Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core Ultra 7 258V

Intel Core Ultra 7 258V

酷睿至尊 7 258V是一款中高端 Lunar Lake 系列处理器。这是一款用于笔记本电脑和平板电脑的 SoC，采用了 4 个新的 E 核和 4 个新的 P 核，主频从 2.2 GHz 到 4.8 GHz 不等。 Arc 140ViGPU 和 32 GB 内置 LPDDR5x-8533 内存。此外，还包括一个新的 47 TOPS 神经引擎、雷电 4 和 PCIe 5 固态硬盘支持。

该芯片与 超 7 256V的唯一区别是封装内存的数量：分别为 32 GB 和 16 GB。

架构和功能

Lunar Lake 采用 Foveros 技术（将多个芯片堆叠在一起，彼此相邻），就像 Meteor Lake 一样。这些新芯片使用了巨大的 BGA2833 插座接口；Lion Cove P 核心取代了 Redwood 核心，而 Crestwood E 核心被弃用，转而使用 Skymont 核心，据说后者非常省电，使得 Meteor Lake 多出的 2 个低功耗岛 CPU 核心完全多余。在这 8 个内核中，没有一个支持超线程技术，这与 AMD 目前在其 Zen 5/5c 芯片.

英特尔声称，Lion Cove 内核的 IPC 性能提高了 14%。而 Skymont 则提高了 68%。此外，英特尔还在其他方面进行了改进，例如低延迟架构（Low Latency Fabric），它可以大大加快内核/缓存之间的小数据传输。在其他方面，258V 拥有 4 条 PCIe 5 和 4 条 PCIe 4 通道，可连接各种设备，包括速度高达 15.75 GB/s 的 NVMe SSD。默认板载支持 Thunderbolt 4，支持英特尔的 CNVi WiFi 7 + BT 5.4 卡。47 TOPS AI Boost 神经引擎以及威胁检测等技术的加入，使 Windows Defender 等支持 AI 的应用更加强大。

这款第 2 代酷睿 Ultra 处理器配备 32 GB 包装内不可更换的 LPDDR5x-8533 内存。

性能

该芯片的高效内核运行频率高达 3.7 GHz。P 核心的主频则高达 4.8GHz。

如果我们 2024 年 9 月的初步评测显示，258V 的速度与 AMD 和英特尔的老式 U 级芯片（如 Ryzen 7 6800U和 酷睿 i7-1355U在多线程性能方面不相上下。它还能超越 256V略胜一筹。截至 2024 年第 4 季度，这一结果尚可，但并不出色。

图形性能

显卡 弧形图形 140V取代了 Arc 8iGPU。它拥有 8 个 Xe² 架构内核，运行频率高达 1,950 MHz，同时还有 8 个光线追踪单元。它支持 DirectX 12 Ultimate，能够对 h.266 VVC、h.265 HEVC、h.264 AVC、AV1 和 VP9 等众多流行视频编解码器进行硬件解码。该 iGPU 可同时使用三台 SUHD 4320p 显示器。

