Notebookcheck Logo

华为 MateBook D 16 2024 评测--配备英特尔酷睿 i9-13900H 的多媒体笔记本电脑

猛禽湖与 USB 2.0 的完美结合。

华为为其 2024 型多媒体笔记本电脑 MateBook D 16 配备了英特尔酷睿 i9-13900H 处理器。然而,它却受到了功耗限制的制约。特别是在端口方面进行了严格的削减,但相比之下,电池续航时间却得到了改善。
Intel Laptop / Notebook Raptor Lake Windows

华为推出了新版 MateBook D 16,配备了强大的英特尔酷睿 i9-13900H(猛禽湖)处理器。它采用金属外壳,配备 16 GB 内存和 1 TB SSD。雾面 IPS 显示屏具有完整的 sRGB 覆盖范围,但只有全高清分辨率,也没有更高的刷新率等特殊功能。如果你仔细看看参数表,你还会发现一个 720p 网络摄像头,甚至是一个老式的 USB 2.0 端口。华为新款 MateBook D 16 2024 的要价为 1199 英镑,我们研究了一下这个价格是否合理。

此外,还有一款更便宜的机型,配备酷睿 i5-13420H、16 GB 内存和 512 GB 固态硬盘,售价 699 英镑。不过,该机的显示效果较差(只有 45% NTSC 而不是 100% sRGB),电池容量也较小(56 Wh 而不是 70 Wh)。

Huawei MateBook D 16 2024 (MateBook D 16 Series)
Processor
Intel Core i9-13900H 14 x 1.9 - 5.4 GHz, 64 W PL2 / Short Burst, 35 W PL1 / Sustained, Raptor Lake-H
Memory
16 GB 
, LPDDR4-3733, Dual-Channel, onboard
Display
16.00 inch 16:10, 1920 x 1200 pixel 142 PPI, NV160WUM-NH0, IPS, glossy: no, 60 Hz
Mainboard
Intel Alder Lake-P PCH
Storage
321JN1024GB-TX01, 1024 GB 
, 868 GB free
Soundcard
Intel Raptor Lake-P/U/H PCH - cAVS
Connections
1 USB 2.0, 2 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: 3.5 mm Stereo, 1 Fingerprint Reader
Networking
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.1
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 18.4 x 356.7 x 248.7
Battery
70 Wh, 6000 mAh Lithium-Polymer
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 11 Home
Camera
Webcam: 720p
Primary Camera: 0.9 MPix
Additional features
Speakers: Stereo, Keyboard: Chiclet, Keyboard Light: yes, 65W PSU, 24 Months Warranty
Weight
1.716 kg, Power Supply: 204 g
Price
1399 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Price
85 %
v7 (old)
01 / 2024
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024
i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
1.7 kg18.4 mm16.00"1920x1200
88.1 %
v7 (old)
12 / 2023
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
1.6 kg19.1 mm16.00"2560x1600
88.6 %
v7 (old)
10 / 2023
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U
R7 7840U, Radeon 780M
1.2 kg13 mm16.00"3200x2000
88.6 %
v7 (old)
08 / 2023
SCHENKER Vision 16 PH6PRX1
i7-13700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
1.5 kg17.1 mm16.00"2560x1600
86.6 %
v7 (old)
06 / 2023
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71
i7-13700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
1.6 kg19 mm16.00"3200x2000
85.8 %
v7 (old)
05 / 2023
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8
i7-1355U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
2 kg16.99 mm16.00"1920x1200
85.6 %
v7 (old)
05 / 2023
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16
i5-1340P, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
1.6 kg12.5 mm16.00"2880x1800
86 %
v7 (old)
06 / 2023
Huawei MateBook 16s i9
i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
2 kg17.8 mm16.00"2560x1680

外壳 - MateBook D 16 采用金属外壳

乍一看,深灰色的表壳与前代产品并无不同 前代但这是一个全新的外壳,内部设计也有所改变。得益于纤薄的边框,设计显得更加时尚,表面也不会特别容易吸附灰尘和指纹。新功能之一是显示屏铰链,现在的最大开启角度为 180 度。铰链的位置非常紧,单手无法打开盖子。不过,在调整打开角度时,会出现明显的晃动。

质量方面,这款手机壳给人的印象还不错。华为没有使用金属,虽然塑料结构主要是牢固的,但按压中央区域时,底座和盖子很容易松动。这在日常使用中并不会造成任何问题。扭动底座时会发出嘎吱嘎吱的声音,相当不雅观。

相比之下,MateBook 并不占空间,重量略高于 1.7 千克,可以说是一般。65 瓦的 PSU 重 204 克,非常轻巧。

尺寸比较

362.2 mm 250.1 mm 16.99 mm 2 kg358 mm 258 mm 19.1 mm 1.6 kg356.7 mm 248.7 mm 18.4 mm 1.7 kg355 mm 246 mm 19 mm 1.6 kg358.2 mm 246.4 mm 13 mm 1.2 kg353.7 mm 245.3 mm 17.1 mm 1.5 kg351 mm 254.9 mm 17.8 mm 2 kg355.4 mm 250.4 mm 12.5 mm 1.6 kg297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g

功能 - 华为采用了 USB 2.0 而非 Thunderbolt 技术

当涉及到端口时,你只能得到最低限度的端口,这种情况是一个明显的倒退,即使与旧的 MateBook D 16 2022.华为完全没有使用 Thunderbolt 或 USB 4。取而代之的是,只有一个 USB-C 端口(3.2 Gen.1),同时也用于电源。在右侧,唯一的 USB-A 接口仅使用 2.0 标准。在这个价位的产品中,这是绝对不允许的。HDMI 输出也只支持 1.4 标准,这意味着外接 4K 显示器无法以 60 赫兹运行,只能以 30 赫兹运行。即使是旧款 2022 型号也集成了 HDMI 2.0 输出和一个额外的 USB 端口。如果您使用其他华为设备(如智能手机、平板电脑),这部分的唯一好处就是跨设备操作。

