Notebookcheck Logo

摩托罗拉Moto G53 5G评论。负担得起的5G智能手机,拥有120赫兹和5000万像素摄像头

对中段来说太少了?

摩托G53是一款经济实惠的中档智能手机,更新时间长,功能好,但与摩托G52相比,它留下了一些问题。继续阅读,看看我们对Moto智能手机的评测中揭示了哪些弱点,以及200-250美元的价格(取决于你的位置)是否合理。
5G Touchscreen Smartphone
摩托罗拉Moto G53 5G智能手机评测

摩托G53专注于安全功能等精简的软件,并通过其杜比全景声认证的立体声扬声器和6.5英寸120赫兹的屏幕专注于多媒体使用。然而,这块IPS面板只有1600x720(HD+)的微弱分辨率,像素密度为269 ppi。

摩托罗拉已经安装了高通公司的 骁龙480+芯片组,这与它的 前者相比,现在可以接入5G网络。此外,摩托罗拉将4GB的内存与128GB的内部存储结合起来,建议零售价为200-250美元(取决于地点)。

一个所谓的亮点是带有ISOCELL JN1的后置主摄像头,这也被用于 三星Galaxy A23 5G。传感器尺寸为1/2.76英寸,分辨率为50MP,但像素相当小,为0.64微米。通过SOCELL 2.0技术,至少可以实现1.28微米的虚拟像素。

Motorola Moto G53 (Moto G50 Series)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus 5G 8 x 1.8 - 2.2 GHz, Cortex-A76 / 55
Graphics adapter
Qualcomm Adreno 619
Memory
6 GB 
,
Display
6.50 inch 20:9, 1600 x 720 pixel 270 PPI, Capacitive touchscreen, IPS, glossy: yes, 120 Hz
Storage
128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash, 128 GB 
, 112 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: 3.5 mm jack, Card Reader: microSD up to 1TB, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, OTG, Miracast
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.1, 5G: n1/n3/n5/n7/n8/n20/n28/n38/n40/n41/n77/n78 | 4G: 1/2/3/5/7/8/18/19/20/26/28/32/38/40/41/42 | 3G: 1/2/5/8/19 | 2G: 2/3/5/8, Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 8.2 x 162.7 x 74.7
Battery
5000 mAh Lithium-Polymer
Operating System
Android 13
Camera
Primary Camera: 50 MPix (f/1.8, 1/2.76", 0.64µm) + 2 MP (f/2.4)
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix (f/2,0, 1,12 µm)
Additional features
Speakers: Stereo, Keyboard: OnScreen, USB cable, charger, info material, MyUX, 24 Months Warranty, SAR value: 0.980W/​kg Head, 1.320W/​kg Body, widevine L1, fanless
Weight
183 g
Price
250 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Price
79.1 %
v7 (old)
03 / 2023
Motorola Moto G53
SD 480+, Adreno 619
183 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.50"1600x720
79.2 %
v7 (old)
01 / 2023
Realme 10
Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2
178 g128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.40"2400x1080
82.5 %
v7 (old)
07 / 2022
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro
SD 695 5G, Adreno 619
205 g128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.67"2400x1080
80.3 %
v7 (old)
10 / 2022
Samsung Galaxy A23 5G
SD 695 5G, Adreno 619
197 g64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.60"2408x1080
80.2 %
v7 (old)
10 / 2022
Oppo A77 5G
Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2
190 g64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.56"1612x720
81 %
v7 (old)
07 / 2022
Motorola Moto G52
SD 680, Adreno 610
169 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.60"2400x1080
摩托罗拉Moto G53 5G智能手机评测
摩托罗拉Moto G53的粉色和银色
摩托罗拉Moto G53的粉色和银色

这款价格低廉的摩托罗拉智能手机配备了一个冲孔,1600万像素的自拍相机就装在里面。Moto G53的外壳由塑料制成,结构牢固,有三种颜色可供选择,即墨水蓝、北极 银和淡粉色

背面是哑光的,可以很好地抵御油腻的污渍。与Moto G52不同, ,继任者缺乏IP52认证。相反,Moto G53只采用了防水设计。制造商规定这是对溅水或小雨的保护。

就在IPS面板下面的边框相当宽。用数字表示:智能手机正面不到84%的面积是由显示屏构成的。因此,6.5英寸的Moto G53并不完全紧凑。与其他Moto机型一样,Moto G53没有安装专用的谷歌助理按钮。

摩托罗拉Moto G53 5G智能手机评测
摩托罗拉Moto G53 5G智能手机评测
摩托罗拉Moto G53 5G智能手机评测
摩托罗拉Moto G53 5G智能手机评测
摩托罗拉Moto G53 5G智能手机评测

尺寸比较

165.4 mm 76.9 mm 8.4 mm 197 g164.19 mm 76.1 mm 8.12 mm 205 g163.8 mm 75.1 mm 8 mm 190 g162.7 mm 74.7 mm 8.2 mm 183 g160.1 mm 74.5 mm 8 mm 169 g159.9 mm 73.3 mm 8 mm 178 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g

设备 - 带有3.5毫米插孔的摩托罗拉智能手机

除了立体声扬声器和双SIM卡功能外,这款中档智能手机的功能还包括NFC芯片和用于快速连接外部配件的USB OTG。屏幕内容的无线图像传输(Miracast)在测试中也没有问题。一个支持USB 2.0标准的USB Type-C端口可用于有线数据传输。

摩托手机的买家还可以使用耳机的音频插孔,由于DRM Widevine L1的存在,流媒体内容可以以高清质量观看。

底部(扬声器、USB接口、麦克风、插孔)
底部(扬声器、USB接口、麦克风、插孔)
顶部(麦克风)
顶部(麦克风)
右边(按钮)
右边(按钮)
左侧(卡槽)
左侧(卡槽)

微型SD卡读卡器

集成的microSD插槽支持当前的SDHC和SDXC标准,最高可达1TB。Moto G53的复制速度为27MB/s,很扎实,但一个 三星Galaxy A23复制图片的速度要快得多。尽管如此,与我们的AV PRO V60参考卡一起,microSD插槽表现良好,在跨平台磁盘测试中具有良好的数值。

SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Samsung Galaxy A23 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash (Angelbird V60)
45.7 MB/s +71%
Realme 10
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash (Angelbird V60)
29.7 MB/s +11%
Motorola Moto G53
Adreno 619, SD 480+, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash (Angelbird V60)
26.8 MB/s
Oppo A77 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash (Angelbird V60)
22.9 MB/s -15%
Motorola Moto G52
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash (Angelbird V60)
20.56 MB/s -23%
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
11.84 MB/s -56%

Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)

05101520253035404550556065707580Tooltip
Motorola Moto G53 Adreno 619, SD 480+, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB: Ø38.9 (28.3-49.6)
Samsung Galaxy A23 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø41.4 (29.9-52.3)
Motorola Moto G53 Adreno 619, SD 480+, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB: Ø76.1 (26.1-84.4)
Samsung Galaxy A23 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø76.9 (67.1-81.5)

软件 - 摩托罗拉智能手机与Android 13

摩托罗拉为其中档智能手机使用了自己的MyUX界面,这是对谷歌的Android (13版)的补充。在我们审查期间,我们的Moto G53的安全补丁是从2023年1月开始的。根据制造商的说法,安全补丁将从2026年1月起停止使用,并将以两个月的时间间隔发布。这对于一款中档智能手机来说是非常值得称赞的。然而,Android 升级有一个缺点--Moto G53将只接受下一代,即Android 14。

摩托G53的MyUX用户界面不提供该公司的Ready For功能,但支持名为ThinkShield for Mobile的硬件和软件安全功能束。还有新的Moto Secure 应用程序,它允许用户调整隐私控制和安全功能,或将应用程序和文件隐藏在一个受密码保护的安全文件夹中。敏感的应用程序,如来自金融领域的应用程序,也可以通过中性的应用程序图标和命名选项来隐藏。

摩托罗拉Moto G53 5G智能手机评测
摩托罗拉Moto G53 5G智能手机评测
摩托罗拉Moto G53 5G智能手机评测
摩托罗拉Moto G53 5G智能手机评测

通信和GNSS - 配备5G的Moto G53

在通信方面,Moto智能手机只使用蓝牙5.1,尽管 骁龙480 Plus理论上支持蓝牙5.2--这可能是由于摩托罗拉数据表中的一个错误,因为LC3编解码器被列入Moto G53的开发者选项中。除了支持5G之外,这款中档智能手机还通过16个LTE频段连接到移动互联网。对于家庭无线网络,Moto G53提供了相当标准的WiFi 5,在我们的测量中,它仍然提供有竞争力的传输速率。在与我们的华硕ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000参考路由器的配合下,Moto智能手机在接收和发送数据时表现一致。

Networking
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Average of class Smartphone
  (34.8 - 1875, n=189, last 2 years)
717 MBit/s +108%
Realme 10
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
346 (316min - 353max) MBit/s 0%
Motorola Moto G53
Adreno 619, SD 480+, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
345 (317min - 350max) MBit/s
Oppo A77 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
336 (292min - 344max) MBit/s -3%
Samsung Galaxy A23 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
330 (304min - 343max) MBit/s -4%
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
322 (124min - 352max) MBit/s -7%
Motorola Moto G52
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
283 (244min - 311max) MBit/s -18%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Average of class Smartphone
  (40.5 - 1810, n=191, last 2 years)
733 MBit/s +105%
Realme 10
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
370 (345min - 381max) MBit/s +3%
Oppo A77 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
368 (337min - 378max) MBit/s +3%
Samsung Galaxy A23 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
358 (334min - 374max) MBit/s 0%
Motorola Moto G53
Adreno 619, SD 480+, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
358 (319min - 374max) MBit/s
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
349 (317min - 362max) MBit/s -3%
Motorola Moto G52
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
292 MBit/s -18%
020406080100120140160180200220240260280300320340360Tooltip
Motorola Moto G53; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø345 (317-350)
Motorola Moto G53; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø358 (319-374)
在室内定位
在室内定位
在户外进行本地化
在户外进行本地化

为了更好地评估日常使用中的定位精度,我们带着Moto G53进行了一次短途骑行,并与Garmin Venue 2并行记录路线,以进行比较。尽管摩托罗拉智能手机的定位能力并不总是完美的,但在GPS记录的详细总结中,偏差很小。在使用Moto G53的近4公里长的旅程中,没有出现明显的不准确之处。

Moto智能手机的定位模块使用主要的卫星系统GPS(L1+L5)、GLONASS(L1)、BeiDou(B1)和Galileo(E1)来确定其位置。还使用了基于卫星的补充系统SBAS。

Garmin Venu 2的定位
Garmin Venu 2的定位
摩托罗拉Moto G53的定位
摩托罗拉Moto G53的定位

电话和语音质量 - 摩托罗拉双卡智能手机

摩托罗拉Moto G53 5G智能手机评测
摩托罗拉Moto G53 5G智能手机评测

在我们的测试中,我们喜欢Moto智能手机产生的语音质量,但其SAR值相对较高,几乎为每公斤1瓦(头部)和1.3瓦/公斤(身体)。支持VoLTE或WLAN通话等标准。在我们用Moto G53进行的测试通话中,声音被清晰地再现,也被我们的对话伙伴定性为清晰。由于有两个功能良好的麦克风,这款Moto智能手机在视频会议(通过Skype测试)和通过立体声扬声器时也表现出色。

照相机 - 摩托罗拉智能手机的双摄像头

摩托G53:人像模式
摩托G53:人像模式
Moto G53:照片模式
Moto G53:照片模式

在灵活性和多功能性方面,Moto G53的相机设置当然不是最棒的。前面有一个1600万像素的摄像头,可以录制最大分辨率为1080p的视频。在困难的照明条件下,照片的清晰度很吸引人,在人像模式下曝光度很高。

