Notebookcheck Logo
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro tablet review (image source: Marcus Herbrich)

小米 Pad 7 Pro 评测--具有超强持久力和超大屏幕的经济型平板电脑

Apple iPad Air 的廉价替代品。

在许多方面，小米 Pad 7 Pro 都优于 iPad Air 2024，但价格却不到后者的一半。尤其是小米平板电脑的 3K 显示屏，在这个价位上是无与伦比的。不过，与小米 Pad 7 相比，Pro 版可能有一个缺陷。
Marcus Herbrich, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
Android Touchscreen Tablet

小米 Pad 7 Pro 评测

在我们的评测中，小米 Pad 7 Pro 的性能、功能和价格比给我们留下了非常深刻的印象。它配备了功能强大的高通处理器、无 PWM 高分辨率显示屏和出色的扬声器系统，可确保用户享受到绝佳的音质。因此，它是一款非常适合多媒体应用的中端平板电脑。由于电池续航能力极强，加上支持手写笔和可选配的键盘保护套，没有什么能阻挡你高效完成工作。

不过，小米平板电脑也留下了一些问号，尤其是在更新政策和全球可用性方面。因此，希望获得长期软件支持的用户应该选择Galaxy Tab S9 或三星Galaxy Tab S9 FE。此外，由于缺乏 GNSS 和 5G 选项以及 6 GHz Wi-Fi，Pad 7 Pro 在连接性方面受到一定限制。

Pros

+ 明亮的 144 Hz 面板
+ 高档外观
+ 电池寿命长
+ 高性能
+ 强大的扬声器

Cons

- (目前）只能导入
- 无 6 GHz 频段
- 无更新保证

价格和供应情况

小米 Pad 7 Pro 目前仅在德国以进口方式销售。在中国，这款中档平板电脑的基本版售价为 2499 元（约合 330 美元）。在我们的合作伙伴深圳贸易公司，起价约为 440 美元。目前还没有进一步的全球上市迹象，因此 Pro 版（与 Pad 6 系列类似）可能不会进入欧洲市场。

可能的替代品比较

Image
Model / Review
Price
Weight
Drive
Display
1.
86.5%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 ⎘
Qualcomm Adreno 735 ⎘
12 GB Memory, 256 GB 		Amazon:
1. $269.50
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro WiFi Ve...
2. $629.99
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro (256GB + 8...
3. $264.50
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro WiFi Ve...
List Price: 450€		500 g256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash11.20"
3000x2136
329 PPI
IPS
2.
86.1%
OnePlus Pad 2
OnePlus Pad 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 ⎘
Qualcomm Adreno 750 ⎘
12 GB Memory, 256 GB 		Amazon: $599.99
List Price: 549€		584 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash12.10"
3000x2120
304 PPI
IPS
3.
90% v7 (old)
Apple iPad Air 6 2024
Apple iPad Air 6 2024
Apple M2 ⎘
Apple M2 10-Core GPU ⎘
8 GB Memory, 128 GB NVMe		Amazon: $799.00
List Price: 699€		462 g128 GB NVMe10.86"
2360x1640
265 PPI
IPS
4.
81.1%
Huawei MatePad 11.5 S
Huawei MatePad 11.5 S
HiSilicon Kirin 9000W ⎘
HiSilicon Maleoon 910 ⎘
8 GB Memory, 256 GB 		Amazon:
1. $25.64
YOUULAR Tablet Case for Huaw...
2. $10.95
Mr.Shield Screen Protector c...
3. $33.99
YOUULAR Shoulder Strap Table...
List Price: 399€		510 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash11.50"
2800x1840
291 PPI
TFT-LCD
5.
90.9% v7 (old)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 5G
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy ⎘
Qualcomm Adreno 740 ⎘
12 GB Memory, 256 GB 		Amazon:
List Price: 1169€		500 g256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash11.00"
2560x1600
274 PPI
Dynamic AMOLED 2x

与 小米 15和 小米 15 Pro作为其中国发布会的一部分，中国制造商还展示了小米 Pad 7 Pro。这款中端平板电脑配置了 11.2 英寸显示屏和骁龙 8s Gen 3 处理器。 骁龙 8s Gen 3.由于价格低廉，制造商在可选配件方面也毫不妥协。带照明按键的键盘盖和触控笔也可将 Pad 7 Pro 变为学校或大学的工作机器。

小米 Pad 7 Pro 规格

Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro (Pad 7 Series)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 8 x 2 - 2.8 GHz, Cortex-X4 / A720 / A720 / A520 (Kryo)
Graphics adapter
Qualcomm Adreno 735
Memory
12 GB 
Display
11.20 inch 3:2, 3000 x 2136 pixel 329 PPI, Capacitive Touchscreen, native pen support, IPS, glossy: yes, HDR, 144 Hz
Storage
256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash, 256 GB 
, 225 GB free
Connections
1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: USB Type C, 1 Fingerprint Reader, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, OTG, Miracast
Networking
Wi-Fi 7 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz be = Wi-Fi 7), Bluetooth 5.4
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 6.18 x 251.22 x 173.42
Battery
8850 mAh Lithium-Ion
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 15
Camera
Primary Camera: 50 MPix (f/1.8, 1/2.76", 4K@60fps) + 2 MPix (f/2.4), camera2 API: Full
Secondary Camera: 32 MPix (f/2.2, FF)
Additional features
Speakers: 4 Speaker, charger, USB cable, info material, HyperOS 2.0, 12 Months Warranty, widvine L1, BT-Codecs: SBC, AAC, LDAC, LHDC, aptX, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, aptX TWS+, HDR10, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, HLG, fanless
Weight
500 g, Power Supply: 93 g
Price
450 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

