Notebookcheck Logo
Honor Pad V9 (image source: Daniel Schmidt)

一款轻巧、高端耐用的平板电脑，配备环绕声和手写笔： Honor Pad V9 评测

迈出大步。

XXL 电池、144 Hz 显示屏和八个扬声器。凭借这些功能，11.5 英寸Honor Pad V9 的目标是撼动Android 的竞争格局，并将自己打造成新款入门级 iPad 的替代产品。甚至连翻盖和手写笔都包括在内。我们对这款设备进行了测试。
Manuel Masiero, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
Android Tablet Touchscreen

Honor Pad V9 的评价

Honor Pad V9 的价格与新版Apple iPad 相近，但在某些方面，它提供了更多。我们所说的 "更多 "指的是 144 Hz 的显示屏、8 个扬声器和清晰可闻的低音，以及 256 GB 的存储容量，是最小 iPad 版本的两倍。这款中端平板电脑还配备了 10,100 毫安时电池，即使在高强度使用的情况下，也能轻松实现一到两天的续航时间。随机附送的触控笔和翻盖也给人留下了深刻印象。

Honor Pad V9 仍不能完全替代Apple iPad。开箱即用的 IPS 显示屏校准效果太差，对比度低，导致图像乏善可陈。虽然摄像头性能不错，但成像质量一般（充其量），这也是造成成像质量不佳的原因--这不会让平板电脑赢得奥斯卡奖。Honor该平板电脑保守的更新政策也让潜在买家难以做出购买决定，因为你可能不应该期望操作系统升级超过一次。

Pros

+ 轻薄金属外壳
+ 144 赫兹
+ 支持手写笔
+ 快速存储
+ WiFi 6
+ 无 PWM
+ 强大的扬声器系统
+ 电池寿命长

Cons

- 无 GPS/移动选项
- 无指纹传感器
- 校准不佳的 IPS 显示屏
- 更新时间短

价格和供应情况

Honor 英国在线商店，配备 8/256 GB 存储空间的 Pad V9 售价 399 英镑。截稿时，该平板电脑尚未在比价网站上列出。

垫子 Honor Pad 9作为一款可靠的中端平板电脑通过了我们的测试。它的继任者拥有一个几乎相同的名字，旨在把一切做得更好：Honor Pad V9 配备了 WiFi 6 模块，电池容量从 8,300 mAh 增至 10,100 mAh，并采用了 144 Hz 显示屏，娱乐性更强。它还保留了手写笔支持和高级感等功能。不过，它仍然缺少电源适配器。

规格

Honor Pad V9
Processor
MediaTek Dimensity 8350 8 x 2.2 - 3.4 GHz, Cortex-A15 / A510
Graphics adapter
ARM Mali-G615 MP6
Memory
12 GB 
, LPDDR5X
Display
11.50 inch 4.6:3, 2800 x 1840 pixel 291 PPI, capacitive touchscreen, native pen support, IPS, brightness up to 500 nits, 10 Bit color depth; HDR suppport: HDR10, HDR10+, HLG, glossy: yes, HDR, 144 Hz
Storage
256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash, 256 GB 
, 232 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: USB-C, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: Accelerometer, Gyroscope, OTG
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.2
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 6.1 x 259.1 x 176.1
Battery
10100 mAh Lithium-Polymer
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 15
Camera
Primary Camera: 13 MPix (f/2.0)
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix (f/2.0)
Additional features
Speakers: 8 speakers, support for DTS X:Ultra, IMAX Enhanced, Hi-Res Audio, Spatial Audio, Keyboard: virtual, Honor Magic Pencil 3, Flip Cover, USB-C cable, quick start guide, warranty card, MagicOS 9.0, 24 Months Warranty, DRM Widevine L1, Camera2 API Level 3; Charging speed up to 35W; supported file systems for external USB drives: exFAT, NTFS , fanless
Weight
475 g
Price
500 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Honor Pad V9（图片来源：Manuel Masiero）
Honor Pad V9（图片来源：Manuel Masiero）
Honor Pad V9（图片来源：Manuel Masiero）
Honor Pad V9（图片来源：Manuel Masiero）
Honor Pad V9（图片来源：Manuel Masiero）
Honor Pad V9（图片来源：Manuel Masiero）
Honor Pad V9（图片来源：Manuel Masiero）
Honor Pad V9（图片来源：Manuel Masiero）
Honor Pad V9（图片来源：Manuel Masiero）

尺寸比较

❌
268.7 mm 195 mm 6.49 mm 584 g261 mm 177.3 mm 6.2 mm 510 g259.1 mm 176.1 mm 6.1 mm 475 g254.3 mm 165.8 mm 6.5 mm 524 g251.22 mm 173.42 mm 6.18 mm 500 g210 mm 148 mm 1 mm 2.9 g

功能 - 只有一种欧盟存储版本，容量为 8/256 GB

Honor Pad V9 评论机配备了 12 GB 内存和 256 GB UFS 3.1 存储空间。但在欧洲，这款 11.5 英寸的中端平板电脑只有 8/256 GB 版本，Honor ，建议零售价为 399 英镑。内部存储无法扩展

Pad V9 的八个扬声器是一个明显的亮点，但 USB-C 端口则是标准配置。由于其 USB 2.0 的速度，在与测试固态硬盘（三星 980 Pro）的拷贝测试中，它的速度没有超过 38 MB/s。

