Notebookcheck Logo

华为 Pura 70 Ultra 评测--功能强大的智能手机，配备杀手级摄像头，但也有局限性

快乐？

华为重新命名了其 P 系列，新机型被称为 Pura，但除此之外，其总体概念并无太大变化。华为再次成功地在其高端智能手机中集成了业界领先的摄像头，而且在解决谷歌服务中众所周知的问题方面做得越来越好。更多详情，请参阅我们的评测。
Android Smartphone Touchscreen
(照片：Alexander Wätzel）

在中国，华为新推出的 Pura 70 系列包括四款智能手机，每款手机都有不同的存储配置：Pura 70、Pura 70 Pro、Pura 70 Pro+ 和 Pura 70 Ultra。在美国，这些手机不能直接购买，因此如果您想使用它们，就必须进口。下表考虑了所有可用型号，其中在欧洲（本次测试在欧洲进行）可用的型号以粗体标出。

Pura 70 Pura 70 Pro Pura 70 Pro+ Pura 70 Ultra
显示屏 6.6 英寸 OLED
2760 x 1256 像素
1-120 Hz LTPO
1440 Hz PWM		 6.8 英寸 OLED
2844 x 1260 像素
1-120 Hz LTPO
1440 Hz PWM		 6.8 英寸 OLED
2844 x 1260 像素
1-120 Hz LTPO
1440 Hz PWM		 6.8 英寸 OLED
2844 x 1260 像素
1-120 Hz LTPO
1440 Hz PWM
主摄像头 50 MPix, f/1.4-f/4.0, 1/1.3", OIS 50 MPix, f/1.4-f/4.0, 1/1.3", OIS 50 MPix, f/1.4-f/4.0, 1/1.3", OIS 50 MPix, f/1.6-f/4.0, 1", Sensor Shift OIS
超广角 1300 万像素，f/2.2 1250 万像素，f/2.2 1250 万像素，f/2.2 4000 万像素，f/2.2
光学变焦 1200 万像素，长焦，125 毫米，f/3.4，OIS 4800 万像素，长焦，92.5 毫米，f/2.1，OIS 4800 万像素，长焦，92.5 毫米，f/2.1，OIS 5000 万像素，长焦，95 毫米，f/2.1，OIS
前置摄像头 1300 万像素，f/2.4，FF 1300 万像素，f/2.4，自动对焦 1300 万像素，f/2.4，自动对焦 1300 万像素，f/2.4，自动对焦
SoC Kirin 9000S1 Kirin 9010 Kirin 9010 Kirin 9010
存储 12 GB RAM
256GB / 512 GB / 1 TB UFS		 12 GB RAM
256 GB /512GB / 1 TB UFS		 16 GB RAM
512 GB / 1 TB UFS		 16 GB RAM
512 GB / 1 TB UFS
电池 4900 mAh 5050 mAh 5050 mAh 5200 mAh
快速充电 66 瓦 100 瓦 100 瓦 100 瓦
无线充电 50 瓦 80 瓦 80 瓦 80 瓦
认证 IP68 IP68 IP68 IP68
重量 207 克 220 克 220 克 226 克
价格 999 欧元 1199 欧元 - 1499 欧元

华为继续依赖自己的 SoC，而且由于法律原因，它在中国以外的地区又不得不没有 5G 和卫星 SOS 系统。华为智能手机也没有预装谷歌服务和相关应用程序。

Pura 70 Ultra 是该系列手机的先驱，它的摄像头设置给人留下了深刻印象，该摄像头依赖于一个带有可伸缩镜头的 1 英寸主传感器。但它的其他镜头也拥有强大的规格。

在这篇评测中，您将了解华为 Pura 70 Ultra 与竞争对手的比较，以及这款手机是否值得您花钱购买。

Huawei Pura 70 Ultra (Pura 70 Series)
Processor
HiSilicon Kirin 9010 12 x 1.6 - 2.3 GHz, HiSilicon Main-II, Mid, Cortex A510
Graphics adapter
HiSilicon Maleoon 910, Core: 750 MHz
Memory
16 GB 
Display
6.80 inch 20:9, 2844 x 1260 pixel 457 PPI, Capacitive, OLED, X-True Display, Kunlun Glass, LTPO 1-120 Hz, 1440 Hz PWM-Dimming, 300 Hz Touch Sampling Rate, glossy: yes, HDR, 120 Hz
Storage
1 TB UFS 3.1 Flash, 1024 GB 
, 512GB / 1TB, 1000.93 GB free
Connections
1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: USB-C, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Sensors: accelerometer, proximity, gyro, compass, color spectrum, OTG, IR-Blaster, NearLink
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.2, GSM, CDMA, UMTS, LTE, 5G, Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 8.4 x 162.6 x 75.1
Battery
5200 mAh Lithium-Polymer, wired charging: up to 100 W, wireless charging: up to 80 W
Charging
wireless charging, fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 12
Camera
Primary Camera: 50 MPix (23mm) + 50MP (3.5x optical zoom, f/2.1, 90mm) + 40MP (f/2.2, 13mm)
Secondary Camera: 13 MPix f/2.4
Additional features
Speakers: Dual, Keyboard: OnScreen, 100W-Charger, USB-Cabel, Case, SIM-Tool, EMUI 14.2, 24 Months Warranty, SAR: ?; GNSS: GPS (L1, L5), Glonass (L1), BeiDou (B1, B1C, B2a, B2b), Galileo (E1, E5a, E5b), QZSS (L1, L5), NavIC, SBAS; Bluetooth Audio Codecs: SBC, AAC, L2HC, LDAC; HDR: HLG, HDR10, HDR Vivid; IP68, fanless, waterproof
Weight
226 g, Power Supply: 163 g
Price
1499 Euro
Links
Huawei homepage
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

潜在的竞争对手比较

Version
Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Price
v881.8 %
07 / 2024
Huawei Pura 70 Ultra
Kirin 9010, Maleoon 910		226 g1 TB UFS 3.1 Flash6.80"2844x1260
v7 (old)91.1 %
v7 (old)
12 / 2023
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
A17 Pro, A17 Pro GPU		221 g256 GB NVMe6.70"2796x1290
v7 (old)90.6 %
v7 (old)
05 / 2024
Honor Magic6 Pro
SD 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750		229 g512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash6.80"2800x1280
v7 (old)91.1 %
v7 (old)
05 / 2024
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750		232 g256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash6.80"3120x1440
v7 (old)89 %
v7 (old)
12 / 2023
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7		213 g128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.70"2992x1344
v7 (old)89.2 %
v7 (old)
04 / 2024
Xiaomi 14 Ultra
SD 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750		219.8 g512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash6.73"3200x1440

请注意：我们更新了评级系统，第 8 版的结果与第 7 版的结果不可比。更多信息 请点击此处.

