Notebookcheck Logo
Xiaomi Mix Flip smartphone review

小米 Mix Flip 评测--配备徕卡摄像头的可折叠智能手机终于给三星带来了压力

折痕去哪儿了?

Mix Flip 为目前的紧凑型可折叠智能手机带来了很多可能性。尤其是小米智能手机巨大的副显示屏,让Galaxy Flip 6 相比之下显得有些老气。但对于小米的第一代翻盖智能手机来说,其他设备也令人印象深刻。
Marcus Herbrich, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
5G Android Foldable Smartphone

通过 Mix Flip,小米又多了一个竞争对手。 三星Galaxy Z Flip6的竞争对手。一看 Mix Flip 的数据表,就知道它很有前途,因为这家中国制造商生产的 Flip 智能手机在许多方面都超过了三星智能手机。Mix Flip 最大的亮点是它拥有一块相对较大、几乎无边框的 4.01 英寸副显示屏,刷新率高达 120 Hz,甚至可以使用(某些)第三方应用程序。

与更大的 "兄弟 "Mix Fold 4 相比,可折叠设备的朋友们应该会对 Mix Flip 在中国以外的全球上市感到高兴。在早些时候的新闻发布会上,小米保加利亚分公司透露,这款翻盖智能手机将正式登陆欧洲。这款紧凑型可折叠智能手机的全球版本将于 9 月 26 日开始发售,建议零售价为 1299 欧元(约合人民币 1456 元)。中国 中国在中国,Mix Flip 的基本版本(12 GB 内存、256 GB 存储空间)售价约为 5999 元人民币(约合 760 欧元或 852 美元),而配备 16 GB 内存和 1 TB 存储空间的顶级型号售价约为 930 欧元(约合 1042 美元)。作为进口产品,起价约为 850 欧元(约合 953 美元),对于配备此类设备的可折叠手机来说,这个价格相对实惠。

Xiaomi Mix Flip
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 8 x 2.3 - 3.3 GHz, Cortex-X4 / A720 / A720 / A520 (Kryo)
Graphics adapter
Memory
12 GB 
Display
6.86 inch 21.41:9, 2912 x 1224 pixel 460 PPI, capacitive touchscreen, AMOLED, Schott UTG; 2nd screen: 4.01 inch 1.5K AMOLED with 120Hz refresh rate, glossy: yes, HDR, 120 Hz
Storage
256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash, 256 GB 
, 235 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 Infrared, Audio Connections: USB Type-C, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer, OTG, Miracast, IP54
Networking
Wi-Fi 7 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz be = Wi-Fi 7), Bluetooth 5.4, 5G: n1/n2/n3/n5/n7/n8/n12/n20/n26/n28/n38/n40/n41/n48/n66/n77/n78/n79; 4G: FDD-LTE: B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B12/B17/B18/B19/B20/B26/B28/B66; TDD-LTE: B34/B38/B39/B40/B41/B42/B48; 3G: WCDMA: B1/B2/B4/B5/B6/B8/B19; 2G: B2/B3/B5/B8, Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 7.6 x 167.5 x 74.02
Battery
4780 mAh Lithium-Ion
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 14
Camera
Primary Camera: 50 MPix (f/1.7, 23 mm, OIS, 1/1.55 inch) + 50 MP (2x optical zoom, f/2.0, 47 mm), camera2 API: Level 3
Secondary Camera: 32 MPix (f/2.0, 21 mm, 0.7µm, FF)
Additional features
Speakers: s, Keyboard: on, case, charger, info material, HyperOS 1.0, 12 Months Warranty, Widevine L1: GNSS: GPS (L1+L5), Galileo (E1+E5), GLONASS (L1), QZSS (L1), and Beidou (B1, B2), fanless
Weight
190 g, Power Supply: 98 g
Price
1299 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating
Version
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Price
83.3 %v8
09 / 2024
Xiaomi Mix Flip
SD 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750
190 g256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash6.86"2912x1224
80.2 %v8
09 / 2024
Honor Magic V Flip
SD 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730
193 g512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.80"2520x1080
85.4 %
v7 (old)
v7 (old)
05 / 2024
Nubia Flip 5G
SD 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644
214 g256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.90"2790x1188
84.7 %v8
09 / 2024
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5G
SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750
187 g512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash6.70"2640x1080
80.4 %v8
08 / 2024
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
SD 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735
189 g512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash6.90"2640x1080

保护壳 - IP54 小米混合翻盖

Mix Flip 的重量为 190 克(约 6.7 盎司),厚度为 7.6 毫米(约 0.3 英寸),比 Z Flip6 稍重稍厚。 Galaxy Z Flip6虽然在日常操作中,两者的差异可以忽略不计。更严重的是,Mix Flip 没有通过 IPX8 认证,这意味着它不具备防水功能。不过,在雨天使用小米翻盖智能手机应该不会有任何问题,因为它的防水等级为 IP54。

小米混合翻盖黑色
小米混合翻盖黑色
小米混合翻盖尼龙纤维版
小米混合翻盖尼龙纤维版
紫色小米混合翻盖
紫色小米混合翻盖

外壳由自制的龙晶玻璃(国际上也称为小米盾形玻璃)保护,尼龙纤维版本相应地只在正面使用了这种玻璃。Mix Flip 的做工堪称一流,加上金属边框,握在手中有一种高品质的感觉。由于背面采用哑光处理,因此不会留下指纹,但在智能手机外部和内部之间采用高光处理的铝制铰链上除外。

可折叠 OLED 面板周围的边框比Galaxy Flip 6 稍微纤薄一些。用数字表示,Mix Flip 内部的可折叠 OLED 显示屏的屏占比为 87.5%,而三星机型仅为 85.5%。小米智能手机 4.01 英寸的大尺寸外部显示屏看起来也更加时尚。在耐用性方面,小米宣称其柔性肖特UTG 显示屏可进行约 50 万次折叠操作。难能可贵的是,折痕几乎不再明显,甚至用手触摸也无法察觉。

小米 Mix Flip 智能手机评测
小米 Mix Flip 智能手机评测
小米 Mix Flip 智能手机评测
小米 Mix Flip 智能手机评测
小米 Mix Flip 智能手机评测
小米 Mix Flip 智能手机评测
小米 Mix Flip 智能手机评测

尺寸比较

171.4 mm 74 mm 7.1 mm 189 g170 mm 76 mm 7.3 mm 214 g167.5 mm 74.02 mm 7.6 mm 190 g167.3 mm 75.6 mm 7.15 mm 193 g165.1 mm 71.9 mm 6.9 mm 187 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g

尺寸比较

88 mm 76 mm 15.5 mm 214 g85.6 mm 74.02 mm 15.99 mm 192 g86.5 mm 75.6 mm 14.89 mm 193 g85.1 mm 71.9 mm 14.9 mm 187 g