左：电源按钮、扬声器（图片来源：Manuel Masiero）
左：电源按钮、扬声器（图片来源：Manuel Masiero）
右：扬声器、USB-C 2.0、扬声器（图片来源：Manuel Masiero）
右：扬声器、USB-C 2.0、扬声器（图片来源：Manuel Masiero）
顶部：手写笔座、麦克风、音量摇杆（图片来源：Manuel Masiero）
顶部：手写笔座、麦克风、音量摇杆（图片来源：Manuel Masiero）
底部：无端口（图片来源：Manuel Masiero）
底部：无端口（图片来源：Manuel Masiero）

软件 - 适用于 Pad V9 的Android 15 和 MagicOS 9.0

Pad V9 运行Android 15 和 MagicOS 9.0。Honor 通过人工智能增强了其平板电脑软件，但将其功能限制在最低限度。例如，你可以创建头像，将语音笔记和手写表格转换成文本。 Honor 文档 "还包括一个办公套件，打开的应用程序的分割视图方便了多任务处理。

Honor 关于Pad V9将在多长时间内接受安全更新和操作系统升级的信息，我们还没有提供。这可能与上一版本的 Honor Pad 9的情况类似，它可能会接受一次操作系统升级和三年的安全补丁。

Honor 垫子 V9
Honor 垫子 V9
Honor 垫子 V9
Honor 垫子 V9
Honor 垫子 V9
Honor 垫子 V9

可持续性

Honor Pad V9 没有提供任何有关可持续发展的信息，因此它在二氧化碳排放量、使用可回收材料或可维修性方面的表现如何仍不确定。该公司没有提供备件或维修说明。不过，可以直接通过 对平板电脑进行维修。Honor

通信和 GNSS -Honor Pad 9 配备 WiFi 6

Pad V9 配备了 Wi-Fi 6 无线模块，可以实现快速的 Wi-Fi 连接。连接到我们的参考路由器--华硕 ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000，该平板电脑实现了较高且相当稳定的传输速度，在同类设备中名列前茅。Pad V9 不支持 6 GHz 频段，而且Honor 也没有提供蜂窝版本的平板电脑。

Networking
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Honor Pad V9
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
1051 (925min - 1174max) MBit/s
Huawei MatePad 11.5 S
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
1015 (495min - 1037max) MBit/s -3%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Wi-Fi 7
991 (512min - 1016max) MBit/s -6%
Average 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
  (305 - 1757, n=140)
859 MBit/s -18%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
795 (342min - 895max) MBit/s -24%
Average of class Tablet
  (10.5 - 1656, n=86, last 2 years)
548 MBit/s -48%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Honor Pad V9
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
1336 (1285min - 1399max) MBit/s
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Wi-Fi 7
895 (751min - 988max) MBit/s -33%
Huawei MatePad 11.5 S
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
876 (737min - 950max) MBit/s -34%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
847 (791min - 876max) MBit/s -37%
Average 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
  (234 - 1696, n=138)
831 MBit/s -38%
Average of class Tablet
  (20.1 - 1705, n=86, last 2 years)
538 MBit/s -60%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
Average of class Tablet
  (578 - 1888, n=19, last 2 years)
1285 MBit/s
Average 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
  (614 - 1902, n=21)
1256 MBit/s
OnePlus Pad 2
Wi-Fi 7
895 (675min - 1017max) MBit/s
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
OnePlus Pad 2
Wi-Fi 7
1652 (1472min - 1703max) MBit/s
Average of class Tablet
  (960 - 1842, n=19, last 2 years)
1436 MBit/s
Average 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
  (743 - 1816, n=21)
1228 MBit/s
05010015020025030035040045050055060065070075080085090095010001050110011501200125013001350Tooltip
Honor Pad V9 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1051 (925-1174)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø795 (342-895)
Honor Pad V9 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1333 (1285-1399)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø847 (791-876)

摄像头 -Honor Pad V9 配备 1300 万像素摄像头

用自拍相机拍摄的照片
用自拍相机拍摄的照片

显示屏上方的边框中配备了一枚 800 万像素定焦自拍摄像头，光圈为 f/2.2。在足够明亮的环境光线下，它能拍摄出不错的照片，但不是特别清晰，而且总是有点噪点。不过，偶尔进行视频聊天时，图像质量还是足够的。

1300 万像素（f/2.2）主摄像头具有自动对焦功能，在日光下的表现也可以接受。不过，与自拍摄像头类似，它也有模糊的问题。虽然在实验室条件下，它的色彩值与目标值没有太大偏差，但其图像确实略带红色。在弱光条件下，主摄像头很快就会达到极限。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Daylight shotDaylight shot5x zoomLowlight shot
ColorChecker
8.4 ∆E
6.8 ∆E
5.3 ∆E
6.8 ∆E
5 ∆E
2.7 ∆E
9.9 ∆E
6.2 ∆E
7.1 ∆E
6.5 ∆E
3.7 ∆E
6.7 ∆E
8.8 ∆E
9.5 ∆E
2.6 ∆E
4.6 ∆E
7.2 ∆E
9.2 ∆E
8.5 ∆E
7.7 ∆E
9.3 ∆E
14.2 ∆E
12.1 ∆E
10.4 ∆E
ColorChecker Honor Pad V9: 7.47 ∆E min: 2.55 - max: 14.21 ∆E
ColorChecker
29.1 ∆E
52.7 ∆E
39.3 ∆E
34.8 ∆E
45.2 ∆E
60.7 ∆E
52.1 ∆E
36.1 ∆E
41.7 ∆E
28.3 ∆E
63.5 ∆E
62.1 ∆E
31.5 ∆E
47.1 ∆E
35.8 ∆E
74 ∆E
42.5 ∆E
41.5 ∆E
84.1 ∆E
69.9 ∆E
51.6 ∆E
36.9 ∆E
23.9 ∆E
13.3 ∆E
ColorChecker Honor Pad V9: 45.73 ∆E min: 13.35 - max: 84.06 ∆E

