Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022评测 - 具有快速显示功能的紧凑型游戏笔记本电脑

Name: Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Brand: Razer

一把更锋利的剃刀。

新的Razer Blade 15配备了全新的第12代英特尔处理器和NvidiaGeForce RTX 3070 Ti/3080 Ti。再加上快如闪电的360赫兹面板，这保证了令人难以置信的流畅显示。在下面的评论中，看看这个小机箱是如何应对强大的硬件的。

Marius Schell, 👁 Florian Glaser (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy), Published 05/05/2022 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Alder Lake Gaming Geforce Intel Laptop / Notebook

装有最新的英特尔和Nvidia芯片，Razer Blade 15 2022春季型号承诺对流行的15英寸游戏笔记本电脑系列进行迭代改进。这里审查的模型和之前审查的模型之间的主要区别是之前审查的Blade 15 2022的主要区别是1080p 360 Hz的面板，所以读者可以坚持在这篇评论中了解基本相同的物理规格的细节。刀锋15的直接竞争对手包括其他高性能15.6英寸游戏笔记本电脑，如申克XMG Neo 15 E22，以及华硕ROG Strix Scar 15，以及 MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS和微星Vector GP66 12UGS.

进一步的Razer评论。

Test device courtesy of Razer DE

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Blade 15 Profimodell Frühjahr 2022 (Blade 15 Series)

Processor

Intel Core i7-12800H 14 x 1.8 - 4.8 GHz, 160 W PL2 / Short Burst, 65 W PL1 / Sustained, Alder Lake-H

Graphics adapter

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU - 16 GB VRAM, Core: 1125 MHz, RAM: 1750 MHz, 110 W TDP, GDDR6, 511,69, Optimus

Memory

32 GB

, Quad-channel DDR5-4800

Display

15.60 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 141 PPI, TL156VDXP02-0, IPS, glossy: no, 360 Hz

Mainboard

Intel Alder Lake-P PCH

Storage

Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, 1024 GB

, PCIe 4

Soundcard

Intel Alder Lake-P PCH - cAVS (Audio, Voice, Speech)

Connections

5 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 Thunderbolt, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Connections: 3.5mm headset, Card Reader: SD card reader

Networking

Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1690i 160MHz (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz), Bluetooth 5.2

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 16.99 x 355 x 235

Battery

80 Wh, 5209 mAh Lithium-Ion

Operating System

Microsoft Windows 11 Home

Camera

Webcam: 1080p webcam
Primary Camera: 2 MPix
Secondary Camera: IR camera

Additional features

Speakers: Stereo, Keyboard: Chiclet, Keyboard Light: yes, Razer Synapse, 12 Months Warranty

Weight

2.09 kg, Power Supply: 646 g

Price

4099 Euro

Links

Razer homepage

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating	Date	Model	Weight	Height	Size	Resolution
88.3 % v7 ^(old)	05 / 2022	Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	2.1 kg	16.99 mm	15.60"	1920x1080
89.1 % v7 ^(old)	03 / 2022	Razer Blade 15 2022 i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	2.1 kg	16.99 mm	15.60"	2560x1440
v ^(old)	03 / 2022	SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti) i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	2.2 kg	26.6 mm	15.60"	2560x1440
86.3 % v7 ^(old)	09 / 2021	Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS R9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU	2.3 kg	27.2 mm	15.60"	2560x1440
84.5 % v7 ^(old)	02 / 2022	MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	2.2 kg	19.8 mm	15.60"	2560x1440
86.9 % v7 ^(old)	03 / 2022	MSI Vector GP66 12UGS i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	2.3 kg	23.4 mm	15.60"	1920x1080

箱子 - 结构紧凑，适合旅行

在表壳方面，我们再次看到熟悉的、光滑的金属结构，Blade系列最初就是以这种结构而闻名的。因此，稳定性、做工和抗扭性仍然很好。反面是对指纹的高敏感度。

Razer Blade 15是一款非常紧凑的15.6英寸笔记本电脑，比大多数竞争对手既小又薄。特别是，ROG Strix Scar 15和XMG Neo 15 E22明显更厚，比我们2.1公斤的审查设备重约100-200克。

尺寸比较

SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti) MSI Vector GP66 12UGS Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 Razer Blade 15 2022 DIN A4 ❌

硬件 - 具有现代连接功能的刀片15

在连接方面没有什么大的惊喜。值得一提的是全面的SD读卡器和支持2.1版本的HDMI端口。与许多竞争对手不同，如 XMG Neo 15 E22的情况，这里没有专用的LAN端口。但是，如果需要的话，可以通过雷电底座来解决这个问题。

左边：电源接口，2个USB-A 3.2 Gen. 2，USB-C 3.2 Gen. 2，3.5毫米音频接口

右边。SD读卡器、Thunderbolt、USB-A 3.2 Gen. 2、HDMI 2.1、锁定端口

SD卡阅读器

SD读卡器的性能处于较高的水平。在用我们的microSD AV PRO 128GB V60卡进行的连续AS-SSD读取测试中，我们的评测设备上出现了一个错误。

SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Razer Blade 15 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	165.4 MB/s +7%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)	155 MB/s
Average of class Gaming (19 - 202, n=87, last 2 years)	95.9 MB/s -38%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti) Intel Core i7-12700H	68.3 (65.41^min - 69.52^max) MB/s -56%

沟通

当连接到我们的华硕GT-AXE11000测试路由器时，集成的杀手Wi-Fi 6E 1690i模块提供了非常快的传输速率。还提供了蓝牙5.2支持。

Networking
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1690i 160MHz	1621 (1412^min - 1672^max) MBit/s
Average of class Gaming (469 - 1843, n=147, last 2 years)	1238 MBit/s -24%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1690i 160MHz	1727 (866^min - 1759^max) MBit/s
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter	1569 (622^min - 1690^max) MBit/s -9%
Average of class Gaming (680 - 1890, n=147, last 2 years)	1390 MBit/s -20%

Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1697 (866-1759)

Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1621 (1412-1672)

网络摄像头

ColorChecker Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022: 12.53 ∆E min: 2.28 - max: 18.39 ∆E

Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022

维护

卸下六颗Torx螺丝（T5）后，可以接触到两个内存模块、电池、WLAN模块和（卸下一个额外的盖子后）M.2 SSD。

输入设备 - 大型点击板和整洁的键盘

键盘

键盘具有16个亮度级别的RGB按键照明（包括 "关闭"）和半高的向上和向下箭头键，这使得Razer能够将整个键盘置于扬声器开口之间的一个矩形区域内。键盘提供了一个平坦的键程和安静的、消音的打字声。按键阻力适中，打字时，键盘中心几乎不产生位移。

触摸板

触摸板的面积约为13x8厘米，允许手指出色地滑行。点击的特点是键程短，触觉反馈清晰。

显示屏------快速面板，色彩光谱有限

我们的评测设备中安装了一块哑光全高清IPS面板，原始分辨率为1920x1080像素，刷新率为360赫兹。另外，还有一个QHD 240赫兹和4K 144赫兹的显示屏，每一个都应该覆盖DCI-P3色彩空间。QHD型号还支持Nvidia G-Sync和Advanced Optimus。