设备 - 仅支持 USB 2.0 的小米智能手机

Mix Flip 配备了蓝牙 5.4、双 SIM 卡、立体声扬声器、红外爆破器和用于非接触式支付的 NFC,功能非常齐全。内存为 LPDDR5X,存储为 UFS 4.0。由于没有通过 microSD 卡扩展存储空间,临时需要更多空间的用户可以通过 USB-OTG 将数据保存到 U 盘等外部存储介质上。

USB 连接仍然使用 2.0 标准,这与不折不扣的可折叠智能手机形象不太相符。对于这个价位的手机来说,这是一个遗憾,因为它无法进行有线图像输出。不过,你仍然可以通过 Miracast 将显示内容无线输出到外部显示器。

连接的存储介质可以格式化为 FAT、FAT32 或 exFAT。小米还支持读写 NTFS 格式的数据媒体。我们使用连接的外置 M2.SSD 硬盘进行的复制测试不幸失败,因为 USB 端口无法识别我们的三星 980 Pro SSD。这可能是由于连接没有提供足够高的功率输出。

铰链
铰链
箱体左侧
箱体左侧
机箱右侧(按键:开/关/音量)
机箱右侧(按键:开/关/音量)
机壳顶部/底部侧面(麦克风、SIM 卡插槽、红外爆破器、USB 端口、扬声器)
机壳顶部/底部侧面(麦克风、SIM 卡插槽、红外爆破器、USB 端口、扬声器)

软件 - 可折叠,含Android 14

Mix Flip 搭载了基于当前Android 14 的内置 HyperOS。按照中国版小米智能手机的惯例,我们的测试机在交付状态下不支持任何谷歌服务或 Play Store。我们使用的是中文服务和小米自己的服务。不过,发货时已经预装了谷歌框架,因此只需手动安装 Play Store 即可。

在软件更新方面,小米保留了中文互联网上提供的规格(根据我们使用谷歌翻译的理解)。对于目前的 小米 14 代则规定了四年的Android 升级和五年的安全补丁。我们认为全球 Mix 系列也会获得类似的升级,但目前还不确定中文 ROM 将支持多久。在本次测试时,可折叠手机使用的安全补丁是从 2024 年 8 月开始的。虽然中文 ROM 的补丁交付速度通常比全球版本的 HyperOS 更快,但是 小米的操作水平 谷歌三星的水平运作。

小米 Mix Flip 智能手机评测
小米 Mix Flip 智能手机评测
小米 Mix Flip 智能手机评测
小米 Mix Flip 智能手机评测

可持续性

除了有关软件更新的更多信息外,随着 Mix Fip 的全球推出,小米还可能提供一些有关所用材料及其回收报价的规格信息。但目前我们还缺乏这方面的信息。这款可折叠智能手机的包装似乎大多不使用塑料。设备本身是用铝箔纸包裹的,但包装的其他部分是用硬纸板制成的。

通信与全球导航卫星系统 - 配备 5G 技术的小米混合翻盖手机

在家中的网络中,小米智能手机可以使用包括 MU-MIMO 支持在内的 WiFi 7,但 Mix Flip 只能使用 2.4 和 5 GHz 频段创建连接--至少我们测试的是中国版本。在不使用 6 GHz 频段的情况下,与华硕 ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000 路由器配合使用时,我们确定传输速率约为 1,000 Mbit/s。就无线传输的稳定性和持续性而言,几乎没有什么可抱怨的。

在移动互联网接入方面,这款可折叠手机支持 5G 网络接入,并提供多种支持频段,LTE 标准也是如此。甚至连 20 频段和 28 频段(德国需要)也已包含在中国版本中。德语国家的用户可以很好地配备这些功能。尽管您在出国旅行前仍需确认所需的频段,但由于 Mix Flip 支持 22 个 4G 频段和 18 个 5G 频段,您应该可以在大多数国家顺利使用。

Networking
Xiaomi Mix Flip
iperf3 receive AXE11000
968 (min: 784) MBit/s ∼98%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1001 (min: 904) MBit/s ∼100%
Honor Magic V Flip
iperf3 receive AXE11000
898 (min: 631) MBit/s ∼91%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
716 (min: 324) MBit/s ∼72%
Nubia Flip 5G
iperf3 receive AXE11000
986 (min: 846) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
954 (min: 472) MBit/s ∼95%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1759 (min: 1696) MBit/s ∼97%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1844 (min: 1767) MBit/s ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5G
iperf3 receive AXE11000
623 (min: 320) MBit/s ∼63%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
723 (min: 659) MBit/s ∼72%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1816 (min: 900) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1501 (min: 1447) MBit/s ∼81%
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
649 (min: 450) MBit/s ∼36%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
944 (min: 782) MBit/s ∼51%
Average of class Smartphone
iperf3 receive AXE11000
714 (min: 34.8) MBit/s ∼72%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
729 (min: 40.5) MBit/s ∼73%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1451 (min: 229) MBit/s ∼80%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1385 (min: 668) MBit/s ∼75%
055110165220275330385440495550605660715770825880935990Tooltip
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Qualcomm Adreno 735; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø649 (450-756)
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Qualcomm Adreno 735; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø944 (782-985)
Xiaomi Mix Flip Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Qualcomm Adreno 750; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø963 (784-992)
Xiaomi Mix Flip Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Qualcomm Adreno 750; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1001 (904-1017)
户外定位
户外定位
室内定位
室内定位

小米智能手机使用主要的卫星系统来定位:GPS、Galileo、GLONASS、QZSS 和北斗,大部分采用双频。为了在实践中评估定位精度,我们带着 Mix Flip 进行了一次自行车旅行。为了进行比较,我们还使用 Garmin Venu 2 记录路线。

虽然总体而言我们更喜欢用 Garmin 智能手表记录路线细节,但路线记录之间的偏差很小。但记录的路线往往完全相同。因此,可折叠智能手机可以很好地完成日常导航任务。

Garmin Venu 2 与小米 Mix Flip
Garmin Venu 2 与小米 Mix Flip

电话功能和语音质量 - 无 WLAN 通话功能的小米智能手机

小米 Mix Flip 智能手机评测
小米 Mix Flip 智能手机评测

Mix Flip 通过两个 Nano-SIM 卡插槽提供全面的双 SIM 卡支持。不过,该系统不支持 eSIM 卡,甚至全球版本也不支持。虽然支持 VoLTE,但不支持 VoWiFi。

通过听筒,语音质量很有吸引力,我们的语音也能清晰地传输。虽然通过扬声器听起来略显沉闷,但在与手机距离适中的情况下,效果仍然不错。

照相机 - 带远摄镜头的翻转式智能手机

使用 3200 万像素摄像头自拍
使用 3200 万像素摄像头自拍
用主摄像头自拍
用主摄像头自拍

就像 小米 14 代一样,Mix Flip 也在软件和硬件方面享受到了与徕卡合作的成果。尤其是 "大师镜头系统",它将为您带来原汁原味的徕卡影像。得益于可折叠的外形设计,盖板屏幕应该可以让你用背面的主摄像头拍照和摄像,这可能是自拍爱好者们感兴趣的功能。此外,内部的 3200 万像素镜头也能在不进行像素分档计算的情况下拍摄出合理的照片,尽管这里只有一个固定焦距,而且曝光还有改进的余地。

