惠普 Victus 16 笔记本电脑评测：配备 RTX 4070 的全高清游戏本

Name: HP Victus 16-r0077ng
Brand: HP

Omen 是价格敏感者的另一种选择。

Victus 16 的价格略低于硬件相当的 Omen 16。请继续阅读，了解是否有哪些节约成本的措施。我们的测试机配备了酷睿 i7-13700H 和GeForce RTX 4070。

Florian Glaser, 👁 Florian Glaser (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy), Published 09/26/2023 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Gaming Geforce Intel Laptop / Notebook Raptor Lake

与 Omen 系列类似，Victus 也有多种硬件配置可供选择。我们的测试机配备了酷睿 i7-13700H和 GeForce RTX 4070属于高端性能。16 GB DDR5-5600 内存和 1 TB M.2 NVMe 固态硬盘也是 2023 年的可靠配置。显示屏为哑光 IPS 面板，16:9 格式，1920 x 1080，144 Hz。整套价格：目前至少为 1439.99美元。

Test device courtesy of HP Deutschland

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

HP Victus 16-r0077ng (Victus 16 Series)

Processor

Intel Core i7-13700H 14 x 1.8 - 5 GHz, 115 W PL2 / Short Burst, 45 W PL1 / Sustained, Raptor Lake-H

Graphics adapter

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU - 8 GB VRAM, Core: 1980 MHz, RAM: 2000 MHz, 120 W TDP, GDDR6, ForceWare 529.04, Optimus

Memory

16 GB

, 2x 8 GB DDR5-5600 SO-DIMM

Display

16.10 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 137 PPI, CMN162D, IPS, Full-HD, glossy: no, 144 Hz

Mainboard

Intel Alder Lake-P PCH

Storage

Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02, 1024 GB

, M.2 NVMe-SSD

Soundcard

Intel Alder Point-M/P PCH - HD Audio

Connections

4 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: Combo (Headset/Mic)

Networking

Realtek Gaming GBE Family Controller (10/100/1000MBit/s), MediaTek MT7921 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.2

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 24 x 369 x 259

Battery

83 Wh Lithium-Polymer, 6 Cells

Operating System

Microsoft Windows 11 Home

Camera

Webcam: 2 MP

Additional features

Speakers: 2.0 Bang & Olufsen, Keyboard: Chiclet RGB, Keyboard Light: yes, 230 W Power Supply, Omen Gaming-Hub, 24 Months Warranty

Weight

2.372 kg, Power Supply: 610 g

Price

1630 EUR

Links

HP homepage

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Victus 16 的竞争对手包括同样配备GeForce RTX 4070 的其他 16 英寸游戏机，如联想Legion Pro 5 16ARX8和宏碁 Nitro 16 AN16-41、技嘉技嘉 Aero 16 OLED BSF和微星 Stealth 16 Studio A13VG。其中一些采用了 AMD 处理器，所有这些都作为对比设备出现在下表中。

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating	Date	Model	Weight	Height	Size	Resolution
85.1 % v7 ^(old)	09 / 2023	HP Victus 16-r0077ng i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	2.4 kg	24 mm	16.10"	1920x1080
86.6 % v7 ^(old)	09 / 2023	HP Omen 16-xf0376ng R7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	2.4 kg	23.5 mm	16.10"	1920x1080
88.4 % v7 ^(old)	05 / 2023	Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 R7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	2.5 kg	26.8 mm	16.00"	2560x1600
88.1 % v7 ^(old)	06 / 2023	Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 R7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	2.7 kg	27.9 mm	16.00"	2560x1600
86.2 % v7 ^(old)	03 / 2023	Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	2.1 kg	18 mm	16.00"	3840x2400
88.8 % v7 ^(old)	07 / 2023	MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	2 kg	19.95 mm	16.00"	2560x1600

由于该机箱与最近评测的美国版相同，配备了酷睿 i5-13500HX和 GeForce RTX 4050、在本评测中，我们将不再详细介绍机箱、设备和输入设备。您可以在相应的评测中找到所有相关信息这里.

尺寸比较

HP Victus 16-r0077ng HP Omen 16-xf0376ng Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF DIN A4 ❌

交流

Networking
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card	1679 (1470^min - 1802^max) MBit/s +135%
HP Omen 16-xf0376ng Realtek 8852CE	1326 (976^min - 1449^max) MBit/s +86%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter	1325 (977^min - 1480^max) MBit/s +86%
Average of class Gaming (469 - 1843, n=149, last 2 years)	1233 MBit/s +73%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card	1173 (839^min - 1366^max) MBit/s +64%
Average MediaTek MT7921 (47.8 - 985, n=18)	795 MBit/s +11%
HP Victus 16-r0077ng MediaTek MT7921	714 (679^min - 745^max) MBit/s
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card	1725 (1685^min - 1740^max) MBit/s +138%
HP Omen 16-xf0376ng Realtek 8852CE	1481 (741^min - 1496^max) MBit/s +104%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card	1438 (767^min - 1513^max) MBit/s +98%
Average of class Gaming (680 - 1890, n=149, last 2 years)	1394 MBit/s +92%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter	1364 (675^min - 1404^max) MBit/s +88%
Average MediaTek MT7921 (104.2 - 968, n=18)	778 MBit/s +7%
HP Victus 16-r0077ng MediaTek MT7921	726 (714^min - 732^max) MBit/s

HP Victus 16-r0077ng MediaTek MT7921; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø714 (679-745)

HP Omen 16-xf0376ng Realtek 8852CE; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1326 (976-1449)

Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1174 (839-1366)

Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1679 (1470-1802)

MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1325 (977-1480)

HP Victus 16-r0077ng MediaTek MT7921; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø726 (714-732)

HP Omen 16-xf0376ng Realtek 8852CE; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1456 (741-1496)

Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1412 (767-1513)

Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1725 (1685-1740)

MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1341 (675-1404)

网络摄像头

ColorChecker HP Victus 16-r0077ng: 9.63 ∆E min: 2.53 - max: 17.11 ∆E

显示屏

虽然面板名称非常相似，但 RTX 4070 版本的全高清显示屏与 RTX 4050 版本略有不同，不过大部分效果几乎没有差别。


290 cd/m²	294 cd/m²	290 cd/m²
262 cd/m²	308 cd/m²	275 cd/m²
280 cd/m²	284 cd/m²	285 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

CMN162D tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 308 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 285.3 cd/m² Minimum: 18 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 85 %
Center on Battery: 308 cd/m²
Contrast: 1232:1 (Black: 0.25 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.3 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 0.92
ΔE Greyscale 1.7 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
69% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
98% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
66.7% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.167

Download ICC File (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	HP Victus 16-r0077ng CMN162D, IPS, 1920x1080, 16.1"	HP Omen 16-xf0376ng BOE0B81, IPS, 1920x1080, 16.1"	Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 CSOT T3 MNG007DA1-Q, IPS, 2560x1600, 16"	Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 BOE CQ NE16QDM-NY1, IPS, 2560x1600, 16"	Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Samsung SDC4191 (ATNA60YV09-0, OLED, 3840x2400, 16"	MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG AUO26A9, IPS, 2560x1600, 16"
Display		5%	4%	1%	31%	23%
Display P3 Coverage	66.7	72.1 8%	70.4 6%	67.9 2%	99.9 50%	96.4 45%
sRGB Coverage	98	99.6 2%	99.6 2%	99.1 1%	100 2%	99.7 2%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	69	72.3 5%	72.6 5%	69.9 1%	96.4 40%	84.8 23%
Response Times		10%	18%	28%	81%	50%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	13.3 ?(6, 7.3)	12.3 ?(5.9, 6.4) 8%	7 ?(3.2, 3.8) 47%	11 ?(5, 6) 17%	2 ?(1, 1) 85%	4.4 ?(2.2, 2.2) 67%
Response Time Black / White *	8.2 ?(4.5, 3.7)	7.2 ?(4, 3.2) 12%	9.1 ?(4.9, 4.2) -11%	5 ?(2, 3) 39%	1.98 ?(0.5, 1.48) 76%	5.6 ?(2.2, 3.4) 32%
PWM Frequency					60
Screen		-68%	11%	-12%	101%	-73%
Brightness middle	308	350 14%	355.3 15%	520 69%	389.97 27%	424 38%
Brightness	285	338 19%	340 19%	494 73%	395 39%	411 44%
Brightness Distribution	85	91 7%	91 7%	91 7%	97 14%	88 4%
Black Level *	0.25	0.35 -40%	0.32 -28%	0.39 -56%	0.03 88%	0.37 -48%
Contrast	1232	1000 -19%	1110 -10%	1333 8%	12999 955%	1146 -7%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	1.3	3.29 -153%	1.13 13%	1.94 -49%	2 -54%	3.04 -134%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	2.76	8.47 -207%	2.78 -1%	5.62 -104%	4.1 -49%	7.5 -172%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *	0.92	2.23 -142%	0.32 65%	0.74 20%	1.68 -83%	3.04 -230%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	1.7	3.2 -88%	1.4 18%	2.94 -73%	2.23 -31%	4.34 -155%
Gamma	2.167 ^102%	2.131 ^103%	2.24 ^98%	2.37 ^93%	2.41 ^91%	2.32 ^95%
CCT	6767 ^96%	6317 ^103%	6372 ^102%	6443 ^101%	6323 ^103%	6952 ^93%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		-18% / -41%	11% / 11%	6% / -3%	71% / 83%	0% / -35%

