Notebookcheck Logo

三星Galaxy A55 5G 评测--中端智能手机中的众多高端功能

优质体验。

今年，Galaxy A55 5G 代表了三星中端产品的顶级水平，提供了多项高端功能、焕然一新的设计和长期更新。虽然它的价格不是很实惠，但我们的测试表明，它仍然值得投资。
5G Android AMD Touchscreen Smartphone
(照片：丹尼尔-施密特）

撠 Galaxy A54 5G紧随其后的是三星的中端新星Galaxy A55 5G。除了常见的小改进外，设计也有了明显的更新，三星在材料的选择上也很大方。

Galaxy A55 有两个存储版本：128 GB 和 256 GB。其建议零售价分别为 479 欧元和 529 欧元（约合 516 美元和 569 美元），甚至比上一代产品还便宜 10 欧元（约合 11 美元）。

Samsung Galaxy A55 5G (Galaxy A55 Series)
Processor
Samsung Exynos 1480 8 x 2.1 - 2.8 GHz, ARM Cortex-A55 / A78
Graphics adapter
Samsung Xclipse 530, Core: 1300 MHz
Memory
8 GB 
, LPDDR5
Display
6.60 inch 19.5:9, 2340 x 1080 pixel 390 PPI, Capacitive touchscreen, Super AMOLED, Corning Gorilla Glass Victus+, glossy: yes, HDR, 120 Hz
Storage
256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash, 256 GB 
, 235.9 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Card Reader: microSD up to 1 TB (FAT, FAT32, exFAT), 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: accelerometer, gyro, compass, barometer, OTG
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.3, 2G (850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz), 3G (Band 1, 2, 4, 5, 8), LTE Cat. 18 (Band 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66), 5G Sub6 (Band 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78), Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 8.2 x 161.1 x 77.4
Battery
5000 mAh Lithium-Ion
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 14
Camera
Primary Camera: 50 MPix (f/1.8, 23 mm, 1.0 µm) + 12 MPix (Ultra Wide, f/2.2, 13 mm, 1.12 µm) + 5 MPix (Macro, f/2.4); Camera2-API-Level: Limited
Secondary Camera: 32 MPix (f/2.2, 26 mm, 0.8 µm)
Additional features
Speakers: Dual, Keyboard: OnScreen, USB cable, SIM tool, One UI 6.1, 24 Months Warranty, GNSS: GPS (L1), Glonass (L1), BeiDou (B1, B1C), Galileo (E1), QZSS; Body SAR: 1.037 W/kg, Head SAR: 0.684 W/kg; IP67; HDR: HLG, HDR10, HDR10+; Hybrid SIM + eSIM; DRM Widevine L1, fanless, waterproof
Weight
213 g
Price
529 Euro
Links
Samsung notebook section
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Price
87.4 %
v7 (old)
05 / 2024
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530		213 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.60"2340x1080
87.1 %
v7 (old)
06 / 2023
Google Pixel 7a
Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7		193.5 g128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.10"2400x1080
86 %
v7 (old)
05 / 2023
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5		202 g128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.40"2340x1080
87.4 %
v7 (old)
03 / 2024
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G
Dimensity 7200, Mali-G610 MP4		204.5 g512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.67"2712x1220
83.1 %
v7 (old)
09 / 2023
Sony Xperia 10 V
SD 695 5G, Adreno 619		159 g128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.10"2520x1080
88.2 %
v7 (old)
07 / 2023
OnePlus Nord 3
Dimensity 9000, Mali-G710 MP10		193.5 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.74"2772x1240

三星Galaxy A55 5G 有四种颜色可供选择：Awesome Iceblue、Lilac、Lemon 和 Navy 四种颜色。机身厚度为 8.2 毫米（约 0.323 英寸），我们测量的厚度为 8.25 毫米（约 0.325 英寸）。三个相机镜头的排列方式与Galaxy S24 相似，但额外突出了 2.15 毫米（约 0.08 英寸）。因此，如果将智能手机放在一个平面上，它可能会有很大的晃动。

三星智能手机的做工干净利落。缝隙紧密而均匀，我们尝试翘起外壳，它也没有发出任何嘎吱嘎吱的声音。尽管显示屏与表面的比例有所改善（86%），但三星智能手机的显示屏与表面的比例仍然很低； A54：83%），但它仍然相当陈旧。现在，A55 的边框完全由拉丝铝制成，看起来非常吸引人。此外，正面和背面都采用了康宁大猩猩 Glas Victus+ 玻璃。

Galaxy A55 通过了 IP67 防尘防水认证。卡槽与边框齐平，塑料托盘可接受两张 Nano SIM 卡或 microSD 代替第二张 SIM 卡。

三星并没有像其高端产品那样提供有关可持续发展的更多信息，而且该制造商还延续了用额外的塑料薄膜包裹智能手机的坏习惯。

(照片：丹尼尔-施密特）
(照片：丹尼尔-施密特）
(照片：丹尼尔-施密特）
(照片：丹尼尔-施密特）
(照片：丹尼尔-施密特）

尺寸比较

❌
162.6 mm 75.1 mm 8.1 mm 193.5 g161.4 mm 74.2 mm 8.9 mm 204.5 g161.1 mm 77.4 mm 8.2 mm 213 g158.2 mm 76.7 mm 8.2 mm 202 g155 mm 68 mm 8.3 mm 159 g152 mm 72.9 mm 9 mm 193.5 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g

设备 - 三星智能手机，NTFS 访问受限

三星Galaxy A55 5G 为中端市场提供了高档设备。不过，它仍然使用 USB 2.0，在我们的拷贝测试中，传输速度并不特别高，仅为 23.37 MB/s。由于支持 OTG，你可以连接外部存储介质，这些介质可以格式化为 FAT、FAT32 或 exFAT。对于 NTFS，只支持读取数据。

