Oppo Find X6 Pro评论：令人印象深刻的旗舰级智能手机，配备改进的哈苏相机

Name: Oppo Find X6 Pro
Brand: Oppo

这算不算作弊？

Find X6 Pro建立在其前辈的优势之上，凭借哈苏相机系统和Snapdragon 8 Gen 2，以有吸引力的价格提供了非常好的硬件。然而，有一点需要注意的是。阅读我们的评论，了解这款Oppo智能手机是否值得购买。

Marcus Herbrich, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy), Published 05/28/2023 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

5G Android Smartphone

Find X6 Pro是Oppo对S23 Ultra的回应。Galaxy 旗舰机和小米13Ultra。虽然小米13 Ultra也计划在欧洲市场销售，但遗憾的是，Oppo的旗舰机只在中国销售。全球上市是不确定的，尤其是步步高电子仍需应对德国的销售禁令。

X5 Pro的继任者X5 Pro、X5 Pro的继任者（仍在德国销售），再次将重点放在相机系统上，与过去一样，是与哈苏公司共同开发的。以索尼1英寸规格的IMX989作为主摄像头的基础，并以其自己的MariSilicon X NPU进行图像优化，这家中国制造商希望给其在高端智能手机领域的强大竞争对手一个交代。

在其他方面，X6 Pro提供的高端硬件对于这个价格范围来说是可以预期的，其中包括一个6.82英寸的高分辨率1440p AMOLED显示屏，动态刷新率高达120赫兹，一个骁龙8代2以及高达16GB的LPDDR5X内存和512GB的UFS 4.0闪存。作为进口产品，Oppo旗舰机的价格约为1029.31美元起。

Test device courtesy of Trading Shenzhen

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Oppo Find X6 Pro (Find X6 Series)

Processor

Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 8 x 2 - 3.2 GHz, Cortex-X3 / A715 / A710 / A510 (Kryo)

Graphics adapter

Qualcomm Adreno 740

Memory

12 GB

Display

6.82 inch, 3168 x 1440 pixel 510 PPI, Capacitive Touchscreen, AMOLED, 240 Hz Touch-Sampling-Rate, glossy: yes, HDR, 120 Hz

Storage

256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash, 256 GB

, 223 GB free

Connections

1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: USB-C, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, color spectrum, IR Blaster, Miracast, OTG

Networking

Wi-Fi 7 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz be = Wi-Fi 7), Bluetooth 5.3, 5G: n1, n3, n41, n77, n78, n79, n5, n8, n28, n7, n20, n38, n40, n66, n41, n77, n78, n79; 4G: 1, 2 , 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 66, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41; 3G: 1, 2, 4, 5; 2G: 850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz, Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 9.5 x 164.8 x 76.2

Battery

5000 mAh Lithium-Polymer

Charging

wireless charging, fast charging / Quickcharge

Operating System

Android 13

Camera

Primary Camera: 50 MPix (f/1.8, 23mm, 1.6µm, OIS) + 50 MP (f/2.6, 65mm, 1.0µm, OIS, Tele) + 50 MP (f/2.2, 15mm, 1/1.56", 1.0µm, wide), Camera2 API: Level 3
Secondary Camera: 32 MPix (f/2.4, 21mm, 0.8µm)

Additional features

Speakers: Stereo, Keyboard: OnScreen, charger, USB cable, case, infomaterial, Color OS, 12 Months Warranty, widevine L1, GNSS: GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BeiDou (B1+B2), Galileo (E1+E5), SBAS., fanless, waterproof

Weight

218 g, Power Supply: 107 g

Price

920 Euro

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating	Date	Model	Weight	Drive	Size	Resolution
88.9 % v7 ^(old)	05 / 2023	Oppo Find X6 Pro SD 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740	218 g	256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	6.82"	3168x1440
89.2 % v7 ^(old)	04 / 2022	Oppo Find X5 Pro SD 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730	221 g	256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	6.70"	3216x1440
89.7 % v7 ^(old)	06 / 2023	Xiaomi 13 Ultra SD 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740	227 g	512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	6.73"	3200x1440
91.1 % v7 ^(old)	03 / 2023	Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740	233 g	256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	6.80"	3080x1440
89.1 % v7 ^(old)	11 / 2022	Google Pixel 7 Pro Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7	212 g	128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	6.70"	3120x1440

外壳 - Oppo手机，具有IP等级

Find X6 Pro的IP68级外壳有黑色和绿色的钢化玻璃背面，以及棕银色的仿皮/玻璃混合版本。由于其磨砂表面，指纹不是一个问题，但这也使得Oppo智能手机在手中有些滑溜，所以不一定能牢牢握住。Find X6 Pro相当重，有218克，但由于其圆润的边缘和均匀的重量分布，并不觉得太笨重。

从正面看，这款Oppo旗舰机与它的前辈几乎没有区别。外形因素几乎是相同的。只有打孔的位置让人明显感觉到这是Find X5 Pro的继任者。Find X5 Pro的继任者。与背面相比，这家中国制造商指定了正面使用的材料--康宁大猩猩玻璃Victus 2。

Find X6 Pro的做工是一流的。缝隙非常紧密，大部分是平齐的。显示屏和其边缘之间的尺寸比非常好，为90%。

尺寸比较

Oppo Find X6 Pro Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra Xiaomi 13 Ultra Oppo Find X5 Pro Google Pixel 7 Pro DIN A6 ❌

设备 - 配备UFS 4.0的Oppo智能手机

Find X6 Pro使用了一个快速的USB端口，它根据USB 3.2（Gen. 1）标准工作，支持USB OTG和有线图像输出。在我们使用连接的M2.SSD硬盘（三星980 Pro）进行拷贝测试时，USB端口的传输速度为544 MB/s。Find X6 Pro省去了内存扩展选项和音频插孔。只有两种UFS存储方式可供选择：