附件和保修 - 包括触控笔和翻盖

Pad V9 的包装盒包括Honor Magic Pencil 3 触控笔、翻盖和 USB-C 数据线。

Honor 在欧盟，Pad V9 享有 24 个月的保修服务。

输入设备和操作 - Pad V9 缺少指纹传感器

IPS 显示屏的最大刷新率为 144 Hz，可动态适应图像内容，显示效果非常流畅。测试时没有手写笔和翻盖。

生物识别认证可通过 2D 面部识别进行，在明亮的环境中也能可靠地工作。该平板电脑没有指纹传感器。

肖像键盘
肖像键盘
风景键盘
风景键盘

显示屏--坚固的 IPS 面板减轻了色彩弱点

子像素
子像素

11.5 英寸 IPS 面板的分辨率为 2,800 x 1,840 像素。它的平均亮度为 501 cd/m²，在显示 SDR 内容时最高可达 543 cd/m²（APL18：542 cd/m²，HDR：546 cd/m²），达到了相当高的亮度水平。不过，几款同类设备显示，更亮也是可能的。

IPS 面板不使用脉宽调制来控制亮度。

484
cd/m²		515
cd/m²		489
cd/m²
510
cd/m²		543
cd/m²		503
cd/m²
485
cd/m²		494
cd/m²		486
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 543 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 501 cd/m² Minimum: 2.33 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 89 %
Center on Battery: 543 cd/m²
Contrast: 876:1 (Black: 0.62 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 12.4 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.86
ΔE Greyscale 12.1 | 0.5-98 Ø5.1
98.8% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 0.58
Honor Pad V9
IPS, 2800x1840, 11.5"		Huawei MatePad 11.5 S
TFT-LCD, 2800x1840, 11.5"		OnePlus Pad 2
IPS, 3000x2120, 12.1"		Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE
TFT-LCD, 2304x1440, 10.9"		Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
IPS, 3200x2136, 11.2"
Screen
7%
59%
39%
49%
Brightness middle
543
511
-6%
833
53%
694
28%
776
43%
Brightness
501
449
-10%
771
54%
695
39%
750
50%
Brightness Distribution
89
83
-7%
84
-6%
88
-1%
91
2%
Black Level *
0.62
0.99
-60%
0.45
27%
0.66
-6%
0.58
6%
Contrast
876
516
-41%
1851
111%
1052
20%
1338
53%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
12.4
3.6
71%
1.79
86%
2.1
83%
1.6
87%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
15.9
7.5
53%
4.01
75%
4.3
73%
4.5
72%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
12.1
5.5
55%
3
75%
3.3
73%
2.5
79%
Gamma
0.58 379%
2.27 97%
2.254 98%
2.26 97%
2.23 99%
CCT
6175 105%
7566 86%
6419 101%
7010 93%
6892 94%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8482 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

IPS 面板在色彩还原方面令人失望。在下图所示的屏幕设置下，它最接近理想值（Delta E < 3），但平均 Delta E 为 12，仍然完全达不到要求。不过，在日常使用中，这并不像因 876:1 对比度而导致的相对较淡的色彩还原那么明显。

色彩精度（色彩模式正常、色温暖色、目标色彩空间 sRGB）
色彩精度（色彩模式正常、色温暖色、目标色彩空间 sRGB）
色彩空间（色彩模式 "正常"、色温 "暖色"、目标色彩空间 sRGB）
色彩空间（色彩模式 "正常"、色温 "暖色"、目标色彩空间 sRGB）
灰度（色彩模式 "正常"、色温 "暖色"、目标色彩空间 sRGB）
灰度（色彩模式 "正常"、色温 "暖色"、目标色彩空间 sRGB）
色彩饱和度（色彩模式正常、色温暖、目标色彩空间 sRGB）
色彩饱和度（色彩模式正常、色温暖、目标色彩空间 sRGB）

Display Response Times

ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
   ↔    Response Time Black to White
16.11 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 4.367 ms rise
↘ 11.74 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 35 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.7 ms).
   ↔    Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
36.92 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 14.25 ms rise
↘ 22.67 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 50 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.4 ms).

IPS 面板视角稳定，在室外表现良好。它对阳光的保护作用很小，但在阴凉处，其亮度足以清晰显示内容。

户外活动
户外活动
户外活动
户外活动
视角
视角

性能 -Honor Pad V9 搭载联发科 Dimensity 8350

凭借其 联发科 Dimensity 8350Honor Pad V9 是同价位最强大的平板电脑之一。然而，在合成基准测试和一些浏览器测试中，小米Pad 7 Pro的性能并不尽如人意。 小米 Pad 7 Pro配备了 骁龙8代3，甚至更快。

