华硕 ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 评测--配备 G-Sync OLED 和英特尔流星湖技术的游戏笔记本电脑

Name: Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Brand: Asus

游戏与高端多媒体的完美结合

华硕的新款 ROG Zephyrus G16 采用了全新的超薄设计，目标市场不仅限于游戏玩家。这款产品是一款高品质的 16 英寸笔记本电脑，配备了令人印象深刻的 OLED 面板和出色的扬声器，可轻松与Apple 的 MacBook Pro 或 Razer Blade 16 相媲美。

Andreas Osthoff, 👁 Andreas Osthoff (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy), Published 02/07/2024 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

AI Gaming Geforce Laptop / Notebook Meteor Lake Thunderbolt Windows

玩家共和国--这代表着华硕的游戏笔记本电脑。不过，在新款 ROG Zephyrus G16（以及尺寸更小的 G14）上，制造商略微改变了做法，旨在面向更多类型的客户。为此，它采用了更扁平、更优雅的机箱设计，但这限制了可安装的组件。因此，这款高端游戏/多媒体混合型笔记本电脑对于内容创作者或那些正在寻找时尚、功能强大设备的普通用户来说也很有吸引力。事实上，新款 Zephyrus G16 也是华硕迄今为止唯一一款使用英特尔全新流星湖处理器的 2024 游戏笔记本电脑。而较小的 ROG Zephyrus G14（评测即将发布）则使用了 AMD 的新 Ryzen 8000 处理器。

我们测试的 ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605M 并不是高端机型，因为除了新的酷睿至尊 7 155H之外，它还配备了 GeForce RTX 4070 笔记本电脑.此外，它现在采用了三星的 OLED 显示屏，刷新率为 240 赫兹，并首次支持 G-Sync。此外，该笔记本电脑还安装了 16 GB 内存和 1 TB SSD。新款 G16 将于 2 月 15 日开始发售，售价为 2,899.99 美元起；目前我们还不能确定测试配置的 MRSP。

Test device courtesy of Asus Deutschland

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M (ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 Series)

Processor

Intel Core Ultra 7 155H 16 x 3.8 - 4.8 GHz, 70 W PL2 / Short Burst, 50 W PL1 / Sustained, Meteor Lake-H

Graphics adapter

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU - 8 GB VRAM, 80 W TDP ( including 15 W Dynamic Boost), GDDR6

Memory

16 GB

, LPDDR5x-7467, Dual-Channel, onboard

Display

16.00 inch 16:10, 2560 x 1600 pixel 189 PPI, ATNA60DL01-0, OLED, glossy: yes, HDR, 240 Hz

Mainboard

Intel Meteor Lake-U/P/H PCH

Storage

WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00, 1024 GB

, 855 GB free

Soundcard

Intel Meteor Lake-U/P/H PCH - cAVS (Audio, Voice, Speech)

Connections

3 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 USB 4.0 40 Gbps, 1 Thunderbolt, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 3 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: 3.5 mm Stereo, Card Reader: SDXC (UHS-II)

Networking

Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz), Bluetooth 5.3

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 16.4 x 354 x 246

Battery

90 Wh, 5820 mAh Lithium-Polymer

Operating System

Microsoft Windows 11 Home

Camera

Webcam: 1080p + IR
Primary Camera: 2 MPix

Additional features

Speakers: 6 Speakers (4x 2W Woofers, 2x 2W Tweeters), Keyboard Light: yes, 200W PSU, 24 Months Warranty

Weight

1.817 kg, Power Supply: 583 g

Price

3000 Euro

Amazon

$1,614.99

Links

Asus homepage
Asus notebook section

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating	Date	Model	Weight	Height	Size	Resolution
92.3 % v7 ^(old)	02 / 2024	Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	1.8 kg	16.4 mm	16.00"	2560x1600
88.4 % v7 ^(old)	08 / 2023	Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8 i7-13705H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	2.2 kg	18.2 mm	16.00"	3200x2000
91.2 % v7 ^(old)	02 / 2023	Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	2.4 kg	21.99 mm	16.00"	2560x1600
86.2 % v7 ^(old)	03 / 2023	Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	2.1 kg	18 mm	16.00"	3840x2400
88.6 % v7 ^(old)	07 / 2023	SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	1.6 kg	17.1 mm	16.00"	2560x1600
88.8 % v7 ^(old)	07 / 2023	MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	2 kg	19.95 mm	16.00"	2560x1600
93.2 % v7 ^(old)	11 / 2023	Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Max Apple M3 Max 16-Core, M3 Max 40-Core GPU	2.1 kg	16.9 mm	16.00"	3456x2234

外壳 - Zephyrus 现在由铝制成

华硕新款 Zephyrus G16 采用优雅的铝制一体成型机身，第一眼看到它，你会立即联想到雷蛇刀锋 16 等设备。雷蛇刀锋 16或 Apple MacBook Pro 16.操作这款笔记本电脑时，毫无疑问这是一款真正的高端设备。我们的测试设备是深灰色版本（日蚀灰），在去年年底的预览活动中，我们也有机会看到了白色版本（铂金白）。白色机型的指纹识别能力稍弱，但深灰色机型的指纹识别能力则更强一些。我们还在照片库中收录了几张白色机型的照片。

华硕放弃了新机盖子上的大量点阵显示屏，转而采用了由 28 颗微型 LED 和 7 个不同区域组成的薄型对角白色灯带（Slash Lighting）。它可以进行编程（例如作为通知灯），也可以完全关闭，以免引起过多关注。除键盘外，没有其他发光元件。

背面的散热器开口将暖空气引向地板，而不是直接引向屏幕下缘，这限制了笔记本电脑的开启角度。

该设备的构造和稳定性令人震惊，键盘几乎无法按入，即使使用很大的压力也是如此。Zephyrus 也不会发出吱吱嘎嘎的声音。薄薄的显示屏盖子略显灵活，但我们也没有发现任何问题。不过，新的铰链设计将笔记本电脑的最大开启角度限制在 135 度。单手就能轻松打开盖子，但就我们的口味而言，铰链可以设置得更紧一些，因为当你调整角度时，它会晃动得很厉害。

新款 ROG Zephyrus G16 是我们对比领域中最紧凑的机型之一，它与 Vision 16 Pro和 MacBook Pro和 MacBook Pro 一样，其 16.4 毫米的机身也是最薄的机型之一。不过，需要指出的是，我们的测试设备是该系列中最薄的机型，因为 TFT 机型和 Vapor-Chamber 机型稍厚一些。它的重量也很轻，仅为 1.8 千克；200 瓦的电源则额外增加了 583 克。

尺寸比较

Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8 Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Max Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M DIN A4 ❌

连接性 - Thunderbolt 和高速无线局域网

背面完全被散热占据，这也是端口分布在笔记本电脑两侧的原因。华硕现在使用了一个新的矩形电源接口，它被放置在机身背面的左侧。该设备配备了所有重要的连接端口，除了 USB-C，还有 USB-A、全 HDMI 输出和读卡器。两个 USB-C 端口都支持功率高达 100 瓦的 Power Delivery，左侧的端口支持 Thunderbolt 4。只是它没有以太网连接--如果需要，你必须使用 USB 适配器。

左：电源、HDMI 2.1、USB-C 4.0 和 Thunderbolt 4（40 GBit/s、DisplayPort 2.1、Power Delivery）、USB-A 3.2 Gen 2（10 GBit/s）

SD 读卡器

G16 右侧有一个全功能读卡器，插入的卡突出约 1.2 厘米。结合我们的参考卡（Angelbird AV Pro V60），它的传输速率约为 80-90 MB/s，这意味着测试设备的传输速率接近底部。

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Intel Core i9-13900H	181.2 (133.5^min - 187.53^max) MB/s +130%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Max Apple M3 Max 16-Core (Angelbird AV Pro V60)	163.3 MB/s +107%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Intel Core i7-13700H	158 (154.8^min - 166.31^max) MB/s +101%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)	125 MB/s +59%
Average of class Gaming (19 - 202, n=87, last 2 years)	95.9 MB/s +22%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	78.7 MB/s
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8 Intel Core i7-13705H (Angelibird AV Pro V60)	74.6 MB/s -5%
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) Intel Core i7-13700H (Angelbird AV Pro V60)	23.3 MB/s -70%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Max Apple M3 Max 16-Core (Angelbird AV Pro V60)	226.7 MB/s +152%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)	207.6 MB/s +131%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Intel Core i9-13900H	188.81 MB/s +110%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Intel Core i7-13700H	180.68 MB/s +101%
Average of class Gaming (25.8 - 269, n=88, last 2 years)	120 MB/s +33%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	89.9 MB/s
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8 Intel Core i7-13705H (Angelibird AV Pro V60)	82.9 MB/s -8%
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) Intel Core i7-13700H (Angelbird AV Pro V60)	26.1 MB/s -71%

交流

华硕放弃了 Wi-Fi 7，但即便如此，英特尔的 AX211 模块仍然是一款支持蓝牙 5.3 和 Wi-Fi 6E 的最新无线局域网适配器。与华硕的参考路由器相比，它的传输速率非常好且稳定，在测试期间，我们没有遇到任何信号质量问题。

Networking
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	1654 (min: 1599) MBit/s ∼96%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	1600 (min: 1564) MBit/s ∼91%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	1618 (min: 1527) MBit/s ∼94%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	1547 (min: 1409) MBit/s ∼88%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	1155 (min: 495) MBit/s ∼67%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	1328 (min: 1093) MBit/s ∼76%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1371 (min: 1036) MBit/s ∼85%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1494 (min: 1283) MBit/s ∼93%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1444 (min: 745) MBit/s ∼90%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1611 (min: 805) MBit/s ∼100%
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	1630 (min: 1571) MBit/s ∼94%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	1687 (min: 1665) MBit/s ∼96%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	1325 (min: 977) MBit/s ∼77%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	1364 (min: 675) MBit/s ∼78%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1612 (min: 1573) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1446 (min: 731) MBit/s ∼90%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Max Broadcom 0x14E4, 0x4388 WiFi 6E AirPort
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	1726 (min: 1684) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	1752 (min: 1702) MBit/s ∼100%

Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M; iperf3 transmit AXE11000: Ø1654 (1599-1713)

Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M; iperf3 receive AXE11000: Ø1600 (1564-1627)

网络摄像头

安装在显示屏上边框的 1080p 网络摄像头可在光线充足的条件下拍摄出漂亮的照片，还支持面部跟踪和柔焦等功能。它还配备了一个额外的红外摄像头，可通过 Windows Hello 进行面部识别。

ColorChecker Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M: 7.45 ∆E min: 2.33 - max: 13.28 ∆E

维护

除了可见的螺钉外，还有两个螺钉隐藏在胶粘的橡胶套下。这就给查看元件带来了不必要的困难。不过，由于内存已被焊接在机身内部，因此无论如何都无法深入内部。另一方面，有两个固态硬盘插槽，如果需要，还可以更换 WLAN 模块和电池。你还可以进入风扇进行清洁。

输入设备 - 舒适的键盘和超大触摸板

G16 采用背光键盘（一个 RGB 区域，3 个强度级别），没有专用的数字键盘。键盘布局并无特别之处，但你必须习惯单行回车键和小方向键，这对于游戏笔记本电脑来说并不理想。不过，键盘本身非常舒适，按键抬升高度为 1.7 毫米。日常使用时相当安静，你可以轻松地用它来书写较长的文字。

笔记本电脑的新触摸板非常大，尺寸为 15 x 9.9 厘米（比以前大 37%），比例为 16:10。触摸板表面光滑，操作起来手感极佳，咔哒咔哒的噪音也很低，给人一种高品质的感觉。

显示屏 - 华硕首款配备 G-Sync 技术的 240-Hz OLED 显示屏

新款 ROG Zephyrus G16 是首款配备支持 G-Sync 的 16 英寸 OLED 面板的笔记本电脑。此外，它的刷新率为 240 Hz，主观而言，三星反射式面板的画质令人震惊：内容清晰锐利，色彩超级鲜艳。得益于其快速的响应时间，OLED 也非常适合游戏。华硕没有安装亮度传感器。

在 SDR 模式下，它的平均亮度为 420 cd/m²，这是一个不错的结果。与 OLED 的典型特性一样，它的黑色值为 0，因此对比度极高。华硕宣称 HDR 最大亮度为 500 cd/m²，而我们测量的峰值为 455 cd/m²。在这方面，三星面板无法与其他 OLED 显示器相提并论，尤其是安装在Apple MacBook Pro 16 （最大 1600 cd/m²）上的迷你 LED 面板。此外，我们还必须继续批评 Windows 的 HDR 实施，因为它必须手动激活，随后色彩配置文件就无法正常工作了。目前，所有 Windows 设备都会受到影响。由于 OLED 面板的构造，它不会出现任何光晕效应。


420 cd/m²	423 cd/m²	419 cd/m²
421 cd/m²	416 cd/m²	418 cd/m²
425 cd/m²	410 cd/m²	412 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

ATNA60DL01-0 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 425 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 418.2 cd/m² Minimum: 19.7 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 96 %
Center on Battery: 416 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.6 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 2.7 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
96.9% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.9% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.16

	Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M ATNA60DL01-0, OLED, 2560x1600, 16"	Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8 LEN160-3.2K, Mini-LED, 3200x2000, 16"	Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 CSOT T3 MNG007DA4-1, IPS, 2560x1600, 16"	Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Samsung SDC4191 (ATNA60YV09-0, OLED, 3840x2400, 16"	SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) NE160QDM-NZ1, IPS, 2560x1600, 16"	MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG AUO26A9, IPS, 2560x1600, 16"	Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Max Mini-LED, 3456x2234, 16"
Display		-2%	-3%	-0%	-20%	-5%	-1%
Display P3 Coverage	99.9	97 -3%	98.5 -1%	99.9 0%	68.8 -31%	96.4 -4%	99.2 -1%
sRGB Coverage	100	99.8 0%	100 0%	100 0%	98.8 -1%	99.7 0%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	96.9	95.1 -2%	89.7 -7%	96.4 -1%	70 -28%	84.8 -12%
Response Times		-3113%	-3800%	-532%	-4634%	-2020%	-15400%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	0.22 ?(0.11, 0.11)	14 ?(7.5, 6.5) -6264%	6.6 ?(3.4, 3.2) -2900%	2 ?(1, 1) -809%	13.7 ?(6.7, 7) -6127%	4.4 ?(2.2, 2.2) -1900%	66.9 ?(29.4, 37.5) -30309%
Response Time Black / White *	0.25 ?(0.13, 0.12)	9.2 ?(2.2, 7) -3580%	12 ?(6.8, 5.2) -4700%	1.98 ?(0.5, 1.48) -692%	8.1 ?(3.8, 4.3) -3140%	5.6 ?(2.2, 3.4) -2140%	43.6 ?(13.6, 30) -17340%
PWM Frequency	960 ?(60)	5800 ?(100) 504%		60 -94%			14877 1450%
Screen		15%	-55%	-19%	-84%	-69%	19%
Brightness middle	416	539 30%	456.8 10%	389.97 -6%	384 -8%	424 2%	630 51%
Brightness	418	546 31%	437 5%	395 -6%	371 -11%	411 -2%	604 44%
Brightness Distribution	96	96 0%	83 -14%	97 1%	88 -8%	88 -8%	94 -2%
Black Level *		0.18	0.35	0.03	0.3	0.37
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	1.6	1.4 12%	3.7 -131%	2 -25%	3.4 -113%	3.04 -90%	1.2 25%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	2.1	2.1 -0%	6.42 -206%	4.1 -95%	9.2 -338%	7.5 -257%	2.8 -33%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	2.7	2.2 19%	2.6 4%	2.23 17%	3.4 -26%	4.34 -61%	1.9 30%
Gamma	2.16 ^102%	2.19 ^100%	2.3 ^96%	2.41 ^91%	2.16 ^102%	2.32 ^95%	2.29 ^96%
CCT	6331 ^103%	6479 ^100%	6108 ^106%	6323 ^103%	7462 ^87%	6952 ^93%	6812 ^95%
Contrast		2994	1305	12999	1280	1146
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *			0.66	1.68	1.3	3.04
Total Average (Program / Settings)		-1033% / -771%	-1286% / -722%	-184% / -143%	-1579% / -894%	-698% / -407%	-5127% / -4609%

* ... smaller is better

Armoury-Crate 软件提供了不同的色彩配置文件供您选择，我们使用专业的 CalMAN 软件（X-Rite i1 Pro2）对其进行了分析。预选的Native配置文件非常适合日常使用，但色彩有点过于饱和。为了确保最佳色彩准确度，您应该选择显示 P3 配置文件。灰阶可能仍会出现一些偏差（但不会有色差），不过，与 P3 参考相比，它的色彩准确度已经非常出色，所有颜色的偏差都低于重要的 3 值。

CalMAN ColorChecker（配置文件：显示 P3，目标色彩空间 P3）

此外，我们还自行校准了显示屏，结果喜忧参半。虽然我们能略微改善灰度偏差，但这导致了更大的色彩偏差，总的来说，并没有真正改善情况。这就是我们不提供相应配置文件供下载的原因。该显示屏覆盖了整个 P3 色彩空间，但也具有非常精确的 sRGB 模式，以备您在较小的色彩空间中编辑照片或视频。

CalMAN ColorChecker（配置文件：sRGB，目标色彩空间 sRGB）

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
0.25 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 0.13 ms rise
0.25 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 0.12 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 0 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
0.22 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 0.11 ms rise
0.22 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 0.11 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 0 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

960 Hz

≤ 60 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 960 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 60 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 960 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

一般来说，新型 OLED 面板使用频率为 960 Hz 的 PWM 技术，但当亮度超过 60% 时，则使用危害较小的直流调光技术（频率为 240 Hz）。一旦亮度低于这个水平，就会弹出警告，说明直流调光不再可用。与华硕其他 OLED 笔记本电脑的情况一样，你可以通过软件调暗显示屏，从而继续使用直流调光。我们只是希望将这种控制与常规的亮度控制结合起来，以最大限度地提高舒适度。

Zephyrus G16 的户外表现非常出色，即使在阳光明媚的日子里，只要避免阳光直射，也能使用得很好。它的视角稳定性很好，只有在偏离中心较大的情况下才会出现轻微的蓝色光泽，但这是 OLED 面板的典型现象。

性能 - 现在的 Zephyrus 带有流星湖

测试条件

在 Armoury-Crate 软件中，华硕提供了多种能耗配置文件以及手动模式，让您可以单独设置 GPU/CPU 性能。我们在下表中列出了这些能耗曲线的数值。但需要注意的是，这些数值仅适用于配备传统热管和三个风扇的 4070/4060/4050 笔记本电脑配置。而配备 RTX 4080/4090 笔记本电脑的功能更强大的机型则采用了带有两个风扇的 Vapor-Chamber 冷却系统，因此处理器和 GPU 的功耗更高（在所有配置文件中）。

能源概况	CPU 负载	CB R23 Multi	GPU 负载	Time Spy 显卡	赛博朋克 2077 QHD Ultra	风扇最大排放量
静音	60->45 瓦	15,869 分	65 瓦	9,042 分	32.6 fps	41.5 dB(A)
性能	70->50 瓦	17,133 分	80 瓦	10,989 分	43.7 帧/秒	46.4 分贝(A)
涡轮	95->70 瓦	18,372 分	105 瓦	12,312 分	48.7 fps	52.4 dB(A)

经过多次测试，我们决定使用性能模式进行以下基准测试和测量。虽然您可能无法获得最高性能，但在玩游戏时，风扇仍然是可以忍受的，因为约 48 分贝（A）的噪音是难以忍受的。得益于其出色的扬声器，在选择性能模式时，你甚至可以不戴耳机玩游戏。即便如此，如果您需要尽可能高的性能，只需按下按钮就能轻松切换模式（不过，涡轮增压仅在连接电源时可用）。在执行简单任务时，应选择静音模式，否则几乎总能听到风扇的声音。

