Notebookcheck Logo

Honor Pad 9 评测 - 大型平板电脑，显示效果出众，音质出色，价格低廉

价格小，显示大。

除了大屏幕和 120 Hz 的刷新率外，12.1 英寸的Honor Pad 9 还配备了八个扬声器，音质极佳。这款中档平板电脑还支持手写笔，并可选配键盘盖，在生产力方面也有很高的表现。
Touchscreen Tablet Android
测试Honor Pad 9 平板电脑

继 Honor Pad 8只在欧洲市场上销售配备 8GB 内存和 256GB 内置存储器的版本。这款中档平板电脑的零售价为 350 欧元，配备了超大、高分辨率显示屏，IPS 面板对角线尺寸为 12.1 英寸，像素为 2,560 x 1,600。制造商还承诺，由于采用了无闪烁和低蓝光显示屏，该平板电脑还获得了德国莱茵 TÜV 认证的护眼功能。

配备 8,300 毫安时电池，为 骁龙 6 代 1可提供约 11 小时的续航时间。您可以在下面的评测中了解Honor 平板电脑在我们的测试中是否给人留下深刻印象。

Honor Pad 9 (Pad Series)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 8 x 1.8 - 2.2 GHz, Cortex-A78 / A55
Graphics adapter
Qualcomm Adreno 710
Memory
8 GB 
Display
12.10 inch 16:10, 2560 x 1600 pixel 249 PPI, capacitive Touchscreen, native pen support, IPS LCD, glossy: yes, HDR, 120 Hz
Storage
256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash, 256 GB 
, 224 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: USB-C, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: Accelerometer, OTG, Miracast
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.1
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 6.96 x 278.27 x 180.11
Battery
8300 mAh Lithium-Polymer
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 13
Camera
Primary Camera: 13 MPix (f/2.0, AF, 4K@30fps), camera2 API: Level 3
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix (f/2.2, Fixfocus)
Additional features
Speakers: Stereo (8 speakers), Keyboard: Onscreen, USB cable, info material, MagicOS 7.2, 24 Months Warranty, Widevine L1, Dolby Vision, HDR10, HLG, fanless
Weight
555 g, Power Supply: 89 g
Price
350 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Price
84.8 %
v7 (old)
03 / 2024
Honor Pad 9
SD 6 Gen 1, Adreno 710		555 g6.96 mm12.10"2560x1600
80.7 %
v7 (old)
01 / 2024
Teclast T60
T7255, Mali-G57 MP1		570 g7.7 mm11.97"2000x1200
86.5 %
v7 (old)
09 / 2023
Huawei MatePad 11.5
SD 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644		499 g6.85 mm11.50"2200x1440
85.2 %
v7 (old)
09 / 2023
Lenovo Tab P12
Dimensity 7050, Mali-G68 MP4		615 g6.9 mm12.70"2944x1840
81.7 %
v7 (old)
11 / 2022
Honor Pad 8
SD 680, Adreno 610		520 g6.9 mm12.00"2000x1200

保护套 -Honor Pad 9 金属

Honor Pad 9 在欧洲只有一种颜色。
Honor Pad 9 在欧洲只有一种颜色。

Honor Pad 9 薄度不到 7 毫米，重量相对于 12.1 英寸平板电脑也较轻，仅为 555 克。虽然 Pad 9 是一款中端设备，但金属外壳意味着在手感方面几乎没有任何妥协。其制造质量令人印象深刻，但没有通过 IP 认证。

IPS 面板的边缘非常窄，因此屏占比略低于 85%，令人满意。Honor 没有说明安装了哪种保护玻璃。

测试Honor Pad 9 平板电脑
测试Honor Pad 9 平板电脑
测试Honor Pad 9 平板电脑
测试Honor Pad 9 平板电脑

尺寸比较

❌
293.37 mm 190.76 mm 6.9 mm 615 g279 mm 174 mm 7.7 mm 570 g278.54 mm 174.06 mm 6.9 mm 520 g278.27 mm 180.11 mm 6.96 mm 555 g260.88 mm 176.82 mm 6.85 mm 499 g297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g

功能 -Honor 平板电脑，无内存扩展

由于操作系统和一些预装应用程序的原因，256 GB UFS 3.1 内存的可用容量为 224 GB。存储介质可通过内置 USB 2.0 端口使用 USB-OTG 进行连接，但无法使用 microSD 卡进行扩展。通过 USB 端口传输数据的速度非常慢，我们在测试中仅测得 30 MB/s。不过，它支持 exFAT 文件系统和 NTFS（微软系统的首选）。

软件 -Honor Pad 9 与Android 13

我们测试设备上的操作系统是过时的Android 13，带有 2024 年 2 月起的安全补丁和 Magic UI (V7.2)。鉴于Android 14 和未来版本的更新政策，不可能升级到 14 和未来版本。 前身.例如，Pad 8 仍在运行Android 12，可能永远不会收到新的操作系统版本。Honor 打算为中端平板电脑提供多长时间的安全补丁，官方也没有透露，只是说这些补丁可能会在季度推出。.

