Notebookcheck Logo
Teaser

小米红米 Pad Pro 5G 平板电脑--外观吸引人、价格实惠的大屏幕平板电脑

巨型显示屏。 如果您选择的平板电脑越大越好,那么小米红米 Pad Pro 5G 可能是一个很有吸引力的选择:它的 12.1 英寸显示屏有足够的空间,而且设备也不会太重,另外,不到 400 美元的价格也不是最高的。在这次评测中,我们对这款配备金属外壳的平板电脑进行了近距离观察。
Florian Schmitt, 👁 Florian Schmitt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
Android ARM Tablet 5G

小米红米 Pad Pro 的尺寸为 12.1 英寸,它不一定是你会一直带在身边的平板电脑(尽管它支持 5G),而是你在家中或办公室的伴侣。

同时,大尺寸平板电脑也很受欢迎,因为它们可以代替电视,以合适的尺寸显示电影和连续剧。由于显示屏相对较大,小米平板电脑还可以作为笔记本电脑的替代品。

小米平板电脑的售价不到 400 美元,并不是最贵的,但仍有很多优点。在这篇评测中,我们将仔细分析小米红米 Pad 5G 能否与更昂贵的平板电脑相媲美。

Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro (Redmi Pad Series)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 8 x 2 - 2.4 GHz, Cortex-A78 / A55
Graphics adapter
Qualcomm Adreno 710
Memory
6 GB 
Display
12.10 inch 16:10, 2560 x 1600 pixel 249 PPI, capacitive touchscreen, IPS, Corning Gorilla 3, glossy: yes, 120 Hz
Storage
128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash, 128 GB 
, 100 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Card Reader: microSD, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Color temperature sensor, Electronic compass, Hall sensor
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.2, 5G (n1/​n3/​n5/​n7/​n8/​n20/​n28/​n38/​n40/​n41/​n66/​n77/​n78), LTE (B1/​B2/​B3/​B4/​B5/​B7/​B8/​B12/​B13/​B17/​B18/​B19/​B20/​B26/​B28/​B38/​B40/​B41/​B66), UMTS (B1/​B2/​B4/​B5/​B6/​B8/​B19), GSM (B2/​B3/​B5/​B8), Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 7.52 x 280 x 181.85
Battery
10000 mAh Lithium-Polymer, 33 Watt fast charging
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 14
Camera
Primary Camera: 8 MPix f/2.0
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix f/2.0
Additional features
USB-C cable, SIM tool, 12 Months Warranty, fanless
Weight
571 g
Price
380 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating
Version
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Price
78.7 %v8
09/2024
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro
SD 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710
571 g7.52 mm12.10"2560x1600
84.8 %v7 (old)
03/2024
Honor Pad 9
SD 6 Gen 1, Adreno 710
555 g6.96 mm12.10"2560x1600
74.8 %v8
06/2024
Lenovo Tab P12 matte display
Dimensity 7050, Mali-G68 MP4
615 g6.9 mm12.70"2944x1840
89.3 %v7 (old)
05/2024
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro
SD 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740
590 g6.26 mm12.40"3048x2032
89.3 %v7 (old)
04/2023
OnePlus Pad
Dimensity 9000, Mali-G710 MP10
552 g6.5 mm11.61"2800x2000

请注意:我们更新了评级系统,第 8 版的结果与第 7 版的结果不可比。更多信息 请点击此处.

外壳 - 金属,内嵌塑料

虽然小米红米 Pad Pro 的金属外壳在同价位产品中并不完全独特,但无论如何,它都给人一种高品质的感觉。

不过,在上部区域插入了一条塑料条,以确保天线有良好的接收效果。你可以感觉到并看到这种材料上的差异,而且这种差异还通过使用略微不同的灰色在视觉上得到了强调。采用完整金属一体成型机身和压印天线的昂贵平板电脑在这方面更有优势,因为它们看起来更像是一体成型的,也更坚固耐用。

说到稳定性,这款平板电脑的尺寸优势就显现出来了,因为你可以很容易地扭转它,而且在扭转或施加压力时,液晶上有时会出现一些明显的痕迹。在日常使用中,小米红米 Pad Pro 给人的感觉是稳定且做工精良,但我们不想让它承受太大的压力。

除了我们的深灰色版本,这款平板电脑还有薄荷绿的颜色,如果没有 5G,还可以选择淡蓝色。两个大的摄像头开口有点误导人;仔细观察,你会发现只安装了一个很小的摄像头传感器,第二个开口只用于闪光灯。与此同时,较大的镜头也与设计相得益彰。

它不具备防水或防尘功能。

尺寸比较

293.4 mm 190.8 mm 6.9 mm 615 g280 mm 181.85 mm 7.52 mm 571 g278.27 mm 180.11 mm 6.96 mm 555 g278.7 mm 191.58 mm 6.26 mm 590 g258 mm 189.4 mm 6.5 mm 552 g297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g

连接性 - 有无 5G

小米红米 Pad Pro 总共有四个版本:你可以买到带或不带 5G 模块的平板电脑,还有两种存储版本。

  • 小米红米 Pad Pro WiFi - 6 GB 内存 / 128 GB 存储空间:约 335 美元
  • 小米红米平板 Pro WiFi - 8 GB 内存 / 256 GB 存储空间:约 390 美元
  • 小米红米Pad Pro 5G - 6 GB内存/128 GB存储空间:约424美元
  • 小米红米Pad Pro 5G - 8 GB内存/256 GB存储空间:约480美元

