一款轻巧、高端耐用的平板电脑，配备环绕声和手写笔： Honor Pad V9 评测

Name: Honor Pad V9
Brand: Honor

迈出大步。

XXL 电池、144 Hz 显示屏和八个扬声器。凭借这些功能，11.5 英寸Honor Pad V9 的目标是撼动Android 的竞争格局，并将自己打造成新款入门级 iPad 的替代产品。甚至连翻盖和手写笔都包括在内。我们对这款设备进行了测试。
Manuel Masiero, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 04/05/2025 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
Android Tablet Touchscreen

Honor Pad V9 的评价

Honor Pad V9 的价格与新版Apple iPad 相近，但在某些方面，它提供了更多。我们所说的 "更多 "指的是 144 Hz 的显示屏、8 个扬声器和清晰可闻的低音，以及 256 GB 的存储容量，是最小 iPad 版本的两倍。这款中端平板电脑还配备了 10,100 毫安时电池，即使在高强度使用的情况下，也能轻松实现一到两天的续航时间。随机附送的触控笔和翻盖也给人留下了深刻印象。

Test device courtesy of Honor

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Honor Pad V9 仍不能完全替代Apple iPad。开箱即用的 IPS 显示屏校准效果太差，对比度低，导致图像乏善可陈。虽然摄像头性能不错，但成像质量一般（充其量），这也是造成成像质量不佳的原因--这不会让平板电脑赢得奥斯卡奖。Honor该平板电脑保守的更新政策也让潜在买家难以做出购买决定，因为你可能不应该期望操作系统升级超过一次。

Pros

+ 轻薄金属外壳

+ 144 赫兹

+ 支持手写笔

+ 快速存储

+ WiFi 6

+ 无 PWM

+ 强大的扬声器系统

+ 电池寿命长

Cons

- 无 GPS/移动选项

- 无指纹传感器

- 校准不佳的 IPS 显示屏

- 更新时间短

价格和供应情况

Honor 英国在线商店，配备 8/256 GB 存储空间的 Pad V9 售价 399 英镑。截稿时，该平板电脑尚未在比价网站上列出。

Honor Pad V9 的评价
规格
保护套 -Honor Pad V9 配备金属保护套
功能 - 只有一种欧盟存储版本，容量为 8/256 GB
软件 - 适用于 Pad V9 的Android 15 和 MagicOS 9.0
通信和 GNSS -Honor Pad 9 配备 WiFi 6
摄像头 -Honor Pad V9 配备 1300 万像素摄像头
附件和保修 - 包括触控笔和翻盖
输入设备和操作 - Pad V9 缺少指纹传感器
显示屏--坚固的 IPS 面板减轻了色彩弱点
性能 -Honor Pad V9 搭载联发科 Dimensity 8350
游戏 - 没有每秒 144 帧的痕迹
排放 - 配备 8 个扬声器的强大音响系统
电池寿命 - 保证长时间运行
Notebookcheck 总体评分

垫子 Honor Pad 9作为一款可靠的中端平板电脑通过了我们的测试。它的继任者拥有一个几乎相同的名字，旨在把一切做得更好：Honor Pad V9 配备了 WiFi 6 模块，电池容量从 8,300 mAh 增至 10,100 mAh，并采用了 144 Hz 显示屏，娱乐性更强。它还保留了手写笔支持和高级感等功能。不过，它仍然缺少电源适配器。

规格

Honor Pad V9

Processor

MediaTek Dimensity 8350 8 x 2.2 - 3.4 GHz, Cortex-A15 / A510

Graphics adapter

ARM Mali-G615 MP6

Memory

12 GB

, LPDDR5X

Display

11.50 inch 4.6:3, 2800 x 1840 pixel 291 PPI, capacitive touchscreen, native pen support, IPS, brightness up to 500 nits, 10 Bit color depth; HDR suppport: HDR10, HDR10+, HLG, glossy: yes, HDR, 144 Hz

Storage

256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash, 256 GB

, 232 GB free

Connections

1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: USB-C, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: Accelerometer, Gyroscope, OTG

Networking

802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.2

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 6.1 x 259.1 x 176.1

Battery

10100 mAh Lithium-Polymer

Charging

fast charging / Quickcharge

Operating System

Android 15

Camera

Primary Camera: 13 MPix (f/2.0)
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix (f/2.0)

Additional features

Speakers: 8 speakers, support for DTS X:Ultra, IMAX Enhanced, Hi-Res Audio, Spatial Audio, Keyboard: virtual, Honor Magic Pencil 3, Flip Cover, USB-C cable, quick start guide, warranty card, MagicOS 9.0, 24 Months Warranty, DRM Widevine L1, Camera2 API Level 3; Charging speed up to 35W; supported file systems for external USB drives: exFAT, NTFS , fanless

Weight

475 g

Price

500 Euro

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

保护套 -Honor Pad V9 配备金属保护套

Honor Pad V9 薄度仅为 6.1 毫米，重量仅为 475 克。这款 11.5 英寸的平板电脑手感舒适，质感上乘。尽管设计纤薄，但机身几乎不可能凹陷或扭曲。这款平板电脑没有 IP 认证，除了我们的灰色评测版本外，Honor 还提供白色外壳。