处理器 - Core Ultra 7 155H

我们已经对全新的流星湖一代酷睿至尊 7 155H的分析文章。在 70/50 瓦的功率限制下，这款处理器的性能表现不错，但与老款 Raptor-Lake 芯片（如酷睿 i7-13700H选择涡轮增压模式时也是如此。不过，它的单核性能稍弱，我们已经开始期待流星湖处理器与新款 Ryzen-8000 CPU 的较量了。总而言之，它的多核性能总体保持稳定。在电池使用中，CPU 性能保持不变。更多 CPU 基准测试这里。

Cinebench R15 Multi continuous test

Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M Intel Core Ultra 7 155H: Ø2533 (2383.65-2679.17)

Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8 Intel Core i7-13705H: Ø2816 (2725.35-2987.08)

Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX: Ø4512 (4463.29-4528.99)

Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Intel Core i9-13900H: Ø2829 (2772.58-2962.96)

SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) Intel Core i7-13700H: Ø2126 (2076.41-2253.14)

MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Intel Core i7-13700H: Ø2552 (2375.16-3030.99)

Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Max Apple M3 Max 16-Core: Ø3354 (3260.25-3391.27)

Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.3: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean

Cinebench R23 / Multi Core
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX	26736 (22394.1^min - 26736.1^max) Points +55%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Max Apple M3 Max 16-Core	24024 Points +39%
Average of class Gaming (5668 - 36249, n=189, last 2 years)	21812 Points +26%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Intel Core i7-13700H	20034 Points +16%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8 Intel Core i7-13705H	19675 Points +14%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Intel Core i9-13900H	19188 Points +11%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	17267 Points
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) Intel Core i7-13700H	14760 Points -15%

Cinebench R23 / Single Core
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX	2029 Points +21%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Max Apple M3 Max 16-Core	1968 Points +17%
Average of class Gaming (1136 - 2235, n=187, last 2 years)	1887 Points +12%
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) Intel Core i7-13700H	1885 Points +12%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8 Intel Core i7-13705H	1879 Points +12%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Intel Core i7-13700H	1854 Points +10%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Intel Core i9-13900H	1707 Points +2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	1681 Points

Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core)
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX	8697 Points +30%
Average of class Gaming (2179 - 13832, n=187, last 2 years)	8300 Points +24%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Intel Core i7-13700H	7674 Points +15%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8 Intel Core i7-13705H	7529 Points +13%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Intel Core i9-13900H	7254 Points +9%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	6682 Points
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Max Apple M3 Max 16-Core	6327 Points -5%
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) Intel Core i7-13700H	5672 Points -15%

Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core)
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX	742 Points +7%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8 Intel Core i7-13705H	732 Points +6%
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) Intel Core i7-13700H	729 Points +5%
Average of class Gaming (439 - 856, n=187, last 2 years)	725 Points +5%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Intel Core i7-13700H	719 Points +4%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	693 Points
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Intel Core i9-13900H	651 Points -6%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Max Apple M3 Max 16-Core	497 Points -28%

Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX	4529 (4463.29^min - 4528.99^max) Points +69%
Average of class Gaming (905 - 5663, n=194, last 2 years)	3417 Points +28%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Max Apple M3 Max 16-Core	3401 (3260^min - 3401^max) Points +27%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8 Intel Core i7-13705H	2987 (2725.35^min - 2987.08^max) Points +11%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Intel Core i9-13900H	2963 (2772.58^min - 2962.96^max) Points +11%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Intel Core i7-13700H	2854 Points +7%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	2679 (2383.65^min - 2679.17^max) Points
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) Intel Core i7-13700H	2253 (2076.41^min - 2253.14^max) Points -16%

Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit
Average of class Gaming (191.9 - 318, n=191, last 2 years)	278 Points +5%
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) Intel Core i7-13700H	276 Points +5%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX	274 Points +4%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8 Intel Core i7-13705H	274 Points +4%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Intel Core i7-13700H	273 Points +3%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Max Apple M3 Max 16-Core	269 Points +2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	264 Points
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Intel Core i9-13900H	243 Points -8%

Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) Intel Core i7-13700H	223 Seconds * -16%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Max Apple M3 Max 16-Core	215 Seconds * -11%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	193 Seconds *
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Intel Core i9-13900H	172 Seconds * +11%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8 Intel Core i7-13705H	172 Seconds * +11%
Average of class Gaming (87 - 555, n=182, last 2 years)	170.8 Seconds * +12%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Intel Core i7-13700H	169 Seconds * +12%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX	114 Seconds * +41%

7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX	109330 MIPS +60%
Average of class Gaming (23795 - 140932, n=186, last 2 years)	85207 MIPS +24%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8 Intel Core i7-13705H	78446 MIPS +15%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Intel Core i7-13700H	76344 MIPS +11%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Intel Core i9-13900H	74386 MIPS +9%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	68500 MIPS
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) Intel Core i7-13700H	61921 MIPS -10%

7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX	6445 MIPS +18%
Average of class Gaming (4199 - 7581, n=186, last 2 years)	6305 MIPS +16%
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) Intel Core i7-13700H	6224 MIPS +14%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Intel Core i7-13700H	6125 MIPS +13%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8 Intel Core i7-13705H	5924 MIPS +9%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Intel Core i9-13900H	5570 MIPS +2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	5439 MIPS

Geekbench 6.3 / Multi-Core
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Max Apple M3 Max 16-Core	21243 Points +59%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8 Intel Core i7-13705H	14502 Points +9%
Average of class Gaming (5340 - 19665, n=110, last 2 years)	14195 Points +7%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	13323 Points

Geekbench 6.3 / Single-Core
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Max Apple M3 Max 16-Core	3096 Points +28%
Average of class Gaming (1490 - 3129, n=110, last 2 years)	2650 Points +10%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8 Intel Core i7-13705H	2588 Points +7%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	2410 Points

Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Max Apple M3 Max 16-Core	22816 Points +77%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX	18152 Points +41%
Average of class Gaming (4557 - 23194, n=187, last 2 years)	14993 Points +16%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8 Intel Core i7-13705H	14521 Points +13%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Intel Core i9-13900H	13796 Points +7%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Intel Core i7-13700H	13239 Points +3%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	12905 Points
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) Intel Core i7-13700H	11808 Points -9%

Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Max Apple M3 Max 16-Core	2331 Points +33%
Average of class Gaming (986 - 2210, n=187, last 2 years)	1892 Points +8%
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) Intel Core i7-13700H	1885 Points +7%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Intel Core i7-13700H	1829 Points +4%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX	1805 Points +3%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8 Intel Core i7-13705H	1791 Points +2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	1755 Points
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Intel Core i9-13900H	1718 Points -2%

HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX	28.7 fps +44%
Average of class Gaming (6.72 - 38.9, n=186, last 2 years)	23.5 fps +18%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8 Intel Core i7-13705H	21.3 fps +7%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Intel Core i9-13900H	21 fps +6%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	19.9 fps
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Intel Core i7-13700H	19.7 fps -1%
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) Intel Core i7-13700H	16.6 fps -17%

LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Intel Core i9-13900H	57.8 s * -17%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Intel Core i7-13700H	54.6 s * -10%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	49.6 s *
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8 Intel Core i7-13705H	47.7 s * +4%
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) Intel Core i7-13700H	47.6 s * +4%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX	47.5 s * +4%
Average of class Gaming (31.4 - 96.6, n=183, last 2 years)	47.3 s * +5%

R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Intel Core i9-13900H	0.4934 sec * -6%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	0.4654 sec *
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8 Intel Core i7-13705H	0.4571 sec * +2%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Intel Core i7-13700H	0.4498 sec * +3%
Average of class Gaming (0.3609 - 0.759, n=187, last 2 years)	0.438 sec * +6%
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) Intel Core i7-13700H	0.434 sec * +7%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX	0.4121 sec * +11%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

2679 Points

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

173.6 fps

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

99.6 %

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

264 Points

Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)

693 Points

Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)

6682 Points

Cinebench R23 Multi Core

17267 Points

Cinebench R23 Single Core

1681 Points

Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core

103 Points

Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core

799 Points

Help

... in comparison

Performance Rating
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	98.1 pt
Average of class Gaming	80.9 pt
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	73.9 pt
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8 Intel Core i7-13705H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	71.4 pt
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	68.6 pt
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	66.2 pt
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	57.6 pt
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	57.4 pt

AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	25857 KRay/s +57%
Average of class Gaming (4986 - 60169, n=183, last 2 years)	21786 KRay/s +33%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	18385 KRay/s +12%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	17934 KRay/s +9%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8 Intel Core i7-13705H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	17568 KRay/s +7%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	16431 KRay/s
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	13486 KRay/s -18%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (6670 - 18470, n=46)	13107 KRay/s -20%

AIDA64 / FPU Julia
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	125944 Points +47%
Average of class Gaming (25360 - 252486, n=183, last 2 years)	106398 Points +24%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8 Intel Core i7-13705H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	92250 Points +8%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	90834 Points +6%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	85461 Points
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	81656 Points -4%
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	70104 Points -18%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (40905 - 93181, n=46)	69549 Points -19%

AIDA64 / CPU SHA3
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	6350 MB/s +66%
Average of class Gaming (1339 - 10389, n=183, last 2 years)	4884 MB/s +28%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8 Intel Core i7-13705H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	4189 MB/s +10%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	4187 MB/s +10%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	4080 MB/s +7%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	3814 MB/s
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (1940 - 4436, n=46)	3249 MB/s -15%
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	3200 MB/s -16%

AIDA64 / CPU Queen
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	133226 Points +47%
Average of class Gaming (50699 - 200651, n=183, last 2 years)	116767 Points +29%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8 Intel Core i7-13705H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	106736 Points +18%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	105597 Points +17%
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	99961 Points +11%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	95175 Points +5%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	90347 Points
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (64698 - 94181, n=46)	83603 Points -7%

AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	15813 Points +49%
Average of class Gaming (4800 - 32988, n=183, last 2 years)	13223 Points +24%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8 Intel Core i7-13705H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	11077 Points +4%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	11050 Points +4%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	10641 Points
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	10485 Points -1%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (5639 - 10647, n=46)	9130 Points -14%
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	8982 Points -16%

AIDA64 / FPU Mandel
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	63308 Points +51%
Average of class Gaming (12321 - 134044, n=183, last 2 years)	53561 Points +28%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	44967 Points +8%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	44154 Points +6%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8 Intel Core i7-13705H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	42686 Points +2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	41806 Points
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (18236 - 47685, n=46)	33785 Points -19%
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	33488 Points -20%