Oppo Find X6 Pro| 12GB LPDDR5X内存| 256GB UFS 4.0存储空间

Oppo Find X6 Pro| 16GB LPDDR5X RAM| 256GB UFS 4.0存储空间

Oppo Find X6 Pro| 16GB LPDDR5X RAM| 512GB UFS 4.0存储空间

除了快速存储之外，这款智能手机还配备了蓝牙5.3、红外辐射器和NFC，使其装备非常完善。只有超宽带芯片在Find X6 Pro中没有配备。

软件 - Oppo手机与Android 13

Find X6 Pro配备了Android 13和内部ColorOS 13.1用户界面。该制造商最近宣布，将为该机型提供四个主要的Android 。奥普还保证五年的安全补丁。这不仅大大改善了Opp的2023年高端智能手机，而且还与三星Galaxy系列。

我们测试设备上的安全补丁是2023年4月的。由于今年预计没有全球版本的Find X6 Pro，我们只得用中国的彩色操作系统变体来做。这只包括三种语言（英语、中文、法语），而且没有谷歌应用程序的运行，如Gmail或PlayStore。然而，谷歌服务框架已经在交付状态下预装了。

通信和GNSS - 配备5G的Oppo Find X6 Pro

在WLAN网络中，Find X6 Pro的得分基本上是恒定的传输率，但在我们的测试中，建立连接被证明是迟缓的。正如这个价格范围内的智能手机所预期的那样，这款高端的Oppo智能手机采用了现代的Wi-Fi 7标准。然而，我们的测试设备无法利用6千兆赫兹频段进行Wi-Fi传输。我们也无法最终澄清Find X6 Pro是否支持WLAN的IEEE 802.11-be标准，是否确实不支持6GHz标准（像Honor Magic5 Pro)或者是否有其他原因。结合我们的华硕ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000参考路由器，因此Oppo旗舰机的传输速率相当低。

对于移动互联网接入，Oppo智能手机支持目前所有的移动通信标准，包括5G-Sub6，频率范围很广。在总共20个支持的LTE频段，包括20号和28号频段，在全球大多数地方没有任何东西可以阻挡使用。

Networking
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	1496 (1387^min - 1627^max) MBit/s +116%
Xiaomi 13 Ultra Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	917 (882^min - 930^max) MBit/s +32%
Google Pixel 7 Pro Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	904 (453^min - 912^max) MBit/s +30%
Oppo Find X5 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	820 (799^min - 837^max) MBit/s +18%
Average of class Smartphone (34.8 - 1875, n=184, last 2 years)	714 MBit/s +3%
Oppo Find X6 Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	693 (310^min - 816^max) MBit/s
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	1671 (801^min - 1815^max) MBit/s +118%
Xiaomi 13 Ultra Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	1002 (985^min - 1011^max) MBit/s +30%
Google Pixel 7 Pro Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	945 (917^min - 968^max) MBit/s +23%
Oppo Find X5 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	890 (433^min - 934^max) MBit/s +16%
Oppo Find X6 Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	768 (223^min - 905^max) MBit/s
Average of class Smartphone (40.5 - 1810, n=186, last 2 years)	729 MBit/s -5%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
Xiaomi 13 Ultra Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	1789 (1557^min - 1884^max) MBit/s
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	1754 (1618^min - 1808^max) MBit/s
Google Pixel 7 Pro Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1645 (1586^min - 1695^max) MBit/s
Average of class Smartphone (229 - 1902, n=76, last 2 years)	1440 MBit/s
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
Google Pixel 7 Pro Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1743 (1585^min - 1798^max) MBit/s
Xiaomi 13 Ultra Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	1579 (1415^min - 1656^max) MBit/s
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	1504 (1343^min - 1604^max) MBit/s
Average of class Smartphone (668 - 1864, n=76, last 2 years)	1371 MBit/s

Xiaomi 13 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Qualcomm Adreno 740; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1789 (1557-1884)

Xiaomi 13 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Qualcomm Adreno 740; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1579 (1415-1656)

Oppo Find X6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Qualcomm Adreno 740; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø692 (310-816)

Xiaomi 13 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Qualcomm Adreno 740; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø916 (882-930)

Oppo Find X6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Qualcomm Adreno 740; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø768 (223-905)

Xiaomi 13 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Qualcomm Adreno 740; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1002 (985-1011)

对于定位，Oppo智能手机采用了主要的卫星系统GPS（L1+L5）、GLONASS（G1）、BeiDou（B1+B2）和Galileo（E1+E5）以及SBAS。为了评估智能手机的实际追踪能力，我们带着它进行了一次短途自行车旅行，并与Garmin Venu 2一起记录了路线，以便进行比较。

我们非常喜欢Find X6 Pro的追踪能力。在GPS记录的详细历史中，几乎看不出与实际路线的偏差。只有在少数地方，智能手机才会显示最小的偏差。

路线记录：Oppo Find X6 Pro vs. Garmin Venu 2

电话和语音质量 - Oppo的双卡智能手机

Find X6 Pro支持两张nano-SIM卡，以及WLAN通话和VoLTE标准，但不支持eSIM。语音质量很好，不显眼，背景噪音被有效过滤掉。声音被清晰地再现，被我们的对话伙伴描述为非常清晰。

相机 - Oppo手机配备1英寸传感器

从技术上讲，Oppo Find X6 Pro的前置摄像头与它的前代产品相比，几乎没有进化。前任。光学器件在32MP下运行，没有像素分档，在白天提供良好的图像质量，曝光方面的弱点最小。不幸的是，视频录制仍然限于1080p，传感器分辨率为6560x4928。

索尼IMX989的1英寸格式的广角镜头被用在背面，就像中国的竞争对手一样。小米13 Ultra和 vivo X90 Pro+。用主摄像头拍摄的照片，标准分辨率为1250万像素，看起来没有Magic5 Pro那样的数字锐化。 Honor Magic5 Pro- 这在原则上并不坏--但锐度水平可以更高。模糊是明显可见的，特别是在周边地区。

