Honor MagicPad 2 平板电脑评测--12.3 英寸、144 赫兹 OLED 价格杀手

Name: Honor MagicPad 2
Brand: Honor

令人印象深刻。

对于平板电脑来说，600 英镑是个不小的数字。然而，纤薄的Honor MagicPad 2 却能给你带来丰厚的回报：它是配备 OLED 显示屏的最经济实惠的 12 英寸平板电脑之一。144 Hz 的刷新率、3K 分辨率、8 个扬声器和速度极快的 Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 使其规格表堪称一流。但它的实际表现如何呢？我们在评测中进行了仔细观察。
Manuel Masiero, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 10/02/2024 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
Android Tablet Touchscreen

到目前为止，MagicPad 2 只在中国有售。现在，Honor ，这款 12.3 英寸平板电脑的欧洲版已经面世，而且价格诱人。

在英国，MagicPad 2 的售价为 450 英镑。当然，这仍然是一大笔钱。但 MagicPad 2 实际上是配备 OLED 屏幕的最实惠的 12.x 英寸平板电脑之一。它还具有 144 Hz 的刷新率和 3K 分辨率（3000 x 1920 像素）。据Honor 报道，该显示屏的亮度高达 1600 尼特。

MagicPad 2 采用

骁龙 8s 第 3 代处理器和 12GB RAM，可以确保良好的性能。总体而言，这些参数使这款平板电脑跻身同类产品的前列，并接近强劲的竞争对手，如 Apple iPad Pro 12.9.与此同时，Apple 平板电脑的分辨率较低，并且只能达到 120 Hz。而且价格是它的两倍。

Test device courtesy of Honor

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Honor MagicPad 2

Processor

Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 8 x 2 - 2.8 GHz, Cortex-X4 / A720 / A720 / A520 (Kryo)

Graphics adapter

Qualcomm Adreno 735

Memory

12 GB

Display

12.30 inch 16:10, 3000 x 1920 pixel 290 PPI, capacitive, native pen support, OLED, 1.07 billion colors, 4320 Hz PWM dimming, Dynamic Dimming, brightness up to 1600 Nits, glossy: yes, HDR, 144 Hz

Storage

256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash, 256 GB

, 227 GB free

Connections

1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: USB-C, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: Accelerometer, Gravity Sensor, Camera2 API Level 3, 66W max. charging speed

Networking

802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.3

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 5.8 x 274.5 x 180.5

Battery

10050 mAh Lithium-Ion

Charging

fast charging / Quickcharge

Operating System

Android 14

Camera

Primary Camera: 13 MPix (f/2.0, AF, video recording up to 4K@30fps)
Secondary Camera: 9 MPix (f/2.2, video recording up to 4K@30fps)

Additional features

Speakers: 8 speakers with IMAX Enhanced and Hi-Res Audio Certification, Keyboard: virtual, 66W charger (11V/6A), USB-C cable, quick start guide, warranty card, MagicOS 8.0, 24 Months Warranty, fanless

Weight

555 g, Power Supply: 105 g

Price

600 Euro

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating	Version	Date	Model	Weight	Height	Size	Resolution
84.8 %	v8	10 / 2024	Honor MagicPad 2 SD 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735	555 g	5.8 mm	12.30"	3000x1920
91.8 % v7 ^(old)	v7 ^(old)	11 / 2022	Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 M2, M2 10-Core GPU	682 g	6.4 mm	12.90"	2732x2048
74.8 %	v8	06 / 2024	Lenovo Tab P12 Paper Dimensity 7050, Mali-G68 MP4	615 g	6.9 mm	12.70"	2944x1840
91.3 % v7 ^(old)	v7 ^(old)	10 / 2023	Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+ SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740	586 g	5.7 mm	12.40"	2800x1752
89.3 % v7 ^(old)	v7 ^(old)	05 / 2024	Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro SD 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740	590 g	6.26 mm	12.40"	3048x2032

请注意：我们更新了评级系统，这意味着第 8 版的结果不能与第 7 版进行比较。了解更多关于此更改的信息这里.

外壳 - 12.3 英寸平板电脑，轻薄小巧

尽管 MagicPad 2 体积庞大，但它采用了非常纤薄的一体式机身外壳，555 克的重量让用户可以轻松地单手长时间握持平板电脑而不会感到疲倦。12.3 英寸平板电脑的厚度仅为 5.8 毫米，同样非常纤薄。你可能会注意到，平板电脑并不能完全平放在坚硬的表面上，这是因为后置摄像头模块突出机身约一毫米。

5 毫米的窄边框由铝硅酸盐玻璃制成，进一步凸显了纤薄的外观。平板电脑给人的整体印象很好，尽管磨砂后盖是由塑料制成，而不是像其他边框一样由铝制成。缝隙尺寸紧凑均匀，平板电脑在我们尝试翘起时也没有变形。不过，该设备没有 IP 防护等级。

除了月光白这一白色版本外，Honor MagicPad 2 还有黑色版本。

尺寸比较

Lenovo Tab P12 Paper Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+ Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro Honor MagicPad 2 DIN A4 ❌

连接性 - 仅提供 256 GB 存储空间

在欧洲，Honor 的 MagicPad 2 只提供一种存储选项。该设备配备 12 GB 内存和 256 GB 存储空间，目前在英国的售价为 500 英镑。由于没有 micoSD 读卡器，该平板电脑的内部存储空间几乎无法扩展。

在中国，这款平板电脑有更多选择，包括高达 16 GB 的内存和 1 TB 的存储容量。但优势也仅限于此：即使是中国版本也不支持 LTE 或 5G，也不支持 NFC。

