戴尔Latitude 9430二合一敞篷车回顾。英特尔第12代的升级
在去年推出了全面刷新该系列的 Latitude 9420二合一，今年的Latitude 9430 2-in-1是该系列相对较小的一个进步。最新机型采用了英特尔第12代Alder Lake-U CPU，取代了Latitude 9420二合一上的第11代Tiger Lake-U选项。还有一些其他的升级，我们将在评论中进行介绍，但机箱设计保持不变，因此我们对Latitude 9420 2-in-1的大部分现有评论也适用于Latitude 9430 2-in-1。
我们的测试装置采用酷睿i7-1265U CPU，16GB焊接内存，QHD+ 1600p触摸屏，以及512GB NVMe固态硬盘，可以在网上找到，价格约为2700美元。酷睿i5-1245U SKU也是可用的，但QHD+面板是固定的，用于二合一的形式因素。这一领域的竞争者包括其他14英寸以办公为中心的笔记本电脑，如联想ThinkPad X1 Yoga G7, 惠普EliteBook 840系列,MSI Summit E14 Flip, LG的格拉姆14T90P, 或 华为MateBook 14.
更多戴尔评论。
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 89.8 % v7 (old) | 08 / 2022 | Dell Latitude 9430 2-in-1 i7-1265U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1.5 kg | 13.94 mm | 14.00" | 2560x1600 | |
| 89 % v7 (old) | 09 / 2021 | Dell Latitude 9420 2-in-1 i7-1185G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1.5 kg | 13.94 mm | 14.00" | 2560x1600 | |
| 86.1 % v7 (old) | 07 / 2022 | MSI Summit E14 Flip Evo A12MT i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1.6 kg | 17.9 mm | 14.00" | 2880x1800 | |
| 87.5 % v7 (old) | 05 / 2022 | LG Gram 14T90P i5-1135G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs | 1.2 kg | 17 mm | 14.00" | 1900x1200 | |
| 89.4 % v7 (old) | 05 / 2022 | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga G7 21CE002HGE i7-1270P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1.5 kg | 15.53 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1200 | |
| 86.5 % v7 (old) | 05 / 2022 | Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UN5401QA-KN085W R7 5800H, Vega 8 | 1.4 kg | 15.9 mm | 14.00" | 2880x1800 |
案例
戴尔似乎放弃了Latitude 9420二合一的浅灰色，而在Latitude 9430二合一上采用深色调。除了独特的新颜色之外，没有其他重大的视觉变化。
即使在上市一年后，该设计仍然是14英寸尺寸类别中最小和最薄的一个。然而，它并不轻，因为该机型一般都有更多的功能，包括可选的5G连接。
连接性
与Latitude 9420 2合1相比，端口选项没有变化。如果能看到USB-A 3.2 Gen.2端口而不是Gen.1端口就更好了，但无论如何，没有多少设备能利用Gen.2的速度。
SD卡阅读器
MicroSD读卡器的传输速度是副笔记本上最快的一些。当与华硕ZenBook Flip 14例如，当使用UHS-II卡时，戴尔的文件传输速度大约是2倍。
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Dell Latitude 9430 2-in-1 (AV Pro UHS-II V60) | |
| Dell Latitude 9420 2-in-1 (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
| Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UN5401QA-KN085W (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60) | |
| LG Gram 14T90P (AV Pro V60) | |
| MSI Summit E14 Flip Evo A12MT (AV Pro V60) | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| Dell Latitude 9420 2-in-1 (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
| Dell Latitude 9430 2-in-1 (AV Pro UHS-II V60) | |
| Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UN5401QA-KN085W (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60) | |
| LG Gram 14T90P (AV Pro V60) | |