Geekbench 6.4 | Geekbench 5.5 | Antutu v10 | PCMark for Android | BaseMark OS II | UL Procyon AI Inference for Android | AImark | Geekbench AI | AI Benchmark
Geekbench 6.4
Single-Core
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
1973 Points +45%
Honor Pad V9
MediaTek Dimensity 8350, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288
1359 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8350
  (n=1)
1359 Points 0%
Huawei MatePad 11.5 S
HiSilicon Kirin 9000W, Maleoon 910, 8192
1245 Points -8%
Average of class Tablet
  (185 - 3715, n=85, last 2 years)
1202 Points -12%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 0
1011 Points -26%
OnePlus Pad 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
954 Points -30%
Multi-Core
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
5127 Points +24%
OnePlus Pad 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
4564 Points +11%
Honor Pad V9
MediaTek Dimensity 8350, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288
4119 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8350
  (n=1)
4119 Points 0%
Huawei MatePad 11.5 S
HiSilicon Kirin 9000W, Maleoon 910, 8192
3989 Points -3%
Average of class Tablet
  (493 - 14690, n=85, last 2 years)
3871 Points -6%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 0
2858 Points -31%
Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
1403 Points +37%
Honor Pad V9
MediaTek Dimensity 8350, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288
1026 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8350
  (n=1)
1026 Points 0%
Huawei MatePad 11.5 S
HiSilicon Kirin 9000W, Maleoon 910, 8192
965 Points -6%
Average of class Tablet
  (103 - 2224, n=76, last 2 years)
788 Points -23%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 0
778 Points -24%
Multi-Core
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
4602 Points +27%
Huawei MatePad 11.5 S
HiSilicon Kirin 9000W, Maleoon 910, 8192
3694 Points +2%
Honor Pad V9
MediaTek Dimensity 8350, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288
3635 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8350
  (n=1)
3635 Points 0%
Average of class Tablet
  (303 - 10522, n=76, last 2 years)
2935 Points -19%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 0
2728 Points -25%
Antutu v10 - Total Score
Honor Pad V9
MediaTek Dimensity 8350, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288
1133809 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8350
  (n=1)
1133809 Points 0%
Average of class Tablet
  (164396 - 2716980, n=50, last 2 years)
887993 Points -22%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 0
573936 Points -49%
Huawei MatePad 11.5 S
HiSilicon Kirin 9000W, Maleoon 910, 8192
Points -100%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
Points -100%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Honor Pad V9
MediaTek Dimensity 8350, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288
17996 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8350
  (n=1)
17996 Points 0%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
15743 Points -13%
OnePlus Pad 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
12156 Points -32%
Huawei MatePad 11.5 S
HiSilicon Kirin 9000W, Maleoon 910, 8192
11872 Points -34%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 0
11259 Points -37%
Average of class Tablet
  (3195 - 25683, n=76, last 2 years)
10685 Points -41%
BaseMark OS II
Overall
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
8895 Points +7%
Honor Pad V9
MediaTek Dimensity 8350, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288
8279 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8350
  (n=1)
8279 Points 0%
Huawei MatePad 11.5 S
HiSilicon Kirin 9000W, Maleoon 910, 8192
6401 Points -23%
Average of class Tablet
  (195 - 11721, n=61, last 2 years)
4611 Points -44%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 0
4424 Points -47%
System
Honor Pad V9
MediaTek Dimensity 8350, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288
11001 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8350
  (n=1)
11001 Points 0%
Huawei MatePad 11.5 S
HiSilicon Kirin 9000W, Maleoon 910, 8192
10447 Points -5%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
9937 Points -10%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 0
9016 Points -18%
Average of class Tablet
  (904 - 16435, n=61, last 2 years)
7613 Points -31%
Memory
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
12938 Points +33%
Honor Pad V9
MediaTek Dimensity 8350, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288
9693 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8350
  (n=1)
9693 Points 0%
Huawei MatePad 11.5 S
HiSilicon Kirin 9000W, Maleoon 910, 8192
8362 Points -14%
Average of class Tablet
  (401 - 12938, n=61, last 2 years)
5343 Points -45%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 0
4486 Points -54%
Graphics
Honor Pad V9
MediaTek Dimensity 8350, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288
28497 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8350
  (n=1)
28497 Points 0%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
24738 Points -13%
Huawei MatePad 11.5 S
HiSilicon Kirin 9000W, Maleoon 910, 8192
12763 Points -55%
Average of class Tablet
  (418 - 57192, n=61, last 2 years)
10817 Points -62%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 0
7031 Points -75%
Web
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
1928 Points +25%
Honor Pad V9
MediaTek Dimensity 8350, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288
1546 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8350
  (n=1)
1546 Points 0%
Huawei MatePad 11.5 S
HiSilicon Kirin 9000W, Maleoon 910, 8192
1532 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 0
1347 Points -13%
Average of class Tablet
  (10 - 2056, n=61, last 2 years)
1325 Points -14%
UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Honor Pad V9
MediaTek Dimensity 8350, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288
58543 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8350
  (n=1)
58543 Points 0%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
14738 Points -75%
Average of class Tablet
  (2597 - 74821, n=59, last 2 years)
12166 Points -79%
Huawei MatePad 11.5 S
HiSilicon Kirin 9000W, Maleoon 910, 8192
10847 Points -81%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 0
6110 Points -90%
AImark - Score v3.x
Honor Pad V9
MediaTek Dimensity 8350, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288
35706 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8350
  (n=1)
35706 Points 0%
Average of class Tablet
  (84 - 156427, n=53, last 2 years)
7082 Points -80%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
1192 Points -97%
Huawei MatePad 11.5 S
HiSilicon Kirin 9000W, Maleoon 910, 8192
738 Points -98%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 0
636 Points -98%
Geekbench AI
Single Precision TensorFlow NNAPI 1.2
Honor Pad V9
MediaTek Dimensity 8350, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288
1140 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8350
  (n=1)
1140 Points 0%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
473 Points -59%
Average of class Tablet
  (85 - 1140, n=10, last 2 years)
443 Points -61%
Half Precision TensorFlow NNAPI 1.2
Honor Pad V9
MediaTek Dimensity 8350, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288
4545 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8350
  (n=1)
4545 Points 0%
Average of class Tablet
  (84 - 4545, n=10, last 2 years)
1100 Points -76%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
466 Points -90%
Quantized TensorFlow NNAPI 1.2
Honor Pad V9
MediaTek Dimensity 8350, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288
4532 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8350
  (n=1)
4532 Points 0%
Average of class Tablet
  (130 - 4532, n=10, last 2 years)
1340 Points -70%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
1082 Points -76%
AI Benchmark
Score V5
Average of class Tablet
  (101 - 8305, n=6, last 2 years)
2251 Points +96%
Honor Pad V9
MediaTek Dimensity 8350, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288
1148 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8350
  (n=1)
1148 Points 0%
Huawei MatePad 11.5 S
HiSilicon Kirin 9000W, Maleoon 910, 8192
101 Points -91%
Score V6
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
3686 Points +244%
Average of class Tablet
  (99.7 - 7341, n=8, last 2 years)
2165 Points +102%
Honor Pad V9
MediaTek Dimensity 8350, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288
1070 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8350
  (n=1)
1070 Points 0%

