小米Redmi Note 12评论：具备120赫兹AMOLED和1,200尼特的智能手机，价格低于200美元

Name: Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G
Brand: Xiaomi

对讨价还价的人来说，最好的展示是什么？

Redmi Note 12针对价格敏感的买家，采用明亮的OLED面板和骁龙SoC。此外，它以很少的钱提供了强大的配置，有音频插孔、存储扩展、IP等级和快速充电技术。然而，一个重要的功能被省略了。

Marcus Herbrich, 👁 Florian Schmitt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy), Published 05/12/2023 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Touchscreen Smartphone Android

Redmi Note 12旨在通过非常明亮的120赫兹AMOLED显示屏在经济实惠的中产阶级中脱颖而出--制造商宣传6.67英寸OLED面板的峰值亮度为1,200尼特。

虽然5G版本的Note 12姐妹机型使用的是高通骁龙4代，但 "普通 "Note 12依靠的是较老的骁龙685.因此，这款中档智能手机只支持4G标准。与笔记11，相机爱好者也应该得到他们的钱的价值，2023型号的50MP三星JN1传感器。

Redmi Note 12配备了4GB的内存和64GB或128GB的UFS 2.2存储。在审查时，入门级机型的价格约为170美元。买家还可以从内部的小米商店和选定的合作商店免费获得红米芽4 Lite或红米智能手环2。

Test device courtesy of cyberport.de

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G (Redmi Note 12 Series)

Processor

Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G 8 x 1.9 - 2.8 GHz, Kryo 265 Gold (Cortex-A73) / Silver (Cortex-A53)

Graphics adapter

Qualcomm Adreno 610

Memory

4 GB

Display

6.67 inch 20:9, 2400 x 1080 pixel 395 PPI, Capacitive Touchscreen , AMOLED, 240Hz sampling rate, glossy: yes, HDR, 120 Hz

Storage

128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash, 128 GB

, 107 GB free

Connections

1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: 3.5 mm jack, Card Reader: microSD slot (shared, up to 1TB), 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, IP53, Miracast, infrared port, OTG

Networking

802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.1, 2G (850/900/1800/1900), 3G (B1/B5/B8), 4G (B1/B3/B5/B7/B8/B20/B28/B32/B38/B40/B41), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 8 x 165.9 x 76.2

Battery

5000 mAh Lithium-Polymer

Charging

fast charging / Quickcharge

Operating System

Android 13

Camera

Primary Camera: 48 MPix (f/1.8) + 8 MP (f/2.2, wide angle lens) + 2 MP (f/2.4, macro)
Secondary Camera: 13 MPix (f/2.5)

Additional features

Speakers: Stereo, Keyboard: OnScreen, charger, USB cable, info material, MIUI, 12 Months Warranty, widevine L1, fanless

Weight

188 g, Power Supply: 112 g

Price

229 Euro

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating	Date	Model	Weight	Drive	Size	Resolution
80.1 % v7 ^(old)	05 / 2023	Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G SD 685, Adreno 610	188 g	128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	6.67"	2400x1080
80 % v7 ^(old)	05 / 2022	Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 SD 680, Adreno 610	179 g	64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	6.43"	2400x1080
79 % v7 ^(old)	04 / 2023	Motorola Moto G13 Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2	183.5 g	128 GB eMMC Flash	6.50"	1600x720
79.6 % v7 ^(old)	08 / 2021	Samsung Galaxy A22 5G Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2	203 g	64 GB eMMC Flash	6.60"	2400x1080
80.9 % v7 ^(old)	12 / 2022	Xiaomi Poco M5s Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4	178.8 g	64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	6.43"	2400x1080
78.3 % v7 ^(old)	04 / 2023	Telekom T Phone Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2	195 g	64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	6.52"	1600x720

外壳 -Redmi Note 12，具有IP53认证

从视觉上看，Redmi Note 12与Pro系列几乎没有区别，但在入门级机型上，显示屏周围的边缘要宽一点。因此，屏幕与边缘的比例低于Note 12 Pro为85%。对于我们的口味来说，屏幕的边缘可以再窄一点，但对于这个价格范围来说还是可以接受的。关于正面的内置保护玻璃一无所知，这使得对其抗损坏性的评估变得困难。

这款手机壳可以买到玛瑙灰、薄荷绿 和冰蓝三种颜色，并且有一个磨砂塑料表面，这意味着指纹不是很明显。Redmi Note 12以良好的工艺令人信服，但在质量和感觉方面不得不做出妥协。带有玻璃背面的专业机型在这里有优势，特别是因为其表面更容易清洁。

与前辈一样、Note 12有IP认证，但只是IP53，这意味着它可以防止水的溅射。因此，这款箱子并不防水。

尺寸比较

Samsung Galaxy A22 5G Telekom T Phone Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G Motorola Moto G13 Xiaomi Poco M5s Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 DIN A6 ❌

设备 - 带有音频插孔的小米智能手机

除了NFC芯片和蓝牙5.2之外，这款廉价的中档智能手机的功能还包括一个音频插孔端口和用于快速连接外部配件的USB OTG。一个支持USB 2.0标准的USB Type-C端口可用于有线数据传输。屏幕内容的无线图像传输（Miracast）在我们的测试中也没有问题。