在背面,小米采用了 5000 万像素主摄像头,配备感光度为 f/1.7 的徕卡 Summilux 镜头。在日光下,OmniVision 传感器(OVX8000)可拍摄出清晰度良好的照片。动态效果很好,但与可折叠的竞争对手相比,某些阴暗区域的效果更为突出。

在黑暗环境中,Mix Flip 相对较小的传感器尺寸(1/1.55")在拍摄的照片中变得非常明显。另一方面,它的弱光能力仍然明显优于Honor Magic V Flip 。但Galaxy Z Flip6 也表明,使用几乎相同尺寸(1/1.57")的 ISOCELL GN3,可以明显提高清晰度和细节。

1x
1x
2x
2x
5x
5x
10x
10x
20 倍(最大值)
20 倍(最大值)
宏观
宏观

附加的 5000 万像素长焦镜头对焦长度为 47 毫米(类似于小型相机)令人失望。小米使用的是 OmniVision OV60A 的一部分,其原始分辨率为 6000 万像素。使用无损 2 倍变焦时,我们仍然喜欢照片,但一旦添加了数字处理,图像就会显得矫揉造作,几乎没有任何细节。如果我们看看Galaxy Flip 6 在不使用长焦镜头的情况下拍摄的对比照片,就会发现问题的严重性。此外,50MP 传感器还可用作微距镜头,因为小米没有为其翻盖智能手机添加超广角摄像头。

小米 Mix Flip 智能手机评测
小米 Mix Flip 智能手机评测
小米 Mix Flip 智能手机评测
小米 Mix Flip 智能手机评测

视频可以 720p、1080p 或 2160p 格式录制,最高可达 4K30。您还可以使用背面的两个镜头以最高 960 fps 的 1080p 速率进行延时拍摄。与主摄像头(OIS + EIS)相比,长焦镜头仅使用电子防抖。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

HauptkameraHauptkameraLow LightZoom 5x

我们在实验室中分析了主摄像头在可控光线条件下的色彩还原情况,并与实际参考色彩进行了比较。尽管我们在这里看到 Mix Flip 有一些明显的增亮,但相机软件的整体表现还是非常令人满意的,确保了 ColorChecker Passport 的低色彩偏差。色彩准确度(>10)中唯一真正的异常值是绿色和青色色调。

ColorChecker
7.7 ∆E
7.7 ∆E
8 ∆E
11.8 ∆E
9.6 ∆E
4.7 ∆E
10.4 ∆E
9.5 ∆E
9.2 ∆E
6.8 ∆E
8 ∆E
7.4 ∆E
5.9 ∆E
13.1 ∆E
12.6 ∆E
2.8 ∆E
9.2 ∆E
12.2 ∆E
3.3 ∆E
2.9 ∆E
8.5 ∆E
8.5 ∆E
1.9 ∆E
6.1 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi Mix Flip: 7.81 ∆E min: 1.92 - max: 13.09 ∆E
ColorChecker
8.1 ∆E
8.8 ∆E
2.2 ∆E
11.9 ∆E
8 ∆E
3.5 ∆E
4.8 ∆E
2 ∆E
11 ∆E
7.4 ∆E
5.9 ∆E
3 ∆E
5.9 ∆E
11 ∆E
7.5 ∆E
3.1 ∆E
5.9 ∆E
8.8 ∆E
12.3 ∆E
10.3 ∆E
9.5 ∆E
15.2 ∆E
15.1 ∆E
12 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi Mix Flip: 8.04 ∆E min: 2.02 - max: 15.25 ∆E

配件和保修 - 小米 Mix Flip 翻盖手机壳

配备可选打印机的小米 Mix Flip
配备可选打印机的小米 Mix Flip

包装盒包括一个 67W 快速充电器(5V/3A、5-20V/6.2-3.25A)、一条数据和充电线(USB-C 至 USB-C,2.0)、一个 SIM 卡工具和快速入门指南。两块显示屏均由预装的保护膜覆盖,还包括一个颜色协调的保护套。此外,为我们提供测试机的深圳贸易公司还为我们的中文版智能手机提供了一个欧盟充电器适配器和一个 USB-OTG 适配器。

我们的进口设备享有 12 个月的保修服务。如果出现保修情况,Trading Shenzhen 还提供将手机寄往德国地址进行维修的服务(在德国)。

小米 Mix Flip 智能手机评测
小米 Mix Flip 智能手机评测
小米 Mix Flip 智能手机评测

输入设备和操作 - 带面部解锁功能的可折叠智能手机

Mix Flip 还支持 Flex 模式,这是三星的一种扩展折叠显示屏选项。
Mix Flip 还支持 Flex 模式,这是三星的一种扩展折叠显示屏选项。

这两款 Mix Flip 显示器的操作都非常精确,由于其 120 Hz 的高刷新率,看起来非常流畅。此外,清晰的振动电机(X 轴)和 240 Hz 的触摸扫描速率,以及德国莱茵 TÜV 的三重认证(低蓝光、无闪烁和昼夜节律友好)这一印象提供了支持。后一项认证仅适用于大尺寸主显示屏。

由于您也可以使用外接显示屏完成许多任务,因此您不一定非要打开Mix Flip 的主显示屏。您可以查看某些应用程序,甚至是第三方应用程序,查看电子邮件或通知,回复它们,或使用摄像头进行视频录制。

虽然 Mix Flip 的铰链允许以 90 度角部分折叠使用,但几乎可以无级打开任何角度,就像在 Galaxy 机型是不可能的。与三星类似,HyperOS 也支持在半折叠状态下为某些应用程序扩展显示选项。

电源按钮上的电容式指纹传感器可用于生物识别安全。它反应迅速,大部分时间都能准确识别手指。只是位置有点高。打开时的打孔摄像头和折叠状态下的主摄像头都可以通过人脸进行生物识别,不过这里使用的 2D 人脸识别被认为非常不安全。

小米 Mix Flip 智能手机评测
小米 Mix Flip 智能手机评测
小米 Mix Flip 智能手机评测

显示屏 - Mix Flip 使用 LTPO OLED

OLED 显示屏采用 RG/BG 子像素矩阵,由一个红光二极管、一个蓝光二极管和两个绿光二极管组成。
OLED 显示屏采用 RG/BG 子像素矩阵,由一个红光二极管、一个蓝光二极管和两个绿光二极管组成。