AIDA64 / CPU AES
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	149377 MB/s +88%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	125644 MB/s +58%
Average of class Gaming (19065 - 328679, n=183, last 2 years)	109083 MB/s +37%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8 Intel Core i7-13705H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	85118 MB/s +7%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	81504 MB/s +3%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	79475 MB/s
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (45713 - 152179, n=46)	78103 MB/s -2%
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	66616 MB/s -16%

AIDA64 / CPU ZLib
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	1850 MB/s +64%
Average of class Gaming (373 - 2409, n=183, last 2 years)	1359 MB/s +20%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8 Intel Core i7-13705H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	1226 MB/s +9%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	1192 MB/s +6%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	1128 MB/s
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	1032 MB/s -9%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (557 - 1250, n=46)	962 MB/s -15%
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	948 MB/s -16%

AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	13844 KRay/s +64%
Average of class Gaming (2540 - 31796, n=183, last 2 years)	11734 KRay/s +39%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	9803 KRay/s +16%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	9680 KRay/s +15%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8 Intel Core i7-13705H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	9166 KRay/s +8%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	8449 KRay/s
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	7240 KRay/s -14%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (3569 - 9802, n=46)	6853 KRay/s -19%

AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8 Intel Core i7-13705H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	52257 MPixel/s +6%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	50834 MPixel/s +3%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	49238 MPixel/s
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (32719 - 54223, n=46)	46590 MPixel/s -5%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	46114 MPixel/s -6%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	44611 MPixel/s -9%
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	44545 MPixel/s -10%
Average of class Gaming (10805 - 60161, n=184, last 2 years)	40082 MPixel/s -19%

系统性能

主观而言，这款笔记本电脑表现良好，只有在图形切换（如启动游戏）时，在 MUX 切换过程中会出现轻微卡顿，但这完全正常。竞争对手在合成测试中取得了更高的分数，但在日常使用中你可能不会注意到差异。它的内存基准测试结果非常出色，但它的内存不能扩展，16 GB 内存对于高端设备来说根本不够用。所有机型都应标配 32 GB。

PCMark 10 / Score
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	8058 Points +13%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024	7888 Points +11%
Average of class Gaming (5776 - 9852, n=164, last 2 years)	7791 Points +9%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (7084 - 7761, n=4)	7418 Points +4%
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	7368 Points +3%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	7329 Points +3%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13705H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	7301 Points +2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	7123 Points

PCMark 10 / Essentials
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	11332 Points +13%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024	11078 Points +10%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13705H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	10994 Points +10%
Average of class Gaming (9057 - 12334, n=163, last 2 years)	10841 Points +8%
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	10753 Points +7%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	10491 Points +5%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (10038 - 10393, n=4)	10259 Points +2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	10038 Points

PCMark 10 / Productivity
Average of class Gaming (6662 - 14612, n=163, last 2 years)	9900 Points +8%
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	9511 Points +3%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	9376 Points +2%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (9192 - 9518, n=4)	9335 Points +1%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	9231 Points 0%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	9208 Points
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13705H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	8858 Points -4%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024	8271 Points -10%

PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024	14535 Points +37%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	13575 Points +28%
Average of class Gaming (6703 - 18475, n=163, last 2 years)	12077 Points +14%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (10100 - 13035, n=4)	11610 Points +9%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	10860 Points +2%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13705H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	10849 Points +2%
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	10691 Points +1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	10612 Points

CrossMark / Overall
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Max M3 Max 40-Core GPU, Apple M3 Max 16-Core, Apple SSD AP8192Z	2051 Points +19%
Average of class Gaming (1247 - 2344, n=147, last 2 years)	1905 Points +11%
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	1896 Points +10%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	1882 Points +9%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13705H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	1835 Points +7%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	1789 Points +4%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (1687 - 1848, n=4)	1755 Points +2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	1721 Points
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024	1592 Points -7%

CrossMark / Productivity
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Max M3 Max 40-Core GPU, Apple M3 Max 16-Core, Apple SSD AP8192Z	1828 Points +13%
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	1822 Points +12%
Average of class Gaming (1299 - 2204, n=147, last 2 years)	1805 Points +11%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	1781 Points +10%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	1705 Points +5%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13705H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	1698 Points +5%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (1589 - 1750, n=4)	1662 Points +2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	1624 Points
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024	1509 Points -7%

CrossMark / Creativity
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Max M3 Max 40-Core GPU, Apple M3 Max 16-Core, Apple SSD AP8192Z	2564 Points +32%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13705H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	2104 Points +8%
Average of class Gaming (1275 - 2660, n=147, last 2 years)	2090 Points +8%
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	2012 Points +4%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	1978 Points +2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	1942 Points
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	1936 Points 0%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (1860 - 2014, n=4)	1932 Points -1%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024	1780 Points -8%

CrossMark / Responsiveness
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	1915 Points +34%
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	1789 Points +26%
Average of class Gaming (1030 - 2330, n=147, last 2 years)	1704 Points +20%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	1635 Points +15%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (1424 - 1683, n=4)	1548 Points +9%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13705H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	1535 Points +8%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Max M3 Max 40-Core GPU, Apple M3 Max 16-Core, Apple SSD AP8192Z	1486 Points +4%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	1424 Points
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024	1342 Points -6%

WebXPRT 3 / Overall
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Max M3 Max 40-Core GPU, Apple M3 Max 16-Core, Apple SSD AP8192Z	426 Points +51%
Average of class Gaming (215 - 480, n=161, last 2 years)	304 Points +7%
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	301 Points +6%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13705H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	299 Points +6%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	297 Points +5%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	283 Points
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (264 - 294, n=4)	281 Points -1%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024	269 Points -5%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	231 Points -18%

WebXPRT 4 / Overall
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024	279 Points +9%
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	274 Points +7%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	268 Points +5%
Average of class Gaming (157.9 - 328, n=148, last 2 years)	267 Points +4%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13705H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	264 Points +3%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	256 Points
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (247 - 257, n=4)	254 Points -1%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	234 Points -9%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	563 ms * -3%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (546 - 568, n=3)	554 ms * -1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	548 ms *
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	509 ms * +7%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13705H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	505 ms * +8%
Average of class Gaming (421 - 674, n=175, last 2 years)	503 ms * +8%
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	494 ms * +10%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024	474 ms * +14%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Max M3 Max 40-Core GPU, Apple M3 Max 16-Core, Apple SSD AP8192Z	391.7 ms * +29%

* ... smaller is better

PCMark 10 Score		7123 points
Help

AIDA64: Memory Copy | Memory Read | Memory Write | Memory Latency

AIDA64 / Memory Copy
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	89414 MB/s
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (62397 - 96791, n=46)	83126 MB/s -7%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8 Intel Core i7-13705H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	78047 MB/s -13%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	77060 MB/s -14%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	69289 MB/s -23%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	66344 MB/s -26%
Average of class Gaming (21842 - 94222, n=183, last 2 years)	65188 MB/s -27%
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	65071 MB/s -27%

AIDA64 / Memory Read
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	86576 MB/s
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	84869 MB/s -2%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (60544 - 90647, n=46)	80035 MB/s -8%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8 Intel Core i7-13705H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	77976 MB/s -10%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	73950 MB/s -15%
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	70707 MB/s -18%
Average of class Gaming (23681 - 99713, n=183, last 2 years)	69056 MB/s -20%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	68252 MB/s -21%

AIDA64 / Memory Write
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8 Intel Core i7-13705H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	95196 MB/s +30%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	80441 MB/s +10%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	73337 MB/s
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (58692 - 93451, n=46)	72600 MB/s -1%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	71464 MB/s -3%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	68170 MB/s -7%
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	67041 MB/s -9%
Average of class Gaming (22986 - 108954, n=183, last 2 years)	66928 MB/s -9%

AIDA64 / Memory Latency
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (116.2 - 233, n=46)	143.6 ns * -3%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	140 ns *
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8 Intel Core i7-13705H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	115 ns * +18%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	99.5 ns * +29%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	94.4 ns * +33%
Average of class Gaming (59.5 - 259, n=183, last 2 years)	94 ns * +33%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	87.6 ns * +37%
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	84.2 ns * +40%

* ... smaller is better

DPC 延迟

在我们的标准化延迟测试（网上冲浪、4K YouTube 播放、CPU 负载）中，使用当前 BIOS 版本的测试设备在使用实时音频应用程序时显示出轻微的限制。

DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	18226.8 μs * -634%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13705H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	4358.5 μs * -75%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	2484.4 μs *
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024	2448.6 μs * +1%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	1053.8 μs * +58%
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	893 μs * +64%

* ... smaller is better

存储设备

新款 G16 有两个 M.2-2280 插槽，通过 PCIe 4.0 连接。我们的测试设备中安装了 1 TB 版本的西部数据 SN560，虽然它的传输速率高达 5 GB/s，但并不是市场上最快的硬盘之一。至少，即使在长期负载的情况下，它的性能也能保持稳定。出厂时，用户有 855 GB 的可用空间。更多固态硬盘基准测试这里。

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6

AS SSD

DiskSpd

WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00

CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 4970 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 3496 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 468 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 412 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 46.6 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 115.5 MB/s

CDM 6 Write 4K Q8T8: 372 MB/s

CDM 6 Read 4K Q8T8: 779 MB/s

Drive Performance Rating | DiskSpd | AS SSD

Drive Performance Rating - Percent
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	93.9 pt
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	81.5 pt
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	74.3 pt
Average of class Gaming	71.1 pt
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 SSSTC CA6-8D1024	68.3 pt
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	68.2 pt
Average WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	50.9 pt
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	47.5 pt

