小米Poco F4 GT评测--具有旗舰功能的平价游戏智能手机

Name: Xiaomi Poco F4 GT
Brand: Xiaomi

性能满足快速充电。

弹出式触发器和广泛的冷却解决方案将Poco F4 GT牢牢置于游戏手机类别中。凭借120赫兹的AMOLED面板、骁龙1代和四路音频系统，它看起来很有希望--而且不仅仅是针对游戏玩家。

Marcus Herbrich, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy), Published 06/26/2022 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

5G Android Touchscreen Smartphone

有两个弹出式触发器，一个强大的骁龙8代1 SoC，以及120赫兹的AMOLED面板，Poco F4 GT有两个弹出式触发器。 Poco F4 GT是一款让游戏爱好者兴奋的智能手机。此外，小米还安装了两个高音喇叭和两个低音喇叭，据制造商称，还采用了全球首创的 "超宽带 "振动马达，可产生更强大的振动，频率为50赫兹至500赫兹。

而前辈的可用性从未正式包括欧洲--甚至我们只能审查正常的 Poco F3 - Poco F4 GT现在可以在全球范围内购买，价格约为600美元。对于这个价格，买家得到的是一个拥有8GB内存和128GB内部存储的机型。配备12GB内存和256GB UFS 3.1存储的SKU价格约为700美元。

虽然Poco F4 GT的电池不是特别大，只有4700毫安时，但使用附带的120瓦充电器，只需17分钟就能完全充电。三重摄像头的主摄像头包含一个IMX686传感器，分辨率为64MP。

Test device courtesy of Xiaomi Germany

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Xiaomi Poco F4 GT (Poco F Series)

Processor

Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 8 x 1.8 - 3 GHz, Cortex-X2 / A710 / A510 (Kryo) Waipio

Graphics adapter

Qualcomm Adreno 730

Memory

12 GB

Display

6.67 inch 20:9, 2400 x 1080 pixel 395 PPI, Capacitive touchscreen, AMOLED, Gorilla Glass Victus, glossy: yes, HDR, 120 Hz

Storage

256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash, 256 GB

, 223 GB free

Connections

1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: USB-C, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: Accelerometer, gyro, compass, color spectrum, flicker sensor, OTG, Miracast, IR blaster, RGB LED

Networking

Wi-Fi 6E (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz), Bluetooth 5.2, 2G (850/900/1800/1900), 3G (B1/B2/B4/B5/B6/B8/B19), 4G (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B12/B17/B18/B19/B20/B26/B28/B38/B40/B41), 5G (n1/n3/n5/n7/n8/n20/n28/n38/n40/n41/n77/n78), Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 8.5 x 162.5 x 76.7

Battery

4700 mAh Lithium-Polymer

Charging

fast charging / Quickcharge

Operating System

Android 12

Camera

Primary Camera: 64 MPix (f/1.9, phase comparison AF, dual LED flash) + 8.0 MP (f/2.2, wide-angle lens) + 2.0 MP, (f/2.4, macro lens)
Secondary Camera: 20 MPix (f/2.4, 0.8µm)

Additional features

Speakers: Symmetrical quad speakers, Keyboard: virtual, 120W charger, USB cable, case, 3.5 mm dongle , MIUI 13, 12 Months Warranty, GNSS: A-GPS (L1/L5), GLONASS, BeiDou (B1I/B1C/B2a), Galileo (E1/E5a); SAR value: 0.592W/kg, head, 0.960W/kg body, widevine L1, fanless

Weight

210 g, Power Supply: 125 g

Price

699 Euro

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating	Date	Model	Weight	Drive	Size	Resolution
85.9 % v7 ^(old)	06 / 2022	Xiaomi Poco F4 GT SD 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730	210 g	256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	6.67"	2400x1080
85 % v7 ^(old)	03 / 2022	Nubia RedMagic 7 SD 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730	226 g	256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	6.80"	2400x1080
88.7 % v7 ^(old)	12 / 2021	Asus ROG Phone 5s SD 888+ 5G, Adreno 660	238 g	512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	6.78"	2448x1080
87.7 % v7 ^(old)	03 / 2022	Xiaomi 12 SD 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730	179 g	256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	6.28"	2400x1080
87.9 % v7 ^(old)	03 / 2022	Motorola Edge 30 Pro SD 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730	196 g	256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	6.70"	2400x1080
85.7 % v7 ^(old)	06 / 2022	Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro SD 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730	220 g	256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	6.67"	2400x1080

案例 - 带有RGB LED的小米智能手机

在外观方面，基本上也是如此。 Poco F4 GT和其他游戏智能手机一样--大多数人可能会喜欢或讨厌这种独特的设计语言。这款游戏手机的外观游戏手机是由其引人注目的背面和RGB游戏LED定义的。特别是黄色的版本。由于保护玻璃的表面和金属框架的结合，Poco F4的手感很好。此外，还有游戏典型的、可伸缩的弹出式触发器。一个机械滑块让用户可以快速切换到游戏模式。

虽然正面的大猩猩玻璃Victus在边缘处略有翘起，但屏幕并没有弯曲。虽然6.67英寸的OLED显示屏在侧面有相当纤细的边框，但这款游戏智能手机的 "下巴 "边框并不那么微妙，导致屏幕与身体的比例达到了86%。

