Notebookcheck Logo

华硕ROG Strix G16 G614JZ笔记本电脑回顾。为RTX 4080清除舞台

发现甜蜜点。

ROG Strix G16是我们在2023年仍未成熟的情况下评测的第三款Strix。根据最近的经验,选择缩减到16英寸的模型是一个好的选择。我们看到,4080完全适合RTX 4090和RTX 4070之间。在ROG Strix G16中,GeForce 显卡终于能够展示其能力。
Gaming Geforce Intel Laptop / Notebook Raptor Lake

ROG,即Republic of Gamers,是华硕的高端游戏品牌。其中有三个产品系列。Flow、Zephyrus和Strix,其中只有Strix笔记本电脑是经典游戏笔记本电脑。华硕将Strix产品线进一步细分为ROG Strix和ROG Strix Scar类别。原则上,所有ROG Strix笔记本电脑都有与ROG Strix Scar型号类似的硬件,但设计略显简单。然后,这也是一个角度问题,因为这家台湾制造商的所有游戏笔记本电脑都相当华丽。同时,ROG Strix G和Scar系列的设备已经有点接近了。虽然2022年的Scar型号是用蒸汽室冷却的,但这两个系列的冷却系统现在几乎是相同的。

我们的测试设备,其英特尔酷睿i7-13980HXNvidiaGeForce RTX 4080是装备最好的设备之一。为了使强大的硬件保持在可容忍的工作温度,华硕安装了一个带有三个风扇的大规模冷却系统。液态金属也确保了良好的散热和长时间的提升。

Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ (ROG Strix G16 Series)
Processor
Intel Core i9-13980HX 24 x 1.6 - 5.6 GHz, 175 W PL2 / Short Burst, 130 W PL1 / Sustained, Raptor Lake-HX
Graphics adapter
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU - 12 GB VRAM, 175 W TDP ( including 25 W Dynamic Boost), Intel Iris Xe 96 EUs
Memory
16 GB 
, DDR5-4800
Display
16.00 inch 16:10, 2560 x 1600 pixel 189 PPI, TL160ADMP03-0, IPS, glossy: no, 240 Hz
Mainboard
Intel HM770 (Raptor Lake-S PCH)
Storage
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00, 1024 GB 
, 850 GB free
Soundcard
Intel Raptor Lake-S PCH - cAVS
Connections
4 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 Thunderbolt, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: 3.5 mm Headset Jack
Networking
Realtek RTL8125 2.5GBe Family Ethernet Controller (10/100/1000/2500MBit/s), Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz), Bluetooth 5.2
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 30.4 x 354 x 264
Battery
90 Wh Lithium-Polymer
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 11 Home
Camera
Webcam: HD
Primary Camera: 0.9 MPix
Additional features
Speakers: 4 speakers in stereo configuration, Keyboard: Chiclet keyboard with RGB lights, Keyboard Light: yes, Armoury Crate, 24 Months Warranty
Weight
2.382 kg, Power Supply: 966 g
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

16英寸游戏笔记本电脑目前风头正劲,因此我们的数据库中有大量规格相似的现役游戏机。我们已经审查了ROG Strix系列最新一代的几款笔记本电脑。这些产品包括 华硕ROG Strix G18华硕ROG Strix Scar 18。这两款笔记本电脑有不同的图形芯片,即RTX 4070和RTX 4090,但有类似的冷却系统,几乎相同的主板,因此有类似的功率限制值。这导致不同的Nvidia图形单元之间出现了有趣的比较可能性。

联想Legion Pro 7Razer Blade 16是与ROG Strix G16处于同一性能级别的16英寸笔记本电脑,尽管这两款笔记本电脑可能更加昂贵。

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Price
88.4 %
v7 (old)
03 / 2023
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
2.4 kg30.4 mm16.00"2560x1600
88 %
v7 (old)
04 / 2023
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
R9 7945HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
2.7 kg29.7 mm16.00"2560x1600
89.4 %
v7 (old)
02 / 2023
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
2.7 kg26 mm16.00"2560x1600
86.2 %
v7 (old)
03 / 2023
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
2.1 kg18 mm16.00"3840x2400
86.2 %
v7 (old)
02 / 2023
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
R7 7735HS, Radeon RX 7600S
2.2 kg27 mm16.00"1920x1200
91.2 %
v7 (old)
02 / 2023
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
2.4 kg21.99 mm16.00"2560x1600
88.4 %
v7 (old)
04 / 2023
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI
R9 7945HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
2.8 kg30.7 mm17.30"2560x1440
87.4 %
v7 (old)
03 / 2023
Asus ROG Strix G18 G814JI
i7-13650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
3 kg31 mm18.00"2560x1600
86.6 %
v7 (old)
02 / 2023
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
3.1 kg30.8 mm18.00"2560x1600
86.9 %
v7 (old)
11 / 2022
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W
i9-12950HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
2.9 kg28.3 mm17.30"2560x1440
85 %
v7 (old)
03 / 2021
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QR
R9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
2.3 kg27.2 mm15.60"1920x1080

案例 - 顶尖的设计,但实施可以改进

华硕ROG Strix G16的设计师们不遗余力。这款笔记本电脑的任何组件都没有设计或文字元素。每个部件也都以这种或那种方式进行了3D塑形。例如,底座的顶部是略微向边缘凹陷的。正面和部分侧面配有RGB灯带。键盘也是RGB发光的,并通过半透明的按键公开突出了对游戏最重要的区域。各种灰色的阴影定义了这个别致的外壳。华硕甚至还在大多数笔记本中无趣的底部布置了各种设计元素,其中一些也是为了帮助散热。与以前的机型相比,一些端口不得不从笔记本的背面移开,以便为散热让路,因为现在散热器沿着笔记本的整个背面运行。这使散热器的总表面积超过174平方毫米,使这台游戏笔记本看起来非常有侵略性。16:10格式的屏幕可以用一只手打开到130°。铰链相当坚硬,但能稳定地将16英寸(约41厘米)的显示屏固定在任何可以想象的位置。

与其说是肆无忌惮的设计,我们倒是希望机箱的质量和做工更好。除了显示屏的盖子,所有部件都是由塑料制成的。许多元素显得过度,有难看的缝隙,如铰链上方的条状物。摄像头模块是受影响最严重的,除了较大的缝隙外,关闭时还会远远地伸出来。这使得网络摄像头看起来好像是在机箱制造完成后被附加上去的。从远处看,这款游戏笔记本看起来质量很高,但仔细观察就会发现其弱点。至少,16英寸的笔记本比18英寸的笔记本更稳定;我们发现ROG Strix G18的基本单元的稳定性很好。ROG Strix G18的基本单元的稳定性是值得批评的。

目前所有的16英寸游戏笔记本电脑在尺寸和重量方面都非常相似。几乎所有机型的重量都在两到三公斤之间,不含电源装置。在我们的测试设备中,电源装置几乎增加了一公斤的重量,所以你不得不拖着一台重约3.3公斤的笔记本电脑。只有Gigabyte AERO 16比我们数据库中的其他16英寸笔记本明显更薄。

尺寸比较

399 mm 294 mm 31 mm 3 kg399 mm 294 mm 30.8 mm 3.1 kg363 mm 262 mm 26 mm 2.7 kg355 mm 266 mm 29.7 mm 2.7 kg354 mm 264 mm 30.4 mm 2.4 kg355 mm 252 mm 27 mm 2.2 kg355 mm 244 mm 21.99 mm 2.4 kg354 mm 255 mm 18 mm 2.1 kg297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g

设备 - Thunderbolt 4和快速Wi-Fi 6E

ROG Strix G16的大部分端口都集中在笔记本的左侧。在右边,只有两个USB接口。左边的两个USB Type-C插座分享它们的任务:后面的支持Thunderbolt 4,前面的支持Power Delivery,同时都支持DisplayPort。通过USB-C的供电是相当有限的。笔记本电脑需要20伏的电源输出,最大功率为100瓦。因此,通过USB-C电力传输无法获得笔记本电脑的全部性能。

2个USB Type-A USB 3.2 Gen 1 (5 Gbps)
2个USB Type-A USB 3.2 Gen 1 (5 Gbps)
直流电源,RJ-45(LAN),HDMI 2.1,带雷电4的USB Type-C,带DisplayPort和Power Delivery的USB Type-C,3.5毫米插孔
直流电源,RJ-45(LAN),HDMI 2.1,带雷电4的USB Type-C,带DisplayPort和Power Delivery的USB Type-C,3.5毫米插孔

沟通

英特尔的Wi-Fi 6E AX211模块确保本地网络和华硕游戏笔记本电脑之间的快速连接,因此是最先进的。上传和下载的连接速度略高于平均水平,但我们看到英特尔的WLAN-ax模块的效果更强。

Networking
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Asus ROG Strix G18 G814JI
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1586 (803min - 1641max) MBit/s +3%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter
1579 (848min - 1696max) MBit/s +2%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1545 (1189min - 1625max) MBit/s
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1466 (748min - 1542max) MBit/s -5%
Average of class Gaming
  (469 - 1843, n=149, last 2 years)
1233 MBit/s -20%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
  (64 - 1921, n=242)
1231 MBit/s -20%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1155 (495min - 1441max) MBit/s -25%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
MediaTek MT7921
908 (806min - 973max) MBit/s -41%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1890 (1843min - 1936max) MBit/s +21%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter
1619 (1537min - 1665max) MBit/s +4%
Asus ROG Strix G18 G814JI
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1611 (839min - 1699max) MBit/s +3%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1557 (795min - 1691max) MBit/s
Average of class Gaming
  (680 - 1890, n=149, last 2 years)
1394 MBit/s -10%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
  (582 - 1890, n=242)
1382 MBit/s -11%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1328 (1093min - 1448max) MBit/s -15%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
MediaTek MT7921
899 (755min - 936max) MBit/s -42%
05010015020025030035040045050055060065070075080085090095010001050110011501200125013001350140014501500155016001650Tooltip
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1545 (1189-1625)
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1530 (795-1691)

网络摄像头

华硕ROG Strix G16的网络摄像头

这款笔记本电脑的720p网络摄像头拥有针孔摄像头的图像质量,表现并不出色。只有在光线良好的情况下,图片才有一定的可用性。否则,噪声抑制吞噬了所有的细节。边缘处的细节也非常模糊。至少,网络摄像头旁边的三个麦克风能提供相当好的声音。

ColorChecker
5.8 ∆E
9.2 ∆E
10.5 ∆E
3.5 ∆E
8.6 ∆E
5.5 ∆E
6.5 ∆E
13.6 ∆E
10.1 ∆E
2.2 ∆E
1.9 ∆E
4.9 ∆E
9.5 ∆E
3.5 ∆E
10.5 ∆E
7.5 ∆E
7.7 ∆E
12.3 ∆E
2.9 ∆E
4.6 ∆E
7.2 ∆E
4.7 ∆E
4.9 ∆E
8 ∆E
ColorChecker Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ: 6.89 ∆E min: 1.86 - max: 13.58 ∆E

安全问题

这里找不到指纹扫描仪或其他安全功能。只有英特尔酷睿i9的安全措施,如TPM 2.0,是可用的。

辅料

这款游戏笔记本除了一个330瓦的电源和一些文件外,并没有带来更多东西。华硕在很大程度上免除了塑料包装,只用保护膜将笔记本包裹起来。

维护

11颗PH1螺丝将游戏笔记本的底板固定在原位。我们建议从笔记本的后面到前面,最后松开前面右边的螺丝。这是因为它有一个锁环,确保盖子的一部分被抬起,因此为塑料开启工具提供了方便。几个夹子将盖子固定住。该工具是用来打开底部四周的。关于如何打开笔记本电脑以及哪些部件可以更换的更详细的信息,见华硕的维修手册.

