data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/77f61/77f61a4ef24efff2b88574fe783d0f7fd0cfac8f" alt="Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G (image source: Manuel Masiero)"
小米Redmi Note 14 5G 评测--功能强大、价格优势明显的入门级智能手机
购买是否不费吹灰之力?
小米公司新推出的入门级手机小米Redmi Note 14 5G,售价已低至 250 美元。这个价格可以买到很多智能手机,包括 120Hz AMOLED 显示屏和其他几乎值得购买的功能。在这篇评测中,您还会发现小米在哪些方面偷工减料。Manuel Masiero, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
关于小米Redmi Note 14 5G 的评价
作为一款入门级智能手机,小米Redmi Note 14 5G 拥有很多亮点。首先是其明亮的 120-Hz AMOLED 显示屏,其次是稳固的主摄像头和令人印象深刻的连接功能,包括 5G、NFC、红外爆破器和通过 microSD 卡进行的存储扩展。其轻巧、高品质和 IP64 认证的外壳也是一大亮点。
小米智能手机的售价约为 300 美元,但在撰写本文时,您只需 250 美元就能买到,而且还有继续大幅下降的趋势。您可以放心地以这个价格购买Redmi Note 14 5G,因为没有多少竞争对手能提供这么好的整体方案。不过,我们希望该款手机能提供电源和更长的软件支持,但令人惊讶的是,只有价格更低的Redmi Note 14 LTE 才能提供这两项服务。
Pros
Cons
价格和供应情况
小米Redmi Note 14 5G 目前可在亚马逊上购买,价格约为 255 美元。
可能的替代品比较
Image | Model / Review | Price | Weight | Drive | Display |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G MediaTek Dimensity 7025 ⎘ IMG BXM-8-256 ⎘ 8 GB Memory, 256 GB UFS 2.1 | Amazon: 1. $6.99 Natbok 2+2 Pack 3D Screen Pr... 2. $5.99 Natbok 2 Pack Compatible wit... 3. $6.99 Suttkue for Xiaomi Redmi Not... | 190 g | 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | 6.67" 2400x1080 395 PPI AMOLED | |
Motorola Edge 50 Neo MediaTek Dimensity 7300 ⎘ ARM Mali-G615 MP2 ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 512 GB | Amazon: 1. $6.95 Mr.Shield Screen Protector c... 2. $7.82 Pusiikeer 2 Pack for Motorol... 3. $8.99 Iiseon High Sensitivity Hydr... List Price: 499€ | 171 g | 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 6.40" 2670x1220 459 PPI P-OLED | |
Nothing Phone (2a) MediaTek Dimensity 7200 ⎘ ARM Mali-G610 MP4 ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 256 GB | Amazon: 1. $6.95 Mr.Shield Screen Protector c... 2. $5.99 Supershieldz (2 Pack) Design... 3. $11.99 Foluu Clear Case for Nothing... List Price: 329€ | 190 g | 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 6.70" 2412x1084 394 PPI AMOLED | |
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G Samsung Exynos 1380 ⎘ ARM Mali-G68 MP5 ⎘ 6 GB Memory, 128 GB UFS 2.1 | Amazon: 1. $6.99 Supershieldz (2 Pack) Design... 2. $5.95 Mr.Shield Screen Protector C... 3. $9.99 Samsung Charger Fast Chargin... List Price: 379€ | 209 g | 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | 6.60" 2340x1080 390 PPI Super AMOLED | |