相机三人组由一个超广角镜头和一个潜望镜长焦镜头组成，这两个镜头都采用了OIS和5000万像素的分辨率，包括像素分选。超广角镜头的等效焦距为15毫米，视角为110度，其细致的景深给人留下深刻印象，图像清晰度非常好，即使在周边地区也是如此。此外，Find X6 Pro在录制过程中几乎没有发现任何人工痕迹。该镜头还可作为微距镜头。

长焦镜头也使用索尼IMX 890，但提供三倍光学变焦，等效焦距为65毫米，数字放大率为100倍。通过1/1.56格式的图像传感器拍摄的照片细节丰富，但与其他两台相机相比，颜色调和得可以更好一些。此外，在6倍混合变焦时，照片也可以做得更清晰一些。在这一领域，小米13 Ultra 或Galaxy S23 Ultra 提供更好的照片质量。

Find X6 Pro的所有摄像头都能以UHD和最高每秒60帧的速度录制视频。索尼IMX989主摄像头没有8K选项，这一点出乎意料。在不同的镜头之间切换是可能的，没有大的停顿，但只有30帧。视频防抖功能令人印象深刻，得益于OIS，从超广角到长焦范围（3倍变焦）都能取得良好效果。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Wide angle Wide angle Low light Ultra wide angle Zoom 5x

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images

在受控的光线条件下，我们分析了Find X6 Pro的色彩再现与实际参考色彩的对比。除了轻微的增亮外，主传感器的5000万像素光学器件在ColorChecker护照中显示出轻微的偏差。在色彩保真度方面根本没有异常值（>10）。然而，白平衡显然过于温暖。

附件和保修 - Oppo Find X6 Pro带AC适配器

Find X6 Pro配备了一个模块化的100瓦电源，一条数据和充电线，一个保护套，一个SIM卡针和一个快速入门指南。此外，我们的贷款人TradingShenzhen在我们的中国测试模型的交付范围内包括一个用于充电器的欧盟适配器和一个USB-OTG适配器。

保修保修OPPO智能手机的保修期为12个月。

输入设备和操作 - 带有FaceUnlock的Oppo智能手机

输入准确地在6.82英寸大的OLED触摸屏上实现，一直到角落。保护膜在出厂前就已经安装好了。在240Hz的采样率下，LTPO面板以高灵敏度对触摸作出反应，每秒刷新240次，例如在游戏中，这确保了输入的低延迟性。

光学指纹传感器集成在显示屏上，可以非常可靠和快速地解锁智能手机。还有一种相当不安全的2D面部识别方法，它是基于通过前置摄像头的FaceUnlock功能。

与前代产品一样，这家中国制造商安装了一个高质量的振动电机，在日常使用中提供良好的触觉和精确的反馈。

▶ load Youtube video

显示屏 - Oppo手机采用AMOLED

Oppo Find X6 Pro使用了一个RGBG矩阵，由一个红色、一个蓝色和两个绿色LED组成。

Find X6 Pro有一个6.82英寸的OLED显示屏，分辨率为3,168 x 1,440，采用自适应刷新率控制。这家中国制造商的旗舰智能手机可以自动适应所显示的内容，应该在1到120赫兹之间进行调节。然而，根据系统数据的读取，Oppo旗舰机目前只使用最低的5赫兹。

Find X6 Pro的最大亮度被规定为2500尼特，尽管我们在测量中无法证明这一点。在纯白的表面上，AMOLED面板的峰值达到了1225cd/m²的好成绩。如果我们在显示屏上抛出一些黑暗区域，在APL18测试中，亮度增加到1339 cd/m²。因此，Oppo智能手机不仅远远没有达到宣传的最大亮度，而且在APL测试中甚至没有达到制造商为HBM模式提供的1500尼特的规格。


1174 cd/m²	1176 cd/m²	1210 cd/m²
1195 cd/m²	1109 cd/m²	1211 cd/m²
1205 cd/m²	1203 cd/m²	1225 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3

Maximum: 1225 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 1189.8 cd/m² Minimum: 2.29 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 91 %
Center on Battery: 1109 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.3 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 1.6 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
99.2% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.23

	Oppo Find X6 Pro AMOLED, 3168x1440, 6.8"	Oppo Find X5 Pro AMOLED, 3216x1440, 6.7"	Xiaomi 13 Ultra AMOLED, 3200x1440, 6.7"	Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra Dynamic AMOLED 2x, 3080x1440, 6.8"	Google Pixel 7 Pro OLED, 3120x1440, 6.7"
Screen		-1%	0%	-31%	9%
Brightness middle	1109	746 -33%	1357 22%	1117 1%	1022 -8%
Brightness	1190	744 -37%	1340 13%	1133 -5%	1025 -14%
Brightness Distribution	91	97 7%	89 -2%	97 7%	99 9%
Black Level *
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	1.3	0.9 31%	1.1 15%	2.2 -69%	0.9 31%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	2.2	1.6 27%	2.7 -23%	3.9 -77%	2.1 5%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	1.6	1.6 -0%	2 -25%	2.3 -44%	1.1 31%
Gamma	2.23 ^99%	2.23 ^99%	2.2 ^100%	2.37 ^93%	2.22 ^99%
CCT	6571 ^99%	6499 ^100%	6366 ^102%	6572 ^99%	6650 ^98%

* ... smaller is better

像所有的OLED显示屏一样，Oppo Find X6 Pro的屏幕在整个亮度光谱中都会闪烁。我们测量的频率为120赫兹，有几个离群值，振幅曲线平缓。因此，低频率仍可归类为容易上眼。

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

120 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 120 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 120 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