MagicPad 2 的 USB-C 端口支持 OTG，但速度仅限于 USB 2.0，因此无法实现图像输出。使用三星 980 Pro 固态硬盘，我们测得的传输速率为 25.5 MB/s。由于缺少 3.5 英寸音频接口，USB-C 端口被迫承担起音频接口的角色。平板电脑支持 DRM WideVine L1。

软件 - MagicPad 2，含Android 14

MagicPad 2 运行Android 14 和Honor 自己的用户界面 MagicOS 8.0。制造商选择加入各种人工智能功能，包括 Magic Capsule（Applie 动态岛的副本）、Magic Ring（兼容Honor 设备之间的数据交换）等智能助手以及用于照片的人工智能橡皮擦。您可以在Honor 网站上找到 MagicOS 8 的功能概览。.

遗憾的是，Honor 的Android 更新相当少。包括 Magic Pro 系列在内的其他Honor 设备最多可获得 3 次操作系统更新和 5 年的安全补丁，而 MagicPad 2 只能获得 1 次操作系统升级和 3 年的安全补丁。后者将每季度。.

可持续性

Honor MagicPad 2 的包装几乎不使用塑料，但却没有说明包装或平板电脑本身使用了多少可回收材料。制造商也没有提供任何有关该设备碳足迹的信息。最终消费者无法购买 MagicPad 2 的更换部件，但制造商提供维修服务。

通信和全球导航卫星系统 -Honor 平板电脑，无 GPS 和蜂窝系统

MagicPad 2 依靠 WiFi 6，在我们使用参考路由器华硕 ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000 进行的测试中，传输速率稳定在 937 MBit/s。这几乎足以充分利用千兆网络连接。(最初发送数据时吞吐量较慢是由于路由器仍在唤醒）。

Honor 平板电脑的 WiFi 传输速率比 Apple iPad Pro 12.9和联想平板电脑 P12.与三星Galaxy Tab S9+和小米 Pad 6S Pro不同的是，它不能使用 6 GHz 频段，这意味着，总体而言，这款平板电脑的 WiFi 性能与其替代产品相比一般。

由于缺少 GPS 模块，MagicPad 2 不提供导航服务。该功能仅在中国提供。我们不知道为什么国际版的平板电脑会取消这一功能。

Networking
Honor MagicPad 2 Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000	937 (min: 892) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	867 (min: 453) MBit/s ∼91%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe
iperf3 receive AXE11000	442 (min: 222) MBit/s ∼47%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	486 (min: 175) MBit/s ∼51%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	747 (min: 145) MBit/s ∼46%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	702 (min: 225) MBit/s ∼49%
Lenovo Tab P12 Paper Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000	673 (min: 516) MBit/s ∼72%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	873 (min: 734) MBit/s ∼92%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+ Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1518 (min: 1344) MBit/s ∼94%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1006 (min: 859) MBit/s ∼70%
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000	778 (min: 542) MBit/s ∼83%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	953 (min: 870) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1620 (min: 1070) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1437 (min: 1239) MBit/s ∼100%

Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 Apple M2, Apple M2 10-Core GPU; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø747 (145-917)

Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 Apple M2, Apple M2 10-Core GPU; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø694 (225-834)

Honor MagicPad 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Qualcomm Adreno 735; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø936 (892-952)

Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 Apple M2, Apple M2 10-Core GPU; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø442 (222-528)

Honor MagicPad 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Qualcomm Adreno 735; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø852 (453-934)

Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 Apple M2, Apple M2 10-Core GPU; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø486 (175-591)

照相机--日光下的好照片

MagicPad 2 的自拍摄像头分辨率为 900 万像素，与主摄像头一样，可以录制高达 4K 的视频和每秒 30 张图片。它足以满足视频聊天的需要，但不能显示很多细节，即使在光线良好的情况下也会显得颗粒感很强。

Honor 12.3 英寸平板电脑的背面是一个单摄像头。虽然看起来像是两个镜头，但左边实际上是一个 LED 闪光灯。1300 万像素的主摄像头色彩平衡偏暖，在日光下拍摄的照片效果不错，甚至可以与一般的中端智能手机相媲美。我们在可控光线下进行的色彩分析并未发现任何重大偏差（最大 Delta-E 值为 10.03）。

当拍摄对象距离较远时，动态范围仍然很高，但细节水平明显下降，图像暗部有明显的噪点。主摄像头的变焦能力不佳，文字图片容易模糊。在光线不好的情况下，相机几乎无法使用，因为照片图案几乎完全消失在黑暗中。

主摄像头最大可录制 4K 视频，每秒可拍摄 30 幅图像。效果相当不错。拍摄时无法在主摄像头和自拍摄像头之间切换。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Tageslicht-Aufnahme 1 Tageslicht-Aufnahme 2 Textdarstellung 5-facher Zoom Lowlight-Aufnahme

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images

配件和保修 - 需要电源适配器？

MagicPad 2 随附 USB-C 连接线、快速入门指南和保修信息。在英国网站上,Honor 还允许用户免费添加 100 瓦电源适配器和耳塞。

如果您打算在平板电脑上书写和绘画，您可以在Honor 网上商店找到合适的配件。.可用的配件包括Honor Magic Pen(80 英镑）和智能蓝牙键盘（76 英镑）。(£76).

