Notebookcheck Logo
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro

联想 Idea Tab Pro 评测--带笔、运行时间长的大型平板电脑,价格不到 450 美元

超级实惠。

联想 Idea Tab Pro 拥有大屏幕,售价不到 450 美元。该平板电脑的主动式手写笔可以让创意人员尽情发挥,游戏玩家可以期待高帧率,而电影迷则会对其高分辨率显示屏和四个扬声器感到满意。但是,低廉的价格是否有什么限制呢?
Florian Schmitt, 👁 Florian Schmitt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
Android ARM Tablet

联想 Idea Tab Pro 的评价

联想 Idea Tab Pro 有一些小瑕疵,比如 SoC 在负载情况下会出现节流现象,或者屏幕不是最亮的。但由于它的价格不到 450 美元,而且有许多优点,你可以忽略不计:毕竟,它拥有超大屏幕、高速无线局域网、笔支持、良好的运行时间、可选的键盘底座以及四个带有 JBL 品牌和强劲音效的扬声器。

你还可以通过 microSD 扩展存储空间并使用卫星导航,这两项功能在大型平板电脑中都很罕见。它的软件已适应笔输入和多任务处理,并有自己的鼠标和键盘控制模式。这款平板电脑的 SoC 处理器足以满足各种需求,并能以 60fps 的速度运行游戏--尽管帧速率并不总是完全稳定。

当然,你必须接受它的高重量,它的更新支持仅限于不到 4 年的时间,它的摄像头对于日常使用来说也不够好。不过,总的来说,联想的平板电脑还是非常成功的,而且还配备了高品质的外壳,这一点值得祝贺。

Idea Tab Pro 让人们可以买得起支持手写笔的大尺寸平板电脑,因此,它应该会吸引很多嫌 iPad Pro 太贵的人。

Pros

+ 价格相对便宜
+ 良好的性能价值
+ 高质量外壳
+ 输入笔
+ 快速存储
+ 运行时间长
+ 144-Hz 显示屏...
+ ... 无 PWM
+ 强大的扬声器音效
+ 快速无线局域网
+ 卫星定位服务
+ 可通过 microSD 扩展存储

Cons

- 显示屏最大亮度较低
- 相当重
- SoC 在长时间负载下会出现节流
- 摄像头质量差

价格和供应情况

在美国,联想 Idea Tab Pro 尚未发售。

可能的替代品比较

Image
Model / Review
Price
Weight
Drive
Display
1.
82.3%
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 8300 ⎘
ARM Mali-G615 MP6 ⎘
8 GB Memory, 256 GB 
Amazon:
1. $309.99
Lenovo Tab P12-2024 - Expans...
2. $14.95
ProCase 2 Pack Screen Protec...
3. $10.66
KEANBOLL 2 Pack Tempered Gla...
List Price: 379€
620 g256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash12.70"
2944x1840
273 PPI
IPS
2.
86.1%
OnePlus Pad 2
OnePlus Pad 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 ⎘
Qualcomm Adreno 750 ⎘
12 GB Memory, 256 GB 
Amazon: $549.99
List Price: 549€
584 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash12.10"
3000x2120
304 PPI
IPS
3.
84.8%
Honor MagicPad 2
Honor MagicPad 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 ⎘
Qualcomm Adreno 735 ⎘
12 GB Memory, 256 GB 
Amazon:
1. $26.99
INSOLKIDON Compatible with H...
2. $13.96
Kepuch 2 Pack Tempered Glass...
3. $11.99
Natbok 2 Pack Compatible wit...
List Price: 600€
555 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash12.30"
3000x1920
290 PPI
OLED
4.
86.4%
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 ⎘
Qualcomm Adreno 750 ⎘
12 GB Memory, 256 GB 
Amazon:
1. $294.69
Lenovo Tab Plus - 2024 - Pre...
2. $269.90
Lenovo Tab Plus - 2024 - Pre...
3. $309.99
Lenovo Tab P12-2024 - Expans...
List Price: 799€
640 g256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash12.70"
2944x1840
273 PPI
IPS
5.
78.7%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 ⎘
Qualcomm Adreno 710 ⎘
6 GB Memory, 128 GB UFS 2.1
Amazon: $264.00
List Price: 380€
571 g128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash12.10"
2560x1600
249 PPI
IPS

最近,我们对 联想 Yoga Tab Plus.同时亮相的联想 Idea Tab Pro 今天也来到了我们的测试实验室:它与 在许多方面在许多方面与 Yoga Tab Plus 相似,但价格要便宜得多。其代价包括处理器性能较弱、音响系统瘦身等。不过,与姊妹机型相比,Idea Tab Pro 也具有卫星定位等优势。

在这次测试中,我们将仔细研究 Idea Tab Pro 的超低价格所带来的局限性、它的适用人群以及它是否能与更昂贵的机型相抗衡。让我们开始吧。

规格

Lenovo Idea Tab Pro (IdeaTab Series)
Processor
MediaTek Dimensity 8300 8 x 2.2 - 3.4 GHz, Cortex-A15 / A510
Graphics adapter
ARM Mali-G615 MP6
Memory
8 GB 
Display
12.70 inch 16:10, 2944 x 1840 pixel 273 PPI, capacitive touchscreen, IPS, glossy: yes, 144 Hz
Storage
256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash, 256 GB 
, 210 GB free
Connections
1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: audio via USB, Card Reader: microSD, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: hall, color, acceleration, compass
Networking
Wi-Fi 6E (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz), Bluetooth 5.3, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 6.9 x 291.8 x 189.1
Battery
10200 mAh Lithium-Polymer, 45 Watt charging
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 14
Camera
Primary Camera: 13 MPix LED flash
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix
Additional features
Speakers: four speakers, USB-C cable, microSD tray pin, 12 Months Warranty, fanless
Weight
620 g
Price
379 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

