![Lenovo Idea Tab Pro](fileadmin/_processed_/8/4/csm_Lenovo_Idea_Tab_Pro_Test_1_566632b53d.jpg)
联想 Idea Tab Pro 评测--带笔、运行时间长的大型平板电脑,价格不到 450 美元
超级实惠。
联想 Idea Tab Pro 拥有大屏幕,售价不到 450 美元。该平板电脑的主动式手写笔可以让创意人员尽情发挥,游戏玩家可以期待高帧率,而电影迷则会对其高分辨率显示屏和四个扬声器感到满意。但是,低廉的价格是否有什么限制呢?Florian Schmitt, 👁 Florian Schmitt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
联想 Idea Tab Pro 的评价
联想 Idea Tab Pro 有一些小瑕疵,比如 SoC 在负载情况下会出现节流现象,或者屏幕不是最亮的。但由于它的价格不到 450 美元,而且有许多优点,你可以忽略不计:毕竟,它拥有超大屏幕、高速无线局域网、笔支持、良好的运行时间、可选的键盘底座以及四个带有 JBL 品牌和强劲音效的扬声器。
你还可以通过 microSD 扩展存储空间并使用卫星导航,这两项功能在大型平板电脑中都很罕见。它的软件已适应笔输入和多任务处理,并有自己的鼠标和键盘控制模式。这款平板电脑的 SoC 处理器足以满足各种需求,并能以 60fps 的速度运行游戏--尽管帧速率并不总是完全稳定。
当然,你必须接受它的高重量,它的更新支持仅限于不到 4 年的时间,它的摄像头对于日常使用来说也不够好。不过,总的来说,联想的平板电脑还是非常成功的,而且还配备了高品质的外壳,这一点值得祝贺。
Idea Tab Pro 让人们可以买得起支持手写笔的大尺寸平板电脑,因此,它应该会吸引很多嫌 iPad Pro 太贵的人。
Pros
Cons
价格和供应情况
在美国,联想 Idea Tab Pro 尚未发售。
可能的替代品比较
Image | Model / Review | Price | Weight | Drive | Display |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro MediaTek Dimensity 8300 ⎘ ARM Mali-G615 MP6 ⎘ 8 GB Memory, 256 GB | Amazon: 1. $309.99 Lenovo Tab P12-2024 - Expans... 2. $14.95 ProCase 2 Pack Screen Protec... 3. $10.66 KEANBOLL 2 Pack Tempered Gla... List Price: 379€ | 620 g | 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash | 12.70" 2944x1840 273 PPI IPS | |
OnePlus Pad 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 750 ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 256 GB | Amazon: $549.99 List Price: 549€ | 584 g | 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 12.10" 3000x2120 304 PPI IPS | |
Honor MagicPad 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 735 ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 256 GB | Amazon: 1. $26.99 INSOLKIDON Compatible with H... 2. $13.96 Kepuch 2 Pack Tempered Glass... 3. $11.99 Natbok 2 Pack Compatible wit... List Price: 600€ | 555 g | 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 12.30" 3000x1920 290 PPI OLED | |
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 750 ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 256 GB | Amazon: 1. $294.69 Lenovo Tab Plus - 2024 - Pre... 2. $269.90 Lenovo Tab Plus - 2024 - Pre... 3. $309.99 Lenovo Tab P12-2024 - Expans... List Price: 799€ | 640 g | 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash | 12.70" 2944x1840 273 PPI IPS | |
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 710 ⎘ 6 GB Memory, 128 GB UFS 2.1 | Amazon: $264.00 List Price: 380€ | 571 g | 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | 12.10" 2560x1600 249 PPI IPS |
最近,我们对 联想 Yoga Tab Plus.同时亮相的联想 Idea Tab Pro 今天也来到了我们的测试实验室:它与 在许多方面在许多方面与 Yoga Tab Plus 相似,但价格要便宜得多。其代价包括处理器性能较弱、音响系统瘦身等。不过,与姊妹机型相比,Idea Tab Pro 也具有卫星定位等优势。
在这次测试中,我们将仔细研究 Idea Tab Pro 的超低价格所带来的局限性、它的适用人群以及它是否能与更昂贵的机型相抗衡。让我们开始吧。
规格
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
外壳 - 好天气平板电脑
联想 Idea Tab Pro 采用金属一体成型外壳,有两种颜色可供选择:有浅绿色和深灰色两种。摄像头模块被玻璃盖板稍稍遮挡,但整体突出的部分很少。Idea Tab Pro 的尺寸略大于联想 Yoga Tab Plus,但重量却比后者轻 20 克。不过,620 克的重量还是很重。
它的做工质量非常好,只有非常强的压力才会在屏幕的液晶上显示出来。虽然在扭动时会发出轻微的吱吱声,但总体来说非常稳定。材料过渡也非常干净,几乎感觉不到。
它没有 IP 认证,因此您应该注意不要将设备暴露在过于恶劣的环境条件下。
连通性 - 种类繁多,令人眼花缭乱
说到可选配置,情况就有点复杂了:除了两种颜色外,还有 8GB RAM 和 12GB RAM、128GB 或 256GB 大容量存储的机型,网站还提到了可选的磨砂显示屏,但目前(尚未)上市。此外,还有配备手写笔和对开本的配置包。理论上,SoC 还可以支持蜂窝网络。
我们在测试时发现了以下机型:
- 联想 Idea Tab Pro 8 GB 内存/128 GB 存储空间/WiFi/含手写笔:约 390 美元
- 联想 Idea Tab Pro 8 GB 内存/256 GB 存储空间/WiFi/含笔:约 415 美元
- 联想 Idea Tab Pro 8GB 内存 / 128GB 存储空间 / WiFi / 含笔和对开包:约 425 美元
- 联想 Idea Tab Pro 8 GB 内存 / 256 GB 存储空间 / WiFi / 包括手写笔和对开本:约 445 美元
- 联想 Idea Tab Pro 12 GB 内存 / 256 GB 存储空间 / WiFi / 不含配件:约 360 美元