摩托罗拉显然将重点放在Moto G53的广角摄像头上--因为第二个镜头只用于微距摄影,而且分辨率很低,只有200万像素。主摄像头是三星的ISOCELL JN1传感器,它也被用于 Galaxy A23 5G.5千万像素的传感器有一个f/1.8光圈,可以捕捉到具有高对比度的物体。除了像素分选过程,即4个像素合并形成一个巨大的 "超级像素 "外,还可以使用50MP模式。在白天,令人惊讶的是,在黑暗中,Moto G53也能拍出引人注目的清晰照片。由于图像传感器相当小,照片在低光下不能完美照亮,但对于这个价格范围来说,它们更有说服力。

广角
广角
3倍变焦
8倍变焦(最大)
宏观
摩托罗拉Moto G53 5G智能手机评测
摩托罗拉Moto G53 5G智能手机评测
摩托罗拉Moto G53 5G智能手机评测
摩托罗拉Moto G53 5G智能手机评测

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

HouseFlowerLow light
orginal image
click to load images

在受控的照明条件下,我们使用ColorChecker Passport来分析50MP光学器件的颜色表现与实际参考颜色的对比。那些重视精确色彩表现的人不太可能对Moto G53感到满意。除了智能手机的典型亮度外,Moto手机在ColorChecker中显示出相对较大的偏差,特别是在绿色和蓝色调方面。

ColorChecker
21.6 ∆E
12 ∆E
22 ∆E
24.4 ∆E
18.5 ∆E
12.6 ∆E
10.6 ∆E
23 ∆E
10.7 ∆E
15.1 ∆E
9.7 ∆E
7.9 ∆E
18.2 ∆E
16.3 ∆E
9.7 ∆E
4.8 ∆E
12.1 ∆E
21.4 ∆E
6.4 ∆E
6.9 ∆E
12.9 ∆E
19.8 ∆E
19.6 ∆E
2 ∆E
ColorChecker Motorola Moto G53: 14.1 ∆E min: 2.04 - max: 24.44 ∆E
ColorChecker
25.8 ∆E
48.5 ∆E
35.7 ∆E
33.1 ∆E
40.3 ∆E
57.5 ∆E
48.9 ∆E
31.7 ∆E
35.3 ∆E
23.1 ∆E
55.5 ∆E
58.2 ∆E
27.9 ∆E
42.4 ∆E
32 ∆E
53.9 ∆E
37.6 ∆E
39.6 ∆E
54.1 ∆E
55.3 ∆E
45.7 ∆E
33.3 ∆E
20.8 ∆E
10.4 ∆E
ColorChecker Motorola Moto G53: 39.45 ∆E min: 10.37 - max: 58.19 ∆E

配件和保修 - Moto G53带电源适配器

摩托G53的混合卡槽
摩托G53的混合卡槽

交付范围包括一个模块化的10瓦电源,一条数据和充电线,一个SIM卡针,以及一份包含保修信息的快速入门指南。除了摩托罗拉没有为Moto G53配备的保护套外,其 前代产品还配备了33瓦的TurboPower充电器。这里的退步是不可理解的,尤其是电池容量一直保持在5000毫安时不变。制造商在德国为Moto G53提供24个月的保修。这在其他国家可能有所不同,所以买家在购买前应仔细检查。

通过摩托罗拉的网上商店,还可以买到可选的扩展保险,价格约为20美元,根据该保险,Moto G53的缺陷和机械故障保险期为额外的12个月。一份名为Moto Care 的可选事故保护合同为液体或财产损失提供额外的保障。为此,摩托罗拉额外收取约40美元,为期24个月。

输入设备和操作 - 带有FaceUnlock的摩托罗拉智能手机

Moto G53的电容式触摸屏能够可靠地识别我们的手指输入。除了120赫兹的高刷新率外,低触摸延迟也有利于智能手机的操作。在某些应用程序(如游戏)中,Moto G53对用户可能的触摸进行扫描,每秒可达250次。通过前置摄像头,Moto智能手机可以通过面部识别进行解锁,但这是通过二维程序完成的,因此不是很安全。指纹扫描仪已被整合到电源按钮中,以实现安全的生物识别解锁选项,它表现良好,识别率高。定位也很舒适,符合我们的口味。然而,解锁过程直到显示屏打开需要一定的时间。

摩托罗拉Moto G53 5G智能手机评测
摩托罗拉Moto G53 5G智能手机评测
摩托罗拉Moto G53 5G智能手机评测

显示屏 - Moto G53采用IPS面板,而不是OLED面板

子像素网格
子像素网格

显示器癖好者肯定不会对Moto G53感到满意,因为与前代产品相比,摩托罗拉在这里做了削减。摩托G52的高对比度OLED面板 摩托G52的高对比度OLED面板,在2023年的型号中被像素密度低至269 ppi的IPS面板所取代。至少刷新率已经提高到120赫兹。想节省一些能源的人可以将屏幕设置为60赫兹。该智能手机还提供了一个自动模式。

在我们的亮度测量中,IPS面板在全白显示屏上的平均亮度为559cd/m²,这对于这个价格范围来说是令人满意的,但低于 摩托G52.更能代表日常使用的APL18测量,在图像中心登记了602 cd/m²。另一个坚实的数值,但前辈在这里也是比较亮的,大约是664 cd/m²(APL50)。