此外，还包括蓝牙 5.3、NFC 和可配置的始终开启显示屏。

顶部：卡槽、麦克风（摄影：Daniel Schmidt）
顶部：卡槽、麦克风
左侧（摄影：丹尼尔-施密特）
左侧
右侧：音量、功能键（摄影：Daniel Schmidt）
右侧：音量、功能键
底部：扬声器、麦克风、USB、麦克风（摄影：Daniel Schmidt）
底部：扬声器、麦克风、USB、麦克风

microSD 读卡器

Galaxy A55 具有混合卡插槽，可通过选配的 microSD 卡扩展存储空间。它支持所有常见的标准和尺寸。在使用我们的 Angelbird AV Pro V60 参考卡进行的复制测试中，它达到了相对较高的传输速率。

SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
57.33 MB/s +8%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
53.26 MB/s
Sony Xperia 10 V
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
12.75 MB/s -76%

Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)

0102030405060708090100Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø38.6 (28.3-52.1)
Sony Xperia 10 V Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø31.6 (22-40)
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø74.6 (44.1-101.9)
Sony Xperia 10 V Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø76.5 (37.8-84)

软件 -Galaxy A55 将获得Android 18

Galaxy A55 5G 预装了Android 14 和三星 One UI 6.1 用户界面。从推向市场算起，它将获得四次大型版本更新以及五年的安全补丁。在本次测试中，系统的更新非常及时。

不过（在这一点上），A55 还不能使用 S24 的新人工智能功能。 Galaxy S24.三星用户对系统本身会感觉非常熟悉。除了谷歌和Galaxy 应用程序外，还预装了一些第三方厂商的应用程序。虽然其中大部分可以卸载，但有些（如 OneDrive）只能停用。

通信和全球导航卫星系统 -Galaxy A55 使用 Wi-Fi 6 和单频全球导航卫星系统

凭借广泛的频段支持和现代 5G Sub6，三星Galaxy A55 可以很好地满足移动使用的需求。经常去远方旅行的人也不会经常遇到问题。在（德国）城市地区，接收质量非常好。

三星智能手机使用的是 Wi-Fi 6，尽管与华硕 ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000 路由器配合使用时传输速度并不是最高的，但连接速度仍然很快，尤其是非常稳定。

Networking
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000
823 (min: 704) MBit/s ∼52%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
735 (min: 671) MBit/s ∼49%
Google Pixel 7a
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000
957 (min: 475) MBit/s ∼61%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
819 (min: 499) MBit/s ∼55%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
930 (min: 471) MBit/s ∼64%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
934 (min: 915) MBit/s ∼67%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000
843 (min: 813) MBit/s ∼53%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
750 (min: 546) MBit/s ∼50%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G
Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000
848 (min: 445) MBit/s ∼54%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
881 (min: 669) MBit/s ∼59%
Sony Xperia 10 V
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000
347 (min: 332) MBit/s ∼22%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
363 (min: 180) MBit/s ∼24%
OnePlus Nord 3
Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1581 (min: 1484) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1488 (min: 1308) MBit/s ∼100%
Average of class Smartphone
 
iperf3 receive AXE11000
711 (min: 34.8) MBit/s ∼45%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
725 (min: 40.5) MBit/s ∼49%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1443 (min: 229) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1387 (min: 668) MBit/s ∼100%
050100150200250300350400450500550600650700750800850900950Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G Samsung Exynos 1480, Samsung Xclipse 530; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø822 (704-841)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G MediaTek Dimensity 7200, ARM Mali-G610 MP4; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø832 (445-913)
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G Samsung Exynos 1480, Samsung Xclipse 530; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø735 (671-791)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G MediaTek Dimensity 7200, ARM Mali-G610 MP4; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø881 (669-965)
GPS 测试：室内
室内
GPS 测试：户外
室外

对于大多数全球卫星网络，三星Galaxy A55 5G 只能使用单频连接，但它仍然能够非常快速、准确地确定自己的位置。在室内，找到卫星定位的时间稍长，但仍需要几秒钟才能确定其确切位置。

我们将这款智能手机与 Garmin Venu 2 进行了比较，并将两者都带到了自行车旅行中。我们发现Galaxy A55 记录的旅行路线不如健身智能手表准确。定位可以更加准确，尤其是在一些建筑物之间。不过，这应该不会对导航任务造成任何限制。

全球导航卫星系统测试路线：环湖
全球导航卫星系统测试路线：环湖
全球导航卫星系统测试路线：转折点
全球导航卫星系统测试路线：转折点
全球导航卫星系统测试路线：概述
全球导航卫星系统测试路线：概述

电话功能和语音质量

在日常使用中，三星Galaxy A55 5G 的语音质量听起来非常自然，许多环境噪音都被可靠地过滤掉了。只有当噪音较大时，过滤功能才会达到极限，一些声音片段才会清晰可闻。这时，用户的声音听起来也会比较紧凑，有点刺耳。但总的来说，语音质量还是不错的。扬声器模式也能非常清晰地传送自己的声音，只是比直接对着听筒说话时略显沉闷。

Galaxy A55 支持 WLAN 通话或 VoLTE 等常用功能。可以广泛配置双 SIM 卡操作，也可以使用 eSIM 卡。

摄像头 - 三摄像头系统，配备优质主镜头

使用Galaxy A55 5G 拍摄的自拍照
使用Galaxy A55 5G 拍摄的自拍照

前置摄像头的标称分辨率为 3200 万像素，并采用了像素二进制技术，因此照片的分辨率仅为 800 万像素。但照片仍然令人信服，Galaxy A55 的色彩还原均衡，功能众多，给人留下了深刻印象。视频可以 UHD 或 HD 分辨率录制，最高可达 30 FPS，还有 60 FPS 的全高清选项。

背面三摄像头系统的核心是一个可使用光学防抖的 50 百万像素传感器。它拍摄出的色彩相当冷艳自然，但 A55 有时会夸大锐度。总的来说，它能拍摄出不错的照片。从附加的超广角镜头和微距镜头拍摄的照片来看，画质明显有所下降，但对于这个价位的产品来说，仍然处于合适的水平。缩放完全通过数字方式实现，在 2 倍水平以内都能达到不错的效果。如果超过 2 倍，则只能拍摄一些有吸引力的快照。虽然有专业模式，但它不支持 RAW 格式。

视频可使用主镜头或超广角镜头拍摄。它们可以使用与前置摄像头相同的分辨率和帧频。只有微距镜头被排除在外，只能用于拍照。现在，超高清视频也可以进行 VDIS 防抖动，而且有了超级 HDR 视频，您还可以创建 12 位的记录。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Main CameraMain CameraUltrawide Angle5x ZoomLow Light

