Notebookcheck Logo

三星Galaxy S23 Ultra评论。 拥有银河系力量和200MP摄像头的智能手机

你好,Snapdragon!

三星Galaxy S23 Ultra建立在其前辈的优势之上,除了全面的高端硬件外,还再次提供了集成的S Pen。除此之外,该机型还在全球范围内推出了全新的骁龙处理器。然而,我们的审查显示,这款智能手机并非完全没有批评意见。
5G Android Galaxy S Smartphone Touchscreen
(图片: Daniel Schmidt)

乍一看,S22 Ultra看起来与它的前辈S22 Ultra令人困惑地相似。但仔细观察,显示屏的弧度在侧面更平坦,这导致铝制框架略高。

三星再次为其旗舰机采用了最新的技术。这包括新的LPDDR5x内存,快速的UFS 4.0内存,更明亮的LTPO显示屏,以及四摄像头的两个新传感器,包括Galaxy 智能手机中的第一个200-MP光学器件。今年,Exynos处理器已被弃用,改用骁龙8代,名义上比标准SoC型号更快。

就价格而言,三星Galaxy S23 Ultra并不便宜。例如,配备8GB内存和256GB内部存储器的最低价机型起价为1199.99美元,其次是512GB和1TB的变体,分别为1379.99美元和1379.99美元。

Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra (Galaxy S Series)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy 8 x 2 - 3.4 GHz, Cortex-X3 / A715 / A710 / A510 (Kryo)
Graphics adapter
Memory
12 GB 
, LPDDR5x
Display
6.80 inch 19.3:9, 3080 x 1440 pixel 500 PPI, capacitive, native pen support, Dynamic AMOLED 2x, 1 - 120Hz, Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2, glossy: yes, HDR, 120 Hz
Storage
256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash, 256 GB 
, 216.1 GB free
Connections
1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: USB-C, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: Accelerometer, Magnetometer, Gyroscope, Rotation, Proximity, Orientation, Pressure, UWB, OTG
Networking
Wi-Fi 6E (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz), Bluetooth 5.3, 2G (850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz), 3G (Band 1, 2, 4, 5, 8), LTE (Band 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66), 5G-Sub6 (Band 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 75, 77, 78), Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 8.9 x 163.4 x 78.1
Battery
5000 mAh Lithium-Ion, Wireless PowerShare (10 W), Fast Charging 45 W
Charging
wireless charging, fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 13
Camera
Primary Camera: 200 MPix (Samsung HP2, f/1.7, 85°, 23 mm, OIS) + 12 MPix (Sony IMX564, Ultra Wide, f/2.2, 120°, 13 mm) + 10 MPix (Sony IMX754, 3x opt. Zoom, f/2.4, 36°, 69 mm, OIS) + 10 MPix (Sony IMX754, 10x opt. Zoom, f/4.9, 11°, 230 mm, OIS)
Secondary Camera: 12 MPix (Samsung S5K3LU, f/2.2, 80°, 25 mm, HDR10+)
Additional features
Speakers: Dual, Keyboard: Onscreen, S Pen, USB cable, One UI 5.1, 24 Months Warranty, IP68, Dolby Atmos, DeX, GNSS: GPS (L1, L5), Glonass (L1), BeiDou (B1, B1C, B2a), Galileo (E1, E5a), QZSS (L1, L5); Head-SAR: 0.963 W/Kg, Body-SAR: 1.398 W/Kg, fanless, waterproof
Weight
233 g
Price
1399 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Price
91.1 %
v7 (old)
03 / 2023
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra
SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740
233 g256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash6.80"3080x1440
90.3 %
v7 (old)
03 / 2023
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max
A16, A16 GPU 5-Core
240 g128 GB NVMe6.70"2796x1290
89.2 %
v7 (old)
03 / 2023
Xiaomi 13 Pro
SD 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740
229 g256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash6.73"3200x1440
89.1 %
v7 (old)
02 / 2023
Vivo X90 Pro
Dimensity 9200, Immortalis-G715 MP11
214.9 g256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash6.78"2800x1260
89.3 %
v7 (old)
10 / 2022
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
SD 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730
198.5 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.67"2400x1080
89.2 %
v7 (old)
04 / 2022
Oppo Find X5 Pro
SD 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730
221 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.70"3216x1440

三星Galaxy S23 Ultra有绿色(橄榄绿)、幻影黑(黑色)、薰衣草色(淡紫色)和奶油色(乳白色)等颜色的变体。镜框在各自的颜色中都有高光的抛光。石墨色、天蓝色、青柠色和红色也可在三星的网上商店购买。只有灰色和红色的型号采用了黑色亚光边框,而其他两个型号则提供了亮光镀铝。

由于侧面的显示屏弧度更平坦,S23 Ultra获得了更多一点的表面积,因此也为使用S Pen提供了更多的空间和舒适度。然而,那些不使用保护壳的人将不得不面对智能手机放置在平面上时的强烈晃动。这是由于背面的相机镜头,其中三个较大的镜头突出了1.75毫米,较小的镜头突出了0.9毫米。

Galaxy S23 Ultra的制造质量很好。缝隙非常紧密和齐平;即使在角落里,玻璃也与框架无缝融合。在扭转压力测试中,我们无法从智能手机中获得如此多的声音。正面和背面由康宁大猩猩玻璃Victus 2保护,而框架同样由铠甲铝制成,据说这是一种特别耐腐蚀的合金。

这款三星智能手机的防尘防水性能符合IP68标准,使其既能防尘又能防水。然而,三星将后者限制在1.5米深的淡水中,持续30分钟。卡槽的盖子与边框齐平,托盘可容纳两张nano-SIM卡。

可持续发展

这里当然可以省略塑料。(图片: Daniel Schmidt)
这里当然可以省略塑料。(图片: Daniel Schmidt)

就整个Galaxy S23系列的可持续性而言,"部分回收 "这一概念特别引人注目,因为除其他外,正面和背面的玻璃平均由22%的回收玻璃组成。然后,事情变得更加复杂:位于S笔插槽中的内壳由至少20%的海洋来源的聚酰胺制成。在Galaxy S23 Ultra的许多部分都可以找到这些部分回收的成分,但不幸的是,大多只有相对较少的数量。

外包装完全由再生纸组成,是一个典范,显示屏上的纸张也是如此。三星在纸质插页上也有所保留。盒子里只包括一个狭窄的插页,上面有最重要的安全说明,以及一份简洁的快速启动指南。不幸的是,塑料制品并没有被完全免除,因为智能手机的边框仍然受到薄膜的完全保护,我们认为这没有必要。此外,背面也有一层薄膜保护。

三星的目标是到2030年在其智能手机领域实现二氧化碳中和生产,而整个公司打算到2050年效仿。

(图片: Daniel Schmidt)
(图片: Daniel Schmidt)
(图片: Daniel Schmidt)
(图片: Daniel Schmidt)
(图片: Daniel Schmidt)
(图片: Daniel Schmidt)
(图片: Daniel Schmidt)
(图片: Daniel Schmidt)

