Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
Magyar联想Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H评论。高端的RTX4080性能强者
联想Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H的零售价接近4,000欧元，我们现在评测的这款产品不能真正被视为便宜货。然而，这个价格为你提供了一个 酷睿i9-13900HX，32GB DDR5-5600-RAM（2x 16GB），以及1TB PCIe Gen 4x4 NVMe M.2 2280 SSD。
该 NvidiaGeForce RTX 4080 笔记本电脑GPU12 GB GDDR6 VRAM，负责处理苛刻的图形任务。哑光IPS显示屏采用16:10格式，分辨率为2560 x 1600像素，可实现100% sRGB和500尼特的峰值亮度。联想为240赫兹的面板配备了支持Nvidia G-Sync和AMD FreeSync的功能，这是一件好事。
Windows 11家庭版作为首选操作系统被安装。
到目前为止，联想Legion 7 Pro的主要竞争对手是Razer Blade 16 Early 2023不过，看看这款笔记本电脑与上一代产品的对比情况也很有意思。因此，我们还包括Legion 7 SKU，具有以下组合。酷睿i9-12900HX和RTX 3080 Ti, Ryzen 9 5900HX和RTX 3080, 以及 Ryzen 9 6900HX和 RX 6850M XT.
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 89.4 % v7 (old) | 02 / 2023 | Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU | 2.7 kg | 26 mm | 16.00" | 2560x1600 | |
| 91.2 % v7 (old) | 02 / 2023 | Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU | 2.4 kg | 21.99 mm | 16.00" | 2560x1600 | |
| 88.9 % v7 (old) | 09 / 2022 | Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU | 2.6 kg | 20 mm | 16.00" | 2560x1600 | |
| 88.1 % v7 (old) | 06 / 2021 | Lenovo Legion 7 16ACHg6 R9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU | 2.5 kg | 23.5 mm | 16.00" | 2560x1600 | |
| 90.8 % v7 (old) | 09 / 2022 | Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 R9 6900HX, Radeon RX 6850M XT | 2.6 kg | 19.4 mm | 16.00" | 2560x1600 |
案例：与前代产品差别不大
机箱设计与它的前辈相当相似，即 Legion 7 16ARHA7有一些轻微的变化，如重新设计的侧面和后部通风口。即使有这些变化，机箱设计仍然很好。铰链的稳定性和强度，可以完全打开到180°，也高于该级别的平均水平。
整体质量感觉很好。特别是金属盖子，看起来很有档次，但它很快就会成为一个指纹磁铁。除了盖子上的Legion 标记外，关机时的外观基本不显眼。
然而，在操作过程中，由于RGB照明键盘和前面的LED灯带，Legion 7 Pro可以立即被识别为一台游戏笔记本电脑。
16英寸Legion 7 Pro的重量约为2.7公斤，往往是同类产品中较重的笔记本电脑之一（Razer Blade 16的重量少300克）。同样，2.6厘米的高度比Blade 16多出约4毫米，这在理论上应该有助于更好地散热。
连接性。一系列的USB端口
端口
Legion 7 Pro以其丰富的端口而令人印象深刻。总共有6个USB端口（2个Type-C，4个Type-A），即使在高端游戏笔记本电脑中也不是经常出现这种情况。由于两个USB Type-C端口支持HDMI 2.1输出和DisplayPort输出，因此可以连接三个外部显示器。同样令人印象深刻的是通过USB Type-C的140W电力传输。
一个RJ-45端口和一个音频插孔完成了端口的选择。右侧有一个物理网络摄像头快门开关是一个优点。Legion 7 Pro的唯一缺点是没有读卡器。
由于大多数端口都位于设备的后部，在使用有线游戏鼠标时，左手和右手都会得到他们的金钱回报。
沟通
我们没有发现Wi-Fi性能方面的任何差异。Legion Pro 7在距离我们的华硕ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000参考路由器1米处实现了1,600 Mb/s的吞吐量，这相当于非常好的传输和接收。Razer Blade 16的吞吐量要比它少几百兆。
网络摄像头
网络摄像头的质量在某种程度上高于平均水平。200万像素的摄像头提供了体面的图像清晰度和合格的色彩准确性，这对笔记本来说是可以接受的（不幸的是，这里的标准非常差）。
辅料
交付范围包括一个重达800克的电源，尺寸为18.5 x 8 x 2.5厘米，对于一个330瓦的模型来说，这符合预期。一些信息小册子是标准配置。
维护
联想可以让拆解Legion 7 Pro更加方便客户。即使卸下所有的外壳螺丝，底板也非常紧（特别是在后面），如果用力过猛，恐怕会损坏机箱。
由于这个原因，加上这是一个来自商店的零售样品，为了安全起见，我们没有尝试打开笔记本电脑。
担保
根据制造商在德国的信息，Legion 7 Pro的保修期可以通过高级护理延长到三年以上。
输入设备。没有太多的抱怨空间
键盘
键盘没有什么可抱怨的地方。典型的联想式按键，下边缘有弧度，确保在熟悉后有愉快的打字体验。启动和压力点相当好，虽然不完全接近机械键盘的水平。
在我们看来，键盘布局让人信服。那些经常依赖方向键的人可以期待体面的尺寸。一个完整的数字键盘也是可用的。清晰的键位标签意味着你可以在白天关闭背光。否则，背光提供了一个有用的强度和几种调整模式。
触摸板
12 x 7.5厘米的光滑触摸板对于一个16英寸的设备来说感觉足够了，而且放在相对较远的左边。我们没有发现任何关于精确度和滑行特性的问题，这有利于流畅的操作。
靠近底部的点击区域非常稳定，可以很容易地触发，但听起来相当响亮和摇摆不定。
显示：240赫兹面板，高亮度水平，无PWM
Legion 7 Pro的240赫兹WQXGA面板提供了469cd/m2的高平均亮度，这对于户外观看应该是个好兆头。然而，竞争对手也提供类似的亮度水平。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 86 %
Center on Battery: 511 cd/m²
Contrast: 1278:1 (Black: 0.4 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 0.95 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92, calibrated: 0.91
ΔE Greyscale 0.6 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
71.2% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.7% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
69.1% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.176
| Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H MNG007DA2-3 (CSO1628), IPS, 2560x1600, 16" | Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 CSOT T3 MNG007DA4-1, IPS, 2560x1600, 16" | Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE NE160QDM-NY1, IPS, 2560x1600, 16" | Lenovo Legion 7 16ACHg6 CSOT T3 MNG007DA1-1, IPS, 2560x1600, 16" | Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 BOE CQ NE160QDM-NY1, IPS, 2560x1600, 16" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 23% | -1% | 1% | -7% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 69.1 | 98.5 43% | 69.3 0% | 70.3 2% | 63.7 -8% |