其实际性能比 Radeon 780M在低图形设置的 1080p 下，在任何 2024 游戏中的可播放帧率仅略高于 Radeon 780M。

功耗

大多数 Lunar Lake 处理器的长期功耗目标是 17 W，258V 也是如此。与此同时，英特尔建议该芯片的短期 PL 值为 37 W。

SeriesIntel Lunar Lake
CodenameLunar Lake

Series: Lunar Lake Lunar Lake

Intel Core Ultra 9 288V3.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 7 268V2.2 - 5 GHz8 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 7 266V2.2 - 5 GHz8 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 7 258V « 2.2 - 4.8 GHz8 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 7 256V2.2 - 4.8 GHz8 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 238V2.1 - 4.7 GHz8 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 236V2.1 - 4.7 GHz8 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 228V2.1 - 4.5 GHz8 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 226V2.1 - 4.5 GHz8 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Clock Rate2200 - 4800 MHz
Level 3 Cache12 MB
Number of Cores / Threads8 / 8
4 x 4.8 GHz Intel Lion Cove P-core
4 x 3.7 GHz Intel Skymont E-core
Power Consumption (TDP = Thermal Design Power)17 Watt
TDP Turbo PL237 Watt
Manufacturing Technology3 nm
Max. Temperature100 °C
SocketBGA2833
FeaturesLPDDR5x-8533 RAM, PCIe 5 + PCIe 4, USB 4, AI Boost NPU (47 TOPS), Thread Director, PSE, Threat Detection, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AS, AVX, AVX2, AVX-VNNi, FMA3, SHA
GPUIntel Arc Graphics 140V (1950 MHz)
64 Bit64 Bit support
Architecturex86
Announcement Date09/03/2024
Product Link (external)ark.intel.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU
37.4 pt (62%)
AMD E1-2100
2.35 -94%
...
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H
36.7 -2%
Intel Core i9-11900H
36.7 -2%
Intel Core i9-11950H
36.7 -2%
Intel Core i5-12500H
36.8 -2%
Intel Core i7-1355U
36.9 -1%
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS
36.9 -1%
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
37 -1%
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS
37 -1%
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
37.2 -1%
Intel Core Ultra 7 258V
37.4
Intel Core 5 120U
37.5 0%
Intel Core i7-12650H
37.5 0%
Intel Core i5-13500H
37.9 1%
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
37.9 1%
Intel Core Ultra 7 165H
38 2%
Intel Core i7-1360P
38 2%
AMD Ryzen 7 8840U
38.1 2%
Intel Core i9-13905H
38.1 2%
Intel Core i5-13450HX
38.1 2%
...
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D
47.9 28%
max:
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX
60.6 62%
0%
100%
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
120 Points (69%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
min: 406     avg: 517     median: 512 (10%)     max: 602 Points
+ 7 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 9114     avg: 10082     median: 10081.5 (9%)     max: 11049 Points
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1773     avg: 1819     median: 1819 (77%)     max: 1865 Points
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 643     avg: 664     median: 663.5 (74%)     max: 684 Points
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 3530     avg: 3902     median: 3901.5 (10%)     max: 4273 Points
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 1550     avg: 1593     median: 1592.5 (10%)     max: 1635 Points
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
AMD A4-1200
31 -98%
...
Intel Core Ultra 7 155U
1505 -6%
Intel Core 7 150U
1506 -5%
Intel Core i9-9880H
1506 -5%
Intel Xeon W-10885M
1509 -5%
Intel Core i5-1250P
1528 -4%
Intel Core i5-1240P
1547 -3%
Intel Core i7-10875H
1554 -2%
AMD Ryzen 5 5600H
1562 -2%
Intel Core Ultra 5 125U
1568 -2%
Intel Core Ultra 7 258V
1593
AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS
1607 1%
Intel Core i7-10870H
1614 1%
Intel Core i7-1260P
1625 2%
AMD Ryzen 7 5800U
1628 2%
Intel Core Ultra 5 135U
1634 3%
Intel Core Ultra 7 165U
1636 3%
Intel Core i9-9980HK
1656 4%
AMD Ryzen 5 6600HS
1656 4%
AMD Ryzen 7 4980U
1658 4%
...
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D
5600 252%
max:
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX
15842 894%
0%
100%
08517025534042551059568076585093510201105119012751360144515301615Tooltip
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 258     avg: 270     median: 270 (78%)     max: 282 Points
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
19.7 Points (26%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
3.4 Points (83%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
9982 points (60%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
36479 points (26%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
wPrime 1.55 - wPrime 1.55 1024m *
296.1 s (1%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
wPrime 1.55 - wPrime 1.55 32m *
9.2 s (5%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
8536 points (14%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
min: 32198     avg: 34255     median: 34254.5 (20%)     max: 36311 MIPS
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 5551     avg: 5670     median: 5670 (68%)     max: 5789 MIPS
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 10.5     avg: 11.8     median: 11.8 (21%)     max: 13.1 fps
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
012345678910111213141516171819Tooltip
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
1.2 GB/s (36%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
1.4 GB/s (24%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
7.6 GB/s (20%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 565     avg: 633     median: 632.5 (8%)     max: 700 Seconds
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 333     avg: 373.5     median: 373.5 (3%)     max: 414 Seconds
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.4515     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (10%)     max: 0.4593 sec
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
10693 Points (23%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
8.1 s (2%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
17.8 s (1%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
418.4 s (2%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
40813 Points (36%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 13464     avg: 14298     median: 14298 (39%)     max: 15132 Points
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
12378 Points (31%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
18279 Points (33%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
5439 Points (23%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core
min: 2679     avg: 2718     median: 2718 (72%)     max: 2757 points
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core
min: 10730     avg: 10836     median: 10836 (43%)     max: 10942 points
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1956     avg: 1973     median: 1972.5 (78%)     max: 1989 points
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 9330     avg: 9540     median: 9540 (17%)     max: 9750 points
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 516     avg: 538     median: 537.5 (1%)     max: 559 ms
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
102225 Points (90%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 251     avg: 257.5     median: 257.5 (74%)     max: 264 Points
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 260     avg: 269.5     median: 269.5 (56%)     max: 279 Points
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 1654     avg: 1662     median: 1662 (64%)     max: 1670 Points
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
33.3 Watt (6%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
05101520253035404550Tooltip
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
53 Watt (10%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
05101520253035404550Tooltip
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
3.4 Watt (2%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
00.20.40.60.811.21.41.61.822.22.42.62.833.23.43.63.8Tooltip
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
5.7 Watt (6%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
0123456Tooltip
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
29.2 Points per Watt (22%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