尺寸比较

164.1 mm 74.5 mm 9.3 mm 214.9 g163.4 mm 78.1 mm 8.9 mm 233 g163.3 mm 77.9 mm 8.9 mm 228 g163.7 mm 73.9 mm 8.5 mm 221 g162.9 mm 74.6 mm 8.38 mm 229 g161.76 mm 73.5 mm 8.39 mm 198.5 g160.7 mm 77.6 mm 7.85 mm 240 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g

设备 - 带有快速USB3.2和UWB的三星智能手机

三星Galaxy S23 Ultra提供了与S22 Ultra 相对类似的功能。USB 3.2(Gen. 1)再次搭载,除了有线图像输出外,还支持OTG。这意味着不仅外围设备,而且存储设备也可以连接到USB端口。在复制测试中,该接口实现了285MB/s的传输率,exFAT文件系统对三星智能手机也没有构成问题。NTFS是一个不同的故事:一个相应格式化的存储设备可以被读取,但不能写入。

桌面模式DeX也再次得到支持,可以通过无线或可选的电缆使用,其中后者的变体工作得更顺利。电源键再次作为一个功能键,可以用来启动内部语音助手Bixby ex works。那些喜欢没有语音助手的人可以在设置中切换回经典的电源键。此外,相机或任何其他应用程序可以通过双击电源键启动。

此外,还集成了一个超宽带芯片(UWB),它不仅用于定位SmartTags,也是数字钥匙的基础。因此,S23 Ultra的功能非常完整;只有缺少红外发射器、音频插孔或对microSD卡的支持可以被批评。

上图:麦克风 (Photo: Daniel Schmidt)
顶部: 麦克风
左侧 (Photo: Daniel Schmidt)
左侧
右侧:音量摇杆、功能键 (Photo: Daniel Schmidt)
右侧:音量摇杆、功能键
底部。SIM卡、麦克风、USB、麦克风、扬声器、S Pen(图片:Daniel Schmidt)。
底部。SIM卡、麦克风、USB、麦克风、扬声器、S Pen

软件--三星仍然是Android 更新之王

三星Galaxy S23 Ultra配备了谷歌Android 13和内部One UI 5.1。那些已经拥有三星智能手机的人将能够毫不费力地进行切换。其他系统的用户肯定要适应新系统,特别是如果他们的前辈有点老。

三星的更新政策仍然堪称典范,因为S23 Ultra也将获得四次系统升级和至少五年的安全补丁(从发布之日起)。安全补丁每月发放一次,三星已经建立了一个专门的网站https://security.samsungmobile.com/workScope.smsb以了解更多信息。

One UI 5.1包括许多改进。除其他外,通过WLAN扬声器的媒体输出已被整合到系统中,与连接的PC进行的多任务处理也得到了改进。完整的清单可以在这里找到https://www.samsung.com/de/support/mobile-devices/neu-in-one-ui-5-android-13/.

除了谷歌应用程序,三星自己的应用程序也可以在智能手机上找到,还有Galaxy App Store。但Facebook、Netflix、Spotify和各种微软应用也都预装在S23 Ultra上。除了OneDrive,所有第三方应用都可以完全卸载,而上述应用可以被禁用。

通信和GNSS -Galaxy S23 Ultra与VHT160 WLAN

三星Galaxy S23 Ultra支持目前所有的移动通信标准,包括5G Sub6。只有5G毫米波不被支持。频率覆盖面非常广泛,所以在地球上任何地方都不应该有连接问题。在大都市环境中,智能手机的接收特性非常好,没有理由抱怨。

Galaxy 智能手机在名义上不支持Wi-Fi 7,尽管SoC实际上应该能够做到这一点。另一方面,你不必在WLAN中没有6GHz网络,由于VHT160的支持,5GHz网络也有很大的能量。在与我们的华硕ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000参考路由器的测试中,S23 Ultra实现了高数据率,也基本稳定。只有在发送数据时(5.0GHz)出现了短暂的下滑,但传输速率仍然很高,这在实践中不会被察觉。

Networking
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1496 (min: 1387) MBit/s ∼84%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1671 (min: 801) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1754 (min: 1618) MBit/s ∼94%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1504 (min: 1343) MBit/s ∼83%
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe
iperf3 receive AXE11000
723 (min: 643) MBit/s ∼40%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
817 (min: 751) MBit/s ∼49%
Xiaomi 13 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000
809 (min: 780) MBit/s ∼45%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
993 (min: 972) MBit/s ∼59%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1859 (min: 919) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1637 (min: 1603) MBit/s ∼90%
Vivo X90 Pro
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1787 (min: 928) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
227 (min: 115) MBit/s ∼14%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
229 (min: 219) MBit/s ∼12%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1814 (min: 1250) MBit/s ∼100%
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000
881 (min: 446) MBit/s ∼49%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
839 (min: 531) MBit/s ∼50%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1657 (min: 1379) MBit/s ∼89%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1522 (min: 1278) MBit/s ∼84%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000
820 (min: 799) MBit/s ∼46%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
890 (min: 433) MBit/s ∼53%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000
716 (min: 539) MBit/s ∼40%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
521 (min: 311) MBit/s ∼31%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1704 (min: 852) MBit/s ∼92%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1702 (min: 1642) MBit/s ∼94%
Average of class Smartphone
 
iperf3 receive AXE11000
712 (min: 34.8) MBit/s ∼40%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
727 (min: 40.5) MBit/s ∼44%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1443 (min: 229) MBit/s ∼78%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1387 (min: 668) MBit/s ∼76%
01002003004005006007008009001000110012001300140015001600170018001900Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Qualcomm Adreno 740; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1754 (1618-1808)
Xiaomi 13 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Qualcomm Adreno 740; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1829 (919-1905)
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Qualcomm Adreno 740; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1504 (1343-1604)
Xiaomi 13 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Qualcomm Adreno 740; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1636 (1603-1672)
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Qualcomm Adreno 740; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1496 (1387-1627)
Xiaomi 13 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Qualcomm Adreno 740; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø808 (780-871)
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Qualcomm Adreno 740; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1645 (801-1815)
Xiaomi 13 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Qualcomm Adreno 740; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø993 (972-1016)
户外的GPS测试
户外活动
室内的GPS测试
在室内
GPSTest:支持的GNSS
全球导航卫星系统

Galaxy S23 Ultra的定位速度非常快,即使在室内也是如此,而且GPS测试应用程序仍然显示出高信号强度。这是一种罕见的现象。

因此,我们更加惊讶的是,这些良好的接收值在我们的自行车测试运行中并没有真正体现出来。虽然记录的距离差异非常小,在10公里左右有20米的距离,但S23 Ultra在详细的路线历史中往往会与实际路线有一些偏差。另一方面,用谷歌地图导航没有任何问题,我们的位置被非常迅速和准确地定位在那里。

GNSS试骑:环湖
GNSS试骑:环湖
GNSS试骑:循环
GNSS试骑:循环
GNSS试骑:总结
GNSS试骑:总结

电话和语音质量

如同其的前辈 ,Galaxy S23 Ultra的特点是语音质量出色。当智能手机放在耳边时,用户的声音传达得非常自然,轻微的背景噪音不会影响对话体验。如果对话发生在一个嘈杂的环境中,这也会被很好地过滤掉,但用户的声音听起来有些模糊。在扬声器模式下,用户的声音在再现时有轻微的混响;在更远的距离上,混响会增加一些,音量也会降低,但声音仍然很容易听到,甚至在超过两米半的地方。