Honor MagicPad 2 的保修期为 24 个月。

输入设备和操作 - 可购买触控笔和键盘

Honor 但 OLED 面板对输入的响应非常迅速和精确。平板电脑上为数不多的实体按键（电源键和音量摇杆）虽然有些松动，但按压点非常清晰。

制造商还提供了 Magic Pencil 3 和智能蓝牙键盘供我们测试。进行测试。触控笔支持 4096 级压力，通过磁力吸附在平板电脑顶部。充电时间为 45 分钟，一次充电可持续使用 10 个小时。

智能蓝牙键盘既是一个盖子，也是一个键盘。当打开键盘时，它有一个 60 度的固定开启角度，平板电脑会被磁铁牢牢吸住。按键高 1.6 毫米，提供舒适的键入体验。键盘不支持背光或触摸板。将键盘翻转到背面，使其隐藏在平板电脑下面，可自动锁定按键，防止不必要的输入。

MagicPad 2 没有配备指纹识别器。自拍摄像头可用于 2D 人脸识别，只要显示屏足够亮，即使在黑暗中也能正常工作。平板电脑最多可设置识别 5 张人脸。

▶ load Youtube video

显示屏 - 3K OLED 面板，144 Hz

MagicPad 2 的绝对亮点之一是其明亮而精确的 3K 显示屏。OLED 面板的分辨率为 3000 x 1920 像素，像素密度高达 290 PPI。此外，显示屏的刷新率高达 144 Hz，平板电脑可根据显示内容动态调整刷新率。此外，它还可以设置为 60、90 或 144 Hz。MagicPad 2 支持 HDR10、HDR 10+ 和 HLG。

在纯白背景下，显示屏的平均亮度为 650 cd/m²。在较小的图像部分（APL18）上进行测量时，结果与此类似。在显示 HDR 内容时，OLED 面板的亮度增加到 1503 cd/m²，接近制造商报告的 1600 nits。如果关闭亮度传感器，显示屏的最高亮度可设置为 601 cd/m²，最低亮度为 2.26 cd/m²。

在我们测量的所有亮度水平下，OLED 面板都会以 90 Hz 的低频闪烁。这对敏感用户来说可能是个问题。不过，这款平板电脑还具有 4320 Hz 的特殊 PWM 调光模式，我们的测量结果非常接近（4166 Hz）。


640 cd/m²	636 cd/m²	637 cd/m²
650 cd/m²	645 cd/m²	638 cd/m²
674 cd/m²	669 cd/m²	659 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3

Maximum: 674 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 649.8 cd/m² Minimum: 2.26 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 94 %
Center on Battery: 645 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.3 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 1.5 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
98.4% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.25

	Honor MagicPad 2 OLED, 3000x1920, 12.3"	Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 Mini-LED, 2732x2048, 12.9"	Lenovo Tab P12 Paper LTPS, 2944x1840, 12.7"	Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+ AMOLED, 2800x1752, 12.4"	Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro IPS, 3048x2032, 12.4"
Screen		-22%	-100%	-51%	-44%
Brightness middle	645	611 -5%	148 -77%	574 -11%	867 34%
Brightness	650	605 -7%	139 -79%	551 -15%	810 25%
Brightness Distribution	94	92 -2%	90 -4%	89 -5%	87 -7%
Black Level *			0.3		0.58
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	1.3	1.4 -8%	3.59 -176%	2.01 -55%	2 -54%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	2.1	3.3 -57%	5.52 -163%	4.93 -135%	5.5 -162%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	1.5	2.3 -53%	3 -100%	2.8 -87%	3 -100%
Gamma	2.25 ^98%	2.22 ^99%	2.243 ^98%	2.066 ^106%	2.29 ^96%
CCT	6658 ^98%	6930 ^94%	7115 ^91%	6566 ^99%	6957 ^93%
Contrast			493		1495

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

90 Hz
Amplitude: 18.02 %
Secondary Frequency: 4166 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 90 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 90 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

使用固定变焦和各种亮度设置进行的一系列测量（最低亮度下的振幅曲线看起来非常平缓，但这是缩放造成的。最小亮度下的振幅放大图可在信息框中查看）。

凭借 OLED 面板，MagicPad 2 不仅在分辨率和亮度上与 iPad Pro 12.9 等竞争对手不相上下 Apple iPad Pro 12.9和三星Galaxy Tab S9+测试表明，MagicPad 2 的画质也丝毫不逊色于它们。如果将显示设置中的色彩模式设为 "正常"，色温设为 "标准"，MagicPad 2 的色彩准确度和白平衡都非常理想。

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
1.16 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 0.583 ms rise
1.16 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 0.577 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 3 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
8.84 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 0.999 ms rise
8.84 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 7.844 ms fall
The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 19 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

MagicPad 2 适合在户外使用，不过在阳光充足的日子里，增加的显示屏亮度可能不足以让用户读取显示内容。不过，在阴凉处，视角稳定的 OLED 面板始终易于阅读。

性能 - 配备骁龙 8s 第 3 代处理器的 MagicPad 2

配备骁龙 8s 第 3 代处理器Honor MagicPad 2 是目前速度最快的平板电脑之一，与小米 Pad 6S Pro(骁龙 8 代 2).三星三星Galaxy Tab S9+的速度还是稍快一些，因为其主频更高骁龙 8 代 2Galaxy.