* ... smaller is better

Victus 16 的平均亮度为 285 cd/m²，不幸的是，它并不属于最亮的型号。虽然这个数值对于大多数室内空间来说仍然足够，但在室外您很快就会达到可读性和可识别性的极限。得益于 IPS 标准 0.25 cd/m² 的相对较好的黑色值，该显示器仍能达到约 1200:1 的稳定对比度。

色彩空间也没有什么值得批评的地方，因为 sRGB 的覆盖率接近 100%。AdobeRGB 的 69% 和 DCI-P3 的 67% 对于游戏笔记本来说也是可以接受的。Victus 16 的色彩准确度值得特别表扬：即使在交货状态下，数值也在理想范围内（见 Calman 截图）。

可视角度达到了典型（良好）的 IPS 水平。我们的测试设备没有显示任何屏幕闪烁或屏幕出血的迹象。响应时间也不明显，应能满足大多数用户的要求。

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
8.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 4.5 ms rise
8.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 3.7 ms fall
The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 20 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
13.3 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 6 ms rise
13.3 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 7.3 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 23 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

性能

在硬件方面，Victus 16 介于中端和高端之间。虽然英特尔处理器在未来几年应该有足够的储备，但由于GeForce RTX 4070 的 VRAM 容量略显不足（8 GB GDDR6 已不再是最新或未来的标准），它可能会陷入困境。

测试条件

在预装的 Omen Gaming Hub 中，用户可以调整性能控制（截图 #4）。由于在 "性能 "模式下 3D 性能几乎没有提高，但噪音却大幅增加，因此我们在 "平衡 "模式下进行了所有测量。生态模式只能说是名副其实：帧速率和噪音水平都偏向于中间模式。

Witcher 3 (FHD/Ultra) Eco Balanced 性能
帧频 ~110 fps ~114 fps ~118 fps
噪音 ~46 dB(A) ~46 dB(A) ~56 dB(A)

处理器

英特尔的酷睿 i7-13700H 目前被大量游戏笔记本电脑采用。这款 Raptor Lake 代的 10 纳米机型提供 6 个带超线程的性能核心和 8 个不带超线程的效率核心，可实现多达 20 个并行线程。
。

在基准测试过程中，如果将 Victus 16 的酷睿 i7-13700H 与之前的平均成绩相比，其性能略低于平均水平。至少，惠普的性能在长时间内保持了相当的稳定性，这一点值得称赞。在我们的 Cinebench 循环中没有出现大的波动或下降。

Cinebench R15 Multi Sustained Load

HP Victus 16-r0077ng Intel Core i7-13700H: Ø2242 (2203.13-2316.56)

HP Omen 16-xf0376ng AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS: Ø2531 (2518.1-2561.97)

Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX: Ø2918 (2861.03-2977.96)

Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS: Ø2303 (2287.15-2328.15)

Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Intel Core i9-13900H: Ø2829 (2772.58-2962.96)

MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Intel Core i7-13700H: Ø2552 (2375.16-3030.99)

CPU Performance Rating - Percent
Average of class Gaming	81.5 pt
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX	78.8 pt
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Intel Core i7-13700H	74.7 pt
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Intel Core i9-13900H	70.9 pt
HP Omen 16-xf0376ng AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	69.1 pt
Average Intel Core i7-13700H	65.4 pt
HP Victus 16-r0077ng Intel Core i7-13700H	61.9 pt
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	59.7 pt

Cinebench R23
Multi Core
Average of class Gaming (5668 - 36249, n=189, last 2 years)	21842 Points +42%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Intel Core i7-13700H	20034 Points +30%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Intel Core i9-13900H	19188 Points +25%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX	18060 (17729.5^min - 18059.9^max) Points +17%
HP Omen 16-xf0376ng AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	16188 Points +5%
HP Victus 16-r0077ng Intel Core i7-13700H	15410 Points
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (5890 - 20034, n=28)	15266 Points -1%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	14131 Points -8%
Single Core
Average of class Gaming (1136 - 2235, n=187, last 2 years)	1888 Points +12%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Intel Core i7-13700H	1854 Points +10%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX	1846 Points +9%
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (1323 - 1914, n=28)	1797 Points +7%
HP Omen 16-xf0376ng AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	1785 Points +6%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Intel Core i9-13900H	1707 Points +1%
HP Victus 16-r0077ng Intel Core i7-13700H	1687 Points
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	1546 Points -8%

Cinebench R20
CPU (Multi Core)
Average of class Gaming (2179 - 13832, n=187, last 2 years)	8311 Points +41%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Intel Core i7-13700H	7674 Points +30%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Intel Core i9-13900H	7254 Points +23%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX	7072 Points +20%
HP Omen 16-xf0376ng AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	6224 Points +6%
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (2322 - 7674, n=28)	5945 Points +1%
HP Victus 16-r0077ng Intel Core i7-13700H	5895 Points
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	5502 Points -7%
CPU (Single Core)
Average of class Gaming (439 - 856, n=187, last 2 years)	726 Points +12%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Intel Core i7-13700H	719 Points +11%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX	717 Points +10%
HP Omen 16-xf0376ng AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	693 Points +7%
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (508 - 741, n=28)	693 Points +7%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Intel Core i9-13900H	651 Points 0%
HP Victus 16-r0077ng Intel Core i7-13700H	649 Points
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	601 Points -7%

Cinebench R15
CPU Multi 64Bit
Average of class Gaming (905 - 5663, n=194, last 2 years)	3421 Points +48%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX	2978 (2861.03^min - 2977.96^max) Points +29%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Intel Core i9-13900H	2963 (2772.58^min - 2962.96^max) Points +28%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Intel Core i7-13700H	2854 Points +23%
HP Omen 16-xf0376ng AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	2562 (2518.1^min - 2561.97^max) Points +11%
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (905 - 2982, n=28)	2455 Points +6%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	2328 Points 0%
HP Victus 16-r0077ng Intel Core i7-13700H	2317 (2203.13^min - 2316.56^max) Points
CPU Single 64Bit
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX	294 Points +20%
HP Omen 16-xf0376ng AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	280 Points +14%
Average of class Gaming (191.9 - 318, n=191, last 2 years)	278 Points +13%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Intel Core i7-13700H	273 Points +11%
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (213 - 278, n=28)	260 Points +6%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	247 Points +1%
HP Victus 16-r0077ng Intel Core i7-13700H	245 Points
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Intel Core i9-13900H	243 Points -1%

Blender - v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (169 - 555, n=28)	229 Seconds * -7%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	219 Seconds * -2%
HP Victus 16-r0077ng Intel Core i7-13700H	215 Seconds *
HP Omen 16-xf0376ng AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	198 Seconds * +8%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX	174 Seconds * +19%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Intel Core i9-13900H	172 Seconds * +20%
Average of class Gaming (87 - 555, n=182, last 2 years)	170.3 Seconds * +21%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Intel Core i7-13700H	169 Seconds * +21%