在图形测试中，Pad V9 的 ARM Mali G615 MP6也不得不向 OnePlus Pad 2 的Adreno 750.在 GFXBench 屏幕测试中，Pad V9 无法展示其 144 Hz 的屏幕，因为基准测试将其限制为 60fps。

3DMark: Wild Life Extreme Unlimited | Wild Life Extreme | Wild Life Unlimited Score | Solar Bay Score | Solar Bay Unlimited Score | Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score | Steel Nomad Light Score | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7: T-Rex Onscreen | 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
GFXBench 3.0: on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
GFXBench 3.1: on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
GFXBench: on screen Car Chase Onscreen | 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | 3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
OnePlus Pad 2
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4454 Points +72%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3283 Points +27%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3001 Points +16%
Honor Pad V9
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2594 Points
Huawei MatePad 11.5 S
Maleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1018 Points -61%
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
OnePlus Pad 2
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4485 Points +69%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3201 Points +21%
Honor Pad V9
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2649 Points
Huawei MatePad 11.5 S
Maleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
994 Points -62%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
838 Points -68%
3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
12074 Points +24%
Honor Pad V9
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
9759 Points
Huawei MatePad 11.5 S
Maleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
3802 Points -61%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2987 Points -69%
3DMark / Solar Bay Score
OnePlus Pad 2
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
8315 Points +75%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
5212 Points +10%
Honor Pad V9
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4738 Points
3DMark / Solar Bay Unlimited Score
OnePlus Pad 2
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
8321 Points +80%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
5182 Points +12%
Honor Pad V9
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4613 Points
3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score
OnePlus Pad 2
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1626 Points +49%
Honor Pad V9
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1093 Points
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1075 Points -2%
3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Score
OnePlus Pad 2
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1639 Points +44%
Honor Pad V9
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1137 Points
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1098 Points -3%
Huawei MatePad 11.5 S
Maleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
Points -100%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
OnePlus Pad 2
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
7196 Points +52%
Huawei MatePad 11.5 S
Maleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4731 Points 0%
Honor Pad V9
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4728 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
4369 Points -8%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
OnePlus Pad 2
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
28816 Points +86%
Honor Pad V9
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
15484 Points
Huawei MatePad 11.5 S
Maleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
6584 Points -57%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
5233 Points -66%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
OnePlus Pad 2
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
17279 Points +68%
Honor Pad V9
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
10285 Points
Huawei MatePad 11.5 S
Maleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
6005 Points -42%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
5013 Points -51%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps +100%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
82 fps +37%
Huawei MatePad 11.5 S
Maleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps 0%
Honor Pad V9
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
449 fps +20%
Honor Pad V9
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
375 fps
Huawei MatePad 11.5 S
Maleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
256 fps -32%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
120 fps -68%
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
109 fps +82%
Honor Pad V9
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
58 fps -3%
Huawei MatePad 11.5 S
Maleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
56 fps -7%
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
267 fps +77%
Huawei MatePad 11.5 S
Maleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
155 fps +3%
Honor Pad V9
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
151 fps
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
79 fps -48%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Honor Pad V9
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
59 fps
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
58 fps -2%
Huawei MatePad 11.5 S
Maleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
40 fps -32%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
35 fps -41%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
183 fps +58%
Honor Pad V9
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
116 fps
Huawei MatePad 11.5 S
Maleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
106 fps -9%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
53 fps -54%
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Honor Pad V9
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
44 fps
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
35 fps -20%
Huawei MatePad 11.5 S
Maleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
22 fps -50%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
21 fps -52%
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
109 fps +28%
Honor Pad V9
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
85 fps
Huawei MatePad 11.5 S
Maleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
48 fps -44%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
31 fps -64%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
OnePlus Pad 2
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
42 fps +27%
Honor Pad V9
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
33 fps
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
30 fps -9%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
16 fps -52%
Huawei MatePad 11.5 S
Maleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
16 fps -52%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
OnePlus Pad 2
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
69 fps +53%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
53 fps +18%
Honor Pad V9
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
45 fps
Huawei MatePad 11.5 S
Maleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
23 fps -49%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
14 fps -69%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Honor Pad V9
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
51 fps
OnePlus Pad 2
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
50 fps -2%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
46 fps -10%
Huawei MatePad 11.5 S
Maleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
28 fps -45%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
24 fps -53%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
OnePlus Pad 2
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
170 fps +47%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
145 fps +25%
Honor Pad V9
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
116 fps
Huawei MatePad 11.5 S
Maleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
64 fps -45%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
35 fps -70%
GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
OnePlus Pad 2
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
32 fps +60%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
24 fps +20%
Honor Pad V9
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
20 fps
Huawei MatePad 11.5 S
Maleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
10 fps -50%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
6 fps -70%
Jetstream 2 | Speedometer 2.0 | Speedometer 3.0 | WebXPRT 4 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1
Jetstream 2 - 2.0 Total Score
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro (Chrome 132)
195.343 Points +41%
Honor Pad V9 (Chrome 134.0.6998.96)
138.702 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8350 (n=1)
138.7 Points 0%
Average of class Tablet (19.9 - 393, n=73, last 2 years)
127.6 Points -8%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE (Chrome 119)
102.6 Points -26%
Huawei MatePad 11.5 S (Huawei Browser V14)
89.474 Points -35%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Honor Pad V9
192 runs/min
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8350 (n=1)
192 runs/min 0%
Average of class Tablet (2.59 - 572, n=65, last 2 years)
153.9 runs/min -20%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE (Chrome 119)
80.1 runs/min -58%
Huawei MatePad 11.5 S (Huawei Browser V14)
62.7 runs/min -67%
Speedometer 3.0 - Score
Average of class Tablet (1.25 - 34.4, n=41, last 2 years)
14 runs/min +14%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro (Chrome 132)
12.3 runs/min 0%
Honor Pad V9
12.3 runs/min
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8350 (n=1)
12.3 runs/min 0%
Huawei MatePad 11.5 S (Huawei Browser V14)
3.11 runs/min -75%
WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro (Chrome 132)
155 Points +5%
Honor Pad V9 (Chrome 134.0.6998.96)
148 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8350 (n=1)
148 Points 0%
Average of class Tablet (21 - 315, n=71, last 2 years)
117.3 Points -21%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE (Chrome 119)
107 Points -28%
Huawei MatePad 11.5 S (Huawei Browser V14)
85 Points -43%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro (Chrome 132)
65712 Points +34%
Honor Pad V9 (Chrome 134.0.6998.96)
49086 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8350 (n=1)
49086 Points 0%
OnePlus Pad 2 (Chrome 128)
45083 Points -8%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE (Chrome 119)
34739 Points -29%
Average of class Tablet (763 - 111219, n=94, last 2 years)
34432 Points -30%
Huawei MatePad 11.5 S (Huawei Browser V14)
32134 Points -35%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Average of class Tablet (319 - 34733, n=80, last 2 years)
3421 ms * -304%
Huawei MatePad 11.5 S (Huawei Browser V14)
1243.7 ms * -47%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE (Chrome 119)
1208.7 ms * -43%
Honor Pad V9 (Chrome 134.0.6998.96)
847.4 ms *
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8350 (n=1)
847 ms * -0%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro (Chrome 132)
654.56 ms * +23%

