Notebookcheck Logo
(Photo: Daniel Schmidt)

三星Galaxy Z Flip6 5G 评测--无与伦比的翻盖手机不断进步

翻转继续。

今年，三星Galaxy Z Flip6 再次进行了一些小改进：新的 SoC、优化的摄像头、IP 认证、更亮的显示屏等等。特别是，三星在更新方面迈出了决定性的一步。我们的全面评测将为您提供所需的一切信息。
Daniel Schmidt, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
5G Android Smartphone Foldable Touchscreen

与前代产品相比 Galaxy Z Flip5，你会立刻注意到三星Galaxy Z Flip6 5G 的设计更加方正。不过，内部结构也发生了一些变化：三星为其可折叠手机配备了更大的内存、新的摄像头、更大的电池、IP 认证以及更亮的主显示屏。

Flip6 的价格和内存规格与前代产品相同。该设备配备 256 GB（1099 美元）或 512 GB（1219 美元）。

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5G
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy 8 x 2.3 - 3.4 GHz, Cortex-X4 / A720 / A720 / A520 (Kryo)
Graphics adapter
Qualcomm Adreno 750
Memory
12 GB 
, LPDDR5x
Display
6.70 inch 22:9, 2640 x 1080 pixel 426 PPI, Capacitive, Dynamic AMOLED 2X, LTPO: 1 - 120 Hz; Cover display: 3.4 inches, Super AMOLED, 748 x 720 pixel, Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2, 60 Hz, glossy: yes, HDR, 120 Hz
Storage
512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash, 512 GB 
, 484.2 GB free
Connections
1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: USB-C, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer, OTG
Networking
Wi-Fi 6E (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz), Bluetooth 5.3, 2G (850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz), 3G (Band 1, 2, 4, 5, 8), LTE (Band 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66), 5G-Sub6 (Band 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 75, 77, 78), Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 6.9 x 165.1 x 71.9
Battery
4000 mAh Lithium-Ion, 25 W charging, Wireless Charging 15 W
Charging
wireless charging, fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 14
Camera
Primary Camera: 50 MPix (f/1.8, 23 mm, OIS) + 12 MPix (Ultra Wide, f/2.2); Camera2-API-Level: Level 3
Secondary Camera: 10 MPix (f/2.2, 23 mm, FF)
Additional features
Speakers: Dual, Keyboard: OnScreen, USB-C-Cabel, SIM-Tool, One UI 6.1, 24 Months Warranty, Head-SAR: 1.09 W/kg, Body-SAR: 1.511 W/kg; HDR: HLG, HDR10, HDR10+; GNSS: GPS (L1, L5), Glonass (L1), BeiDou (B1, B1C, B2a), Galileo (E1, E5a), QZSS; IP48; Dual-eSIM; Bluetooth Audio Codecs: SBC, AAC, aptX, LDAC, SSC, fanless, waterproof
Weight
187 g
Price
1319 Euro
Amazon
Links
Samsung notebook section
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating
Version
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Price
84.7 %v8
09 / 2024
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5G
SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750		187 g512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash6.70"2640x1080
80.4 %v8
08 / 2024
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
SD 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735		189 g512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash6.90"2640x1080
85.4 %
v7 (old)		v7 (old)
05 / 2024
Nubia Flip 5G
SD 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644		214 g256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.90"2790x1188
86.3 %
v7 (old)		v7 (old)
02 / 2024
Oppo Find N3 Flip
Dimensity 9200, Immortalis-G715 MP11		201 g256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash6.80"2520x1080

保护壳 - Flip6，带大猩猩玻璃胜利者 2 和 IP48防护等级

这四种颜色已在所有商店有售。(照片：丹尼尔-施密特）
这四种颜色已在所有商店有售。

三星在Galaxy Z Flip6 上沿用了相同的外形设计。尽管它的尺寸与前两代产品完全相同，但现在更方正了一些，并有新的颜色可供选择：银色、蓝色、黄色和薄荷色。三星在线商店还提供三种独家颜色--手工黑、白和桃红。

这款可折叠智能手机手感极佳，表面处理高档。所有的缝隙尺寸都是齐平的，完全吻合。任何扭动设备的尝试都会导致内部显示屏发出轻微的吱吱声。但除此之外，Flip6 非常坚固。

此外，磨砂边框由铠甲铝（Armor Aluminum）制成，玻璃表面由康宁大猩猩胜利者 2（Corning Gorilla Victus 2）制成。Galaxy 智能手机现已通过 IP48 认证。这意味着它在深度达 1.5 米的永久浸水环境中也能得到保护。同样，它还能防止大小超过一米的异物穿透。

(照片：丹尼尔-施密特）
(照片：丹尼尔-施密特）
(照片：丹尼尔-施密特）
(照片：丹尼尔-施密特）
(照片：丹尼尔-施密特）
(照片：丹尼尔-施密特）
(照片：丹尼尔-施密特）
(照片：丹尼尔-施密特）
(照片：丹尼尔-施密特）
(照片：丹尼尔-施密特）
(照片：丹尼尔-施密特）
(照片：丹尼尔-施密特）
(照片：丹尼尔-施密特）
(照片：丹尼尔-施密特）
(照片：丹尼尔-施密特）