在固定的变焦水平和不同的亮度设置下进行的一系列测量

我们的光谱仪分析和Calman软件显示，Oppo智能手机与sRGB色彩空间的平均DeltaE偏差非常低。然而，显示器的色彩表现必须通过正确的设置来调整。为此，颜色模式 "自然 "和色温应设置为显示选项中的最大 "暖 "水平。肉眼几乎看不到颜色偏差。

除了 "自然 "之外，还有另外两个颜色配置文件，以及滤色片和白平衡的设置。此外，光线传感器可以用来自动调整色彩再现。

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
1.3 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 0.656 ms rise
1.3 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 0.64 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 4 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
2.18 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 1.098 ms rise
2.18 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 1.082 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 7 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

虽然Oppo智能手机不能达到超过2000尼特的峰值亮度，但它在户外仍然给人留下全面的印象。由于面板的高亮度和OLED屏幕的强对比度，屏幕上的反光不是问题。即使是那些手动控制亮度的人（没有传感器），也有788 cd/m²的相对较高的亮度供他们使用。

Find X6 Pro的可视角度稳定性非常好。在平坦的可视角度下，只能看到亮度的轻微损失。

性能 - 采用高通SoC的Oppo Find X6 Pro

Find X6 Pro部署了骁龙8代2与16GB的LPDDR5x内存。然而，这款智能手机的高性能功能在出厂时并不能立即使用。必须先在电池设置中启用高性能 模式，否则高通芯片组无法挖掘其全部潜力。Geekbench 6的单核显示，尤其是主核（Cortex-X3）受到标准性能降低的影响。

我们使用高性能 模式进行基准测试。Find X6 Pro在这里表现得非常好，大致上达到了小米13 Ultra和 Galaxy S23 Ultra的水平。然而，在PCMark系统基准测试中，Oppo的智能手机没有达到预期。此外，Antutu测试报告显示，达到了一个异常高的数值，这可能与 "作弊 "有关。

Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 12288	1556 Points +31%
Xiaomi 13 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288	1498 Points +26%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (1048 - 1574, n=20)	1455 Points +22%
Oppo Find X5 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	1257 Points +6%
Oppo Find X6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288	1191 Points
Google Pixel 7 Pro Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 12288	1048 Points -12%
Average of class Smartphone (126 - 2437, n=172, last 2 years)	995 Points -16%
Multi-Core
Xiaomi 13 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288	5232 Points +5%
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 12288	5082 Points +2%
Oppo Find X6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288	4998 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4192 - 5243, n=20)	4918 Points -2%
Oppo Find X5 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	3488 Points -30%
Average of class Smartphone (473 - 6687, n=172, last 2 years)	3312 Points -34%
Google Pixel 7 Pro Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 12288	3222 Points -36%

Geekbench 6.0
Single-Core
Xiaomi 13 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288	1998 Points +1%
Oppo Find X6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288	1981 Points
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 12288	1976 Points 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (1753 - 2008, n=10)	1925 Points -3%
Google Pixel 7 Pro Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 12288	1487 Points -25%
Average of class Smartphone (188 - 2008, n=41, last 2 years)	1257 Points -37%
Multi-Core
Xiaomi 13 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288	5453 Points +3%
Oppo Find X6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288	5278 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4255 - 5702, n=10)	5234 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 12288	5221 Points -1%
Google Pixel 7 Pro Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 12288	3862 Points -27%
Average of class Smartphone (512 - 5702, n=41, last 2 years)	3366 Points -36%

Antutu v9 - Total Score
Oppo Find X6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288	1312927 Points
Xiaomi 13 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288	1290091 Points -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (1111522 - 1322448, n=17)	1259049 Points -4%
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 12288	1226224 Points -7%
Oppo Find X5 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	856953 Points -35%
Average of class Smartphone (99654 - 1650926, n=104, last 2 years)	798401 Points -39%
Google Pixel 7 Pro Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 12288	773857 Points -41%

PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 12288	15991 Points +14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (11562 - 20394, n=24)	15817 Points +13%
Xiaomi 13 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288	15411 Points +10%
Oppo Find X6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288	14001 Points
Average of class Smartphone (4609 - 24088, n=190, last 2 years)	12976 Points -7%
Oppo Find X5 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	12144 Points -13%
Google Pixel 7 Pro Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 12288	11397 Points -19%

CrossMark - Overall
Xiaomi 13 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288	1242 Points +2%
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 12288	1226 Points 0%
Oppo Find X6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288	1221 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (778 - 1356, n=22)	1138 Points -7%
Oppo Find X5 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	956 Points -22%
Google Pixel 7 Pro Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 12288	886 Points -27%
Average of class Smartphone (187 - 1517, n=157, last 2 years)	884 Points -28%

BaseMark OS II
Overall
Xiaomi 13 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288	9563 Points +1%
Oppo Find X6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288	9456 Points
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 12288	9091 Points -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (7354 - 9730, n=22)	8794 Points -7%
Oppo Find X5 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	6799 Points -28%
Average of class Smartphone (1196 - 11976, n=151, last 2 years)	6297 Points -33%
Google Pixel 7 Pro Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 12288	6164 Points -35%
System
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 12288	14275 Points +7%
Xiaomi 13 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288	13765 Points +3%
Oppo Find X6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288	13356 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (10786 - 15148, n=22)	13173 Points -1%
Oppo Find X5 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	10340 Points -23%
Average of class Smartphone (2368 - 16475, n=151, last 2 years)	10163 Points -24%
Google Pixel 7 Pro Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 12288	9294 Points -30%
Memory
Xiaomi 13 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288	10363 Points +5%
Oppo Find X6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288	9837 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (6601 - 10834, n=22)	9479 Points -4%
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 12288	9075 Points -8%
Average of class Smartphone (962 - 12716, n=151, last 2 years)	6767 Points -31%
Oppo Find X5 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	6523 Points -34%
Google Pixel 7 Pro Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 12288	5456 Points -45%
Graphics
Oppo Find X6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288	30125 Points
Xiaomi 13 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288	29678 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 12288	28497 Points -5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (22837 - 32334, n=22)	27375 Points -9%
Oppo Find X5 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	21944 Points -27%
Average of class Smartphone (1017 - 58651, n=151, last 2 years)	16908 Points -44%
Google Pixel 7 Pro Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 12288	16375 Points -46%
Web
Oppo Find X6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288	2001 Points
Xiaomi 13 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288	1998 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 12288	1850 Points -8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (1077 - 2044, n=22)	1777 Points -11%
Google Pixel 7 Pro Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 12288	1739 Points -13%
Average of class Smartphone (841 - 2145, n=151, last 2 years)	1564 Points -22%
Oppo Find X5 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	1444 Points -28%

UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Oppo Find X5 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	68880 Points +338%
Google Pixel 7 Pro Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 12288	42662 Points +171%
Average of class Smartphone (1267 - 74958, n=143, last 2 years)	16841 Points +7%
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 12288	16511 Points +5%
Oppo Find X6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288	15738 Points
Xiaomi 13 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288	15683 Points 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (11338 - 16880, n=21)	15142 Points -4%

AImark - Score v3.x
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (941 - 173234, n=18)	29790 Points +2155%
Average of class Smartphone (82 - 307528, n=135, last 2 years)	25873 Points +1859%
Oppo Find X6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288	1321 Points
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 12288	1312 Points -1%
Xiaomi 13 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288	1298 Points -2%
Google Pixel 7 Pro Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 12288	1008 Points -24%

的性能。Adreno 740在图形基准测试中也很高，但Find X6 Pro在GFXBench的屏幕上的数值仍然低于图形单元理论上可以达到的水平。虽然面板的全部120赫兹可用，但结果仍然只有60帧。这方面的原因在3DMark的压力测试中得到了揭示，并为HFR游戏留下了小小的希望。

3DMark: Wild Life Extreme Unlimited | Wild Life Extreme | Wild Life Unlimited Score | Wild Life Score | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7: T-Rex Onscreen | 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
GFXBench 3.0: on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
GFXBench 3.1: on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
GFXBench: on screen Car Chase Onscreen | 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | 3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	3791 Points +2%
Oppo Find X6 Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	3721 Points
Xiaomi 13 Ultra Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	3712 Points 0%
Oppo Find X5 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	2523 Points -32%
Google Pixel 7 Pro Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1807 Points -51%

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	3829 Points +3%
Xiaomi 13 Ultra Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	3763 Points +2%
Oppo Find X6 Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	3704 Points
Oppo Find X5 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	2575 Points -30%
Google Pixel 7 Pro Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1847 Points -50%

3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	14369 Points +3%
Oppo Find X6 Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	14012 Points
Xiaomi 13 Ultra Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	13995 Points 0%
Oppo Find X5 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	10175 Points -27%
Google Pixel 7 Pro Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	6721 Points -52%

3DMark / Wild Life Score
Oppo Find X5 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	9826 Points
Google Pixel 7 Pro Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	6534 Points
Oppo Find X6 Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	Points

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Oppo Find X6 Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	6489 Points
Xiaomi 13 Ultra Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	6411 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	6293 Points -3%
Google Pixel 7 Pro Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	4672 Points -28%
Oppo Find X5 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	3902 Points -40%

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Oppo Find X6 Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	25152 Points
Xiaomi 13 Ultra Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	25076 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	23070 Points -8%
Oppo Find X5 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	18090 Points -28%
Google Pixel 7 Pro Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	10987 Points -56%

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Oppo Find X6 Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	15344 Points
Xiaomi 13 Ultra Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	15192 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	14487 Points -6%
Oppo Find X5 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	10005 Points -35%
Google Pixel 7 Pro Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	8449 Points -45%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Google Pixel 7 Pro Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	120 fps +100%
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	120 fps +100%
Xiaomi 13 Ultra Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	120 fps +100%
Oppo Find X5 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	60 fps 0%
Oppo Find X6 Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	60 fps

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	492 fps +1%
Xiaomi 13 Ultra Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	489 fps 0%
Oppo Find X6 Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	488 fps
Oppo Find X5 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	380 fps -22%
Google Pixel 7 Pro Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	251 fps -49%

GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Xiaomi 13 Ultra Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	120 fps +100%
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	119 fps +98%
Google Pixel 7 Pro Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	84 fps +40%
Oppo Find X5 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	60 fps 0%
Oppo Find X6 Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	60 fps

GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Xiaomi 13 Ultra Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	319 fps +32%
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	261 fps +8%
Oppo Find X6 Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	241 fps
Oppo Find X5 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	181 fps -25%
Google Pixel 7 Pro Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	139 fps -42%

GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Xiaomi 13 Ultra Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	108 fps +80%
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	91 fps +52%
Oppo Find X6 Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	60 fps
Oppo Find X5 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	56 fps -7%
Google Pixel 7 Pro Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	56 fps -7%

GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Xiaomi 13 Ultra Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	223 fps +39%
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	190 fps +18%
Oppo Find X6 Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	161 fps
Oppo Find X5 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	111 fps -31%
Google Pixel 7 Pro Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	101 fps -37%

GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	65 fps +8%
Xiaomi 13 Ultra Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	64 fps +7%
Oppo Find X6 Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	60 fps
Oppo Find X5 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	39 fps -35%
Google Pixel 7 Pro Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	37 fps -38%

GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Oppo Find X6 Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	166 fps
Xiaomi 13 Ultra Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	128 fps -23%
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	123 fps -26%
Google Pixel 7 Pro Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	68 fps -59%
Oppo Find X5 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	63 fps -62%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	60 fps +11%
Oppo Find X6 Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	54 fps
Xiaomi 13 Ultra Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	51 fps -6%
Oppo Find X5 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	36 fps -33%
Google Pixel 7 Pro Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	28 fps -48%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	67 fps +10%
Xiaomi 13 Ultra Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	62 fps +2%
Oppo Find X6 Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	61 fps
Oppo Find X5 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	40 fps -34%
Google Pixel 7 Pro Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	31 fps -49%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	84 fps +40%
Xiaomi 13 Ultra Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	84 fps +40%
Oppo Find X6 Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	60 fps
Oppo Find X5 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	53 fps -12%
Google Pixel 7 Pro Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	38 fps -37%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	157 fps +8%
Xiaomi 13 Ultra Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	156 fps +8%
Oppo Find X6 Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	145 fps
Oppo Find X5 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	94 fps -35%
Google Pixel 7 Pro Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	75 fps -48%

GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	31 fps +11%
Xiaomi 13 Ultra Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	29 fps +4%
Oppo Find X6 Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	28 fps
Google Pixel 7 Pro Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	14 fps -50%

在浏览器基准测试中，我们用Chrome浏览器进行了测试，Find X6 Pro在日常使用中提供了非常好的结果和强大的性能，在滚动或打开复杂网站时没有明显延迟。

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Xiaomi 13 Ultra (Chrome 113)	162.122 Points +2%
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra (Chrome 109)	159.102 Points 0%
Oppo Find X6 Pro (Chrome 113)	158.575 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (62.7 - 179.2, n=23)	133.1 Points -16%
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=161, last 2 years)	120.4 Points -24%
Oppo Find X5 Pro (Chrome 99)	103 Points -35%
Google Pixel 7 Pro (Chrome 106)	98.153 Points -38%

Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Xiaomi 13 Ultra (Chrome 113)	151 runs/min +4%
Oppo Find X6 Pro (Chrome 113)	145 runs/min
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra (Chrome 109)	143 runs/min -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (62.9 - 225, n=18)	141.6 runs/min -2%
Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 569, n=146, last 2 years)	136.2 runs/min -6%
Oppo Find X5 Pro (Chrome 99)	104 runs/min -28%
Google Pixel 7 Pro (Chrome 106)	104 runs/min -28%

WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Oppo Find X6 Pro (Chrome 113)	147 Points
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra (Chrome 110)	145 Points -1%
Xiaomi 13 Ultra (Chrome 113)	139 Points -5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (28 - 183, n=22)	130.6 Points -11%
Average of class Smartphone (22 - 271, n=152, last 2 years)	113.8 Points -23%
Google Pixel 7 Pro (Chrome 106)	90 Points -39%

WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Oppo Find X6 Pro (Chrome 113)	219 Points
Xiaomi 13 Ultra (Chrome 113)	211 Points -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (115 - 238, n=11)	197.5 Points -10%
Average of class Smartphone (38 - 347, n=79, last 2 years)	148.7 Points -32%
Oppo Find X5 Pro (Chrome 99)	133 Points -39%
Google Pixel 7 Pro (Chrome 106)	98 Points -55%

Octane V2 - Total Score
Xiaomi 13 Ultra (Chrome 113)	60432 Points +6%
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra (Chrome 109)	59214 Points +4%
Oppo Find X6 Pro (Chrome 113)	56848 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (19870 - 65418, n=25)	45827 Points -19%
Google Pixel 7 Pro (Chrome 106)	44245 Points -22%
Oppo Find X5 Pro (Chrome 99)	38407 Points -32%
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=203, last 2 years)	37161 Points -35%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=160, last 2 years)	1568 ms * -84%
Oppo Find X5 Pro (Chrome 99)	1125 ms * -32%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (602 - 1837, n=22)	1023 ms * -20%
Google Pixel 7 Pro (Chrome 106)	1011.5 ms * -19%
Oppo Find X6 Pro (Chrome 113)	853.5 ms *
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra (Chrome 109)	685 ms * +20%
Xiaomi 13 Ultra (Chrome 113)	657.6 ms * +23%

* ... smaller is better

在存储速度方面，Oppo智能手机的第四代UFS存储提供了出色的性能。然而，AndroBench的分数要比在小米13 Ultra.

	Oppo Find X6 Pro	Oppo Find X5 Pro	Xiaomi 13 Ultra	Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra	Google Pixel 7 Pro	Average 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	Average of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5		-60%	9%	-27%	-56%	-5%	-42%
Sequential Read 256KB	3307.82	1410 -57%	4511.82 36%	3426.56 4%	1346.78 -59%	3608 ?(3249 - 4384, n=26) 9%	1839 ?(226 - 4512, n=192, last 2 years) -44%
Sequential Write 256KB	2842.59	894 -69%	2878.39 1%	1389.84 -51%	874.73 -69%	2530 ?(555 - 3348, n=26) -11%	1425 ?(57.5 - 3908, n=192, last 2 years) -50%
Random Read 4KB	413.21	183.7 -56%	398.87 -3%	449.77 9%	219.01 -47%	406 ?(218 - 483, n=26) -2%	277 ?(22.2 - 483, n=192, last 2 years) -33%
Random Write 4KB	505.72	210.4 -58%	507.27 0%	152.92 -70%	253.18 -50%	421 ?(152.9 - 730, n=26) -17%	309 ?(9.4 - 753, n=192, last 2 years) -39%

游戏--Oppo智能手机只能管理60帧的画面

那些想从Play商店玩一个或另一个游戏的人肯定可以伸手去拿Find X6 Pro，但游戏玩家不会对Oppo的智能手机感到满意。我们使用GameBench应用来看看PUBG手机和Armajet运行的流畅程度，但GFXBench中的分数已经是一个坏兆头。

事实上，即使在这两个游戏中，Oppo的高端智能手机也无法管理超过60帧。对于PUBG手机，上述60帧在中等细节（高清模式）下是恒定的，但如果我们增加图形的细节（UHD），该图形单元只有每秒40帧的流畅速度。

Oppo Find X6 Pro; Armajet: Ø59.5 (28-61)

Oppo Find X6 Pro; PUBG Mobile; Balanced: Ø59.7 (53-61)

Oppo Find X6 Pro; PUBG Mobile; HD: Ø59.8 (54-61)