| MSI Summit E14 Flip Evo A12MT (AV Pro V60) | |
沟通
5G现在是该系列的一个选项。然而，该功能必须在购买前进行配置，因为否则不包括天线，以阻止用户安装自己的4G或5G模块。
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UN5401QA-KN085W | |
| Dell Latitude 9420 2-in-1 | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UN5401QA-KN085W | |
| Dell Latitude 9420 2-in-1 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga G7 21CE002HGE | |
| Dell Latitude 9430 2-in-1 | |
| MSI Summit E14 Flip Evo A12MT | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga G7 21CE002HGE | |
| MSI Summit E14 Flip Evo A12MT | |
| Dell Latitude 9430 2-in-1 | |
网络摄像头
戴尔将网络摄像头的分辨率从720p提高到1080p，以获得更清晰的画面。惠普在这方面领先一步，因为一些 幽灵 和EliteBook机型已经开始配备500万像素网络摄像头。
维护
底部面板仍然非常容易拆卸。不过，除了固态硬盘和电池之外，没有什么可以维修的，因为WLAN和内存模块是焊接的。
配件和保修
除了交流电适配器和文件之外，盒子里没有任何额外的东西。PN7522W有源笔必须单独购买，价格为80至110美元。
输入设备
键盘和触摸板
与惠普EliteBook或Spectre的键盘相比，我们的Latitude ，键盘略微安静一些，但比较柔软。它的舒适度并不低，因为这主要取决于用户的偏好。然而，惠普机型有一个额外的点，因为它们纳入了一个专用键，用于启动惠普特定的应用程序，如命令中心或myHP。戴尔Latitude ，如果有这样一个键来启动优化器或电源管理器，将是非常有用的。
显示
去年型号上的AU Optronics B140QAN IPS面板已经回归，这意味着用户可以期待Latitude 9420二合一和Latitude 9430二合一之间的相同观看体验。不过，如果至少能看到刷新率更快的新选择，甚至像最新的华硕ZenBook 14或惠普Spectre系列那样采用OLED，那就更好了。特别是非常缓慢的黑白和灰白的响应时间仍然是引人注目的。然而，该面板对于办公室类型的工作负荷来说是非常好的，因为缓慢的响应时间影响不大。
戴尔宣传的sRGB全覆盖，我们可以独立确认。我们不会对一个高端的Latitude 9000系列机型有任何期望。
我们的设备遇到了一个错误，在0-28%的亮度设置范围内，亮度不会改变。亮度会停留在32尼特，直到设置达到29%或更高。戴尔已经意识到这个问题。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 90 %
Center on Battery: 517.7 cd/m²
Contrast: 1569:1 (Black: 0.33 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.38 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 0.41
ΔE Greyscale 4 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
79.4% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
79.4% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.13
| Dell Latitude 9430 2-in-1 AU Optronics B140QAN, IPS, 2560x1600, 14" | Dell Latitude 9420 2-in-1 AU Optronics B140QAN, IPS, 2560x1600, 14" | MSI Summit E14 Flip Evo A12MT AU Optronics B140QAN04.R, IPS, 2880x1800, 14" | LG Gram 14T90P LG Philips LP140WU1-SPA1, IPS, 1900x1200, 14" | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga G7 21CE002HGE MNE007JA1-1, IPS, 1920x1200, 14" | Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UN5401QA-KN085W SDC4154, OLED, 2880x1800, 14" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 1% | 10% | 12% | -8% | 17% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 79.4 | 80.7 2% | 97.8 23% | 98.8 24% | 69.3 -13% | 99.7 26% |
| sRGB Coverage | 100 | 100 0% | 99.9 0% | 100 0% | 99.7 0% | 100 0% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 79.4 | 79.7 0% | 85.9 8% | 71.3 -10% | 98.6 24% | |