* ... smaller is better

Honor Pad V9Huawei MatePad 11.5 SOnePlus Pad 2Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FEXiaomi Pad 7 ProAverage 256 GB UFS 3.1 FlashAverage of class Tablet
AndroBench 3-5
-4%
-10%
-69%
40%
-20%
-44%
Sequential Read 256KB
1921.68
1837.4
-4%
2003.1
4%
526.65
-73%
3849.52
100%
1737 ?(950 - 2037, n=104)
-10%
1238 ?(126.9 - 3984, n=77, last 2 years)
-36%
Sequential Write 256KB
1767.43
1134.93
-36%
1732.7
-2%
282.47
-84%
3283.91
86%
1164 ?(452 - 2004, n=104)
-34%
876 ?(78.2 - 3484, n=77, last 2 years)
-50%
Random Read 4KB
343.96
334.71
-3%
236.5
-31%
225.02
-35%
302.34
-12%
286 ?(173.5 - 543, n=104)
-17%
204 ?(18.4 - 474, n=77, last 2 years)
-41%
Random Write 4KB
396.64
498.29
26%
348.6
-12%
68.78
-83%
346.85
-13%
319 ?(132.1 - 499, n=105)
-20%
211 ?(8.23 - 668, n=77, last 2 years)
-47%

游戏 - 没有每秒 144 帧的痕迹

我们使用Gamebench 测得的帧频显示，《源氏冲击》和《PUBG Mobile》等当前游戏在 Pad V9 上的可玩性非常高，即使在高细节级别下也是如此。不过，这款平板电脑在以最高可显示 144fps 的速度运行游戏时还有一定差距。在我们选择的少量游戏中，60fps 是我们所能达到的最佳速度。

051015202530354045505560Tooltip
Honor Pad V9; Asphalt 9: Legends; 24.4.0h: Ø59.7 (54-60)
Honor Pad V9; Genshin Impact; lowest 120 fps; 5.4.0_30057195_30231699: Ø60 (58-60)
Honor Pad V9; Genshin Impact; highest 120 fps; 5.4.0_30057195_30231699: Ø59.3 (52-60)
Honor Pad V9; PUBG Mobile; Smooth; 3.7.0: Ø60 (60-60)
Honor Pad V9; PUBG Mobile; HD; 3.7.0: Ø59.5 (43-60)
Honor Pad V9; PUBG Mobile; Ultra HD; 3.7.0: Ø39.8 (30-41)

排放 - 配备 8 个扬声器的强大音响系统

温度

Pad V9 在日常使用中保持凉爽。平板电脑的最高温度为 38.4°C，在负载情况下表面温度会略有升高，但几乎不会比温水更热。在 3DMark 压力测试中，它给我们留下了深刻印象，尽管在所有测试场景中，第一次运行后都会出现节流现象。不过，每次的结果都比较适中。

Max. Load
 33.5 °C38.1 °C37.6 °C 
 34.6 °C31.5 °C32.7 °C 
 33.5 °C30.3 °C31.1 °C 
Maximum: 38.1 °C
Average: 33.7 °C
37.9 °C38.4 °C32.4 °C
33.1 °C33.3 °C31.6 °C
29.6 °C29.8 °C30.9 °C
Maximum: 38.4 °C
Average: 33 °C
Power Supply (max.)  31.3 °C | Room Temperature 22 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 33.7 °C / 93 F, compared to the average of 30 °C / 86 F for the devices in the class Tablet.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 38.1 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 33.7 °C / 93 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 38.4 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 31.1 °C / 88 F, compared to the device average of 30 °C / 86 F.