外壳 - 小米平板电脑采用金属外壳

Pad 7 Pro 的装配和做工都非常出色，铝制边框和后部也具有高品质的手感。得益于磨砂表面，指纹不是问题，但制造商没有说明正面使用了哪种保护玻璃。

小米平板电脑的重量为 500 克，机身厚度不到 6 毫米，即使长时间使用也能轻松驾驭。尽管拥有 11 英寸的机身，Pad 7 Pro 的尺寸却相当紧凑。这也得益于其约 86% 的良好屏占比。这使得屏幕边框相当纤薄。该保护套没有 IP 认证。

小米 Pad 7 Pro 颜色（图片来源：小米）
小米 Pad 7 Pro 颜色（图片来源：小米）
小米 Pad 7 Pro 平板电脑评测（图片来源：Marcus Herbrich）
小米 Pad 7 Pro 平板电脑评测（图片来源：Marcus Herbrich）
小米 Pad 7 Pro 平板电脑评测（图片来源：Marcus Herbrich）
小米 Pad 7 Pro 平板电脑评测（图片来源：Marcus Herbrich）

尺寸比较

❌
268.7 mm 195 mm 6.49 mm 584 g261 mm 177.3 mm 6.2 mm 510 g254.3 mm 165.8 mm 5.9 mm 500 g251.22 mm 173.42 mm 6.18 mm 500 g247.6 mm 178.5 mm 6.1 mm 462 g210 mm 148 mm 1 mm 2.9 g

功能 - Pad 7 Pro 采用 USB 3.2 接口。

小米平板电脑配备 8 或 12 GB LDDR5X 内存和 256 或 512 GB UFS 4.0 存储空间。此外，Pad 7 Pro 的四扬声器系统、手写笔支持、Miracast 和指纹传感器为中端平板电脑提供了强大的功能。在测试中，我们还通过快速 USB 3.2 端口（1 代）测得三星 980 Pro（M2 固态硬盘）的数据传输速度高达 212 MB/s。连接的存储介质可使用 NTFS 或 exFAT 格式化。借助适配器，USB 端口还可将图像信号输出到外部屏幕。

软件 - 小米平板电脑运行Android 15

Pad 7 Pro 使用的是该公司自己的第二代 HyperOS，其中包括 Play Protect 认证。我们的中文版开箱并不支持谷歌服务，但出厂时已经预装了谷歌框架。这意味着可以通过该公司自己的应用商店手动安装 PlayStore。不过，除中文和英文外，无法选择德语语言包。

小米公司不愿提供有关中国市场软件更新的信息。在我们进行评测时，小米平板电脑的Android 15 包含从 2024 年 12 月开始的安全补丁。我们认为产品支持期不会超过两到三年。

小米 Pad 7 Pro 平板电脑评测
小米 Pad 7 Pro 平板电脑评测
小米 Pad 7 Pro 平板电脑评测
小米 Pad 7 Pro 平板电脑评测

可持续性

小米没有提供有关所用材料及其回收率的详细信息，但制造商提供了一般的回收信息。重点是增加回收材料的使用，包括铝、金和铜。使用有机基高分子材料和从废弃渔网中回收的塑料也有助于将生态足迹降至最低。

包装看似不含塑料，但设备本身是用铝箔包裹的。包装的其余部分由纸板制成。

通信和全球导航卫星系统 - 缺乏 GPS 的平板电脑

小米平板电脑既不提供使用移动数据的选项，也不支持通过卫星系统定位。

在家庭网络中，Pad 7 Pro 使用现代 WiFi 7 标准，但只能在 2.4 和 5 GHz 范围内建立连接。在与华硕 ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000 配对的测试中，我们在不使用 6 GHz 频段的情况下实现了近 1,000 Mbit/s 的惊人传输速度。不过，我们无法使用 6E 参考路由器完全利用 WiFi 7。

Networking
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Huawei MatePad 11.5 S
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
1015 (495min - 1037max) MBit/s +2%
Average Wi-Fi 7
  (556 - 1801, n=53)
1010 MBit/s +2%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Wi-Fi 7
991 (512min - 1016max) MBit/s
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 5G
Wi-Fi 6E
944 (474min - 970max) MBit/s -5%
Average of class Tablet
  (10.5 - 1710, n=82, last 2 years)
542 MBit/s -45%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Average Wi-Fi 7
  (565 - 1875, n=53)
980 MBit/s +9%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 5G
Wi-Fi 6E
951 (929min - 960max) MBit/s +6%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Wi-Fi 7
895 (751min - 988max) MBit/s
Huawei MatePad 11.5 S
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
876 (737min - 950max) MBit/s -2%
Average of class Tablet
  (20.1 - 1705, n=82, last 2 years)
527 MBit/s -41%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
Average Wi-Fi 7
  (563 - 1945, n=40)
1538 MBit/s
Average of class Tablet
  (691 - 1888, n=16, last 2 years)
1399 MBit/s
OnePlus Pad 2
Wi-Fi 7
895 (675min - 1017max) MBit/s
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
OnePlus Pad 2
Wi-Fi 7
1652 (1472min - 1703max) MBit/s
Average Wi-Fi 7
  (451 - 1864, n=40)
1525 MBit/s
Average of class Tablet
  (666 - 1842, n=18, last 2 years)
1348 MBit/s
Apple iPad Air 6 2024
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
1196 (767min - 1336max) MBit/s
Apple iPad Air 6 2024
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
666 (403min - 883max) MBit/s
0501001502002503003504004505005506006507007508008509009501000Tooltip
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro Wi-Fi 7; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø974 (512-1016)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 5G Wi-Fi 6E; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø929 (474-970)
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro Wi-Fi 7; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø891 (751-988)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 5G Wi-Fi 6E; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø951 (929-960)