DiskSpd
seq read
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 SSSTC CA6-8D1024	3844 (3257.93^min - 3843.87^max) MB/s +20%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	3770 (3740.06^min - 3770.26^max) MB/s +18%
Average of class Gaming (1319 - 7045, n=164, last 2 years)	3470 MB/s +8%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	3349 (938.07^min - 3349.15^max) MB/s +5%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	3202 (3129.61^min - 3201.93^max) MB/s
Average WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00 (2406 - 4128, n=18)	3183 MB/s -1%
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	3077 (2170.13^min - 3076.66^max) MB/s -4%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	2519 MB/s -21%
seq write
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	5155 (4427.3^min - 5155.43^max) MB/s +104%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	4485 (775.32^min - 4484.81^max) MB/s +78%
Average of class Gaming (535 - 9307, n=164, last 2 years)	3807 MB/s +51%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	3340 (3237.37^min - 3340.31^max) MB/s +32%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	3291 (3216.4^min - 3290.77^max) MB/s +30%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 SSSTC CA6-8D1024	3242 (1498^min - 3241.78^max) MB/s +28%
Average WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00 (2235 - 3416, n=18)	2922 MB/s +16%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	2526 (2498.97^min - 2525.81^max) MB/s
seq q8 t1 read
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	7121 (6367.95^min - 7120.69^max) MB/s +42%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	6935 (5510.15^min - 6934.86^max) MB/s +38%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 SSSTC CA6-8D1024	6872 (4963.33^min - 6872.25^max) MB/s +37%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	6555 (5758.8^min - 6554.54^max) MB/s +31%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	6460 (6020.84^min - 6459.94^max) MB/s +29%
Average of class Gaming (2594 - 16089, n=164, last 2 years)	6313 MB/s +26%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	5008 (4421.01^min - 5007.74^max) MB/s
Average WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00 (3728 - 5023, n=18)	4902 MB/s -2%
seq q8 t1 write
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	6761 (6735.84^min - 6761.33^max) MB/s +109%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	4937 (4926.84^min - 4936.71^max) MB/s +53%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	4926 (4833.5^min - 4926^max) MB/s +53%
Average of class Gaming (539 - 14571, n=164, last 2 years)	4851 MB/s +50%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	4803 (4344.79^min - 4802.73^max) MB/s +49%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 SSSTC CA6-8D1024	4244 (427.59^min - 4244.22^max) MB/s +31%
Average WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00 (2957 - 3464, n=18)	3238 MB/s 0%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	3230 (3169.22^min - 3230.03^max) MB/s
4k q1 t1 read
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	85.3 (84.45^min - 85.25^max) MB/s +61%
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	83.7 (81.88^min - 83.66^max) MB/s +58%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	67.9 (64.79^min - 67.93^max) MB/s +28%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	66.9 (50.9^min - 66.86^max) MB/s +26%
Average of class Gaming (30.6 - 95.9, n=164, last 2 years)	65.9 MB/s +25%
Average WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00 (41.9 - 73.3, n=18)	56.6 MB/s +7%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 SSSTC CA6-8D1024	56.5 (49.8^min - 56.49^max) MB/s +7%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	52.9 (51.15^min - 52.91^max) MB/s
4k q1 t1 write
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	313 (306.34^min - 313.21^max) MB/s +144%
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	267 (266.37^min - 267.43^max) MB/s +108%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	253 (250.9^min - 252.85^max) MB/s +97%
Average of class Gaming (66.6 - 397, n=164, last 2 years)	223 MB/s +74%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 SSSTC CA6-8D1024	220 (56.84^min - 219.56^max) MB/s +71%
Average WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00 (78 - 318, n=18)	176.8 MB/s +38%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	141 (138.88^min - 140.96^max) MB/s +10%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	128.4 (126.56^min - 128.36^max) MB/s
4k q32 t16 read
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	4358 (4325.31^min - 4358.41^max) MB/s +622%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	3523 (3416.03^min - 3522.69^max) MB/s +483%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 SSSTC CA6-8D1024	3111 (2388.54^min - 3111.42^max) MB/s +415%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	3013 (755.04^min - 3013.06^max) MB/s +399%
Average of class Gaming (417 - 6172, n=164, last 2 years)	2568 MB/s +325%
Average WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00 (592 - 1544, n=18)	1061 MB/s +76%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	996 (952.75^min - 996.41^max) MB/s +65%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	604 (565.74^min - 603.6^max) MB/s
4k q32 t16 write
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	3597 (3488.54^min - 3597.4^max) MB/s +795%
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	3090 (3060.74^min - 3090.41^max) MB/s +669%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	2736 (1172^min - 2736.15^max) MB/s +581%
Average of class Gaming (162.3 - 4869, n=164, last 2 years)	2130 MB/s +430%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 SSSTC CA6-8D1024	1282 (960.6^min - 1281.78^max) MB/s +219%
Average WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00 (227 - 2783, n=18)	1030 MB/s +156%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	457 (451.8^min - 456.79^max) MB/s +14%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	402 (389.17^min - 402.07^max) MB/s

AS SSD
Score Total
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	9172 Points +180%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	7774 Points +138%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 SSSTC CA6-8D1024	7311 Points +123%
Average of class Gaming (2271 - 13854, n=156, last 2 years)	6745 Points +106%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	5792 Points +77%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	5636 Points +72%
Average WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00 (2750 - 5610, n=16)	4109 Points +26%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	3272 Points
Score Read
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	3369 Points +230%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 SSSTC CA6-8D1024	3308 Points +224%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	2959 Points +190%
Average of class Gaming (776 - 4721, n=156, last 2 years)	2446 Points +140%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	1805 Points +77%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	1496 Points +47%
Average WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00 (961 - 1761, n=16)	1353 Points +33%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	1020 Points
Score Write
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	4082 Points +126%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	3631 Points +101%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	3331 Points +84%
Average of class Gaming (515 - 7208, n=156, last 2 years)	3112 Points +72%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	3012 Points +67%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 SSSTC CA6-8D1024	2428 Points +34%
Average WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00 (651 - 3010, n=16)	2134 Points +18%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	1808 Points
Seq Read
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 SSSTC CA6-8D1024	5144.76 MB/s +40%
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	5128 MB/s +40%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	5126 MB/s +40%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	5048 MB/s +38%
Average of class Gaming (2260 - 12763, n=156, last 2 years)	4938 MB/s +35%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	4582 MB/s +25%
Average WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00 (3074 - 4328, n=16)	3878 MB/s +6%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	3662 MB/s
Seq Write
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	5101 MB/s +166%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	4546 MB/s +137%
Average of class Gaming (495 - 11316, n=156, last 2 years)	3759 MB/s +96%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 SSSTC CA6-8D1024	3058.47 MB/s +59%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	2623 MB/s +37%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	2310 MB/s +20%
Average WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00 (1536 - 3101, n=16)	2299 MB/s +20%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	1921 MB/s
4K Read
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	76 MB/s +80%
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	75.8 MB/s +80%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	67.7 MB/s +60%
Average of class Gaming (27.8 - 112.1, n=156, last 2 years)	65.3 MB/s +55%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	61.3 MB/s +45%
Average WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00 (36.6 - 61.3, n=16)	49.7 MB/s +18%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 SSSTC CA6-8D1024	49.65 MB/s +18%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	42.2 MB/s
4K Write
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	288 MB/s +82%
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	231 MB/s +46%
Average of class Gaming (108.8 - 512, n=156, last 2 years)	212 MB/s +34%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	207 MB/s +31%
Average WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00 (117 - 512, n=16)	205 MB/s +30%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	193 MB/s +22%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	157.9 MB/s
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 SSSTC CA6-8D1024	144.8 MB/s -8%
4K-64 Read
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	2780 MB/s +354%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 SSSTC CA6-8D1024	2744.3 MB/s +348%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	2378 MB/s +289%
Average of class Gaming (451 - 3475, n=156, last 2 years)	1881 MB/s +207%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	1285 MB/s +110%
Average WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00 (551 - 1272, n=16)	916 MB/s +50%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	915 MB/s +50%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	612 MB/s
4K-64 Write
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	3341 MB/s +129%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	3176 MB/s +118%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	2669 MB/s +83%
Average of class Gaming (277 - 5909, n=156, last 2 years)	2526 MB/s +73%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	2493 MB/s +71%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 SSSTC CA6-8D1024	1944.47 MB/s +33%
Average WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00 (172.9 - 2500, n=16)	1717 MB/s +18%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	1458 MB/s
Access Time Read
Average WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00 (0.03 - 0.17, n=16)	0.07281 ms * -128%
Average of class Gaming (0.016 - 0.379, n=155, last 2 years)	0.05538 ms * -73%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	0.041 ms * -28%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	0.032 ms *
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 SSSTC CA6-8D1024	0.028 ms * +12%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	0.027 ms * +16%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	0.021 ms * +34%
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	0.018 ms * +44%
Access Time Write
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 SSSTC CA6-8D1024	0.082 ms * -257%
Average of class Gaming (0.011 - 1.028, n=156, last 2 years)	0.04826 ms * -110%
Average WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00 (0.016 - 0.088, n=16)	0.03494 ms * -52%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	0.023 ms *
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	0.021 ms * +9%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	0.02 ms * +13%
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	0.017 ms * +26%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	0.013 ms * +43%

* ... smaller is better

Reading continuous performance: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø4947 (4458.34-4961.59)

图形卡

笔记本电脑 GeForce RTX 4070 笔记本电脑拥有 8GB 内存，在性能模式下，最大运行功耗为 80 瓦。要获得高达 105 瓦的全性能，必须选择涡轮增压模式。Zephyrus G16 具有带高级 Optimus 的 MUX 开关，因此切换到 dGPU 时无需重启系统。新款 Meteor-Lake 处理器的 Arc iGPU 与旧款 Iris Xe Graphics G7 相比，性能有了大幅提升，但由于 G16 配备了专用的 Nvidia GPU，这一点并不太重要。

其基准测试结果尚可，使用涡轮增压模式可以获得更好的性能（这也将缩小与对比设备的差距）。在永久负载下，GPU 的功耗仅为 42 瓦，这就是为什么 GPU 性能最终会降低 27%。更多 GPU 基准测试请访问。

3DMark 11 | 3DMark | Geekbench 5.5 | Geekbench 6.3

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX	56565 Points +52%
Average of class Gaming (1029 - 72178, n=182, last 2 years)	43857 Points +18%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H	41480 Points +11%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H	41302 Points +11%
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H	40870 Points +10%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (24229 - 46434, n=61)	40495 Points +9%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	37313 Points
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13705H	35299 Points -5%

