Notebookcheck Logo
Nothing Phone (3a) (image: Daniel Schmidt)

优雅的多功能手机，按键一应俱全 - Nothing Phone (3a) 评测

多了一个人工智能按钮。

为什么要花 380 多美元购买智能手机？只需花这个价钱，你就能买到拥有出色日常性能、超长运行时间、6 年更新、120 赫兹 AMOLED 屏幕和独特 Glyph 设计的 Nothing Phone (3a)。它还配备了变焦摄像头，这在中端手机中实属罕见。
Manuel Masiero, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
5G Android Smartphone Touchscreen

关于 "Nothing Phone "的评语 (3a)

Nothing Phone (3a) 绝不是功能怪兽，但它是目前 400 美元以内价位的智能手机中最好的一款。它搭载的骁龙 7s Gen 3 处理器足以轻松胜任日常任务，在游戏方面也有足够的储备。它的其他优势还包括：高质量的外观（包括玻璃后壳和 Glyph 界面）、出色的摄像头、非常流畅的 Nothing OS 以及超长的电池寿命和快速充电。6 年更新保证也是一个值得欢迎的亮点。

不过，如果你想要更好的相机，Nothing Phone (3a) Pro 及其 3 倍远摄变焦可能更适合你。这款手机的人工智能功能不应成为您是否购买它的主要因素，因为它们仍处于测试阶段。

Pros

+ 独特设计和玻璃后壳
+ 响应系统
+ IP64 认证
+ 明亮的 120 赫兹显示屏
+ 出色的主摄像头
+ 6 年安全更新
+ 超长运行时间和快速充电

Cons

- 人工智能功能仍在测试阶段
- 不完全防水
- 不支持 eSIM 卡
- 不支持无线充电
- 不含电源

价格和供应情况

您目前可以通过 Nothing 的在线商店购买 Nothing Phone (3a)，价格为$379。.

Nothing 发布了新版中档智能手机。Nothing Phone (3a) 取代了 Nothing Phone (2a)并拥有所有典型的 Nothing 标志，即 Glyph 界面和透明背面。继任机型在两个方面进行了改进：摄像头和人工智能。

它的摄像头组合增加了一个镜头，这意味着除了主镜头和超广角镜头外，Nothing Phone（3a）现在还有一个带 2 倍光学变焦的长焦摄像头。与Apple 类似，也有一个新的物理按键。它被命名为 "Essential Key"，位于电源键旁边，能让 Nothing Phone (3a) 的人工智能功能发挥到极致。

规格

Nothing Phone (3a) (Phone Series)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3 8 x 1.8 - 2.6 GHz, Cortex-A720 / A520
Graphics adapter
Qualcomm Adreno 810
Memory
12 GB 
, LPDDR5X
Display
6.77 inch 19.9:9, 2392 x 1080 pixel 387 PPI, capacitive, AMOLED, 1000 Hz touch sampling rate, 3000 nits maximum brightness, Panda Glass, glossy: yes, HDR, 120 Hz
Storage
256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash, 256 GB 
, 230 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: USB-C, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.4, 2G (850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz), 3G (Band 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 8, 19), 4G (Band 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66), 5G (Band n1, n2, n3, n5, n7, n8, n12, n20, n28, n38, n40, n41, n48, n66, n77, n78), 4x4 MIMO, Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 8.35 x 163.52 x 77.5
Battery
5000 mAh Lithium-Ion
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 15
Camera
Primary Camera: 50 MPix (f/1.88, 1/1.57" sensor, 84,5° FOV, OIS & EIS, AF, 24mm) + 50MP telephoto camera (2x optical zoom, f/2.0, 1/2.75" sensor, 49,5° FOV, EIS, AF, 50mm) + 8MP ultrawide camera (f/2.2, 1/4" sensor, 120° FOV, 15mm)
Secondary Camera: 32 MPix f/2.2, 1/3.44" sensor, 89° FOV, 22mm
Additional features
Speakers: stereo, Keyboard: virtual, USB-C cable, SIM tool, safety information, NothingOS 3.1, 24 Months Warranty, 50W max. charging speed; Head SAR 0.99 W/kg, Body SAR 1.29 W/kg; GPS: GPS (L1), Glonass (L1), Beidou (B1), Galilei (E1), QZSS (L1); Bluetooth Codecs: SBC, AAC, aptX, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, aptX TWS+, LDAC, LC3, LHDC V1/V2/V3/V5, Opus, fanless
Weight
201 g
Links
Nothing homepage
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

外壳 - 带玻璃后壳的 Nothing Phone (3a)

Nothing Phone (3a)保留了其设计语言，因为它再次采用了透明的背面，现在由玻璃而不是塑料制成。与 Nothing Phone（2a）不同的是，它获得了 IP64 认证，这意味着这款智能手机的防水性能大大提高--尽管它并非完全防水。

透明的背面下是 Glyph 界面，与 Nothing Phone (2a) 相比，该界面略有改动。 Nothing Phone (2a)相比，Glyph 界面略有改动，但仍由三个 LED 灯条组成。背面的其他设计这次没有采用纽约地铁地图的外观，而是从日本获得了灵感。另一个新功能是电源键旁边的第二个按钮，可用于激活人工智能功能。正面和背面由坚固的铝制边框连接。

Nothing Phone (3a) 的重量为 201 克，比上一代产品略重。这主要是因为它的尺寸略大，因为手机的 AMOLED 面板从 6.7 英寸增大到了 6.77 英寸。除了我们测试设备的白色配色外，您还可以选择蓝色和黑色。

Nothing Phone (3a)（图片来源：Manuel Masiero）
Nothing Phone (3a)（图片来源：Manuel Masiero）
Nothing Phone (3a)（图片来源：Manuel Masiero）
Nothing Phone (3a)（图片来源：Manuel Masiero）
Nothing Phone (3a)（图片来源：Manuel Masiero）
Nothing Phone (3a)（图片来源：Manuel Masiero）
无手机（3a）（图片来源：Daniel Schmidt）
无手机（3a）（图片来源：Daniel Schmidt）
无手机（3a）（图片来源：Daniel Schmidt）
无手机（3a）（图片来源：Daniel Schmidt）

尺寸比较

❌
166.1 mm 77.2 mm 8.3 mm 205 g163.52 mm 77.5 mm 8.35 mm 201 g162.33 mm 74.42 mm 8.4 mm 185.5 g162.4 mm 75.7 mm 7.99 mm 190 g161.74 mm 76.32 mm 8.55 mm 190 g161.7 mm 78 mm 8.2 mm 209 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g

连接性 - Nothing 手机最高支持 12GB RAM 和 256GB 存储空间

在本次测试所在的 DACH 地区，Nothing Phone (3a) 有两种内存/存储版本，即 8 GB 内存和 128 GB 存储，以及 12 + 256 GB。在印度，Nothing 还销售第三种 8 + 256 GB 的智能手机。

在其他功能方面，Nothing Phone（3a）从 Nothing Phone (2a)但使用了最新的蓝牙版本，即蓝牙 5.4。它的 SIM 卡插槽可插入两张 nano SIM 卡，但不能激活 eSIM 卡。手机的 USB-C 端口以 USB 2.0 的速度运行，使用我们的外置三星 PSSD T7 参考固态硬盘，数据吞吐量达到 28.1 MB/s。