尺寸比较

OnePlus Pad 2 Huawei MatePad 11.5 S Honor Pad V9 Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro DIN A5 ❌

功能 - 只有一种欧盟存储版本，容量为 8/256 GB

Honor Pad V9 评论机配备了 12 GB 内存和 256 GB UFS 3.1 存储空间。但在欧洲，这款 11.5 英寸的中端平板电脑只有 8/256 GB 版本，Honor ，建议零售价为 399 英镑。内部存储无法扩展

Pad V9 的八个扬声器是一个明显的亮点，但 USB-C 端口则是标准配置。由于其 USB 2.0 的速度，在与测试固态硬盘（三星 980 Pro）的拷贝测试中，它的速度没有超过 38 MB/s。

右：扬声器、USB-C 2.0、扬声器（图片来源：Manuel Masiero）

软件 - 适用于 Pad V9 的Android 15 和 MagicOS 9.0

Pad V9 运行Android 15 和 MagicOS 9.0。Honor 通过人工智能增强了其平板电脑软件，但将其功能限制在最低限度。例如，你可以创建头像，将语音笔记和手写表格转换成文本。 Honor 文档 "还包括一个办公套件，打开的应用程序的分割视图方便了多任务处理。

Honor 关于Pad V9将在多长时间内接受安全更新和操作系统升级的信息，我们还没有提供。这可能与上一版本的 Honor Pad 9的情况类似，它可能会接受一次操作系统升级和三年的安全补丁。

可持续性

Honor Pad V9 没有提供任何有关可持续发展的信息，因此它在^二氧化碳排放量、使用可回收材料或可维修性方面的表现如何仍不确定。该公司没有提供备件或维修说明。不过，可以直接通过对平板电脑进行维修。Honor

通信和 GNSS -Honor Pad 9 配备 WiFi 6

Pad V9 配备了 Wi-Fi 6 无线模块，可以实现快速的 Wi-Fi 连接。连接到我们的参考路由器--华硕 ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000，该平板电脑实现了较高且相当稳定的传输速度，在同类设备中名列前茅。Pad V9 不支持 6 GHz 频段，而且Honor 也没有提供蜂窝版本的平板电脑。

Networking
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Honor Pad V9 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax	1051 (925^min - 1174^max) MBit/s
Huawei MatePad 11.5 S 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax	1015 (495^min - 1037^max) MBit/s -3%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro Wi-Fi 7	991 (512^min - 1016^max) MBit/s -6%
Average 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax (305 - 1757, n=133)	863 MBit/s -18%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax	795 (342^min - 895^max) MBit/s -24%
Average of class Tablet (10.5 - 1463, n=82, last 2 years)	526 MBit/s -50%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Honor Pad V9 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax	1336 (1285^min - 1399^max) MBit/s
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro Wi-Fi 7	895 (751^min - 988^max) MBit/s -33%
Huawei MatePad 11.5 S 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax	876 (737^min - 950^max) MBit/s -34%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax	847 (791^min - 876^max) MBit/s -37%
Average 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax (234 - 1696, n=131)	830 MBit/s -38%
Average of class Tablet (20.1 - 1705, n=82, last 2 years)	519 MBit/s -61%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
Average of class Tablet (666 - 1888, n=18, last 2 years)	1325 MBit/s
Average 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax (614 - 1902, n=21)	1256 MBit/s
OnePlus Pad 2 Wi-Fi 7	895 (675^min - 1017^max) MBit/s
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
OnePlus Pad 2 Wi-Fi 7	1652 (1472^min - 1703^max) MBit/s
Average of class Tablet (960 - 1842, n=18, last 2 years)	1431 MBit/s
Average 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax (743 - 1816, n=21)	1228 MBit/s

Honor Pad V9 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1051 (925-1174)

Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø795 (342-895)

Honor Pad V9 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1333 (1285-1399)

Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø847 (791-876)

摄像头 -Honor Pad V9 配备 1300 万像素摄像头

显示屏上方的边框中配备了一枚 800 万像素定焦自拍摄像头，光圈为 f/2.2。在足够明亮的环境光线下，它能拍摄出不错的照片，但不是特别清晰，而且总是有点噪点。不过，偶尔进行视频聊天时，图像质量还是足够的。

