摩托罗拉 Moto G24 Power 评测--一款经济实惠、电池寿命长的手机
潜在的竞争对手比较
Bewertung | Datum | Modell | Gewicht | Laufwerk | Groesse | Aufloesung | Preis ab |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 79 % v7 (old) | 04 / 2024 | Motorola Moto G24 Power Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2 | 197 g | 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash | 6.56" | 1612x720 | |
| 80 % v7 (old) | 04 / 2024 | Samsung Galaxy A15 Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2 | 200 g | 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | 6.50" | 2340x1080 | |
| 80.2 % v7 (old) | 02 / 2024 | Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G SD 685, Adreno 610 | 188.5 g | 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | 6.67" | 2400x1080 | |
| 81.9 % v7 (old) | 03 / 2024 | Motorola Moto G34 SD 695 5G, Adreno 619 | 179 g | 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash | 6.50" | 1600x720 |
外壳和规格 - 结构合理，不厚重
除了标准版 Moto G24 外，摩托罗拉还推出了 G24 Power，这款手机以更大的电池容量脱颖而出。今天，我们将近距离了解这款手机。
两款手机有一些不同之处：Power 机型厚 1 毫米（约 0.04 英寸），重 16 克（0.56 盎司），但充电速度快一倍，电池容量多 1000 毫安时。
机身由哑光塑料制成，有浅蓝和深蓝两种颜色可供选择。左上角略微突出的摄像头模块与设计有机地融为一体，并采用了柔和的弧形过渡，使该设备的外观和质感极具质感。
边框同样与显示屏模块天衣无缝地融为一体，相当薄的屏幕边框使 G24 Power 看起来非常时尚。机身的坚固程度给我们留下了深刻印象：扭动手机不会导致吱吱作响或任何移动；同样，你必须施加非常强大的力量才能影响显示屏中的液晶。
这款摩托罗拉手机甚至还通过了 IP 认证，尽管认证等级仅为 IP52。这意味着该设备可以很好地防尘，但只能承受水滴。
与 Moto G24 不同的是，Moto G24 Power 配备了 256 GB 存储空间和 8 GB 内存，因此在这方面的规格更高。这款手机的价格约为 190 欧元（195 美元），而且只有这种存储和内存配置。
3.5 毫米音频插孔可让你插入一副耳机。您还可以使用 NFC 读取标签并进行无线支付。除了两个 nano-SIM 卡插槽外，SIM 卡托盘还能容纳一张 microSD 卡。但你不能在这款经济型手机上添加任何 eSIM 配置文件。
我们用参考 microSD（Angelbird V60）对读卡器进行了测试，发现它的传输速度与同类手机相当。尽管如此，它并没有充分发挥该卡的潜力。
| SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Samsung Galaxy A15 (Angelbird V60) | |
| Motorola Moto G34 (Angelbird V60) | |
| Motorola Moto G24 Power (Angelbird V60) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (7.7 - 77, n=76, last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G (Angelbird V60) | |
Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)
连接、软件和操作 -Android 14，3 年更新一次
Wi-Fi 5 是摩托罗拉 Moto G24 Power 支持的最快无线标准。在使用我们的参考路由器（华硕 ROG Rapture AXE11000）进行的测试中，这款智能手机的速度通常在 290 到 350 Mbit/s 之间。在测试过程中，传输速率也非常稳定。
Moto G24 Power 是一款 LTE 手机，因此无法使用目前最快的蜂窝标准 5G。我们的评测机支持在欧洲中部使用的最基本频率，但仅此而已。如果您打算去更远的地方旅行，有必要检查一下 Moto G24 Power 是否能在相应的国家访问移动互联网。
Android Moto G24 Power 预装了 14，而且是相当原版的，这意味着制造商没有对用户界面进行任何改动。所有特殊功能都可以在 Moto 应用程序中找到。我们的评测机在评测期间收到了 2024 年 3 月的安全补丁，因此保持了最新状态。摩托罗拉甚至承诺每两个月提供一次安全更新，直到 2027 年 1 月。至于这款手机最终会有多少个新的操作系统版本，我们拭目以待。
90Hz 的触摸屏使用起来非常准确可靠，即使在边缘和角落也是如此。物理音量键和电源键位于机身右侧。后者内置了指纹传感器，解锁时延迟很短，非常可靠。手机还提供人脸识别解锁功能，但它使用的是 2D 方法，因此不太安全。
| Networking | |
| Motorola Moto G24 Power | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Samsung Galaxy A15 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Motorola Moto G34 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
摄像头 - 清晰的图像质量
摩托罗拉为主摄像头配备了 5000 万像素的三星传感器，通常只使用四分之一的分辨率来拍摄照片。这就有效地增大了像素，从而提高了感光度。对于这个价位的手机来说，使用该相机拍摄的照片非常典型：色彩尚可，但在极亮或极暗的区域并不总是有完美的动态范围。总体而言，清晰度还可以更高；在放大图片或使用数码变焦时，这一点尤为明显。
总体而言，照片的细节表现不错，即使是戏剧性的天空也能很好地呈现在周围环境的照片中。在光线不足和对比度较高的情况下，清晰度会有所下降，但图像增亮处理得当。尽管如此，该款相机却完全无能为力，在光照度为 1 勒克斯、图像中没有任何光源的情况下，无法检测到任何东西。
