华为 MateBook D 16 2024 评测--配备英特尔酷睿 i9-13900H 的多媒体笔记本电脑
华为推出了新版 MateBook D 16,配备了强大的英特尔酷睿 i9-13900H(猛禽湖)处理器。它采用金属外壳,配备 16 GB 内存和 1 TB SSD。雾面 IPS 显示屏具有完整的 sRGB 覆盖范围,但只有全高清分辨率,也没有更高的刷新率等特殊功能。如果你仔细看看参数表,你还会发现一个 720p 网络摄像头,甚至是一个老式的 USB 2.0 端口。华为新款 MateBook D 16 2024 的要价为 1199 英镑,我们研究了一下这个价格是否合理。
此外,还有一款更便宜的机型,配备酷睿 i5-13420H、16 GB 内存和 512 GB 固态硬盘,售价 699 英镑。不过,该机的显示效果较差(只有 45% NTSC 而不是 100% sRGB),电池容量也较小(56 Wh 而不是 70 Wh)。
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
85 % v7 (old) | 01 / 2024 | Huawei MateBook D 16 2024 i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1.7 kg | 18.4 mm | 16.00" | 1920x1200 | |
88.1 % v7 (old) | 12 / 2023 | MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core | 1.6 kg | 19.1 mm | 16.00" | 2560x1600 | |
88.6 % v7 (old) | 10 / 2023 | Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U R7 7840U, Radeon 780M | 1.2 kg | 13 mm | 16.00" | 3200x2000 | |
88.6 % v7 (old) | 08 / 2023 | SCHENKER Vision 16 PH6PRX1 i7-13700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1.5 kg | 17.1 mm | 16.00" | 2560x1600 | |
86.6 % v7 (old) | 06 / 2023 | Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 i7-13700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1.6 kg | 19 mm | 16.00" | 3200x2000 | |
85.8 % v7 (old) | 05 / 2023 | Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 i7-1355U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 2 kg | 16.99 mm | 16.00" | 1920x1200 | |
85.6 % v7 (old) | 05 / 2023 | Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 i5-1340P, Iris Xe G7 80EUs | 1.6 kg | 12.5 mm | 16.00" | 2880x1800 | |
86 % v7 (old) | 06 / 2023 | Huawei MateBook 16s i9 i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 2 kg | 17.8 mm | 16.00" | 2560x1680 |
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
外壳 - MateBook D 16 采用金属外壳
乍一看,深灰色的表壳与前代产品并无不同 前代但这是一个全新的外壳,内部设计也有所改变。得益于纤薄的边框,设计显得更加时尚,表面也不会特别容易吸附灰尘和指纹。新功能之一是显示屏铰链,现在的最大开启角度为 180 度。铰链的位置非常紧,单手无法打开盖子。不过,在调整打开角度时,会出现明显的晃动。
质量方面,这款手机壳给人的印象还不错。华为没有使用金属,虽然塑料结构主要是牢固的,但按压中央区域时,底座和盖子很容易松动。这在日常使用中并不会造成任何问题。扭动底座时会发出嘎吱嘎吱的声音,相当不雅观。
相比之下,MateBook 并不占空间,重量略高于 1.7 千克,可以说是一般。65 瓦的 PSU 重 204 克,非常轻巧。
功能 - 华为采用了 USB 2.0 而非 Thunderbolt 技术
当涉及到端口时,你只能得到最低限度的端口,这种情况是一个明显的倒退,即使与旧的 MateBook D 16 2022.华为完全没有使用 Thunderbolt 或 USB 4。取而代之的是,只有一个 USB-C 端口(3.2 Gen.1),同时也用于电源。在右侧,唯一的 USB-A 接口仅使用 2.0 标准。在这个价位的产品中,这是绝对不允许的。HDMI 输出也只支持 1.4 标准,这意味着外接 4K 显示器无法以 60 赫兹运行,只能以 30 赫兹运行。即使是旧款 2022 型号也集成了 HDMI 2.0 输出和一个额外的 USB 端口。如果您使用其他华为设备(如智能手机、平板电脑),这部分的唯一好处就是跨设备操作。
交流
华为采用了我们熟悉的英特尔 AX201 Wi-Fi 模块,它支持 Wi-Fi 6 网络,但还不支持当前的 Wi-Fi 6E 标准。不过,与华硕参考路由器连接后,其性能非常出色,而且在测试过程中,我们无法检测到任何形式的 Wi-Fi 连接问题。
Networking | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
SCHENKER Vision 16 PH6PRX1 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
网络摄像头
顶部边框上的网络摄像头只能提供 720p 的分辨率,因此绝对不能再被视为最新的摄像头。因此,图像缺乏细节,也不是特别清晰。
维护