Xiaomi Poco X7 MediaTek Dimensity 7300 ⎘ ARM Mali-G615 MP2 ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 512 GB UFS 2.1 | Amazon: 1. $8.99 Suttkue for Xiaomi Poco X7 P... 2. $4.49 Anoowkoa[2 pack for Redmi No... 3. $7.99 Suttkue for Xiaomi Poco X7 P... | 185.5 g | 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | 6.67" 2712x1220 446 PPI AMOLED | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G MediaTek Dimensity 6080 ⎘ ARM Mali-G57 MP2 ⎘ 8 GB Memory, 256 GB UFS 2.1 | Amazon: $207.50 List Price: 212 Euro | 174.5 g | 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | 6.67" 2400x1080 395 PPI AMOLED |
Table of Contents
- 关于小米Redmi Note 14 5G 的评价
- 规格
- 手机壳 - 边框纤薄的轻型智能手机
- 连接性 -Redmi Note 14 5G 配备红外触发器和耳机插孔
- 软件 -Redmi Note 14 5G 仅有 2 项操作系统升级
- 通信和全球导航卫星系统 - WiFi 5 和 GPS 适合日常使用
- 电话功能和通话质量 -Redmi Note 14 5G 不支持 eSIM 卡
- 摄像头 - 10800 万像素三摄像头和 OIS
- 配件和保修 - 电源需额外付费
- 输入设备和操作 -Redmi Note 14 5G 配备指纹传感器
- 显示屏:明亮的 120 Hz AMOLED 面板,带 PWM 调光功能
- 性能 -Redmi Note 14 5G 配备联发科 Dimensity 7025
- 游戏 - 远未达到 120fps
- 废气排放 - 智能手机冷却不节流
- 电池续航时间 - 尽管电池容量为 5110 毫安时,但续航能力一般
- Notebookcheck 总评分
任何想购买小米经济型智能手机的人都能在红米系列中找到自己想要的产品。目前有五种不同的机型可供选择,我们已经对其中的 Redmi Note 14 LTE和 Redmi Note 14 Pro、 Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G和 Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G.
现在,我们将对剩余的红米机型进行评测:Redmi Note 14 5G 的官方售价约为 300 美元,只有配备 8 GB 内存和 256 GB 存储空间的版本。正如产品名称所示,与Redmi Note 14 LTE 不同,Redmi Note 14 5G 配备了 5G 模块。它使用的硬件也比入门级机型稍强。
规格
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
手机壳 - 边框纤薄的轻型智能手机
在外观设计方面,Redmi Note 14 5G 大量采用了前代产品的设计,同时还采用了纤薄轻巧的塑料外壳和更窄的显示屏边缘。精巧的圆角和边缘设计、190 克的重量和良好的制造质量确保了这款智能手机的触感和使用舒适度。
有三种哑光颜色可供选择,即午夜黑、薰衣草紫和珊瑚绿。我们的测试设备是后者。在黑色版本中,后盖是统一的黑色,而在薰衣草紫和珊瑚绿版本中,后盖则装饰有由四个部分组成的图案。四个表面反射的光线略有不同,并略微闪烁。
手机边框由与外壳同色的铝合金制成,显示屏由大猩猩 5 号玻璃保护。屏幕上还安装了保护膜。这款智能手机还提供符合 IP64 标准的防尘和防水保护。
连接性 -Redmi Note 14 5G 配备红外触发器和耳机插孔
Redmi Note 14 5G 采用 8 GB LPDDR4X 内存和 256 GB UFS 2.2 存储,这是一个不错的标准。在某些地区,这款智能手机还提供最高 12 GB 内存和 512 GB 存储空间。
红外触发器、立体声扬声器和 3.5 毫米插孔等功能都超出了这个价位智能手机的常规配置。它的混合 SIM 卡插槽可容纳两张 nano SIM 卡或一张 SIM 卡和一张 microSD 卡,最大容量可达 1 TB。
USB-C 端口的运行速度为 USB 2.0,因此没有任何意外。在我们使用三星 980 Pro 固态硬盘进行的复制测试中,它的数据吞吐量达到了 24.1 MB/s。
microSD 读卡器
在插入 Angelbird AV Pro V60 microSD 参考卡后,Redmi Note 14 5G 的 microSD 数据吞吐率没有达到前代产品的水平,但它的传输速率比前代产品更稳定。 三星Galaxy A35 5G.
SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G (Angelbird AV Pro microSD 128 GB V60) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
Average of class Smartphone (7.7 - 77, n=77, last 2 years) |
Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)
软件 -Redmi Note 14 5G 仅有 2 项操作系统升级
小米交付的Redmi Note 14 5G 搭载了基于Android 14 的 HyperOS 1.0,制造商的目标是在 2029 年 1 月之前为其提供Android 安全更新。在 2 月底进行测试时,其最新的Android 安全补丁是从 2025 年 1 月 1 日开始的。
据称,小米只想为其 2 个操作系统升级Redmi Note 14 5G。有趣的是,它似乎给 Redmi Note 14 LTE最便宜的红米机型的支持直到 2031 年 3 月才结束。这里还计划进行 4 次操作系统升级。
除了谷歌和小米的应用程序,HyperOS 还包括一些第三方供应商提供的臃肿软件,如 TikTok、Facebook 和 Booking。不过,所有这些程序都可以轻松卸载。
可持续性
关于Redmi Note 14 5G 的二氧化碳排放量,小米尚未提供任何信息。不过,该设备的包装几乎不使用塑料,而且制造商承诺其智能手机的使用寿命很长。
一方面,这是通过吸能泡沫和内部四角加固等保护措施实现的,以防止手机跌落损坏。其次,据小米公司称,即使在使用四年或 1600 次充电后,其电池仍能保持初始容量的 80% 以上。
通信和全球导航卫星系统 - WiFi 5 和 GPS 适合日常使用
Redmi Note 14 5G 的 WiFi 5 模块没有打破任何速度记录。不过,当连接到华硕 ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000 参考路由器时,数据传输非常稳定,峰值约为 370 MBit/s。竞争对手如 三星Galaxy A35 5G和 摩托罗拉 Edge 50 Neo等竞争对手的产品表明,即使在这个价格范围内,您也可以期待更快的 Wi-Fi 网速。
在通信技术方面,Redmi Note 14 5G 配备了 NFC 模块和 5G 模块,领先于其更便宜的姐妹机型 Redmi Note 14 LTE.它能识别 DACH 地区(本次测试所在地)所有重要的 5G 频段,如频段 1、3、28、77 和 78。
电话功能和通话质量 -Redmi Note 14 5G 不支持 eSIM 卡
Redmi Note 14 5G 使用谷歌的标准应用程序拨打电话,通话质量不错。有时,电话另一端的人听起来有点刺耳,而且环境噪音并不总是能得到有效抑制。不过,我们在测试通话过程中没有发现噪音或掉线现象。
VoLTE 和 Wi-Fi 通话可以在手机设置中激活,但不能激活 eSIM。
摄像头 - 10800 万像素三摄像头和 OIS
Redmi Note 14 5G 的摄像头设置与前代产品几乎没有区别。与 Redmi Note 13 5G一样,它配备了一个 10800 万像素的主摄像头(图像传感器为三星 ISOCELL HM6)和一个 800 万像素的超广角摄像头(图像传感器为 Omnivision OV08)。上一代产品的深度传感器现在被分辨率为 200 万像素的微距摄像头所取代。
手机的自拍摄像头也从 1600 万像素提高到 2000 万像素。这使得Redmi Note 14 5G 能够拍摄出不错的照片,准确捕捉更精细的图像细节,并相对真实地再现肤色。这在人像模式下也能可靠地工作。
它的主摄像头在日光下也能拍摄出不错的照片,色彩鲜艳,细节清晰。不过,动态范围明显不足,相机软件有时对物体边缘的描绘过于锐利。如果使用数码变焦,图像质量会明显下降。使用预设的 3 倍放大率时,图像有时会显得模糊,通常只能描绘出淡淡的颜色。
在其他摄像头方面,小米手机的表现也不过是这个价位的标准水平。它的超广角拍摄效果并不出众,但尽管色彩饱和度低、细节不丰富,在白天拍摄简单的快照还是完全没问题的。而微距镜头则是主摄像头和数码变焦无法做到的。
由于配备了 OIS 防抖动主摄像头,Redmi Note 14 5G 可以录制高质量的视频。在拍摄时,无法在主摄像头和超广角摄像头之间切换。两个摄像头都能以最高 1080p 30fps 的速度工作。
Image Comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
Daylight photo 1Daylight photo 2Ultra-wide angle5x zoomLow-light photo在我们的测试实验室中,即使在最佳光线下,手机主摄像头有时也难以准确捕捉色彩。与 ColorChecker 测试图中的参考色相比,绿色调和灰色的暗色调存在很大偏差。在 1 勒克斯的残余光线下,先前清晰的测试图表和 ColorChecker 图表只能部分识别。
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a58cc/a58cce9974dfa01fc941922a099e6a2d4bf1e503" alt="ColorChecker"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5f152/5f15217c88a1f95637a77fc99faf85058bf1c7f5" alt="ColorChecker"
配件和保修 - 电源需额外付费
Redmi Note 14 5G 的欧盟供货范围包括一条 USB-C 连接线、一个 SIM 卡工具、一个保护盖和两份宣传页,其中包括快速入门指南以及安全和保修信息。您需要自行解决配套的 45 瓦电源。
小米在线商店提供电源适配器、移动电源和耳机等配件。Redmi Note 14 5G 还可以购买小米关怀保险。保险期限为 2 年,仅承保意外损坏或盗窃。
Redmi Note 14 5G 在欧盟地区的保修期为 12 个月。
输入设备和操作 -Redmi Note 14 5G 配备指纹传感器
显示屏:明亮的 120 Hz AMOLED 面板,带 PWM 调光功能
Redmi Note 14 5G 的 6.67 英寸 AMOLED 显示屏分辨率为 2,400 × 1,080 像素,触摸采样率为 240 Hz。根据显示的内容,屏幕会在 60、90 和 120 Hz 之间自动切换。如果您不希望这样,也可以将显示屏设置为 60 或 120 Hz 的固定刷新率。支持 HDR10、HDR10+ 和 HLG。
小米标称其屏幕亮度为 1,200 cd/m²,这是一个符合实际的数字。在测试过程中,我们测得的平均亮度为 1,146 cd/m²,最高亮度为 1,169 cd/m²。在显示 HDR 时,面板亮度增加到 2,078 cd/m²,再次非常接近制造商的规格(2,100 cd/m²)。关闭亮度传感器后,显示屏的最高亮度为 466 cd/m²。
用户可以在显示设置中选择 "始终开启 "功能。不过,屏幕只能保持 10 秒钟的激活状态,而且必须事先轻触屏幕。
在我们测量的所有亮度下,AMOLED 显示屏都会以 60 Hz 的频率闪烁。但与此同时,为了减轻脉宽调制对敏感用户的负面影响,我们采用了高达 952 Hz 的 PWM 调光频率(制造商的规格为 980 Hz)。
|
Brightness Distribution: 96 %
Center on Battery: 1147 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.6 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.89
ΔE Greyscale 2.3 | 0.5-98 Ø5.1
99.3% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.27
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.7" | Motorola Edge 50 Neo P-OLED, 2670x1220, 6.4" | Nothing Phone (2a) AMOLED, 2412x1084, 6.7" | Samsung Galaxy A35 5G Super AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.6" | Xiaomi Poco X7 AMOLED, 2712x1220, 6.7" | Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.7" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Screen | 1% | 10% | -7% | 13% | 6% | |