不幸的是,互联网上的大量报价让人很难看出哪些配件包含在供货范围内,因此如果您有任何疑问,应该询问零售商。
我们测试的机型配备 8GB LPDDR5 内存和 256GB UFS 4.0 存储空间。128GB 的机型只使用速度稍慢的 UFS 3.1 闪存。
在所有情况下,USB 端口都是按照 USB 3.1 Gen 1 内部连接的,这意味着它的数据传输速率可达 5 GBit/s。使用Display Port 标准,还可将图像有线传输到外部显示器。
键盘底座可通过底部的 Pogo 针连接。
microSD 读卡器
平板电脑的存储空间还可以通过 microSD 卡进行扩展。在我们使用 Angelbird V60 作为 microSD 卡参考的测试中,读卡器的速度被证明一般。
SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro (Angelbird V60) | |
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro (Angelbird V60) | |
Average of class Tablet (7.61 - 101.6, n=58, last 2 years) |
Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)
软件 - 可定制并提供 4 年更新
联想 ZUI 很好地适应了平板电脑的大屏幕,例如,它可以在窗口中同时显示多个应用程序,并在连接鼠标和键盘时自动切换到优化的控制模式。任务栏基本可见,即使不在主屏幕上,也能轻松启动常用的应用程序。不过,并非所有应用程序都为此进行了优化,有些程序中的控制元素会被遮住。
我们测试设备上的软件基于Android 14。安全更新将持续到 2028 年 9 月,也就是测试时不到 3 年半的时间。Android 的新版本将持续到Android 17。我们对 Yoga Tab Plus的更新周期也类似。从可持续发展的角度看,Idea Tab Pro 也希望有更长的供应期,但它的价格要便宜得多,因此更新供应期在这种情况下更容易接受。
一些预装的赞助应用程序是意料之中的,但可以很容易地删除。
可持续性
联想平板电脑采用彩色印刷包装,不使用任何塑料。不过,我们无法找到有关所用材料或 Idea Tab Pro 碳足迹的更多详细信息。
联想网站上有一个备件搜索,其中也列出了 Idea Tab Pro 的备件,但目前没有备件可供购买。我们找不到任何用于自我维修的服务手册。
通信和全球导航卫星系统 - 即使是卫星导航
联想 Idea Tab Pro 配备了 WiFi 6E 作为最快的 Wi-Fi 标准,这意味着它也可以使用不太拥挤的 6 GHz 频段。
速度优势相当可观:我们使用 WiFi 6E 测得的速度高达 1,780 MBit/s,而在 5 GHz 频段上只能达到约 1,000 MBit/s。这意味着,你甚至可以充分利用家中的千兆网线;只有那些拥有自己的光纤线路或经常在内部网络中工作的人才能享受到其他平板电脑上 WiFi 7 带来的更高速度。
在我们的测试中,它的 WiFi 信号在路由器附近完全可用,即使是大型网站也能快速加载。在距离接入点 10 米远的地方,隔着 3 面墙,信号强度只有一半,网页加载有些延迟。
该平板电脑目前没有提供蜂窝版本,但理论上可以使用该芯片组。
Networking | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
Average Wi-Fi 6E (227 - 1810, n=56) | |
Honor MagicPad 2 | |
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro | |
Average of class Tablet (10.5 - 1710, n=82, last 2 years) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro | |
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro | |
Average Wi-Fi 6E (442 - 1787, n=56) | |
Honor MagicPad 2 | |
Average of class Tablet (20.1 - 1705, n=82, last 2 years) | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro | |
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus | |
Average Wi-Fi 6E (229 - 1845, n=58) | |
Average of class Tablet (691 - 1888, n=16, last 2 years) | |
OnePlus Pad 2 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro | |
OnePlus Pad 2 | |
Average of class Tablet (666 - 1842, n=18, last 2 years) | |
Average Wi-Fi 6E (598 - 1844, n=58) | |
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus |
虽然我们的测试设备是一款 WLAN 平板电脑,但它仍然支持卫星定位。不过,如果你走到户外,需要一段时间才能达到可用的精度水平,而且能访问的卫星也不多。即便如此,它仍然支持主要的全球卫星网络,甚至支持精度更高的 SBAS。
当然,我们也想看看这款平板电脑在实际使用中的表现如何,于是带着 Garmin Venu 2 智能手表去骑自行车,作为对比设备。
总的来说,我们喜欢 Idea Tab Pro 记录的路线。它并不总是百分之百准确,有时似乎会穿过建筑物,但总的来说,我们可以说它足以满足导航的需要。只有那些重视绝对精确度的用户才应该选择其他设备。
平心而论,必须指出的是,本来相当精确的 Garmin 智能手表也出现了问题,因此测试当天的卫星接收可能受到了普遍干扰。
摄像头 - 更多用于紧急情况
Image Comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
Main camera plantMain camera surroundingsMain camera low light在光线非常好的实验室中,主摄像头显示的清晰度一般,在显示精细文字时存在问题,尤其是在红色前面。在 1 勒克斯的光照条件下,测试图表的辨识度仍然很低。
![ColorChecker](fileadmin/_processed_/8/a/csm_Farbchart_high_a395926ec0.jpg)
![ColorChecker](fileadmin/_processed_/0/3/csm_Farbchart_low_5c13de2b8a.jpg)
配件和保修 - 批量提供
我们的联想 Idea Tab Pro 配备了一支触控笔、一根 USB 数据线和一个用于打开 microSD 插槽的工具。制造商提供的触控笔单价约为 60 美元,而不带键盘的对开保护套价格约为 30 美元。目前联想还没有提供键盘对开包,但可以从网上零售商购买,价格约为 80 美元。
保修期为 12 个月。
输入设备和操作 - 配备指纹传感器的 Idea Tab Pro
显示屏可处理高达 144 Hz 的帧频,使触摸输入非常迅速。因此,当你在平板电脑上打字时,会有一种非常直接的感觉。触摸屏也非常精确和灵敏,直至边角和边缘。
待机键位于机身左侧,集成了指纹传感器,可用于解锁设备和敏感应用程序(如银行应用程序)。它对指纹的反应非常迅速可靠,解锁平板电脑几乎无需等待。面部识别功能不可用。