在可控光线条件下，我们的测试图并没有以全分辨率完全清晰地再现。大部分区域的清晰度都很好，图像边缘的轻微模糊也很正常，属于正常水平。但同样的模糊现象也出现在图像中心。在像素分档的照片中，我们没有发现同样的效果。

三星智能手机对 ColorChecker 图表的还原堪称典范，绝不会出现过度饱和的情况。

ColorChecker
3.3 ∆E
4.1 ∆E
1.9 ∆E
7.6 ∆E
2.6 ∆E
8.4 ∆E
1.9 ∆E
1.8 ∆E
3.4 ∆E
4 ∆E
6.1 ∆E
1.9 ∆E
3.1 ∆E
7.2 ∆E
3.1 ∆E
3.6 ∆E
3.5 ∆E
7.8 ∆E
5.7 ∆E
2.7 ∆E
3 ∆E
6 ∆E
4.6 ∆E
4.1 ∆E
ColorChecker Samsung Galaxy A55 5G: 4.24 ∆E min: 1.85 - max: 8.42 ∆E
ColorChecker
19.8 ∆E
30.2 ∆E
25 ∆E
20.3 ∆E
29.6 ∆E
31.3 ∆E
29.2 ∆E
21.9 ∆E
22 ∆E
24.2 ∆E
25.7 ∆E
35 ∆E
20.7 ∆E
24 ∆E
16.6 ∆E
25.8 ∆E
27.2 ∆E
27.8 ∆E
31.3 ∆E
30.3 ∆E
32.7 ∆E
27.7 ∆E
21.4 ∆E
13.5 ∆E
ColorChecker Samsung Galaxy A55 5G: 25.54 ∆E min: 13.46 - max: 35.01 ∆E

配件和保修 - A55 的配件极少

预购 A55 的用户还可获得额外赠品。
预购 A55 的用户还可获得额外赠品。

三星Galaxy A55 5G 的包装盒仅包括一根 USB 数据线、SIM 卡工具和常规文件。预购手机的用户还可以免费获得一个透明防撞保护套和一个屏幕保护膜。

三星为其智能手机提供两年保修。Care+ 保险套餐可以延长保修期。该套餐的一次性费用在 25 至 65 欧元（约合 27 至 70 美元）之间，具体取决于保修期限和范围（可选防盗保险）。

输入设备和操作 - 指纹识别速度更快

三星Galaxy A55 5G 的电容式触摸屏可同时识别多达十个输入，在所有屏幕区域的操作都非常可靠。光学指纹传感器集成在显示屏中，非常靠近底部边缘。尽管可以非常可靠地识别存储的指纹，但识别时间相对较长。使用前置摄像头的附加或可选人脸识别功能速度更快，但在黑暗环境中不仅安全性较低，而且并不总是可靠。

右侧的两个物理按键给人留下的印象质量很高，而且非常精确。不过，如果用户的手比较小，不管是左撇子还是右撇子，都必须改变握法才能操作音量摇杆。功能键可以配置，也可以选择用作经典的电源键。

还可提供双信使或单手模式等功能。线性振动电机可根据用户的喜好在设置中进行调整。它非常安静，但仍然非常精确，而且很容易察觉。

显示屏 - Super AMOLED，亮度高达 1,883 cd/m²

RGGB 子像素结构
RGGB 子像素结构

与上一代产品相比，三星Galaxy A55 5G 现在的显示屏稍大一些，达到了 6.6 英寸。尽管在分辨率相同的情况下像素密度略有下降，但图像依然清晰锐利。刷新率由系统自动调整为 60 或 120 Hz，但你也可以在设置中将其固定为 60 Hz。

Galaxy A55 采用全白显示图像并激活了亮度传感器，平均亮度达到 967 cd/m²，亮度分布也非常均匀。在亮暗图像区域分布均匀的情况下（APL18），亮度增加到 1,678 cd/m²，在 YouTube 上播放 HDR 视频时，亮度甚至达到 1,883 cd/m²。

与所有其他 OLED 显示屏一样，Galaxy 智能手机的 Super AMOLED 也会出现常见的闪烁现象。虽然频率为 120 Hz，但在最低亮度时频率并不高，随着亮度的增加而增加，最终变化在 240 Hz 左右。虽然相当平缓和均匀的振幅削弱了这种影响，但敏感的用户在使用时仍会遇到一些困难。

964
cd/m²		965
cd/m²		965
cd/m²
967
cd/m²		962
cd/m²		968
cd/m²
962
cd/m²		976
cd/m²		974
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 976 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 967 cd/m² Minimum: 1.54 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 99 %
Center on Battery: 962 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.6 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 1.5 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
100% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.13
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Super AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.6"		Google Pixel 7a
OLED, 2400x1080, 6.1"		Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Super AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.4"		Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G
AMOLED, 2712x1220, 6.7"		Sony Xperia 10 V
OLED, 2520x1080, 6.1"		OnePlus Nord 3
AMOLED, 2772x1240, 6.7"
Screen
7%
-21%
18%
7%
-37%
Brightness middle
962
1006
5%
940
-2%
1240
29%
933
-3%
481
-50%
Brightness
967
1010
4%
935
-3%
1233
28%
944
-2%
478
-51%
Brightness Distribution
99
95
-4%
99
0%
98
-1%
97
-2%
91
-8%
Black Level *
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
1.6
1.1
31%
2.4
-50%
1.1
31%
1.1
31%
1.4
12%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
2.6
2.5
4%
3.2
-23%
2.2
15%
1.7
35%
3.87
-49%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
1.5
1.5
-0%
2.2
-47%
1.4
7%
1.8
-20%
2.6
-73%
Gamma
2.13 103%
2.25 98%
2.05 107%
2.21 100%
2.29 96%
2.28 96%
CCT
6382 102%
6531 100%
6422 101%
6669 97%
6611 98%
6395 102%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 120 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 120 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 120 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8706 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

