Notebookcheck Logo
Teaser

OnePlus Pad 2 评论--与 iPad Air 不相上下,但价格只有后者的一半。

全面发展。 充足的电量、存储空间和屏幕空间:OnePlus Pad 2 有很多优点。总部位于中国的 OnePlus 努力与平板电脑领域的主要厂商竞争,同时在价格上大大低于它们。在这篇评测中,我们将探讨这一成功公式这次是否还有效。
Florian Schmitt, 👁 Florian Schmitt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
Android ARM Tablet
OnePlus Pad 2 (Pad Series)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 8 x 2.3 - 3.3 GHz, Cortex-X4 / A720 / A720 / A520 (Kryo)
Graphics adapter
Memory
12 GB 
, DDR5X
Display
12.10 inch 7:5, 3000 x 2120 pixel 304 PPI, capacitive touchscreen, native pen support, IPS, glossy: yes, HDR, 144 Hz
Storage
256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash, 256 GB 
, 220 GB free
Connections
1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 DisplayPort, 1 Docking Station Port, Audio Connections: audio via USB-C, Brightness Sensor
Networking
Wi-Fi 7 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz be = Wi-Fi 7), Bluetooth 5.4
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 6.49 x 268.7 x 195
Battery
36.99 Wh, 9510 mAh Lithium-Ion, 67-watt charging
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 14
Camera
Primary Camera: 13 MPix f/​2.2, LED-flash
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix f/​2.3
Additional features
Speakers: six speakers, Keyboard: On-screen, USB cable, 24 Months Warranty, fanless
Weight
584 g
Price
549 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

潜在的竞争对手比较

Bewertung
Datum
Modell
Gewicht
Laufwerk
Groesse
Aufloesung
Preis ab
Price
86.1 %v8
10 / 2024
OnePlus Pad 2
SD 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750
584 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash12.10"3000x2120
85.2 %
v7 (old)
v7 (old)
09 / 2023
Lenovo Tab P12
Dimensity 7050, Mali-G68 MP4
615 g128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash12.70"2944x1840
88.8 %
v7 (old)
v7 (old)
08 / 2023
Xiaomi Pad 6
SD 870, Adreno 650
490 g128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash11.00"2880x1800
87 %
v7 (old)
v7 (old)
11 / 2023
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE Plus
Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5
627 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash12.40"2560x1600
85.7 %v8
06 / 2024
Apple iPad Air 13 2024
M2, M2 10-Core GPU
617 g128 GB NVMe13.00"2732x2048

外壳和规格 - 一体成型机身的大型平板电脑

如果你喜欢屏幕尺寸稍大的平板电脑,而又不喜欢过厚的边框和笨重的机身,那么 OnePlus Pad 2 值得你仔细一试。在评测期间,这款采用一体式金属机身、配备 12.1 英寸显示屏的设备在网上的售价不到 500 欧元(545 美元)。尽管体积庞大,但 OnePlus Pad 2 在扭转时几乎没有任何弯曲,而且还相当耐压。

平板电脑的背面由一整块铝碾压而成。天线采用压印工艺,无需使用塑料插件来改善接收效果。平板电脑的表面略微粗糙,手感舒适,给人以高档的感觉。尽管圆角边缘在现代移动设备设计中可能已略显过时,但它们增强了 OnePlus Pad 2 的人体工学设计,确保没有尖锐的棱角刺入用户的手掌。

不过,这款平板电脑没有通过任何 IP 认证,这意味着在多尘或潮湿的环境中使用时要小心谨慎。

OnePlus Pad 2 拥有 256 GB 的存储空间和 12 GB 的内存,确实为数据提供了相当大的空间。在我们的对比中,同价位平板电脑的存储空间只有 128 GB。此外,对于 iPad Air 13 (2024)则需要在已经很高的价格上再额外支付 130 欧元(100 美元)才能获得 256 GB 的存储空间。

遗憾的是,这款平板电脑缺少 NFC 模块和 5G 选项。因此,要想在 OnePlus 平板电脑上使用移动互联网,你需要一个 5G 路由器或带有 Wi-Fi 热点功能的手机。

在中端设备上降低成本的一个常见方法是在内部加入一个仅连接 USB 2.0 的慢速 USB-C 端口。不过,OnePlus 避开了这一陈词滥调,安装了一个迅捷的 USB 3.2 Gen 1 端口,峰值数据传输速率可达 5Gbit/s。该平板电脑还可以通过 USB 端口连接外部显示器。