以上为官方预估价格,但您已经可以在网上以更低的价格购买到这款平板电脑。

喜欢模拟音频连接的用户可以期待一个 3.5 毫米音频插孔。有一个 USB-C 端口可以为设备充电和交换数据,但遗憾的是只能通过 USB 2.0 标准连接。这意味着无法输出图像,数据传输也相对较慢。

例如,您在使用移动支付服务时就不能使用 NFC。5G 版支持使用两张 nano SIM 卡进行双 SIM 卡操作,但不支持 eSIM 卡。

顶部:音量摇杆、麦克风、SIM 卡插槽、麦克风
顶部:音量摇杆、麦克风、SIM 卡插槽、麦克风
底部:无连接
底部:无连接
右:扬声器、3.5 毫米音频接口、USB-C 接口、扬声器
右:扬声器、3.5 毫米音频接口、USB-C 接口、扬声器
左:扬声器、扬声器、待机键
左:扬声器、扬声器、待机键

microSD 读卡器

WiFi 版和 5G 版都配备了 microSD 读卡器,但在红米 Pad Pro 5G 上,你必须放弃一个 SIM 卡插槽才能使用它。

在我们的测试中,microSD 卡的读取速度尚可,但无法达到参考卡的最高速度。

SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash (Angelbird V60)
42.3 MB/s

Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)

0510152025303540455055606570758085Tooltip
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø38.4 (30.1-48.6)
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø78.3 (24.3-88.6)

软件 - HyperOS,更新不多

小米的 HyperOS 基于Android 14,平板电脑上安装的是 1.0.4 版本。最新的安全补丁是 2024 年 8 月发布的,因此在测试时,它们仍然是最新的。

小米公司将在 2027 年 6 月前提供安全补丁,即上市三年后。制造商还没有透露这款平板电脑会有多少大型软件更新,但至少可以保证更新到Android 15,因为红米 Pad Pro 是 "Android 企业推荐 "计划的一部分。

与旧版 MIUI 相比,HyperOS 有不少改进:该操作系统不仅更轻薄、占用存储空间更少,而且据称反应更灵敏、更安全,并对人工智能支持进行了优化。

它的底层结构已经过修改,但视觉上几乎没有任何明显的变化。即使是新用户,操作系统也很容易上手,但那些喜欢深入研究系统的用户就不得不忍受许多警告弹出窗口和强制等待时间。

系统预装了一些第三方应用程序,但可以轻松删除。

可持续性 - 提供的不多

小米这款平板电脑的包装基本不使用塑料,但几乎没有任何关于产品本身可持续发展的信息。例如,没有对生产和使用过程中的二氧化碳消耗量进行分析。

你无法购买任何备件,网上也找不到任何维修手册。前面提到的相对较短的软件支持也不能说明平板电脑的可持续性。

通信和全球导航卫星系统 - 高速 WiFi 和稳定的 5G 连接

在无线局域网方面,你可以使用 WiFi 6 作为平板电脑的最快标准,但它尚未掌握较少使用的 6 GHz 频率。

即便如此,它的接收速度也非常快,几乎达到每秒 1,600 MBit,而发送速度则在每秒 500 MBit 左右。这足以充分发挥千兆线路的优势。另一方面,如果您需要与内部网络中的其他设备通信,那么市场上还有更快的设备。

在靠近路由器的地方,路由器的接收能力可以得到充分发挥,网站加载速度也相当快。如果与路由器的距离为十米,中间有三堵墙,则只能获得大约一半的信号强度,网站的加载时间会更长。

使用我们的 5G 型号,您还可以访问移动网络,并根据需要通过平板电脑拨打电话。大量的 4G 和 5G 频率都可以实现这一功能,因此您也可以在旅行时随身携带红米 Pad Pro 5G,几乎肯定可以在现场访问移动互联网。

在测试期间,我们对其在 4G 和 5G 网络中的接收情况进行了抽查。这款平板电脑有足够的天线空间,确保了良好的接收效果--尽管一些高端手机的信号强度甚至更好。

Networking
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1596 (min: 1524) MBit/s ∼94%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
528 (min: 438) MBit/s ∼31%
Honor Pad 9
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000
349 (min: 171) MBit/s ∼21%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
366 (min: 184) MBit/s ∼21%
Lenovo Tab P12 matte display
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000
673 (min: 516) MBit/s ∼40%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
873 (min: 734) MBit/s ∼51%
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000
778 (min: 542) MBit/s ∼46%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
953 (min: 870) MBit/s ∼56%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1620 (min: 1070) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1437 (min: 1239) MBit/s ∼100%
OnePlus Pad
Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1696 (min: 1635) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1710 (min: 1696) MBit/s ∼100%
08517025534042551059568076585093510201105119012751360144515301615Tooltip
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1596 (1524-1625)
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø528 (438-633)
外部 GPS 测试
外部 GPS 测试
可用的卫星网络
可用的卫星网络

此外,您还可以在小米红米 Pad Pro 的 5G 机型上使用卫星定位服务。而 WLAN 机型则无法使用这些服务。

如果你带着平板电脑走出户外,它能以 3 米的精度快速定位。它支持主要的卫星网络,但不支持精度更高的 SBAS。

当然,为了评估红米平板电脑在日常使用中的定位能力,我们带着它进行了自行车旅行。

它给我们留下了相当不错的印象,尽管平板电脑上记录的一些偏僻路段并不是非常准确。总之,它准确地记录了我们的路线,没有出现任何重大错误,所以你完全可以用平板电脑来完成导航任务。即便如此,市场上还是有更精确的移动产品可用于此目的。