外壳 - 好天气平板电脑

联想 Idea Tab Pro 采用金属一体成型外壳,有两种颜色可供选择:有浅绿色和深灰色两种。摄像头模块被玻璃盖板稍稍遮挡,但整体突出的部分很少。Idea Tab Pro 的尺寸略大于联想 Yoga Tab Plus,但重量却比后者轻 20 克。不过,620 克的重量还是很重。

它的做工质量非常好,只有非常强的压力才会在屏幕的液晶上显示出来。虽然在扭动时会发出轻微的吱吱声,但总体来说非常稳定。材料过渡也非常干净,几乎感觉不到。

它没有 IP 认证,因此您应该注意不要将设备暴露在过于恶劣的环境条件下。

联想 Idea Tab Pro
联想 Idea Tab Pro
联想 Idea Tab Pro
联想 Idea Tab Pro
联想 Idea Tab Pro
联想 Idea Tab Pro

尺寸比较

291.8 mm 189.1 mm 6.9 mm 620 g290.9 mm 188.3 mm 6.69 mm 640 g280 mm 181.85 mm 7.52 mm 571 g274.5 mm 180.5 mm 5.8 mm 555 g268.7 mm 195 mm 6.49 mm 584 g297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g

连通性 - 种类繁多,令人眼花缭乱

说到可选配置,情况就有点复杂了:除了两种颜色外,还有 8GB RAM 和 12GB RAM、128GB 或 256GB 大容量存储的机型,网站还提到了可选的磨砂显示屏,但目前(尚未)上市。此外,还有配备手写笔和对开本的配置包。理论上,SoC 还可以支持蜂窝网络。

我们在测试时发现了以下机型:

  • 联想 Idea Tab Pro 8 GB 内存/128 GB 存储空间/WiFi/含手写笔:约 390 美元
  • 联想 Idea Tab Pro 8 GB 内存/256 GB 存储空间/WiFi/含笔:约 415 美元
  • 联想 Idea Tab Pro 8GB 内存 / 128GB 存储空间 / WiFi / 含笔和对开包:约 425 美元
  • 联想 Idea Tab Pro 8 GB 内存 / 256 GB 存储空间 / WiFi / 包括手写笔和对开本:约 445 美元
  • 联想 Idea Tab Pro 12 GB 内存 / 256 GB 存储空间 / WiFi / 不含配件:约 360 美元

不幸的是,互联网上的大量报价让人很难看出哪些配件包含在供货范围内,因此如果您有任何疑问,应该询问零售商。

我们测试的机型配备 8GB LPDDR5 内存和 256GB UFS 4.0 存储空间。128GB 的机型只使用速度稍慢的 UFS 3.1 闪存。

在所有情况下,USB 端口都是按照 USB 3.1 Gen 1 内部连接的,这意味着它的数据传输速率可达 5 GBit/s。使用Display Port 标准,还可将图像有线传输到外部显示器。

键盘底座可通过底部的 Pogo 针连接。

microSD 读卡器

平板电脑的存储空间还可以通过 microSD 卡进行扩展。在我们使用 Angelbird V60 作为 microSD 卡参考的测试中,读卡器的速度被证明一般。

SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 (Angelbird V60)
42.3 MB/s +6%
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 8300 (Angelbird V60)
39.9 MB/s
Average of class Tablet
  (7.61 - 101.6, n=58, last 2 years)
35.5 MB/s -11%

Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)

0510152025303540455055606570758085Tooltip
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø38.5 (30.5-48.8)
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø38.4 (30.1-48.6)
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø72.2 (43.4-78.5)
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø78.3 (24.3-88.6)

软件 - 可定制并提供 4 年更新

联想 ZUI 很好地适应了平板电脑的大屏幕,例如,它可以在窗口中同时显示多个应用程序,并在连接鼠标和键盘时自动切换到优化的控制模式。任务栏基本可见,即使不在主屏幕上,也能轻松启动常用的应用程序。不过,并非所有应用程序都为此进行了优化,有些程序中的控制元素会被遮住。

我们测试设备上的软件基于Android 14。安全更新将持续到 2028 年 9 月,也就是测试时不到 3 年半的时间。Android 的新版本将持续到Android 17。我们对 Yoga Tab Plus的更新周期也类似。从可持续发展的角度看,Idea Tab Pro 也希望有更长的供应期,但它的价格要便宜得多,因此更新供应期在这种情况下更容易接受。

一些预装的赞助应用程序是意料之中的,但可以很容易地删除。

联想 Idea Tab Pro 软件
联想 Idea Tab Pro 软件
联想 Idea Tab Pro 软件

可持续性

联想平板电脑采用彩色印刷包装,不使用任何塑料。不过,我们无法找到有关所用材料或 Idea Tab Pro 碳足迹的更多详细信息。

联想网站上有一个备件搜索,其中也列出了 Idea Tab Pro 的备件,但目前没有备件可供购买。我们找不到任何用于自我维修的服务手册。

通信和全球导航卫星系统 - 即使是卫星导航

联想 Idea Tab Pro 配备了 WiFi 6E 作为最快的 Wi-Fi 标准,这意味着它也可以使用不太拥挤的 6 GHz 频段。

速度优势相当可观:我们使用 WiFi 6E 测得的速度高达 1,780 MBit/s,而在 5 GHz 频段上只能达到约 1,000 MBit/s。这意味着,你甚至可以充分利用家中的千兆网线;只有那些拥有自己的光纤线路或经常在内部网络中工作的人才能享受到其他平板电脑上 WiFi 7 带来的更高速度。

在我们的测试中,它的 WiFi 信号在路由器附近完全可用,即使是大型网站也能快速加载。在距离接入点 10 米远的地方,隔着 3 面墙,信号强度只有一半,网页加载有些延迟。