摄像头 - 小米平板电脑只有一个摄像头

与小米 Pad 7 Pro 自拍合影
与小米 Pad 7 Pro 自拍合影

在 Pad 7 Pro 的相机系统方面，小米从其姊妹机型 Pad 6S Pro 中汲取了灵感。前置 3200 万像素镜头采用了像素二进制技术，但只能使用固定焦距。对于这个价位的产品来说，照片质量还是可以接受的。使用前置摄像头可以 30fps 的全高清画质录制视频。此外，这款中端平板电脑还能拍摄 4K60 的动态图像。

相机系统的核心是一个自动对焦的 5000 万像素镜头，光圈为 f/1.8。在日光下，三星 JN1 能拍出不错的照片，对于一款售价不到 500 美元的平板电脑来说，照片质量非常出色。不过，色彩还原有时似乎有点过度饱和。Pad 7 Pro 所提供的照片质量非常适合为文件拍照，以便日后添加注释。通过相应的模式，识别到的文档区域也会自动裁剪并保存。

1x
1x
2x
2x
5x
5x
10倍（最大值）
10倍（最大值）
文件模式
文件模式
小米 Pad 7 Pro 平板电脑评测
小米 Pad 7 Pro 平板电脑评测
小米 Pad 7 Pro 平板电脑评测
小米 Pad 7 Pro 平板电脑评测

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Wide-angleWide-angleLow-lightZoom 5x
ColorChecker
4.2 ∆E
4.2 ∆E
6.4 ∆E
7.1 ∆E
6.8 ∆E
3.6 ∆E
3.1 ∆E
8 ∆E
6.8 ∆E
3.1 ∆E
5.9 ∆E
2 ∆E
8.3 ∆E
10.5 ∆E
10.2 ∆E
2.2 ∆E
8 ∆E
11.7 ∆E
7.3 ∆E
3.9 ∆E
7.3 ∆E
6.1 ∆E
2.5 ∆E
4.8 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro: 6 ∆E min: 1.96 - max: 11.66 ∆E
ColorChecker
29.6 ∆E
54.6 ∆E
39.3 ∆E
34.8 ∆E
45.2 ∆E
61.9 ∆E
53.3 ∆E
35.7 ∆E
43.2 ∆E
29 ∆E
64.7 ∆E
63.7 ∆E
31.5 ∆E
47.2 ∆E
36.9 ∆E
76.1 ∆E
44.1 ∆E
41.5 ∆E
92 ∆E
70.6 ∆E
52 ∆E
36.4 ∆E
23.8 ∆E
13.3 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro: 46.69 ∆E min: 13.35 - max: 92 ∆E

配件和保修 - Pad 7 Pro 随附一个电源适配器

小米 Pad 7 Pro 的电源适配器（图片来源：Marcus Herbrich）
小米 Pad 7 Pro 的电源适配器（图片来源：Marcus Herbrich）

包装盒内包括一个 67 瓦快速充电电源适配器、一条数据线或充电线（USB-A 转 USB-C）和一份快速指南。深圳贸易公司在中国版的基础上增加了充电器的欧盟适配器和 USB OTG 适配器。Pad 7 Pro 还可选配触控笔和键盘盖。

我们的进口设备提供 12 个月 保修.如果需要保修，Trading Shenzhen 可以选择将智能手机寄往德国的收货地址。

输入设备和操作 - 小米平板电脑和 360 Hz

该设备可以用手指和 15 克重的小米 Focus Pen（具有 8192 级压力灵敏度）进行操作。得益于高达 144 Hz 的高刷新率，尽管分辨率为 3K，但显示效果非常流畅。不过，我们的评测设备还是出现了一些微小的抖动。

指纹传感器位于平板电脑左侧的开/关按钮内。用食指很容易就能触及传感器区域。解锁过程快速可靠，还可以通过前置摄像头进行二维面部识别。

小米 Pad 7 Pro 平板电脑评测
小米 Pad 7 Pro 平板电脑评测
小米 Pad 7 Pro 平板电脑评测

显示屏 - Pad 7 Pro 采用 LCD

LC 显示器采用经典的 RGB 子像素矩阵，由一个红光、一个蓝光和一个绿光二极管组成。
LC 显示器采用经典的 RGB 子像素矩阵，由一个红光、一个蓝光和一个绿光二极管组成。