小米红米 Pad Pro 定位服务 - 概述
小米红米 Pad Pro 定位服务 - 概述
小米红米 Pad Pro 定位服务--转折点
小米红米 Pad Pro 定位服务--转折点
小米红米 Pad Pro 定位服务 - 桥接
小米红米 Pad Pro 定位服务 - 桥接
Garmin Venu 2 定位服务 - 概述
Garmin Venu 2 定位服务 - 概述
Garmin Venu 2 定位服务 - 转折点
Garmin Venu 2 定位服务 - 转折点
Garmin Venu 2 定位服务 - 桥接
Garmin Venu 2 定位服务 - 桥接

摄像头 - 与平板电脑一样,更多是应急解决方案

使用前置摄像头拍摄的照片
使用前置摄像头拍摄的照片

如前所述,平板电脑背面只有一个摄像头,尽管看起来好像有两个。它的分辨率相对较低,只有 800 万像素,拍出的照片根本无法与智能手机相比:明亮的区域很快就会曝光过度,细节往往看起来模糊不清。在恶劣的天气条件下,照片很快就会出现颗粒感,而在反差较大的弱光环境下,自动对焦功能也会达到极限。

对于快照、记录过程或拍摄收据来说,这款相机已经足够了,但摄影爱好者肯定不会满意。

视频最高可录制 1080p 和 30 fps,但质量充其量也只能算一般。

正面配备了与背面相同的 800 万像素传感器,用于自拍,但角度明显更大。这意味着你不必把平板电脑拿得太远就能自拍或拍摄多人肖像。

乍一看,自拍效果相当不错,但由于采用了广角镜头,图像中心以外的部分会有明显的畸变,清晰度也有待提高。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Main camera plantMain camera surroundingsMain camera low light

在我们的实验室中,在设定的照明条件下,主摄像头显示出模糊的轮廓和苍白的色彩。在仅有 1 勒克斯的照明条件下,照片中的任何东西都无法辨认。

ColorChecker
13.7 ∆E
11.8 ∆E
16.1 ∆E
16 ∆E
14.3 ∆E
9.4 ∆E
9.3 ∆E
14.9 ∆E
11.1 ∆E
9.7 ∆E
9.3 ∆E
6.3 ∆E
12.2 ∆E
12 ∆E
12.9 ∆E
3.9 ∆E
12.3 ∆E
14 ∆E
7 ∆E
7.2 ∆E
10.6 ∆E
12.1 ∆E
7.7 ∆E
5 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro: 10.78 ∆E min: 3.87 - max: 16.08 ∆E

配件和保修 - 不含充电器

小米红米 Pad Pro 5G 不附带充电器,只有充电线和 SIM 卡工具。如果直接从制造商处订购,还将获赠一个键盘保护套。

这款平板电脑兼容主动式红米智能笔,支持 4096 级压力。主动式触控笔有两个按钮,可同时执行多种功能,例如直接更换笔刷。

小米为其设备提供 12 个月的保修服务。

输入设备和操作 - 支持面部识别

触摸屏的触摸扫描频率高达每秒 240 次,不过只有使用有源手写笔时才能达到最高采样率。即便如此,120 Hz 的显示屏仍是一个可靠且反应灵敏的触摸屏。

除了音量摇杆和待机键外,机身上没有其他实体按键。它们工作可靠,但在硕大的机身上并不容易找到。

虽然没有指纹传感器,但可以使用前置摄像头进行面部识别。一般来说,面部识别效果不错,而且大屏幕的亮度也足以在黑暗中进行识别。

不过,如果没有额外的红外线传感器,识别只能在 2D 模式下进行。因此,与更复杂的方法相比,这种安全措施更容易被操纵,而且并不是所有的应用程序都允许用面部确认身份来代替密码。

直立式键盘
直立式键盘
水平键盘
水平键盘

显示屏 - 像素丰富的大显示屏

子像素阵列
子像素阵列

IPS 屏幕直径为 12.1 英寸,分辨率为 2,560 x 1,600 像素,这样的尺寸足以确保清晰地显示内容。与此同时,竞争对手如 OnePlus Pad联想平板电脑 P12的像素更高。

屏幕由大猩猩 3 号玻璃保护,因此足够耐用,适合日常使用。

在亮度方面,该显示屏与同类设备大致相当:我们在全白屏幕上测得的平均亮度为 480 cd/m²,不过在显示较小区域的白色时,亮度可能会更高一些。不过,要在 HDR 视频中显示耀眼的白色,亮度还远远不够。

476
cd/m²
495
cd/m²
442
cd/m²
484
cd/m²
513
cd/m²
472
cd/m²
475
cd/m²
494
cd/m²
470
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 513 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 480.1 cd/m² Minimum: 2.13 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 86 %
Center on Battery: 513 cd/m²
Contrast: 1283:1 (Black: 0.4 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.82 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.94
ΔE Greyscale 2.9 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
94% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.265
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro
IPS, 2560x1600, 12.1"
Honor Pad 9
IPS LCD, 2560x1600, 12.1"
Lenovo Tab P12 matte display
LTPS, 2944x1840, 12.7"
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro
IPS, 3048x2032, 12.4"
OnePlus Pad
IPS, 2800x2000, 11.6"
Screen
10%
-21%
22%
8%
Brightness middle
513
613
19%
148
-71%
867
69%
474
-8%
Brightness
480
570
19%
139
-71%
810
69%
447
-7%
Brightness Distribution
86
87
1%
90
5%
87
1%
89
3%
Black Level *
0.4
0.4
-0%
0.3
25%
0.58
-45%
0.32
20%
Contrast
1283
1533
19%
493
-62%
1495
17%
1481
15%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
2.82
2.7
4%
3.59
-27%
2
29%
3.16
-12%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
8.83
5.1
42%
5.52
37%
5.5
38%
5.37
39%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
2.9
3.7
-28%
3
-3%
3
-3%
2.5
14%
Gamma
2.265 97%
2.3 96%
2.243 98%
2.29 96%
2.09 105%
CCT
7189 90%
6763 96%
7115 91%
6957 93%
7112 91%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17212 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