该平板电脑目前没有提供蜂窝版本,但理论上可以使用该芯片组。

Networking
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Average Wi-Fi 6E
  (227 - 1810, n=56)
956 MBit/s +29%
Honor MagicPad 2
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
867 (453min - 934max) MBit/s +17%
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro
Wi-Fi 6E
740 (571min, 575.93P1 - 868max) MBit/s
Average of class Tablet
  (10.5 - 1710, n=82, last 2 years)
542 MBit/s -27%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
528 (438min - 633max) MBit/s -29%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
1596 (1524min - 1625max) MBit/s +68%
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro
Wi-Fi 6E
949 (754min, 758.35P1 - 1070max) MBit/s
Average Wi-Fi 6E
  (442 - 1787, n=56)
947 MBit/s 0%
Honor MagicPad 2
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
937 (892min - 952max) MBit/s -1%
Average of class Tablet
  (20.1 - 1705, n=82, last 2 years)
527 MBit/s -44%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro
Wi-Fi 6E
1623 (1396min, 1418.33P1 - 1740max) MBit/s
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus
802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be
1598 (1108min, 1152.08P1 - 1731max) MBit/s -2%
Average Wi-Fi 6E
  (229 - 1845, n=58)
1435 MBit/s -12%
Average of class Tablet
  (691 - 1888, n=16, last 2 years)
1399 MBit/s -14%
OnePlus Pad 2
Wi-Fi 7
895 (675min - 1017max) MBit/s -45%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro
Wi-Fi 6E
1698 (1105min, 1186.78P1 - 1780max) MBit/s
OnePlus Pad 2
Wi-Fi 7
1652 (1472min - 1703max) MBit/s -3%
Average of class Tablet
  (666 - 1842, n=18, last 2 years)
1348 MBit/s -21%
Average Wi-Fi 6E
  (598 - 1844, n=58)
1345 MBit/s -21%
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus
802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be
960 (700min, 702.32P1 - 1188max) MBit/s -43%
0501001502002503003504004505005506006507007508008509009501000105011001150120012501300135014001450150015501600165017001750Tooltip
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz: Ø1623 (1396-1740)
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz: Ø1698 (1105-1780)
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro; iperf3 transmit AXE11000: Ø740 (571-868)
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro; iperf3 receive AXE11000: Ø949 (754-1070)
外部 GPS 测试
外部 GPS 测试
可用的卫星网络
可用的卫星网络

虽然我们的测试设备是一款 WLAN 平板电脑,但它仍然支持卫星定位。不过,如果你走到户外,需要一段时间才能达到可用的精度水平,而且能访问的卫星也不多。即便如此,它仍然支持主要的全球卫星网络,甚至支持精度更高的 SBAS。

当然,我们也想看看这款平板电脑在实际使用中的表现如何,于是带着 Garmin Venu 2 智能手表去骑自行车,作为对比设备。

总的来说,我们喜欢 Idea Tab Pro 记录的路线。它并不总是百分之百准确,有时似乎会穿过建筑物,但总的来说,我们可以说它足以满足导航的需要。只有那些重视绝对精确度的用户才应该选择其他设备。

平心而论,必须指出的是,本来相当精确的 Garmin 智能手表也出现了问题,因此测试当天的卫星接收可能受到了普遍干扰。

联想 Idea Tab Pro 定位服务 - 概述
联想 Idea Tab Pro 定位服务 - 概述
联想 Idea Tab Pro 定位服务--转折点
联想 Idea Tab Pro 定位服务--转折点
联想 Idea Tab Pro 定位服务 - 桥接
联想 Idea Tab Pro 定位服务 - 桥接
Garmin Venu 2 定位服务 - 概述
Garmin Venu 2 定位服务 - 概述
Garmin Venu 2 定位服务 - 转折点
Garmin Venu 2 定位服务 - 转折点
Garmin Venu 2 定位服务 - 桥接
Garmin Venu 2 定位服务 - 桥接

摄像头 - 更多用于紧急情况

使用前置摄像头拍摄的照片
使用前置摄像头拍摄的照片

与智能手机相比,摄像头在这种大型平板电脑上的重要性要小得多,但联想仍然在正面和背面各安装了一个镜头。它们可用于视频通话、扫描二维码或记录情况。

机身背面有一个 1300 万像素的摄像头,在光线充足的条件下能拍出不错的照片。不过,明亮的区域往往看起来曝光过度。图像清晰度一般。在光线很暗、对比度很高的情况下,明亮的蜡烛火焰会丢失一些细节。曝光尚可,但图像锐度有所下降。

可拍摄 30fps 的 4K 视频,但自动对焦不准确,有时需要用户协助。

前置摄像头的自拍效果不错,但明亮的区域看起来还是曝光过度。在视频会议期间,应确保背景不要太亮。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Main camera plantMain camera surroundingsMain camera low light

在光线非常好的实验室中,主摄像头显示的清晰度一般,在显示精细文字时存在问题,尤其是在红色前面。在 1 勒克斯的光照条件下,测试图表的辨识度仍然很低。

ColorChecker
10.6 ∆E
8.6 ∆E
12.5 ∆E
14.7 ∆E
10.5 ∆E
9.3 ∆E
6.2 ∆E
10.8 ∆E
8.1 ∆E
7.9 ∆E
9.7 ∆E
3.9 ∆E
7.9 ∆E
13.1 ∆E
10.2 ∆E
2.7 ∆E
8.9 ∆E
12 ∆E
7 ∆E
8.8 ∆E
11.4 ∆E
10.3 ∆E
1.9 ∆E
8 ∆E
ColorChecker Lenovo Idea Tab Pro: 8.96 ∆E min: 1.93 - max: 14.68 ∆E
ColorChecker
29.6 ∆E
54.3 ∆E
39.4 ∆E
34.8 ∆E
45.2 ∆E
61.5 ∆E
53.3 ∆E
35.7 ∆E
43.2 ∆E
29 ∆E
64.7 ∆E
63.9 ∆E
31.5 ∆E
47.7 ∆E
37.3 ∆E
75.6 ∆E
44.6 ∆E
42 ∆E
88.4 ∆E
70.2 ∆E
52 ∆E
36.9 ∆E
23.8 ∆E
13.3 ∆E
ColorChecker Lenovo Idea Tab Pro: 46.59 ∆E min: 13.35 - max: 88.41 ∆E