最低显示亮度
分钟
25% 显示屏亮度
25%
50% 显示亮度
50%
75% 显示亮度
75%
最大手动显示亮度
100%

在不同亮度设置下以固定缩放级别进行的测量系列（尽管最小亮度下的振幅看起来很平，但这是由于缩放造成的）。您可以在信息框中看到最小亮度下振幅的放大版本）。最小亮度下的振幅）。

卡尔曼分析表明，只要在设置中选择 "自然 "模式，Galaxy A55 的显示屏校准非常准确。在默认的 "鲜艳 "模式下，色彩饱和度更高，显示效果更冷。

灰度（模式：自然，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
灰度（模式：自然，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
色彩（模式：自然，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
色彩（模式：自然，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
色彩空间（模式：自然，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
色彩空间（模式：自然，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
饱和度（模式：自然，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
饱和度（模式：自然，目标色彩空间：sRGB）

Display Response Times

ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
   ↔    Response Time Black to White
1.47 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.754 ms rise
↘ 0.7145 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 5 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
   ↔    Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
1.53 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.7745 ms rise
↘ 0.7575 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 5 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

在户外，三星Galaxy A55 5G 在大多数光线条件下都能给人留下深刻印象，只要正面玻璃上没有太多反光，它就能提供足够的亮度储备，在阳光直射下仍能保持清晰可读。对于那些只能手动调节亮度（最大 425 cd/m²）的用户来说，可能会受到一些限制。

户外活动
户外活动

面板的视角稳定性非常好。在日常操作中，完全不会出现色彩失真，而且几乎看不出陡峭视角带来的亮度损失。只有在黑暗中，我们才会经常注意到在陡峭的视角下会出现不连续的彩虹状面纱。

三星Galaxy A55 5G 的视角稳定性
三星Galaxy A55 5G 的视角稳定性

性能 -Galaxy A55 采用 Exynos 1480 处理器。

Galaxy A55 是首款采用 三星Exynos 1480.它可以访问 8 GB LPDDR5 工作内存。这款中端 SoC 的性能达到了 Dimensity 7200.

在 Geekbench 中，它的性能比 Galaxy A54与 Exynos 1380.不出所料，1480 在系统基准测试中的速度也略快，但奇怪的是，人工智能性能却并非如此。

在日常操作中，系统表现得非常流畅，只有在启动应用程序时偶尔会出现短暂的等待。

Geekbench 6.3 | Geekbench 5.5 | Antutu v10 | PCMark for Android | CrossMark | BaseMark OS II | UL Procyon AI Inference for Android | AImark
Geekbench 6.3
Single-Core
OnePlus Nord 3
MediaTek Dimensity 9000, Mali-G710 MP10, 16384
1608 Points +39%
Average of class Smartphone
  (193 - 3479, n=173, last 2 years)
1494 Points +29%
Google Pixel 7a
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 8192
1428 Points +23%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Samsung Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530, 8192
1157 Points
Average Samsung Exynos 1480
  ()
1157 Points 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7200, Mali-G610 MP4, 12288
1147 Points -1%
Sony Xperia 10 V
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
904 Points -22%
Multi-Core
OnePlus Nord 3
MediaTek Dimensity 9000, Mali-G710 MP10, 16384
4482 Points +30%
Average of class Smartphone
  (845 - 10401, n=173, last 2 years)
4189 Points +21%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Samsung Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530, 8192
3456 Points
Average Samsung Exynos 1480
  ()
3456 Points 0%
Google Pixel 7a
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 8192
3383 Points -2%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7200, Mali-G610 MP4, 12288
2715 Points -21%
Sony Xperia 10 V
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
2111 Points -39%
Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
OnePlus Nord 3
MediaTek Dimensity 9000, Mali-G710 MP10, 16384
1211 Points +36%
Average of class Smartphone
  (126 - 2437, n=175, last 2 years)
1040 Points +17%
Google Pixel 7a
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 8192
1036 Points +16%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Samsung Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530, 8192
891 Points
Average Samsung Exynos 1480
  ()
891 Points 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7200, Mali-G610 MP4, 12288
887 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 8192
783 Points -12%
Sony Xperia 10 V
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
669 Points -25%
Multi-Core
OnePlus Nord 3
MediaTek Dimensity 9000, Mali-G710 MP10, 16384
4051 Points +21%
Average of class Smartphone
  (473 - 8816, n=175, last 2 years)
3474 Points +4%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Samsung Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530, 8192
3349 Points
Average Samsung Exynos 1480
  ()
3349 Points 0%
Google Pixel 7a
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 8192
3093 Points -8%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 8192
2817 Points -16%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7200, Mali-G610 MP4, 12288
2521 Points -25%
Sony Xperia 10 V
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
1921 Points -43%
Antutu v10 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone
  (142748 - 3015111, n=106, last 2 years)
1307393 Points +76%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7200, Mali-G610 MP4, 12288
767738 Points +4%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Samsung Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530, 8192
740935 Points
Average Samsung Exynos 1480
  ()
740935 Points 0%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
OnePlus Nord 3
MediaTek Dimensity 9000, Mali-G710 MP10, 16384
14915 Points +11%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Samsung Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530, 8192
13393 Points
Average Samsung Exynos 1480
  ()
13393 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4609 - 27169, n=197, last 2 years)
13174 Points -2%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 8192
13024 Points -3%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7200, Mali-G610 MP4, 12288
12313 Points -8%
Google Pixel 7a
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 8192
11736 Points -12%
Sony Xperia 10 V
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