3 月 25 日更新： 我们向荣耀提出的请求得到了回应。Pad 9 将迎来一次重大更新（Android 14）和为期三年的安全补丁。

测试Honor Pad 9 平板电脑
测试Honor Pad 9 平板电脑
测试Honor Pad 9 平板电脑
测试Honor Pad 9 平板电脑
测试Honor Pad 9 平板电脑
测试Honor Pad 9 平板电脑

通信 -Honor 平板电脑，不带 GPS

Honor Pad 9 只有 Wi-Fi 5 可用于连接 Wi-Fi 网络。联想 联想平板电脑 P12或 华为 MatePad 11.5支持 Wi-Fi 6 的联想 Tab P12 或华为 MatePad 11.5 都表明，在中端市场提供更快的速度是可能的。结合我们的参考路由器华硕 ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000，Honor ，在 5 GHz 范围内平均传输速率仅约为 350 MBit/s，因此我们认为与 Pad 8.

如果你想在移动中使用平板电脑上网，很遗憾，Honor Pad 9 没有可选的 5G 版本，你只能使用移动热点作为替代。Honor 的这款中档平板电脑也不允许使用 GNSS 模块进行定位。

Networking
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Huawei MatePad 11.5
846 (507min - 927max) MBit/s +142%
Lenovo Tab P12
814 (759min - 840max) MBit/s +133%
Honor Pad 9
349 (171min - 354max) MBit/s
Honor Pad 8
345 (326min - 357max) MBit/s -1%
Teclast T60
309 (244min - 321max) MBit/s -11%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Lenovo Tab P12
928 (909min - 950max) MBit/s +154%
Huawei MatePad 11.5
792 (376min - 968max) MBit/s +116%
Honor Pad 9
366 (184min - 389max) MBit/s
Teclast T60
360 (341min - 370max) MBit/s -2%
Honor Pad 8
357 (323min - 366max) MBit/s -2%
020406080100120140160180200220240260280300320340360380Tooltip
Honor Pad 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1, Qualcomm Adreno 710; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø343 (171-354)
Honor Pad 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Qualcomm Adreno 610; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø344 (326-357)
Honor Pad 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1, Qualcomm Adreno 710; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø360 (184-389)
Honor Pad 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Qualcomm Adreno 610; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø357 (323-366)

摄像头 -Honor Pad 9 配有单摄像头

与Honor Pad 9 自拍
与Honor Pad 9 自拍

显示屏上方边框内置的 800 万像素固定焦距摄像头采用 f/2.2 光圈，在光线充足的情况下效果不错。背面的单摄像头性能稍好，分辨率略高，为 1300 万像素。它还能以 30 帧/秒的超高清画质拍摄视频。

主摄像头非常适合拍摄文档照片，但买家不应对Honor Pad 9 抱有更高的期望。有些偏红的照片不仅清晰度不够，而且在日光下还略显噪点。在弱光条件下，尽管有 f/2.0 光圈，但 1300 万像素的镜头很快就会被逼到极限。不过，我们对最佳光照下的色彩还原进行了分析，并没有发现任何值得批评的地方，而且内置自动对焦功能在日常使用中也能正常工作。

1x
1x
2x
2x
8 倍（最大值）
8 倍（最大值）
测试Honor Pad 9 平板电脑
测试Honor Pad 9 平板电脑
测试Honor Pad 9 平板电脑
测试Honor Pad 9 平板电脑

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Main cameraMain cameraLow LightZoom 5x
ColorChecker
7.2 ∆E
3.5 ∆E
3.1 ∆E
6.1 ∆E
4.1 ∆E
5.5 ∆E
1.9 ∆E
3.1 ∆E
6.8 ∆E
6.2 ∆E
3.2 ∆E
3.4 ∆E
3.7 ∆E
5 ∆E
7.3 ∆E
1.4 ∆E
5.1 ∆E
6.1 ∆E
3.8 ∆E
1.5 ∆E
2.8 ∆E
5.8 ∆E
8.5 ∆E
8.8 ∆E
ColorChecker Honor Pad 9: 4.75 ∆E min: 1.43 - max: 8.76 ∆E
ColorChecker
29.1 ∆E
54.8 ∆E
39.9 ∆E
36.3 ∆E
45.4 ∆E
65.5 ∆E
54.2 ∆E
35.6 ∆E
43.4 ∆E
28.3 ∆E
66.7 ∆E
64.3 ∆E
31.4 ∆E
48.8 ∆E
37.3 ∆E
77.5 ∆E
44.1 ∆E
44.1 ∆E
94.4 ∆E
71.4 ∆E
52.6 ∆E
37.5 ∆E
24.4 ∆E
14 ∆E
ColorChecker Honor Pad 9: 47.54 ∆E min: 13.99 - max: 94.37 ∆E

附件和保修 -Honor Pad 9 不含电源装置

Honor Pad 9 的智能蓝牙键盘
Honor Pad 9 的智能蓝牙键盘

甚至在拆开包装之前，Honor ，薄薄的平板电脑包装就表明 Pad 9 在德国并不附带电源适配器--尽管在其他国家附带了电源适配器。除了一条 USB 电缆（USB-A 转 USB-C），送货箱内只有信息资料。不过，Honor 为其中档平板电脑提供了可选配件，如智能蓝牙键盘（零售价：60 欧元）或Honor Pencil。后者将于 3 月底上市。

在德国，制造商提供 保修 保修 24 个月。

测试Honor Pad 9 平板电脑
测试Honor Pad 9 平板电脑
测试Honor Pad 9 平板电脑

输入设备和操作 -Honor- 支持手写笔的平板电脑

Honor Pad 9 的面板具有 120 Hz 的高刷新率，可确保在滚动或浏览菜单时显示流畅。不过，这款Honor 平板电脑在日常使用中偶尔会出现卡顿现象。不过，触摸屏可以精确操作。由于支持笔输入，Honor Pad 9 还可用于记笔记。

据制造商称，玻璃表面有一层特殊涂层，可以减少入射光的反射。这也有利于手写笔的使用，创造出特别自然的书写和绘画体验。与同类平板电脑相比，反射率明显略有降低，但与新的 康宁大猩猩装甲玻璃.

