Honor X8a评测--拥有100MP摄像头和全高清屏幕的智能手机
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Drive | Size | Resolution | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 78.5 % v7 (old) | 06 / 2023 | Honor X8a Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2 | 179 g | 128 GB eMMC Flash | 6.70" | 2388x1080 | |
| 78.5 % v7 (old) | 07 / 2022 | Honor X8 SD 680, Adreno 610 | 177 g | 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash | 6.70" | 2388x1080 | |
| 80.1 % v7 (old) | 05 / 2023 | Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G SD 685, Adreno 610 | 188 g | 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | 6.67" | 2400x1080 | |
| 79.1 % v7 (old) | 03 / 2023 | Motorola Moto G53 SD 480+, Adreno 619 | 183 g | 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash | 6.50" | 1600x720 | |
| 81.4 % v7 (old) | 06 / 2023 | OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite 5G SD 695 5G, Adreno 619 | 195 g | 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | 6.72" | 2400x1080 |
箱子和设备 - 坚固的塑料
作为华为的替代品，Honor 品牌在西方世界的复出当然主要由强大的高端手机承载，但Honor 在廉价机型领域也有X系列的代表。
X8a是一款中档手机，建议价格为269欧元，配备了1亿像素的摄像头和全高清屏幕，但不得不说没有5G功能。
在外壳方面，Honor ，提供了一个塑料机箱，其黑色、银色或浅蓝色的哑光背面和大的相机模块看起来非常漂亮。机壳中间可以压一下，屏幕上会出现图像错误，但手机在其他方面非常稳定，几乎不能扭动。
屏幕的边框非常纤细，手机的尺寸也很轻，只有179克。尽管有棱有角的设计，Honor X8a的手感很好。
配置6GB内存和128GB大容量存储在这个价格范围内很常见，但Honor 智能手机只配备了相当慢的eMMC闪存。还缺少一个3.5毫米接口，以及通过microSD扩展存储的选项。至少，用于移动支付服务的NFC已经上岗。
制造商对附带的配件也有点吝啬：虽然盒子里有一个充电器和一条合适的电缆，但没有硅胶保险杠。
通信、软件和操作 - WiFi 5，但没有5G
WiFi 5是这个价格范围内通常的WLAN标准。Honor X8a在这里可以跟上，还能提供相当快和稳定的传输速率，超过所有的对比设备。
想要5G手机的用户将不得不在其他地方寻找，或者购买国际通用的Honor X8a 5G版本。至少评测样本提供了许多4G频率，所以你也可以在旅行时使用它进行移动互联网。
令人讨厌的是，这款手机仍然采用基于Android 12的MagicUI 6.1。预计会更新到Android 13，但没有关于何时以及是否会有进一步的操作系统版本用于这款廉价手机的信息。根据Honor 's网站的网站，该手机将有季度性的安全更新，但根据我们的测试设备，我们无法确认这一点：我们发现2022年12月的安全补丁已经完全过时。
同样令人讨厌的是，Honor ，没有对Widevin-L1进行认证，所以流媒体内容只能以标清方式观看。
90赫兹的屏幕可以流畅地操作。在外壳右侧的待机按钮上有一个指纹传感器。它能非常可靠地解锁Honor X8a，但有一个短暂的延迟。脸部识别也是可能的，而且在我们的测试中也能可靠地工作。然而，它不太安全，因为它只基于软件识别。
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| Honor X8a | |
| Motorola Moto G53 | |
| OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite 5G | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G | |
| Honor X8 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Motorola Moto G53 | |
| Honor X8a | |
| OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite 5G | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G | |
| Honor X8 | |
相机 - 亮点
1亿像素的摄像头无疑是Honor X8a的主要卖点，制造商也用它对手机进行了密集的宣传。的确，照片在第一眼看上去非常细致。然而，当你放大时，与更高质量的镜头有明显区别，特别是在动态方面。总的来说，考虑到这个价格，Honor X8a可以拍出非常漂亮的照片。
这款便宜的手机还有一个广角镜头，可以拍出体面的快照。然而，你不应该靠近看，否则，你会发现细节几乎不存在。200万像素的微距相机的分辨率很低。你不应该期望太多，这反而是一个不错的噱头。
自拍相机拍摄的照片还不错，但放大后显示的动态范围有点低，特别是在黑暗区域。
视频可以以最大30帧/秒的速度录制为1080p。
Image Comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
Main cameraMain cameraLow LightWide-angle
显示 - 无PMW，颜色准确
具有扩展的FullHD分辨率的IPS显示屏可以显示每秒60或90帧，你可以把这个值固定下来，或者让手机根据情况决定。亮度明显低于同类手机，但对于有些明亮的环境，平均481cd/m²的亮度还是足够的。
在 "正常 "模式下，色彩再现令人信服，肉眼看不出与参考色彩空间有什么区别。
在我们的测试中，即使在非常低的亮度下，我们也没有注意到PWM的闪烁。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 94 %
Center on Battery: 492 cd/m²
Contrast: 1295:1 (Black: 0.38 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.32 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 1.9 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
99.5% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.194
| Honor X8a IPS, 2388x1080, 6.7" | Honor X8 TFT-LCD, 2388x1080, 6.7" | Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.7" | Motorola Moto G53 IPS, 1600x720, 6.5" | OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite 5G IPS, 2400x1080, 6.7" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Response Times | -2% | 89% | -92% | 5% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 29 ? | 28.94 ? -0% | 2.8 ? 90% | 56 ? -93% | 26 ? 10% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 14 ? | 14.62 ? -4% | 1.7 ? 88% | 26.6 ? -90% | 14 ? -0% |
| PWM Frequency | 484 | ||||
| Screen | -58% | 14% | -25% | -50% | |
| Brightness middle | 492 | 510 4% | 650 32% | 587 19% | 672 37% |
| Brightness | 481 | 469 -2% | 658 37% | 559 16% | 656 36% |
| Brightness Distribution | 94 | 78 -17% | 97 3% | 91 -3% | 90 -4% |
| Black Level * | 0.38 | 0.82 -116% | 0.4 -5% | 0.39 -3% | |
| Contrast | 1295 | 622 -52% | 1468 13% | 1723 33% | |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.32 | 2.5 -89% | 1.55 -17% | 2.6 -97% | 3.88 -194% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 3.37 | 5.8 -72% | 2.59 23% | 5.62 -67% | 7.89 -134% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.9 | 4.1 -116% | 1.8 5% | 3.3 -74% | 5.2 -174% |