主显示屏对角线为 6.86 英寸,采用 21.4:9 的拉伸格式。虽然使用的是 TLC 的柔性 POLED 面板(CSOT,12 位),但与传统智能手机相比,您不必接受任何技术上的妥协。显示屏采用 LTPO 技术,可实现 1 至 120 Hz 的自适应刷新率。像素密度也非常高,达到 460 ppi。

Mix Flip 支持多种 HDR 标准(HDR10、HDR10+、HDR Vivid、Dolby Vision),在播放 4K 视频材料时,我们的亮度测量值为 2,890 cd/m²,不仅接近制造商的规格(3,000 尼特),而且亮度也足以达到一流的 HDR 效果。

APL18 测量结果显示,白色背景上的暗区亮度达到了 1,561 cd/m²,这也是非常不错的。另一方面,在纯白显示屏和激活亮度传感器的情况下,最大亮度仅达到约 950 cd/m²。

947
cd/m²
945
cd/m²
954
cd/m²
946
cd/m²
949
cd/m²
962
cd/m²
948
cd/m²
944
cd/m²
946
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 962 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 949 cd/m² Minimum: 2.14 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 98 %
Center on Battery: 949 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.1 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 3.8 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
99.9% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.25
Xiaomi Mix Flip
AMOLED, 2912x1224, 6.9"
Honor Magic V Flip
OLED, 2520x1080, 6.8"
Nubia Flip 5G
OLED, 2790x1188, 6.9"
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5G
Dynamic AMOLED 2X, 2640x1080, 6.7"
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
P-OLED, 2640x1080, 6.9"
Screen
47%
43%
14%
35%
Brightness middle
949
1529
61%
1164
23%
1210
28%
1099
16%
Brightness
949
1535
62%
1172
23%
1221
29%
1087
15%
Brightness Distribution
98
97
-1%
97
-1%
98
0%
95
-3%
Black Level *
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
2.1
1.3
38%
0.7
67%
3.1
-48%
1.04
50%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
5.6
2.1
62%
1.5
73%
4.2
25%
2.36
58%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
3.8
1.5
61%
1.1
71%
2
47%
1.1
71%
Gamma
2.25 98%
2.22 99%
2.2 100%
2.05 107%
2.199 100%
CCT
6826 95%
6303 103%
6482 100%
6666 98%
6418 101%

* ... smaller is better

小米使用 PWM 控制显示屏亮度,这带来了典型的显示屏闪烁现象。虽然 Mix Flip 不像小米 14 智能手机那样使用高频率(3,840 Hz),但闪烁的频率也很高(2,160 Hz)。我们的测量结果(1,923 赫兹)也证实了这一点。尽管面板显示的基本背光频闪(BFI)频率较低,为 120 Hz,但敏感的用户仍能从视觉上感受到光密度的明显变化。示波器中的振幅在整个亮度范围内都非常均匀,振幅深度也相当平坦,仅为 16.5%。

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 120 Hz
Amplitude: 16.53 %
Secondary Frequency: 1923 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 120 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 120 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

最低显示亮度
分钟
25% 显示屏亮度
25%
50% 显示亮度
50%
75% 显示亮度
75%
最大手动显示亮度
100%

在固定缩放级别和不同亮度设置下的测量系列(虽然最小亮度下的振幅看起来很平,但这是缩放造成的。您可以在信息框中看到放大后的最小亮度下的振幅)。

在我们使用 CalMAN 软件和光谱光度计进行的测试中,这款可折叠智能手机的 OLED 显示屏似乎校准得很好,尽管我们仍然看到灰度有一些轻微的偏差。只有色彩的 Delta-E 值保持在理想范围内(<3)。

在软件方面,Mix Flip 拥有丰富的调整选项。除了四种色彩配置文件外,您还可以选择 "高级 "模式,不仅可以调整色温,还可以调整饱和度或色彩空间等个别参数。您还可以使用更大的 DCI-P3 色彩空间。

色彩准确度(配置文件:原始、暖色;目标色彩空间:sRGB)
色彩准确度(配置文件:原始、暖色;目标色彩空间:sRGB)
色彩空间(配置文件:原始、暖色;目标色彩空间:sRGB)
色彩空间(配置文件:原始、暖色;目标色彩空间:sRGB)
灰度(轮廓:原始,暖色;目标色彩空间:sRGB)
灰度(轮廓:原始,暖色;目标色彩空间:sRGB)
饱和度(轮廓:原始,暖色;目标色彩空间:sRGB)
饱和度(轮廓:原始,暖色;目标色彩空间:sRGB)

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
1.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.6595 ms rise
↘ 0.5425 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 4 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
1.63 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.9075 ms rise
↘ 0.72 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 5 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

在户外,两个对比度丰富的显示屏给人留下了深刻的印象,在大多数光线条件下都很容易读取。但在阳光充足的日子里,由于反光的影响,可读性可能会略有下降。在陡峭的视角下,亮度会略有下降,但我们并没有注意到任何色彩变化或彩色面纱。

小米 Mix Flip 智能手机评测
小米 Mix Flip 智能手机评测
小米 Mix Flip 的视角
小米 Mix Flip 的视角

封面显示屏 - 采用大型 OLED 面板的混合翻转屏

外部显示面板尺寸为 4.01 英寸,格式比例为 10.37:9。与内部显示屏相比,在可视性方面你几乎无需接受任何妥协。像素密度(460 ppi)、最高亮度(3,000 nits)、刷新率(120 Hz)以及护眼技术(高频 PWM)都完全相同。我们的测量结果(HDR:2990 cd/m²)也与主显示屏非常相似。只有 LTPO 技术不可用,我们在测试中只能根据显示内容在 120 赫兹和 60 赫兹之间切换。

OLED 显示屏采用 RG/BG 子像素矩阵,由一个红光二极管、一个蓝光二极管和两个绿光二极管组成。
OLED 显示屏采用 RG/BG 子像素矩阵,由一个红光二极管、一个蓝光二极管和两个绿光二极管组成。
PWM 闪烁(在最低显示亮度下测量)
PWM 闪烁
小米 Mix Flip 智能手机评测
小米 Mix Flip 智能手机评测
小米 Mix Flip 智能手机评测
小米 Mix Flip 智能手机评测
Xiaomi Mix Flip
AMOLED, 1392x1208, 4"
Honor Magic V Flip
OLED, 1200x1092, 4"
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5G
Super AMOLED, 720x748, 3.4"
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
1272x1080, 4"
Screen
Brightness middle
945
1559
993
972
Black Level *
Brightness
994
966
Brightness Distribution
95
96
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
0.84
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
2.62
Greyscale dE 2000 *
3
Gamma
2.138 103%
CCT
6579 99%