平均315cd/m²的亮度对于大多数应用场景来说是绰绰有余的，再加上0.24的体面黑值，在同类比较中，对比度高于平均水平的1375：1。灰色到灰色的反应时间特别短，我们无法检测到任何PWM。


311 cd/m²	294 cd/m²	305 cd/m²
324 cd/m²	330 cd/m²	320 cd/m²
321 cd/m²	320 cd/m²	307 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

TL156VDXP02-0 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 330 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 314.7 cd/m² Minimum: 16 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 89 %
Center on Battery: 330 cd/m²
Contrast: 1375:1 (Black: 0.24 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.47 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 0.63
ΔE Greyscale 1.8 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
67.4% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
85.1% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
65.3% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.282

Download ICC File (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 TL156VDXP02-0, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"	Razer Blade 15 2022 Sharp LQ156T1JW03, IPS, 2560x1440, 15.6"	SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti) BOE0A67 (BOE CQ NE156QHM-NZ1), IPS, 2560x1440, 15.6"	Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS BOE CQ NE156QHM-NY1, IPS, 2560x1440, 15.6"	MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS Sharp LQ156T1JW04 (SHP153C), IPS-Level, 2560x1440, 15.6"	MSI Vector GP66 12UGS BOE NE156FHM-NZ3, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"
Display		33%		31%	31%	10%
Display P3 Coverage	65.3	99.1 52%		97.6 49%	96.4 48%	70.1 7%
sRGB Coverage	85.1	99.9 17%		99.9 17%	99.7 17%	99.5 17%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	67.4	86.8 29%		85.3 27%	85.6 27%	72.1 7%
Response Times		-123%	-119%	-122%	-10%	-13%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	4.3 ?(2.4, 1.9)	14.4 ?(6.8, 7.6) -235%	14.4 ?(6.6, 7.8) -235%	14 ?(7.2, 6.8) -226%	6 ?(3.2, 2.8) -40%	5.8 ?(3.4, 2.4) -35%
Response Time Black / White *	10.5 ?(5.7, 4.8)	11.6 ?(5.6, 6) -10%	10.8 ?(5.4, 5.4) -3%	12.4 ?(7.2, 5.2) -18%	8.4 ?(4.4, 4) 20%	9.6 ?(5.2, 4.4) 9%
PWM Frequency
Screen		-54%	-38%	-77%	-87%	-45%
Brightness middle	330	286 -13%	295 -11%	304.3 -8%	272 -18%	353.1 7%
Brightness	315	271 -14%	277 -12%	286 -9%	253 -20%	325 3%
Brightness Distribution	89	89 0%	62 -30%	76 -15%	87 -2%	85 -4%
Black Level *	0.24	0.25 -4%	0.28 -17%	0.33 -38%	0.25 -4%	0.38 -58%
Contrast	1375	1144 -17%	1054 -23%	922 -33%	1088 -21%	929 -32%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	1.47	2.74 -86%	2.36 -61%	2.76 -88%	3.73 -154%	2.24 -52%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	2.73	5.21 -91%	4.24 -55%	5.57 -104%	9.43 -245%	5 -83%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *	0.63	2.52 -300%		2.38 -278%	0.98 -56%	1.02 -62%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	1.8	1.1 39%	3.43 -91%	4 -122%	6.5 -261%	4 -122%
Gamma	2.282 ^96%	2.2 ^100%	2.44 ^90%	2.14 ^103%	2.172 ^101%	2.24 ^98%
CCT	6499 ^100%	6408 ^101%	6266 ^104%	6844 ^95%	6485 ^100%	6864 ^95%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		-48% / -45%	-79% / -54%	-56% / -60%	-22% / -51%	-16% / -28%

* ... smaller is better

在我们的配置中，Razer Blade 15只能覆盖85%的sRGB色彩空间。考虑到制造商声称的 "高达100%"，我们在这里期待更多。

交付时，灰度和颜色的DeltaE色彩空间偏差已经在理想范围内（小于3），并且可以通过后续校准分别提高到0.63和0.8的稳固水平。

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
10.5 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 5.7 ms rise
10.5 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 4.8 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 26 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
4.3 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 2.4 ms rise
4.3 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 1.9 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 12 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

由于亮度超过300cd/m²，只要你呆在阴凉处，该显示器也可用于户外使用。

可视角度是一流的。即使在陡峭的角度，IPS显示屏的颜色和对比度也几乎没有失真。

性能 - 拥有顶级硬件的Razer游戏笔记本

我们的Razer Blade 15配备了一个英特尔酷睿i7-12800H和一个 NvidiaGeForce RTX 3080 Ti.还有32GB四通道模式的DDR5内存和1TB PCIe 4.0固态硬盘。结合4K面板, 笔记本电脑是可供选择的与酷睿i9-12900H.

测试条件

为了在测试中获得新的见解，我们用Synapse "平衡 "配置文件进行了所有测量。这使得GPU的最大TGP约为95W，同时也限制了CPU的工作。你可以在我们的评论中找到可实现的最大分数。其他评论.

处理器

在我们选择的配置文件下，Cinebench R15多线程测试在电池模式下取得了相同的分数。英特尔酷睿i7-12800H是一个全新的第12代英特尔处理器，支持DDR5内存。DDR5功能允许两个RAM模块以四通道模式运行。

在 "平衡 "模式下，Razer Blade 15在CPU性能方面不如没有性能限制的情况下能跟上竞争对手。即使是名义上较弱的酷睿i7-12700H在Cinebench R15多循环测试中，即使是XMG Neo 15 E22的名义上较弱的酷睿i7-12700H也能在两种情况下击败我们的评测设备。一些单线程基准测试结果更好的事实，可能是由于在TDP限制之前就达到了温度限制。涡轮增压只在短时间内保持活跃。

在我们选择的配置文件下，Cinebench R15多线程测试在电池模式下提供相同的分数。

Cinebench R15 Multi Sustained Load

Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H: Ø1535 (1448.91-1565.5)

Razer Blade 15 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H: Ø2081 (2061.43-2178.41)

SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti) Intel Core i7-12700H: Ø2766 (2740.48-2824.46)

Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX: Ø2175 (2157.5-2197.2)

MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS Intel Core i7-12700H: Ø2624 (2577.65-2843.74)

MSI Vector GP66 12UGS Intel Core i9-12900H: Ø2372 (2349.62-2449.33)

CPU Performance Rating - Percent
Average of class Gaming	83.1 pt
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti) Intel Core i7-12700H	75.3 pt
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS Intel Core i9-12900H	74.2 pt
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS Intel Core i7-12700H	73.9 pt
Average Intel Core i7-12800H	66.7 pt
Razer Blade 15 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H	66.2 pt
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H	56.8 pt
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS ^-2! AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX	56.5 pt

Cinebench R23
Multi Core
Average of class Gaming (5668 - 36249, n=188, last 2 years)	21841 Points +123%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti) Intel Core i7-12700H	18452 Points +89%
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS Intel Core i7-12700H	17940 Points +83%
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS Intel Core i9-12900H	16812 (15129.6^min - 16812.1^max) Points +72%
Razer Blade 15 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H	14893 (13078^min - 14893.1^max) Points +52%
Average Intel Core i7-12800H (9777 - 16597, n=5)	14387 Points +47%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX	13519 (13222.6^min - 13519.5^max) Points +38%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H	9777 Points
Single Core
Average of class Gaming (1136 - 2235, n=186, last 2 years)	1888 Points +5%
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS Intel Core i9-12900H	1887 Points +5%
Average Intel Core i7-12800H (1796 - 1859, n=5)	1824 Points +1%
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS Intel Core i7-12700H	1803 Points 0%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H	1799 Points
Razer Blade 15 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H	1796 Points 0%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti) Intel Core i7-12700H	1782 Points -1%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX	1469 Points -18%