尺寸比较

❌
171.4 mm 74 mm 7.1 mm 189 g170 mm 76 mm 7.3 mm 214 g166.4 mm 75.8 mm 7.8 mm 201 g165.1 mm 71.9 mm 6.9 mm 187 g165.1 mm 71.9 mm 6.9 mm 187 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g

尺寸比较

❌
88 mm 76 mm 15.5 mm 214 g85.5 mm 75.8 mm 16.45 mm 198 g85.1 mm 71.9 mm 15.1 mm 187 g

功能 - USB 3.2 和更多内存

在功能方面，三星的变化并不大。两个存储版本现在都配备了 12 GB 内存，其余部分让我们想起了它的前身 前代.

USB 3.2 端口（第一代）可用于有线图像输出，不过，它只能与 Flip6 相匹配，而且不支持 DeX。与固态硬盘（三星 980 Pro）连接后，我们的复制传输测试速度为 214.72 MB/s，可以说是相当不错。

软件 -Galaxy Z Flip 6 预装了Galaxy AI

三星Galaxy Z Flip6 5G 配备了Android 14 和 One UI 6.1.1 用户界面，其中包括我们已经熟悉的三星Galaxy AI 功能。 S24 系列.

三星还将其可折叠手机的更新保证期延长至七年（至 2031 年 7 月 31 日）。在测试时，安全补丁是从 2024 年 9 月 1 日开始的，这意味着它们是最新的。Flip6 只是在 Play 系统更新方面落后了一些。

同样，外部显示屏可以显示各种小部件，这也是 Flip 与其前代产品几乎没有区别的地方。 前代产品.还可以使用适配的应用程序。不过，该功能必须首先在实验室下激活，而且列表仍然很不完整。

可持续性

在可持续发展方面，三星为业界其他公司树立了榜样。在网站上的可持续发展报告中，您可以找到有关Galaxy Z Flip6 碳足迹的详细信息，而且回收和可回收材料的比例再次大幅增加。我们再也检测不到外包装中使用了任何塑料。

三星还希望用户能够维修设备，制造商本身也提供了相应的说明。Flip 6 还很新，因此提供的选择还不够全面。不过，在未来几周内，这一点应该不会改变。

通信和全球导航卫星系统 - 三星智能手机不带 Wi-Fi 功能 7

SamsungGalaxy Z Flip 6 支持各种移动频段，这意味着在欧洲以外的地区也不会有任何接收问题。支持包括 5G Sub6 在内的所有现代标准。

在 Wi-Fi 网络方面，Flip6 只支持 Wi-Fi 6E。虽然这意味着它支持 6 GHz 频段，但目前的标准却被排除在外。

此外，还支持蓝牙 5.3 和 NFC，但不支持 UWB。

Networking
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5G
iperf3 receive AXE11000
623 (min: 320) MBit/s ∼87%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
723 (min: 659) MBit/s ∼99%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1816 (min: 900) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1501 (min: 1447) MBit/s ∼100%
Average of class Smartphone
iperf3 receive AXE11000
714 (min: 34.8) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
729 (min: 40.5) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1451 (min: 229) MBit/s ∼80%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1368 (min: 668) MBit/s ∼91%
095190285380475570665760855950104511401235133014251520161517101805Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5G; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1786 (900-1861)
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5G; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1500 (1447-1527)
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5G; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø611 (320-663)
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5G; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø723 (659-792)
GPS 测试：室内
室内
GPS 测试：户外
户外活动

Galaxy Z Flip6 5G 使用双频 GNSS 确定位置。在室内，卫星定位是可能的，但需要较长的时间。在室外，三星智能手机可以非常快速、精确地确定其位置。

在一次自行车旅行中，我们将其定位精度与 Garmin Venu 2 进行了比较。Flip6 的路线记录非常准确，但也有一些小的异常值。不过，这在日常使用中不会造成任何问题。

GNNS 测试之旅：环湖航行
GNNS 测试之旅：环湖航行
GNNS 测试之旅：转折点
GNNS 测试之旅：转折点

电话功能和语音质量

在我们的测试中，使用Galaxy Z Flip6 打电话的语音质量非常自然，背景噪音也被有效地过滤掉了。扬声器功能在日常使用中也表现出色。

支持 VoLTE 和 Wi-Fi 通话等功能。三星可折叠手机既可以使用实体 Nano SIM 卡，也可以使用 eSIM 卡。同样，也可以实现双 eSIM 卡操作。

摄像头 - 从Galaxy S24 继承的传感器

主摄像头自拍
主摄像头自拍
用内置摄像头自拍
用内置摄像头自拍

三星Galaxy Z Flip 6 5G 内部的前置摄像头可拍摄 1000 万像素的图像，但只能提供固定焦距。尽管如此，它在日光下仍能拍摄出相对较好的照片，并能以最高 60fps 的超高清速度录制视频。通过外置显示屏的主摄像头可以拍摄出更好看的自拍照，这在 Flip5的外置显示屏作为取景器。