Oppo Find X6 Pro; PUBG Mobile; Ultra HD: Ø39.9 (37-41)

排放--Oppo智能手机不能保持凉爽

温度

背面的玻璃外壳在持续的负载下发热很厉害。由于我们现在对负载下的温度测量是基于Burnout基准测试，而不是稳定性测试，所以与配备了骁龙8代2的旗舰智能手机进行比较，只能在有限的范围内进行。由于强烈的废热，Find X6 Pro无法完成我们的测量或基准测试。

我们用3DMark进行了压力测试，以检查内部热量的发展。在这里，高通SoC在计算密集型负载下显示出高波动性。Find X6 Pro几乎节流了三分之二的性能，这在日常使用中，在较长的游戏过程中可能会很明显。在夏季气温下，不排除Oppo智能手机在负载下的性能损失。

Max. Load

Idle


50.8 °C	50 °C	49.3 °C
51.2 °C	51.8 °C	49.2 °C
50.6 °C	51.7 °C	47.7 °C

Maximum: 51.8 °C
Average: 50.3 °C


47.4 °C	48 °C	45.8 °C
47.2 °C	47.8 °C	47 °C
46 °C	47.8 °C	46.9 °C

Maximum: 48 °C
Average: 47.1 °C

Power Supply (max.) 32.4 °C | Room Temperature 22 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 50.3 °C / 123 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 51.8 °C / 125 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 48 °C / 118 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 31.5 °C / 89 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Xiaomi 13 Ultra Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	89 % +143%
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	69 % +88%
Google Pixel 7 Pro Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	67.9 % +85%
Oppo Find X5 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	62.7 % +71%
Oppo Find X6 Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	36.7 %
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Xiaomi 13 Ultra Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	92.2 % +170%
Google Pixel 7 Pro Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	75.6 % +122%
Oppo Find X5 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	62.7 % +84%
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	58.7 % +72%
Oppo Find X6 Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	34.1 %

Oppo Find X6 Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø16.7 (7.58-22.2)

Oppo Find X5 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.8.1: Ø10.9 (9.64-15.4)

Xiaomi 13 Ultra Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø20.5 (20.4-22.1)

Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø16.8 (13.5-23)

Google Pixel 7 Pro Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø9.93 (8.31-11)

Oppo Find X6 Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø63.4 (28.9-78.7)

Oppo Find X5 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø41.7 (37.2-59.4)

Xiaomi 13 Ultra Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø71.2 (69.2-77.8)

Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø60 (53.6-77.7)

Google Pixel 7 Pro Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø32.8 (26.2-38.6)

Oppo Find X5 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability: Ø43.7 (38.1-60.9)

Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability: Ø72.7 (55.1-86.1)

Google Pixel 7 Pro Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability: Ø36.5 (30.7-39.8)

发言人

立体声扬声器为智能手机提供了非常好的音频质量。扬声器的音量非常大，几乎达到90分贝，音质的特点是线性的中音和淡淡的低音。超级高音扬声器在粉红噪声图中略微下降。

耳机可以通过USB-C端口连接到Find X6 Pro。另外，蓝牙5.3也可用于无线传输。有多种音频编解码器可供选择：SBC、AAC、aptX、aptX HD、aptX Adaptive和aptX TWS+，以及LDAC和LDHC。

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Oppo Find X6 Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 16% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 75% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 38% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 55% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (91.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 19.4% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (5.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.1% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.2% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (2.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 3% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 94% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 21% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 75% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电池寿命 - Oppo Find X6 Pro采用快速充电技术

消耗功率

Oppo Find X6 Pro有一个5000毫安时的电池，可以通过电缆以最大100瓦的功率充电。当完全空载时，Oppo智能手机必须保持与电源线的连接超过30分钟才能充满电。幸运的是，交货范围内包括一个足够快的充电器。通过Qi快速充电协议的无线充电也被支持，最大功率为50瓦。此外，还有10瓦的反向无线充电作为补充。

总体而言，功耗并不显著，但Oppo智能手机在闲置时可以少用一点电。AGalaxy S23 Ultra显示，具有类似硬件的旗舰机在闲置模式下可以用不到1瓦的电量。

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.05 / 0.11 Watt
Idle	0.87 / 1.6 / 1.68 Watt
Load	3.65 / 6.14 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Oppo Find X6 Pro 5000 mAh	Oppo Find X5 Pro 5000 mAh	Xiaomi 13 Ultra 5000 mAh	Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra 5000 mAh	Google Pixel 7 Pro 5000 mAh	Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2	Average of class Smartphone
Power Consumption		-5%	3%	6%	5%	-42%	-25%
Idle Minimum *	0.87	1.24 -43%	0.86 1%	0.9 -3%	0.78 10%	1.036 ?(0.7 - 2.37, n=23) -19%	0.894 ?(0.4 - 2.37, n=152, last 2 years) -3%
Idle Average *	1.6	1.39 13%	1.53 4%	1.05 34%	1.61 -1%	1.766 ?(0.8 - 7.18, n=23) -10%	1.456 ?(0.6 - 4.26, n=152, last 2 years) 9%
Idle Maximum *	1.68	1.42 15%	1.64 2%	1.1 35%	1.63 3%	1.94 ?(1.07 - 8.22, n=23) -15%	1.616 ?(0.83 - 4.45, n=152, last 2 years) 4%
Load Average *	3.65	3.58 2%	3.12 15%	3.99 -9%	3.29 10%	7.22 ?(2.61 - 15.3, n=23) -98%	6.45 ?(2.3 - 16.5, n=147, last 2 years) -77%
Load Maximum *	6.14	6.99 -14%	6.5 -6%	7.82 -27%	6.01 2%	10.4 ?(4.57 - 18.1, n=23) -69%	9.8 ?(3.53 - 20.8, n=147, last 2 years) -60%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