用户通过前置摄像头进行面部识别验证。在光线充足的日常使用中，这种方法非常可靠，总共可以保存五个配置文件。使用生物手指识别解锁是不可能的。

测试Honor Pad 9 平板电脑
测试Honor Pad 9 平板电脑
测试Honor Pad 9 平板电脑

显示屏 -Honor Pad 9 采用 IPS 显示屏

LC 显示器采用经典的 RGB 子像素矩阵，由一个红色、一个蓝色和一个绿色发光二极管组成。
LC 显示器采用经典的 RGB 子像素矩阵，由一个红色、一个蓝色和一个绿色发光二极管组成。

12.1 英寸 120 Hz IPS 面板宽高比为 16:10，分辨率高达 2,560 x 1,600 像素。我们测量的最大屏幕亮度为 613 cd/m²（APL18：606 cd/m²），在同价位产品中属于较高水平，但提供的照明并不均匀。得益于 "昼夜节律 "功能，Honor Pad 9 的屏幕在日落后会自动减少蓝光量，使眼睛在黑暗中阅读更轻松。

Honor Pad 9 没有使用 PWM 控制亮度，不过我们在测量中还是检测到了高频闪烁。

567
cd/m²		606
cd/m²		592
cd/m²
552
cd/m²		613
cd/m²		537
cd/m²
544
cd/m²		588
cd/m²		532
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 613 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 570.1 cd/m² Minimum: 2.22 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 87 %
Center on Battery: 613 cd/m²
Contrast: 1533:1 (Black: 0.4 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.7 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 3.7 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
99.8% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.3
Honor Pad 9
IPS LCD, 2560x1600, 12.1"		Teclast T60
IPS, 2000x1200, 12"		Huawei MatePad 11.5
IPS, 2200x1440, 11.5"		Lenovo Tab P12
LTPS, 2944x1840, 12.7"		Honor Pad 8
IPS, 2000x1200, 12"
Screen
-6%
-22%
-5%
-38%
Brightness middle
613
352
-43%
472
-23%
435
-29%
379
-38%
Brightness
570
324
-43%
432
-24%
407
-29%
382
-33%
Brightness Distribution
87
88
1%
86
-1%
89
2%
84
-3%
Black Level *
0.4
0.44
-10%
0.58
-45%
0.3
25%
Contrast
1533
1073
-30%
750
-51%
1263
-18%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
2.7
2.6
4%
3.4
-26%
1.5
44%
4.76
-76%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
5.1
5.75
-13%
6.6
-29%
3.2
37%
9.25
-81%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
3.7
1.5
59%
4.8
-30%
2.4
35%
6.7
-81%
Gamma
2.3 96%
2.319 95%
2.41 91%
2.2 100%
2.234 98%
CCT
6763 96%
6747 96%
7035 92%
6546 99%
8468 77%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 29480 Hz ≤ 57 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 29480 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 57 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 29480 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

最低显示亮度
分钟
25 % 显示屏亮度
25 %
显示屏亮度为 50
50 %
75 % 显示亮度
75 %
最大手动显示亮度
100 %

具有固定缩放级别和不同亮度设置的测量系列

在我们使用 Calman 软件和分光光度计进行的显示测量中，IPS 显示屏的校准效果令人满意，尽管灰度超出了理想范围（<3），并有轻微偏绿。由于 0.4 cd/m² 的纯黑值，对比度约为 1,500:1。APL 测量值（0.37 cd/m²）证实，12.1 英寸平板电脑的对比度略胜一筹。

色彩准确度（配置文件：暖色，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
色彩准确度（配置文件：暖色，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
色彩空间（配置文件：暖色，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
色彩空间（配置文件：暖色，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
灰度（配置文件：暖色，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
灰度（配置文件：暖色，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
色彩饱和度（配置文件：暖色，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
色彩饱和度（配置文件：暖色，目标色彩空间：sRGB）

Display Response Times

ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
   ↔    Response Time Black to White
17.08 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 5.683 ms rise
↘ 11.4 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 35 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
   ↔    Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
37.06 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 17.09 ms rise
↘ 19.97 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 50 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

IPS 面板的视角稳定性很好，色彩也没有明显变化。Honor 平板电脑具备良好的户外使用条件。得益于明亮的面板，内容在阳光直射下依然清晰可辨，但尽管采用了特殊的显示处理，仍应始终避免玻璃表面的反光。

测试Honor Pad 9 平板电脑
测试Honor Pad 9 平板电脑

性能 -Honor 配备高通 SoC 的平板电脑

标准模式下的 Geekbench 数值几乎不低于高性能模式下的数值
标准模式下的 Geekbench 数值几乎不低于高性能模式下的数值

配备 骁龙 6 代 1Honor Pad 9 采用了现代的 4 纳米芯片组，但高通 SoC 的性能仍然不算强大。我们的基准测试结果与中端竞争产品相当，尤其是在 Geekbench 多核测试中，联发科 Dimensity 7050 处理器的性能与中端竞争产品相当。 联发科 Dimensity 7050在 联想平板电脑 P12表现较弱。