7-Zip 18.03
7z b 4
Average of class Gaming (23795 - 140932, n=186, last 2 years)	85304 MIPS +30%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Intel Core i7-13700H	76344 MIPS +17%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX	75557 MIPS +16%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Intel Core i9-13900H	74386 MIPS +14%
HP Omen 16-xf0376ng AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	68646 MIPS +5%
HP Victus 16-r0077ng Intel Core i7-13700H	65405 MIPS
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	61191 MIPS -6%
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (27322 - 76344, n=28)	61025 MIPS -7%
7z b 4 -mmt1
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX	7244 MIPS +30%
HP Omen 16-xf0376ng AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	6640 MIPS +19%
Average of class Gaming (4199 - 7581, n=186, last 2 years)	6311 MIPS +14%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Intel Core i7-13700H	6125 MIPS +10%
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (4825 - 6238, n=28)	5858 MIPS +5%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	5584 MIPS 0%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Intel Core i9-13900H	5570 MIPS 0%
HP Victus 16-r0077ng Intel Core i7-13700H	5559 MIPS

Geekbench 5.5
Multi-Core
Average of class Gaming (4557 - 23194, n=187, last 2 years)	15010 Points +30%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Intel Core i9-13900H	13796 Points +20%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Intel Core i7-13700H	13239 Points +15%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX	12378 Points +8%
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (6165 - 14215, n=28)	11777 Points +2%
HP Victus 16-r0077ng Intel Core i7-13700H	11504 Points
HP Omen 16-xf0376ng AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	11414 Points -1%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	9683 Points -16%
Single-Core
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX	2040 Points +21%
HP Omen 16-xf0376ng AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	2005 Points +19%
Average of class Gaming (986 - 2210, n=187, last 2 years)	1894 Points +12%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Intel Core i7-13700H	1829 Points +9%
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (1362 - 1919, n=28)	1792 Points +6%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Intel Core i9-13900H	1718 Points +2%
HP Victus 16-r0077ng Intel Core i7-13700H	1685 Points
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	1555 Points -8%

HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - 4k Preset
Average of class Gaming (6.72 - 38.9, n=186, last 2 years)	23.5 fps +42%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX	23.2 fps +40%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Intel Core i9-13900H	21 fps +27%
HP Omen 16-xf0376ng AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	19.8 fps +19%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Intel Core i7-13700H	19.7 fps +19%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	17.5 fps +5%
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (6.72 - 21.2, n=28)	16.7 fps +1%
HP Victus 16-r0077ng Intel Core i7-13700H	16.6 fps

LibreOffice - 20 Documents To PDF
HP Omen 16-xf0376ng AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	65.1 s * -6%
HP Victus 16-r0077ng Intel Core i7-13700H	61.5 s *
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Intel Core i9-13900H	57.8 s * +6%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Intel Core i7-13700H	54.6 s * +11%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	53.4 s * +13%
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (31.3 - 62.4, n=28)	48.2 s * +22%
Average of class Gaming (31.4 - 96.6, n=183, last 2 years)	47.4 s * +23%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX	37.9 s * +38%

R Benchmark 2.5 - Overall mean
HP Victus 16-r0077ng Intel Core i7-13700H	0.504 sec *
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	0.4958 sec * +2%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Intel Core i9-13900H	0.4934 sec * +2%
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (0.4308 - 0.607, n=28)	0.4651 sec * +8%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Intel Core i7-13700H	0.4498 sec * +11%
Average of class Gaming (0.3609 - 0.759, n=187, last 2 years)	0.4374 sec * +13%
HP Omen 16-xf0376ng AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	0.4309 sec * +15%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX	0.421 sec * +16%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

2317 Points

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

190.5 fps

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

99.6 %

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

245 Points

Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)

5895 Points

Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)

649 Points

Cinebench R23 Single Core

1687 Points

Cinebench R23 Multi Core

15410 Points

Help

... in comparison

Performance Rating
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	89.4 pt
Average of class Gaming	85.3 pt
HP Omen 16-xf0376ng AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	83 pt
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	77.8 pt
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	72.2 pt
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	69.5 pt
Average Intel Core i7-13700H	61.3 pt
HP Victus 16-r0077ng Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	60.6 pt

AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	29656 KRay/s +105%
HP Omen 16-xf0376ng AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	25896 KRay/s +79%
Average of class Gaming (4986 - 60169, n=183, last 2 years)	21864 KRay/s +51%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	18385 KRay/s +27%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	17934 KRay/s +24%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	17161 KRay/s +19%
HP Victus 16-r0077ng Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	14470 KRay/s
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (4986 - 18908, n=28)	14011 KRay/s -3%

AIDA64 / FPU Julia
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	120974 Points +68%
HP Omen 16-xf0376ng AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	109633 Points +52%
Average of class Gaming (25360 - 252486, n=183, last 2 years)	106582 Points +48%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	105483 Points +46%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	90834 Points +26%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	81656 Points +13%
HP Victus 16-r0077ng Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	72193 Points
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (25360 - 92359, n=28)	70414 Points -2%

AIDA64 / CPU SHA3
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	4974 MB/s +50%
Average of class Gaming (1339 - 10389, n=183, last 2 years)	4896 MB/s +47%
HP Omen 16-xf0376ng AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	4602 MB/s +38%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	4187 MB/s +26%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	4080 MB/s +23%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	3492 MB/s +5%
HP Victus 16-r0077ng Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	3326 MB/s
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (1339 - 4224, n=28)	3272 MB/s -2%

AIDA64 / CPU Queen
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	126954 Points +39%
HP Omen 16-xf0376ng AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	117257 Points +28%
Average of class Gaming (50699 - 200651, n=183, last 2 years)	116926 Points +28%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	108729 Points +19%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	105597 Points +15%
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (68763 - 107159, n=28)	98096 Points +7%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	95175 Points +4%
HP Victus 16-r0077ng Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	91638 Points

AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	15887 Points +83%
HP Omen 16-xf0376ng AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	15036 Points +73%
Average of class Gaming (4800 - 32988, n=183, last 2 years)	13244 Points +53%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	13097 Points +51%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	11050 Points +27%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	10485 Points +21%
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (4800 - 11050, n=28)	8871 Points +2%
HP Victus 16-r0077ng Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	8677 Points

AIDA64 / FPU Mandel
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	64255 Points +78%
HP Omen 16-xf0376ng AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	58454 Points +62%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	58232 Points +61%
Average of class Gaming (12321 - 134044, n=183, last 2 years)	53651 Points +48%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	44967 Points +24%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	44154 Points +22%
HP Victus 16-r0077ng Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	36179 Points
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (12321 - 45118, n=28)	34551 Points -4%

AIDA64 / CPU AES
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	149377 MB/s +125%
Average of class Gaming (19065 - 328679, n=183, last 2 years)	109303 MB/s +64%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	81504 MB/s +23%
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (28769 - 151254, n=28)	76444 MB/s +15%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	71191 MB/s +7%
HP Omen 16-xf0376ng AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	67389 MB/s +1%
HP Victus 16-r0077ng Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	66484 MB/s
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	55915 MB/s -16%

AIDA64 / CPU ZLib
Average of class Gaming (373 - 2409, n=183, last 2 years)	1361 MB/s +43%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	1192 MB/s +25%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	1147 MB/s +21%
HP Omen 16-xf0376ng AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	1062 MB/s +12%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	1032 MB/s +9%
HP Victus 16-r0077ng Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	950 MB/s
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (389 - 1215, n=28)	945 MB/s -1%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	906 MB/s -5%

AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	15975 KRay/s +106%
HP Omen 16-xf0376ng AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	13731 KRay/s +77%
Average of class Gaming (2540 - 31796, n=183, last 2 years)	11775 KRay/s +52%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	9803 KRay/s +26%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	9680 KRay/s +25%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	9094 KRay/s +17%
HP Victus 16-r0077ng Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	7770 KRay/s
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (2540 - 10135, n=28)	7510 KRay/s -3%

AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	46114 MPixel/s +18%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	44611 MPixel/s +14%
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (12872 - 52727, n=28)	40281 MPixel/s +3%
Average of class Gaming (10805 - 60161, n=184, last 2 years)	40126 MPixel/s +3%
HP Victus 16-r0077ng Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	39045 MPixel/s
HP Omen 16-xf0376ng AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	33395 MPixel/s -14%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	28499 MPixel/s -27%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	27554 MPixel/s -29%