底盖由 10 颗 Torx 螺钉(T5)固定,可以拆卸。在内部,你很快就会注意到新的冷却系统,它在底座的右侧装有两个风扇。此外,你还可以看到有许多未使用的空间,这些空间本可以轻松用于内存插槽或第二个 M.2 2280 插槽。但现在,你只能使用一个固态硬盘、16 GB 焊接内存和一个焊接 Wi-Fi 模块。
输入设备 - 背光键盘和数字键盘
MateBook D 16 2024 的键盘配备了专用数字键盘,其按键略显狭窄。总的来说,键盘给人留下了良好的印象。得益于 1.5 毫米的键程和精确的输入,打字体验非常舒适,即使是较长的文本也能直接输入。不过,该键盘也是声音较大的机型之一。华为集成了两级白色背光,可惜不能通过传感器自动激活。电源按钮位于键盘上方的右侧,它还包含指纹传感器。
点击板的尺寸为 12 x 7.3 厘米,大小适中,运行正常。像往常一样,可以用物理方式按压键盘底部,但会发出响亮而廉价的 "咔嗒 "声。在实际使用中,我们只建议点击键盘进行输入。
显示屏 - 16:10 IPS 面板
我们已经知道京东方(NV160WUM-NH0)的 16 英寸 IPS 雾面面板来自旧的 2022 型号.这是一款非常简单的显示屏,分辨率为 1,920 x 1,200 像素。主观画质不错,即使是明亮区域也不会出现颗粒感。不过,在 60 Hz 和没有 HDR 等附加功能的情况下,这个价位段的竞争非常激烈。从对比设备中可以看出,这些设备都采用了更好的显示屏(更高分辨率、偶尔采用 OLED、更高频率)。只有 联想 Yoga 7采用了类似的面板。
华为指定的亮度为 300 cd/m²,但我们的评测设备的平均亮度为 340 cd/m²,远远超过了这一标准。尽管如此,在 80% 的亮度下,照明效果并不理想。我们测得的黑度为 0.24 cd/m²,最大对比度几乎达到 1.500:1。
|
Brightness Distribution: 80 %
Center on Battery: 349 cd/m²
Contrast: 1454:1 (Black: 0.24 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.8 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 0.7
ΔE Greyscale 4.9 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
68.8% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
96.5% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
66.7% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.2
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024 NV160WUM-NH0, IPS, 1920x1200, 16" | MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US AU Optronics B160QAN03.R, IPS, 2560x1600, 16" | Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U Samsung ATNA60BX03-0, OLED, 3200x2000, 16" | SCHENKER Vision 16 PH6PRX1 BOE CQ NE160QDM-NZ1 , IPS, 2560x1600, 16" | Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Samsung SDC418D ATNA60BC03-0, OLED, 3200x2000, 16" | Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 LEN160FHD, IPS, 1920x1200, 16" | Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 Samsung ATNA60CL03-0, AMOLED, 2880x1800, 16" | Huawei MateBook 16s i9 BOE0BB0 TV160DKT-NH1, IPS, 2560x1680, 16" | Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 BOE NV160WUM-NH0, IPS, 1920x1200, 16" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 24% | 33% | 4% | 33% | -36% | 31% | -4% | -1% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 66.7 | 96.7 45% | 99.9 50% | 70 5% | 99.91 50% | 42 -37% | 99.7 49% | 63 -6% | 66.2 -1% |
sRGB Coverage | 96.5 | 99.8 3% | 100 4% | 99.3 3% | 100 4% | 62.8 -35% | 100 4% | 94.9 -2% | 96.4 0% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 68.8 | 84.6 23% | 100 45% | 71.2 3% | 98.87 44% | 43.5 -37% | 97 41% | 65.1 -5% | 68.3 -1% |
Response Times | -63% | 97% | 63% | 92% | -3% | 92% | 3% | 5% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 31 ? | 49.4 ? -59% | 0.57 ? 98% | 11 ? 65% | 2 ? 94% | 31.8 ? -3% | 2 ? 94% | 34 ? -10% | 30.5 ? 2% |
Response Time Black / White * | 20.3 ? | 33.9 ? -67% | 1 ? 95% | 8 ? 61% | 2 ? 90% | 20.9 ? -3% | 2 ? 90% | 17 ? 16% | 18.7 ? 8% |
PWM Frequency | 238.8 | 227 ? | 26 ? | ||||||