案例 - Pura 70 Ultra 采用昆仑玻璃

华为 Pura 70 Ultra 有三种颜色：绿色、棕色和黑色。前者是我们的测试设备。它的背面由结构性人造皮革制成，可确保良好的触感和握持感。显示屏由第二代昆仑玻璃保护，据称防碎防刮性能更好。这两个元素均由高光铝框包围。

华为表示该机厚度为 8.4 毫米，而我们测量的厚度为 8.9 毫米。加上相机模块后，厚度增加到 14.65 毫米。即便如此，Pura 70 Ultra 也不会显得太重，拿在手里感觉很平衡。

华为智能手机的制造质量很好。所有缝隙都紧密均匀地贴合在一起，SIM 卡槽盖也与边框齐平。Pura 70 Ultra 成功地抵御了扭转尝试，仅发出极小的嘎吱声。

出厂时贴在显示屏上的保护膜提供了额外的保护，但我们的测试设备在使用很短的时间后就在边角处出现了气泡。这款智能手机还符合 IP68 防水和防尘标准。

(照片：丹尼尔-施密特）
(照片：丹尼尔-施密特）
(照片：丹尼尔-施密特）
(照片：丹尼尔-施密特）
(照片：丹尼尔-施密特）
缩回的相机（摄影：丹尼尔-施密特）
加长相机（摄影：丹尼尔-施密特）
光圈 f/1.6（摄影：Daniel Schmidt）
光圈 f/2.0（摄影：Daniel Schmidt）
光圈 f/2.8（摄影：Daniel Schmidt）
光圈 f/4.0（摄影：Daniel Schmidt）

尺寸比较

❌
162.5 mm 75.8 mm 8.9 mm 229 g162.6 mm 76.5 mm 8.8 mm 213 g162.6 mm 75.1 mm 8.4 mm 226 g162.3 mm 79 mm 8.6 mm 232 g161.4 mm 75.3 mm 9.2 mm 219.8 g159.9 mm 76.7 mm 8.25 mm 221 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g

可持续性 - 华为提供的信息不多

到目前为止，还没有关于华为 Pura 70 Ultra 生产过程中二氧化碳排放量的确切信息。制造商也没有公布所用回收材料的比例。

不过，外包装主要由纸板制成，据说来自可持续林业。遗憾的是，这些纸板是用塑料收缩包装的。

在测试时也无法购买备件，但华为确实在其网站和 "我的华为"应用程序中列出了有缺陷部件的费用。不过，这些都是不在保修范围内的维修指导价。

在更新方面，华为非常节俭，并遵循中国市场的惯例，即两次主要更新和三年安全补丁。在可持续性方面，华为仍有很大的改进空间。

连接性 - 配备 NearLink 的华为智能手机

与 P60 Pro华为 Pura 70 系列不再支持 NanoMemory 存储卡（简称 NM 卡）。不过，华为 Pura 70 系列新加入了近距离无线技术（NearLink），该技术也被用于该制造商的平板电脑中。

USB 3.2 端口（Gen.1）可以快速传输数据，在我们的复制测试中达到了 269.98 MB/s。该接口还支持 OTG 和有线图像输出。对于后者，可以镜像显示内容或使用桌面模式。连接的数据载体可使用 FAT、FAT32、exFAT 或 NTFS 格式化。

此外，还集成了红外发射器、NFC 和蓝牙 5.2。

顶部：红外热像仪、麦克风
顶部：红外热像仪、麦克风
左侧
左侧
右：音量、功率
右：音量、功率
底部：扬声器、USB、麦克风、SIM 卡
底部：扬声器、USB、麦克风、SIM 卡

软件 - EMUI 14.2，提供短期更新服务

华为 Pura 70 Ultra 使用基于 OpenAndroid 12 的 EMUI 14.2 操作系统。在测试时，其最新的安全补丁是 2024 年 5 月的，因此仍然是最新的。不过，这款手机只进行了两次版本升级，因此并不完全清楚华为认为的新版本是什么，因为Android 12 现在已经快三年了。HarmonyOS Next 也是一个全新的操作系统，已经发布（我们曾报道过）。我们报道过)，但目前还没有可靠的信息。安全补丁只能使用三年。从价格上看，这个期限很短。

华为预装了大量来自第三方应用程序的快捷方式。这些快捷方式可以移除，但由于数量太多，需要花费一些时间。AppGallery 可用于安装应用程序；另外，也可以通过花瓣搜索直接从网上安装 APK，不过这样做会增加安全风险。如果您不想没有谷歌应用程序，我们在的详细指南 中介绍了如何在华为智能手机上设置谷歌服务和应用程序。

主屏幕
预装了大量应用程序快捷方式。
桌面模式

通信和全球导航卫星系统 - 没有 5G 只有 Wi-Fi 6

华为 Pura 70 Ultra 支持 2.4 和 5.0 GHz Wi-Fi 6。这意味着您将不得不放弃 Wi-Fi 6E 或 Wi-Fi 7 等快速标准。与我们的参考路由器华硕 ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000 配合使用时，华为智能手机可能实现了稳定的数据传输速率，但比通常的标准稍慢。

由于对华为的贸易限制，该设备的全球版本没有 5G 接收功能。而且也不支持中国的卫星 SOS 系统。取而代之的是 LTE。在我们使用德国电信网络进行的连接测试中，速度并不是特别快，只有 125 MBit/s（下载）。作为比较，我们测试了 Galaxy S24在 LTE 网络中的速度为 191 MBit/s，在 5G 网络中的速度为 702 MBit/s。我们没有发现 Pura 70 Ultra 的接收能力有任何限制。

Networking
Huawei Pura 70 Ultra
iperf3 receive AXE11000
795 (min: 677) MBit/s ∼89%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
781 (min: 710) MBit/s ∼84%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
iperf3 receive AXE11000
810 (min: 793) MBit/s ∼90%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
931 (min: 893) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1534 (min: 1415) MBit/s ∼85%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1345 (min: 1298) MBit/s ∼90%
Honor Magic6 Pro
iperf3 receive AXE11000
806 (min: 404) MBit/s ∼90%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
904 (min: 308) MBit/s ∼97%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
iperf3 receive AXE11000
801 (min: 397) MBit/s ∼89%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
556 (min: 253) MBit/s ∼60%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1553 (min: 815) MBit/s ∼86%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1461 (min: 1284) MBit/s ∼98%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
iperf3 receive AXE11000
897 (min: 870) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
892 (min: 333) MBit/s ∼96%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1468 (min: 1069) MBit/s ∼81%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1467 (min: 1304) MBit/s ∼98%
Xiaomi 14 Ultra
iperf3 receive AXE11000
797 (min: 400) MBit/s ∼89%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
928 (min: 642) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1814 (min: 939) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1495 (min: 1227) MBit/s ∼100%
Average of class Smartphone
iperf3 receive AXE11000
714 (min: 34.8) MBit/s ∼80%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
729 (min: 40.5) MBit/s ∼78%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1451 (min: 229) MBit/s ∼80%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1368 (min: 668) MBit/s ∼92%
095190285380475570665760855950104511401235133014251520161517101805Tooltip
Xiaomi 14 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Qualcomm Adreno 750; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1782 (939-1885)
Xiaomi 14 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Qualcomm Adreno 750; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1494 (1227-1540)
Huawei Pura 70 Ultra HiSilicon Kirin 9010, HiSilicon Maleoon 910; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø794 (677-845)
Xiaomi 14 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Qualcomm Adreno 750; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø783 (400-815)
Huawei Pura 70 Ultra HiSilicon Kirin 9010, HiSilicon Maleoon 910; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø781 (710-817)
Xiaomi 14 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Qualcomm Adreno 750; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø928 (642-987)
GPS 测试：户外
室外
GPS 测试：室内
室内