左：音量摇杆（图片来源：Manuel Masiero）
左：音量摇杆（图片来源：Manuel Masiero）
右：基本键，电源按钮（图片来源：Manuel Masiero）
右：基本键，电源按钮（图片来源：Manuel Masiero）
上图：麦克风（图片来源：Manuel Masiero）
上图：麦克风（图片来源：Manuel Masiero）
底部：双 SIM 卡、麦克风、USB-C 2.0、扬声器（图片来源：Manuel Masiero）
底部：双 SIM 卡、麦克风、USB-C 2.0、扬声器（图片来源：Manuel Masiero）

软件 - 配备本地人工智能助手的 Nothing Phone (3a)

Nothing Phone (3a) 运行基于Android 15 的 Nothing OS 3.1。在操作方式上，它与Android 几乎没有区别，但在黑白设计和像素外观上却有自己的特色。如果需要，您可以随时切换到经典的Android 外观。

背面的 Glyph 界面由三个 LED 灯条组成，可以显示通知、来电和计时器等信息。用户可以对显示的内容进行详细配置。

位于电源键旁边的 Essential Key 可以调用 Essential Space。这是一个人工智能中心，旨在帮助用户处理日常事务。如果您按一次 Essential 键，智能手机就会截图，您可以在截图中添加文字或语音备忘录。然后，应用程序会自动分析信息，将其保存在 "必要空间 "中，并提醒用户即将到来的约会或有趣的产品等。

如果按两下 "基本键"，就可以直接切换到 "基本中心"，在那里可以浏览迄今为止添加的所有内容。Essential Space 与云无关，因为它在本地运行。它目前仍处于测试阶段，但在我们的测试中，它能听懂我们的德语。现在还可以添加摄像头记录。未来几个月还将推出其他中心功能，如图像、文本和音频编目功能。

Nothing 将为其智能手机提供 3 年的Android 升级。Android 安全更新将提供 6 年。

无电话 (3a)
无电话 (3a)
无电话 (3a)
无电话 (3a)
无电话 (3a)
无电话 (3a)

可持续性

据悉，Nothing Phone (3a) 的碳足迹为 51.3 千克二氧化碳，是迄今为止最具可持续性的 Nothing 智能手机。它的铝框架由 100% 的回收铝制成。六块电路板由 100% 的回收锡制成。Nothing表示，85%的钢材都是回收的。据说超过 60% 的塑料部件来自可持续来源。

Nothing 不提供 Nothing Phone (3a) 的备件或维修手册。不过，智能手机可以直接送到制造商处维修。

通信和全球导航卫星系统 - 配备 WiFi 6 和精确 GPS 的 Nothing Phone (3a)

Nothing Phone (3a) 支持多种 5G 频率。它通过 WiFi 6 连接到 2.4 GHz 和 5 GHz WLAN 网络。连接到我们的参考路由器华硕 ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000，它实现了快速且基本稳定的传输速率，峰值达到 938 Mb/s。

Networking
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Nothing Phone (3a)
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
938 (466min - 956max) MBit/s
Average 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
  (305 - 1757, n=136)
864 MBit/s -8%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
834 (780min - 913max) MBit/s -11%
Average of class Smartphone
  (49.8 - 1806, n=189, last 2 years)
726 MBit/s -23%
Nothing Phone (2a)
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
680 (417min - 860max) MBit/s -28%
Xiaomi Poco X7
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
398 (193min - 410max) MBit/s -58%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
373 (183min - 385max) MBit/s -60%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Nothing Phone (3a)
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
831 (777min - 861max) MBit/s
Average 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
  (234 - 1696, n=134)
831 MBit/s 0%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
830 (758min - 851max) MBit/s 0%
Nothing Phone (2a)
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
782 (633min - 873max) MBit/s -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (52 - 1857, n=187, last 2 years)
712 MBit/s -14%
Xiaomi Poco X7
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
377 (187min - 380max) MBit/s -55%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
351 (340min - 366max) MBit/s -58%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
Average of class Smartphone
  (521 - 1945, n=82, last 2 years)
1437 MBit/s
Average 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
  (614 - 1902, n=21)
1256 MBit/s
Nothing Phone (2a)
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
872 (464min - 957max) MBit/s
Motorola Moto G75
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
614 (224min, 294.76P1 - 786max) MBit/s
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
Motorola Moto G75
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
1434 (1076min, 1112.83P1 - 1626max) MBit/s
Average of class Smartphone
  (451 - 1864, n=82, last 2 years)
1367 MBit/s
Average 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
  (743 - 1816, n=21)
1228 MBit/s
Nothing Phone (2a)
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
914 (902min - 925max) MBit/s
050100150200250300350400450500550600650700750800850900950Tooltip
Nothing Phone (3a) 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø923 (466-956)
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø834 (780-913)
Nothing Phone (3a) 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø830 (777-861)
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø829 (758-851)
室内 GPS 接收
室内 GPS 接收
外部 GPS 接收
外部 GPS 接收

Nothing Phone (3a) 通过卫星导航服务 GPS、Glonass、Beidou、Galileo 和 QZSS 确定当前位置，每种服务都以单频模式运行。在步行 3.5 公里多一点的路程中，这款智能手机与 Garmin Venu 2 健身智能手表一样精确地确定了我们的位置，因此非常适合导航用途。

GPS 测试：总结
GPS 测试：总结
GPS 测试：路线
GPS 测试：路线
GPS 测试：池塘
GPS 测试：池塘

电话功能和通话质量 - 不支持 eSIM 的 Nothing Phone (3a)

Nothing Phone (3a) 支持 VoLTE 和 Wi-Fi 通话，但不支持 eSIM。

它能提供良好的通话质量，并能有效抑制环境噪音。在扬声器模式下，它也能可靠地工作，不过在测试过程中，我们经常不得不把声音说得大一些，否则我们的声音就会显得太小，无法与对方通话。

摄像头 - 三摄像头，带 2 倍光学变焦和 Glyph 摄影辅助功能

使用自拍相机拍摄的照片
使用自拍相机拍摄的照片

与前代产品一样，Nothing Phone (3a) 配备了 3200 万像素自拍摄像头，成像质量良好，在人像模式下可实现逼真的虚化效果。它可以每秒 60 帧的速度录制高达 1080p 的视频。

Nothing Phone (3a) 不再像 Nothing Phone (2a) 一样采用双摄像头，而是采用了三传感器。它的新功能是具有 2 倍光学变焦的 5000 万像素长焦镜头。主摄像头的分辨率仍为 5000 万像素，而超广角镜头则从 5000 万像素降至 800 万像素。

在日光下，Nothing Phone (3a) 为我们带来了精美的照片。虽然这些照片还没有达到旗舰机的质量，但对于这个价位的手机来说已经非常不错了。图像的清晰度很好，色彩也很清晰，不会显得不真实。即使在光线不足的情况下，主摄像头也能拍出不错的照片。Glyph 界面可用于提亮拍摄对象。

2 倍远摄变焦可捕捉大量细节，放大倍率可达 5 倍，从而扩展了拍照功能。不过，超过这个倍率后，照片很快就会变得模糊，尤其是使用 30 倍的最大变焦级别时。该手机的超广角镜头是其相机组合中最弱的一个，因为其分辨率仅为 800 万像素，拍摄的可能性非常有限。它的图像不是特别清晰，而且边缘噪点较多。