尺寸比较

293.37 mm 190.76 mm 6.9 mm 615 g285.4 mm 185.4 mm 6.5 mm 627 g280.6 mm 214.9 mm 6.1 mm 617 g268.7 mm 195 mm 6.49 mm 584 g253.95 mm 165.18 mm 6.51 mm 490 g297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g

连接性和软件 - 超快的 Wi-Fi 和四年的更新服务

OnePlus Pad 2 的另一个亮点是支持最新的无线标准 Wi-Fi 7。尽管如此,要充分利用该标准提供的速度,你需要一个万兆网络环境,而目前这种环境还相当昂贵。Wi-Fi 7 路由器已经上市,但我们目前还没有任何一款路由器可供测试。

OnePlus 的支持论坛上的用户报告说,当使用 Wi-Fi 6E 或 Wi-Fi 7 模式时,平板电脑偶尔会在很少使用的 6GHz 频段上找不到高速网络。我们在路由器上启用了 6GHz 访客网络,成功地建立了连接。

即使华硕 ROG Rapture AXE11000 路由器提供的 Wi-Fi 6E 标准稍显老旧,连接速度也非常快,平均接收和发送速率分别约为 1,652 Mbit/s 和 900 Mbit/s。这样的速度对于千兆互联网连接来说绰绰有余,而这样的速度更适合内部网络。

我们对 Wi-Fi 接收效果也非常满意:即使设备距离路由器约 10 米(32 英尺),中间有三面墙,网站加载速度也非常快,有时甚至能显示出完整的信号强度。尽管没有定位模块,OnePlus Pad 2 仍能使用Android 上已知的 Wi-Fi 网络相当准确地确定自己的位置,前提是用户不要移动得太快。

虽然基于Android 14,但 OxygenOS 的设计独特而清晰,还为平板电脑提供了一些额外的功能,如更方便的多任务处理。在测试时,安全补丁的日期是 2024 年 9 月,这意味着它们仍然是最新的。对于平板电脑,该公司承诺提供四年的安全更新和操作系统升级服务,直至Android 17。这是可以接受的,但对于如此强大的设备来说,还可以做得更多。

Networking
OnePlus Pad 2
Wi-Fi 7
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
895 (min: 675) MBit/s ∼60%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1652 (min: 1472) MBit/s ∼100%
Lenovo Tab P12
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
928 (min: 909) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
814 (min: 759) MBit/s ∼87%
Xiaomi Pad 6
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
880 (min: 791) MBit/s ∼95%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
932 (min: 727) MBit/s ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE Plus
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
860 (min: 811) MBit/s ∼93%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
859 (min: 837) MBit/s ∼92%
Apple iPad Air 13 2024
Wi-Fi 6E
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
823 (min: 583) MBit/s ∼89%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
801 (min: 769) MBit/s ∼86%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1482 (min: 1401) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1336 (min: 1285) MBit/s ∼81%
0901802703604505406307208109009901080117012601350144015301620Tooltip
OnePlus Pad 2; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø894 (675-1017)
OnePlus Pad 2; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1652 (1472-1703)

可持续性、操作和附件 - 支持多种压力级别的手写笔

遗憾的是,OnePlus 在可持续发展方面所做的努力并不十分可信,因为该公司自 2020 年以来就没有发布过新的可持续发展报告,而且平板电脑在运输过程中仍然使用塑料薄膜。不过,至少包装上使用的油墨是植物油基的。

总的来说,OnePlus 遵循了所有相关的国际标准,但除此之外几乎没有做出任何明显的努力。例如,该公司没有提供碳足迹分析或产品维修说明。不过,你还是可以在网上找到一个相当隐蔽的官方零配件供应商。

得益于功能强大的处理器和丰富的内存,反应灵敏的触摸屏可让您毫无延迟地可靠使用设备。此外,还可以选择使用触控笔。兼容的 OnePlus Stylo 2 可直接从制造商处购买,价格约为 100 欧元(100 美元),支持 16,000 级压力灵敏度,还可用于浏览演示文稿。此外,OnePlus Pad 2 还配有一个磁性支架,可以安全地存放触控笔并为其充电。