系统性能

由于固态硬盘的速度不够快，Victus 16 在系统基准测试中排名最后。不过，PCMark 10 的 7158 分仍然是一个不错的总成绩。

PCMark 10 / Score
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7745HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	8206 Points +15%
HP Omen 16-xf0376ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7840HS, WDC PC SN810 512GB	8167 Points +14%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	8058 Points +13%
Average of class Gaming (5776 - 9852, n=165, last 2 years)	7799 Points +9%
Average Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (7158 - 7956, n=8)	7417 Points +4%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	7329 Points +2%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7735HS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	7220 Points +1%
HP Victus 16-r0077ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02	7158 Points

PCMark 10 / Essentials
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	11332 Points +6%
HP Omen 16-xf0376ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7840HS, WDC PC SN810 512GB	11250 Points +5%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7745HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	11074 Points +3%
Average of class Gaming (9057 - 12334, n=164, last 2 years)	10832 Points +1%
HP Victus 16-r0077ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02	10707 Points
Average Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (10252 - 11449, n=8)	10695 Points 0%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7735HS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	10579 Points -1%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	10491 Points -2%

PCMark 10 / Productivity
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7745HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	10235 Points +14%
HP Omen 16-xf0376ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7840HS, WDC PC SN810 512GB	10179 Points +13%
Average of class Gaming (6662 - 14612, n=164, last 2 years)	9904 Points +10%
Average Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (8501 - 10769, n=8)	9421 Points +5%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	9376 Points +4%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	9231 Points +3%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7735HS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	9146 Points +2%
HP Victus 16-r0077ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02	8974 Points

PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	13575 Points +31%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7745HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	13229 Points +28%
HP Omen 16-xf0376ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7840HS, WDC PC SN810 512GB	12908 Points +25%
Average of class Gaming (6703 - 18475, n=164, last 2 years)	12117 Points +17%
Average Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (10358 - 12908, n=8)	11031 Points +6%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	10860 Points +5%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7735HS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	10558 Points +2%
HP Victus 16-r0077ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02	10358 Points

CrossMark / Overall
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7745HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	2027 Points
Average of class Gaming (1247 - 2344, n=146, last 2 years)	1908 Points
Average Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (1768 - 2073, n=6)	1886 Points
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	1882 Points
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	1789 Points
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7735HS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	1535 Points

CrossMark / Productivity
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7745HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	1930 Points
Average of class Gaming (1299 - 2204, n=146, last 2 years)	1808 Points
Average Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (1645 - 2006, n=6)	1789 Points
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	1781 Points
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	1705 Points
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7735HS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	1508 Points

CrossMark / Creativity
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7745HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	2222 Points
Average of class Gaming (1275 - 2660, n=146, last 2 years)	2095 Points
Average Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (1936 - 2137, n=6)	2045 Points
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	1978 Points
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	1936 Points
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7735HS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	1637 Points

CrossMark / Responsiveness
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	1915 Points
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7745HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	1785 Points
Average Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (1451 - 2202, n=6)	1749 Points
Average of class Gaming (1030 - 2330, n=146, last 2 years)	1708 Points
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	1635 Points
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7735HS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	1337 Points

PCMark 10 Score		7158 points
Help

AIDA64: Memory Copy | Memory Read | Memory Write | Memory Latency

AIDA64 / Memory Copy
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	69289 MB/s +14%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	66344 MB/s +9%
Average of class Gaming (21842 - 94222, n=183, last 2 years)	65265 MB/s +7%
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (24334 - 78081, n=28)	62480 MB/s +3%
HP Omen 16-xf0376ng AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	62231 MB/s +2%
HP Victus 16-r0077ng Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	60917 MB/s
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	50007 MB/s -18%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	47903 MB/s -21%

AIDA64 / Memory Read
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	73950 MB/s +5%
HP Victus 16-r0077ng Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	70121 MB/s
Average of class Gaming (23681 - 99713, n=183, last 2 years)	69175 MB/s -1%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	68252 MB/s -3%
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (23681 - 79656, n=28)	65892 MB/s -6%
HP Omen 16-xf0376ng AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	61147 MB/s -13%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	50703 MB/s -28%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	50111 MB/s -29%

AIDA64 / Memory Write
HP Omen 16-xf0376ng AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	78406 MB/s +27%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	71464 MB/s +16%
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (22986 - 99898, n=28)	68690 MB/s +12%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	68170 MB/s +11%
Average of class Gaming (22986 - 108954, n=183, last 2 years)	67077 MB/s +9%
HP Victus 16-r0077ng Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	61520 MB/s
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	54955 MB/s -11%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	54587 MB/s -11%

AIDA64 / Memory Latency
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	94.4 ns * -0%
HP Victus 16-r0077ng Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	94.1 ns *
Average Intel Core i7-13700H (82.4 - 136.8, n=28)	94.1 ns * -0%
Average of class Gaming (59.5 - 259, n=183, last 2 years)	93.7 ns * -0%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	93.5 ns * +1%
HP Omen 16-xf0376ng AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	89.8 ns * +5%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	87.6 ns * +7%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	86.5 ns * +8%

* ... smaller is better

DPC 延迟

与其他众多竞争对手一样，Victus 16 在延迟方面也存在不足。根据 LatencyMon 工具，用户在执行实时音频和视频编辑等对延迟敏感的任务时可能会遇到问题。

DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	18226.8 μs * -974%
HP Omen 16-xf0376ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7840HS, WDC PC SN810 512GB	2185.9 μs * -29%
HP Victus 16-r0077ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02	1697 μs *
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7735HS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	1312.1 μs * +23%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	1053.8 μs * +38%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7745HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	603 μs * +64%

* ... smaller is better

存储设备

总的来说，尽管固态硬盘的容量更大（1,000 GB 对 512 GB），但其性能略低于 Omen 16。我们的 DiskSpd 循环还显示，安装在 Victus 16 上的 Kioxia 固态硬盘在负载情况下会在一段时间后失去速度，这在其他笔记本电脑上也能看到。

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6

AS SSD

DiskSpd

Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02

CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 6961 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 5395 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 463.2 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 424.8 MB/s

CDM 5 Read Seq: 2536 MB/s

CDM 5 Write Seq: 3539 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 58.47 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 141.6 MB/s

Drive Performance Rating | DiskSpd | AS SSD

Drive Performance Rating - Percent
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	88.6 pt
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	83.3 pt
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	76.1 pt
Average of class Gaming	72.4 pt
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	71.3 pt
Average Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02	66.6 pt
HP Omen 16-xf0376ng WDC PC SN810 512GB	64.5 pt
HP Victus 16-r0077ng Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02	61.8 pt