我们测试设备附带的触控笔是 Tab Pen Plus。与 Tab Pen Pro 相反,Yoga Tab Plus 配备了 Yoga Tab Plus相比,它有一些限制:例如,触控笔必须通过 USB 线缆充电。虽然它可以通过磁力吸附在平板电脑的背面,但并不能从那里供电。此外,Pen Plus 在书写时没有阻力,输入时也没有触摸感应表面,只有一个按钮。
尽管如此,你仍然可以在 Tab Pen Plus 上非常精确地书写和绘图,因为它具有 4096 级压力和倾斜度。这支笔握持起来非常舒适,因此即使长时间绘画也不成问题。
显示屏 - 不太明亮的 IPS 屏幕
|
Brightness Distribution: 89 %
Center on Battery: 409 cd/m²
Contrast: 1023:1 (Black: 0.4 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.46 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.9
ΔE Greyscale 5.2 | 0.5-98 Ø5.1
98.4% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.106
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro IPS, 2944x1840, 12.7" | OnePlus Pad 2 IPS, 3000x2120, 12.1" | Honor MagicPad 2 OLED, 3000x1920, 12.3" | Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus IPS, 2944x1840, 12.7" | Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro IPS, 2560x1600, 12.1" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Screen | 48% | 55% | 22% | 9% | |
Brightness middle | 409 | 833 104% | 645 58% | 726 78% | 513 25% |
Brightness | 388 | 771 99% | 650 68% | 691 78% | 480 24% |
Brightness Distribution | 89 | 84 -6% | 94 6% | 91 2% | 86 -3% |
Black Level * | 0.4 | 0.45 -13% | 0.55 -38% | 0.4 -0% | |
Contrast | 1023 | 1851 81% | 1320 29% | 1283 25% | |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 3.46 | 1.79 48% | 1.3 62% | 4.67 -35% | 2.82 18% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 5.46 | 4.01 27% | 2.1 62% | 5.6 -3% | 8.83 -62% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 5.2 | 3 42% | 1.5 71% | 1.8 65% | 2.9 44% |
Gamma | 2.106 104% | 2.254 98% | 2.25 98% | 2.249 98% | 2.265 97% |
CCT | 5823 112% | 6419 101% | 6658 98% | 6382 102% | 7189 90% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8623 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
20.3 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 5 ms rise | |
↘ 15.3 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 42 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
37.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 5 ms rise | |
↘ 32.5 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 51 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.7 ms). |
性能 - 花很少的钱获得一流的性能
联想采用了 联发科 Dimensity 8300作为 Idea Tab Pro 的 SoC。这使该平板电脑的性能处于中上水平,意味着它在这方面无法与真正的高端平板电脑相媲美。因此,Idea Tab Pro 的 Honor MagicPad 2和 联想 Yoga Tab Plus在大多数处理器和系统基准测试中都遥遥领先,也就不足为奇了。
单独的 NPU 可用于人工智能计算,而且似乎能很快完成工作:我们的测试设备通常在人工智能基准测试中遥遥领先。
Antutu v10 - Total Score | |
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus | |
Honor MagicPad 2 | |
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro | |
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8300 () | |
Average of class Tablet (164396 - 2716980, n=42, last 2 years) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro |
CrossMark - Overall | |
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus | |
Honor MagicPad 2 | |
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro | |
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8300 () | |
Average of class Tablet (172 - 1944, n=63, last 2 years) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro |
UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI | |
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro | |
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8300 () | |
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus | |
Honor MagicPad 2 | |
Average of class Tablet (2597 - 74821, n=56, last 2 years) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro |
Geekbench AI | |
Single Precision TensorFlow NNAPI 1.2 | |