OnePlus Folio Case 可以让用户安全地支撑平板电脑观看电影等。它的价格约为 50 欧元(55 美元),而官方键盘盖的价格约为 150 欧元(164 美元)。遗憾的是,该键盘盖目前只提供美式键盘布局。

人脸识别是平板电脑上唯一的生物识别解锁选项。它通过前置摄像头以 2D 方式可靠地工作。

OnePlus Folio 保护套 2
OnePlus Folio 保护套 2
OnePlus Stylo 2
OnePlus Stylo 2
OnePlus 智能键盘
OnePlus 智能键盘

摄像头 - 4K 视频录制功能

前置摄像头拍摄的图像
前置摄像头拍摄的图像

平板电脑通常不是摄影的最佳选择。大型设备尤其如此,因为人们更不愿意拖着它们去有趣的场景。OnePlus Pad 2 的 1300 万像素后置摄像头更适合扫描文件、方便地捕捉精彩瞬间或扫描二维码,而不是进行高质量摄影。

尽管如此,我们还是拍摄了几张测试照片。虽然植物场景的亮度不错,但细节显得非常模糊。同样,我们周围环境的图像也可以使用,但细节模糊。在弱光、高对比度的环境下,亮部和暗部难以区分。图像清晰度充其量只能算一般,在 1 勒克斯的光照条件下,相机很难捕捉到任何细节。

该相机可录制高达 30 帧/秒的 4K 视频。自动对焦效果相当不错,曝光调整也相当快。不过,在视频模式下,清晰度仍有待提高。

总的来说,800 万像素的前置摄像头在细节方面有些欠缺,在暗处也很难拍到。但其质量足以满足快速自拍的需要。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Main camera: plantsMain camera: surroundingsMain camera: low light
click to load images
ColorChecker
6.5 ∆E
7.3 ∆E
12.3 ∆E
11.5 ∆E
11.4 ∆E
5.2 ∆E
8.6 ∆E
6.4 ∆E
9.2 ∆E
6.3 ∆E
7.9 ∆E
4 ∆E
3.8 ∆E
7.6 ∆E
10 ∆E
3.1 ∆E
4.1 ∆E
4.5 ∆E
6.7 ∆E
2.5 ∆E
5 ∆E
4.5 ∆E
6.6 ∆E
8 ∆E
ColorChecker OnePlus Pad 2: 6.78 ∆E min: 2.47 - max: 12.33 ∆E
ColorChecker
29.6 ∆E
55.1 ∆E
39.8 ∆E
34.8 ∆E
45.6 ∆E
62.4 ∆E
53.7 ∆E
36.1 ∆E
44.2 ∆E
29 ∆E
66.2 ∆E
64.1 ∆E
31.1 ∆E
48.6 ∆E
37.6 ∆E
77.6 ∆E
44 ∆E
42 ∆E
94.3 ∆E
71.4 ∆E
52.5 ∆E
37 ∆E
23.8 ∆E
13.5 ∆E
ColorChecker OnePlus Pad 2: 47.24 ∆E min: 13.46 - max: 94.33 ∆E

显示屏 - 色彩还原度高,无 PWM

子像素图像
子像素图像

OnePlus Pad 2 的 IPS 显示屏分辨率为 3,000 x 2,120,相当于不太传统的 9:7 长宽比,该公司称这非常适合观看文档。不过,在观看典型的 16:9 视频时,顶部和底部会出现很粗的黑条。

在屏幕亮度方面,要超越 OnePlus Pad 2 并不容易。正常情况下,显示屏亮度可达 550 cd/m²,但将环境光传感器置于光源下可将峰值亮度提高到 833 cd/m² 以上。这种高亮度可用于 HDR 内容并增强对比度。

虽然 OnePlus Pad 2 的 IPS 面板不能像 OLED 显示屏那样达到绝对的黑色,但 HDR 视频在它上面看起来仍然非常清晰。峰值亮度高也使平板电脑即使在较亮的天气也能在户外使用。

在我们使用分光光度计和 CalMAN 软件进行的测量中,专业色彩模式的色彩准确度最高。在该模式下,我们无法用肉眼感知参考色和屏幕上的颜色之间的任何差异;测量的色差也非常小,最高值仅为 4.07。

