Notebookcheck Logo
测试中Poco F6 Pro

小米 Poco F6 Pro 智能手机评测--不止于游戏

超级超级

Poco 希望通过 F6 Pro 翻开公司历史的新篇章。最好的显示屏、最好的摄像头、最强劲的动力。至少对于 Poco 来说是如此。F6 Pro 将成为有史以来最好的 Poco 智能手机。它打破了一些传统。在我们的测试中看看它能做什么。
Benedikt Winkel, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
5G Android Smartphone Touchscreen

Poco 用超级词汇为 F6 Pro 做广告。超强相机、超强充电、超强动力。然而，这并不是什么新鲜事。在 F5 Pro在我们的测试中也凭借明亮的 AMOLED 显示屏、强大的计算能力和快速充电功能给人留下了深刻印象。而分类则很困难。多年来，Poco 一直在为 F 系列提供速度极快的 SoC，但其他组件不得不做出妥协。

制造商提供两种颜色的智能手机：黑色和白色。有三种内存版本：12 GB 内存和 256 GB 内存（580 欧元/~634 美元）、12 GB 内存和 512 GB 内存（630 欧元/~688 美元）或 16 GB 内存和 1 TB 内存（700 欧元/~765 美元）的顶级版本。我们的测试机型配置最高，为黑色。

Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro (Poco F6 Series)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 8 x 2 - 3.2 GHz, Cortex-X3 / A715 / A710 / A510 (Kryo)
Graphics adapter
Qualcomm Adreno 740
Memory
16 GB 
, LPDDR5x
Display
6.67 inch 20:9, 3200 x 1440 pixel 526 PPI, Capacitive, AMOLED, glossy: yes, HDR, 120 Hz
Storage
1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash, 1024 GB 
, 970 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 Infrared, Audio Connections: USB-C, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: accelerometer, proximity, gyro, compass, IR blaster, OTG
Networking
Wi-Fi 7 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz be = Wi-Fi 7), Bluetooth 5.3, GSM (Band 2/3/5/8), 3G (Band 1/2/4/5/6/8/19), LTE FDD (Band 1/2/3/4/5/7/8/18/19/20/28/66), LTE TDD (Band 38/40/41), 5G sub 6 (Band n1/3/5/7/8/20/28/38/40/41/77/78), Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 8.21 x 160.86 x 74.95
Battery
5000 mAh Lithium-Polymer
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 14
Camera
Primary Camera: 50 MPix ((f/1.6) Light Fusion 800, OIS, 1/1.55" sensor size) + 8 MPix (f/2.2 FOV 119°) + 2 MPix (f/2.4)
Secondary Camera: 16 MPix
Additional features
Speakers: Stereo, Keyboard: OnScreen, fastcharger, case, SIM-Needle, HyperOS 1.0, 24 Months Warranty, Dolby Atmos, Camera2 API Level 3, GNSS: GPS (L1, L5), Glonass (L1), Galileo (E1, E5a), Beidou (B1, B1C, B2a), SBAS (L1); SAR-Head: 0,99 W/kg, SAR-Body: 0,99 W/kg; HDR: HDR10, HDR10+, Dolby Vision video content, fanless
Weight
209 g, Power Supply: 203 g
Price
700 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating
Version
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Price
82.1 %v8
08 / 2024
Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro
SD 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740		209 g1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash6.67"3200x1440
85.5 %
v7 (old)		v7 (old)
03 / 2024
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE
Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920		209 g128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.40"2340x1080
75.4 %v8
07 / 2024
Motorola Edge 50 Fusion
SD 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710		175 g256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.70"2400x1080
81.9 %v8
07 / 2024
Google Pixel 8a
Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7		188 g128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.10"2400x1080
77.1 %v8
07 / 2024
Realme 12 Pro+
SD 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710		196 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.70"2412x1080

外壳 - Poco 采用玻璃和金属材质

Poco 还全力打造了 F6 Pro 的外壳。这款智能手机采用金属边框和玻璃后壳。背面为磨砂大理石纹，几乎看不到指纹。而摄像头周围则是亮黑色，绝对是指纹和灰尘的 "磁铁"。遗憾的是，制造商没有透露使用的是哪种玻璃。

背面的镜头明显突出，但其分布方式使设备放在桌子上时几乎不会晃动。做工非常好，缝隙小而均匀，即使用力也很难扭动设备。按键的着力点很好，但在测试设备上有轻微的晃动。

尺寸比较

❌
161.5 mm 74 mm 8.8 mm 196 g162 mm 73 mm 7.9 mm 175 g160.86 mm 74.95 mm 8.21 mm 209 g158 mm 76.5 mm 8.2 mm 209 g152.2 mm 72.7 mm 8.9 mm 188 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g

功能 - F6 Pro 拥有充足的内存和双卡双待功能

在我们的测试设备中，Poco 旗舰机型采用了骁龙 8 代 2 和 16 GB 内存。内存方面也很慷慨，配备了 1 TB UFS 4.0。不过，内存不可扩展。F6 Pro 支持两张实体 SIM 卡，但不支持 eSIM。F6 Pro 配备了用于无线支付的 NFC 功能，以及可将智能手机变为遥控器的红外发射器。与前代产品一样，不再支持无线充电。

遗憾的是，USB-C 端口仅支持 USB 2.0。在与三星 980 Pro 硬盘配合使用时，我们的传输速度达到了 47.05 MB/s。F6 Pro 兼容 USB OTG，支持 exFAT 和 NTFS。

软件 - F6 Pro 尚不具备所有人工智能功能

Poco F6 Pro 预装了Android 14。在测试时，该安全补丁是从 2024 年 7 月开始的。根据小米的说法，该设备将在四年内提供安全更新，并可能会收到两个主要的Android 版本更新。