v1.28
log 15. 13:03:30

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 13 Oct 2024 05:33:27 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0.029s ... 0.03s

#5 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.03s

#6 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.031s

#7 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.031s

#8 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.031s

#9 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.032s

#10 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.032s

#11 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.033s

#12 composed specs +0.001s ... 0.034s

#13 did output specs +0s ... 0.034s

#14 getting avg benchmarks for device 17995 +0.019s ... 0.053s

#15 got single benchmarks 17995 +0.014s ... 0.067s

#16 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.067s

#17 min, max, avg, median took s +0.841s ... 0.909s

#18 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.909s

#19 return log +0s ... 0.909s

Reviews for the Intel Core Ultra 7 258V processor

英特尔 Lunar Lake iGPU 分析 - Arc Graphics 140V 比 Radeon 890M 更快更高效

英特尔 Lunar Lake iGPU 分析 - Arc Graphics 140V 比 Radeon 890M 更快更高效

英特尔 Lunar Lake 处理器配备了采用第二代 Xe 核心的新型集成图形适配器。我们评估了配备 8 个 Xe 内核的新型 Arc Graphics 140V 的性能和效率。 ...
Intel Core Ultra 7 258V | Intel Arc Graphics 140V |
英特尔 Lunar Lake iGPU 分析 - Arc Graphics 140V 比 Radeon 890M 更快更高效

英特尔 Lunar Lake iGPU 分析 - Arc Graphics 140V 比 Radeon 890M 更快更高效

英特尔 Lunar Lake 处理器配备了采用第二代 Xe 核心的新型集成图形适配器。我们评估了配备 8 个 Xe 内核的新型 Arc Graphics 140V 的性能和效率。 ...
Intel Core Ultra 7 258V | Intel Arc Graphics 140V | 14.00" | 1.2 kg
华硕 Zenbook S 14 UX5406 笔记本电脑评测--配备英特尔 Lunar Lake 处理器的优秀日常笔记本电脑