我们没有检测到任何 PWM 闪烁。

734
cd/m²
802
cd/m²
699
cd/m²
803
cd/m²
833
cd/m²
707
cd/m²
829
cd/m²
803
cd/m²
726
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 833 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 770.7 cd/m² Minimum: 2.1 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 84 %
Center on Battery: 833 cd/m²
Contrast: 1851:1 (Black: 0.45 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.79 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93
ΔE Greyscale 3 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
98.9% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.254
OnePlus Pad 2
IPS, 3000x2120, 12.1"
Lenovo Tab P12
LTPS, 2944x1840, 12.7"
Xiaomi Pad 6
IPS LCD, 2880x1800, 11"
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE Plus
TFT LCD, HDR10, HGL, 2560x1600, 12.4"
Apple iPad Air 13 2024
Liquid Retina Display, IPS, 2732x2048, 13"
Response Times
6%
17%
9%
-47%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
34.9 ?(18.2, 16.7)
38.25 ?(17.49, 20.76)
-10%
35.16 ?(16.27, 18.89)
-1%
35.94 ?(9.339, 26.6)
-3%
54.3 ?(25.04, 29.26)
-56%
Response Time Black / White *
25.6 ?(11.1, 14.5)
19.89 ?(8.464, 11.43)
22%
16.81 ?(6.167, 10.64)
34%
20.43 ?(5.501, 14.93)
20%
35.21 ?(18.76, 16.45)
-38%
PWM Frequency
280300
181600
61100 ?(14)
Screen
-15%
-1%
-15%
-7%
Brightness middle
833
435
-48%
541
-35%
789
-5%
631
-24%
Brightness
771
407
-47%
494
-36%
762
-1%
589
-24%
Brightness Distribution
84
89
6%
89
6%
92
10%
88
5%
Black Level *
0.45
0.58
-29%
0.65
-44%
0.72
-60%
0.62
-38%
Contrast
1851
750
-59%
832
-55%
1096
-41%
1018
-45%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
1.79
1.5
16%
0.9
50%
2.3
-28%
1.5
16%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
4.01
3.2
20%
1.8
55%
4.2
-5%
3
25%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
3
2.4
20%
1.4
53%
2.8
7%
2.2
27%
Gamma
2.254 98%
2.2 100%
2.26 97%
2.31 95%
2.24 98%
CCT
6419 101%
6546 99%
6710 97%
6722 97%
6918 94%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-5% / -11%
8% / 3%
-3% / -11%
-27% / -15%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
25.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 11.1 ms rise
↘ 14.5 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 57 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
34.9 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 18.2 ms rise
↘ 16.7 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 44 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (33 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8795 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

卡尔曼灰度
卡尔曼灰度
CalMAN 色彩精度
CalMAN 色彩精度
CalMAN sRGB 色域
CalMAN sRGB 色域
CalMAN 饱和度
CalMAN 饱和度

性能、排放和电池寿命 - 高端性能与六个扬声器相得益彰

配备 高通骁龙 8 代 3OnePlus Pad 2 拥有目前最快的移动 SoC 之一,同时保持了中端价格标签。除了在 Geekbench 中的单核性能外,该处理器在各种任务中的强大性能也有目共睹。虽然 SoC 无法与 Apple M2在价格更高的 iPad Air 2024的 M2,但它的性能足以处理当前的所有应用程序。

在图形处理能力方面,这款平板电脑让同价位的竞争对手望尘莫及,其性能足以运行所有现代游戏和图形要求较高的应用程序。此外,OnePlus 使用的 UFS 3.1 闪存也非常迅捷。快速的 SoC 和功能强大的存储控制器使存储设备能够有效利用其速度,确保快速复制过程和较短的加载时间。

另一个积极的方面是 骁龙 8 代 3在 OnePlus Pad 2 的大机身内不会出现发热问题。在我们的测试过程中,平板电脑在长时间负载后的表面温度峰值为 41.9°C(107.4°C),温度适中。不过,在 3DMark 压力测试中,我们确实发现在持续负载下出现了轻微的节流现象。

OnePlus Pad 2 配备了六个扬声器,最大音量为 87.8 dB(A)。对于如此轻薄的平板电脑来说,扬声器发出的声音相当强劲、温暖。在聆听古典乐曲时,我们可以很容易地分辨出各个乐器,尽管在全音量时会有轻微失真。