左:USB-C 3.2 Gen.1(5 GBit/s、DisplayPort ALT 模式、Power Delivery)、USB-A 3.2 Gen.1(5 GBit/s)、HDMI 1.4、3.5 mm 音频
左:USB-C 3.2 Gen.1(5 GBit/s、DisplayPort ALT 模式、Power Delivery)、USB-A 3.2 Gen.1(5 GBit/s)、HDMI 1.4、3.5 mm 音频
右侧USB-A 2.0
右侧USB-A 2.0

交流

焊接好的 Wi-Fi 模块
焊接好的 Wi-Fi 模块

华为采用了我们熟悉的英特尔 AX201 Wi-Fi 模块,它支持 Wi-Fi 6 网络,但还不支持当前的 Wi-Fi 6E 标准。不过,与华硕参考路由器连接后,其性能非常出色,而且在测试过程中,我们无法检测到任何形式的 Wi-Fi 连接问题。

Networking
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1658 (min: 1616) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1693 (min: 1623) MBit/s ∼100%
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Intel Killer Wi-Fi 7 BE1750W 320 MHz (BE200NGW)
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1144 (min: 654) MBit/s ∼69%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1317 (min: 915) MBit/s ∼78%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1210 (min: 747) MBit/s ∼75%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1111 (min: 866) MBit/s ∼72%
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U
MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
537 (min: 404) MBit/s ∼32%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1443 (min: 1217) MBit/s ∼85%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1256 (min: 1053) MBit/s ∼77%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1225 (min: 1094) MBit/s ∼80%
SCHENKER Vision 16 PH6PRX1
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
737 (min: 596) MBit/s ∼44%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1515 (min: 818) MBit/s ∼89%
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71
Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1459 (min: 796) MBit/s ∼88%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1553 (min: 1528) MBit/s ∼92%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1583 (min: 1034) MBit/s ∼98%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1337 (min: 676) MBit/s ∼87%
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1086 (min: 810) MBit/s ∼66%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1327 (min: 1121) MBit/s ∼78%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1180 (min: 1054) MBit/s ∼73%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1501 (min: 1422) MBit/s ∼98%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1619 (min: 1559) MBit/s ∼98%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1529 (min: 1477) MBit/s ∼90%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1623 (min: 1172) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1502 (min: 1405) MBit/s ∼98%
Huawei MateBook 16s i9
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1498 (min: 704) MBit/s ∼90%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1476 (min: 1300) MBit/s ∼87%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1442 (min: 1087) MBit/s ∼89%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1539 (min: 1497) MBit/s ∼100%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1372 (min: 1168) MBit/s ∼83%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1576 (min: 1376) MBit/s ∼93%
050100150200250300350400450500550600650700750800850900950100010501100115012001250130013501400145015001550160016501700Tooltip
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1658 (1616-1722)
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1692 (1623-1708)

网络摄像头

顶部边框上的网络摄像头只能提供 720p 的分辨率,因此绝对不能再被视为最新的摄像头。因此,图像缺乏细节,也不是特别清晰。

ColorChecker
11.8 ∆E
14.9 ∆E
14.4 ∆E
15.7 ∆E
11.8 ∆E
13.8 ∆E
16.7 ∆E
15.4 ∆E
17 ∆E
9 ∆E
13 ∆E
8.7 ∆E
11.2 ∆E
16.1 ∆E
20.4 ∆E
7.5 ∆E
14.1 ∆E
18.2 ∆E
1.5 ∆E
8.5 ∆E
9.9 ∆E
8.7 ∆E
4.4 ∆E
3.8 ∆E
ColorChecker Huawei MateBook D 16 2024: 11.94 ∆E min: 1.45 - max: 20.37 ∆E

维护

底盖由 10 颗 Torx 螺钉(T5)固定,可以拆卸。在内部,你很快就会注意到新的冷却系统,它在底座的右侧装有两个风扇。此外,你还可以看到有许多未使用的空间,这些空间本可以轻松用于内存插槽或第二个 M.2 2280 插槽。但现在,你只能使用一个固态硬盘、16 GB 焊接内存和一个焊接 Wi-Fi 模块。

内部布局
内部布局

输入设备 - 背光键盘和数字键盘

MateBook D 16 2024 的键盘配备了专用数字键盘,其按键略显狭窄。总的来说,键盘给人留下了良好的印象。得益于 1.5 毫米的键程和精确的输入,打字体验非常舒适,即使是较长的文本也能直接输入。不过,该键盘也是声音较大的机型之一。华为集成了两级白色背光,可惜不能通过传感器自动激活。电源按钮位于键盘上方的右侧,它还包含指纹传感器。

输入设备
输入设备
键盘照明
键盘照明

点击板的尺寸为 12 x 7.3 厘米,大小适中,运行正常。像往常一样,可以用物理方式按压键盘底部,但会发出响亮而廉价的 "咔嗒 "声。在实际使用中,我们只建议点击键盘进行输入。

显示屏 - 16:10 IPS 面板

子像素结构
子像素结构
边缘轻微渗色
边缘轻微渗色

我们已经知道京东方(NV160WUM-NH0)的 16 英寸 IPS 雾面面板来自旧的 2022 型号.这是一款非常简单的显示屏,分辨率为 1,920 x 1,200 像素。主观画质不错,即使是明亮区域也不会出现颗粒感。不过,在 60 Hz 和没有 HDR 等附加功能的情况下,这个价位段的竞争非常激烈。从对比设备中可以看出,这些设备都采用了更好的显示屏(更高分辨率、偶尔采用 OLED、更高频率)。只有 联想 Yoga 7采用了类似的面板。

华为指定的亮度为 300 cd/m²,但我们的评测设备的平均亮度为 340 cd/m²,远远超过了这一标准。尽管如此,在 80% 的亮度下,照明效果并不理想。我们测得的黑度为 0.24 cd/m²,最大对比度几乎达到 1.500:1。

