Notebookcheck Logo
Oppo Reno12 Pro in review

Oppo Reno12 Pro 智能手机评测：轻盈纤薄的回归

欢迎回来 OPPO 又推出了面向中端市场的 Reno12 Pro。这款 "AI 手机 "旨在以其人工智能功能和设计给人留下深刻印象。然而，制造商在其他方面却偷工减料。我们的测试着眼于雷诺 12 Pro 的优缺点。
Benedikt Winkel, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
5G Android Smartphone Touchscreen

雷诺系列是 Oppo 的中端产品。该制造商不仅提供一款 Reno12，还提供四款不同的型号。除了普通的 Reno12，还有两款更便宜的 Reno12 F 和顶级机型 Reno12 Pro。即使是中端机型也离不开人工智能--Oppo 称 Reno12 Pro 为 "人工智能手机"。

Reno12 Pro 有两个版本，存储空间分别为 256 GB 或 512 GB，两款机型均配备 12 GB 内存。此外，还有三种颜色可供选择：太空棕、日落金和星云银。

我们的测试设备是星云银版本。它的颜色会随着光线的照射而变化，但看起来更像是紫色而不是银色，而且还闪烁着绿色的光泽。

Oppo Reno12 Pro (Reno12 Series)
Processor
MediaTek Dimensity 7300 8 x 2 - 2.5 GHz, Cortex-A78 / A55
Graphics adapter
ARM Mali-G615 MP2
Memory
12 GB 
Display
6.70 inch 20.1:9, 2412 x 1080 pixel 394 PPI, Capacitive Touchscreen, AMOLED, Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2, glossy: yes, HDR, 120 Hz
Storage
512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash, 512 GB 
, 483 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 Infrared, Audio Connections: USB-C, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: Geomagnetic, Proximity, Optical, Acceleration, Gravity, Gyroscope, Step counting, IR Blaster, OTG
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.4, GSM (850/ 900/ 1800/ 1900 MHz), UMTS (Bands 1/ 2/ 4/ 5/ 6/ 8/ 19), LTE (FDD Bands 1/ 2/ 3/ 4/ 5/ 7/ 8/ 12/ 13/ 17/ 18/ 19/ 20/ 26/ 28/ 66; TDD Bands 38/ 39/ 40/ 41) 5G (n77/ n78/ n38/ n40/ n41/ n1/ n2/ n3/ n5/ n7/ n8/ n12/ n20/ n26/ n28/ n66), Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 7.6 x 161.4 x 74.8
Battery
5000 mAh Lithium-Polymer
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 14
Camera
Primary Camera: 50 MPix (f/1.8) OIS FOV 79° + 8 MPix (f/2.2) FOV 112° + 50 MPix (f/2.0) FOV 50°
Secondary Camera: 50 MPix (f/2.0 AF FOV 90°)
Additional features
Speakers: Stereo, Keyboard: OnScreen, SIM-Needle, Screen-Protection, USB-Cable, ColorOS 14.1, 24 Months Warranty, SAR-Head: 0,75 W/kg; SAR-Body: 0,97 W/kg; DRM Widevine L1; Camera2 API: Level 3; GNSS: GPS (L1), Glonass (L1), Galileo (E1), Beidoo (B1); Supported HDR Types: HDR10, HDR10+, HLG, fanless
Weight
184 g
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating
Version
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Best Price
78.3 %v8
09/2024
Oppo Reno12 Pro
Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2		184 g512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.70"2412x1080
82.1 %v8
08/2024
Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro
SD 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740		209 g1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash6.67"3200x1440
80.5 %v8
07/2024
Honor 200 Pro
SD 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735		199 g512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash6.78"2700x1224
87.4 %v7 (old)
05/2024
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530		213 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.60"2340x1080
75.4 %v8
07/2024
Motorola Edge 50 Fusion
SD 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710		175 g256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.70"2400x1080

外壳 - Reno12 Pro 纤薄稳定

雷诺 12 Pro 的 6.7 英寸显示屏四边略呈圆形，但仍不是边缘显示屏。不过，这使得这款智能手机握持起来非常舒适，而且重量只有 184 克，也相当轻巧。显示屏由康宁大猩猩玻璃 Victus 2 保护。

边框由合金制成，表面呈亮光处理，因此它能神奇地吸附指纹，尽管在评测设备的磨砂背面几乎看不到指纹。Reno12 Pro 的做工非常出色。按键间隙均匀，按键稳固且有良好的受力点。即使在压力下，手机也几乎不会扭曲。

背面的摄像头凸起明显突出于设备。如果将智能手机放在桌子上，在输入时会有明显的晃动。Reno12 Pro 的防尘防水性能符合 IP65 标准。

Oppo Reno12 Pro
Oppo Reno12 Pro
Oppo Reno12 Pro
Oppo Reno12 Pro
Oppo Reno12 Pro
Oppo Reno12 Pro
Oppo Reno12 Pro
Oppo Reno12 Pro
Oppo Reno12 Pro
Oppo Reno12 Pro

尺寸比较

❌
163.3 mm 75.2 mm 8.2 mm 199 g162 mm 73 mm 7.9 mm 175 g161.1 mm 77.4 mm 8.2 mm 213 g160.86 mm 74.95 mm 8.21 mm 209 g161.4 mm 74.8 mm 7.6 mm 184 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g

功能特点Reno12Pro 带红外触发器和内存扩展功能

Oppo 为 Reno12 Pro 配备了 UFS 3.1 内存。SoC 为 联发科 Dimensity 7300与 Mali-G615 MP2图形处理器。Oppo 智能手机支持蓝牙 5.4、Wi-Fi 6 和 NFC。存储空间可通过插入混合插槽的 microSD 卡进行扩展。可使用两张 SIM 卡或一张 SIM 卡和一张存储卡。此外，还配备了红外热像仪。