您可以通过 USB-C 或蓝牙将外置扬声器或耳机连接到平板电脑。平板电脑只支持最基本的编解码器,因此喜欢更奇特蓝牙编解码器的用户可能需要调整一下期望值。具体来说,可使用以下编解码器:SBC、AAC、aptX、aptX HD、LDAC、LHDC、aptX Adaptive 和 aptX TWS+。

OnePlus Pad 2 的电池容量高达 9510 毫安时,续航能力令人印象深刻:在我们的 Wi-Fi 测试中,它的续航时间为 14 小时 26 分钟,这当然足够你在沙发上度过整个雨天。

通过有线连接,平板电脑的充电功率可达 68 瓦。包装盒中不包括充电器,但你可以从制造商那里购买一个,价格约为 40 欧元(44 美元)。Pad 2 与我们测试的所有充电器都配合得很好,最快的一次充电时间约为一个小时。

Geekbench 6.2
Single-Core
Apple iPad Air 13 2024
Apple M2, M2 10-Core GPU, 8192
2605 Points +173%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
  (954 - 2329, n=21)
2106 Points +121%
Xiaomi Pad 6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
1299 Points +36%
Average of class Tablet
  (185 - 3715, n=64, last 2 years)
1054 Points +10%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE Plus
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 8192
1023 Points +7%
Lenovo Tab P12
MediaTek Dimensity 7050, Mali-G68 MP4, 8192
958 Points 0%
OnePlus Pad 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
954 Points
Multi-Core
Apple iPad Air 13 2024
Apple M2, M2 10-Core GPU, 8192
10120 Points +122%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
  (4564 - 7501, n=21)
6638 Points +45%
OnePlus Pad 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
4564 Points
Average of class Tablet
  (493 - 14690, n=64, last 2 years)
3382 Points -26%
Xiaomi Pad 6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
3357 Points -26%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE Plus
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 8192
2899 Points -36%
Lenovo Tab P12
MediaTek Dimensity 7050, Mali-G68 MP4, 8192
2422 Points -47%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
  (12156 - 21628, n=20)
17861 Points +47%
Xiaomi Pad 6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
13728 Points +13%
OnePlus Pad 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
12156 Points
Lenovo Tab P12
MediaTek Dimensity 7050, Mali-G68 MP4, 8192
12131 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE Plus
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 8192
11637 Points -4%
Average of class Tablet
  (3195 - 20841, n=70, last 2 years)
9523 Points -22%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
OnePlus Pad 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
17279 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
  (9984 - 20131, n=13)
16473 Points -5%
Xiaomi Pad 6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
7363 Points -57%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE Plus
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 8192
5002 Points -71%
Lenovo Tab P12
MediaTek Dimensity 7050, Mali-G68 MP4, 8192
4307 Points -75%
Average of class Tablet
  (267 - 17279, n=64, last 2 years)
3946 Points -77%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
  (22388 - 33376, n=13)
29406 Points +2%
OnePlus Pad 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
28816 Points
Xiaomi Pad 6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
8593 Points -70%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE Plus
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 8192
5323 Points -82%
Average of class Tablet
  (240 - 28816, n=64, last 2 years)
5031 Points -83%
Lenovo Tab P12
MediaTek Dimensity 7050, Mali-G68 MP4, 8192
4301 Points -85%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
OnePlus Pad 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
7196 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
  (3397 - 8480, n=13)
6562 Points -9%
Xiaomi Pad 6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
4882 Points -32%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE Plus
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 8192
4375 Points -39%
Lenovo Tab P12
MediaTek Dimensity 7050, Mali-G68 MP4, 8192
4307 Points -40%
Average of class Tablet
  (441 - 7196, n=64, last 2 years)
3438 Points -52%
Wild Life Extreme
Apple iPad Air 13 2024
Apple M2, M2 10-Core GPU, 8192
6406 Points +43%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
  (3967 - 5338, n=18)
4842 Points +8%
OnePlus Pad 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
4485 Points
Average of class Tablet
  (75 - 8689, n=73, last 2 years)
1326 Points -70%
Xiaomi Pad 6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
1246 Points -72%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE Plus
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 8192
845 Points -81%
Lenovo Tab P12
MediaTek Dimensity 7050, Mali-G68 MP4, 8192
623 Points -86%
Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Apple iPad Air 13 2024
Apple M2, M2 10-Core GPU, 8192
6316 Points +42%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
  (3991 - 5190, n=17)
4764 Points +7%
OnePlus Pad 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
4454 Points
Average of class Tablet
  (72 - 8889, n=72, last 2 years)
1559 Points -65%
Xiaomi Pad 6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
1233 Points -72%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE Plus
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 8192
839 Points -81%
Lenovo Tab P12
MediaTek Dimensity 7050, Mali-G68 MP4, 8192
611 Points -86%
Solar Bay Unlimited Score
Average of class Tablet
  (4887 - 15576, n=9, last 2 years)
8467 Points +2%
OnePlus Pad 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
8321 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
  (6765 - 9262, n=17)
8305 Points 0%
Apple iPad Air 13 2024
Apple M2, M2 10-Core GPU, 8192
7806 Points -6%
Solar Bay Score
OnePlus Pad 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
8315 Points
Average of class Tablet
  (4876 - 14922, n=9, last 2 years)
8211 Points -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
  (6788 - 8791, n=18)
8165 Points -2%
Apple iPad Air 13 2024