| sRGB Coverage | 99.7 | 100 0% | 98.2 -2% | 99.4 0% | 95.3 -4% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 71.2 | 89.7 26% | 70.8 -1% | 72.7 2% | 65.7 -8% |
| Response Times | -29% | 2% | -11% | -19% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 12.3 ? | 6.6 ? 46% | 12.6 ? -2% | 14 ? -14% | 9.2 ? 25% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 5.9 ? | 12 ? -103% | 5.6 ? 5% | 6.4 ? -8% | 9.6 ? -63% |
| PWM Frequency | |||||
| Screen | -90% | -87% | -27% | -74% | |
| Brightness middle | 511 | 456.8 -11% | 547 7% | 489 -4% | 478.8 -6% |
| Brightness | 469 | 437 -7% | 523 12% | 469 0% | 477 2% |
| Brightness Distribution | 86 | 83 -3% | 88 2% | 92 7% | 90 5% |
| Black Level * | 0.4 | 0.35 12% | 0.44 -10% | 0.38 5% | 0.43 -8% |
| Contrast | 1278 | 1305 2% | 1243 -3% | 1287 1% | 1113 -13% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 0.95 | 3.7 -289% | 2.1 -121% | 1.45 -53% | 2.24 -136% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 2.07 | 6.42 -210% | 7 -238% | 2.16 -4% | 4.49 -117% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 0.91 | 0.66 27% | 0.9 1% | 1.16 -27% | 1.89 -108% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 0.6 | 2.6 -333% | 3.2 -433% | 1.6 -167% | 2.3 -283% |
| Gamma | 2.176 101% | 2.3 96% | 2.23 99% | 2.197 100% | 2.25 98% |
| CCT | 6545 99% | 6108 106% | 6979 93% | 6377 102% | 6955 93% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 73 | ||||
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 94 | ||||
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -32% /
-57% | -29% /
-56% | -12% /
-19% | -33% /
-52% |
* ... smaller is better
1,278:1的对比度与Blade 16相似。然而，Razer的旗舰产品提供了更高的色域覆盖率。Legion Pro 7可以管理100%的sRGB，但在涉及到Adobe RGB和Display P3的覆盖范围时就显得不足了。
也就是说，由于X-Rite Pantone校准，Legion Pro 7提供了开箱即用的出色色彩准确性。
响应时间（从黑到白约6毫秒）在预期范围内。观察角度的稳定性通常取决于IPS水平，从斜向位置看似乎相对较好。
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 5.9 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 2.2 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 3.7 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 15 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 12.3 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 5.7 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 6.6 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 22 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8746 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
性能。酷睿i9-13900HX和RTX 4080名列榜首
目前的配置使联想Legion Pro 7处于绝对的高端类别，这意味着你将不得不相应地掏出钱来（尽管如此，我们认为目前的价格水平过高）。
在任何情况下，这种配置提供了足够的动力，可以在未来几年内完成各种工作负荷。
测试条件
联想Vantage应用程序预装在其中，你可以选择几种性能和GPU操作模式。你还可以通过快捷键Fn+Q来改变性能模式。
我们使用性能模式进行了所有的测量，同时使用了主动图形切换，在iGPU和dGPU之间动态切换。纯粹的dGPU模式也是可用的（查看下面的截图）。
下表说明了不同性能模式对PL1/PL2值和风扇噪音的影响。
| 静音 | 平衡 | 性能 | |
| CPU PL1 (HWiNFO) | 55 W | 75 W | 130 W |
| CPU PL2 (HWiNFO) | 65 W | 119 W | 185 W |
| 噪音 (TheWitcher 3) | 39 dB(A) | 43 - 46 dB(A) | 49 - 55 dB(A) |
| 性能 (TheWitcher 3) | 40 fps (locked) | 150 fps | 180 fps |
基金会
芯片 英特尔酷睿i9-13900HX是一个性能怪物。这个10纳米的部件提供了8个性能核心，时钟频率为2.2GHz至5.4GHz，并支持超线程，以及16个效率核心，时钟频率为1.6GHz至3.9GHz，不支持超线程，因此总共有32个并行线程。
茂盛的36MB L3缓存和55W TDP进一步重申了Core i9-13900HX是一款强大的芯片。
Cinebench R15 Multi Dauertest
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
| Performance Rating | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H | |
| Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
| Average Intel Core i9-13900HX | |
| Average of class Gaming | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16ACHg6 | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE | |
| AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H | |
| Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
| Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (17589 - 27615, n=21) | |
| Average of class Gaming (4986 - 60169, n=187, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16ACHg6 | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H | |
| Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
| Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (88686 - 137015, n=21) | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 | |
| Average of class Gaming (25360 - 252486, n=187, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16ACHg6 | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE | |
| AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H | |
| Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
| Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (4362 - 7029, n=21) | |
| Average of class Gaming (1339 - 10389, n=187, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16ACHg6 | |
| AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H | |
| Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (125644 - 141385, n=21) | |
| Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
| Average of class Gaming (50699 - 200651, n=187, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16ACHg6 | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE | |
| AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
| Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H | |
| Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (12334 - 17179, n=21) | |
| Average of class Gaming (4800 - 32988, n=187, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16ACHg6 | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H | |
| Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
| Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (43850 - 69202, n=21) | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 | |
| Average of class Gaming (12321 - 134044, n=187, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16ACHg6 | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE | |
| AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 | |
| Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (89413 - 237881, n=21) | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16ACHg6 | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H | |
| Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE | |
| Average of class Gaming (19065 - 328679, n=187, last 2 years) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H | |
| Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
| Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (1284 - 1958, n=21) | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE | |
| Average of class Gaming (373 - 2409, n=187, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16ACHg6 | |
| AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H | |
| Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
| Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (9481 - 15279, n=21) | |
| Average of class Gaming (2540 - 31796, n=187, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16ACHg6 | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE | |
| AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
| Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H | |
| Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (42994 - 51994, n=21) | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE | |
| Average of class Gaming (10805 - 60161, n=188, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16ACHg6 | |
系统性能
整体系统性能与刀锋16并驾齐驱。Legion Pro 7在PCMark 10中得到7830分，这是一个优秀的结果，比同类平均水平高出11%。
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
| PCMark 10 / Score | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE | |
| Average Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (7609 - 8549, n=3) | |
| Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H | |
| Average of class Gaming (5776 - 9852, n=168, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16ACHg6 | |
| PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H | |
| Average Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (10982 - 11824, n=3) | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE | |
| Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
| Average of class Gaming (9057 - 12334, n=167, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16ACHg6 | |
| PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H | |