由于采用LC显示技术,Moto G53没有检测到屏幕闪烁(PWM)。IPS典型的弱点(阴影,边缘光线不均匀)在摩托罗拉的智能手机上也不是很明显。

561
cd/m²
562
cd/m²
534
cd/m²
553
cd/m²
587
cd/m²
542
cd/m²
554
cd/m²
581
cd/m²
561
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 587 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 559.4 cd/m² Minimum: 2.3 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 91 %
Center on Battery: 587 cd/m²
Contrast: 1468:1 (Black: 0.4 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.6 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 3.3 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
90.1% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.463
Motorola Moto G53
IPS, 1600x720, 6.5"
Realme 10
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.4"
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.7"
Samsung Galaxy A23 5G
PLS, 2408x1080, 6.6"
Oppo A77 5G
IPS, 1612x720, 6.6"
Motorola Moto G52
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.6"
Screen
-29%
33%
-43%
-16%
32%
Brightness middle
587
553
-6%
687
17%
447
-24%
592
1%
655
12%
Brightness
559
553
-1%
694
24%
428
-23%
566
1%
649
16%
Brightness Distribution
91
91
0%
96
5%
86
-5%
90
-1%
95
4%
Black Level *
0.4
0.31
22%
0.4
-0%
Contrast
1468
1442
-2%
1480
1%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
2.6
4.23
-63%
1.2
54%
5.54
-113%
4.62
-78%
1.1
58%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
5.62
10.83
-93%
4
29%
10.04
-79%
6.5
-16%
2.58
54%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
3.3
3.6
-9%
1
70%
7.3
-121%
4.5
-36%
1.7
48%
Gamma
2.463 89%
2.24 98%
2.16 102%
2.03 108%
2.32 95%
2.212 99%
CCT
6288 103%
7171 91%
6496 100%
8853 73%
7653 85%
6557 99%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

镜头下的画面是固定的放大镜和不一样的智能显示。

IPS面板的黑度为0.4cd/m²,使Moto G53拥有约1,500:1的良好对比度,但与OLED竞争对手相比,黑度并不真正令人信服,因为屏幕上的黑色区域有轻微的灰雾。这款中档智能手机只有两个颜色配置文件,可以调整色温。使用Calman分析软件检查了AMOLED面板的校准情况。我们测量的sRGB色彩空间的DeltaE值表明色彩有小的偏差(<3)。差异在洋红色和蓝色中特别明显。灰度的表现也显示出轻微的偏差,但这里我们只是在小于3的目标范围之外。

色彩准确性(目标色彩空间:sRGB;配置文件:自然)。
色彩准确性(目标色彩空间:sRGB;配置文件:自然)。
色彩空间(目标色彩空间:AdobeRGB;配置文件:自然)。
色彩空间(目标色彩空间:AdobeRGB;配置文件:自然)。
色彩空间(目标色彩空间:P3;配置文件:自然)。
色彩空间(目标色彩空间:P3;配置文件:自然)。
色彩空间(目标色彩空间:sRGB;配置文件:自然)。
色彩空间(目标色彩空间:sRGB;配置文件:自然)。
灰度(目标色彩空间:sRGB;配置文件:自然)。
灰度(目标色彩空间:sRGB;配置文件:自然)。
色彩饱和度(目标色彩空间:sRGB;配置文件:自然)。
色彩饱和度(目标色彩空间:sRGB;配置文件:自然)。

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
26.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 12.6 ms rise
↘ 14 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 63 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
56 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 32 ms rise
↘ 24 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 92 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

Moto G53在日常户外使用方面有良好的装备。由于亮度适中,内容在阳光直射下仍然清晰可见,但应避免玻璃表面的反光。

IPS面板的视角稳定性还可以,但在非常平坦的视角下,亮度的强烈损失是明显的。色彩的变化几乎不明显。

摩托罗拉Moto G53 5G智能手机评测
摩托罗拉Moto G53 5G智能手机评测
摩托罗拉Moto G53 5G智能手机评测

性能 - 采用高通SoC的摩托罗拉智能手机

这款Moto智能手机搭载了 骁龙480 Plus它集成了总共八个核心,分为两个群组。得益于两个Cortex A76核心,Moto G53在其价格范围内实现了坚实的性能值,尽管 骁龙695中的 Poco X4 ProGalaxy A23在Geekbench中的表现要好20%左右。另一方面,在PCMark系统基准测试中,Moto G53的得分更吸引人。

Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Average of class Smartphone
  (126 - 2437, n=174, last 2 years)
1021 Points +83%
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
694 Points +24%
Samsung Galaxy A23 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
680 Points +22%
Oppo A77 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
598 Points +7%
Realme 10
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
576 Points +3%
Motorola Moto G53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
558 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus 5G
  (540 - 558, n=3)
551 Points -1%
Motorola Moto G52
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
378 Points -32%
Multi-Core
Average of class Smartphone
  (473 - 8816, n=174, last 2 years)
3404 Points +109%
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
2038 Points +25%
Samsung Galaxy A23 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
1997 Points +22%
Oppo A77 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
1774 Points +9%
Realme 10
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
1767 Points +8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus 5G
  (1632 - 1661, n=3)
1645 Points +1%
Motorola Moto G53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
1632 Points
Motorola Moto G52
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
1573 Points -4%
Antutu v9 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone
  (99654 - 2056989, n=105, last 2 years)
810387 Points +155%
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
383847 Points +21%
Samsung Galaxy A23 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
344344 Points +8%
Motorola Moto G53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
317725 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus 5G
  (311776 - 317725, n=2)
314751 Points -1%
Motorola Moto G52
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
207780 Points -35%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Average of class Smartphone
  (4609 - 26863, n=191, last 2 years)
13055 Points +29%
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
10571 Points +5%
Realme 10
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
10328 Points +2%
Motorola Moto G53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
10093 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus 5G
  (9527 - 10492, n=3)
10037 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy A23 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
9742 Points -3%
Oppo A77 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
8100 Points -20%
Motorola Moto G52
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
6728 Points -33%
CrossMark - Overall
Average of class Smartphone
  (187 - 2044, n=160, last 2 years)
894 Points +64%
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
604 Points +11%
Motorola Moto G53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
546 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus 5G
  (496 - 546, n=3)
522 Points -4%
Samsung Galaxy A23 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
521 Points -5%
Motorola Moto G52
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
327 Points -40%
BaseMark OS II
Overall
Average of class Smartphone
  (1196 - 11976, n=154, last 2 years)
6363 Points +97%
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
3794 Points +17%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus 5G
  (3194 - 3311, n=3)
3247 Points 0%
Motorola Moto G53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
3236 Points
Samsung Galaxy A23 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
3171 Points -2%
Motorola Moto G52
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
2573 Points -20%
System
Average of class Smartphone
  (2368 - 16475, n=154, last 2 years)
10203 Points +66%
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
7736 Points +26%
Samsung Galaxy A23 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
6789 Points +10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus 5G
  (5903 - 6975, n=3)
6345 Points +3%
Motorola Moto G53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
6157 Points
Motorola Moto G52
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
5739 Points -7%
Memory
Average of class Smartphone
  (962 - 12716, n=154, last 2 years)
6843 Points +81%
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
4593 Points +21%
Motorola Moto G53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
3782 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus 5G
  (3715 - 3782, n=3)
3750 Points -1%
Motorola Moto G52
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
3483 Points -8%
Samsung Galaxy A23 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
3167 Points -16%
Graphics
Average of class Smartphone
  (1017 - 58651, n=154, last 2 years)
17343 Points +503%
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
4401 Points +53%
Samsung Galaxy A23 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
4166 Points +45%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus 5G
  (2876 - 3868, n=3)
3523 Points +22%
Motorola Moto G53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
2876 Points
Motorola Moto G52
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
2182 Points -24%
Web
Average of class Smartphone
  (841 - 2145, n=154, last 2 years)
1569 Points +24%
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
1283 Points +2%
Motorola Moto G53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
1263 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus 5G
  (1213 - 1263, n=3)
1231 Points -3%
Samsung Galaxy A23 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
1128 Points -11%
Motorola Moto G52
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
917 Points -27%
UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Average of class Smartphone
  (1267 - 75143, n=146, last 2 years)
17392 Points +232%
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
7638 Points +46%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus 5G
  (5126 - 6690, n=3)
5686 Points +8%
Motorola Moto G53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
5242 Points
AImark - Score v3.x
Average of class Smartphone
  (82 - 307528, n=138, last 2 years)
25706 Points +5963%
Motorola Moto G53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
424 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus 5G
  (413 - 424, n=2)
419 Points -1%