在后部，Flip6 采用了双摄像头，与 Galaxy S24一样，它由一个广角镜头（23 毫米）和一个超广角镜头（13 毫米）组成。遗憾的是，没有集成专用的长焦镜头，但主传感器可实现几乎无损的 2 倍放大，即使是 5 倍变焦也能提供良好的效果。最大数字变焦可达 10 倍。

超广角拍摄的图像效果良好，图像中心锐度均衡。不过，边缘的模糊程度有所增加，而且有明显的颗粒结构。

主摄像头还可以录制高达 60fps 的超高清视频，但在录制过程中不允许切换镜头。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Main cameraMain cameraUltra-wide angle5x zoomLow-light
ColorChecker
1.7 ∆E
4 ∆E
3.8 ∆E
3.1 ∆E
2.4 ∆E
5.7 ∆E
3.9 ∆E
4.2 ∆E
4.2 ∆E
3.9 ∆E
3.8 ∆E
2.3 ∆E
5.2 ∆E
3.7 ∆E
5 ∆E
1.4 ∆E
2.2 ∆E
9.9 ∆E
4.8 ∆E
0.7 ∆E
3.1 ∆E
1.4 ∆E
1.3 ∆E
2.9 ∆E
ColorChecker Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5G: 3.52 ∆E min: 0.68 - max: 9.91 ∆E
ColorChecker
11.3 ∆E
12 ∆E
15 ∆E
12.4 ∆E
21.1 ∆E
20.5 ∆E
8.8 ∆E
12.2 ∆E
10.3 ∆E
14.5 ∆E
11.4 ∆E
17 ∆E
13.8 ∆E
10.7 ∆E
6.8 ∆E
9.6 ∆E
18 ∆E
23.4 ∆E
15.5 ∆E
13.1 ∆E
14.8 ∆E
20.2 ∆E
18.6 ∆E
12.8 ∆E
ColorChecker Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5G: 14.32 ∆E min: 6.79 - max: 23.44 ∆E

配件和保修 - Care+ 的价格保持稳定

Galaxy Z Flip6 5G 随附 SIM 卡工具和 USB-C 数据线。还可通过三星或第三方供应商订购充电器和各种保护套。

在德国，Flip6 的保修期为 24 个月，可通过Care+ 延长保修期。保险套餐，价格在 129 美元到 349 美元之间。

输入设备和操作 - 通过每个摄像头进行人脸识别

Galaxy Z Flip6 的电容式触摸屏在两个显示屏上的功能都非常可靠，没有任何值得批评的地方。可折叠面板的褶皱非常平整，但仍然很明显。盖板屏幕上还有一个键盘，它能准确地完成工作。

在生物识别安全方面，指纹传感器位于功能键中，识别率非常可靠。此外，还可以通过摄像头进行安全性稍低的人脸识别。线性振动电机可提供清晰的触觉反馈，而且非常安静。

显示屏 -Galaxy Z Flip6 采用明亮的 LTPO OLED 显示屏

子像素结构
子像素结构

三星Galaxy Z Flip6 5G 的 6.7 英寸动态 AMOLED 显示屏采用 LTPO 技术，可在 1 到 120 Hz 之间动态调节刷新率。支持常见的 HDR 标准，但不支持 Dolby Vision。

在激活环境光传感器的纯白背景图像中央，亮度为 1,210 cd/m²。在亮部和暗部均匀分布的情况下（APL18），亮度会增加到 2,636 cd/m²，而在播放 YouTube 上的 HDR 视频时，亮度会增加到 2,684 cd/m²。如果您想手动调节亮度，可选择 417 cd/m²，选择 "附加亮度 "选项可获得 709 cd/m²。

在最低亮度下，OLED 的闪烁频率为 120 Hz，一旦亮度增加，频率就会上升到 240 Hz。尽管振幅较低，但敏感用户还是会遇到一些问题。

1235
cd/m²		1205
cd/m²		1227
cd/m²
1230
cd/m²		1210
cd/m²		1224
cd/m²
1227
cd/m²		1209
cd/m²		1226
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 1235 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 1221.4 cd/m² Minimum: 1.43 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 98 %
Center on Battery: 1210 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.1 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 2 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
97.6% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.05
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5G
Dynamic AMOLED 2X, 2640x1080, 6.7"		Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
P-OLED, 2640x1080, 6.9"		Nubia Flip 5G
OLED, 2790x1188, 6.9"		Oppo Find N3 Flip
AMOLED, 2520x1080, 6.8"		Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G
Dynamic AMOLED, 2640x1080, 6.7"
Screen
22%
30%
23%
-6%
Brightness middle
1210
1099
-9%
1164
-4%
922
-24%
836
-31%
Brightness
1221
1087
-11%
1172
-4%
932
-24%
848
-31%
Brightness Distribution
98
95
-3%
97
-1%
96
-2%
97
-1%
Black Level *
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
3.1
1.04
66%
0.7
77%
0.7
77%
2.6
16%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
4.2
2.36
44%
1.5
64%
1.8
57%
4.5
-7%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
2
1.1
45%
1.1
45%
0.9
55%
1.6
20%
Gamma
2.05 107%
2.199 100%
2.2 100%
2.24 98%
2.22 99%
CCT
6666 98%
6418 101%
6482 100%
6569 99%
6319 103%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 120 Hz
Amplitude: 18.35 %