372
cd/m²
381
cd/m²
368
cd/m²
327
cd/m²
349
cd/m²
316
cd/m²
312
cd/m²
332
cd/m²
303
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
NV160WUM-NH0 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 381 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 340 cd/m² Minimum: 2.7 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 80 %
Center on Battery: 349 cd/m²
Contrast: 1454:1 (Black: 0.24 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.8 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.88, calibrated: 0.7
ΔE Greyscale 4.9 | 0.5-98 Ø5.1
68.8% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
96.5% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
66.7% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.2
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024
NV160WUM-NH0, IPS, 1920x1200, 16"
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
AU Optronics B160QAN03.R, IPS, 2560x1600, 16"
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U
Samsung ATNA60BX03-0, OLED, 3200x2000, 16"
SCHENKER Vision 16 PH6PRX1
BOE CQ NE160QDM-NZ1 , IPS, 2560x1600, 16"
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71
Samsung SDC418D ATNA60BC03-0, OLED, 3200x2000, 16"
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8
LEN160FHD, IPS, 1920x1200, 16"
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16
Samsung ATNA60CL03-0, AMOLED, 2880x1800, 16"
Huawei MateBook 16s i9
BOE0BB0 TV160DKT-NH1, IPS, 2560x1680, 16"
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022
BOE NV160WUM-NH0, IPS, 1920x1200, 16"
Display
24%
33%
4%
33%
-36%
31%
-4%
-1%
Display P3 Coverage
66.7
96.7
45%
99.9
50%
70
5%
99.91
50%
42
-37%
99.7
49%
63
-6%
66.2
-1%
sRGB Coverage
96.5
99.8
3%
100
4%
99.3
3%
100
4%
62.8
-35%
100
4%
94.9
-2%
96.4
0%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
68.8
84.6
23%
100
45%
71.2
3%
98.87
44%
43.5
-37%
97
41%
65.1
-5%
68.3
-1%
Response Times
-63%
97%
63%
92%
-3%
92%
3%
5%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
31 ?(14.4, 16.6)
49.4 ?(22.6, 26.8)
-59%
0.57 ?(0.28, 0.29)
98%
11 ?(5, 6)
65%
2 ?(1, 1)
94%
31.8 ?(15.4, 16.4)
-3%
2 ?(1, 1)
94%
34 ?(16, 18)
-10%
30.5 ?(14.2, 16.3)
2%
Response Time Black / White *
20.3 ?(10.6, 9.7)
33.9 ?(15.6, 18.3)
-67%
1 ?(0.55, 0.45)
95%
8 ?(4, 4)
61%
2 ?(1, 1)
90%
20.9 ?(11.2, 9.7)
-3%
2 ?(1, 1)
90%
17 ?(7, 10)
16%
18.7 ?(9.7, 9)
8%
PWM Frequency
238.8
227 ?(50)
26 ?(10)
Screen
-5%
11%
13%
-25%
-48%
193%
16%
-7%
Brightness middle
349
473.6
36%
379.8
9%
356
2%
370
6%
279.4
-20%
412
18%
448
28%
319
-9%
Brightness
340
456
34%
383
13%
349
3%
371
9%
257
-24%
412
21%
436
28%
317
-7%
Brightness Distribution
80
87
9%
98
23%
93
16%
98
23%
81
1%
98
23%
93
16%
90
13%
Black Level *
0.24
0.19
21%
0.28
-17%
0.18
25%
0.015
94%
0.35
-46%
0.23
4%
Contrast
1454
2493
71%
1271
-13%
1552
7%
27467
1789%
1280
-12%
1387
-5%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
2.8
5.9
-111%
4.7
-68%
1.7
39%
2.77
1%
5.12
-83%
2.34
16%
1.6
43%
3.4
-21%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
7.3
9.37
-28%
7.51
-3%
3
59%
4.08
44%
19.42
-166%
3.34
54%
4.44
39%
8.1
-11%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
0.7
0.89
-27%
0.55
21%
1
-43%
2.83
-304%
1.84
-163%
2.95
-321%
0.64
9%
0.8
-14%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
4.9
7.3
-49%
0.8
84%
1.3
73%
2.58
47%
5.5
-12%
2.78
43%
2.78
43%
5.7
-16%
Gamma
2.2 100%
1.9 116%
2.22 99%
2.1 105%
2.46 89%
2.22 99%
2.5 88%
2.1 105%
CCT
7328 89%
7260 90%
6381 102%
6625 98%
6241 104%
6407 101%
6879 94%
6582 99%
7433 87%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
2.43
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-15% / -7%
47% / 31%
27% / 18%
33% / 9%
-29% / -39%
105% / 144%
5% / 10%
-1% / -4%

* ... smaller is better

卡尔曼灰阶
卡尔曼灰阶
CalMAN 饱和度
CalMAN 饱和度
CalMAN 色彩检查器
CalMAN 色彩检查器
校准 CalMAN 灰度标尺
校准 CalMAN 灰度标尺
CalMAN 饱和度校准
CalMAN 饱和度校准
CalMAN ColorChecker 已校准
CalMAN ColorChecker 已校准

我们使用专业 CalMAN 软件(X-Rite i1 Pro2)进行的分析表明,出厂时的校准效果并不是特别好,开箱后,灰度和色彩方面都存在明显偏差。此外,你还可以发现明显的蓝色色调,再加上过冷的色温,最大亮度也无法从中受益。经过我们的校准(可在上面免费下载相应的配置文件),面板显示出了其隐藏的潜力,因为与 sRGB 参考色彩空间(几乎完全覆盖)有关的灰度和色彩偏差极低,所有值都明显低于重要的 DeltaE 2000 偏差 3。

对比 sRGB
对比 sRGB
对 P3
对 P3
对比 AdobeRGB
对比 AdobeRGB

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
20.3 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 10.6 ms rise
↘ 9.7 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 42 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (20.8 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
31 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 14.4 ms rise
↘ 16.6 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 38 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (32.6 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8529 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