Poco 的用户界面来自母公司小米公司 - HyperOS 1.0.5 据此运行。还提供一个可选的应用程序启动器。该机安装了大量第三方应用程序，但可以轻松删除。

Poco F6 的特殊功能包括人工智能功能，但在测试时这些功能尚未完全激活。这款智能手机应该可以在人工智能的帮助下自动显示字幕，但目前只能在测试版中实现，需要单独注册。

人工智能图像引擎 "的情况则不同。人工智能可以放大视频的分辨率，也可以计算额外的图像，使视频更流畅。之后还可以使用 HDR 效果编辑视频。这些功能已经可以激活，但 AI 图像增强功能会出现在设置中，但无法选择。

可持续性

可持续发展并非 Poco F6 Pro 的重点。制造商没有提供任何关于材料提取或可回收性的信息。不过，小米通过网站提供了以旧换新计划。这款智能手机的包装也几乎不使用塑料。设备本身和外壳都用可堆肥薄膜包裹，其余包装则由纸板制成。

通信和全球导航卫星系统 - Poco F6 Pro 没有 6 GHz 网络

我们结合参考路由器华硕 ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000 测试 Poco F6 Pro 的 Wi-Fi 接收能力。虽然 Poco 智能手机应该支持 WiFi 7，但 F6 Pro 在测试中并没有连接到 6 GHz 网络。

不过，现有的传输是稳定的，传输值与同类平均值基本一致。这款智能手机还支持 38 个移动电话频段，因此在全球范围内都能正常连接。实际上，F6 Pro 的连接效果符合预期。

Networking
Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro
iperf3 receive AXE11000
664 (min: 628) MBit/s ∼43%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
818 (min: 430) MBit/s ∼96%
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE
iperf3 receive AXE11000
914 (min: 461) MBit/s ∼60%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
822 (min: 789) MBit/s ∼96%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1588 (min: 1465) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1446 (min: 1398) MBit/s ∼100%
Motorola Edge 50 Fusion
iperf3 receive AXE11000
529 (min: 443) MBit/s ∼35%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
617 (min: 494) MBit/s ∼72%
Google Pixel 8a
iperf3 receive AXE11000
834 (min: 780) MBit/s ∼55%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
856 (min: 450) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
521 (min: 418) MBit/s ∼33%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
754 (min: 611) MBit/s ∼52%
Realme 12 Pro+
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1530 (min: 1086) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
815 (min: 609) MBit/s ∼95%
Average of class Smartphone
iperf3 receive AXE11000
714 (min: 34.8) MBit/s ∼47%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
729 (min: 40.5) MBit/s ∼85%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1451 (min: 229) MBit/s ∼91%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1368 (min: 668) MBit/s ∼95%
08517025534042551059568076585093510201105119012751360144515301615Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE Samsung Exynos 2200, Samsung Xclipse 920; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1588 (1465-1658)
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE Samsung Exynos 2200, Samsung Xclipse 920; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1444 (1398-1497)
Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Qualcomm Adreno 740; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø662 (628-709)
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE Samsung Exynos 2200, Samsung Xclipse 920; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø897 (461-932)
Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Qualcomm Adreno 740; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø804 (430-898)
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE Samsung Exynos 2200, Samsung Xclipse 920; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø822 (789-857)
全球导航卫星系统户外测量
全球导航卫星系统户外测量
室内全球导航卫星系统测量
室内全球导航卫星系统测量

Poco 在 F6 Pro 中安装了双 DNSS，该智能手机支持所有常见的卫星系统。我们带着智能手机去骑自行车。该设备给人留下深刻印象的是其良好的精确度，甚至连曲线半径都能准确再现。

无论是在室内还是室外，都能快速建立连接。

全球导航卫星系统测量：环湖航行
全球导航卫星系统测量：环湖航行
全球导航卫星系统测量：转折点
全球导航卫星系统测量：转折点
全球导航卫星系统测量：摘要
全球导航卫星系统测量：摘要

电话功能和语音质量 - 传输清晰的 F6 Pro

Poco F6 Pro 依靠谷歌应用程序实现电话功能。该程序清晰易懂，但没有任何特殊功能。这款智能手机支持 VoLTE 和通过 Wi-Fi 通话。

Poco 智能手机的语音质量很好。背景噪音通常会被过滤掉，语音传输清晰。听筒和扬声器的声音也足够大，适合免提通话。

相机 - F6 Pro 还能应对弱光环境

与 Poco F6 Pro 自拍。
与 Poco F6 Pro 自拍。

在此之前，Poco 的设备一直专注于性能和游戏。F6 Pro 软化了这一策略。这款设备不仅要速度快，还要能提供出色的图像和视频。

其核心是配备 OIS 和 Light Fusion 800 传感器的 5000 万像素主摄像头。根据制造商的说法，它应该特别明亮。它的两侧是一个 800 万像素的超广角镜头和一个 200 万像素的微距摄像头。前置摄像头为 1600 万像素。

F6 Pro 可录制最高分辨率为 8K 和 24 FPS 的视频，但不支持 HDR。分辨率为 4K、60 FPS 时可以选择 HDR 模式，分辨率为 4K、30 FPS 时可以选择 HDR 模式。另一方面，只有在 1080p 分辨率下才能实现强大的视频防抖动功能。前置摄像头一般只能拍摄 1080p。

主摄像头的拍摄效果令人印象深刻。图像清晰，动态范围大。只有在近距离拍摄时，清晰度才会明显下降。整体而言，图像的饱和度非常高。

即使是在光线条件较差的情况下拍摄的照片，总体效果也不错。软件并不是简单地将所有区域提亮，而是创造出大气的图像。相比之下，其他镜头拍摄的照片就差了很多。超广角镜头可以使用，但可能会失真。