The display backlight flickers at 120 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 120 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

最低显示亮度
分钟
25 % 显示屏亮度
25 %
显示屏亮度为 50
50 %
75 % 显示亮度
75 %
最大显示亮度
100 %

使用固定变焦和各种亮度设置进行的一系列测量（最低亮度下的振幅曲线看起来非常平缓，但这是缩放造成的。最小亮度下的振幅放大图可在信息框中查看）。

Galaxy Z Flip6 的色彩和灰度还原效果不错，但与目标值有明显偏差，尤其是在色彩方面。这在日常使用中不是问题，但考虑到其价格档次，三星应该在这方面多加注意。

灰度（轮廓：自然，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
灰度（轮廓：自然，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
色彩（配置文件：自然，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
色彩（配置文件：自然，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
色彩空间（配置文件：自然，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
色彩空间（配置文件：自然，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
饱和度（配置文件：自然，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
饱和度（配置文件：自然，目标色彩空间：sRGB）

Display Response Times

ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
   ↔    Response Time Black to White
1.38 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.7135 ms rise
↘ 0.6645 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 5 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
   ↔    Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
4.03 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 2.078 ms rise
↘ 1.955 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 12 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

在户外，这款可折叠的三星智能手机给人留下了很好的印象，在大多数光线条件下都能提供充足的亮度储备。只有从广角观看时，反光表面才会令人讨厌。

AMOLED 面板的视角稳定性非常好。不过，在视角很宽的情况下，亮度会有明显的下降，显示的图像也会变冷。

户外活动
户外活动
视角稳定性
视角稳定性

封面显示屏 - 仅限于 60 赫兹和更暗的频率

子像素结构
子像素结构
最低亮度时的 PWM 频率
最低亮度时的 PWM 频率

外置的 4.3 英寸 AMOLED 显示屏可以再大一些，而且在测试中，我们测得它的亮度低于主显示屏。

在激活环境光传感器的情况下，我们在纯白图像中央测得的亮度为 993 cd/m²。当进行 HDR 再现时，亮度则攀升至 1,295 cd/m²。如果手动调节亮度，则可达到 649 cd/m²。