| Response Times | 9% | 64% | 21% | 34% | 96% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 63.6 ? | 54 ? 15% | 16.9 ? 73% | 44 ? 31% | 42 ? 34% | 2 ? 97% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 33.6 ? | 32.8 ? 2% | 15.4 ? 54% | 30 ? 11% | 22.4 ? 33% | 2 ? 94% |
| PWM Frequency | ||||||
| Screen | -45% | -33% | -5% | 8% | -80% | |
| Brightness middle | 517.7 | 483.6 -7% | 496.7 -4% | 305.5 -41% | 371 -28% | 366 -29% |
| Brightness | 493 | 465 -6% | 468 -5% | 289 -41% | 363 -26% | 369 -25% |
| Brightness Distribution | 90 | 92 2% | 87 -3% | 87 -3% | 92 2% | 96 7% |
| Black Level * | 0.33 | 0.32 3% | 0.3 9% | 0.27 18% | 0.21 36% | |
| Contrast | 1569 | 1511 -4% | 1656 6% | 1131 -28% | 1767 13% | |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 3.38 | 3.69 -9% | 3.93 -16% | 3.31 2% | 1.3 62% | 2.84 16% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 6.25 | 5.97 4% | 7.9 -26% | 6.12 2% | 2.6 58% | 5.29 15% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 0.41 | 2.05 -400% | 1.27 -210% | 0.8 -95% | 2.81 -585% | |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 4 | 3.5 12% | 5.9 -48% | 1.9 52% | 2.1 47% | 2.32 42% |
| Gamma | 2.13 103% | 2.04 108% | 2.04 108% | 2.04 108% | 2.15 102% | 2.44 90% |
| CCT | 6186 105% | 6158 106% | 7618 85% | 6706 97% | 6759 96% | 6170 105% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -12% /
-28% | 14% /
-10% | 9% /
2% | 11% /
8% | 11% /
-27% |
* ... smaller is better
这款显示器在开箱后没有被很好地校准，灰度和色彩的平均DeltaE值分别为4和3.38。我们能够用X-Rite色度计将这些平均值降低到0.7和0.41。我们建议安装我们的上述ICM配置文件，以更好地利用面板的全部sRGB覆盖。
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 33.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 17.2 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 16.4 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 89 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 63.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 33.2 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 30.4 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 97 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8710 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
在500尼特，显示器比许多其他14英寸的笔记本电脑更亮，以获得更好的户外可视性。联想ThinkPad X1 Yoga G7或 LG Gram 16 2合1.然而，在大多数情况下，眩光仍然是不可避免的，但如果在阴凉处工作，屏幕上的文字和图像仍然清晰和多彩。
业绩
测试条件
在运行以下任何基准测试之前，我们通过Dell Optimizer软件将我们的设备设置为超性能模式。我们喜欢Optimizer有一个设置，将Windows电源配置文件设置与当前Optimizer性能设置同步。例如，如果Optimizer设置为安静模式，那么Windows电源配置文件将自动切换到节电模式。如果优化器设置为超性能模式，那么Windows将自动切换到其同等的性能模式，以此类推。这就解决了多个应用程序的热力设置相互冲突的问题（即Windows设置为节能模式，而优化大师设置为超性能模式）。
令人讨厌的是，优化大师不能被最大化，因此其非常小的窗口尺寸被固定下来。对于拥有如此多的按钮和选项，该应用程序绝对可以从一个更大的用户界面中受益。
处理器
与第11代相比，CPU的收益 酷睿i7-1185G7在去年的Latitude 9420 2-in-1中，特别是在多线程性能方面有显著的提高。与Core i7-1185G7相比，我们的Core i7-1265U的单线程和多线程性能分别提高了20%和55%。该CPU甚至能够与 酷睿i7-1260P尽管酷睿P系列在市场上被称为更快的系列。在刚刚经历了非常令人失望的 酷睿i5-1235U.