前置摄像头可以进行自拍，但与主摄像头的效果不在同一水平线上。F6 Pro 还提供专业模式，可手动调节白平衡、对焦、曝光时间和 ISO。软件中还集成了视频提词器功能。AI 功能无法在相机应用程序中操作。这些功能也不会出现在图库中，只能在设置中集中激活。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

RabbitLakeUltra wide angle5x ZoomLow Light
ColorChecker
12.1 ∆E
5.6 ∆E
11.6 ∆E
18.3 ∆E
11.2 ∆E
5.9 ∆E
5.8 ∆E
14.2 ∆E
9.9 ∆E
9.4 ∆E
8.1 ∆E
3.8 ∆E
12.1 ∆E
14.4 ∆E
13.5 ∆E
2.8 ∆E
9.4 ∆E
16.6 ∆E
7.8 ∆E
2.9 ∆E
7.2 ∆E
11.3 ∆E
6.6 ∆E
1 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro: 9.22 ∆E min: 0.98 - max: 18.26 ∆E
ColorChecker
11.9 ∆E
6.4 ∆E
11.8 ∆E
11.8 ∆E
9.5 ∆E
5.7 ∆E
12.4 ∆E
9.2 ∆E
8.5 ∆E
12.5 ∆E
6.3 ∆E
8.5 ∆E
11.8 ∆E
13 ∆E
3.8 ∆E
8.7 ∆E
10.5 ∆E
12.7 ∆E
12.8 ∆E
7.8 ∆E
8.7 ∆E
16.7 ∆E
15.1 ∆E
11 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro: 10.31 ∆E min: 3.85 - max: 16.72 ∆E

配件和保修 - Poco 提供保护套和快速充电器

Poco F6 Pro 的供货范围非常广泛。制造商在包装盒中附带了一个 120 瓦的电源装置。此外，显示屏上已经贴上了保护膜，保护膜排列整齐，在测试期间没有脱落。

此外，还赠送了一个带有摄像头大开口的保护套。Poco 规定该智能手机在德国的保修期为 24 个月。

输入设备和操作 - F6 Pro 上的箭头快速面部解锁

Poco 在 F6 Pro 上使用了前谷歌键盘。在测试中，输入基本没有错误。边缘输入也能可靠识别。出厂时贴的保护膜让显示屏感觉有点暗淡，滑动性能也可能更好，但这并不令人讨厌。

智能手机可以使用光学指纹扫描仪和 2D 面部识别解锁。在测试中，这两种方法都非常可靠。通常不需要扫描手指，因为摄像头会瞬间解锁智能手机。如果需要，还可以跳过锁屏。

Poco 依靠的是 X 轴振动电机。振动很舒服，但马达的声音清晰可闻。

显示屏 - Poco F6 Pro 达到 4000 尼特

子像素显示
子像素显示
PWM 调光模式
PWM 调光模式

Poco 智能手机中最好的显示屏--这是制造商的宣称。它的尺寸为 6.67 英寸，最大刷新率为 120 Hz。不过，它不是 LTPO 面板。根据 DRM Info 应用程序，可在 60、90 和 120 Hz 下播放电平。可以在设置中将刷新率固定为 120 和 60 Hz，否则将由软件进行调整。

AMOLED 显示屏的分辨率为 FHD+ 或 WQHD+，软件也可根据内容在此进行更改。色彩方案也可以根据个人喜好或环境光线进行调整。

Poco 宣称最高亮度可达 4000 cd/m²。我们在测试中确实达到了这一水平。我们测得的亮度为 4015 尼特，但仅限于显示 HDR 内容时。在 APL18 测试中，启动环境光传感器后的亮度仍为 1292 cd/m²。在没有传感器的情况下，F6 Pro 的最高亮度为 716 尼特。

在测量中，我们还发现屏幕闪烁的频率为 120 Hz。不过，在 PWM 调光模式的帮助下，频率可以提高到 3840 Hz。不过，我们只在亮度为 26% 时测量了这一频率。在最低亮度下，频率为 515 Hz。

令人欣慰的是，F6 Pro 提供了真正的 "始终保持开启 "显示屏，它可以永久亮起，也可以根据用户需要自定义亮起时间。

1011
cd/m²		1021
cd/m²		1016
cd/m²
1021
cd/m²		1025
cd/m²		1032
cd/m²
1019
cd/m²		1017
cd/m²		1028
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 1032 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 1021.1 cd/m² Minimum: 2.61 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 98 %
Center on Battery: 1025 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.2 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 2.4 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
99.5% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.21
Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro
AMOLED, 3200x1440, 6.7"		Samsung Galaxy S23 FE
Dynamic AMOLED x2, 2340x1080, 6.4"		Motorola Edge 50 Fusion
P-OLED, 2400x1080, 6.7"		Google Pixel 8a
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.1"		Realme 12 Pro+
AMOLED, 2412x1080, 6.7"
Screen
-14%
16%
15%
-13%
Brightness middle
1025
897
-12%
1213
18%
1518
48%
778
-24%
Brightness
1021
908
-11%
1190
17%
1466
44%
783
-23%
Brightness Distribution
98
97
-1%
93
-5%
88
-10%
95
-3%
Black Level *
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
1.2
2.2
-83%
1.36
-13%
1.2
-0%
1.63
-36%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
3
3.1
-3%
2.3
23%
3.3
-10%
3.57
-19%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
2.4
1.7
29%
1.1
54%
2
17%
1.7
29%
Gamma
2.21 100%
2.08 106%
2.254 98%
2.2 100%
2.221 99%
CCT
6656 98%
6617 98%
6624 98%
6786 96%
6576 99%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 120 Hz
Amplitude: 16.76 %