* ... smaller is better

最低显示亮度
分钟
25% 显示屏亮度
25%
50% 显示亮度
50%
75% 显示亮度
75%
最大手动显示亮度
100%

在固定缩放级别和不同亮度设置下的测量系列(虽然最小亮度下的振幅看起来很平,但这是缩放造成的。您可以在信息框中看到放大后的最小亮度下的振幅)。

性能 - 小米智能手机采用高通公司的 SoC 芯片

小米采用了强大的 骁龙 8 代 3可折叠智能手机配备了蒸汽室冷却系统。在我们的基准测试包中,Mix Flip 稍微落后于 Galaxy Flip6在 Geekbench 6 中的表现略逊一筹,尤其是在单核测试中。在系统基准测试中,小米智能手机取得了非常好的成绩。但在人工智能测试中,Mix Flip 的成绩往往排在最后。

Geekbench 6.3
Single-Core
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
  (954 - 2329, n=21)
2106 Points +10%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
2072 Points +8%
Xiaomi Mix Flip
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
1911 Points
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
1848 Points -3%
Honor Magic V Flip
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1700 Points -11%
Average of class Smartphone
  (193 - 3479, n=171, last 2 years)
1491 Points -22%
Nubia Flip 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 8192
1016 Points -47%
Multi-Core
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
  (4564 - 7501, n=21)
6638 Points +9%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
6354 Points +4%
Xiaomi Mix Flip
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
6099 Points
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
4630 Points -24%
Honor Magic V Flip
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
4277 Points -30%
Average of class Smartphone
  (845 - 10401, n=171, last 2 years)
4177 Points -32%
Nubia Flip 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 8192
2885 Points -53%
Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
  (1343 - 1702, n=14)
1652 Points +23%
Xiaomi Mix Flip
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
1343 Points
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
1329 Points -1%
Honor Magic V Flip
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1252 Points -7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (126 - 2437, n=176, last 2 years)
1037 Points -23%
Multi-Core
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
  (5393 - 6543, n=14)
6058 Points +7%
Xiaomi Mix Flip
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
5675 Points
Honor Magic V Flip
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
3997 Points -30%
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
3980 Points -30%
Average of class Smartphone
  (473 - 8816, n=176, last 2 years)
3464 Points -39%
Antutu v10 - Total Score
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
  (1390723 - 2162423, n=17)
1934946 Points +13%
Xiaomi Mix Flip
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
1705950 Points
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
1492419 Points -13%
Average of class Smartphone
  (142748 - 3015111, n=106, last 2 years)
1307393 Points -23%
Honor Magic V Flip
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1162599 Points -32%
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
1142944 Points -33%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Xiaomi Mix Flip
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
18983 Points
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
18121 Points -5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
  (12156 - 21628, n=20)
17861 Points -6%
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
17105 Points -10%
Honor Magic V Flip
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
15809 Points -17%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4609 - 27169, n=197, last 2 years)
13179 Points -31%
Nubia Flip 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 8192
11666 Points -39%
CrossMark - Overall
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
1444 Points +16%
Xiaomi Mix Flip
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
1243 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
  (983 - 1474, n=13)
1238 Points 0%
Honor Magic V Flip
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1050 Points -16%
Average of class Smartphone
  (187 - 2485, n=164, last 2 years)
920 Points -26%
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
771 Points -38%
Nubia Flip 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 8192
683 Points -45%
BaseMark OS II
Overall
Xiaomi Mix Flip
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
10076 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
  (8148 - 10966, n=16)
9947 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
9267 Points -8%
Honor Magic V Flip
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
7751 Points -23%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1196 - 12993, n=158, last 2 years)
6499 Points -36%
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
5685 Points -44%
Nubia Flip 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 8192
4805 Points -52%
System
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
15600 Points +7%
Xiaomi Mix Flip
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
14569 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
  (8611 - 16015, n=16)
13995 Points -4%
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
12407 Points -15%
Honor Magic V Flip
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
11852 Points -19%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2368 - 17953, n=158, last 2 years)
10346 Points -29%
Nubia Flip 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 8192
10293 Points -29%
Memory
Xiaomi Mix Flip
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
12476 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
  (7426 - 12716, n=16)
10611 Points -15%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
9230 Points -26%
Honor Magic V Flip
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
7881 Points -37%
Average of class Smartphone
  (962 - 18911, n=158, last 2 years)
7058 Points -43%
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
5966 Points -52%
Nubia Flip 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 8192
4856 Points -61%
Graphics
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
  (26972 - 39727, n=16)
34142 Points +15%
Xiaomi Mix Flip
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
29711 Points
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
26269 Points -12%
Honor Magic V Flip
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
22976 Points -23%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1017 - 58651, n=158, last 2 years)
17998 Points -39%
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
8020 Points -73%
Nubia Flip 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 8192
7680 Points -74%
Web
Xiaomi Mix Flip
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
1973 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
  (1661 - 2145, n=16)
1962 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
1950 Points -1%
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
1760 Points -11%
Honor Magic V Flip
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1682 Points -15%
Average of class Smartphone
  (841 - 2363, n=158, last 2 years)
1578 Points -20%
Nubia Flip 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 8192
1389 Points -30%
UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Average of class Smartphone
  (1267 - 81594, n=150, last 2 years)
17814 Points +55%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
  (11487 - 18370, n=15)
16446 Points +43%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
15793 Points +37%
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
15572 Points +36%
Honor Magic V Flip
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
12674 Points +10%
Xiaomi Mix Flip
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
11487 Points
AImark - Score v3.x
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
239813 Points +4%
Xiaomi Mix Flip
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
229987 Points
Honor Magic V Flip
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
147801 Points -36%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
  (963 - 245629, n=14)
101518 Points -56%
Average of class Smartphone
  (82 - 307528, n=143, last 2 years)
25319 Points -89%
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
946 Points -100%
Geekbench AI
Single Precision TensorFlow NNAPI 1.1
Honor Magic V Flip
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1257 Points +351%
Average of class Smartphone
  (122 - 4619, n=41, last 2 years)
766 Points +175%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
  (243 - 489, n=8)
372 Points +33%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
343 Points +23%
Xiaomi Mix Flip
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
279 Points
Half Precision TensorFlow NNAPI 1.1
Average of class Smartphone
  (122 - 32432, n=41, last 2 years)
3626 Points +1430%
Honor Magic V Flip
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1239 Points +423%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
  (227 - 498, n=8)
365 Points +54%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
326 Points +38%
Xiaomi Mix Flip
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
237 Points
Quantized TensorFlow NNAPI 1.1
Average of class Smartphone
  (118 - 44657, n=41, last 2 years)
5224 Points +864%
Honor Magic V Flip
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
2576 Points +375%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
  (508 - 1128, n=8)
817 Points +51%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
715 Points +32%
Xiaomi Mix Flip
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
542 Points

在图形测试中,这款可折叠智能手机凭借其 Adreno 750虽然 Galaxy Z Flip6在 3DMark 测试中的表现有时仍然明显更好。另一方面,Mix Flip 在 GFXBench 中的表现与三星智能手机相当。