Poco F4 GT并没有获得官方确认的IP认证，以防止灰尘或水。我们不知道在这种情况下有哪些密封措施来防止水进入游戏手机。至少，SIM卡插槽包含一个红色的橡胶元素。

尺寸比较

连接性 - 带有UFS存储的Poco F4 GT

至于我们的测试设备，UFS存储的容量为256GB。由于操作系统占用了空间以及预装的应用程序，实际可用的存储空间明显低于223GB。Poco F4 GT不提供通过microSD卡的存储扩展，也不提供3.5毫米耳机插孔，这势必会让至少一些游戏玩家不高兴。至少，这款游戏手机包括一个适当的USB-C适配器。它是USB 2.0指定的，在我们的测试中，通过USB-OTG识别优盘等外设，没有任何问题。

小米手机还配备了红外辐射器、NFC、蓝牙5.2和双卡。此外，背面的RGB游戏LED会通知用户有来电或信息。Miracast可用于将屏幕内容无线串联到外部显示器。由于完成了Widevine L1认证过程，来自流行流媒体服务的视频内容可以以高清质量观看。

软件 - 小米手机与Android 12

小米将Android 操作系统与自己的用户界面MiUI相结合，推出Poco 13版。在测试时，Poco手机是基于Android 12，安全补丁可以追溯到2022年5月。虽然Poco F4 GT很有可能收到更新到Android 13，但我们无法找到制造商的官方声明。该更新保证包括三个主要的Android 版本更新和四年的安全补丁并不适用于Poco智能手机。因此，软件支持可能最多限于3年，有2次重大升级。

通过Poco的MiUI 13，F4 GT具有更新的MiSans字体，各种新的小工具，以及对谷歌 "Material You "设计的支持。横幅广告和弹出式广告集成到Poco机型的MiUI 13用户界面，并在安装应用程序时显示出来，例如。总的来说，这些所谓的MSA（MiUI系统广告）可以相当容易地从 "密码和安全 "下的系统设置中禁用。同样，安装的臃肿软件，如游戏或Netflix，也可以被卸载。

通信和GNSS - Poco F4 GT with Wi-Fi 6E

Poco F4 GT是为数不多的600美元左右的智能手机之一，它支持Wi-Fi 6E标准，允许它使用6千兆赫的频段进行Wi-Fi数据传输。除了最新的Wi-Fi标准，这款游戏手机还支持多用户MIMO，这确保了家庭网络内一致的高传输速率。结合我们的华硕ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000路由器，Poco F4 GT的峰值传输速度超过1800 Mb/s。即使使用普通的Wi-Fi 6路由器，在2.4GHz和5GHz频段，也可以达到900Mb/s以上的快速Wi-Fi传输速度。

对于移动网络，Poco F4 GT支持目前所有的移动网络标准，包括5G。

Networking
Xiaomi Poco F4 GT Wi-Fi 6E
iperf3 receive AXE11000	824 (min: 405) MBit/s ∼44%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	902 (min: 875) MBit/s ∼47%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1768 (min: 1697) MBit/s ∼90%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1342 (min: 580) MBit/s ∼72%
Nubia RedMagic 7 Wi-Fi 6E
iperf3 receive AXE11000	717 (min: 608) MBit/s ∼38%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	227 (min: 74) MBit/s ∼12%
Asus ROG Phone 5s Wi-Fi 6E
iperf3 transmit AX12	853 (min: 437) MBit/s ∼36%
iperf3 receive AX12	839 (min: 794) MBit/s ∼35%
Xiaomi 12 Wi-Fi 6E
iperf3 receive AXE11000	854 (min: 763) MBit/s ∼45%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	757 (min: 380) MBit/s ∼39%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1407 (min: 872) MBit/s ∼72%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1751 (min: 879) MBit/s ∼94%
Motorola Edge 30 Pro Wi-Fi 6E
iperf3 receive AXE11000	933 (min: 833) MBit/s ∼49%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	898 (min: 852) MBit/s ∼47%
Average of class Smartphone
iperf3 receive AXE11000	719 (min: 34.8) MBit/s ∼38%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	736 (min: 40.5) MBit/s ∼38%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1444 (min: 229) MBit/s ∼74%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1377 (min: 668) MBit/s ∼74%

Xiaomi Poco F4 GT; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1768 (1697-1848)

Xiaomi Poco F4 GT; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1320 (580-1521)

Xiaomi Poco F4 GT; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø810 (405-844)

Xiaomi Poco F4 GT; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø902 (875-928)

为了评估实践中的定位能力，我们同时用Garmin Venu 2记录我们的路线，以进行比较。对于大多数卫星导航系统，Poco F4 GT至少通过双频连接确定我们的位置。在户外，卫星上行链路很快建立起来，精度在3米以内。即使在室内，小米手机也能快速而准确地定位我们。

路线的偏差总体上非常小，导致游戏手机和手机的线路完全相同。 Garmin智能手表。即使在看详细的GPS记录时，也只有在改变方向时才有微小的不精确性。

电话和通话质量 - 小米双卡智能手机

虽然这款游戏智能手机最多接受两张nano SIM卡，但它不支持eSIM。Poco F4 GT的集成麦克风确保了通话和视频会议期间的良好语音质量。当贴在耳朵上时，声音听起来很自然，小的环境噪音也被可靠地过滤掉了。扬声器提供了一个良好的最大音量水平。