性能的可持续性本可以更好。当循环运行CineBench R15 xT时，最初的1572分会稳步下降，并稳定在1230分左右，代表着由于热限制，随着时间的推移，性能下降约20%。
Cinebench R15 Multi Loop
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
| Performance Rating | |
| Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UN5401QA-KN085W | |
| Dell Latitude 9430 2-in-1 | |
| Dell Latitude 9420 2-in-1 | |
| MSI Summit E14 Flip Evo A12MT | |
| LG Gram 14T90P | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1265U | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga G7 21CE002HGE | |
| AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
| Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UN5401QA-KN085W | |
| Dell Latitude 9430 2-in-1 | |
| Dell Latitude 9420 2-in-1 | |
| LG Gram 14T90P | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1265U (2619 - 8178, n=10) | |
| MSI Summit E14 Flip Evo A12MT | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga G7 21CE002HGE | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
| Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UN5401QA-KN085W | |
| Dell Latitude 9430 2-in-1 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1265U (12909 - 41649, n=10) | |
| Dell Latitude 9420 2-in-1 | |
| LG Gram 14T90P | |
| MSI Summit E14 Flip Evo A12MT | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga G7 21CE002HGE | |
| AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
| Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UN5401QA-KN085W | |
| Dell Latitude 9430 2-in-1 | |
| Dell Latitude 9420 2-in-1 | |
| LG Gram 14T90P | |
| MSI Summit E14 Flip Evo A12MT | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1265U (824 - 2183, n=10) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga G7 21CE002HGE | |
| AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
| Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UN5401QA-KN085W | |
| MSI Summit E14 Flip Evo A12MT | |
| Dell Latitude 9430 2-in-1 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1265U (63615 - 67065, n=10) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga G7 21CE002HGE | |
| Dell Latitude 9420 2-in-1 | |
| LG Gram 14T90P | |
| AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
| Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UN5401QA-KN085W | |
| MSI Summit E14 Flip Evo A12MT | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga G7 21CE002HGE | |
| Dell Latitude 9430 2-in-1 | |
| Dell Latitude 9420 2-in-1 | |
| LG Gram 14T90P | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1265U (3105 - 5135, n=10) | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
| Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UN5401QA-KN085W | |
| Dell Latitude 9430 2-in-1 | |
| Dell Latitude 9420 2-in-1 | |
| LG Gram 14T90P | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1265U (6967 - 20804, n=10) | |
| MSI Summit E14 Flip Evo A12MT | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga G7 21CE002HGE | |
| AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
| Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UN5401QA-KN085W | |
| Dell Latitude 9420 2-in-1 | |
| LG Gram 14T90P | |
| Dell Latitude 9430 2-in-1 | |
| MSI Summit E14 Flip Evo A12MT | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1265U (19489 - 42966, n=10) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga G7 21CE002HGE | |
| AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
| Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UN5401QA-KN085W | |
| Dell Latitude 9430 2-in-1 | |
| MSI Summit E14 Flip Evo A12MT | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga G7 21CE002HGE | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1265U (314 - 632, n=10) | |
| Dell Latitude 9420 2-in-1 | |
| LG Gram 14T90P | |
| AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
| Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UN5401QA-KN085W | |
| Dell Latitude 9430 2-in-1 | |
| Dell Latitude 9420 2-in-1 | |
| LG Gram 14T90P | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1265U (1473 - 4376, n=10) | |
| MSI Summit E14 Flip Evo A12MT | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga G7 21CE002HGE | |
| AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
| Dell Latitude 9430 2-in-1 | |
| Dell Latitude 9420 2-in-1 | |
| LG Gram 14T90P | |
| MSI Summit E14 Flip Evo A12MT | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1265U (20213 - 47031, n=10) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga G7 21CE002HGE | |
| Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UN5401QA-KN085W | |
系统性能
PCMark 10得分一直高于我们在老款Latitude 9420 2-in-1上记录的分数，尽管只是几个百分点。与大多数第11代酷睿i7-1165G7笔记本电脑相比，典型的办公负载，如网页浏览、视频流或轻度编辑，不会感觉快很多。
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
| PCMark 10 / Score | |
| Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UN5401QA-KN085W | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga G7 21CE002HGE | |
| Dell Latitude 9430 2-in-1 | |
| MSI Summit E14 Flip Evo A12MT | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1265U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (4753 - 5766, n=7) | |
| Dell Latitude 9420 2-in-1 | |
| LG Gram 14T90P | |
| PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga G7 21CE002HGE | |
| Dell Latitude 9430 2-in-1 | |
| MSI Summit E14 Flip Evo A12MT | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1265U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (9278 - 11418, n=7) | |
| Dell Latitude 9420 2-in-1 | |
| Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UN5401QA-KN085W | |
| LG Gram 14T90P | |
| PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
| Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UN5401QA-KN085W | |
| Dell Latitude 9430 2-in-1 | |
| Dell Latitude 9420 2-in-1 | |
| MSI Summit E14 Flip Evo A12MT | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga G7 21CE002HGE | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1265U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (5828 - 7311, n=7) | |
| LG Gram 14T90P | |
| PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga G7 21CE002HGE | |
| Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UN5401QA-KN085W | |
| Dell Latitude 9430 2-in-1 | |
| MSI Summit E14 Flip Evo A12MT | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1265U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (5127 - 6330, n=7) | |
| Dell Latitude 9420 2-in-1 | |
| LG Gram 14T90P | |
| CrossMark / Overall | |
| MSI Summit E14 Flip Evo A12MT | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga G7 21CE002HGE | |
| Dell Latitude 9430 2-in-1 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1265U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (1301 - 1615, n=7) | |
| LG Gram 14T90P | |
| CrossMark / Productivity | |
| MSI Summit E14 Flip Evo A12MT | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga G7 21CE002HGE | |
| Dell Latitude 9430 2-in-1 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1265U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (1230 - 1586, n=7) | |
| LG Gram 14T90P | |
| CrossMark / Creativity | |
| MSI Summit E14 Flip Evo A12MT | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga G7 21CE002HGE | |
| Dell Latitude 9430 2-in-1 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1265U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (1413 - 1706, n=7) | |
| LG Gram 14T90P | |
| CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
| MSI Summit E14 Flip Evo A12MT | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga G7 21CE002HGE | |
| Dell Latitude 9430 2-in-1 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1265U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (1193 - 1521, n=7) | |
| LG Gram 14T90P | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 5474 points | |
Help | ||
| AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
| Dell Latitude 9430 2-in-1 | |
| MSI Summit E14 Flip Evo A12MT | |
| Dell Latitude 9420 2-in-1 | |
| LG Gram 14T90P | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga G7 21CE002HGE | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1265U (40212 - 72204, n=10) | |
| Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UN5401QA-KN085W | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga G7 21CE002HGE | |
| MSI Summit E14 Flip Evo A12MT | |
| Dell Latitude 9420 2-in-1 | |
| LG Gram 14T90P | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1265U (41808 - 69493, n=10) | |
| Dell Latitude 9430 2-in-1 | |
| Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UN5401QA-KN085W | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
| LG Gram 14T90P | |
| Dell Latitude 9420 2-in-1 | |
| Dell Latitude 9430 2-in-1 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga G7 21CE002HGE | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1265U (41382 - 76027, n=10) | |
| MSI Summit E14 Flip Evo A12MT | |
| Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UN5401QA-KN085W | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
| Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UN5401QA-KN085W | |
| Dell Latitude 9430 2-in-1 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1265U (74.6 - 112.4, n=10) | |
| Dell Latitude 9420 2-in-1 | |
| LG Gram 14T90P | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga G7 21CE002HGE | |
| MSI Summit E14 Flip Evo A12MT | |
* ... smaller is better
DPC延时
LatencyMon显示，在打开我们主页的多个标签或运行Prime95压力时，没有重大的DPC问题。在60FPS下的4K视频播放也是完美的，没有掉帧。
| DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
| MSI Summit E14 Flip Evo A12MT | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga G7 21CE002HGE | |