Screen | -5% | 11% | 13% | -25% | -48% | 193% | 16% | -7% | |
Brightness middle | 349 | 473.6 36% | 379.8 9% | 356 2% | 370 6% | 279.4 -20% | 412 18% | 448 28% | 319 -9% |
Brightness | 340 | 456 34% | 383 13% | 349 3% | 371 9% | 257 -24% | 412 21% | 436 28% | 317 -7% |
Brightness Distribution | 80 | 87 9% | 98 23% | 93 16% | 98 23% | 81 1% | 98 23% | 93 16% | 90 13% |
Black Level * | 0.24 | 0.19 21% | 0.28 -17% | 0.18 25% | 0.015 94% | 0.35 -46% | 0.23 4% | ||
Contrast | 1454 | 2493 71% | 1271 -13% | 1552 7% | 27467 1789% | 1280 -12% | 1387 -5% | ||
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2.8 | 5.9 -111% | 4.7 -68% | 1.7 39% | 2.77 1% | 5.12 -83% | 2.34 16% | 1.6 43% | 3.4 -21% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 7.3 | 9.37 -28% | 7.51 -3% | 3 59% | 4.08 44% | 19.42 -166% | 3.34 54% | 4.44 39% | 8.1 -11% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 0.7 | 0.89 -27% | 0.55 21% | 1 -43% | 2.83 -304% | 1.84 -163% | 2.95 -321% | 0.64 9% | 0.8 -14% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 4.9 | 7.3 -49% | 0.8 84% | 1.3 73% | 2.58 47% | 5.5 -12% | 2.78 43% | 2.78 43% | 5.7 -16% |
Gamma | 2.2 100% | 1.9 116% | 2.22 99% | 2.1 105% | 2.46 89% | 2.22 99% | 2.5 88% | 2.1 105% | |
CCT | 7328 89% | 7260 90% | 6381 102% | 6625 98% | 6241 104% | 6407 101% | 6879 94% | 6582 99% | 7433 87% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 2.43 | ||||||||
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -15% /
-7% | 47% /
31% | 27% /
18% | 33% /
9% | -29% /
-39% | 105% /
144% | 5% /
10% | -1% /
-4% |
* ... smaller is better
我们使用专业 CalMAN 软件(X-Rite i1 Pro2)进行的分析表明,出厂时的校准效果并不是特别好,开箱后,灰度和色彩方面都存在明显偏差。此外,你还可以发现明显的蓝色色调,再加上过冷的色温,最大亮度也无法从中受益。经过我们的校准(可在上面免费下载相应的配置文件),面板显示出了其隐藏的潜力,因为与 sRGB 参考色彩空间(几乎完全覆盖)有关的灰度和色彩偏差极低,所有值都明显低于重要的 DeltaE 2000 偏差 3。
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
20.3 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 10.6 ms rise | |
↘ 9.7 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 41 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
31 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 14.4 ms rise | |
↘ 16.6 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 37 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8715 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
得益于雾面 IPS 面板,MateBook 甚至可以在室外使用,即使在非常明亮的日子里,也应避免光源反射。总的来说,可视角度稳定性不错。
性能 - 经济模式下的酷睿 i9
测试条件
在华为的 PC Manager 中,有两种能耗设置--首先是预设的平衡模式,其次是性能模式。后者并没有提供更多的性能,在连续负载时仅增加 5 瓦(40 瓦而不是 35 瓦 TDP)。这与风扇的噪音(46.2 对 36.2 dB(A))不成比例。这意味着您可以放心使用平衡 模式,也就是我们在即将进行的基准测试和测量中使用的模式。
处理器 - 酷睿 i9-13900H
英特尔 英特尔酷睿 i9-13900H是猛禽湖系列中速度极快的移动处理器,拥有 6 个快速性能内核和 8 个效率内核。它总共可以同时处理多达 20 个线程。其性能潜力非常大,不过,MateBook D 16 中的酷睿 i9 受限于 64/45 瓦(之后为 35 瓦)的低功耗限制。唯一令人印象深刻的是单核性能,虽然这在日常使用中起着重要作用,但归根结底,选择酷睿 i9 其实只是为了在数据表上好看。更便宜的 酷睿 i7-13700H的整体性能几乎相同。此外,多核性能在使用很短时间后就会明显下降。 MateBook 16s在多核负载方面要快 20% 以上。在电池模式下,CPU 性能几乎保持不变。 其他 CPU 基准测试 这里.