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro | |
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8300 () | |
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus | |
Average of class Tablet (85 - 1110, n=7, last 2 years) | |
Half Precision TensorFlow NNAPI 1.2 | |
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro | |
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8300 () | |
Average of class Tablet (84 - 4279, n=7, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus | |
Quantized TensorFlow NNAPI 1.2 | |
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro | |
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8300 () | |
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus | |
Average of class Tablet (130 - 4200, n=7, last 2 years) |
在图形计算中,我们的测试设备在对比设备中再次处于中场位置。对于 4K 分辨率来说,它的帧率太低,但在要求苛刻的 GFXBench 中,1440p 的帧率仍能达到约 30fps。由于显示器的原生分辨率介于这两个数值之间,因此您应该尽可能选择稍低的分辨率,以保证游戏的流畅性。
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7: T-Rex Onscreen | 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
GFXBench 3.0: on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
GFXBench 3.1: on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
GFXBench: on screen Car Chase Onscreen | 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | 3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited | |
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus | |
OnePlus Pad 2 | |
Honor MagicPad 2 | |
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro | |
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro |
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme | |
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus | |
OnePlus Pad 2 | |
Honor MagicPad 2 | |
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro | |
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro |
3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score | |
Honor MagicPad 2 | |
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro | |
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro |
3DMark / Wild Life Score | |
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro | |
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro | |
Honor MagicPad 2 |
3DMark / Solar Bay Score | |
OnePlus Pad 2 | |
Honor MagicPad 2 | |
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus | |
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro |
3DMark / Solar Bay Unlimited Score | |
OnePlus Pad 2 | |
Honor MagicPad 2 | |
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus | |
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro |
3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score | |
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro | |
OnePlus Pad 2 | |
Honor MagicPad 2 | |
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus |
3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Score | |
OnePlus Pad 2 | |
Honor MagicPad 2 | |
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro | |
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus |
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen | |
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro | |
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro | |
Honor MagicPad 2 | |
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus |
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen | |
Honor MagicPad 2 | |
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus | |
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro | |
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro |
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL | |
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro | |
Honor MagicPad 2 | |
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus | |
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro |
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen | |
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus | |
Honor MagicPad 2 | |
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro | |
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro |
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | |
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus | |
Honor MagicPad 2 | |
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro | |
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro |
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen | |
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus | |
Honor MagicPad 2 | |
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro | |
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro |
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen | |
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus | |
Honor MagicPad 2 | |
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro | |
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro |
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen | |
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus | |
Honor MagicPad 2 | |
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro | |
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro |
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | |
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus | |
OnePlus Pad 2 | |
Honor MagicPad 2 | |
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro | |
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro |
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | |
OnePlus Pad 2 | |
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus | |
Honor MagicPad 2 | |
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro | |
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro |
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | |
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus | |
Honor MagicPad 2 | |
OnePlus Pad 2 | |
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro | |
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro |
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | |
OnePlus Pad 2 | |
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus | |
Honor MagicPad 2 | |
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro | |
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro |
GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | |
OnePlus Pad 2 | |
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus | |
Honor MagicPad 2 | |
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro | |
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro |
联想 Idea Tab Pro 的上网速度很快,在我们的测试中,它的表现超过了许多同类设备。即使是大型网站,加载速度也相当快,快速滚动时只需稍等片刻即可加载图片。
Jetstream 2 - Total Score | |
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus (Chrome 132) | |
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro (Chrome 132) | |
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8300 () | |
Honor MagicPad 2 (Chrome 128.0.6613.146) | |
Average of class Tablet (19.9 - 334, n=68, last 2 years) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro (Chrome 128) |
Speedometer 2.0 - Result | |
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus (Chrome 132) | |
Honor MagicPad 2 (Chrome 128.0.6613.146) | |
