OnePlus 10T智能手机评论。得益于骁龙8+1代的OnePlus 10 Pro效率更高，并伴有惊人的快速充电。

Name: OnePlus 10T
Brand: OnePlus

让搭载骁龙8代的手机看起来很旧？

一加10T比一加的旗舰智能手机便宜很多，同时提供更好的处理器和更快的充电，充电功率达到令人难以置信的150瓦。阅读这篇评论，了解顶级智能手机在哪些方面必须做出妥协，以及它是否值得购买。

Marcus Herbrich, 👁 Florian Schmitt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy), Published 08/21/2022 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

5G Smartphone Touchscreen

虽然OnePlus 10从未出现过，但这家中国制造商现在将T型机带到了下半年的市场上。OnePlus 10T部署了骁龙8+第一代这款处理器的速度和功率效率应略高于骁龙8代1中的一加10专业版。这款高端智能手机的另一个亮点是内置的快速充电技术：4,800毫安时的电池可以通过SUPERVOOC技术以高达150瓦的功率充电。

与专业机型相比，一加10T的相机系统不仅省去了哈苏品牌，而且长焦相机也被低分辨率的微距相机取代。配备8GB内存和128GB存储空间的基本型号预计售价约为700美元，而顶级版本则配备了完整的16GB内存和256GB存储空间。对于这一点，OnePlus估计零售价将在800美元左右。

Test device courtesy of OnePlus Deutschland

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

OnePlus 10T (10 Series)

Processor

Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 8 x 1.8 - 3.2 GHz, Cortex-X2 / A710 / A510 (Kryo) Waipio

Graphics adapter

Qualcomm Adreno 730

Memory

16 GB

Display

6.70 inch 20.1:9, 2412 x 1080 pixel 394 PPI, capacitive ouchscreen , Fluid AMOLED, Touch Response Rate: 360Hz (hardware), 720Hz (software), HDR, 120 Hz

Storage

256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash, 256 GB

, 224 GB free

Connections

1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: USB-C, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: Accelerometer, Electronic Compass, Gyroscope, Proximity Sensor, Flick-detect Sensor, OTG, Miracast

Networking

802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.2, GSM: 850/900/1800/1900; WCDMA: B1/B2/B4/B5/B8/B19; FDD-LTE: B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B12/B13/B17/B18/B19/B20/B25/B26/B28/B30/B32/B66/B71; TDD-LTE: B38/B39/B40/B41; SA: n1/n2/n3/n5/n7/n8/n20/n25/n28/n30/n38/n40/n41/n66/n71/n77/n78; NSA: n1/n2/n3/n5/n7/n8/n20/n25/n28/n30/n38/n40/n41/n66/n71/n77/n78, Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 8.75 x 163 x 75.4

Battery

4800 mAh, 2x 2S1P 2,400 mAh

Charging

wireless charging, fast charging / Quickcharge

Operating System

Android 12

Camera

Primary Camera: 50 MPix (Sony IMX766, OIS, 1/1.56", ƒ/1.8) + 8 MP (Ultra-wide Angle: 119.9°, ƒ/2.2) + 2 MP (Macro Lens)
Secondary Camera: 16 MPix (ƒ/2.4, EIS

Additional features

Speakers: Stereo, charger, USB cable, Quick Start Guide, Oxygen OS12, 24 Months Warranty, Widevine L1, GPS (L1, L5), GLONASS, QZSS, BeiDOU, Galileo (E1, E5), SBAS, fanless

Weight

203.5 g, Power Supply: 209 g

Price

699 Euro

Links

OnePlus homepage

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating	Date	Model	Weight	Drive	Size	Resolution
87 % v7 ^(old)	08 / 2022	OnePlus 10T SD 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730	203.5 g	256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	6.70"	2412x1080
88.1 % v7 ^(old)	06 / 2022	OnePlus 10 Pro SD 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730	200.5 g	256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	6.70"	3216x1440
87.7 % v7 ^(old)	03 / 2022	Xiaomi 12 SD 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730	179 g	256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	6.28"	2400x1080
87.9 % v7 ^(old)	04 / 2022	Oppo Find X5 SD 888 5G, Adreno 660	196 g	256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	6.55"	2400x1080
87.9 % v7 ^(old)	03 / 2022	Motorola Edge 30 Pro SD 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730	196 g	256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	6.70"	2400x1080
89.3 % v7 ^(old)	05 / 2022	Samsung Galaxy S22 Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920	167 g	128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	6.10"	2340x1080

保护壳 - OnePlus智能手机，带冲孔

OnePlus 10T的正面有一个平坦的OLED显示屏，边缘很好，很窄。屏幕和设备正面之间的比例是很好的87.9%。与使用大猩猩玻璃的OnePlus 10 Pro相比，T型机只在两侧使用大猩猩玻璃5。

OnePlus智能手机的设计在很大程度上是基于Oppo的姐妹机型的设计。OnePlus 10T的玻璃背面与主底座无缝连接，类似于Find X5 Pro。由于采用了特殊的玻璃热弯工艺，相机模块和背面之间几乎没有可以用手指感觉到的过渡。后者有两个颜色版本，即翡翠绿和月石黑。如果你想尽量减少指纹，你不应该选择高光版本，而应该选择具有类似玄武岩纹理的黑色版本。

我们喜欢这款上流社会的智能手机的做工和感觉。只有塑料框架并不真正符合700美元智能手机的形象。OnePlus用一个新颖的天线系统来证明这一点，该系统由总共15根独立的天线组成，据称在横向模式下持有时可以提高信号性能。这种天线系统在外壳周围呈环形排列，也需要相当大的空间，因此，高端OnePlus智能手机的商标--警报滑块被牺牲了。