如果选择 "标准 "色彩配置文件,就能获得良好的色彩再现效果,只有轻微可见的偏蓝。我们使用分光光度计测定的 CalMAN 软件的测量结果显示了这一点。

蓝色色调一般偏差稍大,与参考色也有明显的差异。总体而言,可以肯定显示屏上的色彩与实际相符。

即使在低亮度下,我们也没有测到 PWM 闪烁。另一方面,它的响应时间相对较长,这可能会让游戏玩家感到特别烦恼。

卡尔曼灰度(标准色彩配置文件)
卡尔曼灰度(标准色彩配置文件)
CalMAN 色彩精度(色彩配置文件标准)
CalMAN 色彩精度(色彩配置文件标准)
CalMAN sRGB 色彩空间(色彩配置文件标准)
CalMAN sRGB 色彩空间(色彩配置文件标准)
CalMAN AdobeRGB 色彩空间(色彩配置文件标准)
CalMAN AdobeRGB 色彩空间(色彩配置文件标准)
CalMAN DCI P3 色彩空间(色彩配置文件标准)
CalMAN DCI P3 色彩空间(色彩配置文件标准)
CalMAN 饱和度(色彩配置文件标准)
CalMAN 饱和度(色彩配置文件标准)

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
14.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 9.3 ms rise
↘ 5.3 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 32 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.1 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
25 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 13.8 ms rise
↘ 11.2 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 31 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.1 ms).

这款平板电脑还可以在户外使用。不过,在光线很强的日子里,显示屏上会出现强烈的反光,导致阅读困难。

尽管从侧面看显示屏的亮度会稍有下降,但从各个方向看都有很好的可视角度。

室外使用
室外使用
视角
视角

性能 - 快速中档

平板电脑的 高通骁龙 7s 第二代处理器是一款非常适合其价格档次的 SoC。这款中端处理器在绝大多数情况下都能流畅运行,只有在执行要求更高的任务时才会接近极限。

这使小米红米 Pad Pro 与大多数同类设备不相上下,只有价格明显更高的 小米平板 6S ProOnePlus Pad表现更好。

Geekbench 6.2
Multi-Core
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro
5176 Points +98%
Average of class Tablet (493 - 14690, n=63, last 2 years)
3362 Points +29%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 (2616 - 2955, n=5)
2800 Points +7%
Honor Pad 9
2773 Points +6%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro
2616 Points
Lenovo Tab P12 matte display
2408 Points -8%
Single-Core
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro
1924 Points +91%
Average of class Tablet (185 - 3715, n=63, last 2 years)
1055 Points +5%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro
1007 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 (922 - 1029, n=5)
983 Points -2%
Lenovo Tab P12 matte display
964 Points -4%
Honor Pad 9
944 Points -6%
Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro
1477 Points +91%
OnePlus Pad
1279 Points +65%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 (774 - 800, n=5)
787 Points +2%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro
774 Points
Lenovo Tab P12 matte display
757 Points -2%
Honor Pad 9
725 Points -6%
Average of class Tablet (140 - 1892, n=73, last 2 years)
714 Points -8%
Multi-Core
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro
4548 Points +66%
OnePlus Pad
3998 Points +46%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 (2678 - 2888, n=5)
2794 Points +2%
Honor Pad 9
2763 Points +1%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro
2744 Points
Average of class Tablet (312 - 8624, n=73, last 2 years)
2518 Points -8%
Lenovo Tab P12 matte display
2025 Points -26%
Antutu v10 - Total Score
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro
1516127 Points +148%
Average of class Tablet (164396 - 2716980, n=33, last 2 years)
730478 Points +19%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro
612145 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 (566071 - 665728, n=4)
603747 Points -1%
Lenovo Tab P12 matte display
503958 Points -18%
Honor Pad 9
490448 Points -20%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro
16960 Points +32%
OnePlus Pad
15951 Points +25%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro
12802 Points
Lenovo Tab P12 matte display
12789 Points 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 (9593 - 15308, n=5)
12713 Points -1%
Honor Pad 9
11693 Points -9%
Average of class Tablet (3195 - 20841, n=70, last 2 years)
9441 Points -26%
CrossMark - Overall
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro
1153 Points +54%
OnePlus Pad
1114 Points +49%
Average of class Tablet (172 - 1944, n=63, last 2 years)
773 Points +3%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro
747 Points
Honor Pad 9
689 Points -8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 (614 - 747, n=3)
683 Points -9%
Lenovo Tab P12 matte display
656 Points -12%
BaseMark OS II
Overall
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro
8483 Points +104%
OnePlus Pad
7453 Points +80%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 (4140 - 5056, n=4)
4528 Points +9%
Honor Pad 9
4233 Points +2%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro
4151 Points
Lenovo Tab P12 matte display
3965 Points -4%
Average of class Tablet (444 - 9147, n=57, last 2 years)
3806 Points -8%
System
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro
12668 Points +36%
OnePlus Pad
10635 Points +14%
Honor Pad 9
10083 Points +8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 (7571 - 11239, n=4)
9636 Points +3%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro
9324 Points
Average of class Tablet (1103 - 14097, n=57, last 2 years)
6772 Points -27%
Lenovo Tab P12 matte display
6734 Points -28%
Memory
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro
10049 Points +212%
OnePlus Pad
6873 Points +113%
Lenovo Tab P12 matte display
5328 Points +65%
Honor Pad 9
4837 Points +50%
Average of class Tablet (916 - 10977, n=57, last 2 years)
4494 Points +39%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 (3222 - 4595, n=4)
4093 Points +27%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro
3222 Points
Graphics
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro
23041 Points +399%
OnePlus Pad
22155 Points +379%
Average of class Tablet (580 - 31738, n=57, last 2 years)
7149 Points +55%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 (4622 - 7249, n=4)
6535 Points +41%
Honor Pad 9
5783 Points +25%
Lenovo Tab P12 matte display
5160 Points +12%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro
4622 Points
Web
OnePlus Pad
1906 Points +47%
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro
1766 Points +36%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 (1297 - 1905, n=4)
1489 Points +15%
Lenovo Tab P12 matte display
1335 Points +3%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro
1297 Points
Average of class Tablet (10 - 1907, n=57, last 2 years)
1230 Points -5%
Honor Pad 9
1192 Points -8%
AImark - Score v3.x
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro
38990 Points
OnePlus Pad
27367 Points -30%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 (691 - 38990, n=4)
10283 Points -74%
Average of class Tablet (84 - 156427, n=48, last 2 years)
5273 Points -86%
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro
1118 Points -97%
Honor Pad 9
644 Points -98%
Lenovo Tab P12 matte display
457 Points -99%
UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
OnePlus Pad
29879 Points +314%
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro
14961 Points +107%
Average of class Tablet (1662 - 44323, n=55, last 2 years)
8868 Points +23%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 (7223 - 9206, n=3)
8349 Points +16%
Honor Pad 9
7236 Points 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro
7223 Points
Lenovo Tab P12 matte display
5266 Points -27%