在笔记本电脑内部,我们遇到了一个相当容易维护的设备。我们发现两个内存插槽(都被占用),两个M.2插槽(一个被占用)和可更换的WLAN模块。90瓦时的电池也很容易更换,因为它不是用胶粘的。

担保

华硕在欧洲为ROG Strix G16提供两年的保修。这在其他地区可能有所不同,所以感兴趣的买家应该在购买前仔细检查。

输入设备 - 良好的键盘,但不是机械键盘

键盘

ROG Strix G16配备了一个小键盘,但由于其1.9毫米的键程和体面的触觉反馈,它提供了一个愉快的打字感觉。键盘设计是典型的游戏笔记本电脑,安装了RBG照明。此外,对游戏最重要的按键被突出显示。所有按钮都被设计成全尺寸键,这意味着右侧的方向键相当拥挤。在紧张的时刻,你很容易在这里按错键。笔记本电脑本身会有足够的空间将方向键往下移一点。然而,在输入文本时,你必须习惯于缩短的移位键

在功能键上方还有五个可以分配各种宏的按键。然而,宏键离掌托很远。根据你的手的大小,如果不改变手的位置,就很难够到它们。

触摸板

13×8.5厘米,这款游戏笔记本的点击板大得令人愉快,其位置不应该影响键盘操作。由于它的玻璃表面,它应该能长期保持其丝滑的哑光质地。这具有令人愉快的感觉和良好的滑行特性。点击板本身对所有的输入都有快速而准确的反应,一直到角落里。

点击板和RGB照明键盘
点击板和RGB照明键盘

显示屏 - 响应式QHD+,16:10格式

子像素
子像素

IPS显示屏提供16:10格式的QHD+分辨率,刷新率为240赫兹。然而,该面板并没有达到宣传的3毫秒的响应时间;在某些情况下,该数值甚至翻倍。亮度也没有华硕在数据表中承诺的500 cd/m²那么高。总的来说,我们仍然有一个坚实的显示屏,它具有哑光表面和高DisplayP3色彩空间覆盖率。这里没有发现明显的照明错误。

但有一件事可能会在游戏时被证明是一种困扰。华硕ROG Strix G16的状态LED位于屏幕的正下方,其中存储设备LED在游戏过程中闪烁得相当频繁,令人分心,尤其是在动作密集的游戏中。为了获得身临其境的游戏体验,唯一可以帮助的是一条黑色的胶带。

460
cd/m²
477
cd/m²
445
cd/m²
453
cd/m²
470
cd/m²
464
cd/m²
451
cd/m²
454
cd/m²
457
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
TL160ADMP03-0 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 477 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 459 cd/m² Minimum: 24 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 93 %
Center on Battery: 470 cd/m²
Contrast: 1119:1 (Black: 0.42 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.86 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 0.93
ΔE Greyscale 2.7 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
84.9% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.9% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
97% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.246
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
TL160ADMP03-0, IPS, 2560x1600, 16"
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
NE160QDM-NM4, MiniLED, 2560x1600, 16"
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
MNG007DA2-3 (CSO1628), IPS, 2560x1600, 16"
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Samsung SDC4191 (ATNA60YV09-0, OLED, 3840x2400, 16"
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
NE160WUM-NX2 (BOE0B33), IPS-Level, 1920x1200, 16"
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
CSOT T3 MNG007DA4-1, IPS, 2560x1600, 16"
Display
3%
-15%
6%
-15%
3%
Display P3 Coverage
97
99.4
2%
69.1
-29%
99.9
3%
69.4
-28%
98.5
2%
sRGB Coverage
99.9
100
0%
99.7
0%
100
0%
97.8
-2%
100
0%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
84.9
90.8
7%
71.2
-16%
96.4
14%
70.9
-16%
89.7
6%
Response Times
-193%
-65%
66%
-143%
-56%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
5.1 ?(2.3, 2.8)
15.2 ?(11.2, 4)
-198%
12.3 ?(5.7, 6.6)
-141%
2 ?(1, 1)
61%
17 ?(8, 9)
-233%
6.6 ?(3.4, 3.2)
-29%
Response Time Black / White *
6.6 ?(2.2, 4.2)
19 ?(10.6, 8.4)
-188%
5.9 ?(2.2, 3.7)
11%
1.98 ?(0.5, 1.48)
70%
10.1 ?(5.4, 4.7)
-53%
12 ?(6.8, 5.2)
-82%
PWM Frequency
12000 ?(100)
60
Screen
108%
22%
117%
5%
-13%
Brightness middle
470
712
51%
511
9%
389.97
-17%
308
-34%
456.8
-3%
Brightness
459
703
53%
469
2%
395
-14%
293
-36%
437
-5%
Brightness Distribution
93
95
2%
86
-8%
97
4%
90
-3%
83
-11%
Black Level *
0.42
0.07
83%
0.4
5%
0.03
93%
0.23
45%
0.35
17%
Contrast
1119
10171
809%
1278
14%
12999
1062%
1339
20%
1305
17%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
1.86
1.7
9%
0.95
49%
2
-8%
1.47
21%
3.7
-99%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
3.87
4
-3%
2.07
47%
4.1
-6%
2.98
23%
6.42
-66%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
0.93
1.2
-29%
0.91
2%
1.68
-81%
1.02
-10%
0.66
29%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
2.7
2.8
-4%
0.6
78%
2.23
17%
2.2
19%
2.6
4%
Gamma
2.246 98%
2.21 100%
2.176 101%
2.41 91%
2.228 99%
2.3 96%
CCT
6711 97%
6978 93%
6545 99%
6323 103%
6228 104%
6108 106%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-27% / 42%
-19% / 2%
63% / 86%
-51% / -21%
-22% / -16%

* ... smaller is better

华硕ROG Strix G16在出厂时就配备了一个经过良好校准的显示器。没有一个平均色彩偏差超过2的ΔΕ2000。使用我们信息箱中的ICC配置文件,色彩偏差下降到1的ΔΕ2000以下,但最大值几乎保持不变,只是高于3的ΔΕ2000。

卡尔曼:灰度
卡尔曼:灰度
卡尔曼:色彩饱和度
卡尔曼:色彩饱和度
CalMAN: ColorChecker
CalMAN: ColorChecker
CalMAN:灰度(校准的)。
CalMAN:灰度(校准的)。
CalMAN:色彩饱和度(已校准)。
CalMAN:色彩饱和度(已校准)。
CalMAN: ColorChecker (已校准)
CalMAN: ColorChecker (已校准)

对于电影制片人和电影爱好者来说,DisplayP3色彩空间97%的覆盖率也应该是令人满意的。接近100%的sRGB色彩空间覆盖率通常对游戏来说是足够的。只有少数游戏提供更大色彩空间的选择。只有在AdobeRGB中,屏幕才会有些削弱,其中对摄影师很重要的色彩空间只有85%左右的覆盖率。

华硕ROG Strix G16 VS sRGB
华硕ROG Strix G16 VS sRGB
华硕ROG Strix G16 VS AdobeRGB
华硕ROG Strix G16 VS AdobeRGB
华硕ROG Strix G16 VS DCI-P3
华硕ROG Strix G16 VS DCI-P3

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
6.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 2.2 ms rise
↘ 4.2 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 17 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
5.1 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 2.3 ms rise
↘ 2.8 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 14 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

470 cd/m²的对比度为1119:1,对于在户外不受限制地使用哑光屏幕来说还不够。如果你看的角度不对,蓝天会反射到屏幕上,使阅读变得困难。幸运的是,华硕ROG Strix G16的屏幕是非常稳定的可视角度。从各个角度看,几乎没有任何明显的亮度和颜色偏差。

户外使用的ROG Strix G16
户外使用的ROG Strix G16
户外使用的ROG Strix G16
户外使用的ROG Strix G16
视角稳定
视角稳定
 

性能 -GeForce RTX 4080的功率最高可达175瓦。

华硕ROG Strix G16有多种配置。顶级配置包括一个 英特尔酷睿i9-13980HX与32GB的DDR5内存和一个 NvidiaGeForce RTX 4080.我们的测试单元是相同的,除了16GB的内存。由于高TDP和TGP值,对游戏几乎没有任何限制。在最高质量设置下,许多当前的标题在ROG Strix上以显示器的原生QHD+分辨率呈现,远远超过60 FPS。

 
 

性能控制和测试条件

ROG Strix G16的性能可以通过全面的Armory Crate应用来控制。除了性能之外,RGB灯光、显示器和其他功能也在这里配置。有三个预定义的性能配置文件,即静音、性能和涡轮,以及对 RTX 4080.根据GPU模式,有一种混合模式,或在i9的iGPU或Nvidia显卡作为GPU之间进行选择。切换是通过MUX进行的,因此显示器总是直接连接到活动的图形单元。如果需要,用户可以在手动模式下榨出笔记本的所有游戏潜力,并调整各种设置。可以设置风扇曲线、TGP、动态提升、PL1和PL2以及温度限制。即使华硕试图用硬性限制来遏制系统,超频者也会在这里得到他们的金钱回报。至少笔记本电脑的性能可以适应一些游戏的要求。GPU和CPU都没有构成任何性能瓶颈问题。