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro (Chrome 132) | |
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8300 () | |
Average of class Tablet (2.59 - 572, n=60, last 2 years) |
Speedometer 3.0 - Score | |
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus (Chrome 132) | |
Average of class Tablet (1.25 - 33.7, n=32, last 2 years) | |
Honor MagicPad 2 (Chrome 128.0.6613.146) | |
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro (Chrome 132) | |
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8300 () | |
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro (Chrome 128) |
WebXPRT 4 - Overall | |
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus (Chrome 132) | |
Honor MagicPad 2 (Chrome 128.0.6613.146) | |
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro (Chrome 132) | |
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8300 () | |
Average of class Tablet (21 - 315, n=67, last 2 years) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro (Chrome 128) |
Octane V2 - Total Score | |
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus (Chrome 132) | |
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro (Chrome 132) | |
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8300 () | |
OnePlus Pad 2 (Chrome 128) | |
Honor MagicPad 2 (Chrome 128.0.6613.146) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro (Chrome 128) | |
Average of class Tablet (763 - 105178, n=87, last 2 years) |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
Average of class Tablet (319 - 34733, n=74, last 2 years) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro (Chrome 128) | |
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro (Chrome 132) | |
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8300 () | |
Honor MagicPad 2 (Chrome 128.0.6613.146) | |
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus (Chrome 132) |
* ... smaller is better
我们的测试设备拥有 256 GB 的存储空间,配备了 UFS 4.0 闪存,因此在传输数据时速度超快,在运行复杂应用程序时也能明显缩短加载时间。
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro | OnePlus Pad 2 | Honor MagicPad 2 | Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus | Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro | Average 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash | Average of class Tablet | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AndroBench 3-5 | -48% | -40% | -27% | -69% | -19% | -68% | |
Sequential Read 256KB | 3648.3 | 2003.1 -45% | 2025.54 -44% | 3868 6% | 844.9 -77% | 3633 ? 0% | 1176 ? -68% |
Sequential Write 256KB | 3298.5 | 1732.7 -47% | 2003.53 -39% | 3047.6 -8% | 705.3 -79% | 2625 ? -20% | 812 ? -75% |
Random Read 4KB | 474.4 | 236.5 -50% | 298.27 -37% | 241.2 -49% | 215.5 -55% | 396 ? -17% | 199.5 ? -58% |
Random Write 4KB | 668 | 348.6 -48% | 401.95 -40% | 290.9 -56% | 231.4 -65% | 420 ? -37% | 202 ? -70% |
游戏 - 甚至可以达到 60 fps
对于雄心勃勃的游戏玩家来说,平板电脑的大显示屏是福也是祸:一方面,它的高分辨率和大对角线让游戏成为一种体验;另一方面,屏幕上的控制按钮非常大,但有时手握平板电脑却难以触及。对于长时间游戏而言,该设备也相当沉重。
它的帧率通常能达到 60 帧/秒,但有时会出现明显的下降,例如在《源氏冲击》中,因此你不能总是依赖流畅的游戏。即使在玩《PUBG Mobile》时,在低设置下也不能始终保证 60 帧/秒。在高设置下,也只能达到 40 帧。
我们使用GameBench软件进行测量。
排放 - SoC 被节流
温度
平板电脑的大表面积使 SoC 工作时产生的热量得以很好地散发。在长时间使用后,我们测得平板电脑外壳的最高温度为 34.3 °C。虽然这个温度很明显,但绝非问题。
不过,正如我们在 3DMark 压力测试中了解到的那样,SoC 的性能在长时间负载后并不能完全保持,反而会下降 20%。
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 34.3 °C / 94 F, compared to the average of 33.7 °C / 93 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 33.5 °C / 92 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.1 °C / 79 F, compared to the device average of 29.9 °C / 86 F.