最低亮度为 1.44 cd/m²，非常低，是在黑暗中护眼的最佳选择。遗憾的是，60 或 240 Hz PWM 频率较低，因此敏感用户可能会遇到一些问题。

性能 - 三星手机采用更快的 Snapdragon 处理器

Galaxy Z Flip 6 采用了 骁龙 8 代 3Galaxy并在每个存储版本中配备 12GB LPDDR5x 内存。

速度达到了很高的水平，系统操作起来非常流畅。

Geekbench 6.3 | Antutu v10 | PCMark for Android | CrossMark | BaseMark OS II | UL Procyon AI Inference for Android | AImark
Geekbench 6.3
Single-Core
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy
  (2072 - 2287, n=3)
2199 Points +6%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
2072 Points
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192
2040 Points -2%
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
1848 Points -11%
Oppo Find N3 Flip
MediaTek Dimensity 9200, Immortalis-G715 MP11, 12288
1460 Points -30%
Average of class Smartphone
  (193 - 3479, n=162, last 2 years)
1454 Points -30%
Nubia Flip 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 8192
1016 Points -51%
Multi-Core
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy
  (6354 - 7102, n=3)
6783 Points +7%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
6354 Points
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192
5228 Points -18%
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
4630 Points -27%
Average of class Smartphone
  (845 - 10401, n=162, last 2 years)
4049 Points -36%
Oppo Find N3 Flip
MediaTek Dimensity 9200, Immortalis-G715 MP11, 12288
3799 Points -40%
Nubia Flip 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 8192
2885 Points -55%
Antutu v10 - Total Score
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy
  (1492419 - 1837994, n=3)
1672062 Points +12%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
1492419 Points
Oppo Find N3 Flip
MediaTek Dimensity 9200, Immortalis-G715 MP11, 12288
1432115 Points -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (142748 - 3015111, n=98, last 2 years)
1232320 Points -17%
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
1142944 Points -23%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy
  (18026 - 18672, n=3)
18273 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
18121 Points
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
17105 Points -6%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192
17002 Points -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4609 - 24088, n=190, last 2 years)
12976 Points -28%
Nubia Flip 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 8192
11666 Points -36%
Oppo Find N3 Flip
MediaTek Dimensity 9200, Immortalis-G715 MP11, 12288
9920 Points -45%
CrossMark - Overall
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy
  (1443 - 1473, n=3)
1453 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
1444 Points
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192
1120 Points -22%
Average of class Smartphone
  (187 - 1517, n=157, last 2 years)
884 Points -39%
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
771 Points -47%
Nubia Flip 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 8192
683 Points -53%
Oppo Find N3 Flip
MediaTek Dimensity 9200, Immortalis-G715 MP11, 12288
Points -100%
BaseMark OS II
Overall
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy
  (9267 - 9696, n=3)
9506 Points +3%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
9267 Points
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192
8541 Points -8%
Oppo Find N3 Flip
MediaTek Dimensity 9200, Immortalis-G715 MP11, 12288
7488 Points -19%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1196 - 11976, n=151, last 2 years)
6297 Points -32%
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
5685 Points -39%
Nubia Flip 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 8192
4805 Points -48%
System
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy
  (15087 - 16475, n=3)
15721 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
15600 Points
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192
14188 Points -9%
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
12407 Points -20%
Nubia Flip 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 8192
10293 Points -34%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2368 - 16475, n=151, last 2 years)
10163 Points -35%
Oppo Find N3 Flip
MediaTek Dimensity 9200, Immortalis-G715 MP11, 12288
9997 Points -36%
Memory
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy
  (9073 - 10389, n=3)
9564 Points +4%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
9230 Points
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192
8629 Points -7%
Oppo Find N3 Flip
MediaTek Dimensity 9200, Immortalis-G715 MP11, 12288
7411 Points -20%
Average of class Smartphone
  (962 - 12716, n=151, last 2 years)
6767 Points -27%
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
5966 Points -35%
Nubia Flip 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 8192
4856 Points -47%
Graphics
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy
  (26269 - 32352, n=3)
28842 Points +10%
Oppo Find N3 Flip
MediaTek Dimensity 9200, Immortalis-G715 MP11, 12288
26484 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
26269 Points
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192
21505 Points -18%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1017 - 58651, n=151, last 2 years)
16908 Points -36%
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
8020 Points -69%
Nubia Flip 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 8192
7680 Points -71%
Web
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192
2021 Points +4%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
1950 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy
  (1815 - 1950, n=3)
1882 Points -3%
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
1760 Points -10%
Oppo Find N3 Flip
MediaTek Dimensity 9200, Immortalis-G715 MP11, 12288
1602 Points -18%
Average of class Smartphone
  (841 - 2145, n=151, last 2 years)
1564 Points -20%
Nubia Flip 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 8192
1389 Points -29%
UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Oppo Find N3 Flip
MediaTek Dimensity 9200, Immortalis-G715 MP11, 12288
40276 Points +155%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy
  (15793 - 18852, n=3)
17486 Points +11%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1267 - 74958, n=143, last 2 years)
16841 Points +7%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 8192
16235 Points +3%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
15793 Points
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
15572 Points -1%
AImark - Score v3.x
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
239813 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy
  (1518 - 239813, n=3)
88473 Points -63%
Oppo Find N3 Flip
MediaTek Dimensity 9200, Immortalis-G715 MP11, 12288
30444 Points -87%
Average of class Smartphone
  (82 - 307528, n=135, last 2 years)
25873 Points -89%
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
946 Points -100%