Armory Crate的各种设置可以使TGP和TDP值有相当大的变化。例如,该处理器在涡轮模式下能够长时间提取130瓦,而在静音模式下能够提取约70瓦。在用Prime95和Furmark进行的压力测试中,英特尔酷睿i9和NvidiaGeForce RTX 4080在涡轮模式下的综合输出功率约为210瓦,在静音模式下为95瓦。更精确的数值可以从下面的日志中收集到。仔细观察可以发现,虽然以瓦为单位的硬件性能值偶尔会因工作模式而相差甚远,但处理器和图形芯片的有效时钟速率却相差不远。

另一方面,我们注意到笔记本的噪音排放有很大差异。在静音模式下,三个风扇的运行速度约为40 dB(A)。涡轮模式约为51 dB(A)。由于分贝尺度是对数的,这使ROG Strix G16的感知响度增加了一倍。我们的测量和基准测试主要是在标准GPU模式和性能模式下进行的。

Cinebench R23环路
Cinebench R23环路
皮尔马克
皮尔马克
Prime95 + Furmark
Prime95 + Furmark

处理器

猛禽湖是英特尔第13代处理器的名称,它带来了 英特尔酷睿i9-13980HX.这款高端CPU是为具有强大冷却能力的大型笔记本设计的。由于有8个P核和16个E核,i9有32个线程。根据HWinfo,华硕游戏笔记本中的CPU运行时远远高于英特尔推荐的TDP值。在涡轮增压模式下,可实现高达130瓦的连续功率。

在性能模式下,风扇在Cinebench R15循环中反复明显地启动得相当晚。这解释了前三次运行后性能急剧下降的原因。然而,此后不久,冷却就稳定下来,处理器能够继续在高水平上工作。性能的急剧下降只发生在这个特定的基准测试中。每次运行后,Cinebench都会重新启动,在两次运行之间给处理器一到三秒的时间来恢复。然而,这也可能导致性能控制对负载情况的延迟反应。在使用Cinebench R23的循环中,我们无法引起性能的急剧下降。在这里,各次运行之间的时间要短一些。在两次超过30,000分的强劲运行后,ROG Strix G16在CB R23循环中保持了10分钟的29,000分左右。在电池模式下,多核性能下降了约30%,达到约20,000分。

总的来说,ROG Strix G16的英特尔酷睿i9是相当强大的。这里的基准测试结果一直是顶级水平。然而,i9无法与华硕Zephyrus Duo 16中的Ryzen 9相比。

Cinebench R15 Multi Sustained Load

02805608401120140016801960224025202800308033603640392042004480476050405320Tooltip
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ Intel Core i9-13980HX; turbo: Ø4509 (4425.76-4764.17)
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ Intel Core i9-13980HX: Ø4416 (1123.72-4730.93)
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX: Ø5385 (5255.55-5554.01)
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H Intel Core i9-13900HX: Ø4574 (4429.68-4819.28)
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Intel Core i9-13900H: Ø2829 (2772.58-2962.96)
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS: Ø2250 (2235.89-2298.72)
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX: Ø4512 (4463.29-4528.99)
CPU Performance Rating: Percent
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
CPU Performance Rating
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX
82.5 pt
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Intel Core i9-13900HX
80.3 pt
Average Intel Core i9-13980HX
 
79.6 pt
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
Intel Core i9-13980HX
78.9 pt
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX
72.1 pt
Average of class Gaming
 
63.4 pt
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Intel Core i9-13900H
54.9 pt
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
46.3 pt
Cinebench R23 / Multi Core
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX
34521 (32987.6min - 34521.3max) Points +15%
Average Intel Core i9-13980HX
  (28301 - 33052, n=11)
30305 Points +1%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Intel Core i9-13900HX
30162 Points 0%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
Intel Core i9-13980HX
30139 Points
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX
26736 (22394.1min - 26736.1max) Points -11%
Average of class Gaming
  (5668 - 36249, n=190, last 2 years)
21784 Points -28%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Intel Core i9-13900H
19188 Points -36%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
13995 Points -54%
Cinebench R23 / Single Core
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
Intel Core i9-13980HX
2126 Points
Average Intel Core i9-13980HX
  (1825 - 2169, n=9)
2081 Points -2%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Intel Core i9-13900HX
2043 Points -4%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX
2029 Points -5%
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX
1940 Points -9%
Average of class Gaming
  (1136 - 2235, n=188, last 2 years)
1886 Points -11%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Intel Core i9-13900H
1707 Points -20%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
1561 Points -27%
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core)
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX
13457 Points +17%
Average Intel Core i9-13980HX
  (10353 - 12437, n=10)
11540 Points 0%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
Intel Core i9-13980HX
11510 Points
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Intel Core i9-13900HX
11500 Points 0%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX
8697 Points -24%
Average of class Gaming
  (2179 - 13832, n=188, last 2 years)
8290 Points -28%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Intel Core i9-13900H
7254 Points -37%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
5441 Points -53%
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core)
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
Intel Core i9-13980HX
818 Points
Average Intel Core i9-13980HX
  (717 - 825, n=10)
789 Points -4%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Intel Core i9-13900HX
788 Points -4%
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX
756 Points -8%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX
742 Points -9%
Average of class Gaming
  (439 - 856, n=188, last 2 years)
725 Points -11%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Intel Core i9-13900H
651 Points -20%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
612 Points -25%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX
5554 (5255.55min - 5554.01max) Points +17%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Intel Core i9-13900HX
4819 (4429.68min - 4819.28max) Points +1%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
Intel Core i9-13980HX
4764 (4425.76min - 4764.17max) Points
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
Intel Core i9-13980HX
4731 (1123.72min - 4730.93max) Points -1%
Average Intel Core i9-13980HX
  (4358 - 5172, n=11)
4708 Points -1%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX
4529 (4463.29min - 4528.99max) Points -5%
Average of class Gaming
  (905 - 5663, n=195, last 2 years)
3413 Points -28%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Intel Core i9-13900H
2963 (2772.58min - 2962.96max) Points -38%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
2299 (2235.89min - 2298.72max) Points -52%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX
307 Points 0%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
Intel Core i9-13980HX
306 Points
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
Intel Core i9-13980HX
296 Points -3%
Average Intel Core i9-13980HX
  (289 - 312, n=11)
303 Points -1%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Intel Core i9-13900HX
301 Points -2%
Average of class Gaming
  (191.9 - 318, n=192, last 2 years)
277 Points -9%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX
274 Points -10%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
248 Points -19%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Intel Core i9-13900H
243 Points -21%
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
225 Seconds * -112%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Intel Core i9-13900H
172 Seconds * -62%
Average of class Gaming
  (87 - 555, n=183, last 2 years)
170.9 Seconds * -61%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX
114 Seconds * -8%
Average Intel Core i9-13980HX
  (97 - 136, n=10)
109.3 Seconds * -3%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
Intel Core i9-13980HX
106 Seconds *
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Intel Core i9-13900HX
105 Seconds * +1%
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX
93 Seconds * +12%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX
135927 MIPS +19%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Intel Core i9-13900HX
122254 MIPS +7%
Average Intel Core i9-13980HX
  (104616 - 129804, n=10)
118278 MIPS +3%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
Intel Core i9-13980HX
114658 MIPS
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX
109330 MIPS -5%
Average of class Gaming
  (23795 - 140932, n=187, last 2 years)
85120 MIPS -26%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Intel Core i9-13900H
74386 MIPS -35%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
61292 MIPS -47%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX
7319 MIPS +6%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Intel Core i9-13900HX
7035 MIPS +2%
Average Intel Core i9-13980HX
  (6230 - 7163, n=10)
6915 MIPS 0%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
Intel Core i9-13980HX
6909 MIPS
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX
6445 MIPS -7%
Average of class Gaming
  (4199 - 7581, n=187, last 2 years)
6306 MIPS -9%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
5779 MIPS -16%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Intel Core i9-13900H
5570 MIPS -19%
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Intel Core i9-13900HX
21058 Points +8%
Average Intel Core i9-13980HX
  (18475 - 22200, n=10)
20092 Points +3%
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX
19583 Points +1%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
Intel Core i9-13980HX
19433 Points
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX
18152 Points -7%
Average of class Gaming
  (4557 - 23194, n=188, last 2 years)
14972 Points -23%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Intel Core i9-13900H
13796 Points -29%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
9836 Points -49%
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX
2132 Points +4%
Average Intel Core i9-13980HX
  (1796 - 2139, n=10)
2051 Points 0%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
Intel Core i9-13980HX
2044 Points
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Intel Core i9-13900HX
2025 Points -1%
Average of class Gaming
  (986 - 2210, n=188, last 2 years)
1892 Points -7%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX
1805 Points -12%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Intel Core i9-13900H
1718 Points -16%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
1574 Points -23%
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX
34.8 fps +17%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Intel Core i9-13900HX
31.9 fps +7%
Average Intel Core i9-13980HX
  (27 - 33.4, n=9)
31.1 fps +5%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
Intel Core i9-13980HX
29.7 fps
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX
28.7 fps -3%
Average of class Gaming
  (6.72 - 38.9, n=187, last 2 years)
23.4 fps -21%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Intel Core i9-13900H
21 fps -29%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
17.5 fps -41%
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX
60.4 s * -27%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
59.1 s * -24%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Intel Core i9-13900H
57.8 s * -21%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
Intel Core i9-13980HX
47.7 s *
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX
47.5 s * -0%
Average of class Gaming
  (31.4 - 96.6, n=184, last 2 years)
47.4 s * +1%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Intel Core i9-13900HX
44 s * +8%
Average Intel Core i9-13980HX
  (35 - 51.4, n=10)
43 s * +10%
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
0.5 sec * -29%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Intel Core i9-13900H
0.4934 sec * -27%
Average of class Gaming
  (0.3609 - 0.759, n=188, last 2 years)
0.438 sec * -13%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX
0.4121 sec * -6%
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX
0.3982 sec * -3%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Intel Core i9-13900HX
0.3979 sec * -3%
Average Intel Core i9-13980HX
  (0.3793 - 0.4462, n=10)
0.3959 sec * -2%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
Intel Core i9-13980HX
0.387 sec *