该设备的主摄像头和长焦摄像头能以每秒 30 帧的速度录制高达 4K 的优质视频。如果需要 60fps，则只能录制 1080p。

使用主相机拍摄的照片
使用主相机拍摄的照片
使用主相机拍摄的照片
使用主相机拍摄的照片
使用主相机拍摄的照片
使用主相机拍摄的照片

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Daylight photoDaylightUltra-wide angle5x zoomLow-light photo

在我们的测试实验室中，这款手机的主摄像头再次证明了其良好的成像性能。即使在 1 勒克斯的残余光线下，它也能精确捕捉色彩，清晰显示测试图表。

ColorChecker
7.9 ∆E
7.6 ∆E
3.4 ∆E
6.3 ∆E
6.3 ∆E
1.8 ∆E
6.3 ∆E
6.7 ∆E
10.9 ∆E
2.6 ∆E
4.8 ∆E
2.5 ∆E
5.3 ∆E
6.3 ∆E
12.3 ∆E
1.5 ∆E
8.1 ∆E
7.6 ∆E
8.7 ∆E
5.9 ∆E
6.6 ∆E
3.9 ∆E
3.4 ∆E
5.7 ∆E
ColorChecker Nothing Phone (3a): 5.93 ∆E min: 1.45 - max: 12.26 ∆E
ColorChecker
26.6 ∆E
44.8 ∆E
35 ∆E
32.3 ∆E
39.1 ∆E
54.1 ∆E
42.1 ∆E
29 ∆E
30.3 ∆E
25.2 ∆E
55.5 ∆E
55.1 ∆E
25.8 ∆E
42.6 ∆E
25.9 ∆E
58.7 ∆E
35.5 ∆E
38.3 ∆E
57.3 ∆E
61 ∆E
47.4 ∆E
35.4 ∆E
23.3 ∆E
13.5 ∆E
ColorChecker Nothing Phone (3a): 38.91 ∆E min: 13.46 - max: 61.01 ∆E

配件和保修 - 不带 50 瓦电源的 Nothing Phone (3a)

Nothing Phone (3a) 随附一条 USB-C 数据线、一个 SIM 卡工具和一本安全说明手册。开箱即在显示屏上贴上保护膜。

Nothing 在线商店只为这款手机提供了少量配件。除了保护套和耳机，你还可以在那里买到一个 45 瓦的电源适配器。这对于Nothing Phone（2a）来说足够了，但Nothing Phone（3a）的充电功率可达50瓦。

在美国，Nothing Phone (3a) 享有 12 个月的标准保修期。

输入设备和操作 - 1000 赫兹采样率的响应式显示屏

虽然 Nothing Phone (3a) 配备的是中端 SoC，即 骁龙 7s 第 3 代但在使用过程中却给人一种高端智能手机的感觉。

一方面，这是因为显示屏的触摸采样率高达 1000 Hz，另一方面，这要归功于 Nothing OS，它运行超级流畅，几乎不会因多个应用程序同时运行而拖慢速度。只有要求很高的应用程序偶尔会出现小故障或短暂延迟。手机的良好运行还得益于可微调振动电机提供的精确反馈。

您可以使用位于显示屏下方的指纹传感器解锁智能手机，在我们的测试过程中，10 次尝试中有 9 次都被识别出来。也可以通过自拍摄像头进行二维面部扫描登录，但安全性较低。

直立式键盘
直立式键盘
水平键盘
水平键盘

显示屏 - 带 PWM 调光功能的明亮 AMOLED 面板

子像素
子像素

这款智能手机的 AMOLED 显示屏分辨率为 2392 x 1080 像素，在标准设置下可根据显示内容将帧频动态调整为 30、60、90 或 120 Hz。除了 HDR10 和 HDR10+，它还支持 HLG。

在显示屏亮度方面，Nothing Phone (3a) 有了很大的飞跃--至少制造商是这么说的。在显示 SDR 内容时，我们注意到的平均亮度为 1274 cd/m²（APL18：1202 cd/m²），比上一代产品略高。即便如此，AMOLED 面板离承诺的 3000 cd/m² 的峰值亮度仍有一段距离。这同样适用于 HDR 内容，在 HDR 内容中，我们能从显示屏中获得最高 1179 cd/m² 的亮度。

AMOLED 屏幕以 90 Hz 的低 PWM 频率运行。同时，它还使用 PWM 调光频率来保护敏感用户的眼睛。我们测得的频率为 741 Hz，而 Nothing 规定的频率为 2160 Hz。

1291
cd/m²		1278
cd/m²		1264
cd/m²
1290
cd/m²		1287
cd/m²		1252
cd/m²
1281
cd/m²		1276
cd/m²		1249
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 1291 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 1274.2 cd/m² Minimum: 2.23 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 97 %
Center on Battery: 1287 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.9 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.87
ΔE Greyscale 3.4 | 0.5-98 Ø5.1
99.8% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.26
Nothing Phone (3a)
AMOLED, 2392x1080, 6.8"		Motorola Moto G75
IPS, 2388x1080, 6.8"		Nothing Phone (2a)
AMOLED, 2412x1084, 6.7"		Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Super AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.6"		Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.7"		Xiaomi Poco X7
AMOLED, 2712x1220, 6.7"
Screen
-1%
19%
6%
14%
23%
Brightness middle
1287
947
-26%
1033
-20%
904
-30%
1147
-11%
1156
-10%
Brightness
1274
946
-26%
1042
-18%
912
-28%
1146
-10%
1150
-10%
Brightness Distribution
97
95
-2%
96
-1%
97
0%
96
-1%
98
1%
Black Level *
0.46
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
1.9
2.53
-33%
1.6
16%
2.1
-11%
1.6
16%
1.1
42%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
8.7
4.91
44%
2.5
71%
2.8
68%
3.7
57%
3.1
64%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
3.4
2.1
38%
1.2
65%
2.2
35%
2.3
32%
1.6
53%
Gamma
2.26 97%
2.237 98%
2.07 106%
2.1 105%
2.27 97%
2.22 99%
CCT
7072 92%
6733 97%
6482 100%
6478 100%
6368 102%
6304 103%
Contrast
2059

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 90 Hz
Amplitude: 13.58 %
Secondary Frequency: 740 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 90 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 90 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8519 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

最低显示亮度
分钟
25 % 显示屏亮度
25 %
显示屏亮度为 50
50 %
75 % 显示亮度
75 %
最大手动显示亮度
100 %

固定缩放级别和不同亮度设置下的测量系列（最低亮度下的振幅曲线看起来很平，但这是缩放造成的。信息框显示的是最小亮度下的振幅放大图）。

我们使用分光光度计和卡尔曼分析软件进行了测量，结果显示该屏幕能相当准确地再现色彩和灰度。使用下面的设置可以获得最佳画质。面板显示屏仍然略微偏冷（色温为 7072 K），但在操作过程中并不十分明显。

色彩精度（色彩模式标准、色温标准、目标色彩空间 sRGB）
色彩精度（色彩模式标准、色温标准、目标色彩空间 sRGB）
色彩空间（色彩模式标准、色温标准、目标色彩空间 sRGB）
色彩空间（色彩模式标准、色温标准、目标色彩空间 sRGB）
灰度（色彩模式标准、色温标准、目标色彩空间 sRGB）
灰度（色彩模式标准、色温标准、目标色彩空间 sRGB）
色彩饱和度（色彩模式标准、色温标准、目标色彩空间 sRGB）
色彩饱和度（色彩模式标准、色温标准、目标色彩空间 sRGB）

Display Response Times

ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
   ↔    Response Time Black to White
0.96 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.44 ms rise
↘ 0.518 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 2 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.8 ms).
   ↔    Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
1.71 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.626 ms rise
↘ 1.087 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 6 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.5 ms).