Cinebench R20
CPU (Multi Core)
Average of class Gaming (2179 - 13832, n=186, last 2 years)	8311 Points +122%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti) Intel Core i7-12700H	6988 Points +87%
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS Intel Core i7-12700H	6651 Points +78%
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS Intel Core i9-12900H	6594 Points +76%
Razer Blade 15 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H	5731 Points +53%
Average Intel Core i7-12800H (3741 - 6433, n=5)	5443 Points +45%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX	5214 Points +39%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H	3741 Points
CPU (Single Core)
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS Intel Core i9-12900H	730 Points +5%
Average of class Gaming (439 - 856, n=186, last 2 years)	725 Points +4%
Average Intel Core i7-12800H (690 - 714, n=5)	703 Points +1%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti) Intel Core i7-12700H	696 Points 0%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H	695 Points
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS Intel Core i7-12700H	693 Points 0%
Razer Blade 15 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H	690 Points -1%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX	574 Points -17%

Cinebench R15
CPU Multi 64Bit
Average of class Gaming (905 - 5663, n=193, last 2 years)	3421 Points +118%
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS Intel Core i7-12700H	2844 (2577.65^min - 2843.74^max) Points +82%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti) Intel Core i7-12700H	2824 (2740.48^min - 2824.46^max) Points +80%
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS Intel Core i9-12900H	2449 (2349.62^min - 2449.33^max) Points +56%
Average Intel Core i7-12800H (1566 - 2697, n=5)	2236 Points +43%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX	2197 (2157.5^min - 2197.2^max) Points +40%
Razer Blade 15 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H	2178 (2061.43^min - 2178.41^max) Points +39%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H	1566 (1448.91^min - 1565.5^max) Points
CPU Single 64Bit
Average of class Gaming (191.9 - 318, n=190, last 2 years)	278 Points +15%
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS Intel Core i9-12900H	273 Points +13%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti) Intel Core i7-12700H	261 Points +8%
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS Intel Core i7-12700H	260 Points +7%
Average Intel Core i7-12800H (242 - 269, n=5)	260 Points +7%
Razer Blade 15 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H	258 Points +7%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H	242 Points
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX	234 Points -3%

Blender - v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H	306 Seconds *
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX	240 Seconds * +22%
Average Intel Core i7-12800H (192 - 306, n=5)	233 Seconds * +24%
Razer Blade 15 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H	226 Seconds * +26%
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS Intel Core i9-12900H	197 Seconds * +36%
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS Intel Core i7-12700H	187 Seconds * +39%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti) Intel Core i7-12700H	177 Seconds * +42%
Average of class Gaming (87 - 555, n=181, last 2 years)	170.7 Seconds * +44%

7-Zip 18.03
7z b 4
Average of class Gaming (23795 - 140932, n=185, last 2 years)	85288 MIPS +91%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti) Intel Core i7-12700H	73067 MIPS +64%
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS Intel Core i7-12700H	69454 MIPS +56%
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS Intel Core i9-12900H	66678 MIPS +50%
Razer Blade 15 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H	61936 MIPS +39%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX	61422 MIPS +38%
Average Intel Core i7-12800H (44553 - 68930, n=5)	59950 MIPS +35%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H	44553 MIPS
7z b 4 -mmt1
Average of class Gaming (4199 - 7581, n=185, last 2 years)	6304 MIPS +7%
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS Intel Core i9-12900H	6071 MIPS +3%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H	5892 MIPS
Average Intel Core i7-12800H (5726 - 5976, n=5)	5835 MIPS -1%
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS Intel Core i7-12700H	5804 MIPS -1%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti) Intel Core i7-12700H	5775 MIPS -2%
Razer Blade 15 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H	5726 MIPS -3%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX	5568 MIPS -5%

Geekbench 5.5
Multi-Core
Average of class Gaming (4557 - 23194, n=186, last 2 years)	15012 Points +56%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti) Intel Core i7-12700H	13745 Points +43%
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS Intel Core i7-12700H	13033 Points +36%
Razer Blade 15 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H	12434 Points +29%
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS Intel Core i9-12900H	12382 Points +29%
Average Intel Core i7-12800H (9607 - 12940, n=5)	11957 Points +24%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H	9607 Points
Single-Core
Average of class Gaming (986 - 2210, n=186, last 2 years)	1891 Points +3%
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS Intel Core i9-12900H	1883 Points +2%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H	1842 Points
Average Intel Core i7-12800H (1739 - 1842, n=5)	1790 Points -3%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti) Intel Core i7-12700H	1784 Points -3%
Razer Blade 15 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H	1758 Points -5%
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS Intel Core i7-12700H	1718 Points -7%

HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - 4k Preset
Average of class Gaming (6.72 - 38.9, n=185, last 2 years)	23.5 fps +101%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti) Intel Core i7-12700H	20.9 fps +79%
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS Intel Core i9-12900H	19.8 fps +69%
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS Intel Core i7-12700H	19.6 fps +68%
Razer Blade 15 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H	17.2 fps +47%
Average Intel Core i7-12800H (11.7 - 19.4, n=5)	16.3 fps +39%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX	15.6 fps +33%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H	11.7 fps

LibreOffice - 20 Documents To PDF
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX	52.3 s * -22%
Razer Blade 15 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H	51.5 s * -20%
Average of class Gaming (31.4 - 96.6, n=182, last 2 years)	47.3 s * -10%
Average Intel Core i7-12800H (41.3 - 51.5, n=5)	45.1 s * -5%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti) Intel Core i7-12700H	42.9 s * -0%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H	42.9 s *
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS Intel Core i7-12700H	40.3 s * +6%
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS Intel Core i9-12900H	40.3 s * +6%

R Benchmark 2.5 - Overall mean
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX	0.4908 sec * -9%
Razer Blade 15 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H	0.4715 sec * -4%
Average Intel Core i7-12800H (0.4442 - 0.4715, n=5)	0.4562 sec * -1%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti) Intel Core i7-12700H	0.4553 sec * -1%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H	0.4522 sec *
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS Intel Core i7-12700H	0.448 sec * +1%
Average of class Gaming (0.3609 - 0.759, n=186, last 2 years)	0.438 sec * +3%
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS Intel Core i9-12900H	0.4218 sec * +7%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

1566 Points

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

198 fps

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

99.6 %

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

242 Points

Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)

3741 Points

Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)

695 Points

Cinebench R23 Single Core

1799 Points

Cinebench R23 Multi Core

9777 Points

Help

... in comparison

Performance Rating
Average of class Gaming	97.6 pt
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU	81.5 pt
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	64.4 pt
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti) Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	64.1 pt
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	60.4 pt
Average Intel Core i7-12800H	57.9 pt
Razer Blade 15 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	55.8 pt
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	47.5 pt

AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace
Average of class Gaming (4986 - 60169, n=182, last 2 years)	21760 KRay/s +273%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU	15150 KRay/s +159%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti) Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	9537 KRay/s +63%
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	9023 KRay/s +55%
Average Intel Core i7-12800H (5839 - 15206, n=5)	8773 KRay/s +50%
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	8506 KRay/s +46%
Razer Blade 15 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	7671 KRay/s +31%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	5839 KRay/s

AIDA64 / FPU Julia
Average of class Gaming (25360 - 252486, n=182, last 2 years)	106366 Points +283%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU	100744 Points +262%
Average Intel Core i7-12800H (27801 - 80002, n=5)	43634 Points +57%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti) Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	41732 Points +50%
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	41116 Points +48%
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	38603 Points +39%
Razer Blade 15 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	36695 Points +32%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	27801 Points

AIDA64 / CPU SHA3
Average of class Gaming (1339 - 10389, n=182, last 2 years)	4885 MB/s +143%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU	3412 MB/s +69%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti) Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	3343 MB/s +66%
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	3192 MB/s +59%
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	3031 MB/s +51%
Average Intel Core i7-12800H (2013 - 3684, n=5)	2749 MB/s +37%
Razer Blade 15 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	2681 MB/s +33%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	2013 MB/s

AIDA64 / CPU Queen
Average of class Gaming (50699 - 200651, n=182, last 2 years)	116755 Points +36%
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	106194 Points +24%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU	102329 Points +19%
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	97910 Points +14%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti) Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	97871 Points +14%
Average Intel Core i7-12800H (85965 - 108084, n=5)	96746 Points +13%
Razer Blade 15 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	93492 Points +9%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	85965 Points

AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia
Average of class Gaming (4800 - 32988, n=182, last 2 years)	13213 Points +88%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU	12610 Points +79%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti) Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	9928 Points +41%
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	9899 Points +41%
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	9756 Points +39%
Razer Blade 15 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	9205 Points +31%
Average Intel Core i7-12800H (7027 - 9658, n=5)	8839 Points +26%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	7027 Points

AIDA64 / FPU Mandel
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU	55702 Points +253%
Average of class Gaming (12321 - 134044, n=182, last 2 years)	53525 Points +240%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti) Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	26824 Points +70%
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	24769 Points +57%
Average Intel Core i7-12800H (15765 - 38179, n=5)	23653 Points +50%
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	23055 Points +46%
Razer Blade 15 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	21312 Points +35%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	15765 Points

AIDA64 / CPU AES
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU	132655 MB/s +101%
Average of class Gaming (19065 - 328679, n=182, last 2 years)	109308 MB/s +66%
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	99638 MB/s +51%
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	96687 MB/s +47%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti) Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	67282 MB/s +2%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	65871 MB/s
Average Intel Core i7-12800H (55371 - 73928, n=5)	61463 MB/s -7%
Razer Blade 15 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	55775 MB/s -15%

AIDA64 / CPU ZLib
Average of class Gaming (373 - 2409, n=182, last 2 years)	1361 MB/s +94%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti) Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	1156 MB/s +65%
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	1081 MB/s +54%
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	1069 MB/s +52%
Razer Blade 15 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	928 MB/s +32%
Average Intel Core i7-12800H (701 - 1047, n=5)	926 MB/s +32%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU	841 MB/s +20%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	701 MB/s

AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace
Average of class Gaming (2540 - 31796, n=182, last 2 years)	11721 KRay/s +260%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU	8644 KRay/s +165%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti) Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	5597 KRay/s +72%
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	5237 KRay/s +61%
Average Intel Core i7-12800H (3257 - 8559, n=5)	4904 KRay/s +51%
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	4883 KRay/s +50%
Razer Blade 15 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	4173 KRay/s +28%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	3257 KRay/s

AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx
Razer Blade 15 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	40992 MPixel/s +3%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti) Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	40524 MPixel/s +2%
Average of class Gaming (10805 - 60161, n=183, last 2 years)	40119 MPixel/s +1%
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	39921 MPixel/s +1%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	39666 MPixel/s
Average Intel Core i7-12800H (31329 - 40992, n=5)	38291 MPixel/s -3%
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	27416 MPixel/s -31%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU	25533 MPixel/s -36%

系统性能

根据PCMark 10的测试，系统性能很稳定。在日常使用中，操作速度平稳，没有明显的延迟，这就是为什么你可以无忧无虑地使用 "平衡 "模式。

PCMark 10 / Score
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H	8004 Points +9%
Average of class Gaming (5776 - 9852, n=164, last 2 years)	7791 Points +7%
Razer Blade 15 2022 GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12800H, SSSTC CA6-8D1024	7706 Points +5%
Average Intel Core i7-12800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (7313 - 7744, n=3)	7588 Points +4%
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, WDC PC SN810 1TB	7582 Points +4%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	7313 Points
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti) GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 250GB MZ-V8P250BW	7240 Points -1%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HX, ADATA Swordfish 2 TB	7201 Points -2%

PCMark 10 / Essentials
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H	10943 Points +3%
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, WDC PC SN810 1TB	10847 Points +2%
Average of class Gaming (9057 - 12334, n=163, last 2 years)	10841 Points +2%
Razer Blade 15 2022 GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12800H, SSSTC CA6-8D1024	10708 Points +1%
Average Intel Core i7-12800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (10597 - 10814, n=3)	10706 Points +1%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	10597 Points
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HX, ADATA Swordfish 2 TB	10218 Points -4%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti) GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 250GB MZ-V8P250BW	10070 Points -5%

PCMark 10 / Productivity
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H	10141 Points +5%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HX, ADATA Swordfish 2 TB	10066 Points +4%
Average of class Gaming (6662 - 14612, n=163, last 2 years)	9900 Points +2%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	9675 Points
Razer Blade 15 2022 GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12800H, SSSTC CA6-8D1024	9581 Points -1%
Average Intel Core i7-12800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (9470 - 9675, n=3)	9575 Points -1%
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, WDC PC SN810 1TB	9495 Points -2%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti) GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 250GB MZ-V8P250BW	8944 Points -8%

PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H	12541 Points +21%
Razer Blade 15 2022 GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12800H, SSSTC CA6-8D1024	12104 Points +17%
Average of class Gaming (6703 - 18475, n=163, last 2 years)	12077 Points +17%
Average Intel Core i7-12800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (10351 - 12306, n=3)	11587 Points +12%
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, WDC PC SN810 1TB	11488 Points +11%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti) GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 250GB MZ-V8P250BW	11434 Points +10%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	10351 Points
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HX, ADATA Swordfish 2 TB	9852 Points -5%

CrossMark / Overall
Average of class Gaming (1247 - 2344, n=147, last 2 years)	1905 Points +8%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	1768 Points
Average Intel Core i7-12800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU ()	1768 Points 0%

CrossMark / Productivity
Average of class Gaming (1299 - 2204, n=147, last 2 years)	1805 Points +5%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	1719 Points
Average Intel Core i7-12800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU ()	1719 Points 0%