Geekbench 5.5 | Geekbench 6.3 | PCMark for Android | CrossMark | BaseMark OS II | AImark | UL Procyon AI Inference for Android | Antutu v10
Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Huawei MatePad 11.5
781 Points +8%
Lenovo Tab P12
738 Points +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 (725 - 735, n=2)
730 Points +1%
Honor Pad 9
725 Points
Average of class Tablet (140 - 1887, n=70, last 2 years)
712 Points -2%
Honor Pad 8
377 Points -48%
Teclast T60
361 Points -50%
Multi-Core
Huawei MatePad 11.5
2854 Points +3%
Honor Pad 9
2763 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 (2736 - 2763, n=2)
2750 Points 0%
Average of class Tablet (312 - 8624, n=70, last 2 years)
2508 Points -9%
Lenovo Tab P12
1973 Points -29%
Honor Pad 8
1522 Points -45%
Teclast T60
1502 Points -46%
Geekbench 6.3
Single-Core
Average of class Tablet (185 - 3715, n=69, last 2 years)
1121 Points +19%
Huawei MatePad 11.5
1059 Points +12%
Lenovo Tab P12
958 Points +1%
Honor Pad 9
944 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 (940 - 948, n=3)
944 Points 0%
Teclast T60
440 Points -53%
Multi-Core
Average of class Tablet (493 - 14690, n=69, last 2 years)
3575 Points +29%
Huawei MatePad 11.5
2970 Points +7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 (2773 - 2896, n=3)
2815 Points +2%
Honor Pad 9
2773 Points
Lenovo Tab P12
2422 Points -13%
Teclast T60
1596 Points -42%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Lenovo Tab P12
12131 Points +4%
Honor Pad 9
11693 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 (9887 - 12573, n=3)
11384 Points -3%
Huawei MatePad 11.5
10389 Points -11%
Average of class Tablet (3195 - 20841, n=72, last 2 years)
9873 Points -16%
Teclast T60
7992 Points -32%
Honor Pad 8
6655 Points -43%
CrossMark - Overall
Average of class Tablet (172 - 1944, n=62, last 2 years)
779 Points +13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 (689 - 698, n=2)
694 Points +1%
Honor Pad 9
689 Points
Lenovo Tab P12
682 Points -1%
Honor Pad 8
407 Points -41%
Teclast T60
386 Points -44%
BaseMark OS II
Overall
Huawei MatePad 11.5
4784 Points +13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 (4233 - 4382, n=3)
4324 Points +2%
Average of class Tablet (444 - 11721, n=58, last 2 years)
4238 Points 0%
Honor Pad 9
4233 Points
Lenovo Tab P12
4158 Points -2%
Honor Pad 8
2621 Points -38%
Teclast T60
2182 Points -48%
System
Honor Pad 9
10083 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 (9801 - 10083, n=3)
9921 Points -2%
Huawei MatePad 11.5
9716 Points -4%
Average of class Tablet (1103 - 16435, n=58, last 2 years)
7305 Points -28%
Lenovo Tab P12
6610 Points -34%
Honor Pad 8
5817 Points -42%
Teclast T60
5151 Points -49%
Memory
Lenovo Tab P12
5807 Points +20%
Huawei MatePad 11.5
4970 Points +3%
Average of class Tablet (916 - 10977, n=58, last 2 years)
4900 Points +1%
Honor Pad 9
4837 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 (4263 - 4837, n=3)
4628 Points -4%
Honor Pad 8
3361 Points -31%
Teclast T60
3255 Points -33%
Graphics
Average of class Tablet (580 - 57192, n=58, last 2 years)
9295 Points +61%
Huawei MatePad 11.5
7739 Points +34%
Honor Pad 9
5783 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 (5662 - 5837, n=3)
5761 Points 0%
Lenovo Tab P12
4975 Points -14%
Honor Pad 8
2098 Points -64%
Teclast T60
1146 Points -80%
Web
Lenovo Tab P12
1566 Points +31%
Huawei MatePad 11.5
1402 Points +18%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 (1192 - 1432, n=3)
1341 Points +13%
Average of class Tablet (10 - 2051, n=58, last 2 years)
1272 Points +7%
Honor Pad 9
1192 Points
Teclast T60
1179 Points -1%
Honor Pad 8
1151 Points -3%
AImark - Score v3.x
Average of class Tablet (84 - 156427, n=50, last 2 years)
7290 Points +1032%
Huawei MatePad 11.5
668 Points +4%
Honor Pad 9
644 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 (589 - 644, n=2)
617 Points -4%
Lenovo Tab P12
456 Points -29%
Teclast T60
321 Points -50%
UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Average of class Tablet (1662 - 74821, n=56, last 2 years)
11456 Points +58%
Huawei MatePad 11.5
9027 Points +25%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 (7236 - 8191, n=3)
7693 Points +6%
Honor Pad 9
7236 Points
Lenovo Tab P12
5315 Points -27%
Honor Pad 8
4627 Points -36%
Teclast T60
2902 Points -60%
Antutu v10 - Total Score
Average of class Tablet (164396 - 2716980, n=36, last 2 years)
759506 Points +55%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 (490448 - 564247, n=3)
519572 Points +6%
Honor Pad 9
490448 Points
Teclast T60
257601 Points -47%

Legend

 
Honor Pad 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1, Qualcomm Adreno 710, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
 
Teclast T60 Unisoc T7255, ARM Mali-G57 MP1, 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash
 
Huawei MatePad 11.5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Qualcomm Adreno 644, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
 
Lenovo Tab P12 MediaTek Dimensity 7050, ARM Mali-G68 MP4, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
 
Honor Pad 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Qualcomm Adreno 610, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
 
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1
 
Average of class Tablet

在图形测试中，Honor Pad 9 配备了 高通 Adreno 710取得了极具竞争力的成绩。基准测试值与 联想平板电脑 P12的 Mali-G68 MP4.