图形处理器采用 Adreno 750它支持基于硬件的光线追踪技术，并承诺提供高水平的性能。在对比中，你可以清楚地看到它在竞争中脱颖而出。

3DMark: Wild Life Extreme Unlimited | Wild Life Extreme | Wild Life Unlimited Score | Wild Life Score | Solar Bay Score | Solar Bay Unlimited Score | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7: T-Rex Onscreen | 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
GFXBench 3.0: on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
GFXBench 3.1: on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
GFXBench: on screen Car Chase Onscreen | 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | 3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
3DMark: Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score | Steel Nomad Light Score
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5G
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
4739 Points
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3496 Points -26%
Oppo Find N3 Flip
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3454 Points -27%
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1659 Points -65%
Nubia Flip 5G
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
825 Points -83%
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5G
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
4912 Points
Oppo Find N3 Flip
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3116 Points -37%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3090 Points -37%
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1723 Points -65%
Nubia Flip 5G
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
819 Points -83%
3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5G
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
18949 Points
Oppo Find N3 Flip
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
12831 Points -32%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
9805 Points -48%
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
6661 Points -65%
Nubia Flip 5G
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3136 Points -83%
3DMark / Wild Life Score
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
6496 Points
Nubia Flip 5G
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3124 Points
3DMark / Solar Bay Score
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5G
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
8046 Points
Oppo Find N3 Flip
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
5532 Points -31%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
5414 Points -33%
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3223 Points -60%
3DMark / Solar Bay Unlimited Score
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5G
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
7270 Points
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
5563 Points -23%
Oppo Find N3 Flip
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
5530 Points -24%
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
2799 Points -61%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
5825 Points +49%
Nubia Flip 5G
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
4329 Points +11%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5G
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3911 Points
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3243 Points -17%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5G
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
26616 Points
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
20215 Points -24%
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
12176 Points -54%
Nubia Flip 5G
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
6893 Points -74%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
13051 Points +12%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5G
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
11622 Points
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
7553 Points -35%
Nubia Flip 5G
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
6091 Points -48%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5G
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps 0%
Oppo Find N3 Flip
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps -50%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
496 fps +10%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5G
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
451 fps
Oppo Find N3 Flip
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
306 fps -32%
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
292 fps -35%
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5G
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
118 fps -2%
Oppo Find N3 Flip
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps -50%
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5G
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
312 fps
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
276 fps -12%
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
170 fps -46%
Oppo Find N3 Flip
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
156 fps -50%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5G
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
94 fps -22%
Oppo Find N3 Flip
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps -50%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5G
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
245 fps
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
212 fps -13%
Oppo Find N3 Flip
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
112 fps -54%
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
111 fps -55%
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5G
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
115 fps
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
72 fps -37%
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
55 fps -52%
Oppo Find N3 Flip
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
50 fps -57%
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5G
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
127 fps
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
67 fps -47%
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
63 fps -50%
Oppo Find N3 Flip
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
58 fps -54%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5G
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
105 fps
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
88 fps -16%
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
69 fps -34%
Oppo Find N3 Flip
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
59 fps -44%
Nubia Flip 5G
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
18 fps -83%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5G
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
67 fps
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
52 fps -22%
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
48 fps -28%
Oppo Find N3 Flip
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
42 fps -37%
Nubia Flip 5G
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
17 fps -75%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5G
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
88 fps -27%
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
76 fps -37%
Oppo Find N3 Flip
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps -50%
Nubia Flip 5G
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
29 fps -76%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5G
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
201 fps
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
121 fps -40%
Oppo Find N3 Flip
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
101 fps -50%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
84 fps -58%
Nubia Flip 5G
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
46 fps -77%
GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5G
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
40 fps
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
32 fps -20%
Oppo Find N3 Flip
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
20 fps -50%
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
12 fps -70%
Nubia Flip 5G
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
7.5 fps -81%
3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5G
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1268 Points
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
579 Points -54%
3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Score
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5G
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1333 Points
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
739 Points -45%
Jetstream 2 | Speedometer 2.0 | WebXPRT 4 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra (Chrome 127)
191.085 Points +14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy (155.8 - 210, n=3)
177.6 Points +6%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5G (Chrome 127)
167.118 Points
Oppo Find N3 Flip (Edge 121)
125 Points -25%
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=161, last 2 years)
120.4 Points -28%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5G (Chrome 127)
281 runs/min
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy (237 - 281, n=3)
261 runs/min -7%
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra (Chrome 127)
247 runs/min -12%
Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 569, n=146, last 2 years)
136.2 runs/min -52%
Oppo Find N3 Flip (Edge 121)
103 runs/min -63%
WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy (181 - 211, n=3)
195.7 Points +8%
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra (Chrome 127)
184 Points +2%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5G (Chrome 127)
181 Points
Oppo Find N3 Flip (Edge 121)
134 Points -26%
Oppo Find N3 Flip (Chrome 121)
22 Points -88%
Average of class Smartphone (22 - 271, n=152, last 2 years)
113.8 Points -37%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5G (Chrome 127)
72835 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy (66754 - 72835, n=3)
70533 Points -3%
Oppo Find N3 Flip (Edge 121)
45823 Points -37%
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra (Chrome 127)
39446 Points -46%
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=203, last 2 years)
37161 Points -49%
Nubia Flip 5G (Chrome 124)
22047 Points -70%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=160, last 2 years)
1568 ms * -173%
Oppo Find N3 Flip (Edge 121)
917.8 ms * -60%
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra (Chrome 127)
638.8 ms * -11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy (555 - 599, n=3)
576 ms * -0%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5G (Chrome 127)
574.7 ms *

* ... smaller is better

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5GMotorola Razr 50 UltraNubia Flip 5GOppo Find N3 FlipAverage 512 GB UFS 4.0 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
35%
-35%
45%
32%
-21%
Sequential Read 256KB
3930.68
4012
2%
967.4
-75%
3794
-3%
3622 ?(1851 - 4512, n=31)
-8%
1839 ?(226 - 4512, n=192, last 2 years)
-53%
Sequential Write 256KB
2603.84
3512
35%
766.69
-71%
2965
14%
2956 ?(1524 - 3678, n=31)
14%
1425 ?(57.5 - 3908, n=192, last 2 years)
-45%
Random Read 4KB
445.5
340
-24%
263.87
-41%
411
-8%
392 ?(250 - 480, n=31)
-12%
277 ?(22.2 - 483, n=192, last 2 years)
-38%
Random Write 4KB
202.97
457
125%
295.55
46%
558
175%
475 ?(45.7 - 709, n=31)
134%
309 ?(9.4 - 753, n=192, last 2 years)
52%

排放 - 尽管蒸发腔很大，但还是会发热

温度

Galaxy Z Flip 6 在某些表面区域会变得非常热，这是因为 "Burnout "基准测试对这款可折叠智能手机进行了较长时间的测试。我们在接触式测量中也记录到了高达 50.0 °C的温度。不过，在日常使用中，它的温度仍然较低。

尽管采用了大型散热装置，3DMark 压力测试的性能下降幅度还是很大。不过，与 前代产品.