Apple M2, M2 10-Core GPU, 8192
8084 Points -3%
GFXBench
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
  (50 - 121, n=18)
87.1 fps +74%
Apple iPad Air 13 2024
Apple M2, M2 10-Core GPU, 8192
60 fps +20%
OnePlus Pad 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
50 fps
Average of class Tablet
  (3 - 120, n=78, last 2 years)
27.2 fps -46%
Xiaomi Pad 6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
22 fps -56%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE Plus
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 8192
20 fps -60%
Lenovo Tab P12
MediaTek Dimensity 7050, Mali-G68 MP4, 8192
11 fps -78%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Apple iPad Air 13 2024
Apple M2, M2 10-Core GPU, 8192
243.1 fps +43%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
  (92 - 241, n=19)
188.9 fps +11%
OnePlus Pad 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
170 fps
Average of class Tablet
  (2.5 - 340, n=78, last 2 years)
56.4 fps -67%
Xiaomi Pad 6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
53 fps -69%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE Plus
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 8192
35 fps -79%
Lenovo Tab P12
MediaTek Dimensity 7050, Mali-G68 MP4, 8192
29 fps -83%
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
  (42 - 119, n=18)
72.1 fps +72%
Apple iPad Air 13 2024
Apple M2, M2 10-Core GPU, 8192
58 fps +38%
OnePlus Pad 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
42 fps
Average of class Tablet
  (1.9 - 106.4, n=78, last 2 years)
19.1 fps -55%
Xiaomi Pad 6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
17 fps -60%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE Plus
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 8192
13 fps -69%
Lenovo Tab P12
MediaTek Dimensity 7050, Mali-G68 MP4, 8192
7.1 fps -83%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Apple iPad Air 13 2024
Apple M2, M2 10-Core GPU, 8192
97.4 fps +41%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
  (43 - 96, n=20)
76.3 fps +11%
OnePlus Pad 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
69 fps
Average of class Tablet
  (0.9 - 114.5, n=78, last 2 years)
21 fps -70%
Xiaomi Pad 6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
20 fps -71%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE Plus
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 8192
14 fps -80%
Lenovo Tab P12
MediaTek Dimensity 7050, Mali-G68 MP4, 8192
11 fps -84%
3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Apple iPad Air 13 2024
Apple M2, M2 10-Core GPU, 8192
42.8 fps +34%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
  (31 - 42, n=19)
36.7 fps +15%
OnePlus Pad 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
32 fps
Average of class Tablet
  (0.4 - 55.1, n=76, last 2 years)
9.93 fps -69%
Xiaomi Pad 6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
9.7 fps -70%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE Plus
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 8192
6 fps -81%
Lenovo Tab P12
MediaTek Dimensity 7050, Mali-G68 MP4, 8192
4.7 fps -85%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPad Air 13 2024
Apple M2, M2 10-Core GPU, 8192
78736 Points +75%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
  (25953 - 72665, n=19)
50413 Points +12%
OnePlus Pad 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
45083 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE Plus
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 8192
34758 Points -23%
Lenovo Tab P12
MediaTek Dimensity 7050, Mali-G68 MP4, 8192
31245 Points -31%
Xiaomi Pad 6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
30783 Points -32%
Average of class Tablet
  (763 - 105178, n=86, last 2 years)
28666 Points -36%
Geekbench AI
Single Precision TensorFlow NNAPI
Average of class Tablet
  (243 - 1065, n=4, last 2 years)
606 Points +149%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
  (243 - 489, n=7)
380 Points +56%
OnePlus Pad 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
243 Points
Half Precision TensorFlow NNAPI
Average of class Tablet
  (227 - 981, n=4, last 2 years)
582 Points +156%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
  (227 - 498, n=7)
373 Points +64%
OnePlus Pad 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
227 Points
Quantized TensorFlow NNAPI
Average of class Tablet
  (508 - 1693, n=4, last 2 years)
1146 Points +126%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
  (508 - 1128, n=7)
839 Points +65%
OnePlus Pad 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
508 Points
OnePlus Pad 2Lenovo Tab P12Xiaomi Pad 6Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE PlusAverage 256 GB UFS 3.1 FlashAverage of class Tablet
AndroBench 3-5
-35%
-15%
-61%
-8%
-47%
Sequential Read 256KB
2003.1
956.07
-52%
1673.97
-16%
537.33
-73%
1762 ?(1004 - 2037, n=96)
-12%
Sequential Write 256KB
1732.7
776.24
-55%
745.32
-57%
245.73
-86%
1166 ?(452 - 2004, n=96)
-33%
Random Read 4KB
236.5
241.23
2%
298.45
26%
228.19
-4%
Random Write 4KB
348.6
234.58
-33%
304.34
-13%
68.58
-80%
Max. Load
 39.1 °C39.5 °C32 °C 
 33.5 °C33.7 °C30.3 °C 
 31.4 °C31.7 °C29.8 °C 
Maximum: 39.5 °C
Average: 33.4 °C
33 °C41.9 °C41.9 °C
31.3 °C35.8 °C36.5 °C
29.9 °C31.8 °C32.8 °C
Maximum: 41.9 °C
Average: 35 °C
Power Supply (max.)  40.3 °C | Room Temperature 20 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 33.4 °C / 92 F, compared to the average of 30 °C / 86 F for the devices in the class Tablet.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 39.5 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 33.7 °C / 93 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 41.9 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 23.8 °C / 75 F, compared to the device average of 30 °C / 86 F.