3DMark: Wild Life Extreme Unlimited | Wild Life Extreme | Wild Life Unlimited Score | Wild Life Score
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7: T-Rex Onscreen | 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
GFXBench 3.0: on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
GFXBench 3.1: on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
GFXBench: on screen Car Chase Onscreen | 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | 3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Huawei MatePad 11.5
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
825 Points +35%
Lenovo Tab P12
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
611 Points 0%
Honor Pad 9
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
611 Points
Teclast T60
Mali-G57 MP1, T7255, 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash
127 Points -79%
Honor Pad 8
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
122 Points -80%
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Huawei MatePad 11.5
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
829 Points +34%
Lenovo Tab P12
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
623 Points +1%
Honor Pad 9
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
618 Points
Teclast T60
Mali-G57 MP1, T7255, 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash
129 Points -79%
Honor Pad 8
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
123 Points -80%
3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Huawei MatePad 11.5
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3164 Points +32%
Honor Pad 9
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2402 Points
Lenovo Tab P12
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2237 Points -7%
Teclast T60
Mali-G57 MP1, T7255, 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash
476 Points -80%
Honor Pad 8
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
445 Points -81%
3DMark / Wild Life Score
Huawei MatePad 11.5
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3157 Points +33%
Honor Pad 9
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2367 Points
Lenovo Tab P12
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2156 Points -9%
Teclast T60
Mali-G57 MP1, T7255, 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash
479 Points -80%
Honor Pad 8
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
447 Points -81%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Huawei MatePad 11.5
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
60 fps +2%
Honor Pad 9
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
59 fps
Lenovo Tab P12
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
50 fps -15%
Honor Pad 8
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
35 fps -41%
Teclast T60
Mali-G57 MP1, T7255, 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash
24 fps -59%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Huawei MatePad 11.5
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
150 fps +43%
Honor Pad 9
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
105 fps
Lenovo Tab P12
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
100 fps -5%
Honor Pad 8
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
41 fps -61%
Teclast T60
Mali-G57 MP1, T7255, 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash
25 fps -76%
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Huawei MatePad 11.5
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
58 fps +66%
Honor Pad 9
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
35 fps
Lenovo Tab P12
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
28 fps -20%
Honor Pad 8
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
19 fps -46%
Teclast T60
Mali-G57 MP1, T7255, 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash
16 fps -54%
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Huawei MatePad 11.5
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
91 fps +47%
Lenovo Tab P12
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
64 fps +3%
Honor Pad 9
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
62 fps
Honor Pad 8
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
22 fps -65%
Teclast T60
Mali-G57 MP1, T7255, 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash
16 fps -74%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Huawei MatePad 11.5
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
44 fps +83%
Honor Pad 9
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
24 fps
Lenovo Tab P12
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
16 fps -33%
Honor Pad 8
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
13 fps -46%
Teclast T60
Mali-G57 MP1, T7255, 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash
9.5 fps -60%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Huawei MatePad 11.5
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
65 fps +41%
Honor Pad 9
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
46 fps
Lenovo Tab P12
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
43 fps -7%
Honor Pad 8
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
15 fps -67%
Teclast T60
Mali-G57 MP1, T7255, 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash
9.8 fps -79%
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Huawei MatePad 11.5
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
25 fps +127%
Honor Pad 9
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
11 fps
Lenovo Tab P12
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
9.9 fps -10%
Honor Pad 8
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
7.2 fps -35%
Teclast T60
Mali-G57 MP1, T7255, 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash
5.7 fps -48%
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Huawei MatePad 11.5
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
38 fps +65%
Lenovo Tab P12
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
26 fps +13%
Honor Pad 9
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
23 fps
Honor Pad 8
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
8.3 fps -64%
Teclast T60
Mali-G57 MP1, T7255, 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash
6.1 fps -73%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Huawei MatePad 11.5
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
18 fps +91%
Honor Pad 9
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
9.4 fps
Lenovo Tab P12
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
7.1 fps -24%
Honor Pad 8
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
4.9 fps -48%
Teclast T60
Mali-G57 MP1, T7255, 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash
3.7 fps -61%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Huawei MatePad 11.5
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
17 fps +52%
Honor Pad 9
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
11.2 fps
Lenovo Tab P12
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
11 fps -2%
Honor Pad 8
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3.2 fps -71%
Teclast T60
Mali-G57 MP1, T7255, 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash
2.3 fps -79%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Huawei MatePad 11.5
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
30 fps +100%
Honor Pad 9
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
15 fps
Lenovo Tab P12
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
11 fps -27%
Honor Pad 8
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
8.4 fps -44%
Teclast T60
Mali-G57 MP1, T7255, 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash
5.8 fps -61%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Huawei MatePad 11.5
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
47 fps +52%
Honor Pad 9
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
31 fps
Lenovo Tab P12
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
29 fps -6%
Honor Pad 8
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
9.6 fps -69%
Teclast T60
Mali-G57 MP1, T7255, 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash
6.2 fps -80%
GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Huawei MatePad 11.5
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
7.6 fps +58%
Honor Pad 9
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4.8 fps
Lenovo Tab P12
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
4.7 fps -2%
Honor Pad 8
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1.4 fps -71%
Teclast T60
Mali-G57 MP1, T7255, 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash
0.98 fps -80%
Jetstream 2 | WebXPRT 4 | WebXPRT 3 | Speedometer 2.0 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Average of class Tablet (19.9 - 334, n=68, last 2 years)
109.8 Points +24%
Honor Pad 9 (Chrome 122)
88.235 Points
Huawei MatePad 11.5 (Edge 115)
86.231 Points -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 (69.6 - 88.2, n=3)
78.5 Points -11%
Lenovo Tab P12 (Chrome 115.0.5790.166)
75.924 Points -14%
Teclast T60 (Chrome 120)
56.281 Points -36%
Honor Pad 8 (Chrome 106.0.5249.126)
46.797 Points -47%
WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Average of class Tablet (21 - 315, n=67, last 2 years)
105.2 Points +11%
Honor Pad 9 (Chrome 122)
95 Points
Huawei MatePad 11.5 (Edge 115)
91 Points -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 (70 - 95, n=3)
80.3 Points -15%
Lenovo Tab P12 (Chrome 115.0.5790.166)
78 Points -18%
Teclast T60 (Chrome 120)
60 Points -37%
Honor Pad 8 (Chrome 106.0.5249.126)
48 Points -49%
WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Average of class Tablet (34 - 435, n=44, last 2 years)
151.7 Points +15%
Honor Pad 9
132 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 (115 - 132, n=2)
123.5 Points -6%
Lenovo Tab P12 (Chrome 115.0.5790.166)
99 Points -25%
Honor Pad 8 (Chrome 106.0.5249.126)
70 Points -47%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average of class Tablet (2.59 - 572, n=62, last 2 years)
116.9 runs/min +35%
Honor Pad 9 (Chrome 122)
86.6 runs/min
Lenovo Tab P12 (Chrome 115.0.5790.166)
78 runs/min -10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 (62.5 - 86.6, n=3)
73.3 runs/min -15%
Huawei MatePad 11.5 (Edge 115)
61.5 runs/min -29%
Teclast T60 (Chrome 120)
44.4 runs/min -49%
Honor Pad 8 (Chrome 106.0.5249.126)
40.54 runs/min -53%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Honor Pad 9 (Chrome 122)
32436 Points
Lenovo Tab P12 (Chrome 115.0.5790.166)
31245 Points -4%
Huawei MatePad 11.5 (Edge 115)
30021 Points -7%
Average of class Tablet (763 - 105178, n=85, last 2 years)
28868 Points -11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 (24583 - 32436, n=3)
27601 Points -15%
Teclast T60 (Chrome 120)
15304 Points -53%
Honor Pad 8 (Chrome 106.0.5249.126)
13831 Points -57%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Average of class Tablet (319 - 34733, n=73, last 2 years)
3794 ms * -187%
Honor Pad 8 (Chrome 106.0.5249.126)
2873.8 ms * -118%
Teclast T60 (Chrome 120)
2592 ms * -96%
Lenovo Tab P12 (Chrome 115.0.5790.166)
1460.1 ms * -11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 (1188 - 1786, n=3)
1432 ms * -8%
Huawei MatePad 11.5 (Edge 115)
1365.8 ms * -3%
Honor Pad 9 (Chrome 122)
1321.1 ms *