USB-C 端口仅对应 USB 2.0。与三星 980 Pro 硬盘配合使用时，我们测得的传输速度为 20.15 MB/s。Reno12 Pro 兼容 USB-OTG，支持 exFAT 和 NTFS。

microSD 读卡器：Reno12 Pro 传输缓慢

Oppo Reno12 Pro 的内存可以使用 microSD 卡进行扩展。我们在测试中使用了 AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60 参考卡。通过三次测量，我们获得了 9.78 MB/s 的平均传输速度。

因此传输速度相当慢。A 三星Galaxy A55在相同测试中的速度是它的五倍多。

SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
53.26 MB/s +445%
Oppo Reno12 Pro
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
9.78 MB/s

Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)

0102030405060708090100Tooltip
Oppo Reno12 Pro Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø37.4 (25.9-48.2)
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø38.6 (28.3-52.1)
Oppo Reno12 Pro Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø72.6 (30.4-78.8)
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø74.6 (44.1-101.9)

软件：奥普人工智能功能仍是噱头

奥普为 Reno12 Pro 提供了Android 14 和自己的 ColorOS 14 UI。在测试时，安全补丁是从 2024 年 7 月开始的，因此是最新的。在评测期间，发布了一个 1 GB 的更新，增加了一些人工智能功能。

出厂内存容量约为 29 GB。该机安装了许多臃肿的软件，包括游戏、亚马逊和 WPS Office。不过，这些程序可以顺利删除。制造商打算为 Reno12 Pro 提供三年的操作系统更新和四年的安全更新。

OPPO 宣传 Reno12 Pro 是一款 AI 智能手机。AI 功能主要用于图像处理。这款智能手机可在场景中设置人脸，避免在照片中闭眼，并提供 "魔力橡皮擦 "来消除令人分心的元素。

其他功能包括 AI LinkBoost，旨在帮助与各种网络建立快速稳定的连接。此外，Oppo 还提供了总结文本和口头语言的功能。要使用这些服务，必须创建一个 Oppo 账户，而且语音功能还没有德语版本。

可持续性：采用无塑料包装的 Reno12 Pro

Oppo 在 Reno12 Pro 的包装中摒弃了塑料。只有智能手机采用可生物降解薄膜包装，其余包装均由纸板制成。制造商没有提供任何关于智能手机中可回收材料的信息。

不过，Oppo 声称，由于集成了减震器，Reno12 Pro 即使在没有保护套的情况下也能很好地抵御碰撞和磕碰。

通信和全球导航卫星系统：Reno12 Pro 定位不准确

OPPO 宣称 Reno12 Pro 配备了 Wi-Fi 6，但只支持 2.4 和 5 GHz 频段。与我们的参考路由器华硕 ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000 配合使用，传输速度达到了不错的水平。Reno12 Pro 的速度比大多数对比设备都要快。不过，测试中也出现了一些明显的掉线现象。

Reno12 Pro 支持 5G，支持 47 个手机频段。因此，全球范围内的接收应该不成问题。在测试中，接收效果总体良好。不过，智能手机有时会在没有数据流量的情况下显示 5G 连接。

Networking
Oppo Reno12 Pro
iperf3 receive AXE11000
880 (min: 565) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
922 (min: 790) MBit/s ∼98%
Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro
iperf3 receive AXE11000
664 (min: 628) MBit/s ∼75%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
818 (min: 430) MBit/s ∼87%
Honor 200 Pro
iperf3 receive AXE11000
828 (min: 801) MBit/s ∼94%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
944 (min: 483) MBit/s ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
iperf3 receive AXE11000
823 (min: 704) MBit/s ∼94%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
735 (min: 671) MBit/s ∼78%
Motorola Edge 50 Fusion
iperf3 receive AXE11000
529 (min: 443) MBit/s ∼60%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
617 (min: 494) MBit/s ∼65%
Average of class Smartphone
iperf3 receive AXE11000
692 (min: 34.8) MBit/s ∼79%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
712 (min: 40.5) MBit/s ∼75%
050100150200250300350400450500550600650700750800850900950Tooltip
Oppo Reno12 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 7300, ARM Mali-G615 MP2; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø879 (565-927)
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G Samsung Exynos 1480, Samsung Xclipse 530; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø822 (704-841)
Oppo Reno12 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 7300, ARM Mali-G615 MP2; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø922 (790-987)
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G Samsung Exynos 1480, Samsung Xclipse 530; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø735 (671-791)
全球导航卫星系统测量：室内
全球导航卫星系统测量：室内
全球导航卫星系统测量：室外
全球导航卫星系统测量：室外

Reno12 Pro 支持包括 SBAS 在内的所有常见卫星系统，但仅限于单波段。该系统的精确度还有待提高。在使用 Garmin Venu 2 进行共享单车旅行时，智能手机记录的路线并不总是在公路上，这在建筑密集区尤为明显。

但在日常生活中，使用谷歌地图等进行导航则没有任何问题。

全球导航卫星系统测量：环湖航行
全球导航卫星系统测量：环湖航行
全球导航卫星系统测量：转折点
全球导航卫星系统测量：转折点
全球导航卫星系统测量：摘要
全球导航卫星系统测量：摘要

电话功能和语音质量Reno12 Pro 无异常

Oppo 依靠的是谷歌手机应用。该软件布局清晰，但不提供任何特殊功能。所宣传的人工智能抑制背景噪音功能也没有作为选项出现在应用程序中。

电话质量不错。通话双方的声音都能清晰再现，没有干扰。通过扬声器拨打电话时，设备的声音足够大。不过，背景噪声应该被更好地过滤掉。

摄像头配备三个 5000 万像素传感器的 Reno12 Pro

与 Oppo Reno12 Pro 自拍。
与 Oppo Reno12 Pro 自拍。

奥普在 Reno12 Pro 中安装了三个 5000 万像素的传感器。除了主摄像头外，人像长焦镜头和自拍摄像头也提供了相同的分辨率。而超广角摄像头则只能使用 800 万像素的传感器。主摄像头拍摄的图像令人愉悦，但制造商在饱和度方面做得太过了。