该手机能以高达 1080p 和 30 fps 的速度录制视频。自动对焦速度较快，但在录制过程中有时会出现追焦现象。
背面还有一个微距镜头，可进行超近距离拍摄。该镜头的分辨率很低，仅为 200 万像素，但可用于快照。
前置 800 万像素摄像头可在光线良好的环境中拍摄出漂亮的自拍照。图像增亮效果可以稍好一些，但使用该摄像头拍摄的照片可以放大而不会有太大的质量损失。
Image Comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
Main camera: plantMain camera: surroundingsMain camera: low-light
显示屏 - Moto G24 Power 的像素较低
IPS 显示屏是 Moto G24 Power 明显削减成本的一个方面：该面板的分辨率仅为 1,612 x 720，低于许多同价位设备的分辨率。此外，Moto G24 Power 的 AMOLED 屏幕 三星Galaxy A15 4G和 小米Redmi Note 13 4G更亮，因此更适合户外使用。
尽管如此，Moto G24 Power 显示屏的平均峰值亮度为 497 cd/m²，在许多情况下仍然足够明亮。遗憾的是，显示屏上的黑色区域亮度也略高，这导致它们看起来更灰暗，对比度也更低。
我们注意到显示屏有明显的蓝色调，给人一种冷色调。你可以使用可用设置在一定程度上抵消这种影响。
我们没有发现任何 PWM 闪烁。对闪烁比较敏感的用户在使用这款手机时应该不会有任何问题。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 93 %
Center on Battery: 499 cd/m²
Contrast: 1018:1 (Black: 0.49 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.82 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 4.7 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
94.2% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.073
| Motorola Moto G24 Power IPS, 1612x720, 6.6" | Samsung Galaxy A15 Super AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.5" | Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.7" | Motorola Moto G34 IPS, 1600x720, 6.5" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Response Times | 95% | 94% | -36% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 39 ? | 2 ? 95% | 2.2 ? 94% | 71.3 ? -83% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 28.6 ? | 1.7 ? 94% | 1.6 ? 94% | 25.5 ? 11% |
| PWM Frequency | 187 | 389.2 | ||
| Screen | 43% | 66% | 20% | |
| Brightness middle | 499 | 731 46% | 940 88% | 523 5% |
| Brightness | 497 | 711 43% | 922 86% | 512 3% |
| Brightness Distribution | 93 | 93 0% | 96 3% | 95 2% |
| Black Level * | 0.49 | 0.47 4% | ||
| Contrast | 1018 | 1113 9% | ||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.82 | 2.31 52% | 1.2 75% | 1.89 61% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 7.76 | 3.51 55% | 2.28 71% | 4.63 40% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 4.7 | 1.7 64% | 1.4 70% | 3.1 34% |
| Gamma | 2.073 106% | 2.091 105% | 2.27 97% | 2.262 97% |
| CCT | 7445 87% | 6424 101% | 6503 100% | 6471 100% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 69% /
56% | 80% /
73% | -8% /
9% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 28.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 15.8 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 12.8 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 73 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 39 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 22.1 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 16.9 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 55 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
性能、排放和电池寿命--耐力是优势
Moto G24 Power 的性能由 联发科SoC 驱动。这款手机在基准测试中的表现相当令人失望：在我们的对比中，它的性能落后于许多同价位的设备。虽然在大多数情况下你都能顺利浏览菜单，但要求稍高的任务往往会出现卡顿和等待时间。
在浏览网页时，你可能会发现大型网站的加载时间相当长，而且在滚动时，图片的显示往往需要一定的时间。这很可能也是由于板载的 eMMC 闪存速度较慢，在速度方面无法与对比设备中的任何存储解决方案相提并论。