Pura 70 Ultra 支持多达四个频段的卫星连接。这使手机即使在室内也能快速定位用户，不过需要几秒钟才能确定准确位置。

在一次自行车旅行中，我们将华为智能手机与 Garmin Venu 2 进行了比较。Ultra 比健身智能手表更准确地显示了我们的位置，但它检索位置的频率较低，使曲线看起来更有棱角。总之，它的定位性能非常出色。

全球导航卫星系统测试自行车骑行：环湖之旅
全球导航卫星系统测试自行车骑行：环湖之旅
全球导航卫星系统测试自行车骑行：转折点
全球导航卫星系统测试自行车骑行：转折点
全球导航卫星系统测试自行车骑行：总结
全球导航卫星系统测试自行车骑行：总结

电话功能和通话质量

华为 Pura 70 Ultra 支持双卡双待，但只能使用两个 nano-SIM 卡。不支持 eSIM 卡。此外还支持 VoLTE 和 Wi-Fi 通话等功能。

将手机放在耳边时，声音能很好地传输到智能手机上，即使在嘈杂的环境中也能有效过滤背景噪音。使用扬声器时，用户听起来有点闷，但除此之外，它非常适合通话。

相机 - Pura 70 Ultra 配备功能强大的相机

在 Pura 70 Ultra 上自拍
在 Pura 70 Ultra 上自拍

华为 Pura 70 Ultra 的前置摄像头具有自动对焦和眼动追踪功能，此外还可以使用大量特效以及带有美颜滤镜的人像模式。它可以录制最高 60fps 的超高清视频。自拍照的色彩看起来漂亮而均衡，照片也很清晰--在弱光环境下，一些噪点很快就会出现。

亮点在设备背面，因为华为首次使用了 1 英寸传感器。它的镜头可以自动扩展。这样做的目的是增加镜片与传感器之间的距离，使更多光线能够照射到传感器上。此外，华为还再次提供了可变光圈，可自动调节四个阶段的曝光，但也可以手动控制。传感器偏移 OIS 用于图像稳定。

Pura 70 Ultra 在日光下拍摄的照片各方面都很出色。相机对照片的锐化程度不高，白平衡也比较温暖。它的动态范围也很宽，但这是以牺牲一些细节为代价的。在弱光环境下使用自动曝光模式时，华为智能手机会尽可能降低快门速度。如果您需要更多细节，并且面前有固定的拍摄对象，最好使用手动 夜景 模式。

顺便提一下，华为并不总是依赖经典的像素分级方法。如果环境光线充足，它可以生成 2540 万像素的图像；只有在弱光环境下，它才会自动将四个像素合并为一个超级像素，从而生成 1250 万像素的照片。不过，如果您愿意，也可以手动使用 50 万像素模式。专业模式下也可使用 RAW 格式。

自动夜间模式（左）与手动夜间模式对比

超广角摄像头也使用了高分辨率传感器，并承诺可以呈现高水平的细节，但在日常使用中却无法完全证实这一点。图像看起来略显模糊，尤其是外围区域。潜望镜变焦提供 3.5 倍光学放大率，数字放大率可达 100 倍；还使用了微距功能（最小距离 5 厘米），这使得手机的摄像头设置非常灵活。不过，它的变焦质量还不够理想，应该能生成结构更精细的图像。

10 倍变焦
10 倍变焦
100 倍变焦
100 倍变焦

Pura 70 Ultra 能以高达 60fps 的速度录制最高 2160p 的视频。不过，这只能在 16:9 的格式下实现，想要使用 21:9 格式的用户只能使用全高清（30/60fps）。不过，与许多竞争对手不同的是，宽屏格式是以全分辨率（2,560 x 1,080 像素）录制的。视频质量非常好，甚至还能以 HDR Vivid 格式录制，但只能以 30fps 的速度录制。到目前为止，HDR Vivid 还不是很普及。

模式 高宽比 分辨率
照片 全屏、1:1、4:3 12.5 / 25.4 MPix
专业版 全屏、1:1、4:3 12.5 / 50 MPix
高分辨率 4:3 50 MPix
视频 全屏、16:9、21:9 高清 (30/60fps)、全高清 (30/60fps)、超高清 (30/60fps)

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Main cameraMain cameraUltra-wide angle5x zoomLow light

在可控的照明条件下，Pura 7 Ultra 能够非常均衡地捕捉我们的测试图表，图像边缘的细节也非常清晰。在弱光环境下（1 勒克斯），被摄体明显变亮，色彩也很均衡，但细节却因此大打折扣。

色彩表现明显变亮，但只有绿色、红色和青色的 DeltaE 偏差较大。

ColorChecker
11.9 ∆E
8.4 ∆E
9.5 ∆E
11.4 ∆E
8.3 ∆E
9.1 ∆E
7.9 ∆E
9.4 ∆E
9.2 ∆E
2.1 ∆E
7.3 ∆E
5.4 ∆E
7.3 ∆E
13.1 ∆E
12.6 ∆E
4.4 ∆E
9.6 ∆E
17.1 ∆E
6.9 ∆E
4.4 ∆E
10.5 ∆E
13.1 ∆E
7.6 ∆E
3.3 ∆E
ColorChecker Huawei Pura 70 Ultra: 8.75 ∆E min: 2.06 - max: 17.12 ∆E
ColorChecker
14.8 ∆E
14.7 ∆E
16 ∆E
17 ∆E
17.9 ∆E
19.1 ∆E
17.4 ∆E
10 ∆E
13.7 ∆E
15 ∆E
16.8 ∆E
19.8 ∆E
10.6 ∆E
17.9 ∆E
9.5 ∆E
17.7 ∆E
15.3 ∆E
17.6 ∆E
22.7 ∆E
18.5 ∆E
17.4 ∆E
21 ∆E
16.2 ∆E
10.7 ∆E
ColorChecker Huawei Pura 70 Ultra: 16.14 ∆E min: 9.54 - max: 22.71 ∆E

配件和保修 - 12 个月保修的华为手机

供货范围包括电源和外壳。(照片：丹尼尔-施密特）
交货范围包括电源和机箱。

华为 Pura 70 Ultra 的供货范围相对较广。除智能手机外，购买者还将获得一个模块化的 100 瓦电源适配器，该适配器提供 USB Type-C 和 Type-A 接口，但一次只能为一台设备供电。此外，还包括一个保护盖、一个 SIM 卡工具和一条 USB-C 数据线。