CrossMark / Creativity
Average of class Gaming (1275 - 2660, n=147, last 2 years)	2090 Points +12%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	1868 Points
Average Intel Core i7-12800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU ()	1868 Points 0%

CrossMark / Responsiveness
Average of class Gaming (1030 - 2330, n=147, last 2 years)	1704 Points +4%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	1633 Points
Average Intel Core i7-12800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU ()	1633 Points 0%

PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2		6657 points
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2		7009 points
PCMark 10 Score		7313 points
Help

AIDA64: Memory Copy | Memory Read | Memory Write | Memory Latency

AIDA64 / Memory Copy
Average of class Gaming (21842 - 94222, n=182, last 2 years)	65204 MB/s +5%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti) Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	65103 MB/s +5%
Razer Blade 15 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	62522 MB/s +1%
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	61994 MB/s 0%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	61946 MB/s
Average Intel Core i7-12800H (48643 - 62522, n=5)	59483 MB/s -4%
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	45395 MB/s -27%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU	43318 MB/s -30%

AIDA64 / Memory Read
Average of class Gaming (23681 - 99713, n=182, last 2 years)	69101 MB/s +6%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti) Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	66265 MB/s +2%
Razer Blade 15 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	65933 MB/s +1%
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	65341 MB/s 0%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	65277 MB/s
Average Intel Core i7-12800H (56629 - 66199, n=5)	63902 MB/s -2%
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	49035 MB/s -25%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU	45841 MB/s -30%

AIDA64 / Memory Write
Average of class Gaming (22986 - 108954, n=182, last 2 years)	66867 MB/s +2%
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	66256 MB/s +1%
Razer Blade 15 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	66074 MB/s 0%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	65772 MB/s
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti) Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	65495 MB/s 0%
Average Intel Core i7-12800H (50923 - 66074, n=5)	62637 MB/s -5%
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	46932 MB/s -29%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU	46062 MB/s -30%

AIDA64 / Memory Latency
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	95.2 ns *
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	94.7 ns * +1%
Average of class Gaming (59.5 - 259, n=182, last 2 years)	94 ns * +1%
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	90.6 ns * +5%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU	85.3 ns * +10%
Average Intel Core i7-12800H (89.3 - 95.2, n=5)	36.9 (89.3^min - 95.2^max) ns * +61%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti) Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	0 ns * +100%
Razer Blade 15 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	0 ns * +100%

* ... smaller is better

DPC延迟

根据LatencyMon，在我们测试的配置中，DPC延迟对于实时音频和视频编辑来说可能太高。

DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	4836 μs *
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H	3882 μs * +20%
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, WDC PC SN810 1TB	2156 μs * +55%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HX, ADATA Swordfish 2 TB	1380 μs * +71%
Razer Blade 15 2022 GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12800H, SSSTC CA6-8D1024	1364 μs * +72%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti) GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 250GB MZ-V8P250BW	808 μs * +83%

* ... smaller is better

存储设备

在我们的评测设备中安装了一个1TB的三星PM9A1 M.2 SDD，带有PCIe 4.0，这导致了非常高的数据传输率。由于SSTC的PCIe 4.0固态硬盘 "CA6-8D1024 "被安装在我们的第一个Blade 15评测设备因此，驱动器型号和传输速率可能有所不同。

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6

AS SSD

DiskSpd

Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR

CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 7096.4 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 5251.3 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 863.75 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 631.75 MB/s

CDM 5 Read Seq: 4212.51 MB/s

CDM 5 Write Seq: 3980.96 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 92.87 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 242.96 MB/s

Drive Performance Rating | DiskSpd | AS SSD

Drive Performance Rating - Percent
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	87.2 pt
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS ^-8! WDC PC SN810 1TB	87.1 pt
Razer Blade 15 2022 SSSTC CA6-8D1024	84.7 pt
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	77.1 pt
Average of class Gaming	75.4 pt
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti) Samsung SSD 980 Pro 250GB MZ-V8P250BW	72.1 pt
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS	68.1 pt
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS ADATA Swordfish 2 TB	24.8 pt

DiskSpd
seq read
Razer Blade 15 2022 SSSTC CA6-8D1024	4119 (4098.66^min - 4118.81^max) MB/s +4%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	3946 (3883.92^min - 3946.42^max) MB/s
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (1761 - 4677, n=85)	3764 MB/s -5%
Average of class Gaming (1319 - 7045, n=163, last 2 years)	3478 MB/s -12%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti) Samsung SSD 980 Pro 250GB MZ-V8P250BW	3225 (3206.01^min - 3225.21^max) MB/s -18%
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS	2119 (2058.22^min - 2119.13^max) MB/s -46%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS ADATA Swordfish 2 TB	1160 (560.08^min - 1160.14^max) MB/s -71%
seq write
Razer Blade 15 2022 SSSTC CA6-8D1024	4167 (4120.63^min - 4166.62^max) MB/s +7%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	3899 (3880.57^min - 3898.61^max) MB/s
Average of class Gaming (535 - 9307, n=163, last 2 years)	3810 MB/s -2%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (2220 - 4564, n=85)	3578 MB/s -8%
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS	3405 (3386.69^min - 3404.63^max) MB/s -13%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti) Samsung SSD 980 Pro 250GB MZ-V8P250BW	2661 (2641.11^min - 2661^max) MB/s -32%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS ADATA Swordfish 2 TB	1156 (590.64^min - 1155.74^max) MB/s -70%
seq q8 t1 read
Razer Blade 15 2022 SSSTC CA6-8D1024	6921 (6631.14^min - 6921.02^max) MB/s +4%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	6666 (5850.89^min - 6666.43^max) MB/s
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (3421 - 7100, n=85)	6477 MB/s -3%
Average of class Gaming (2594 - 16089, n=163, last 2 years)	6322 MB/s -5%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti) Samsung SSD 980 Pro 250GB MZ-V8P250BW	4536 (4257.18^min - 4536.14^max) MB/s -32%
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS	3563 (3099.47^min - 3563.48^max) MB/s -47%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS ADATA Swordfish 2 TB	1741 (791.56^min - 1740.72^max) MB/s -74%
seq q8 t1 write
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	4939 (4931.24^min - 4938.77^max) MB/s
Average of class Gaming (539 - 14571, n=163, last 2 years)	4867 MB/s -1%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (2216 - 5281, n=85)	4814 MB/s -3%
Razer Blade 15 2022 SSSTC CA6-8D1024	4740 (4542.15^min - 4740.19^max) MB/s -4%
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS	3448 (3378.51^min - 3448.14^max) MB/s -30%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti) Samsung SSD 980 Pro 250GB MZ-V8P250BW	2665 (2644.09^min - 2664.64^max) MB/s -46%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS ADATA Swordfish 2 TB	1185 (657.19^min - 1184.83^max) MB/s -76%
4k q1 t1 read
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	90.6 (86.51^min - 90.63^max) MB/s
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti) Samsung SSD 980 Pro 250GB MZ-V8P250BW	89.7 (89.47^min - 89.72^max) MB/s -1%
Razer Blade 15 2022 SSSTC CA6-8D1024	79.6 (78.85^min - 79.63^max) MB/s -12%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (48.4 - 97.4, n=85)	76.7 MB/s -15%
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS	69.5 (66.71^min - 69.49^max) MB/s -23%
Average of class Gaming (30.6 - 95.9, n=163, last 2 years)	66 MB/s -27%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS ADATA Swordfish 2 TB	23.3 (23.23^min - 23.32^max) MB/s -74%
4k q1 t1 write
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS	408 (406.25^min - 408.46^max) MB/s +62%
Razer Blade 15 2022 SSSTC CA6-8D1024	256 (23.49^min - 256.28^max) MB/s +2%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	252 (240.11^min - 252.24^max) MB/s
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti) Samsung SSD 980 Pro 250GB MZ-V8P250BW	223 (222.49^min - 223.25^max) MB/s -12%
Average of class Gaming (66.6 - 397, n=163, last 2 years)	222 MB/s -12%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (49.9 - 280, n=85)	188.5 MB/s -25%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS ADATA Swordfish 2 TB	138 (137.2^min - 137.78^max) MB/s -45%
4k q32 t16 read
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	3493 (3465.14^min - 3493.06^max) MB/s
Razer Blade 15 2022 SSSTC CA6-8D1024	3184 (3180.75^min - 3183.86^max) MB/s -9%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (376 - 4185, n=85)	2579 MB/s -26%
Average of class Gaming (417 - 6172, n=163, last 2 years)	2579 MB/s -26%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti) Samsung SSD 980 Pro 250GB MZ-V8P250BW	2272 (2266.88^min - 2271.97^max) MB/s -35%
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS	1844 (1840.41^min - 1844.18^max) MB/s -47%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS ADATA Swordfish 2 TB	439 (211.56^min - 439^max) MB/s -87%
4k q32 t16 write
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS	3354 (3320.28^min - 3353.86^max) MB/s +27%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	2645 (2612.9^min - 2645.36^max) MB/s
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti) Samsung SSD 980 Pro 250GB MZ-V8P250BW	2613 (2594.87^min - 2613.35^max) MB/s -1%
Razer Blade 15 2022 SSSTC CA6-8D1024	2141 (2137.08^min - 2141.26^max) MB/s -19%
Average of class Gaming (162.3 - 4869, n=163, last 2 years)	2132 MB/s -19%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (291 - 3559, n=85)	1957 MB/s -26%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS ADATA Swordfish 2 TB	618 (524.5^min - 618^max) MB/s -77%