Max. Load
 49.5 °C54.2 °C39.4 °C 
 49.9 °C54.1 °C38.2 °C 
 44.8 °C42.8 °C37.7 °C 
Maximum: 54.2 °C
Average: 45.6 °C
37.1 °C46 °C48.1 °C
36.5 °C42.8 °C48.2 °C
36.6 °C41.6 °C44.6 °C
Maximum: 48.2 °C
Average: 42.4 °C
Room Temperature 22 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 45.6 °C / 114 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 54.2 °C / 130 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 48.2 °C / 119 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.2 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

3DMark Steel Nomad Stress Test

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Nubia Flip 5G
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.5 % +128%
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
94.4 % +117%
Oppo Find N3 Flip
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
58.9 % +35%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5G
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
43.6 %
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
38.3 % -12%
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Nubia Flip 5G
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
98.7 % +162%
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
77 % +104%
Oppo Find N3 Flip
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
50.3 % +33%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5G
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
37.7 %
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
34.8 % -8%
Solar Bay Stress Test Stability
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5G
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
56.6 %
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
50.2 % -11%
Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
88.8 % +79%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5G
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
49.7 %
0510152025303540455055606570758085Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5G Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø13.5 (10.8-28.5)
Oppo Find N3 Flip Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø13.3 (9.44-18.8)
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5G Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø44.5 (37.7-86.5)
Oppo Find N3 Flip Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø46.5 (37.4-63.5)
Oppo Find N3 Flip Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.5: Ø10.2 (9.14-19.8)
Oppo Find N3 Flip Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.5: Ø11.1 (9.19-19.9)
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5G Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.5: Ø14.4 (12.7-22.5)
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5G Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.0.0.15: Ø6.95 (5.81-11.7)

发言人

三星Galaxy Z Flip6 配备了两个扬声器，在中等音量下可发出悦耳的高音。音量越大，声音越不和谐，但仍不会失真。

有线和无线声音输出分别由 USB-C 和蓝牙 5.3 提供。不过，蓝牙 5.3 只提供非常低的编解码器支持。不过，Flip6 可以处理双音频和 Auracast。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2031.837.32530.838.83125.539.14021.533.85031.337.16328.237.98016.53910018.835.61251641.216017.952.820015.95425015.556.431516.3594001460.850015.36563015.469.58001574.5100015.277.4125014.278.516001576.3200014.279.9250014.281.6315015.582400014.282.7500014.178.9630015.574.6800014.4761000014.173.81250015.769.21600014.166.9SPL26.990.8N0.883.1median 15.2median 74.5Delta0.89.228.640.325.937.423.437.427.336.736.237.625.436.616.638.616.939.914.741.713.149.615.147.914.351.611.655.51058.69.168.211.169.49.171.811.875.51576.411.375.1127612.377.912.782.112.684.213.183.413.483.513.577.113.569.613.663.713.660.324.791.60.686.3median 13.1median 71.81.310.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseSamsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5GOppo Find N3 Flip
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5G audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (90.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.3% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 9% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 84% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 29% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 62% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Oppo Find N3 Flip audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (91.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.1% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 8.5% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 27% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 64% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 47% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 44% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电池寿命 -Galaxy Z Flip 6 配备 4,000 mAh 大容量电池

耗电量

功耗较低，但比上一代产品 Flip5的功耗略高，这应该可以抵消较大的电池容量。

Galaxy Z Flip6 可以处理高达 25 瓦的有线充电。在使用相同功率的三星充电器进行的测试中，充满电需要 128 分钟--换句话说，时间相当长。不过，28 分钟后就能充满 50%的电量，而充满 80% 的电量则需要 51 分钟。