这款顶级华为智能手机享有标准的本地保修服务，保修期取决于您购买手机的地点。

输入设备和操作 - Pura 70 Ultra 配备光学指纹传感器

华为 Pura 70 Ultra 的电容式触摸屏采样率为 300 Hz，显示效果漂亮流畅，触摸响应可靠准确。如果您认为该手机的 NearLink 集成还包括对输入笔的支持，那您就会失望了。

显示屏中集成了光学指纹传感器，以确保生物识别的安全性--它能快速、准确地识别保存的指纹。此外，也可以通过前置摄像头进行安全性较低的面部识别，效果也很好。3D 人脸识别仍是 Mate 系列的专利。

线性振动电机可提供微妙的触觉反馈。指关节手势、单手模式和高级模式再次登场。

显示屏 - Pura 70 Ultra 采用 LTPO-OLED 技术，频率高达 120 赫兹

子像素阵列
子像素阵列

华为 Pura 70 Ultra 的 OLED 显示屏对角线尺寸为 6.8 英寸（17.27 厘米，110.5 平方厘米），采用先进的全高清分辨率，使内容看起来锐利无比。由于采用了集成的 LTPO 技术，其刷新率可根据显示的内容进行动态调整，范围在 1 到 120 Hz 之间。

在显示全白屏幕并启动环境光传感器时，我们注意到屏幕中央的亮度为 1,095 cd/m²。在播放 YouTube 上的 HDR 视频时，我们测得的亮度甚至达到了 2863 cd/m²，比承诺的 2500 nits 高出很多。如果完全手动调节亮度，则可达到 623 cd/m²。

与所有 OLED 面板一样，Pura 70 Ultra 也无法避免这种技术特有的屏幕闪烁现象。不过，由于华为采用了高达 1,440 Hz 的高频 PWM 调光技术，因此不会对眼睛造成太大伤害。在最低显示亮度下，我们测得的频率为 1,351 Hz，但也有振幅较高的低频闪烁（363 Hz）。因此，该面板对眼睛的影响相对较小，但也不能完全排除敏感人群会感到不适。

1089
cd/m²		1100
cd/m²		1083
cd/m²
1095
cd/m²		1095
cd/m²		1077
cd/m²
1121
cd/m²		1104
cd/m²		1086
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 1121 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 1094.4 cd/m² Minimum: 1.84 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 96 %
Center on Battery: 1095 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.1 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 2.3 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
99.8% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.28
Huawei Pura 70 Ultra
OLED, 2844x1260, 6.8"		Huawei P60 Pro
OLED, 2700x1220, 6.7"		Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
OLED, 2796x1290, 6.7"		Honor Magic6 Pro
OLED, 2800x1280, 6.8"		Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Dynamic AMOLED 2X, 3120x1440, 6.8"		Google Pixel 8 Pro
OLED, 2992x1344, 6.7"		Xiaomi 14 Ultra
AMOLED, 3200x1440, 6.7"
Screen
-9%
1%
-8%
-49%
6%
-13%
Brightness middle
1095
1188
8%
1102
1%
1575
44%
1317
20%
1510
38%
997
-9%
Brightness
1094
1189
9%
1102
1%
1508
38%
1365
25%
1467
34%
1002
-8%
Brightness Distribution
96
98
2%
98
2%
89
-7%
94
-2%
92
-4%
96
0%
Black Level *
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
1.1
1.3
-18%
1.1
-0%
1.7
-55%
3.4
-209%
1.1
-0%
1.6
-45%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
2.4
3.7
-54%
3.1
-29%
3.9
-63%
5
-108%
3.8
-58%
3.3
-38%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
2.3
2.3
-0%
1.6
30%
2.4
-4%
2.8
-22%
1.7
26%
1.8
22%
Gamma
2.28 96%
2.23 99%
2.19 100%
2.22 99%
2 110%
2.23 99%
2.19 100%
CCT
6500 100%
6561 99%
6555 99%
6398 102%
6458 101%
6670 97%
6493 100%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 363 Hz
Amplitude: 21.43 %

The display backlight flickers at 363 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 363 Hz is relatively high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. However, there are reports that some users are still sensitive to PWM at 500 Hz and above, so be aware.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8746 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

最低显示亮度
分钟
25 % 显示屏亮度
25 %
显示屏亮度为 50
50 %
75 % 显示亮度
75 %
最大手动显示亮度
100 %

固定缩放级别和不同亮度设置下的测量系列（最低亮度下的振幅曲线看起来很平，但这是缩放造成的。信息框显示的是最小亮度下的振幅放大图）。

我们使用 Calman 来检查手机显示屏上色彩还原的准确度。Pura 70 Ultra 一直保持良好的效果，偏差极小，肉眼无法看到。

灰度（配置文件：正常，白平衡：标准，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
灰度（配置文件：正常，白平衡：标准，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
色彩（配置文件：正常，白平衡：标准，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
色彩（配置文件：正常，白平衡：标准，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
色彩空间（配置文件：正常，白平衡：标准，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
色彩空间（配置文件：正常，白平衡：标准，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
饱和度（配置文件：正常，白平衡：标准，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
饱和度（配置文件：正常，白平衡：标准，目标色彩空间：sRGB）

Display Response Times

ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
   ↔    Response Time Black to White
0.81 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.426 ms rise
↘ 0.3795 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 1 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
   ↔    Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
1.17 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.545 ms rise
↘ 0.6245 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 3 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

在室外，华为手机的屏幕即使在晴天也依然清晰可辨。如果有的话，一些反光可能会影响您的使用。

华为 Pura 70 Ultra 外置
外
华为 Pura 70 Ultra 外置
外

显示屏的视角稳定性同样出色。从非常平的角度观看时，亮度会略有下降，而且我们注意到有轻微的绿色色调。但在日常使用中，这一点应该不会很明显。

华为 Pura 70 Ultra 的视角稳定性
华为 Pura 70 Ultra 的视角稳定性

性能 - Pura 70 Ultra 使用麒麟 9010

华为 Pura 70 Ultra 采用了该公司自己的 海思麒麟 9010配备 16GB 内存。该处理器拥有 12 个核心，系统性能良好，但在基准测试中明显落后于当前的高端竞争产品。此外，它的人工智能性能相对较低，即使它比 麒麟 9000W.