7933 Points -41%
CrossMark - Overall
OnePlus Nord 3
MediaTek Dimensity 9000, Mali-G710 MP10, 16384
1051 Points +34%
Google Pixel 7a
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 8192
934 Points +19%
Average of class Smartphone
  (187 - 2485, n=165, last 2 years)
917 Points +17%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Samsung Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530, 8192
784 Points
Average Samsung Exynos 1480
  ()
784 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 8192
703 Points -10%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7200, Mali-G610 MP4, 12288
686 Points -12%
Sony Xperia 10 V
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
597 Points -24%
BaseMark OS II
Overall
OnePlus Nord 3
MediaTek Dimensity 9000, Mali-G710 MP10, 16384
7714 Points +55%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1196 - 12993, n=159, last 2 years)
6470 Points +30%
Google Pixel 7a
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 8192
5751 Points +16%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7200, Mali-G610 MP4, 12288
5192 Points +5%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Samsung Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530, 8192
4964 Points
Average Samsung Exynos 1480
  ()
4964 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 8192
4666 Points -6%
Sony Xperia 10 V
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
3655 Points -26%
System
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Samsung Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530, 8192
11778 Points
Average Samsung Exynos 1480
  ()
11778 Points 0%
OnePlus Nord 3
MediaTek Dimensity 9000, Mali-G710 MP10, 16384
11650 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2368 - 17953, n=159, last 2 years)
10306 Points -12%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7200, Mali-G610 MP4, 12288
9366 Points -20%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 8192
8961 Points -24%
Sony Xperia 10 V
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
7953 Points -32%
Google Pixel 7a
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 8192
7803 Points -34%
Memory
OnePlus Nord 3
MediaTek Dimensity 9000, Mali-G710 MP10, 16384
7602 Points +85%
Average of class Smartphone
  (962 - 18911, n=159, last 2 years)
7031 Points +71%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7200, Mali-G610 MP4, 12288
5847 Points +42%
Google Pixel 7a
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 8192
5126 Points +25%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 8192
4857 Points +18%
Sony Xperia 10 V
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
4146 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Samsung Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530, 8192
4109 Points
Average Samsung Exynos 1480
  ()
4109 Points 0%
Graphics
OnePlus Nord 3
MediaTek Dimensity 9000, Mali-G710 MP10, 16384
20494 Points +141%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1017 - 58651, n=159, last 2 years)
17891 Points +110%
Google Pixel 7a
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 8192
15766 Points +85%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7200, Mali-G610 MP4, 12288
10386 Points +22%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Samsung Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530, 8192
8511 Points
Average Samsung Exynos 1480
  ()
8511 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 8192
7108 Points -16%
Sony Xperia 10 V
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
4376 Points -49%
Web
OnePlus Nord 3
MediaTek Dimensity 9000, Mali-G710 MP10, 16384
1951 Points +32%
Google Pixel 7a
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 8192
1734 Points +18%
Average of class Smartphone
  (841 - 2363, n=159, last 2 years)
1575 Points +7%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 8192
1533 Points +4%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Samsung Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530, 8192
1474 Points
Average Samsung Exynos 1480
  ()
1474 Points 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7200, Mali-G610 MP4, 12288
1278 Points -13%
Sony Xperia 10 V
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
1237 Points -16%
UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Google Pixel 7a
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 8192
43053 Points +727%
OnePlus Nord 3
MediaTek Dimensity 9000, Mali-G710 MP10, 16384
29236 Points +462%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7200, Mali-G610 MP4, 12288
28870 Points +455%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1267 - 81594, n=150, last 2 years)
17814 Points +242%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 8192
5835 Points +12%
Sony Xperia 10 V
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
5442 Points +5%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Samsung Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530, 8192
5205 Points
Average Samsung Exynos 1480
  ()
5205 Points 0%
AImark - Score v3.x
OnePlus Nord 3
MediaTek Dimensity 9000, Mali-G710 MP10, 16384
28688 Points +4804%
Average of class Smartphone
  (82 - 307528, n=143, last 2 years)
25319 Points +4228%
Google Pixel 7a
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 8192
805 Points +38%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 8192
622 Points +6%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Samsung Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530, 8192
585 Points
Average Samsung Exynos 1480
  ()
585 Points 0%
Sony Xperia 10 V
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
445 Points -24%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7200, Mali-G610 MP4, 12288
Points -100%