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5G
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
4739 Points +19%
Xiaomi Mix Flip
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3991 Points
Honor Magic V Flip
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2778 Points -30%
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1659 Points -58%
Nubia Flip 5G
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
825 Points -79%
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5G
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
4912 Points +24%
Xiaomi Mix Flip
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3967 Points
Honor Magic V Flip
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2823 Points -29%
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1723 Points -57%
Nubia Flip 5G
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
819 Points -79%
3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5G
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
18949 Points +25%
Xiaomi Mix Flip
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
15108 Points
Honor Magic V Flip
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
11056 Points -27%
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
6661 Points -56%
Nubia Flip 5G
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3136 Points -79%
3DMark / Wild Life Score
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
6496 Points
Nubia Flip 5G
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3124 Points
Honor Magic V Flip
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
Points
3DMark / Solar Bay Score
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5G
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
8046 Points +19%
Xiaomi Mix Flip
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
6788 Points
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3223 Points -53%
Honor Magic V Flip
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
Points -100%
3DMark / Solar Bay Unlimited Score
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5G
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
7270 Points +7%
Xiaomi Mix Flip
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
6765 Points
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
2799 Points -59%
Honor Magic V Flip
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
Points -100%
3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5G
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1268 Points +3%
Xiaomi Mix Flip
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1232 Points
Honor Magic V Flip
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
864 Points -30%
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
579 Points -53%
3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Score
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5G
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1333 Points +7%
Xiaomi Mix Flip
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1243 Points
Honor Magic V Flip
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
872 Points -30%
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
739 Points -41%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Honor Magic V Flip
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
5071 Points +27%
Nubia Flip 5G
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
4329 Points +9%
Xiaomi Mix Flip
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3980 Points
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5G
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3911 Points -2%
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3243 Points -19%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5G
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
26616 Points +13%
Xiaomi Mix Flip
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
23452 Points
Honor Magic V Flip
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
16131 Points -31%
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
12176 Points -48%
Nubia Flip 5G
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
6893 Points -71%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Xiaomi Mix Flip
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
11879 Points
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5G
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
11622 Points -2%
Honor Magic V Flip
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
10865 Points -9%
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
7553 Points -36%
Nubia Flip 5G
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
6091 Points -49%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Honor Magic V Flip
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
121 fps +1%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5G
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps 0%
Xiaomi Mix Flip
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps 0%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5G
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
451 fps 0%
Xiaomi Mix Flip
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
451 fps
Honor Magic V Flip
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
450 fps 0%
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
292 fps -35%
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Honor Magic V Flip
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
121 fps +1%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5G
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps 0%
Xiaomi Mix Flip
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
118 fps -2%
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Xiaomi Mix Flip
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
344 fps
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5G
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
312 fps -9%
Honor Magic V Flip
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
216 fps -37%
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
170 fps -51%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5G
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps 0%
Xiaomi Mix Flip
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps
Honor Magic V Flip
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
119 fps -1%
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
94 fps -22%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Xiaomi Mix Flip
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
248 fps
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5G
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
245 fps -1%
Honor Magic V Flip
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
171 fps -31%
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
111 fps -55%
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5G
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
115 fps +28%
Xiaomi Mix Flip
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
90 fps
Honor Magic V Flip
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
80 fps -11%
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
55 fps -39%
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5G
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
127 fps +9%
Xiaomi Mix Flip
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
117 fps
Honor Magic V Flip
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
103 fps -12%
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
63 fps -46%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5G
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
105 fps +28%
Xiaomi Mix Flip
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
82 fps
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
69 fps -16%
Honor Magic V Flip
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
61 fps -26%
Nubia Flip 5G
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
18 fps -78%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi Mix Flip
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
78 fps
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5G
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
67 fps -14%
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
48 fps -38%
Honor Magic V Flip
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
45 fps -42%
Nubia Flip 5G
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
17 fps -78%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5G
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps +1%
Xiaomi Mix Flip
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
119 fps
Honor Magic V Flip
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
84 fps -29%
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
76 fps -36%
Nubia Flip 5G
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
29 fps -76%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5G
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
201 fps 0%
Xiaomi Mix Flip
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
201 fps
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
121 fps -40%
Honor Magic V Flip
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
103 fps -49%
Nubia Flip 5G
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
46 fps -77%
GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5G
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
40 fps +8%
Xiaomi Mix Flip
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
37 fps
Honor Magic V Flip
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
23 fps -38%
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
12 fps -68%
Nubia Flip 5G
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
7.5 fps -80%

在使用 Chrome 浏览器上网时,Mix Flip 的快速加载时间给人留下了深刻印象,这款小米智能手机在基准测试中也达到了稳定的数值。

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra (Chrome 127)
191.085 Points +68%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5G (Chrome 127)
167.118 Points +47%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (64.1 - 241, n=19)
152.3 Points +34%
Honor Magic V Flip (Chrome 128.0.6613.127)
133.319 Points +17%
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=169, last 2 years)
124.4 Points +9%
Xiaomi Mix Flip (Chrome 128)
113.865 Points
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5G (Chrome 127)
281 runs/min +25%
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra (Chrome 127)
247 runs/min +10%
Xiaomi Mix Flip (Chrome 128)
224 runs/min
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (69.6 - 311, n=16)
207 runs/min -8%
Honor Magic V Flip (Chrome 128.0.6613.127)
174 runs/min -22%
Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 569, n=152, last 2 years)
143.9 runs/min -36%
Speedometer 3.0 - Score
Xiaomi Mix Flip (Chrome 128)
13.5 runs/min
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5G (Chrome 127)
13 runs/min -4%
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra (Chrome 127)
12.7 runs/min -6%
Average of class Smartphone (1.03 - 34, n=66, last 2 years)
11.9 runs/min -12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4.3 - 16.5, n=10)
11.4 runs/min -16%
Honor Magic V Flip (Chrome 128.0.6613.127)
10.9 runs/min -19%
WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra (Chrome 127)
184 Points +3%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5G (Chrome 127)
181 Points +2%
Xiaomi Mix Flip (Chrome 128)
178 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (69 - 212, n=15)
161.7 Points -9%
Honor Magic V Flip (Chrome 128.0.6613.127)
139 Points -22%
Average of class Smartphone (22 - 271, n=159, last 2 years)
117.1 Points -34%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5G (Chrome 127)
72835 Points +117%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (25953 - 72665, n=19)
50413 Points +50%
Honor Magic V Flip (Chrome 128.0.6613.127)
40904 Points +22%
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra (Chrome 127)
39446 Points +18%
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=210, last 2 years)
38550 Points +15%
Xiaomi Mix Flip (Chrome 128)
33543 Points
Nubia Flip 5G (Chrome 124)
22047 Points -34%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=167, last 2 years)
1523 ms * -85%
Honor Magic V Flip (Chrome 128.0.6613.127)
906.5 ms * -10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (546 - 2066, n=16)
841 ms * -2%
Xiaomi Mix Flip (Chrome 128)
822.6 ms *
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra (Chrome 127)
638.8 ms * +22%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5G (Chrome 127)
574.7 ms * +30%

