摩托罗拉Moto E22i智能手机评测--花小钱办大事的特别手机
潜在的竞争对手比较
Bewertung | Datum | Modell | Gewicht | Laufwerk | Groesse | Aufloesung | Preis ab |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 75.4 % v7 (old) | 10 / 2022 | Motorola Moto E22i Helio G37, PowerVR GE8320 | 169 g | 32 GB eMMC Flash | 6.50" | 1600x720 | |
| 75.1 % v7 (old) | 09 / 2022 | Motorola Moto E32s Helio G37, PowerVR GE8320 | 185 g | 32 GB eMMC Flash | 6.50" | 1600x720 | |
| 76.6 % v7 (old) | 07 / 2022 | Xiaomi Redmi 10C SD 680, Adreno 610 | 190 g | 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | 6.71" | 1650x720 | |
| 74.8 % v7 (old) | 07 / 2022 | Realme Narzo 50i Prime T7225 (T612), Mali-G52 MP1 | 182 g | 32 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | 6.50" | 1600x720 |
外壳和功能 - 轻便和基本的IP认证
如果你不仔细看，很难将摩托罗拉今年的廉价智能手机区分开来。淘宝网上的 摩托E32, E32s以及我们将在此测试的Moto E22i，都采用了哑光背面，6.5英寸屏幕，尺寸也非常相似。
然而，Moto E22i更轻一些，也更纤细一些。它还有一个更前卫、对我们来说看起来更复杂的相机模块。这款手机的出厂价不到130欧元（约129美元），有灰色和白色两种颜色。
这款手机几乎不能被扭曲，也不会吱吱作响，但前面的玻璃不能很好地保护屏幕免受压力。IP52认证并不能说明防水性，但至少手机的防尘性能相当好。
目前，这款低价手机在欧洲只有一个存储版本：32GB的大容量存储和2GB的RAM。即使对于2022年的低价手机来说，这两样东西也是非常紧张的。NFC也不可用，所以不能使用谷歌支付等移动支付服务。
至少，除了2张SIM卡外，还可以将microSD卡插入手机中。然而，在我们用参考的microSD卡Angelbird V60进行的测试中，其读写速度比同类智能手机要慢一些。
| SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 10C (Angelbird V60) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (7.7 - 77, n=81, last 2 years) | |
| Realme Narzo 50i Prime (Angelbird V60) | |
| Motorola Moto E32s (Angelbird V60) | |
| Motorola Moto E22i (Angelbird V60) | |
Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)
通信、软件和操作 - 快速WLAN
我们不能抱怨Wi-Fi模块的问题。快速Wi-Fi 5还不是这个价格范围内所有制造商的标准，在我们与路由器华硕ROG Rapture AXE11000的测试中，数据速率非常稳定和快速。
摩托E22i是一款4G手机，拥有欧洲所需的所有频段。然而，在进一步出国旅行时，你必须检查目的地国家是否可以移动互联网接入 - 频率的选择不是特别多。在我们的信号强度测试中，摩托罗拉手机并不总是令人信服的。它从未完全失去与网络的联系，但它的接收能力比高质量的手机弱得多。
Android 12在Go版的智能手机上安装，所以稀缺的存储空间不应该被不必要的应用程序所堵塞。摩托罗拉在智能手机上安装了相当纯粹的 ，安全补丁是从2022年9月1日开始的，因此在测试的时候仍然是合理的最新版本。Android
由于这款廉价的手机有一个90赫兹的屏幕，在某些情况下，你可以很流畅地滚动菜单和网站，但由于SoC的性能很低，偶尔也会受到抽搐的干扰。指纹传感器位于外壳的右侧，并集成在备用按钮上。识别是可靠的，而且相当快。有趣的是，摩托罗拉不允许通过面部识别进行解锁。
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| Motorola Moto E22i | |
| Motorola Moto E32s | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 10C | |
| Realme Narzo 50i Prime | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Motorola Moto E22i | |
| Motorola Moto E32s | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 10C | |
| Realme Narzo 50i Prime | |
摄像机 - 单一的摄像机很难激发灵感
Moto E22i使用与Moto E32s相同的相机传感器。 摩托E32s海力士1643提供了1600万像素，在良好的照明条件下拍摄的照片具有良好的动态效果，尽管明亮的区域有点冲淡了。测试图在实验室中也显得曝光过度。细节也总是显得有些模糊。在低光下，增亮效果充其量是平庸的。
视频可以用1080p和30 fps录制。自动对焦通常工作可靠，但视频看起来总是有点模糊，就像静态照片一样。
前面有一个500万像素的摄像头。它在黑暗区域几乎无法处理任何细节，总体而言，照片看起来有点颗粒感，所以你不应该过多地放大它们。
Image Comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
Main camera FlowerMain camera EnvironmentMain camera Low Light
显示器 - 像素少，但90赫兹
该显示器的分辨率为1,600 x 720像素，但仍然很低。它支持60或90赫兹的帧率，即使在低亮度下也不会出现PWM闪烁。
屏幕的最大亮度相对较低，但低黑值允许更强的对比度和色彩。色彩再现的准确性也比同类智能手机要好，但我们仍然可以在灰度中检测到轻微的蓝色偏移。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 86 %
Center on Battery: 390 cd/m²
Contrast: 1625:1 (Black: 0.24 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.81 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 4.9 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
96.3% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.166