ǞǞǞ 阿德雷诺619安装在 高通公司SoC处理图形任务的能力明显优于 阿德雷诺610中的 前代产品但Moto G53的结果却低于中端竞争产品的结果。特别是在3DMark中,Moto智能手机的成绩比Adreno 610落后近30%。 Mali-G57 MP2中的 realme 10.由于HD+分辨率较低,Moto G53在GFXBench的屏幕数值上比1080p的对比设备表现得更好,正如预期的那样。

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
371 Points +29%
Realme 10
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
366 Points +28%
Samsung Galaxy A23 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
351 Points +22%
Oppo A77 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
348 Points +21%
Motorola Moto G53
Adreno 619, SD 480+, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
287 Points
Motorola Moto G52
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
122 Points -57%
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Realme 10
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
378 Points +29%
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
362 Points +24%
Oppo A77 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
361 Points +23%
Samsung Galaxy A23 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
355 Points +21%
Motorola Moto G53
Adreno 619, SD 480+, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
293 Points
Motorola Moto G52
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
115 Points -61%
3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Realme 10
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1340 Points +38%
Oppo A77 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1293 Points +33%
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1227 Points +26%
Samsung Galaxy A23 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1196 Points +23%
Motorola Moto G53
Adreno 619, SD 480+, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
973 Points
Motorola Moto G52
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
463 Points -52%
3DMark / Wild Life Score
Realme 10
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1364 Points +39%
Oppo A77 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1326 Points +35%
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1292 Points +32%
Samsung Galaxy A23 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1198 Points +22%
Motorola Moto G53
Adreno 619, SD 480+, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
982 Points
Motorola Moto G52
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
457 Points -53%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics
Motorola Moto G53
Adreno 619, SD 480+, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2901 Points
Samsung Galaxy A23 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2865 Points -1%
Realme 10
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2861 Points -1%
Oppo A77 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2806 Points -3%
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2736 Points -6%
Motorola Moto G52
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2511 Points -13%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2731 Points +22%
Samsung Galaxy A23 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2655 Points +19%
Oppo A77 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2576 Points +15%
Realme 10
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2541 Points +14%
Motorola Moto G53
Adreno 619, SD 480+, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2232 Points
Motorola Moto G52
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
1153 Points -48%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2738 Points +16%
Samsung Galaxy A23 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2699 Points +14%
Oppo A77 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2624 Points +11%
Realme 10
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2606 Points +10%
Motorola Moto G53
Adreno 619, SD 480+, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2363 Points
Motorola Moto G52
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
1299 Points -45%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Realme 10
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3798 Points +12%
Oppo A77 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3556 Points +5%
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3512 Points +4%
Motorola Moto G53
Adreno 619, SD 480+, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
3387 Points
Samsung Galaxy A23 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3383 Points 0%
Motorola Moto G52
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2674 Points -21%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2998 Points +24%
Samsung Galaxy A23 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2899 Points +20%
Realme 10
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2653 Points +10%
Oppo A77 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2535 Points +5%
Motorola Moto G53
Adreno 619, SD 480+, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2412 Points
Motorola Moto G52
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
1242 Points -49%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3092 Points +17%
Samsung Galaxy A23 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2994 Points +13%
Realme 10
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2843 Points +8%
Oppo A77 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2708 Points +3%
Motorola Moto G53
Adreno 619, SD 480+, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2638 Points
Motorola Moto G52
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
1367 Points -48%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1)
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2983 Points +19%
Samsung Galaxy A23 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2856 Points +14%
Realme 10
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2769 Points +10%
Oppo A77 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2652 Points +6%
Motorola Moto G53
Adreno 619, SD 480+, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2511 Points
Motorola Moto G52
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
1357 Points -46%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2836 Points +20%
Samsung Galaxy A23 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2733 Points +16%
Realme 10
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2632 Points +11%
Oppo A77 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2529 Points +7%
Motorola Moto G53
Adreno 619, SD 480+, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2363 Points
Motorola Moto G52
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
1154 Points -51%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3527 Points +47%
Samsung Galaxy A23 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3393 Points +41%
Realme 10
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3388 Points +41%
Oppo A77 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3195 Points +33%
Motorola Moto G52
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2738 Points +14%
Motorola Moto G53
Adreno 619, SD 480+, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2398 Points
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Motorola Moto G53
Adreno 619, SD 480+, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
103 fps
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
82 fps -20%
Samsung Galaxy A23 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
81 fps -21%
Motorola Moto G52
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
36 fps -65%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
94 fps +16%