DiskSpd
seq read
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	4677 (4664.17^min - 4676.56^max) MB/s +71%
HP Omen 16-xf0376ng WDC PC SN810 512GB	3550 (3505.51^min - 3549.67^max) MB/s +30%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	3520 (3490.23^min - 3519.95^max) MB/s +29%
Average Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02 (2735 - 4156, n=10)	3481 MB/s +27%
Average of class Gaming (1319 - 7045, n=164, last 2 years)	3475 MB/s +27%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	3349 (938.07^min - 3349.15^max) MB/s +22%
HP Victus 16-r0077ng Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02	2735 (2694.63^min - 2735.3^max) MB/s
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	2519 MB/s -8%
seq write
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	4485 (775.32^min - 4484.81^max) MB/s +23%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	4326 (4313.21^min - 4326.48^max) MB/s +19%
Average Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02 (3038 - 4893, n=10)	3890 MB/s +7%
Average of class Gaming (535 - 9307, n=164, last 2 years)	3805 MB/s +5%
HP Omen 16-xf0376ng WDC PC SN810 512GB	3783 (3552.81^min - 3782.83^max) MB/s +4%
HP Victus 16-r0077ng Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02	3641 (3537^min - 3640.66^max) MB/s
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	3291 (3216.4^min - 3290.77^max) MB/s -10%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	2220 (2186.31^min - 2219.63^max) MB/s -39%
seq q8 t1 read
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	6935 (5510.15^min - 6934.86^max) MB/s +12%
HP Omen 16-xf0376ng WDC PC SN810 512GB	6889 (5972.9^min - 6888.72^max) MB/s +12%
Average Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02 (6169 - 6985, n=10)	6663 MB/s +8%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	6661 (6037.07^min - 6660.97^max) MB/s +8%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	6660 (6017.57^min - 6659.93^max) MB/s +8%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	6460 (6020.84^min - 6459.94^max) MB/s +5%
Average of class Gaming (2594 - 16089, n=164, last 2 years)	6322 MB/s +2%
HP Victus 16-r0077ng Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02	6169 (5196.32^min - 6168.56^max) MB/s
seq q8 t1 write
Average Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02 (5144 - 5667, n=10)	5441 MB/s +2%
HP Victus 16-r0077ng Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02	5355 (5315.44^min - 5354.87^max) MB/s
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	4943 (4926^min - 4942.6^max) MB/s -8%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	4926 (4833.5^min - 4926^max) MB/s -8%
Average of class Gaming (539 - 14571, n=164, last 2 years)	4850 MB/s -9%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	4803 (4344.79^min - 4802.73^max) MB/s -10%
HP Omen 16-xf0376ng WDC PC SN810 512GB	4459 (4352.43^min - 4459.27^max) MB/s -17%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	2216 (2187.96^min - 2215.64^max) MB/s -59%
4k q1 t1 read
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	80.1 (78.57^min - 80.12^max) MB/s +42%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	67.9 (64.79^min - 67.93^max) MB/s +20%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	66.9 (50.9^min - 66.86^max) MB/s +18%
HP Omen 16-xf0376ng WDC PC SN810 512GB	66.1 (65.3^min - 66.08^max) MB/s +17%
Average of class Gaming (30.6 - 95.9, n=164, last 2 years)	66 MB/s +17%
Average Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02 (51.3 - 69.6, n=10)	58.8 MB/s +4%
HP Victus 16-r0077ng Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02	56.6 (54^min - 56.56^max) MB/s
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	48.4 (47.92^min - 48.42^max) MB/s -14%
4k q1 t1 write
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	313 (306.34^min - 313.21^max) MB/s +120%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	253 (250.9^min - 252.85^max) MB/s +78%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	244 (243^min - 243.65^max) MB/s +71%
Average of class Gaming (78 - 397, n=164, last 2 years)	224 MB/s +57%
Average Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02 (116.4 - 219, n=10)	160.9 MB/s +13%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	159.6 (158.36^min - 159.58^max) MB/s +12%
HP Omen 16-xf0376ng WDC PC SN810 512GB	155.1 (147.48^min - 155.14^max) MB/s +9%
HP Victus 16-r0077ng Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02	142.3 (140.08^min - 142.3^max) MB/s
4k q32 t16 read
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	4173 (4166.98^min - 4173.4^max) MB/s +316%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	3523 (3416.03^min - 3522.69^max) MB/s +251%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	3311 (3243.78^min - 3311.19^max) MB/s +230%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	3013 (755.04^min - 3013.06^max) MB/s +200%
Average of class Gaming (417 - 6172, n=164, last 2 years)	2568 MB/s +156%
Average Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02 (561 - 3829, n=10)	2039 MB/s +103%
HP Omen 16-xf0376ng WDC PC SN810 512GB	1217 (1195.73^min - 1216.61^max) MB/s +21%
HP Victus 16-r0077ng Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02	1004 (933.19^min - 1004.48^max) MB/s
4k q32 t16 write
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	3597 (3488.54^min - 3597.4^max) MB/s +637%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	3552 (3546.24^min - 3551.63^max) MB/s +628%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	2736 (1172^min - 2736.15^max) MB/s +461%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	2193 (2174.06^min - 2193.44^max) MB/s +349%
Average of class Gaming (162.3 - 4869, n=164, last 2 years)	2133 MB/s +337%
Average Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02 (365 - 2682, n=10)	1315 MB/s +169%
HP Victus 16-r0077ng Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02	488 (476.91^min - 488.32^max) MB/s
HP Omen 16-xf0376ng WDC PC SN810 512GB	486 (470.43^min - 486.44^max) MB/s 0%

AS SSD
Score Total
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	8963 Points +80%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	8452 Points +69%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	7774 Points +56%
Average of class Gaming (2271 - 13854, n=156, last 2 years)	6746 Points +35%
Average Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02 (4422 - 8212, n=10)	6080 Points +22%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	5636 Points +13%
HP Omen 16-xf0376ng WDC PC SN810 512GB	5262 Points +5%
HP Victus 16-r0077ng Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02	4988 Points
Score Read
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	3449 Points +133%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	3174 Points +114%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	2959 Points +100%
Average of class Gaming (776 - 4721, n=156, last 2 years)	2446 Points +65%
Average Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02 (1322 - 3403, n=10)	2182 Points +47%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	1805 Points +22%
HP Omen 16-xf0376ng WDC PC SN810 512GB	1638 Points +11%
HP Victus 16-r0077ng Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02	1480 Points
Score Write
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	3832 Points +34%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	3723 Points +30%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	3331 Points +17%
Average of class Gaming (515 - 7208, n=156, last 2 years)	3112 Points +9%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	3012 Points +5%
HP Omen 16-xf0376ng WDC PC SN810 512GB	2885 Points +1%
Average Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02 (2518 - 3244, n=10)	2871 Points 0%
HP Victus 16-r0077ng Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02	2858 Points
Seq Read
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	5621.18 MB/s +7%
Average Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02 (4806 - 5837, n=10)	5485 MB/s +4%
HP Victus 16-r0077ng Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02	5265.97 MB/s
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	5185.49 MB/s -2%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	5126 MB/s -3%
HP Omen 16-xf0376ng WDC PC SN810 512GB	5080.22 MB/s -4%
Average of class Gaming (2260 - 12763, n=156, last 2 years)	4945 MB/s -6%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	4582 MB/s -13%
Seq Write
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	4546 MB/s +61%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	4010.3 MB/s +42%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	3900.46 MB/s +38%
Average of class Gaming (495 - 11316, n=156, last 2 years)	3760 MB/s +33%
Average Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02 (2429 - 5175, n=10)	3626 MB/s +28%
HP Victus 16-r0077ng Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02	2831.66 MB/s
HP Omen 16-xf0376ng WDC PC SN810 512GB	2824.64 MB/s 0%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	2310 MB/s -18%
4K Read
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	73.46 MB/s +20%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	67.7 MB/s +10%
HP Omen 16-xf0376ng WDC PC SN810 512GB	65.35 MB/s +6%
Average of class Gaming (27.8 - 112.1, n=156, last 2 years)	65.2 MB/s +6%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	62.76 MB/s +2%
HP Victus 16-r0077ng Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02	61.43 MB/s
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	61.3 MB/s 0%
Average Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02 (49.8 - 65.6, n=10)	58.9 MB/s -4%
4K Write
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	288 MB/s +38%
Average of class Gaming (108.8 - 512, n=156, last 2 years)	213 MB/s +2%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	211.54 MB/s +1%
HP Victus 16-r0077ng Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02	209.28 MB/s
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	207 MB/s -1%
HP Omen 16-xf0376ng WDC PC SN810 512GB	194.78 MB/s -7%
Average Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02 (147.9 - 224, n=10)	186.4 MB/s -11%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	137.9 MB/s -34%
4K-64 Read
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	2813.87 MB/s +215%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	2593.07 MB/s +191%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	2378 MB/s +166%
Average of class Gaming (451 - 3475, n=156, last 2 years)	1881 MB/s +111%
Average Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02 (773 - 2766, n=10)	1574 MB/s +76%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	1285 MB/s +44%
HP Omen 16-xf0376ng WDC PC SN810 512GB	1064.22 MB/s +19%
HP Victus 16-r0077ng Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02	892.37 MB/s
4K-64 Write
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	3219.74 MB/s +36%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	3195.33 MB/s +35%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	2669 MB/s +13%
Average of class Gaming (277 - 5909, n=156, last 2 years)	2527 MB/s +7%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	2493 MB/s +5%
HP Omen 16-xf0376ng WDC PC SN810 512GB	2408.24 MB/s +2%
HP Victus 16-r0077ng Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02	2365.53 MB/s
Average Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02 (2083 - 2535, n=10)	2322 MB/s -2%
Access Time Read
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	0.079 ms * -52%
Average Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02 (0.037 - 0.126, n=10)	0.0755 ms * -45%
Average of class Gaming (0.016 - 0.379, n=155, last 2 years)	0.05576 ms * -7%
HP Victus 16-r0077ng Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02	0.052 ms *
HP Omen 16-xf0376ng WDC PC SN810 512GB	0.051 ms * +2%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	0.041 ms * +21%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	0.031 ms * +40%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	0.027 ms * +48%
Access Time Write
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	0.064 ms * -220%
Average of class Gaming (0.011 - 1.028, n=156, last 2 years)	0.04728 ms * -136%
Average Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02 (0.018 - 0.073, n=10)	0.0404 ms * -102%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	0.029 ms * -45%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	0.02 ms * -0%
HP Victus 16-r0077ng Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02	0.02 ms *
HP Omen 16-xf0376ng WDC PC SN810 512GB	0.019 ms * +5%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	0.013 ms * +35%