此外，您还可以用 15 瓦的功率为 Flip6 进行无线充电。此外，Flip6 还支持 Wireless PowerShare（无线共享电源）功能，可以为其他设备无线充电。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.01 / 0.07 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 0.51 / 1.18 / 1.21 Watt
Load midlight 6.23 / 8.01 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5G
4000 mAh		Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
4000 mAh		Oppo Find N3 Flip
4300 mAh		Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G
3700 mAh		Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy
 		Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-28%
-42%
18%
-42%
-32%
Idle Minimum *
0.51
0.7
-37%
0.77
-51%
0.44
14%
0.69 ?(0.51 - 0.83, n=3)
-35%
0.894 ?(0.4 - 2.37, n=152, last 2 years)
-75%
Idle Average *
1.18
1.1
7%
1.68
-42%
0.69
42%
1.233 ?(1.18 - 1.3, n=3)
-4%
1.456 ?(0.6 - 4.26, n=152, last 2 years)
-23%
Idle Maximum *
1.21
1.5
-24%
1.72
-42%
0.91
25%
1.33 ?(1.21 - 1.44, n=3)
-10%
1.616 ?(0.83 - 4.45, n=152, last 2 years)
-34%
Load Average *
6.23
8.5
-36%
8.45
-36%
6.61
-6%
12.1 ?(6.23 - 16.5, n=3)
-94%
6.45 ?(2.3 - 16.5, n=147, last 2 years)
-4%
Load Maximum *
8.01
12
-50%
11.05
-38%
6.72
16%
13.5 ?(8.01 - 16.6, n=3)
-69%
9.8 ?(3.53 - 20.8, n=147, last 2 years)
-22%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

0123456789101112131415Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø6.45 (0.744-15.2)
Oppo Find N3 Flip MediaTek Dimensity 9200; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø3.4 (0.791-7.68)
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.834 (0.786-1.104)
Oppo Find N3 Flip MediaTek Dimensity 9200; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.938 (0.912-1.035)

Power consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

0123456Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø6.66 (6.16-6.71)
Oppo Find N3 Flip MediaTek Dimensity 9200; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø4.96 (4.31-5.42)
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.834 (0.786-1.104)
Oppo Find N3 Flip MediaTek Dimensity 9200; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.938 (0.912-1.035)

电池寿命

说到电池续航时间，Galaxy Z Flip6 5G 有了很大的飞跃，这不仅是因为它配备了更大的 4,000 毫安时电池。

在自适应亮度（150 cd/m²）的 Wi-Fi 测试中，它的续航时间超过了 15 小时。这意味着，如果您在日常情况下节俭地使用该设备，您应该可以使用两天再去充电。

Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing (Chrome 127)
15h 29min
Battery Runtime - WiFi v1.3
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5G
4000 mAh
929 min
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
4000 mAh
726 min
Nubia Flip 5G
4310 mAh
951 min
Oppo Find N3 Flip
4300 mAh
857 min
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G
3700 mAh
647 min

Pros

+ 明亮准确的主显示屏
+ 快速性能
+ 防水
+ 双 eSIM 卡
+ 电池寿命长
+ 7 年更新

Cons

- 合上时有点太厚
- 既没有 Wi-Fi 7 也没有 UWB
- 外部显示屏只有 60 Hz，而且有点小
- 蓝牙音频编解码器较少

结论 -Galaxy Z Flip6 几乎没有弱点

评论：SamsungGalaxy Z Flip 6 5G。评测设备由德国三星公司提供。(照片：丹尼尔-施密特）
评论：SamsungGalaxy Z Flip 6 5G。评测设备由德国三星公司提供。(照片：丹尼尔-施密特）

当许多竞争对手还在首次尝试翻盖智能手机时，三星Galaxy Z Flip6 5G 就已经给人留下了成熟的印象，提供了全面的综合解决方案。

快速的 SoC、明亮的主显示屏、良好的电池续航能力、更长的更新时间以及无线充电、IP48 认证、Galaxy AI 和双 eSIM 卡等实用附加功能，让这款可折叠智能手机拥有了许多有利的论据。

三星Galaxy Z Flip6 5G 提供了一个出色的全方位组合，唯一的不足之处在于其设计。

不过，在折叠后，我们希望 Flip6 能更轻薄一些，而且在我们看来，缺少 Wi-Fi 7 也是一种人为的退化。此外，外部显示屏的工作频率仅为 60 赫兹，而且由于有足够的可用空间，显示屏还可以再大一些。

令人兴奋的替代产品有 Razr 50 Ultra以及 Razr 50.努比亚 努比亚 Flip甚至更便宜，但在功能设置和更新方面有所删减。

价格和供应情况

Galaxy Z Flip 6 5G 可直接从三星以及亚马逊等大型零售商处订购。

注：我们最近更新了评级系统，第 8 版的结果与第 7 版的结果不具可比性。更多信息 此处.

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5G - 09/16/2024 v8
Daniel Schmidt

Chassis
91%
Keyboard
67 / 75 → 89%
Pointing Device
92%
Connectivity
63 / 69 → 91%
Weight
90%
Battery
90%
Display
90%
Games Performance
30 / 55 → 54%
Application Performance
74 / 85 → 87%
AI Performance
87%
Temperature
82%
Noise
100%
Audio
77 / 90 → 86%
Camera
82%
Average
82%
85%
Smartphone - Weighted Average
CO2 Emissions
93.6%
Materials
60%
Packaging
95%
Power Use
98.9%
Repairability
80%
Software Updates
100%
Recycle Logo Total Sustainability Score: 87.9%

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 三星Galaxy Z Flip6 5G 评测--无与伦比的翻盖手机不断进步
Daniel Schmidt, 2024-09-21 (Update: 2024-09-21)