摄像机 - Poco F4 GT与Tripe摄像机

虽然游戏智能手机的优先级肯定不在于相机，但中国制造商使用优秀的索尼IMX686相机传感器的64MP主相机。华硕华硕ROG手机5s也使用了相同的传感器。

尽管由于Poco F4 GT缺乏光学防抖功能，用户应该篡改他们的期望，但照片的效果还是相当不错的。就相对于游戏手机价格的清晰度而言，它往往能达到很好的效果。然而，在光线不足的情况下，一些区域往往会曝光过度，近距离的物体会失焦。

除了主摄像头，背面的三摄像头还包含一个800万像素的超宽镜头和一个用于微距摄影和景深的200万像素长焦镜头。用超广角摄像头拍摄的照片在整体质量上是扎实的，甚至可以捕捉到令人惊讶的许多细节，而图像的清晰度和分辨率则有些不足之处。与姐妹机型不同小米12，Poco F4 GT的广角照片没有受到过度锐化的影响。

在正面，有一个隐藏在小孔内的2000万像素摄像头。自拍提供了很好的清晰度，尽管照明并不总是准确的。人像模式下的虚化效果不值得批评。然而，在视频质量方面存在缺点（没有UHD选项）。

同样，超宽相机只能以1080p 30 FPS的速度记录。更高的刷新率或UHD选项仅由6400万像素的主摄像头支持，由于防抖效果好，它能以4K30的速度产生令人信服的记录。录像时，光学器件不能切换。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Weitwinkel Weitwinkel Low Light Ultraweitwinkel Zoom 5x

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images

当涉及到绿色和棕色调时，用Poco F4 GT拍摄的照片的色彩准确性和平衡性不符合旗舰智能手机的要求。我们分析了64MP相机在受控照明条件下与参考色的色彩表现。在我们的ColorChecker护照测试中，有几个离群值（DeltaE值>15）。

配件和保修 - 小米智能手机与120W充电器

Poco F4 GT的交货范围包括一个120W充电器、一个保护罩、一条1.5米（约4.9英尺）的L型USB-C电缆、一份快速启动指南和一个SIM卡工具包。这款游戏智能手机还包括一个Type-C到3.5毫米的适配器。

对于国际型号，Poco手机包括电池和配件的6个月保修，以及设备本身的12个月有限保修。如果你在2022年4月26日和2023年4月26日之间购买Poco F4 GT，如果显示屏被意外损坏，你可能有资格获得免费的屏幕维修。

输入设备和处理 - Poco F4 GT with 480 Hz

对于其游戏智能手机，小米使用了一个超宽带X轴振动电机。据制造商称，该电机有560毫米³，是Android 设备中潜在的最大的一个。在日常使用中，Poco F4 GT产生了舒适的触觉反馈，使在OLED面板上打字成为非常愉快的体验。

然而，不仅仅是振动马达有利于用户体验，还有120赫兹的高刷新率和高达480赫兹的高采样率。后者在游戏时检查电容式多触摸屏的输入，每秒可达480次。因此，电容式触摸屏能够对输入作出快速反应。

Poco F4 GT的指纹传感器没有位于OLED显示屏下方，而是被整合到了电源按钮上。这似乎是一个很好的决定，因为它能快速而准确地识别我们的手指。另外，前置摄像头也可用于面部识别。然而，由于使用了二维数据，通过面部识别进行的生物识别认证不是很安全。

▶ load Youtube video

显示器 - 小米智能手机采用OLED面板

Poco F4 GT采用6.67英寸AMOLED显示屏，分辨率为2400 x 1080像素，刷新率为120赫兹。虽然小米的游戏手机不依赖支持可变频率的LTPO面板，但F4 GT能够在60 Hz和120 Hz之间自动切换。

这款显示器被中国制造商评为最高800尼特的面板亮度，这与我们在启用环境光传感器显示纯白色图像时的测量结果几乎完全吻合。随着明亮和黑暗区域的均匀分布，Poco智能手机在APL18测试中达到了914尼特的优异成绩。这使得OLED面板适用于HDR内容。

由于采用了OLED面板，Poco F4 GT受到屏幕闪烁的影响。根据我们的测量，PWM频率几乎没有波动，保持在一个相对稳定的120赫兹。小米宣传Poco F4 GT的PWM频率非常高，达到1920赫兹，这将更加令人愉快，特别是对于敏感的用户。我们无法确定差异的原因是否在于我们的测量设备，或者是否没有启用自动直流调光模式。


801 cd/m²	803 cd/m²	808 cd/m²
802 cd/m²	807 cd/m²	803 cd/m²
809 cd/m²	808 cd/m²	811 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3

Maximum: 811 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 805.8 cd/m² Minimum: 2.14 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 99 %
Center on Battery: 807 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.2 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 2.2 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
98.7% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.2