配件和保修 - 批量提供

我们的联想 Idea Tab Pro 配备了一支触控笔、一根 USB 数据线和一个用于打开 microSD 插槽的工具。制造商提供的触控笔单价约为 60 美元,而不带键盘的对开保护套价格约为 30 美元。目前联想还没有提供键盘对开包,但可以从网上零售商购买,价格约为 80 美元。

保修期为 12 个月。

输入设备和操作 - 配备指纹传感器的 Idea Tab Pro

显示屏可处理高达 144 Hz 的帧频,使触摸输入非常迅速。因此,当你在平板电脑上打字时,会有一种非常直接的感觉。触摸屏也非常精确和灵敏,直至边角和边缘。

待机键位于机身左侧,集成了指纹传感器,可用于解锁设备和敏感应用程序(如银行应用程序)。它对指纹的反应非常迅速可靠,解锁平板电脑几乎无需等待。面部识别功能不可用。

我们测试设备附带的触控笔是 Tab Pen Plus。与 Tab Pen Pro 相反,Yoga Tab Plus 配备了 Yoga Tab Plus相比,它有一些限制:例如,触控笔必须通过 USB 线缆充电。虽然它可以通过磁力吸附在平板电脑的背面,但并不能从那里供电。此外,Pen Plus 在书写时没有阻力,输入时也没有触摸感应表面,只有一个按钮。

尽管如此,你仍然可以在 Tab Pen Plus 上非常精确地书写和绘图,因为它具有 4096 级压力和倾斜度。这支笔握持起来非常舒适,因此即使长时间绘画也不成问题。

水平键盘
水平键盘
直立式键盘
直立式键盘

显示屏 - 不太明亮的 IPS 屏幕

子像素阵列
子像素阵列

从平板电脑的显示屏可以看出,联想不得不在某些方面节省开支。虽然 IPS 面板具有 2,944 x 1,840 像素的高分辨率,但最大亮度仅为 400 cd/m²。这使得它无法充分显示 HDR 内容。

此外,它的色彩准确度也有待提高,我们发现灰阶略微偏黄。

365
cd/m²
401
cd/m²
384
cd/m²
385
cd/m²
409
cd/m²
387
cd/m²
397
cd/m²
385
cd/m²
376
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 409 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 387.7 cd/m² Minimum: 1.94 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 89 %
Center on Battery: 409 cd/m²
Contrast: 1023:1 (Black: 0.4 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.46 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.9
ΔE Greyscale 5.2 | 0.5-98 Ø5.1
98.4% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.106
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro
IPS, 2944x1840, 12.7"
OnePlus Pad 2
IPS, 3000x2120, 12.1"
Honor MagicPad 2
OLED, 3000x1920, 12.3"
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus
IPS, 2944x1840, 12.7"
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro
IPS, 2560x1600, 12.1"
Screen
48%
55%
22%
9%
Brightness middle
409
833
104%
645
58%
726
78%
513
25%
Brightness
388
771
99%
650
68%
691
78%
480
24%
Brightness Distribution
89
84
-6%
94
6%
91
2%
86
-3%
Black Level *
0.4
0.45
-13%
0.55
-38%
0.4
-0%
Contrast
1023
1851
81%
1320
29%
1283
25%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
3.46
1.79
48%
1.3
62%
4.67
-35%
2.82
18%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
5.46
4.01
27%
2.1
62%
5.6
-3%
8.83
-62%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
5.2
3
42%
1.5
71%
1.8
65%
2.9
44%
Gamma
2.106 104%
2.254 98%
2.25 98%
2.249 98%
2.265 97%
CCT
5823 112%
6419 101%
6658 98%
6382 102%
7189 90%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8623 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

我们没有注意到任何 PWM 闪烁,但游戏玩家将不得不考虑比 OLED 显示屏稍慢的响应时间。

卡尔曼灰度
卡尔曼灰度
CalMAN 色彩精度
CalMAN 色彩精度
CalMAN 饱和度
CalMAN 饱和度
CalMAN sRGB 色彩空间
CalMAN sRGB 色彩空间
CalMAN AdobeRGB 色彩空间
CalMAN AdobeRGB 色彩空间
CalMAN DCI P3 色彩空间
CalMAN DCI P3 色彩空间

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
20.3 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 5 ms rise
↘ 15.3 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 42 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
37.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 5 ms rise
↘ 32.5 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 51 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.7 ms).