Geekbench 6.3
Multi-Core
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+	5652 Points +9%
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro	5176 Points 0%
Honor MagicPad 2	5166 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4602 - 5284, n=6)	4906 Points -5%
Average of class Tablet (493 - 14690, n=70, last 2 years)	3544 Points -31%
Lenovo Tab P12 Paper	2408 Points -53%
Single-Core
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+	2107 Points +6%
Honor MagicPad 2	1986 Points
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro	1924 Points -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (1821 - 2012, n=6)	1916 Points -4%
Average of class Tablet (185 - 3715, n=70, last 2 years)	1111 Points -44%
Lenovo Tab P12 Paper	964 Points -51%

Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022	1890 Points +31%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+	1566 Points +8%
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro	1477 Points +2%
Honor MagicPad 2	1447 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (1329 - 1498, n=6)	1436 Points -1%
Lenovo Tab P12 Paper	757 Points -48%
Average of class Tablet (140 - 1887, n=71, last 2 years)	707 Points -51%
Multi-Core
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022	8524 Points +91%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+	5198 Points +17%
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro	4548 Points +2%
Honor MagicPad 2	4460 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (3980 - 4746, n=6)	4318 Points -3%
Average of class Tablet (312 - 8624, n=71, last 2 years)	2494 Points -44%
Lenovo Tab P12 Paper	2025 Points -55%

Antutu v10 - Total Score
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro	1516127 Points +6%
Honor MagicPad 2	1432569 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (1142944 - 1553057, n=6)	1414338 Points -1%
Average of class Tablet (164396 - 2716980, n=37, last 2 years)	781418 Points -45%
Lenovo Tab P12 Paper	503958 Points -65%

PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Honor MagicPad 2	17329 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+	17267 Points 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (15547 - 19083, n=6)	17045 Points -2%
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro	16960 Points -2%
Lenovo Tab P12 Paper	12789 Points -26%
Average of class Tablet (3195 - 20841, n=73, last 2 years)	9847 Points -43%

CrossMark - Overall
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022	1584 Points +37%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+	1277 Points +11%
Honor MagicPad 2	1155 Points
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro	1153 Points 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (771 - 1155, n=6)	961 Points -17%
Average of class Tablet (172 - 1944, n=63, last 2 years)	773 Points -33%
Lenovo Tab P12 Paper	656 Points -43%

BaseMark OS II
Overall
Honor MagicPad 2	9147 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+	8886 Points -3%
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro	8483 Points -7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (5685 - 9147, n=6)	7738 Points -15%
Average of class Tablet (444 - 11721, n=59, last 2 years)	4205 Points -54%
Lenovo Tab P12 Paper	3965 Points -57%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022	Points -100%
System
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+	13730 Points +4%
Honor MagicPad 2	13141 Points
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro	12668 Points -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (9875 - 13391, n=6)	12187 Points -7%
Average of class Tablet (1103 - 16435, n=59, last 2 years)	7265 Points -45%
Lenovo Tab P12 Paper	6734 Points -49%
Memory
Honor MagicPad 2	10977 Points
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro	10049 Points -8%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+	8890 Points -19%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (5456 - 10977, n=6)	7838 Points -29%
Lenovo Tab P12 Paper	5328 Points -51%
Average of class Tablet (916 - 10977, n=59, last 2 years)	4862 Points -56%
Graphics
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+	31688 Points +24%
Honor MagicPad 2	25642 Points
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro	23041 Points -10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (8020 - 29006, n=6)	22941 Points -11%
Average of class Tablet (580 - 57192, n=59, last 2 years)	9168 Points -64%
Lenovo Tab P12 Paper	5160 Points -80%
Web
Honor MagicPad 2	1893 Points
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro	1766 Points -7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (1534 - 1893, n=6)	1744 Points -8%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+	1612 Points -15%
Lenovo Tab P12 Paper	1335 Points -29%
Average of class Tablet (10 - 2051, n=59, last 2 years)	1269 Points -33%

AImark - Score v3.x
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+	156427 Points +12607%
Average of class Tablet (84 - 156427, n=50, last 2 years)	7290 Points +492%
Honor MagicPad 2	1231 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (946 - 1321, n=6)	1161 Points -6%
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro	1118 Points -9%
Lenovo Tab P12 Paper	457 Points -63%

UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+	16134 Points +16%
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro	14961 Points +8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (13576 - 15572, n=5)	14536 Points +5%
Honor MagicPad 2	13900 Points
Average of class Tablet (1662 - 74821, n=57, last 2 years)	11323 Points -19%
Lenovo Tab P12 Paper	5266 Points -62%

Geekbench AI
Single Precision TensorFlow NNAPI 1.1
Honor MagicPad 2	1065 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (407 - 1065, n=2)	736 Points -31%
Average of class Tablet (243 - 1243, n=8, last 2 years)	705 Points -34%
Half Precision TensorFlow NNAPI 1.1
Average of class Tablet (227 - 5204, n=8, last 2 years)	1683 Points +72%
Honor MagicPad 2	981 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (399 - 981, n=2)	690 Points -30%
Quantized TensorFlow NNAPI 1.1
Average of class Tablet (508 - 4998, n=8, last 2 years)	2014 Points +19%
Honor MagicPad 2	1693 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (903 - 1693, n=2)	1298 Points -23%

Legend

Honor MagicPad 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Qualcomm Adreno 735, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 Apple M2, Apple M2 10-Core GPU, 128 GB NVMe

Lenovo Tab P12 Paper MediaTek Dimensity 7050, ARM Mali-G68 MP4, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash

Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+ Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Qualcomm Adreno 740, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash

Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Qualcomm Adreno 740, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash

Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3

Average of class Tablet

MagicPad 2 的图形处理性能强劲，这要归功于 Adreno 735图形处理器。这再次使这款平板电脑在图形基准测试中名列前茅，尽管在 CPU 基准测试中并不那么轻松。除了 Apple iPad Pro 12.9和三星Galaxy Tab S9+之外，它还落后于小米 Pad 6S Pro.