Nothing 手机在户外也能很好地使用。如果避免阳光直射，视角稳定的 AMOLED 显示屏几乎总是完全可读。停用亮度传感器的作用不大，因为此时屏幕的最大亮度为 760 cd/m²。

户外使用（图片来源：Manuel Masiero）
户外使用（图片来源：Manuel Masiero）
户外使用（图片来源：Manuel Masiero）
户外使用（图片来源：Manuel Masiero）
视角（图片来源：Manuel Masiero）
视角（图片来源：Manuel Masiero）

性能 - 配备骁龙 7s 第 3 代处理器的 Nothing Phone (3a)

骁龙 7s 骁龙 7s 第 3 代使 Nothing Phone (3a) 成为一款快速的中端智能手机。在合成基准测试中，它几乎总是排在第一位，至少在对比设备中是这样，即使在某些情况下它的领先优势很小。而 Nothing Phone (2a)在人工智能基准测试 UL Procyon AI 和 AImark 中表现更佳。

Geekbench 6.4 | Geekbench 5.5 | Antutu v10 | PCMark for Android | CrossMark | BaseMark OS II | UL Procyon AI Inference for Android | AImark | AI Benchmark
Geekbench 6.4
Single-Core
Average of class Smartphone
  (196 - 3479, n=200, last 2 years)
1541 Points +32%
Nothing Phone (3a)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 12288
1171 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3
  (1162 - 1179, n=3)
1171 Points 0%
Nothing Phone (2a)
MediaTek Dimensity 7200, Mali-G610 MP4, 12288
1128 Points -4%
Xiaomi Poco X7
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 12288
1030 Points -12%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 6144
1017 Points -13%
Motorola Moto G75
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 8192
1011 Points -14%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7025, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192
947 Points -19%
Multi-Core
Average of class Smartphone
  (830 - 10401, n=200, last 2 years)
4395 Points +35%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3
  (3239 - 3298, n=3)
3262 Points 0%
Nothing Phone (3a)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 12288
3250 Points
Xiaomi Poco X7
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 12288
2908 Points -11%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 6144
2906 Points -11%
Motorola Moto G75
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 8192
2887 Points -11%
Nothing Phone (2a)
MediaTek Dimensity 7200, Mali-G610 MP4, 12288
2592 Points -20%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7025, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192
2302 Points -29%
Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Average of class Smartphone
  (139 - 2437, n=168, last 2 years)
1084 Points +25%
Nothing Phone (2a)
MediaTek Dimensity 7200, Mali-G610 MP4, 12288
890 Points +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3
  (854 - 893, n=3)
870 Points +1%
Nothing Phone (3a)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 12288
864 Points
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 6144
783 Points -9%
Motorola Moto G75
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 8192
779 Points -10%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7025, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192
739 Points -14%
Xiaomi Poco X7
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 12288
726 Points -16%
Multi-Core
Average of class Smartphone
  (512 - 8816, n=168, last 2 years)
3652 Points +26%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3
  (2894 - 3242, n=3)
3028 Points +5%
Nothing Phone (3a)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 12288
2894 Points
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 6144
2778 Points -4%
Xiaomi Poco X7
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 12288
2741 Points -5%
Motorola Moto G75
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 8192
2645 Points -9%
Nothing Phone (2a)
MediaTek Dimensity 7200, Mali-G610 MP4, 12288
2177 Points -25%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7025, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192
2100 Points -27%
Antutu v10 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone
  (142748 - 3015111, n=132, last 2 years)
1327541 Points +67%
Nothing Phone (3a)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 12288
795329 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3
  (756800 - 795329, n=3)
779866 Points -2%
Nothing Phone (2a)
MediaTek Dimensity 7200, Mali-G610 MP4, 12288
693939 Points -13%
Xiaomi Poco X7
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 12288
665983 Points -16%
Motorola Moto G75
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 8192
620511 Points -22%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 6144
602612 Points -24%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7025, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192
469182 Points -41%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Nothing Phone (3a)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 12288
15606 Points
Average of class Smartphone
  (4507 - 27169, n=196, last 2 years)
13808 Points -12%
Motorola Moto G75
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 8192
13807 Points -12%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 6144
13430 Points -14%
Xiaomi Poco X7
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 12288
13406 Points -14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3
  (10617 - 15606, n=3)
13366 Points -14%
Nothing Phone (2a)
MediaTek Dimensity 7200, Mali-G610 MP4, 12288
10924 Points -30%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7025, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192
10629 Points -32%
CrossMark - Overall
Average of class Smartphone
  (187 - 2674, n=163, last 2 years)
981 Points +25%
Nothing Phone (3a)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 12288
785 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3
  (759 - 785, n=2)
772 Points -2%
Xiaomi Poco X7
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 12288
759 Points -3%
Motorola Moto G75
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 8192
737 Points -6%
Nothing Phone (2a)
MediaTek Dimensity 7200, Mali-G610 MP4, 12288
695 Points -11%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 6144
647 Points -18%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7025, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192
585 Points -25%
BaseMark OS II
Overall
Average of class Smartphone
  (1196 - 14066, n=162, last 2 years)
6751 Points +22%
Nothing Phone (3a)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 12288
5543 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3
  (5402 - 5543, n=3)
5458 Points -2%
Xiaomi Poco X7
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 12288
4725 Points -15%
Motorola Moto G75
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 8192
4545 Points -18%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 6144
4416 Points -20%
Nothing Phone (2a)
MediaTek Dimensity 7200, Mali-G610 MP4, 12288
4115 Points -26%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7025, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192
3678 Points -34%
System
Average of class Smartphone
  (2368 - 20776, n=162, last 2 years)
10573 Points +22%
Motorola Moto G75
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 8192
9006 Points +4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3
  (7930 - 10153, n=3)
8918 Points +3%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 6144
8843 Points +2%
Xiaomi Poco X7
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 12288
8774 Points +1%
Nothing Phone (3a)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 12288
8672 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7025, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192
7104 Points -18%
Nothing Phone (2a)
MediaTek Dimensity 7200, Mali-G610 MP4, 12288
6734 Points -22%
Memory
Nothing Phone (3a)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 12288
7675 Points
Average of class Smartphone
  (962 - 20572, n=162, last 2 years)
7445 Points -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3
  (5642 - 8078, n=3)
7132 Points -7%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7025, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192
4735 Points -38%
Xiaomi Poco X7
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 12288
4732 Points -38%
Nothing Phone (2a)
MediaTek Dimensity 7200, Mali-G610 MP4, 12288
4567 Points -40%
Motorola Moto G75
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 8192
4554 Points -41%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 6144
4301 Points -44%
Graphics
Average of class Smartphone
  (1017 - 58651, n=162, last 2 years)
19263 Points +115%
Nothing Phone (2a)
MediaTek Dimensity 7200, Mali-G610 MP4, 12288
10646 Points +19%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3
  (8662 - 9482, n=3)
9032 Points +1%
Nothing Phone (3a)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 12288
8951 Points
Xiaomi Poco X7
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 12288
8570 Points -4%
Motorola Moto G75
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 8192
7298 Points -18%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 6144
7040 Points -21%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7025, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192
4058 Points -55%
Web
Average of class Smartphone
  (841 - 2363, n=162, last 2 years)
1604 Points +1%
Nothing Phone (3a)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 12288
1585 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3
  (1566 - 1585, n=3)
1573 Points -1%
Motorola Moto G75
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 8192
1425 Points -10%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 6144
1421 Points -10%
Xiaomi Poco X7
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 12288
1401 Points -12%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7025, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192
1341 Points -15%
Nothing Phone (2a)
MediaTek Dimensity 7200, Mali-G610 MP4, 12288
876 Points -45%
UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Nothing Phone (2a)
MediaTek Dimensity 7200, Mali-G610 MP4, 12288
26315 Points +205%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1267 - 81594, n=153, last 2 years)
17885 Points +107%
Motorola Moto G75
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 8192
9416 Points +9%
Nothing Phone (3a)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 12288
8626 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3
  (8460 - 8652, n=3)
8579 Points -1%
Xiaomi Poco X7
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 12288
8359 Points -3%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 6144
5987 Points -31%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7025, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192
5946 Points -31%
AImark - Score v3.x
Average of class Smartphone
  (82 - 307528, n=141, last 2 years)
27022 Points +3658%
Nothing Phone (2a)
MediaTek Dimensity 7200, Mali-G610 MP4, 12288
11407 Points +1487%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7025, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192
1019 Points +42%
Motorola Moto G75
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 8192
729 Points +1%
Nothing Phone (3a)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 12288
719 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3
  (702 - 719, n=2)
711 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 6144
545 Points -24%
AI Benchmark
Score V5
Average of class Smartphone
  (46.4 - 3219, n=36, last 2 years)
930 Points +830%
Nothing Phone (3a)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 12288
100 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3
  (96.6 - 100, n=2)
98.3 Points -2%
Xiaomi Poco X7
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 12288
88.8 Points -11%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7025, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192
67.3 Points -33%
Score V6
Average of class Smartphone
  (68.9 - 12578, n=39, last 2 years)
4624 Points +233%
Nothing Phone (3a)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 12288
1388 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3
  (1246 - 1388, n=2)
1317 Points -5%
Xiaomi Poco X7
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 12288
234 Points -83%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7025, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192
212 Points -85%