在室外,即使是阴天,在最大亮度下也很难看清显示屏上的内容:光面屏幕上的反光实在太强烈了。

另一方面,它的可视角度却非常出色:即使从非常平的角度观看,屏幕上的内容也很容易看清,不会有任何色彩变化。

室外使用
室外使用
视角
视角

性能 - 花很少的钱获得一流的性能

联想采用了 联发科 Dimensity 8300作为 Idea Tab Pro 的 SoC。这使该平板电脑的性能处于中上水平,意味着它在这方面无法与真正的高端平板电脑相媲美。因此,Idea Tab Pro 的 Honor MagicPad 2联想 Yoga Tab Plus在大多数处理器和系统基准测试中都遥遥领先,也就不足为奇了。

单独的 NPU 可用于人工智能计算,而且似乎能很快完成工作:我们的测试设备通常在人工智能基准测试中遥遥领先。

Geekbench 6.3
Single-Core
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
2213 Points +54%
Honor MagicPad 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
1986 Points +38%
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 8300, Mali-G615 MP6, 8192
1440 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8300
  ()
1440 Points 0%
Average of class Tablet
  (185 - 3715, n=76, last 2 years)
1103 Points -23%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 6144
1007 Points -30%
OnePlus Pad 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
954 Points -34%
Multi-Core
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
6723 Points +44%
Honor MagicPad 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
5166 Points +11%
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 8300, Mali-G615 MP6, 8192
4674 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8300
  ()
4674 Points 0%
OnePlus Pad 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
4564 Points -2%
Average of class Tablet
  (493 - 14690, n=76, last 2 years)
3507 Points -25%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 6144
2616 Points -44%
Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
1644 Points +54%
Honor MagicPad 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
1447 Points +36%
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 8300, Mali-G615 MP6, 8192
1065 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8300
  ()
1065 Points 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 6144
774 Points -27%
Average of class Tablet
  (103 - 1887, n=71, last 2 years)
732 Points -31%
Multi-Core
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
5924 Points +48%
Honor MagicPad 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
4460 Points +11%
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 8300, Mali-G615 MP6, 8192
4009 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8300
  ()
4009 Points 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 6144
2744 Points -32%
Average of class Tablet
  (303 - 8624, n=71, last 2 years)
2589 Points -35%
Antutu v10 - Total Score
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
1891925 Points +53%
Honor MagicPad 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
1432569 Points +16%
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 8300, Mali-G615 MP6, 8192
1234789 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8300
  ()
1234789 Points 0%
Average of class Tablet
  (164396 - 2716980, n=42, last 2 years)
784268 Points -36%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 6144
612145 Points -50%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 8300, Mali-G615 MP6, 8192
20813 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8300
  ()
20813 Points 0%
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
17967 Points -14%
Honor MagicPad 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
17329 Points -17%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 6144
12802 Points -38%
OnePlus Pad 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
12156 Points -42%
Average of class Tablet
  (3195 - 20841, n=73, last 2 years)
10311 Points -50%
CrossMark - Overall
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
1431 Points +35%
Honor MagicPad 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
1155 Points +9%
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 8300, Mali-G615 MP6, 8192
1062 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8300
  ()
1062 Points 0%
Average of class Tablet
  (172 - 1944, n=63, last 2 years)
800 Points -25%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 6144
747 Points -30%
BaseMark OS II
Overall
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
10498 Points +38%
Honor MagicPad 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
9147 Points +21%
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 8300, Mali-G615 MP6, 8192
7584 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8300
  ()
7584 Points 0%
Average of class Tablet
  (195 - 11721, n=58, last 2 years)
4503 Points -41%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 6144
4151 Points -45%
System
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
14858 Points +60%
Honor MagicPad 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
13141 Points +42%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 6144
9324 Points 0%
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 8300, Mali-G615 MP6, 8192
9280 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8300
  ()
9280 Points 0%
Average of class Tablet
  (904 - 16435, n=58, last 2 years)
7516 Points -19%
Memory
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
11834 Points +38%
Honor MagicPad 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
10977 Points +28%
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 8300, Mali-G615 MP6, 8192
8586 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8300
  ()
8586 Points 0%
Average of class Tablet
  (401 - 12938, n=58, last 2 years)
5209 Points -39%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 6144
3222 Points -62%
Graphics
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
33602 Points +37%
Honor MagicPad 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
25642 Points +5%
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 8300, Mali-G615 MP6, 8192
24475 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8300
  ()
24475 Points 0%
Average of class Tablet
  (418 - 57192, n=58, last 2 years)
10319 Points -58%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 6144
4622 Points -81%
Web
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
2056 Points +21%
Honor MagicPad 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
1893 Points +12%
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 8300, Mali-G615 MP6, 8192
1696 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8300
  ()
1696 Points 0%
Average of class Tablet
  (10 - 2056, n=58, last 2 years)
1316 Points -22%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 6144
1297 Points -24%
UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 8300, Mali-G615 MP6, 8192
55840 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8300
  ()
55840 Points 0%
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
17975 Points -68%
Honor MagicPad 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
13900 Points -75%
Average of class Tablet
  (2597 - 74821, n=56, last 2 years)
12001 Points -79%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 6144
7223 Points -87%
Geekbench AI
Single Precision TensorFlow NNAPI 1.2
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 8300, Mali-G615 MP6, 8192
1110 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8300
  ()
1110 Points 0%
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
480 Points -57%
Average of class Tablet
  (85 - 1110, n=7, last 2 years)
355 Points -68%
Half Precision TensorFlow NNAPI 1.2
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 8300, Mali-G615 MP6, 8192
4279 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8300
  ()
4279 Points 0%
Average of class Tablet
  (84 - 4279, n=7, last 2 years)
808 Points -81%
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
480 Points -89%
Quantized TensorFlow NNAPI 1.2
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 8300, Mali-G615 MP6, 8192
4200 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8300
  ()
4200 Points 0%
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
1108 Points -74%
Average of class Tablet
  (130 - 4200, n=7, last 2 years)
1014 Points -76%
AI Benchmark
Score V5
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
8305 Points
Average of class Tablet
  (101 - 8305, n=5, last 2 years)
2472 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 6144
456 Points
Honor MagicPad 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
120 Points
Score V6
Average of class Tablet
  (99.7 - 7341, n=6, last 2 years)
2096 Points +121%
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 8300, Mali-G615 MP6, 8192
948 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8300
  ()
948 Points 0%