3DMark Steel Nomad stress test
3DMark | |
Wild Life Stress Test Stability | |
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus | |
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro | |
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro | |
OnePlus Pad 2 | |
Honor MagicPad 2 | |
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test | |
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro | |
Honor MagicPad 2 | |
OnePlus Pad 2 | |
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro | |
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus | |
Solar Bay Stress Test Stability | |
Honor MagicPad 2 | |
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro | |
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus | |
OnePlus Pad 2 | |
Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability | |
Honor MagicPad 2 | |
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus | |
OnePlus Pad 2 | |
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro |
发言人
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 9% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 89% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 5% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 94% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 19.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.9% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 51% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 42% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 47% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 46% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
电池续航时间--耐用的巨型平板电脑
耗电量
实际上,联想 Idea Tab Pro 在空闲模式下的耗电量很小,最大耗电量也很适中。不过,考虑到 SoC 的性能水平较低,后者也就不足为奇了。
平板电脑的最大充电功率为 45 瓦。为大容量电池充满电最长需要 2:20 小时。
Off / Standby | ![]() ![]() |
Idle | ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Load |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | |
Key:
min: ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro 10200 mAh | Honor MagicPad 2 10050 mAh | Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus 10200 mAh | Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro 10000 mAh | Average MediaTek Dimensity 8300 | Average of class Tablet | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -128% | -24% | -14% | 0% | -54% | |
Idle Minimum * | 1.2 | 3.6 -200% | 1.5 -25% | 1.7 -42% | 1.2 ? -0% | 1.837 ? -53% |
Idle Average * | 1.8 | 6.52 -262% | 1.8 -0% | 2.2 -22% | 1.8 ? -0% | 3.81 ? -112% |
Idle Maximum * | 2.8 | 6.54 -134% | 2.3 18% | 2.9 -4% | 2.8 ? -0% | 4.38 ? -56% |
Load Average * | 7.9 | 10.63 -35% | 11.1 -41% | 5.8 27% | 7.9 ? -0% | 9.72 ? -23% |
Load Maximum * | 10.8 | 11.57 -7% | 18.5 -71% | 13.9 -29% | 10.8 ? -0% | 13.6 ? -26% |
* ... smaller is better
Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)
Power consumption: GFXbench (150 cd/m²)
运行时间
Idea Tab Pro 的电池容量为 10,200 毫安时,略高于许多同类设备,我们的测试设备也拥有良好的运行时间。然而 小米红米 Pad Pro和 OnePlus Pad 2的续航时间更长。
在使用 Wi-Fi 上网时,13:18 小时的续航时间应该足够您在沙发上或办公桌上使用 Idea Tab Pro 度过一天,而无需再去找电源线。在没有网络连接的情况下观看电影时,它甚至可以持续近 17 个小时,这应该足够在不充电的情况下观看一季你最喜欢的连续剧。
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro 10200 mAh | OnePlus Pad 2 9510 mAh | Honor MagicPad 2 10050 mAh | Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus 10200 mAh | Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro 10000 mAh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 9% | -13% | -7% | 16% | |
Reader / Idle | 1523 | 1469 -4% | 1422 -7% | 2236 47% | |
H.264 | 1018 | 880 -14% | 998 -2% | 1052 3% | |
WiFi v1.3 | 798 | 866 9% | 606 -24% | 768 -4% | 924 16% |
Load | 256 | 232 -9% | 219 -14% | 245 -4% |
Notebookcheck 总评分
![联想 Idea Tab Pro 评测。测试设备由联想德国公司提供。 联想 Idea Tab Pro 评测。测试设备由联想德国公司提供。](fileadmin/_processed_/8/4/csm_Lenovo_Idea_Tab_Pro_Test_1_eb5e8e57bb.jpg)
联想 Idea Tab Pro 的性能足以满足日常使用需求,运行时间长,扬声器出色,显示屏大而不闪,甚至还有卫星定位功能。而这一切的价格还不到 450 美元。
因此,如果你正在寻找一款经济实惠、支持手写笔的大尺寸平板电脑,并且Android ,我们强烈推荐这款平板电脑。
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro
- 02/11/2025 v8
Florian Schmitt
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.