Samsung Galaxy A23 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
91 fps +12%
Motorola Moto G53
Adreno 619, SD 480+, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
81 fps
Motorola Moto G52
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
41 fps -49%
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Motorola Moto G53
Adreno 619, SD 480+, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
68 fps
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
42 fps -38%
Samsung Galaxy A23 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
41 fps -40%
Motorola Moto G52
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
20 fps -71%
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
47 fps +15%
Samsung Galaxy A23 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
46 fps +12%
Motorola Moto G53
Adreno 619, SD 480+, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
41 fps
Motorola Moto G52
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
22 fps -46%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Motorola Moto G53
Adreno 619, SD 480+, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
55 fps
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
30 fps -45%
Samsung Galaxy A23 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
29 fps -47%
Motorola Moto G52
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
13 fps -76%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
35 fps +21%
Samsung Galaxy A23 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
34 fps +17%
Motorola Moto G53
Adreno 619, SD 480+, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
29 fps
Motorola Moto G52
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
15 fps -48%
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Motorola Moto G53
Adreno 619, SD 480+, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
29 fps
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
17 fps -41%
Samsung Galaxy A23 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
16 fps -45%
Motorola Moto G52
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
7.4 fps -74%
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
20 fps +18%
Samsung Galaxy A23 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
19 fps +12%
Motorola Moto G53
Adreno 619, SD 480+, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
17 fps
Motorola Moto G52
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
8.8 fps -48%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Motorola Moto G53
Adreno 619, SD 480+, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
20 fps
Oppo A77 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
19 fps -5%
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
12 fps -40%
Samsung Galaxy A23 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
12 fps -40%
Realme 10
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
10 fps -50%
Motorola Moto G52
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
5.3 fps -73%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Motorola Moto G53
Adreno 619, SD 480+, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
8.9 fps
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
8.1 fps -9%
Samsung Galaxy A23 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
7.7 fps -13%
Realme 10
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
6.5 fps -27%
Oppo A77 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
6.2 fps -30%
Motorola Moto G52
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
1.4 fps -84%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Oppo A77 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
31 fps 0%
Motorola Moto G53
Adreno 619, SD 480+, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
31 fps
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
19 fps -39%
Samsung Galaxy A23 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
18 fps -42%
Realme 10
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
16 fps -48%
Motorola Moto G52
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
9.5 fps -69%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
21 fps +17%
Samsung Galaxy A23 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
21 fps +17%
Realme 10
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
18 fps 0%
Motorola Moto G53
Adreno 619, SD 480+, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
18 fps
Oppo A77 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
17 fps -6%
Motorola Moto G52
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
5.1 fps -72%
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=164, last 2 years)
121.7 Points +75%
Motorola Moto G53 (Chrome 111)
69.475 Points
Samsung Galaxy A23 5G (Chrome 106)
67.19 Points -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus 5G (61.8 - 69.5, n=3)
65.7 Points -5%
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro (Chrome 103)
64.534 Points -7%
Motorola Moto G52 (Chrome 103)
40.743 Points -41%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 569, n=150, last 2 years)
139.5 runs/min +192%
Motorola Moto G53 (Chrome 111)
47.78 runs/min
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus 5G (42.3 - 47.8, n=3)
45.9 runs/min -4%
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro (Chrome 103)
42.4 runs/min -11%
Samsung Galaxy A23 5G (Chome 106)
40.6 runs/min -15%
Motorola Moto G52 (Chrome 103)
37.48 runs/min -22%
WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Average of class Smartphone (22 - 271, n=155, last 2 years)
114.5 Points +49%
Motorola Moto G53 (Chrome 111)
77 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus 5G (63 - 77, n=2)
70 Points -9%
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro (Chrome 103)
65 Points -16%
Samsung Galaxy A23 5G (Chrome 106)
60 Points -22%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=204, last 2 years)
37721 Points +80%
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro (Chrome 103)
22938 Points +10%
Realme 10 (Chrome 109)
21308 Points +2%
Motorola Moto G53 (Chrome 111)
20938 Points
Samsung Galaxy A23 5G (Chrome 106)
20787 Points -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus 5G (19795 - 20938, n=3)
20474 Points -2%
Oppo A77 5G (Chrome 106)
14427 Points -31%
Motorola Moto G52 (Chrome 103)
12386 Points -41%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Motorola Moto G52 (Chrome 103)
3183.3 ms * -74%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus 5G (1829 - 2280, n=3)
2067 ms * -13%
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro (Chrome 103)
1982.32 ms * -8%
Samsung Galaxy A23 5G (Chrome 106)
1948.1 ms * -6%
Motorola Moto G53 (Chrome 111)
1829.3 ms *
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=163, last 2 years)
1551 ms * +15%

* ... smaller is better

摩托罗拉没有提供关于UFS存储连接的任何信息。根据确定的数值,制造商可能再次安装了2.1标准,就像在 前代产品.然而,AndroBench基准测试并不能证明Moto G53的高性能。尤其是低于500MBit/s的读取率是非常低的。该 高通SoC似乎在这里限制了速度,因为Moto G51也有类似的数据吞吐量。

Motorola Moto G53Realme 10Xiaomi Poco X4 ProSamsung Galaxy A23 5GOppo A77 5GMotorola Moto G52Average 128 GB UFS 2.1 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
77%
26%
33%
63%
46%
17%
245%
Sequential Read 256KB
474.6
881
86%
303.4
-36%
485.1
2%
908.5
91%
893.44
88%
Sequential Write 256KB
243.87
530.1
117%
483.33
98%
487.4
100%
492.8
102%
503.56
106%
Random Read 4KB
166.24
200.5
21%
193.45
16%
188.2
13%
182.4
10%
98.99
-40%
152.9 ?(92.6 - 239, n=113)
-8%
Random Write 4KB
139.83
257.7
84%
173.03
24%
163.1
17%
206.3
48%
182.92
31%
131.6 ?(18.2 - 290, n=113)
-6%

游戏--Moto G53能做到120帧

为了评估 的GPU能力为了评估Moto G53的GPU能力,不仅在图形基准测试中,而且在游戏中,我们使用我们的合作伙伴GameBench的软件,仔细查看了Play商店的两个Android 。.