The display backlight flickers at 120 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 120 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8746 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

最低显示亮度
分钟
25 % 显示屏亮度
25 %
显示屏亮度为 50
50 %
75 % 显示亮度
75 %
最大手动显示亮度
100 %

固定缩放级别和不同亮度设置下的测量系列 (最低亮度下的振幅曲线看起来很平，但这是缩放造成的。信息框显示的是最小亮度下的振幅放大图）

Poco 面板的色彩平衡很好。只是灰度偏差稍大，但并不明显。根据 2D CalMan 测量，智能手机覆盖了 99.5% 的 sRGB 色彩空间。

色彩保真度（色彩方案标准、色温标准、目标色彩空间 sRGB）
色彩保真度（色彩方案标准、色温标准、目标色彩空间 sRGB）
色彩空间（色彩方案标准、色温标准、目标色彩空间 sRGB）
色彩空间（色彩方案标准、色温标准、目标色彩空间 sRGB）
灰度（色彩方案标准、色温标准、目标色彩空间 sRGB）
灰度（色彩方案标准、色温标准、目标色彩空间 sRGB）
色彩饱和度（色彩方案标准、色温标准、目标色彩空间 sRGB）
色彩饱和度（色彩方案标准、色温标准、目标色彩空间 sRGB）

Display Response Times

ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
   ↔    Response Time Black to White
1.14 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.58 ms rise
↘ 0.562 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 3 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
   ↔    Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
1.16 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.5125 ms rise
↘ 0.651 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 3 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

F6 Pro 的亮度足以在户外阳光下舒适地使用。这款智能手机只提供了一个不使用环境光传感器的阳光下特殊增强模式。自动调节工作可靠而迅速。

Poco F6 Pro 显示屏的可视角度稳定性也给人留下了深刻印象。几个人可以同时轻松地观看内容。即使从锐角观看，色彩也能忠实显示。

性能 - F6 Pro 性能强劲，内存容量大

性能是 Poco 智能手机的核心竞争力之一，F6 Pro 也是如此，它配备了 骁龙 8 代 2.因此，F6 Pro 将 摩托罗拉 Edge 50 Fusion和 Realme 12 Pro+ 的 骁龙 7s 第二代远远落后，与 张力 G3的 谷歌 Pixel 8a和 Exynos 2200和三星 Galaxy S23 FE.

在日常使用中，F6 Pro 可以飞快地完成所有可以想象到的任务，而大容量内存也功不可没。不过，超快的 UFS 4.0 内存在传输速率方面超越了同类设备，这也是 F6 Pro 工作速度快的重要原因。

Geekbench 6.3 | Antutu v10 | PCMark for Android | CrossMark | BaseMark OS II | UL Procyon AI Inference for Android | Geekbench ML
Geekbench 6.3
Single-Core
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
  (1432 - 2104, n=17)
1926 Points +34%
Google Pixel 8a
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
1699 Points +19%
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
1601 Points +12%
Average of class Smartphone
  (193 - 3479, n=161, last 2 years)
1446 Points +1%
Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
1432 Points
Motorola Edge 50 Fusion
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 8192
998 Points -30%
Realme 12 Pro+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 8192
922 Points -36%
Multi-Core
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
  (4255 - 5765, n=17)
5226 Points +2%
Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
5100 Points
Google Pixel 8a
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
4408 Points -14%
Average of class Smartphone
  (845 - 10401, n=161, last 2 years)
4028 Points -21%
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
3938 Points -23%
Motorola Edge 50 Fusion
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 8192
2813 Points -45%
Realme 12 Pro+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 8192
2793 Points -45%
Antutu v10 - Total Score
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
  (1398472 - 1607558, n=12)
1539082 Points 0%
Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
1536373 Points
Average of class Smartphone
  (142748 - 3015111, n=98, last 2 years)
1232320 Points -20%
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
1124908 Points -27%
Google Pixel 8a
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
1049981 Points -32%
Realme 12 Pro+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 8192
665728 Points -57%
Motorola Edge 50 Fusion
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 8192
571043 Points -63%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
  (11562 - 20394, n=24)
15817 Points +9%
Motorola Edge 50 Fusion
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 8192
15308 Points +5%
Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
14517 Points
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
13573 Points -7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4609 - 24088, n=190, last 2 years)
12976 Points -11%
Realme 12 Pro+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 8192
12895 Points -11%
Google Pixel 8a
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
11565 Points -20%
CrossMark - Overall
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
  (778 - 1356, n=22)
1138 Points +9%
Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
1041 Points
Google Pixel 8a
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
919 Points -12%
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
888 Points -15%
Average of class Smartphone
  (187 - 1517, n=157, last 2 years)
884 Points -15%
Motorola Edge 50 Fusion
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 8192
688 Points -34%
Realme 12 Pro+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 8192
614 Points -41%
BaseMark OS II
Overall
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
  (7354 - 9730, n=22)
8794 Points +2%
Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
8631 Points
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
7179 Points -17%
Google Pixel 8a
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