* ... smaller is better

Sustained Read Performance: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

HP Victus 16-r0077ng Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02: Ø5244 (4542.22-6091.41)

HP Omen 16-xf0376ng WDC PC SN810 512GB: Ø6732 (5625.82-6897.16)

Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR: Ø6087 (3287.84-6658.98)

Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR: Ø3831 (253.34-6627.38)

Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10: Ø6590 (6239.87-6954.51)

MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH: Ø1946 (1623.72-6448.85)

图形卡

由于 Nvidia 在内存扩展（VRAM 数量和接口）方面相当节俭--如前所述--GeForce RTX 4070 远远落后于RTX 4080和 RTX 4090。如果单纯与其他 RTX 4070 笔记本电脑相比，Victus 16 的性能并不差。在合成图形基准测试中，16 英寸机型被迫向竞争对手认输，但仍保持了之前 RTX 4070 的平均水平，尤其是惠普没有将自己的最大可能 TGP 限制在 140 瓦，而仅设定为 120 瓦。

3DMark Performance Rating | 3DMark 11 | 3DMark

3DMark Performance Rating - Percent
Average of class Gaming	99.8 pt
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	93.9 pt
HP Omen 16-xf0376ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	92.3 pt
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	90.7 pt
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	90 pt
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	89.4 pt
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	88.4 pt
HP Victus 16-r0077ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	87.3 pt

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Average of class Gaming (1029 - 72178, n=183, last 2 years)	43810 Points +10%
HP Omen 16-xf0376ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	42142 Points +5%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	41480 Points +4%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	41302 Points +3%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	41090 Points +3%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	40995 Points +3%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (24229 - 46434, n=63)	40427 Points +1%
HP Victus 16-r0077ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	39951 Points

3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
HP Omen 16-xf0376ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	31698 Points +5%
Average of class Gaming (781 - 53059, n=194, last 2 years)	31415 Points +4%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	30936 Points +2%
HP Victus 16-r0077ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	30239 Points
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	30051 Points -1%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	29853 Points -1%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (12242 - 33451, n=67)	29070 Points -4%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	28885 Points -4%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Average of class Gaming (224 - 22717, n=189, last 2 years)	13118 Points +17%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	12617 Points +13%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	11955 Points +7%
HP Omen 16-xf0376ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	11907 Points +7%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	11868 Points +6%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	11798 Points +6%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (5012 - 13391, n=65)	11605 Points +4%
HP Victus 16-r0077ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	11168 Points
2560x1440 Port Royal Graphics
Average of class Gaming (371 - 14592, n=113, last 2 years)	8704 Points +29%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	7649 Points +13%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	7200 Points +7%
HP Omen 16-xf0376ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	7161 Points +6%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	7141 Points +6%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	7131 Points +6%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (3761 - 8041, n=42)	7072 Points +5%
HP Victus 16-r0077ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	6759 Points

3DMark 11 Performance		33616 points
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score		159379 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score		65316 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score		26013 points
3DMark Time Spy Score		11427 points
Help

... in comparison

Blender
v3.3 Classroom OPTIX/RTX
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H	24 Seconds * -4%
HP Victus 16-r0077ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H	23 Seconds *
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (18 - 30, n=64)	21.5 Seconds * +7%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H	21 Seconds * +9%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	21 Seconds * +9%
HP Omen 16-xf0376ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	21 Seconds * +9%
Average of class Gaming (9 - 95, n=178, last 2 years)	20.9 Seconds * +9%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX	19 Seconds * +17%
v3.3 Classroom CUDA
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (32 - 181, n=66)	40.3 Seconds * -12%
Average of class Gaming (16 - 175, n=183, last 2 years)	36.5 Seconds * -1%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H	36 Seconds * -0%
HP Victus 16-r0077ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H	36 Seconds *
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	35 Seconds * +3%
HP Omen 16-xf0376ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	35 Seconds * +3%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H	34 Seconds * +6%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX	33 Seconds * +8%

* ... smaller is better

游戏性能

在实际游戏测试中，3D 性能也接近 RTX 4070 的平均水平。在原生全高清分辨率下，Victus 16 能够流畅运行几乎所有当前游戏，即使在最高设置下也是如此。只有要求非常苛刻或优化不佳的游戏，如不朽的阿维姆或星际争霸无法达到 60 FPS 以上。

Performance Rating - Percent
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7745HX	98 pt
Average of class Gaming	94.5 pt
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H	92.3 pt
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H	92 pt
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	87.6 pt
HP Victus 16-r0077ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H	84.8 pt
HP Omen 16-xf0376ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7840HS	82.5 pt
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7735HS	78.4 pt

The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Average of class Gaming (18.4 - 216, n=163, last 2 years)	128.3 fps +13%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7745HX	119.8 (114^min) fps +5%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H	119 fps +4%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H	116 (48.5^P0.1, 82.5^P1) fps +2%
HP Victus 16-r0077ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H	114 fps
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7735HS	113.2 (98^min) fps -1%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (69.8 - 133.7, n=56)	112.5 fps -1%
HP Omen 16-xf0376ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7840HS	112 fps -2%

GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H	123.2 (3.96^min, 76.9^P1) fps +9%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7745HX	119.9 (3.81^min, 76.9^P1) fps +6%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H	119.7 (4.54^min, 76.9^P1) fps +6%
Average of class Gaming (12.1 - 167.7, n=169, last 2 years)	113.7 fps +1%
HP Victus 16-r0077ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H	112.8 (4.13^min, 66.7^P1) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (48.3 - 140.5, n=59)	110.7 fps -2%
HP Omen 16-xf0376ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7840HS	105.9 (19.5^min, 76.9^P1) fps -6%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7735HS	97.4 (36.1^min, 71.4^P1) fps -14%

Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7745HX	119.9 fps +10%
Average of class Gaming (19.2 - 201, n=181, last 2 years)	119.8 fps +10%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H	116.2 fps +6%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H	115 fps +5%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (41 - 131.9, n=61)	110.9 fps +1%
HP Victus 16-r0077ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H	109.3 fps
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7735HS	109.1 fps 0%
HP Omen 16-xf0376ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7840HS	108.7 fps -1%

Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16
Average of class Gaming (38.9 - 421, n=178, last 2 years)	229 fps +19%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7745HX	223 (89^min, 167.8^P1) fps +16%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H	204 (39^min, 153.9^P1) fps +6%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H	200 (31.2^min, 147.4^P1) fps +4%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (76.3 - 234, n=61)	196 fps +2%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7735HS	192.6 (25.1^min, 144.3^P1) fps 0%
HP Victus 16-r0077ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H	192 (24.8^min, 138.8^P1) fps
HP Omen 16-xf0376ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7840HS	190.3 (22.4^min, 141.8^P1) fps -1%

Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7745HX	182 (152.8^min) fps +38%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H	154.7 (131.1^min) fps +18%
Average of class Gaming (65.1 - 220, n=186, last 2 years)	151 fps +15%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (89.7 - 191.2, n=63)	147.9 fps +12%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H	144.5 (123.6^min) fps +10%
HP Omen 16-xf0376ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7840HS	137.8 (120.3^min) fps +5%
HP Victus 16-r0077ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H	131.6 (112.7^min) fps
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7735HS	114.8 (97.8^min) fps -13%

X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3)
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7745HX	117.8 fps +23%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H	115.3 fps +21%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H	110.2 fps +16%
Average of class Gaming (32.8 - 166.2, n=192, last 2 years)	108.2 fps +13%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (52.1 - 147.9, n=65)	104.6 fps +10%
HP Victus 16-r0077ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H	95.4 fps
HP Omen 16-xf0376ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7840HS	84.8 fps -11%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7735HS	76.3 fps -20%

Immortals of Aveum - 1920x1080 Ultra AF:16x
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (46.1 - 49.9, n=4)	47.5 fps +3%
HP Omen 16-xf0376ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7840HS	46.9 (9.42^min, 11^P0.1, 21.8^P1) fps +2%
HP Victus 16-r0077ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H	46.1 (4.47^min, 6.52^P0.1, 23.1^P1) fps
Average of class Gaming (14.9 - 106.3, n=10, last 2 years)	46.1 fps 0%