IPS 面板的宽高比为 3:2，像素密度高达 345 PPI，对于平板电脑来说亮度非常吸引人。在使用白色背景进行测量时，我们也达到了制造商规定的 800 尼特亮度。APL18 测试中的峰值亮度为 780 cd/m²，而观看 HDR 视频时达到的最大亮度仅为 522 cd/m²。此外，还获得了德国莱茵 TÜV 的三重认证（无闪烁、低蓝光含量、"昼夜节律友好"）。

得益于 LC 技术，即使在低亮度条件下，我们也无法检测到任何闪烁，这对 PMW 敏感的用户来说应该很有吸引力。

749
cd/m²		799
cd/m²		756
cd/m²
739
cd/m²		776
cd/m²		725
cd/m²
742
cd/m²		724
cd/m²		744
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 799 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 750.4 cd/m² Minimum: 1.48 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 91 %
Center on Battery: 776 cd/m²
Contrast: 1338:1 (Black: 0.58 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.6 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.9
ΔE Greyscale 2.5 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
99.3% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.23
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
IPS, 3000x2136, 11.2"		OnePlus Pad 2
IPS, 3000x2120, 12.1"		Apple iPad Air 6 2024
IPS, 2360x1640, 10.9"		Huawei MatePad 11.5 S
TFT-LCD, 2800x1840, 11.5"		Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 5G
Dynamic AMOLED 2x, 2560x1600, 11"
Screen
5%
-1%
-66%
-15%
Brightness middle
776
833
7%
506
-35%
511
-34%
576
-26%
Brightness
750
771
3%
474
-37%
449
-40%
579
-23%
Brightness Distribution
91
84
-8%
87
-4%
83
-9%
99
9%
Black Level *
0.58
0.45
22%
0.4
31%
0.99
-71%
Contrast
1338
1851
38%
1265
-5%
516
-61%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
1.6
1.79
-12%
1.48
7%
3.6
-125%
2.5
-56%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
4.5
4.01
11%
3.12
31%
7.5
-67%
4.6
-2%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
2.5
3
-20%
2.3
8%
5.5
-120%
2.3
8%
Gamma
2.23 99%
2.254 98%
2.204 100%
2.27 97%
2.02 109%
CCT
6892 94%
6419 101%
6954 93%
7566 86%
6585 99%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8627 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

对比度保持在 1,500:1 左右的合理水平，"专业 "配置文件对色彩的校准也非常出色。个别颜色的差异几乎看不出来。色彩表现的设置选项也很丰富。除了各种色彩配置文件外，还可以调整色温和色彩空间。

色彩准确度（配置文件：专业、暖色，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
色彩准确度（配置文件：专业、暖色，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
Farbraum（配置文件：专业，暖色，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
Farbraum（配置文件：专业，暖色，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
灰度（配置文件：专业、暖色，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
灰度（配置文件：专业、暖色，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
色彩饱和度（配置文件：专业，暖色，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
色彩饱和度（配置文件：专业，暖色，目标色彩空间：sRGB）

Display Response Times

ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
   ↔    Response Time Black to White
18.37 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 4.82 ms rise
↘ 13.55 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 37 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
   ↔    Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
36.13 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 11.32 ms rise
↘ 24.81 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 49 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.7 ms).

由于亮度相对较高，这款中档平板电脑在户外使用非常方便。不过，在阴凉处，Pad 7 Pro 的显示屏即使在夏天也不会受到任何限制。IPS 面板的可视角度非常吸引人。

小米 Pad 7 Pro 平板电脑评测（图片来源：Marcus Herbrich）
小米 Pad 7 Pro 平板电脑评测（图片来源：Marcus Herbrich）
小米 Pad 7 Pro 平板电脑评测（图片来源：Marcus Herbrich）
小米 Pad 7 Pro 平板电脑评测（图片来源：Marcus Herbrich）

性能 - 小米平板电脑依赖于高通公司

在我们的一系列基准测试中 骁龙 8s 第 3 代与 12GB 内存一起运行，达到了中端平板电脑的高性能水平。与 Galaxy 平板电脑 S9相比，记录的分数要低一些。在图形测试中 Adreno 735也取得了不错的成绩；不过，在要求苛刻的 GFXBench tier 测试中，它的工作就像拉上了手刹。

