Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core Ultra 7 256V

Intel Core Ultra 7 256V

酷睿至尊 7 256V是 Lunar Lake 系列的中高端处理器。这是一款用于笔记本电脑和平板电脑的 SoC，采用了 4 个新的 E 核和 4 个新的 P 核，主频从 2.2 GHz 到 4.8 GHz 不等。 Arc 140ViGPU 和 16GB 内置 LPDDR5x-8533 内存。此外，还包括一个新的 47 TOPS 神经引擎、雷电 4 和 PCIe 5 固态硬盘支持。

该芯片与 超 7 258V的唯一区别是封装内存的数量：分别为 16 GB 和 32 GB。

架构和功能

Lunar Lake 采用 Foveros 技术（将多个芯片堆叠在一起，彼此相邻），就像 Meteor Lake 一样。这些新芯片使用了巨大的 BGA2833 插座接口；Lion Cove P 核心取代了 Redwood 核心，而 Crestwood E 核心则被 Skymont 所取代，据说后者非常省电，使得 Meteor Lake 多出的 2 个低功耗岛 CPU 核心完全多余。在这 8 个内核中，没有一个支持超线程技术，这与 AMD 目前的 Zen 5/5c 芯片正好相反。

英特尔声称，Lion Cove 内核的 IPC 性能提高了 14%。而 Skymont 则提高了 68%。此外，英特尔还在其他方面进行了改进，例如低延迟架构（Low Latency Fabric），它可以大大加快内核/缓存之间的小数据传输。在其他方面，256V 拥有 4 条 PCIe 5 和 4 条 PCIe 4 通道，可连接各种设备，包括速度高达 15.75 GB/s 的 NVMe SSD。默认板载支持 Thunderbolt 4，支持英特尔的 CNVi WiFi 7 + BT 5.4 卡。47 TOPS AI Boost 神经引擎以及威胁检测等技术的加入，使 Windows Defender 等支持 AI 的应用更加强大。

这款第 2 代酷睿 Ultra 处理器配备了 16 GB 包装内不可更换的 LPDDR5x-8533 内存。

性能

该芯片的高效内核运行频率高达 3.7 GHz。P 核心的主频则高达 4.8GHz。

如果我们的首次内部测试显示出任何迹象，256V 的性能与较早的 U 级 AMD 和英特尔芯片（如 Ryzen 7 6800U和 酷睿 i7-1355U在多线程性能方面。就 2024 年第四季度而言，这是一个可以使用但并不出色的结果。

图形性能

显卡 Arc Graphics 140V已取代 8 核 ArciGPU。它的 8 个 Xe² 架构内核运行频率高达 1,950 MHz，还拥有 8 个光线追踪单元。适配器支持 DirectX 12 Ultimate，能够对 h.266 VVC、h.265 HEVC、h.264 AVC、AV1 和 VP9 等一系列流行视频编解码器进行硬件解码。该 iGPU 可同时使用三台 SUHD 4320p 显示器。