正如OnePlus 10 Pro，制造商已经为其最新的高端智能手机处置了IP认证，所以没有官方的防尘、防溅水或防雨保护。像一加910T具有相同的密封性，根据OnePlus的说法，所以与水接触（理论上）应该不是问题。

尺寸比较

特点 - 带有USB2.0的OnePlus 10T

OnePlus 10T提供快速的UFS 3.1存储，在我们的样本设备中拥有256GB的容量。然而，由于操作系统和一些预装的应用程序，实际可用的存储空间明显低于224GB。需要更多空间存放视频或照片的用户将不得不寻找其他替代品，因为通过micoSD卡进行存储扩展是不可能的。

不像专业机型OnePLus 10T的USB-C端口只有2.0规格，但可以通过USB OTG连接记忆棒等外设。通过Miracast将显示内容无线传输到外部显示器也是可能的，而且由于Widevine L1的存在，流媒体服务的视频内容可以以高清质量观看。

软件--OnePlus智能手机与Android 12

OnePlus 10T搭载了Android 12，在市场推出时将与内部的Oxygen OS用户界面的12版本相结合。在审查期间，安全补丁是从2022年7月开始，在市场推出之前。制造商承诺在最初发布后有三个主要的Android 更新和四年的安全补丁。

更新时间表预计将升级到OxygenOS 13，并采用新的Aquamorphic设计，用于OnePlus 10 Pro今年晚些时候。与OnePlus 10 Pro一样，用户界面是基于一个名为统一操作系统的统一代码库，它合并了Oppo和OnePlus智能手机的操作系统。据称，拥有16GB内存的OnePlus 10T的一个特殊功能是多任务处理--制造商声称，超过35个应用程序可以在后台同时运行。

通信与GNSS - 带WiFi 6的OnePlus手机

OnePlus 10T应该总共安装了15根天线，以确保一流的5G和Wi-Fi接收。正如700美元左右价格区间的智能手机所预期的那样，这款高端智能手机使用Wi-Fi 6，但6千兆赫的频段不能用于WLAN传输。

除了目前的Wi-Fi标准外，OnePlus 10T还提供多用户MIMO，确保家庭网络中的传输速率高且稳定。结合华硕的ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000，我们测得的峰值传输率超过900MBit/s。

OnePlus手机支持所有当前的移动标准，包括用于移动互联网接入的5G。频率范围非常广泛，用户一般都能得到很好的定位。由于总共有24个支持的LTE频段，没有什么能阻挡OnePlus 10T的海外旅行。

Networking
iperf3 receive AXE11000
OnePlus 10T Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	934 (768^min - 949^max) MBit/s
Samsung Galaxy S22 Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	763 (386^min - 780^max) MBit/s -18%
Average of class Smartphone (34.8 - 1875, n=184, last 2 years)	714 MBit/s -24%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
OnePlus 10T Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	933 (865^min - 958^max) MBit/s
Samsung Galaxy S22 Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	823 (418^min - 852^max) MBit/s -12%
Average of class Smartphone (40.5 - 1810, n=186, last 2 years)	729 MBit/s -22%

OnePlus 10T; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø934 (768-949)

OnePlus 10T; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø933 (865-958)

为了评估智能手机在现实世界中的定位能力，我们用Garmin Venu 2记录测试路线，以便进行比较。一加手机用大多数至少有双频连接的卫星导航系统来确定其位置。

偏差总体上令人满意地低，因此，高端智能手机和Garmin智能手表之间记录的路线往往是相同的。在GPS数据中只显示出轻微的不准确，主要是在弯道或转弯处。

电话和语音质量 - OnePlus双卡手机

OnePlus 10T提供双SIM卡功能，因此可以同时将两张nano-SIM卡插入智能手机。

语音质量很好，在扬声器模式的视频通话中，智能手机也能与通话者进行清晰的沟通。还支持VoLTE。

摄像机 - OnePlus 10T配备三摄像头

隐藏在冲孔中的1600万像素前置摄像头提供了良好的自拍效果，具有令人愉悦的曝光水平和强烈的色彩还原。在人像模式下，虚化效果很到位。

OnePlus 10T并不像10 Pro那样依赖索尼的IMX789。 10 Pro。而是使用了OnePlus Nord 2 5G的IMX766传感器。 OnePlus Nord 2 5G的主摄像头。5千万像素的镜头，用OIS稳定，在明亮的光线下，良好的图像清晰度和生动的色彩给人留下深刻印象。然而，OnePlus仍然需要在明亮图像区域的曝光方面做出改进。OnePlus 10T在黑暗中很快达到了它的极限。特别是在感光性和主体照明方面，一加10T在黑暗中迅速达到极限。 10 Pro在另一个层面上运作。

这同样适用于超广角镜头，尽管10 Pro 和2021 旗舰，在照片质量方面的退步在这里已经可见。OnePlus 10T的镜头产生了199度的视野，一些伪影，相对较少的细节，以及外围区域明显的模糊性。只有800万像素的分辨率也很低。

视频性能也有削减：8K选项以及前置摄像头或超广角摄像头的UHD录制都无法使用。索尼IMX766镜头在4K30时的稳定效果还不错，录制质量也一般。在录制过程中更换镜头，只有在1080p时才有可能。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Main camera Main camera Low light Ultra wide angle

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images

我们用ColorChecker Passport进行的色彩分析显示，与实际参考色相比，偏差相对较高；尤其是蓝色和绿色调并不真正匹配。在受控的照明条件下，颜色明显更亮，但在灰色调中也可以看到弱点，对于这个价格范围来说，肯定可以做得更好。