Brightness middle | 1147 | 1246 9% | 1033 -10% | 904 -21% | 1156 1% | 958 -16% |
Brightness | 1146 | 1235 8% | 1042 -9% | 912 -20% | 1150 0% | 965 -16% |
Brightness Distribution | 96 | 98 2% | 96 0% | 97 1% | 98 2% | 83 -14% |
Black Level * | ||||||
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.6 | 1.8 -13% | 1.6 -0% | 2.1 -31% | 1.1 31% | 1.43 11% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 3.7 | 3.81 -3% | 2.5 32% | 2.8 24% | 3.1 16% | 2.51 32% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.3 | 2.3 -0% | 1.2 48% | 2.2 4% | 1.6 30% | 1.4 39% |
Gamma | 2.27 97% | 2.191 100% | 2.07 106% | 2.1 105% | 2.22 99% | 2.33 94% |
CCT | 6368 102% | 6488 100% | 6482 100% | 6478 100% | 6304 103% | 6476 100% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM detected | 60 Hz Amplitude: 14.42 % Secondary Frequency: 952 Hz | ||
The display backlight flickers at 60 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) . The frequency of 60 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8592 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
固定缩放级别和不同亮度设置下的测量系列(最低亮度下的振幅曲线看起来很平,但这是缩放造成的。信息框显示的是最小亮度下的振幅放大图)。
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
1.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.985 ms rise | |
↘ 0.819 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 7 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.8 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
1.66 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.858 ms rise | |
↘ 0.8035 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 6 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.7 ms). |
性能 -Redmi Note 14 5G 配备联发科 Dimensity 7025
小米目前的红米智能手机几乎全部采用联发科处理器,只有 Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G的 骁龙 7s 第 3 代.相比之下,Redmi Note 14 5G 则采用了 联发科 Dimensity 7025速度略快于 联发科 Dimensity 6080略快。
Redmi Note 14 5G 在我们测试的对比设备中表现不错,但在性能方面仅排在第三位。不过,这在日常使用中并不重要,因为小米手机运行流畅,只有在处理要求较高的应用程序时才会达到极限。
UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI | |
Nothing Phone (2a) | |
Average of class Smartphone (1267 - 81594, n=151, last 2 years) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G | |
Xiaomi Poco X7 | |
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G | |
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7025 (n=1) |
联发科 联发科 Dimensity 7025使用 Imagination IMG BXM-8-256作为图形处理器,它与 SoC 一样,在性能方面可被归类为中端机型。不过,在我们的测试中,与竞争对手相比,它的排名略低于平均水平。由于不兼容 Vulkan,大多数 3DMark 测试都无法在智能手机上运行。
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7: T-Rex Onscreen | 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
GFXBench 3.0: on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
GFXBench 3.1: on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
GFXBench: on screen Car Chase Onscreen | 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | 3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics | |
Xiaomi Poco X7 | |
Motorola Edge 50 Neo | |
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G | |
Nothing Phone (2a) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G |
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics | |
Nothing Phone (2a) | |
Xiaomi Poco X7 | |
Motorola Edge 50 Neo | |
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G |
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited | |
Nothing Phone (2a) | |
Xiaomi Poco X7 | |
Motorola Edge 50 Neo | |
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G |
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen | |
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G | |
Xiaomi Poco X7 | |
Nothing Phone (2a) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G |
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen | |
Nothing Phone (2a) | |
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G | |