在图形计算中,我们的测试设备在对比设备中再次处于中场位置。对于 4K 分辨率来说,它的帧率太低,但在要求苛刻的 GFXBench 中,1440p 的帧率仍能达到约 30fps。由于显示器的原生分辨率介于这两个数值之间,因此您应该尽可能选择稍低的分辨率,以保证游戏的流畅性。

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
4514 Points +81%
OnePlus Pad 2
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4454 Points +78%
Honor MagicPad 2
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
3218 Points +29%
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
2497 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
779 Points -69%
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
4742 Points +77%
OnePlus Pad 2
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4485 Points +68%
Honor MagicPad 2
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
3301 Points +23%
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
2677 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
789 Points -71%
3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Honor MagicPad 2
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
12985 Points +623%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2998 Points +67%
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1796 Points
3DMark / Wild Life Score
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
8911 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2954 Points -67%
Honor MagicPad 2
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
Points -100%
3DMark / Solar Bay Score
OnePlus Pad 2
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
8315 Points +98%
Honor MagicPad 2
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
5468 Points +30%
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
4769 Points +13%
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
4203 Points
3DMark / Solar Bay Unlimited Score
OnePlus Pad 2
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
8321 Points +112%
Honor MagicPad 2
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
5458 Points +39%
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
4808 Points +23%
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3921 Points
3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
8796 Points
OnePlus Pad 2
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1626 Points -82%
Honor MagicPad 2
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1071 Points -88%
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
935 Points -89%
3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Score
OnePlus Pad 2
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1639 Points +54%
Honor MagicPad 2
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1090 Points +2%
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1067 Points
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
948 Points -11%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
143 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
79 fps -45%
Honor MagicPad 2
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps -58%
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps -58%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Honor MagicPad 2
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
520 fps +65%
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
498 fps +58%
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
316 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
122 fps -61%
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
88 fps
Honor MagicPad 2
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps -32%
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps -32%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
42 fps -52%
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
325 fps +84%
Honor MagicPad 2
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
265 fps +50%
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
177 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
72 fps -59%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps +9%
Honor MagicPad 2
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
59 fps +7%
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
55 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
29 fps -47%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
240 fps +95%
Honor MagicPad 2
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
200 fps +63%
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
123 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
53 fps -57%
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
59 fps +74%
Honor MagicPad 2
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
42 fps +24%
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
34 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
15 fps -56%
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
137 fps +88%
Honor MagicPad 2
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
110 fps +51%
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
73 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
29 fps -60%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
54 fps +93%
OnePlus Pad 2
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
42 fps +50%
Honor MagicPad 2
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
35 fps +25%
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
28 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
11 fps -61%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
OnePlus Pad 2
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
69 fps +109%
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
67 fps +103%
Honor MagicPad 2
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
55 fps +67%
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
33 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
13 fps -61%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps +62%
Honor MagicPad 2
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
53 fps +43%
OnePlus Pad 2
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
50 fps +35%
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
37 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
18 fps -51%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
OnePlus Pad 2
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
170 fps +107%
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
167 fps +104%
Honor MagicPad 2
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
144 fps +76%
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
82 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
34 fps -59%
GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
OnePlus Pad 2
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
32 fps +113%
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
30 fps +100%
Honor MagicPad 2
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
24 fps +60%
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
15 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
5.9 fps -61%

联想 Idea Tab Pro 的上网速度很快,在我们的测试中,它的表现超过了许多同类设备。即使是大型网站,加载速度也相当快,快速滚动时只需稍等片刻即可加载图片。

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus (Chrome 132)
231.7 Points +68%
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro (Chrome 132)
137.835 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8300 ()
137.8 Points 0%
Honor MagicPad 2 (Chrome 128.0.6613.146)
134.356 Points -3%
Average of class Tablet (19.9 - 334, n=68, last 2 years)
119.3 Points -13%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro (Chrome 128)
116.621 Points -15%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus (Chrome 132)
294 runs/min +58%
Honor MagicPad 2 (Chrome 128.0.6613.146)
197 runs/min +6%
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro (Chrome 132)
186 runs/min
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8300 ()
186 runs/min 0%
Average of class Tablet (2.59 - 572, n=60, last 2 years)
134.3 runs/min -28%
Speedometer 3.0 - Score
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus (Chrome 132)
17.2 runs/min +58%
Average of class Tablet (1.25 - 33.7, n=32, last 2 years)
12.2 runs/min +12%
Honor MagicPad 2 (Chrome 128.0.6613.146)
11.9 runs/min +9%
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro (Chrome 132)
10.9 runs/min
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8300 ()
10.9 runs/min 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro (Chrome 128)
6.72 runs/min -38%
WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus (Chrome 132)
164 Points +14%
Honor MagicPad 2 (Chrome 128.0.6613.146)
155 Points +8%
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro (Chrome 132)
144 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8300 ()
144 Points 0%
Average of class Tablet (21 - 315, n=67, last 2 years)
113.5 Points -21%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro (Chrome 128)
112 Points -22%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus (Chrome 132)
70252 Points +54%
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro (Chrome 132)
45579 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8300 ()
45579 Points 0%
OnePlus Pad 2 (Chrome 128)
45083 Points -1%
Honor MagicPad 2 (Chrome 128.0.6613.146)
42032 Points -8%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro (Chrome 128)
34923 Points -23%
Average of class Tablet (763 - 105178, n=87, last 2 years)
30694 Points -33%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Average of class Tablet (319 - 34733, n=74, last 2 years)
3641 ms * -303%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro (Chrome 128)
1151.6 ms * -27%
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro (Chrome 132)
904.3 ms *
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8300 ()
904 ms * -0%
Honor MagicPad 2 (Chrome 128.0.6613.146)
842.2 ms * +7%
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus (Chrome 132)
579.9 ms * +36%