我们测试设备的内部128GB存储空间可以用microSD卡扩展。扣除操作系统和应用程序后，用户有107GB可用。

微型SD卡读卡器

Redmi Note 12中的集成microSD插槽支持当前的SDHC和SDXC标准，最高可达1TB--由于有三卡槽，在内存扩展时，双卡功能不受影响。

在复制速度方面，小米智能手机的运行速度达到了坚实的水平。笔记11前一年的24MB/s。因此，这里没有取得任何进展；竞争设备，如 Galaxy A22复制图像的速度要快得多。另一方面，与我们的AV PRO V60参考卡一起，Redmi Note 12的microSD插槽在跨平台磁盘测试中以良好的数值说服了人们。

SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB eMMC Flash (Angelbird V60)	44 MB/s +86%
Motorola Moto G13 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 128 GB eMMC Flash (Angelbird V60)	25.1 MB/s +6%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash (Angelbird AV Pro V60)	24.74 MB/s +5%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash (Angelbird V60)	23.6 MB/s
Telekom T Phone Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash (Angelbird AV Pro V60)	17.68 MB/s -25%
Xiaomi Poco M5s Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G95, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash (Angelbird V60)	16.7 MB/s -29%

Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)

Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø39.3 (27.4-50)

Telekom T Phone Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø17.9 (0.984-45.4)

Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø75.5 (28-82.5)

Telekom T Phone Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø76.3 (50.1-77.6)

软件 - 小米智能手机与Android 13

中国制造商在软件维护方面的产品理念几乎让人吃惊。虽然专业机型推出的是旧的Android 12，而廉价的Redmi Note 12已经使用了Android 13，因此将比其更高价格的姐妹机型提供更长的更新。根据小米安全中心的数据，Note 12将收到安全更新（包括Android 15），直到2026年。

小米将Android 系统与自己的MiUI用户界面（14版）相结合。在审查的时候，最新的安全补丁是从2023年4月开始的，因此是最新的。Note 12应该每季度收到一次更新。

通信和GNSS -Redmi Note 12，不含5G

在家庭网络中，Redmi Note 12以稳定的传输速率令人信服，但只使用Wi-Fi 5；在这个价格范围内，Wi-Fi 6真的不能指望。与竞争对手一样，红米智能手机只能管理低带宽，但对于200美元以下的智能手机来说，速度还是可以的。与华硕ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000结合使用，我们测得的峰值速度超过300MBit/s，但在接收时平均只能得到286MBit/s。

这款中档智能手机不支持接入5G网络进行移动互联网接入。频率范围也非常小，只有11个LTE频段。虽然用户在欧洲有足够的装备，但在出国前应检查所需的4G频率。

Networking
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Average of class Smartphone (34.8 - 1875, n=191, last 2 years)	711 MBit/s +149%
Telekom T Phone Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	371 (364^min - 371^max) MBit/s +30%
Motorola Moto G13 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 128 GB eMMC Flash	340 (311^min - 351^max) MBit/s +19%
Xiaomi Poco M5s Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G95, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	321 (304^min - 327^max) MBit/s +12%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	298 (198^min - 345^max) MBit/s +4%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	286 (267^min - 310^max) MBit/s
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Average of class Smartphone (40.5 - 1810, n=193, last 2 years)	725 MBit/s +123%
Telekom T Phone Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	374 (187^min - 385^max) MBit/s +15%
Motorola Moto G13 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 128 GB eMMC Flash	370 (349^min - 383^max) MBit/s +14%
Xiaomi Poco M5s Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G95, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	354 (346^min - 360^max) MBit/s +9%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	325 (290^min - 347^max) MBit/s
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	322 (162^min - 386^max) MBit/s -1%
iperf3 transmit AX12
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB eMMC Flash	348 (340^min - 353^max) MBit/s
iperf3 receive AX12
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB eMMC Flash	361 (322^min - 366^max) MBit/s

Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G, Qualcomm Adreno 610; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø286 (267-310)

Telekom T Phone MediaTek Dimensity 700, ARM Mali-G57 MP2; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø369 (364-371)

Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G, Qualcomm Adreno 610; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø325 (290-347)

Telekom T Phone MediaTek Dimensity 700, ARM Mali-G57 MP2; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø368 (187-385)

小米智能手机使用GPS、GLONASS、BeiDou和Galileo卫星系统的单频定位。为了评估它的实际跟踪能力，我们把这款中档智能手机和Garmin Venu 2一起骑了一小段自行车进行比较。

Note 12的追踪能力并不全面，令人印象深刻。在GPS记录的详细历史中，有时可以清楚地看到偏离选定路线的情况。红米手机往往会偏离实际走过的路径，尤其是在转弯的时候。尽管有这些小的不准确之处，Note 12仍然适用于导航任务。

电话和语音质量 - 小米双卡智能手机

Redmi Note 12支持两个nano-SIM卡，以及VoLTE和WLAN通话。语音质量很好，不显眼。声音再现得很清楚，我们的对话伙伴也认为很清晰。由于有两个麦克风，这款小米智能手机在视频会议中的清晰度也很高--通过Skype测试--而且还有一个体面的双扬声器系统。

照相机 - 小米智能手机配备三摄像头

小米在前面安装了一个1/3英寸的传感器，分辨率为1300万像素。该自拍摄像头在白天提供令人满意的清晰度和体面的曝光。隐藏在冲孔中的摄像头可以录制最高全高清质量的视频。