这两款Android ,游戏运行基本流畅,只有少量掉帧。然而,无论我们选择哪种图形设置,Moto智能手机在PUBG Mobile中都无法超过40帧的限制。在高清模式下,Moto G53的运行速度仅为30帧。
令人惊讶的是,在Armajet中可以实现IPS面板的原生120帧。平均而言,Moto G53 "只 "达到了98帧,但即使是目前的高端智能手机,如 Vivo X90 Pro也无法在2D多人射击游戏中平均超过60帧,原因是帧数锁定。因此,低价的摩托罗拉中端产品在这里可以得到一些分数。

氩氦刀
氩氦刀
PUBG手机
PUBG手机
0102030405060708090100110120Tooltip
Motorola Moto G53; Armajet: Ø98 (51-120)
Motorola Moto G53; PUBG Mobile; Smooth: Ø39.8 (30-41)
Motorola Moto G53; PUBG Mobile; Balanced: Ø39.7 (34-41)
Motorola Moto G53; PUBG Mobile; HD: Ø29.7 (21-31)

排放 - 摩托罗拉手机保持相当凉爽

温度

在我们的负载情况下,Moto G53明显变热,峰值略低于42℃,但并没有令人不舒服的热度。有趣的是,这款中端智能手机的低热开发是否对高通SoC的性能产生负面影响。

在3DMark压力测试中,我们监测了 骁龙480 Plus在持续负载下的表现。我们得到的Moto G53的数值超过95%,这证明了该系统的性能稳定。

Max. Load
 40.8 °C35.4 °C32.9 °C 
 40.1 °C35.3 °C33 °C 
 38.9 °C34.7 °C33 °C 
Maximum: 40.8 °C
Average: 36 °C
34.5 °C36.1 °C40 °C
34.7 °C36.4 °C41.6 °C
33.7 °C36.5 °C40.7 °C
Maximum: 41.6 °C
Average: 37.1 °C
Power Supply (max.)  41.3 °C | Room Temperature 21.2 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 36 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 40.8 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 41.6 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.1 °C / 79 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Samsung Galaxy A23 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.7 % +3%
Motorola Moto G52
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
99.7 % +3%
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.5 % +3%
Realme 10
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.4 % +3%
Oppo A77 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
98.8 % +2%
Motorola Moto G53
Adreno 619, SD 480+, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
96.9 %
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.1 % 0%
Motorola Moto G53
Adreno 619, SD 480+, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
98.8 %
Samsung Galaxy A23 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
98.6 % 0%
Oppo A77 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
98.6 % 0%
Motorola Moto G52
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
% -100%
012345678Tooltip
Motorola Moto G53 Adreno 619, SD 480+, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø1.755 (1.744-1.766)
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.9.1: Ø2.15 (2.14-2.16)
Samsung Galaxy A23 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø2.14 (2.13-2.16)
Oppo A77 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø2.17 (2.15-2.18)
Motorola Moto G53 Adreno 619, SD 480+, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø5.87 (5.72-5.9)
Realme 10 Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø8.19 (8.16-8.21)
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø7.25 (7.24-7.28)
Samsung Galaxy A23 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø7.2 (7.19-7.22)
Oppo A77 5G Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 810, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø8.04 (7.97-8.07)
Motorola Moto G52 Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø2.68 (2.68-2.68)
摩托罗拉Moto G53 5G智能手机评测
摩托罗拉Moto G53 5G智能手机评测

发言人

在音频方面,尽管价格低廉,但Moto G53拥有立体声扬声器和多种蓝牙编解码器,包括LDAC、LHDC、aptX HD和aptX Adaptive,以及一个3.5毫米插孔。这两个扬声器提供的最大音量相当低,只有83分贝,声音也暴露出弱点。尤其是高音和超级高音,可以更加线性,低音也几乎不存在。看看我们对Moto G52的评论就知道,前者在这方面的表现更好。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2038.644.82537.136.13128304032.933.45031.835.8632630.78022.927.810021.131.712523.73016018.234.820013.339.125014.545.131512.851.540011.454.850011.759.963010.965.980015.270.5100012.271125012.872160010.973.9200010.973.8250011.674.931501272.4400012.966.5500013.664.1630014.365.5800015.161.41000015.757.61250016.557.31600017.454SPL25.482.7N0.749.4median 13.3median 61.4Delta2.311.534.229.131.625.528.224.829.630.734.235.226.723.219.42220.119.413.823.413.336.110.441.711.247.39.552.1957.39.461.59.364.613.170.615.178.715.578.79.676.89.374.610.172.210.67611.471.61257.812.952.813.569.214.170.114.959.615.552.624.485.90.559.2median 12median 61.52.411.6hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseMotorola Moto G53Samsung Galaxy A23 5G
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Motorola Moto G53 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 8.3% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.7% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 51% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 40% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 69% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 24% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Samsung Galaxy A23 5G audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 9.9% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 9.2% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (13.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (26.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 65% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 29% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 80% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 16% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电池寿命 - 摩托罗拉智能手机,5000毫安时

消耗功率

摩托罗拉Moto G53:10W电源适配器
摩托罗拉Moto G53:10W电源适配器

这款Moto智能手机的电池容量为5000毫安时,用10瓦特可以在2小时40分钟左右充电,这已经不是真正的最新技术了。幸运的是,配套的电源适配器至少包括在Moto G53中