| Average Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (9976 - 10788, n=3) | |
| Average of class Gaming (6662 - 14612, n=167, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16ACHg6 | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 | |
| Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
| PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
| Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE | |
| Average of class Gaming (6703 - 18475, n=167, last 2 years) | |
| Average Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (10135 - 14720, n=3) | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16ACHg6 | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H | |
| CrossMark / Overall | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE | |
| Average Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (1991 - 2194, n=2) | |
| Average of class Gaming (1247 - 2344, n=151, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 | |
| Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
| CrossMark / Productivity | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE | |
| Average Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (1828 - 2059, n=2) | |
| Average of class Gaming (1299 - 2204, n=151, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 | |
| Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
| CrossMark / Creativity | |
| Average Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (2239 - 2411, n=2) | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE | |
| Average of class Gaming (1275 - 2660, n=151, last 2 years) | |
| Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 | |
| CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE | |
| Average Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (1808 - 1998, n=2) | |
| Average of class Gaming (1030 - 2330, n=151, last 2 years) | |
| Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 7830 points | |
Help | ||
| AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H | |
| Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
| Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (67716 - 78835, n=21) | |
| Average of class Gaming (21842 - 94222, n=187, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16ACHg6 | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H | |
| Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
| Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (73998 - 88462, n=21) | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE | |
| Average of class Gaming (23681 - 99713, n=187, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16ACHg6 | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
| Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
| Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (65472 - 77045, n=21) | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H | |
| Average of class Gaming (22986 - 108954, n=187, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16ACHg6 | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
| Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
| Average of class Gaming (59.5 - 259, n=187, last 2 years) | |
| Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (80.4 - 91.1, n=21) | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16ACHg6 | |
* ... smaller is better
DPC延时
DPC延迟再次被证明是有问题的，尽管这可能只与一小部分用户有关。根据LatencyMon，Legion Pro 7在没有进一步微调的情况下，不是实时音频编辑的理想选择。
| DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
| Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16ACHg6 | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H | |
* ... smaller is better
存储设备
Legion Pro 7在存储部门的成绩不错。我们的测试模型使用快速的三星PM9A1 1 TB NVMe固态硬盘，在我们的基准测试中表现良好。该硬盘实现了约5400MB/s的连续读取速度，连续写入速度超过4000MB/s。
然而，我们的DiskSpd循环测试证明了在连续负载下的强烈性能波动。竞争对手似乎没有受到这种严重节流的影响。
* ... smaller is better
Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
GPU性能
包括动态升压在内的最大TGP为175瓦。 RTX 4080笔记本GPU从玩家的角度来看，可能是Legion Pro 7中最令人兴奋的组件。这个来自Nvidia Ada一代的4纳米部件的规格在纸面上令人印象深刻。
总共7,424个CUDA核心保证了出色的性能。然而，在2023年，192位内存接口的12GB GDDR6 VRAM并没有给人带来什么启发--考虑到当今游戏的要求和高额的要价，16GB的VRAM会更合适。更多信息和性能分析可以在我们专门的 Nvidia Ada RTX 40 GPU评论分析.