| Motorola Moto E22i IPS, 1600x720, 6.5" | Motorola Moto E32s IPS, 1600x720, 6.5" | Xiaomi Redmi 10C IPS, 1650x720, 6.7" | Realme Narzo 50i Prime IPS, 1600x720, 6.5" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Response Times | -8% | -7% | -3% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 34 ? | 30 ? 12% | 33 ? 3% | 34 ? -0% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 18 ? | 23 ? -28% | 21 ? -17% | 19 ? -6% |
| PWM Frequency | ||||
| Screen | -31% | 16% | -25% | |
| Brightness middle | 390 | 346 -11% | 511 31% | 365 -6% |
| Brightness | 355 | 330 -7% | 478 35% | 354 0% |
| Brightness Distribution | 86 | 90 5% | 84 -2% | 83 -3% |
| Black Level * | 0.24 | 0.47 -96% | 0.42 -75% | 0.45 -88% |
| Contrast | 1625 | 736 -55% | 1217 -25% | 811 -50% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 3.81 | 5.4 -42% | 1.51 60% | 4.58 -20% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 7.03 | 9 -28% | 2.53 64% | 8.81 -25% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 4.9 | 5.5 -12% | 2.9 41% | 5.2 -6% |
| Gamma | 2.166 102% | 2.874 77% | 2.266 97% | 2.28 96% |
| CCT | 7727 84% | 5971 109% | 6443 101% | 7929 82% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -20% /
-26% | 5% /
12% | -14% /
-20% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 18 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 10 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 8 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 36 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 34 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 19 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 15 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 42 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8706 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
性能、排放和电池寿命--作为瓶颈的Helio G37
芯片 联发科Helio G37已经被摩托罗拉安装在几款智能手机上，例如在 Moto G22或在 摩托E32s.到目前为止，即使在廉价的智能手机中，该SoC也不能给人留下深刻的印象；其性能实在太低。这也是Moto E22i的一个问题，因为基准测试显示红米10C或 realme Narzo 50i Prime也非常便宜，但功率更大。
即使就其本身而言，这款智能手机也非常慢，在运行要求较高的任务时几乎没有性能储备。加载时间相对较长，这也要归功于缓慢的内存，而且操作经常出现故障。至少，在长时间的负载下，智能手机几乎没有升温。
摩托罗拉可能在扬声器方面打了一个胜仗，因为在150欧元（约148美元）以下的手机中几乎找不到立体声扬声器。而事实上，Moto E22i的声音并不特别响亮，但总体上比同类手机要悦耳得多。尽管如此，只有通过3.5毫米插孔或蓝牙连接耳机或扬声器时，声音才会真正好听。无线传输的编解码器的多样性是可以接受的，例如，可以使用aptX HD。
电池相当小：摩托罗拉只提供4020毫安时，在我们的WLAN测试中只够运行12:33小时。这比同类手机要少得多。由于该智能手机的最大充电功率为10瓦，所以充满电仍然需要2个多小时。
| 3DMark | |
| 2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited | |
| Average of class Smartphone (883 - 23024, n=72, last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 10C | |
| Motorola Moto E32s | |
| Average Mediatek Helio G37 (895 - 921, n=3) | |
| Motorola Moto E22i | |
| 2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics | |
| Average of class Smartphone (840 - 45492, n=72, last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 10C | |
| Motorola Moto E32s | |
| Average Mediatek Helio G37 (838 - 853, n=3) | |
| Motorola Moto E22i | |
| 2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics | |
| Average of class Smartphone (1075 - 8749, n=72, last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 10C | |
| Motorola Moto E32s | |
| Average Mediatek Helio G37 (1173 - 1292, n=3) | |
| Motorola Moto E22i | |
| GFXBench | |
| on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | |
| Average of class Smartphone (3.6 - 166, n=206, last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 10C | |
| Realme Narzo 50i Prime | |
| Motorola Moto E32s | |
| Motorola Moto E22i | |
| Average Mediatek Helio G37 (7 - 7.9, n=4) | |
| 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | |
| Average of class Smartphone (2.3 - 321, n=206, last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 10C | |