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
4764 Points
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
278 fps
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
306 Points
Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
818 Points
Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
11510 Points
Cinebench R23 Multi Core
30139 Points
Cinebench R23 Single Core
2126 Points
Help
Performance Rating
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
96.6 pt
Average Intel Core i9-13980HX
 
95.7 pt
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
95.2 pt
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
93.8 pt
Average of class Gaming
 
77.3 pt
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
70.9 pt
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, Radeon RX 7600S
62.3 pt
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
27227 KRay/s
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
26741 KRay/s -2%
Average Intel Core i9-13980HX
  (21332 - 29553, n=9)
26707 KRay/s -2%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
25857 KRay/s -5%
Average of class Gaming
  (4986 - 60169, n=184, last 2 years)
21813 KRay/s -20%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
18385 KRay/s -32%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, Radeon RX 7600S
16661 KRay/s -39%
AIDA64 / FPU Julia
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
133668 Points +2%
Average Intel Core i9-13980HX
  (108001 - 148168, n=9)
132982 Points +1%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
131131 Points
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
125944 Points -4%
Average of class Gaming
  (25360 - 252486, n=184, last 2 years)
106435 Points -19%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, Radeon RX 7600S
101275 Points -23%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
90834 Points -31%
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
6750 MB/s +2%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
6596 MB/s
Average Intel Core i9-13980HX
  (5264 - 7142, n=9)
6559 MB/s -1%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
6350 MB/s -4%
Average of class Gaming
  (1339 - 10389, n=184, last 2 years)
4884 MB/s -26%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
4187 MB/s -37%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, Radeon RX 7600S
3494 MB/s -47%
AIDA64 / CPU Queen
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
143409 Points
Average Intel Core i9-13980HX
  (126758 - 143409, n=9)
138011 Points -4%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
134227 Points -6%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
133226 Points -7%
Average of class Gaming
  (50699 - 200651, n=184, last 2 years)
116781 Points -19%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, Radeon RX 7600S
104709 Points -27%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
95175 Points -34%
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
17026 Points
Average Intel Core i9-13980HX
  (13785 - 17117, n=9)
16075 Points -6%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
15813 Points -7%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
15807 Points -7%
Average of class Gaming
  (4800 - 32988, n=184, last 2 years)
13235 Points -22%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, Radeon RX 7600S
12691 Points -25%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
10485 Points -38%
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
66753 Points +1%
Average Intel Core i9-13980HX
  (53398 - 73758, n=9)
66568 Points 0%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
66336 Points
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
63308 Points -5%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, Radeon RX 7600S
55209 Points -17%
Average of class Gaming
  (12321 - 134044, n=184, last 2 years)
53598 Points -19%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
44967 Points -32%
AIDA64 / CPU AES
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
149377 MB/s +17%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
128070 MB/s
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
127698 MB/s 0%
Average Intel Core i9-13980HX
  (105169 - 136520, n=9)
126745 MB/s -1%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
125644 MB/s -2%
Average of class Gaming
  (19065 - 328679, n=184, last 2 years)
108960 MB/s -15%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, Radeon RX 7600S
64725 MB/s -49%
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
1936 MB/s +1%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
1912 MB/s
Average Intel Core i9-13980HX
  (1513 - 2039, n=9)
1894 MB/s -1%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
1850 MB/s -3%
Average of class Gaming
  (373 - 2409, n=184, last 2 years)
1358 MB/s -29%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
1192 MB/s -38%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, Radeon RX 7600S
883 MB/s -54%
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
14722 KRay/s 0%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
14671 KRay/s
Average Intel Core i9-13980HX
  (11431 - 16325, n=9)
14483 KRay/s -1%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
13844 KRay/s -6%
Average of class Gaming
  (2540 - 31796, n=184, last 2 years)
11747 KRay/s -20%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
9803 KRay/s -33%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, Radeon RX 7600S
8923 KRay/s -39%
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
50834 MPixel/s +37%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
48626 MPixel/s +31%
Average Intel Core i9-13980HX
  (37069 - 52949, n=9)
46025 MPixel/s +24%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
44611 MPixel/s +20%
Average of class Gaming
  (10805 - 60161, n=185, last 2 years)
40045 MPixel/s +8%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
37069 MPixel/s
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, Radeon RX 7600S
27871 MPixel/s -25%

系统性能

在PCMark 10测试中,华硕ROG Strix G16落后于许多具有类似硬件的竞争对手。性能下降发生在生产力子部分,其中考虑到了内存和硬盘驱动器的性能。与目前其他游戏笔记本相比,ROG Strix G16的这两项性能都不理想。然而,我们不能说这里的数值低,因为华硕ROG Strix仍然远远高于一般的游戏笔记本。

当你看到Crossmark以及PCMark 10 Essentials和Content Creation的结果时,你就会明白这款笔记本非常强大:华硕ROG Strix G16配备了所有可能的设备。除了在游戏方面的主要能力外,这款笔记本电脑在日常使用中也是非常通用的。强大的计算硬件确保了较短的加载时间和一个非常灵敏的系统。

PCMark 10 / Score
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, R9 7945HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
9151 Points +27%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13980HX, 2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)
8764 Points +21%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
8058 Points +12%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024
7888 Points +9%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
7830 Points +8%
Average of class Gaming
  (5776 - 9852, n=166, last 2 years)
7789 Points +8%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
Radeon RX 7600S, R7 7735HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
7332 Points +2%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13980HX, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
7223 Points
Average Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
  ()
7223 Points 0%
Asus ROG Strix G18 G814JI
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13650HX, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
6404 Points -11%
PCMark 10 / Essentials
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, R9 7945HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
12176 Points +1%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13980HX, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
12031 Points
Average Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
  ()
12031 Points 0%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
11703 Points -3%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
11332 Points -6%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024
11078 Points -8%
Average of class Gaming
  (9057 - 12334, n=165, last 2 years)
10828 Points -10%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
Radeon RX 7600S, R7 7735HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
10622 Points -12%
Asus ROG Strix G18 G814JI
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13650HX, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
9768 Points -19%
PCMark 10 / Productivity
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, R9 7945HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
11833 Points +54%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
10788 Points +40%
Average of class Gaming
  (6662 - 14612, n=165, last 2 years)
9897 Points +29%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
Radeon RX 7600S, R7 7735HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
9332 Points +21%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
9231 Points +20%
Asus ROG Strix G18 G814JI
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13650HX, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
8886 Points +16%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024
8271 Points +8%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13980HX, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
7686 Points
Average Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
  ()
7686 Points 0%
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024
14535 Points +31%
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, R9 7945HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
14432 Points +31%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
13575 Points +23%
Average of class Gaming
  (6703 - 18475, n=165, last 2 years)
12085 Points +9%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13980HX, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
11058 Points
Average Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
  ()
11058 Points 0%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
Radeon RX 7600S, R7 7735HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
10790 Points -2%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
10319 Points -7%
Asus ROG Strix G18 G814JI
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13650HX, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
8212 Points -26%
CrossMark / Overall
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13980HX, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
2182 Points
Average Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
  ()
2182 Points 0%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13980HX, 2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)
2080 Points -5%
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, R9 7945HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
2078 Points -5%
Average of class Gaming
  (1247 - 2344, n=147, last 2 years)
1905 Points -13%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
1882 Points -14%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024
1592 Points -27%
CrossMark / Productivity
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13980HX, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
2044 Points
Average Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
  ()
2044 Points 0%
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, R9 7945HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
1946 Points -5%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13980HX, 2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)
1909 Points -7%
Average of class Gaming
  (1299 - 2204, n=147, last 2 years)
1805 Points -12%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
1781 Points -13%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024
1509 Points -26%
CrossMark / Creativity
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13980HX, 2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)
2455 Points +2%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13980HX, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
2400 Points
Average Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
  ()
2400 Points 0%
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, R9 7945HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
2377 Points -1%
Average of class Gaming
  (1275 - 2660, n=147, last 2 years)
2090 Points -13%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
1978 Points -18%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024
1780 Points -26%
CrossMark / Responsiveness
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13980HX, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
1990 Points
Average Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
  ()
1990 Points 0%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
1915 Points -4%
Average of class Gaming
  (1030 - 2330, n=147, last 2 years)
1704 Points -14%
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, R9 7945HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
1689 Points -15%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13980HX, 2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)
1634 Points -18%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024
1342 Points -33%
PCMark 10 Score
7223 points
Help
AIDA64 / Memory Copy
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
77544 MB/s +25%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
77060 MB/s +24%
Average Intel Core i9-13980HX
  (62189 - 80776, n=9)
71190 MB/s +14%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
67561 MB/s +9%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
66344 MB/s +7%
Average of class Gaming
  (21842 - 94222, n=184, last 2 years)
65173 MB/s +5%
Asus ROG Strix G18 G814JI
Intel Core i7-13650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
64308 MB/s +3%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
62189 MB/s
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, Radeon RX 7600S
48549 MB/s -22%
AIDA64 / Memory Read
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
85073 MB/s +17%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
84869 MB/s +17%
Average Intel Core i9-13980HX
  (62624 - 89096, n=9)
76728 MB/s +6%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
74518 MB/s +3%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
72658 MB/s
Average of class Gaming
  (23681 - 99713, n=184, last 2 years)
69015 MB/s -5%
Asus ROG Strix G18 G814JI
Intel Core i7-13650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
68497 MB/s -6%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
68252 MB/s -6%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, Radeon RX 7600S
50338 MB/s -31%
AIDA64 / Memory Write
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
80441 MB/s +34%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
70939 MB/s +18%
Average Intel Core i9-13980HX
  (59912 - 79917, n=9)
69396 MB/s +16%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
68170 MB/s +14%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
67449 MB/s +13%
Average of class Gaming
  (22986 - 108954, n=184, last 2 years)
66990 MB/s +12%
Asus ROG Strix G18 G814JI
Intel Core i7-13650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
60111 MB/s 0%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
59912 MB/s
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, Radeon RX 7600S
55012 MB/s -8%
AIDA64 / Memory Latency
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
99.5 ns * -14%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
94.4 ns * -8%
Average of class Gaming
  (59.5 - 259, n=184, last 2 years)
94 ns * -7%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
89.3 ns * -2%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
87.5 ns *
Average Intel Core i9-13980HX
  (79.4 - 93.2, n=9)
87.5 ns * -0%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, Radeon RX 7600S
84.6 ns * +3%
Asus ROG Strix G18 G814JI
Intel Core i7-13650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
83.7 ns * +4%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
83.2 ns * +5%