Geekbench 6.3 | Geekbench 5.5 | PCMark for Android | CrossMark | BaseMark OS II | UL Procyon AI Inference for Android | AImark | Geekbench AI | AI Benchmark
Geekbench 6.3
Single-Core
Apple iPad Air 6 2024
Apple M2, M2 10-Core GPU, 8192
2587 Points +31%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 12288
2079 Points +5%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
1973 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3
  (1821 - 2012, n=7)
1924 Points -2%
Huawei MatePad 11.5 S
HiSilicon Kirin 9000W, Maleoon 910, 8192
1245 Points -37%
Average of class Tablet
  (185 - 3715, n=76, last 2 years)
1103 Points -44%
OnePlus Pad 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
954 Points -52%
Multi-Core
Apple iPad Air 6 2024
Apple M2, M2 10-Core GPU, 8192
10085 Points +97%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 12288
5503 Points +7%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
5127 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3
  (4602 - 5284, n=7)
4938 Points -4%
OnePlus Pad 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
4564 Points -11%
Huawei MatePad 11.5 S
HiSilicon Kirin 9000W, Maleoon 910, 8192
3989 Points -22%
Average of class Tablet
  (493 - 14690, n=76, last 2 years)
3507 Points -32%
Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Apple iPad Air 6 2024
Apple M2, M2 10-Core GPU, 8192
1887 Points +34%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 12288
1550 Points +10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3
  (1329 - 1498, n=7)
1431 Points +2%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
1403 Points
Huawei MatePad 11.5 S
HiSilicon Kirin 9000W, Maleoon 910, 8192
965 Points -31%
Average of class Tablet
  (103 - 1887, n=71, last 2 years)
732 Points -48%
Multi-Core
Apple iPad Air 6 2024
Apple M2, M2 10-Core GPU, 8192
8624 Points +87%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 12288
5036 Points +9%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
4602 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3
  (3980 - 4746, n=7)
4359 Points -5%
Huawei MatePad 11.5 S
HiSilicon Kirin 9000W, Maleoon 910, 8192
3694 Points -20%
Average of class Tablet
  (303 - 8624, n=71, last 2 years)
2589 Points -44%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3
  (15547 - 19083, n=7)
16859 Points +7%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 12288
16172 Points +3%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
15743 Points
OnePlus Pad 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
12156 Points -23%
Huawei MatePad 11.5 S
HiSilicon Kirin 9000W, Maleoon 910, 8192
11872 Points -25%
Average of class Tablet
  (3195 - 20841, n=73, last 2 years)
10311 Points -35%
CrossMark - Overall
Apple iPad Air 6 2024
Apple M2, M2 10-Core GPU, 8192
1437 Points +28%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 12288
1222 Points +9%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
1123 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3
  (771 - 1155, n=7)
984 Points -12%
Huawei MatePad 11.5 S
HiSilicon Kirin 9000W, Maleoon 910, 8192
911 Points -19%
Average of class Tablet
  (172 - 1944, n=63, last 2 years)
800 Points -29%
BaseMark OS II
Overall
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
8895 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 12288
8673 Points -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3
  (5685 - 9147, n=7)
7903 Points -11%
Huawei MatePad 11.5 S
HiSilicon Kirin 9000W, Maleoon 910, 8192
6401 Points -28%
Average of class Tablet
  (195 - 11721, n=58, last 2 years)
4503 Points -49%
Apple iPad Air 6 2024
Apple M2, M2 10-Core GPU, 8192
Points -100%
System
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 12288
14097 Points +42%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3
  (9875 - 13391, n=7)
11865 Points +19%
Huawei MatePad 11.5 S
HiSilicon Kirin 9000W, Maleoon 910, 8192
10447 Points +5%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
9937 Points
Average of class Tablet
  (904 - 16435, n=58, last 2 years)
7516 Points -24%
Memory
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
12938 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 12288
8702 Points -33%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3
  (5456 - 12938, n=7)
8566 Points -34%
Huawei MatePad 11.5 S
HiSilicon Kirin 9000W, Maleoon 910, 8192
8362 Points -35%
Average of class Tablet
  (401 - 12938, n=58, last 2 years)
5209 Points -60%
Graphics
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 12288
31626 Points +28%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
24738 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3
  (8020 - 29006, n=7)
23198 Points -6%
Huawei MatePad 11.5 S
HiSilicon Kirin 9000W, Maleoon 910, 8192
12763 Points -48%
Average of class Tablet
  (418 - 57192, n=58, last 2 years)
10319 Points -58%
Web
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
1928 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3
  (1534 - 1928, n=7)
1770 Points -8%
Huawei MatePad 11.5 S
HiSilicon Kirin 9000W, Maleoon 910, 8192
1532 Points -21%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 12288
1460 Points -24%
Average of class Tablet
  (10 - 2056, n=58, last 2 years)
1316 Points -32%
UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 12288
16088 Points +9%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
14738 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3
  (13576 - 15572, n=6)
14570 Points -1%
Average of class Tablet
  (2597 - 74821, n=56, last 2 years)
12001 Points -19%
Huawei MatePad 11.5 S
HiSilicon Kirin 9000W, Maleoon 910, 8192
10847 Points -26%
AImark - Score v3.x
Average of class Tablet
  (84 - 156427, n=49, last 2 years)
7399 Points +521%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 12288
1308 Points +10%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
1192 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3
  (946 - 1321, n=7)
1165 Points -2%
Huawei MatePad 11.5 S
HiSilicon Kirin 9000W, Maleoon 910, 8192
738 Points -38%
Geekbench AI
Quantized TensorFlow NNAPI 1.2
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
1082 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3
  ()
1082 Points 0%
Average of class Tablet
  (130 - 4200, n=7, last 2 years)
1014 Points -6%
Half Precision TensorFlow NNAPI 1.2
Average of class Tablet
  (84 - 4279, n=7, last 2 years)
808 Points +73%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
466 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3
  ()
466 Points 0%
Single Precision TensorFlow NNAPI 1.2
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
473 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3
  ()
473 Points 0%
Average of class Tablet
  (85 - 1110, n=7, last 2 years)
355 Points -25%
AI Benchmark
Score V5
Average of class Tablet
  (101 - 8305, n=5, last 2 years)
2472 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3
  (115 - 194, n=3)
143 Points
Huawei MatePad 11.5 S
HiSilicon Kirin 9000W, Maleoon 910, 8192
101 Points
Score V6
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
3686 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3
  ()
3686 Points 0%
Average of class Tablet
  (99.7 - 7341, n=6, last 2 years)
2096 Points -43%
3DMark: Wild Life Extreme Unlimited | Wild Life Extreme | Wild Life Unlimited Score | Solar Bay Score | Solar Bay Unlimited Score | Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score | Steel Nomad Light Score
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7: T-Rex Onscreen | 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
GFXBench 3.0: on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
GFXBench 3.1: on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
GFXBench: on screen Car Chase Onscreen | 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | 3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Apple iPad Air 6 2024
M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe
6204 Points +89%
OnePlus Pad 2
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4454 Points +36%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 5G
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3826 Points +17%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3283 Points
Huawei MatePad 11.5 S
Maleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1018 Points -69%
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Apple iPad Air 6 2024
M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe
5598 Points +75%
OnePlus Pad 2
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4485 Points +40%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 5G
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3857 Points +20%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3201 Points
Huawei MatePad 11.5 S
Maleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
994 Points -69%
3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Apple iPad Air 6 2024
M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe
23565 Points +95%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 5G
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
14527 Points +20%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
12074 Points
Huawei MatePad 11.5 S
Maleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
3802 Points -69%
3DMark / Solar Bay Score
OnePlus Pad 2
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
8315 Points +60%
Apple iPad Air 6 2024
M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe
6654 Points +28%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 5G
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
5627 Points +8%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
5212 Points
3DMark / Solar Bay Unlimited Score
OnePlus Pad 2
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
8321 Points +61%
Apple iPad Air 6 2024
M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe
7899 Points +52%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 5G
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
5550 Points +7%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
5182 Points
3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score
OnePlus Pad 2
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1626 Points +51%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1075 Points
3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Score
OnePlus Pad 2
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1639 Points +49%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1098 Points
Huawei MatePad 11.5 S
Maleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
Points -100%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 5G
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps 0%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps
Apple iPad Air 6 2024
M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe
60 fps -50%
Huawei MatePad 11.5 S
Maleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps -50%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Apple iPad Air 6 2024
M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe
628 fps +40%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
449 fps
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 5G
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
367 fps -18%
Huawei MatePad 11.5 S
Maleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
256 fps -43%
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 5G
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps +10%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
109 fps
Apple iPad Air 6 2024
M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe
60 fps -45%
Huawei MatePad 11.5 S
Maleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
56 fps -49%
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Apple iPad Air 6 2024
M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe
411 fps +54%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
267 fps
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 5G
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
249 fps -7%
Huawei MatePad 11.5 S
Maleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
155 fps -42%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 5G
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
97 fps +67%
Apple iPad Air 6 2024
M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe
60 fps +3%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
58 fps
Huawei MatePad 11.5 S
Maleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
40 fps -31%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Apple iPad Air 6 2024
M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe
281 fps +54%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 5G
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
186 fps +2%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
183 fps
Huawei MatePad 11.5 S
Maleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
106 fps -42%
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 5G
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
64 fps +83%
Apple iPad Air 6 2024
M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe
60 fps +71%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
35 fps
Huawei MatePad 11.5 S
Maleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
22 fps -37%
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Apple iPad Air 6 2024
M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe
173 fps +59%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 5G
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps +10%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
109 fps
Huawei MatePad 11.5 S
Maleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
48 fps -56%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 5G
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
62 fps +107%
Apple iPad Air 6 2024
M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe
60 fps +100%
OnePlus Pad 2
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
42 fps +40%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
30 fps
Huawei MatePad 11.5 S
Maleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
16 fps -47%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 5G
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
69 fps +30%
OnePlus Pad 2
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
69 fps +30%
Apple iPad Air 6 2024
M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe
68 fps +28%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
53 fps
Huawei MatePad 11.5 S
Maleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
23 fps -57%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 5G
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
95 fps +107%
Apple iPad Air 6 2024
M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe
60 fps +30%
OnePlus Pad 2
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
50 fps +9%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
46 fps
Huawei MatePad 11.5 S
Maleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
28 fps -39%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Apple iPad Air 6 2024
M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe
208 fps +43%
OnePlus Pad 2
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
170 fps +17%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 5G
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
168 fps +16%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
145 fps
Huawei MatePad 11.5 S
Maleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
64 fps -56%
GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Apple iPad Air 6 2024
M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe
36.7 fps +53%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 5G
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
32 fps +33%
OnePlus Pad 2
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
32 fps +33%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
24 fps
Huawei MatePad 11.5 S
Maleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
10 fps -58%
Jetstream 2 | Speedometer 3.0 | WebXPRT 4 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Apple iPad Air 6 2024 (Safari 17)
256.985 Points +32%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro (Chrome 132)
195.343 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (59.7 - 235, n=7)
160.1 Points -18%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 5G (chrome 117)
152.9 Points -22%
Average of class Tablet (19.9 - 334, n=68, last 2 years)
119.3 Points -39%
Huawei MatePad 11.5 S (Huawei Browser V14)
89.474 Points -54%
Speedometer 3.0 - Score
Apple iPad Air 6 2024 (Safari 17)
29.9 runs/min +143%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro (Chrome 132)
12.3 runs/min
Average of class Tablet (1.25 - 33.7, n=32, last 2 years)
12.2 runs/min -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (3.54 - 13.6, n=7)
10.1 runs/min -18%
Huawei MatePad 11.5 S (Huawei Browser V14)
3.11 runs/min -75%
WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Apple iPad Air 6 2024
243 Points +57%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 5G (chrome 117)
179 Points +15%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro (Chrome 132)
155 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (61 - 185, n=7)
146.3 Points -6%
Average of class Tablet (21 - 315, n=67, last 2 years)
113.5 Points -27%
Huawei MatePad 11.5 S (Huawei Browser V14)
85 Points -45%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPad Air 6 2024 (Safari 17)
77756 Points +18%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro (Chrome 132)
65712 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 5G (Edge 117)
49582 Points -25%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (28536 - 66369, n=7)
48215 Points -27%
OnePlus Pad 2 (Chrome 128)
45083 Points -31%
Huawei MatePad 11.5 S (Huawei Browser V14)
32134 Points -51%
Average of class Tablet (763 - 105178, n=87, last 2 years)
30694 Points -53%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Average of class Tablet (319 - 34733, n=74, last 2 years)
3641 ms * -456%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 5G (chrome 117)
1532.5 ms * -134%
Huawei MatePad 11.5 S (Huawei Browser V14)
1243.7 ms * -90%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (603 - 1456, n=7)
874 ms * -34%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro (Chrome 132)
654.56 ms *
Apple iPad Air 6 2024 (Safari 17)
442.8 ms * +32%