| Realme Narzo 50i Prime | |
| Motorola Moto E32s | |
| Motorola Moto E22i | |
| Average Mediatek Helio G37 (4 - 4.2, n=4) | |
| on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | |
| Average of class Smartphone (0.85 - 144, n=207, last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 10C | |
| Realme Narzo 50i Prime | |
| Motorola Moto E32s | |
| Average Mediatek Helio G37 (4.9 - 5, n=4) | |
| Motorola Moto E22i | |
| 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | |
| Average of class Smartphone (0.85 - 129, n=207, last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 10C | |
| Realme Narzo 50i Prime | |
| Motorola Moto E32s | |
| Motorola Moto E22i | |
| Average Mediatek Helio G37 (1.5 - 1.5, n=4) | |
| Motorola Moto E22i | Motorola Moto E32s | Xiaomi Redmi 10C | Realme Narzo 50i Prime | Average 32 GB eMMC Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | -5% | 227% | 209% | -30% | 590% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB | 263.1 | 248.6 -6% | 927.7 253% | 658.2 150% | 242 ? -8% | 1894 ? 620% |
| Sequential Write 256KB | 189 | 184.3 -2% | 510.2 170% | 445.6 136% | 100.5 ? -47% | 1476 ? 681% |
| Random Read 4KB | 53.6 | 49.1 -8% | 120.2 124% | 161.8 202% | 43.2 ? -19% | 278 ? 419% |
| Random Write 4KB | 42.3 | 40 -5% | 195.2 361% | 189.8 349% | 22.4 ? -47% | 312 ? 638% |
温度
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 38.8 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 40.3 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 22 °C / 72 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
演讲者
Motorola Moto E22i audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 30.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.9% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (1.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 38% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 55% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 57% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 36% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Motorola Moto E32s audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 29.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.9% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 56% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 37% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 73% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 22% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
电池寿命
| Battery Runtime - WiFi Websurfing | |
| Average of class Smartphone (476 - 3244, n=208, last 2 years) | |
| Motorola Moto E32s | |
| Realme Narzo 50i Prime | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 10C | |
| Motorola Moto E22i | |
Pros
Cons
结论 - 这完全取决于要求
当然，摩托罗拉Moto E22i现在和将来都是一款非常便宜的手机，你必须降低你的期望。然而，它确实有其优势。这款手机很轻，比同类手机更紧凑一些，而且它的设计也不错。声音相当可接受的立体声扬声器在这个级别中很少见，90赫兹的显示屏也是如此。然而，后者只能很少显示其优势，因为一般系统性能太慢。
因此，我们只能重复我们对SoC的感叹，它也被用在其他一些廉价的摩托罗拉手机中。这款手机是 Helio G37没有提供足够的性能来完全流畅地运行，即使是系统中最基本的导航，Moto E22i也必须处理非常紧张的工作内存。
所以，这取决于你的优先事项和预算。缓慢的处理器会很快破坏手机的乐趣，但如果你正在寻找一款真正的廉价手机，有立体声扬声器和快速的屏幕，你可以冒险看看。然而，小电池和非常慢的充电技术也是令人讨厌的。
摩托罗拉Moto E22i在性能方面落后，但想用立体声扬声器和轻质结构来弥补。
第一个选择来自他们自己的公司。如果你不介意额外的重量，你可以得到 摩托E32你会得到更多的动力和更快的充电技术。这款手机 小米红米10C更胜一筹，拥有更多电量和电池性能，但只有60赫兹的显示屏。
价格和可用性
这款手机可直接从制造商处获得https://www.motorola.de/smartphones-moto-e-22-i/p#售价不到130欧元（约合129美元）。如果你想节省几欧元，在测试时，你可以在互联网上找到这款廉价的摩托罗拉手机，价格略微便宜。
Motorola Moto E22i
- 10/24/2022 v7 (old)
Florian Schmitt
Price comparison