Legend

 
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Qualcomm Adreno 710, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
 
Honor Pad 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1, Qualcomm Adreno 710, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
 
Lenovo Tab P12 matte display MediaTek Dimensity 7050, ARM Mali-G68 MP4, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
 
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Qualcomm Adreno 740, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
 
OnePlus Pad MediaTek Dimensity 9000, ARM Mali-G710 MP10,

在图形基准测试中,平板电脑也大多处于中场位置。即便如此,以显示屏的原始分辨率进行游戏时,大部分情况下也只能以非常生涩的方式进行,而平板电脑通常能以全高清分辨率实现稳定播放。

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3088 Points +296%
OnePlus Pad
Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000
2310 Points +197%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
779 Points
Lenovo Tab P12 matte display
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
616 Points -21%
Honor Pad 9
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
611 Points -22%
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3421 Points +334%
OnePlus Pad
Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000
2377 Points +201%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
789 Points
Lenovo Tab P12 matte display
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
623 Points -21%
Honor Pad 9
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
618 Points -22%
3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
12952 Points +332%
OnePlus Pad
Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000
8497 Points +183%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2998 Points
Honor Pad 9
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2402 Points -20%
Lenovo Tab P12 matte display
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2236 Points -25%
3DMark / Wild Life Score
OnePlus Pad
Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000
7933 Points +169%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2954 Points
Honor Pad 9
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2367 Points -20%
Lenovo Tab P12 matte display
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2148 Points -27%
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
Points -100%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
13009 Points +166%
OnePlus Pad
Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000
9689 Points +98%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
4894 Points
Lenovo Tab P12 matte display
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
4308 Points -12%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
20808 Points +284%
OnePlus Pad
Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000
12658 Points +134%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
5420 Points
Lenovo Tab P12 matte display
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
4314 Points -20%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
5627 Points +54%
OnePlus Pad
Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000
5321 Points +46%
Lenovo Tab P12 matte display
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
4289 Points +17%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3652 Points
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
144 fps +82%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
79 fps
OnePlus Pad
Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000
60 fps -24%
Honor Pad 9
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
59 fps -25%
Lenovo Tab P12 matte display
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
51 fps -35%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
397 fps +225%
OnePlus Pad
Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000
246 fps +102%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
122 fps
Honor Pad 9
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
105 fps -14%
Lenovo Tab P12 matte display
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
100 fps -18%
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps +186%
OnePlus Pad
Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000
60 fps +43%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
42 fps
Honor Pad 9
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
35 fps -17%
Lenovo Tab P12 matte display
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
30 fps -29%
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
249 fps +246%
OnePlus Pad
Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000
177 fps +146%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
72 fps
Lenovo Tab P12 matte display
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
65 fps -10%
Honor Pad 9
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
62 fps -14%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
69 fps +138%
OnePlus Pad
Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000
51 fps +76%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
29 fps
Honor Pad 9
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
24 fps -17%
Lenovo Tab P12 matte display
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
17 fps -41%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
181 fps +242%
OnePlus Pad
Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000
128 fps +142%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
53 fps
Honor Pad 9
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
46 fps -13%
Lenovo Tab P12 matte display
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
43 fps -19%
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
42 fps +180%
OnePlus Pad
Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000
32 fps +113%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
15 fps
Honor Pad 9
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
11 fps -27%
Lenovo Tab P12 matte display
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
10 fps -33%
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
106 fps +266%
OnePlus Pad
Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000
73 fps +152%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
29 fps
Lenovo Tab P12 matte display
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
26 fps -10%
Honor Pad 9
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
23 fps -21%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
35 fps +218%
OnePlus Pad
Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000
26 fps +136%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
11 fps
Honor Pad 9
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
9.4 fps -15%
Lenovo Tab P12 matte display
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
6.9 fps -37%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
56 fps +331%
OnePlus Pad
Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000
37 fps +185%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
13 fps
Honor Pad 9
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
11.2 fps -14%
Lenovo Tab P12 matte display
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
11 fps -15%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
56 fps +211%
OnePlus Pad
Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000
36 fps +100%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
18 fps
Honor Pad 9
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
15 fps -17%
Lenovo Tab P12 matte display
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
12 fps -33%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
146 fps +329%
OnePlus Pad
Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000
93 fps +174%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
34 fps
Honor Pad 9
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
31 fps -9%
Lenovo Tab P12 matte display
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
29 fps -15%
GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
26 fps +341%
OnePlus Pad
Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000
17 fps +188%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
5.9 fps
Honor Pad 9
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4.8 fps -19%
Lenovo Tab P12 matte display
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
4.7 fps -20%