7088 Points -18%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1196 - 11976, n=151, last 2 years)
6297 Points -27%
Motorola Edge 50 Fusion
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 8192
4765 Points -45%
Realme 12 Pro+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 8192
4140 Points -52%
System
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
  (10786 - 15148, n=22)
13173 Points 0%
Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
13142 Points
Motorola Edge 50 Fusion
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 8192
11239 Points -14%
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
11081 Points -16%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2368 - 16475, n=151, last 2 years)
10163 Points -23%
Google Pixel 8a
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
7828 Points -40%
Realme 12 Pro+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 8192
7571 Points -42%
Memory
Google Pixel 8a
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
9837 Points +17%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
  (6601 - 10834, n=22)
9479 Points +13%
Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
8397 Points
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
7614 Points -9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (962 - 12716, n=151, last 2 years)
6767 Points -19%
Motorola Edge 50 Fusion
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 8192
4465 Points -47%
Realme 12 Pro+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 8192
4089 Points -51%
Graphics
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
  (22837 - 32334, n=22)
27375 Points +1%
Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
27062 Points
Google Pixel 8a
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
18837 Points -30%
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
17941 Points -34%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1017 - 58651, n=151, last 2 years)
16908 Points -38%
Motorola Edge 50 Fusion
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 8192
7249 Points -73%
Realme 12 Pro+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 8192
7102 Points -74%
Web
Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
1858 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
  (1077 - 2044, n=22)
1777 Points -4%
Google Pixel 8a
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
1762 Points -5%
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
1755 Points -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (841 - 2145, n=151, last 2 years)
1564 Points -16%
Motorola Edge 50 Fusion
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 8192
1417 Points -24%
Realme 12 Pro+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 8192
1335 Points -28%
UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Google Pixel 8a
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
29654 Points +105%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1267 - 74958, n=143, last 2 years)
16841 Points +16%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
  (11338 - 16880, n=21)
15142 Points +5%
Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
14466 Points
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
10374 Points -28%
Motorola Edge 50 Fusion
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 8192
9206 Points -36%
Geekbench ML
0.6 TensorFlow Lite CPU
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
  (1004 - 1053, n=3)
1027 Points 0%
Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
1025 Points
Google Pixel 8a
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
998 Points -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (246 - 1342, n=34, last 2 years)
824 Points -20%
Realme 12 Pro+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 8192
564 Points -45%
Motorola Edge 50 Fusion
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 8192
561 Points -45%
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
509 Points -50%
0.6 TensorFlow Lite GPU
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
  (871 - 1166, n=3)
1054 Points +21%
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
1021 Points +17%
Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
871 Points
Average of class Smartphone
  (123 - 1478, n=33, last 2 years)
746 Points -14%
Google Pixel 8a
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
704 Points -19%
Motorola Edge 50 Fusion
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 8192
289 Points -67%
Realme 12 Pro+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 8192
275 Points -68%
0.6 TensorFlow Lite NNAPI
Google Pixel 8a
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
2488 Points +387%
Average of class Smartphone
  (186 - 3410, n=29, last 2 years)
647 Points +27%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
  (511 - 648, n=3)
588 Points +15%
Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
511 Points
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
413 Points -19%
Motorola Edge 50 Fusion
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 8192
288 Points -44%