其实际性能仅略高于 Radeon 780M在低图形设置下以 1080p 处理任何 2024 游戏的帧速率时，其实际性能仅略高于 Radeon 780M。

功耗

大多数 Lunar Lake 处理器的长期功耗目标应该是 17 W。与此同时，英特尔建议该芯片的短期 PL 值为 37 W。

CodenameLunar Lake
SeriesIntel Lunar Lake

Series: Lunar Lake Lunar Lake

Intel Core Ultra 9 288V3.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 7 268V2.2 - 5 GHz8 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 7 266V2.2 - 5 GHz8 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 7 258V2.2 - 4.8 GHz8 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 7 256V « 2.2 - 4.8 GHz8 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 238V2.1 - 4.7 GHz8 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 236V2.1 - 4.7 GHz8 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 228V2.1 - 4.5 GHz8 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 226V2.1 - 4.5 GHz8 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Clock Rate2200 - 4800 MHz
Level 1 Cache1.4 MB
Level 2 Cache14 MB
Level 3 Cache12 MB
Number of Cores / Threads8 / 8
4 x 4.8 GHz Intel Lion Cove P-core
4 x 3.7 GHz Intel Skymont E-core
Power Consumption (TDP = Thermal Design Power)17 Watt
TDP Turbo PL237 Watt
Manufacturing Technology3 nm
Max. Temperature100 °C
SocketBGA2833
FeaturesLPDDR5x-8533 RAM, PCIe 5 + PCIe 4, USB 4, AI Boost NPU (47 TOPS), Thread Director, PSE, Threat Detection, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX-VNNi, FMA3, SHA
GPUIntel Arc Graphics 140V ( - 1950 MHz)
64 Bit64 Bit support
Architecturex86
Announcement Date09/03/2024
Product Link (external)ark.intel.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU
38.5 pt (64%)
AMD E1-2100
2.31 -94%
...
Intel Core 5 220H
37.7 -2%
Intel Core i9-13905H
37.7 -2%
Intel Core i7-1365U
37.7 -2%
AMD Ryzen 5 8640HS
37.8 -2%
Intel Core i5-13450HX
37.8 -2%
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
37.9 -2%
AMD Ryzen 7 8840U
38.1 -1%
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U
38.2 -1%
Intel Core Ultra 7 258V
38.4 0%
Intel Core Ultra 7 256V
38.5
Intel Core i5-13500HX
38.6 0%
AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS
38.6 0%
AMD Ryzen 5 8645HS
38.6 0%
Intel Core i7-12800H
38.7 1%
Intel Core i7-13620H
38.7 1%
AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360
38.8 1%
Intel Core i7-12850HX
38.9 1%
AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS
38.9 1%
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
38.9 1%
...
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
50.1 30%
max:
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX
60.1 56%
0%
100%
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
min: 117.4     avg: 118.5     median: 118 (66%)     max: 120 Points
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
min: 435     avg: 549     median: 582 (11%)     max: 630 Points
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 8589     avg: 10070     median: 10460.5 (10%)     max: 10768 Points
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1875     avg: 1890     median: 1890.5 (80%)     max: 1902 Points
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 720     avg: 726     median: 727 (81%)     max: 730 Points
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 4038     avg: 4102     median: 4106 (10%)     max: 4162 Points
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 1570     avg: 1599     median: 1598.5 (10%)     max: 1627 Points
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
AMD A4-1200
31 -98%
...
Intel Core i5-1250P
1528 -4%
Intel Core i5-1240P
1547 -3%
Intel Core i7-10875H
1554 -3%
Intel Core Ultra 7 155U
1559 -3%
AMD Ryzen 5 5600H
1562 -2%
Intel Core Ultra 5 125U
1583 -1%
Intel Core Ultra 7 165U
1590 -1%
AMD Ryzen 5 8540U
1594 0%
Intel Core Ultra 7 258V
1598 0%
Intel Core Ultra 7 256V
1599
AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS
1607 1%
Intel Core Ultra 7 268V
1609 1%
Intel Core i7-10870H
1614 1%
Intel Core i7-1260P
1625 2%
AMD Ryzen 7 5800U
1628 2%
Intel Core Ultra 5 135U
1634 2%
Intel Core i9-9980HK
1656 4%
AMD Ryzen 5 6600HS
1656 4%
AMD Ryzen 7 4980U
1658 4%
...
AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX
6089 281%
max:
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX
15842 891%
0%
100%
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
08517025534042551059568076585093510201105119012751360144515301615Tooltip
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 285     avg: 285.5     median: 285.5 (80%)     max: 286 Points
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
min: 35535     avg: 35821     median: 35950 (21%)     max: 35978 MIPS
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 5616     avg: 5697     median: 5727 (68%)     max: 5749 MIPS
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 13     avg: 13.2     median: 13.1 (23%)     max: 13.5 fps
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
05101520Tooltip
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 533     avg: 549     median: 534 (7%)     max: 580 Seconds
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 324     avg: 330.7     median: 329 (2%)     max: 339 Seconds
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.4578     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (10%)     max: 0.4645 sec
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 14943     avg: 15126     median: 15079 (38%)     max: 15356 Points
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 13840     avg: 14107     median: 13988 (35%)     max: 14493 Points
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 14488     avg: 19994     median: 21614.5 (39%)     max: 22257 Points
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 4853     avg: 6273     median: 6586.5 (28%)     max: 7066 Points
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Single-Core
min: 2680     avg: 2748     median: 2763 (69%)     max: 2784 points
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Multi-Core
min: 9852     avg: 10701     median: 10962 (43%)     max: 11026 points
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1972     avg: 1994     median: 2000 (78%)     max: 2010 points
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 9302     avg: 9427     median: 9361 (17%)     max: 9618 points
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 472     avg: 475.3     median: 474 (1%)     max: 480 ms
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 281.6     avg: 283.9     median: 284 (78%)     max: 286 Points
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 243     avg: 286.3     median: 306 (55%)     max: 310 Points
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 1636     avg: 1678     median: 1663 (62%)     max: 1736 Points
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 42.2     avg: 47.3     median: 46.1 (8%)     max: 53.6 Watt
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
051015202530354045505560Tooltip
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 50.9     avg: 54     median: 54 (10%)     max: 57.1 Watt
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
051015202530354045505560Tooltip
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 1.596     avg: 2.6     median: 2.6 (2%)     max: 3.63 Watt
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
00.20.50.711.21.51.722.22.42.72.93.23.43.73.94.14.44.6Tooltip
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 1.954     avg: 4.2     median: 5.1 (6%)     max: 5.48 Watt
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
01234567891011Tooltip
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
30.8 Points per Watt (23%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

v1.29
log 12. 11:50:11

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 10 Apr 2025 05:30:34 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0.014s ... 0.015s