* ... smaller is better

Xiaomi Pad 7 ProOnePlus Pad 2Huawei MatePad 11.5 SSamsung Galaxy Tab S9 5GAverage 256 GB UFS 4.0 FlashAverage of class Tablet
AndroBench 3-5
-29%
-16%
-13%
7%
-55%
Sequential Read 256KB
3849.52
2003.1
-48%
1837.4
-52%
3355.97
-13%
3626 ?(3249 - 4384, n=29)
-6%
1176 ?(126.9 - 3912, n=74, last 2 years)
-69%
Sequential Write 256KB
3283.91
1732.7
-47%
1134.93
-65%
2188.2
-33%
2600 ?(555 - 3348, n=29)
-21%
812 ?(78.2 - 3299, n=74, last 2 years)
-75%
Random Read 4KB
302.34
236.5
-22%
334.71
11%
451.18
49%
399 ?(218 - 483, n=29)
32%
199.5 ?(18.4 - 474, n=74, last 2 years)
-34%
Random Write 4KB
346.85
348.6
1%
498.29
44%
160.96
-54%
423 ?(152.9 - 730, n=29)
22%
202 ?(8.23 - 668, n=74, last 2 years)
-42%

排放量

温度

机箱的温度其实并不高，但测得的表面温度却不均匀，Pad 7 Pro 在一个热点区域的温度超过了 42 度。我们使用 3DMark 来检查机箱内部的散热情况。Wild Life 压力测试以 90% 以上的高一致性结束。

Max. Load
 33.9 °C42.2 °C42.6 °C 
 29.5 °C32.5 °C32.3 °C 
 31 °C31.1 °C32.3 °C 
Maximum: 42.6 °C
Average: 34.2 °C
39.8 °C40.7 °C36.8 °C
31.7 °C33 °C30.9 °C
30.3 °C31.4 °C29.2 °C
Maximum: 40.7 °C
Average: 33.8 °C
Power Supply (max.)  29.1 °C | Room Temperature 21.4 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 34.2 °C / 94 F, compared to the average of 29.9 °C / 86 F for the devices in the class Tablet.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42.6 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 33.7 °C / 93 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 40.7 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.6 °C / 83 F, compared to the device average of 29.9 °C / 86 F.

3DMark Steel Nomad Stress Test

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Apple iPad Air 6 2024
M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe
100 % +13%
Huawei MatePad 11.5 S
Maleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
99.2 % +12%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
88.7 %
OnePlus Pad 2
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
77 % -13%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 5G
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
71.6 % -19%
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Huawei MatePad 11.5 S
Maleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
99 % +10%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
89.8 %
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 5G
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
84.9 % -5%
OnePlus Pad 2
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
83.8 % -7%
Apple iPad Air 6 2024
M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe
65.3 % -27%
Solar Bay Stress Test Stability
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
95.7 %
Apple iPad Air 6 2024
M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe
87.3 % -9%
OnePlus Pad 2
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
86.9 % -9%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 5G
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
79.8 % -17%
Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
97.1 %
OnePlus Pad 2
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
86.5 % -11%
05101520253035404550556065707580859095Tooltip
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø18 (17.6-19.6)
OnePlus Pad 2 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø24.1 (22.9-27.4)
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø65 (63.4-71.5)
OnePlus Pad 2 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø78.9 (74-96)
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.11.1: Ø16.4 (16.2-16.9)
OnePlus Pad 2 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.5: Ø23.2 (22.2-25.5)
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.1.1.3: Ø7.81 (7.7-7.93)
OnePlus Pad 2 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.1.1.3: Ø11.1 (10.6-12.3)