尽管没有特别丰富的VRAM，但RTX 4080笔记本GPU与AMD的竞争者及其前辈们擦身而过。将所有的3DMark分数加在一起，RTX 4080笔记本GPU比RTX 3080 Ti笔记本GPU快30%以上。 RTX 3080 Ti 笔记本GPU和 RX 6850M XT上一代军团的RX 6850M XT，后者也是在高TGP下运行。
| 3DMark 06 Standard Score | 59578 points | |
| 3DMark Vantage P Result | 111294 points | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 44468 points | |
| 3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 208555 points | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 66531 points | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 34434 points | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 17928 points | |
Help | ||
* ... smaller is better
游戏性能
在游戏中，RTX 4080笔记本GPU具有更高的优势，从累积性能评级中可以看出，特别是与 RTX 3080笔记本电脑GPU和RX 6850M XT。不过，CPU确实对1080p分辨率下的帧率有影响。
当光线追踪被激活并在QHD和4K分辨率下，可以看到更有意义的比较。我们选择了一些现代游戏，如 蜘蛛人Miles Morales, 生化危机村，以及 守护者的Galaxy来说明RTX 4080笔记本GPU在更高的分辨率和设置下的威力。
平均而言，在这些测试中，RTX 4080笔记本GPU比175 RTX 3080 Ti笔记本GPU快三分之一，比165 W RTX 3080笔记本GPU快大约60%。
详细的性能比较可在我们的广泛的游戏基准列表 。
| Performance Rating - Percent | |
| Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H | |
| Average of class Gaming | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16ACHg6 | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 | |
| The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H | |
| Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
| Average of class Gaming (18.4 - 216, n=168, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16ACHg6 | |
| GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H | |
| Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
| Average of class Gaming (12.1 - 167.7, n=171, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16ACHg6 | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 | |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H | |
| Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE | |
| Average of class Gaming (19.2 - 201, n=184, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16ACHg6 | |
| Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16 | |
| Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H | |
| Average of class Gaming (38.9 - 421, n=182, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16ACHg6 | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE | |
| Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking | |
| Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE | |
| Average of class Gaming (30.8 - 220, n=190, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16ACHg6 | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 | |
| X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3) | |
| Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE | |
| Average of class Gaming (31.5 - 166.2, n=196, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16ACHg6 | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 | |
| Spider-Man Miles Morales | |
| 1920x0180 Very High Preset + Ray-Tracing AA:T | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU () | |
| MSI Raider GE76 12UHS @175 W TGP | |
| Average of class Gaming (19.1 - 96.2, n=12, last 2 years) | |
| XMG Neo 15 @165 W TGP | |
| 2560x1440 Very High Preset AA:T | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU () | |
| MSI Raider GE76 12UHS @175 W TGP | |