这款智能手机的弱光表现出人意料的好。虽然锐度有所欠缺，但拍出的照片大气美观。人像和自拍同样令人印象深刻。

相比之下，超广角摄像头的成像质量就差强人意了。它缺乏锐度，图像边缘有明显的弧度。

在变焦方面，Reno12 Pro 也有不足，至少在人像镜头的放大倍率超过 2 倍时是如此。

正面和背面均可拍摄视频，最高可达 4K 和 30 fps。如果激活 "超图像稳定 "功能，分辨率会自动变为 1080p 和 60 FPS。视频的防抖动效果和音质都很好。

不过，色彩明显过于饱和，视频中物体的色彩会因观看角度的不同而产生巨大波动。

一些人工智能功能有些隐蔽；脸部光照调整被列在滤镜下。此外，魔法橡皮擦在所有情况下都无法令人信服。

有时，修饰效果会很明显，但在其他情况下，程序却能很好地工作。背景中的人物通常都能被识别并可靠地去除。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Main CameraMain cameraUltra-wide5x ZoomLow Light
ColorChecker
4.4 ∆E
4.2 ∆E
5.5 ∆E
12.8 ∆E
6.2 ∆E
3.3 ∆E
2.9 ∆E
8 ∆E
8.2 ∆E
6.1 ∆E
6.9 ∆E
2 ∆E
7.8 ∆E
7.9 ∆E
9.5 ∆E
3 ∆E
7.5 ∆E
6.8 ∆E
5.1 ∆E
5.9 ∆E
8.2 ∆E
6 ∆E
5 ∆E
2.4 ∆E
ColorChecker Oppo Reno12 Pro: 6.07 ∆E min: 2.02 - max: 12.84 ∆E
ColorChecker
16.5 ∆E
14.2 ∆E
18.7 ∆E
17.9 ∆E
18.6 ∆E
18.6 ∆E
14.7 ∆E
12.5 ∆E
10.7 ∆E
16.3 ∆E
13.7 ∆E
17.2 ∆E
14.4 ∆E
18.3 ∆E
6 ∆E
11 ∆E
14 ∆E
21.7 ∆E
16 ∆E
12.7 ∆E
14.1 ∆E
20.6 ∆E
19.3 ∆E
12.9 ∆E
ColorChecker Oppo Reno12 Pro: 15.43 ∆E min: 5.95 - max: 21.72 ∆E

配件和保修：随 OPPO 附带保护膜

Reno12 Pro 的供货范围很小。除智能手机外，包装盒内只有一条 USB 数据线（USB-A 转 USB-C）、一个 SIM 卡工具和一份快速入门指南。

出厂时在显示屏上贴了一层保护膜。这层保护膜贴合得很好，但在测试过程中会出现气泡，保护膜也会脱落。

Oppo 在德国为这款智能手机提供 24 个月的保修服务。

输入设备和操作：Reno12 Pro 便宜的振动电机

Oppo 使用 GBoard 作为前键盘。输入通常不会出错，触摸边缘区域也能可靠识别。即使贴上了保护膜，显示屏的滑动性能也非常好，不过如果不贴保护膜，手指的滑动会更加顺畅。

Reno12 Pro 可以使用光学屏内指纹传感器或通过摄像头进行二维人脸识别解锁。在测试中，这两种方法都能非常可靠、快速地工作。面部识别的速度尤其快，而且可以跳过锁屏。即使在光线非常暗的情况下，相机解锁也能可靠地工作。

在输入方面，ERM 振动电机破坏了原本相当不错的画面。它的声音很大，反馈也很松散。这与智能手机本来非常出色的操作印象不符。

显示屏配备 120 Hz 非 LTPO 面板的 Reno12 Pro

子像素显示
子像素显示

Reno12 Pro 配备了一块 6.7 英寸 AMOLED 显示屏，分辨率为 FHD+。面板支持 120 Hz 的最大刷新率。不过，它不是 LTPO 显示器；支持的刷新率为 60 Hz、90 Hz 和 120 Hz。软件会根据内容自动调整刷新率。最大触摸采样率为 240 Hz。

Oppo 宣称其峰值亮度为 1,200 cd/m²。在开启环境光线传感器的情况下，我们的测量结果可以达到这一水平。在没有传感器的情况下，设备的最高亮度为 587 尼特。在 HDR 内容下，我们甚至可以测量到 1529 cd/m² 的最大亮度。这使 Reno12 Pro 在同类产品中处于领先地位。

不过，我们也注意到了频率为 60 Hz 的基本闪烁现象。不过，这种情况只发生在最大手动屏幕亮度时。有一种频率高达 2160 Hz 的 PWM 调光模式，随着亮度的增加，频率也会增加。

1170
cd/m²		1179
cd/m²		1233
cd/m²
1180
cd/m²		1192
cd/m²		1260
cd/m²
1187
cd/m²		1212
cd/m²		1269
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 1269 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 1209.1 cd/m² Minimum: 2.1 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 92 %
Center on Battery: 1192 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.8 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.95
ΔE Greyscale 2.9 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
98.7% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.33
Oppo Reno12 Pro
AMOLED, 2412x1080, 6.7"		Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro
AMOLED, 3200x1440, 6.7"		Honor 200 Pro
OLED, 2700x1224, 6.8"		Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Super AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.6"		Motorola Edge 50 Fusion
P-OLED, 2400x1080, 6.7"
Screen
9%
30%
11%
22%
Brightness middle
1192
1025
-14%
1208
1%
962
-19%
1213
2%
Brightness
1209
1021
-16%
1194
-1%
967
-20%
1190
-2%
Brightness Distribution
92
98
7%
98
7%
99
8%
93
1%
Black Level *
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
1.8
1.2
33%
0.9
50%
1.6
11%
1.36
24%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
4
3
25%
1.4
65%
2.6
35%
2.3
42%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
2.9
2.4
17%
1.3
55%
1.5
48%
1.1
62%
Gamma
2.33 94%
2.21 100%
2.29 96%
2.13 103%
2.254 98%
CCT
6242 104%
6656 98%
6413 101%
6382 102%
6624 98%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 60 Hz
Amplitude: 16.91 %