在阳光下
在阳光下

得益于雾面 IPS 面板,MateBook 甚至可以在室外使用,即使在非常明亮的日子里,也应避免光源反射。总的来说,可视角度稳定性不错。

视角稳定性
视角稳定性

性能 - 经济模式下的酷睿 i9

 
 

测试条件

在华为的 PC Manager 中,有两种能耗设置--首先是预设的平衡模式,其次是性能模式。后者并没有提供更多的性能,在连续负载时仅增加 5 瓦(40 瓦而不是 35 瓦 TDP)。这与风扇的噪音(46.2 对 36.2 dB(A))不成比例。这意味着您可以放心使用平衡 模式,也就是我们在即将进行的基准测试和测量中使用的模式。

处理器 - 酷睿 i9-13900H

英特尔 英特尔酷睿 i9-13900H是猛禽湖系列中速度极快的移动处理器,拥有 6 个快速性能内核和 8 个效率内核。它总共可以同时处理多达 20 个线程。其性能潜力非常大,不过,MateBook D 16 中的酷睿 i9 受限于 64/45 瓦(之后为 35 瓦)的低功耗限制。唯一令人印象深刻的是单核性能,虽然这在日常使用中起着重要作用,但归根结底,选择酷睿 i9 其实只是为了在数据表上好看。更便宜的 酷睿 i7-13700H的整体性能几乎相同。此外,多核性能在使用很短时间后就会明显下降。 MateBook 16s在多核负载方面要快 20% 以上。在电池模式下,CPU 性能几乎保持不变。 其他 CPU 基准测试 这里.

Cinebench R15 Multi Continuous Test

01503004506007509001050120013501500165018001950210022502400255027002850Tooltip
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024 Intel Core i9-13900H: Ø1949 (1809.79-2490.19)
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US Intel Core Ultra 7 155H: Ø2289 (2208.24-2361.97)
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U AMD Ryzen 7 7840U: Ø1628 (1515.15-1985.51)
SCHENKER Vision 16 PH6PRX1 Intel Core i7-13700H: Ø1807 (1727.64-1846.81)
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Intel Core i7-13700H: Ø1906 (1816.37-2350.45)
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 Intel Core i7-1355U: Ø1298 (1272.02-1735.28)
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 Intel Core i5-1340P: Ø1457 (1291.45-1828.74)
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 Intel Core i9-13900H: Ø2518 (2463.05-2968.46)
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 Intel Core i7-12700H; Performance: Ø1777 (1730.55-2218.28)
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022 Intel Core i7-12700H; Balanced: Ø1672 (1578.91-2216.93)
CPU Performance Rating: Percent
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU | v3.3 Classroom CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
CPU Performance Rating
Huawei MateBook 16s i9
Intel Core i9-13900H
82 pt
Average Intel Core i9-13900H
 
75.2 pt
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024
Intel Core i9-13900H
73.6 pt
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
69.2 pt
Average of class Multimedia
 
69.1 pt
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71
Intel Core i7-13700H
68.6 pt
SCHENKER Vision 16 PH6PRX1
Intel Core i7-13700H
65 pt
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
63.6 pt
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022
Intel Core i7-12700H
62.4 pt
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16
Intel Core i5-1340P
57.4 pt
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8
Intel Core i7-1355U
54 pt

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
2490 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
101.8 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
97.8 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
286 Points
Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
5435 Points
Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
759 Points
Cinebench R23 Single Core
1963 Points
Cinebench R23 Multi Core
13984 Points
Help
Performance Rating
Huawei MateBook 16s i9
Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
94 pt
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
88.3 pt
Average Intel Core i9-13900H
 
87.6 pt
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
86.1 pt
Average of class Multimedia
 
85.1 pt
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024
Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
79.7 pt
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71
Intel Core i7-13700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
77.3 pt
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022
Intel Core i7-12700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
70.8 pt
SCHENKER Vision 16 PH6PRX1
Intel Core i7-13700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
68.7 pt
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16
Intel Core i5-1340P, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
64.6 pt
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8
Intel Core i7-1355U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
53.1 pt

系统性能

从主观上看,MateBook 的性能水平非常高,每次输入都能迅速执行。合成基准测试结果没有显示任何异常,我们在测试过程中也未能发现任何异常。

PCMark 10 / Score
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
7033 Points +9%
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U
Radeon 780M, R7 7840U, SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N
6952 Points +7%
Average of class Multimedia
  (4325 - 8670, n=72, last 2 years)
6837 Points +6%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, 321JN1024GB-TX01
6472 Points
Huawei MateBook 16s i9
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, 321JN1024GB-TX01
6406 Points -1%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
  (5944 - 6802, n=8)
6328 Points -2%
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-13700H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
6192 Points -4%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-12700H, Silicon Motion PCIe-8 SSD
6041 Points -7%
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1355U, WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101
5933 Points -8%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16
Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1340P, WD PC SN740 256GB SDDPNQD-256G
5576 Points -14%
SCHENKER Vision 16 PH6PRX1
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-13700H, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
5531 Points -15%

* ... smaller is better

PCMark 10 Score
6472 points
Help
AIDA64 / Memory Copy
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core
80951 MB/s +42%
Average of class Multimedia
  (21158 - 104459, n=78, last 2 years)
70974 MB/s +24%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16
Intel Core i5-1340P, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
69103 MB/s +21%
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
68255 MB/s +20%
SCHENKER Vision 16 PH6PRX1
Intel Core i7-13700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
64605 MB/s +13%
Huawei MateBook 16s i9
Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
63839 MB/s +12%
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8
Intel Core i7-1355U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
62918 MB/s +10%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H
  (37448 - 74486, n=25)
61864 MB/s +8%
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71
Intel Core i7-13700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
61697 MB/s +8%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022
Intel Core i7-12700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
58627 MB/s +3%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024
Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
57062 MB/s

* ... smaller is better

DPC 延迟

在我们的标准化延迟测试中(上网、4K YouTube 播放、CPU 负载),使用提供的 BIOS 版本,评测设备在使用实时音频应用程序时没有表现出任何限制。一个驱动程序确实有点故障,但重要的 "中断处理延迟 "值可以忽略不计。