Cinebench R15 Multi Continuous Test
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU | v3.3 Classroom CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
CPU Performance Rating | |
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900H | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024 | |
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 | |
Average of class Multimedia | |
SCHENKER Vision 16 PH6PRX1 | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 |
Cinebench R23 / Multi Core | |
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (11997 - 20385, n=28) | |
Average of class Multimedia (6936 - 30789, n=103, last 2 years) | |
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024 | |
SCHENKER Vision 16 PH6PRX1 | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 |
Cinebench R23 / Single Core | |
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024 | |
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (1297 - 2054, n=26) | |
SCHENKER Vision 16 PH6PRX1 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 | |
Average of class Multimedia (878 - 2290, n=94, last 2 years) | |
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (4935 - 7716, n=25) | |
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
Average of class Multimedia (2681 - 11768, n=87, last 2 years) | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024 | |
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
SCHENKER Vision 16 PH6PRX1 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024 | |
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (428 - 792, n=25) | |
SCHENKER Vision 16 PH6PRX1 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 | |
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 | |
Average of class Multimedia (341 - 853, n=87, last 2 years) |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (2061 - 3100, n=26) | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024 | |
Average of class Multimedia (1252 - 4774, n=94, last 2 years) | |
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
SCHENKER Vision 16 PH6PRX1 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024 | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (211 - 297, n=26) | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
SCHENKER Vision 16 PH6PRX1 | |
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 | |
Average of class Multimedia (99.6 - 323, n=89, last 2 years) | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 | |
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 |
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 | |
Average of class Multimedia (107 - 502, n=85, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER Vision 16 PH6PRX1 | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024 | |
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (166 - 268, n=24) | |
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 |
Blender / v3.3 Classroom CPU | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 | |
SCHENKER Vision 16 PH6PRX1 | |
Average of class Multimedia (167 - 946, n=87, last 2 years) | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024 | |
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (279 - 467, n=23) | |
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (45045 - 79032, n=25) | |
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024 | |
Average of class Multimedia (30592 - 121228, n=79, last 2 years) | |
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 | |
SCHENKER Vision 16 PH6PRX1 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024 | |
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 | |
SCHENKER Vision 16 PH6PRX1 | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (3665 - 6600, n=25) | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 | |
Average of class Multimedia (3398 - 7545, n=79, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 | |
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US |
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (9094 - 15410, n=26) | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024 | |
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
Average of class Multimedia (4990 - 23059, n=87, last 2 years) | |
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 | |
SCHENKER Vision 16 PH6PRX1 |
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024 | |
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (1140 - 2043, n=26) | |
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 | |
SCHENKER Vision 16 PH6PRX1 | |
Average of class Multimedia (891 - 2555, n=87, last 2 years) | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 | |
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 |
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (14.1 - 22.3, n=25) | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024 | |
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
Average of class Multimedia (5.26 - 30.5, n=78, last 2 years) | |
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
SCHENKER Vision 16 PH6PRX1 | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 |
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
Average of class Multimedia (6.7 - 146.7, n=81, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (34.4 - 82.8, n=25) | |
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 | |
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 | |
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024 | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 | |
SCHENKER Vision 16 PH6PRX1 |
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 | |
Average of class Multimedia (0.3604 - 0.947, n=79, last 2 years) | |
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
SCHENKER Vision 16 PH6PRX1 | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (0.4052 - 0.723, n=25) | |
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024 | |
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 |
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Performance Rating | |
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 | |
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900H | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Average of class Multimedia | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024 | |
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 | |
SCHENKER Vision 16 PH6PRX1 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 |
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 | |
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (6788 - 19557, n=25) | |
Average of class Multimedia (4906 - 36957, n=76, last 2 years) | |
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024 | |
SCHENKER Vision 16 PH6PRX1 | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 |
AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (22551 - 95579, n=25) | |
Average of class Multimedia (14528 - 147248, n=77, last 2 years) | |
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024 | |
SCHENKER Vision 16 PH6PRX1 | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 |
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 | |
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (2491 - 4270, n=25) | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Average of class Multimedia (1529 - 6698, n=77, last 2 years) | |
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024 | |
SCHENKER Vision 16 PH6PRX1 | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 |
AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024 | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (65121 - 120936, n=25) | |
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
Average of class Multimedia (21547 - 141074, n=77, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 | |
SCHENKER Vision 16 PH6PRX1 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 |
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (6108 - 11631, n=25) | |
Average of class Multimedia (1240 - 19021, n=77, last 2 years) | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024 | |
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 | |
SCHENKER Vision 16 PH6PRX1 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 |
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 | |
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (11283 - 48474, n=25) | |
Average of class Multimedia (9903 - 75780, n=76, last 2 years) | |