The display backlight flickers at 60 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 60 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17263 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

最低显示亮度
分钟
25 % 显示屏亮度
25 %
显示屏亮度为 50
50 %
75 % 显示亮度
75 %
最大手动显示亮度
100 %

固定缩放级别和不同亮度设置下的测量系列 (最低亮度下的振幅曲线看起来很平，但这是缩放造成的。信息框显示的是最小亮度下的振幅放大图）

面板的色彩还原很好。虽然存在偏差，但并不严重。从对比设备中可以看出，该级别产品还有改进的余地。200 Pro 的面板 Honor 200 Pro的面板调校得更好。

不过，在日常使用中，色彩偏差并不明显，这也适用于面板照明不完全均匀的情况。

色彩保真度（色彩方案标准、色温标准、目标色彩空间 sRGB）
色彩保真度（色彩方案标准、色温标准、目标色彩空间 sRGB）
色彩空间（色彩方案标准、色温标准、目标色彩空间 sRGB）
色彩空间（色彩方案标准、色温标准、目标色彩空间 sRGB）
灰度（色彩方案标准、色温标准、目标色彩空间 sRGB）
灰度（色彩方案标准、色温标准、目标色彩空间 sRGB）
色彩饱和度（色彩方案标准、色温标准、目标色彩空间 sRGB）
色彩饱和度（色彩方案标准、色温标准、目标色彩空间 sRGB）

Display Response Times

ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
   ↔    Response Time Black to White
1.04 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.5205 ms rise
↘ 0.517 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 2 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.1 ms).
   ↔    Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
1.08 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.4835 ms rise
↘ 0.5935 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 2 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.1 ms).

即使在阳光下，Reno12 Pro 的亮度也足以识别内容。虽然性能不足以超越所有反光效果，但这款智能手机仍可放心使用。

多云天气下的 Oppo Reno12 Pro
多云天气下的 Oppo Reno12 Pro

Reno12 Pro 的视角稳定性尚可，即使从锐角观看也不会出现色彩偏移。不过，显示屏的部分区域颜色较暗，因此内容更难辨认。

性能：Reno12 Pro 被竞争对手超越

在雷诺 12 Pro 中，Oppo 采用了 联发科 Dimensity 7300作为 SoC。在基准测试中，这款智能手机通常只能与红灯笼相提并论。在 Honor 200 Pro配备了 骁龙 8s 第 3 代和 Poco F6 Pro配备 骁龙 8 代 2在性能方面完全不同。

Dimensity 7300 只在 Procyon AI Inference forAndroid 和 Geekbench ML 中取得了不错的成绩。而在内存基准测试中，Reno12 Pro 则处于中游。

不过，在日常使用中，这款智能手机的性能并没有太多值得批评的地方。应用程序启动迅速，滚动流畅，用户界面运行无明显卡顿。

Geekbench 6.2 | Geekbench 5.5 | Antutu v10 | PCMark for Android | CrossMark | BaseMark OS II | Geekbench ML | UL Procyon AI Inference for Android
Geekbench 6.2
Single-Core
Honor 200 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
1821 Points +237%
Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
1432 Points +165%
Average of class Smartphone
  (193 - 2930, n=143, last 2 years)
1361 Points +152%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Samsung Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530, 8192
1157 Points +114%
Motorola Edge 50 Fusion
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 8192
998 Points +84%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7300
  (541 - 1016, n=2)
779 Points +44%
Oppo Reno12 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 12288
541 Points
Multi-Core
Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
5100 Points +168%
Honor 200 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
4602 Points +141%
Average of class Smartphone
  (845 - 7408, n=143, last 2 years)
3798 Points +99%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Samsung Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530, 8192
3456 Points +81%
Motorola Edge 50 Fusion
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 8192
2813 Points +48%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7300
  (1906 - 2630, n=2)
2268 Points +19%
Oppo Reno12 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 12288
1906 Points
Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Honor 200 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
1413 Points +73%
Average of class Smartphone
  (126 - 2138, n=180, last 2 years)
941 Points +15%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Samsung Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530, 8192
891 Points +9%
Oppo Reno12 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 12288
817 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7300
  ()
817 Points 0%
Motorola Edge 50 Fusion
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 8192
792 Points -3%
Multi-Core
Honor 200 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
4155 Points +41%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Samsung Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530, 8192
3349 Points +13%
Average of class Smartphone
  (473 - 6681, n=180, last 2 years)
3144 Points +6%
Oppo Reno12 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 12288
2953 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7300
  ()
2953 Points 0%
Motorola Edge 50 Fusion
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 8192
2888 Points -2%
Antutu v10 - Total Score
Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
1536373 Points +157%
Honor 200 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
1329696 Points +122%
Average of class Smartphone
  (142748 - 2162423, n=82, last 2 years)
1159866 Points +94%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Samsung Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530, 8192
740935 Points +24%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7300
  (598120 - 646650, n=2)
622385 Points +4%
Oppo Reno12 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 12288
598120 Points
Motorola Edge 50 Fusion
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 8192
571043 Points -5%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Honor 200 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
16008 Points +27%
Motorola Edge 50 Fusion
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 8192
15308 Points +21%
Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
14517 Points +15%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Samsung Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530, 8192
13393 Points +6%
Oppo Reno12 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 12288
12633 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7300
  ()
12633 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4609 - 21385, n=191, last 2 years)
12476 Points -1%
CrossMark - Overall
Honor 200 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
1112 Points +185%
Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
1041 Points +167%
Average of class Smartphone
  (187 - 1474, n=152, last 2 years)
851 Points +118%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Samsung Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530, 8192
784 Points +101%
Motorola Edge 50 Fusion
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 8192
688 Points +76%
Oppo Reno12 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 12288
390 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7300
  ()
390 Points 0%
BaseMark OS II
Overall
Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
8631 Points +95%
Honor 200 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
8433 Points +90%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1196 - 11438, n=151, last 2 years)
6096 Points +38%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Samsung Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530, 8192
4964 Points +12%
Motorola Edge 50 Fusion
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 8192
4765 Points +8%
Oppo Reno12 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 12288
4432 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7300
  ()
4432 Points 0%
System
Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
13142 Points +46%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Samsung Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530, 8192
11778 Points +31%
Honor 200 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
11299 Points +26%
Motorola Edge 50 Fusion
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 8192
11239 Points +25%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2368 - 16475, n=151, last 2 years)
9976 Points +11%
Oppo Reno12 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 12288
8990 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7300
  ()
8990 Points 0%
Memory
Honor 200 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
8722 Points +97%
Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
8397 Points +89%
Average of class Smartphone
  (962 - 12716, n=151, last 2 years)
6575 Points +48%
Motorola Edge 50 Fusion
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 8192
4465 Points +1%
Oppo Reno12 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 12288
4432 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7300
  ()
4432 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Samsung Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530, 8192
4109 Points -7%
Graphics
Honor 200 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
29006 Points +239%
Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
27062 Points +216%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1017 - 58651, n=151, last 2 years)
15988 Points +87%
Oppo Reno12 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 12288
8566 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7300
  ()
8566 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Samsung Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530, 8192
8511 Points -1%
Motorola Edge 50 Fusion
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 8192
7249 Points -15%
Web
Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
1858 Points +64%
Honor 200 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
1734 Points +53%
Average of class Smartphone
  (747 - 2145, n=151, last 2 years)
1541 Points +36%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Samsung Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530, 8192
1474 Points +30%
Motorola Edge 50 Fusion
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 8192
1417 Points +25%
Oppo Reno12 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 12288
1130 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7300
  ()
1130 Points 0%
Geekbench ML
0.6 TensorFlow Lite CPU
Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
1025 Points
Average of class Smartphone
  (246 - 1342, n=34, last 2 years)
824 Points
Honor 200 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
564 Points
Motorola Edge 50 Fusion
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 8192
561 Points
0.6 TensorFlow Lite GPU
Honor 200 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
967 Points
Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
871 Points
Average of class Smartphone
  (123 - 1478, n=33, last 2 years)
746 Points
Motorola Edge 50 Fusion
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 8192
289 Points
0.6 TensorFlow Lite NNAPI
Honor 200 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
955 Points
Average of class Smartphone
  (186 - 3410, n=29, last 2 years)
647 Points
Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
511 Points
Motorola Edge 50 Fusion
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 8192
288 Points
UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Oppo Reno12 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 12288
27247 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7300
  ()
27247 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1267 - 78964, n=145, last 2 years)
17460 Points -36%
Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
14466 Points -47%
Honor 200 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
13576 Points -50%
Motorola Edge 50 Fusion
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 8192
9206 Points -66%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Samsung Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530, 8192
5205 Points -81%