Redmi Note 12的主摄像头是基于ISOCELL JN1的，这也是安装在前辈和摩托G53。传感器尺寸为1/2.76英寸，分辨率为50MP，像素相当小，为0.64微米，但ISOCELL 2.0技术处理的虚拟像素尺寸为1.28微米。由于骁龙685只支持1080p的视频分辨率，Redmi Note 12只能以30帧/秒的速度录制全高清视频。

照片在明亮的光线下提供了良好的图像清晰度，但在阴暗的地方有时可以看到颗粒感。照片中的动态效果总体上也可以更好。红米智能手机在弱光条件下很快就达到了极限。在1250万像素的图像中，很少有细节被保留下来，锐度也处于较低水平。在我们的测试照片中，弱光下相机软件的配色也很 "有趣"。

具有相当狭窄的120度视野的超广角镜头是这个价格范围内的标准配置。低分辨率的800万像素Omnivision传感器（OV08D）显示出许多图像错误和有些苍白的颜色，但对于廉价的中端产品来说，图像质量仍然是坚实的。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Main camera Main camera Low light Wide angle

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images

我们分析了5千万像素镜头在受控照明条件下与实际参考颜色的对比，其色彩还原度。智能手机典型的照片增亮是可以识别的。除此之外，小米的相机软件在ColorChecker护照中提供了相对较低的偏差，在色彩保真度方面没有重大异常（>15）。白平衡也令人满意。

附件和保修 -Redmi Note 12，带电源

Redmi Note 12的交付范围包括一个模块化的33瓦电源，一条数据或充电线，一个保护壳盖，一个SIM卡针和一个快速启动指南，包括保修条件。

小米在德国对其智能手机给予12个月的保修。这在其他国家可能有所不同，所以买家在购买前应仔细检查。

输入设备和操作 - 带有FaceUnlock的小米智能手机

在240赫兹的采样率下，Redmi Note 12面板以高灵敏度对触摸作出反应，每秒刷新240次，例如在游戏中，这确保了低输入延迟。在6.67英寸OLED点阵显示器上的输入被准确地实现，直到触摸屏的角落。保护膜在出厂时就已贴好。

指纹传感器被集成到开/关按钮中，并可靠地解锁了这款中档智能手机。然而，这需要短暂的一秒钟，然后屏幕就会闪耀出所有的光彩。还有一种有点不安全的2D面部识别方法，它是基于通过前置摄像头的FaceUnlock功能。它在日光下也能很好地工作。

▶ load Youtube video

显示屏 - 红米智能手机，120赫兹

Redmi Note 12的6.67英寸AMOLED面板提供120赫兹的帧率和2400 x 1,080的分辨率。帧率可以手动降低到60赫兹以节省电力。使用了一个由一个红色、一个蓝色和两个绿色LED组成的RGBG矩阵。

小米公司规定，在HBM（高亮度模式）下，显示屏的亮度为700尼特。在我们的亮度测量中，OLED屏幕在全表面白色显示中达到了672cd/m²的峰值，这对于这个价格范围来说是一个很好的比率，几乎与制造商指定的一样高。在更能代表日常使用的APL18测量中，该智能手机在屏幕中央达到1045cd/m²。对于200美元以下的智能手机来说，又是一个非常好的价值，但比小米宣传的1200尼特略低。

由于安装了显示技术，Redmi Note 12使用PWM技术，包括屏幕闪烁，来控制屏幕亮度。振幅曲线在整个亮度光谱上是均匀的，频率为484赫兹。


652 cd/m²	655 cd/m²	672 cd/m²
651 cd/m²	650 cd/m²	662 cd/m²
659 cd/m²	655 cd/m²	665 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 672 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 657.9 cd/m² Minimum: 3 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 97 %
Center on Battery: 650 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.55 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 1.8 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
100% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.194

	Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.7"	Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 OLED, 2400x1080, 6.4"	Motorola Moto G13 IPS, 1600x720, 6.5"	Samsung Galaxy A22 5G IPS, 2400x1080, 6.6"	Xiaomi Poco M5s AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.4"	Telekom T Phone IPS, 1600x720, 6.5"
Screen		14%	-122%	-132%	-15%	-179%
Brightness middle	650	702 8%	555 -15%	415 -36%	715 10%	419 -36%
Brightness	658	701 7%	553 -16%	378 -43%	720 9%	391 -41%
Brightness Distribution	97	98 1%	93 -4%	76 -22%	95 -2%	89 -8%
Black Level *			0.29	0.26		0.29
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	1.55	1 35%	5.17 -234%	5.41 -249%	2.04 -32%	6.1 -294%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	2.59	2.3 11%	10.61 -310%	9.77 -277%	4.85 -87%	11.9 -359%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	1.8	1.4 22%	4.5 -150%	4.8 -167%	1.6 11%	7.8 -333%
Gamma	2.194 ^100%	2.2 ^100%	2.131 ^103%	2.348 ^94%	2.28 ^96%	2.21 ^100%
CCT	6316 ^103%	6520 ^100%	7380 ^88%	7748 ^84%	6488 ^100%	8208 ^79%
Contrast			1914	1596		1445

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

484 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 484 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 484 Hz is relatively high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. However, there are reports that some users are still sensitive to PWM at 500 Hz and above, so be aware.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8702 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

