摩托罗拉 Moto G24 智能手机评测--配备 90 赫兹显示屏的迷人手机
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Drive | Size | Resolution | Price from |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 78.8 % v7 (old) | 05 / 2024 | Motorola Moto G24 Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2 | 181 g | 128 GB eMMC Flash | 6.56" | 1612x720 | |
| 79 % v7 (old) | 04 / 2024 | Motorola Moto G24 Power Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2 | 197 g | 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash | 6.56" | 1612x720 | |
| 77.7 % v7 (old) | 03 / 2024 | Xiaomi Redmi 13C Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2 | 192 g | 128 GB eMMC Flash | 6.74" | 1600x720 | |
| 77.2 % v7 (old) | 07 / 2023 | Nokia G11 Plus T7200, Mali-G57 MP1 | 192 g | 32 GB eMMC Flash | 6.52" | 1600x720 | |
| 80 % v7 (old) | 04 / 2024 | Samsung Galaxy A15 Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2 | 200 g | 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | 6.50" | 2340x1080 |
外壳和连接性 - 外观漂亮的塑料
Moto G24 秉承了摩托罗拉今年的设计理念，将手机的摄像头模块完美地整合到了手机壳的左上方：镜头周围的材料和颜色与外壳的其他部分相同，在平坦的背面和稍厚的相机模块之间的过渡处有一个轻微的弧度。所使用的材料是塑料，在黑色、浅绿色和玫瑰色三种颜色中都具有哑光光泽。
表壳非常稳固，只能在中间轻微凹陷。手机不可能扭转，受力也不会吱吱作响。制造商为这款手机提供了 IP52 认证，因此它可以抵御灰尘和飞溅的水，但不能浸入任何液体中。Moto G24 比 Moto G24 Power 稍微薄了一点，轻了 5 克。 Moto G24 Power总体而言，它是一款小巧的手机。
直到一年前，该价位手机的标准存储空间还非常小；而今年，128 GB 闪存已成为标准配置。8 GB 内存应该足以满足大多数应用的需求。幸运的是，Moto G24 还配备了 NFC 功能，因此您可以使用移动支付服务或与附近的其他设备进行交互。
我们的测试设备可以同时处理两张 SIM 卡，但不支持 eSIM。此外，还有一个独立的 microSD 卡插槽。在我们使用天使鸟 V60 作为参考卡进行的测试中，读卡器的工作速度相当快。
| SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Samsung Galaxy A15 (Angelbird V60) | |
| Motorola Moto G24 Power (Angelbird V60) | |
| Motorola Moto G24 (Angelbird V60) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 13C (Angelbird V60) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (7.7 - 77, n=78, last 2 years) | |
| Nokia G11 Plus (Angelbird V60) | |
Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)
通信、软件和操作 - 保证 3 年更新
Moto G24 不支持 5G，因此是一款纯 LTE 手机。我们测试设备的可用频率被限制在最低限度，以确保在中欧地区的运行，本次测试就是在中欧地区进行的。在世界其他地区购买的机型也是如此，只能使用当地的普通频率。如果你想在国外使用智能手机上网，那么你可能需要寻找一款不同的手机。
在我们使用几个随机样本进行的测试中，接收效果相当不错，但无法与高端智能手机相媲美。
在 Wi-Fi 方面，Moto G24 支持最快的 Wi-Fi 5 标准，因此可以达到预期的 300 - 350 MBit/s，这在同价位手机中是很常见的。即使多次重复测试，传输速度也相当稳定。
在软件方面，摩托罗拉安装了相当纯粹的Android 14，并通过 Moto 应用程序提供了附加功能。这样做很聪明，因为可以通过应用程序更新轻松添加其他功能。最新的安全补丁是从 2024 年 3 月开始的，因此在测试时仍然是合理的最新版本。摩托罗拉承诺每两个月更新一次，直到 2027 年 1 月。目前尚不清楚这款手机是否还会有其他操作系统版本。
这款手机通过了 DRM L1 认证，因此可以高清流畅地播放大多数主要供应商提供的内容。
它的屏幕每秒最多可显示 90 幅图像，这意味着它能对输入做出快速反应。触摸屏的工作非常精确，即使在边角位置也是如此。指纹传感器集成在机身右侧的待机键上。在保存一个或多个指纹后，它能非常精确地识别指纹，在解锁手机时只有极小的延迟。
面部识别也可以通过前置摄像头进行，无需额外的传感器。它也相当准确。在较暗的环境中，屏幕光线通常足以进行识别。
| Networking | |
| Motorola Moto G24 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Motorola Moto G24 Power | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 13C | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Nokia G11 Plus | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Samsung Galaxy A15 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
相机 - 照片质量尚可
摩托罗拉使用了三星的 5000 万像素传感器作为 Moto G24 的主摄像头，该摄像头通常只使用 1/4 的分辨率拍摄照片。这使得像素更大，光量也更大。
HDR 照片看起来比较平庸；前景中的植物仍然很暗，而明亮的背景则很容易辨认。相机的整体图像清晰度并不是最好的；照片中周围环境的阳光照射区域略微过亮，但整体看起来还可以。