3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX	40570 Points +53%
Average of class Gaming (781 - 53059, n=192, last 2 years)	31443 Points +18%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H	30051 Points +13%
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H	29801 Points +12%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (12242 - 33451, n=64)	29065 Points +9%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H	28885 Points +9%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	26568 Points
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13705H	25562 Points -4%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX	18441 Points +68%
Average of class Gaming (224 - 22717, n=187, last 2 years)	13142 Points +20%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H	11955 Points +9%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H	11798 Points +7%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (5012 - 13391, n=62)	11625 Points +6%
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H	11496 Points +5%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	10989 Points
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13705H	9913 Points -10%
Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Max Apple M3 Max 40-Core GPU, Apple M3 Max 16-Core	31268 Points
Average of class Gaming (4663 - 44948, n=20, last 2 years)	25566 Points
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (17684 - 24275, n=9)	21668 Points
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H	21612 Points
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13705H	19185 Points

Geekbench 5.5 - OpenCL Score
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX	173311 Points +52%
Average of class Gaming (5039 - 237138, n=189, last 2 years)	126940 Points +11%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H	118031 Points +4%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (17391 - 129366, n=63)	114234 Points 0%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	113949 Points
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H	112071 Points -2%
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H	108736 Points -5%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13705H	100573 Points -12%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Max Apple M3 Max 40-Core GPU, Apple M3 Max 16-Core	91362 Points -20%

Geekbench 6.3 - GPU OpenCL
Average of class Gaming (4321 - 207373, n=109, last 2 years)	116253 Points +8%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (85488 - 129836, n=39)	114180 Points +6%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	107953 Points
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Max Apple M3 Max 40-Core GPU, Apple M3 Max 16-Core	91413 Points -15%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13705H	87488 Points -19%

3DMark 11 Performance		31273 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score		23302 points
3DMark Time Spy Score		10850 points
Help

... in comparison

Blender: v3.3 Classroom OPTIX/RTX | v3.3 Classroom CUDA | v3.3 Classroom CPU | v3.3 Classroom METAL

Blender / v3.3 Classroom OPTIX/RTX
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13705H	25 Seconds * -14%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H	24 Seconds * -9%
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H	23 Seconds * -5%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	22 Seconds *
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (18 - 30, n=61)	21.5 Seconds * +2%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H	21 Seconds * +5%
Average of class Gaming (9 - 95, n=176, last 2 years)	20.9 Seconds * +5%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX	15 Seconds * +32%

Blender / v3.3 Classroom CUDA
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13705H	44 Seconds * -29%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (32 - 181, n=64)	40.5 Seconds * -19%
Average of class Gaming (16 - 175, n=182, last 2 years)	36.5 Seconds * -7%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H	36 Seconds * -6%
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H	35 Seconds * -3%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H	34 Seconds * -0%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	34 Seconds *
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX	22 Seconds * +35%

Blender / v3.3 Classroom CPU
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H	393 Seconds * -19%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	330 Seconds *
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13705H	307 Seconds * +7%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H	304 Seconds * +8%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H	299 Seconds * +9%
Average of class Gaming (138 - 962, n=187, last 2 years)	295 Seconds * +11%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (158 - 440, n=61)	289 Seconds * +12%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX	207 Seconds * +37%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Max Apple M3 Max 40-Core GPU, Apple M3 Max 16-Core	194 Seconds * +41%

Blender / v3.3 Classroom METAL
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Max Apple M3 Max 40-Core GPU, Apple M3 Max 16-Core	32 Seconds *

* ... smaller is better

游戏性能

尽管新款 ROG Zephyrus G16 不再是一款硬核游戏笔记本电脑，但其游戏性能自然仍是一个非常重要的方面--新款机型当然不会让人失望。它的 RTX 4070 笔记本电脑的性能加上流星湖处理器，足以流畅运行当前的游戏。结合出色的 OLED 面板，这款笔记本电脑可提供非凡的游戏体验。只有要求极其苛刻的游戏或光线追踪才可能需要使用升频技术，如果游戏支持这些技术的话。此外，即使在长时间的游戏过程中，它的游戏性能也能保持完全稳定。

Performance Rating - Percent
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	100 pt
Average of class Gaming	76.1 pt
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	74.7 pt
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	74.5 pt
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	68.7 pt
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8 Intel Core i7-13705H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	65 pt
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	59.5 pt

The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	176.8 (159^min) fps +79%
Average of class Gaming (18.4 - 216, n=163, last 2 years)	128.3 fps +30%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	119 fps +21%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	116 (48.5^P0.1, 82.5^P1) fps +18%
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	105.4 (100^min, 100^P1) fps +7%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	98.6 (94^min, 94^P1) fps
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8 Intel Core i7-13705H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	90.8 (87^min, 88^P1) fps -8%

GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	140.7 (3.02^min, 100^P1) fps +42%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	123.2 (3.96^min, 76.9^P1) fps +25%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	119.7 (4.54^min, 76.9^P1) fps +21%
Average of class Gaming (12.1 - 167.7, n=168, last 2 years)	113.7 fps +15%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8 Intel Core i7-13705H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	107.4 (4.68^min, 66.7^P1) fps +9%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	98.8 (3.78^min, 58.8^P1) fps
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	96.5 (4.91^min, 66.7^P1) fps -2%

Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	157.8 fps +57%
Average of class Gaming (19.2 - 201, n=180, last 2 years)	119.9 fps +19%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	116.2 fps +15%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	115 fps +14%
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	109 fps +8%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	100.8 fps
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8 Intel Core i7-13705H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	95.7 fps -5%

Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	323 (61.7^min, 222^P1) fps +150%
Average of class Gaming (38.9 - 421, n=178, last 2 years)	229 fps +77%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	204 (39^min, 153.9^P1) fps +58%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	200 (31.2^min, 147.4^P1) fps +55%
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	196.7 (34.8^min, 146.3^P1) fps +52%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8 Intel Core i7-13705H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	184.1 (24^min, 133^P1) fps +42%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	129.3 (30.4^min, 84.7^P1) fps

Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	194.7 (160^min) fps +48%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	154.7 (131.1^min) fps +18%
Average of class Gaming (33.2 - 220, n=186, last 2 years)	150.5 fps +14%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	144.5 (123.6^min) fps +10%
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	143.8 (126.1^min) fps +9%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8 Intel Core i7-13705H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	142.3 (118.3^min) fps +8%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	131.6 (114.5^min) fps

X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3)
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	137 fps +69%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	115.3 fps +42%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	110.2 fps +36%
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	109.7 fps +35%
Average of class Gaming (31.5 - 166.2, n=192, last 2 years)	108.1 fps +33%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8 Intel Core i7-13705H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	98.3 fps +21%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	81.2 fps

The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	176.8 (159^min) fps +79%
Average of class Gaming (18.4 - 216, n=163, last 2 years)	128.3 fps +30%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	119 fps +21%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	116 (48.5^P0.1, 82.5^P1) fps +18%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (69.8 - 133.7, n=56)	112.5 fps +14%
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	105.4 (100^min, 100^P1) fps +7%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	98.6 (94^min, 94^P1) fps
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8 Intel Core i7-13705H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	90.8 (87^min, 88^P1) fps -8%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Max Apple M3 Max 16-Core, Apple M3 Max 40-Core GPU	69 fps -30%

Far Cry 5
1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	149 fps +33%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	143 (112^min) fps +28%
Average of class Gaming (34 - 218, n=101, last 2 years)	131 fps +17%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (92 - 158, n=35)	127.8 fps +14%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8 Intel Core i7-13705H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	127 fps +13%
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	120 fps +7%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	112 fps
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Max Apple M3 Max 16-Core, Apple M3 Max 40-Core GPU	50 fps -55%
2560x1440 Ultra Preset AA:T
Average of class Gaming (71 - 194, n=80, last 2 years)	119.6 fps +27%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	115 fps +22%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	113 (102^min) fps +20%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (79 - 128, n=32)	109.1 fps +16%
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	108 fps +15%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8 Intel Core i7-13705H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	97 fps +3%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	94 fps
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Max Apple M3 Max 16-Core, Apple M3 Max 40-Core GPU	49 fps -48%

Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty
1920x1080 Ultra Preset (FSR off)
Average of class Gaming (6.76 - 144.7, n=79, last 2 years)	86.5 fps +25%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (30.7 - 90.7, n=31)	79.7 fps +16%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	69 fps
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Max Apple M3 Max 16-Core, Apple M3 Max 40-Core GPU	42.8 fps -38%
2560x1440 Ultra Preset (FSR off)
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	84.4 (72^min) fps +93%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	83 (30^min) fps +90%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	72.2 (58^min) fps +65%
Average of class Gaming (24.8 - 110, n=69, last 2 years)	64.9 fps +49%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (24.8 - 57.1, n=30)	49.1 fps +12%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	43.7 fps
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Max Apple M3 Max 16-Core, Apple M3 Max 40-Core GPU	37.4 fps -14%

Call of Duty Modern Warfare 3 2023
1920x1080 Extreme Preset
Average of class Gaming (27 - 205, n=18, last 2 years)	112.5 fps +20%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (92 - 120, n=7)	103.9 fps +11%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	94 fps
2560x1440 Extreme Preset
Average of class Gaming (48 - 162, n=15, last 2 years)	95.9 fps +50%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (64 - 83, n=6)	74.2 fps +16%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	64 fps

Avatar Frontiers of Pandora
1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T
Average of class Gaming (19 - 103, n=15, last 2 years)	65.7 fps +34%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (49 - 62, n=8)	55.8 fps +14%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	49 fps
2560x1440 Ultra Preset AA:T
Average of class Gaming (18 - 70, n=12, last 2 years)	51.1 fps +60%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (32 - 42, n=8)	37.9 fps +18%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	32 fps