发言人

Pad 7 Pro 有四个扬声器，并支持杜比全景声（Dolby Atmos）。就这个价位而言，音质非常不错，有很强的层次感和低音。粉红噪声的中音具有线性频率响应，而高音则稍有衰减。如果您希望实现外部声音输出，可以使用带线缆的 USB 端口，或通过蓝牙 5.4 无线连接。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs203340.22527.530.33122.831.64026.331.85036.440.96321.130.78020.738.510019.643.812512.650.816016.359.720016.359.125013.163.231512.4654001063.250010.869.263012.473.880011.976.1100011.678.4125012.480.8160011.679.8200011.378.6250011.977.8315012.175.6400013.175.6500013.174.6630013.778.8800013.379.81000013.674.41250013.765.81600014.269.8SPL24.689.5N0.683.7median 12.6median 74.6Delta1.17.638.136.428.730.423.128.626.535.137.63419.626.116.721.324.231.520.44420.54911.651.910.753.410.356.67.852.38.1499.257.79.552.69.653.88.160.49.3649.765.910.259.810.96111.460.312.355.112.856.213.953.214.66015.459.516.259.623.672.40.529.1median 10.9median 56.22.64.8hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseXiaomi Pad 7 ProApple iPad Air 6 2024
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (12.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 17% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 78% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 10% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 88% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Apple iPad Air 6 2024 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (72.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 8.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.9% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 26% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 72% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 15% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 81% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

电池运行时间 - 小米平板电脑充电迅速

小米平板电脑拥有 8850 毫安时电池，可以高达 67 瓦的速度快速充电。使用附带的电源适配器，80 分钟后电池即可再次充满电。Pad 7 Pro 的耗电量相当高效，尤其是与 MatePad 11.5 S.

耗电量

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.06 / 0.16 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 0.75 / 1.5 / 1.56 Watt
Load midlight 7.92 / 16.5 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
8850 mAh		Apple iPad Air 6 2024
 mAh		Huawei MatePad 11.5 S
8800 mAh		Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 5G
8400 mAh		Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3
 		Average of class Tablet
 
Power Consumption
-100%
-124%
-92%
-28%
-97%
Idle Minimum *
0.75
1.5
-100%
1.53
-104%
2.58
-244%
1.267 ?(0.7 - 3.6, n=7)
-69%
1.837 ?(0.63 - 6.5, n=65, last 2 years)
-145%
Idle Average *
1.5
3.6
-140%
5.96
-297%
3.24
-116%
2.17 ?(1.09 - 6.52, n=7)
-45%
3.81 ?(1 - 9.2, n=65, last 2 years)
-154%
Idle Maximum *
1.56
4.6
-195%
6.07
-289%
3.39
-117%
2.3 ?(1.16 - 6.54, n=7)
-47%
4.38 ?(1.3 - 15.3, n=65, last 2 years)
-181%
Load Average *
7.92
12.8
-62%
6.87
13%
7.02
11%
8.41 ?(6.5 - 10.6, n=7)
-6%
9.72 ?(2.5 - 44.9, n=65, last 2 years)
-23%
Load Maximum *
16.5
16.8
-2%
6.88
58%
15.86
4%
11.9 ?(8.64 - 16.5, n=7)
28%
13.6 ?(3.9 - 54.8, n=65, last 2 years)
18%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

0123456789101112131415Tooltip
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø6.02 (1.025-12.7)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø8.87 (3.26-15.7)
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.781 (0.697-1.46)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø3.31 (3.25-3.39)

Power consumption: GFXbench (150 cd/m²)

01234567891011121314Tooltip
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø11.9 (11.3-12.5)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø12.3 (9.05-14.4)
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.781 (0.697-1.46)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø3.31 (3.25-3.39)

电池寿命

在我们使用 150 cd/m² 的适应显示亮度进行的日常 Wi-Fi 测试中，17.5 小时的运行时间对于一款 11 英寸平板电脑来说非常不错。

Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing (Chrome132)
17h 34min
Battery Runtime - WiFi v1.3
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
8850 mAh
1054 min
OnePlus Pad 2
9510 mAh
866 min
Apple iPad Air 6 2024
 mAh
683 min
Huawei MatePad 11.5 S
8800 mAh
831 min
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 5G
8400 mAh
539 min

Notebookcheck 总体评分

购买小米 Pad 7 Pro 的理由有很多，但必须考虑到进口限制。

Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro - 02/07/2025 v8
Marcus Herbrich

Chassis
85 / 98 → 87%
Keyboard
70 / 80 → 88%
Pointing Device
92%
Connectivity
59 / 69 → 86%
Weight
83 / 40-88 → 90%
Battery
91%
Display
84%
Games Performance
44 / 65 → 67%
Application Performance
71 / 92 → 77%
AI Performance
32%
Temperature
91%
Noise
100%
Audio
84 / 91 → 93%
Camera
60 / 90 → 66%
Average
65%
87%
Tablet - Weighted Average
CO2 Emissions
No Data
Materials
40%
Packaging
50%
Power Use
97.3%
Repairability
40%
Software Updates
44.5%
Recycle Logo Total Sustainability Score: 45.3%

More articles related to this device

Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro (Pad 7 Series)

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 小米 Pad 7 Pro 评测--具有超强持久力和超大屏幕的经济型平板电脑
Marcus Herbrich, 2025-02-12 (Update: 2025-02-12)