Atlas Fallen - 1920x1080 Very High Preset
HP Omen 16-xf0376ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7840HS	111.1 (21.6^min, 27.8^P0.1, 46.4^P1) fps +4%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (105.3 - 111.1, n=4)	107.3 fps +1%
HP Victus 16-r0077ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H	106.6 (23.2^min, 33.1^P0.1, 76^P1) fps
Average of class Gaming (9.8 - 161, n=13, last 2 years)	83.5 fps -22%

Armored Core 6 - 1920x1080 Maximum Preset
HP Omen 16-xf0376ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7840HS	107 (52.8^min, 64^P0.1, 78.6^P1) fps +10%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (87.2 - 107, n=4)	99.4 fps +2%
HP Victus 16-r0077ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H	97 (17.3^min, 21.6^P0.1, 65.4^P1) fps
Average of class Gaming (10.7 - 107, n=14, last 2 years)	71 fps -27%

Atomic Heart - 1920x1080 Atomic Preset
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7735HS	78 (41.8^min, 61.5^P0.1, 67.9^P1) fps +11%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (70.4 - 79, n=4)	75.4 fps +7%
Average of class Gaming (10.2 - 166, n=18, last 2 years)	72.8 fps +3%
HP Victus 16-r0077ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H	70.4 (20.9^min, 40.5^P0.1, 54.2^P1) fps

High On Life - 1920x1080 Very High Preset
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H	110.6 (26.9^min, 44^P0.1, 67.4^P1) fps +9%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (101.9 - 114, n=4)	108.8 fps +7%
HP Victus 16-r0077ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H	101.9 (37.5^min, 46.1^P0.1, 66.1^P1) fps
Average of class Gaming (9.55 - 185.2, n=16, last 2 years)	94.5 fps -7%

Company of Heroes 3 - 1920x1080 Maximum Settings
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H	153.9 fps +15%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (134 - 157.5, n=5)	147.1 fps +10%
HP Victus 16-r0077ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H	134 (20^min) fps
Average of class Gaming (43.8 - 235, n=16, last 2 years)	129 fps -4%

Resident Evil 4 Remake - 1920x1080 Max Preset
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H	82.4 (14.4^min, 35^P0.1, 57.2^P1) fps +10%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (74.8 - 86.7, n=4)	81.1 fps +8%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7735HS	80.5 (12.2^min, 26.8^P0.1, 60.9^P1) fps +8%
HP Victus 16-r0077ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H	74.8 (24.5^min, 41.7^P0.1, 51.9^P1) fps
Average of class Gaming (19.7 - 143.2, n=15, last 2 years)	70.7 fps -5%

Sons of the Forest - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T
HP Victus 16-r0077ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H	87.5 (34.6^min, 39.6^P0.1, 55.4^P1) fps
HP Omen 16-xf0376ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7840HS	85.4 (54.8^min, 64.6^P0.1, 72.6^P1) fps -2%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (71.1 - 87.5, n=4)	81.6 fps -7%
Average of class Gaming (14.8 - 93.9, n=19, last 2 years)	68.8 fps -21%

Baldur's Gate 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset
Average of class Gaming (34.5 - 208, n=45, last 2 years)	103.5 fps +8%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (66.7 - 128.5, n=24)	101.9 fps +7%
HP Victus 16-r0077ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H	95.4 (26.9^min, 35^P0.1, 50.4^P1) fps

Ratchet & Clank Rift Apart - 1920x1080 Very High Preset AA:T
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (52.3 - 58.1, n=4)	56 fps +7%
Average of class Gaming (28.5 - 111.1, n=13, last 2 years)	53.7 fps +3%
HP Victus 16-r0077ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H	52.3 (22.6^min, 25.3^P0.1, 35.1^P1) fps

在我们 60 分钟的 Witcher 3测试中没有出现掉帧等异常情况。随着时间的推移，性能略有下降，但仍相当稳定。

Witcher 3 FPS chart

HP Victus 16-r0077ng i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU: Ø107.8 (102-118)

HP Omen 16-xf0376ng R7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU: Ø106.6 (94-113)

Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 R7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU: Ø112.3 (106-121)

Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 R7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU: Ø111.1 (107-116)

Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU: Ø113.3 (107-120)

MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU: Ø117.1 (108-122)

	low	med.	high	ultra
GTA V (2015)		180.9	175.7	112.8
The Witcher 3 (2015)				114
Dota 2 Reborn (2015)	173.9	147.9	139.3	131.6
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018)		145	109.3
X-Plane 11.11 (2018)	136	118.3	95.4
Strange Brigade (2018)		224	192.4	192
High On Life (2023)		166.2	126.7	101.9
Atomic Heart (2023)		131.7	86.2	70.4
Company of Heroes 3 (2023)		174	135	134
Sons of the Forest (2023)		92.1	88.5	87.5
Resident Evil 4 Remake (2023)		108.3	105.5	74.8
Ratchet & Clank Rift Apart (2023)		72.5	58	52.3
Atlas Fallen (2023)		133.8	126.7	106.6
Immortals of Aveum (2023)			56	46.1
Armored Core 6 (2023)		102.5	101.9	97
Starfield (2023)		62.3	51.2	46.6
The Crew Motorfest (2023)		60	60	60
Baldur's Gate 3 (2023)		115.2	99.1	95.4

排放量

噪音

如果使用平衡模式，Victus 16 的声音不会太大。在Witcher 3 中，大约 46 分贝（A）的音量清晰可闻，但并不极端（在性能模式下，音量达到了令人恼火的 56 分贝）。在空闲状态和无害任务（如办公、视频和网页浏览）下，风扇的转速通常为 28 至 30 dB(A)，高于竞争对手。惠普在这方面还有改进的余地。

Noise Level

Idle		28 / 29 / 30 dB(A)
Load		43 / 48 dB(A)

	30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 25 dB(A)

	HP Victus 16-r0077ng i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	HP Omen 16-xf0376ng R7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 R7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 R7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
Noise		2%	10%	3%	-3%	10%
off / environment *	25	24 4%	23.2 7%	25.7 -3%	23 8%	24 4%
Idle Minimum *	28	25 11%	23.2 17%	25.7 8%	23 18%	24 14%
Idle Average *	29	29 -0%	23.2 20%	25.7 11%	23 21%	24 17%
Idle Maximum *	30	32 -7%	26.2 13%	26.3 12%	33.64 -12%	24 20%
Load Average *	43	44 -2%	31.4 27%	33.9 21%	51.49 -20%	34.81 19%
Witcher 3 ultra *	46	44 4%	48.4 -5%		55.27 -20%	44.05 4%
Load Maximum *	48	46 4%	53.8 -12%	62 -29%	55.24 -15%	51.57 -7%

* ... smaller is better

温度

在空闲模式和负载情况下，温度也略高于大多数对比设备。在Witcher 3 上运行一小时后，机箱顶部温度达到 52 °C，机箱底部温度达到 54 °C，这与在膝上进行游戏时的温度不相称。至少手掌区域始终保持在舒适的温度范围内，最高温度为 33 °C。

Max. Load

Idle

Witcher 3


49 °C	51 °C	45 °C
48 °C	49 °C	39 °C
29 °C	32 °C	31 °C

Maximum: 51 °C
Average: 41.4 °C


54 °C	51 °C	46 °C
45 °C	47 °C	46 °C
30 °C	30 °C	32 °C

Maximum: 54 °C
Average: 35.8 °C

Power Supply (max.) 46 °C | Room Temperature 22 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900

Max. Load

Idle

Witcher 3


29 °C	35 °C	28 °C
30 °C	37 °C	28 °C
27 °C	27 °C	27 °C

Maximum: 37 °C
Average: 29.8 °C


29 °C	29 °C	28 °C
29 °C	29 °C	27 °C
27 °C	27 °C	27 °C

Maximum: 29 °C
Average: 28 °C

Power Supply (max.) 31 °C | Room Temperature 22 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900

Max. Load

Idle

Witcher 3


47 °C	51 °C	43 °C
46 °C	52 °C	40 °C
33 °C	31 °C	31 °C

Maximum: 52 °C
Average: 41.6 °C


51 °C	54 °C	48 °C
44 °C	46 °C	48 °C
29 °C	32 °C	32 °C

Maximum: 54 °C
Average: 42.7 °C

Power Supply (max.) 45 °C | Room Temperature 22 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 41.4 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 51 °C / 124 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 54 °C / 129 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.8 °C / 86 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 41.6 °C / 107 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (33 °C / 91.4 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-4.1 °C / -7.4 F).