配件和保修 - OnePlus手机与电源适配器

OnePlus 10T的交货范围包括一个160瓦的电源适配器、一条红色的USB 2.0电缆（Type C to C）、一个SIM卡工具和一份快速启动指南。不包括保护罩，但安装了保护膜，可以使用。

OnePlus在德国提供24个月的保修。这可能因地区而异，所以购买前一定要向供应商查询。

输入设备和操作 - 带有360赫兹的OnePlus 10T

那些想使用人脸识别来解锁屏幕的人可以通过前置摄像头来实现。然而，由于二维程序，用脸部进行生物识别不是很安全。出于安全考虑，应该使用OLED屏幕下的指纹传感器。尽管这只是通过光学方式工作，而不是通过超声波技术，如在三星的Galaxy S22 Ultra，但该传感器反应迅速，通常能准确识别手指。

安装的振动马达在日常使用中提供了很好的触觉反馈，但对于我们的口味来说可以再强一点。除了良好的振动质量，由于120赫兹的高刷新率以及高达360赫兹的采样率，智能手机的操作非常流畅。电容式多点触屏甚至被指定为在特殊应用（包括游戏）中具有高达720次/秒的触摸检测率（通过软件）。单手模式也是可用的，但必须先在设置中启用。

▶ load Youtube video

显示屏 - OnePlus智能手机采用OLED

OnePlus手机使用6.7英寸AMOLED显示屏，刷新率高达120赫兹。分辨率为2412x1080，这导致了约400PPI的体面的像素密度和20.1:9的格式。用户可以在60和120赫兹之间切换刷新率。一加10T没有LTPO显示屏，就像在专业机型具有1至120赫兹之间的自适应控制。该面板提供HDR10+认证和对10位色彩的原生支持。

在亮度方面，T型的AMOLED屏幕与OnePlus的旗舰智能手机相当。我们的测量结果显示，APL18的最大亮度为873cd/m²，在纯白背景下的亮度也是861cd/m²。然而，一个小米12或 Galaxy S22比一加10T的亮度还要高。实现的亮度低于1000cd/m²，也不是HDR内容的最佳选择。

OnePlus 10T使用脉冲宽度调制（PWM），频率相当高，为361赫兹，用于亮度控制。我们在设置菜单中没有找到直流调光模式，但在低亮度时，振幅的波动变得更小。


842 cd/m²	853 cd/m²	862 cd/m²
852 cd/m²	861 cd/m²	865 cd/m²
849 cd/m²	859 cd/m²	860 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 865 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 855.9 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 97 %
Center on Battery: 861 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.27 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 2.9 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
99.6% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.303

	OnePlus 10T Fluid AMOLED, 2412x1080, 6.7"	OnePlus 10 Pro AMOLED, 3216x1440, 6.7"	Xiaomi 12 OLED, 2400x1080, 6.3"	Oppo Find X5 AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.6"	Motorola Edge 30 Pro AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.7"	Samsung Galaxy S22 AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.1"
Screen		26%	10%	17%	16%	12%
Brightness middle	861	793 -8%	867 1%	709 -18%	649 -25%	853 -1%
Brightness	856	776 -9%	867 1%	718 -16%	649 -24%	858 0%
Brightness Distribution	97	95 -2%	98 1%	95 -2%	98 1%	96 -1%
Black Level *
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	2.27	0.79 65%	1.7 25%	1.3 43%	1.18 48%	1.9 16%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	4.17	1.93 54%	4.4 -6%	2.5 40%	2.07 50%	3.2 23%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	2.9	1.3 55%	1.8 38%	1.3 55%	1.5 48%	1.9 34%
Gamma	2.303 ^96%	2.223 ^99%	2.2 ^100%	2.27 ^97%	2.236 ^98%	2.07 ^106%
CCT	6141 ^106%	6624 ^98%	6762 ^96%	6489 ^100%	2538 ^256%	6460 ^101%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

360.8 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 360.8 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 360.8 Hz is relatively high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. However, there are reports that some users are still sensitive to PWM at 500 Hz and above, so be aware.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8746 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

在固定的变焦水平和不同的亮度设置下进行的一系列测量

安装的OLED显示屏，其中个别像素可以完全禁用，导致 "绝对 "黑色，提供强烈的对比度和良好的校准。在我们用软件CalMAN和分光光度计进行的测试中，OnePlus 10T的面板在<3的目标范围内提供了低色彩偏差（在配置文件 "自然 "中）。此外，这款高端手机提供了许多设置选项，除了不同的配置文件外，还影响专业模式的个别参数。

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
1.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 0.6 ms rise
1.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 0.6 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 4 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
1.3 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 0.7 ms rise
1.3 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 0.6 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 4 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

OnePlus 10T在日常户外使用方面的装备非常好。在阳光直射和玻璃表面的伴随反射下，由于高亮度和强烈的对比度，内容总是足够清晰的（带保护膜的照片）。

AMOLED面板的可视角度稳定性也非常好。即使在平坦的视角下，也只能感觉到亮度的最小损失。

性能 - 采用高通SoC的OnePlus 10T

作为欧洲首批智能手机之一，OnePlus 10T采用了骁龙8+第一代芯片，它不仅承诺与10 Pro相比，CPU性能提高10%。 10 Pro而且GPU时钟速率也提高了10%。