* ... smaller is better

DPC延时

在审查时的当前驱动配置中,ROG Strix G16的DPC延迟相对较高。因此,音频处理等实时应用可能会在这里遇到麻烦。

延迟监测
延迟监测
LatencyMon驱动程序
LatencyMon驱动程序
YouTube 4K60Hz测试
YouTube 4K60Hz测试
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, R9 7945HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
5418.4 μs * -116%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13980HX, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
2505 μs *
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024
2448.6 μs * +2%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
1053.8 μs * +58%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
437.7 μs * +83%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
Radeon RX 7600S, R7 7735HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
237.9 μs * +91%

* ... smaller is better

存储设备

西部数据PC SN560 NVMe SSD
西部数据PC SN560 NVMe SSD

西部数据PC SN560 NVMe固态硬盘的速度其实并不慢,但它还没有完全接近对比领域中其他几款游戏笔记本的极快硬盘。因此,这款固态硬盘不得不在中场休息时占有一席之地。对于华硕ROG Strix G16的性能来说,这只意味着轻微的性能损失,在一些游戏中可能会有稍长的加载时间。

AS SSD
AS SSD
AS SSD复制基准
AS SSD复制基准
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
Sequential Read: 4308.28MB/s
Sequential Write: 2890.58MB/s
4K Read: 58.78MB/s
4K Write: 220.74MB/s
4K-64 Read: 1271.5MB/s
4K-64 Write: 2499.95MB/s
Access Time Read: 0.087ms
Access Time Write: 0.017ms
Copy ISO: 631.9MB/s
Copy Program: 1178.98MB/s
Copy Game: 2176.18MB/s
Score Read: 1761Points
Score Write: 3010Points
Score Total: 5610Points
Drive Performance Rating - Percent
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
85.4 pt
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
70.3 pt
Average of class Gaming
 
67.8 pt
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
65.5 pt
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
65.5 pt
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)
61.1 pt
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
60.6 pt
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
53.2 pt
Average WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
 
48.9 pt
Asus ROG Strix G18 G814JI
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
39 pt
DiskSpd
seq read
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)
4842 (4719.64min - 4842.11max) MB/s +18%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
4525 (4498.41min - 4525.41max) MB/s +11%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
4093 (4067.17min - 4092.59max) MB/s
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
3650 (3626.52min - 3649.67max) MB/s -11%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
3844 (3257.93min - 3843.87max) MB/s -6%
Average of class Gaming
  (1319 - 7045, n=165, last 2 years)
3468 MB/s -15%
Average WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
  (2406 - 4128, n=20)
3165 MB/s -23%
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
2756 (2741.19min - 2756.29max) MB/s -33%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
2519 MB/s -38%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
2460 (2456.1min - 2460.17max) MB/s -40%
Asus ROG Strix G18 G814JI
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
1870 (1827.25min - 1869.82max) MB/s -54%
seq write
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
4378 (4355.78min - 4378.43max) MB/s +28%
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
4250 (4204.35min - 4249.88max) MB/s +24%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)
4199 (3998.61min - 4199.12max) MB/s +23%
Average of class Gaming
  (535 - 9307, n=165, last 2 years)
3802 MB/s +11%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
3416 (3372.4min - 3415.84max) MB/s
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
3366 (3313.08min - 3366.35max) MB/s -1%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
3291 (3216.4min - 3290.77max) MB/s -4%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
3242 (1498min - 3241.78max) MB/s -5%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
2991 (2932.66min - 2991.48max) MB/s -12%
Average WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
  (2235 - 3416, n=20)
2924 MB/s -14%
Asus ROG Strix G18 G814JI
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
2166 (2094.01min - 2166.15max) MB/s -37%
seq q8 t1 read
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)
10774 (9137.92min - 10774max) MB/s +114%
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
7048 (6068.56min - 7047.9max) MB/s +40%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
6935 (5510.15min - 6934.86max) MB/s +38%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
6872 (4963.33min - 6872.25max) MB/s +37%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
6682 (5778.28min - 6681.95max) MB/s +33%
Average of class Gaming
  (2594 - 16089, n=165, last 2 years)
6305 MB/s +26%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
5023 MB/s
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
5017 (4534.25min - 5017.23max) MB/s 0%
Average WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
  (3728 - 5023, n=20)
4908 MB/s -2%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
4633 (4029.05min - 4633.45max) MB/s -8%
Asus ROG Strix G18 G814JI
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
4239 (3584.87min - 4239.18max) MB/s -16%
seq q8 t1 write
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)
8404 (8165.05min - 8403.71max) MB/s +145%
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
6004 (5933.65min - 6004.3max) MB/s +75%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
4943 (4923.06min - 4943.2max) MB/s +44%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
4926 (4833.5min - 4926max) MB/s +44%
Average of class Gaming
  (539 - 14571, n=165, last 2 years)
4841 MB/s +41%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
4244 (427.59min - 4244.22max) MB/s +24%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
3429 (3365.09min - 3429.47max) MB/s
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
3387 (3363.41min - 3386.9max) MB/s -1%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
3415 (3353.98min - 3415.42max) MB/s 0%
Average WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
  (2957 - 3464, n=20)
3226 MB/s -6%
Asus ROG Strix G18 G814JI
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
2982 (2920.07min - 2981.52max) MB/s -13%
4k q1 t1 read
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
95.3 (93.25min - 95.25max) MB/s +52%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
66.9 (50.9min - 66.86max) MB/s +7%
Average of class Gaming
  (30.6 - 95.9, n=165, last 2 years)
65.9 MB/s +5%
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
64.3 (63.09min - 64.34max) MB/s +3%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
62.5 (61.85min - 62.46max) MB/s
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
61.5 (60.59min - 61.49max) MB/s -2%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)
57.5 (57.09min - 57.53max) MB/s -8%
Average WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
  (41.9 - 73.3, n=20)
57 MB/s -9%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
56.5 (49.8min - 56.49max) MB/s -10%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
35.5 (35.31min - 35.47max) MB/s -43%
Asus ROG Strix G18 G814JI
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
30.6 (30.29min - 30.64max) MB/s -51%
4k q1 t1 write
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
313 (306.34min - 313.21max) MB/s +31%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
255 (243.79min - 255.25max) MB/s +7%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
239 (230.87min - 239.2max) MB/s
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
236 (223.33min - 235.64max) MB/s -1%
Average of class Gaming
  (66.6 - 397, n=165, last 2 years)
223 MB/s -7%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
220 (56.84min - 219.56max) MB/s -8%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
181.3 (175.93min - 181.25max) MB/s -24%
Average WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
  (78 - 318, n=20)
177.4 MB/s -26%
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
164.3 (163.26min - 164.34max) MB/s -31%
Asus ROG Strix G18 G814JI
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
116.3 (111.83min - 116.33max) MB/s -51%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)
103.7 (103.17min - 103.74max) MB/s -57%
4k q32 t16 read
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
4100 (4085.58min - 4100.1max) MB/s +167%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
3523 (3416.03min - 3522.69max) MB/s +130%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
3111 (2388.54min - 3111.42max) MB/s +103%
Average of class Gaming
  (417 - 6172, n=165, last 2 years)
2561 MB/s +67%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
2025 (1213.07min - 2024.78max) MB/s +32%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
1533 (1526.72min - 1532.76max) MB/s
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
1527 (1525.66min - 1526.54max) MB/s 0%
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
1158 (1132.18min - 1157.71max) MB/s -24%
Average WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
  (592 - 1544, n=20)
1085 MB/s -29%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)
711 (692.26min - 710.64max) MB/s -54%
Asus ROG Strix G18 G814JI
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
613 (588.72min - 613.33max) MB/s -60%
4k q32 t16 write
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
3597 (3488.54min - 3597.4max) MB/s +29%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3537 (3519.01min - 3536.66max) MB/s +27%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
2783 (2698.54min - 2783.41max) MB/s
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
2689 (2088.87min - 2688.7max) MB/s -3%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
2291 (2256.15min - 2290.93max) MB/s -18%
Average of class Gaming
  (162.3 - 4869, n=165, last 2 years)
2132 MB/s -23%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
1282 (960.6min - 1281.78max) MB/s -54%
Average WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
  (227 - 2783, n=20)
1079 MB/s -61%
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
481 (462.66min - 481.19max) MB/s -83%
Asus ROG Strix G18 G814JI
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
441 (428.19min - 440.55max) MB/s -84%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)
350 (343.49min - 350.45max) MB/s -87%
AS SSD
Score Total
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
8224 Points +47%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
7311 Points +30%
Average of class Gaming
  (2271 - 13854, n=157, last 2 years)
6736 Points +20%
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
6435 Points +15%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
5903 Points +5%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
5636 Points 0%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
5610 Points
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)
4364 Points -22%
Asus ROG Strix G18 G814JI
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
4272 Points -24%
Average WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
  (2750 - 5610, n=18)
4125 Points -26%
Score Read
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
3308 Points +88%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3188 Points +81%
Average of class Gaming
  (776 - 4721, n=157, last 2 years)
2442 Points +39%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
2348 Points +33%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)
1858 Points +6%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
1805 Points +2%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
1761 Points
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
1554 Points -12%
Average WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
  (872 - 1761, n=18)
1349 Points -23%
Asus ROG Strix G18 G814JI
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
1294 Points -27%
Score Write
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
4164 Points +38%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3468 Points +15%
Average of class Gaming
  (515 - 7208, n=157, last 2 years)
3109 Points +3%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
3012 Points 0%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
3010 Points
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
2428 Points -19%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
2404 Points -20%
Asus ROG Strix G18 G814JI
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
2387 Points -21%
Average WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
  (651 - 3010, n=18)
2156 Points -28%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)
1691 Points -44%
Seq Read
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)
7888 MB/s +83%
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
5689 MB/s +32%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
5429.33 MB/s +26%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
5144.76 MB/s +19%
Average of class Gaming
  (2260 - 12763, n=157, last 2 years)
4933 MB/s +15%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
4582 MB/s +6%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
4308.28 MB/s
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
3976.53 MB/s -8%
Average WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
  (3074 - 4328, n=18)
3885 MB/s -10%
Asus ROG Strix G18 G814JI
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
3810.59 MB/s -12%
Seq Write
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)
5041 MB/s +74%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
4064.76 MB/s +41%
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
3904 MB/s +35%
Average of class Gaming
  (495 - 11316, n=157, last 2 years)
3755 MB/s +30%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
3058.47 MB/s +6%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
3020.8 MB/s +5%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
2890.58 MB/s
Asus ROG Strix G18 G814JI
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
2319.92 MB/s -20%
Average WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
  (1536 - 3101, n=18)
2315 MB/s -20%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
2310 MB/s -20%
4K Read
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
85.9 MB/s +46%
Average of class Gaming
  (27.8 - 112.1, n=157, last 2 years)
65.3 MB/s +11%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
61.3 MB/s +4%
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
59.2 MB/s +1%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
58.78 MB/s
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)
58 MB/s -1%
Average WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
  (36.6 - 61.3, n=18)
50.1 MB/s -15%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
49.65 MB/s -16%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
49.25 MB/s -16%
Asus ROG Strix G18 G814JI
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
37.91 MB/s -36%
4K Write
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
288 MB/s +30%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
220.74 MB/s
Average of class Gaming
  (108.8 - 512, n=157, last 2 years)
212 MB/s -4%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
205.06 MB/s -7%
Average WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
  (117 - 512, n=18)
204 MB/s -8%
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
189.7 MB/s -14%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
152.75 MB/s -31%
Asus ROG Strix G18 G814JI
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
152.19 MB/s -31%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
144.8 MB/s -34%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)
114.7 MB/s -48%
4K-64 Read
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
2744.3 MB/s +116%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
2558.72 MB/s +101%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
1901.41 MB/s +50%
Average of class Gaming
  (451 - 3475, n=157, last 2 years)
1877 MB/s +48%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
1285 MB/s +1%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
1271.5 MB/s
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)
1011 MB/s -20%
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
925 MB/s -27%
Average WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
  (457 - 1272, n=18)
910 MB/s -28%
Asus ROG Strix G18 G814JI
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
874.66 MB/s -31%
4K-64 Write
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
3584 MB/s +43%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
2856.24 MB/s +14%
Average of class Gaming
  (277 - 5909, n=157, last 2 years)
2524 MB/s +1%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
2499.95 MB/s
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
2493 MB/s 0%
Asus ROG Strix G18 G814JI
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
2002.63 MB/s -20%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
1949.13 MB/s -22%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
1944.47 MB/s -22%
Average WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
  (172.9 - 2500, n=18)
1736 MB/s -31%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)
1072 MB/s -57%
Access Time Read
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
0.087 ms *
Average WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
  (0.026 - 0.17, n=18)
0.07078 ms * +19%
Average of class Gaming
  (0.016 - 0.379, n=156, last 2 years)
0.05556 ms * +36%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
0.05 ms * +43%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)
0.044 ms * +49%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
0.041 ms * +53%
Asus ROG Strix G18 G814JI
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
0.04 ms * +54%
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
0.029 ms * +67%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
0.028 ms * +68%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
0.025 ms * +71%
Access Time Write
Asus ROG Strix G18 G814JI
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
0.12 ms * -606%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
0.105 ms * -518%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
0.082 ms * -382%
Average of class Gaming
  (0.011 - 1.028, n=157, last 2 years)
0.04807 ms * -183%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)
0.035 ms * -106%
Average WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
  (0.016 - 0.088, n=18)
0.03311 ms * -95%
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
0.021 ms * -24%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
0.019 ms * -12%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
0.017 ms *
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
0.013 ms * +24%