在小米红米 Pad Pro 5G 上可以浏览网页:即使是大型网站,加载速度也相当快,而且可以流畅地滚动。只有偶尔需要等待图片加载或 cookie 免责声明,这会耽误上网体验。

有一些平板电脑可以让你更流畅地上网,但就其价格范围而言,红米平板电脑确实做得很好。

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro (Chrome 125.0.6422.52)
176.366 Points +51%
OnePlus Pad (Chrome 112)
148.115 Points +27%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro (Chrome 128)
116.621 Points
Lenovo Tab P12 matte display (Chrome 126)
108.8 Points -7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 (82.1 - 118.2, n=4)
108.5 Points -7%
Average of class Tablet (19.9 - 334, n=70, last 2 years)
108.4 Points -7%
Honor Pad 9 (Chrome 122)
88.235 Points -24%
WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro (Chrome 125.0.6422.52)
167 Points +49%
OnePlus Pad (Chrome 112)
158 Points +41%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro (Chrome 128)
112 Points
Lenovo Tab P12 matte display (Chrome 126)
107 Points -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 (91 - 115, n=4)
106 Points -5%
Average of class Tablet (21 - 315, n=68, last 2 years)
104.1 Points -7%
Honor Pad 9 (Chrome 122)
95 Points -15%
Speedometer 3.0 - Score
Average of class Tablet (1.25 - 33.7, n=20, last 2 years)
12.9 runs/min +92%
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro (Chrome 125.0.6422.52)
12.2 runs/min +82%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro (Chrome 128)
6.72 runs/min
Lenovo Tab P12 matte display (Chrome 126)
6.37 runs/min -5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 (5.28 - 6.72, n=3)
6.18 runs/min -8%
Honor Pad 9 (Chrome 122)
4.74 runs/min -29%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro (Chrome 125.0.6422.52)
64638 Points +85%
OnePlus Pad (Chrome 112)
50429 Points +44%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro (Chrome 128)
34923 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 (31340 - 36202, n=5)
34792 Points 0%
Lenovo Tab P12 matte display (Chrome 126)
34656 Points -1%
Honor Pad 9 (Chrome 122)
32436 Points -7%
Average of class Tablet (763 - 105178, n=86, last 2 years)
28261 Points -19%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Average of class Tablet (319 - 34733, n=75, last 2 years)
3801 ms * -230%
Honor Pad 9 (Chrome 122)
1321.1 ms * -15%
Lenovo Tab P12 matte display (Chrome 126)
1263.6 ms * -10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 (1091 - 1478, n=4)
1223 ms * -6%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro (Chrome 128)
1151.6 ms *
OnePlus Pad (Chrome 112)
797.7 ms * +31%
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro (Chrome 125.0.6422.52)
602 ms * +48%

* ... smaller is better

小米的存储系统采用 UFS 2.2,因此不再仅仅是紧随昂贵的设备之后:事实证明,在顺序读写时,小米手机的存储速度明显慢于许多其他平板电脑。在较小的文件和随机读写时,差异没有那么大,但仍然很明显。

Xiaomi Redmi Pad ProHonor Pad 9Lenovo Tab P12 matte displayXiaomi Pad 6S ProOnePlus PadAverage 128 GB UFS 2.2 FlashAverage of class Tablet
AndroBench 3-5
59%
4%
214%
98%
-18%
-12%
Sequential Read 256KB
844.9
1921.34
127%
894.3
6%
3465.72
310%
1866.48
121%
Sequential Write 256KB
705.3
1222.83
73%
722.1
2%
3154.3
347%
1616.83
129%
Random Read 4KB
215.5
256.06
19%
237.4
10%
381.97
77%
341.39
58%
190.5 ?(89.3 - 297, n=70)
-12%
Random Write 4KB
231.4
266.17
15%
225.7
-2%
510.95
121%
420.93
82%
183.9 ?(62.6 - 419, n=70)
-21%

游戏--60 赫兹游戏频率的红米平板电脑

在小米红米 Pad Pro 5G 上玩游戏非常棒,因为它的显示屏很大,但显示屏上的控制按钮有时很难触及。连接的游戏手柄在这方面会有所帮助。

当选择低细节时,游戏也能以 60 fps 的速度显示,正如我们使用GameBench软件进行的测量显示。具体来说,我们通过《PUBG Mobile》实现了这一目标,即使在超高清模式下也能达到 40 帧/秒。另一方面,《暗黑破坏神 永生不朽》将该设备的帧速率限制在 30 帧/秒,我们也能稳定地达到这一水平。