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024 | |
SCHENKER Vision 16 PH6PRX1 | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 |
AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024 | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (3691 - 149377, n=25) | |
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
Average of class Multimedia (31432 - 169946, n=77, last 2 years) | |
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
SCHENKER Vision 16 PH6PRX1 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 |
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (789 - 1254, n=25) | |
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 | |
Average of class Multimedia (454 - 1973, n=77, last 2 years) | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024 | |
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
SCHENKER Vision 16 PH6PRX1 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 |
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (3655 - 10716, n=25) | |
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
Average of class Multimedia (2738 - 20608, n=77, last 2 years) | |
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024 | |
SCHENKER Vision 16 PH6PRX1 | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 |
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 | |
SCHENKER Vision 16 PH6PRX1 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 | |
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 | |
Average of class Multimedia (7419 - 53918, n=77, last 2 years) | |
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (10871 - 50488, n=25) | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024 | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U |
系统性能
从主观上看,MateBook 的性能水平非常高,每次输入都能迅速执行。合成基准测试结果没有显示任何异常,我们在测试过程中也未能发现任何异常。
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
PCMark 10 / Score | |
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Average of class Multimedia (4542 - 8670, n=72, last 2 years) | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024 | |
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (5944 - 6802, n=8) | |
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 | |
SCHENKER Vision 16 PH6PRX1 |
PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 | |
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024 | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (10347 - 12286, n=8) | |
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 | |
Average of class Multimedia (8480 - 12420, n=72, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER Vision 16 PH6PRX1 |
PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Average of class Multimedia (6089 - 10742, n=72, last 2 years) | |
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024 | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (7319 - 8526, n=8) | |
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 | |
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 | |
SCHENKER Vision 16 PH6PRX1 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 |
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
Average of class Multimedia (3651 - 13548, n=72, last 2 years) | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024 | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (7527 - 8155, n=8) | |
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 | |
SCHENKER Vision 16 PH6PRX1 |
CrossMark / Overall | |
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024 | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (1766 - 2146, n=7) | |
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
Average of class Multimedia (978 - 2255, n=90, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER Vision 16 PH6PRX1 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 |
CrossMark / Productivity | |
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024 | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (1684 - 2064, n=7) | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 | |
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 | |
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
SCHENKER Vision 16 PH6PRX1 | |
Average of class Multimedia (913 - 2064, n=90, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 |
CrossMark / Creativity | |
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024 | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (1789 - 2224, n=7) | |
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 | |
Average of class Multimedia (1054 - 2795, n=90, last 2 years) | |
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 | |
SCHENKER Vision 16 PH6PRX1 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 |
CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024 | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (1474 - 2171, n=7) | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 | |
SCHENKER Vision 16 PH6PRX1 | |
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 | |
Average of class Multimedia (869 - 2171, n=90, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 |
WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 | |
Average of class Multimedia (136.4 - 545, n=87, last 2 years) | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024 | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (271 - 339, n=8) | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 | |
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 |
WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024 | |
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (244 - 348, n=6) | |
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 | |
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
Average of class Multimedia (133.2 - 353, n=79, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 | |
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 | |
Average of class Multimedia (254 - 1016, n=91, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (456 - 550, n=8) | |
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 | |
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024 |
* ... smaller is better
PCMark 10 Score | 6472 points | |
Help |
AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 | |
Average of class Multimedia (20549 - 104459, n=77, last 2 years) | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
SCHENKER Vision 16 PH6PRX1 | |
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (37448 - 74486, n=25) | |
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024 |
AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
Average of class Multimedia (22917 - 125604, n=77, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER Vision 16 PH6PRX1 | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (41599 - 75433, n=25) | |
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 | |
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024 | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U |
AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 | |
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 | |
Average of class Multimedia (20226 - 117933, n=77, last 2 years) | |
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 | |
SCHENKER Vision 16 PH6PRX1 | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (36152 - 88505, n=25) | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024 |
AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 | |
Average of class Multimedia (7 - 346, n=77, last 2 years) | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (75.8 - 102.3, n=25) | |
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 | |
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 | |
SCHENKER Vision 16 PH6PRX1 |
* ... smaller is better
DPC 延迟
在我们的标准化延迟测试中(上网、4K YouTube 播放、CPU 负载),使用提供的 BIOS 版本,评测设备在使用实时音频应用程序时没有表现出任何限制。一个驱动程序确实有点故障,但重要的 "中断处理延迟 "值可以忽略不计。
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 | |
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 | |
SCHENKER Vision 16 PH6PRX1 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024 | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 |
* ... smaller is better
大容量存储器
与 MateBook 16s安装的固态硬盘没有制造商标识。固态硬盘上只有型号(321JN1024GB-TX01)。我们使用的是 M.2 2280 固态硬盘,它通过 PCIe 4.0 连接,容量为 1 TB。该固态硬盘的传输速度超过 4 GB/s,性能非常令人满意,即使在长时间负载的情况下也能保持稳定。不过,开箱即用的固态硬盘分区再次出现问题。在系统 C 盘中,用户只能使用 135 GB,另外的 733 GB 都在 D 盘中。这完全没有必要,而且很快就会成为问题,因为通常情况下,所有应用程序和下载都在 C 盘。更多固态硬盘基准测试 这里.