#5 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.015s

#6 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.015s

#7 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.016s

#8 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.016s

#9 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.016s

#10 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.016s

#11 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.017s

#12 composed specs +0.001s ... 0.017s

#13 did output specs +0s ... 0.017s

#14 getting avg benchmarks for device 17996 +0.016s ... 0.034s

#15 got single benchmarks 17996 +0.015s ... 0.048s

#16 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.048s

#17 min, max, avg, median took s +0.559s ... 0.607s

#18 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.607s

#19 return log +0s ... 0.607s

Reviews for the Intel Core Ultra 7 256V processor

轻便省电，20 小时续航 - LG Gram Pro 16 笔记本电脑评测

轻便省电，20 小时续航 - LG Gram Pro 16 笔记本电脑评测

作为一款搭载强劲酷睿 Ultra 7 处理器的 "长跑者"，LG Gram Pro 16 是旅行中的强力伴侣。不过，这款笔记本电脑在家庭娱乐中的出色音质和画面同样令人印象深刻。...
Intel Core Ultra 7 256V | Intel Arc Graphics 140V | 16.00" | 1.2 kg
戴尔 XPS 13 9350 笔记本电脑评测：英特尔 "月亮湖 "完美契合

戴尔 XPS 13 9350 笔记本电脑评测：英特尔 "月亮湖 "完美契合

与 XPS 13 9340 相比，新的英特尔 CPU 提供了更稳定的处理器性能，同时电池续航时间和图形处理能力也有了大幅提升。这些变化有助于使 XPS 13 成为 MacBook Air 13 系列更好的竞争者。...
Intel Core Ultra 7 256V | Intel Arc Graphics 140V | 13.40" | 1.2 kg
英特尔酷睿 Ultra 7 256V 性能首次亮相：联想 Yoga Slim 7 15 Aura 笔记本电脑评测

英特尔酷睿 Ultra 7 256V 性能首次亮相：联想 Yoga Slim 7 15 Aura 笔记本电脑评测

既然 Lunar Lake 可以提供与之相当的电池续航时间，骁龙精英系列的吸引力就大打折扣了。不过，要想获得最佳的游戏性能，我们仍然推荐使用 Zen 5。...
Intel Core Ultra 7 256V | Intel Arc Graphics 140V | 15.30" | 1.5 kg

Samsung Galaxy Book5 360: Intel Arc Graphics 140V, 15.60", 1.5 kg
  External Review » Samsung Galaxy Book5 360

Asus VivoBook 14 Flip TP3407SA: Intel Arc Graphics 140V, 14.00", 1.6 kg
  External Review » Asus VivoBook 14 Flip TP3407SA

Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-51, Ultra 7 256V: Intel Arc Graphics 140V, 16.00", 1.5 kg
  External Review » Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-51, Ultra 7 256V

Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro NP960: Intel Arc Graphics 140V, 16.00", 1.6 kg
  External Review » Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro NP960

Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA, Ultra 7 256V: Intel Arc Graphics 140V, 14.00", 1.3 kg
  External Review » Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA, Ultra 7 256V

Dell XPS 13 9350: Intel Arc Graphics 140V, 13.40", 1.2 kg
  External Review » Dell XPS 13 9350

Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360: Intel Arc Graphics 140V, 16.00", 1.7 kg
  External Review » Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360

Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 Aura: Intel Arc Graphics 140V, 15.30", 1.5 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 Aura

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo

»移动处理器 对比
所有移动处理器的对比


»移动处理器 基准测试
所有已有笔记本电脑中使用的处理器的基准测试成绩 (桌面处理器或移动处理器)

Other CPUs of the series Lunar Lake

» Intel Core Ultra 9 288V
   8x 3.3 GHz - 5.1 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra 7 268V
   8x 2.2 GHz - 5 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra 7 266V
   8x 2.2 GHz - 5 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra 7 258V
   8x 2.2 GHz - 4.8 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra 7 256V
   8x 2.2 GHz - 4.8 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra 5 238V
   8x 2.1 GHz - 4.7 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra 5 236V
   8x 2.1 GHz - 4.7 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra 5 228V
   8x 2.1 GHz - 4.5 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra 5 226V
   8x 2.1 GHz - 4.5 GHz

Surrounding CPUs

+ AMD Ryzen AI 5 340
   6x 2 GHz - 4.8 GHz
+ AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340
   6x 2 GHz - 4.8 GHz
+ AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS
   6x 4.3 GHz - 5 GHz
+ AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS
   6x 4.3 GHz - 5 GHz
+ Intel Core Ultra 7 258V
   8x 2.2 GHz - 4.8 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra 7 256V
   8x 2.2 GHz - 4.8 GHz
- AMD Ryzen 7 250
   8x 3.3 GHz - 5.1 GHz
- AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 250
   8x 3.3 GHz - 5.1 GHz
- AMD Ryzen 7 8840U
   8x 3.3 GHz - 5.1 GHz
- AMD Ryzen 7 8840U
   8x 3.3 GHz - 5.1 GHz
- AMD Ryzen Z2
   8x 3.3 GHz - 5.1 GHz
Klaus Hinum (Update: 2024-10-31)