即使在长时间负载后，机箱的最高温度仍低于 40°C（104°F），这并不令人担忧。3DMark 压力测试表明，即使在长时间负载的情况下，SoC 也没有出现节流现象。
Moto G24 Power 在底部边缘使用了专用扬声器，并通过耳部扬声器产生立体声音效。扬声器的音量足以在中等大小的房间内使用。它们的声音很好听，还能提供一些深沉的中音，但你不应该对它们的低音抱有期望。通过 3.5 毫米插孔或蓝牙连接扬声器或耳机，大多能获得更饱满的音效。无线音频有许多编解码器可供选择，包括高保真选项和 Opus 和 LHDC 等更奇特的编解码器。
6,000 毫安时电池是 Moto G24 Power 的一大亮点。我们的电池测试也证明了这一点：在显示屏亮度设定的情况下，该手机通过 Wi-Fi 浏览网页的续航时间达到了令人印象深刻的 18 小时 23 分钟，远远超过了我们对比的所有其他设备。由于手机的充电功率高达 30 瓦，因此完全充满电池不超过两小时。
| Motorola Moto G24 Power | Samsung Galaxy A15 | Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G | Motorola Moto G34 | Average 256 GB eMMC 5.1 Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | 150% | 142% | 90% | -19% | 355% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB | 297 | 967.8 226% | 909.8 206% | 524.1 76% | 272 ? -8% | 1867 ? 529% |
| Sequential Write 256KB | 253.2 | 488.5 93% | 606.3 139% | 495 95% | 221 ? -13% | 1451 ? 473% |
| Random Read 4KB | 100 | 233.2 133% | 177.1 77% | 192.1 92% | 81.3 ? -19% | 279 ? 179% |
| Random Write 4KB | 92.2 | 229.6 149% | 228 147% | 180.2 95% | 61 ? -34% | 311 ? 237% |
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 39.6 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 38.1 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.2 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
3DMark Wild Life Stress Test
Motorola Moto G24 Power audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 37% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 55% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 56% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 36% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Motorola Moto G34 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 34.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.7% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.2% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (26.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 65% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 29% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 80% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 16% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| Battery Runtime - WiFi Websurfing | |
| Motorola Moto G24 Power | |
| Motorola Moto G34 | |
| Average of class Smartphone (476 - 3244, n=203, last 2 years) | |
| Samsung Galaxy A15 | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G | |
Pros
Cons
结论 - 持久耐用，但性能欠佳
摩托罗拉 Moto G24 Power 有很多值得称道的地方：例如，时尚的机身和材料之间的无缝衔接，或者大容量电池在不增加过多重量或体积的情况下提供了较长的续航时间。除此以外，你还能获得Android ，据说还有三年的安全更新、不错的扬声器、不闪烁的显示屏，以及同类手机中速度最快的充电技术。
丰富的存储空间同样是一大亮点，甚至可以通过 microSD 插槽进行扩展。Moto G24 Power 还配备了 NFC 功能，这在经济型中端手机中并不常见。
尽管如此，Moto G24 Power 可能并不适合所有人，因为它的显示屏只有 720p 分辨率，色彩还原的准确度也不高。从手机的性能上也可以看出削减成本的措施：与同价位的设备相比，处理器和存储设备都显得相当迟缓。
Moto G24 Power 的售价不到 200 欧元（195 美元），在时尚的机身内提供了超长的电池续航时间和充足的存储空间。不过，制造商在显示屏和性能方面有所欠缺。
在此之前，我们先来看看其他的替代产品：如果你想继续使用摩托罗拉的产品，可以选择 摩托 G34可在不明显影响电池续航时间的情况下增强性能。三星 三星Galaxy A15 4G也能提供不错的续航时间，而且还配备了 AMOLED 屏幕。
Motorola Moto G24 Power
- 04/25/2024 v7 (old)
Florian Schmitt
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.
Price comparison