* ... smaller is better

在存储连接方面,Mix Flip 确实很有优势,尤其是 UFS 4.0 存储的写入率非常高。

Xiaomi Mix FlipHonor Magic V FlipNubia Flip 5GSamsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5GMotorola Razr 50 UltraAverage 256 GB UFS 4.0 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-44%
-58%
-17%
-6%
-13%
-45%
Sequential Read 256KB
4063.4
1947.4
-52%
967.4
-76%
3930.68
-3%
4012
-1%
3608 ?(3249 - 4384, n=26)
-11%
Sequential Write 256KB
3332.67
1672.06
-50%
766.69
-77%
2603.84
-22%
3512
5%
2530 ?(555 - 3348, n=26)
-24%
Random Read 4KB
367.24
277.55
-24%
263.87
-28%
445.5
21%
340
-7%
Random Write 4KB
587.21
297.97
-49%
295.55
-50%
202.97
-65%
457
-22%

游戏 - 小米混合翻盖不适合游戏玩家

为了评估 Adreno GPU在日常运行中的图形性能,我们使用合作伙伴GameBench 的软件对 Play Store 中的两款游戏进行了测试。.总的来说,这款可折叠智能手机并不适合进行高强度游戏。

要求较高的《源氏冲击》可以在高分辨率下以 60 帧/秒的速度短暂运行,但由于发热明显,帧率在短时间内就会降低。我们在 40 fps 左右达到一个高点,即使在降低图形性能后,这一数值也保持不变。我们看不到任何恢复到每秒 60 帧的迹象。如果您在夏季室外使用 Max Flip,并将显示屏亮度调到最高,您可能连平均每秒 40 帧的速度都达不到。

在《PUBG Mobile》中,在低细节的情况下可以达到稳定的 60 帧/秒。我们无法启用 90 帧模式。令人惊讶的是,UHD 模式也是如此。在高清设置下,搭载了 骁龙 8 代 3也无法实现,而只能达到 40 帧。这可能是软件优化不足造成的,因为射击游戏的发热量仍保持在一定范围内。

Geshin Impact
Geshin Impact
PUBG 手机
PUBG 手机
051015202530354045505560Tooltip
Xiaomi Mix Flip; Genshin Impact; lowest 120 fps: Ø39.5 (35-43)
Xiaomi Mix Flip; Genshin Impact; highest 120 fps: Ø54.1 (38-61)
Xiaomi Mix Flip; PUBG Mobile; Smooth: Ø58 (54-60)
Xiaomi Mix Flip; PUBG Mobile; HD: Ø39.8 (35-41)

排放 - 翻盖智能手机加热不均匀

温度

在日常操作中,小型可折叠机箱的散热系统能够轻松控制机箱表面温度。但在 Burnout 基准测试中,我们测得摄像头区域的热量明显高于 46 ºC(115 ºF)。在 3DMark 的 Wild Life Stress Tests(野外生存压力测试)中,发热也导致系统性能中度至高度下降,降幅约为 30% 至 45%。

Max. Load
 46.4 °C45.6 °C33.9 °C 
 46.1 °C44.9 °C32.4 °C 
 45.8 °C45 °C32.3 °C 
Maximum: 46.4 °C
Average: 41.4 °C
32.1 °C41 °C42.7 °C
31.4 °C42 °C42.9 °C
30.9 °C40.4 °C42.9 °C
Maximum: 42.9 °C
Average: 38.5 °C
Power Supply (max.)  29.1 °C | Room Temperature 20.9 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 41.4 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 46.4 °C / 116 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 42.9 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.3 °C / 76 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

3DMark Steel Nomad Stress Test

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Nubia Flip 5G
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.5 % +79%
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
94.4 % +70%
Honor Magic V Flip
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
56 % +1%
Xiaomi Mix Flip
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
55.6 %
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5G
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
43.6 % -22%
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Nubia Flip 5G
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
98.7 % +68%
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
77 % +31%
Xiaomi Mix Flip
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
58.9 %
Honor Magic V Flip
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
54.8 % -7%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5G
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
37.7 % -36%
Solar Bay Stress Test Stability
Xiaomi Mix Flip
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60.6 %
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5G
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
56.6 % -7%
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
50.2 % -17%
Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
88.8 % +21%
Xiaomi Mix Flip
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
73.5 %
Honor Magic V Flip
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
71.1 % -3%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5G
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
49.7 % -32%
0510152025303540455055606570758085Tooltip
Xiaomi Mix Flip Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø17.4 (14.6-24.8)
Honor Magic V Flip Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø10.9 (8.89-16.2)
Nubia Flip 5G Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø4.96 (4.91-4.98)
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5G Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø13.5 (10.8-28.5)
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø10.1 (9.79-12.7)
Xiaomi Mix Flip Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø61.8 (48.5-87.1)
Honor Magic V Flip Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø40 (34.5-61.7)
Nubia Flip 5G Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø18.8 (18.7-18.8)
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5G Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø44.5 (37.7-86.5)
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø37.4 (37.2-39.4)
Xiaomi Mix Flip Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.5: Ø18.2 (13.7-22.6)
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5G Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.5: Ø14.4 (12.7-22.5)
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.5: Ø10.4 (8.49-16.9)
Xiaomi Mix Flip Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.0.0.15: Ø9.2 (7.4-10.1)
Honor Magic V Flip Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.0.0.15: Ø4.64 (4.44-6.24)
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5G Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.0.0.15: Ø6.95 (5.81-11.7)
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.0.0.15: Ø4.2 (3.91-4.4)

发言人

Flip Mix 采用双扬声器系统,支持杜比全景声(Dolby Atmos)。小米智能手机无法重现低音,我们的粉红噪声测量也显示出频率曲线相当不均匀。

如果你想使用外接音效设备,可以将它们连接到 USB 端口,或使用蓝牙 5.4(包括 Auracast)进行无线连接。支持的编解码器非常广泛,包括 AAC、aptX、aptX HD、aptX adaptive、LDAC、LHDC 1-5 和 LC3。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2032.436.82534.135.63126.927.44034.332.45037.436.76324.930.98020.628.310024.529.712517.636.716015.844.520011.645.92501052.131514.356.34007.959.35006.566.46308.169.58008.669.2100010.575.912508.780.816009.876.720009.272.125009.47431509.878.740009.382.850009.579.4630010.375.4800010.872100001170.61250011.166.11600010.861.3SPL22.389.2N0.475median 10median 70.6Delta1.79.731.837.330.838.825.539.121.533.831.337.128.237.916.53918.835.61641.217.952.815.95415.556.416.3591460.815.36515.469.51574.515.277.414.278.51576.314.279.914.281.615.58214.282.714.178.915.574.614.47614.173.815.769.214.166.926.990.80.883.1median 15.2median 74.50.89.2hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseXiaomi Mix FlipSamsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5G
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Xiaomi Mix Flip audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.1% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.6% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 14% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 78% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 35% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 57% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5G audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (90.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.3% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 10% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 84% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 30% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 62% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电池续航时间 - 配备大容量电池的小米智能手机

耗电量

Mix Flip 的电池容量为 4,780 毫安时,比 Z Flip6 的电池容量大得多。 Galaxy Z Flip6而且还能以高达 67 瓦的功率快速充电。使用附带的充电器,只需不到 45 分钟就能为电池充电,大约 20 分钟后电池电量就能达到 50%以上。如果你不想总是使用中国版本的适配器,也可以使用小米智能手机的常用快速充电器(QC 2-4、PD2.0、PD3.0、PPS)。但不支持无线充电。

闲置时的功耗非常低,不到 1 瓦。在负载情况下,功耗略高于 Galaxy Z Flip6Magic V Flip.