LatencyMon - 概述
LatencyMon - 概述
LatencyMon - 驱动程序
LatencyMon - 驱动程序
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-13700H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
2645.7 μs * -325%
Huawei MateBook 16s i9
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, 321JN1024GB-TX01
2290 μs * -268%
SCHENKER Vision 16 PH6PRX1
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-13700H, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
1589 μs * -155%
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1355U, WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101
877 μs * -41%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-12700H, Silicon Motion PCIe-8 SSD
824.9 μs * -33%
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, 321JN1024GB-TX01
622.4 μs *
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U
Radeon 780M, R7 7840U, SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N
580.3 μs * +7%
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
527.2 μs * +15%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16
Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1340P, WD PC SN740 256GB SDDPNQD-256G
370.2 μs * +41%

* ... smaller is better

大容量存储器

M.2 2280 固态硬盘通过 PCIe 4.0 连接。
M.2 2280 固态硬盘通过 PCIe 4.0 连接。

MateBook 16s安装的固态硬盘没有制造商标识。固态硬盘上只有型号(321JN1024GB-TX01)。我们使用的是 M.2 2280 固态硬盘,它通过 PCIe 4.0 连接,容量为 1 TB。该固态硬盘的传输速度超过 4 GB/s,性能非常令人满意,即使在长时间负载的情况下也能保持稳定。不过,开箱即用的固态硬盘分区再次出现问题。在系统 C 盘中,用户只能使用 135 GB,另外的 733 GB 都在 D 盘中。这完全没有必要,而且很快就会成为问题,因为通常情况下,所有应用程序和下载都在 C 盘。更多固态硬盘基准测试 这里.

321JN1024GB-TX01
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 4899 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 3938 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 972 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 597 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 79.3 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 319 MB/s
CDM 6 Write 4K Q8T8: 2525 MB/s
CDM 6 Read 4K Q8T8: 1717 MB/s
Drive Performance Rating - Percent
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024
321JN1024GB-TX01
83.6 pt
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
83.6 pt
Average 321JN1024GB-TX01
 
82.6 pt
Huawei MateBook 16s i9
321JN1024GB-TX01
81.6 pt
SCHENKER Vision 16 PH6PRX1
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
79.6 pt
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U
SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N
75.7 pt
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
58.8 pt
Average of class Multimedia
 
58.1 pt
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8
WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101
51 pt
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022
Silicon Motion PCIe-8 SSD
50.9 pt
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16
WD PC SN740 256GB SDDPNQD-256G
47.7 pt

* ... smaller is better

Continuous Performance Read: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

02505007501000125015001750200022502500275030003250350037504000425045004750Tooltip
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø4895 (4355.16-4908.38)

图形卡

GPU-Z Iris Xe Graphics G7
GPU-Z Iris Xe Graphics G7

处理器的集成 Iris Xe Graphics G7负责图形计算。它的速度很快,拥有 96 个 EU,最高速度可达 1.5 GHz。这样的性能已经足够,只要不使用 GPU 密集型应用程序,就可以播放高分辨率视频。不过 AMD Radeon 780M和新的 Arc iGPU要快得多。

Matebook D 16 用户不应该有高远的游戏目标,而且由于没有 Thunderbolt 和 USB 4.0 接口,也不可能使用外置显卡。即使是在玩较老和要求不高的游戏时,一般也只能使用低细节设置。至少在长时间负载和电池模式下,性能仍然稳定。其他 GPU 基准测试 这里.

3DMark Performance Rating - Percent
Average of class Multimedia
 
100 pt
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
61.1 pt
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
49.1 pt
Huawei MateBook 16s i9
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-13900H
36.9 pt
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-13900H
36.1 pt
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-13700H
35.1 pt
SCHENKER Vision 16 PH6PRX1
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-13700H
34.8 pt
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-12700H
34.6 pt
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1355U
32.4 pt
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
 
30.4 pt
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs, Intel Core i5-1340P
30.3 pt
3DMark 11 Performance
8141 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score
5618 points
3DMark Time Spy Score
2028 points
Help
Performance Rating - Percent
Average of class Multimedia
 
100 pt
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US -1!
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
55.9 pt
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 -1!
Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
45.7 pt
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
45.4 pt
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022
Intel Core i7-12700H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
43.1 pt
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024
Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
40.6 pt
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71
Intel Core i7-13700H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
40.4 pt
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8 -1!
Intel Core i7-1355U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
40.3 pt
SCHENKER Vision 16 PH6PRX1
Intel Core i7-13700H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
36.3 pt
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 -1!
Intel Core i5-1340P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
31 pt

Witcher 3 FPS diagram

012345678910111213141516Tooltip
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024 i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs: Ø15.5 (14-17)
lowmed.highultra
GTA V (2015) 130.4 112.3 25.6 10.6
The Witcher 3 (2015) 110 71 38 15.5
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 121.3 91.1 74 65
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) 49.9 27 19.1
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) 60.9 44.8 39.5
Far Cry 5 (2018) 61 34 31 29
Strange Brigade (2018) 102.7 44.8 35.4 28.5
F1 2021 (2021) 114.8 59.1 46 31.7
F1 22 (2022) 53.4 47.6 33.6
F1 23 (2023) 48.8 44.2 30.7

排放 - 静音风扇

噪音排放

两个风扇
两个风扇

华为对散热系统进行了全面调整,现在使用两个并排安装在机箱右侧的风扇。这两个风扇非常安静,在日常工作中通常会被关闭(或只听到极其安静的嗡嗡声)。即使在玩游戏时,噪音水平也仅为 32 dB(A),在 CPU 满负荷运行几分钟后也仅为 36.2 dB(A)。可选的性能模式会将噪音值提高到 46.2 dB(A),因此应避免使用。我们的评测设备没有任何其他类型的电子噪音。