设备清单保持不变:S23 Ultra可以容纳两个nano-SIM卡,这两个都是5G功能的。另外,也可以使用eSIM。支持WLAN通话或VoLTE等功能,但系统中没有实现单独的SIP账户控制。

相机 - 200MP和一个新的超广角

与S23 Ultra的自拍(纵向模式)。
与S23 Ultra的自拍(纵向模式)。
用S23 Ultra自拍(照片模式)。
用S23 Ultra自拍(照片模式)。

三星Galaxy S23 Ultra现在在前面有一个12MP的摄像头。虽然标称的分辨率有所降低,但新的光学器件的质量得到了极大的改善。该相机还继续支持每秒高达60帧的超高清视频,包括HDR10+和自动对焦。纵横比为1:1、全屏和16:9。照片可以用同样的格式拍摄,但也提供4:3作为标准。

质量很好,默认情况下提供自然模式,我们的测试照片也是在这种模式下拍摄的,还有一种更温暖的模式。后者使主体看起来更柔和。更多细节可以在我们的与S22 Ultra的对比测试.

主摄像头首次使用新的HP2传感器,可提供高达200MP的像素。除了S23 Ultra之外,只有小米12T Pro摩托罗拉Edge 30 Ultra有这样一个高分辨率的图像传感器。虽然HP2传感器不是具有这种分辨率的最大传感器,但它的优势是能够使用其整个表面进行对焦,这应该特别有利于移动的主体。高分辨率被用于像素分选,这应该有利于低光摄影。四个四的像素然后形成一个大像素,这意味着产生的图像达到12MP。此外,也有可能创建50或200MP的照片。可用的图像格式有4:3、16:9、全图和1:1。前者还可以制作50或200MP的照片。

三星照片应用程序提供了许多照片,可以根据个人需要进行分类。如果你想拍摄RAW格式的照片,你必须从Galaxy Store下载免费的Expert RAW应用程序。这提供了许多手动设置,还提供了天体摄影模式。

专家级RAW:设置
专家级RAW文件:天体摄影模式
专家级RAW:50MP模式
专家级RAW:12MP模式
相机应用:额外的拍摄模式
相机应用程序:照片格式

我们非常喜欢用智能手机上的主摄像头拍摄的照片,但它们在放大后会发现有很多噪音和颗粒状结构。该相机在市场上推出的S22 Ultra但三星很快解决了这个问题。我们预计这次也会出现类似情况。这个问题只限于特写对象;全景拍摄不受影响。在弱光环境下,S23 Ultra拍摄的照片还不错,但我们仍然看到有改进的余地。

新的超广角传感器再次来自索尼,并提供了比其前辈更好的结果,但也不是完全没有批评意见。由于分辨率相当低,景深还有待提高,周边区域的锐度明显下降。该传感器还可作为微距镜头,当与被摄物体的距离变得对主镜头的自动对焦来说太小时,焦点优化选项就会自动使用。这创造了相当可观的特写镜头。

三星Galaxy S23 Ultra
Apple iPhone 14 Pro
Honor 魔法4专业版
vivo X90 Pro

Galaxy S23 Ultra上有两个放大镜。一个提供3倍光学变焦,另一个提供10倍变焦。在数字方面,甚至可以对一个主题进行100倍的放大。后者在某些情况下当然可能被证明是有用的,但这样拍出来的照片就不再是相册的质量了。

普通广角
10倍变焦
30倍变焦
100倍变焦

视频以8k记录,最多只有30FPS,而超高清选项最多可提供每秒60帧。遗憾的是,三星在这一点上不允许有更高的刷新率。毕竟,通过专业视频模式在全高清中可以实现120FPS,以及所有分辨率下的其他帧率,但PAL格式的25或50FPS除外。除了提到的长宽比之外,在专业模式下还可以选择21:9。

录像支持HDR10+,我们发现它们非常令人满意。它们还得益于三星智能手机良好的图像稳定功能。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Main cameraMain cameraUltra wide angle5x zoomLow light

在受控的光线条件下,Galaxy S23 Ultra表现良好。颜色检查器被充分再现,平均DeltaE为7.4,并在深绿色中显示出其最差的异常值(DeltaE为12.9)。

在我们的测试图中,200MP的光学器件发挥了它们的作用,并以极大的细节再现了它。然而,在黑色区域可以看到一些噪音,而且在图像的边缘锐利度会有一些下降。

ColorChecker
6.3 ∆E
6.5 ∆E
7.3 ∆E
12.9 ∆E
6.1 ∆E
5.4 ∆E
6.5 ∆E
7.2 ∆E
10.7 ∆E
5.7 ∆E
7 ∆E
7.8 ∆E
6.9 ∆E
9.2 ∆E
8.6 ∆E
3.5 ∆E
4.5 ∆E
11.3 ∆E
8.3 ∆E
5.2 ∆E
7.5 ∆E
5.7 ∆E
7.9 ∆E
9.6 ∆E
ColorChecker Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra: 7.39 ∆E min: 3.5 - max: 12.87 ∆E
ColorChecker
12.4 ∆E
9 ∆E
15 ∆E
14.5 ∆E
16.9 ∆E
17 ∆E
12.6 ∆E
13.1 ∆E
12.6 ∆E
15.1 ∆E
12.7 ∆E
18.2 ∆E
12.3 ∆E
18.5 ∆E
8.6 ∆E
11.5 ∆E
17.4 ∆E
24.2 ∆E
12.4 ∆E
11.3 ∆E
15.6 ∆E
22.3 ∆E
19.4 ∆E
13.1 ∆E
ColorChecker Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra: 14.82 ∆E min: 8.6 - max: 24.2 ∆E

附件和保修 - 狭窄的交货范围

第三方电源适配器明显更便宜。(图片: Daniel Schmidt)
第三方电源适配器明显更便宜。

三星Galaxy S23 Ultra有24个月的保修期,可以用Care+保险包来补充。这可以预订12个月或24个月的保险,并可以包括额外的盗窃保护。保险套餐的价格从44.5美元到249美元不等。当你提出索赔时,可能需要支付99-199美元的免赔额或29-99美元的服务费,而且车主在12个月内只能提出3次索赔。

除了集成的S Pen之外,Galaxy S23 Ultra的交货范围只包括一个SIM卡工具和一条USB-C电缆。不包括电源适配器。那些想要从三星直接购买45瓦电源的人的人必须额外投资50美元。另外,第三方供应商出售的版本也明显便宜。新的Anker Ace 313(GaN, 45 Watt),例如,专门为新的Galaxy ,价格仅为29.99美元。