* ... smaller is better
Continuous Performance Read: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
图形卡
处理器的集成 Iris Xe Graphics G7负责图形计算。它的速度很快,拥有 96 个 EU,最高速度可达 1.5 GHz。这样的性能已经足够,只要不使用 GPU 密集型应用程序,就可以播放高分辨率视频。不过 AMD Radeon 780M和新的 Arc iGPU要快得多。
Matebook D 16 用户不应该有高远的游戏目标,而且由于没有 Thunderbolt 和 USB 4.0 接口,也不可能使用外置显卡。即使是在玩较老和要求不高的游戏时,一般也只能使用低细节设置。至少在长时间负载和电池模式下,性能仍然稳定。其他 GPU 基准测试 这里.
3DMark 11 Performance | 8141 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 5618 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 2028 points | |
Help |
GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x | |
Average of class Multimedia (5.09 - 126.3, n=81, last 2 years) | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 | |
SCHENKER Vision 16 PH6PRX1 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 |
Witcher 3 FPS diagram
low | med. | high | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
GTA V (2015) | 130.4 | 112.3 | 25.6 | 10.6 |
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 110 | 71 | 38 | 15.5 |
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 121.3 | 91.1 | 74 | 65 |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 49.9 | 27 | 19.1 | |
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 60.9 | 44.8 | 39.5 | |
Far Cry 5 (2018) | 61 | 34 | 31 | 29 |
Strange Brigade (2018) | 102.7 | 44.8 | 35.4 | 28.5 |
F1 2021 (2021) | 114.8 | 59.1 | 46 | 31.7 |
F1 22 (2022) | 53.4 | 47.6 | 33.6 | |
F1 23 (2023) | 48.8 | 44.2 | 30.7 |
排放 - 静音风扇
噪音排放
华为对散热系统进行了全面调整,现在使用两个并排安装在机箱右侧的风扇。这两个风扇非常安静,在日常工作中通常会被关闭(或只听到极其安静的嗡嗡声)。即使在玩游戏时,噪音水平也仅为 32 dB(A),在 CPU 满负荷运行几分钟后也仅为 36.2 dB(A)。可选的性能模式会将噪音值提高到 46.2 dB(A),因此应避免使用。我们的评测设备没有任何其他类型的电子噪音。
Noise Level
Idle |
| 23.2 / 23.2 / 24 dB(A) |
Load |
| 28 / 36.2 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 23.2 dB(A) |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, 321JN1024GB-TX01 | MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB | Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U Radeon 780M, R7 7840U, SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N | SCHENKER Vision 16 PH6PRX1 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-13700H, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB | Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-13700H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM | Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1355U, WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101 | Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1340P, WD PC SN740 256GB SDDPNQD-256G | Huawei MateBook 16s i9 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, 321JN1024GB-TX01 | Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-12700H, Silicon Motion PCIe-8 SSD | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | -22% | -16% | -18% | -23% | -15% | -24% | -25% | -18% | |
off / environment * | 23.2 | 24.5 -6% | 23.4 -1% | 25.5 -10% | 25.7 -11% | 22.8 2% | 25.2 -9% | 25.7 -11% | 24.2 -4% |
Idle Minimum * | 23.2 | 24.5 -6% | 24.1 -4% | 25.5 -10% | 26.1 -13% | 22.9 1% | 25.2 -9% | 25.7 -11% | 24.2 -4% |
Idle Average * | 23.2 | 26.3 -13% | 24.3 -5% | 28.7 -24% | 26.1 -13% | 22.9 1% | 25.2 -9% | 28.4 -22% | 25.8 -11% |
Idle Maximum * | 24 | 26.3 -10% | 28 -17% | 29.1 -21% | 27.2 -13% | 26.9 -12% | 29.3 -22% | 28.4 -18% | 30.5 -27% |
Load Average * | 28 | 36.5 -30% | 41 -46% | 33.8 -21% | 44.2 -58% | 41.7 -49% | 46.4 -66% | 45.3 -62% | 39.8 -42% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 31.9 | 46.3 -45% | 40.9 -28% | 37.6 -18% | 41.5 -30% | 39.8 -25% | |||
Load Maximum * | 36.2 | 52.9 -46% | 40.9 -13% | 44.9 -24% | 47.5 -31% | 43.6 -20% | 46.4 -28% | 45.6 -26% | 39.8 -10% |
* ... smaller is better
温度
由于风扇布局不对称,在负载情况下左侧的温度尤其高。总之,无论在低负载还是高负载下,温度都不会造成太大问题。在压力测试中,只要使用平衡 模式,处理器的功耗很快就降到了 35 瓦。在可选的性能模式下,几分钟后,功耗稳定在 40 瓦。
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 40.3 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 45.1 °C / 113 F, compared to the average of 39.2 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.3 °C / 78 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 33.5 °C / 92 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 30.2 °C / 86.4 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-1.4 °C / -2.6 F).