不过，在日常使用中，该系统的性能还是不错的，运行时没有任何卡顿现象。

Geekbench 6.3 | Geekbench 5.5 | Antutu v10 | PCMark for Android | CrossMark | BaseMark OS II | UL Procyon AI Inference for Android | AI Benchmark | Geekbench ML
Geekbench 6.3
Single-Core
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
Apple A17 Pro, A17 Pro GPU, 8192
2930 Points +103%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
2287 Points +58%
Xiaomi 14 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
2254 Points +56%
Honor Magic6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
2127 Points +47%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 12288
1769 Points +22%
Huawei Pura 70 Ultra
HiSilicon Kirin 9010, Maleoon 910, 16384
1446 Points
Average HiSilicon Kirin 9010
  ()
1446 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (193 - 3479, n=160, last 2 years)
1443 Points 0%
Multi-Core
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
Apple A17 Pro, A17 Pro GPU, 8192
7244 Points +62%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
7102 Points +58%
Xiaomi 14 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
6933 Points +55%
Honor Magic6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
6765 Points +51%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 12288
4538 Points +1%
Huawei Pura 70 Ultra
HiSilicon Kirin 9010, Maleoon 910, 16384
4484 Points
Average HiSilicon Kirin 9010
  ()
4484 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (845 - 10401, n=160, last 2 years)
4025 Points -10%
Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
1716 Points +58%
Xiaomi 14 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
1695 Points +56%
Honor Magic6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
1654 Points +52%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 12288
1274 Points +17%
Huawei Pura 70 Ultra
HiSilicon Kirin 9010, Maleoon 910, 16384
1087 Points
Average HiSilicon Kirin 9010
  ()
1087 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (126 - 2437, n=171, last 2 years)
993 Points -9%
Multi-Core
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
6426 Points +52%
Xiaomi 14 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
6252 Points +48%
Honor Magic6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
6157 Points +46%
Huawei Pura 70 Ultra
HiSilicon Kirin 9010, Maleoon 910, 16384
4221 Points
Average HiSilicon Kirin 9010
  ()
4221 Points 0%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 12288
3624 Points -14%
Average of class Smartphone
  (473 - 6687, n=171, last 2 years)
3309 Points -22%
Antutu v10 - Total Score
Honor Magic6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
2050639 Points +112%
Xiaomi 14 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
1987321 Points +105%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
1837994 Points +90%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
Apple A17 Pro, A17 Pro GPU, 8192
1487075 Points +54%
Average of class Smartphone
  (142748 - 3015111, n=97, last 2 years)
1231394 Points +27%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 12288
1113506 Points +15%
Huawei Pura 70 Ultra
HiSilicon Kirin 9010, Maleoon 910, 16384
968434 Points
Average HiSilicon Kirin 9010
  ()
968434 Points 0%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
18672 Points +38%
Honor Magic6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
18155 Points +34%
Xiaomi 14 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
17260 Points +27%
Huawei Pura 70 Ultra
HiSilicon Kirin 9010, Maleoon 910, 16384
13575 Points
Average HiSilicon Kirin 9010
  ()
13575 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4609 - 24088, n=189, last 2 years)
12976 Points -4%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 12288
11824 Points -13%
CrossMark - Overall
Honor Magic6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
1474 Points +43%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
1443 Points +40%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
Apple A17 Pro, A17 Pro GPU, 8192
1408 Points +37%
Xiaomi 14 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
1239 Points +20%
Huawei Pura 70 Ultra
HiSilicon Kirin 9010, Maleoon 910, 16384
1031 Points
Average HiSilicon Kirin 9010
  ()
1031 Points 0%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 12288
935 Points -9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (187 - 1517, n=156, last 2 years)
882 Points -14%
BaseMark OS II - Overall
Xiaomi 14 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
10871 Points +46%
Honor Magic6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
10480 Points +41%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
9696 Points +30%
Huawei Pura 70 Ultra
HiSilicon Kirin 9010, Maleoon 910, 16384
7455 Points
Average HiSilicon Kirin 9010
  ()
7455 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1196 - 11976, n=150, last 2 years)
6288 Points -16%
UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 12288
27018 Points +126%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
18852 Points +58%
Honor Magic6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
18147 Points +52%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1267 - 74958, n=142, last 2 years)
16706 Points +40%
Xiaomi 14 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
14617 Points +22%
Huawei Pura 70 Ultra
HiSilicon Kirin 9010, Maleoon 910, 16384
11969 Points
Average HiSilicon Kirin 9010
  ()
11969 Points 0%
AI Benchmark - Score V5
Average of class Smartphone
  (66.3 - 3219, n=21, last 2 years)
1286 Points +735%
Huawei Pura 70 Ultra
HiSilicon Kirin 9010, Maleoon 910, 16384
154 Points
Average HiSilicon Kirin 9010
  ()
154 Points 0%
Geekbench ML
0.6 TensorFlow Lite CPU
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
1317 Points +37%
Honor Magic6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
1292 Points +34%
Xiaomi 14 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
1180 Points +23%
Huawei Pura 70 Ultra
HiSilicon Kirin 9010, Maleoon 910, 16384
961 Points
Average HiSilicon Kirin 9010
  ()
961 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (246 - 1342, n=34, last 2 years)
824 Points -14%
0.6 TensorFlow Lite GPU
Honor Magic6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
1478 Points +356%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
1254 Points +287%
Xiaomi 14 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
1070 Points +230%
Average of class Smartphone
  (123 - 1478, n=33, last 2 years)
746 Points +130%
Huawei Pura 70 Ultra
HiSilicon Kirin 9010, Maleoon 910, 16384
324 Points
Average HiSilicon Kirin 9010
  ()
324 Points 0%
0.6 TensorFlow Lite NNAPI
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
678 Points +37%
Honor Magic6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
663 Points +34%
Average of class Smartphone
  (186 - 3410, n=29, last 2 years)
647 Points +31%
Huawei Pura 70 Ultra
HiSilicon Kirin 9010, Maleoon 910, 16384
494 Points
Average HiSilicon Kirin 9010
  ()
494 Points 0%
Xiaomi 14 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
378 Points -23%

马利龙 马利龙 910集成在 SoC 中，位于 Adreno 640和 ARM Mali-G76 MP12之间。这对于目前的高端智能手机来说，GPU 性能微乎其微，你将不得不完全放弃光线追踪等现代功能。