输入设备和操作 -Galaxy S23 Ultra的超声波指纹识别

三星Galaxy S23 Ultra受到康宁大猩猩Victus 2玻璃的保护,它具有出色的滑行性能。输入的实现非常迅速和准确。

以前只保留给前Note系列的S Pen,现在成为Ultra智能手机的独特卖点。然而,在技术方面没有任何改变。这支小笔仍然可以识别4096个压力级别,输入延迟为9毫秒。它还通过蓝牙与智能手机连接,因此可用于手势控制和作为遥控器使用。除了作为纯输入笔的功能外,它还适用于绘画,并可用于文字翻译或屏幕截图记录。

在生物识别安全方面,显示屏上集成了一个超声波指纹传感器,可以非常可靠地识别存储的数字,并快速解锁智能手机。识别区域也足够大,不仅仅局限于小的动画区域。此外,或者说,通过前置摄像头可以进行面部识别,这也是非常可靠的工作,但安全性较低。

 

显示屏 - 明亮且对眼睛友好的LTPO AMOLED

子像素网格
子像素网格

从技术角度看,三星Galaxy S23 Ultra使用的面板与S22 Ultra非常相似。S22 Ultra。它的尺寸为6.8英寸(17.27厘米),具有WQHD+分辨率,确保极高的像素密度。然而,这必须先在设置中激活,否则将使用较低的2316 x 1080像素的分辨率。HD+(1544x720像素)甚至可以提供给那些喜欢有点像素化并希望节约能源的用户。

三星智能手机支持众多HDR标准,即HLG、HDR10和HDR10+,但不支持Dolby Vision。该系统可在1至120赫兹之间动态调整刷新率。另外,这也可以固定在60赫兹。

动态AMOLED 2x的亮度几乎没有变化。在激活环境光传感器的纯白显示中,S23 Ultra的显示屏平均达到1133cd/m²,这是一个非常好的数值,但仍被小米13 Pro超越。小米13 Pro在比较领域超过。我们测量了高达1770 cd/m²的亮度和暗区的均匀分布(APL18)。在APL10中,这甚至达到1806 cd/m²。对于那些喜欢手动调节亮度的人来说,最高可以达到429 cd/m²。有了额外的亮度 选项,这个数字会攀升到733 cd/m²。

Galaxy S23 Ultra在最低亮度方面也堪称典范,它可以降低到1.17 cd/m²。如果你想让它变得更暗,你可以激活额外调光 功能,这样可以达到0.82cd/m²。

1137
cd/m²
1118
cd/m²
1135
cd/m²
1142
cd/m²
1117
cd/m²
1137
cd/m²
1149
cd/m²
1131
cd/m²
1133
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 1149 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 1133.2 cd/m² Minimum: 1.17 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 97 %
Center on Battery: 1117 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.2 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 2.3 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
96.9% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.37
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra
Dynamic AMOLED 2x, 3080x1440, 6.8"
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max
Super Retina XDR OLED, 2796x1290, 6.7"
Xiaomi 13 Pro
OLED, 3200x1440, 6.7"
Vivo X90 Pro
AMOLED, 2800x1260, 6.8"
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
pOLED, 2400x1080, 6.7"
Oppo Find X5 Pro
AMOLED, 3216x1440, 6.7"
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Dynamic AMOLED, 3088x1440, 6.8"
Screen
14%
20%
16%
12%
14%
22%
Brightness middle
1117
1061
-5%
1230
10%
1018
-9%
1020
-9%
746
-33%
1077
-4%
Brightness
1133
1057
-7%
1244
10%
1026
-9%
1020
-10%
744
-34%
1093
-4%
Brightness Distribution
97
99
2%
94
-3%
93
-4%
96
-1%
97
0%
97
0%
Black Level *
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
2.2
1.3
41%
1
55%
0.9
59%
1
55%
0.9
59%
1.2
45%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
3.9
3.1
21%
2.8
28%
2.2
44%
2.8
28%
1.6
59%
2
49%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
2.3
1.6
30%
1.8
22%
1.9
17%
2.1
9%
1.6
30%
1.3
43%
Gamma
2.37 93%
2.19 100%
2.24 98%
2.26 97%
2.29 96%
2.23 99%
2.37 93%
CCT
6572 99%
6511 100%
6446 101%
6473 100%
6502 100%
6499 100%
6526 100%

* ... smaller is better

即使是三星Galaxy S23 Ultra的OLED面板也不能幸免于闪动。在我们的测量中,我们观察到在最低亮度时的恒定频率为120赫兹。这乍听起来很低,但由于周期曲线平坦,可以归类为相对容易上眼。如果亮度增加,频率会增加一倍,但仍保持在一个恒定的水平。在触摸输入时,仅在240和250赫兹之间出现轻微的波动。该面板的行为对应于具有永久直流调光的面板,即使三星没有说明这一点。

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 240 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 240 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 240 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8715 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

最小显示亮度
闵行区。
25%的显示亮度
25%
50%的显示亮度
50%
75%的显示亮度
75%
最大显示亮度
100%

在固定的变焦水平和不同的亮度设置下进行的一系列测量

Galaxy S23 Ultra的色彩还原被证明是非常准确的,但在比较领域中排在最后。这同时适用于白平衡和色彩准确性。

这款智能手机在屏幕模式 "自然"中实现了最自然的结果,这也是评估的基础,但随后只使用了较小的sRGB颜色空间。然而,如果将白平衡设置得更暖和一些,那么在 "鲜艳"模式下的效果会更好,而且S23 Ultra会使用更大的DCI-P3色彩空间。反之,颜色的饱和度更高,因此准确性也更低。

灰度(模式:鲜艳,白平衡:标准。 目标色彩空间:DCI-P3)。
灰度(模式:鲜艳,白平衡:标准。 目标色彩空间:DCI-P3)。
灰度(模式。生动,白平衡。暖色(1级)。目标色彩空间。DCI-P3)
灰度(模式。生动,白平衡。暖色(1级)。目标色彩空间。DCI-P3)
灰度(模式:自然,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
灰度(模式:自然,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
颜色(模式:鲜艳,白平衡:标准。 目标色彩空间:DCI-P3)。
颜色(模式:鲜艳,白平衡:标准。 目标色彩空间:DCI-P3)。
颜色(模式。生动,白平衡。暖色(1级)。目标色彩空间。DCI-P3)
颜色(模式。生动,白平衡。暖色(1级)。目标色彩空间。DCI-P3)
颜色(模式:自然,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
颜色(模式:自然,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
色彩空间(模式:鲜艳,白平衡:标准。 目标色彩空间:DCI-P3)
色彩空间(模式:鲜艳,白平衡:标准。 目标色彩空间:DCI-P3)
色彩空间(模式:鲜艳,白平衡:温暖(1级)。目标色彩空间。DCI-P3)
色彩空间(模式:鲜艳,白平衡:温暖(1级)。目标色彩空间。DCI-P3)
色彩空间(模式:自然,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
色彩空间(模式:自然,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
饱和度(模式:鲜艳,白平衡:标准。 目标色彩空间:DCI-P3)。
饱和度(模式:鲜艳,白平衡:标准。 目标色彩空间:DCI-P3)。
饱和度(模式。生动,白平衡。暖色(1级)。目标色彩空间。DCI-P3)
饱和度(模式。生动,白平衡。暖色(1级)。目标色彩空间。DCI-P3)
饱和度(模式:自然,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
饱和度(模式:自然,目标色彩空间:sRGB)