1300 万像素（f/2.2）主摄像头具有自动对焦功能，在日光下的表现也可以接受。不过，与自拍摄像头类似，它也有模糊的问题。虽然在实验室条件下，它的色彩值与目标值没有太大偏差，但其图像确实略带红色。在弱光条件下，主摄像头很快就会达到极限。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Daylight shot Daylight shot 5x zoom Lowlight shot

click to load images

Honor Pad V9

Canon EOS 90D

Samsung Galaxy A55

Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro Plus

click to load images

Honor Pad V9

Canon EOS 90D

Samsung Galaxy A55

Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro Plus

click to load images

Honor Pad V9

Canon EOS 90D

Samsung Galaxy A55

Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro Plus

click to load images

Honor Pad V9

Canon EOS 90D

Samsung Galaxy A55

Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro Plus

ColorChecker Honor Pad V9: 7.47 ∆E min: 2.55 - max: 14.21 ∆E

附件和保修 - 包括触控笔和翻盖

Pad V9 的包装盒包括Honor Magic Pencil 3 触控笔、翻盖和 USB-C 数据线。

Honor 在欧盟，Pad V9 享有 24 个月的保修服务。

输入设备和操作 - Pad V9 缺少指纹传感器

IPS 显示屏的最大刷新率为 144 Hz，可动态适应图像内容，显示效果非常流畅。测试时没有手写笔和翻盖。

生物识别认证可通过 2D 面部识别进行，在明亮的环境中也能可靠地工作。该平板电脑没有指纹传感器。

显示屏--坚固的 IPS 面板减轻了色彩弱点

11.5 英寸 IPS 面板的分辨率为 2,800 x 1,840 像素。它的平均亮度为 501 cd/m²，在显示 SDR 内容时最高可达 543 cd/m²（APL18：542 cd/m²，HDR：546 cd/m²），达到了相当高的亮度水平。不过，几款同类设备显示，更亮也是可能的。

IPS 面板不使用脉宽调制来控制亮度。


484 cd/m²	515 cd/m²	489 cd/m²
510 cd/m²	543 cd/m²	503 cd/m²
485 cd/m²	494 cd/m²	486 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3

Maximum: 543 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 501 cd/m² Minimum: 2.33 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 89 %
Center on Battery: 543 cd/m²
Contrast: 876:1 (Black: 0.62 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 12.4 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.88
ΔE Greyscale 12.1 | 0.5-98 Ø5.1
98.8% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 0.58

	Honor Pad V9 IPS, 2800x1840, 11.5"	Huawei MatePad 11.5 S TFT-LCD, 2800x1840, 11.5"	OnePlus Pad 2 IPS, 3000x2120, 12.1"	Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE TFT-LCD, 2304x1440, 10.9"	Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro IPS, 3200x2136, 11.2"
Screen		7%	59%	39%	49%
Brightness middle	543	511 -6%	833 53%	694 28%	776 43%
Brightness	501	449 -10%	771 54%	695 39%	750 50%
Brightness Distribution	89	83 -7%	84 -6%	88 -1%	91 2%
Black Level *	0.62	0.99 -60%	0.45 27%	0.66 -6%	0.58 6%
Contrast	876	516 -41%	1851 111%	1052 20%	1338 53%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	12.4	3.6 71%	1.79 86%	2.1 83%	1.6 87%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	15.9	7.5 53%	4.01 75%	4.3 73%	4.5 72%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	12.1	5.5 55%	3 75%	3.3 73%	2.5 79%
Gamma	0.58 ^379%	2.27 ^97%	2.254 ^98%	2.26 ^97%	2.23 ^99%
CCT	6175 ^105%	7566 ^86%	6419 ^101%	7010 ^93%	6892 ^94%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8527 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

IPS 面板在色彩还原方面令人失望。在下图所示的屏幕设置下，它最接近理想值（Delta E < 3），但平均 Delta E 为 12，仍然完全达不到要求。不过，在日常使用中，这并不像因 876:1 对比度而导致的相对较淡的色彩还原那么明显。

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
16.11 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 4.367 ms rise
16.11 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 11.74 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 35 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.8 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
36.92 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 14.25 ms rise
36.92 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 22.67 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 50 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.5 ms).

IPS 面板视角稳定，在室外表现良好。它对阳光的保护作用很小，但在阴凉处，其亮度足以清晰显示内容。

性能 -Honor Pad V9 搭载联发科 Dimensity 8350

凭借其联发科 Dimensity 8350Honor Pad V9 是同价位最强大的平板电脑之一。然而，在合成基准测试和一些浏览器测试中，小米Pad 7 Pro的性能并不尽如人意。小米 Pad 7 Pro配备了骁龙8代3，甚至更快。

Geekbench 6.4
Single-Core
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288	1973 Points +45%
Honor Pad V9 MediaTek Dimensity 8350, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288	1359 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8350 (n=1)	1359 Points 0%
Huawei MatePad 11.5 S HiSilicon Kirin 9000W, Maleoon 910, 8192	1245 Points -8%
Average of class Tablet (185 - 3715, n=80, last 2 years)	1139 Points -16%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 0	1011 Points -26%
OnePlus Pad 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288	954 Points -30%
Multi-Core
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288	5127 Points +24%
OnePlus Pad 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288	4564 Points +11%
Honor Pad V9 MediaTek Dimensity 8350, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288	4119 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8350 (n=1)	4119 Points 0%
Huawei MatePad 11.5 S HiSilicon Kirin 9000W, Maleoon 910, 8192	3989 Points -3%
Average of class Tablet (493 - 14690, n=80, last 2 years)	3686 Points -11%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 0	2858 Points -31%

Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288	1403 Points +37%
Honor Pad V9 MediaTek Dimensity 8350, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288	1026 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8350 (n=1)	1026 Points 0%
Huawei MatePad 11.5 S HiSilicon Kirin 9000W, Maleoon 910, 8192	965 Points -6%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 0	778 Points -24%
Average of class Tablet (103 - 2224, n=71, last 2 years)	738 Points -28%
Multi-Core
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288	4602 Points +27%
Huawei MatePad 11.5 S HiSilicon Kirin 9000W, Maleoon 910, 8192	3694 Points +2%
Honor Pad V9 MediaTek Dimensity 8350, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288	3635 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8350 (n=1)	3635 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 0	2728 Points -25%
Average of class Tablet (303 - 10522, n=71, last 2 years)	2724 Points -25%

Antutu v10 - Total Score
Honor Pad V9 MediaTek Dimensity 8350, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288	1133809 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8350 (n=1)	1133809 Points 0%
Average of class Tablet (164396 - 2716980, n=46, last 2 years)	837925 Points -26%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 0	573936 Points -49%
Huawei MatePad 11.5 S HiSilicon Kirin 9000W, Maleoon 910, 8192	Points -100%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288	Points -100%

PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Honor Pad V9 MediaTek Dimensity 8350, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288	17996 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8350 (n=1)	17996 Points 0%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288	15743 Points -13%
OnePlus Pad 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288	12156 Points -32%
Huawei MatePad 11.5 S HiSilicon Kirin 9000W, Maleoon 910, 8192	11872 Points -34%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 0	11259 Points -37%
Average of class Tablet (3195 - 20841, n=73, last 2 years)	10344 Points -43%

BaseMark OS II
Overall
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288	8895 Points +7%
Honor Pad V9 MediaTek Dimensity 8350, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288	8279 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8350 (n=1)	8279 Points 0%
Huawei MatePad 11.5 S HiSilicon Kirin 9000W, Maleoon 910, 8192	6401 Points -23%
Average of class Tablet (195 - 11721, n=58, last 2 years)	4428 Points -47%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 0	4424 Points -47%
System
Honor Pad V9 MediaTek Dimensity 8350, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288	11001 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8350 (n=1)	11001 Points 0%
Huawei MatePad 11.5 S HiSilicon Kirin 9000W, Maleoon 910, 8192	10447 Points -5%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288	9937 Points -10%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 0	9016 Points -18%
Average of class Tablet (904 - 16435, n=58, last 2 years)	7433 Points -32%
Memory
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288	12938 Points +33%
Honor Pad V9 MediaTek Dimensity 8350, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288	9693 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8350 (n=1)	9693 Points 0%
Huawei MatePad 11.5 S HiSilicon Kirin 9000W, Maleoon 910, 8192	8362 Points -14%
Average of class Tablet (401 - 12938, n=58, last 2 years)	5160 Points -47%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 0	4486 Points -54%
Graphics
Honor Pad V9 MediaTek Dimensity 8350, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288	28497 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8350 (n=1)	28497 Points 0%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288	24738 Points -13%
Huawei MatePad 11.5 S HiSilicon Kirin 9000W, Maleoon 910, 8192	12763 Points -55%
Average of class Tablet (418 - 57192, n=58, last 2 years)	10121 Points -64%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 0	7031 Points -75%
Web
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288	1928 Points +25%
Honor Pad V9 MediaTek Dimensity 8350, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288	1546 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8350 (n=1)	1546 Points 0%
Huawei MatePad 11.5 S HiSilicon Kirin 9000W, Maleoon 910, 8192	1532 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 0	1347 Points -13%
Average of class Tablet (10 - 2056, n=58, last 2 years)	1296 Points -16%

UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Honor Pad V9 MediaTek Dimensity 8350, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288	58543 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8350 (n=1)	58543 Points 0%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288	14738 Points -75%
Average of class Tablet (2597 - 74821, n=56, last 2 years)	12050 Points -79%
Huawei MatePad 11.5 S HiSilicon Kirin 9000W, Maleoon 910, 8192	10847 Points -81%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 0	6110 Points -90%

AImark - Score v3.x
Honor Pad V9 MediaTek Dimensity 8350, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288	35706 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8350 (n=1)	35706 Points 0%
Average of class Tablet (84 - 156427, n=50, last 2 years)	7432 Points -79%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288	1192 Points -97%
Huawei MatePad 11.5 S HiSilicon Kirin 9000W, Maleoon 910, 8192	738 Points -98%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 0	636 Points -98%

Geekbench AI
Single Precision TensorFlow NNAPI 1.2
Honor Pad V9 MediaTek Dimensity 8350, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288	1140 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8350 (n=1)	1140 Points 0%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288	473 Points -59%
Average of class Tablet (85 - 1140, n=8, last 2 years)	453 Points -60%
Half Precision TensorFlow NNAPI 1.2
Honor Pad V9 MediaTek Dimensity 8350, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288	4545 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8350 (n=1)	4545 Points 0%
Average of class Tablet (84 - 4545, n=8, last 2 years)	1275 Points -72%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288	466 Points -90%
Quantized TensorFlow NNAPI 1.2
Honor Pad V9 MediaTek Dimensity 8350, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288	4532 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8350 (n=1)	4532 Points 0%
Average of class Tablet (130 - 4532, n=8, last 2 years)	1454 Points -68%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288	1082 Points -76%