Reno12 Pro 的图形性能与 CPU 性能相似。内置 Mali-G615 MP2-图形处理器的性能只能排在比较的末尾。与 摩托罗拉 Edge 50 FusionOPPO 智能手机并驾齐驱。

来自 Honor和 Poco的设备在我们的基准测试中提供了更高的图形性能。

3DMark: Wild Life Extreme Unlimited | Wild Life Extreme | Wild Life Unlimited Score | Wild Life Score | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7: T-Rex Onscreen | 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
GFXBench 3.0: on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
GFXBench 3.1: on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
GFXBench: on screen Car Chase Onscreen | 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | 3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
3DMark: Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score | Steel Nomad Light Score
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
3315 Points +293%
Honor 200 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3076 Points +264%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
915 Points +8%
Oppo Reno12 Pro
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
844 Points
Motorola Edge 50 Fusion
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
793 Points -6%
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
3394 Points +306%
Honor 200 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3056 Points +266%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
926 Points +11%
Oppo Reno12 Pro
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
835 Points
Motorola Edge 50 Fusion
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
799 Points -4%
3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
12705 Points +305%
Honor 200 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
12004 Points +283%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
3992 Points +27%
Oppo Reno12 Pro
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
3135 Points
Motorola Edge 50 Fusion
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3066 Points -2%
3DMark / Wild Life Score
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
3897 Points +28%
Oppo Reno12 Pro
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
3052 Points
Motorola Edge 50 Fusion
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3049 Points 0%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
6212 Points +15%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
5850 Points +9%
Oppo Reno12 Pro
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
5382 Points
Oppo Reno12 Pro
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
5382 Points 0%
Motorola Edge 50 Fusion
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
4428 Points -18%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
23436 Points +250%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
7170 Points +7%
Oppo Reno12 Pro
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
6698 Points
Oppo Reno12 Pro
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
6698 Points 0%
Motorola Edge 50 Fusion
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
5526 Points -17%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
14501 Points +128%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
6828 Points +7%
Oppo Reno12 Pro
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
6353 Points
Oppo Reno12 Pro
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
6353 Points 0%
Motorola Edge 50 Fusion
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
5237 Points -18%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps +100%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
111 fps +85%
Motorola Edge 50 Fusion
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
104 fps +73%
Honor 200 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps 0%
Oppo Reno12 Pro
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
486 fps +326%
Honor 200 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
455 fps +299%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
134 fps +18%
Motorola Edge 50 Fusion
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
123 fps +8%
Oppo Reno12 Pro
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
114 fps
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
119 fps +102%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
81 fps +37%
Motorola Edge 50 Fusion
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
63 fps +7%
Honor 200 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps +2%
Oppo Reno12 Pro
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
59 fps
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
270 fps +238%
Honor 200 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
270 fps +238%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
95 fps +19%
Oppo Reno12 Pro
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
80 fps
Motorola Edge 50 Fusion
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
72 fps -10%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
105 fps +119%
Honor 200 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps +25%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
57 fps +19%
Oppo Reno12 Pro
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
48 fps
Motorola Edge 50 Fusion
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
47 fps -2%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
222 fps +311%
Honor 200 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
171 fps +217%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
67 fps +24%
Motorola Edge 50 Fusion
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
54 fps 0%
Oppo Reno12 Pro
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
54 fps
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
63 fps +117%
Honor 200 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps +107%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
32 fps +10%
Oppo Reno12 Pro
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
29 fps
Motorola Edge 50 Fusion
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
24 fps -17%
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
129 fps +291%
Honor 200 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
99 fps +200%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
36 fps +9%
Oppo Reno12 Pro
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
33 fps