	Xiaomi Poco F4 GT AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.7"	Nubia RedMagic 7 AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.8"	Asus ROG Phone 5s AMOLED, 2448x1080, 6.8"	Xiaomi 12 OLED, 2400x1080, 6.3"	Motorola Edge 30 Pro AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.7"
Screen		-80%	-1%	-9%	5%
Brightness middle	807	683 -15%	749 -7%	867 7%	649 -20%
Brightness	806	685 -15%	750 -7%	867 8%	649 -19%
Brightness Distribution	99	95 -4%	97 -2%	98 -1%	98 -1%
Black Level *
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	1.2	3.6 -200%	1.4 -17%	1.7 -42%	1.18 2%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	3.1	6.7 -116%	2.8 10%	4.4 -42%	2.07 33%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	2.2	5 -127%	1.8 18%	1.8 18%	1.5 32%
Gamma	2.2 ^100%	2.14 ^103%	2.29 ^96%	2.2 ^100%	2.236 ^98%
CCT	6439 ^101%	7537 ^86%	6602 ^98%	6762 ^96%	2538 ^256%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

121.4 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 121.4 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 121.4 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

在一个固定的变焦水平和各种亮度设置下进行测量

在典型的OLED风格中，Poco F4 GT的显示屏有一个绝对的黑值，以达到（理论上）完美的对比度。有三种颜色预设和大量的可定制设置。除了各种配置文件，单一的显示特性，如饱和度或伽玛，可以手动控制。

当使用出厂设置（配置文件：原始）时，该智能手机能够完全覆盖相当小的sRGB色彩空间。色彩精度非常准确，DeltaE值低于3。同样，灰度也没有出现任何颜色偏差。

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
1.14 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 0.557 ms rise
1.14 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 0.585 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 3 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
0.89 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 0.423 ms rise
0.89 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 0.468 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 2 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

在户外，Poco手机的显示内容仍然容易阅读。虽然这款游戏智能手机即使在晴天也能提供足够的亮度储备，但过多的眩光可能就会让人分心。这款便宜的机型并不能与小米12 Pro的出色亮度相提并论。小米12 Pro.

AMOLED显示屏具有出色的可视角度。即使从一个极端的角度看，也没有大的颜色失真。

性能 - 配备高通SoC的Poco F4 GT

对于Poco F4 GT，小米选择了使用高通迄今为止最好的智能手机芯片组。该芯片骁龙8代1是一款4纳米SoC，集成了阿德雷诺730用于图形加速。在日常使用中，系统性能没有任何问题。动画很流畅，没有明显的卡顿现象。CPU基准测试结果与其他采用这种SoC的智能手机总体上是一致的，尽管AImark得分有些低。

Geekbench 5.5 | Antutu v9 | PCMark for Android | AImark

Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Xiaomi Poco F4 GT Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	1298 Points
Nubia RedMagic 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 18432	1244 Points -4%
Xiaomi 12 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192	1237 Points -5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (1181 - 1298, n=21)	1231 Points -5%
Motorola Edge 30 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	1195 Points -8%
Asus ROG Phone 5s Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G, Adreno 660, 16384	1156 Points -11%
Average of class Smartphone (126 - 2437, n=174, last 2 years)	1012 Points -22%
Multi-Core
Nubia RedMagic 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 18432	3813 Points +5%
Asus ROG Phone 5s Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G, Adreno 660, 16384	3668 Points +1%
Motorola Edge 30 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	3659 Points +1%
Xiaomi Poco F4 GT Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	3624 Points
Xiaomi 12 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192	3581 Points -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (3269 - 3839, n=21)	3548 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone (473 - 8816, n=174, last 2 years)	3370 Points -7%

Antutu v9 - Total Score
Nubia RedMagic 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 18432	1041980 Points +7%
Xiaomi 12 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192	982789 Points 0%
Xiaomi Poco F4 GT Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	978273 Points
Motorola Edge 30 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	970465 Points -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (692924 - 1041980, n=18)	928953 Points -5%
Average of class Smartphone (99654 - 2056989, n=105, last 2 years)	810387 Points -17%

PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Asus ROG Phone 5s Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G, Adreno 660, 16384	16592 Points +20%
Xiaomi 12 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192	14508 Points +5%
Xiaomi Poco F4 GT Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	13827 Points
Motorola Edge 30 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	13611 Points -2%
Nubia RedMagic 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 18432	13295 Points -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (10140 - 17025, n=21)	13216 Points -4%
Average of class Smartphone (4609 - 26863, n=192, last 2 years)	13052 Points -6%

AImark - Score v2.x
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (1046 - 96317, n=14)	17097 Points +148%
Xiaomi Poco F4 GT Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	6893 Points
Xiaomi 12 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192	6766 Points -2%

虽然GPU性能也非常快，但Poco F4 GT令人惊讶地没有达到和小米12一样的分数。小米12，后者使用相同的骁龙8代.虽然测试时环境温度高可能是部分原因，但游戏手机仍应产生更稳定的帧率--例如，在曼哈顿的屏幕基准测试中，有明显的节流现象。

3DMark: Wild Life Extreme Unlimited | Wild Life Extreme | Wild Life Unlimited Score | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited | 2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited | 2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7: T-Rex Onscreen | 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
GFXBench 3.0: on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
GFXBench 3.1: on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
GFXBench: on screen Car Chase Onscreen | 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Nubia RedMagic 7 Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	2549 Points 0%
Xiaomi Poco F4 GT Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	2537 Points
Xiaomi 12 Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	2418 Points -5%
Motorola Edge 30 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1567 Points -38%
Asus ROG Phone 5s Adreno 660, SD 888+ 5G, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1532 Points -40%

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Nubia RedMagic 7 Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	2604 Points +1%
Xiaomi 12 Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	2586 Points 0%
Xiaomi Poco F4 GT Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	2578 Points
Motorola Edge 30 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1629 Points -37%
Asus ROG Phone 5s Adreno 660, SD 888+ 5G, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1538 Points -40%

