brightness middle | 477 | 513 8% | 420 -12% | 863 81% |
| Brightness | 456 | 517 13% | 428 -6% | 860 89% |
| Brightness Distribution | 92 | 93 1% | 89 -3% | 93 1% |
| Black Level * | 0.41 | 0.39 5% | ||
| Contrast | 1163 | 1315 13% | ||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2 | 7.2 -260% | 3.15 -58% | 3.2 -60% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 5.9 | 10.8 -83% | 7.1 -20% | 5.2 12% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 3.2 | 8.6 -169% | 4 -25% | 3.9 -22% |
| Gamma | 2.14 103% | 1.91 115% | 2.233 99% | 2.33 94% |
| CCT | 6525 100% | 8643 75% | 7413 88% | 7299 89% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
CalMAN的分析表明，图像开箱后非常酷。只有通过调整设置才能获得最自然的图像。为此，我们选择了正常配置文件，并将白平衡设置为标准。如果你决定将后者设置为暖色，你将受到轻微绿色色调的惩罚。然而，总的来说，该显示器可以相当准确地再现颜色和灰度。
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 16.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 5.2 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 11.6 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 35 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 40 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 18 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 22 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 57 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
Honor
50 Lite的显示屏在阴天仍然清晰可辨，但由于其亮度有限，在晴天会达到极限。视角的稳定性很好。在平坦的视角下，内容看起来比较温暖，面板看起来有点暗淡。然而，我们无法检测到任何屏幕出血或发光效果。
性能--Honor 50 Lite中的Snapdragon 662
Honor 50 Lite搭载的是略显过时的 骁龙662芯片，它有6GB的内存。系统速度还不错，但这里和那里都有卡顿，刷新率只有60赫兹，减缓了平滑滚动的速度。
与竞争对手相比，50 Lite配备了最慢的SoC，但由于使用了更快的UFS存储，其性能仍然令人满意。休闲游戏对于Honor 智能手机来说没有问题，但在要求更高的游戏中，有限的帧率和较低的细节水平需要考虑。
| GFXBench 3.1 | |
| on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| Honor 50 Lite | |
| Motorola Edge 20 Lite | |
| Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G | |
| Motorola Defy | |
| Oppo A74 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 (11 - 26, n=10) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (3.7 - 166, n=172, last 2 years) | |
| 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Honor 50 Lite | |
| Motorola Edge 20 Lite | |
| Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G | |
| Motorola Defy | |
| Oppo A74 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 (13 - 14, n=10) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (8.3 - 341, n=172, last 2 years) | |
| AImark - Score v2.x (sort by value) | |
| Honor 50 Lite | |
| Motorola Edge 20 Lite | |
| Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G | |
| Oppo A74 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 (4660 - 15832, n=7) | |
| CrossMark - Overall (sort by value) | |
| Honor 50 Lite | |
| Gigaset GS5 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 () | |
| Average of class Smartphone (187 - 2044, n=160, last 2 years) | |
| JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
| Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G (Chrome90) | |
| Motorola Edge 20 Lite (Chrome 94) | |
| Honor 50 Lite (Chrome 96) | |
| Motorola Defy (Chrome 93) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 (47.8 - 53.7, n=9) | |
| Oppo A74 (Chrome 91.0.4472.77) | |
| WebXPRT 3 - Overall | |
| Average of class Smartphone (38 - 347, n=79, last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G (Chrome90) | |
| Oppo A74 (Chrome 91.0.4472.77) | |
| Motorola Edge 20 Lite (Chrome 94) | |
| Motorola Defy (Chrome 93) | |
| Honor 50 Lite (Chrome 96) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 (51 - 59, n=11) | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score | |
| Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=205, last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G (Chrome90) | |
| Motorola Edge 20 Lite (Chrome 94) | |
| Honor 50 Lite (Chrome 96) | |
| Motorola Defy (Chrome 93) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 (8893 - 10247, n=14) | |
| Oppo A74 (Chrome 91.0.4472.77) | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 (3779 - 4650, n=11) | |
| Oppo A74 (Chrome 91.0.4472.77) | |
| Motorola Defy (Chrome 93) | |
| Honor 50 Lite (Chrome 96) | |