AS SSD
Score Total
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS WDC PC SN810 1TB	8556 Points +6%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	8103 Points
Razer Blade 15 2022 SSSTC CA6-8D1024	7659 Points -5%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (2577 - 9147, n=85)	6855 Points -15%
Average of class Gaming (2271 - 13854, n=155, last 2 years)	6760 Points -17%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti) Samsung SSD 980 Pro 250GB MZ-V8P250BW	6267 Points -23%
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS	6130 Points -24%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS ADATA Swordfish 2 TB	1814 Points -78%
Score Read
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS WDC PC SN810 1TB	3482 Points +14%
Razer Blade 15 2022 SSSTC CA6-8D1024	3431 Points +12%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	3054 Points
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti) Samsung SSD 980 Pro 250GB MZ-V8P250BW	2462 Points -19%
Average of class Gaming (776 - 4721, n=155, last 2 years)	2452 Points -20%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (983 - 3469, n=85)	2417 Points -21%
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS	2008 Points -34%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS ADATA Swordfish 2 TB	637 Points -79%
Score Write
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	3545 Points
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS WDC PC SN810 1TB	3325 Points -6%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (921 - 4043, n=85)	3272 Points -8%
Average of class Gaming (515 - 7208, n=155, last 2 years)	3118 Points -12%
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS	3087 Points -13%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti) Samsung SSD 980 Pro 250GB MZ-V8P250BW	2661 Points -25%
Razer Blade 15 2022 SSSTC CA6-8D1024	2563 Points -28%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS ADATA Swordfish 2 TB	882 Points -75%
Seq Read
Razer Blade 15 2022 SSSTC CA6-8D1024	5750 MB/s +10%
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS WDC PC SN810 1TB	5450 MB/s +5%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	5205 MB/s
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti) Samsung SSD 980 Pro 250GB MZ-V8P250BW	5022 MB/s -4%
Average of class Gaming (2260 - 12763, n=155, last 2 years)	4942 MB/s -5%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (2638 - 5621, n=85)	4891 MB/s -6%
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS	3080 MB/s -41%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS ADATA Swordfish 2 TB	1757 MB/s -66%
Seq Write
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS WDC PC SN810 1TB	4795 MB/s +22%
Razer Blade 15 2022 SSSTC CA6-8D1024	4073 MB/s +3%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	3936 MB/s
Average of class Gaming (495 - 11316, n=155, last 2 years)	3756 MB/s -5%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (1617 - 4526, n=85)	3320 MB/s -16%
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS	2997 MB/s -24%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti) Samsung SSD 980 Pro 250GB MZ-V8P250BW	2466 MB/s -37%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS ADATA Swordfish 2 TB	1071 MB/s -73%
4K Read
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS WDC PC SN810 1TB	81.9 MB/s 0%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	81.55 MB/s
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti) Samsung SSD 980 Pro 250GB MZ-V8P250BW	80.4 MB/s -1%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (45.9 - 89.2, n=85)	72.4 MB/s -11%
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS	70 MB/s -14%
Razer Blade 15 2022 SSSTC CA6-8D1024	67.2 MB/s -18%
Average of class Gaming (27.8 - 112.1, n=155, last 2 years)	65.3 MB/s -20%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS ADATA Swordfish 2 TB	22.07 MB/s -73%
4K Write
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS	352 MB/s +75%
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS WDC PC SN810 1TB	302.8 MB/s +51%
Razer Blade 15 2022 SSSTC CA6-8D1024	221.3 MB/s +10%
Average of class Gaming (108.8 - 512, n=155, last 2 years)	212 MB/s +5%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	201.1 MB/s
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti) Samsung SSD 980 Pro 250GB MZ-V8P250BW	193.7 MB/s -4%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (118.6 - 246, n=85)	186 MB/s -8%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS ADATA Swordfish 2 TB	124.2 MB/s -38%
4K-64 Read
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS WDC PC SN810 1TB	2855 MB/s +16%
Razer Blade 15 2022 SSSTC CA6-8D1024	2789 MB/s +14%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	2451.55 MB/s
Average of class Gaming (451 - 3475, n=155, last 2 years)	1887 MB/s -23%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti) Samsung SSD 980 Pro 250GB MZ-V8P250BW	1880 MB/s -23%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (421 - 2854, n=85)	1855 MB/s -24%
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS	1630 MB/s -34%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS ADATA Swordfish 2 TB	439.4 MB/s -82%
4K-64 Write
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	2950.05 MB/s
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (367 - 3451, n=85)	2754 MB/s -7%
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS WDC PC SN810 1TB	2542 MB/s -14%
Average of class Gaming (277 - 5909, n=155, last 2 years)	2533 MB/s -14%
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS	2435 MB/s -17%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti) Samsung SSD 980 Pro 250GB MZ-V8P250BW	2221 MB/s -25%
Razer Blade 15 2022 SSSTC CA6-8D1024	1934 MB/s -34%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS ADATA Swordfish 2 TB	651 MB/s -78%
Access Time Read
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS WDC PC SN810 1TB	0.07 ms * -59%
Average of class Gaming (0.016 - 0.379, n=154, last 2 years)	0.05542 ms * -26%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	0.044 ms *
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS ADATA Swordfish 2 TB	0.043 ms * +2%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (0.018 - 0.083, n=84)	0.03777 ms * +14%
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS	0.033 ms * +25%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti) Samsung SSD 980 Pro 250GB MZ-V8P250BW	0.025 ms * +43%
Razer Blade 15 2022 SSSTC CA6-8D1024	0.023 ms * +48%
Access Time Write
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS	0.425 ms * -1924%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS ADATA Swordfish 2 TB	0.341 ms * -1524%
Razer Blade 15 2022 SSSTC CA6-8D1024	0.058 ms * -176%
Average of class Gaming (0.011 - 1.028, n=155, last 2 years)	0.04837 ms * -130%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (0.017 - 0.101, n=85)	0.03406 ms * -62%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti) Samsung SSD 980 Pro 250GB MZ-V8P250BW	0.022 ms * -5%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	0.021 ms *
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS WDC PC SN810 1TB	0.012 ms * +43%