在固定的变焦水平和不同的亮度设置下进行的一系列测量

我们使用卡尔曼分析软件检查了AMOLED面板的色彩校准。标准 "配置文件控制了sRGB色彩空间，也在很大程度上覆盖了它。小米中档智能手机有三个颜色配置文件，以及调整色温的选项。

我们测量的DeltaE值表明颜色有一个小的偏差（1.55）。然而，在sRGB中仍然可以看到蓝色和洋红色的最小差异。灰度的再现也显示出轻微的偏差，小于2.0dB(A)。

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
1.7 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 0.8 ms rise
1.7 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 0.9 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 7 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
2.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 1.4 ms rise
2.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 1.4 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 9 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

Redmi Note 12为户外使用做好了准备。由于高亮度，内容在阳光直射下仍然足够清晰，尽管玻璃表面的反射会严重限制可读性。由于采用了OLED技术，可视角度的稳定性非常好，在非常平坦的可视角度下，只有轻微的亮度损失是明显的。

性能 - 采用高通SoC的小米手机

的高通骁龙685、Redmi Note 12采用了6纳米工艺制造。与其前身一样，该芯片组有四个Cortex-A73核心和四个Cortex-A53核心，并使用了一个 Adreno 610作为图形单元。

在我们的基准测试包中，红米智能手机的定位略高于骁龙680的笔记11，有4GB的内存和2GB的虚拟工作内存，但Note 12的分数在单核性能上处于低水平。然而，联发科的联发科Dimensity 700中的电信T-Phone在多核方面也更强大。

Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Average of class Smartphone (126 - 2437, n=177, last 2 years)	1045 Points +136%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096	564 Points +28%
Telekom T Phone MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096	541 Points +22%
Xiaomi Poco M5s Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 4096	512 Points +16%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G, Adreno 610, 4096	442 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G (437 - 442, n=2)	440 Points 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096	384 Points -13%
Motorola Moto G13 Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	351 Points -21%
Multi-Core
Average of class Smartphone (473 - 8816, n=177, last 2 years)	3488 Points +95%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G, Adreno 610, 4096	1787 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G (1775 - 1787, n=2)	1781 Points 0%
Xiaomi Poco M5s Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 4096	1778 Points -1%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096	1738 Points -3%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096	1712 Points -4%
Telekom T Phone MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096	1638 Points -8%
Motorola Moto G13 Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	1358 Points -24%

Geekbench 6.0
Single-Core
Average of class Smartphone (188 - 2008, n=41, last 2 years)	1257 Points +164%
Telekom T Phone MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096	692 Points +45%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G, Adreno 610, 4096	477 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G ()	477 Points 0%
Motorola Moto G13 Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	429 Points -10%
Multi-Core
Average of class Smartphone (512 - 5702, n=41, last 2 years)	3366 Points +125%
Telekom T Phone MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096	1826 Points +22%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G, Adreno 610, 4096	1498 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G ()	1498 Points 0%
Motorola Moto G13 Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	1442 Points -4%

Antutu v9 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (99654 - 2056989, n=104, last 2 years)	810694 Points +180%
Xiaomi Poco M5s Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 4096	326670 Points +13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G (289659 - 300122, n=2)	294891 Points +2%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G, Adreno 610, 4096	289659 Points
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096	287506 Points -1%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096	252044 Points -13%

PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Average of class Smartphone (4609 - 27169, n=199, last 2 years)	13195 Points +40%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G, Adreno 610, 4096	9421 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G (7305 - 9421, n=2)	8363 Points -11%
Motorola Moto G13 Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096	8214 Points -13%
Telekom T Phone MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096	8139 Points -14%
Xiaomi Poco M5s Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 4096	7938 Points -16%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096	7694 Points -18%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096	7434 Points -21%

CrossMark - Overall
Average of class Smartphone (187 - 2674, n=167, last 2 years)	925 Points +104%
Telekom T Phone MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096	519 Points +14%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G, Adreno 610, 4096	454 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G (369 - 454, n=2)	412 Points -9%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096	388 Points -15%
Xiaomi Poco M5s Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 4096	278 Points -39%

BaseMark OS II
Overall
Average of class Smartphone (1196 - 12993, n=161, last 2 years)	6467 Points +136%
Xiaomi Poco M5s Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 4096	3198 Points +17%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096	3005 Points +10%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096	2738 Points 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G, Adreno 610, 4096	2737 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G (2728 - 2737, n=2)	2733 Points 0%
System
Average of class Smartphone (2368 - 17953, n=161, last 2 years)	10321 Points +68%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096	6486 Points +5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G (6155 - 6320, n=2)	6238 Points +1%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G, Adreno 610, 4096	6155 Points
Xiaomi Poco M5s Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 4096	5830 Points -5%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096	5794 Points -6%
Memory
Average of class Smartphone (962 - 18911, n=161, last 2 years)	7017 Points +116%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096	4473 Points +37%
Xiaomi Poco M5s Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 4096	3984 Points +22%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096	3824 Points +18%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G (3254 - 3285, n=2)	3270 Points 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G, Adreno 610, 4096	3254 Points
Graphics
Average of class Smartphone (1017 - 58651, n=161, last 2 years)	17962 Points +670%
Xiaomi Poco M5s Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 4096	3728 Points +60%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096	2398 Points +3%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G, Adreno 610, 4096	2334 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G (2331 - 2334, n=2)	2333 Points 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096	2183 Points -6%
Web
Average of class Smartphone (841 - 2363, n=161, last 2 years)	1572 Points +28%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G, Adreno 610, 4096	1232 Points
Xiaomi Poco M5s Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 4096	1221 Points -1%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096	1199 Points -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G (1144 - 1232, n=2)	1188 Points -4%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G MediaTek Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096	1172 Points -5%

UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Average of class Smartphone (1267 - 81594, n=152, last 2 years)	17753 Points +299%
Xiaomi Poco M5s Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 4096	8538 Points +92%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096	4853 Points +9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G (4445 - 4615, n=2)	4530 Points +2%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G, Adreno 610, 4096	4445 Points

AImark - Score v3.x
Average of class Smartphone (82 - 307528, n=145, last 2 years)	24985 Points +6745%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G (365 - 382, n=2)	374 Points +2%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G, Adreno 610, 4096	365 Points
Xiaomi Poco M5s Mediatek Helio G95, Mali-G76 MP4, 4096	Points -100%

在图形测试中，Note 12配备了阿德雷诺610的表现几乎没有比其前代产品.配备联发科的设备 Dimensity 700和 Helio G95在GFX Bench和3DMark中取得了明显更高的数值。

3DMark: Wild Life Extreme Unlimited | Wild Life Extreme | Wild Life Unlimited Score | Wild Life Score | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7: T-Rex Onscreen | 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
GFXBench 3.0: on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
GFXBench 3.1: on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
GFXBench: on screen Car Chase Onscreen | 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | 3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB eMMC Flash	1073 Points +661%
Xiaomi Poco M5s Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G95, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	418 Points +196%
Telekom T Phone Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	315 Points +123%
Motorola Moto G13 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 128 GB eMMC Flash	187 Points +33%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	141 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	124 Points -12%

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Xiaomi Poco M5s Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G95, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	421 Points +212%
Telekom T Phone Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	326 Points +141%
Motorola Moto G13 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 128 GB eMMC Flash	190 Points +41%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	135 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	127 Points -6%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB eMMC Flash	100 Points -26%

3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Xiaomi Poco M5s Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G95, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	1476 Points +133%
Telekom T Phone Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	1166 Points +84%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB eMMC Flash	1074 Points +69%
Motorola Moto G13 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 128 GB eMMC Flash	748 Points +18%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	634 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	435 Points -31%

3DMark / Wild Life Score
Xiaomi Poco M5s Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G95, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	1434 Points +122%
Telekom T Phone Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	1191 Points +84%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB eMMC Flash	1094 Points +69%
Motorola Moto G13 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 128 GB eMMC Flash	744 Points +15%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	646 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	447 Points -31%

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics
Telekom T Phone Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	2822 Points +9%
Xiaomi Poco M5s Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G95, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2765 Points +7%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB eMMC Flash	2698 Points +4%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2589 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2375 Points -8%

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics
Xiaomi Poco M5s Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G95, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2821 Points +110%
Telekom T Phone Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	2314 Points +72%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB eMMC Flash	2141 Points +59%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	1343 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	1155 Points -14%

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited
Xiaomi Poco M5s Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G95, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2856 Points +85%
Telekom T Phone Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	2410 Points +56%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB eMMC Flash	2244 Points +45%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	1545 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	1253 Points -19%

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Xiaomi Poco M5s Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G95, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	3581 Points +34%
Telekom T Phone Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	3561 Points +33%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB eMMC Flash	3350 Points +25%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2676 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2573 Points -4%

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Xiaomi Poco M5s Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G95, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2745 Points +91%
Telekom T Phone Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	2324 Points +62%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB eMMC Flash	2290 Points +59%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	1436 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	1199 Points -17%

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Xiaomi Poco M5s Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G95, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2855 Points +83%
Telekom T Phone Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	2518 Points +62%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB eMMC Flash	2463 Points +58%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	1558 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	1372 Points -12%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Xiaomi Poco M5s Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G95, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	59 fps +51%
Motorola Moto G13 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 128 GB eMMC Flash	55 fps +41%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB eMMC Flash	52 fps +33%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	39 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	37 fps -5%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Xiaomi Poco M5s Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G95, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	85 fps +89%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB eMMC Flash	61 fps +36%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	45 fps
Motorola Moto G13 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 128 GB eMMC Flash	44 fps -2%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	42 fps -7%

GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Xiaomi Poco M5s Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G95, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	47 fps +124%
Motorola Moto G13 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 128 GB eMMC Flash	43 fps +105%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB eMMC Flash	33 fps +57%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	21 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	17 fps -19%

GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Xiaomi Poco M5s Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G95, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	53 fps +121%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB eMMC Flash	37 fps +54%
Motorola Moto G13 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 128 GB eMMC Flash	25 fps +4%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	24 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	20 fps -17%

GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Motorola Moto G13 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 128 GB eMMC Flash	30 fps +114%
Xiaomi Poco M5s Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G95, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	29 fps +107%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB eMMC Flash	21 fps +50%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	14 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	13 fps -7%

GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Xiaomi Poco M5s Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G95, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	32 fps +100%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB eMMC Flash	24 fps +50%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	16 fps 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	16 fps
Motorola Moto G13 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 128 GB eMMC Flash	16 fps 0%

GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Xiaomi Poco M5s Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G95, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	17 fps +124%
Motorola Moto G13 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 128 GB eMMC Flash	15 fps +97%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB eMMC Flash	11 fps +45%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	7.6 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	7.3 fps -4%

GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Xiaomi Poco M5s Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G95, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	21 fps +136%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB eMMC Flash	14 fps +57%
Motorola Moto G13 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 128 GB eMMC Flash	9.4 fps +6%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	8.9 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	8.6 fps -3%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Telekom T Phone Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	16 fps +196%
Xiaomi Poco M5s Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G95, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	11 fps +104%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB eMMC Flash	8.1 fps +50%
Motorola Moto G13 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 128 GB eMMC Flash	7.7 fps +43%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	5.4 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	5 fps -7%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi Poco M5s Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G95, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	7.6 fps +111%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB eMMC Flash	5.5 fps +53%
Telekom T Phone Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	5.2 fps +44%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	3.6 fps
Motorola Moto G13 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 128 GB eMMC Flash	3.3 fps -8%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	3.2 fps -11%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Telekom T Phone Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	24 fps +161%
Xiaomi Poco M5s Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G95, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	18 fps +96%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB eMMC Flash	13 fps +41%
Motorola Moto G13 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 128 GB eMMC Flash	12 fps +30%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	9.2 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	8.8 fps -4%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi Poco M5s Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G95, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	22 fps +118%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB eMMC Flash	15 fps +49%
Telekom T Phone Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	13 fps +29%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	10.1 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	9.8 fps -3%
Motorola Moto G13 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 128 GB eMMC Flash	8.8 fps -13%

GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi Poco M5s Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G95, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	3.7 fps +147%
Telekom T Phone Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	2.2 fps +47%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	1.5 fps
Motorola Moto G13 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 128 GB eMMC Flash	1.5 fps 0%

红米智能手机在日常使用和浏览时都给人以坚实的印象。性能和基准测试都还不错，但用户不得不时不时地忍受轻微的停顿。

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=171, last 2 years)	125.2 Points +112%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G (58.9 - 62.4, n=2)	60.7 Points +3%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G (Chrome 113)	58.945 Points
Xiaomi Poco M5s (Chrome 107)	50.839 Points -14%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 (Chrome 101)	43.525 Points -26%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G (Chrome 92)	38.21 Points -35%

Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 569, n=153, last 2 years)	143.5 runs/min +182%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G (50.9 - 52.4, n=2)	51.7 runs/min +2%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G (Chrome 113)	50.9 runs/min
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 (Chrome 101)	39.64 runs/min -22%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G (Chome 92)	37.2 runs/min -27%
Xiaomi Poco M5s (Chrome 107)	33.5 runs/min -34%

WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Average of class Smartphone (22 - 271, n=161, last 2 years)	117.9 Points +103%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G (Chrome 113)	58 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G (49 - 58, n=2)	53.5 Points -8%
Xiaomi Poco M5s (Chrome 107)	40 Points -31%

WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Average of class Smartphone (38 - 347, n=80, last 2 years)	149.9 Points +103%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G (Chrome 113)	74 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G ()	74 Points 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 (Chrome 101)	67 Points -9%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G (Chrome 92)	58 Points -22%
Xiaomi Poco M5s	53 Points -28%

Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=213, last 2 years)	38624 Points +146%
Telekom T Phone (Chrome 111)	17157 Points +9%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G (Chrome 92)	16870 Points +7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G (15695 - 15900, n=2)	15798 Points +1%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G (Chrome 113)	15695 Points
Xiaomi Poco M5s (Chrome 107)	15289 Points -3%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 (Chrome 101)	13056 Points -17%
Motorola Moto G13 (Chrome 112)	12107 Points -23%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 (Chrome 101)	3234.1 ms * -28%
Xiaomi Poco M5s (Chrome 107)	2783.3 ms * -10%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G (Chrome 92)	2543 ms * -0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G (2535 - 2535, n=2)	2535 ms * -0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G (Chrome 113)	2534.5 ms *
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=169, last 2 years)	1515 ms * +40%

* ... smaller is better

128GB的UFS 2.2存储空间提供了很高的读取和写入率。近1000MBit/s的写入速度在这个价格范围内是非常强大的，小数据块的性能也是如此。

	Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G	Xiaomi Redmi Note 11	Motorola Moto G13	Samsung Galaxy A22 5G	Xiaomi Poco M5s	Telekom T Phone	Average 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	Average of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5		-24%	-65%	-66%	-47%	-65%	-24%	62%
Sequential Read 256KB	954.87	895.34 -6%	281.1 -71%	300.5 -69%	507.89 -47%	685.21 -28%	728 ?(303 - 1038, n=71) -24%	1893 ?(226 - 4512, n=200, last 2 years) 98%
Sequential Write 256KB	709.51	519.23 -27%	244.7 -66%	210.3 -70%	376.97 -47%	94.15 -87%	527 ?(103.2 - 903, n=71) -26%	1478 ?(57.5 - 3908, n=200, last 2 years) 108%
Random Read 4KB	261.09	172.95 -34%	99.4 -62%	118 -55%	132.77 -49%	80.62 -69%	191.7 ?(89.3 - 297, n=71) -27%	278 ?(22.2 - 483, n=200, last 2 years) 6%
Random Write 4KB	231.57	163.29 -29%	94.9 -59%	69.2 -70%	123.92 -46%	55.82 -76%	185.8 ?(62.6 - 419, n=71) -20%	312 ?(9.4 - 753, n=200, last 2 years) 35%

游戏--Redmi Note 12人管理118帧

除了图形基准测试外，我们还使用我们的合作伙伴GameBench的测试工具看了一下智能手机的游戏能力。我们安装了三个Android 游戏，并记录了确切的帧率。

根据《PUBG Mobile》中的图形选项的选择，立即可以看出 Adreno 610已经开始显示它的年龄。这款射击游戏在大多数情况下都能在最低的细节上顺利运行，但甚至连高清设置都无法使用。此外，最高只能达到30帧。

在稍微简单的游戏中，FPS率更令人高兴，如Armajet和Dead Trigger。在这里，小米智能手机偶尔会达到每秒110帧以上，因此大大超过了其他一些高端智能手机.

Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G; Armajet: Ø86.5 (26-119)

Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G; Dead Trigger 2: Ø65.9 (58-116)

Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G; PUBG Mobile; Smooth: Ø29.6 (22-31)

Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G; PUBG Mobile; Balanced: Ø25 (24-26)

排放--小米智能手机的低废热

温度

在我们的负载情况下，机箱在峰值温度低于40°C时保持令人愉快的凉爽，低热开发也对高通SoC的性能产生了积极影响。

我们进行了3DMark压力测试，以检查骁龙685的行为。骁龙685在持续负载下的表现。在Redmi Note 12，我们得到的数值超过98%，这说明了该系统的性能稳定。

Max. Load

Idle


38.5 °C	33.5 °C	30.2 °C
38.9 °C	34.2 °C	30.8 °C
38.7 °C	33.8 °C	31.1 °C

Maximum: 38.9 °C
Average: 34.4 °C


29.9 °C	33.3 °C	34 °C
30.1 °C	33.3 °C	37.3 °C
30.5 °C	33.6 °C	37.6 °C

Maximum: 37.6 °C
Average: 33.3 °C

Power Supply (max.) 42.3 °C | Room Temperature 19.8 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 34.4 °C / 94 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 38.9 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 37.6 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 22.6 °C / 73 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	99.6 %
Telekom T Phone Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	99.5 % 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	99.1 % -1%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB eMMC Flash	99 % -1%
Motorola Moto G13 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 128 GB eMMC Flash	98.6 % -1%
Xiaomi Poco M5s Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G95, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	94.9 % -5%
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Telekom T Phone Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	99.1 % 0%
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB eMMC Flash	98.8 % 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	98.8 %
Xiaomi Poco M5s Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G95, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	98 % -1%

Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø0.813 (0.807-0.816)

Xiaomi Poco M5s Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G95, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø2.49 (2.47-2.52)

Telekom T Phone Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø1.956 (1.949-1.967)

Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø3.9 (3.89-3.91)

Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø2.68 (2.66-2.69)

Motorola Moto G13 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 128 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø4.5 (4.46-4.52)

Xiaomi Poco M5s Mali-G76 MP4, Helio G95, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø8.88 (8.54-9)

Telekom T Phone Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 700, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø7.14 (7.12-7.16)

发言人

小米智能手机的双扬声器系统比它的前辈要差一些。前者更差。两个扬声器的最大音量低至81分贝，而且中音也不是很线性地再现。低音和低中音几乎没有出现在声音组合中。

除了一个相当简陋的蓝牙编解码器选择，即SBC、AAC、aptX和aptX HD，耳机可以通过3.5毫米插孔连接。

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 6.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (12.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.4% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 46% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 48% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 64% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 30% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 29.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 18% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 72% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 40% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 52% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电池寿命 - 小米智能手机的快速充电功能

消耗功率

对于一款拥有6.67英寸、120赫兹屏幕的智能手机来说，我们测得的耗电量并不突出。红米智能手机的电池容量为5000毫安时，通过快速充电技术，在33瓦的标称功率下，可以在一个多小时内完成充电。幸运的是，Note 12配备了相应的电源。

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.1 / 0.2 Watt
Idle	0.8 / 1 / 1.5 Watt
Load	4.8 / 6.7 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G 5000 mAh	Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 5000 mAh	Samsung Galaxy A22 5G 5000 mAh	Xiaomi Poco M5s 5000 mAh	Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G	Average of class Smartphone
Power Consumption		-15%	-4%	-38%	-6%	-30%
Idle Minimum *	0.8	1.06 -33%	0.9 -13%	1.2 -50%	0.95 ?(0.8 - 1.1, n=2) -19%	0.883 ?(0.4 - 2.37, n=161, last 2 years) -10%
Idle Average *	1	1.93 -93%	1.3 -30%	1.5 -50%	1.15 ?(1 - 1.3, n=2) -15%	1.467 ?(0.6 - 4.36, n=161, last 2 years) -47%
Idle Maximum *	1.5	1.96 -31%	1.7 -13%	1.8 -20%	1.5 ?(1.5 - 1.5, n=2) -0%	1.621 ?(0.83 - 4.46, n=161, last 2 years) -8%
Load Average *	4.8	2.87 40%	3.8 21%	6.5 -35%	4.2 ?(3.6 - 4.8, n=2) 12%	6.58 ?(2.3 - 16.5, n=155, last 2 years) -37%
Load Maximum *	6.7	3.85 43%	5.8 13%	8.9 -33%	7.25 ?(6.7 - 7.8, n=2) -8%	9.91 ?(3.53 - 20.8, n=155, last 2 years) -48%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø2.51 (0.839-6.72)

Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø3.03 (1.109-6.23)

Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.289 (0.996-1.847)

Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.302 (1.117-1.614)

Power consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø2.82 (2.47-4.26)

Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø2.88 (2.54-5.23)

Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.289 (0.996-1.847)

Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.302 (1.117-1.614)

电池寿命

在我们的实际电池测试中，是在调整后的150cd/m²的显示亮度下进行的，在固定刷新率为120Hz的WLAN测试中，电池可以提供12小时的良好运行时间。在禁用Wi-Fi模块的情况下，它在视频播放中的持续时间几乎是两倍，这表明这是一个非常耗能的通信模块。

Battery Runtime

Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)		25h 12min
WiFi Websurfing		11h 59min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		23h 22min
Load (maximum brightness)		5h 27min

	Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G 5000 mAh	Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 5000 mAh	Motorola Moto G13 5000 mAh	Samsung Galaxy A22 5G 5000 mAh	Xiaomi Poco M5s 5000 mAh	Telekom T Phone 4500 mAh
Battery Runtime		15%	55%	35%	23%	24%
Reader / Idle	1512	2098 39%		2853 89%	2088 38%
H.264	1402	1076 -23%		1307 -7%	1324 -6%
WiFi v1.3	719	842 17%	1115 55%	1156 61%	1011 41%	894 24%
Load	327	409 25%		316 -3%	382 17%

Pros

+ 明亮的120 Hz AMOLED面板

+ 强大的设备

+ 快速充电+合适的电源

+ 吸引人的设计

Cons

- 没有5G

- 少数LTE频段

- 扬声器比前代产品差

- 弱的SoC

对Redmi Note 12的评价

Redmi Note 12类似于其前代产品在许多方面，但只要买家愿意忍受连接方面的缺陷，这款廉价的中档智能手机仍然是购买建议，价格不到200美元。Note 12系列最便宜的代表仍然不提供5G支持，出国前还应考虑微薄的LTE频段。那些不想没有快速5G标准的人可以仔细看看我们对三星Galaxy A22 5G或摩托罗拉Moto G53 5G.

否则，Redmi Note 12有很多优点。除了漂亮的AMOLED显示屏，以120赫兹的速度快速刷新，并以超过1000cd/m²的亮度闪耀，电池寿命长，设备强，在这个价格范围内，中档智能手机也因吸引人的更新供应而得到加强。此外，Note 12的5000毫安时电池可以用附带的33瓦电源适配器相当迅速地充电。

对5G或最新游戏中的HFR游戏关心不多的用户可以毫不犹豫地购买Redmi Note 12。

安装的骁龙685 绝不是中产阶级的性能奇迹，在这里和那里显得有点过度消耗，但它在日常使用中的表现与竞争对手相当。然而，老化的Andreno GPU在目前的游戏中已无法真正令人信服。Poco X4 Pro 5G 可能是250美元以下的游戏玩家更适合的选择。

价格和可用性

在美国亚马逊上，Redmi Note 12的薄荷绿全球版本目前售价为169.75美元，而其他两种颜色的版本为173.74美元。这款智能手机在英国亚马逊上也以折扣价提供。(-19%，176.53英镑)和印度亚马逊(-20%，15,140英镑)。

价格截至12.05.2023，可能会有变化。

Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G - 05/08/2023 v7 ^(old)
Marcus Herbrich

Chassis

83%

Keyboard

67 / 75 → 89%

Pointing Device

90%

Connectivity

48 / 70 → 69%

Weight

89%

Battery

91%

Display

92%

Games Performance

16 / 64 → 25%

Application Performance

68 / 86 → 79%

Temperature

92%

Noise

100%

Audio

70 / 90 → 78%

Camera

61%

Average

74%

80%

Smartphone - Weighted Average

Price comparison

Editor of the original article: Jacob Fisher - Translator - 1459 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2022

Translator: Ninh Ngoc Duy - Editorial Assistant - 473355 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008

contact me via: Facebook

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 小米Redmi Note 12评论：具备120赫兹AMOLED和1,200尼特的智能手机，价格低于200美元

Marcus Herbrich, 2023-05-12 (Update: 2024-08-15)

小米Redmi Note 12评论：具备120赫兹AMOLED和1,200尼特的智能手机，价格低于200美元

对讨价还价的人来说，最好的展示是什么？

潜在的竞争对手比较

外壳 -Redmi Note 12，具有IP53认证

尺寸比较

设备 - 带有音频插孔的小米智能手机

微型SD卡读卡器

Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)

软件 - 小米智能手机与Android 13

通信和GNSS -Redmi Note 12，不含5G

电话和语音质量 - 小米双卡智能手机

照相机 - 小米智能手机配备三摄像头

附件和保修 -Redmi Note 12，带电源

输入设备和操作 - 带有FaceUnlock的小米智能手机

显示屏 - 红米智能手机，120赫兹

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Display Response Times

性能 - 采用高通SoC的小米手机

游戏--Redmi Note 12人管理118帧

排放--小米智能手机的低废热

温度

3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

发言人

Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G audio analysis

Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 audio analysis

电池寿命 - 小米智能手机的快速充电功能

消耗功率

Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

Power consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

电池寿命

Pros

Cons

对Redmi Note 12的评价

价格和可用性

More articles related to this device

Transparency

Price comparison