	HP Victus 16-r0077ng i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	HP Omen 16-xf0376ng R7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 R7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 R7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
Heat		2%	15%	5%	23%	-16%
Maximum Upper Side *	51	49 4%	41.8 18%	41.5 19%	41 20%	60 -18%
Maximum Bottom *	54	57 -6%	41.4 23%	51.8 4%	47 13%	61 -13%
Idle Upper Side *	37	31 16%	29 22%	31.6 15%	23 38%	38.2 -3%
Idle Bottom *	29	31 -7%	30.4 -5%	34.5 -19%	23 21%	37.7 -30%

* ... smaller is better

压力测试

冷却系统让我们喜忧参半。尽管酷睿 i7-13700H 在满载情况下仅以基本时钟或略低于基本时钟的频率运行，但 CPU 的温度仍高达 85 ℃ 左右。显卡的情况则要宽松一些。在进行 60 分钟的 Furmark 和 Prime95 测试后，温度略低于 78 °C，时钟频率为 1,635 MHz，这是一个稳定的结果。

发言人

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

HP Victus 16-r0077ng audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (77 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 35% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 58% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 21% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 74% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

HP Omen 16-xf0376ng audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 14.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.2% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 26% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 67% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 16% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 80% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

能源管理

耗电量

在功耗方面，Victus 16 在竞争中脱颖而出。平均空闲功耗为 13 瓦，游戏功耗为 142 瓦，低于大多数同类设备。因此，随附的 230 瓦电源完全够用。

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.1 / Watt
Idle	8 / 13 / 22 Watt
Load	86 / 233 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	HP Victus 16-r0077ng i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	HP Omen 16-xf0376ng R7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 R7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 R7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	Average of class Gaming
Power Consumption		3%	-24%	-20%	-10%	-10%	-33%
Idle Minimum *	8	9 -13%	8.1 -1%	11.6 -45%	11.8 -48%	11 -38%	13.5 ?(2 - 39, n=154, last 2 years) -69%
Idle Average *	13	14 -8%	15.9 -22%	15.6 -20%	16.1 -24%	18 -38%	18.9 ?(8 - 55.6, n=154, last 2 years) -45%
Idle Maximum *	22	20 9%	37.2 -69%	16.5 25%	17 23%	19 14%	26.7 ?(9 - 101.1, n=154, last 2 years) -21%
Load Average *	86	84 2%	90.9 -6%	155 -80%	100.6 -17%	91 -6%	106.3 ?(32.1 - 201, n=153, last 2 years) -24%
Witcher 3 ultra *	141.8	140.9 1%	189.6 -34%	154.8 -9%	158 -11%	130 8%
Load Maximum *	233	176 24%	263.5 -13%	205 12%	192 18%	228 2%	249 ?(64.5 - 418, n=154, last 2 years) -7%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption Witcher 3 / Stress test

HP Victus 16-r0077ng; Witcher 3 ultra: Ø141.8 (138.7-146.4)

HP Victus 16-r0077ng; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø164.1 (149.7-220)

HP Victus 16-r0077ng; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø12.8 (8.49-21.8)

Power consumption with an external monitor

HP Victus 16-r0077ng; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø77.7 (58.2-159)

HP Victus 16-r0077ng; Cinebench R23 Multi (external Monitor): Ø107.2 (73-188.7)

HP Victus 16-r0077ng; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø120.6 (116.5-133.9)

HP Victus 16-r0077ng; 1920x1080 The Witcher 3 ultra (external Monitor): Ø135.6 (131.2-141.4)

HP Victus 16-r0077ng; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø18.7 (10.1-28.3)

电池寿命

由于采用了主动图形切换功能，Victus 16 在没有电源插座的情况下也能保持较长的游戏时间。在实际的 WLAN 测试中（亮度设置为 150 cd/m²），这款 16 英寸设备的续航时间为 426 分钟，比同类的 Omen 16 长了近 1.5 小时，尽管一些竞争对手由于采用了更大的电池（Victus 16 的电池容量为 83 Wh）而续航时间更长。

Battery Runtime

WiFi Websurfing

7h 06min

	HP Victus 16-r0077ng i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 83 Wh	HP Omen 16-xf0376ng R7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 83 Wh	Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 R7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 80 Wh	Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 R7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 90 Wh	Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 88 Wh	MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 99.9 Wh	Average of class Gaming
Battery Runtime		-19%	-44%	27%	5%	9%	-12%
WiFi v1.3	426	344 -19%	240 -44%	540 27%	448 5%	466 9%	375 ?(85 - 889, n=154, last 2 years) -12%
Reader / Idle			392	729		661	565 ?(155 - 1290, n=67, last 2 years)
Load			61	105	126	142	85.6 ?(41 - 173, n=117, last 2 years)
H.264				614	442	462	409 ?(129 - 837, n=79, last 2 years)

Pros

+ 稳定的 CPU 和 GPU 性能

+ 真彩色 144 Hz 显示屏

+ 电池续航时间长

+ 优雅的设计

Cons

- 外壳质量有待提高

- WiFi 性能一般

- 负载时温度较高

- 没有 Thunderbolt 4

判决

如果惠普没有采取合理定价的方式，Victus 16-r0077ng 在与竞争对手的竞争中将会相当艰难。技嘉技嘉 Aero 16、联想联想Legion Pro 5和宏碁 Nitro 16和微星 Stealth 16 Studio虽然其中一些产品的价格要高得多，但它们的综合评分都比较高。

Victus 16 的起售价约为 949.99 美元，性价比相对较高。

虽然塑料机箱看起来并不特别优质，而且没有 Thunderbolt 4，但它的设计和可用的输入设备还是值得称赞的。大多数买家对色彩精确的全高清显示屏（144 Hz）也会感到满意，尽管亮度较差。性能酷睿 i7-13700H和 GeForce RTX 4070性能基本符合预期，而排放值则有些参差不齐。在平衡模式下（我们建议日常使用该模式），16 英寸处理器的噪音不大，但温度较高。

总的来说，注重价格的玩家在这里不会出错。不过，那些更看重个别方面的质量或希望获得更好效果的玩家最好还是购买其他竞争设备。

价格和供应情况

与我们的 Victus 16 评测配置（酷睿 i7-13700H、GeForce RTX 4070 和 144 Hz 显示屏）相当的美国售价为 1439.99 美元。

价格截至 2023 年 9 月 26 日，可能会有变动。

HP Victus 16-r0077ng - 09/25/2023 v7 ^(old)
Florian Glaser

Chassis

74 / 98 → 76%

Keyboard

79%

Pointing Device

83%

Connectivity

60 / 80 → 75%

Weight

61 / 10-66 → 90%

Battery

75 / 95 → 79%

Display

89%

Games Performance

98%

Application Performance

95%

Temperature

81 / 95 → 85%

Noise

78 / 90 → 87%

Audio

73%

Camera

41 / 85 → 48%

Average

76%

85%

Gaming - Weighted Average

Price comparison

Editor of the original article: Jacob Fisher - Translator - 1418 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2022

Translator: Ninh Ngoc Duy - Editorial Assistant - 470341 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008

contact me via: Facebook

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 惠普 Victus 16 笔记本电脑评测：配备 RTX 4070 的全高清游戏本

Florian Glaser, 2023-09-26 (Update: 2023-09-26)

惠普 Victus 16 笔记本电脑评测：配备 RTX 4070 的全高清游戏本

Omen 是价格敏感者的另一种选择。

潜在的竞争对手比较

尺寸比较

交流

网络摄像头

显示屏

Display Response Times

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

性能

测试条件

处理器

Cinebench R15 Multi Sustained Load

系统性能

DPC 延迟

存储设备

Sustained Read Performance: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

图形卡

游戏性能

Witcher 3 FPS chart

排放量

噪音

温度

压力测试

发言人

HP Victus 16-r0077ng audio analysis

HP Omen 16-xf0376ng audio analysis

能源管理

耗电量

Power consumption Witcher 3 / Stress test

Power consumption with an external monitor

电池寿命

Pros

Cons

判决

价格和供应情况

More articles related to this device

Transparency

Price comparison