骁龙 7s 骁龙 7s 第三代's Adreno 810GPU 帮助 Nothing Phone (3a) 实现了良好的图形性能，但是，除了 3DMark Wild Life 之外，它始终低于前代产品的水平。在 GFXBench 中，AMOLED 显示屏的速度被降至 60 Hz。

3DMark: Wild Life Extreme Unlimited | Wild Life Extreme | Wild Life Unlimited Score | Wild Life Score | Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score | Steel Nomad Light Score | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7: T-Rex Onscreen | 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
GFXBench 3.0: on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
GFXBench 3.1: on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
GFXBench: on screen Car Chase Onscreen | 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | 3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Nothing Phone (2a)
Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1156 Points +9%
Nothing Phone (3a)
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1063 Points
Xiaomi Poco X7
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
842 Points -21%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
796 Points -25%
Motorola Moto G75
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
793 Points -25%
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Nothing Phone (2a)
Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1153 Points +9%
Nothing Phone (3a)
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1057 Points
Xiaomi Poco X7
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
846 Points -20%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
809 Points -23%
Motorola Moto G75
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
801 Points -24%
3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Nothing Phone (2a)
Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4259 Points +2%
Nothing Phone (3a)
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4186 Points
Xiaomi Poco X7
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3129 Points -25%
Motorola Moto G75
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3069 Points -27%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2796 Points -33%
3DMark / Wild Life Score
Nothing Phone (2a)
Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4140 Points +4%
Nothing Phone (3a)
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
3998 Points
Xiaomi Poco X7
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3141 Points -21%
Motorola Moto G75
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3034 Points -24%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2820 Points -29%
3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score
Nothing Phone (3a)
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
381 Points
Xiaomi Poco X7
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
346 Points -9%
Motorola Moto G75
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
254 Points -33%
3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Score
Nothing Phone (3a)
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
382 Points
Xiaomi Poco X7
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
344 Points -10%
Motorola Moto G75
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
256 Points -33%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Xiaomi Poco X7
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
5641 Points +23%
Nothing Phone (3a)
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4585 Points
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
4391 Points -4%
Nothing Phone (2a)
Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4006 Points -13%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7025, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3437 Points -25%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Nothing Phone (2a)
Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
6935 Points +2%
Nothing Phone (3a)
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
6770 Points
Xiaomi Poco X7
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
5220 Points -23%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
5118 Points -24%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7025, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2277 Points -66%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Nothing Phone (3a)
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
6122 Points
Nothing Phone (2a)
Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
5966 Points -3%
Xiaomi Poco X7
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
5308 Points -13%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
4936 Points -19%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7025, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2462 Points -60%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Motorola Moto G75
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
106 fps +77%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
94 fps +57%
Xiaomi Poco X7
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
86 fps +43%
Nothing Phone (2a)
Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps 0%
Nothing Phone (3a)
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7025, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
57 fps -5%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Nothing Phone (2a)
Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
159 fps +22%
Nothing Phone (3a)
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
130 fps
Motorola Moto G75
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
124 fps -5%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
118 fps -9%
Xiaomi Poco X7
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
115 fps -12%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7025, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
72 fps -45%
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
68 fps +13%
Motorola Moto G75
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
65 fps +8%
Nothing Phone (2a)
Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps 0%
Xiaomi Poco X7
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
60 fps 0%
Nothing Phone (3a)
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7025, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
47 fps -22%
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Nothing Phone (2a)
Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
98 fps +15%
Nothing Phone (3a)
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
85 fps
Xiaomi Poco X7
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
81 fps -5%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
79 fps -7%
Motorola Moto G75
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
73 fps -14%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7025, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
62 fps -27%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Nothing Phone (2a)
Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
57 fps +4%
Nothing Phone (3a)
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
55 fps
Motorola Moto G75
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
48 fps -13%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
47 fps -15%
Xiaomi Poco X7
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
39 fps -29%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7025, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
29 fps -47%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Nothing Phone (2a)
Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
67 fps +8%
Nothing Phone (3a)
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
62 fps
Xiaomi Poco X7
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
56 fps -10%
Motorola Moto G75
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
55 fps -11%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
52 fps -16%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7025, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
34 fps -45%
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Nothing Phone (2a)
Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
34 fps +17%
Nothing Phone (3a)
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
29 fps
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
25 fps -14%
Motorola Moto G75
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
25 fps -14%
Xiaomi Poco X7
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
23 fps -21%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7025, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
15 fps -48%
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Nothing Phone (2a)
Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
40 fps +18%
Nothing Phone (3a)
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
34 fps
Xiaomi Poco X7
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
33 fps -3%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
30 fps -12%
Motorola Moto G75
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
29 fps -15%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7025, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
17 fps -50%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Nothing Phone (2a)
Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
33 fps +18%
Nothing Phone (3a)
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
28 fps
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
20 fps -29%
Motorola Moto G75
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
19 fps -32%
Xiaomi Poco X7
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
17 fps -39%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7025, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
10 fps -64%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Nothing Phone (2a)
Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
21 fps +5%
Nothing Phone (3a)
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
20 fps
Xiaomi Poco X7
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
15 fps -25%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
13 fps -35%
Motorola Moto G75
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
13 fps -35%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7025, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
6.7 fps -66%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Nothing Phone (2a)
Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
48 fps +4%
Nothing Phone (3a)
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
46 fps
Motorola Moto G75
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
31 fps -33%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
30 fps -35%
Xiaomi Poco X7
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
28 fps -39%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7025, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
18 fps -61%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Nothing Phone (2a)
Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
53 fps +2%
Nothing Phone (3a)
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
52 fps
Xiaomi Poco X7
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
40 fps -23%
Motorola Moto G75
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
36 fps -31%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
34 fps -35%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7025, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
20 fps -62%
GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Nothing Phone (2a)
Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
9.4 fps +7%
Nothing Phone (3a)
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
8.8 fps
Xiaomi Poco X7
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
6.5 fps -26%
Motorola Moto G75
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
5.9 fps -33%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
5.8 fps -34%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7025, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2.8 fps -68%