3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Nubia RedMagic 7 Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	10185 Points +4%
Xiaomi Poco F4 GT Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	9837 Points
Xiaomi 12 Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	9782 Points -1%
Motorola Edge 30 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	6483 Points -34%
Asus ROG Phone 5s Adreno 660, SD 888+ 5G, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	5824 Points -41%

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Asus ROG Phone 5s Adreno 660, SD 888+ 5G, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	5087 Points +22%
Nubia RedMagic 7 Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	4771 Points +14%
Xiaomi 12 Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	4303 Points +3%
Xiaomi Poco F4 GT Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	4182 Points

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Nubia RedMagic 7 Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	19364 Points +14%
Xiaomi 12 Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	18286 Points +8%
Xiaomi Poco F4 GT Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	16937 Points
Asus ROG Phone 5s Adreno 660, SD 888+ 5G, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	12752 Points -25%

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Nubia RedMagic 7 Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	11528 Points +17%
Xiaomi 12 Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	10618 Points +8%
Xiaomi Poco F4 GT Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	9873 Points
Asus ROG Phone 5s Adreno 660, SD 888+ 5G, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	9553 Points -3%

3DMark / Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited
Nubia RedMagic 7 Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	13121 Points +14%
Xiaomi Poco F4 GT Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	11527 Points
Asus ROG Phone 5s Adreno 660, SD 888+ 5G, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	11389 Points -1%
Xiaomi 12 Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	9693 Points -16%

3DMark / Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics
Nubia RedMagic 7 Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	25906 Points +10%
Xiaomi 12 Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	24177 Points +2%
Xiaomi Poco F4 GT Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	23637 Points
Asus ROG Phone 5s Adreno 660, SD 888+ 5G, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	17018 Points -28%

3DMark / Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics
Asus ROG Phone 5s Adreno 660, SD 888+ 5G, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	5278 Points +26%
Nubia RedMagic 7 Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	4811 Points +15%
Xiaomi Poco F4 GT Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	4189 Points
Xiaomi 12 Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	3754 Points -10%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Xiaomi 12 Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	121 fps 0%
Xiaomi Poco F4 GT Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	121 fps
Motorola Edge 30 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	119 fps -2%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Xiaomi 12 Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	428 fps +8%
Xiaomi Poco F4 GT Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	398 fps
Motorola Edge 30 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	306 fps -23%

GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Xiaomi 12 Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	121 fps +30%
Motorola Edge 30 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	119 fps +28%
Xiaomi Poco F4 GT Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	93 fps

GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Xiaomi 12 Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	213 fps +2%
Xiaomi Poco F4 GT Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	209 fps
Motorola Edge 30 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	158 fps -24%

GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Xiaomi 12 Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	121 fps +6%
Xiaomi Poco F4 GT Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	114 fps
Motorola Edge 30 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	109 fps -4%

GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Xiaomi 12 Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	164 fps +21%
Xiaomi Poco F4 GT Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	136 fps
Motorola Edge 30 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	119 fps -12%

GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Xiaomi 12 Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	81 fps +9%
Xiaomi Poco F4 GT Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	74 fps
Motorola Edge 30 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	68 fps -8%

GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Motorola Edge 30 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	86 fps +2%
Xiaomi Poco F4 GT Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	84 fps
Xiaomi 12 Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	78 fps -7%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Xiaomi 12 Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	69 fps +23%
Motorola Edge 30 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	60 fps +7%
Nubia RedMagic 7 Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	60 fps +7%
Xiaomi Poco F4 GT Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	56 fps
Asus ROG Phone 5s Adreno 660, SD 888+ 5G, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	41 fps -27%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Nubia RedMagic 7 Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	47 fps +27%
Motorola Edge 30 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	42 fps +14%
Xiaomi 12 Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	39 fps +5%
Xiaomi Poco F4 GT Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	37 fps
Asus ROG Phone 5s Adreno 660, SD 888+ 5G, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	30 fps -19%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Motorola Edge 30 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	98 fps +58%
Xiaomi 12 Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	93 fps +50%
Nubia RedMagic 7 Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	89 fps +44%
Asus ROG Phone 5s Adreno 660, SD 888+ 5G, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	65 fps +5%
Xiaomi Poco F4 GT Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	62 fps

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Nubia RedMagic 7 Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	123 fps +14%
Xiaomi Poco F4 GT Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	108 fps
Motorola Edge 30 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	101 fps -6%
Xiaomi 12 Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	99 fps -8%
Asus ROG Phone 5s Adreno 660, SD 888+ 5G, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	81 fps -25%

浏览器的基准测试结果也偏弱--Poco手机的速度计基准测试结果特别差。我们使用了Edge浏览器，因为使用Chrome浏览器时，分数更低。在日常使用中，用Poco F4 GT浏览网页的效果不明显。

Jetstream 2 | Speedometer 2.0 | WebXPRT 3 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=164, last 2 years)	121.7 Points +29%
Motorola Edge 30 Pro (Chrome 99)	121.6 Points +29%
Xiaomi 12 (Chrome 99.0.4844.58)	113.8 Points +21%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (72.8 - 134.6, n=16)	107.9 Points +15%
Xiaomi Poco F4 GT (MS Edge 102)	94.153 Points

Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 569, n=150, last 2 years)	139.5 runs/min +117%
Motorola Edge 30 Pro (Chome 99)	129 runs/min +100%
Xiaomi 12 (Chrome 99.0.4844.58)	107 runs/min +66%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (64.4 - 129.3, n=16)	104 runs/min +62%
Xiaomi Poco F4 GT (MS Edge 102)	64.38 runs/min

WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Motorola Edge 30 Pro (Chrome 99)	167 Points +22%
Average of class Smartphone (38 - 347, n=79, last 2 years)	148.7 Points +9%
Xiaomi 12 (Chrome 99.0.4844.58)	148 Points +8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (79 - 193, n=15)	142.9 Points +4%
Xiaomi Poco F4 GT (MS Edge 102)	137 Points

Octane V2 - Total Score
Motorola Edge 30 Pro (Chrome 99)	50626 Points +64%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (27730 - 50626, n=17)	42391 Points +37%
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=205, last 2 years)	37643 Points +22%
Xiaomi 12 (Chrome 99.0.4844.58)	37279 Points +21%
Xiaomi Poco F4 GT (MS Edge 102)	30884 Points

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=163, last 2 years)	1551 ms * -17%
Xiaomi Poco F4 GT (MS Edge 102)	1323.4 ms *
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (814 - 1440, n=16)	1010 ms * +24%
Xiaomi 12 (Chrome 99.0.4844.58)	930 ms * +30%
Motorola Edge 30 Pro (Chrome 99)	819 ms * +38%

* ... smaller is better

Poco F4 GT使用非常快的UFS 3.1存储，在AndroBench中达到了良好的成绩。与华硕ROG手机5s相比，其写入速度特别快。华硕ROG手机5s，这至少可以部分归功于较新的内存控制器的骁龙8代1.

	Xiaomi Poco F4 GT	Nubia RedMagic 7	Asus ROG Phone 5s	Xiaomi 12	Motorola Edge 30 Pro	Average 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	Average of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5		-16%	-22%	-2%	-18%	-18%	-12%
Sequential Read 256KB	1832.34	1750 -4%	1972 8%	1851 1%	1832 0%	1749 ?(950 - 2037, n=101) -5%	1863 ?(226 - 4512, n=194, last 2 years) 2%
Sequential Write 256KB	1482.42	1260 -15%	770 -48%	1417 -4%	1028 -31%	1163 ?(452 - 2004, n=101) -22%	1446 ?(57.5 - 3908, n=194, last 2 years) -2%
Random Read 4KB	328.58	306.2 -7%	297.8 -9%	325.2 -1%	277.7 -15%	286 ?(173.5 - 543, n=101) -13%	278 ?(22.2 - 483, n=194, last 2 years) -15%
Random Write 4KB	457.69	282.5 -38%	287.2 -37%	437.5 -4%	339.5 -26%	319 ?(132.1 - 499, n=102) -30%	309 ?(9.4 - 753, n=194, last 2 years) -32%

游戏--Poco F4 GT，120 FPS

快速的响应时间，120赫兹的高刷新率，以及高达480赫兹的采样率，加上 Adreno 730承诺了一个伟大的游戏体验。侧面的游戏麦克风确保在横向模式下能清晰地捕捉到声音。

图形性能足够高，在UHD设置下，PUBG手机的帧数稳定在40帧。即使在降低质量设置下，我们也没有遇到任何帧率下降。在较低的细节设置（高清预设）下，我们记录了最高60 FPS。各种命令可以分配给由弹性硅胶制成的磁性弹出式触发器，类似于游戏控制器的触发器。这对腾讯游戏的射击游戏来说非常有用。即使在日常使用中，也可以为额外的按钮分配几个快捷键，如手电筒功能，以便在正常使用中更加舒适。

此外，我们使用GameBench应用程序来看看Play Store中要求不高的游戏。在很短的时间内，Armajet 可以在接近120-Hz面板原生刷新率的高图形设置下玩。然而，我们在玩竞技场射击游戏时遇到了明显的帧率下降，导致平均帧率只有90 FPS。

Xiaomi Poco F4 GT; Armajet: Ø90.2 (59-120)

Xiaomi Poco F4 GT; PUBG Mobile; Smooth: Ø59 (51-61)

Xiaomi Poco F4 GT; PUBG Mobile; Balanced: Ø59 (54-61)

Xiaomi Poco F4 GT; PUBG Mobile; HD: Ø58.9 (45-61)

Xiaomi Poco F4 GT; PUBG Mobile; Ultra HD: Ø39.7 (28-41)

排放--小米智能手机散热良好

温度

小米吹嘘Poco F4 GT的LiquidCool技术3.0，其中包括两个不锈钢蒸汽室与3D石墨层相结合，以确保从内部到外部的有效热传导。不同于努比亚RedMagic 7，Poco手机没有配备主动式风扇。

不幸的是，在日常使用中，改进的LiquidCool技术并不明显，因为热量的发展导致高通SoC的性能大大降低。然而，即使在负载下，机箱的表面温度也不会太高。

尽管F4 GT完成了GFX基准测试的压力测试，其中包括连续运行30次OpenGL ES 3.1场景，但无法读出结果。随后，Poco F4 GT必须在3DMark压力测试中证明自己。该骁龙8代1在两个测试场景中都迅速节流了约50%，代表着性能的大量下降。因此，不能排除在长期日常使用高要求的应用程序时帧率下降的可能性。