3DMark Steel Nomad stress test

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Huawei MatePad 11.5 S
Maleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
99.2 % +13%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
98.4 % +12%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
88.7 % +1%
Honor Pad V9
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
87.7 %
OnePlus Pad 2
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
77 % -12%
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.3 % +17%
Huawei MatePad 11.5 S
Maleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
99 % +17%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
89.8 % +6%
Honor Pad V9
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
84.7 %
OnePlus Pad 2
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
83.8 % -1%
Solar Bay Stress Test Stability
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
95.7 % +18%
OnePlus Pad 2
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
86.9 % +7%
Honor Pad V9
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
81.3 %
Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
97.1 % +9%
Honor Pad V9
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
89 %
OnePlus Pad 2
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
86.5 % -3%
05101520253035404550556065707580859095Tooltip
Honor Pad V9 Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø14.4 (13.9-16.4)
Huawei MatePad 11.5 S Maleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø6.29 (6.26-6.32)
OnePlus Pad 2 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø24.1 (22.9-27.4)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø5.05 (5.03-5.07)
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø18 (17.6-19.6)
Honor Pad V9 Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø50.5 (49.2-56.2)
Huawei MatePad 11.5 S Maleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø23.6 (23.5-23.7)
OnePlus Pad 2 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø78.9 (74-96)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø17.7 (17.6-17.9)
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø65 (63.4-71.5)
Honor Pad V9 Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø50.6 (48.5-58.9)
Huawei MatePad 11.5 S Maleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø22.7 (22.6-22.7)
Honor Pad V9 Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Solar Bay Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 1.0.11.1: Ø13.6 (13.4-14.6)
Honor Pad V9 Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.11.1: Ø13.7 (12-14.8)
OnePlus Pad 2 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.5: Ø23.2 (22.2-25.5)
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.11.1: Ø16.4 (16.2-16.9)
Honor Pad V9 Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8350, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.1.1.3: Ø7.35 (7.17-8.06)
OnePlus Pad 2 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.1.1.3: Ø11.1 (10.6-12.3)
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.1.1.3: Ø7.81 (7.7-7.93)
Honor 垫子 V9
Honor 垫子 V9

发言人

Pad V9 有八个扬声器，能够提供强大的音频系统。我们测得中高音的频率响应相对线性，声音甚至包括低音--这在这个价位的产品中并不多见。外部音频设备可通过 USB-C 和蓝牙 5.2 连接。支持的蓝牙编解码器有 SBC、AAC、LDAC、aptX 和 aptX HD。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2038.437.32530.628.73119.227.94021.529.65036.938.26324.424.38019.729.110015.841.112514.149.416015.264.620012.464.12509.566.53159.769.740010.566.5500969.16309.8728008.975.310009.475.3125011.577.4160011.278.920001281.8250011.781.33150127840001267500012.563.6630012.970.4800013.372.61000013.568.81250013.565.21600013.669.9SPL23.988.8N0.575median 12median 69.9Delta1.55.33340.227.530.322.831.626.331.836.440.921.130.720.738.519.643.812.650.816.359.716.359.113.163.212.4651063.210.869.212.473.811.976.111.678.412.480.811.679.811.378.611.977.812.175.613.175.613.174.613.778.813.379.813.674.413.765.814.269.824.689.50.683.7median 12.6median 74.61.17.6hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseHonor Pad V9Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Honor Pad V9 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 10.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.7% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.7% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (11.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 13% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 83% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 7% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 90% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (12.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 18% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 77% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 10% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 87% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

电池寿命 - 保证长时间运行

耗电量

Pad V9 的能耗要求在很大程度上并不明显。不过，在负载情况下，功耗有时会大幅上升。

Honor 平板电脑的 10,100 毫安时电池充电功率可达 35 瓦。在我们的测试中，制造商为我们提供了一个 35 瓦的电源适配器（Honor SuperCharge HN-110320E00），可在 2 小时 10 分钟内为 Pad V9 充满电。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.11 / 0.14 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 1.26 / 5.57 / 5.61 Watt
Load midlight 12 / 13.36 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Honor Pad V9
10100 mAh		Huawei MatePad 11.5 S
8800 mAh		Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE
8000 mAh		Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
8850 mAh		Average MediaTek Dimensity 8350
 		Average of class Tablet
 
Power Consumption
11%
-0%
39%
0%
8%
Idle Minimum *
1.26
1.53
-21%
1.13
10%
0.75
40%
1.26 ?(n=1)
-0%
1.761 ?(0.63 - 4.66, n=72, last 2 years)
-40%
Idle Average *
5.57
5.96
-7%
4.81
14%
1.5
73%
5.57 ?(n=1)
-0%
3.75 ?(1 - 9.2, n=72, last 2 years)
33%
Idle Maximum *
5.61
6.07
-8%
4.89
13%
1.56
72%
5.61 ?(n=1)
-0%
4.24 ?(1.3 - 15.3, n=72, last 2 years)
24%
Load Average *
12
6.87
43%
15.02
-25%
7.92
34%
12 ?(n=1)
-0%
9.47 ?(2.5 - 34.9, n=72, last 2 years)
21%
Load Maximum *
13.36
6.88
49%
15.22
-14%
16.5
-24%
13.4 ?(n=1)
-0%
13.2 ?(3.9 - 46.7, n=72, last 2 years)
1%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