在弱光和高对比度环境下，图片增亮效果不错，但清晰度明显下降。如果画面中没有光源，手机摄像头就无法在弱光条件下充分增亮画面。
视频最高可录制 1080p 和 30fps。自动对焦速度相当快，但并不总是在无形中工作。
该设备还配备了一个微距镜头，可拍摄极致的特写镜头，但分辨率非常低，仅为 200 万像素。快照看起来还可以接受，但照片不宜放大太多。
前置自拍摄像头的分辨率为 800 万像素，在光线充足的情况下也能拍出不错的照片。照片的亮度可以更好一些，但可以放大照片而不会损失太多质量。
Image Comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
Main camera plantMain camera surroundingsMain camera low light
显示屏 - 90 赫兹，但有蓝色色调
屏幕与 Moto G24 Power:1,612 x 720 像素的分辨率在同价位产品中并不罕见，但仍然偏低。与类似尺寸的全高清屏幕相比，字体尤其显得模糊。
它的最大亮度约为 510 cd/m²，因此也可以在稍亮的环境中使用，但在阳光直射的情况下，由于反光，几乎无法看到任何东西。
在使用 CalMAN 软件和分光光度计测试屏幕时，我们发现了明显的蓝色色调。特别是强烈的红色色调会因此而有些失真，显示屏总体上看起来相当冷。
即使在低亮度下，我们也没有发现 PWM 闪烁。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 93 %
Center on Battery: 521 cd/m²
Contrast: 1336:1 (Black: 0.39 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.83 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 5.3 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
94.1% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.111
| Motorola Moto G24 IPS, 1612x720, 6.6" | Motorola Moto G24 Power IPS, 1612x720, 6.6" | Xiaomi Redmi 13C IPS, 1600x720, 6.7" | Nokia G11 Plus IPS, 1600x720, 6.5" | Samsung Galaxy A15 Super AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.5" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Response Times | -21% | -31% | -18% | 93% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 36 ? | 39 ? -8% | 44.9 ? -25% | 47.7 ? -33% | 2 ? 94% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 21.4 ? | 28.6 ? -34% | 29.2 ? -36% | 21.8 ? -2% | 1.7 ? 92% |
| PWM Frequency | 187 | ||||
| Screen | -6% | 3% | -19% | 42% | |
| Brightness middle | 521 | 499 -4% | 430 -17% | 395 -24% | 731 40% |
| Brightness | 510 | 497 -3% | 424 -17% | 385 -25% | 711 39% |
| Brightness Distribution | 93 | 93 0% | 92 -1% | 94 1% | 93 0% |
| Black Level * | 0.39 | 0.49 -26% | 0.28 28% | 0.3 23% | |
| Contrast | 1336 | 1018 -24% | 1536 15% | 1317 -1% | |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.83 | 4.82 -0% | 4.06 16% | 6.21 -29% | 2.31 52% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 7.71 | 7.76 -1% | 8.11 -5% | 10.61 -38% | 3.51 54% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 5.3 | 4.7 11% | 5 6% | 8.3 -57% | 1.7 68% |
| Gamma | 2.111 104% | 2.073 106% | 2.35 94% | 2.639 83% | 2.091 105% |
| CCT | 7021 93% | 7445 87% | 7813 83% | 7999 81% | 6424 101% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -14% /
-9% | -14% /
-4% | -19% /
-19% | 68% /
55% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 21.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 13 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 8.4 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 43 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 36 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 19.9 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 16.1 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 46 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8746 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
性能、排放和电池寿命 - 扬声器性能好，运行时间长
A 联发科 Helio G85作为手机的 SoC。在这个价位的手机中，联发科 Helio G85 很受欢迎，小米红米 13C 也采用了联发科 Helio G85。 小米红米 13C为例。这款处理器的性能绝非奇迹，但在大多数情况下足以流畅地浏览设备菜单。不过，更复杂的应用程序会暴露出它的性能极限。三星 三星Galaxy A15 4G为例，它的功耗明显更高。