但节约潜力是这里的主要焦点。据高通公司称，与10 Pro相比，耗电量下降了15%。骁龙8代1而每瓦特的性能最高可提高30%。

我们使用高性能模式进行基准测量。与华为设备类似，OnePlus一直在节制高通芯片组出厂时的性能，因为OnePlus 9 Pro.该骁龙8+第一代的性能大致上与骁龙8代1在Geekbench 5的单核测试中，但Plus版本在多核测试中的得分接近3000分，给人留下深刻印象。

Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (897 - 1389, n=25)	1281 Points 0%
OnePlus 10T Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 16384	1277 Points
Xiaomi 12 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192	1237 Points -3%
OnePlus 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	1211 Points -5%
Motorola Edge 30 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	1195 Points -6%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192	1145 Points -10%
Oppo Find X5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192	1121 Points -12%
Average of class Smartphone (126 - 2437, n=172, last 2 years)	995 Points -22%
Multi-Core
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (3782 - 4436, n=25)	4167 Points +5%
OnePlus 10T Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 16384	3987 Points
Motorola Edge 30 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	3659 Points -8%
Xiaomi 12 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192	3581 Points -10%
OnePlus 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	3521 Points -12%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192	3474 Points -13%
Oppo Find X5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192	3376 Points -15%
Average of class Smartphone (473 - 6687, n=172, last 2 years)	3312 Points -17%

Antutu v9 - Total Score
OnePlus 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	1011412 Points +20%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (782013 - 1119358, n=23)	997431 Points +18%
Xiaomi 12 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192	982789 Points +16%
Motorola Edge 30 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	970465 Points +15%
OnePlus 10T Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 16384	846323 Points
Oppo Find X5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192	824694 Points -3%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192	813746 Points -4%
Average of class Smartphone (99654 - 1650926, n=104, last 2 years)	798401 Points -6%

PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
OnePlus 10T Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 16384	15944 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (11029 - 20841, n=24)	15090 Points -5%
Xiaomi 12 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192	14508 Points -9%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192	14068 Points -12%
Oppo Find X5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192	13913 Points -13%
OnePlus 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	13827 Points -13%
Motorola Edge 30 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	13611 Points -15%
Average of class Smartphone (4609 - 24088, n=190, last 2 years)	12976 Points -19%

CrossMark - Overall
OnePlus 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	1169 Points +45%
Xiaomi 12 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192	1109 Points +38%
Oppo Find X5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192	1042 Points +29%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (749 - 1178, n=23)	1033 Points +28%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192	957 Points +19%
Average of class Smartphone (187 - 1517, n=157, last 2 years)	884 Points +10%
OnePlus 10T Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 16384	806 Points

BaseMark OS II
Overall
OnePlus 10T Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 16384	8320 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (5642 - 8753, n=23)	7450 Points -10%
Motorola Edge 30 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	7070 Points -15%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192	6991 Points -16%
Oppo Find X5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192	6921 Points -17%
Xiaomi 12 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192	6860 Points -18%
OnePlus 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	6584 Points -21%
Average of class Smartphone (1196 - 11976, n=151, last 2 years)	6297 Points -24%
System
OnePlus 10T Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 16384	12230 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (8750 - 13563, n=23)	11726 Points -4%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192	11210 Points -8%
Oppo Find X5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192	11207 Points -8%
Motorola Edge 30 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	10739 Points -12%
Xiaomi 12 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192	10334 Points -16%
Average of class Smartphone (2368 - 16475, n=151, last 2 years)	10163 Points -17%
OnePlus 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	9934 Points -19%
Memory
OnePlus 10T Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 16384	8822 Points
Oppo Find X5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192	7610 Points -14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (3871 - 9114, n=23)	7492 Points -15%
Motorola Edge 30 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	7357 Points -17%
Average of class Smartphone (962 - 12716, n=151, last 2 years)	6767 Points -23%
Xiaomi 12 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192	6535 Points -26%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192	6413 Points -27%
OnePlus 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	5437 Points -38%
Graphics
OnePlus 10T Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 16384	24037 Points
OnePlus 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	21678 Points -10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (16194 - 26660, n=23)	21146 Points -12%
Xiaomi 12 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192	18370 Points -24%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192	17269 Points -28%
Motorola Edge 30 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	17159 Points -29%
Average of class Smartphone (1017 - 58651, n=151, last 2 years)	16908 Points -30%
Oppo Find X5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192	14770 Points -39%
Web
Samsung Galaxy S22 Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192	1924 Points +5%
Motorola Edge 30 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	1843 Points +1%
OnePlus 10T Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 16384	1833 Points
Oppo Find X5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192	1822 Points -1%
Xiaomi 12 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192	1785 Points -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (1198 - 2006, n=23)	1699 Points -7%
Average of class Smartphone (841 - 2145, n=151, last 2 years)	1564 Points -15%
OnePlus 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	1527 Points -17%

AImark - Score v2.x
Oppo Find X5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192	257002 Points +3595%
OnePlus 10T Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 16384	6955 Points
Xiaomi 12 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192	6766 Points -3%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192	6487 Points -7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (1043 - 7865, n=11)	6385 Points -8%
OnePlus 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	6121 Points -12%

两者之间的性能差异骁龙8+第一代和其前代产品在图形基准测试中略大。在GFXBench的屏幕外得分中，OnePlus 10T的 Adreno 730的表现有时会超过配备骁龙8代的竞争对手20%。与10 Pro类似，屏幕上的分数显示了与该公司兄弟Oppo的软件亲和性。中国人将他们的手机锁定在每秒60帧。

3DMark | GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 | GFXBench 3.0 | GFXBench 3.1 | GFXBench