Motorola Edge 50 Fusion
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
29 fps -12%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
55 fps +139%
Honor 200 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
51 fps +122%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
27 fps +17%
Oppo Reno12 Pro
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
23 fps
Motorola Edge 50 Fusion
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
18 fps -22%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
68 fps +353%
Honor 200 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
44 fps +193%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
19 fps +27%
Oppo Reno12 Pro
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
15 fps
Motorola Edge 50 Fusion
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
13 fps -13%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
89 fps +147%
Honor 200 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps +67%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
42 fps +17%
Oppo Reno12 Pro
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
36 fps
Motorola Edge 50 Fusion
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
31 fps -14%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
175 fps +338%
Honor 200 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
111 fps +178%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
49 fps +23%
Oppo Reno12 Pro
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
40 fps
Motorola Edge 50 Fusion
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
35 fps -12%
GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
31 fps +377%
Honor 200 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
20 fps +208%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
7.9 fps +22%
Oppo Reno12 Pro
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
6.5 fps
Motorola Edge 50 Fusion
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
5.8 fps -11%
3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score
Honor 200 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1065 Points +205%
Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
986 Points +183%
Oppo Reno12 Pro
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
349 Points
Motorola Edge 50 Fusion
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
254 Points -27%
3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Score
Honor 200 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1055 Points +200%
Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
992 Points +182%
Oppo Reno12 Pro
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
352 Points
Motorola Edge 50 Fusion
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
253 Points -28%
Jetstream 2 | Speedometer 2.0 | WebXPRT 4 | WebXPRT 3 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro (chrome 127)
171.1 Points +184%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G (Chrome 123)
131.393 Points +118%
Motorola Edge 50 Fusion (Chrome 126)
118.202 Points +96%
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 351, n=158, last 2 years)
111.8 Points +86%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7300 ()
60.2 Points 0%
Oppo Reno12 Pro (chrome 127)
60.18 Points
Honor 200 Pro (Chrome 126)
59.665 Points -1%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro (chrome 127)
190 runs/min +148%
Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 445, n=146, last 2 years)
120 runs/min +57%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G (Chrome 123)
116 runs/min +52%
Motorola Edge 50 Fusion (Chrome 126)
110 runs/min +44%
Oppo Reno12 Pro (chrome 127)
76.5 runs/min
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7300 ()
76.5 runs/min 0%
Honor 200 Pro (Chrome 126)
65.9 runs/min -14%
WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro (chrome 127)
156 Points +179%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G (Chrome 123)
126 Points +125%
Average of class Smartphone (22 - 212, n=149, last 2 years)
106.4 Points +90%
Motorola Edge 50 Fusion (Chrome 126)
106 Points +89%
Honor 200 Pro (Chrome 126)
61 Points +9%
Oppo Reno12 Pro (chrome 127)
56 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7300 ()
56 Points 0%
WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro (chrome 127)
182 Points
Average of class Smartphone (38 - 304, n=87, last 2 years)
140.4 Points
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G (Chrome 123)
135 Points
Octane V2 - Total Score
Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro (chrome 127)
49818 Points +57%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G (Chrome 123)
41576 Points +31%
Motorola Edge 50 Fusion (Chrome 126)
36202 Points +14%
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 89112, n=199, last 2 years)
34633 Points +9%
Oppo Reno12 Pro (chrome 127)
31742 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7300 ()
31742 Points 0%
Honor 200 Pro
28536 Points -10%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Oppo Reno12 Pro (chrome 127)
2154.2 ms *
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7300 ()
2154 ms * -0%
Average of class Smartphone (388 - 28190, n=157, last 2 years)
1673 ms * +22%
Honor 200 Pro
1456.4 ms * +32%
Motorola Edge 50 Fusion (Chrome 126)
1090.6 ms * +49%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G (Chrome 123)
1012.6 ms * +53%
Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro (chrome 127)
802.4 ms * +63%

* ... smaller is better

Oppo Reno12 ProXiaomi Poco F6 ProHonor 200 ProSamsung Galaxy A55 5GMotorola Edge 50 FusionAverage 512 GB UFS 3.1 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
78%
13%
-13%
-21%
6%
1%
Sequential Read 256KB
1777.39
3070.33
73%
1992.32
12%
1688.53
-5%
967.8
-46%
1876 ?(1695 - 2023, n=25)
6%
1729 ?(226 - 4512, n=194, last 2 years)
-3%
Sequential Write 256KB
1700.51
2987.47
76%
1644.98
-3%
831.44
-51%
800.5
-53%
1198 ?(575 - 1876, n=25)
-30%
1338 ?(57.5 - 3875, n=194, last 2 years)
-21%
Random Read 4KB
228.05
381.58
67%
276.23
21%
351.47
54%
281.5
23%
279 ?(208 - 386, n=25)
22%
266 ?(22.2 - 543, n=194, last 2 years)
17%
Random Write 4KB
265.4
520.87
96%
321.09
21%
132.11
-50%
241.4
-9%
329 ?(221 - 503, n=25)
24%
292 ?(9.4 - 709, n=194, last 2 years)
10%