* ... smaller is better

Sustained Read Performance: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

035571010651420177521302485284031953550390542604615497053255680603563906745Tooltip
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00: Ø5002 (4613.53-5017.26)
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N: Ø7048 (6645.87-7075.48)
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR: Ø5697 (3283.58-6647.05)
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10: Ø6590 (6239.87-6954.51)
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM: Ø4593 (4015.9-4669.31)
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 SSSTC CA6-8D1024: Ø6412 (5645.36-6872.58)

图形卡

RTX 4080在Nvidia的最新一代显卡中占据第二位。强大的AD104芯片由12GB的GDDR6X内存支持,并提供最多7680个着色器和232个张量核心。华硕还依靠图形芯片的高性能率。在涡轮模式下,RTX 4080能够以约170瓦的功率连续工作。这使Strix G16的图形性能与华硕ROG Strix Scar 18相差无几。然而,这款笔记本的RTX 4090具有类似的冷却效果。因此,在冷却选项和图形性能之间的平衡方面,RTX 4080处于甜蜜点。

ROG Strix G16在安静模式下的高图形性能也很有趣。在这里,我们可以再次与另一个华硕ROG设备进行直接比较。ROG Strix G18的RTX 4070在激活性能模式的Time Spy 基准测试中达到12111分。G16中的RTX 4080在静音模式下达到了11817分。因此,这款游戏笔记本可以在不牺牲良好图形性能的情况下安静地运行。

电池模式
电池模式
无声模式
无声模式
性能模式
性能模式
涡轮模式
涡轮模式
涡轮+终极GPU模式
涡轮+终极GPU模式
3DMark Performance Rating - Percent
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13980HX
99.2 pt
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W -1!
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX
97.2 pt
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13980HX
93.4 pt
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX
88.9 pt
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 -1!
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX
86.7 pt
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
 
84.7 pt
Average of class Gaming
 
70.8 pt
Asus ROG Strix G18 G814JI
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13650HX
68.8 pt
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H
61.2 pt
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Radeon RX 7600S, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
60.2 pt
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13980HX
63818 Points +9%
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX
62240 Points +6%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX
60038 Points +2%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13980HX
58631 Points
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
  (45199 - 63128, n=24)
56791 Points -3%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX
56565 Points -4%
Average of class Gaming
  (1029 - 72178, n=183, last 2 years)
43810 Points -25%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H
41480 Points -29%
Asus ROG Strix G18 G814JI
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13650HX
40413 Points -31%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Radeon RX 7600S, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
33988 Points -42%
3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13980HX
164706 Points
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13980HX
159724 Points -3%
Asus ROG Strix G18 G814JI
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13650HX
157410 Points -4%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Radeon RX 7600S, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
150582 Points -9%
Average of class Gaming
  (15902 - 193851, n=101, last 2 years)
143583 Points -13%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX
138528 Points -16%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
  (92134 - 167815, n=10)
133526 Points -19%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H
105600 Points -36%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13980HX
48101 Points +10%
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX
47798 Points +9%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13980HX
43847 Points
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX
43525 Points -1%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
  (33058 - 45220, n=22)
40862 Points -7%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX
40570 Points -7%
Average of class Gaming
  (781 - 53059, n=194, last 2 years)
31415 Points -28%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H
28885 Points -34%
Asus ROG Strix G18 G814JI
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13650HX
28374 Points -35%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Radeon RX 7600S, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
25514 Points -42%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13980HX
21167 Points +10%
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX
20033 Points +5%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13980HX
19157 Points
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX
18441 Points -4%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX
18417 Points -4%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
  (13282 - 19663, n=22)
17777 Points -7%
Average of class Gaming
  (224 - 22717, n=189, last 2 years)
13118 Points -32%
Asus ROG Strix G18 G814JI
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13650HX
12111 Points -37%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H
11798 Points -38%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Radeon RX 7600S, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
9080 Points -53%
3DMark 11 Performance
44528 points
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score
288532 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
72794 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score
34456 points
3DMark Time Spy Score
18495 points
Help
Blender
v3.3 Classroom OPTIX/RTX
Asus ROG Strix G18 G814JI
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13650HX
24 Seconds * -71%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H
21 Seconds * -50%
Average of class Gaming
  (9 - 95, n=178, last 2 years)
20.9 Seconds * -49%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
  (13 - 20, n=21)
15.1 Seconds * -8%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX
15 Seconds * -7%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX
15 Seconds * -7%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13980HX
14 Seconds *
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX
13 Seconds * +7%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13980HX
10 Seconds * +29%
v3.3 Classroom CUDA
Asus ROG Strix G18 G814JI
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13650HX
37 Seconds * -68%
Average of class Gaming
  (16 - 175, n=183, last 2 years)
36.5 Seconds * -66%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H
34 Seconds * -55%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX
23 Seconds * -5%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
  (21 - 28, n=22)
22.8 Seconds * -4%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX
22 Seconds * -0%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13980HX
22 Seconds *
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX
20 Seconds * +9%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13980HX
18 Seconds * +18%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13980HX
17 Seconds * +23%

* ... smaller is better

游戏性能

得益于RTX 4080充足的图形性能值,即使在最高质量设置和QHD分辨率下,也能在当前许多游戏中实现高帧率(FPS)。该图形芯片还可以很好地处理光线追踪。然而,在2560 × 1600的原始分辨率下,显示器的240赫兹只能在要求不高的游戏中或在降低的质量设置下得到充分利用。

在静音模式下取得强大的结果后,我们没有错过机会,也在这种模式下测试ROG Strix G16的游戏性能。结果是。静音模式适用于游戏。因此,那些不追求最高FPS的人在使用该模式时不应该害羞。在F1 22基准测试中,沉默模式和性能模式之间偶尔只有30 FPS的差异。图形单元也能很好地处理光线追踪,达到72FPS。尽管冷却度较低,但没有一个测试的游戏出现滞后。

Performance Rating - Percent
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W -1!
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
98.9 pt
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
95.8 pt
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
94.7 pt
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
93.6 pt
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
92.2 pt
Average of class Gaming
 