Oppo Find X6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø4.88 (0.771-11.2)

Xiaomi 13 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø6.02 (0.681-15.6)

Oppo Find X6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.725 (0.657-1.147)

Xiaomi 13 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.807 (0.712-0.961)

Power consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

Oppo Find X6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø9.05 (6.4-10.4)

Xiaomi 13 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø7.29 (6.71-7.92)

Oppo Find X6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.725 (0.657-1.147)

Xiaomi 13 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.807 (0.712-0.961)

电池寿命

在我们的实际电池测试中，Find X6 Pro在刷新率为120赫兹的Wi-Fi测试中提供了15.5小时的良好运行时间，这是在调整显示亮度为150cd/m²时进行的。在禁用WLAN模块的情况下，这款Oppo智能手机在视频播放中的持续时间超过10小时，这说明它的通信模块非常耗能。另一方面，27.5小时的视频测试是一个非常好的速度，也说明了相当有效的能源管理。

Battery Runtime

Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)		28h 49min
WiFi Websurfing		15h 36min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		27h 28min
Load (maximum brightness)		4h 11min

	Oppo Find X6 Pro 5000 mAh	Oppo Find X5 Pro 5000 mAh	Xiaomi 13 Ultra 5000 mAh	Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra 5000 mAh	Google Pixel 7 Pro 5000 mAh
Battery Runtime		-7%	-2%	24%	-24%
Reader / Idle	1729	1269 -27%	1729 0%	2139 24%	1210 -30%
H.264	1648	1142 -31%	1010 -39%	1543 -6%	1213 -26%
WiFi v1.3	936	788 -16%	1065 14%	1100 18%	676 -28%
Load	251	367 46%	298 19%	400 59%	226 -10%

Pros

+ 高质量的外壳

+ 明亮的 LTPO 面板

+ 强大的设备

+ 更快的SoC...

Cons

- ...有严重的节流现象

- 可用性差/进口选择少

- 亮度规格有差异

- 没有UHD选项（前置摄像头）

- 出厂时的性能被扼杀

对Oppo Find X6 Pro的评判

由于缺乏供应，Find X6 Pro在德国可能仍然是一个稀有产品，这是一个遗憾，因为Oppo的旗舰产品是一个有趣的替代品。 Honor 魔术5 Pro或 Galaxy S23 Ultra.至少Oppo旗舰智能手机的粉丝们可以期待广泛的LTE覆盖，包括20和28频段，而小米在中国版本的Find X6 Pro上并没有提供这种覆盖。 13 Ultra、举例来说。

在显示屏亮度方面，制造商的规格和我们的测量结果之间的巨大差异是令人讨厌的。在1,300cd/m²左右，本来非常好的LTPO面板并没有接近宣传的2,500尼特的峰值亮度。在其核心领域，即相机方面，Find X6 Pro的整体水平不在一个 Galaxy S23 Ultra或小米13 Ultra.尽管如此，强大的超广角摄像头可能会使它成为某些用户更好的相机包。

希望Oppo的旗舰产品在欧洲的节制不会成为来年的一个问题。

在技术上，Oppo在其Find X6 Pro上做得很好。唯一的抱怨是Wi-Fi传输速率有点太慢，以及与明显的节流有关的高废热。为什么采用骁龙8代2为什么只允许在非常隐蔽的高性能 模式下挖掘其全部潜力，这仍然是这家中国制造商的秘密--这当然不是因为电池运行时间，Find X6 Pro的电池运行时间非常惊人。

Download your licensed rating image as SVG / PNG

价格和可用性

所有三种颜色的变体都可以在TradingSchenzen以多种货币购买进口产品。以美元为例，12GB/256GB配置的售价为1029.31美元，16GB/256GB为1126.11美元，16GB/512GB为1201.40美元。

Oppo Find X6 Pro - 05/26/2023 v7 ^(old)
Marcus Herbrich

Chassis

91%

Keyboard

67 / 75 → 89%

Pointing Device

93%

Connectivity

67 / 70 → 95%

Weight

88%

Battery

93%

Display

94%

Games Performance

59 / 64 → 92%

Application Performance

94 / 86 → 100%

Temperature

78%

Noise

100%

Audio

78 / 90 → 86%

Camera

79%

Average

83%

89%

Smartphone - Weighted Average

Price comparison

Editor of the original article: Jacob Fisher - Translator - 1344 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2022

Translator: Ninh Ngoc Duy - Editorial Assistant - 460014 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008

contact me via: Facebook

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > Oppo Find X6 Pro评论：令人印象深刻的旗舰级智能手机，配备改进的哈苏相机

Marcus Herbrich, 2023-05-28 (Update: 2024-08-15)

Oppo Find X6 Pro评论：令人印象深刻的旗舰级智能手机，配备改进的哈苏相机

这算不算作弊？

潜在的竞争对手比较

外壳 - Oppo手机，具有IP等级

尺寸比较

设备 - 配备UFS 4.0的Oppo智能手机

软件 - Oppo手机与Android 13

通信和GNSS - 配备5G的Oppo Find X6 Pro

电话和语音质量 - Oppo的双卡智能手机

相机 - Oppo手机配备1英寸传感器

附件和保修 - Oppo Find X6 Pro带AC适配器

输入设备和操作 - 带有FaceUnlock的Oppo智能手机

显示屏 - Oppo手机采用AMOLED

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Display Response Times

性能 - 采用高通SoC的Oppo Find X6 Pro

游戏--Oppo智能手机只能管理60帧的画面

排放--Oppo智能手机不能保持凉爽

温度

3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

发言人

Oppo Find X6 Pro audio analysis

Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra audio analysis

电池寿命 - Oppo Find X6 Pro采用快速充电技术

消耗功率

Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

Power consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

电池寿命

Pros

Cons

对Oppo Find X6 Pro的评判

价格和可用性

More articles related to this device

Transparency

Price comparison