* ... smaller is better

Honor Pad 9 的低价在内存方面并不明显。这款中端平板电脑使用 UFS 3.1 闪存，在 AndroBench 基准测试中与竞争对手相比得分较高。

Honor Pad 9Teclast T60Huawei MatePad 11.5Lenovo Tab P12Honor Pad 8Average 256 GB UFS 3.1 FlashAverage of class Tablet
AndroBench 3-5
-78%
0%
-26%
-39%
5%
-35%
Sequential Read 256KB
1921.34
240.4
-87%
1037.71
-46%
956.07
-50%
833.56
-57%
1749 ?(950 - 2037, n=101)
-9%
1055 ?(163 - 3912, n=73, last 2 years)
-45%
Sequential Write 256KB
1222.83
230
-81%
903.32
-26%
776.24
-37%
708.51
-42%
1163 ?(452 - 2004, n=101)
-5%
692 ?(78.2 - 3154, n=73, last 2 years)
-43%
Random Read 4KB
256.06
76.4
-70%
297.25
16%
241.23
-6%
189.57
-26%
286 ?(173.5 - 543, n=101)
12%
191 ?(18.4 - 451, n=73, last 2 years)
-25%
Random Write 4KB
266.17
67.5
-75%
418.84
57%
234.58
-12%
186.95
-30%
319 ?(132.1 - 499, n=102)
20%
191.4 ?(8.23 - 555, n=73, last 2 years)
-28%