3DMark
Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
OnePlus 10T Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	2876 Points
OnePlus 10 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	2568 Points -11%
Xiaomi 12 Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	2418 Points -16%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1855 Points -36%
Motorola Edge 30 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1567 Points -46%
Oppo Find X5 Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1535 Points -47%
Wild Life Extreme
OnePlus 10T Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	2824 Points
OnePlus 10 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	2637 Points -7%
Xiaomi 12 Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	2586 Points -8%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1946 Points -31%
Motorola Edge 30 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1629 Points -42%
Oppo Find X5 Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1542 Points -45%
Wild Life Unlimited Score
OnePlus 10T Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	10989 Points
OnePlus 10 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	10282 Points -6%
Xiaomi 12 Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	9782 Points -11%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	7458 Points -32%
Motorola Edge 30 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	6483 Points -41%
Oppo Find X5 Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	5888 Points -46%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen
Xiaomi 12 Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	121 fps +102%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	119 fps +98%
Motorola Edge 30 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	119 fps +98%
OnePlus 10 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	60 fps 0%
Oppo Find X5 Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	60 fps 0%
OnePlus 10T Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	60 fps
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
OnePlus 10T Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	435 fps
Xiaomi 12 Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	428 fps -2%
OnePlus 10 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	368 fps -15%
Motorola Edge 30 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	306 fps -30%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	302 fps -31%
Oppo Find X5 Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	294 fps -32%

GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Xiaomi 12 Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	121 fps +102%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	119 fps +98%
Motorola Edge 30 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	119 fps +98%
Oppo Find X5 Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	62 fps +3%
OnePlus 10 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	60 fps 0%
OnePlus 10T Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	60 fps
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
OnePlus 10T Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	221 fps
Xiaomi 12 Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	213 fps -4%
OnePlus 10 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	204 fps -8%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	193 fps -13%
Oppo Find X5 Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	180 fps -19%
Motorola Edge 30 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	158 fps -29%

GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Xiaomi 12 Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	121 fps +102%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	113 fps +88%
Motorola Edge 30 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	109 fps +82%
Oppo Find X5 Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	61 fps +2%
OnePlus 10 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	60 fps 0%
OnePlus 10T Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	60 fps
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
OnePlus 10T Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	171 fps
Xiaomi 12 Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	164 fps -4%
OnePlus 10 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	131 fps -23%
Oppo Find X5 Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	126 fps -26%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	123 fps -28%
Motorola Edge 30 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	119 fps -30%

GFXBench
on screen Car Chase Onscreen
Xiaomi 12 Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	81 fps +35%
Motorola Edge 30 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	68 fps +13%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	60 fps 0%
OnePlus 10 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	60 fps 0%
Oppo Find X5 Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	60 fps 0%
OnePlus 10T Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	60 fps
1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen
OnePlus 10T Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	108 fps
Motorola Edge 30 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	86 fps -20%
Xiaomi 12 Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	78 fps -28%
Oppo Find X5 Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	74 fps -31%
OnePlus 10 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	71 fps -34%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	67 fps -38%
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Xiaomi 12 Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	69 fps +17%
Motorola Edge 30 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	60 fps +2%
OnePlus 10T Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	59 fps
OnePlus 10 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	57 fps -3%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	51 fps -14%
Oppo Find X5 Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	51 fps -14%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
OnePlus 10T Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	44 fps
OnePlus 10 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	43 fps -2%
Motorola Edge 30 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	42 fps -5%
Xiaomi 12 Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	39 fps -11%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	29 fps -34%
Oppo Find X5 Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	29 fps -34%
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Motorola Edge 30 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	98 fps +63%
Xiaomi 12 Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	93 fps +55%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	66 fps +10%
OnePlus 10 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	60 fps 0%
Oppo Find X5 Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	60 fps 0%
OnePlus 10T Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	60 fps
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
OnePlus 10T Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	123 fps
OnePlus 10 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	101 fps -18%
Motorola Edge 30 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	101 fps -18%
Xiaomi 12 Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	99 fps -20%
Oppo Find X5 Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	78 fps -37%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	67 fps -46%

在日常使用中，系统速度是一流的，在我们的审查样本中，结合16GB的内存，确保平稳运行。使用Chrome浏览器进行浏览也很稳健，尽管基准测试有些温和。

Jetstream 2 | Speedometer 2.0 | WebXPRT 3 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (76.2 - 204, n=23)	125.2 Points +54%
Oppo Find X5 (Chrome 99.0.4844.73)	125.1 Points +54%
Motorola Edge 30 Pro (Chrome 99)	121.6 Points +49%
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=161, last 2 years)	120.4 Points +48%
Xiaomi 12 (Chrome 99.0.4844.58)	113.8 Points +40%
OnePlus 10 Pro (Chrome100)	101.23 Points +24%
Samsung Galaxy S22 (Chrome 100.0.4896.79)	96.4 Points +18%
OnePlus 10T (Chrome 104)	81.383 Points

Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 569, n=146, last 2 years)	136.2 runs/min +46%
OnePlus 10 Pro (Chrome100)	129.3 runs/min +38%
Motorola Edge 30 Pro (Chome 99)	129 runs/min +38%
Oppo Find X5 (Chrome 99.0.4844.73)	121 runs/min +30%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (69.1 - 196, n=18)	119.6 runs/min +28%
Samsung Galaxy S22 (Chrome 100.0.4896.79)	111 runs/min +19%
Xiaomi 12 (Chrome 99.0.4844.58)	107 runs/min +15%
OnePlus 10T (Chrome 104)	93.4 runs/min