| Average of class Gaming (53.1 - 115.7, n=13, last 2 years) | |
| XMG Neo 15 @165 W TGP | |
| 3840x2160 Very High Preset AA:T | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU () | |
| Average of class Gaming (30 - 84.2, n=10, last 2 years) | |
| MSI Raider GE76 12UHS @175 W TGP | |
| XMG Neo 15 @165 W TGP | |
| Guardians of the Galaxy | |
| 1920x1080 Ultra Preset + Ultra Ray-Tracing | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU () | |
| MSI GE76 Raider | |
| XMG Neo 15 @165 W TGP | |
| Average of class Gaming (54 - 128, n=7, last 2 years) | |
| 2560x1440 Ultra Preset | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU () | |
| MSI GE76 Raider | |
| XMG Neo 15 @165 W TGP | |
| Average of class Gaming (51 - 146, n=5, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 | |
| 3840x2160 Ultra Preset | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU () | |
| MSI GE76 Raider | |
| Average of class Gaming (42 - 96, n=3, last 2 years) | |
| XMG Neo 15 @165 W TGP | |
与SSD不同，在较小程度上与CPU不同，GPU在很长一段时间内保持相对稳定。在60分钟的压力下，我们没有看到急剧的帧率下降或不一致的情况。在Witcher 3在1080p Ultra下，我们没有看到帧率急剧下降或不一致。
The Witcher 3 FPS Chart
| low | med. | high | ultra | QHD | 4K | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GTA V (2015) | 187.6 | 185.1 | 145.5 | |||
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 509 | 325 | 178 | |||
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 206 | 194.4 | 179 | |||
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 192.1 | 162.4 | ||||
| X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 167.9 | 131.8 | ||||
| Far Cry 5 (2018) | 179 | 158 | 156 | |||
| Strange Brigade (2018) | 392 | 351 | 318 | |||
| Outriders (2021) | 157.7 | 151.1 | 149.9 | 130.5 | 72.3 | |
| Resident Evil Village (2021) | 239 | 239 | 239 | 193.7 | 100.5 | |
| Days Gone (2021) | 243 | 215 | 171.3 | 125.1 | 70.9 | |
| Deathloop (2021) | 130.5 | 129.4 | 123.5 | 112.8 | 60.7 | |
| Back 4 Blood (2021) | 345 | 295 | 276 | 188.4 | 112 | |
| Guardians of the Galaxy (2021) | 165 | 165 | 163 | 146 | 96 | |
| Riders Republic (2021) | 172 | 169 | 168 | 133 | 76 | |
| Farming Simulator 22 (2021) | 263 | 217 | 194.4 | 191.6 | 145.2 | |
| Halo Infinite (2021) | 239 | 209 | 197.5 | 150.7 | 88.6 | |
| God of War (2022) | 160.6 | 137.7 | 101.4 | 86.7 | 60 | |
| Rainbow Six Extraction (2022) | 278 | 272 | 221 | 172 | 88 | |
| Elden Ring (2022) | 59.9 | 59.8 | 59.8 | 59.6 | 59.3 | |
| Elex 2 (2022) | 118.7 | 118.7 | 118.5 | 114.5 | 63 | |
| Vampire Bloodhunt (2022) | 266 | 239 | 221 | 195.5 | 124.6 | |
| F1 22 (2022) | 247 | 222 | 101 | 72 | 38 | |
| The Quarry (2022) | 206 | 174.1 | 142 | 102.5 | 48.7 | |
| A Plague Tale Requiem (2022) | 110.9 | 97.7 | 86 | 63.4 | 36.1 | |
| Uncharted Legacy of Thieves Collection (2022) | 102.3 | 100.3 | 99.5 | 86.5 | 54.1 | |
| Call of Duty Modern Warfare 2 2022 (2022) | 182 | 149 | 140 | 104 | 67 | |
| Spider-Man Miles Morales (2022) | 115.2 | 103.3 | 101.3 | 94.8 | 68.5 | |
| Need for Speed Unbound (2022) | 101.2 | 94.7 | 83 | 79.7 | 63.6 | |
| High On Life (2023) | 214 | 162.8 | 148.4 | 100.6 | 42.6 | |
| The Witcher 3 v4.00 (2023) | 161.4 | 144 | 125.3 | 81.1 | 42.8 | |
| Dead Space Remake (2023) | 121.5 | 113.3 | 109.3 | 81.8 | 41.3 |
排放。与刀锋16相比，温度和噪音排放更高
系统噪音