游戏 -Honor 平板电脑只能达到 60 fps

根据我们的基准软件包 Adreno 710必须在游戏中证明自己。我们使用GameBench应用程序来确定所选Android 游戏的准确帧率。

PUBG mobile》无法在当前最高图形设置（UHD）下运行；在高清模式下，我们测得的帧率为 30 帧/秒。即使在低细节条件下，这款射击游戏的帧数也不会比 40 帧时流畅多少。

对于要求不高的游戏，情况就有些不同了。死亡扳机 2》至少能达到 60 帧/秒。在最低图形设置下，《源氏冲击》也能达到 47 帧/秒。如果我们增加细节，这款奇幻动作角色扮演游戏的帧率仅为 31 帧/秒。

死亡扳机 2
死亡扳机 2
源泉冲击
源泉冲击
PUBG 手机
PUBG 手机
051015202530354045505560Tooltip
Honor Pad 9; Dead Trigger 2: Ø59.3 (38-60)
Honor Pad 9; Genshin Impact; lowest 120 fps: Ø47.2 (30-51)
Honor Pad 9; Genshin Impact; highest 120 fps: Ø30.8 (25-37)
Honor Pad 9; PUBG Mobile; Smooth: Ø39.1 (34-41)
Honor Pad 9; PUBG Mobile; HD: Ø29.5 (28-31)

排放 -Honor Pad 9 保持凉爽

温度

Honor Pad 9 的外壳在日常使用中几乎不会发热，即使在负载情况下，温度上升也非常温和。我们使用 3DMark 来检查内部散热情况。

野外生活压力测试的完成率超过 99%。因此，即使在较长时间的游戏过程中，性能下降的可能性也很小。

Max. Load
 30.2 °C35.3 °C36.9 °C 
 28.5 °C32.3 °C33.5 °C 
 29.7 °C29 °C29.3 °C 
Maximum: 36.9 °C
Average: 31.6 °C
34.7 °C34.1 °C29.7 °C
33 °C32.8 °C31 °C
28.6 °C29.5 °C29.1 °C
Maximum: 34.7 °C
Average: 31.4 °C
Power Supply (max.)  31.9 °C | Room Temperature 21.6 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260
(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 31.6 °C / 89 F, compared to the average of 30 °C / 86 F for the devices in the class Tablet.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 36.9 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 33.7 °C / 93 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 34.7 °C / 94 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 32.3 °C / 90 F, compared to the device average of 30 °C / 86 F.

3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

0123456789101112131415161718Tooltip
Honor Pad 9 Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø14.1 (14.1-14.1)
Teclast T60 Mali-G57 MP1, T7255, 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø2.87 (2.85-2.87)
Huawei MatePad 11.5 Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø18.8 (18.8-18.9)
Lenovo Tab P12 Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø12.9 (12.9-12.9)
Honor Pad 8 Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø2.68 (2.67-2.68)
Honor Pad 9 Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø3.65 (3.65-3.66)
Teclast T60 Mali-G57 MP1, T7255, 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø0.787 (0.742-0.833)
Huawei MatePad 11.5 Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø4.94 (4.94-4.96)
Lenovo Tab P12 Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø3.71 (3.7-3.72)
Honor Pad 8 Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø0.737 (0.728-0.748)
Honor Pad 9 Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø14.3 (14.2-14.3)
3DMark
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Huawei MatePad 11.5
99.5 (4.94min - 4.96max) % 0%
Honor Pad 9
99.5 (3.65min - 3.66max) %
Lenovo Tab P12
99.4 (3.7min - 3.72max) % 0%
Honor Pad 8
97.3 (0.728min - 0.748max) % -2%
Teclast T60
89.1 (0.742min - 0.833max) % -10%
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Honor Pad 8
99.7 (2.67min - 2.68max) % 0%
Lenovo Tab P12
99.7 (12.9min - 12.9max) % 0%
Huawei MatePad 11.5
99.7 (18.8min - 18.9max) % 0%
Honor Pad 9
99.7 (14.1min - 14.1max) %
Teclast T60
99.4 (2.85min - 2.87max) % 0%
Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability
Honor Pad 9
99.3 (14.2min - 14.3max) %

Legend

 
Honor Pad 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1, Qualcomm Adreno 710, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
 
Teclast T60 Unisoc T7255, ARM Mali-G57 MP1, 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash
 
Huawei MatePad 11.5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Qualcomm Adreno 644, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
 
Lenovo Tab P12 MediaTek Dimensity 7050, ARM Mali-G68 MP4, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
 
Honor Pad 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Qualcomm Adreno 610, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
源泉冲击
源泉冲击

发言人

Honor 平板电脑的一大亮点是配有八个扬声器的音频系统。我们的测量结果表明，中高音的频率曲线呈线性，不过超级高音扬声器会有一些破音。低音也很明显，这在同价位产品中是非常值得称赞的。

有线耳机可以通过 USB-C 端口连接，而Honor Pad 9 支持蓝牙 5.1 无线版本。支持的音频编解码器没有在规格中列出。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2036.243.12530.736.83125.629.44026.733.55036.737.86324.6368017.634.310018.742.612518.254.716015.963.620017.362.425015.266.531514.171.240013.469.650013.874.163014.377.580013.779.7100012.481125012.782.1160012.178.3200012.977.6250012.574.7315012.270.6400012.872.3500013.172.6630013.576.5800013.175.91000013.774.3125001464.51600013.358.7SPL25.289.1N0.782.9median 13.5median 74.1Delta1.25.639.244.340.339.931.530.630.333.333.735.823.728.922.427.922.743.815.550.81954.915.354.114.358.913.964.715.267.615.769.915.371.518.374.417.176.1187614.870.814.371.114.269.514.969.215.371.81672.416.971.816.269.517.16616.261.316.656.728.184162.1median 15.7median 69.51.15.8hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseHonor Pad 9Honor Pad 8
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Honor Pad 9 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 13.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (11.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 12% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 84% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 7% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 91% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Honor Pad 8 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (12.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 16% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 79% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 9% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 88% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