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
2.07 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 1.23 ms rise
↘ 0.8365 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 8 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
2.43 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 1.277 ms rise
↘ 1.155 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 8 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

在户外,三星Galaxy S23 Ultra给人留下了极好的印象,在任何一种光线下都能轻松阅读。即使阳光直射也不会构成问题。

三星Galaxy S23户外
三星Galaxy S23
三星Galaxy S23户外
户外活动

OLED面板的可视角度稳定性非常好。在平坦的视角下,只出现了亮度的轻微降低,而且没有颜色反转或闪闪发光的OLED面纱。

三星Galaxy S23 Ultra的可视角度稳定性
三星Galaxy S23 Ultra的可视角度稳定性

性能--配备骁龙8代2的S23 Ultra用于Galaxy

与该系列的所有智能手机一样,三星Galaxy S23 Ultra部署了高通公司的Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 forGalaxy ,根据内存配置,它可以访问8或12GB的LPDDR5x内存。这听起来非常独特,与传统的骁龙8代2 ,以更高的主频核心来区分,工作频率高达3.36 GHz而不是3.2 GHz。

更高的单核性能也反映在基准测试中,但没有反映在系统基准测试中。在那里,三星智能手机占据了一个非常好的位置,但不是顶级的。然而,日常性能是一流的。AIMark分数也相当弱,就像许多竞争对手一样,这表明驱动优化很平庸。

Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max
Apple A16 Bionic, A16 GPU 5-Core, 6144
1885 Points +21%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy
  (1542 - 1598, n=7)
1561 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 12288
1556 Points
Xiaomi 13 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
1499 Points -4%
Vivo X90 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9200, Immortalis-G715 MP11, 12288
1384 Points -11%
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1328 Points -15%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1257 Points -19%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
1154 Points -26%
Average of class Smartphone
  (126 - 2437, n=176, last 2 years)
1037 Points -33%
Multi-Core
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max
Apple A16 Bionic, A16 GPU 5-Core, 6144
5533 Points +9%
Xiaomi 13 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
5201 Points +2%
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 12288
5082 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy
  (4906 - 5198, n=7)
5020 Points -1%
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
4251 Points -16%
Vivo X90 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9200, Immortalis-G715 MP11, 12288
4232 Points -17%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
3560 Points -30%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
3488 Points -31%
Average of class Smartphone
  (473 - 8816, n=176, last 2 years)
3464 Points -32%
Geekbench 6.0
Single-Core
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 12288
1976 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy
  (1958 - 1976, n=3)
1968 Points 0%
Xiaomi 13 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
1753 Points -11%
Vivo X90 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9200, Immortalis-G715 MP11, 12288
1669 Points -16%
Average of class Smartphone
  (188 - 2008, n=41, last 2 years)
1257 Points -36%
Multi-Core
Xiaomi 13 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
5422 Points +4%
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 12288
5221 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy
  (5043 - 5221, n=3)
5130 Points -2%
Vivo X90 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9200, Immortalis-G715 MP11, 12288
4232 Points -19%
Average of class Smartphone
  (512 - 5702, n=41, last 2 years)
3366 Points -36%
Antutu v9 - Total Score
Xiaomi 13 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
1277795 Points +4%
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 12288
1226224 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy
  (1086936 - 1286774, n=8)
1181107 Points -4%
Vivo X90 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9200, Immortalis-G715 MP11, 12288
1175789 Points -4%
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1073804 Points -12%
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max
Apple A16 Bionic, A16 GPU 5-Core, 6144
949107 Points -23%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
856953 Points -30%
Average of class Smartphone
  (99654 - 2056989, n=104, last 2 years)
810694 Points -34%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
704479 Points -43%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
17340 Points +8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy
  (15270 - 17267, n=8)
16185 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 12288
15991 Points
Xiaomi 13 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
14789 Points -8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4609 - 27169, n=197, last 2 years)
13179 Points -18%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
12579 Points -21%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
12144 Points -24%
Vivo X90 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9200, Immortalis-G715 MP11, 12288
9765 Points -39%
CrossMark - Overall
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max
Apple A16 Bionic, A16 GPU 5-Core, 6144
1329 Points +8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy
  (1120 - 1332, n=8)
1239 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 12288
1226 Points
Xiaomi 13 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
1224 Points 0%
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1103 Points -10%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
956 Points -22%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
942 Points -23%
Vivo X90 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9200, Immortalis-G715 MP11, 12288
932 Points -24%
Average of class Smartphone
  (187 - 2485, n=164, last 2 years)
920 Points -25%
BaseMark OS II
Overall
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 12288
9091 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy
  (8541 - 9337, n=8)
8859 Points -3%
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
8164 Points -10%
Xiaomi 13 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
7376 Points -19%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
6799 Points -25%
Vivo X90 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9200, Immortalis-G715 MP11, 12288
6755 Points -26%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1196 - 12993, n=158, last 2 years)
6499 Points -29%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
6319 Points -30%
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max
Apple A16 Bionic, A16 GPU 5-Core, 6144
Points -100%
System
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 12288
14275 Points
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
13412 Points -6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy
  (1374 - 14401, n=8)
12462 Points -13%
Xiaomi 13 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
10786 Points -24%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
10464 Points -27%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2368 - 17953, n=158, last 2 years)
10346 Points -28%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
10340 Points -28%
Vivo X90 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9200, Immortalis-G715 MP11, 12288
9767 Points -32%
Memory
Vivo X90 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9200, Immortalis-G715 MP11, 12288
9245 Points +2%
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 12288
9075 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy
  (8467 - 9212, n=8)
8823 Points -3%
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
8777 Points -3%
Xiaomi 13 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
7232 Points -20%
Average of class Smartphone
  (962 - 18911, n=158, last 2 years)
7058 Points -22%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
6523 Points -28%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
6212 Points -32%
Graphics
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy
  (21505 - 31928, n=8)
28672 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 12288
28497 Points
Vivo X90 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9200, Immortalis-G715 MP11, 12288
27698 Points -3%
Xiaomi 13 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
22986 Points -19%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
21944 Points -23%
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
19247 Points -32%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1017 - 58651, n=158, last 2 years)
17998 Points -37%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
17104 Points -40%
Web
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1960 Points +6%
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 12288
1850 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy
  (1460 - 2032, n=8)
1768 Points -4%
Xiaomi 13 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
1665 Points -10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (841 - 2363, n=158, last 2 years)
1578 Points -15%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1444 Points -22%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
1434 Points -22%
Vivo X90 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9200, Immortalis-G715 MP11, 12288
843 Points -54%
UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
68880 Points +317%
Vivo X90 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9200, Immortalis-G715 MP11, 12288
44483 Points +169%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1267 - 81594, n=150, last 2 years)
17814 Points +8%
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 12288
16511 Points
Xiaomi 13 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
15778 Points -4%
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
14572 Points -12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy
  (1267 - 16702, n=8)
14423 Points -13%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
10841 Points -34%
AImark - Score v3.x
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max
Apple A16 Bionic, A16 GPU 5-Core, 6144
39328 Points +2898%
Vivo X90 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9200, Immortalis-G715 MP11, 12288
31865 Points +2329%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy
  (1216 - 156427, n=6)
27143 Points +1969%
Average of class Smartphone
  (82 - 307528, n=143, last 2 years)
25319 Points +1830%
Xiaomi 13 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
1354 Points +3%
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 12288
1312 Points