Max. Load

Idle


36.6 °C	36.7 °C	34.9 °C
37.1 °C	35.5 °C	34.8 °C
36.1 °C	36.2 °C	34.3 °C

Maximum: 37.1 °C
Average: 35.8 °C


34.4 °C	34.7 °C	36.8 °C
32.9 °C	34.6 °C	36.6 °C
31.6 °C	33.6 °C	36.2 °C

Maximum: 36.8 °C
Average: 34.6 °C

Power Supply (max.) 28 °C | Room Temperature 22 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 35.8 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 37.1 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 36.8 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.9 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Asus ROG Phone 5s Adreno 660, SD 888+ 5G, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	89.3 (31^min) % +77%
Nubia RedMagic 7 Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	86.3 (52^min) % +71%
Nubia RedMagic 7 Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	79 (47.5^min) % +57%
Motorola Edge 30 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	57.4 (34.3^min) % +14%
Xiaomi Poco F4 GT Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	50.4 (27.7^min) %
Xiaomi 12 Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	46.3 (27.5^min) % -8%
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Nubia RedMagic 7 Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	91.5 (14.3^min) % +98%
Asus ROG Phone 5s Adreno 660, SD 888+ 5G, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	89.1 (8.14^min) % +93%
Motorola Edge 30 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	59.6 (9.21^min) % +29%
Xiaomi Poco F4 GT Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	46.2 (7.07^min) %
Xiaomi 12 Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	% -100%

Xiaomi Poco F4 GT Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.9.1: Ø9.07 (7.07-15.3)

Nubia RedMagic 7 Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; active fan: Ø15.1 (14.3-15.6)

Asus ROG Phone 5s Adreno 660, SD 888+ 5G, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.5.1: Ø8.57 (8.14-9.14)

Motorola Edge 30 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.8.1: Ø10.9 (9.21-15.5)

Xiaomi Poco F4 GT Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø30.1 (27.7-54.9)

Nubia RedMagic 7 Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; active fan: Ø56.7 (52-60.2)

Nubia RedMagic 7 Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; inactive fan: Ø54.3 (47.5-60.2)

Asus ROG Phone 5s Adreno 660, SD 888+ 5G, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø32.8 (31-34.7)

Xiaomi 12 Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø35.6 (27.5-59.4)

Motorola Edge 30 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø38.6 (34.3-59.7)

Nubia RedMagic 7 Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability; active fan: Ø60.6 (59.9-60.9)

Asus ROG Phone 5s Adreno 660, SD 888+ 5G, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability: Ø33.9 (32-35.4)

发言人

Poco F4 GT的立体声扬声器设置有两个独立的高音扬声器和两个低音扬声器，使得立体声效果非常好。我们对声音的整体效果也很满意，尽管低频有些单薄，而且与相对线性的中音相比，高音略有下降。

有线耳机或外部扬声器可以通过USB type-C端口连接。音频编解码器SBC、AAC、aptX、aptXHD和aptX自适应以及LDAC和LHDC可供那些喜欢使用蓝牙进行无线音频输出的用户使用。

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Xiaomi Poco F4 GT audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 16.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.1% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.1% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 10% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 83% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 30% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 62% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Nubia RedMagic 7 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (91.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.9% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.8% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.9% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 19% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 71% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 40% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 52% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电池寿命--带快速充电的Poco F4 GT

能源消耗

Poco智能手机的双芯电池容量为4700毫安，支持小米自己的快充技术，功率高达120瓦。我们很高兴地发现，游戏手机已经附带了一个合适的充电器，总充电时间不到20分钟。在游戏时，完全为电池充电大约需要30分钟。为了延长电池寿命，Poco F4 GT在夜间充电时可以检测到。然后，充电过程在80%时中断，并在计算的唤醒时间之前继续。Poco F4 GT不支持无线充电。

总体能耗与小米手机相似。小米12.有趣的是，与小米手机相比，小米手机的峰值消耗要低得多。摩托罗拉Edge 30 Pro.

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.05 / 0.19 Watt
Idle	1 / 1.53 / 1.57 Watt
Load	4.39 / 8.1 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Xiaomi Poco F4 GT 4700 mAh	Xiaomi 12 4500 mAh	Motorola Edge 30 Pro 4800 mAh	Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1	Average of class Smartphone
Power Consumption		-2%	-26%	-26%	-11%
Idle Minimum *	1	0.87 13%	1.2 -20%	1.255 ?(0.7 - 3.18, n=15) -26%	0.885 ?(0.4 - 2.37, n=159, last 2 years) 11%
Idle Average *	1.53	1.7 -11%	1.6 -5%	2.02 ?(1.04 - 4.38, n=15) -32%	1.451 ?(0.6 - 4.26, n=159, last 2 years) 5%
Idle Maximum *	1.57	1.82 -16%	2.5 -59%	2.21 ?(1.15 - 4.45, n=15) -41%	1.608 ?(0.83 - 4.45, n=159, last 2 years) -2%
Load Average *	4.39	4.68 -7%	5.2 -18%	5.49 ?(3.58 - 8.04, n=15) -25%	6.55 ?(2.3 - 16.5, n=154, last 2 years) -49%
Load Maximum *	8.1	7.41 9%	10.4 -28%	8.75 ?(6.67 - 11.3, n=15) -8%	9.92 ?(3.53 - 20.8, n=154, last 2 years) -22%