| LG Gram 14T90P | |
| Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UN5401QA-KN085W | |
| Dell Latitude 9430 2-in-1 | |
| Dell Latitude 9420 2-in-1 | |
* ... smaller is better
存储设备
我们的测试装置采用了一个 512GB东芝Kioxia NVMe SSD具有可选的Opal自我加密功能。传输速率很好，而且相对稳定，但写入速率比旗舰超极本上常见的三星PM981a慢得多。
* ... smaller is better
Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
GPU性能
与其他具有相同集成度的笔记本电脑相比，图形性能与我们期望的差不多。 Iris Xe 96 EUs即使Latitude 是携带较新的第12代英特尔CPU。因此，用户最多只能期待GPU性能同比的边际改善。竞争者 Radeon 680M或GeForce MX450/550能够提供明显比Iris Xe 96 EUs更快的性能。
与Latitude 9420 2合1上的LPDDR4相比，该机型采用了更快的LPDDR5内存，但性能提升不大。
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 6861 points | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 21289 points | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 4684 points | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 1773 points | |
Help | ||
| Cyberpunk 2077 1.6 | |
| 1920x1080 Low Preset | |
| MSI Summit E14 Flip Evo A12MT | |
| Dell Latitude 9430 2-in-1 | |
| Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (13 - 25.9, n=42) | |
| 1920x1080 Medium Preset | |
| MSI Summit E14 Flip Evo A12MT | |
| Dell Latitude 9430 2-in-1 | |
| Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (10.8 - 21.7, n=37) | |
| 1920x1080 High Preset | |
| MSI Summit E14 Flip Evo A12MT | |
| Dell Latitude 9430 2-in-1 | |
| Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (9.8 - 16.9, n=34) | |
| 1920x1080 Ultra Preset | |
| MSI Summit E14 Flip Evo A12MT | |
| Dell Latitude 9430 2-in-1 | |
| Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (7.4 - 16.8, n=32) | |
Witcher 3 FPS Chart
| low | med. | high | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GTA V (2015) | 111.6 | 93.9 | 24.8 | 10.7 |
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 88 | 55.8 | 29.9 | 14.4 |
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 114 | 87.9 | 67.6 | 57.4 |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 43.3 | 24.6 | 17 | |
| X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 37.9 | 41.2 | 36.6 | |
| Strange Brigade (2018) | 89.6 | 41.7 | 32.5 | 26.4 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 1.6 (2022) | 22.2 | 18.8 | 14.1 | 11.3 |
排放
系统噪音
在大多数网络浏览或流媒体条件下，该系统是无声或接近无声的。然而，与我们在Latitude 9420 2-in-1上的体验相比，风扇会更快地开始升温。例如，当运行3DMark 06的第一个90秒基准场景时，Latitude 9420 2-in-1的风扇在整个运行过程中保持沉默。相比之下，Latitude 9430 2-in-1的风扇在35分贝(A)时可以听到，而安静的背景是23.7分贝(A)。
在超性能模式下运行游戏等高要求的负载，会导致风扇的噪音比ThinkPad X1 Yoga G7更响。ThinkPad X1 Yoga G7或LG Gram 14T90P。
Noise Level
| Idle |
| 23.7 / 23.7 / 23.7 dB(A) |
| Load |
| 35.1 / 43 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 23.7 dB(A) | ||
| Dell Latitude 9430 2-in-1 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1265U | Dell Latitude 9420 2-in-1 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1185G7, WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-512G | MSI Summit E14 Flip Evo A12MT Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1260P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR | LG Gram 14T90P Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1135G7, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga G7 21CE002HGE Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1270P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ | Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UN5401QA-KN085W Vega 8, R7 5800H, Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW512G7 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | 1% | 4% | 4% | 4% | -10% | |
| off / environment * | 23.7 | 25.4 -7% | 23.3 2% | 25.4 -7% | 22.7 4% | 26 -10% |
| Idle Minimum * | 23.7 | 25.4 -7% | 23.3 2% | 25.5 -8% | 22.7 4% | 26 -10% |
| Idle Average * | 23.7 | 25.4 -7% | 23.3 2% | 25.5 -8% | 22.7 4% | 26 -10% |
| Idle Maximum * | 23.7 | 25.4 -7% | 23.3 2% | 25.5 -8% | 27.1 -14% | 27.3 -15% |
| Load Average * | 35.1 | 25.4 28% | 24 32% | 28.3 19% | 34.5 2% | 39.8 -13% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 43.3 | 41.3 5% | 35.6 18% | 35 19% | 34.5 20% | |
| Load Maximum * | 43 | 41.3 4% | 55.8 -30% | 35 19% | 38.7 10% | 42.4 1% |
* ... smaller is better
温度
表面温度在靠近键盘中心和笔记本后半部分最热，顶部和底部的热点都可以达到40摄氏度。结果比我们在Latitude 9420 2-in-1上观察到的要冷一些，和微星Summit E14翻盖笔记本上的结果差不多。 MSI Summit E14 Flip在类似负载下的结果。热量沿着机箱的右边缘和后部逸出。
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 39.2 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 35.4 °C / 96 F, ranging from 19.6 to 60 °C for the class Convertible.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 44.8 °C / 113 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 19.7 °C / 67 F, compared to the device average of 30.3 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 28.4 °C / 83.1 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28 °C / 82.4 F (-0.4 °C / -0.7 F).