能源管理 -Honor 高耗能平板电脑

耗电量

这款中端平板电脑配备 8,300 毫安时电池，可通过 USB Type-C 端口以高达 35 瓦的功率充电。我们用一个电源箱（PD 3.0，最大功率 100 瓦）在大约 3.5 小时内就能为 Pad 9 充满电。

耗电量超过 8 瓦，效率特别低，空闲时明显偏高。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.32 / 0.26 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 1.5 / 8.39 / 8.46 Watt
Load midlight 11.65 / 11.67 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Honor Pad 9
8300 mAh		Teclast T60
8000 mAh		Huawei MatePad 11.5
7700 mAh		Lenovo Tab P12
10200 mAh		Honor Pad 8
7250 mAh
Power Consumption
53%
24%
-4%
57%
Idle Minimum *
1.5
1.2
20%
1.23
18%
1.91
-27%
1.1
27%
Idle Average *
8.39
1.4
83%
4.44
47%
7.94
5%
1.5
82%
Idle Maximum *
8.46
1.7
80%
4.49
47%
8.12
4%
2.1
75%
Load Average *
11.65
4.2
64%
11.2
4%
10.68
8%
4.4
62%
Load Maximum *
11.67
9.5
19%
11.32
3%
12.69
-9%
7.2
38%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

012345678910Tooltip
Honor Pad 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1: Ø6.14 (3.02-10.1)
Teclast T60 Unisoc T7255: Ø6.8 (4.25-10.2)

Power consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

0123456Tooltip
Honor Pad 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø4.94 (4.74-5.39)
Teclast T60 Unisoc T7255; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø5.59 (5.39-6.38)
Honor Pad 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø3.03 (3-3.25)
Teclast T60 Unisoc T7255; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.256 (1.129-1.568)

电池寿命

在调整显示屏亮度为 150 cd/m² 的无线局域网测试中，Honor Pad 9 的续航时间达到了制造商预计的 11 小时，但不及中端竞争产品。

Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing (Chrome 122)
11h 01min
Honor Pad 9
8300 mAh		Teclast T60
8000 mAh		Huawei MatePad 11.5
7700 mAh		Lenovo Tab P12
10200 mAh		Honor Pad 8
7250 mAh
Battery Runtime
WiFi v1.3
661
1096
66%
866
31%
675
2%
733
11%

Pros

+ 宽大明亮的 1 600p 显示屏
+ 120 赫兹
+ 支持手写笔
+ 快速内存
+ 强大的扬声器系统

Cons

- 无 GPS/5G 选项
- 更新供应不明确
- 无指纹传感器
- 蹩脚的 USB 2.0 端口
- 仅有 WiFi 5

判决

回顾： Honor Pad 9。测试设备由Honor
回顾： Honor Pad 9。测试设备由Honor

如果您正在寻找一款配备大显示屏的新型中档平板电脑，并欣赏极具吸引力的扬声器系统，Honor Pad 9 可能是您的最佳伴侣。除了高品质的手感，这款Honor 平板电脑的快速内存、低废热和对笔的支持也给人留下了深刻印象。不过，由于制造商的更新政策不明确，对 Pad 9 感兴趣的用户将不得不接受缺乏广泛软件支持的现实。联想通过其 平板电脑 P12.

Honor Pad 9 是一款功能强大的娱乐产品，但却没有展望未来。

不过，除了软件之外，Honor Pad 9 还不得不忍受功能减少（无 GPS、无指纹传感器......）带来的批评。如果你愿意接受稍小的屏幕，那么 小米平板 6由于配备了 WiFi 6 和 USB 3.2，在 350 欧元以下的价位段，它是一个更好、更强大的选择。Honor Pad 9 安装的处理器是 骁龙 6 代 1 - 当然，它的性能并不差，但由于分辨率高达 1600p，系统并不感觉非常强大。

3月25日更新： 软件部分已更新。

价格和供应情况

Honor Pad 9 的建议零售价为 349.90 欧元。在测试期间，Honor 在在线商店提供九折优惠。并免费赠送智能蓝牙键盘。此外，Honor 平板电脑还可从亚马逊（德国）购买。

Honor Pad 9 - 03/19/2024 v7 (old)
Marcus Herbrich

Chassis
80 / 98 → 82%
Keyboard
69 / 80 → 87%
Pointing Device
91%
Connectivity
39 / 70 → 56%
Weight
82 / 40-88 → 88%
Battery
89%
Display
87%
Games Performance
35 / 78 → 45%
Application Performance
80 / 92 → 87%
Temperature
92%
Noise
100%
Audio
88 / 91 → 97%
Camera
50 / 85 → 59%
Average
76%
85%
Tablet - Weighted Average

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > Honor Pad 9 评测 - 大型平板电脑，显示效果出众，音质出色，价格低廉
Marcus Herbrich, 2024-03-24 (Update: 2024-08-15)