* ... smaller is better

Sustained Read Performance: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022: Ø6642 (6357.38-6687.03)

GPU

手机 NvidiaGeForce RTX 3080 Ti拥有16GB的VRAM，属于Ampere Refresh一代。根据3DMark基准测试，使用 "平衡 "模式会导致约10-20%的性能下降。在《Witcher 3 》的帧率进展中可以看到小幅度的下降，但这对游戏体验的主观影响很小。

在电池模式下，性能是有限的。Fire Strike ，在电池模式下，物理和图形得分分别为12,888和10,344，而在主电源模式下为21866和25240。

3DMark Performance Rating | 3DMark 11 | 3DMark

3DMark Performance Rating - Percent
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H	97.2 pt
Average of class Gaming	95.4 pt
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H	93.3 pt
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	89.3 pt
Razer Blade 15 2022 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12800H	87.2 pt
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX	76.6 pt
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H	76.4 pt
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12800H	76.3 pt

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Average of class Gaming (1029 - 72178, n=181, last 2 years)	43915 Points +39%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H	43546 Points +38%
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H	40880 Points +30%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX	39782 Points +26%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (13920 - 45841, n=45)	39402 Points +25%
Razer Blade 15 2022 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12800H	37438 Points +19%
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H	32525 Points +3%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12800H	31565 Points

3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H	167720 Points +21%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H	160517 Points +15%
Razer Blade 15 2022 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12800H	153993 Points +11%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (73574 - 192520, n=26)	145836 Points +5%
Average of class Gaming (15902 - 193851, n=100, last 2 years)	143245 Points +3%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12800H	138996 Points
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H	134948 Points -3%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX	78421 Points -44%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H	32703 Points +30%
Average of class Gaming (781 - 53059, n=192, last 2 years)	31443 Points +25%
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H	29729 Points +18%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (6928 - 34439, n=43)	29496 Points +17%
Razer Blade 15 2022 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12800H	28601 Points +13%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX	26956 Points +7%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12800H	25240 Points
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H	25169 Points 0%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Average of class Gaming (224 - 22717, n=187, last 2 years)	13142 Points +36%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H	12320 Points +28%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (4921 - 13835, n=43)	11850 Points +23%
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H	11739 Points +22%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX	11396 Points +18%
Razer Blade 15 2022 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12800H	11071 Points +15%
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H	9758 Points +1%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12800H	9646 Points

3DMark 11 Performance		25091 points
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score		158195 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score		43351 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score		21106 points
3DMark Time Spy Score		9596 points
Help

... in comparison

游戏性能

在平衡性能模式下，Gming基准测试自然较弱。尽管如此，绝对帧率仍然很高，足以带来流畅的游戏体验，所以你不一定要在高性能模式下运行Blade 15。

The Witcher 3 | GTA V | Final Fantasy XV Benchmark | Strange Brigade

The Witcher 3
1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off)
Average of class Gaming (40.1 - 449, n=120, last 2 years)	242 fps +56%
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H	223.9 (214^min) fps +44%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (144 - 268, n=28)	220 fps +41%
Razer Blade 15 2022 GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12800H	213.7 (196^min) fps +37%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti) GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H	212.4 fps +37%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HX	189.5 (186^min) fps +22%
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H	166 (146^min) fps +7%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12800H	155.5 (115^min) fps
1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Average of class Gaming (18.4 - 216, n=163, last 2 years)	128.3 fps +44%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti) GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H	121 fps +35%
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H	114.6 (108^min) fps +28%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (30 - 130.6, n=43)	112.1 fps +26%
Razer Blade 15 2022 GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12800H	107.2 (99^min) fps +20%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HX	105.8 (100^min) fps +18%
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H	90.4 (78^min) fps +1%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12800H	89.3 (64^min) fps

GTA V
1920x1080 High/On (Advanced Graphics Off) AA:2xMSAA + FX AF:8x
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H	179 (3.57^min, 125^P1) fps +17%
Razer Blade 15 2022 GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12800H	177 (3.71^min, 125^P1) fps +15%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (153.4 - 184.3, n=28)	175.1 fps +14%
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H	170 (3.61^min, 111^P1) fps +11%
Average of class Gaming (24.2 - 187.1, n=142, last 2 years)	169.6 fps +11%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12800H	153.4 (4.65^min, 100^P1) fps
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HX	150 (21.4^min, 100^P1) fps -2%
1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H	123 (4.38^min, 83.3^P1) fps +33%
Razer Blade 15 2022 GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12800H	118 (4.44^min, 76.9^P1) fps +28%
Average of class Gaming (12.1 - 167.7, n=167, last 2 years)	113.8 fps +23%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (30 - 139.2, n=42)	111 fps +20%
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H	105 (21.6^min, 71.4^P1) fps +14%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HX	94.5 (9.87^min, 66.7^P1) fps +2%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12800H	92.4 (7.56^min, 62.5^P1) fps

Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality
Average of class Gaming (19.2 - 201, n=179, last 2 years)	120 fps +33%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti) GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H	115 fps +27%
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H	115 fps +27%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (30.7 - 140.6, n=42)	113.8 fps +26%
Razer Blade 15 2022 GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12800H	106 fps +17%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HX	105 fps +16%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12800H	90.4 fps
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H	87 (53^min) fps -4%

Strange Brigade
1920x1080 high AA:high AF:8
Average of class Gaming (49.4 - 465, n=150, last 2 years)	256 fps +53%
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H	244 (113^min, 182^P1) fps +46%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (156 - 255, n=29)	219 fps +31%
Razer Blade 15 2022 GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12800H	205 (74.7^min, 147^P1) fps +22%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HX	191 (54.2^min, 128^P1) fps +14%
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H	175 (95.7^min, 131^P1) fps +4%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12800H	167.6 (110.5^min, 127^P1) fps
1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16
Average of class Gaming (38.9 - 421, n=177, last 2 years)	229 fps +53%
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H	213 (67.3^min, 162^P1) fps +42%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (42.3 - 224, n=41)	187.3 fps +25%
Razer Blade 15 2022 GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12800H	184 (33.3^min, 131^P1) fps +23%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HX	174 (26.8^min, 123^P1) fps +16%
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H	153 (77.1^min, 115^P1) fps +2%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12800H	149.8 (29.6^min, 114.2^P1) fps