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024 Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU | Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M | SCHENKER Vision 16 PH6PRX1 Intel Core i7-13700H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Intel Core i7-13700H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 Intel Core i7-1355U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 Intel Core i5-1340P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs | Huawei MateBook 16s i9 Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 Intel Core i7-12700H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | -1% | -9% | -0% | -14% | -2% | -11% | -10% | -7% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 40.3 | 48.8 -21% | 41.6 -3% | 41.1 -2% | 44.4 -10% | 37.6 7% | 41.6 -3% | 43.2 -7% | 41.8 -4% |
Maximum Bottom * | 45.1 | 47.6 -6% | 46.6 -3% | 42 7% | 48 -6% | 40 11% | 45 -0% | 44.7 1% | 47.3 -5% |
Idle Upper Side * | 26.6 | 24.2 9% | 30.4 -14% | 28.5 -7% | 31.9 -20% | 30.4 -14% | 31 -17% | 32.1 -21% | 28.3 -6% |
Idle Bottom * | 27.1 | 23.6 13% | 31 -14% | 26.8 1% | 31.9 -18% | 30.6 -13% | 33.6 -24% | 30.1 -11% | 30.2 -11% |
* ... smaller is better
发言人
两个立体声扬声器的表现都很一般,缺乏力量和空间深度。它的优点是能清晰地再现高音,这在语音播放(如电话会议时)时具有积极意义。
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 18.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 27% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 69% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 14% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 83% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 23% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 72% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 12% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 86% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.4% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (15% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.7% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 4% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 12% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 85% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 10.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.4% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (11.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 15% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 82% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 7% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 91% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
能源管理--供电不足的 PSU 和较长的电池寿命
耗电量
空闲运行时,最大功耗为 10 瓦,屏幕亮度达到最大。然而,在负载情况下,65 瓦的 PSU 限制了功耗。考虑到处理器至少能在短时间内消耗 64 瓦的功率,65 瓦的 PSU 在这种情况下无法为笔记本电脑提供足够的电力也就不足为奇了。在这种情况下,电池必须在短时间内使用,这对电池的预期寿命肯定不利。电池的最大耗电量超过 20 瓦。在连续负载的情况下,平衡 模式下的功率会趋于平稳,而 PSU 的功率也足够了。但是,如果长时间使用高性能模式(CPU 稳定在 40 瓦),电池容量就会持续下降(每小时 2-3%)。有趣的是,这个问题无法解决,因为即使使用功率更大的 100 瓦 PSU,MateBook 也不会消耗额外的电量。
Off / Standby | 0.26 / 1.1 Watt |
Idle | 4.7 / 9.5 / 10.1 Watt |
Load |
49.7 / 66.3 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024 i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 321JN1024GB-TX01, IPS, 1920x1200, 16" | MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB, IPS, 2560x1600, 16" | Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U R7 7840U, Radeon 780M, SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N, OLED, 3200x2000, 16" | SCHENKER Vision 16 PH6PRX1 i7-13700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB, IPS, 2560x1600, 16" | Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 i7-13700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM, OLED, 3200x2000, 16" | Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 i7-1355U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101, IPS, 1920x1200, 16" | Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 i5-1340P, Iris Xe G7 80EUs, WD PC SN740 256GB SDDPNQD-256G, AMOLED, 2880x1800, 16" | Huawei MateBook 16s i9 i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 321JN1024GB-TX01, IPS, 2560x1680, 16" | Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 i7-12700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, Silicon Motion PCIe-8 SSD, IPS, 1920x1200, 16" | Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | Average of class Multimedia | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -13% | -13% | -25% | -2% | 6% | 19% | -28% | -16% | -1% | -41% | |