AI Benchmark
Score V5
Average of class Tablet (101 - 8305, n=6, last 2 years)	2251 Points +96%
Honor Pad V9 MediaTek Dimensity 8350, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288	1148 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8350 (n=1)	1148 Points 0%
Huawei MatePad 11.5 S HiSilicon Kirin 9000W, Maleoon 910, 8192	101 Points -91%
Score V6
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288	3686 Points +244%
Average of class Tablet (99.7 - 7341, n=7, last 2 years)	1950 Points +82%
Honor Pad V9 MediaTek Dimensity 8350, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288	1070 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8350 (n=1)	1070 Points 0%

在图形测试中，Pad V9 的 ARM Mali G615 MP6也不得不向 OnePlus Pad 2 的 Adreno 750.在 GFXBench 屏幕测试中，Pad V9 无法展示其 144 Hz 的屏幕，因为基准测试将其限制为 60fps。

3DMark: Wild Life Extreme Unlimited | Wild Life Extreme | Wild Life Unlimited Score | Solar Bay Score | Solar Bay Unlimited Score | Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score | Steel Nomad Light Score | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7: T-Rex Onscreen | 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
GFXBench 3.0: on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
GFXBench 3.1: on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
GFXBench: on screen Car Chase Onscreen | 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | 3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
OnePlus Pad 2 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	4454 Points +72%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	3283 Points +27%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	3001 Points +16%
Honor Pad V9 Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	2594 Points
Huawei MatePad 11.5 S Maleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1018 Points -61%

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
OnePlus Pad 2 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	4485 Points +69%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	3201 Points +21%
Honor Pad V9 Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	2649 Points
Huawei MatePad 11.5 S Maleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	994 Points -62%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	838 Points -68%

3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	12074 Points +24%
Honor Pad V9 Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	9759 Points
Huawei MatePad 11.5 S Maleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	3802 Points -61%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2987 Points -69%

3DMark / Solar Bay Score
OnePlus Pad 2 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	8315 Points +75%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	5212 Points +10%
Honor Pad V9 Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	4738 Points

3DMark / Solar Bay Unlimited Score
OnePlus Pad 2 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	8321 Points +80%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	5182 Points +12%
Honor Pad V9 Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	4613 Points

3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score
OnePlus Pad 2 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1626 Points +49%
Honor Pad V9 Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1093 Points
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	1075 Points -2%

3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Score
OnePlus Pad 2 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1639 Points +44%
Honor Pad V9 Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1137 Points
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	1098 Points -3%
Huawei MatePad 11.5 S Maleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	Points -100%

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
OnePlus Pad 2 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	7196 Points +52%
Huawei MatePad 11.5 S Maleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	4731 Points 0%
Honor Pad V9 Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	4728 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	4369 Points -8%

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
OnePlus Pad 2 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	28816 Points +86%
Honor Pad V9 Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	15484 Points
Huawei MatePad 11.5 S Maleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	6584 Points -57%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	5233 Points -66%

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
OnePlus Pad 2 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	17279 Points +68%
Honor Pad V9 Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	10285 Points
Huawei MatePad 11.5 S Maleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	6005 Points -42%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	5013 Points -51%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	120 fps +100%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	82 fps +37%
Huawei MatePad 11.5 S Maleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	60 fps 0%
Honor Pad V9 Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	60 fps

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	449 fps +20%
Honor Pad V9 Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	375 fps
Huawei MatePad 11.5 S Maleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	256 fps -32%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	120 fps -68%

GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	109 fps +82%
Honor Pad V9 Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	60 fps
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	58 fps -3%
Huawei MatePad 11.5 S Maleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	56 fps -7%

GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	267 fps +77%
Huawei MatePad 11.5 S Maleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	155 fps +3%
Honor Pad V9 Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	151 fps
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	79 fps -48%

GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Honor Pad V9 Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	59 fps
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	58 fps -2%
Huawei MatePad 11.5 S Maleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	40 fps -32%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	35 fps -41%

GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	183 fps +58%
Honor Pad V9 Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	116 fps
Huawei MatePad 11.5 S Maleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	106 fps -9%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	53 fps -54%

GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Honor Pad V9 Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	44 fps
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	35 fps -20%
Huawei MatePad 11.5 S Maleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	22 fps -50%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	21 fps -52%

GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	109 fps +28%
Honor Pad V9 Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	85 fps
Huawei MatePad 11.5 S Maleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	48 fps -44%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	31 fps -64%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
OnePlus Pad 2 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	42 fps +27%
Honor Pad V9 Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	33 fps
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	30 fps -9%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	16 fps -52%
Huawei MatePad 11.5 S Maleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	16 fps -52%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
OnePlus Pad 2 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	69 fps +53%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	53 fps +18%
Honor Pad V9 Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	45 fps
Huawei MatePad 11.5 S Maleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	23 fps -49%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	14 fps -69%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Honor Pad V9 Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	51 fps
OnePlus Pad 2 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	50 fps -2%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	46 fps -10%
Huawei MatePad 11.5 S Maleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	28 fps -45%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	24 fps -53%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
OnePlus Pad 2 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	170 fps +47%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	145 fps +25%
Honor Pad V9 Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	116 fps
Huawei MatePad 11.5 S Maleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	64 fps -45%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	35 fps -70%

GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
OnePlus Pad 2 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	32 fps +60%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	24 fps +20%
Honor Pad V9 Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	20 fps
Huawei MatePad 11.5 S Maleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	10 fps -50%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	6 fps -70%

Jetstream 2 - 2.0 Total Score
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro (Chrome 132)	195.343 Points +41%
Honor Pad V9 (Chrome 134.0.6998.96)	138.702 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8350 (n=1)	138.7 Points 0%
Average of class Tablet (19.9 - 334, n=68, last 2 years)	119.2 Points -14%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE (Chrome 119)	102.6 Points -26%
Huawei MatePad 11.5 S (Huawei Browser V14)	89.474 Points -35%

Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Honor Pad V9	192 runs/min
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8350 (n=1)	192 runs/min 0%
Average of class Tablet (2.59 - 572, n=62, last 2 years)	147.9 runs/min -23%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE (Chrome 119)	80.1 runs/min -58%
Huawei MatePad 11.5 S (Huawei Browser V14)	62.7 runs/min -67%

Speedometer 3.0 - Score
Average of class Tablet (1.25 - 34.4, n=36, last 2 years)	13.2 runs/min +7%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro (Chrome 132)	12.3 runs/min 0%
Honor Pad V9	12.3 runs/min
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8350 (n=1)	12.3 runs/min 0%
Huawei MatePad 11.5 S (Huawei Browser V14)	3.11 runs/min -75%

WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro (Chrome 132)	155 Points +5%
Honor Pad V9 (Chrome 134.0.6998.96)	148 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8350 (n=1)	148 Points 0%
Average of class Tablet (21 - 315, n=66, last 2 years)	111.1 Points -25%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE (Chrome 119)	107 Points -28%
Huawei MatePad 11.5 S (Huawei Browser V14)	85 Points -43%

Octane V2 - Total Score
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro (Chrome 132)	65712 Points +34%
Honor Pad V9 (Chrome 134.0.6998.96)	49086 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8350 (n=1)	49086 Points 0%
OnePlus Pad 2 (Chrome 128)	45083 Points -8%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE (Chrome 119)	34739 Points -29%
Huawei MatePad 11.5 S (Huawei Browser V14)	32134 Points -35%
Average of class Tablet (763 - 105178, n=89, last 2 years)	32105 Points -35%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Average of class Tablet (319 - 34733, n=75, last 2 years)	3615 ms * -327%
Huawei MatePad 11.5 S (Huawei Browser V14)	1243.7 ms * -47%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE (Chrome 119)	1208.7 ms * -43%
Honor Pad V9 (Chrome 134.0.6998.96)	847.4 ms *
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8350 (n=1)	847 ms * -0%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro (Chrome 132)	654.56 ms * +23%

* ... smaller is better

	Honor Pad V9	Huawei MatePad 11.5 S	OnePlus Pad 2	Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE	Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro	Average 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	Average of class Tablet
AndroBench 3-5		-4%	-10%	-69%	40%	-20%	-47%
Sequential Read 256KB	1921.68	1837.4 -4%	2003.1 4%	526.65 -73%	3849.52 100%	1743 ?(950 - 2037, n=103) -9%	1156 ?(126.9 - 3912, n=74, last 2 years) -40%
Sequential Write 256KB	1767.43	1134.93 -36%	1732.7 -2%	282.47 -84%	3283.91 86%	1165 ?(452 - 2004, n=103) -34%	799 ?(78.2 - 3299, n=74, last 2 years) -55%
Random Read 4KB	343.96	334.71 -3%	236.5 -31%	225.02 -35%	302.34 -12%	286 ?(173.5 - 543, n=103) -17%	198.8 ?(18.4 - 474, n=74, last 2 years) -42%
Random Write 4KB	396.64	498.29 26%	348.6 -12%	68.78 -83%	346.85 -13%	319 ?(132.1 - 499, n=104) -20%	201 ?(8.23 - 668, n=74, last 2 years) -49%

游戏 - 没有每秒 144 帧的痕迹

我们使用Gamebench 测得的帧频显示，《源氏冲击》和《PUBG Mobile》等当前游戏在 Pad V9 上的可玩性非常高，即使在高细节级别下也是如此。不过，这款平板电脑在以最高可显示 144fps 的速度运行游戏时还有一定差距。在我们选择的少量游戏中，60fps 是我们所能达到的最佳速度。

Honor Pad V9; Asphalt 9: Legends; 24.4.0h: Ø59.7 (54-60)

Honor Pad V9; Genshin Impact; lowest 120 fps; 5.4.0_30057195_30231699: Ø60 (58-60)

Honor Pad V9; Genshin Impact; highest 120 fps; 5.4.0_30057195_30231699: Ø59.3 (52-60)

Honor Pad V9; PUBG Mobile; Smooth; 3.7.0: Ø60 (60-60)

Honor Pad V9; PUBG Mobile; HD; 3.7.0: Ø59.5 (43-60)