这颗 SoC 处理复杂图形的能力也不强，但在这个价位的手机中，这并不是意料之中的事。令人讨厌的是，摩托罗拉还选择使用非常慢的存储设备：虽然 eMMC 闪存是廉价手机的标准配置，但摩托罗拉的 Galaxy A15 4G显示，速度更快的存储模块可以缩短加载时间，使系统更加流畅。
经过 1 小时的压力测试后，我们测量了 Moto G24 的表面温度。结果是：39.1 °C是我们注意到的最高值--这很明显，但并不严重。不过，我们是在室温下测量的，因此在夏天或炎热的环境中温度可能会更高。即使在长时间满载的情况下，SoC 的性能也不会受到影响。
手机底部边缘的扬声器无需单独工作，因为它得到了手机听筒的支持，使立体声成为可能。就同价位的手机而言，音质相当不错，甚至还能听到一些中低音。外接音频设备可通过 3.5 毫米音频插孔或蓝牙连接。有多种编解码器可用于无线音频传输，包括 LDAC 等支持高重音的编解码器和 Opus 等更奇特的编解码器。
手机的 5,000 毫安时电池比 Moto G24 Power 少了 1,000 毫安时。 Moto G24 Power.这在我们的无线局域网测试中非常明显：它的运行时间缩短了 2 个多小时，但与其他同类产品相比仍算不错。连续使用 16:09 小时而无需充电，这应该足以满足日常使用需求。
值得注意的是，它的充电速度比 Moto G24 Power充电速度有所降低，最大功率仅为 15 瓦。这意味着再次充满电最多需要 2:30 小时。
| Motorola Moto G24 | Motorola Moto G24 Power | Xiaomi Redmi 13C | Nokia G11 Plus | Samsung Galaxy A15 | Average 128 GB eMMC Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | 5% | 5% | -13% | 162% | -17% | 364% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB | 291.9 | 297 2% | 300.2 3% | 270.6 -7% | 967.8 232% | 283 ? -3% | 1839 ? 530% |
| Sequential Write 256KB | 252 | 253.2 0% | 179.4 -29% | 196 -22% | 488.5 94% | 194.6 ? -23% | 1425 ? 465% |
| Random Read 4KB | 86.3 | 100 16% | 101.5 18% | 81.5 -6% | 233.2 170% | 82.7 ? -4% | 277 ? 221% |
| Random Write 4KB | 90.9 | 92.2 1% | 114.8 26% | 77.1 -15% | 229.6 153% | 55.1 ? -39% | 309 ? 240% |
温度
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 38.8 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 39.1 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 22.8 °C / 73 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
3DMark Wild Life Stress Test
发言人
Motorola Moto G24 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.6% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.6% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 51% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 40% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 69% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 24% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Samsung Galaxy A15 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 28.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 42% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 51% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 61% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 33% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
运行时间
| Battery Runtime - WiFi Websurfing | |
| Motorola Moto G24 Power | |
| Nokia G11 Plus | |
| Average of class Smartphone (476 - 3244, n=203, last 2 years) | |
| Motorola Moto G24 | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 13C | |
| Samsung Galaxy A15 | |
Pros
Cons
评价--简单而有吸引力
摩托罗拉 Moto G24 本身就是一款不错的经济型手机，它拥有明亮的显示屏、不错的摄像头、良好的扬声器音效以及适合日常使用的运行时间。不过，它也面临着一些强大的内部竞争：Moto G24 Power。 Moto G24 Power电池容量更大、充电速度更快、存储空间更大。
不过，如果你满足于较少的功能并想节省几块钱，Moto G24 的整体配置还是不错的，包括 NFC、90 Hz 显示屏和做工精良的时尚外壳，颜色时尚但不刺眼。
就性能而言，你不应该把期望值定得太高，但整个价位的手机都是如此。如果你主要是写信息、上网和打电话，那么 Moto G24 就完全足够了。
Moto G24 是一款功能简单、价格低廉的手机，不仅功能齐全，外壳也很吸引人。
另一个选择是 三星Galaxy A15 4G现在这款手机的价格非常便宜，而且性能要好得多。
价格和供应情况
摩托罗拉 Moto G24 目前在亚马逊上的售价为195 美元。
Motorola Moto G24
- 05/08/2024 v7 (old)
Florian Schmitt
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.
Price comparison