毫不奇怪，所提供的高端组件具有高热量排放，因此也有高噪音。虽然Legion Pro 7在空闲状态下仍然相当安静，平均声压级（SPL）为28 dB(A)，但在性能模式下进行游戏时，如果没有耳机，情况会变得令人不安，声压级范围为49至55 dB(A)。
平衡模式不会造成很大的性能损失，其结果是43至46分贝（A）的声压级更容易承受。相对而言，尽管Razer Blade 16的高度和重量较低，但在所有测试条件下仍然比较安静。
Noise Level
| Idle |
| 26 / 28 / 34 dB(A) |
| Load |
| 47 / 56 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 24 dB(A) | ||
| Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU | Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU | Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU | Lenovo Legion 7 16ACHg6 R9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU | Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 R9 6900HX, Radeon RX 6850M XT | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | 14% | 3% | 3% | 16% | |
| off / environment * | 24 | 23 4% | 24.5 -2% | 26 -8% | 22.8 5% |
| Idle Minimum * | 26 | 23 12% | 24.5 6% | 26 -0% | 23 12% |
| Idle Average * | 28 | 23 18% | 30 -7% | 30 -7% | 23 18% |
| Idle Maximum * | 34 | 23.6 31% | 32.5 4% | 35 -3% | 23 32% |
| Load Average * | 47 | 39 17% | 43.9 7% | 40 15% | 26.8 43% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 55 | 51.6 6% | 48.8 11% | 46 16% | 54.3 1% |
| Load Maximum * | 56 | 51.3 8% | 54.2 3% | 50 11% | 54.2 3% |
* ... smaller is better
温度
在使用1080p Ultra的TheWitcher 3时，Legion Pro 7的底部在某些地方超过了50℃，这意味着这不适合在膝上玩游戏。在空闲状态下，顶部的温度高达40℃，这相对较高。
即使涉及到热量排放，Razer Blade 16似乎比Legion Pro 7表现更好。
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 48 °C / 118 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 49 °C / 120 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 32.7 °C / 91 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 43.3 °C / 110 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 42 °C / 107.6 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-13.1 °C / -23.6 F).
| Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU | Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU | Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU | Lenovo Legion 7 16ACHg6 R9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU | Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 R9 6900HX, Radeon RX 6850M XT | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | 16% | -5% | -5% | 13% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * | 48 | 40 17% | 44.4 7% | 51 -6% | 37.2 22% |
| Maximum Bottom * | 49 | 37.6 23% | 60.8 -24% | 52 -6% | 43 12% |
| Idle Upper Side * | 40 | 32.4 19% | 33.8 15% | 37 7% | 34 15% |
| Idle Bottom * | 33 | 31.4 5% | 38.8 -18% | 38 -15% | 32.8 1% |
* ... smaller is better
压力测试
用FurMark和Prime95进行的综合压力测试不是很有帮助，因为GPU显示出节流现象。在《Witcher 3 》的压力下，CPU和GPU的平均温度达到了75℃，这并不是什么问题。
发言人
Legion Pro 7的一个亮点是联想与哈曼的合作，这导致了好听的扬声器。我们的音频分析没有显示出任何频率范围内的明显弱点，这在笔记本中是很罕见的--例如，Blade 16必须要有较弱的低音。
鉴于最大音量为82 dB(A)，外部扬声器或耳机并非绝对必要。
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 8.9% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 3% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 3% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 16.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.9% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (12.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 15% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 82% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 10% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 88% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