* ... smaller is better

Energy Consumption: Geekbench (150 nits)

Xiaomi Poco F4 GT Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1: Ø6.97 (1.137-14)

Motorola Edge 30 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1: Ø7.11 (1.702-12.6)

Energy Consumption: GFXBench (150 nits)

Xiaomi Poco F4 GT Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø13 (12.3-13.9)

Motorola Edge 30 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø11.5 (10.4-12.5)

Xiaomi Poco F4 GT Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.211 (0.976-1.435)

Motorola Edge 30 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.619 (1.378-2.67)

电池寿命

虽然我们的测试模型在电池寿命方面达到了坚实的结果，但我们比较的其他设备往往比Poco F4 GT的时间略长。为了进行有意义的比较，我们在150尼特的亮度水平下比较了运行时间。在刷新率为120赫兹的情况下，小米手机在我们的Wi-Fi测试中持续了近12.5小时，在我们的视频测试中持续了超过16.5小时。相比之下，最大亮度下的负载运行时间相对较差。

Battery Runtime

Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)		26h 02min
WiFi Websurfing		12h 27min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		16h 32min
Load (maximum brightness)		3h 9min

	Xiaomi Poco F4 GT 4700 mAh	Nubia RedMagic 7 4500 mAh	Asus ROG Phone 5s 6000 mAh	Xiaomi 12 4500 mAh	Motorola Edge 30 Pro 4800 mAh
Battery Runtime		-11%	-2%	40%	25%
Reader / Idle	1562			2558 64%	1985 27%
H.264	992			890 -10%	1006 1%
WiFi v1.3	747	667 -11%	734 -2%	760 2%	816 9%
Load	189			385 104%	306 62%

Pros

+ 明亮的120-Hz OLED显示屏

+ 精确的GPS

+ 快速的Wi-Fi

+ 快速的性能

+ 优秀的振动马达

+ 游戏功能（RGB LED，触发器）

Cons

- 没有OIS

- 发热量大

- 对于一款游戏智能手机来说，有大量的节流现象

- 没有IP认证

- USB 2.0

- 没有保证更新期

对小米Poco F4 GT的评判

尽管Poco F4 GT是一款伟大的智能手机，但它在游戏部门落后于竞争对手。不像努比亚RedMagic 7和华硕ROG手机5s分别具有一个集成的和一个可附加的风扇，而Poco F4 GT不得不使用传统的蒸气室。除了表面温度高之外，这也导致了性能不稳定和节流的问题。骁龙8代以及负载时的低运行时间。正如我们的游戏测试所显示的，这在HFR游戏中可能成为一个问题--在这里，华硕ROG手机5在这里，华硕ROG手机5在帧率超过100FPs时表现得更加稳定。

Poco F4 GT是一款价格便宜的智能手机。我们非常高兴看到小米手机附带的120W充电器。

然而，我们对Poco F4 GT作为一款 "普通 "中档手机的评价明显更好。尽管有节流现象，但它以600美元左右的价格提供了大量的性能，快速的存储，以及出色的扬声器系统。由于OLED面板的快速响应时间和120赫兹的快速刷新率，小米智能手机及其触发器仍然能带来愉快的游戏体验，尽管有上述限制。

价格和可用性

Poco F4 GT的建议售价为605美元，例如在Amazon.com上。.

Xiaomi Poco F4 GT - 08/30/2022 v7 ^(old)
Marcus Herbrich

Chassis

86%

Keyboard

67 / 75 → 89%

Pointing Device

96%

Connectivity

54 / 70 → 77%

Weight

88%

Battery

90%

Display

92%

Games Performance

57 / 64 → 89%

Application Performance

88 / 86 → 100%

Temperature

92%

Noise

100%

Audio

74 / 90 → 82%

Camera

62%

Average

80%

86%

Smartphone - Weighted Average

Price comparison

Editor of the original article: Marius Schell - Tech Writer and translator - 398 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2020

contact me via: LinkedIn

Translator: Ninh Ngoc Duy - Editorial Assistant - 463597 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008

contact me via: Facebook

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 小米Poco F4 GT评测--具有旗舰功能的平价游戏智能手机

Marcus Herbrich, 2022-06-26 (Update: 2024-08-15)

潜在的竞争对手比较

案例 - 带有RGB LED的小米智能手机

尺寸比较

连接性 - 带有UFS存储的Poco F4 GT

软件 - 小米手机与Android 12

通信和GNSS - Poco F4 GT with Wi-Fi 6E

电话和通话质量 - 小米双卡智能手机

摄像机 - Poco F4 GT与Tripe摄像机

配件和保修 - 小米智能手机与120W充电器

输入设备和处理 - Poco F4 GT with 480 Hz

显示器 - 小米智能手机采用OLED面板

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Display Response Times

性能 - 配备高通SoC的Poco F4 GT

游戏--Poco F4 GT，120 FPS

排放--小米智能手机散热良好

温度

3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

发言人

Xiaomi Poco F4 GT audio analysis

Nubia RedMagic 7 audio analysis

电池寿命--带快速充电的Poco F4 GT

能源消耗

Energy Consumption: Geekbench (150 nits)

Energy Consumption: GFXBench (150 nits)

电池寿命

Pros

Cons

对小米Poco F4 GT的评判

价格和可用性

More articles related to this device

Price comparison