热图前端
热图前端
热图返回
热图返回

3DMark Stress Test

05101520253035404550556065707580859095Tooltip
OnePlus Pad 2 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø24.1 (22.9-27.4)
Lenovo Tab P12 Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø3.71 (3.7-3.72)
Xiaomi Pad 6 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø6.27 (6.1-7.39)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE Plus Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø5.05 (5.04-5.08)
Apple iPad Air 13 2024 M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 0.0.0.0: Ø25.3 (23.7-37)
OnePlus Pad 2 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø78.9 (74-96)
Lenovo Tab P12 Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø12.9 (12.9-12.9)
Xiaomi Pad 6 Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø21.5 (21.1-25.4)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE Plus Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø17.7 (17.6-17.8)
Apple iPad Air 13 2024 M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø60 (59.9-60)
OnePlus Pad 2 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.5: Ø23.2 (22.2-25.5)
Apple iPad Air 13 2024 M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø16.5 (15.7-21.2)
OnePlus Pad 2 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.1.1.3: Ø11.1 (10.6-12.3)
Apple iPad Air 13 2024 M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø13.3 (12.6-18.5)
OnePlus Pad 2 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 1.1.1.3: Ø11.2 (10.6-12.4)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2046.447.12546.140.33138.836.24040.733.55045.340.36334.531.58030.141.1100305212531.254.216024.556.220021.458.525019.660.831519.762.740018.460.650018.666.363021.270.180023.276.1100021.177.3125016.577.6160017.177.3200016.576.3250016.178.3315016.578400016.776.5500017.171.7630017.167.980001773.41000016.973.61250016.773.61600015.867SPL30.787.8N1.573.1median 17.1median 73.1Delta2.37.333.228.431.83218.22123.424.532.433.919.423.918.830.317.644.513.854.115.966.51662.316.46215.163.513.86412.970.413.872.313.568.513.164.513.866.812.5711368.613.267.914.569.413.468.41465.315.264.91562.113.6621759.715.553.42680.10.750.5median 13.8median 64.914.3hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseOnePlus Pad 2Apple iPad Air 13 2024
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
OnePlus Pad 2 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.7% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.2% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (12.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 15% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 79% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 9% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 88% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Apple iPad Air 13 2024 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 6.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 5% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 93% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Battery Runtime - WiFi Websurfing
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE Plus
10090 mAh
947 min +9%
OnePlus Pad 2
9510 mAh
866 min
Xiaomi Pad 6
8840 mAh
823 min -5%
Average of class Tablet
  (319 - 1764, n=78, last 2 years)
821 min -5%
Apple iPad Air 13 2024
 mAh
771 min -11%
Lenovo Tab P12
10200 mAh
675 min -22%
Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing
14h 26min