Honor Pad V9; PUBG Mobile; Ultra HD; 3.7.0: Ø39.8 (30-41)

排放 - 配备 8 个扬声器的强大音响系统

温度

Pad V9 在日常使用中保持凉爽。平板电脑的最高温度为 38.4°C，在负载情况下表面温度会略有升高，但几乎不会比温水更热。在 3DMark 压力测试中，它给我们留下了深刻印象，尽管在所有测试场景中，第一次运行后都会出现节流现象。不过，每次的结果都比较适中。

Max. Load

Idle


33.5 °C	38.1 °C	37.6 °C
34.6 °C	31.5 °C	32.7 °C
33.5 °C	30.3 °C	31.1 °C

Maximum: 38.1 °C
Average: 33.7 °C


37.9 °C	38.4 °C	32.4 °C
33.1 °C	33.3 °C	31.6 °C
29.6 °C	29.8 °C	30.9 °C

Maximum: 38.4 °C
Average: 33 °C

Power Supply (max.) 31.3 °C | Room Temperature 22 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 33.7 °C / 93 F, compared to the average of 30 °C / 86 F for the devices in the class Tablet.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 38.1 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 33.7 °C / 93 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 38.4 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 31.1 °C / 88 F, compared to the device average of 30 °C / 86 F.

3DMark Steel Nomad stress test

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Huawei MatePad 11.5 S Maleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	99.2 % +13%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	98.4 % +12%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	88.7 % +1%
Honor Pad V9 Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	87.7 %
OnePlus Pad 2 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	77 % -12%
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	99.3 % +17%
Huawei MatePad 11.5 S Maleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	99 % +17%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	89.8 % +6%
Honor Pad V9 Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	84.7 %
OnePlus Pad 2 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	83.8 % -1%
Solar Bay Stress Test Stability
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	95.7 % +18%
OnePlus Pad 2 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	86.9 % +7%
Honor Pad V9 Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	81.3 %
Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	97.1 % +9%
Honor Pad V9 Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	89 %
OnePlus Pad 2 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	86.5 % -3%

Honor Pad V9 Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø14.4 (13.9-16.4)

Huawei MatePad 11.5 S Maleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø6.29 (6.26-6.32)

OnePlus Pad 2 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø24.1 (22.9-27.4)

Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø5.05 (5.03-5.07)

Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø18 (17.6-19.6)

Honor Pad V9 Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø50.5 (49.2-56.2)

Huawei MatePad 11.5 S Maleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø23.6 (23.5-23.7)

OnePlus Pad 2 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø78.9 (74-96)

Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø17.7 (17.6-17.9)

Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø65 (63.4-71.5)

Honor Pad V9 Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø50.6 (48.5-58.9)

Huawei MatePad 11.5 S Maleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø22.7 (22.6-22.7)

Honor Pad V9 Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Solar Bay Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 1.0.11.1: Ø13.6 (13.4-14.6)

Honor Pad V9 Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.11.1: Ø13.7 (12-14.8)

OnePlus Pad 2 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.5: Ø23.2 (22.2-25.5)

Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.11.1: Ø16.4 (16.2-16.9)

Honor Pad V9 Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.1.1.3: Ø7.35 (7.17-8.06)

OnePlus Pad 2 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.1.1.3: Ø11.1 (10.6-12.3)

Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.1.1.3: Ø7.81 (7.7-7.93)

发言人

Pad V9 有八个扬声器，能够提供强大的音频系统。我们测得中高音的频率响应相对线性，声音甚至包括低音--这在这个价位的产品中并不多见。外部音频设备可通过 USB-C 和蓝牙 5.2 连接。支持的蓝牙编解码器有 SBC、AAC、LDAC、aptX 和 aptX HD。

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Honor Pad V9 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 10.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.7% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.7% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (11.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 12% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 83% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 7% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 91% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (12.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 17% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 77% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 10% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 87% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

电池寿命 - 保证长时间运行

耗电量

Pad V9 的能耗要求在很大程度上并不明显。不过，在负载情况下，功耗有时会大幅上升。

Honor 平板电脑的 10,100 毫安时电池充电功率可达 35 瓦。在我们的测试中，制造商为我们提供了一个 35 瓦的电源适配器（Honor SuperCharge HN-110320E00），可在 2 小时 10 分钟内为 Pad V9 充满电。

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.11 / 0.14 Watt
Idle	1.26 / 5.57 / 5.61 Watt
Load	12 / 13.36 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Honor Pad V9 10100 mAh	Huawei MatePad 11.5 S 8800 mAh	Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE 8000 mAh	Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro 8850 mAh	Average MediaTek Dimensity 8350	Average of class Tablet
Power Consumption		11%	-0%	39%	0%	10%
Idle Minimum *	1.26	1.53 -21%	1.13 10%	0.75 40%	1.26 ?(n=1) -0%	1.703 ?(0.63 - 4.66, n=67, last 2 years) -35%
Idle Average *	5.57	5.96 -7%	4.81 14%	1.5 73%	5.57 ?(n=1) -0%	3.72 ?(1 - 9.2, n=67, last 2 years) 33%
Idle Maximum *	5.61	6.07 -8%	4.89 13%	1.56 72%	5.61 ?(n=1) -0%	4.21 ?(1.3 - 15.3, n=67, last 2 years) 25%
Load Average *	12	6.87 43%	15.02 -25%	7.92 34%	12 ?(n=1) -0%	9.19 ?(2.5 - 34.3, n=67, last 2 years) 23%
Load Maximum *	13.36	6.88 49%	15.22 -14%	16.5 -24%	13.4 ?(n=1) -0%	12.9 ?(3.9 - 46.7, n=67, last 2 years) 3%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