Idle Minimum * | 4.7 | 3 36% | 7.1 -51% | 6.3 -34% | 5.8 -23% | 3.3 30% | 3.9 17% | 5.8 -23% | 6.1 -30% | 5.34 ? -14% | 6.54 ? -39% |
Idle Average * | 9.5 | 9.5 -0% | 10.1 -6% | 14.4 -52% | 6 37% | 10.2 -7% | 4.8 49% | 7.7 19% | 10.6 -12% | 8.55 ? 10% | 11.3 ? -19% |
Idle Maximum * | 10.1 | 12 -19% | 18.6 -84% | 16.2 -60% | 6.9 32% | 10.3 -2% | 10 1% | 10.6 -5% | 11.5 -14% | 10.8 ? -7% | 13.3 ? -32% |
Load Average * | 49.7 | 68.3 -37% | 45.3 9% | 46.2 7% | 59 -19% | 55.2 -11% | 44 11% | 76.9 -55% | 65.5 -32% | 45.3 ? 9% | 70.7 ? -42% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 60 | 59.8 -0% | 39.5 34% | 49.4 18% | 61.1 -2% | 43.8 27% | 42.3 29% | 76.7 -28% | 61.2 -2% | ||
Load Maximum * | 66.3 | 104.8 -58% | 52.9 20% | 85.2 -29% | 92 -39% | 65.7 1% | 63 5% | 118 -78% | 68.4 -3% | 67.5 ? -2% | 116.1 ? -75% |
* ... smaller is better
Power consumption Witcher 3 / stress test
Power consumption with an external monitor
电池寿命
酷睿 i9 机型的电池容量增至 70 Wh(i5 版本为 56 Wh),因此电池续航时间非常长。在我们的 Wi-Fi 测试中,在 150 cd/m²(我们的评测设备亮度为 54%)的条件下,运行时间达到了 11 小时 14 分钟,在全亮度条件下甚至达到了 8 小时 21 分钟。我们的视频测试在 150 cd/m² 的亮度下甚至可以运行近 14 个小时。在设备开启的情况下,充满电需要两个多小时,而且不支持快速充电。
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024 i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 70 Wh | MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, 99.9 Wh | Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U R7 7840U, Radeon 780M, 54 Wh | SCHENKER Vision 16 PH6PRX1 i7-13700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 80 Wh | Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 i7-13700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 65 Wh | Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 i7-1355U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 71 Wh | Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 i5-1340P, Iris Xe G7 80EUs, 76 Wh | Huawei MateBook 16s i9 i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 84 Wh | Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 i7-12700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 60 Wh | Average of class Multimedia | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 82% | -50% | 29% | 8% | 17% | 12% | 44% | -37% | 4% | |
H.264 | 835 | 861 3% | 847 ? 1% | |||||||
WiFi v1.3 | 674 | 1100 63% | 336 -50% | 479 -29% | 467.7 -31% | 566 -16% | 613 -9% | 787 17% | 424 -37% | 640 ? -5% |
Load | 83 | 166 100% | 155 87% | 121 46% | 124 49% | 119 43% | 142 71% | 97.1 ? 17% | ||
Reader / Idle | 1506 | 1138 | 1821 | 1168 ? |
Pros
Cons
结论:MateBook D 16 技术落后,价格昂贵
新款 MateBook D 16 2024 让我们大吃一惊,因为它的整体包装相当不平衡。这款 16 英寸多媒体笔记本电脑具有一些积极的方面,例如其强大的处理器。不过,虽然酷睿 i9 处理器的纸面性能不错,但酷睿 i7 处理器也能提供同样的性能。与前代产品一样,尽管功耗限制很低,但它足以胜任日常任务,一般来说,两个风扇都没什么可做的。
雾面 IPS 显示屏有许多令人印象深刻的功能。它的主观图像质量很好,在色彩还原方面达到了参考水平。此外,全 sRGB 色彩覆盖意味着在图像编辑时没有任何障碍。此外,PWM 功能不存在,电池续航时间长和键盘舒适也是其积极的一面。
新款 MateBook D 16 2024 是一款非常不平衡的多媒体笔记本电脑,快速的处理器、出色的 IPS 显示屏和较长的电池续航时间被完全过时的功能集所抵消。售价为 1,199 英镑的新款 Matebook 在 USB 2.0 等功能方面简直令人难以接受,总而言之,它太贵了。
另一方面,MateBook D 16 2024 也存在一些严重的缺陷。尤其是在端口选择上,不得不受到批评。与前代产品相比,华为继续进一步减少端口数量,只为笔记本配备了一个用于供电的 USB-C 端口。制造商没有使用 Thunderbolt 4 或 USB 4.0,但相比之下,在右侧可以找到一个老化的 USB 2.0 端口。此外,网络摄像头只有 720p,而且不支持现代 Wi-Fi 6E 网络。
此外,还有其他一些问题。供电电源功率不足,如果处理器(即使只是短时间使用)的最大功耗为 64 瓦,那么 65 瓦的电源适配器无法提供足够的电力也就不足为奇了。此外,机箱内浪费了太多空间,本可以集成两个 SODIMM 插槽。我们无法对售价 999 美元的较小机型进行评估,因为它配备了性能较差的处理器(iGPU 性能更弱)和较差的显示屏(45% NTSC),电池容量也较小。在最坏的情况下,我们上面描述的积极因素都不复存在。
总体而言,由于其积极的方面,价格更高的 MateBook D 16 2024 版获得了 85% 的良好评价,但性价比却不尽如人意。因此,我们不能推荐购买。
价格和供应情况
新款 MateBook D 16 2024 将于 2024 年 2 月 1 日开始发售,但在英国已经可以从华为预订。凡在 1 月 12 日至 2 月 29 日期间订购该设备者,均可免费获得华为 FreeBuds 5。此外,在 1 月 31 日之前还有 50 英镑的预购折扣。
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024
- 01/12/2024 v7 (old)
Andreas Osthoff
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.