Gaming performance

051015202530354045505560Tooltip
Oppo Reno12 Pro; Asphalt 9: Legends; Standard / low: Ø51 (39-61)
Oppo Reno12 Pro; Asphalt 9: Legends; High Quality; 24.0.6a: Ø43.7 (26-56)
Oppo Reno12 Pro; Genshin Impact; lowest 120 fps; 5.0.0_26041933_26161852: Ø51.5 (40-60)
Oppo Reno12 Pro; Genshin Impact; medium 120 fps; 5.0.0_26041933_26161852: Ø39.4 (16-60)
Oppo Reno12 Pro; PUBG Mobile; Balanced; 3.3.0: Ø39.8 (22-41)
Oppo Reno12 Pro; PUBG Mobile; HD; 3.3.0: Ø39.9 (33-41)

排放：Reno12 Pro 几乎没有任何节流现象

温度Reno12 Pro 在日常使用中保持凉爽

在日常使用中，Reno12 Pro 仍能保持凉爽宜人的感觉。只有在负载情况下，例如玩游戏时，它才会明显发热，但不会让人感到不舒服。热量主要产生在摄像头驼峰旁边的区域。

在我们使用燃烧基准进行的测量中，智能手机顶部的最高温度为 44.8 °C，底部为 44.3 °C。只有在重负载情况下，才会出现轻微的节流现象。

Max. Load
 44.8 °C44.4 °C41.7 °C 
 44.8 °C44.5 °C41.3 °C 
 43.9 °C43.8 °C39.9 °C 
Maximum: 44.8 °C
Average: 43.2 °C
40.7 °C42.6 °C42.7 °C
38.7 °C42.7 °C44.3 °C
39.5 °C40.5 °C41.2 °C
Maximum: 44.3 °C
Average: 41.4 °C
Room Temperature 22 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 43.2 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 32.7 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 44.8 °C / 113 F, compared to the average of 35 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 56 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 44.3 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.5 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 32.7 °C / 91 F.

3DMark Steel Nomad Stress Test

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
99.7 % +4%
Oppo Reno12 Pro
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
96.1 %
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
98.9 % +1%
Oppo Reno12 Pro
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
97.9 %
Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability
Oppo Reno12 Pro
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
96.5 %
05101520Tooltip
Oppo Reno12 Pro Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø5.06 (5-5.11)
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø5.59 (5.56-5.63)
Oppo Reno12 Pro Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø18.4 (18-18.7)
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø23.1 (23.1-23.1)
Oppo Reno12 Pro Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø18.6 (18.3-18.8)
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability: Ø23.7 (23.6-23.7)
Oppo Reno12 Pro Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.0.0.15: Ø2.57 (2.53-2.62)

扬声器Reno12 Pro 的立体声音效响亮

Reno12 Pro 具有立体声扬声器。在顶部，声音通过听筒传到前面，通过边框上的开口传到顶部。只有在最大音量时，后部才会出现轻微震动。

作为一款智能手机，Oppo 智能手机的音质很好，而且相当浑厚。除非使用 "超大音量模式"。这将使智能手机的音量更大，但音质会大打折扣，低频也会丢失。

Reno12 Pro 没有模拟插孔连接。不过，得益于蓝牙 5.4，它可以顺利连接蓝牙耳机。

这款智能手机支持 SBC、AAC、aptX Audio、aptX HD、aptX Adaptive Audio、aptX TWS+、LDAC 和 LHDC 音频编解码器。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2031.844.52530.837.83125.538.74021.538.45031.339.76328.242.18016.54310018.841.71251645.516017.949.420015.948.425015.551.831516.353.64001456.450015.365.263015.466.18001567.6100015.270125014.27616001576.9200014.282.6250014.283.1315015.585.8400014.284.1500014.182.2630015.576.6800014.474.61000014.175.61250015.766.91600014.160.4SPL26.992.6N0.884.1median 15.2median 70Delta0.813.227.333.426.235.525.938.429.240.335.642.325.935.822.14117.840.517.146.518.157.414.255.214.15610.758.61159.312.863.711.164.61271.111.774.71279.312.877.412.479.512.379.713.3821384.213.581.613.278.913.878.213.776.113.469.313.360.624.991.40.685.1median 13.2median 74.719.7hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseOppo Reno12 ProSamsung Galaxy A55 5G
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Oppo Reno12 Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (92.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.6% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.3% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 10.3% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 40% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 53% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 59% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 34% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Samsung Galaxy A55 5G audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (91.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.4% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 6.5% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.4% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 10% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 84% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 30% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 62% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电池续航时间：充电速度非常快，但仅限于 OPPO 标准配置

能耗：Reno12 Pro 经济实惠

在能耗方面，Reno12 Pro 非常节俭。SoC 需要的能量很少，尤其是在空闲模式下。

但即使在负载情况下 联发科 7300也比 Poco F6 Pro 的高端骁龙处理器省电得多。 Poco F6 Pro和 Honor 200 Pro.

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.01 / 0.18 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 0.69 / 1.42 / 1.47 Watt
Load midlight 3.05 / 8.25 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
Oppo Reno12 Pro
5000 mAh		Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro
5000 mAh		Honor 200 Pro
5200 mAh		Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
5000 mAh		Motorola Edge 50 Fusion
5000 mAh		Average MediaTek Dimensity 7300
 		Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-45%
-82%
-29%
-29%
0%
-32%
Idle Minimum *
0.69
0.79
-14%
1.11
-61%
0.85
-23%
1
-45%
0.69 ?()
-0%
0.907 ?(0.4 - 2.37, n=148, last 2 years)
-31%
Idle Average *
1.42
1.05
26%
2.67
-88%
1.51
-6%
1.3
8%
1.42 ?()
-0%
1.444 ?(0.69 - 4.26, n=148, last 2 years)
-2%
Idle Maximum *
1.47
1.13
23%
2.75
-87%
1.71
-16%
1.9
-29%
1.47 ?()
-0%
1.607 ?(0.83 - 4.45, n=148, last 2 years)
-9%
Load Average *
3.05
7.88
-158%
8.13
-167%
4.87
-60%
5.1
-67%
3.05 ?()
-0%
6.25 ?(2.3 - 16.5, n=147, last 2 years)
-105%
Load Maximum *
8.25
16.48
-100%
8.64
-5%
11.73
-42%
9.4
-14%
8.25 ?()
-0%
9.24 ?(3.53 - 20.8, n=147, last 2 years)
-12%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