在 F6 Pro 中，Poco 采用了 Adreno 740图形处理器。这使得这款智能手机在几乎所有基准测试中都名列前茅。

F6 Pro 还能轻松驾驭当前的游戏。PUBG Mobile 》可以在超 HDR 和超帧率下运行。游戏运行流畅，不会出现掉帧现象。

3DMark: Wild Life Extreme Unlimited | Wild Life Extreme | Wild Life Unlimited Score | Wild Life Score | Solar Bay Score | Solar Bay Unlimited Score | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7: T-Rex Onscreen | 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
GFXBench 3.0: on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
GFXBench 3.1: on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
GFXBench: on screen Car Chase Onscreen | 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | 3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
3DMark: Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score | Steel Nomad Light Score
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
3315 Points
Google Pixel 8a
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2353 Points -29%
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1702 Points -49%
Realme 12 Pro+
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
803 Points -76%
Motorola Edge 50 Fusion
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
793 Points -76%
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
3394 Points
Google Pixel 8a
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2359 Points -30%
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1702 Points -50%
Realme 12 Pro+
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
810 Points -76%
Motorola Edge 50 Fusion
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
799 Points -76%
3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
12705 Points
Google Pixel 8a
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
8960 Points -29%
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
6440 Points -49%
Realme 12 Pro+
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
3111 Points -76%
Motorola Edge 50 Fusion
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3066 Points -76%
3DMark / Wild Life Score
Google Pixel 8a
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
8976 Points
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
6350 Points
Realme 12 Pro+
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
3088 Points
Motorola Edge 50 Fusion
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3049 Points
3DMark / Solar Bay Score
Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
4825 Points
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
3589 Points -26%
3DMark / Solar Bay Unlimited Score
Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
4844 Points
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
3631 Points -25%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
6212 Points
Motorola Edge 50 Fusion
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
4428 Points -29%
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4288 Points -31%
Realme 12 Pro+
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4090 Points -34%
Google Pixel 8a
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
3005 Points -52%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
23436 Points
Google Pixel 8a
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
14498 Points -38%
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
11774 Points -50%
Realme 12 Pro+
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
5618 Points -76%
Motorola Edge 50 Fusion
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
5526 Points -76%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
14501 Points
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
8483 Points -42%
Google Pixel 8a
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
7856 Points -46%
Motorola Edge 50 Fusion
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
5237 Points -64%
Realme 12 Pro+
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
5187 Points -64%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
119 fps -1%
Google Pixel 8a
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
119 fps -1%
Motorola Edge 50 Fusion
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
104 fps -13%
Realme 12 Pro+
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps -50%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
486 fps
Google Pixel 8a
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
373 fps -23%
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
218 fps -55%
Motorola Edge 50 Fusion
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
123 fps -75%
Realme 12 Pro+
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
121 fps -75%
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Google Pixel 8a
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
119 fps 0%
Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
119 fps
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
112 fps -6%
Motorola Edge 50 Fusion
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
63 fps -47%
Realme 12 Pro+
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
57 fps -52%
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
270 fps
Google Pixel 8a
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
241 fps -11%
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
135 fps -50%
Motorola Edge 50 Fusion
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
72 fps -73%
Realme 12 Pro+
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
71 fps -74%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
105 fps
Google Pixel 8a
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
98 fps -7%
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
89 fps -15%
Realme 12 Pro+
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
47 fps -55%
Motorola Edge 50 Fusion
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
47 fps -55%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
222 fps
Google Pixel 8a
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
117 fps -47%
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
101 fps -55%
Realme 12 Pro+
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
54 fps -76%
Motorola Edge 50 Fusion
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
54 fps -76%
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Google Pixel 8a
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
75 fps +19%
Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
63 fps
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
56 fps -11%
Realme 12 Pro+
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
25 fps -60%
Motorola Edge 50 Fusion
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
24 fps -62%
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
129 fps
Google Pixel 8a
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
74 fps -43%
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
63 fps -51%
Realme 12 Pro+
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
30 fps -77%
Motorola Edge 50 Fusion
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
29 fps -78%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Google Pixel 8a
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
59 fps +7%
Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
55 fps
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
42 fps -24%
Realme 12 Pro+
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
19 fps -65%
Motorola Edge 50 Fusion
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
18 fps -67%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
68 fps
Google Pixel 8a
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
36 fps -47%
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
28 fps -59%
Realme 12 Pro+
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
13 fps -81%
Motorola Edge 50 Fusion
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
13 fps -81%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
89 fps
Google Pixel 8a
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
81 fps -9%
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
62 fps -30%
Realme 12 Pro+
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
31 fps -65%
Motorola Edge 50 Fusion
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
31 fps -65%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
175 fps
Google Pixel 8a
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
96 fps -45%
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
77 fps -56%
Realme 12 Pro+
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
35 fps -80%
Motorola Edge 50 Fusion
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
35 fps -80%
GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
31 fps
Google Pixel 8a
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
16 fps -48%
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
12 fps -61%
Realme 12 Pro+
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
5.8 fps -81%
Motorola Edge 50 Fusion
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
5.8 fps -81%
3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score
Google Pixel 8a
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
989 Points 0%
Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
986 Points
Realme 12 Pro+
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
256 Points -74%
Motorola Edge 50 Fusion
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
254 Points -74%
3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Score
Google Pixel 8a
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
994 Points 0%
Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
992 Points
Realme 12 Pro+
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
257 Points -74%
Motorola Edge 50 Fusion
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
253 Points -74%
Jetstream 2 | Speedometer 2.0 | WebXPRT 4 | WebXPRT 3 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro (chrome 127)
171.1 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (62.7 - 179.2, n=23)
133.1 Points -22%
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=161, last 2 years)
120.4 Points -30%
Motorola Edge 50 Fusion (Chrome 126)
118.202 Points -31%
Google Pixel 8a (Chrome 126)
94.765 Points -45%
Realme 12 Pro+ (Chrome 126)
82.054 Points -52%
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE (Chrome 121)
13.847 Points -92%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro (chrome 127)
190 runs/min
Google Pixel 8a (Chrome 126)
161 runs/min -15%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (62.9 - 225, n=18)
141.6 runs/min -25%
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE (Chrome 121)
137 runs/min -28%
Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 569, n=146, last 2 years)
136.2 runs/min -28%
Motorola Edge 50 Fusion (Chrome 126)
110 runs/min -42%
Realme 12 Pro+ (Chrome 126)
85.5 runs/min -55%
WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro (chrome 127)
156 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (28 - 183, n=22)
130.6 Points -16%
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE (Chrome 121)
130 Points -17%
Average of class Smartphone (22 - 271, n=152, last 2 years)
113.8 Points -27%
Motorola Edge 50 Fusion (Chrome 126)
106 Points -32%
Google Pixel 8a (Chrome 126)
95 Points -39%
Realme 12 Pro+ (Chrome 126)
91 Points -42%
WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (115 - 238, n=11)
197.5 Points +9%
Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro (chrome 127)
182 Points
Average of class Smartphone (38 - 347, n=79, last 2 years)
148.7 Points -18%
Google Pixel 8a
135 Points -26%
Realme 12 Pro+ (Chrome 126)
106 Points -42%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE (Chrome 121)
51202 Points +3%
Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro (chrome 127)
49818 Points
Google Pixel 8a (Chrome 126)
46738 Points -6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (19870 - 65418, n=25)
45827 Points -8%
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=203, last 2 years)
37161 Points -25%
Motorola Edge 50 Fusion (Chrome 126)
36202 Points -27%
Realme 12 Pro+ (Chrome 126)
31340 Points -37%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=160, last 2 years)
1568 ms * -95%
Realme 12 Pro+ (Chrome 126)
1478 ms * -84%
Motorola Edge 50 Fusion (Chrome 126)
1090.6 ms * -36%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (602 - 1837, n=22)
1023 ms * -27%
Google Pixel 8a (Chrome 126)
886.7 ms * -11%
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE (Chrome 121)
840.3 ms * -5%
Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro (chrome 127)
802.4 ms *