Xiaomi Poco X7 | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G |
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL | |
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G | |
Nothing Phone (2a) | |
Xiaomi Poco X7 | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G |
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen | |
Nothing Phone (2a) | |
Xiaomi Poco X7 | |
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G |
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | |
Nothing Phone (2a) | |
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G | |
Xiaomi Poco X7 | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G |
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen | |
Nothing Phone (2a) | |
Xiaomi Poco X7 | |
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G |
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen | |
Nothing Phone (2a) | |
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G | |
Xiaomi Poco X7 | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G |
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen | |
Nothing Phone (2a) | |
Xiaomi Poco X7 | |
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G |
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | |
Nothing Phone (2a) | |
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G | |
Motorola Edge 50 Neo | |
Xiaomi Poco X7 | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G |
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | |
Nothing Phone (2a) | |
Xiaomi Poco X7 | |
Motorola Edge 50 Neo | |
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G |
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | |
Nothing Phone (2a) | |
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G | |
Motorola Edge 50 Neo | |
Xiaomi Poco X7 | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G |
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | |
Nothing Phone (2a) | |
Xiaomi Poco X7 | |
Motorola Edge 50 Neo | |
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G |
GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | |
Nothing Phone (2a) | |
Xiaomi Poco X7 | |
Motorola Edge 50 Neo | |
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G |
Redmi Note 14 5G 在浏览器基准测试中一直表现出色,在同类产品中具有典型性能。前代机型 Redmi Note 13 5G-在某些情况下速度明显较慢。
Jetstream 2 - Total Score | |
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=169, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G (Chrome 123.0.6312.100) | |
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7025 (n=1) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G (Chrome 133.0.6943.49) | |
Xiaomi Poco X7 (Chrome 132.0.6834.163) | |
Nothing Phone (2a) (Firefox 124.2.0) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G (Chrome 125) |
Speedometer 2.0 - Result | |
Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 569, n=149, last 2 years) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G (Chrome 133.0.6943.49) | |
Xiaomi Poco X7 (Chrome 132.0.6834.163) | |
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7025 (n=1) | |
Nothing Phone (2a) (Chrome 123.0.6312.99) | |
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G (Chrome 123.0.6312.100) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G (Chrome 125) |
Speedometer 3.0 - Score | |
Average of class Smartphone (1.03 - 34, n=83, last 2 years) | |
Xiaomi Poco X7 (Chrome 132.0.6834.163) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G (Chrome 133.0.6943.49) | |
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7025 (n=1) | |
Nothing Phone (2a) (Chrome 123.0.6312.99) | |
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G (Chrome 123.0.6312.100) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G |
WebXPRT 4 - Overall | |
Nothing Phone (2a) (Firefox 124.2.0) | |
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G (Chrome 123.0.6312.100) | |