钛 Xclipse 530Galaxy A55 中提供图形加速的 Xclipse 530 基于 AMD 的 RDNA 架构。然而，那些曾希望它能像 Xclipse 940 一样支持基于硬件的光线追踪技术的人却发现，Xclipse 530 并不支持这种技术。 Xclipse 940中的 Galaxy S24的人将会失望。

但这仍然是计算性能的一大优势，因为 530 芯片的性能比 ARM Mali-G68 MP5 高出 13% 到 44% 不等。 ARM Mali-G68 MP5的 13% 到 44% 之间。 A54.

3DMark: Wild Life Extreme Unlimited | Wild Life Extreme | Wild Life Unlimited Score | Wild Life Score | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7: T-Rex Onscreen | 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
GFXBench 3.0: on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
GFXBench 3.1: on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
GFXBench: on screen Car Chase Onscreen | 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | 3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
OnePlus Nord 3
Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2385 Points +161%
Google Pixel 7a
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1832 Points +100%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G
Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1202 Points +31%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
915 Points
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
799 Points -13%
Sony Xperia 10 V
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
353 Points -61%
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
OnePlus Nord 3
Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2373 Points +156%
Google Pixel 7a
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1860 Points +101%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G
Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1191 Points +29%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
926 Points
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
813 Points -12%
Sony Xperia 10 V
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
358 Points -61%
3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
OnePlus Nord 3
Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
8667 Points +117%
Google Pixel 7a
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
6855 Points +72%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G
Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4483 Points +12%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
3992 Points
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2853 Points -29%
Sony Xperia 10 V
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1198 Points -70%
3DMark / Wild Life Score
OnePlus Nord 3
Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
8394 Points +115%
Google Pixel 7a
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
6557 Points +68%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G
Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4336 Points +11%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
3897 Points
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2826 Points -27%
Sony Xperia 10 V
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1206 Points -69%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
5850 Points
OnePlus Nord 3
Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
5193 Points -11%
Google Pixel 7a
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4267 Points -27%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
4227 Points -28%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G
Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
3833 Points -34%
Sony Xperia 10 V
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3512 Points -40%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
OnePlus Nord 3
Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
14348 Points +100%
Google Pixel 7a
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
10121 Points +41%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G
Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
7275 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
7170 Points
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
5129 Points -28%
Sony Xperia 10 V
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2990 Points -58%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
OnePlus Nord 3
Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
10309 Points +51%
Google Pixel 7a
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
7756 Points +14%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
6828 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G
Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
6065 Points -11%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
4897 Points -28%
Sony Xperia 10 V
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3092 Points -55%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G
Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
114 fps +3%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
111 fps
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
94 fps -15%
Google Pixel 7a
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
90 fps -19%
OnePlus Nord 3
Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps -46%
Sony Xperia 10 V
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
59 fps -47%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
OnePlus Nord 3
Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
297 fps +122%
Google Pixel 7a
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
248 fps +85%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G
Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
191 fps +43%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
134 fps
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
119 fps -11%
Sony Xperia 10 V
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
93 fps -31%
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Google Pixel 7a
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
90 fps +11%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G
Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
81 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
81 fps
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
69 fps -15%
OnePlus Nord 3
Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
59 fps -27%
Sony Xperia 10 V
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
39 fps -52%
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
OnePlus Nord 3
Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
218 fps +129%
Google Pixel 7a
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
134 fps +41%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G
Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
111 fps +17%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
95 fps
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
80 fps -16%
Sony Xperia 10 V
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
47 fps -51%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
OnePlus Nord 3
Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
59 fps +4%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
57 fps
Google Pixel 7a
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
56 fps -2%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G
Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
52 fps -9%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
47 fps -18%
Sony Xperia 10 V
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
26 fps -54%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
OnePlus Nord 3
Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
154 fps +130%
Google Pixel 7a
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
97 fps +45%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G
Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
73 fps +9%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
67 fps
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
52 fps -22%
Sony Xperia 10 V
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
34 fps -49%
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Google Pixel 7a
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
54 fps +69%
OnePlus Nord 3
Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
53 fps +66%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
32 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G
Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
31 fps -3%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
26 fps -19%
Sony Xperia 10 V
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
16 fps -50%
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
OnePlus Nord 3
Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
81 fps +125%
Google Pixel 7a
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
64 fps +78%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G
Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
44 fps +22%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
36 fps
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
31 fps -14%
Sony Xperia 10 V
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
20 fps -44%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Google Pixel 7a
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
44 fps +63%
OnePlus Nord 3
Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
43 fps +59%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
27 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G
Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
26 fps -4%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
20 fps -26%
Sony Xperia 10 V
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
11 fps -59%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
OnePlus Nord 3
Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
43 fps +126%
Google Pixel 7a
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
27 fps +42%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G
Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
22 fps +16%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
19 fps
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
13 fps -32%
Sony Xperia 10 V
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
8.1 fps -57%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
OnePlus Nord 3
Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
56 fps +33%
Google Pixel 7a
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
51 fps +21%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
42 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G
Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
38 fps -10%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
30 fps -29%
Sony Xperia 10 V
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
18 fps -57%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
OnePlus Nord 3
Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
103 fps +110%
Google Pixel 7a
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
56 fps +14%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G
Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
54 fps +10%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
49 fps
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
34 fps -31%
Sony Xperia 10 V
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
22 fps -55%
GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
OnePlus Nord 3
Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
19 fps +141%
Google Pixel 7a
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
13 fps +65%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G
Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
9.5 fps +20%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
7.9 fps
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
5.9 fps -25%
Sony Xperia 10 V
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3.6 fps -54%

在日常操作中，A55 的上网速度非常流畅，网站的呈现速度也非常快。在书房基准测试中，三星智能手机在我们的对比组中排名前三分之一。

Jetstream 2 | Speedometer 2.0 | Speedometer 3.0 | WebXPRT 4 | WebXPRT 3 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
OnePlus Nord 3 (Chrome 114)
148.56 Points +13%
Average Samsung Exynos 1480 ()
131.4 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G (Chrome 123)
131.393 Points
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=169, last 2 years)
124.4 Points -5%
Google Pixel 7a (Chrome 114)
104.662 Points -20%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G (Chrome 112)
94.611 Points -28%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G (Chrome 122.0.6261.90)
83.784 Points -36%
Sony Xperia 10 V (Chrome 116)
78.167 Points -41%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
OnePlus Nord 3 (Chrome 114)
151 runs/min +30%
Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 569, n=152, last 2 years)
143.9 runs/min +24%
Google Pixel 7a (Chrome 114)
125 runs/min +8%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G (Chrome 123)
116 runs/min
Average Samsung Exynos 1480 ()
116 runs/min 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G (Chrome 122.0.6261.90)
112 runs/min -3%
Sony Xperia 10 V (Chrome 116)
72 runs/min -38%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G (Chrome 112)
70.5 runs/min -39%
Speedometer 3.0 - Score
Average of class Smartphone (1.03 - 34, n=66, last 2 years)
11.9 runs/min +89%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G (Chrome 123)
6.3 runs/min
Average Samsung Exynos 1480 ()
6.3 runs/min 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G (Chrome 122.0.6261.90)
6.27 runs/min 0%
WebXPRT 4 - Overall
OnePlus Nord 3 (Chrome 114)
153 Points +21%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G (Chrome 123)
126 Points
Average Samsung Exynos 1480 ()
126 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (22 - 271, n=159, last 2 years)
117.1 Points -7%
Google Pixel 7a (Chrome 114)
111 Points -12%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G (Chrome 112)
97 Points -23%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G (Chrome 122.0.6261.90)
86 Points -32%
Sony Xperia 10 V (Chrome 116)
67 Points -47%
WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Average of class Smartphone (38 - 347, n=79, last 2 years)
150.2 Points +11%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G (Chrome 123)
135 Points
Average Samsung Exynos 1480 ()
135 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G (Chrome 112)
124 Points -8%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G (Chrome 122.0.6261.90)
92 Points -32%
Octane V2 - Total Score
OnePlus Nord 3 (Chrome 114)
50714 Points +22%
Google Pixel 7a (Chrome 114)
44948 Points +8%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G (Chrome 123)
41576 Points
Average Samsung Exynos 1480 ()
41576 Points 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G (Chrome 122.0.6261.90)
39060 Points -6%
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=211, last 2 years)
38432 Points -8%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G (Chrome 112)
33801 Points -19%
Sony Xperia 10 V (Chrome 116)
28902 Points -30%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=167, last 2 years)
1523 ms * -50%
Sony Xperia 10 V (Chrome 116)
1388 ms * -37%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G (Chrome 122.0.6261.90)
1296.2 ms * -28%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G (Chrome 112)
1208.8 ms * -19%
Average Samsung Exynos 1480 ()
1013 ms * -0%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G (Chrome 123)
1012.6 ms *
Google Pixel 7a (Chrome 114)
919.6 ms * +9%
OnePlus Nord 3 (Chrome 114)
847.9 ms * +16%