华硕 Zenbook S 14 UX5406 笔记本电脑评测--配备英特尔 Lunar Lake 处理器的优秀日常笔记本电脑

华硕推出了首款采用英特尔最新 Lunar Lake 处理器的笔记本电脑，即 Zenbook S 14。它配备了 14 英寸 OLED 屏幕、32 GB 内存、铝涂层和目前市场上最快的 iGPU。...
Intel Core Ultra 7 258V | Intel Arc Graphics 140V | 14.00" | 1.2 kg
英特尔月亮湖处理器分析--酷睿至尊 7 258V 的多核性能令人失望，但日常效率不错

英特尔月亮湖处理器分析--酷睿至尊 7 258V 的多核性能令人失望，但日常效率不错

在发布了骁龙 X Elite 芯片和 AMD Zen 5 CPU 之后，英特尔终于推出了全新的 Lunar Lake 移动处理器。这些全新的芯片注重效率，而且英特尔首次取消了超线程技术。但新机型的效率究竟如何，是否牺牲了太多性能？...
Intel Core Ultra 7 258V | Intel Arc Graphics 140V |
英特尔月亮湖处理器分析--酷睿至尊 7 258V 的多核性能令人失望，但日常效率不错

英特尔月亮湖处理器分析--酷睿至尊 7 258V 的多核性能令人失望，但日常效率不错

在发布了骁龙 X Elite 芯片和 AMD Zen 5 CPU 之后，英特尔终于推出了全新的 Lunar Lake 移动处理器。这些全新的芯片注重效率，而且英特尔首次取消了超线程技术。但新机型的效率究竟如何，是否牺牲了太多性能？...
Intel Core Ultra 7 258V | Intel Arc Graphics 140V | 14.00" | 1.2 kg

Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406: Intel Arc Graphics 140V, 14.00", 1.2 kg
   » Linux 在英特尔 Lunar Lake 处理器上击败 Windows 11，性能提升高达 20%，但也存在一些严重的问题

Please share our article, every link counts!

»移动处理器 对比
所有移动处理器的对比


»移动处理器 基准测试
所有已有笔记本电脑中使用的处理器的基准测试成绩 (桌面处理器或移动处理器)

Other CPUs of the series Lunar Lake

» Intel Core Ultra 9 288V
   8x 3.3 GHz - 5.1 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra 7 268V
   8x 2.2 GHz - 5 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra 7 266V
   8x 2.2 GHz - 5 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra 7 258V
   8x 2.2 GHz - 4.8 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra 7 256V
   8x 2.2 GHz - 4.8 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra 5 238V
   8x 2.1 GHz - 4.7 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra 5 236V
   8x 2.1 GHz - 4.7 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra 5 228V
   8x 2.1 GHz - 4.5 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra 5 226V
   8x 2.1 GHz - 4.5 GHz

Surrounding CPUs

+ Intel Core i7-1270P
   12x 1.6 GHz - 4.8 GHz
+ Intel Core Ultra 7 266V
   8x 2.2 GHz - 5 GHz
+ Intel Core i7-1260P
   12x 1.5 GHz - 4.7 GHz
+ AMD Ryzen 7 7730U
   8x 2 GHz - 4.5 GHz
+ AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U
   8x 2 GHz - 4.5 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra 7 258V
   8x 2.2 GHz - 4.8 GHz
- Intel Core Ultra 7 256V
   8x 2.2 GHz - 4.8 GHz
- AMD Ryzen 7 5825U
   8x 2 GHz - 4.5 GHz
- AMD Ryzen 7 5825C
   8x 2 GHz - 4.5 GHz
- AMD Ryzen 5 5600H
   6x 3.3 GHz - 4.2 GHz
- AMD Ryzen 7 5800U
   8x 1.9 GHz - 4.4 GHz
> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > FAQ / 小提示/ 技术参数 > 移动处理器 —— 基准测试成绩列表 > Intel Lunar Lake Core Ultra 7 258V 笔记本处理器
Klaus Hinum (Update: 2024-10-13)