Honor Pad V9 MediaTek Dimensity 8350; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø7.1 (2.36-13.2)

Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE Samsung Exynos 1380; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø6.76 (2.38-11.7)

Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø6.02 (1.025-12.7)

Honor Pad V9 MediaTek Dimensity 8350; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø2.44 (2.41-2.52)

Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE Samsung Exynos 1380; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø2.29 (2.22-2.76)

Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.781 (0.697-1.46)

Power consumption: GFXbench (150 cd/m²)

Honor Pad V9 MediaTek Dimensity 8350; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø10.7 (9.39-12.8)

Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE Samsung Exynos 1380; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø5.4 (4.89-6.13)

Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø11.9 (11.3-12.5)

Honor Pad V9 MediaTek Dimensity 8350; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø2.44 (2.41-2.52)

Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE Samsung Exynos 1380; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø2.29 (2.22-2.76)

Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.781 (0.697-1.46)

电池运行时间

Pad V9 的大容量电池为其出色的续航时间立下了汗马功劳。在 Wi-Fi 测试中，这款平板电脑的续航时间接近 18 小时，甚至超过了非常节能的小米 Pad 7 Pro，尽管它的电池容量较小，但运行时间几乎一样长。然而 Honor Pad 9的前身在Wi-Fi测试中只用了11个小时就停止工作了。

Battery Runtime


WiFi Websurfing		17h 54min

Battery Runtime - WiFi v1.3
Honor Pad V9 10100 mAh	1074 min
Huawei MatePad 11.5 S 8800 mAh	831 min
OnePlus Pad 2 9510 mAh	866 min
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE 8000 mAh	872 min
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro 8850 mAh	1054 min

Notebookcheck 总体评分

Honor Pad 9 重量轻、质量高，其强大的环绕声、手写笔和超长的电池续航时间为它加分不少。不过，144 Hz IPS 显示屏的色彩还原能力较差，而且几乎没有更新。

Back to the verdict

Honor Pad V9 - 03/28/2025 v8
Manuel Masiero

Chassis

82 / 98 → 84%

Keyboard

70 / 80 → 87%

Pointing Device

88%

Connectivity

41 / 69 → 59%

Weight

84 / 40-88 → 91%

Battery

91%

Display

73%

Games Performance

36 / 65 → 55%

Application Performance

69 / 92 → 75%

AI Performance

69%

Temperature

91%

Noise

100%

Audio

83 / 91 → 91%

Camera

59 / 90 → 65%

Average

62%

82%

Tablet - Weighted Average

CO2 Emissions
No Data

Materials
0%

Packaging
50%

Power Use
95%

Repairability
40%

Software Updates
39%

Total Sustainability Score: 37.3%

Possible alternatives compared

Image	Model / Review	Price	Weight	Drive	Display
1. 82.2%	Honor Pad V9 MediaTek Dimensity 8350 ⎘ ARM Mali-G615 MP6 ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 256 GB	Amazon: 1. $12.95 Mr.Shield Screen Protector c... 2. $12.98 YIMASE Compatible with Honor... 3. $15.88 HYUScase Case for Honor Pad ... List Price: 500€	475 g	256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	11.50" 2800x1840 291 PPI IPS
2. 81.1%	Huawei MatePad 11.5 S HiSilicon Kirin 9000W ⎘ HiSilicon Maleoon 910 ⎘ 8 GB Memory, 256 GB	Amazon: 1. $10.95 Mr.Shield Screen Protector c... 2. $27.88 Compatible for Huawei MatePa... 3. $22.49 Bruni Screen Protector compa... List Price: 399€	510 g	256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	11.50" 2800x1840 291 PPI TFT-LCD
3. 86.1%	OnePlus Pad 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 750 ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 256 GB	Amazon: $549.99 List Price: 549€	584 g	256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	12.10" 3000x2120 304 PPI IPS
4. 86.8% ^{v7 (old)}	Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE Samsung Exynos 1380 ⎘ ARM Mali-G68 MP5 ⎘ , 128 GB UFS 2.1	Amazon: 1. $519.99 Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE+ 12... 2. $415.89 SAMSUNG Galaxy Tab S9 FE w/S... 3. $419.89 Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE (SM... List Price: 529€	524 g	128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	10.90" 2304x1440 249 PPI TFT-LCD
5. 86.5%	Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 735 ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 256 GB	Amazon: 1. $504.99 Xiaomi Pad 7 Ai WiFi Version... 2. $299.50 Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro WiFi Ve... 3. $249.50 Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro WiFi Ve... List Price: 450€	500 g	256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	11.20" 3200x2136 344 PPI IPS

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.