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.07 / 0.25 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 0.5 / 0.92 / 1.1 Watt
Load midlight 7.66 / 9.03 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Xiaomi Mix Flip
4780 mAh
Honor Magic V Flip
4800 mAh
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5G
4000 mAh
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
4000 mAh
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-39%
-2%
-28%
-33%
-35%
Idle Minimum *
0.5
0.94
-88%
0.51
-2%
0.7
-40%
0.859 ?(0.4 - 1.5, n=15)
-72%
Idle Average *
0.92
1.69
-84%
1.18
-28%
1.1
-20%
1.231 ?(0.81 - 1.9, n=15)
-34%
Idle Maximum *
1.1
1.77
-61%
1.21
-10%
1.5
-36%
1.363 ?(0.85 - 2.6, n=15)
-24%
Load Average *
7.66
6.63
13%
6.23
19%
8.5
-11%
8.74 ?(3.34 - 14.7, n=14)
-14%
Load Maximum *
9.03
6.96
23%
8.01
11%
12
-33%
10.8 ?(3.53 - 20.8, n=14)
-20%

* ... smaller is better

Power Consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

0123456789101112131415Tooltip
Xiaomi Mix Flip Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø5.38 (0.74-8.99)
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø6.45 (0.744-15.2)
Xiaomi Mix Flip Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.607 (0.541-0.757)
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.834 (0.786-1.104)

Power Consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

012345678Tooltip
Xiaomi Mix Flip Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø8.95 (8.9-9)
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø6.66 (6.16-6.71)
Xiaomi Mix Flip Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.607 (0.541-0.757)
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.834 (0.786-1.104)

电池寿命

在显示屏亮度调至 150 cd/m² 的情况下,我们进行了逼真的 WLAN 测试,结果显示电池续航时间接近 15 小时,与可折叠竞争产品处于同一水平。只有 Honor Magic V Flip的续航时间明显更长。考虑到 Galaxy Flip 6的电池续航时间,Mix Flip 的高电池容量应该还能为软件优化提供一些潜力。

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
33h 15min
WiFi Websurfing (Chrome 128)
14h 53min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
19h 03min
Load (maximum brightness)
4h 06min
Xiaomi Mix Flip
4780 mAh
Honor Magic V Flip
4800 mAh
Nubia Flip 5G
4310 mAh
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5G
4000 mAh
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
4000 mAh
Battery Runtime
13%
6%
4%
-11%
Reader / Idle
1995
1860
-7%
1526
-24%
H.264
1143
1373
20%
1022
-11%
WiFi v1.3
893
1159
30%
951
6%
929
4%
726
-19%
Load
246
267
9%
274
11%

Pros

+ 非常明亮的显示屏
+ 柔性 OLED,无明显褶皱
+ 快速存储和强大的 SoC
+ 良好的设备
+ 使用附带的充电器快速充电

Cons

- 高节流
- 高发热导致游戏性能下降
- 遥控摄像头
- 不确定的更新政策(CN ROM)
- 无无线充电功能

关于小米混合翻盖的评价

测试小米 Mix Flip。测试机由 TradingShenzhen 提供
测试小米 Mix Flip。测试机由 TradingShenzhen 提供

小米的第一代翻盖手机吊足了我们的胃口。虽然 Mix Flip 在日常操作中并没有完全实现其数据表上的积极承诺,但这家中国制造商生产的小型可折叠手机在整体上接近于同类产品中的佼佼者--Z Flip6。 Galaxy Z Flip6.尽管全球版 Mix Flip 的定价不如中国进口版吸引人,但三星终于在翻盖手机领域获得了一些有力的竞争者。

尤其是在外观方面,小米做了很多正确的事情。明亮的可折叠 OLED 面板和相对较大的副显示屏都提供了非常小的显示屏边框和现代感十足的设计。虽然考虑到电池容量较大,我们本希望它能提供更好的电池续航时间,但 Mix Flip 的续航时间一点也不差。不过,那些希望电池续航时间更长的用户可能会在我们对 Magic V Flip 的测试中发现一些有趣的信息。 Magic V Flip.

由于两个徕卡镜头在日常操作中的表现并不总是令人信服,因此相机带来了些许失望。虽然从纸面上看,长焦镜头的变焦质量明显优于竞争对手,但我们的测试照片却给人留下了不同的印象。另一方面,随机附件也值得称赞:Mix Flip 的包装盒中不仅有相应的快速充电器,还有一个质量上乘的保护套。

随着 Mix Flip 即将在德国上市,翻盖手机市场终于可以加快步伐了。我们对即将推出的第二代小米可折叠手机寄予厚望。

价格和供应情况

小米 Mix Flip 目前以进口方式从Trading Shenzhen 等销售商处销售,售价约为 952 美元。全球版本将于 9 月 26 日在欧洲上市,建议零售价为 1,299 欧元(约合 1,456 美元)。

请注意,我们已经更新了评级系统,第 8 版的结果与第 7 版的结果不兼容。您可以在 这里.

Xiaomi Mix Flip - 09/24/2024 v8
Marcus Herbrich

Chassis
87%
Keyboard
67 / 75 → 89%
Pointing Device
93%
Connectivity
52 / 69 → 76%
Weight
89%
Battery
90%
Display
89%
Games Performance
38 / 55 → 68%
Application Performance
73 / 85 → 86%
AI Performance
27%
Temperature
87%
Noise
100%
Audio
73 / 90 → 81%
Camera
76%
Average
66%
83%
Smartphone - Weighted Average
CO2 Emissions
No Data
Materials
40%
Packaging
75%
Power Use
96.5%
Repairability
40%
Software Updates
44.5%
Recycle Logo Total Sustainability Score: 49.3%

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 小米 Mix Flip 评测--配备徕卡摄像头的可折叠智能手机终于给三星带来了压力
Marcus Herbrich, 2024-09-27 (Update: 2024-09-27)