Noise Level

Idle
23.2 / 23.2 / 24 dB(A)
Load
28 / 36.2 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silent
40 dB(A)
audible
50 dB(A)
loud
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance)   environment noise: 23.2 dB(A)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2034.63437.236.437.43536.92528.82528.728.825.726.9283131.226.929.628.429.33031.24030.530.229.830.326.62830.8502824.827.324.724.826.226.86324.521.924.522.522.825.4248021.119.62017.61817.921.91002220.319.718.717.616.219.112523.721.42015.215.614.617.616020.118.818.913.414.712.115.920025.619.218.41818.213.117.325022.120.119.9161714.818.531522.420.21815.714.71618.640023.721.118.713.413.912.316.550023.520.117.612.61210.114.963024.921.418.312.411.810.217.480025.522.418.512.211.39.316.6100025.121.416.51110.99.215.512502622.217.111.511.49.516.6160025.120.215.210.710.69.715.5200025.319.615.110.610.910.314.5250024.519.414.811.611.310.714.431502520.215.511.611.411.215.7400025.820.914.812.411.811.514.8500022.717.413.512.611.911.812.9630018.714.412.812.812.21212.1800016.213.313.41412.212.112.11000013.41313.214.112.212.212.31250012.812.912.813.212.111.912.21600012.514.114.216.312.111.512.3SPL36.231.92824.52423.227.1N2.41.510.60.50.50.9median 23.7median 20.1median 16.5median 12.8median 12.1median 11.8median 15.5Delta3.12.12.51.41.71.82.3hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseHuawei MateBook D 16 2024
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, 321JN1024GB-TX01
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U
Radeon 780M, R7 7840U, SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N
SCHENKER Vision 16 PH6PRX1
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-13700H, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-13700H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1355U, WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16
Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1340P, WD PC SN740 256GB SDDPNQD-256G
Huawei MateBook 16s i9
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, 321JN1024GB-TX01
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-12700H, Silicon Motion PCIe-8 SSD
Noise
-22%
-16%
-18%
-23%
-15%
-24%
-25%
-18%
off / environment *
23.2
24.5
-6%
23.4
-1%
25.5
-10%
25.7
-11%
22.8
2%
25.2
-9%
25.7
-11%
24.2
-4%
Idle Minimum *
23.2
24.5
-6%
24.1
-4%
25.5
-10%
26.1
-13%
22.9
1%
25.2
-9%
25.7
-11%
24.2
-4%
Idle Average *
23.2
26.3
-13%
24.3
-5%
28.7
-24%
26.1
-13%
22.9
1%
25.2
-9%
28.4
-22%
25.8
-11%
Idle Maximum *
24
26.3
-10%
28
-17%
29.1
-21%
27.2
-13%
26.9
-12%
29.3
-22%
28.4
-18%
30.5
-27%
Load Average *
28
36.5
-30%
41
-46%
33.8
-21%
44.2
-58%
41.7
-49%
46.4
-66%
45.3
-62%
39.8
-42%
Witcher 3 ultra *
31.9
46.3
-45%
40.9
-28%
37.6
-18%
41.5
-30%
39.8
-25%
Load Maximum *
36.2
52.9
-46%
40.9
-13%
44.9
-24%
47.5
-31%
43.6
-20%
46.4
-28%
45.6
-26%
39.8
-10%

* ... smaller is better

温度

由于风扇布局不对称,在负载情况下左侧的温度尤其高。总之,无论在低负载还是高负载下,温度都不会造成太大问题。在压力测试中,只要使用平衡 模式,处理器的功耗很快就降到了 35 瓦。在可选的性能模式下,几分钟后,功耗稳定在 40 瓦。

CPU/iGPU 压力测试数据(红色:性能模式,绿色:平衡模式)
CPU/iGPU 压力测试数据(红色:性能模式,绿色:平衡模式)
Max. Load
 39 °C38.7 °C31.4 °C 
 40.3 °C36.6 °C28.6 °C 
 29.2 °C27.3 °C25.7 °C 
Maximum: 40.3 °C
Average: 33 °C
33.9 °C41.3 °C43.1 °C
27.8 °C39.5 °C45.1 °C
26.3 °C29.4 °C31.2 °C
Maximum: 45.1 °C
Average: 35.3 °C
Power Supply (max.)  50.2 °C | Room Temperature 21.6 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 33 °C / 91 F, compared to the average of 31.3 °C / 88 F for the devices in the class Multimedia.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 40.3 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 45.1 °C / 113 F, compared to the average of 39.2 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.3 °C / 78 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 33.5 °C / 92 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 30.2 °C / 86.4 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-1.4 °C / -2.6 F).
应力测试表面温度(顶部)
应力测试表面温度(顶部)
应力测试表面温度(底部)
应力测试表面温度(底部)
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024
Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
SCHENKER Vision 16 PH6PRX1
Intel Core i7-13700H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71
Intel Core i7-13700H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8
Intel Core i7-1355U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16
Intel Core i5-1340P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
Huawei MateBook 16s i9
Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022
Intel Core i7-12700H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
Heat
-1%
-9%
-0%
-14%
-2%
-11%
-10%
-7%
Maximum Upper Side *
40.3
48.8
-21%
41.6
-3%
41.1
-2%
44.4
-10%
37.6
7%
41.6
-3%
43.2
-7%
41.8
-4%
Maximum Bottom *
45.1
47.6
-6%
46.6
-3%
42
7%
48
-6%
40
11%
45
-0%
44.7
1%
47.3
-5%
Idle Upper Side *
26.6
24.2
9%
30.4
-14%
28.5
-7%
31.9
-20%
30.4
-14%
31
-17%
32.1
-21%
28.3
-6%
Idle Bottom *
27.1
23.6
13%
31
-14%
26.8
1%
31.9
-18%
30.6
-13%
33.6
-24%
30.1
-11%
30.2
-11%