在浏览器性能方面，Nothing Phone (3a) 表现出了最好的一面。在所有基准测试中，这款智能手机都是第一个冲过终点线的，这可能主要归功于其最新的浏览器版本。在日常使用中，网页加载速度很快，滚动也很迅速。

Jetstream 2 | Speedometer 2.0 | Speedometer 3.0 | WebXPRT 4 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1
Jetstream 2 - 2.0 Total Score
Nothing Phone (3a) (Chrome 134.0.6998.135)
161.602 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3 (118 - 161.6, n=3)
137.4 Points -15%
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=171, last 2 years)
133.9 Points -17%
Motorola Moto G75 (Chrome 131)
126.402 Points -22%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G (Chrome 123.0.6312.100)
115.153 Points -29%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G (Chrome 133.0.6943.49)
111.073 Points -31%
Xiaomi Poco X7 (Chrome 132.0.6834.163)
87.225 Points -46%
Nothing Phone (2a) (Firefox 124.2.0)
76.624 Points -53%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Nothing Phone (3a) (Chrome 134.0.6998.135)
176 runs/min
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3 (144 - 176, n=3)
163.3 runs/min -7%
Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 569, n=151, last 2 years)
161 runs/min -9%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G (Chrome 133.0.6943.49)
107 runs/min -39%
Xiaomi Poco X7 (Chrome 132.0.6834.163)
107 runs/min -39%
Motorola Moto G75 (Chrome 131)
105 runs/min -40%
Nothing Phone (2a) (Chrome 123.0.6312.99)
104 runs/min -41%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G (Chrome 123.0.6312.100)
104 runs/min -41%
Speedometer 3.0 - Score
Average of class Smartphone (1.03 - 34, n=89, last 2 years)
12.6 runs/min +13%
Nothing Phone (3a) (Chrome 134.0.6998.135)
11.2 runs/min
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3 (8.58 - 11.2, n=2)
9.89 runs/min -12%
Motorola Moto G75 (Chrome 131)
6.97 runs/min -38%
Xiaomi Poco X7 (Chrome 132.0.6834.163)
6.88 runs/min -39%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G (Chrome 133.0.6943.49)
6.79 runs/min -39%
Nothing Phone (2a) (Chrome 123.0.6312.99)
6.62 runs/min -41%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G (Chrome 123.0.6312.100)
5.81 runs/min -48%
WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Nothing Phone (3a) (Chrome 134.0.6998.135)
149 Points
Motorola Moto G75 (Chrome 131)
140 Points -6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3 (110 - 149, n=3)
128 Points -14%
Nothing Phone (2a) (Firefox 124.2.0)
125 Points -16%
Average of class Smartphone (22 - 271, n=162, last 2 years)
124.8 Points -16%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G (Chrome 123.0.6312.100)
123 Points -17%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G (Chrome 133.0.6943.49)
112 Points -25%
Xiaomi Poco X7 (Chrome 132.0.6834.163)
100 Points -33%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Nothing Phone (3a) (Chrome 134.0.6998.135)
45346 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3 (37415 - 45346, n=3)
42407 Points -6%
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=210, last 2 years)
42229 Points -7%
Motorola Moto G75 (Chrome 131)
37483 Points -17%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G (Chrome 133.0.6943.49)
36371 Points -20%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G (Chrome 123.0.6312.100)
36010 Points -21%
Xiaomi Poco X7 (Chrome 132.0.6834.163)
31245 Points -31%
Nothing Phone (2a) (Firefox 124.2.0)
18562 Points -59%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Nothing Phone (2a) (Firefox 124.2.0)
1569.6 ms * -82%
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=171, last 2 years)
1445 ms * -68%
Xiaomi Poco X7
1312.2 ms * -52%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G (Chrome 133.0.6943.49)
1130.9 ms * -31%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G (Chrome 123.0.6312.100)
1099 ms * -27%
Motorola Moto G75 (Chrome 131)
1077.4 ms * -25%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3 (862 - 1044, n=3)
927 ms * -7%
Nothing Phone (3a) (Chrome 134.0.6998.135)
862.4 ms *

* ... smaller is better

由于采用了 UFS 3.1 存储系统，Nothing Phone (3a) 的数据吞吐率高于同类产品的平均水平，充电时间也相对较短。在我们的测试中，竞争对手如 三星Galaxy A35 5G, 小米Redmi Note 14 5G和 小米 Poco X7的 UFS 2.2 存储空间跟不上。

Nothing Phone (3a)Motorola Moto G75Nothing Phone (2a)Samsung Galaxy A35 5GXiaomi Redmi Note 14 5GXiaomi Poco X7Average 256 GB UFS 3.1 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
0%
4%
-50%
-10%
-24%
28%
48%
Sequential Read 256KB
1031.34
1023.1
-1%
1028.37
0%
529.32
-49%
950.62
-8%
947.4
-8%
1737 ?(950 - 2037, n=104)
68%
2030 ?(269 - 4512, n=193, last 2 years)
97%
Sequential Write 256KB
1001.28
868.4
-13%
952
-5%
270
-73%
792.56
-21%
915.23
-9%
1164 ?(452 - 2004, n=104)
16%
1646 ?(103.2 - 4030, n=193, last 2 years)
64%
Random Read 4KB
245.48
285.3
16%
273.19
11%
244.24
-1%
257.91
5%
100.16
-59%
286 ?(173.5 - 543, n=104)
17%
282 ?(47.6 - 504, n=193, last 2 years)
15%
Random Write 4KB
285.24
279.5
-2%
311.8
9%
62.59
-78%
245.16
-14%
226.88
-20%
319 ?(132.1 - 499, n=105)
12%
325 ?(9.4 - 964, n=193, last 2 years)
14%

游戏 - 最高可达 60fps

一般来说，Nothing Phone (3a) 流畅显示游戏不成问题。不过，通常只有在运行较老游戏时才能达到 60fps 以上。不过，对于像《源氏冲击》这样的顶级游戏，你可能仍然可以达到 60 帧/秒，但图形细节会降低。尽管如此，我们在测试过程中仍能很好地运行《源氏冲击》，即使在最高细节级别下也能达到平均每秒 37 帧的速度--不过我们也不时注意到一些卡顿现象。

我们使用Gamebench 测试了游戏帧率。.