Star Wars Jedi Survivor
1920x1080 Epic Preset
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	71.1 (11^min, 24.9^P0.1, 36.9^P1) fps +16%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (61.5 - 80.1, n=8)	71.1 fps +16%
Average of class Gaming (27.2 - 148, n=23, last 2 years)	67.5 fps +10%
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	67 fps +9%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	61.5 fps
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8 Intel Core i7-13705H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	60 fps -2%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Max Apple M3 Max 16-Core, Apple M3 Max 40-Core GPU	51 fps -17%
2560x1440 Epic Preset
Average of class Gaming (30.4 - 114, n=17, last 2 years)	52.2 fps +32%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	47 (17^min, 23.7^P0.1, 31.8^P1) fps +19%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (39.5 - 51.1, n=8)	45.4 fps +15%
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	44 fps +11%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	39.5 fps
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8 Intel Core i7-13705H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	38 fps -4%

我们还注意到不同的能量模式对几款 QHD 分辨率和最高细节的游戏的影响。正如您所看到的，虽然存在一些差异，但这些差异并不大。即使在静音模式下，你通常仍能很好地运行这些游戏（尤其是在稍微降低分辨率或使用 DLSS 的情况下）--在实际操作中，你应该多尝试不同的设置。

Gaming-Performance QHD@ Ultra-Settings
能量曲线	《孤岛惊魂 5》	Witcher 3	《赛博朋克 2077》	《现代战争 3》	《阿凡达》	《星球大战绝地求生
安静	87 fps	68.5 fps	32.6 fps	49 fps	23 fps	29.8 fps
性能	94 fps	82.4 fps	43.7 fps	64 fps	32 fps	39.5 fps
Turbo	105 fps	83.9 fps	48.7 fps	66 fps	34 fps	42.5 fps

Witcher 3 FPS diagram

Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU: Ø98.6 (94-104)

	low	med.	high	ultra	QHD
GTA V (2015)			166.5	98.8	79.6
The Witcher 3 (2015)			221	98.6	82.4
Dota 2 Reborn (2015)	162.3	146.8	140.7	131.6
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018)		131.8	100.8		76.3
X-Plane 11.11 (2018)	119.9	106.3	81.2
Far Cry 5 (2018)	147	126	121	112	94
Strange Brigade (2018)			211	129.3	123.4
F1 2021 (2021)	294	270	220	123.1	95.2
F1 22 (2022)	192.9	199.7	168.1	65.6	44.3
Star Wars Jedi Survivor (2023)	78.7	69.9	65.1	61.5	39.5
F1 23 (2023)	195.2	193.8	165.4	55.8	36
Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty (2023)	96.4	90	77	69	43.7
Call of Duty Modern Warfare 3 2023 (2023)	143	130	101	94	64
Avatar Frontiers of Pandora (2023)	81	75	66	49	32

排放 - 带有第三个风扇的 ROG G16

噪音排放

如前所述，配备 RTX 4050/4060/4070 笔记本电脑的机型使用的是传统的热管冷却装置，带有第三个机箱风扇。该风扇通过底部吸入新鲜空气，并将其导向 GPU。但问题是，这个小风扇的转速非常高，运行速度非常快，因此非常明显。总的来说，新款 Zephyrus G16 绝不是一款静音笔记本电脑，即使在日常工作中也是如此，因为风扇很快就会启动。即使在使用静音模式时也是如此。在负载情况下，使用性能模式时很快就会达到约 46 dB(A)，虽然听起来很明显，但仍然可以忍受。反过来，从 48 dB(A) 左右开始，风扇发出的噪音会让人很不舒服，因为会有额外的嗡嗡声，因此我们不建议使用涡轮增压模式（最大 52.4 dB(A)）。下表显示了使用不同能量曲线时的噪音排放汇总。我们没有注意到测试设备发出任何额外的电子噪音。这些测试结果并不代表配备 RTX 4080/4090 笔记本电脑的机型，因为这些机型使用了两个风扇，包括一个蒸汽腔。我们将尽快测试其中一款机型。

能耗曲线	3DMark 06	Witcher 3	赛博朋克 2077 自由魅影	压力测试
静音	30.4 dB(A)	38 dB(A)	41.5 dB(A)	41.5 dB(A)
性能	34.2 dB(A)	46.4 dB(A)	46.4 dB(A)	46.4 dB(A)
涡轮	41.5 dB(A)	52.4 dB(A)	52.4 dB(A)	52.4 dB(A)

Noise Level

Idle		23.9 / 27.8 / 30.1 dB(A)
Load		34.2 / 46.4 dB(A)

	30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 23.9 dB(A)

	Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13705H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024	Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Max M3 Max 40-Core GPU, Apple M3 Max 16-Core, Apple SSD AP8192Z
Noise		-5%	2%	-11%	-12%	4%	5%
off / environment *	23.9	24.7 -3%	23 4%	23 4%	25.9 -8%	24 -0%	23.7 1%
Idle Minimum *	23.9	24.7 -3%	23 4%	23 4%	25.9 -8%	24 -0%	23.7 1%
Idle Average *	27.8	26.2 6%	23 17%	23 17%	25.9 7%	24 14%	23.7 15%
Idle Maximum *	30.1	26.2 13%	23.6 22%	33.64 -12%	32 -6%	24 20%	23.7 21%
Load Average *	34.2	39.7 -16%	39 -14%	51.49 -51%	47.2 -38%	34.81 -2%	40.8 -19%
Witcher 3 ultra *	46.4	53.2 -15%	51.6 -11%	55.27 -19%	53.1 -14%	44.05 5%	42.8 8%
Load Maximum *	46.4	53.2 -15%	51.3 -11%	55.24 -19%	53.1 -14%	51.57 -11%	42.8 8%

* ... smaller is better

温度

尽管外壳很薄，但 Zephyrus G16 的温度测试结果还是不错的。在执行简单任务时，设备几乎不会发热。在负载情况下，我们在底座顶部测得的温度高达 50 °C，但仅限于键盘上方区域。键盘本身的温度较低，在操作笔记本电脑时不会受到任何限制。在底部，我们测得的温度约为 45-48 °C，因此在这种情况下不要将它放在大腿上。

在压力测试中，CPU 的平衡功耗为 30 瓦，GPU 为 65 瓦，这与华硕提供的配置文件性能完全一致。在静音模式下，我们测得的功率为 30/45 瓦，而在涡轮增压模式下，我们测得的功率为 35+85 瓦。

Max. Load

Idle

Witcher 3


46.1 °C	50.3 °C	48 °C
35.1 °C	41 °C	37.7 °C
29.3 °C	29.6 °C	32.4 °C

Maximum: 50.3 °C
Average: 38.8 °C


46.9 °C	48 °C	44.3 °C
43.1 °C	44.1 °C	35.6 °C
31.9 °C	31.4 °C	27.7 °C

Maximum: 48 °C
Average: 39.2 °C

Power Supply (max.) 42.2 °C | Room Temperature 20.5 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900

Max. Load

Idle

Witcher 3


27.7 °C	28.8 °C	28.3 °C
26.1 °C	27.2 °C	26.4 °C
25.2 °C	24.8 °C	25.2 °C

Maximum: 28.8 °C
Average: 26.6 °C


29.8 °C	29.6 °C	29 °C
27.2 °C	29.1 °C	27 °C
25.5 °C	25.6 °C	25.1 °C

Maximum: 29.8 °C
Average: 27.5 °C

Power Supply (max.) 28.2 °C | Room Temperature 20.8 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900

Max. Load

Idle

Witcher 3


44.4 °C	49 °C	47.1 °C
34.6 °C	40.7 °C	36 °C
29.2 °C	29.5 °C	31.8 °C

Maximum: 49 °C
Average: 38 °C


48.6 °C	47.8 °C	45.6 °C
42.6 °C	43.1 °C	35.5 °C
31 °C	31.5 °C	27.5 °C

Maximum: 48.6 °C
Average: 39.2 °C

Power Supply (max.) 40.7 °C | Room Temperature 20.7 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 38.8 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 50.3 °C / 123 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 48 °C / 118 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.6 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 38 °C / 100 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (32.4 °C / 90.3 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-3.5 °C / -6.3 F).

	Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8 Intel Core i7-13705H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Max Apple M3 Max 16-Core, Apple M3 Max 40-Core GPU
Heat		7%	6%	16%	3%	-27%	18%
Maximum Upper Side *	50.3	41.6 17%	40 20%	41 18%	46.7 7%	60 -19%	42.3 16%
Maximum Bottom *	48	50 -4%	37.6 22%	47 2%	54.1 -13%	61 -27%	42 12%
Idle Upper Side *	28.8	26.8 7%	32.4 -13%	23 20%	26.5 8%	38.2 -33%	22.5 22%
Idle Bottom *	29.8	27.9 6%	31.4 -5%	23 23%	26.8 10%	37.7 -27%	22.9 23%

* ... smaller is better

发言人

华硕在 ROG Zephyrus G16 上安装了一套带有 6 个模块（4 个低音扬声器，每个 2 瓦；2 个高音扬声器，每个 2 瓦）的音响系统。效果非常出色，与 MacBook Pro 16差不多。多媒体竞争对手，如出色的联想 Yoga Pro 9 16华硕在这方面也不落下风。它的音效非常强大，空间感很强，各模块的声音可以非常响亮，而且不会太失真。这意味着，即使使用性能模式，你仍然可以轻松地通过扬声器播放声音。总而言之，它的表现非常出色。

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 3.8% away from median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (7.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 1% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 99% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 1% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 99% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 4.9% away from median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (8.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 2% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Max audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 5% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (5.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (5.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 1% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电源管理 - 90 瓦时的电池可提供出色的运行时间

耗电量

笔记本电脑的功耗测量结果并不那么令人吃惊，尽管测试设备在空闲测量期间特别受益于深色标准壁纸。与 OLED 显示屏的典型情况一样，耗电量因显示的内容而异，浅色图像耗电量更大。在游戏过程中，我们注意到耗电量为 120 瓦，而在压力测试中，它的耗电量在短时间内达到了 170 瓦，但很快又平衡到了 165 瓦。因此，我们可以肯定地说，200 瓦的电源绰绰有余；配备 RTX 4080/4090 笔记本电脑的配置提供了更强劲的 240 瓦电源。