* ... smaller is better

我们的测试设备拥有 256 GB 的存储空间,配备了 UFS 4.0 闪存,因此在传输数据时速度超快,在运行复杂应用程序时也能明显缩短加载时间。

Lenovo Idea Tab ProOnePlus Pad 2Honor MagicPad 2Lenovo Yoga Tab PlusXiaomi Redmi Pad ProAverage 256 GB UFS 4.0 FlashAverage of class Tablet
AndroBench 3-5
-48%
-40%
-27%
-69%
-19%
-68%
Sequential Read 256KB
3648.3
2003.1
-45%
2025.54
-44%
3868
6%
844.9
-77%
Sequential Write 256KB
3298.5
1732.7
-47%
2003.53
-39%
3047.6
-8%
705.3
-79%
2625 ?(555 - 3361, n=30)
-20%
Random Read 4KB
474.4
236.5
-50%
298.27
-37%
241.2
-49%
215.5
-55%
396 ?(218 - 483, n=30)
-17%
Random Write 4KB
668
348.6
-48%
401.95
-40%
290.9
-56%
231.4
-65%

游戏 - 甚至可以达到 60 fps

对于雄心勃勃的游戏玩家来说,平板电脑的大显示屏是福也是祸:一方面,它的高分辨率和大对角线让游戏成为一种体验;另一方面,屏幕上的控制按钮非常大,但有时手握平板电脑却难以触及。对于长时间游戏而言,该设备也相当沉重。

它的帧率通常能达到 60 帧/秒,但有时会出现明显的下降,例如在《源氏冲击》中,因此你不能总是依赖流畅的游戏。即使在玩《PUBG Mobile》时,在低设置下也不能始终保证 60 帧/秒。在高设置下,也只能达到 40 帧。

我们使用GameBench软件进行测量。

源泉冲击
源泉冲击
PUBG Mobile
PUBG Mobile
051015202530354045505560Tooltip
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro; Genshin Impact; lowest 120 fps: Ø58.7 (47-61)
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro; Genshin Impact; highest 120 fps: Ø55.4 (9-61)
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro; PUBG Mobile; Smooth: Ø57.2 (34-64)
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro; PUBG Mobile; HD: Ø39.4 (35-41)
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro; Diablo Immortal; Medium Mobile Low: Ø58.2 (39-60)
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro; Diablo Immortal; Ultra Mobile Very High: Ø59 (49-60)

排放 - SoC 被节流

温度

平板电脑的大表面积使 SoC 工作时产生的热量得以很好地散发。在长时间使用后,我们测得平板电脑外壳的最高温度为 34.3 °C。虽然这个温度很明显,但绝非问题。

不过,正如我们在 3DMark 压力测试中了解到的那样,SoC 的性能在长时间负载后并不能完全保持,反而会下降 20%。

Max. Load
 30.1 °C34.3 °C27.3 °C 
 28.5 °C29.2 °C27 °C 
 29.1 °C28.8 °C27.9 °C 
Maximum: 34.3 °C
Average: 29.1 °C
27.4 °C33.5 °C30.5 °C
26.7 °C29.4 °C30.2 °C
27.5 °C28.6 °C28.6 °C
Maximum: 33.5 °C
Average: 29.2 °C
Power Supply (max.)  39.9 °C | Room Temperature 19 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260
(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 29.1 °C / 84 F, compared to the average of 29.9 °C / 86 F for the devices in the class Tablet.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 34.3 °C / 94 F, compared to the average of 33.7 °C / 93 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 33.5 °C / 92 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.1 °C / 79 F, compared to the device average of 29.9 °C / 86 F.

3DMark Steel Nomad stress test

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
99.7 % +25%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.6 % +25%
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
79.6 %
OnePlus Pad 2
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
77 % -3%
Honor MagicPad 2
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
73.6 % -8%
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.1 % +19%
Honor MagicPad 2
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
89.3 % +7%
OnePlus Pad 2
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
83.8 % 0%
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
83.4 %
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
81.8 % -2%
Solar Bay Stress Test Stability
Honor MagicPad 2
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
93.7 % +2%
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
92.3 %
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
91.3 % -1%
OnePlus Pad 2
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
86.9 % -6%
Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability
Honor MagicPad 2
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
95.9 % +19%
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
86.6 % +8%
OnePlus Pad 2
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
86.5 % +8%
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
80.3 %
05101520253035404550556065707580859095Tooltip
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø11.5 (11.1-13.4)
OnePlus Pad 2 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø24.1 (22.9-27.4)
Honor MagicPad 2 Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø18.1 (17.6-19.7)
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø23.7 (22.2-27.1)
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø4.69 (4.65-4.7)
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø40.2 (38-47.8)
OnePlus Pad 2 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø78.9 (74-96)
Honor MagicPad 2 Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø64.5 (53.4-72.6)
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø60.4 (60.3-60.5)
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø17.7 (17.7-17.7)
Honor MagicPad 2 Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø71.7 (69.5-77.2)
Honor MagicPad 2 Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Solar Bay Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.5: Ø16.7 (16.4-17.5)
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.11.1: Ø11 (10.7-11.6)
OnePlus Pad 2 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.5: Ø23.2 (22.2-25.5)
Honor MagicPad 2 Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.5: Ø16.7 (16.4-17.5)
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.11.1: Ø22.7 (22.1-24.2)
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.1.1.3: Ø6.7 (6.29-7.83)
OnePlus Pad 2 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.1.1.3: Ø11.1 (10.6-12.3)
Honor MagicPad 2 Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.0.0.15: Ø7.85 (7.73-8.06)
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.1.1.3: Ø10.8 (10.4-12.1)
热图前端
热图前端
热图返回
热图返回

发言人

可用的蓝牙音频编解码器
可用的蓝牙音频编解码器

这款大型生产力和娱乐平板电脑配有四个扬声器。这些扬声器位于平板电脑较短边缘的两侧,因此在横向模式下会产生轻微的立体声效果。扬声器的最大音量足以让一个中等大小的房间充满声音。