| Motorola Edge 20 Lite (Chrome 94) | |
| Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G (Chrome90) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=163, last 2 years) | |
* ... smaller is better
| Honor 50 Lite | Gigaset GS5 | Motorola Edge 20 Lite | Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G | Average 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | -10% | 75% | 129% | 3% | 310% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB | 492.5 | 319.8 -35% | 954 94% | 949 93% | 530 ? 8% | 1863 ? 278% |
| Sequential Write 256KB | 184.6 | 269 46% | 478.3 159% | 710 285% | 212 ? 15% | 1446 ? 683% |
| Random Read 4KB | 129.7 | 160.5 24% | 141.4 9% | 207.9 60% | 130.6 ? 1% | 278 ? 114% |
| Random Write 4KB | 117.7 | 31.37 -73% | 161.9 38% | 206.9 76% | 101.2 ? -14% | 309 ? 163% |
排放--体面的声音
温度
Honor 50 Lite的表面温度始终保持在无害的范围内，但在连续的负载下，智能手机会大幅升温。然而，即使在压力情况下，也无法检测到性能损失。
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 35.2 °C / 95 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 33.6 °C / 92 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 30.1 °C / 86 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
演讲者
Honor
50 Lite底部的单声道扬声器提供了良好的声音，适用于偶尔的视频、游戏、电话等。然而，对于长时间的多媒体播放，它在高音方面缺乏精确性，正如预期的那样，也缺乏深度。另外，还有一个非常好的音频插孔（SNR：97.79 dBFS）和用于无线传输的蓝牙。
Honor 50 Lite audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 33.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 6.5% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 32% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 59% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 52% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 40% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.3% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.5% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 27% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 65% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 47% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 46% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
电池寿命 -Honor 智能手机中的4,300毫安时
能源消耗
Honor
50 Lite的功耗在较高的亮度水平上特别高。这适用于最大亮度和我们的标准150cd/m²。由于强大的66瓦快速充电系统，4,300毫安时的电池可在50分钟内完全充电。
| Off / Standby |   0.08 / 0.18 Watt |
| Idle |  0.69 / 2.57 / 2.73 Watt |
| Load |
4.28 / 6.32 Watt |
    
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Honor 50 Lite 4300 mAh | Motorola Edge 20 Lite 5000 mAh | Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G 4250 mAh | Oppo A74 5000 mAh | Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 24% | 1% | 22% | -10% | -11% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 0.69 | 0.8 -16% | 0.83 -20% | 0.62 10% | 0.846 ? -23% | 0.885 ? -28% |
| Idle Average * | 2.57 | 1.2 53% | 1.92 25% | 1.59 38% | 2.51 ? 2% | 1.451 ? 44% |
| Idle Maximum * | 2.73 | 1.5 45% | 1.97 28% | 1.63 40% | 2.72 ? -0% | 1.608 ? 41% |
| Load Average * | 4.28 | 3.7 14% | 3.84 10% | 4.05 5% | 4.99 ? -17% | 6.55 ? -53% |
| Load Maximum * | 6.32 | 4.7 26% | 8.6 -36% | 5.2 18% | 7.16 ? -13% | 9.92 ? -57% |
* ... smaller is better
Energy consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)
Energy consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)
电池寿命
不仅是较小的电池，而且增加的功耗也不允许Honor 50 Lite在我们的比较领域中取得顶级的运行时间。尤其是Edge 20 Lite，尽管采用了90赫兹的显示屏，但其电池寿命要长得多。
尽管如此，Honor 手机总的来说提供了良好的电池寿命。
| Honor 50 Lite 4300 mAh | Gigaset GS5 4500 mAh | Motorola Edge 20 Lite 5000 mAh | Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G 4250 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 13% | 27% | -4% | |
| WiFi v1.3 | 767 | 868 13% | 972 27% | 734 -4% |
| Reader / Idle | 2163 | 1509 | ||
| H.264 | 1443 | 1248 | ||
| Load | 294 | 223 |
Pros
Cons
对Honor 50 Lite的评判
Honor 50 Lite今年仍然无法掩盖它的根基。尽管如此，它是一款成功的入门级智能手机，能以良好的LC显示屏、良好的电池寿命和66瓦的超快充电速度给人留下深刻印象。
Honor
50 Lite的价格略低于300欧元（约339美元），并不便宜，它将很难在竞争中立于不败之地。
6400万像素摄像头的成像性能有些令人失望。希望Honor ，通过更新来改善这个问题。说到更新，他们的发布政策还没有明确，甚至Android 12还不确定。
Honor 50 Lite的有力替代品是 摩托罗拉Edge 20 Lite或小米11 Lite 5G.由于较大的折扣Honor 50的兄弟姐妹机型往往更慷慨，所以绝对值得考虑多投资一些钱。
价格和可用性
在撰写本文时，你可以在Newegg上找到Honor 50 Lite。售价279.99美元。
Honor 50 Lite
- 01/31/2022 v7 (old)
Daniel Schmidt
Price comparison