72.1 pt
Asus ROG Strix G18 G814JI
Intel Core i7-13650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
71.2 pt
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
70.9 pt
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S
48.8 pt
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
178.6 (172min, 173P1) fps +2%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
178 (151min) fps +2%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
176.8 (159min) fps +1%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
175 (150min) fps
Average of class Gaming
  (18.4 - 216, n=163, last 2 years)
128.3 fps -27%
Asus ROG Strix G18 G814JI
Intel Core i7-13650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
119 (100min) fps -32%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
116 (48.5P0.1, 82.5P1) fps -34%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S
91 (77min) fps -48%
GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
146.1 (5.24min, 100P1) fps
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
145.5 (3.79min, 100P1) fps 0%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
141.3 (4.69min, 100P1) fps -3%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
140.7 (3.02min, 100P1) fps -4%
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
134 (7.27min, 90.9P1) fps -8%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
123.2 (3.96min, 76.9P1) fps -16%
Asus ROG Strix G18 G814JI
Intel Core i7-13650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
117.2 (6.43min, 76.9P1) fps -20%
Average of class Gaming
  (12.1 - 167.7, n=169, last 2 years)
113.7 fps -22%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S
85.5 (3.46min, 62.5P1) fps -41%
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
177.6 fps +6%
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
169.6 fps +1%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
168.1 fps
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
162.4 fps -3%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
157.8 fps -6%
Average of class Gaming
  (19.2 - 201, n=181, last 2 years)
119.8 fps -29%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
116.2 fps -31%
Asus ROG Strix G18 G814JI
Intel Core i7-13650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
115.5 fps -31%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S
78.2 fps -53%
Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
366 (29.1min, 263P1) fps +8%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
338 (43.6min, 243P1) fps
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
333 (38min, 227P1) fps -1%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
323 (61.7min, 222P1) fps -4%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
318 (29.2min, 228P1) fps -6%
Average of class Gaming
  (38.9 - 421, n=178, last 2 years)
229 fps -32%
Asus ROG Strix G18 G814JI
Intel Core i7-13650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
209 (45min, 152.5P1) fps -38%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
204 (39min, 153.9P1) fps -40%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S
162.7 (111.4min, 120.7P1) fps -52%
Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
194.7 (160min) fps +8%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
190.2 (160.9min) fps +5%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
180.7 (154.9min) fps
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
179.7 (153.7min) fps -1%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
179 (152.4min) fps -1%
Asus ROG Strix G18 G814JI
Intel Core i7-13650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
154.7 (134.1min) fps -14%
Average of class Gaming
  (33.2 - 220, n=187, last 2 years)
150.4 fps -17%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
144.5 (123.6min) fps -20%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S
110 (85.8min) fps -39%
X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3)
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
142.8 fps +3%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
138.8 fps
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
137 fps -1%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
131.8 fps -5%
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
117.8 fps -15%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
115.3 fps -17%
Asus ROG Strix G18 G814JI
Intel Core i7-13650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
112.6 fps -19%
Average of class Gaming
  (31.5 - 166.2, n=193, last 2 years)
107.8 fps -22%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S
55 fps -60%
Hogwarts Legacy
1920x1080 Ultra Preset + Full Ray Tracing AA:High T
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
  (53 - 66, n=2)
59.5 fps +12%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
53 fps
Average of class Gaming
  (26.8 - 67, n=13, last 2 years)
46.3 fps -13%
Asus ROG Strix G18 G814JI
Intel Core i7-13650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
43.9 (10.3min, 15.2P0.1, 24P1) fps -17%
2560x1440 Ultra Preset AA:High T
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
102 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
  (76 - 102, n=3)
86.3 fps -15%
Asus ROG Strix G18 G814JI
Intel Core i7-13650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
71 (19.8min, 22.6P0.1, 45.4P1) fps -30%
Average of class Gaming
  (29.8 - 125.9, n=18, last 2 years)
60.8 fps -40%
1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:High T
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
131 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
  (108 - 131, n=3)
118.3 fps -10%
Asus ROG Strix G18 G814JI
Intel Core i7-13650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
101.2 (32.8min, 46P0.1, 68.3P1) fps -23%
Average of class Gaming
  (10.3 - 166.1, n=27, last 2 years)
73.7 fps -44%
1920x1080 High Preset AA:High T
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
161.6 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
  (134 - 161.6, n=3)
144.2 fps -11%
Asus ROG Strix G18 G814JI
Intel Core i7-13650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
121.2 (53.2min, 66.5P0.1, 88.4P1) fps -25%
Average of class Gaming
  (12.8 - 186.5, n=26, last 2 years)
88.1 fps -45%
GRID Legends
2560x1440 Ultra Preset
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
158 (125min) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
  ()
158 fps 0%
Average of class Gaming
  (91 - 190, n=7, last 2 years)
133.6 fps -15%
1920x1080 Ultra Preset
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
187 (147min) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
  ()
187 fps 0%
Average of class Gaming
  (109.8 - 199, n=9, last 2 years)
144.5 fps -23%
1920x1080 High Preset
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
199 (147min) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
  ()
199 fps 0%
Average of class Gaming
  (130.1 - 210, n=8, last 2 years)
163.6 fps -18%
F1 22
1920x1080 High Preset AA:T AF:16x
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
273 (110min, 128P1) fps +4%
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
265 (193min, 148P1) fps +1%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
263 (181min, 134P1) fps
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
204 (135min, 113P1) fps -22%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
  (185.7 - 297, n=14)
241 fps -8%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
222 (178min) fps -16%
Average of class Gaming
  (17.1 - 322, n=89, last 2 years)
206 fps -22%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
173.8 (148min, 92P1) fps -34%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S
fps -100%
1920x1080 Ultra High Preset AA:T AF:16x
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
124.5 (107min, 87P1) fps +6%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
117 (95min, 76P1) fps
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
72.3 (47min, 52P1) fps -38%
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
114.3 (92min, 71P1) fps -2%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
  (72.3 - 124.2, n=15)
102.5 fps -12%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
101 (90min) fps -14%
Average of class Gaming
  (13 - 144.7, n=96, last 2 years)
84.9 fps -27%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
66.6 (58min, 47P1) fps -43%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S
fps -100%

用Witcher 3 进行的长期测试表明,G16可以在长时间内保持其性能。这里的FPS的轻微波动是由于昼夜循环造成的。在其他方面,这改变了游戏中的视觉范围。

Witcher 3 FPS Chart

0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180Tooltip
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU: Ø168.2 (160-174)
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W R9 7945HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU: Ø178.6 (172-188)
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU: Ø176.1 (159-182)
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU: Ø113.3 (107-120)
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU: Ø166.9 (141-179)
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
GTA V (2015) 186.9 186.4 183 146.1 131.4
The Witcher 3 (2015) 175
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 233 205 193.9 180.7 182.6
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) 224 201 168.1 128.3 74.2
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) 192.2 181 138.8
Strange Brigade (2018) 497 399 369 338 241
GRID Legends (2022) 241 220 199 187 158
Cyberpunk 2077 1.6 (2022) 123.48 121.41 81.98
F1 22 (2022) 312 294 263 117
FIFA 23 (2022) 165 158 160 155
Call of Duty Modern Warfare 2 2022 (2022) 154 145 108
Hogwarts Legacy (2023) 207 178.5 161.6 131 102

排放--ROG Strix也可以是安静的

噪声

带有三个风扇的冷却系统
带有三个风扇的冷却系统

ROG Strix G16的三个风扇产生了大量的风,但也产生了相当多的噪音,这取决于功率设置。在52 dB(A)的情况下,风扇淹没了大量的环境噪音,也淹没了来自笔记本的其他种类的噪音,否则就会被听到。如果需要,这款游戏笔记本也可以保持安静,但这并不一定意味着你必须依赖耳机,因为这款笔记本在静音模式下的最大音量为40 dB(A),仍然处于可容忍的范围内,而且仍有足够的功率用于游戏。然而,一个线圈的啸叫声就会变得清晰可闻。每当CPU和GPU在Turbo模式下运行时,你可以听到笔记本的VRM或其他部件发出哔哔声。当打开扬声器进行游戏时,线圈啸叫就不再那么明显了。

Noise Level

Idle
26 / 28 / 30 dB(A)
Load
48 / 52 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silent
40 dB(A)
audible
50 dB(A)
loud
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance)   environment noise: 25 dB(A)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2047.444.843.142.145.82543.843.350.841.741.63152.751.14853.151.34036.140.133.933.532.65036.537.938.236.537.66346.327.931.725.241.98039.928.626.423.655.310026.323.524.922.832.912529.625.727.62629.116029.726.827.724.530.320030.92626.42231.225029.825.224.523.134.53152919.319.51632.840031.223.214.61334.150033.92215.611.836.763035.317.315.41438.280035.415.512.911.839.610003614.211.210.439.6125037.114.411.710.441.2160039.415.813.410.543.6200038.715.812.810.942.2250037.214.814.411.941.2315034.615.213.412.138.6400033.813.813.712.538.750003313.913.712.537.1630035.214.714.713.138.4800029.514.814.213.636.11000025.413.817.113.131125002313.81512.7261600025.917.51411.723.6SPL47.828.827.325.651.8N6.21.210.78.7median 33median 15.8median 14.6median 12.7median 36.7Delta3.343.63.2436.643.843.742.14134.738.940.635.838.54449.647.344.74927.533.232.730.932.430.342.442.442.83229.827.629.128.735.325.62120.421.743.922.22019.618.625.223.518.918.816.826.825.524.220.619.22826.823.921.421.429.527.622.919.220.131.227.919.516.514.932.429.720.917.211.935.132.523.622.811.538.23523.619.211.240.536.924.318.911.342.836.623.917.111.64438.523.416.411.445.538.722.81611.645.536.520.514.311.444.736.819.814.21245.134.418.513.312.243.135.317.613.813.244.933.617.714.513.943.732.116.214.514.143.428.315.313.713.540.524.815.113.213.138.320.215.112.71334.216.613.112.11228.447.533.128.325.355.65.81.81.10.710.4median 32.1median 20median 16.4median 13median 40.55.33.62.82.47hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseAsus ROG Strix G16 G614JZLenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
R9 7945HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
R7 7735HS, Radeon RX 7600S
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
Noise
-4%
-4%
0%
6%
11%
off / environment *
25
23.9
4%
24
4%
23
8%
24
4%
23
8%
Idle Minimum *
26
23.9
8%
26
-0%
23
12%
24
8%
23
12%
Idle Average *
28
32.9
-18%
28
-0%
23
18%
25
11%
23
18%
Idle Maximum *
30
36.5
-22%
34
-13%
33.64
-12%
28
7%
23.6
21%
Load Average *
48
42.9
11%
47
2%
51.49
-7%
42
12%
39
19%
Witcher 3 ultra *
49
51.2
-4%
55
-12%
55.27
-13%
50
-2%
51.6
-5%
Load Maximum *
52
56
-8%
56
-8%
55.24
-6%
50
4%
51.3
1%

* ... smaller is better

温度

强大的硬件使ROG Strix G16的机箱升温相当快。在游戏过程中,笔记本顶部的温度上升到54℃。幸运的是,该游戏笔记本的风扇位于WASD键的正下方。这里的温度明显下降,所以你在游戏时不会烫伤手指。掌托始终保持凉爽。在游戏时,你应该把笔记本放在一个坚实的表面上。