WebXPRT 3 - Overall
OnePlus 10 Pro (Chrome100)	193 Points +82%
Oppo Find X5 (Chrome 99.0.4844.73)	182 Points +72%
Motorola Edge 30 Pro (Chrome 99)	167 Points +58%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (106 - 224, n=14)	159.4 Points +50%
Samsung Galaxy S22 (Chrome 100.0.4896.79)	149 Points +41%
Average of class Smartphone (38 - 347, n=79, last 2 years)	148.7 Points +40%
Xiaomi 12 (Chrome 99.0.4844.58)	148 Points +40%
OnePlus 10T (Chrome 104)	106 Points

Octane V2 - Total Score
Motorola Edge 30 Pro (Chrome 99)	50626 Points +27%
OnePlus 10 Pro (Chrome100)	49343 Points +23%
Oppo Find X5 (Chrome 99.0.4844.73)	46054 Points +15%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (17622 - 61536, n=24)	42193 Points +6%
OnePlus 10T (Chrome 104)	39982 Points
Samsung Galaxy S22 (Chrome 100.0.4896.79)	38992 Points -2%
Xiaomi 12 (Chrome 99.0.4844.58)	37279 Points -7%
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=203, last 2 years)	37161 Points -7%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
OnePlus 10T (Chrome 104)	1627.3 ms *
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=160, last 2 years)	1568 ms * +4%
Samsung Galaxy S22 (Chrome 100.0.4896.79)	1566 ms * +4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (665 - 1707, n=22)	1023 ms * +37%
Xiaomi 12 (Chrome 99.0.4844.58)	930 ms * +43%
Oppo Find X5 (Chrome 99.0.4844.73)	923 ms * +43%
OnePlus 10 Pro (Chrome100)	823.5 ms * +49%
Motorola Edge 30 Pro (Chrome 99)	819 ms * +50%

* ... smaller is better

在OnePlus 10T中，应用程序的加载时间令人愉快地缩短，这也是由于UFS 3.1存储的快速写入和读取率。然而，安装的存储介质的速度落后于竞争对手。

	OnePlus 10T	OnePlus 10 Pro	Xiaomi 12	Oppo Find X5	Motorola Edge 30 Pro	Samsung Galaxy S22	Average 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	Average of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5		35%	70%	24%	40%	23%	41%	48%
Sequential Read 256KB	1568.37	1602.12 2%	1851 18%	1964 25%	1832 17%	1486 -5%	1749 ?(950 - 2037, n=101) 12%	1839 ?(226 - 4512, n=192, last 2 years) 17%
Sequential Write 256KB	847.69	1253.34 48%	1417 67%	782 -8%	1028 21%	993 17%	1163 ?(452 - 2004, n=101) 37%	1425 ?(57.5 - 3908, n=192, last 2 years) 68%
Random Read 4KB	173.45	284.34 64%	325.2 87%	272.9 57%	277.7 60%	273 57%	286 ?(173.5 - 543, n=101) 65%	277 ?(22.2 - 483, n=192, last 2 years) 60%
Random Write 4KB	211.24	264.45 25%	437.5 107%	259.3 23%	339.5 61%	257.6 22%	319 ?(132.1 - 499, n=102) 51%	309 ?(9.4 - 753, n=192, last 2 years) 46%

游戏--一加手机只能管理60帧的画面

为了评估日常使用中的GPU性能，我们用我们的软件GameBench运行了一些Android 。制造商特别为游戏玩家实施了PA帧稳定器和GPU负载控制功能，这应该能使系统更加稳定。然而，到目前为止，只有选定的游戏支持这一点，即《元神冲击》和《PUBG》手机。

事实上，这两款Android 游戏的运行都没有大的帧数下降。至于PUBG手机，中国制造商设置了60帧的限制，无论我们选择哪种图形设置 - UHD模式除外。在这里，OnePlus 10T稳定地运行，没有明显的下降，40帧。玄色冲击中的限制是30帧。

即使是理论上支持高达144 FPS的Armajet，也只有最高60 fps的支持。即使是价格低廉的中端SoC，如骁龙695，在2D多人射击游戏中平均能达到80帧以上。由于废热很高，制造商似乎对OnePlus 10T采取了安全措施，因为在游戏过程中机箱会变得非常热。

OnePlus 10T; Armajet: Ø59.4 (28-69)

OnePlus 10T; Genshin Impact: Ø29.6 (14-31)

OnePlus 10T; PUBG Mobile; Smooth: Ø59.8 (59-60)

OnePlus 10T; PUBG Mobile; Balanced: Ø59.7 (50-60)

OnePlus 10T; PUBG Mobile; HD: Ø59.7 (53-60)

OnePlus 10T; PUBG Mobile; Ultra HD: Ø39.8 (29-42)

排放 - OnePlus 10T发热

温度

虽然一加10T有一个新的Cryo Velocity Vapor冷却系统，并且在的SoC效率更高。骁龙8+第一代我们记录到的表面温度（最高为46.7°C）高于一加10T。 10 Pro.正常模式下的废热也成为SoC性能稳定性的问题，因为电压和过热保护在测试中经常启动。

我们通过GFX基准（OpenGL3.1）的压力测试来检查芯片组可能的节流情况，该测试连续重复各自的测试场景30次并记录帧率。之后，一加手机接受了3DMark压力测试。

在GFX Bench中，高负荷下的帧率降低并没有发生，但机箱在这里也变得非常热，并出现系统崩溃。OnePlus 10T在两个3DMark测试场景中也经常过热。

经过大约10次测试，只有在完全冷却的情况下，在事先没有太多使用的情况下，完成了野生生活压力测试。然而，性能的降低在这里也几乎不明显，所以OnePlus在SoC管理方面选择了一个相当积极的设置。要么是高废热导致经常性的系统崩溃，要么是骁龙8+1代在各自的使用场景结束前几乎没有节制地完成工作。