总的来说,红米平板电脑是一款不错的游戏设备,但如果你想追逐每一帧画面,那就得考虑更高的价格区间了。

暗黑破坏神不朽
暗黑破坏神不朽
PUBG Mobile
PUBG Mobile
051015202530354045505560Tooltip
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro; PUBG Mobile; Smooth: Ø59.3 (56-60)
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro; PUBG Mobile; Ultra HD: Ø39.7 (37-41)
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro; Diablo Immortal; Medium Mobile Low: Ø30 (28-31)
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro; Diablo Immortal; Ultra Mobile Very High: Ø29.8 (27-31)

排放 - 负载情况下几乎不加热

温度

在我们的测试过程中,小米红米 Pad Pro 5G 外壳的温度变化仍然非常适中:在长时间负载后,我们测得最高温度为 38.6 °C。这一点很明显,但绝无问题。

因此,它能长时间保持性能也就不足为奇了:在 3DMark 压力测试中,在频繁重复基准测试后,性能损失最小。

Max. Load
 36.4 °C38.5 °C31.2 °C 
 34.3 °C33.4 °C31.2 °C 
 33.3 °C32.3 °C31.4 °C 
Maximum: 38.5 °C
Average: 33.6 °C
31.5 °C38.6 °C36.4 °C
31 °C33.9 °C34.4 °C
30.7 °C33 °C32.9 °C
Maximum: 38.6 °C
Average: 33.6 °C
Power Supply (max.)  42.6 °C | Room Temperature 22 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 33.6 °C / 92 F, compared to the average of 30 °C / 86 F for the devices in the class Tablet.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 38.5 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 33.7 °C / 93 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 38.6 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 30 °C / 86 F.

3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

05101520253035404550556065Tooltip
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø17.7 (17.7-17.7)
Honor Pad 9 Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø14.1 (14.1-14.1)
Lenovo Tab P12 matte display Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø13 (12.9-13)
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø63.9 (63.3-68.9)
OnePlus Pad Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø41.2 (35.1-48.8)
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø4.69 (4.65-4.7)
Honor Pad 9 Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø3.65 (3.65-3.66)
Lenovo Tab P12 matte display Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø3.74 (3.73-3.75)
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø18 (17.9-19.5)
OnePlus Pad Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø12.5 (12-14.1)
Honor Pad 9 Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø14.3 (14.2-14.3)
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.5: Ø14 (14-14)
Lenovo Tab P12 matte display Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.0.0.15: Ø1.779 (1.765-1.795)
3DMark
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Honor Pad 9
99.5 (3.65min - 3.66max) % 0%
Lenovo Tab P12 matte display
99.5 (3.73min - 3.75max) % 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro
99.1 (4.65min - 4.7max) %
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro
91.3 (17.9min - 19.5max) % -8%
OnePlus Pad
84.8 (12min - 14.1max) % -14%
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Honor Pad 9
99.7 (14.1min - 14.1max) % 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro
99.6 (17.7min - 17.7max) %
Lenovo Tab P12 matte display
99.5 (12.9min - 13max) % 0%
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro
91.9 (63.3min - 68.9max) % -8%
OnePlus Pad
72 (35.1min - 48.8max) % -28%
Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability
Honor Pad 9
99.3 (14.2min - 14.3max) %
Solar Bay Stress Test Stability
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro
99.8 (14min - 14max) %
Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability
Lenovo Tab P12 matte display
98.3 (1.765min - 1.795max) %

Legend

 
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Qualcomm Adreno 710, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
 
Honor Pad 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1, Qualcomm Adreno 710, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
 
Lenovo Tab P12 matte display MediaTek Dimensity 7050, ARM Mali-G68 MP4, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
 
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Qualcomm Adreno 740, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
 
OnePlus Pad MediaTek Dimensity 9000, ARM Mali-G710 MP10,
正面
正面
返回
返回

发言人

红米 Pad Pro 配备了四个扬声器,音质不错,对于中等大小的房间来说声音足够大,而且能清晰地再现音乐和声音。不过,市场上肯定有质量更高的扬声器,即使是这个价位的产品也不例外。例如 OnePlus Pad,它的扬声器能提供更多的中低音和低音,使声音更加洪亮。

您还可以通过 3.5 毫米音频接口或蓝牙连接外部音频设备。它支持 AAC、SBC、aptX、aptX HD 和 aptX Adaptive 等所有必要的蓝牙音频编解码器,但某些耳机不支持高保真音频。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2034.838.42534.737.93124.629.64026.528.3502934.2633127.58017.525.110016.931.11251836.416021.239.920021.645.62502253.931523.557.640016.456.950017.562.763017.565.480016.372.1100015.376.1125012.876.1160011.271.8200011.265.6250011.867.4315012.264.4400012.766.8500013.167.7630013.660.8800014.558.11000015.263.41250015.966.21600016.754.4SPL26.882N0.948.8median 15.9median 63.4Delta36.827.222.125.321.224.319.119.223.121.72627.329.725.339.633.45125.75824.362.427.967.520.969.717.970.217.970.214.973.914.573.5147812.979.11278.412.175.712.473.512.271.612.669.913.574.812.768.212.872.812.675.612.566.912.16611.464.126.486.60.975median 12.9median 71.63.64hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseXiaomi Redmi Pad ProOnePlus Pad
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 19.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.9% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 50% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 42% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 46% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 47% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

OnePlus Pad audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 8.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.6% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 1% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 2% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电源管理 - 充电功率高达 33 瓦