012345678910111213Tooltip
Honor Pad V9 MediaTek Dimensity 8350; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø7.1 (2.36-13.2)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE Samsung Exynos 1380; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø6.76 (2.38-11.7)
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø6.02 (1.025-12.7)
Honor Pad V9 MediaTek Dimensity 8350; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø2.44 (2.41-2.52)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE Samsung Exynos 1380; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø2.29 (2.22-2.76)
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.781 (0.697-1.46)

Power consumption: GFXbench (150 cd/m²)

0123456789101112Tooltip
Honor Pad V9 MediaTek Dimensity 8350; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø10.7 (9.39-12.8)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE Samsung Exynos 1380; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø5.4 (4.89-6.13)
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø11.9 (11.3-12.5)
Honor Pad V9 MediaTek Dimensity 8350; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø2.44 (2.41-2.52)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE Samsung Exynos 1380; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø2.29 (2.22-2.76)
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.781 (0.697-1.46)

电池运行时间

Pad V9 的大容量电池为其出色的续航时间立下了汗马功劳。在 Wi-Fi 测试中，这款平板电脑的续航时间接近 18 小时，甚至超过了非常节能的 小米 Pad 7 Pro，尽管它的电池容量较小，但运行时间几乎一样长。然而 Honor Pad 9的前身在Wi-Fi测试中只用了11个小时就停止工作了。

Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing
17h 54min
Battery Runtime - WiFi v1.3
Honor Pad V9
10100 mAh
1074 min
Huawei MatePad 11.5 S
8800 mAh
831 min
OnePlus Pad 2
9510 mAh
866 min
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE
8000 mAh
872 min
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
8850 mAh
1054 min

Notebookcheck 总体评分

Honor Pad 9 重量轻、质量高，其强大的环绕声、手写笔和超长的电池续航时间为它加分不少。不过，144 Hz IPS 显示屏的色彩还原能力较差，而且几乎没有更新。

Honor Pad V9 - 03/28/2025 v8
Manuel Masiero

Chassis
82 / 98 → 84%
Keyboard
70 / 80 → 87%
Pointing Device
88%
Connectivity
41 / 69 → 59%
Weight
84 / 40-88 → 91%
Battery
91%
Display
73%
Games Performance
36 / 65 → 55%
Application Performance
69 / 92 → 75%
AI Performance
69%
Temperature
91%
Noise
100%
Audio
83 / 91 → 91%
Camera
59 / 90 → 65%
Average
62%
82%
Tablet - Weighted Average
CO2 Emissions
No Data
Materials
0%
Packaging
50%
Power Use
95%
Repairability
40%
Software Updates
39%
Recycle Logo Total Sustainability Score: 37.3%

Possible alternatives compared

Image
Model / Review
Price
Weight
Drive
Display
1.
82.2%
Honor Pad V9
Honor Pad V9
MediaTek Dimensity 8350 ⎘
ARM Mali-G615 MP6 ⎘
12 GB Memory, 256 GB 		Amazon:
1. $12.95
Mr.Shield Screen Protector c...
2. $12.99
Vaxson 2-Pack Film Protector...
3. $11.90
Case Compatible for Honor Pa...
List Price: 500€		475 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash11.50"
2800x1840
291 PPI
IPS
2.
81.1%
Huawei MatePad 11.5 S
Huawei MatePad 11.5 S
HiSilicon Kirin 9000W ⎘
HiSilicon Maleoon 910 ⎘
8 GB Memory, 256 GB 		Amazon:
1. $10.95
Mr.Shield Screen Protector c...
2. $9.88
Zrengp Clear Shockproof Case...
3. $11.96
Kepuch 2 Pack Tempered Glass...
List Price: 399€		510 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash11.50"
2800x1840
291 PPI
TFT-LCD
3.
86.1%
OnePlus Pad 2
OnePlus Pad 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 ⎘
Qualcomm Adreno 750 ⎘
12 GB Memory, 256 GB 		Amazon:
List Price: 549€		584 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash12.10"
3000x2120
304 PPI
IPS
4.
86.8% v7 (old)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE
Samsung Exynos 1380 ⎘
ARM Mali-G68 MP5 ⎘
, 128 GB UFS 2.1		Amazon:
1. $448.95
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE 10....
2. $419.00
SAMSUNG Galaxy Tab S9 FE w/S...
3. $441.93
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE (SM...
List Price: 529€		524 g128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash10.90"
2304x1440
249 PPI
TFT-LCD
5.
86.5%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 ⎘
Qualcomm Adreno 735 ⎘
12 GB Memory, 256 GB 		Amazon:
1. $539.88
Xiaomi Pad 7 Ai WiFi Version...
2. $309.50
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro WiFi Ve...
3. $9.95
Gylint Case for Xiaomi Pad 7...
List Price: 450€		500 g256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash11.20"
3200x2136
344 PPI
IPS

More articles related to this device

Honor Pad V9 (Pad V Series)

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 一款轻巧、高端耐用的平板电脑，配备环绕声和手写笔： Honor Pad V9 评测
Manuel Masiero, 2025-04- 5 (Update: 2025-04- 5)