* ... smaller is better

发言人

两个立体声扬声器的表现都很一般,缺乏力量和空间深度。它的优点是能清晰地再现高音,这在语音播放(如电话会议时)时具有积极意义。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs203534.52526.930.8313030.1402831.15026.2266325.424.48017.930.310016.236.512514.643.516012.144.920013.15225014.854.43151659.540012.365.150010.166.363010.270.88009.376.510009.27412509.573.516009.766.6200010.368.3250010.770.9315011.273.2400011.574.1500011.869.363001266.5800012.1691000012.269.61250011.966.81600011.566.1SPL23.283.5N0.558.9median 11.8median 66.8Delta1.85.942.93842.935.332.635.324.922.324.933.128.633.128.724.328.733.124.933.137.72937.743.323.243.351.926.551.955.32455.356.918.656.957.818.857.855.114.955.155.215.955.259.117.259.165.119.865.170.415.770.471.314.471.370.714.270.770.214.570.268.712.768.769.111.569.168.511.668.571.711.671.779.211.579.270.311.870.370.111.670.174.11274.17412.37467.611.767.68426.38458.10.858.1median 68.7median 14.4median 68.773.47021.741.4027.935.3030.234.8025.633.6033.227.9022.127.7016.629.8021.241.3016.553.7015.255.4013.647.6013.657.1017.264012.368.6011.965.4011.268.9012.473.2011.770.8011.670011.871.3012.375.3012.670.3013.369.2013.364.5013.664.2013.763.3014.57201581.9014.180.7012.966.3025.284.800.659.7median 13.3median 68.61.75.32120.22123.924.723.926.225.726.22020.12027.629.527.630.318.130.348.413.148.457.916.457.963.822.563.861.814.561.855.311.655.351.612.151.660.111.560.168.110.668.167.31067.366.79.266.770.510.170.575.810.275.875.910.275.976.810.576.873.910.773.971.411.171.468.912.368.967.812.167.867.113.267.173.21873.281.617.681.684.620.984.675.416.275.463.812.163.887.72687.7710.771median 68.9median 12.1median 68.95.82.85.8hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseHuawei MateBook D 16 2024MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001USSamsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16Huawei MateBook 16s i9
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 18.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 28% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 69% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 14% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 82% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 23% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 72% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 12% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 85% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.4% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (15% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.7% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 5% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 91% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 12% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 84% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Huawei MateBook 16s i9 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 10.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.4% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (11.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 15% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 82% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 7% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 91% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

能源管理--供电不足的 PSU 和较长的电池寿命

耗电量

空闲运行时,最大功耗为 10 瓦,屏幕亮度达到最大。然而,在负载情况下,65 瓦的 PSU 限制了功耗。考虑到处理器至少能在短时间内消耗 64 瓦的功率,65 瓦的 PSU 在这种情况下无法为笔记本电脑提供足够的电力也就不足为奇了。在这种情况下,电池必须在短时间内使用,这对电池的预期寿命肯定不利。电池的最大耗电量超过 20 瓦。在连续负载的情况下,平衡 模式下的功率会趋于平稳,而 PSU 的功率也足够了。但是,如果长时间使用高性能模式(CPU 稳定在 40 瓦),电池容量就会持续下降(每小时 2-3%)。有趣的是,这个问题无法解决,因为即使使用功率更大的 100 瓦 PSU,MateBook 也不会消耗额外的电量。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.26 / 1.1 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 4.7 / 9.5 / 10.1 Watt
Load midlight 49.7 / 66.3 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024
i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 321JN1024GB-TX01, IPS, 1920x1200, 16"
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB, IPS, 2560x1600, 16"
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U
R7 7840U, Radeon 780M, SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N, OLED, 3200x2000, 16"
SCHENKER Vision 16 PH6PRX1
i7-13700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB, IPS, 2560x1600, 16"
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71
i7-13700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM, OLED, 3200x2000, 16"
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8
i7-1355U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101, IPS, 1920x1200, 16"
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16
i5-1340P, Iris Xe G7 80EUs, WD PC SN740 256GB SDDPNQD-256G, AMOLED, 2880x1800, 16"
Huawei MateBook 16s i9
i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 321JN1024GB-TX01, IPS, 2560x1680, 16"
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022
i7-12700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, Silicon Motion PCIe-8 SSD, IPS, 1920x1200, 16"
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
 
Average of class Multimedia
 
Power Consumption
-13%
-13%
-25%
-2%
6%
19%
-28%
-16%
-2%
-44%
Idle Minimum *
4.7
3
36%
7.1
-51%
6.3
-34%
5.8
-23%
3.3
30%
3.9
17%
5.8
-23%
6.1
-30%
5.39 ?(2.2 - 46.5, n=195)
-15%
Idle Average *
9.5
9.5
-0%
10.1
-6%
14.4
-52%
6
37%
10.2
-7%
4.8
49%
7.7
19%
10.6
-12%
Idle Maximum *
10.1
12
-19%
18.6
-84%
16.2
-60%
6.9
32%
10.3
-2%
10
1%
10.6
-5%
11.5
-14%
Load Average *
49.7
68.3
-37%
45.3
9%
46.2
7%
59
-19%
55.2
-11%
44
11%
76.9
-55%
65.5
-32%
Witcher 3 ultra *
60
59.8
-0%
39.5
34%
49.4
18%
61.1
-2%
43.8
27%
42.3
29%
76.7
-28%
61.2
-2%
Load Maximum *
66.3
104.8
-58%
52.9
20%
85.2
-29%
92
-39%
65.7
1%
63
5%
118
-78%
68.4
-3%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption Witcher 3 / stress test

05101520253035404550556065Tooltip
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024; Witcher 3 ultra: Ø60 (56.4-66)
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø58.7 (56.9-66.3)
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø7.39 (6.8-8.94)

Power consumption with an external monitor

05101520253035404550556065Tooltip
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø55 (53.1-66.2)
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø66.1 (66.1-66.1)
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024; Cinebench R23 Single (external Monitor): Ø55.5 (50.2-66.2)
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024; Cinebench R23 Multi (external Monitor): Ø56.9 (52.8-66.3)
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø53.3 (52-55.6)
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024; 1920x1080 The Witcher 3 ultra (external Monitor): Ø51.8 (50.7-63.1)
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø7.22 (6.7-7.98)