3DMark: Wild Life Extreme Unlimited | Wild Life Extreme | Wild Life Unlimited Score | Wild Life Score | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7: T-Rex Onscreen | 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
GFXBench 3.0: on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
GFXBench 3.1: on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
GFXBench: on screen Car Chase Onscreen | 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | 3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Honor Magic6 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
5167 Points +236%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
4804 Points +212%
Xiaomi 14 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
4690 Points +205%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
3879 Points +152%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2410 Points +57%
Huawei Pura 70 Ultra
Maleoon 910, Kirin 9010, 1 TB UFS 3.1 Flash
1539 Points
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Honor Magic6 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
5177 Points +229%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
5040 Points +220%
Xiaomi 14 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
4937 Points +214%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
3765 Points +139%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2422 Points +54%
Huawei Pura 70 Ultra
Maleoon 910, Kirin 9010, 1 TB UFS 3.1 Flash
1573 Points
3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
20068 Points +255%
Honor Magic6 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
19545 Points +246%
Xiaomi 14 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
16691 Points +195%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
15260 Points +170%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
8922 Points +58%
Huawei Pura 70 Ultra
Maleoon 910, Kirin 9010, 1 TB UFS 3.1 Flash
5656 Points
3DMark / Wild Life Score
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
8582 Points +50%
Huawei Pura 70 Ultra
Maleoon 910, Kirin 9010, 1 TB UFS 3.1 Flash
5711 Points
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
Points -100%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
7451 Points +24%
Honor Magic6 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
6883 Points +15%
Huawei Pura 70 Ultra
Maleoon 910, Kirin 9010, 1 TB UFS 3.1 Flash
6003 Points
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
5044 Points -16%
Xiaomi 14 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
4968 Points -17%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
29081 Points +193%
Xiaomi 14 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
28887 Points +191%
Honor Magic6 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
24304 Points +145%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
13743 Points +38%
Huawei Pura 70 Ultra
Maleoon 910, Kirin 9010, 1 TB UFS 3.1 Flash
9928 Points
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
17677 Points +104%
Honor Magic6 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
15555 Points +79%
Xiaomi 14 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
13956 Points +61%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
9935 Points +15%
Huawei Pura 70 Ultra
Maleoon 910, Kirin 9010, 1 TB UFS 3.1 Flash
8668 Points
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
120 fps +100%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps +100%
Xiaomi 14 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps +100%
Honor Magic6 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps +100%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
60 fps 0%
Huawei Pura 70 Ultra
Maleoon 910, Kirin 9010, 1 TB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
549 fps +61%
Honor Magic6 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
544 fps +59%
Xiaomi 14 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
529 fps +55%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
444 fps +30%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
348 fps +2%
Huawei Pura 70 Ultra
Maleoon 910, Kirin 9010, 1 TB UFS 3.1 Flash
342 fps
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
120 fps +97%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps +97%
Xiaomi 14 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps +97%
Honor Magic6 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps +97%
Huawei Pura 70 Ultra
Maleoon 910, Kirin 9010, 1 TB UFS 3.1 Flash
61 fps
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
60 fps -2%
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
339 fps +85%
Xiaomi 14 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
328 fps +79%
Honor Magic6 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
327 fps +79%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
262 fps +43%
Huawei Pura 70 Ultra
Maleoon 910, Kirin 9010, 1 TB UFS 3.1 Flash
183 fps
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
174 fps -5%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Honor Magic6 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps +103%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
117 fps +98%
Xiaomi 14 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
117 fps +98%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
115 fps +95%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
60 fps +2%
Huawei Pura 70 Ultra
Maleoon 910, Kirin 9010, 1 TB UFS 3.1 Flash
59 fps
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Honor Magic6 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
261 fps +102%
Xiaomi 14 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
250 fps +94%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
247 fps +91%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
180 fps +40%
Huawei Pura 70 Ultra
Maleoon 910, Kirin 9010, 1 TB UFS 3.1 Flash
129 fps
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
112 fps -13%
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Honor Magic6 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
101 fps +166%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
83 fps +118%
Xiaomi 14 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
81 fps +113%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
71 fps +87%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
60 fps +58%
Huawei Pura 70 Ultra
Maleoon 910, Kirin 9010, 1 TB UFS 3.1 Flash
38 fps
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Honor Magic6 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
162 fps +195%
Xiaomi 14 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
156 fps +184%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
142 fps +158%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
110 fps +100%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
75 fps +36%
Huawei Pura 70 Ultra
Maleoon 910, Kirin 9010, 1 TB UFS 3.1 Flash
55 fps
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Honor Magic6 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
92 fps +188%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
72 fps +125%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
63 fps +97%
Xiaomi 14 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps +88%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
55 fps +72%
Huawei Pura 70 Ultra
Maleoon 910, Kirin 9010, 1 TB UFS 3.1 Flash
32 fps
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Honor Magic6 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
90 fps +200%
Xiaomi 14 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
79 fps +163%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
71 fps +137%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
61 fps +103%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
37 fps +23%
Huawei Pura 70 Ultra
Maleoon 910, Kirin 9010, 1 TB UFS 3.1 Flash
30 fps
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Honor Magic6 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps +131%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
114 fps +119%
Xiaomi 14 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
104 fps +100%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
91 fps +75%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
59 fps +13%
Huawei Pura 70 Ultra
Maleoon 910, Kirin 9010, 1 TB UFS 3.1 Flash
52 fps
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Honor Magic6 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
228 fps +178%
Xiaomi 14 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
192 fps +134%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
187 fps +128%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
117 fps +43%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
98 fps +20%
Huawei Pura 70 Ultra
Maleoon 910, Kirin 9010, 1 TB UFS 3.1 Flash
82 fps
GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Honor Magic6 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
42 fps +223%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
40 fps +208%
Xiaomi 14 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
37 fps +185%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
25 fps +92%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
16 fps +23%
Huawei Pura 70 Ultra
Maleoon 910, Kirin 9010, 1 TB UFS 3.1 Flash
13 fps

在网上冲浪时，华为 Pura 70 Ultra 赶上了竞争对手，冲浪速度极快。

Jetstream 2 | Speedometer 2.0 | Speedometer 3.0 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 17)
254.048 Points +62%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra (Chrome 121)
209.919 Points +33%
Huawei Pura 70 Ultra (Chrome 125)
157.304 Points
Average HiSilicon Kirin 9010 ()
157.3 Points 0%
Xiaomi 14 Ultra (Chrome 123)
146.13 Points -7%
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=160, last 2 years)
120.5 Points -23%
Honor Magic6 Pro (Chrome 122)
117.078 Points -26%
Google Pixel 8 Pro (Chrome 117)
105.175 Points -33%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 17)
445 runs/min +100%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra (Chrome 121)
265 runs/min +19%
Huawei Pura 70 Ultra (Chrome 125)
223 runs/min
Average HiSilicon Kirin 9010 ()
223 runs/min 0%
Xiaomi 14 Ultra (Chrome 123)
220 runs/min -1%
Google Pixel 8 Pro (Chrome 117)
158 runs/min -29%
Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 569, n=146, last 2 years)
136.2 runs/min -39%
Honor Magic6 Pro (Chrome 122)
134 runs/min -40%
Speedometer 3.0 - Score
Huawei Pura 70 Ultra (Chrome 125)
13 runs/min
Average HiSilicon Kirin 9010 ()
13 runs/min 0%
Xiaomi 14 Ultra (Chrome 123)
11 runs/min -15%
Average of class Smartphone (1.03 - 34, n=57, last 2 years)
10.7 runs/min -18%
Honor Magic6 Pro (Chrome 122)
4.3 runs/min -67%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 17)
86270 Points +75%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra (Chrome 121)
72011 Points +46%
Xiaomi 14 Ultra (Chrome 123)
60574 Points +23%
Google Pixel 8 Pro (Chrome 117)
49506 Points 0%
Huawei Pura 70 Ultra (Chrome 125)
49290 Points
Average HiSilicon Kirin 9010 ()
49290 Points 0%
Honor Magic6 Pro (Chrome 122)
37221 Points -24%
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=202, last 2 years)
37036 Points -25%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=159, last 2 years)
1574 ms * -102%
Honor Magic6 Pro (Chrome 122)
1153.9 ms * -48%
Google Pixel 8 Pro (Chrome 117)
840.2 ms * -8%
Huawei Pura 70 Ultra (Chrome 125)
779.1 ms *
Average HiSilicon Kirin 9010 ()
779 ms * -0%
Xiaomi 14 Ultra (Chrome 123)
688 ms * +12%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra (Chrome 121)
599 ms * +23%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 17)
388.3 ms * +50%