* ... smaller is better

在存储方面，三星采用了速度更快的 UFS 3.1 标准，并改进了连接方式，存储速度明显快于前代产品。但仍有改进的余地，因为 Redmi Note 13 Pro+所展示的。

Samsung Galaxy A55 5GGoogle Pixel 7aSamsung Galaxy A54 5GXiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5GSony Xperia 10 VOnePlus Nord 3Average 256 GB UFS 3.1 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
20%
-52%
48%
-37%
63%
41%
51%
Sequential Read 256KB
1688.53
1624.39
-4%
528.32
-69%
1921.64
14%
444.54
-74%
1617.78
-4%
1742 ?(950 - 2037, n=102)
3%
1889 ?(226 - 4512, n=198, last 2 years)
12%
Sequential Write 256KB
831.44
996.44
20%
335.39
-60%
1702.4
105%
438.02
-47%
1525.8
84%
1160 ?(452 - 2004, n=102)
40%
1473 ?(57.5 - 3908, n=198, last 2 years)
77%
Random Read 4KB
351.47
229.44
-35%
236.23
-33%
248.21
-29%
175.72
-50%
308.68
-12%
286 ?(173.5 - 543, n=102)
-19%
278 ?(22.2 - 483, n=198, last 2 years)
-21%
Random Write 4KB
132.11
263.81
100%
70.52
-47%
265.29
101%
165.15
25%
376.9
185%
319 ?(132.1 - 499, n=103)
141%
312 ?(9.4 - 753, n=198, last 2 years)
136%

游戏 - 游戏速度高达 120 FPS，但有一些小限制

作为一款中端智能手机，三星Galaxy A55 5G 肯定不是最佳的游戏伴侣，尽管它的表现确实不错。在GameBench 的分析中的分析中，它可以在《死亡扳机 2》中达到相当稳定的 120 FPS，即使是要求苛刻的《源氏冲击》游戏也能流畅运行。但在《PUBG Mobile》等游戏中，最高图形设置无法使用，90 FPS 模式也无法使用。

您还可以在Galaxy A55 上使用 Samsung Gaming Hub。

源泉冲击
源泉冲击
PUBG Mobile
PUBG Mobile
0102030405060708090100110120Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G; Dead Trigger 2; 1.10.5: Ø117.6 (87-121)
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G; Genshin Impact; lowest 120 fps: Ø55.5 (44-61)
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G; Genshin Impact; medium 120 fps: Ø46.1 (21-61)
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G; Genshin Impact; highest 120 fps: Ø42.4 (26-57)
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G; PUBG Mobile; Smooth: Ø57.3 (41-61)
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G; PUBG Mobile; HD: Ø39.9 (36-41)

排放 -Galaxy A55 的稳定性能

温度

SamsungGalaxy A55 的表面温度在任何时候都不会令人担忧，只有在负载情况下最高温度达到 41.4 °C（106.5 °F）。

即使是 3DMark 的压力测试也无法让 SoC 出汗。它在任何时候都能保持稳定，并能充分发挥其性能。

Max. Load
 39.3 °C38.5 °C33.9 °C 
 40.3 °C40.3 °C36.8 °C 
 40.8 °C39.8 °C36.3 °C 
Maximum: 40.8 °C
Average: 38.4 °C
32.8 °C38.8 °C39.7 °C
35.7 °C38.8 °C40.4 °C
36.7 °C38.7 °C41.4 °C
Maximum: 41.4 °C
Average: 38.1 °C
Room Temperature 22 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 38.4 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 40.8 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 41.4 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.4 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Sony Xperia 10 V
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.7 % 0%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
99.7 %
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G
Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
99 % -1%
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
98.8 % -1%
OnePlus Nord 3
Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
83 % -17%
Google Pixel 7a
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
54.3 % -46%
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.5 % +1%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G
Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
99.5 % +1%
OnePlus Nord 3
Mali-G710 MP10, Dimensity 9000, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
99.3 % 0%
Sony Xperia 10 V
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.2 % 0%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
98.9 %
Google Pixel 7a
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60.6 % -39%
05101520253035Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø5.59 (5.56-5.63)
Google Pixel 7a Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø8.32 (6.73-11.1)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø7.07 (7.05-7.08)
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø23.1 (23.1-23.1)
Google Pixel 7a Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø27.2 (21.4-39.5)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø25.6 (25.4-25.7)
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability: Ø23.7 (23.6-23.7)

发言人

三星Galaxy A55 的两个扬声器可产生相当不错的声音效果，但高频过于突出。不过，在中等音量下，这种情况仍在可控范围内，不过音量越大，声音越空洞、尖锐。

此外，还可以通过 USB-C 或蓝牙输出声音。后者可用的音频编解码器很少，而且三星也还没有为 A55 提供 Auracast 功能。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2027.333.42526.235.53125.938.44029.240.35035.642.36325.935.88022.14110017.840.512517.146.516018.157.420014.255.225014.15631510.758.64001159.350012.863.763011.164.68001271.1100011.774.712501279.3160012.877.4200012.479.5250012.379.7315013.38240001384.2500013.581.6630013.278.9800013.878.21000013.776.11250013.469.31600013.360.6SPL24.991.4N0.685.1median 13.2median 74.7Delta19.736.234.530.731.825.626.726.728.236.73924.625.717.623.618.731.818.241.715.949.117.34915.252.214.156.413.461.513.869.214.368.713.774.112.475.312.774.212.173.112.97512.574.912.279.412.881.813.177.413.579.713.173.813.772.41475.713.363.725.288.70.776.2median 13.5median 73.81.27.7hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseSamsung Galaxy A55 5GXiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (91.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.4% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 6.5% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.4% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 11% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 82% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 31% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 61% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 4% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 23% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 72% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电池寿命 - 5,000 毫安时三星智能手机

耗电量

Galaxy A55 的功耗仍然很低。空闲运行时，高亮度设置下的功耗值略有升高，这可能与色彩丰富的背景有关。在中等负载下，SoC 被证明是高效的，尽管它不像 Dimensity 7200在 Redmi Note 13 Pro+.