集成的Adreno 740负责图形加速。到目前为止,三星没有人能够告诉我们这是否也是时钟更高一点,而且在这方面的基准测试也是模棱两可的。在GFXBench的4k测试中,性能提高了11%,这无疑有利于提高时钟频率。然而,在其他测试中,S23 Ultra落后于其竞争对手。这可以归因于该SoC的平庸的冷却,我们将在后面讨论。

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Vivo X90 Pro
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3792 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3791 Points
Xiaomi 13 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3784 Points 0%
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe
3196 Points -16%
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2768 Points -27%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2523 Points -33%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1916 Points -49%
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Xiaomi 13 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3843 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3829 Points
Vivo X90 Pro
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3783 Points -1%
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe
3365 Points -12%
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2796 Points -27%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2575 Points -33%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2044 Points -47%
3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
14369 Points
Xiaomi 13 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
13984 Points -3%
Vivo X90 Pro
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
13492 Points -6%
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe
12367 Points -14%
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
10982 Points -24%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
10175 Points -29%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
7288 Points -49%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Vivo X90 Pro
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
6894 Points +10%
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
6293 Points
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
5857 Points -7%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
3957 Points -37%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
3902 Points -38%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
23070 Points
Vivo X90 Pro
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
22483 Points -3%
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
20640 Points -11%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
18090 Points -22%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
12972 Points -44%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Vivo X90 Pro
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
14878 Points +3%
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
14487 Points
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
13223 Points -9%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
10005 Points -31%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
8612 Points -41%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
144 fps +20%
Xiaomi 13 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps
Vivo X90 Pro
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
118 fps -2%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps -50%
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe
60 fps -50%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Xiaomi 13 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
497 fps +1%
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
492 fps
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
456 fps -7%
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe
455 fps -8%
Vivo X90 Pro
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
451 fps -8%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
380 fps -23%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
302 fps -39%
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
144 fps +21%
Xiaomi 13 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps +1%
Vivo X90 Pro
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps +1%
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
119 fps
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
108 fps -9%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps -50%
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe
60 fps -50%
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Xiaomi 13 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
331 fps +27%
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe
289 fps +11%
Vivo X90 Pro
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
265 fps +2%
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
261 fps
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
237 fps -9%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
187 fps -28%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
181 fps -31%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
119 fps +31%
Xiaomi 13 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
109 fps +20%
Vivo X90 Pro
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
104 fps +14%
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
91 fps
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
71 fps -22%
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe
60 fps -34%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
56 fps -38%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Xiaomi 13 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
222 fps +17%
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
190 fps
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe
187 fps -2%
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
179 fps -6%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
127 fps -33%
Vivo X90 Pro
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
113 fps -41%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
111 fps -42%
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
89 fps +37%
Vivo X90 Pro
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
81 fps +25%
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
65 fps
Xiaomi 13 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
63 fps -3%
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe
60 fps -8%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
39 fps -40%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
39 fps -40%
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Xiaomi 13 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
126 fps +2%
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
123 fps
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
103 fps -16%
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe
98 fps -20%
Vivo X90 Pro
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
89 fps -28%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
68 fps -45%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
63 fps -49%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Vivo X90 Pro
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
82 fps +37%
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
68 fps +13%
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe
54 fps -10%
Xiaomi 13 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
51 fps -15%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
36 fps -40%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
31 fps -48%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
67 fps
Xiaomi 13 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
61 fps -9%
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
52 fps -22%
Vivo X90 Pro
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
51 fps -24%
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe
41 fps -39%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
40 fps -40%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
30 fps -55%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Vivo X90 Pro
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
105 fps +25%
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
104 fps +24%
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
84 fps
Xiaomi 13 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
82 fps -2%
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe
60 fps -29%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
53 fps -37%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
42 fps -50%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi 13 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
157 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
157 fps
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe
133 fps -15%
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
119 fps -24%
Vivo X90 Pro
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
111 fps -29%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
94 fps -40%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
68 fps -57%
GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
31 fps
Xiaomi 13 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
28 fps -10%
Vivo X90 Pro
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
24 fps -23%
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
23 fps -26%
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe
23 fps -26%

Basemark GPUScore

05101520253035404550556065707580859095Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; GPUScore: The Expedition; Official Native; 0.9.1 Vulkan 1.0: Ø34.7 (11.1-68.4)
Xiaomi 13 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; GPUScore: The Expedition; Official Native; 0.9.1 Vulkan 1.0: Ø38.8 (15.1-95.8)
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe; GPUScore: The Expedition; Official Native; 1.0.0 : Ø41 (19.8-57.3)
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; GPUScore: The Expedition; 2560x1440 Official; 0.9.1 Vulkan 1.0: Ø39.5 (12.5-78.4)
Xiaomi 13 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; GPUScore: The Expedition; 2560x1440 Official; 0.9.1 Vulkan 1.0: Ø31.3 (12.8-74.5)
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe; GPUScore: The Expedition; 2560x1440 Official; 1.0.0 : Ø46.1 (27.6-58.5)
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; GPUScore: Sacred Path; Official Native; 0.9.0 Vulkan 1.3: Ø16 (10.8-74.7)
Xiaomi 13 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; GPUScore: Sacred Path; Official Native; 0.9.0 Vulkan 1.3: Ø14 (9.28-79)
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; GPUScore: Sacred Path; 2560x1440 Official; 0.9.0 Vulkan 1.3: Ø17.3 (9.4-80.7)
Xiaomi 13 Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; GPUScore: Sacred Path; 2560x1440 Official; 0.9.0 Vulkan 1.3: Ø11.4 (7.67-73.2)

在浏览器基准测试中,Galaxy 智能手机提供了持续良好的结果,只需屈服于iPhone 14 Pro.在Android 部分,它是所有东西的衡量标准;只有在WebXPRT基准中,它才排在中游。