Max. Load

Idle


45.3 °C	41.6 °C	35.8 °C
46.7 °C	42.4 °C	38.2 °C
46.7 °C	42.5 °C	38.4 °C

Maximum: 46.7 °C
Average: 42 °C


34.9 °C	38.9 °C	37.5 °C
36 °C	39.7 °C	40.5 °C
35.2 °C	39.5 °C	41.5 °C

Maximum: 41.5 °C
Average: 38.2 °C

Power Supply (max.) 45.2 °C | Room Temperature 21.6 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 42 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 46.7 °C / 116 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 41.5 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.4 °C / 83 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

3DMark - Wild Life Stress Test Stability
OnePlus 10T Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	92.7 %
OnePlus 10 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	69.3 % -25%
Motorola Edge 30 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	57.4 % -38%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	56.4 % -39%
Oppo Find X5 Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	55.1 % -41%
Xiaomi 12 Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	46.3 % -50%

OnePlus 10T Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; 0.0.0.0: Ø61.8 (59-63.6)

OnePlus 10 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; 0.0.0.0: Ø45.4 (41.6-60)

Xiaomi 12 Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; 0.0.0.0: Ø35.6 (27.5-59.4)

Oppo Find X5 Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; 0.0.0.0: Ø25.3 (19.3-35.1)

Motorola Edge 30 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; 0.0.0.0: Ø38.6 (34.3-59.7)

Samsung Galaxy S22 Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; 0.0.0.0: Ø27.2 (23.6-41.9)

发言人

OnePlus 10T的双扬声器并不像10Pro的扬声器那样响亮或线性。 10 Pro.总体而言，这两个扬声器缺乏深度，而且没有低音。对于一款高端手机来说，中音和高音也可以做得更好。

耳机或外部扬声器可以通过USB-C端口连接。那些喜欢蓝牙无线输出的人可以使用音频编解码器，如SBC、AAC、aptX、aptXHD和aptX自适应，以及LDAC和LHDC。

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

OnePlus 10T audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 68.4% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(-) | nearly no mids - on average 68.4% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(-) | nearly no highs - on average 68.4% lower than median
(+) | highs are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (124.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 93% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 1% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 98% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 0% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

OnePlus 10 Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 31.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 18% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 73% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 40% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 53% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电池寿命 - OnePlus 10T充电很快

消耗功率

OnePlus智能手机的电池容量为4800毫安。据OnePlus称，150瓦的SUPERVOOC耐力版在充电约10分钟后可提供63%的容量，这应该足以满足一天的使用。在测试中，充满电大约需要19至20分钟，这是非常好的，尽管一小米10 Ultra也在不到23分钟内为其两个2250毫安时的电池充电。

尽管SUPERVOOC电源的额定功率很高，但OnePlus承诺的电池寿命为1600次，这明显高于智能手机电池约900至1000次的 "标准"。据报道，这是由13个温度传感器、一个特别适用的智能充电芯片和128位加密技术来保证的。

一加10T的功耗总体上非常好，即使与一加10 Pro相比也是如此。OnePlus 10 Pro。。在负载下，该骁龙8+第一代需要的电量比其前代产品。因此，正如Geekbench和GFX Bench的测量结果所示，新的Kryo-CPU似乎明显更有效率。

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0 / 0.1 Watt
Idle	0.8 / 1.2 / 1.3 Watt
Load	3.5 / 5.9 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	OnePlus 10T 4800 mAh	OnePlus 10 Pro 5000 mAh	Xiaomi 12 4500 mAh	Oppo Find X5 4800 mAh	Motorola Edge 30 Pro 4800 mAh	Samsung Galaxy S22 3700 mAh	Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1	Average of class Smartphone
Power Consumption		-37%	-30%	-28%	-60%	-26%	-47%	-41%
Idle Minimum *	0.8	0.7 12%	0.87 -9%	1.01 -26%	1.2 -50%	0.69 14%	1.006 ?(0.56 - 2.57, n=21) -26%	0.894 ?(0.4 - 2.37, n=152, last 2 years) -12%
Idle Average *	1.2	1.1 8%	1.7 -42%	1.59 -33%	1.6 -33%	1.19 1%	1.834 ?(0.71 - 8.65, n=21) -53%	1.456 ?(0.6 - 4.26, n=152, last 2 years) -21%
Idle Maximum *	1.3	1.7 -31%	1.82 -40%	1.6 -23%	2.5 -92%	1.26 3%	1.984 ?(0.79 - 8.71, n=21) -53%	1.616 ?(0.83 - 4.45, n=152, last 2 years) -24%
Load Average *	3.5	6.4 -83%	4.68 -34%	3.87 -11%	5.2 -49%	6.97 -99%	5.68 ?(2.75 - 15, n=21) -62%	6.45 ?(2.3 - 16.5, n=147, last 2 years) -84%
Load Maximum *	5.9	11.3 -92%	7.41 -26%	8.74 -48%	10.4 -76%	8.85 -50%	8.44 ?(4.54 - 15, n=21) -43%	9.8 ?(3.53 - 20.8, n=147, last 2 years) -66%

* ... smaller is better

Power Consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

OnePlus 10T Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1: Ø3.88 (0.779-7.97)

OnePlus 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1: Ø6.31 (1.89-11.3)

Power Consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

OnePlus 10T Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø9.67 (7.25-10.7)

OnePlus 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø6.72 (5.35-8.45)

Xiaomi 12 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø9.02 (8.51-9.65)

Oppo Find X5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø10.6 (5.82-11.1)