| Dell Latitude 9430 2-in-1 Intel Core i7-1265U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | Dell Latitude 9420 2-in-1 Intel Core i7-1185G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | MSI Summit E14 Flip Evo A12MT Intel Core i7-1260P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | LG Gram 14T90P Intel Core i5-1135G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga G7 21CE002HGE Intel Core i7-1270P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UN5401QA-KN085W AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | -21% | -1% | -5% | -15% | -35% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * | 39.2 | 43.4 -11% | 44.2 -13% | 41.6 -6% | 43.3 -10% | 42.7 -9% |
| Maximum Bottom * | 44.8 | 48 -7% | 45.8 -2% | 46.2 -3% | 45.1 -1% | 53.1 -19% |
| Idle Upper Side * | 21.4 | 29.8 -39% | 19.6 8% | 22.6 -6% | 26.5 -24% | 32.9 -54% |
| Idle Bottom * | 22.4 | 28 -25% | 22 2% | 23.2 -4% | 27.6 -23% | 35.2 -57% |
* ... smaller is better
压力测试
在运行Prime95时，时钟频率、核心温度和电路板功耗将分别飙升至3.6 GHz、98 C和48 W，只有短短的几秒钟时间。然后，时钟频率将稳步下降，最后稳定在2.4 GHz，以保持更易于管理的板卡功耗和核心温度，分别为24 W和74 C。我们欣赏这次稳定和更可预测的性能，而Latitude 9420二合一的时钟速率和温度在类似条件下会有更大的波动。
运行时的GPU时钟速率和温度 Witcher 3将分别稳定在1097 MHz和66 C，相比之下，Latitude 9420 2-in-1或微星Summit E14 Flip上的时钟频率和温度分别为1200 MHz和73 C。
用电池供电运行限制了性能。在电池上进行的3DMark 11测试将返回物理和图形分数，分别为9711和5679分，而在主电源上则为16290和6231分。
| CPU时钟（GHz） | GPU时钟（MHz） | CPU平均温度（°C） | |
| 系统空闲 | -- | -- | 35 |
| Prime95压力 | 2.4 | -- | 74 |
| Prime95 + FurMark 压力 | 1.6 | 698 | 65 |
| Witcher 3 应力 | ~2.0 | 1097 | 66 |
发言人
Dell Latitude 9430 2-in-1 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (94.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 12.3% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.4% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (11.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 8% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 88% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 6% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | bass is linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (4.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
能源管理
消耗功率
在桌面上空转需要3瓦到7瓦，这取决于亮度配置文件和电源设置，这比我们在Latitude 9420二合一上的记录略低。同时，运行Prime95消耗约62瓦，而去年的型号只有32瓦，当CPU受到压力时，功耗增加高达94%。从酷睿i7-1185G7跳到酷睿i7-1265U时，多线程性能提高50%。 酷睿i7-1265U在这方面并不是免费的。
与大多数其他笔记本电脑不同，戴尔在结账时提供了三种交流适配器选项。90 W选项对于为CPU提供更多的电力以获得更高的Turbo Boost时钟速率，从而获得更高的性能非常有用。然而，我们的压力测试表明，无论如何，系统不能长时间保持非常高的Turbo Boost时钟速率，因此90W交流适配器的任何性能提升都是短暂的。例如，在小型（约6.7 x 5.5 x 2.2厘米）60瓦交流适配器上运行Prime95时，功耗将稳定在61瓦。用较大的（约13 x 6.5 x 2.3厘米）90瓦交流电适配器重复这一测试，会导致消耗量在测试开始时飙升至91.6瓦，然后最终下降并在大约90秒后稳定在51瓦，正如我们下面的图表所示。如果你打算运行高要求的程序，90W适配器仍然是一个很好的选择，因为CPU性能的短暂爆发可以在加载应用程序或处理图像时节省时间。
| Off / Standby | 0.2 / 0.5 Watt |
| Idle | 2.9 / 5.8 / 6.6 Watt |
| Load |