Pros

+ 物超所值
+ 坚固的金属机身
+ 强大的处理和图形处理能力
+ 无 PWM 的明亮屏幕
+ 支持笔
+ 六个扬声器,音效强劲
+ 相对较长的电池寿命
+ 4K 视频录制
+ 高速 Wi-Fi 7
+ 带视频输出的 USB 3.0 端口

Cons

- 无 5G 型号
- 无 IP 认证
- 屏幕背光略不均匀
- 在可持续发展方面投入不多
- 摄像头图像质量一般

评语 - 真正的旗舰杀手,价格实惠

OnePlus Pad 2 评测。
OnePlus Pad 2 评测。

如果 iPadOS 不是你的绝对必需品,那么 OnePlus Pad 2 就是比昂贵得多的Apple 平板电脑的绝佳替代品。同样,与其他Android 产品相比,Pad 2 的速度更快、配置更好,最重要的是价格合理。

OnePlus将充足的存储空间、出色的电池续航能力、超快的处理器、令人印象深刻的图形处理性能和手写笔支持整合到了一个相当轻巧和坚固的金属机身中。OnePlus Pad 2 看起来可能有些过时,因为棱角分明的设计在许多制造商那里又开始流行起来。尽管如此,这最终还是归结为品味问题;反正当平板电脑装在对开式保护套中时,圆润的机身设计并不十分明显。

我们对这款产品只有小小的不满:OnePlus承诺为Pad 2提供四年的更新服务,这固然不错,但考虑到平板电脑的性能,更新服务还可以做得更好。并非每个人都会喜欢显示屏的圆角,因为在未经优化的应用程序中,圆角有时可能会遮住屏幕的部分内容。

另一方面,扬声器的声音非常好听,机身也不会太热。此外,即使是 iPad Air 13 (2024)也无法提供与支持 Wi-Fi 7 的 iPad Air 13(2024)相媲美的无线性能。

OnePlus Pad 2 是一款真正令人惊叹的超值产品,它不必惧怕昂贵得多的平板电脑。

小米 小米 Pad 6是更实惠、更耐用的替代品,而 三星Galaxy Tab S9 FE对于那些正在寻找具有 5G 功能的大型平板电脑的用户来说,Plus 是一个不错的选择。

价格和供应情况

OnePlus Pad 2 可在公司网站或亚马逊等在线零售商处购买,售价为 549.99 欧元(或 499.99 美元)。或亚马逊等在线零售商处购买,售价为549.99 欧元(或499.99 美元).

提示:我们对评级系统进行了更新,第 8 版的结果与第 7 版的结果没有可比性。更多信息请参见 这里查看。

OnePlus Pad 2 - 10/15/2024 v8
Florian Schmitt

Chassis
86 / 98 → 88%
Keyboard
75 / 80 → 94%
Pointing Device
96%
Connectivity
53 / 69 → 77%
Weight
82 / 40-88 → 87%
Battery
90%
Display
84%
Games Performance
45 / 65 → 70%
Application Performance
64 / 92 → 70%
AI Performance
15%
Temperature
92%
Noise
100%
Audio
81 / 91 → 89%
Camera
59 / 90 → 66%
Average
58%
86%
Tablet - Weighted Average
CO2 Emissions
No Data
Materials
0%
Packaging
35%
Power Use
50%
Repairability
19%
Software Updates
60%
Total Sustainability Score: 27.3%

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was freely purchased by the author at his/her own expense. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > OnePlus Pad 2 评论--与 iPad Air 不相上下,但价格只有后者的一半。
Florian Schmitt, 2024-10-17 (Update: 2024-10-17)