电池寿命

酷睿 i9 机型的电池容量增至 70 Wh(i5 版本为 56 Wh),因此电池续航时间非常长。在我们的 Wi-Fi 测试中,在 150 cd/m²(我们的评测设备亮度为 54%)的条件下,运行时间达到了 11 小时 14 分钟,在全亮度条件下甚至达到了 8 小时 21 分钟。我们的视频测试在 150 cd/m² 的亮度下甚至可以运行近 14 个小时。在设备开启的情况下,充满电需要两个多小时,而且不支持快速充电。

电池信息
电池信息
充电过程
充电过程
Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing (Edge 120)
11h 14min
WiFi Websurfing max. Brightness (Edge 120)
8h 21min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
13h 55min
Load (maximum brightness)
1h 23min
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024
i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 70 Wh
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US
Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, 99.9 Wh
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U
R7 7840U, Radeon 780M, 54 Wh
SCHENKER Vision 16 PH6PRX1
i7-13700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 80 Wh
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71
i7-13700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 65 Wh
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IRL8
i7-1355U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 71 Wh
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Pro 16
i5-1340P, Iris Xe G7 80EUs, 76 Wh
Huawei MateBook 16s i9
i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 84 Wh
Huawei MateBook D 16 2022
i7-12700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 60 Wh
Average of class Multimedia
 
Battery Runtime
82%
-50%
29%
8%
17%
12%
44%
-37%
6%
H.264
835
861
3%
WiFi v1.3
674
1100
63%
336
-50%
479
-29%
467.7
-31%
566
-16%
613
-9%
787
17%
424
-37%
Load
83
166
100%
155
87%
121
46%
124
49%
119
43%
142
71%
Reader / Idle
1506
1138
1821

Pros

+ 良好的系统性能
+ 静音冷却
+ 良好的键盘
+ 色彩准确度极高的哑光 IPS 显示屏
+ 电池寿命长

Cons

- 过时的端口标准(USB 2.0、HDMI 1.4)
- 既没有 Thunderbolt 4 也没有 USB 4
- 供电不足的 PSU
- 焊接内存
- 720p 网络摄像头
- 不必要的固态硬盘分区
- 酷睿 i9 仍远低于其潜力

结论:MateBook D 16 技术落后,价格昂贵

已评测:华为 MateBook D 16 2024。评测设备由华为德国公司提供。
已评测:华为 MateBook D 16 2024。评测设备由华为德国公司提供。

新款 MateBook D 16 2024 让我们大吃一惊,因为它的整体包装相当不平衡。这款 16 英寸多媒体笔记本电脑具有一些积极的方面,例如其强大的处理器。不过,虽然酷睿 i9 处理器的纸面性能不错,但酷睿 i7 处理器也能提供同样的性能。与前代产品一样,尽管功耗限制很低,但它足以胜任日常任务,一般来说,两个风扇都没什么可做的。

雾面 IPS 显示屏有许多令人印象深刻的功能。它的主观图像质量很好,在色彩还原方面达到了参考水平。此外,全 sRGB 色彩覆盖意味着在图像编辑时没有任何障碍。此外,PWM 功能不存在,电池续航时间长和键盘舒适也是其积极的一面。

新款 MateBook D 16 2024 是一款非常不平衡的多媒体笔记本电脑,快速的处理器、出色的 IPS 显示屏和较长的电池续航时间被完全过时的功能集所抵消。售价为 1,199 英镑的新款 Matebook 在 USB 2.0 等功能方面简直令人难以接受,总而言之,它太贵了。

另一方面,MateBook D 16 2024 也存在一些严重的缺陷。尤其是在端口选择上,不得不受到批评。与前代产品相比,华为继续进一步减少端口数量,只为笔记本配备了一个用于供电的 USB-C 端口。制造商没有使用 Thunderbolt 4 或 USB 4.0,但相比之下,在右侧可以找到一个老化的 USB 2.0 端口。此外,网络摄像头只有 720p,而且不支持现代 Wi-Fi 6E 网络。

此外,还有其他一些问题。供电电源功率不足,如果处理器(即使只是短时间使用)的最大功耗为 64 瓦,那么 65 瓦的电源适配器无法提供足够的电力也就不足为奇了。此外,机箱内浪费了太多空间,本可以集成两个 SODIMM 插槽。我们无法对售价 999 美元的较小机型进行评估,因为它配备了性能较差的处理器(iGPU 性能更弱)和较差的显示屏(45% NTSC),电池容量也较小。在最坏的情况下,我们上面描述的积极因素都不复存在。

总体而言,由于其积极的方面,价格更高的 MateBook D 16 2024 版获得了 85% 的良好评价,但性价比却不尽如人意。因此,我们不能推荐购买。

价格和供应情况

新款 MateBook D 16 2024 将于 2024 年 2 月 1 日开始发售,但在英国已经可以从华为预订。凡在 1 月 12 日至 2 月 29 日期间订购该设备者,均可免费获得华为 FreeBuds 5。此外,在 1 月 31 日之前还有 50 英镑的预购折扣。

Huawei MateBook D 16 2024 - 01/12/2024 v7 (old)
Andreas Osthoff

Chassis
81 / 98 → 83%
Keyboard
88%
Pointing Device
89%
Connectivity
51 / 80 → 64%
Weight
66 / 20-72 → 89%
Battery
89 / 95 → 94%
Display
86%
Games Performance
71 / 90 → 79%
Application Performance
91 / 90 → 100%
Temperature
90%
Noise
97 / 95 → 100%
Audio
83%
Camera
29 / 85 → 34%
Add Points
-1%
Average
72%
85%
Multimedia - Weighted Average

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 华为 MateBook D 16 2024 评测--配备英特尔酷睿 i9-13900H 的多媒体笔记本电脑
Andreas Osthoff, 2024-01-16 (Update: 2024-01-16)