49.2 / 63.1 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Dell Latitude 9430 2-in-1 i7-1265U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, , IPS, 2560x1600, 14" | Dell Latitude 9420 2-in-1 i7-1185G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-512G, IPS, 2560x1600, 14" | MSI Summit E14 Flip Evo A12MT i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, IPS, 2880x1800, 14" | LG Gram 14T90P i5-1135G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ, IPS, 1900x1200, 14" | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga G7 21CE002HGE i7-1270P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ, IPS, 1920x1200, 14" | Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UN5401QA-KN085W R7 5800H, Vega 8, Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW512G7, OLED, 2880x1800, 14" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -27% | -49% | 3% | -13% | -52% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 2.9 | 4.6 -59% | 5.4 -86% | 2.8 3% | 4.2 -45% | 6.4 -121% |
| Idle Average * | 5.8 | 7.8 -34% | 9.5 -64% | 5.5 5% | 6.9 -19% | 9.4 -62% |
| Idle Maximum * | 6.6 | 8.2 -24% | 12.4 -88% | 6.4 3% | 7.6 -15% | 10.7 -62% |
| Load Average * | 49.2 | 47.9 3% | 54.7 -11% | 45.4 8% | 36.2 26% | 52.2 -6% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 35.3 | 38.8 -10% | 52 -47% | 34 4% | 43.2 -22% | 53 -50% |
| Load Maximum * | 63.1 | 87.1 -38% | 63.4 -0% | 65.9 -4% | 63.5 -1% | 69 -9% |
* ... smaller is better
Power Consumption Witcher 3 / Stresstest
Power Consumption external Monitor
电池寿命
在需要为60瓦特的电池充电之前，预计实际使用WLAN的时间将超过12小时。也有一个较小的40瓦特的选项，整体重量较轻，运行时间约为三分之二。
使用附带的60瓦交流适配器从空电到满电只需不到2小时。
| Dell Latitude 9430 2-in-1 i7-1265U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 60 Wh | Dell Latitude 9420 2-in-1 i7-1185G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 60 Wh | MSI Summit E14 Flip Evo A12MT i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 72 Wh | LG Gram 14T90P i5-1135G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs, 72 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga G7 21CE002HGE i7-1270P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 57 Wh | Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UN5401QA-KN085W R7 5800H, Vega 8, 63 Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -1% | -26% | -4% | -30% | -23% | |
| Reader / Idle | 1667 | 1721 3% | 1324 -21% | |||
| WiFi v1.3 | 767 | 699 -9% | 494 -36% | 728 -5% | 535 -30% | 522 -32% |
| Load | 143 | 146 2% | 114 -20% | 138 -3% | 102 -29% | 124 -13% |
| H.264 | 733 | 542 |
Pros
Cons
结论 - 同样的包装，新的名称
我们喜欢的一切 Latitude 9420二合一Latitude 9430 2-in-1全面回归，因为较新的型号主要是处理器更新。CPU带来了更快的性能，尽管功耗水平更高，这与我们在其他Alder Lake笔记本电脑上观察到的情况基本一致。如果更快的CPU、5G选项或200万像素网络摄像头对你的日常工作负荷没有吸引力，那么Latitude 9420 2合1可以提供基本相同的体验，而且价格更低。
Latitude 9430二合一是为那些知道他们可以利用英特尔第12代CPU的强大用户准备的。否则，物理上相同的Latitude 9420二合一产品已经足以满足目标办公用户的需求。
需要记住的一些小烦恼包括不支持80毫米M.2固态硬盘，如果配置时没有广域网支持，则不支持广域网天线。CPU Turbo Boost是有限的，而如果用电池供电运行，性能会降低。另外，令人遗憾的是，主动式手写笔是单独出售的，而竞争对手如联想ThinkPad X1 Yoga G7等竞争对手则在每次购买时都包括手写笔。大多数笔记本电脑都支持更常见的80毫米固态硬盘，这可能会使戴尔的固态硬盘更换更加困难。同时，惠普EliteBook 1040带有一个更明亮的触摸屏，尽管分辨率较低，为1200p。也许戴尔可以通过500万像素网络摄像头和高刷新率的OLED显示屏来改善视觉体验，使明年的最终机型更具吸引力。
价格和可用性
戴尔目前正在运送Latitude 9430蚌壳和2合1。我们的具体配置是Core i7-1265U和16GB内存，售价约为2800美元。
Dell Latitude 9430 2-in-1
- 08/05/2022 v7 (old)
Allen Ngo
Price comparison