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max (Safari 16)
278.979 Points +75%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy (152.9 - 196.3, n=8)
173.4 Points +9%
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra (Chrome 109)
159.102 Points
Xiaomi 13 Pro (Chrome 109)
137.873 Points -13%
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=169, last 2 years)
124.4 Points -22%
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra (Chrome 105)
117.894 Points -26%
Oppo Find X5 Pro (Chrome 99)
103 Points -35%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G (Chrome 99)
96.8 Points -39%
Vivo X90 Pro (Chrome 109)
67.646 Points -57%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max (Safari 16)
371 runs/min +159%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy (136 - 197, n=6)
168.7 runs/min +18%
Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 569, n=152, last 2 years)
143.9 runs/min +1%
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra (Chrome 109)
143 runs/min
Xiaomi 13 Pro (Chrome 109)
110.9 runs/min -22%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G (Chrome 99)
108 runs/min -24%
Oppo Find X5 Pro (Chrome 99)
104 runs/min -27%
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra (Chrome 105)
99.2 runs/min -31%
Vivo X90 Pro (Chrome 109)
60.2 runs/min -58%
WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max (Safari 16)
201 Points +39%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy (145 - 187, n=8)
165.5 Points +14%
Xiaomi 13 Pro (Chrome 109)
157 Points +8%
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra (Chrome 110)
145 Points
Average of class Smartphone (22 - 271, n=159, last 2 years)
117.1 Points -19%
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra (Chrome 105)
101 Points -30%
Vivo X90 Pro (Chrome 109)
66 Points -54%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max (Safari 16)
72024 Points +22%
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra (Chrome 109)
59214 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy (49582 - 64715, n=8)
59058 Points 0%
Xiaomi 13 Pro (Chrome 109)
42544 Points -28%
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=210, last 2 years)
38550 Points -35%
Oppo Find X5 Pro (Chrome 99)
38407 Points -35%
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra (Chrome 105)
37098 Points -37%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G (Chrome 99)
34055 Points -42%
Vivo X90 Pro (Chrome 109)
21648 Points -63%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Vivo X90 Pro (Chrome 109)
1847.5 ms * -170%
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=167, last 2 years)
1523 ms * -122%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G (Chrome 99)
1259 ms * -84%
Oppo Find X5 Pro (Chrome 99)
1125 ms * -64%
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra (Chrome 105)
1104 ms * -61%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy (634 - 1533, n=8)
795 ms * -16%
Xiaomi 13 Pro (Chrome 109)
690.6 ms * -1%
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra (Chrome 109)
685 ms *
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max (Safari 16)
469.9 ms * +31%

* ... smaller is better

Galaxy S23 Ultra中的快速UFS 4.0存储为数据存储提供了显著的速度提升。只有在写入数据时,它才会出人意料地稍稍减弱,甚至在小数据块中很容易被Edge 30 Ultra.

Samsung Galaxy S23 UltraXiaomi 13 ProVivo X90 ProMotorola Edge 30 UltraOppo Find X5 ProSamsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5GAverage 256 GB UFS 4.0 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
84%
82%
30%
-29%
-6%
63%
7%
Sequential Read 256KB
3426.56
3587.83
5%
3866.75
13%
1717.77
-50%
1410
-59%
1653
-52%
Sequential Write 256KB
1389.84
2601.45
87%
2643.38
90%
1363.58
-2%
894
-36%
1074
-23%
Random Read 4KB
449.77
387.72
-14%
367.89
-18%
349.08
-22%
183.7
-59%
322.3
-28%
406 ?(218 - 483, n=26)
-10%
Random Write 4KB
152.92
546.98
258%
521.43
241%
446.25
192%
210.4
38%
273.1
79%

游戏--需要优化的Adreno 740

三星Galaxy S23 Ultra使用了非常强大的SoC,即使对于要求苛刻的游戏也有足够的储备。这也在很大程度上反映在测试的题目中,我们用GameBench进行分析。.

在《源氏冲击》中,在最高的细节水平上,60FPS的恒定帧率是没有问题的。不幸的是,不能使用120赫兹模式。暗黑破坏神不朽》就比较迟钝了。即使在最低的细节水平下,在测试中偶尔会出现卡顿,但在更高的细节水平下这些卡顿并没有增加。不幸的是,选择最高设置还不可能。这当然不是由于硬件的原因,而是由于缺乏优化。

大屏幕提供了一个很好的概览,良好的扬声器也使游戏体验更加完美。

PUBG手机版
PUBG手机版
三星游戏助推器
游戏助推器
玄信影响
玄信影响
三星游戏启动器
游戏启动器
0102030405060708090100110120Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra; Armajet; 1.61.6: Ø119.3 (114-120)
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra; Genshin Impact; 3.4.0_12498014_12591909: Ø59.9 (54-61)
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra; PUBG Mobile; HD; 2.4.0: Ø59.8 (55-61)
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra; PUBG Mobile; Ultra HD; 2.4.0: Ø40 (39-41)

排放--S23 Ultra的性能奖励消失了

温度

三星Galaxy S23 Ultra在任何情况下都能保持令人愉快的表面温度。即使是持续的负载也不会让它感到不安。

然而,SoC的冷却并不十分成功。在3DMark Wild Life压力测试中,性能随着时间的推移而下降,在第二十次运行结束时下沉到原来性能水平的69%。尽管如此,这仍然是54FPS左右,因此比前代产品要多得多。这种下降在日常使用中不太可能被注意到。

Max. Load
 29.8 °C29.8 °C30 °C 
 30.8 °C31.1 °C30.3 °C 
 30.5 °C29.6 °C28.7 °C 
Maximum: 31.1 °C
Average: 30.1 °C
28.5 °C28.7 °C30.1 °C
28 °C28.9 °C30 °C
27.9 °C28.2 °C29.9 °C
Maximum: 30.1 °C
Average: 28.9 °C
Room Temperature 20.8 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260
(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 30.1 °C / 86 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 31.1 °C / 88 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 30.1 °C / 86 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 23.4 °C / 74 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Xiaomi 13 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
83.1 % +20%
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe
80.1 % +16%
Vivo X90 Pro
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
74.1 % +7%
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
69 %
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
62.7 % -9%
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
59.6 % -14%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
58.5 % -15%
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Xiaomi 13 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
88.2 % +50%
Vivo X90 Pro
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
81.7 % +39%
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe
66.7 % +14%
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
63.1 % +7%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
62.7 % +7%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
61.8 % +5%
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
58.7 %
0510152025303540455055606570758085Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø16.8 (13.5-23)
Xiaomi 13 Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø21.1 (19.4-22)
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test: Ø14.4 (13.4-20.1)
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø60 (53.6-77.7)
Xiaomi 13 Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø73.8 (64.6-77.7)
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø50.6 (47.5-59.3)
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability: Ø72.7 (55.1-86.1)
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 128 GB NVMe; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability: Ø55.3 (50.8-74)

发言人

Galaxy S23 Ultra的两个扬声器提供了一个吸引人的音质,今年再次被AKG优化,并支持杜比全景声。即使是上层的低音范围也清晰可闻,但对于真正的深沉音调来说是不够的。

如果你想使用有线声音输出,你必须使用USB-C接口。可以单独购买一个合适的插孔插头的适配器。现代蓝牙5.3是可以无线使用的,但不幸的是仍然只有非常狭窄的编解码支持(SBC、AAC、aptX、LDAC和SSC)。如果你想同时流向两个蓝牙接收器,你必须用SBC编解码器来解决。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2033.834.72527.935.33124.334.84028.240.55036.739.46322.237.58025.442.31002144.312518.648.316015.458.620015.159.225013.161315126140012.76250011.868.263012.967.380010.473.4100013.374.8125013.278160012.179.3200012.279.9250012.982.3315014.881400015.882.5500016.182.6630014.479.6800013.680.41000013.578.61250014.473.5160001570.2SPL25.991.8N0.789.6median 13.5median 74.8Delta1.3935.644.335.230.332.627.92929.737.438.130.631.629.333.226.736.624.34622.556.218.85516.258.51258.99.960.711.767.810.368.511.970.3127212.175.61276.312.180.112.779.612.779.512.978.213.378.213.276.513.674.613.67513.371.412.760.325.1890.776median 12.7median 7228.7hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseSamsung Galaxy S23 UltraApple iPhone 14 Pro Max
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (91.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 19.4% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (5.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.1% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.2% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (2.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 3% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 94% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 21% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 75% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.3% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (1.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 3% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 20% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 76% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电池寿命 - 5,000毫安时,更有耐力