能源管理。即使在空闲状态下也有高消耗
消耗功率
与高端游戏笔记本电脑的情况一样，Legion Pro 7即使在空闲模式下进行图形切换，也有很高的功率要求。Legion Pro 7在空闲状态下的功耗为18至32瓦（包括短时负载峰值），比同类平均水平高出近20%。
我们的记录显示，在平均负载（3DMark06）下，墙体的功耗为130瓦，在最大压力下为320瓦。在游戏期间，你可以预期消耗量达到约260W，这比Blade 16（242W）略高。
| Off / Standby | 0.1 / Watt |
| Idle | 18 / 24 / 32 Watt |
| Load |
130 / 320 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU | Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU | Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU | Lenovo Legion 7 16ACHg6 R9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU | Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 R9 6900HX, Radeon RX 6850M XT | Average of class Gaming | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -1% | 1% | -14% | 21% | 21% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 18 | 15.2 16% | 19.2 -7% | 31 -72% | 9.9 45% | 13.5 ? 25% |
| Idle Average * | 24 | 22.8 5% | 25.1 -5% | 33 -38% | 22 8% | 18.9 ? 21% |
| Idle Maximum * | 32 | 49.8 -56% | 27.1 15% | 46 -44% | 23.1 28% | 26.7 ? 17% |
| Load Average * | 130 | 121.2 7% | 132 -2% | 110 15% | 94.4 27% | 106.6 ? 18% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 260 | 242 7% | 253 3% | 180 31% | 249 4% | |
| Load Maximum * | 320 | 273.7 14% | 308.9 3% | 235 27% | 276 14% | 249 ? 22% |
* ... smaller is better
Power consumption: The Witcher 3 / Stress test
Power consumption: External Monitor
电池寿命
联想为Legion Pro 7配备了强大的99WHr电池，由于能量管理不理想，只能起到一定的作用。在没有其他任务运行和最低亮度的情况下，空闲时可能有6.5小时的运行时间。与Blade 16的9.5小时相比，这是一个适度的结果。
在日常使用中，例如在150尼特的低亮度下通过Wi-Fi上网，我们可以设法获得5小时的运行时间。
| Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, 99.9 Wh | Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, 95.2 Wh | Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, 99 Wh | Lenovo Legion 7 16ACHg6 R9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, 80 Wh | Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 R9 6900HX, Radeon RX 6850M XT, 99 Wh | Average of class Gaming | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 8% | -40% | 13% | 3% | 13% | |
| Reader / Idle | 385 | 533 38% | 494 28% | 293 -24% | 565 ? 47% | |
| WiFi v1.3 | 303 | 365 20% | 267 -12% | 410 35% | 436 44% | 376 ? 24% |
| Load | 124 | 81 -35% | 40 -68% | 93 -25% | 110 -11% | 85.3 ? -31% |
| H.264 | 306 | 406 | 408 ? | |||
| Witcher 3 ultra | 55 | 78.3 ? |
Pros
Cons
评语。一个令人印象深刻的游戏大国
希望以最大的细节玩高要求的现代游戏并不介意花钱的热情玩家会发现联想Legion 7 Pro 16IRX8H是正确的选择。
Core i9-13900HX 和GeForce RTX 4080 的组合提供了令人印象深刻的性能水平，可以在大多数现代游戏中轻松产生40甚至60帧的4K Ultra
明亮、锐利、色彩准确的16:10 QHD 240 Hz显示屏使人有身临其境的观看体验。硬件被安置在一个时尚的机箱中，感觉很高档，在做工和稳定性方面得分很高。其他方面，如音质、输入设备和连接性似乎也接近完美。
然而，联想Legion 7 Pro 16IRX8H的潜在买家将不得不牢记高排放量。除非选择静音模式，否则这台16英寸的笔记本电脑在负载下会变得相当热--我们发现平衡模式是日常使用时性能和排放之间的最佳折衷。我们还希望看到99瓦时的电池能有更长的运行时间。
新联想Legion 7 Pro的顶级竞争对手之一是Razer Blade 16它实际上更安静、更冷，同时提供类似的性能水平。此外，相比之下，Blade 16更轻、更薄。
也就是说，联想Legion 7 Pro 16IRX8H总体上给人留下了深刻印象，适当地值得我们给予 "非常好 "的评级。
价格和可用性
经测试，联想Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H在campuspoint.de上有售。售价为3,599欧元。(建议零售价：3,999欧元)。
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
- 02/21/2023 v7 (old)
Florian Glaser
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.
Price comparison