源泉冲击
源泉冲击
PUBG Mobile
PUBG Mobile
051015202530354045505560657075808590Tooltip
Nothing Phone (3a); Asphalt 9: Legends; Standard / low; 24.5.0m: Ø58.4 (47-61)
Nothing Phone (3a); Asphalt 9: Legends; High Quality; 24.5.0m: Ø58.5 (45-61)
Nothing Phone (3a); Genshin Impact; lowest 120 fps; 5.5.0_31400259_31451966: Ø59.2 (48-61)
Nothing Phone (3a); Genshin Impact; highest 120 fps; 5.5.0_31400259_31451966: Ø41 (29-54)
Nothing Phone (3a); PUBG Mobile; Smooth; 3.7.0: Ø89.4 (81-91)
Nothing Phone (3a); PUBG Mobile; HD; 3.7.0: Ø59.9 (57-61)
Nothing Phone (3a); PUBG Mobile; Ultra HD; 3.7.0: Ø39.9 (34-41)

排放 - 负载时无明显节流现象

温度

在使用过程中，Nothing Phone (3a) 会变得很热，但始终保持在安全的温度范围内。在我们的测试中，表面温度最高升至 46.5 °C。从内部来看，骁龙 7s Gen 3 并没有受到影响，因为我们在 3DMark 压力测试中测得 SoC 性能没有明显下降。

Max. Load
 45.9 °C46.5 °C43.6 °C 
 45.5 °C45.4 °C42.4 °C 
 45.3 °C42.6 °C40.9 °C 
Maximum: 46.5 °C
Average: 44.2 °C
40.3 °C41.6 °C41.8 °C
38.9 °C41.1 °C43 °C
36 °C40.7 °C41 °C
Maximum: 43 °C
Average: 40.5 °C
Room Temperature 22 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 44.2 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 46.5 °C / 116 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 43 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.5 °C / 83 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

3DMark Steel Nomad stress test

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Nothing Phone (3a)
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
99.6 %
Motorola Moto G75
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.5 % 0%
Xiaomi Poco X7
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.4 % 0%
Nothing Phone (2a)
Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
99.2 % 0%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
97.8 % -2%
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Nothing Phone (3a)
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
99.8 %
Nothing Phone (2a)
Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
99.6 % 0%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.6 % 0%
Xiaomi Poco X7
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.6 % 0%
Motorola Moto G75
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.5 % 0%
Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability
Nothing Phone (3a)
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
99.3 %
Motorola Moto G75
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99 % 0%
Xiaomi Poco X7
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
98.6 % -1%
0510152025Tooltip
Nothing Phone (3a) Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø6.28 (6.27-6.29)
Motorola Moto G75 Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø4.82 (4.8-4.83)
Nothing Phone (2a) Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø6.89 (6.88-6.91)
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø4.83 (4.82-4.84)
Xiaomi Poco X7 Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø5.06 (5.05-5.07)
Nothing Phone (3a) Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø23.8 (23.8-23.9)
Motorola Moto G75 Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø18.2 (18.1-18.2)
Nothing Phone (2a) Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø24.7 (24.6-24.8)
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø16.7 (16.6-17)
Xiaomi Poco X7 Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø18.7 (18.7-18.8)
Nothing Phone (3a) Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø24.7 (24.7-25)
Xiaomi Poco X7 Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø18.7 (18.7-18.8)
Nothing Phone (3a) Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.1.1.3: Ø2.81 (2.8-2.81)
Motorola Moto G75 Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.1.1.3: Ø1.891 (1.884-1.903)
Xiaomi Poco X7 Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.1.1.3: Ø2.56 (2.54-2.57)
无电话 (3a)
无电话 (3a)

发言人

Nothing Phone (3a) 配备了立体声扬声器。它们能非常线性地再现中音和高音。不过，低音几乎完全没有。

用户可以通过 USB-C 和蓝牙 5.4 连接外部音频设备。手机支持的蓝牙编解码器列表非常广泛，包括 SBC、AAC、aptX、aptX HD、aptX Adaptive、LDAC、LC3 和 Opus。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2038.238.22532.5413121.935.24031.438.85033.538.16321.732.4802432.410017.836.812516.643.716019.754.62001952.725017.559.731516.261.340016.562.750012.369.863012.371.78001572.6100013.276.2125012.477.6160011.676.1200013.37725001278.6315012.781.1400012.979.8500013.380.963001380.8800013.180.11000013.579.91250013.672.11600013.464.5SPL25.490.5N0.785.9median 13.3median 76.1Delta1.78.927.329.426.238.625.935.329.235.835.633.625.938.522.137.717.840.717.144.318.153.914.252.214.156.310.757.31157.312.863.511.161.51268.711.775.21280.312.878.512.480.612.381.713.380.6138213.580.213.277.813.87513.774.313.470.313.362.524.990.90.681.3median 13.2median 74.3111.6hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseNothing Phone (3a)Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Nothing Phone (3a) audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (90.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (1.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 3% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 93% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 36%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 22% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 74% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Samsung Galaxy A35 5G audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (90.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.6% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 7.9% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 14% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 78% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 36%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 35% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 57% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

电池寿命 - 5000 毫安时电池，保证长时间运行

在我们的测试过程中，Nothing Phone (3a) 的耗电量没有出现大的异常。只有在空闲时，它有时需要比竞争对手多消耗一点电量。

它的 5000 毫安时电池充电功率可达 50 瓦。在我们使用第三方供应商提供的 65 瓦电源（Ugreen 2C1A）进行的测试中，一个完整的充电周期需要 1:03 小时。这意味着，这款智能手机的充电速度并不像 Nothing 声称的那样快（56 分钟），一般来说，它的充电速度与 Nothing Phone (2a) 不相上下。 Nothing Phone (2a).虽然后者只支持较低的最大充电功率（45 瓦），但使用相同的电源适配器充电一小时后即可充满。