* ... smaller is better

由于 Pura 70 Ultra 仍然依赖 UFS 3.1，其竞争对手的 UFS 4.0 要快得多。不过，在同级存储设备中，它的运行速度还是非常快的。 像素 8 Pro可以看出。

Huawei Pura 70 UltraHonor Magic6 ProSamsung Galaxy S24 UltraGoogle Pixel 8 ProXiaomi 14 UltraAverage 1 TB UFS 3.1 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
55%
7%
-57%
40%
0%
-27%
Sequential Read 256KB
1991.82
3923.31
97%
3610.25
81%
1501.13
-25%
4102.56
106%
1992 ?()
0%
1839 ?(226 - 4512, n=191, last 2 years)
-8%
Sequential Write 256KB
1832.42
3678.35
101%
1893.63
3%
257.28
-86%
3095.36
69%
1832 ?()
0%
1426 ?(57.5 - 3908, n=191, last 2 years)
-22%
Random Read 4KB
387.34
415.68
7%
437.12
13%
156.16
-60%
362.88
-6%
387 ?()
0%
277 ?(22.2 - 483, n=191, last 2 years)
-28%
Random Write 4KB
588.69
678.39
15%
181.55
-69%
258.92
-56%
527.15
-10%
589 ?()
0%
308 ?(9.4 - 753, n=191, last 2 years)
-48%

游戏 - 精心优化的游戏乐趣

尽管 马龙 910虽然华为 Pura 70 Ultra 内建的 Maleoon 910 并没有创下任何速度记录，但华为仍对该平台进行了很好的优化，使大多数游戏都能以高达 60fps 的速度流畅运行--即使在高细节级别下也是如此。

在玩《源氏冲击》时，即使在最高细节设置下，手机也能保持较高的帧率，而且我们很少发现掉帧现象。我们使用GameBench 对游戏进行了分析。.

源泉冲击
源泉冲击
PUBG Mobile
PUBG Mobile
051015202530354045505560Tooltip
Huawei Pura 70 Ultra; Dead Trigger 2; 1.10.7: Ø60.4 (58-61)
Huawei Pura 70 Ultra; Genshin Impact; lowest 120 fps; 4.7.0_23093867_23435602: Ø59.8 (55-61)
Huawei Pura 70 Ultra; Genshin Impact; medium 120 fps; 4.7.0_23093867_23435602: Ø59.6 (54-61)
Huawei Pura 70 Ultra; Genshin Impact; highest 120 fps; 4.7.0_23093867_23435602: Ø59.5 (51-61)
Huawei Pura 70 Ultra; PUBG Mobile; HD; 3.2.0: Ø59.1 (51-61)
Huawei Pura 70 Ultra; PUBG Mobile; Ultra HD; 3.2.0: Ø39.7 (37-41)

排放 - 配备双扬声器的华为智能手机

温度

在长期负载的情况下，华为 Pura 70 Ultra 的表面温度基本都超过了 40 摄氏度，但没有出现任何问题或不适。

在 3DMark 压力测试中，温度在相当长的一段时间内保持稳定，但随后急剧下降，只是在很短的时间后才短暂恢复。这在玩游戏时可能会很明显。

Max. Load
 43.6 °C43 °C42.4 °C 
 43.6 °C42.7 °C41.7 °C 
 43.7 °C42 °C40.4 °C 
Maximum: 43.7 °C
Average: 42.6 °C
39.3 °C39.3 °C40.1 °C
39.3 °C43 °C45.7 °C
38.6 °C41.4 °C45.4 °C
Maximum: 45.7 °C
Average: 41.3 °C
Power Supply (max.)  25.1 °C | Room Temperature 22 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 42.6 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 43.7 °C / 111 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 45.7 °C / 114 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.4 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
78.9 % +88%
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
78.8 % +88%
Xiaomi 14 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
64.4 % +54%
Honor Magic6 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
46.7 % +11%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
46.1 % +10%
Huawei Pura 70 Ultra
Maleoon 910, Kirin 9010, 1 TB UFS 3.1 Flash
41.9 %
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Huawei Pura 70 Ultra
Maleoon 910, Kirin 9010, 1 TB UFS 3.1 Flash
99.4 %
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
76 % -24%
Xiaomi 14 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
75.5 % -24%
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
A17 Pro GPU, A17 Pro, 256 GB NVMe
65.4 % -34%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
56.4 % -43%
Honor Magic6 Pro
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
48.1 % -52%
0102030405060708090100Tooltip
Huawei Pura 70 Ultra Maleoon 910, Kirin 9010, 1 TB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø9.41 (9.39-9.44)
Xiaomi 14 Ultra Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø24.2 (21.8-28.9)
Huawei Pura 70 Ultra Maleoon 910, Kirin 9010, 1 TB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø28.8 (14.4-34.4)
Xiaomi 14 Ultra Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø81.6 (68.3-106.1)

发言人

华为 Pura 70 Ultra 的两个扬声器在合理音量下能发出良好的声音，但在最大音量下高音有些偏重，因此听起来略显空洞。高音时还容易失真。

USB-C 端口可用于有线音频输出。蓝牙只有几种编解码器可用，但有 LDAC 和 L2HC，至少有两种高音质编解码器。不过，Pura 不支持 Auracast。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2033.231.92531.828.83118.227.64023.428.55032.435.46319.433.18018.831.910017.633.412513.844.216015.9542001653.825016.459.431515.159.540013.860.350012.96863013.868.880013.573.3100013.175.3125013.877.1160012.576.820001378.7250013.278.6315014.578.4400013.481.750001480.4630015.278.680001578.91000013.677.2125001769.21600015.566.4SPL2690N0.782.2median 13.8median 75.3Delta18.727.33526.228.225.932.229.235.235.63925.934.522.135.517.836.717.142.718.15414.256.114.15810.762.21163.412.870.211.171.21269.611.773.81276.312.874.912.477.112.379.413.381.61382.713.580.113.27813.877.113.778.213.469.613.367.324.990.30.682.6median 13.2median 73.818hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseHuawei Pura 70 UltraXiaomi 14 Ultra
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Huawei Pura 70 Ultra audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (90 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 4% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 23% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 72% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Xiaomi 14 Ultra audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (90.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.8% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (2.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 3% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 94% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 21% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 74% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电池寿命 - 5,200 毫安时，可长时间运行