012345678910Tooltip
Oppo Reno12 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 7300; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø3.03 (0.655-7.28)
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G Samsung Exynos 1480; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø4.37 (1.064-10.1)
Oppo Reno12 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 7300; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.756 (0.681-1.443)
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G Samsung Exynos 1480; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.242 (1.109-1.603)

Power consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

012345Tooltip
Oppo Reno12 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 7300; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø3.1 (2.91-4.02)
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G Samsung Exynos 1480; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø5.21 (4.99-5.9)
Oppo Reno12 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 7300; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.756 (0.681-1.443)
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G Samsung Exynos 1480; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.242 (1.109-1.603)

电池寿命：Reno12 Pro 在同类产品中处于平均水平

OPPO 为 Reno12 Pro 配备了 5,000 毫安时电池。该电池的最大充电功率为 80 瓦，但只能使用 OPPO 自带的 Supervooc 闪充充电器。

在评测过程中，我们没有配备这种充电器。智能手机在 Anker 充电器上的最大功率为 40 W。这样可以在 12 分钟内将电量从 0 充至 35%。30 分钟后，电量为 71%。在测试中，Reno12 Pro 在充电 60 分钟后完全充满。

在我们的实际 Wi-Fi 网上冲浪测试中，Reno12 Pro 的续航时间超过了 16 小时。这符合同类产品的平均水平。

在不高强度使用的情况下，这款智能手机也能使用两天才需要再次充电。不支持无线充电。

Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing
16h 26min
Battery Runtime - WiFi v1.3
Oppo Reno12 Pro
5000 mAh
986 min
Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro
5000 mAh
909 min
Honor 200 Pro
5200 mAh
993 min
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
5000 mAh
1077 min
Motorola Edge 50 Fusion
5000 mAh
966 min

Pros

+ 无可挑剔的做工
+ 轻巧纤薄
+ 相机性能稳定
+ 良好的立体声扬声器
+ 红外触发器
+ 内存扩展

Cons

- 性能相对较低
- 松软、振动大的电机
- GPS 不准确

评语Oppo Reno12 Pro 注重设计而非性能

回顾：Oppo Reno12 Pro。测试设备由 Oppo Europe 提供。
回顾：Oppo Reno12 Pro。测试设备由 Oppo Europe 提供。

OPPO 重返欧洲许多国家，并希望通过 Reno12 Pro 在中端市场加分。其重点在于设计和人工智能功能。在日常使用中，该设备的低重量、良好的手感和无可挑剔的做工给人留下了深刻印象。只有海绵状的振动电机和巨大的振动声让人不甚满意。

人工智能功能在现阶段更像是一个噱头。它们主要用于图像处理，但并不是一个独特的卖点。所有语言功能都还没有德语版本。无论如何，都需要注册一个 OPPO 账户，有时还会产生额外费用，例如 AI Studio 应用程序。

智能手机的性能尚可。UI 运行流畅，即使是当前的游戏，如《PUBG Mobile》或《Genshin Impact》也能流畅运行。不过，看看竞争对手，如 Poco F6 Pro或 Honor 200 Pro等，也可以看出其他厂商在这一级别中提供了更好的性能。

Oppo Reno12 Pro 采用超薄设计，手感很好。就性能而言，其他厂商的产品性价比更高。

Reno12 Pro 的摄像头令人印象深刻。图像清晰度高，动态范围大。OPPO 在视频中的饱和度有点过高。相比之下，超广角摄像头就显得落后了。长焦变焦也不是 Reno12 Pro 的核心竞争力。不过，这款智能手机的人像拍摄和弱光拍摄效果不错。

我们对 AMOLED 显示屏的印象也很好，显示屏边缘纤薄、对称。我们在测试中达到了承诺的 1,200 cd/m² 亮度和 120 Hz 的刷新率。只有频率为 60 Hz 的基本闪烁多少影响了这一良好印象，但由于采用了 PWM 调光技术，显示屏整体上还是比较容易看清的。

凭借立体声扬声器的良好输出，Reno12 Pro 非常适合媒体消费。

凭借 Reno12 Pro，Oppo 提供了一个功能完善的整体包装，但它无法在任何类别中成为亮点。Poco F6 Pro 和Honor 200 Pro 的性能更好。摩托罗拉 Edge 50 Fusion 同样纤薄，也是一个可行的选择。

价格和供应情况

基本内存版本 Reno12 Pro 的零售价为 599 欧元。目前还不清楚在德国双倍内存的额外收费。

在德国的正式销售也没有开始日期。这款智能手机尚未在主要零售商处销售。不过，它已经在较小的零售商和市场上销售，评论时的起价约为 430 欧元。

注：我们更新了评级系统，第 8 版的结果与第 7 版的结果不具可比性。 这里可在此处查阅。

Oppo Reno12 Pro - 08/30/2024 v8
Benedikt Winkel

Chassis
89%
Keyboard
65 / 75 → 86%
Pointing Device
93%
Connectivity
50 / 69 → 72%
Weight
90%
Battery
91%
Display
90%
Games Performance
13 / 55 → 24%
Application Performance
49 / 85 → 57%
AI Performance
36%
Temperature
86%
Noise
100%
Audio
74 / 90 → 82%
Camera
75%
Average
61%
78%
Smartphone - Weighted Average
CO2 Emissions
No Data
Materials
0%
Packaging
90%
Power Use
98.1%
Repairability
40%
Software Updates
61.3%
Total Sustainability Score: 48.2%

More articles related to this device

Oppo Reno12 Pro (Reno12 Series)

Transparency

The present review sample was made available to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or a shop for the purposes of review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review.

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > Oppo Reno12 Pro 智能手机评测：轻盈纤薄的回归
Benedikt Winkel, 2024-09-10 (Update: 2024-09-10)