三星智能手机完全采用有线充电方式，充电功率高达 25 瓦。使用可选的三星原装充电器，智能手机完全充满电需要 83 分钟。28 分钟后电池电量可充至 50%，50 分钟后可充至 80%。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.09 / 0.18 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 0.85 / 1.51 / 1.71 Watt
Load midlight 4.87 / 11.73 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
5000 mAh		Google Pixel 7a
4385 mAh		Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
5000 mAh		Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G
5000 mAh		Sony Xperia 10 V
5000 mAh		OnePlus Nord 3
5000 mAh		Average Samsung Exynos 1480
 		Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
17%
8%
-16%
32%
-36%
0%
-3%
Idle Minimum *
0.85
0.62
27%
0.75
12%
1.22
-44%
0.56
34%
1.46
-72%
0.85 ?()
-0%
0.883 ?(0.4 - 2.37, n=161, last 2 years)
-4%
Idle Average *
1.51
0.87
42%
1.51
-0%
1.47
3%
0.91
40%
1.84
-22%
1.51 ?()
-0%
1.467 ?(0.6 - 4.36, n=161, last 2 years)
3%
Idle Maximum *
1.71
0.95
44%
1.62
5%
1.58
8%
0.98
43%
2.14
-25%
1.71 ?()
-0%
1.621 ?(0.83 - 4.46, n=161, last 2 years)
5%
Load Average *
4.87
6.11
-25%
4.91
-1%
8.09
-66%
5.34
-10%
8.64
-77%
4.87 ?()
-0%
6.58 ?(2.3 - 16.5, n=155, last 2 years)
-35%
Load Maximum *
11.73
11.81
-1%
8.93
24%
9.49
19%
5.46
53%
9.99
15%
11.7 ?()
-0%
9.91 ?(3.53 - 20.8, n=155, last 2 years)
16%

* ... smaller is better

Power Consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

012345678910Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G Samsung Exynos 1480; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø4.37 (1.064-10.1)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G MediaTek Dimensity 7200; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø3.81 (1.357-6.84)
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G Samsung Exynos 1480; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.242 (1.109-1.603)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G MediaTek Dimensity 7200; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.132 (1.063-1.513)

Power Consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

012345Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G Samsung Exynos 1480; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø5.21 (4.99-5.9)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G MediaTek Dimensity 7200; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø4.58 (4.03-5.47)
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G Samsung Exynos 1480; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.242 (1.109-1.603)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G MediaTek Dimensity 7200; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.132 (1.063-1.513)

电池寿命

在我们的测试中，三星Galaxy A55 的 5000 毫安时电池达到了非常好的续航时间。特别是在调整显示屏亮度（150 cd/m²）的测试中，它的表现非常出色，只有 Xperia 10 V 明显超过了它。 Xperia 10 V.如果 A55 需要在无线局域网中传输大量数据，其效率会比上一代产品差。

我们在测试中注意到，A55 在待机时的耗电量极低，一夜之间甚至没有使用 5%的电池电量。

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
36h 42min
WiFi Websurfing (Chrome 123)
17h 57min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
25h 11min
Load (maximum brightness)
3h 40min
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
5000 mAh		Google Pixel 7a
4385 mAh		Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
5000 mAh		Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G
5000 mAh		Sony Xperia 10 V
5000 mAh		OnePlus Nord 3
5000 mAh
Battery Runtime
-17%
9%
-3%
44%
7%
Reader / Idle
2202
1328
-40%
2591
18%
1586
-28%
4067
85%
1755
-20%
H.264
1511
1224
-19%
1508
0%
937
-38%
1615
7%
1725
14%
WiFi v1.3
1077
821
-24%
941
-13%
913
-15%
1157
7%
815
-24%
Load
220
252
15%
284
29%
373
70%
388
76%
350
59%

Pros

+ 精美的设计和优质的材料
+ 长期更新
+ eSIM 和 microSD
+ 通过 IP67 认证
+ 电池寿命长

Cons

- 屏占比一般
- 既不提供无线充电功能，也不提供快速充电功能
- 既不包括 6 GHz WLAN，也不包括 UWB
- 仅支持少数蓝牙音频编解码器

结论 - 成功升级，但仍有改进空间

测试三星Galaxy A55 5G。测试设备由德国三星公司提供。
测试三星Galaxy A55 5G。测试设备由德国三星公司提供。

今年，三星Galaxy A55 再次准备成为同类产品中的标杆。但这并不一定纯粹是因为它的性能--虽然新的 Exynos 1480给人留下了良好的印象，但更多的是由于其调整得当的整体配置。

除了极具吸引力的系统性能和较长的更新接收时间外，Galaxy A55 5G 还通过了 IP67 认证，拥有出色的主摄像头，支持 eSIM 卡，电池续航能力也不错。

虽然三星Galaxy A55 并没有通过新的 Exynos SoC 和新颖的设计重新发明轮子，但它仍然是竞争对手不得不与之抗衡的中端手机中的佼佼者。

不过，A55 的屏占比可能会更好，而且它既不支持快速充电，也不支持无线充电。此外，在中端产品中采用 6 GHz WLAN 会是一个正确的方向。

A55 最强劲的竞争对手包括 Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G和全新的 像素 8a.看重奢华设计和三频无线局域网的用户还可以看看 Nothing Phone (2a).

价格和供应情况

Galaxy A55 5G 可直接从英国Samsung 购买。,印度或澳大利亚等地直接购买，但目前看来美国市场不会有这款机型。

Samsung Galaxy A55 5G - 05/10/2024 v7 (old)
Daniel Schmidt

Chassis
93%
Keyboard
67 / 75 → 89%
Pointing Device
93%
Connectivity
51 / 70 → 73%
Weight
88%
Battery
93%
Display
94%
Games Performance
58 / 64 → 90%
Application Performance
80 / 86 → 93%
Temperature
89%
Noise
100%
Audio
75 / 90 → 83%
Camera
73%
Average
81%
87%
Smartphone - Weighted Average

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 三星Galaxy A55 5G 评测--中端智能手机中的众多高端功能
Daniel Schmidt, 2024-05-12 (Update: 2024-08-15)