Honor X7a智能手机评测--低价手机中的灵活摄像头
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Drive | Size | Resolution | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 74.6 % v7 (old) | 07 / 2023 | Honor X7a Helio G37, PowerVR GE8320 | 196 g | 128 GB eMMC Flash | 6.74" | 1600x720 | |
| 78.5 % v7 (old) | 06 / 2023 | Honor X8a Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2 | 179 g | 128 GB eMMC Flash | 6.70" | 2388x1080 | |
| 80.1 % v7 (old) | 05 / 2023 | Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G SD 685, Adreno 610 | 188 g | 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | 6.67" | 2400x1080 | |
| 78.7 % v7 (old) | 05 / 2023 | Nokia G22 T7200 (T606), Mali-G57 MP1 | 195 g | 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | 6.52" | 1600x720 | |
| 79.4 % v7 (old) | 05 / 2023 | Samsung Galaxy A14 5G Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2 | 202 g | 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | 6.60" | 2408x1080 |
外壳和特征 - 用塑料包裹
Honor X7a是由塑料制成的，但它看起来仍然相当稳定，正面或背面的压力几乎没有达到屏幕的液晶。不过，手机在扭动时，会发出安静的吱吱声。背面有亮黑色或海洋蓝的亚光版本。
在测试时，这两种颜色的版本在互联网上的价格为170欧元（约185美元），例如在amazon.de。与建议零售价230欧元（约251美元）相比，这已经是一个相当大的折扣。钛银色选项几乎只在中欧通过Honor "的在线商店提供。.
这款拥有6.74英寸屏幕的手机具有合理的窄边框，对左右手来说都很容易使用，并且由于边缘圆润，拿在手里很舒服。
128GB的大容量存储对于这个价格范围来说是足够的，但是 小米Redmi Note 12 4G提供的UFS闪存比我们的测试设备快得多。NFC也在机上，还有一个用于音频设备的3.5毫米接口。
在测试中，microSD读卡器与我们的参考SD卡Angelbird V60在读写速度方面处于同一水平。
| SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Samsung Galaxy A14 5G (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (7.7 - 77, n=79, last 2 years) | |
| Honor X7a (Angelbird V60) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G (Angelbird V60) | |
| Nokia G22 (Angelbird V60) | |
Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)
通信、软件和操作 - 信号强度好，但只有4G
在Wi-Fi方面，WiFi 5是船上最快的标准。因此，这款手机达到了300到380MBit/s之间的通常速度。我们使用我们的参考路由器，华硕ROG Rapture AXE11000，进行测试。幸运的是，传输速率非常均匀。
如果你插入一张SIM卡，在我们的测试中，在运行的样本中总是建立了相当好的信号强度。然而，它不在高端手机的水平上，特别是在困难的情况下。只有4G频率可用，Honor X7a不是一个5G手机，尽管现在在这个价格范围内可以找到。此外，4G频率的品种对于长距离旅行来说是不够的。
由于内存相当大，这可能不是那么大的问题，但Honor ，预装了许多广告应用程序，这仍然是令人讨厌的。另外，有些应用程序只是重复的功能，而这些功能反正已经被谷歌的应用程序所覆盖。安全更新是2023年5月的，因此是相当最新的。然而，这款手机仍然搭载了Android 12，分别是基于它的MagicUI 6.1。
屏幕的帧率可以固定在60或90赫兹，或者由系统动态选择。更高的帧率使触摸屏的反应更灵敏。屏幕可以非常精确地操作到角落里。
指纹传感器被集成在待机按钮中。它能可靠地解锁手机，但需要相当长的等待时间。脸部识别也可以使用，但由于是纯软件识别，它更容易被操纵。
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| Honor X7a | |
| Samsung Galaxy A14 5G | |
| Honor X8a | |
| Nokia G22 | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Samsung Galaxy A14 5G | |
| Honor X8a | |
| Nokia G22 | |
| Honor X7a | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G | |
相机 - 具有广角和良好的算法
背面有4个相机镜头，最有趣的是5000万像素的主摄像头和500万像素的广角镜头。微距镜头的分辨率非常低，只有200万像素，用于虚化效果的支持镜头几乎没有任何价值。
鉴于较弱的传感器，与高端手机相比，主摄像头的表现令人尊敬，这可能是由于Honor"的良好算法。当然，它显然缺乏对比度，细节往往不明显。但那些不把照片放大的人，会用这部手机得到体面的照片。在非常低的光线和高亮度差异下，细节会丢失，特别是在黑暗区域，但明亮区域的图像清晰度还算不错。
在实验室里，我们的测试设备部分显示出双重轮廓，在全棚照明下，边缘的清晰度明显下降。相比之下，图像在中心位置仍然相当清晰。在只有1勒克斯的照明下，细节仍然可见。
你只能直接切换到广角相机，所以你不能使用混合变焦。这些照片适合作为快照，但提供的细节很少；例如，天空就模糊得一塌糊涂。
前置摄像头可以拍出很好的自拍，其中的细节仍然可见。然而，黑暗区域缺乏一点清晰度。