根据 Nothing 的说法，该设备的电池在经过 1200 次充电后，其容量仍应超过 90%。这相当于每天充电 3 年零 3 个月。

耗电量

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.03 / 0.2 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 0.93 / 1.67 / 1.68 Watt
Load midlight 3.69 / 4.75 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Nothing Phone (3a)
5000 mAh		Motorola Moto G75
5000 mAh		Nothing Phone (2a)
5000 mAh		Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
5000 mAh		Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G
5110 mAh		Xiaomi Poco X7
5110 mAh		Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3
 		Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-38%
-22%
-45%
-15%
-8%
2%
-36%
Idle Minimum *
0.93
0.8
14%
0.81
13%
0.89
4%
1.15
-24%
1.09
-17%
0.963 ?(0.89 - 1.07, n=3)
-4%
0.872 ?(0.4 - 1.65, n=163, last 2 years)
6%
Idle Average *
1.67
1.1
34%
2.01
-20%
1.99
-19%
1.55
7%
1.28
23%
1.41 ?(1.26 - 1.67, n=3)
16%
1.438 ?(0.6 - 4.36, n=163, last 2 years)
14%
Idle Maximum *
1.68
1.5
11%
2.07
-23%
2.14
-27%
1.57
7%
1.31
22%
1.43 ?(1.28 - 1.68, n=3)
15%
1.582 ?(0.85 - 4.46, n=163, last 2 years)
6%
Load Average *
3.69
8.7
-136%
4.16
-13%
4.57
-24%
3.87
-5%
3.25
12%
3.56 ?(3.29 - 3.7, n=3)
4%
6.99 ?(2.3 - 16.5, n=154, last 2 years)
-89%
Load Maximum *
4.75
10.1
-113%
7.91
-67%
12.31
-159%
7.66
-61%
8.62
-81%
5.68 ?(4.75 - 7.52, n=3)
-20%
10.4 ?(3.53 - 20.8, n=154, last 2 years)
-119%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

012345678910Tooltip
Nothing Phone (3a) Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø2.99 (0.85-4.75)
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G Samsung Exynos 1380; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø5.62 (1.191-10.8)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G MediaTek Dimensity 7025; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø3.33 (1.051-6.28)
Nothing Phone (3a) Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.049 (1.028-1.222)
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G Samsung Exynos 1380; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.46 (1.262-2.89)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G MediaTek Dimensity 7025; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.116 (1.08-1.383)

Power consumption: GFXbench (150 cd/m²)

012345Tooltip
Nothing Phone (3a) Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø4.09 (3.94-4.22)
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G Samsung Exynos 1380; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø4.37 (3.89-5.98)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G MediaTek Dimensity 7025; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø2.91 (2.67-3.6)
Nothing Phone (3a) Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.049 (1.028-1.222)
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G Samsung Exynos 1380; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.46 (1.262-2.89)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G MediaTek Dimensity 7025; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.116 (1.08-1.383)

运行时间

Nothing Phone (3a) 的 5000 毫安时电池续航时间出色，在我们的对比中遥遥领先。手机 Nothing Phone (2a)和 三星Galaxy A35 5G大致相当。只有其他几款中档智能手机，如 摩托罗拉 Moto G75的运行时间更长。

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
42h 47min
WiFi Websurfing (Chrome 134.0.6998.135)
20h 33min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
26h 50min
Load (maximum brightness)
3h 38min
Battery Runtime Idle: Chrome 134.0.6998.135
Nothing Phone (3a)
5000 mAh		Motorola Moto G75
5000 mAh		Nothing Phone (2a)
5000 mAh		Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
5000 mAh		Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G
5110 mAh		Xiaomi Poco X7
5110 mAh
Battery Runtime
9%
2%
-5%
-10%
-15%
Reader / Idle
2567
3022
18%
2522
-2%
2600
1%
1800
-30%
H.264
1610
1332
-17%
1513
-6%
1401
-13%
1019
-37%
WiFi v1.3
1233
1174
-5%
1011
-18%
902
-27%
773
-37%
1049
-15%
Load
218
302
39%
293
34%
262
20%
361
66%

Notebookcheck 总评分

在我们的测试中，Nothing Phone (3a) 的性价比非常高，超过了中端手机的平均水平。不过，这款手机不支持 eSIM 卡，其人工智能功能在上市时也尚未完善。

Nothing Phone (3a) - 04/07/2025 v8
Manuel Masiero

Chassis
86%
Keyboard
67 / 75 → 89%
Pointing Device
91%
Connectivity
48 / 69 → 69%
Weight
88%
Battery
92%
Display
89%
Games Performance
18 / 55 → 33%
Application Performance
65 / 85 → 77%
AI Performance
13%
Temperature
85%
Noise
100%
Audio
83 / 90 → 92%
Camera
77%
Average
73%
79%
Smartphone - Weighted Average
CO2 Emissions
87.8%
Materials
65%
Packaging
85%
Power Use
97.3%
Repairability
40%
Software Updates
83.3%
Recycle Logo Total Sustainability Score: 76.4%

Possible alternatives compared

Image
Model / Review
Price
Weight
Drive
Display
1.
79.2%
Nothing Phone (3a)
Nothing Phone (3a)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3 ⎘
Qualcomm Adreno 810 ⎘
12 GB Memory, 256 GB 		Amazon:
1. $8.99
Suttkue for Nothing Phone (3...
2. $9.99
(3 Pack) Designed for Nothin...
3. $6.99
Anoowkoa 3 Pack Designed for...
201 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.77"
2392x1080
387 PPI
AMOLED
2.
77.4%
Motorola Moto G75
Motorola Moto G75
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 ⎘
Qualcomm Adreno 710 ⎘
8 GB Memory, 256 GB UFS 2.1		Amazon:
1. $6.95
Mr.Shield Screen Protector c...
2. $8.60
Zeking (2 Set for Motorola M...
3. $3.59
Heenjer 2 Pack for Motorola ...
List Price: 299€		205 g256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.78"
2388x1080
387 PPI
IPS
3.
86.9% v7 (old)
Nothing Phone (2a)
Nothing Phone (2a)
MediaTek Dimensity 7200 ⎘
ARM Mali-G610 MP4 ⎘
12 GB Memory, 256 GB 		Amazon:
1. $6.95
Mr.Shield Screen Protector c...
2. $10.79
Ibywind 2 Pack Screen Protec...
3. $7.99
JETech Screen Protector for ...
List Price: 329€		190 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.70"
2412x1084
394 PPI
AMOLED
4.
85.9% v7 (old)
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380 ⎘
ARM Mali-G68 MP5 ⎘
6 GB Memory, 128 GB UFS 2.1		Amazon:
1. $5.98
Supershieldz (2 Pack) Design...
2. $5.95
Mr.Shield Screen Protector C...
3. $6.95
NEW'C 3 Pack Designed for Sa...
List Price: 379€		209 g128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.60"
2340x1080
390 PPI
Super AMOLED
5.
75.4%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7025 ⎘
IMG BXM-8-256 ⎘
8 GB Memory, 256 GB UFS 2.1		Amazon:
1. $5.99
Natbok 2 Pack Compatible wit...
2. $4.99
Aiziki (2 Pack Designed for ...
3. $6.99
Suttkue for Xiaomi Redmi Not...
190 g256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.67"
2400x1080
395 PPI
AMOLED
6.
77.7%
Xiaomi Poco X7
Xiaomi Poco X7
MediaTek Dimensity 7300 ⎘
ARM Mali-G615 MP2 ⎘
12 GB Memory, 512 GB UFS 2.1		Amazon:
1. $7.99
Suttkue for Xiaomi Poco X7 P...
2. $11.99
Ibywind Screen Protector For...
3. $6.89
Anoowkoa[2 pack for Redmi No...
185.5 g512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.67"
2712x1220
446 PPI
AMOLED

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 优雅的多功能手机，按键一应俱全 - Nothing Phone (3a) 评测
Manuel Masiero, 2025-04- 9 (Update: 2025-04- 9)