* ... smaller is better

Xiaomi Poco F6 ProSamsung Galaxy S23 FEMotorola Edge 50 FusionGoogle Pixel 8aRealme 12 Pro+Average 1 TB UFS 4.0 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-44%
-55%
-63%
-27%
10%
-40%
Sequential Read 256KB
3070.33
1657.44
-46%
967.8
-68%
1509.65
-51%
1926.1
-37%
3543 ?(3070 - 4017, n=8)
15%
1839 ?(226 - 4512, n=192, last 2 years)
-40%
Sequential Write 256KB
2987.47
994.67
-67%
800.5
-73%
255.31
-91%
1756.1
-41%
3353 ?(2863 - 3908, n=8)
12%
1425 ?(57.5 - 3908, n=192, last 2 years)
-52%
Random Read 4KB
381.58
322.32
-16%
281.5
-26%
165.98
-57%
335.2
-12%
397 ?(349 - 441, n=8)
4%
277 ?(22.2 - 483, n=192, last 2 years)
-27%
Random Write 4KB
520.87
288.23
-45%
241.4
-54%
243.82
-53%
420.2
-19%
572 ?(431 - 753, n=8)
10%
309 ?(9.4 - 753, n=192, last 2 years)
-41%

排放 - 带节流功能的 F6 Pro

温度 - 尽管波科冷却室温度很高

对于 F6 Pro，Poco 强调了用于冷却设备的蒸汽室的尺寸。制造商提到了 "LiquidCool Technology 4.0"（液冷技术 4.0），该技术旨在确保长期提供最佳性能。

尽管如此，我们还是测得在极端负荷下，设备正面的最高温度为 44.8 摄氏度（约为华氏 112 度）。在基准测试中，F6 Pro 也出现了明显的节流现象。不过，这款智能手机在任何时候都能正常运行，触摸也不会出现任何问题。

Max. Load
 44.6 °C44.8 °C44.3 °C 
 44.7 °C44.6 °C43.7 °C 
 44.7 °C44.8 °C43.8 °C 
Maximum: 44.8 °C
Average: 44.4 °C
42 °C44 °C44 °C
39.7 °C42.8 °C44.7 °C
38 °C42.4 °C43.4 °C
Maximum: 44.7 °C
Average: 42.3 °C
Power Supply (max.)  24.5 °C | Room Temperature 22 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 44.4 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 44.8 °C / 113 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 44.7 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.1 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

3DMark Steel Nomad Stress Test

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
69.9 % +28%
Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
54.7 %
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
73.5 % +6%
Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
69.5 %
Solar Bay Stress Test Stability
Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
74.4 %
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
69 % -7%
0510152025303540455055606570Tooltip
Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø16.7 (14.2-20.4)
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø8.59 (7.53-10.2)
Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø52.1 (39.9-72.9)
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.5: Ø30.9 (26.6-38.1)
Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.5: Ø13.3 (11.9-15.9)
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Solar Bay Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.5: Ø9.91 (8.77-12)
Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.5: Ø13.8 (11.7-15.7)
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.5: Ø9.78 (8.18-11.9)

扬声器 - F6 Pro，带立体声和杜比全景声功能

F6 Pro 配备了立体声扬声器。它们通过了杜比全景声（Dolby Atmos）认证，确保音质清晰。这款智能手机的音量为 88.7 dB(A)，也相当响亮。声音相对均衡，Poco 在高音区的表现尤为突出。低音甚至低频都比较单薄，这也是智能手机的典型特点。

F6 Pro 没有 3.5 毫米插孔。但在测试中，蓝牙耳机的连接没有任何问题。智能手机支持以下编解码器：SBC、AAC、aptX、aptX HD、aptX Adaptive、aptX TWS+、LDAC、LHDC（V1-V5）。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2033.2322531.831.53118.225.24023.426.75032.438.16319.424.98018.826.710017.626.712513.831.416015.945.72001649.325016.457.131515.159.240013.859.250012.962.463013.865.580013.570.2100013.173.2125013.878160012.577.520001377.7250013.277.3315014.579.3400013.479.250001478.2630015.277.880001573.91000013.668.4125001766.31600015.562.7SPL2688.7N0.773.7median 13.8median 70.2Delta111.328.631.525.927.223.424.727.331.136.240.225.426.616.626.516.932.214.742.813.152.415.152.914.35611.657.31058.79.163.811.162.39.167.611.873.81577.511.377.61278.712.377.712.778.812.682.513.175.613.470.113.569.813.570.913.66513.662.524.788.80.671.7median 13.1median 69.81.39.7hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseXiaomi Poco F6 ProSamsung Galaxy S23 FE
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.1% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.6% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 27% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 65% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 47% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 45% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Samsung Galaxy S23 FE audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.9% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.3% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 10% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 83% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 31% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 61% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电池续航时间 - F6 Pro 的长效呼吸和快速充电功能

能耗 - F6 Pro 在负载情况下会变得贪婪

Poco F6 Pro 所搭载的骁龙 8 代 2 有两副面孔。在静止状态下，能耗较低，接近同类产品的平均水平。但在负载情况下，SoC 就会变得贪婪。与使用该 SoC 的其他设备进行比较后发现，这不仅仅是硬件的问题。Poco 似乎更注重顶级性能，而不是经济性。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.02 / 0.05 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 0.79 / 1.05 / 1.13 Watt
Load midlight 7.88 / 16.48 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro
5000 mAh		Samsung Galaxy S23 FE
4500 mAh		Motorola Edge 50 Fusion
5000 mAh		Google Pixel 8a
4492 mAh		Realme 12 Pro+
5000 mAh		Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
 		Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-22%
-8%
-13%
-25%
-7%
Idle Minimum *
0.79
0.69
13%
1
-27%
0.92
-16%
1.036 ?(0.7 - 2.37, n=23)
-31%
0.894 ?(0.4 - 2.37, n=152, last 2 years)
-13%
Idle Average *
1.05
1.15
-10%
1.3
-24%
1.46
-39%
1.766 ?(0.8 - 7.18, n=23)
-68%
1.456 ?(0.6 - 4.26, n=152, last 2 years)
-39%
Idle Maximum *
1.13
1.26
-12%
1.9
-68%
1.65
-46%
1.94 ?(1.07 - 8.22, n=23)
-72%
1.616 ?(0.83 - 4.45, n=152, last 2 years)
-43%
Load Average *
7.88
15.93
-102%
5.1
35%
7.96
-1%
7.22 ?(2.61 - 15.3, n=23)
8%
6.45 ?(2.3 - 16.5, n=147, last 2 years)
18%
Load Maximum *
16.48
16.09
2%
9.4
43%
10.74
35%
10.4 ?(4.57 - 18.1, n=23)
37%
9.8 ?(3.53 - 20.8, n=147, last 2 years)
41%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