最大音量时声音非常饱满,可以听到一些低频。此时高音略显突出,但如果稍稍降低音量,声音会变得更加圆润。总的来说,内置扬声器能给你带来很多乐趣,而且扬声器也非常适合在小型会议室中播放视频声音。

外置扬声器或耳机可通过 USB-C 或蓝牙连接。最重要的无线编解码器均可使用,包括 LDAC、AAC 和 aptX HD。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2044.248.12538.739.13137.7344038.935.95037.235.96325.529.78019.534.610018.744.712520.452.216018.856.220018.162.225015.665.931515.769.740014.763.850016.266.763020.173.280019.176.2100018.378.1125015.378.1160013.571.4200013.668.8250012.769.531501371.1400012.476500012.573.3630012.370.8800012.571.41000012.5711250012.4611600011.866.9SPL27.185.6N0.968.2median 14.7median 69.7Delta2.64.234.838.434.737.924.629.626.528.32934.23127.517.525.116.931.11836.421.239.921.645.62253.923.557.616.456.917.562.717.565.416.372.115.376.112.876.111.271.811.265.611.867.412.264.412.766.813.167.713.660.814.558.115.263.415.966.216.754.426.8820.948.8median 15.9median 63.436.8hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseLenovo Idea Tab ProXiaomi Redmi Pad Pro
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 9% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 89% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 5% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 94% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 19.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.9% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 51% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 42% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 47% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 46% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

电池续航时间--耐用的巨型平板电脑

耗电量

实际上,联想 Idea Tab Pro 在空闲模式下的耗电量很小,最大耗电量也很适中。不过,考虑到 SoC 的性能水平较低,后者也就不足为奇了。

平板电脑的最大充电功率为 45 瓦。为大容量电池充满电最长需要 2:20 小时。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.1 / 0.2 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 1.2 / 1.8 / 2.8 Watt
Load midlight 7.9 / 10.8 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro
10200 mAh
Honor MagicPad 2
10050 mAh
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus
10200 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro
10000 mAh
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8300
 
Average of class Tablet
 
Power Consumption
-128%
-24%
-14%
0%
-54%
Idle Minimum *
1.2
3.6
-200%
1.5
-25%
1.7
-42%
1.2 ?()
-0%
Idle Average *
1.8
6.52
-262%
1.8
-0%
2.2
-22%
1.8 ?()
-0%
Idle Maximum *
2.8
6.54
-134%
2.3
18%
2.9
-4%
2.8 ?()
-0%
Load Average *
7.9
10.63
-35%
11.1
-41%
5.8
27%
7.9 ?()
-0%
Load Maximum *
10.8
11.57
-7%
18.5
-71%
13.9
-29%
10.8 ?()
-0%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

012345678910Tooltip
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø6.55 (2.2-10.8)
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.247 (1.157-2.78)

Power consumption: GFXbench (150 cd/m²)

012345678910Tooltip
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø10.7 (10.5-10.8)
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.247 (1.157-2.78)

运行时间

Idea Tab Pro 的电池容量为 10,200 毫安时,略高于许多同类设备,我们的测试设备也拥有良好的运行时间。然而 小米红米 Pad ProOnePlus Pad 2的续航时间更长。

在使用 Wi-Fi 上网时,13:18 小时的续航时间应该足够您在沙发上或办公桌上使用 Idea Tab Pro 度过一天,而无需再去找电源线。在没有网络连接的情况下观看电影时,它甚至可以持续近 17 个小时,这应该足够在不充电的情况下观看一季你最喜欢的连续剧。

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
25h 23min
WiFi Websurfing
13h 18min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
16h 58min
Load (maximum brightness)
4h 16min
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro
10200 mAh
OnePlus Pad 2
9510 mAh
Honor MagicPad 2
10050 mAh
Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus
10200 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro
10000 mAh
Battery Runtime
9%
-13%
-7%
16%
Reader / Idle
1523
1469
-4%
1422
-7%
2236
47%
H.264
1018
880
-14%
998
-2%
1052
3%
WiFi v1.3
798
866
9%
606
-24%
768
-4%
924
16%
Load
256
232
-9%
219
-14%
245
-4%

Notebookcheck 总评分

联想 Idea Tab Pro 评测。测试设备由联想德国公司提供。
联想 Idea Tab Pro 评测。测试设备由联想德国公司提供。

联想 Idea Tab Pro 的性能足以满足日常使用需求,运行时间长,扬声器出色,显示屏大而不闪,甚至还有卫星定位功能。而这一切的价格还不到 450 美元。

因此,如果你正在寻找一款经济实惠、支持手写笔的大尺寸平板电脑,并且Android ,我们强烈推荐这款平板电脑。

Lenovo Idea Tab Pro - 02/11/2025 v8
Florian Schmitt

Chassis
86 / 98 → 88%
Keyboard
77 / 80 → 97%
Pointing Device
94%
Connectivity
49 / 69 → 71%
Weight
81 / 40-88 → 86%
Battery
89%
Display
78%
Games Performance
24 / 65 → 37%
Application Performance
70 / 92 → 76%
AI Performance
50%
Temperature
94%
Noise
100%
Audio
89 / 91 → 97%
Camera
53 / 90 → 59%
Average
64%
82%
Tablet - Weighted Average
CO2 Emissions
No Data
Materials
10%
Packaging
85%
Power Use
95.7%
Repairability
11%
Software Updates
56.7%
Recycle Logo Total Sustainability Score: 43.1%

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 联想 Idea Tab Pro 评测--带笔、运行时间长的大型平板电脑,价格不到 450 美元
Florian Schmitt, 2025-02-14 (Update: 2025-02-14)