Average of class Smartphone (22 - 271, n=159, last 2 years) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G (Chrome 133.0.6943.49) | |
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7025 (n=1) | |
Xiaomi Poco X7 (Chrome 132.0.6834.163) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G (Chrome 125) |
Octane V2 - Total Score | |
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=207, last 2 years) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G (Chrome 133.0.6943.49) | |
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G (Chrome 123.0.6312.100) | |
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7025 (34723 - 36371, n=2) | |
Xiaomi Poco X7 (Chrome 132.0.6834.163) | |
Motorola Edge 50 Neo | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G (Chrome 125) | |
Nothing Phone (2a) (Firefox 124.2.0) |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G (Chrome 125) | |
Nothing Phone (2a) (Firefox 124.2.0) | |
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=167, last 2 years) | |
Xiaomi Poco X7 | |
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7025 (n=1) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G (Chrome 133.0.6943.49) | |
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G (Chrome 123.0.6312.100) |
* ... smaller is better
得益于 UFS 2.2 闪存,Redmi Note 14 5G 的性能与竞争对手不相上下,应用程序和游戏的加载时间也相对较短。
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G | Motorola Edge 50 Neo | Nothing Phone (2a) | Samsung Galaxy A35 5G | Xiaomi Poco X7 | Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G | Average 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AndroBench 3-5 | 29% | 15% | -47% | -13% | -11% | -7% | 61% | |
Sequential Read 256KB | 950.62 | 1023 8% | 1028.37 8% | 529.32 -44% | 947.4 0% | 951.97 0% | 904 ? -5% | 1962 ? 106% |
Sequential Write 256KB | 792.56 | 964.6 22% | 952 20% | 270 -66% | 915.23 15% | 503.79 -36% | 721 ? -9% | 1577 ? 99% |
Random Read 4KB | 257.91 | 331 28% | 273.19 6% | 244.24 -5% | 100.16 -61% | 243.8 -5% | 230 ? -11% | 280 ? 9% |
Random Write 4KB | 245.16 | 384.1 57% | 311.8 27% | 62.59 -74% | 226.88 -7% | 240.36 -2% | 240 ? -2% | 322 ? 31% |
游戏 - 远未达到 120fps
联发科 联发科 Dimensity 7025's Imagination GPU IMG-BXM8-256大多数情况下,只要不把细节设置得太高,我们选择的一小部分当前游戏都能流畅运行。
在最大可选图形设置下,《Asphalt 9》和《PUBG Mobile》几乎总能超过 30fps。另一方面,《源氏冲击》对于智能手机来说实在是太大了。游戏在最低细节级别下仍能流畅运行,但在最高细节级别下就变得生涩了。
我们使用Gamebench测试工具测量了游戏帧率。
废气排放 - 智能手机冷却不节流
温度
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 39.9 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 38.6 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
发言人
Redmi Note 14 5G 配备了立体声扬声器。虽然它们明显缺乏低音,但却能相当线性地再现中高音。小巧的音膜能很好地传递声音。但在播放音乐时,声音缺乏深度。
为了获得更好的声音体验,我们建议将外置扬声器或耳机连接到智能手机上,可以通过 3.5 毫米插孔或蓝牙 5.3 连接。它支持多种蓝牙编解码器,如 AAC、LDAC 以及各种 aptX 和 LHDC 变体。
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (91.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.4% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (3.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 8.7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 21% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 70% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 36%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 42% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 50% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (90.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.6% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 7.9% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 14% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 79% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 36%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 35% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 58% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
电池续航时间 - 尽管电池容量为 5110 毫安时,但续航能力一般
耗电量
尽管 联发科 Dimensity 7025Redmi Note 14 5G 的运算能力适中,但它并不是同类智能手机中最省钱的一款。不过,总体而言,它比 Nothing Phone (2a)和 三星Galaxy A35 5G.