| Gamma | 2.194 100% | 2.45 90% | 2.194 100% | 2.463 89% | 2.218 99% |
| CCT | 6288 103% | 6307 103% | 6316 103% | 6288 103% | 7734 84% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -30% /
-46% | 52% /
33% | -59% /
-38% | -23% /
-39% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 14 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 9 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 5 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 31 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 29 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 16 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 13 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 35 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8715 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
性能、排放和电池寿命 - 小功率
Honor X8a在性能方面不能真正令人信服：这款手机的 SoC联发科Helio G88已很难与 骁龙680竞争，而前代的 Honor X8.该价格范围内的其他手机，如 小米Redmi Note 12 4G、提供更多动力。
因此，在日常使用中，你不得不忍受系统的抖动和等待时间，而Honor 在其廉价的中档手机中安装的蹩脚的eMMC闪存也反而导致了情况的恶化。
以43.6℃为最高值，我们测量到智能手机上有明显的升温现象。这也对手机的长期性能产生了影响：正如我们在3DMark压力测试中所确定的那样，处理器在较长时间的负载后会明显节流。
底部边缘的单声道扬声器提供了一个平庸的音量和一个非常平均的声音，没有深的中音。外部音频设备可以通过USB-C端口或蓝牙5.1连接。
附带充电器的最大充电功率为22.5瓦。因此，需要2个小时，直到电池再次充满。在我们的Wi-Fi测试中，4500毫安时的电池需要15:27小时放电，这在比较领域是个不错的速度，如果你有点节俭，足够两个工作日使用。
| Honor X8a | Honor X8 | Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G | Motorola Moto G53 | OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite 5G | Average 128 GB eMMC Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | 379% | 480% | 225% | 244% | 55% | 762% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB | 278.1 | 926.58 233% | 954.87 243% | 474.6 71% | 506.1 82% | 284 ? 2% | 1887 ? 579% |
| Sequential Write 256KB | 224.2 | 510.25 128% | 709.51 216% | 243.87 9% | 466.6 108% | 194.6 ? -13% | 1471 ? 556% |
| Random Read 4KB | 61.6 | 189.38 207% | 261.09 324% | 166.24 170% | 162.5 164% | 82.7 ? 34% | 278 ? 351% |
| Random Write 4KB | 18.7 | 195.75 947% | 231.57 1138% | 139.83 648% | 134.9 621% | 55.4 ? 196% | 311 ? 1563% |
温度
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 43.6 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 43.3 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
| 3DMark | |
| Wild Life Extreme Stress Test | |
| OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite 5G | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G | |
| Motorola Moto G53 | |
| Honor X8 | |
| Honor X8a | |
| Wild Life Stress Test Stability | |
| OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite 5G | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G | |
| Honor X8 | |
| Motorola Moto G53 | |
| Honor X8a | |
演讲者
Honor X8a audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 29.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.6% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.5% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (10.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (26.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 64% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 30% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 79% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 17% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite 5G audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.5% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 28% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 65% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 48% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 45% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
电池寿命
| Battery Runtime - WiFi Websurfing | |
| Motorola Moto G53 | |
| Average of class Smartphone (476 - 3244, n=209, last 2 years) | |
| OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite 5G | |
| Honor X8a | |
| Honor X8 | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G | |
Pros
Cons
评语--摄影爱好者必须做出妥协
Honor X8a在很大程度上依赖于其主摄像头的吸引力，即使在这个价格范围内，它确实能拍出相当好的照片。广角和微距相机由于其相对较低的图像质量，更像是一个噱头。此外，漂亮、哑光和稳定的外壳，实用的运行时间，快速的Wi-Fi和屏幕在正确设置下准确的色彩再现都令人信服。
我们对该手机的性能不太满意，它甚至落后于前代产品的性能。 Honor X8.Honor ，在软件更新方面也必须变得更快、更可靠。有了microSD插槽和3.5毫米的端口，Honor 也缺少两个实际上是这个价格范围内的标准功能。
因此，主要想要一个好的相机的用户可以把Honor X8a列入他们的购买决定。然而，那些想要最快的SoC的人，以及不能没有microSD读卡器和插孔的人，可能要在其他地方寻找。
Honor X8a是一款漂亮、便宜的中档手机，有一个好的摄像头。然而，在性能和功能方面，它只能部分达到同类标准。
如果你正在寻找这个价格范围内的5G手机，你可以看一下 摩托罗拉Moto G53 5G.你在那里也能得到更多的性能。
价格和可用性
Honor X8a的价格为269欧元，，直接从制造商那里购买。.在测试时有一个20欧元的折扣促销。
然而，在测试时，这款手机在amazon.de和其他网上商店也有低于200欧元的价格。
Honor X8a
- 06/23/2023 v7 (old)
Florian Schmitt
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.
Price comparison