Image Comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
Main camera FlowerMain camera EnvironmentMain camera LowLightMain camera Wide-angle
显示 -Honor-无PWM的手机
Honor X7a的屏幕分辨率相当低，只有1600 x 720像素，即使是在这个价格范围内。至少这块IPS屏幕相当明亮，平均亮度为562cd/m²，而且还有一个很好的黑值，所以对比度相当高，颜色看起来也更鲜艳一些。
然而，色彩偏差是明显可见的，例如在灰度中出现蓝色偏移的形式，尽管我们已经选择了 "暖色 "的色彩方案。特别是明亮的灰度和浅蓝色和绿色的色调与最佳状态偏差太大。
即使在最低亮度下，我们也没有注意到PWM的闪烁。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 91 %
Center on Battery: 586 cd/m²
Contrast: 2254:1 (Black: 0.26 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.24 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 5.3 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
93.7% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.226
| Honor X7a IPS, 1600x720, 6.7" | Honor X8a IPS, 2388x1080, 6.7" | Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.7" | Nokia G22 IPS, 1600x720, 6.5" | Samsung Galaxy A14 5G PLS LCD, 2408x1080, 6.6" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Response Times | 13% | 91% | -76% | -32% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 33.8 ? | 29 ? 14% | 2.8 ? 92% | 60.2 ? -78% | 46.48 ? -38% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 16 ? | 14 ? 12% | 1.7 ? 89% | 27.7 ? -73% | 20.21 ? -26% |
| PWM Frequency | 484 | ||||
| Screen | 10% | 39% | -7% | -47% | |
| Brightness middle | 586 | 492 -16% | 650 11% | 674 15% | 579 -1% |
| Brightness | 562 | 481 -14% | 658 17% | 641 14% | 543 -3% |
| Brightness Distribution | 91 | 94 3% | 97 7% | 90 -1% | 87 -4% |
| Black Level * | 0.26 | 0.38 -46% | 0.43 -65% | 0.57 -119% | |
| Contrast | 2254 | 1295 -43% | 1567 -30% | 1016 -55% | |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.24 | 1.32 69% | 1.55 63% | 4.45 -5% | 7.6 -79% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 8.44 | 3.37 60% | 2.59 69% | 7.41 12% | 12.7 -50% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 5.3 | 1.9 64% | 1.8 66% | 5.1 4% | 8.7 -64% |
| Gamma | 2.226 99% | 2.194 100% | 2.194 100% | 2.072 106% | 2.23 99% |
| CCT | 6955 93% | 6288 103% | 6316 103% | 7799 83% | 9344 70% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 12% /
10% | 65% /
52% | -42% /
-21% | -40% /
-44% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 16 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 11.2 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 4.8 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 33 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 33.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 22.4 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 11.4 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 42 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
性能、排放和电池寿命--明显的弱点
随着 Helio G37Honor 已经选择了一个非常弱的SoC，即使是在这个价格范围。因此，评测样本在基准测试中只达到了类似价格的A14 5G的1/5的分数。 三星Galaxy A14 5G与 联发科Dimensity 700实现的。在日常使用中，你不得不时常忍受停顿和等待时间，例如在改变设置或打开应用程序时。
在存储方面，Honor X7a装备良好，但也很慢，因为该手机只有eMMC闪存。它只能达到UFS闪存的1/3左右的传输速率。在互联网上，你有时也需要等待相当长的时间才能加载网页和出现照片。