不过，GPU 性能还是非常不错的，甚至可以处理图形要求较高的游戏，正如 GFXBench 的阿兹台克废墟测试所模拟的那样。在这里，平板电脑的帧速率总是远远超过 30 FPS（4K 基准除外）。在 GFXBench On Screen 测试中，Honor ，帧速率降至 60 FPS。

3DMark: Wild Life Extreme Unlimited | Wild Life Extreme | Wild Life Unlimited Score | Solar Bay Unlimited Score | Solar Bay Score | Steel Nomad Light Score | Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7: T-Rex Onscreen | 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
GFXBench 3.0: on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
GFXBench 3.1: on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
GFXBench: on screen Car Chase Onscreen | 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | 3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe	6909 Points +115%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+ Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	3684 Points +14%
Honor MagicPad 2 Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	3218 Points
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	3088 Points -4%
Lenovo Tab P12 Paper Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	616 Points -81%

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe	6919 Points +110%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+ Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	3710 Points +12%
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	3421 Points +4%
Honor MagicPad 2 Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	3301 Points
Lenovo Tab P12 Paper Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	623 Points -81%

3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe	25317 Points +95%
Honor MagicPad 2 Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	12985 Points
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	12952 Points 0%
Lenovo Tab P12 Paper Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2236 Points -83%

3DMark / Solar Bay Unlimited Score
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+ Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	5623 Points +3%
Honor MagicPad 2 Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	5458 Points
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	4887 Points -10%

3DMark / Solar Bay Score
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+ Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	5630 Points +3%
Honor MagicPad 2 Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	5468 Points
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	4876 Points -11%

3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Score
Honor MagicPad 2 Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1090 Points
Lenovo Tab P12 Paper Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	237 Points -78%

3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score
Honor MagicPad 2 Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1071 Points
Lenovo Tab P12 Paper Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	235 Points -78%

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Honor MagicPad 2 Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	13954 Points
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	13009 Points -7%
Lenovo Tab P12 Paper Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	4308 Points -69%

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Honor MagicPad 2 Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	21647 Points
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	20808 Points -4%
Lenovo Tab P12 Paper Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	4314 Points -80%

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Honor MagicPad 2 Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	6219 Points
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	5627 Points -10%
Lenovo Tab P12 Paper Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	4289 Points -31%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	144 fps +140%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe	120 fps +100%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+ Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	120 fps +100%
Honor MagicPad 2 Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	60 fps
Lenovo Tab P12 Paper Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	51 fps -15%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe	873 fps +68%
Honor MagicPad 2 Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	520 fps
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+ Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	493 fps -5%
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	397 fps -24%
Lenovo Tab P12 Paper Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	100 fps -81%

GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe	120 fps +100%
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	120 fps +100%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+ Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	119 fps +98%
Honor MagicPad 2 Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	60 fps
Lenovo Tab P12 Paper Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	30 fps -50%

GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe	494 fps +86%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+ Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	321 fps +21%
Honor MagicPad 2 Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	265 fps
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	249 fps -6%
Lenovo Tab P12 Paper Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	65 fps -75%

GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe	115 fps +95%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+ Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	105 fps +78%
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	69 fps +17%
Honor MagicPad 2 Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	59 fps
Lenovo Tab P12 Paper Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	17 fps -71%

GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe	340 fps +70%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+ Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	226 fps +13%
Honor MagicPad 2 Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	200 fps
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	181 fps -9%
Lenovo Tab P12 Paper Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	43 fps -78%

GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe	89 fps +112%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+ Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	64 fps +52%
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	42 fps 0%
Honor MagicPad 2 Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	42 fps
Lenovo Tab P12 Paper Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	10 fps -76%

GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe	214 fps +95%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+ Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	132 fps +20%
Honor MagicPad 2 Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	110 fps
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	106 fps -4%
Lenovo Tab P12 Paper Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	26 fps -76%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe	70 fps +100%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+ Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	51 fps +46%
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	35 fps 0%
Honor MagicPad 2 Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	35 fps
Lenovo Tab P12 Paper Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	6.9 fps -80%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe	90 fps +64%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+ Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	64 fps +16%
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	56 fps +2%
Honor MagicPad 2 Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	55 fps
Lenovo Tab P12 Paper Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	11 fps -80%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe	89 fps +68%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+ Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	78 fps +47%
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	56 fps +6%
Honor MagicPad 2 Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	53 fps
Lenovo Tab P12 Paper Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	12 fps -77%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe	241 fps +67%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+ Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	159 fps +10%
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	146 fps +1%
Honor MagicPad 2 Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	144 fps
Lenovo Tab P12 Paper Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	29 fps -80%

GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe	48 fps +100%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+ Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	29 fps +21%
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	26 fps +8%
Honor MagicPad 2 Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	24 fps
Lenovo Tab P12 Paper Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	4.7 fps -80%

MagicPad 2 在网上冲浪时也同样出色。网站加载和显示速度很快，但在浏览器基准测试中，这款平板电脑只能排在中间位置。

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 (Safari Mobile 16.1)	225.315 Points +68%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+ (Chrome 117)	196.271 Points +46%
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro (Chrome 125.0.6422.52)	176.366 Points +31%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (59.7 - 235, n=6)	154.2 Points +15%
Honor MagicPad 2 (Chrome 128.0.6613.146)	134.356 Points
Average of class Tablet (19.9 - 334, n=70, last 2 years)	111.2 Points -17%
Lenovo Tab P12 Paper (Chrome 126)	108.8 Points -19%

WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 (Safari Mobile 16.1)	227 Points +46%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+ (Chrome 117)	187 Points +21%
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro (Chrome 125.0.6422.52)	167 Points +8%
Honor MagicPad 2 (Chrome 128.0.6613.146)	155 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (61 - 185, n=6)	144.8 Points -7%
Lenovo Tab P12 Paper (Chrome 126)	107 Points -31%
Average of class Tablet (21 - 315, n=69, last 2 years)	106.9 Points -31%

Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 (Safari Mobile 16.1)	376 runs/min +91%
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro (Chrome 125.0.6422.52)	225 runs/min +14%
Honor MagicPad 2 (Chrome 128.0.6613.146)	197 runs/min
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+ (Chrome 117)	195 runs/min -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (65.9 - 247, n=6)	182 runs/min -8%
Average of class Tablet (2.59 - 572, n=64, last 2 years)	121.9 runs/min -38%
Lenovo Tab P12 Paper (Chrome 126)	99.8 runs/min -49%

Speedometer 3.0 - Score
Average of class Tablet (1.25 - 33.7, n=26, last 2 years)	13.1 runs/min +10%
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro (Chrome 125.0.6422.52)	12.2 runs/min +3%
Honor MagicPad 2 (Chrome 128.0.6613.146)	11.9 runs/min
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (3.54 - 13.6, n=6)	9.79 runs/min -18%
Lenovo Tab P12 Paper (Chrome 126)	6.37 runs/min -46%

Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 (Safari Mobile 16.1)	74614 Points +78%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+ (Chrome 117)	64715 Points +54%
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro (Chrome 125.0.6422.52)	64638 Points +54%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (28536 - 66369, n=6)	45299 Points +8%
Honor MagicPad 2 (Chrome 128.0.6613.146)	42032 Points
Lenovo Tab P12 Paper (Chrome 126)	34656 Points -18%
Average of class Tablet (763 - 105178, n=87, last 2 years)	29371 Points -30%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Average of class Tablet (319 - 34733, n=75, last 2 years)	3734 ms * -343%
Lenovo Tab P12 Paper (Chrome 126)	1263.6 ms * -50%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (603 - 1456, n=6)	910 ms * -8%
Honor MagicPad 2 (Chrome 128.0.6613.146)	842.2 ms *
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+ (Chrome 117)	635.1 ms * +25%
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro (Chrome 125.0.6422.52)	602 ms * +29%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 (Safari Mobile 16.1)	450.9 ms * +46%

* ... smaller is better

Honor 没有提供有关平板电脑存储设备的任何信息。从 Androbench 中达到的传输速率来看，可能是 UFS 3.1 存储设备，它可以缩短加载时间并快速启动应用程序。

	Honor MagicPad 2	Lenovo Tab P12 Paper	Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+	Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro	Average 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	Average of class Tablet
AndroBench 3-5		-46%	22%	46%	-20%	-51%
Sequential Read 256KB	2025.54	894.3 -56%	3413.8 69%	3465.72 71%	1742 ?(950 - 2037, n=102) -14%	1045 ?(163 - 3912, n=74, last 2 years) -48%
Sequential Write 256KB	2003.53	722.1 -64%	2528.2 26%	3154.3 57%	1160 ?(452 - 2004, n=102) -42%	686 ?(78.2 - 3154, n=74, last 2 years) -66%
Random Read 4KB	298.27	237.4 -20%	450.3 51%	381.97 28%	286 ?(173.5 - 543, n=102) -4%	189.4 ?(18.4 - 451, n=74, last 2 years) -37%
Random Write 4KB	401.95	225.7 -44%	161.3 -60%	510.95 27%	319 ?(132.1 - 499, n=103) -21%	189.9 ?(8.23 - 555, n=74, last 2 years) -53%

游戏 - 保证游戏流畅

MagicPad 2 上的游戏显示总是很流畅，即使是像《源氏冲击》这样对图形要求很高的游戏，也能以最高细节进行显示。

我们的测试工具Gamebench在《源氏冲击》的整个游戏过程中，我们测得的帧速率始终保持在 60 FPS。理论上，平板电脑可以提供更高的 FPS 率，但这是不允许的。第二款测试游戏《PUBG Mobile》也是如此，它在 MagicPad 2 的最高设置（超高清）下运行流畅，但每秒帧数被限制在 40 帧。

Honor MagicPad 2; Genshin Impact; lowest 120 fps; 5.0.0_26041933_26161852: Ø59.9 (55-61)

Honor MagicPad 2; Genshin Impact; highest 120 fps; 5.0.0_26041933_26161852: Ø59.5 (54-61)

Honor MagicPad 2; PUBG Mobile; Smooth; 3.4.0: Ø60.1 (59-61)

Honor MagicPad 2; PUBG Mobile; Ultra HD; 3.4.0: Ø39.8 (39-41)

排放 - 强大的环绕声

温度

MagicPad 2 在运行时几乎不会发热。在进行了一个小时的 Burnout Benchmark 压力测试后，我们测得平板电脑表面的最高温度仅为 39.4 °C。这意味着，即使在持续负载的情况下，12.3 英寸设备的触感也很舒适。

3DMark 压力测试场景用于评估平板电脑在负载情况下对 SoC 性能的节流程度。即使激活性能模式，MagicPad 2 的性能下降仍然很明显，所有压力测试场景下的平均性能下降幅度仅约为 10%。如果平板电脑使用了手刹，那么在日常使用中你应该不会注意到它。

Max. Load

Idle


37.7 °C	38 °C	31.2 °C
30.7 °C	32.1 °C	29.7 °C
28.3 °C	29.8 °C	30.2 °C

Maximum: 38 °C
Average: 32 °C


32.3 °C	37.1 °C	39.4 °C
30.3 °C	32.7 °C	30.2 °C
28.5 °C	29.4 °C	28.8 °C

Maximum: 39.4 °C
Average: 32.1 °C

Power Supply (max.) 29.7 °C | Room Temperature 20.9 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 32 °C / 90 F, compared to the average of 30 °C / 86 F for the devices in the class Tablet.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 38 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 33.7 °C / 93 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 39.4 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.4 °C / 83 F, compared to the device average of 30 °C / 86 F.