耗电量

在我们的测试中，华为 Pura 70 Ultra 的功耗很低，在任何方面都没有问题。

使用华为的超级充电器（SuperCharge）为智能手机充电，连接电缆时功率可达 100 瓦。无线充电也可以达到 80 瓦。反向充电的功率可达 20 瓦。

在我们的测试中，使用随机附送的电源适配器，47 分钟即可充满电量，18 分钟即可充满 50%的电量，31 分钟即可充满 80%的电量。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.08 / 0.18 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 0.6 / 1.23 / 1.3 Watt
Load midlight 4.54 / 10.84 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Huawei Pura 70 Ultra
5200 mAh		Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
4422 mAh		Honor Magic6 Pro
5600 mAh		Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
5000 mAh		Google Pixel 8 Pro
5050 mAh		Xiaomi 14 Ultra
5000 mAh		Average HiSilicon Kirin 9010
 		Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-13%
-42%
-68%
-22%
-11%
0%
-25%
Idle Minimum *
0.6
0.5
17%
0.8
-33%
0.73
-22%
0.63
-5%
0.8
-33%
0.6 ?()
-0%
0.894 ?(0.4 - 2.37, n=152, last 2 years)
-49%
Idle Average *
1.23
1.97
-60%
1.32
-7%
1.22
1%
1.47
-20%
0.89
28%
1.23 ?()
-0%
1.456 ?(0.6 - 4.26, n=152, last 2 years)
-18%
Idle Maximum *
1.3
1.99
-53%
1.37
-5%
1.34
-3%
1.55
-19%
0.91
30%
1.3 ?()
-0%
1.616 ?(0.83 - 4.45, n=152, last 2 years)
-24%
Load Average *
4.54
3.36
26%
11.62
-156%
16.52
-264%
8.45
-86%
8.99
-98%
4.54 ?()
-0%
6.45 ?(2.3 - 16.5, n=147, last 2 years)
-42%
Load Maximum *
10.84
10.43
4%
11.65
-7%
16.58
-53%
8.63
20%
9.01
17%
10.8 ?()
-0%
9.8 ?(3.53 - 20.8, n=147, last 2 years)
10%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

012345678910Tooltip
Huawei Pura 70 Ultra HiSilicon Kirin 9010; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø5.8 (0.803-10.9)
Xiaomi 14 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø5.02 (0.821-8.96)
Huawei Pura 70 Ultra HiSilicon Kirin 9010; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.72 (0.64-0.872)
Xiaomi 14 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.71 (0.596-0.848)

Power consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

012345678Tooltip
Huawei Pura 70 Ultra HiSilicon Kirin 9010; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø4.58 (4.54-4.62)
Xiaomi 14 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø8.83 (8.4-8.96)
Huawei Pura 70 Ultra HiSilicon Kirin 9010; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.72 (0.64-0.872)
Xiaomi 14 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.71 (0.596-0.848)

运行时间

Pura 70 Ultra 的 5,200 毫安时电池可确保超长的运行时间，仅次于 iPhone 15 Pro Max和 Magic6 Pro.

如果电池有完全耗尽的危险，华为智能手机会切换到特殊的节能模式，在熄灯前仍能保证通话和收发短信四个小时。

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
53h 49min
WiFi Websurfing (Chrome 125)
19h 12min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
27h 28min
Load (maximum brightness)
4h 57min
Huawei Pura 70 Ultra
5200 mAh		Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
4422 mAh		Honor Magic6 Pro
5600 mAh		Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
5000 mAh		Google Pixel 8 Pro
5050 mAh		Xiaomi 14 Ultra
5000 mAh
Battery Runtime
15%
10%
-12%
-38%
-42%
Reader / Idle
3229
3514
9%
3519
9%
2227
-31%
1344
-58%
1983
-39%
H.264
1648
2013
22%
2027
23%
1922
17%
1122
-32%
1055
-36%
WiFi v1.3
1152
1163
1%
1548
34%
1148
0%
760
-34%
751
-35%
Load
297
384
29%
223
-25%
202
-32%
220
-26%
131
-56%

Pros

+ 良好的摄像头设置
+ 明亮准确的显示屏
+ 运行时间长
+ 精确的定位服务
+ 通过 IP68 认证
+ 快速充电

Cons

- 既不支持 6 GHz 无线局域网，也不支持 5G
- 不支持 eSIM
- GPU 运行速度慢
- 不支持 HDR10+ 和杜比视界
- 更新时间短

评语 - 摄像头仍是华为的强项

华为 Pura 70 Ultra 评测。测试设备由华为德国公司提供。
华为 Pura 70 Ultra 评测。测试设备由华为德国公司提供。

华为 Pura 70 Ultra 是一款非常出色的智能手机，尤其是其出色的摄像头设置给人留下了深刻印象。虽然它并非没有缺点，但它提供了灵活的整体解决方案，而且质量上乘。

此外，华为还为其旗舰手机配备了一块出色的显示屏，具有良好的亮度、色彩准确度和刷新率，而且相对比较容易看清。

华为 Pura 70 Ultra 提供了一个很好的整体方案，但它确实需要做出一些妥协。

但是，政治上的限制也意味着 Pura 70 Ultra 在功能方面不得不面对一些限制。由于 microG（参见手册）的原因，它无法使用谷歌服务。参见手册)几乎可以忽略不计，但考虑到这款手机的价格区间，不支持 5G 尤其令人难以接受。我们还怀念 6 GHz Wi-Fi，麒麟 SoC 对于一款高端智能手机来说相当薄弱，更新周期也很短。

Pura 70 Ultra 的替代产品包括 Galaxy S24 Ultra和 Magic6 Pro.

价格和供应情况

目前，Pura 70 Ultra 无法在美国购买。您或许可以从某些在线零售商那里买到进口设备。预计零售价约为 1,600 美元。

请注意：我们更新了评级系统，第 8 版的结果与第 7 版的结果不可比。更多信息 请点击此处.

Huawei Pura 70 Ultra - 07/10/2024 v8
Daniel Schmidt

Chassis
91%
Keyboard
67 / 75 → 89%
Pointing Device
95%
Connectivity
59 / 69 → 86%
Weight
88%
Battery
92%
Display
91%
Games Performance
16 / 55 → 28%
Application Performance
66 / 85 → 77%
AI Performance
28%
Temperature
86%
Noise
100%
Audio
79 / 90 → 88%
Camera
83%
Average
60%
82%
Smartphone - Weighted Average
CO2 Emissions
No Data
Materials
0%
Packaging
0%
Power Use
96.8%
Repairability
40%
Software Updates
44.5%
Recycle Logo Total Sustainability Score: 30.2%

More articles related to this device

Huawei Pura 70 Ultra (Pura 70 Series)

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 华为 Pura 70 Ultra 评测--功能强大的智能手机，配备杀手级摄像头，但也有局限性
Daniel Schmidt, 2024-07-12 (Update: 2024-08-15)