Off / Standby | ![]() ![]() |
Idle | ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Load |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | |
Key:
min: ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G 5110 mAh | Nothing Phone (2a) 5000 mAh | Samsung Galaxy A35 5G 5000 mAh | Xiaomi Poco X7 5110 mAh | Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G 5000 mAh | Average MediaTek Dimensity 7025 | Average of class Smartphone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -8% | -24% | 8% | 18% | 0% | -16% | |
Idle Minimum * | 1.15 | 0.81 30% | 0.89 23% | 1.09 5% | 1.2 -4% | 1.15 ? -0% | 0.87 ? 24% |
Idle Average * | 1.55 | 2.01 -30% | 1.99 -28% | 1.28 17% | 0.88 43% | 1.55 ? -0% | 1.444 ? 7% |
Idle Maximum * | 1.57 | 2.07 -32% | 2.14 -36% | 1.31 17% | 0.96 39% | 1.57 ? -0% | 1.592 ? -1% |
Load Average * | 3.87 | 4.16 -7% | 4.57 -18% | 3.25 16% | 2.79 28% | 3.87 ? -0% | 6.9 ? -78% |
Load Maximum * | 7.66 | 7.91 -3% | 12.31 -61% | 8.62 -13% | 8.82 -15% | 7.66 ? -0% | 10.3 ? -34% |
* ... smaller is better
Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)
Power consumption: GFXbench (150 cd/m²)
运行时间
Redmi Note 14 5G 的 5,110 毫安时电池耗电相对较快。在我们的实际 Wi-Fi 测试中,这款智能手机运行了约 13 个小时,而连续循环播放视频则持续了近 17 个小时。除了 Redmi Note 13 5G之外,其他竞争产品的续航时间都大大超出了我们的预期。
在测试过程中,我们使用了小米提供的 45 瓦电源适配器。一个完整的充电周期需要 70 分钟。如果只想充到 80%,则需要等待 55 分钟。
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G 5110 mAh | Motorola Edge 50 Neo 4310 mAh | Nothing Phone (2a) 5000 mAh | Samsung Galaxy A35 5G 5000 mAh | Xiaomi Poco X7 5110 mAh | Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G 5000 mAh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 7% | 25% | 18% | 36% | -17% | |
Reader / Idle | 1800 | 2522 40% | 2600 44% | 1160 -36% | ||
H.264 | 1019 | 1513 48% | 1401 37% | 868 -15% | ||
WiFi v1.3 | 773 | 824 7% | 1011 31% | 902 17% | 1049 36% | 801 4% |
Load | 361 | 293 -19% | 262 -27% | 280 -22% |
Notebookcheck 总评分
在我们的测试中,小米Redmi Note 14 5G 以其丰富的功能和相对较低的价格获得了分数。不过,这款入门级手机如果能获得更长时间的软件支持,将会更有优势。
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G
- 02/28/2025 v8
Manuel Masiero
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.