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.08 / 0.79 Watt
Idle	8.3 / 12.5 / 12.8 Watt
Load	71.3 / 169.1 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00, OLED, 2560x1600, 16"	Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8 i7-13705H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, Mini-LED, 3200x2000, 16"	Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, SSSTC CA6-8D1024, IPS, 2560x1600, 16"	Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10, OLED, 3840x2400, 16"	SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB, IPS, 2560x1600, 16"	MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH, IPS, 2560x1600, 16"	Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Max Apple M3 Max 16-Core, M3 Max 40-Core GPU, Apple SSD AP8192Z, Mini-LED, 3456x2234, 16"	Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	Average of class Gaming
Power Consumption		-41%	-113%	-31%	-5%	-32%	-5%	-50%	-64%
Idle Minimum *	8.3	10.9 -31%	15.2 -83%	11.8 -42%	8.6 -4%	11 -33%	5.2 37%	12.4 ?(4.3 - 31, n=52) -49%	13.5 ?(2 - 39, n=153, last 2 years) -63%
Idle Average *	12.5	22.6 -81%	22.8 -82%	16.1 -29%	12 4%	18 -44%	16.9 -35%	17.5 ?(4.6 - 35.1, n=52) -40%	18.9 ?(8 - 55.6, n=153, last 2 years) -51%
Idle Maximum *	12.8	23.5 -84%	49.8 -289%	17 -33%	12.4 3%	19 -48%	17.2 -34%	24.2 ?(9 - 55.4, n=52) -89%	26.7 ?(9 - 101.1, n=153, last 2 years) -109%
Load Average *	71.3	84.6 -19%	121.2 -70%	100.6 -41%	80 -12%	91 -28%	90.5 -27%	98.2 ?(59.2 - 178, n=52) -38%	106.6 ?(32.1 - 201, n=152, last 2 years) -50%
Witcher 3 ultra *	127.5	159.5 -25%	242 -90%	158 -24%	147.7 -16%	130 -2%	109 15%
Load Maximum *	169.1	177.3 -5%	273.7 -62%	192 -14%	173.1 -2%	228 -35%	145.2 14%	223 ?(107 - 319, n=52) -32%	250 ?(64.5 - 418, n=153, last 2 years) -48%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption Witcher 3 / stress test

Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M; Witcher 3 ultra: Ø127.5 (122.2-135.3)

Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø137.3 (125.1-169.1)

Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø12.2 (8.44-15.9)

Power consumption with external monitor

Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø96.1 (82.4-109.4)

Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø99.2 (60.9-104)

Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M; Cinebench R23 Single (external Monitor): Ø41.2 (35.5-76.8)

Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M; Cinebench R23 Multi (external Monitor): Ø104.1 (102.5-117.2)

Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø116.4 (111.4-126.3)

Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M; 1920x1080 The Witcher 3 ultra (external Monitor): Ø122 (118.4-124.8)

Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø19.6 (16.8-24.5)

运行时间

华硕笔记本电脑配备了 90 瓦时的大容量电池，与 Windows 对比设备相比，它的总运行时间非常出色。 MacBook Pro 16遥遥领先。在 Armoury Crate 软件中，刷新率被设置为电池模式下的 60 Hz，这也是我们使用这些值进行比较的原因（我们将很快添加 240 Hz 的值）。在 WLAN 测试中，由于许多网站的亮度较高，对于 OLED 面板来说往往不是最佳状态，我们注意到在 150 cd/m²（最大亮度的 57%）下的运行时间为 07:15 小时，在全亮度下的运行时间为 05:45 小时。在 150 cd/m² 的视频测试中，其 11 小时多一点的成绩要好得多。看来新的 Arc iGPU（或其视频解码器）在这方面的运行效率非常高，因为其他 Meteor-Lake 测试设备的良好运行时间在视频测试中也非常突出（例如 Zenbook 14 OLED 或 Spectre x360 14--评测即将发布）。如果以最大亮度播放 HDR 视频，其运行时间约为 7.5 小时，但这自然也与 HDR 亮度有限有关。在设备开启的情况下，充满一次电需要 112 分钟，其中约 35 分钟后可获得 60% 的电量，50 分钟后可获得 80% 的电量。

Battery Runtime

WiFi Websurfing		7h 15min
WiFi Websurfing max. Brightness		5h 45min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		11h 11min
Load (maximum brightness)		1h 11min

	Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 90 Wh	Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8 i7-13705H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, 75 Wh	Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, 95.2 Wh	Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 88 Wh	SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 80 Wh	MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 99.9 Wh	Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Max Apple M3 Max 16-Core, M3 Max 40-Core GPU, 99.6 Wh	Average of class Gaming
Battery Runtime		-27%	-1%	15%	-5%	25%	71%	-11%
H.264	671	449 -33%		442 -34%	470 -30%	462 -31%	1221 82%	409 ?(129 - 837, n=79, last 2 years) -39%
WiFi v1.3	435	385 -11%	365 -16%	448 3%	467 7%	466 7%	999 130%	376 ?(85 - 889, n=152, last 2 years) -14%
Load	71	44 -38%	81 14%	126 77%	77 8%	142 100%	71 0%	85.6 ?(41 - 173, n=117, last 2 years) 21%

Pros

+ 高质量、小巧的铝制外壳

+ 出色的 OLED 屏幕，刷新率高达 240 赫兹，采用 G-Sync 技术

+ 出色的扬声器

+ 出色的输入设备

+ 2 个固态硬盘插槽

+ 良好的系统性能

Cons

- 恼人的第 3 个风扇，Vapor-Chamber 仅适用于 RTX 4080 及以上机型

- 内存焊接在机身上，小型配置仅配备 16GB 内存

- 有限的最大 HDR 亮度

- 无 Wi-Fi 7

结论 - 全新 ROG Zephyrus G16 是一款出色的游戏/多媒体混合型产品

华硕 ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 评测。测试设备由华硕德国提供。

华硕调整了新款 ROG Zephyrus G16 的设计理念，旨在吸引更多的用户。在我们看来，该制造商的这一做法是成功的，因为其新推出的 2024 机型是一款品质极高、小巧轻便的 16 英寸笔记本电脑，配备了铝合金外壳、令人印象深刻的扬声器、出色的输入设备和出色的 OLED 面板。由于最大亮度有限，OLED 面板在 HDR 功能方面无法与竞争对手相提并论。即便如此，电影和游戏在 240-Hz OLED 屏幕上看起来还是很不错的，游戏玩家也会对它的快速响应时间和 G-Sync 支持感到满意。此外，华硕还是唯一一家提供软件解决方案的厂商，可以在不触及潜在有害 PWM 区域的情况下对显示屏进行调光。

虽然新的 Meteor-Lake 处理器与旧的 Raptor-Lake 处理器相比并没有真正提高性能，而且其单核性能实际上更差，但其组件的性能也不错。新移动处理器的实际优势--新的 Arc iGPU--在这种情况下并没有带来多少优势，因为设备中安装了专用的 Nvidia GPU。

优质轻巧的铝制外壳、出色的 OLED 显示屏和出色的扬声器：得益于其强大的硬件，新款 ROG Zephyrus G16 当然仍能描绘当前的游戏，但华硕的 2024 机型更倾向于高端多媒体。因此，即使你没有任何游戏方面的野心，新款 Zephyrus G16 依然值得一看。

我们最大的问题在于笔记本电脑的散热，因为 G16 只有在最罕见的情况下才能保持真正的静音，此外，其附加系统风扇的转速也非常高。同样令人遗憾的是，只有配备 RTX 4080/4090 的两个版本的笔记本电脑才能享受到更强大的 Vapor-Chamber 冷却系统，这将导致完全不同的风扇行为，CPU 也将从更高的功率限制中获益。该设备的焊接式内存是另一个缺点，尤其是考虑到我们的测试样品仅安装了 16 GB 内存。对于近 3000 美元的起售价，华硕确实应该标配 32 GB 内存。

新款 ROG Zephyrus G16 最大的竞争对手肯定是Razer Blade 16 ，我们对新款 2024（同样采用三星 OLED）的评测即将发布。说到多媒体设备，Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 或Apple MacBook Pro 16 是其最大的竞争对手，不过，这些设备只能提供有限的游戏功能。

Download your licensed rating image as SVG / PNG

价格和供应情况

新款 ROG Zephyrus G16 将于 2024 年 2 月 15 日开始发售，个别配置已经上市。价格从$2,899.99 美元起。.

Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M - 02/04/2024 v7 ^(old)
Andreas Osthoff

Chassis

91 / 98 → 93%

Keyboard

92%

Pointing Device

100%

Connectivity

70 / 80 → 88%

Weight

65 / 10-66 → 99%

Battery

82 / 95 → 86%

Display

92%

Games Performance

99%

Application Performance

95%

Temperature

85 / 95 → 89%

Noise

76 / 90 → 84%

Audio

96%

Camera

44 / 85 → 52%

Average

84%

92%

Gaming - Weighted Average

Price comparison

Editor of the original article: Daisy Dickson - Translator - 343 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2023

Translator: Ninh Ngoc Duy - Editorial Assistant - 463597 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008

contact me via: Facebook

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 华硕 ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 评测--配备 G-Sync OLED 和英特尔流星湖技术的游戏笔记本电脑

Andreas Osthoff, 2024-02- 7 (Update: 2024-02- 7)

潜在的竞争对手比较

外壳 - Zephyrus 现在由铝制成

尺寸比较

连接性 - Thunderbolt 和高速无线局域网

SD 读卡器

交流

网络摄像头

维护

输入设备 - 舒适的键盘和超大触摸板

显示屏 - 华硕首款配备 G-Sync 技术的 240-Hz OLED 显示屏

Display Response Times

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

性能 - 现在的 Zephyrus 带有流星湖

测试条件

处理器 - Core Ultra 7 155H

Cinebench R15 Multi continuous test

系统性能

DPC 延迟

存储设备

Reading continuous performance: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

图形卡

游戏性能

Witcher 3 FPS diagram

排放 - 带有第三个风扇的 ROG G16

噪音排放

温度

发言人

Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M audio analysis

Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8 audio analysis

Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Max audio analysis

电源管理 - 90 瓦时的电池可提供出色的运行时间

耗电量

Power consumption Witcher 3 / stress test

Power consumption with external monitor

运行时间

Pros

Cons

结论 - 全新 ROG Zephyrus G16 是一款出色的游戏/多媒体混合型产品

价格和供应情况

More articles related to this device

Transparency

Price comparison