3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

Honor MagicPad 2 Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø64.5 (53.4-72.6)

Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø97.9 (82.8-119)

Lenovo Tab P12 Paper Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø13 (12.9-13)

Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+ Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø68.1 (60.6-78.8)

Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø63.9 (63.3-68.9)

Honor MagicPad 2 Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø18.1 (17.6-19.7)

Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test: Ø29.8 (27.1-41.5)

Lenovo Tab P12 Paper Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø3.74 (3.73-3.75)

Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+ Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø22.2 (20.5-23.4)

Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø18 (17.9-19.5)

Honor MagicPad 2 Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø71.7 (69.5-77.2)

Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability: Ø124.5 (113.6-152.4)

Honor MagicPad 2 Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.5: Ø16.7 (16.4-17.5)

Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+ Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.5: Ø18.3 (18.2-18.3)

Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.5: Ø14 (14-14)

Honor MagicPad 2 Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Solar Bay Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.5: Ø16.7 (16.4-17.5)

Honor MagicPad 2 Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.0.0.15: Ø7.85 (7.73-8.06)

Lenovo Tab P12 Paper Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.0.0.15: Ø1.779 (1.765-1.795)

Honor MagicPad 2 Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 1.0.0.15: Ø7.85 (7.68-8.09)

3DMark
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Lenovo Tab P12 Paper	99.5 (3.73^min - 3.75^max) % +11%
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro	91.3 (17.9^min - 19.5^max) % +2%
Honor MagicPad 2	89.3 (17.6^min - 19.7^max) %
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+	87.4 (20.5^min - 23.4^max) % -2%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022	65.1 (27.1^min - 41.5^max) % -27%
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Lenovo Tab P12 Paper	99.5 (12.9^min - 13^max) % +35%
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro	91.9 (63.3^min - 68.9^max) % +25%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+	76.9 (60.6^min - 78.8^max) % +4%
Honor MagicPad 2	73.6 (53.4^min - 72.6^max) %
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022	69.6 (82.8^min - 119^max) % -5%
Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability
Honor MagicPad 2	90 (69.5^min - 77.2^max) %
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022	74.6 (113.6^min - 152.4^max) % -17%
Solar Bay Stress Test Stability
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+	99.8 (18.2^min - 18.3^max) % +7%
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro	99.8 (14^min - 14^max) % +7%
Honor MagicPad 2	93.7 (16.4^min - 17.5^max) %
Solar Bay Unlimited Stress Test Stability
Honor MagicPad 2	93.5 (16.4^min - 17.5^max) %
Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability
Lenovo Tab P12 Paper	98.3 (1.765^min - 1.795^max) % +3%
Honor MagicPad 2	95.9 (7.73^min - 8.06^max) %
Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Stress Test Stability
Honor MagicPad 2	94.9 (7.68^min - 8.09^max) %

Legend

Honor MagicPad 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Qualcomm Adreno 735, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 Apple M2, Apple M2 10-Core GPU, 128 GB NVMe

Lenovo Tab P12 Paper MediaTek Dimensity 7050, ARM Mali-G68 MP4, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash

Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+ Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Qualcomm Adreno 740, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash

Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Qualcomm Adreno 740, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash

发言人

四个扬声器格栅下面共有八个扬声器。这使得纤薄的 MagicPad 2 能够产生均衡且令人惊讶的音量，包括对平板电脑而言相当不错的低音。用户可以在音频设置中切换立体声和空间音频，后者会让声音显得更加洪亮，有时甚至过于响亮。即使在最大音量下，扬声器也不会使音频失真。

外部音频设备可通过 USB-C 或蓝牙 5.3 连接。MagicPad 2 仅支持有限的蓝牙编解码器：SBC、AAC、LDAC、aptX 和 aptX HD。

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Honor MagicPad 2 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (90.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 9% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 90% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 5% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 94% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 9.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (8.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 2% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 2% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

能源管理 - 充电时间少于 2 小时

能源消耗

MagicPad 2 在负载情况下非常省电，最大耗电量为 11.6 瓦，比同类产品高效得多。这款平板电脑在闲置时也表现出色，但不得不承认输给了三星Galaxy Tab S9+在这种情况下，三星 Tab S9+ 的能效更高。

MagicPad 2 的电池容量为 10,050 毫安时，充电功率高达 100 瓦。Honor 提供给我们的 66 瓦电源适配器可在 1:49 小时内为设备充电。1:24 小时后可充电 80%。

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.07 / 0.23 Watt
Idle	3.6 / 6.52 / 6.54 Watt
Load	10.63 / 11.57 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Honor MagicPad 2 10050 mAh	Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 10702 mAh	Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+ 10090 mAh	Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro 10000 mAh
Power Consumption		-37%	9%	-5%
Idle Minimum *	3.6	2.54 29%	3.4 6%	1.22 66%
Idle Average *	6.52	11.24 -72%	3.6 45%	7.18 -10%
Idle Maximum *	6.54	11.48 -76%	3.9 40%	8.22 -26%
Load Average *	10.63	12.97 -22%	11.7 -10%	13.63 -28%
Load Maximum *	11.57	16.6 -43%	15.8 -37%	14.56 -26%