耗电量

平板电脑并不过分耗电,而且非常节俭,尤其是在低负载情况下。不过,一旦需要更多电量,就需要相当高的能量:我们测得高负载时的功率高达 13.9 瓦。

平板电脑的充电功率最高可达 33 瓦,但平板电脑并未随附合适的充电器。如果电池之前已完全耗尽,则需要 2 小时才能再次显示 100%。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.1 / 0.2 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 1.7 / 2.2 / 2.9 Watt
Load midlight 5.8 / 13.9 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro
10000 mAh
Honor Pad 9
8300 mAh
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro
10000 mAh
OnePlus Pad
9510 mAh
Power Consumption
-109%
-104%
-103%
Idle Minimum *
1.7
1.5
12%
1.22
28%
3.64
-114%
Idle Average *
2.2
8.39
-281%
7.18
-226%
6.84
-211%
Idle Maximum *
2.9
8.46
-192%
8.22
-183%
7.15
-147%
Load Average *
5.8
11.65
-101%
13.63
-135%
8.98
-55%
Load Maximum *
13.9
11.67
16%
14.56
-5%
11.9
14%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

01234567891011121314Tooltip
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro: Ø9.65 (5.85-14.8)

Power consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

0123456Tooltip
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø6.57 (6.35-6.93)
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø2.55 (2.4-3.43)

运行时间

你可以用红米 Pad Pro 5G 上网 15:24 小时,直到你再次需要电源插座。与同价位的平板电脑相比,这是一个不错的值。你还可以用存储空间观看更长时间的电影,17:32 小时的时长甚至足够观看一两部连续剧。

在负载不足 4 小时的情况下,例如玩游戏时,灯会熄灭。

总而言之,小米红米 Pad 5G 应该能让你很好地度过日常生活,尤其是这款平板电脑因其尺寸而不适合经常旅行,更有可能在电源插座附近使用。

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
37h 16min
WiFi Websurfing
15h 24min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
17h 32min
Load (maximum brightness)
4h 05min
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro
10000 mAh
Honor Pad 9
8300 mAh
Lenovo Tab P12 matte display
10200 mAh
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro
10000 mAh
OnePlus Pad
9510 mAh
Battery Runtime
-28%
-25%
-4%
-13%
Reader / Idle
2236
2565
15%
1345
-40%
H.264
1052
773
-27%
963
-8%
WiFi v1.3
924
661
-28%
692
-25%
959
4%
648
-30%
Load
245
224
-9%
310
27%

Pros

+ 金属外壳
+ 高速无线局域网
+ 可选 5G 和双 SIM 卡
+ 精确的定位服务(5G 机型)
+ microSD 读卡器
+ 兼容输入笔
+ 良好的运行时间
+ 负载情况下发热量不大
+ 系统流畅

Cons

- 更新承诺短
- 几乎无法自行维护
- 无防尘防水功能
- 摄像头质量不佳
- 外壳可轻微扭曲

结论 - 质优价廉

小米红米 Pad Pro 5G 评测。
小米红米 Pad Pro 5G 评测。

小米红米 Pad Pro 5G 的售价约为 335 美元至 480 美元,性能良好,运行时间尚可,最重要的是屏幕非常大。这款平板电脑兼容有源输入笔,还可选配 5G 模块,实现移动互联网接入和卫星定位服务。

快速的无线局域网、光滑的金属外壳和低温负载也是这款设备的优势所在。您可以通过内置的 microSD 读卡器扩展其内部存储空间,5G 机型甚至支持双 SIM 卡操作。

尽管如此,我们还是发现了一些值得批评的地方:首当其冲的是,它的更新交付时间相当短,而且制造商在打造更具可持续性的产品方面做得很差。例如,你无法购买任何替换零件,也没有任何维修说明。

此外,它的外壳有点过于弯曲,而且没有防尘防水功能。它的摄像头更像是一种应急解决方案,并不能拍摄出真正出色的照片。平板电脑的连接功能也存在缺陷,速度相对较慢的 USB 2.0 端口不支持图像输出,也没有 NFC 功能,而这两项功能都可以极大地扩展平板电脑的潜在用途。

即便如此,考虑到它相对较低的价格,尤其是如果你主要在家里使用这款平板电脑,你应该可以很好地接受这些不足。

如果你正在寻找一款在家使用的大尺寸平板电脑,那么小米红米 Pad Pro 5G 是一款物美价廉的设备。

另一款速度更快、价格相近的产品是 OnePlus Pad.如果您愿意花更多的钱,那么 小米 Pad 6S Pro是一款质量更高的平板电脑,屏幕更大,支持有线图像输出,摄像头也很不错。

价格和供应情况

在撰写本文时,您可以从亚马逊以229.50 美元的价格购买 Wi-Fi 版红米 Pad Pro。

请注意:我们更新了评级系统,第 8 版的结果与第 7 版的结果不可比。更多信息 请点击此处.

Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro - 09/24/2024 v8
Florian Schmitt

Chassis
81 / 98 → 83%
Keyboard
73 / 80 → 91%
Pointing Device
92%
Connectivity
39 / 69 → 57%
Weight
82 / 40-88 → 88%
Battery
90%
Display
79%
Games Performance
12 / 65 → 19%
Application Performance
60 / 92 → 65%
AI Performance
40%
Temperature
92%
Noise
100%
Audio
76 / 91 → 84%
Camera
50 / 90 → 55%
Average
59%
79%
Tablet - Weighted Average
CO2 Emissions
No Data
Materials
5%
Packaging
90%
Power Use
94.6%
Repairability
0%
Software Updates
38.3%
Total Sustainability Score: 38%

Transparency

The present review sample was made available to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or a shop for the purposes of review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review.

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 小米红米 Pad Pro 5G 平板电脑--外观吸引人、价格实惠的大屏幕平板电脑
Florian Schmitt, 2024-09-28 (Update: 2024-09-28)