01234567891011121314Tooltip
Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø6.26 (1.051-14.6)
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE Samsung Exynos 2200; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø6.24 (0.961-14.4)
Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.863 (0.736-1.089)
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE Samsung Exynos 2200; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.913 (0.859-1.222)

Power consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

012345678910111213Tooltip
Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø11.6 (10.3-13.1)
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE Samsung Exynos 2200; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø12.6 (11.7-13.4)
Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.863 (0.736-1.089)
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE Samsung Exynos 2200; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.913 (0.859-1.222)

电池续航时间 - F6 Pro 续航时间长，充电功率为 120 瓦

在现实的 WiFi 网上冲浪测试中，Poco F6 的电池续航能力给人留下了深刻印象。在打开显示屏的情况下，我们的续航时间超过了 15 小时。这使 F6 Pro 达到了同类产品的平均水平。不过，在这项测试中，智能手机的性能几乎没有受到挑战。在进行大量游戏时，5000 毫安时电池的耗电速度要快得多。

除了良好的电池续航能力，Poco 智能手机的快速充电时间也给人留下了深刻印象。该设备的最大充电功率为 120 瓦，甚至还附带了相应的电源适配器。这意味着 F6 Pro 可以在 23 分钟内将电量从 7% 充至 100%。该软件可用于设置设备是以最大功率充电还是以稍慢的速度充电。

Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing
15h 9min
Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro
5000 mAh		Samsung Galaxy S23 FE
4500 mAh		Motorola Edge 50 Fusion
5000 mAh		Google Pixel 8a
4492 mAh		Realme 12 Pro+
5000 mAh
Battery Runtime
WiFi v1.3
909
815
-10%
966
6%
796
-12%
919
1%

Pros

+ 系统性能高
+ 极快的内存
+ 明亮锐利的显示屏
+ 令人印象深刻的主摄像头

Cons

- 无 eSIM
- USB 2.0
- 其他镜头明显较弱

结论 - 不仅仅是动力

回顾：Poco F6 Pro。测试设备由小米德国公司提供。
回顾：Poco F6 Pro。测试设备由小米德国公司提供。

通过 F6 Pro，Poco 打造了一个全面的整体组合，它能做的远不止游戏。例如，相机在测试中给我们留下了深刻印象。尤其是主摄像头，它能提供清晰的图像，即使在光线条件恶劣的情况下也不会失效。遗憾的是，其他镜头无法跟上这一水平，但这是可以忍受的。

高级感体现在所使用的材料上。Poco F6 Pro 采用了金属和玻璃材质。这款智能手机的做工也非常精良。

令人高兴的是，制造商不仅在寻找新的人才，而且还在坚持旧的优点。F6 Pro 拥有强大的计算和图形处理能力以及超快的内存。即使是最高分辨率的最新游戏也不在话下。

有了 F6 Pro，Poco 正在远离纯游戏和性能智能手机。因此，该设备失去了一些关注点，但同时也吸引了更广泛的目标群体。

超长的电池续航时间也与此相得益彰。F6 Pro 的充电功率高达 120 瓦，充电器甚至包含在供货范围内，这就更好了。120 Hz AMOLED 面板也给人留下了深刻印象，它具有良好的亮度储备和清晰锐利的显示效果。

不过，F6 Pro 也并非十全十美。例如，我们希望看到 eSIM 支持。此外，该设备无法连接到 6 GHz 网络。智能手机还需要更长的更新支持和插孔连接。USB 2.0 端口不符合超快智能手机的概念。

不过，总体而言，F6 Pro 是一款成功的综合产品，尤其是摄像头升级和出色的显示屏，将吸引一大批目标群体。价格也很合适，特别是考虑到大容量内存和供货范围。

价格和供应情况

最小配置的 F6 Pro 的零售价为 580 欧元（约合人民币 634 元）。存储空间为 512 GB 的版本需要支付 50 欧元（约合 54 美元）的附加费。Poco 出售的大容量版本配备 16 GB 内存和 1 TB 存储空间，售价为 700 欧元（约合 765 美元）。不过，亚马逊或Mediamarkt 等其他零售商也在销售这款智能手机。

注：我们更新了评级系统，第 8 版的结果与第 7 版的结果不具可比性。 这里可在此处查阅。

Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro - 08/21/2024 v8
Benedikt Winkel

Chassis
89%
Keyboard
67 / 75 → 89%
Pointing Device
92%
Connectivity
54 / 69 → 78%
Weight
88%
Battery
90%
Display
90%
Games Performance
34 / 55 → 61%
Application Performance
67 / 85 → 78%
AI Performance
46%
Temperature
85%
Noise
100%
Audio
70 / 90 → 78%
Camera
75%
Average
62%
82%
Smartphone - Weighted Average
CO2 Emissions
No Data
Materials
0%
Packaging
25%
Power Use
98.9%
Repairability
40%
Software Updates
61.3%
Recycle Logo Total Sustainability Score: 37.5%

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 小米 Poco F6 Pro 智能手机评测--不止于游戏
Benedikt Winkel, 2024-08-12 (Update: 2024-08-12)