消耗功率

三星Galaxy S23 Ultra的功耗在闲置模式下是堪称典范的。然而,在我们的测试中,在调整显示亮度(150cd/m2)的情况下,电池的消耗比竞争对手快得多。

三星Galaxy S23 Ultra再次没有配备电源,这就是为什么我们使用Anker Ace 313 (45瓦,GaN),它充分发挥了智能手机的充电技术能力,需要整整一个小时才能将5000毫安的电池充满。18分钟后达到50%大关,34分钟后达到80%大关。

S23 Ultra可以以高达15瓦的功率进行无线充电。通过Wireless PowerShare,该智能手机还可以为其他产品进行无线充电。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.02 / 0.26 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 0.9 / 1.05 / 1.1 Watt
Load midlight 3.99 / 7.82 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra
5000 mAh
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max
4323 mAh
Xiaomi 13 Pro
4820 mAh
Vivo X90 Pro
4870 mAh
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
4610 mAh
Oppo Find X5 Pro
5000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
5000 mAh
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-12%
-15%
-43%
-11%
-16%
-12%
-73%
-35%
Idle Minimum *
0.9
0.61
32%
1.02
-13%
0.9
-0%
0.74
18%
1.24
-38%
0.58
36%
1.531 ?(0.44 - 3.4, n=8)
-70%
Idle Average *
1.05
1.7
-62%
1.36
-30%
2.32
-121%
1.84
-75%
1.39
-32%
0.71
32%
1.848 ?(0.69 - 3.68, n=8)
-76%
Idle Maximum *
1.1
1.73
-57%
1.58
-44%
2.39
-117%
1.86
-69%
1.42
-29%
1.16
-5%
1.998 ?(0.83 - 3.91, n=8)
-82%
Load Average *
3.99
3.85
4%
4.29
-8%
3.64
9%
2.75
31%
3.58
10%
7.07
-77%
Load Maximum *
7.82
5.94
24%
6.15
21%
6.53
16%
4.54
42%
6.99
11%
11.32
-45%
10.7 ?(6.16 - 15.9, n=8)
-37%

* ... smaller is better

Power Consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

01234567891011121314Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø6.7 (1.089-14.7)
Xiaomi 13 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø4.54 (0.899-8.01)
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.938 (0.899-1.321)
Xiaomi 13 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.902 (0.867-1.084)

Power Consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

0123456789101112Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø11.6 (10.3-12.7)
Xiaomi 13 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø6.96 (6.61-7.31)
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.938 (0.899-1.321)
Xiaomi 13 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.902 (0.867-1.084)

电池寿命

三星Galaxy S23 Ultra的电池运行时间在所有测试领域都非常好,只输给了iPhone 14 Pro Max的总运行时间。当查看调整后的显示亮度(150cd/m2)的数值时,Galaxy 智能手机更出色。特别是在网络冲浪方面,它在比较领域中处于领先地位。

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
35h 39min
WiFi Websurfing (Chrome 110)
18h 20min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
25h 43min
Load (maximum brightness)
6h 40min
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra
5000 mAh
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max
4323 mAh
Xiaomi 13 Pro
4820 mAh
Vivo X90 Pro
4870 mAh
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
4610 mAh
Oppo Find X5 Pro
5000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
5000 mAh
Battery Runtime
15%
-27%
-17%
-15%
-26%
-15%
Reader / Idle
2139
3473
62%
1509
-29%
2206
3%
1269
-41%
1973
-8%
H.264
1543
1688
9%
1263
-18%
1188
-23%
1142
-26%
1078
-30%
WiFi v1.3
1100
948
-14%
846
-23%
909
-17%
872
-21%
788
-28%
844
-23%
Load
400
416
4%
254
-36%
323
-19%
367
-8%
410
3%

Pros

+ 在120赫兹下明亮的ltpo oled
+ 性能高
+ 电池寿命长
+ S 笔
+ 通过 IP68 认证
+ 非常好的语音质量

Cons

- 缺少蓝牙的音频编解码器
- 没有-Wi-Fi 7
- 充电技术缓慢
- SoC 的适度冷却

评语 - 一个坚实的升级

在审查中。三星Galaxy S23 Ultra。测试设备由德国三星公司提供。(图片: Daniel Schmidt)
在审查中。三星Galaxy S23 Ultra。测试设备由德国三星公司提供。(图片: Daniel Schmidt)

Galaxy S23 Ultra是目前最好的智能手机之一。今年,三星再次继续专注于进一步发展其旗舰手机,没有推出任何重大创新。全球部署的 Snapdragon 8 Gen 2为Galaxy ,是一个真正的优势。S23 Ultra在上市时比其前辈工作得更顺利,电池寿命尤其受益于SoC的变化。

三星Galaxy S23 Ultra要求用户做出的妥协很少。

Galaxy S23 Ultra的相机在同类产品中是最好的,并提供了特别广泛的用途。然而,虽然新的200MPix的主传感器仍然需要一些微调,但新的超广角传感器是一个明显的改进。

无线局域网快速、稳定,还能利用6GHz频段,但不支持当前的Wi-Fi 7标准,尽管这属于骁龙的能力。此外,更现代的蓝牙编解码器将不会随着SOC的改变而得到支持,这令人失望。因此,S23 Ultra并没有提供任何主要的竞争优势,但它的S Pen仍有一个独特的卖点。

强大的竞争对手包括 小米13 Pro, 摩托罗拉Edge 30 Ultra像素7 Pro.如果用户不是在寻找一款Android 智能手机,那么 iPhone 14 Pro Max是一个不错的选择。

价格和可用性

建议用户直接通过三星的网店(如适用)查询三星Galaxy S23 Ultra的价格和供货情况。在美国例如,最小的内存版本(256GB)价格为1199.99美元,其次是512GB和1TB的版本,分别为1379.99美元和1379.99美元。

一般来说,通过亚马逊等转售商的型号会稍微便宜一些。

上述价格截至2023年3月1日,可能会有变化。

Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra - 07/24/2023 v7 (old)
Daniel Schmidt

Chassis
95%
Keyboard
67 / 75 → 89%
Pointing Device
97%
Connectivity
72 / 70 → 100%
Weight
88%
Battery
93%
Display
93%
Games Performance
70 / 64 → 100%
Application Performance
95 / 86 → 100%
Temperature
96%
Noise
100%
Audio
76 / 90 → 85%
Camera
81%
Average
86%
91%
Smartphone - Weighted Average

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 三星Galaxy S23 Ultra评论。 拥有银河系力量和200MP摄像头的智能手机
Daniel Schmidt, 2023-03- 2 (Update: 2024-08-15)