尽管性能相对较低，但系统发热达到44.3℃（约112°F）。这显然是值得注意的，但还不是关键，特别是由于室温稍高一些。然而，这并没有进一步降低性能，正如压力测试告诉我们的那样：即使在多次运行基准测试后，帧率也是恒定的。不幸的是，Honor X7a不能使用3DMark Wild Life，所以我们使用GFXBench T-Rex进行压力测试。
Honor 手机的单声道扬声器位于底部边缘，工作效果不佳：歌曲听起来相当沉闷，即使在最大音量下，在高频率下，通常只有一点杂音。通过3.5毫米插孔或蓝牙连接的音频设备声音更好。
电池容量充足，有5330毫安时，在我们的无线网络测试中能保持16：54小时的良好运行时间。这应该允许用户工作两天而不必给手机充电。如果有必要，即使手机是空的，也可以在不到2小时内充电，这要归功于附带的22.5瓦的充电器。
| Honor X7a | Honor X8a | Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G | Nokia G22 | Samsung Galaxy A14 5G | Average 128 GB eMMC Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | 8% | 569% | 368% | 458% | 76% | 880% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB | 280 | 278.1 -1% | 954.87 241% | 881 215% | 849.3 203% | 284 ? 1% | 1887 ? 574% |
| Sequential Write 256KB | 223 | 224.2 1% | 709.51 218% | 367 65% | 469.83 111% | 194.6 ? -13% | 1471 ? 560% |
| Random Read 4KB | 59.1 | 61.6 4% | 261.09 342% | 131 122% | 193.63 228% | 82.7 ? 40% | 278 ? 370% |
| Random Write 4KB | 14.7 | 18.7 27% | 231.57 1475% | 172 1070% | 204 1288% | 55.4 ? 277% | 311 ? 2016% |
温度
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 44.4 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 42.4 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.7 °C / 84 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
演讲者
Honor X7a audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 30.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.8% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (28% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 70% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 25% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 83% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 14% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (90.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 33.8% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 6.1% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 28% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 65% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 48% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 45% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
电池寿命
| Battery Runtime - WiFi Websurfing | |
| Nokia G22 | |
| Samsung Galaxy A14 5G | |
| Honor X7a | |
| Average of class Smartphone (476 - 3244, n=209, last 2 years) | |
| Honor X8a | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G | |
Pros
Cons
结论 - 如果它有更多的动力就好了......
如果制造商使用更强大的处理器，Honor X7a本可以成为一款有趣的、负担得起的中档手机。因此，你必须接受性能上的重大限制，额外的广角摄像头和良好的相机算法也难以弥补。
这款手机的续航时间很长，充电速度也相当快，但蹩脚的存储空间和糟糕的扬声器是进一步的弱点。Honor ，也可以通过5G调制解调器使自己在竞争中脱颖而出，但相反，你得到的4G频率选择很少，所以你几乎无法在进一步的旅行中使用你的手机。
Honor X7a看起来不错，有最新的安全补丁和无PWM屏幕，但最多只适合预算紧张、对性能要求不高的照片爱好者。
5G的价格相当，例如，在 三星Galaxy A14 5G.该 Redmi Note 12 4G甚至配备了AMOLED屏幕。两者的性能都大大超过了我们的测试设备。
价格和可用性
直接从制造商https://www.hihonor.com/de/phones/honor-x7a/buy/在测试时，你可以以179欧元（约195美元）购买Honor X7a。如果你想要银灰色的手机，这是目前最便宜的选择，尤其是在其他地方几乎买不到。
有兴趣的人可以在互联网零售商，例如amazon.de，购买黑色和蓝色的变体，再节省10欧元（约11美元）。
Honor X7a
- 07/01/2023 v7 (old)
Florian Schmitt
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.
Price comparison