与Moto G52的消耗值相比,其耗电量有些高。 摩托G52.另一方面,在空闲状态下消耗的1.5瓦,以及我们在Geekbench和GFXBench测量中调整亮度为150cd/m²时的功耗,如果你看一下竞争对手,是可以接受的。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0 / 0.1 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 0.8 / 1.5 / 2 Watt
Load midlight 4.6 / 6.3 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Motorola Moto G53
5000 mAh
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro
5000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A23 5G
5000 mAh
Motorola Moto G52
5000 mAh
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus 5G
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
5%
3%
22%
-14%
-17%
Idle Minimum *
0.8
1.01
-26%
1
-25%
0.8
-0%
0.9 ?(0.8 - 1, n=2)
-13%
Idle Average *
1.5
1.73
-15%
1.5
-0%
1.1
27%
1.7 ?(1.5 - 1.9, n=2)
-13%
Idle Maximum *
2
1.79
10%
2
-0%
1.5
25%
2.3 ?(2 - 2.6, n=2)
-15%
Load Average *
4.6
3.05
34%
3.6
22%
2.9
37%
5.25 ?(4.6 - 5.9, n=2)
-14%
Load Maximum *
6.3
4.91
22%
5.3
16%
5
21%
7.2 ?(6.3 - 8.1, n=2)
-14%

* ... smaller is better

Power Consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

0123456Tooltip
Motorola Moto G53 Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus 5G; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø3.32 (0.822-6.28)
Samsung Galaxy A23 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø2.91 (0.893-5.31)
Motorola Moto G53 Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus 5G; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.068 (0.785-3.35)
Samsung Galaxy A23 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.15 (1.012-2.03)

Power Consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

00.20.40.70.91.11.31.51.722.22.42.62.83.13.33.53.73.94.1Tooltip
Motorola Moto G53 Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus 5G; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø3.53 (2.08-4.36)
Samsung Galaxy A23 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø3.36 (3.19-3.57)
Motorola Moto G53 Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus 5G; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.068 (0.785-3.35)
Samsung Galaxy A23 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.15 (1.012-2.03)

电池寿命

在我们的两项实际电池测试(WiFi、视频)中,Moto G53在120赫兹的固定刷新率下提供了良好的电池运行时间,这些测试是在150cd/m²的调整显示亮度下进行的,因此非常具有可比性。在Wi-Fi测试中,这款中档智能手机持续了17个小时以上,在停用Wi-Fi模块的情况下,无休止的视频播放甚至多了2个小时。

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
38h 21min
WiFi Websurfing
17h 15min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
19h 25min
Load (maximum brightness)
4h 57min
Motorola Moto G53
5000 mAh
Realme 10
5000 mAh
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro
5000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A23 5G
5000 mAh
Oppo A77 5G
5000 mAh
Motorola Moto G52
5000 mAh
Battery Runtime
-7%
-7%
8%
0%
11%
Reader / Idle
2301
1575
-32%
2586
12%
2183
-5%
H.264
1165
1033
-11%
1289
11%
1274
9%
WiFi v1.3
1035
966
-7%
739
-29%
1099
6%
1032
0%
1102
6%
Load
297
432
45%
305
3%
398
34%

Pros

+ 电池寿命长
+ 良好的跟踪能力
+ 纤细的操作系统,具有安全功能和定期更新
+ 包括电源装置
+ 有吸引力的功能(插孔、NFC、立体声扬声器等)。

Cons

- 有弱点的IPS面板
- 只有HD+分辨率
- 性能低下
- 与前代产品相比有所退步
- 充电速度慢(10W)

对摩托罗拉Moto G53的评判

在审查摩托罗拉Moto G53。测试设备由摩托罗拉德国提供。
在审查摩托罗拉Moto G53。测试设备由摩托罗拉德国提供。

Moto G53不可避免地提出的问题是。对于2023年的中端智能手机来说,HD+面板仍然是最新的吗?特别是由于Moto G52的继任者是 摩托G52的继任者,除了显示分辨率方面的缺陷外,在屏幕照明和亮度方面也更差。看看直接的竞争者就会发现,在这个价格范围内,要么是更好的,最重要的是更清晰的全高清+显示屏,比如说 Poco X4 Pro,或者它们至少比Moto G53更强大,如 Galaxy A23.在日常生活中,Moto G53的720p面板当然是可用的,但我们仔细观察后发现字体有些模糊,特别是在基于文本的应用程序中(如网络浏览器),这是一个值得批评的地方。

摩托罗拉的粉丝们应该再等一等,直到Moto G53更广泛地上市,而且价格已经低于200美元的水平。

另一方面,Moto G53在许多方面都有积极的一面。这款经济实惠的中档智能手机具有良好的功能,运行时间很长,定位能力也很吸引人,包括双频GNSS。我们也喜欢其精简的软件产品,包括长时间的更新和安全功能。

然而,已经有一个 Galaxy A33 5G与Moto G53在同一价格范围内,它提供了明显更长的软件支持,有多达四代的Android 操作系统升级和五年的安全更新。

价格和可用性

目前,Moto G53的供应似乎仍然非常有限。在英国,这款智能手机可以通过摩托罗拉的网上商店购买,价格为189.99英镑。售价189.99英镑,或联想售价为190.00英镑。

在摩托罗拉的北美(加拿大和美国)网站上搜索,没有任何结果。同样的情况也适用于印度、新加坡和澳大利亚(这个名单并不详尽)。

价格截止到18.03.23,可能会有变化。

Motorola Moto G53 - 03/17/2023 v7 (old)
Marcus Herbrich

Chassis
80%
Keyboard
65 / 75 → 87%
Pointing Device
91%
Connectivity
47 / 70 → 68%
Weight
90%
Battery
91%
Display
87%
Games Performance
20 / 64 → 31%
Application Performance
64 / 86 → 74%
Temperature
90%
Noise
100%
Audio
60 / 90 → 67%
Camera
61%
Average
73%
79%
Smartphone - Weighted Average

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 摩托罗拉Moto G53 5G评论。负担得起的5G智能手机,拥有120赫兹和5000万像素摄像头
Marcus Herbrich, 2023-03-19 (Update: 2024-08-15)