负荷较低时,情况就不同了。无论是空转、编辑照片和视频,甚至是CAD绘图,ROG Strix G16都不会真正变热。在底面接近30℃的情况下,运行时的热量比负载情况下的热量更容易忍受。

Max. Load
 54 °C54 °C47 °C 
 42 °C45 °C39 °C 
 33 °C38 °C34 °C 
Maximum: 54 °C
Average: 42.9 °C
55 °C54 °C48 °C
44 °C50 °C41 °C
29 °C30 °C31 °C
Maximum: 55 °C
Average: 42.4 °C
Power Supply (max.)  54 °C | Room Temperature 20 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 42.9 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 54 °C / 129 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 55 °C / 131 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.6 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 40.1 °C / 104 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 38 °C / 100.4 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-9.1 °C / -16.4 F).
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
Heat
10%
-4%
23%
-11%
13%
Maximum Upper Side *
54
44.2
18%
48
11%
41
24%
54
-0%
40
26%
Maximum Bottom *
55
46.8
15%
49
11%
47
15%
47
15%
37.6
32%
Idle Upper Side *
29
29.2
-1%
40
-38%
23
21%
40
-38%
32.4
-12%
Idle Bottom *
33
30.2
8%
33
-0%
23
30%
40
-21%
31.4
5%

* ... smaller is better

压力测试

液态金属和三个风扇与巨大的散热器相结合,应确保温度稳定。在压力测试中,大约8到10分钟后达到平衡状态。从那时起,CPU和GPU的温度在83至88℃之间移动。i9在55瓦左右持续工作,RTX 4080在140瓦左右。GeForce RTX 4080的热点是引人注目的,它明显高于平均水平,几乎达到93℃。在有良好的液态金属冷却的情况下,不应该出现如此高的热点。

压力测试
压力测试
压力测试顶部
压力测试顶部
压力测试底部
压力测试底部
Witcher 3
Witcher 3
Witcher 3 顶部
Witcher 3 顶部
Witcher 3 底部
Witcher 3 底部

发言人

在ROG Strix G16中安装了四个扬声器模块。底座前部的两个朝下的全频驱动器与铰链之间的两个高音扬声器相得益彰。这允许一个良好的声音景观,即使低音有点弱。中音和高音是非常平衡的。在83 dB(A)的最大音量下,扬声器也能淹没游戏笔记本的风扇。耳机在这里可以省去,即使3.5毫米耳机插孔和蓝牙5.2提供了连接外部扬声器和耳机的选择。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2042.1452541.744.13153.160.24033.540.85036.538.56325.237.28023.635.810022.841.61252648.716024.555.12002259.725023.164.831516634001366.550011.872.1630147480011.872100010.472.6125010.471.4160010.574200010.976.1250011.977.9315012.177.6400012.569.7500012.576.8630013.178.6800013.6731000013.171.61250012.762.61600011.757.4SPL25.687N0.773.4median 12.7median 72Delta3.2642.142.935.837.944.745.930.933.342.842.328.738.221.74418.650.316.856.419.259.321.459.420.16314.965.111.968.511.569.911.272.911.370.711.67011.467.911.672.111.473.5127112.266.713.261.813.966.514.170.813.570.313.168.61366.31260.825.3820.756.4median 13median 67.92.44.7hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseAsus ROG Strix G16 G614JZLenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 16.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (12.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 12% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 84% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 8% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 90% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 8.9% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 3% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 3% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电源管理--90Wh电池和Optimus确保长的电池寿命

消耗功率

330瓦的电源
330瓦的电源

闲置时的功耗为10至20瓦,这款游戏笔记本在可容忍的范围内。然而,这些相对较低的速率只有通过主动图形切换才能达到。在负载情况下,功耗上升到342瓦,这是提升过程中的一个短暂峰值。附带的330瓦的电源应该能够应付这个问题。在更长的时间内,即使在负载下,功耗仍然相当稳定,为260瓦。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.1 /  Watt
Idledarkmidlight 10 / 16 / 27 Watt
Load midlight 129 / 342 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
R9 7945HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
R7 7735HS, Radeon RX 7600S
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
 
Average of class Gaming
 
Power Consumption
-32%
-25%
20%
34%
-25%
-19%
-1%
Idle Minimum *
10
19.2
-92%
18
-80%
11.8
-18%
8
20%
15.2
-52%
16.1 ?(8 - 39, n=19)
-61%
Idle Average *
16
29.7
-86%
24
-50%
16.1
-1%
11
31%
22.8
-43%
21.5 ?(9.5 - 44.6, n=19)
-34%
Idle Maximum *
27
30.8
-14%
32
-19%
17
37%
16
41%
49.8
-84%
33.4 ?(13.7 - 68.1, n=19)
-24%
Load Average *
129
126
2%
130
-1%
100.6
22%
97
25%
121.2
6%
117.9 ?(77 - 135, n=19)
9%
Witcher 3 ultra *
247
258
-4%
260
-5%
158
36%
161.5
35%
242
2%
Load Maximum *
342
330
4%
320
6%
192
44%
168
51%
273.7
20%

* ... smaller is better

Power Consumption Witcher 3 / Stress Test

020406080100120140160180200220240260280300Tooltip
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU; Witcher 3 ultra: Ø247 (229-258)
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU; Witcher 3 ultra: Ø260 (250-307)
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø257 (234-303)
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø182.7 (145.4-302)
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø16.4 (10.8-68.1)
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø22.6 (18.8-28)

Power Consumption with an external monitor

020406080100120140160180200220240260280300Tooltip
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø157.3 (143.6-190.8)
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø175.4 (104.2-243)
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø175.1 (169.3-176.9)
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø247 (242-251)
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø217 (210-255)
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø245 (239-259)
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU; 1920x1080 The Witcher 3 ultra (external Monitor): Ø237 (229-248)
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU; 1920x1080 The Witcher 3 ultra (external Monitor): Ø251 (131.8-313)
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø19.8 (17.1-25.4)
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø28.4 (22.5-33)

电池寿命

华硕Rog Strix G16的90Wh电池
华硕Rog Strix G16的90Wh电池

华硕ROG Strix G16的电池容量为90瓦时,应该能够在离开插座时提供良好的运行时间。然而,在WiFi网络冲浪测试中,这款笔记本在主动切换图形的情况下只达到了9小时以上。只要GeForce RTX 4080被激活,运行时间就会明显下降。在高负荷下,电池在某些情况下只能维持一小时。尽管如此,对于2023年的游戏笔记本来说,电池运行时间仍然是特别好的。

Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing
9h 43min
WiFi Websurfing max. Brightness
5h 23min
Load (maximum brightness)
1h 05min
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ
i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, 90 Wh
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W
R9 7945HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, 90 Wh
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, 99.9 Wh
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 88 Wh
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
R7 7735HS, Radeon RX 7600S, 90 Wh
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, 95.2 Wh
Average of class Gaming
 
Battery Runtime
-36%
22%
36%
31%
-6%
-2%
WiFi v1.3
583
238
-59%
303
-48%
448
-23%
724
24%
365
-37%
Load
65
57
-12%
124
91%
126
94%
90
38%
81
25%
H.264
230
442
Reader / Idle
385
1212
533

Pros

+ 强大的QHD+显示屏
+ 静音模式下的大量电力
+ USB-C电源传输
+ 良好的声音
+ 可扩展的存储空间
+ 雷电4

Cons

- 外壳质量一般
- 线圈啸叫
- 端口分布严重集中在左边
- 弱光网络摄像头

结论 - 4080是一个不错的选择

华硕ROG Strix G16。测试装置由华硕提供。
华硕ROG Strix G16。测试装置由华硕提供。

凭借移动的NvidiaGeForce RTX 4080,华硕ROG Stix G16在性能和冷却之间找到了甜蜜点。G16也不必回避与它的所谓更强大的家族成员的直接比较,即 ROG Strix Scar 18它的RTX 4090,因为这两款笔记本电脑的大多数基准测试都非常接近对方。此外,G16的价格应该会便宜很多。根据供应商的情况,这里的价格差异可能几乎达到2000美元。

在2023型号系列中,华硕已经大大拉平了两个高端系列之间的差异。由于省略了Strix Scar设备中的蒸汽室,Scar 18和G16之间的差异几乎完全是外观上的。那些绝对坚持要用半透明机箱的笔记本电脑的人将不得不在他们的口袋里挖得更深。我们最近还回顾了一个 Strix G18配备了 RTX 4070.就像G16一样,这里使用了一个好的屏幕和强大的硬件,具有良好的散热效果。也就是说,16英寸的产品可能是更好的选择,因为它的结构更稳定一些。

抢眼的包装中的强大性能。华硕ROG Strix G16由于其强大的功能,使用起来非常有趣。

有趣的是,ROG Strix G16提供了没有噪音污染的游戏的真正可能性。预先配置的静音模式的得分超过了可玩的FPS和低风扇噪音。不幸的是,这也使G16的线圈啸叫声凸显出来。这种穿透力强的噪音在升压过程中特别容易听到,可能是由电压转换器产生的。

在性能方面,ROG Strix G16与联想Legion Pro 7和Razer Blade 16大致相当,但可能更便宜。然而,这两个竞争对手在外壳质量和连接性方面有优势。这两点也是ROG Strix G16的最大弱点。

价格和可用性

考虑到它最近的发布,配备NvidiaGeForce RTX 4080的华硕ROG Strix G16的全球供应目前是有限的,或者根本没有。在美国,只有配置RTX 4070(,通过亚马逊售价1999.99美元)或RTX 4050(通过华硕ROG网站,售价1799.99美元)似乎是可用的。

带有RTX 4080的型号一旦上市,预计将达到3000美元左右。

价格截止到2023年3月17日,可能会有变化。

Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ - 03/16/2023 v7 (old)
Marc Herter

Chassis
80 / 98 → 82%
Keyboard
85%
Pointing Device
85%
Connectivity
66 / 80 → 82%
Weight
61 / 10-66 → 90%
Battery
88 / 95 → 93%
Display
91%
Games Performance
99%
Application Performance
98%
Temperature
80 / 95 → 84%
Noise
74 / 90 → 82%
Audio
81%
Camera
36 / 85 → 42%
Average
79%
88%
Gaming - Weighted Average

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 华硕ROG Strix G16 G614JZ笔记本电脑回顾。为RTX 4080清除舞台
Marc Herter, 2023-03-18 (Update: 2023-03-18)