* ... smaller is better

Energy Consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

Honor MagicPad 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3: Ø7.19 (2.91-11.5)

Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 Apple M2: Ø9.71 (3.73-16.7)

Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+ Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy: Ø8.88 (3.4-15.7)

Energy Consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

Honor MagicPad 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø11.3 (11.2-11.4)

Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 Apple M2; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø16.7 (16.5-16.7)

Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+ Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø14.5 (11.7-15.8)

Honor MagicPad 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø4.05 (3.68-4.28)

Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 Apple M2; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø4.67 (4.29-4.84)

Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+ Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø3.72 (3.61-3.96)

电池寿命

MagicPad 2 的电池续航时间与竞争对手相似。10 小时的上网时间和略高于 14.5 小时的视频时间让Honor 与 iPad Pro 12.9 不相上下。 Apple iPad Pro 12.9.

Battery Runtime

Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)		24h 29min
WiFi Websurfing		10h 06min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		14h 40min
Load (maximum brightness)		3h 52min

	Honor MagicPad 2 10050 mAh	Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 10702 mAh	Lenovo Tab P12 Paper 10200 mAh	Samsung Galaxy Tab S9+ 10090 mAh	Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro 10000 mAh
Battery Runtime		1%	14%	0%	30%
Reader / Idle	1469	1839 25%		996 -32%	2565 75%
H.264	880	816 -7%		693 -21%	773 -12%
WiFi v1.3	606	671 11%	692 14%	584 -4%	959 58%
Load	232	173 -25%		365 57%	224 -3%

Pros

+ 卓越性能

+ 144 Hz 的 OLED 面板

+ 明亮准确的 3K 显示屏

+ 日光下照片效果出色

+ 可使用键盘和触控笔进行扩展

+ 8 个扬声器提供环绕声

+ 良好的电池续航时间，66 瓦充电功率

Cons

- 无 GPS

- 无 IP 等级

- 无蜂窝网络

- 更新时间短

- 无指纹识别器

- 只有一个存储选项

结论 -Honor MagicPad 2

评论 Honor MagicPad 2。测试机由Honor Deutschland 提供。

Honor MagicPad 2 重量轻、机身薄、外观漂亮。但它的内部配置同样诱人，包括 3K 显示屏、强大的 SoC 性能和出色的扬声器。尤其是令人印象深刻的扬声器，使 MagicPad 2 成为电影和音乐爱好者的绝佳选择。

Honor MagicPad 2 拥有 12.3 英寸 OLED 显示屏、IMAX 增强认证和 8 个扬声器，是观看电影和连续剧的最佳选择。如果购买时附带键盘和触控笔，还可以进行几个小时的高效工作。

高分辨率 144-Hz OLED 显示屏和快速的骁龙 8s 第 3 代使 MagicPad 2 成为 iPad Pro 12.9 的理想替代品。 Apple iPad Pro 12.9尤其是它可以与键盘和触控笔结合使用。Honor 的电池续航时间也与Apple 一样出色。两款平板电脑的续航时间几乎完全相同，足以满足一整天的高强度使用。

不过，我们对 MagicPad 2 也有一些不满意的地方。它的外壳不具备防尘防水功能，而且既不支持 GPS 也不支持手机连接。存储容量只有 256 GB，而且更新周期相对较短。用户只能使用 USB 2.0，而且不能输出图像。Honor 也没有加入 NFC 功能。不过，如果你主要是想在自家四面墙壁内使用多媒体和互联网应用程序，那么你可能不会受到这些缺陷的影响。

除了Honor MagicPad 2 之外，还有一款在价格和连接性方面与之相近，而且还可以配备键盘和触控笔的产品：小米 Pad 6S Pro 。或者，如果您愿意花更多的钱，Apple iPad Pro 12.9 或SamsungGalaxy Tab S9+ 会给您带来稍大的平板电脑、更好的摄像头以及图像输出和蜂窝网络。

价格和供应情况

Honor MagicPad 2 在英国有售，售价 500 英镑，请访问 Honor 网站。.该设备目前尚未在美国上市。

请注意：我们更新了评级系统，这意味着第 8 版的结果不能与第 7 版进行比较。了解更多关于此更改的信息这里.

Honor MagicPad 2 - 09/30/2024 v8
Manuel Masiero

Chassis

82 / 98 → 84%

Keyboard

70 / 80 → 88%

Pointing Device

94%

Connectivity

40 / 69 → 58%

Weight

82 / 40-88 → 88%

Battery

88%

Display

90%

Games Performance

39 / 65 → 60%

Application Performance

71 / 92 → 77%

AI Performance

42%

Temperature

92%

Noise

100%

Audio

85 / 91 → 94%

Camera

62 / 90 → 69%

Average

65%

85%

Tablet - Weighted Average

CO2 Emissions
No Data

Materials
25%

Packaging
80%

Power Use
93.6%

Repairability
40%

Software Updates
39%

Total Sustainability Score: 46.3%

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was given to the author by the manufacturer free of charge for the purposes of review. There was no third-party influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Price comparison

Editor of the original article: Katherine Bodner - Translator - 317 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2017

contact me via: LinkedIn

Translator: Ninh Ngoc Duy - Editorial Assistant - 470333 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008

contact me via: Facebook

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > Honor MagicPad 2 平板电脑评测--12.3 英寸、144 赫兹 OLED 价格杀手

Manuel Masiero, 2024-10- 2 (Update: 2024-10- 2)