Motorola Edge 30 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø11.5 (10.4-12.5)

Samsung Galaxy S22 Samsung Exynos 2200; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø9.32 (5-16.8)

OnePlus 10T Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.865 (0.73-1.198)

OnePlus 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.975 (0.806-1.805)

Xiaomi 12 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.18 (1.054-1.884)

Oppo Find X5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.142 (1.071-1.319)

Motorola Edge 30 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.619 (1.378-2.67)

Samsung Galaxy S22 Samsung Exynos 2200; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.845 (0.79-1.42)

电池寿命

在我们的两项实际电池测试中，OnePlus 10T在120赫兹的固定刷新率下提供了非常好的运行时间，这些测试是在150cd/m²的调整显示亮度下进行的，因此非常具有可比性。在WLAN测试中，这款高档智能手机的运行时间超过14小时，在停用WLAN模块的情况下，视频播放时间也达到13小时。

Battery Runtime

Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)		29h 55min
WiFi Websurfing (Chrome 103)		14h 16min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		27h 26min
Load (maximum brightness)		5h 32min

	OnePlus 10T 4800 mAh	OnePlus 10 Pro 5000 mAh	Xiaomi 12 4500 mAh	Oppo Find X5 4800 mAh	Motorola Edge 30 Pro 4800 mAh	Samsung Galaxy S22 3700 mAh
Battery Runtime		-19%	1%	-7%	-10%	-12%
Reader / Idle	1795	1617 -10%	2558 43%	2075 16%	1985 11%	2182 22%
H.264	1646	1121 -32%	890 -46%	1294 -21%	1006 -39%	887 -46%
WiFi v1.3	856	767 -10%	760 -11%	937 9%	816 -5%	675 -21%
Load	332	255 -23%	385 16%	231 -30%	306 -8%	324 -2%

Pros

+ 非常快的充电+电源

+ 高性能

+ 快速WLAN，但没有6GHz

+ 明亮的OLED面板

+ 运行时间长

Cons

- 相机上没有8K/UHD

- 只有USB2.0

- 平庸的超广角相机

- 少数线性扬声器

- 塑料框架

- 没有IP等级

对OnePlus 10T的评价

不管它今年的产品策略是否有些奇怪，一加提供了一个有趣的替代方案，即 OnePlus 10 Pro10T。虽然T型机在名义上不如2022年的实际旗舰机，但它拥有更高效的SoC，因此运行时间更长，还有更快的充电技术和略微明亮的显示屏。另一方面，一加10T也有一些缺点，如平庸的双扬声器，相对较弱的摄像头，以及缺乏高级功能。

那些不想没有IP等级、USB 3.1或Qi支持等功能的人应该仔细看看 Galaxy S22.得益于其更新政策， Galaxy-S22阵容也为反对步步高智能手机提供了一个强有力的论据。另一个拥有长期软件支持和更强大的相机组合的替代方案是谷歌的 Pixel 6 Pro.

一加10T是一款不错的智能手机，但它过于注重骁龙8+一代作为卖点。

价格和可用性

虽然一加10T于8月3日在纽约的发布会上正式推出，但该智能手机在北美的预购要到9月1日才开始，而公开销售预计将在近一个月后的9月29日进行。有趣的是，10T的预购延迟并不适用于英国的潜在买家，自8月3日起，它已经可以通过OnePlus的网站进行预购（629.00英镑起）。.

关于全球供应情况，OnePlus没有给出任何明确的原因，说明其杂乱无章的发布时间表，以及为什么该机型在一些市场比其他市场更早推出。因此，建议有兴趣的买家定期通过亚马逊（或任何其他合适的供应商）或OnePlus的官方网站检查供应情况。

OnePlus 10T - 08/30/2022 v7 ^(old)
Marcus Herbrich

Chassis

87%

Keyboard

67 / 75 → 89%

Pointing Device

94%

Connectivity

52 / 70 → 74%

Weight

88%

Battery

92%

Display

91%

Games Performance

71 / 64 → 100%

Application Performance

87 / 86 → 100%

Temperature

86%

Noise

100%

Audio

70 / 90 → 78%

Camera

70%

Average

81%

87%

Smartphone - Weighted Average

Price comparison

Editor of the original article: Jacob Fisher - Translator - 1344 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2022

Translator: Ninh Ngoc Duy - Editorial Assistant - 459232 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008

contact me via: Facebook

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > OnePlus 10T智能手机评论。得益于骁龙8+1代的OnePlus 10 Pro效率更高，并伴有惊人的快速充电。

Marcus Herbrich, 2022-08-21 (Update: 2024-08-15)

潜在的竞争对手比较

保护壳 - OnePlus智能手机，带冲孔

尺寸比较

特点 - 带有USB2.0的OnePlus 10T

软件--OnePlus智能手机与Android 12

通信与GNSS - 带WiFi 6的OnePlus手机

电话和语音质量 - OnePlus双卡手机

摄像机 - OnePlus 10T配备三摄像头

配件和保修 - OnePlus手机与电源适配器

输入设备和操作 - 带有360赫兹的OnePlus 10T

显示屏 - OnePlus智能手机采用OLED

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Display Response Times

性能 - 采用高通SoC的OnePlus 10T

游戏--一加手机只能管理60帧的画面

排放 - OnePlus 10T发热

温度

3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

发言人

OnePlus 10T audio analysis

OnePlus 10 Pro audio analysis

电池寿命 - OnePlus 10T充电很快

消耗功率

Power Consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

Power Consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

电池寿命

Pros

Cons

对OnePlus 10T的评价

价格和可用性

More articles related to this device

Price comparison