Witcher 3 FPS Diagram

Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU: Ø87.2 (70-92)

	low	med.	high	ultra
GTA V (2015)	178.7	170.7	153.4	92.4
The Witcher 3 (2015)	316	200	155.5	89.3
Dota 2 Reborn (2015)	59.9	59.9	59.9	59.9
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018)	148.3	119.4	90.4
X-Plane 11.11 (2018)	124.3	109.5	93.4
Strange Brigade (2018)	361	212	167.6	149.8

排放 - 导热外壳

噪声

风扇很迟钝，在它们启动之前会让组件变得有点热。特别是，在平衡模式下，负载下的平均噪音水平明显降低。我们的第一台Blade 15的噪音水平是第一台Blade 15(模式：最大性能）在通常范围内。在我们的评测设备中没有检测到线圈的呜呜声。

Noise Level

Idle		26 / 27 / 29 dB(A)
Load		37 / 45 dB(A)

	30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 26 dB(A)

	Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	Razer Blade 15 2022 i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti) i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS R9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU	MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	MSI Vector GP66 12UGS i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
Noise		-5%	-2%	-8%	-12%	-2%
off / environment *	26	25.4 2%	24 8%	25.5 2%	24 8%	22.9 12%
Idle Minimum *	26	26.2 -1%	24 8%	25.5 2%	31 -19%	23.4 10%
Idle Average *	27	26.2 3%	24 11%	25.5 6%	32 -19%	23.4 13%
Idle Maximum *	29	28.4 2%	27.76 4%	37.1 -28%	35 -21%	27.4 6%
Load Average *	37	44.7 -21%	38.81 -5%	39.2 -6%	48 -30%	36 3%
Witcher 3 ultra *	44	44.7 -2%	54.2 -23%	50.5 -15%	43 2%	58.2 -32%
Load Maximum *	45	51.9 -15%	54.18 -20%	51.8 -15%	48 -7%	58 -29%

* ... smaller is better

温度

由于金属结构和强大的组件，机箱在适度负载下会变得相对较热。例如，在播放《Witcher 3》时，笔记本电脑也会通过控制面强烈发热。

Max. Load

Idle

Witcher 3


48 °C	53 °C	50 °C
47 °C	48 °C	37 °C
43 °C	43 °C	36 °C

Maximum: 53 °C
Average: 45 °C


49 °C	53 °C	53 °C
44 °C	45 °C	42 °C
42 °C	42 °C	43 °C

Maximum: 53 °C
Average: 45.9 °C

Power Supply (max.) 45 °C | Room Temperature 20 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900

Max. Load

Idle

Witcher 3


33 °C	36 °C	35 °C
33 °C	34 °C	33 °C
32 °C	32 °C	31 °C

Maximum: 36 °C
Average: 33.2 °C


37 °C	38 °C	35 °C
35 °C	34 °C	34 °C
34 °C	34 °C	35 °C

Maximum: 38 °C
Average: 35.1 °C

Power Supply (max.) 32 °C | Room Temperature 20 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900

Max. Load

Idle

Witcher 3


48 °C	52 °C	50 °C
47 °C	48 °C	38 °C
43 °C	43 °C	38 °C

Maximum: 52 °C
Average: 45.2 °C


54 °C	55 °C	51 °C
46 °C	47 °C	45 °C
43 °C	44 °C	44 °C

Maximum: 55 °C
Average: 47.7 °C

Power Supply (max.) 47 °C | Room Temperature 20 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 45 °C / 113 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 53 °C / 127 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 53 °C / 127 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 33.2 °C / 92 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 45.2 °C / 113 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 43 °C / 109.4 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-14.1 °C / -25.4 F).

	Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	Razer Blade 15 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti) Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU	MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	MSI Vector GP66 12UGS Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
Heat		3%	-3%	8%	11%	12%
Maximum Upper Side *	53	50 6%	52 2%	43.4 18%	54 -2%	40.2 24%
Maximum Bottom *	53	47 11%	68 -28%	48.2 9%	59 -11%	43.8 17%
Idle Upper Side *	36	37.4 -4%	32 11%	35.2 2%	26 28%	34.8 3%
Idle Bottom *	38	38.4 -1%	36 5%	37 3%	27 29%	37 3%

* ... smaller is better

压力测试

在我们的压力测试中，我们同时用Prime95和FurMark加载系统。测试开始时，CPU的P核和E核的时钟速度分别为2和1.9GHz，并分别稳定在1.7和1.5GHz，在较长的时间内稳定在85℃左右。GPU以大约1100MHz的速度开始，最终在640MHz和77℃的核心温度下趋于平稳。

发言人

扬声器的调音不均匀。粉红噪声图显示MacBook Pro 16的频率下降明显更平坦，它是这个学科中最好的笔记本电脑之一。外部音频设备可以通过蓝牙、USB或3.5毫米端口连接。

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (92 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 30% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 64% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 18% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 78% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | bass is linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (4.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

能源管理 - 没有运行时间记录

消耗功率

平均19W的空闲消耗值明显低于之前评测的 Razer Blade 15 (36.4 W).这可能是由于更经济的性能配置和更低的显示分辨率。在The Witcher 3中，总体消耗量降低了约13%。

在同时执行Prime95和FurMark的过程中，230W电源的最大消耗量为179W，230W电源的尺寸足够大。

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.2 / Watt
Idle	17 / 19 / 25 Watt
Load	108 / 179 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	Razer Blade 15 2022 i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti) i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS R9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU	MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	MSI Vector GP66 12UGS i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	Average of class Gaming
Power Consumption		-48%	-14%	-2%	5%	-34%	-5%
Idle Minimum *	17	33.2 -95%	14 18%	11.2 34%	11 35%	17.5 -3%	13.5 ?(2 - 39, n=152, last 2 years) 21%
Idle Average *	19	36.4 -92%	18 5%	16.4 14%	16 16%	20.1 -6%	19 ?(8 - 55.6, n=152, last 2 years) -0%
Idle Maximum *	25	37.6 -50%	19 24%	29.4 -18%	23 8%	47.3 -89%	26.8 ?(9 - 101.1, n=152, last 2 years) -7%
Load Average *	108	116.7 -8%	115 -6%	106.2 2%	110 -2%	107.3 1%	106.9 ?(32.1 - 201, n=151, last 2 years) 1%
Witcher 3 ultra *	150	172 -15%	228 -52%	189 -26%	151 -1%	225 -50%
Load Maximum *	179	228.6 -28%	307 -72%	213.6 -19%	230 -28%	277.7 -55%	250 ?(64.5 - 418, n=152, last 2 years) -40%

* ... smaller is better

Power Consumption Witcher 3 / Stress test

Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022; Witcher 3 ultra: Ø149.6 (143-155)

Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø145.5 (138-161)

{

Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø67.7 (65.1-83.5)

Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø84.3 (65.1-96.2)

Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø139.8 (138-142)

Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022; 1920x1080 The Witcher 3 ultra (external Monitor): Ø144.2 (140-150)

电池寿命

在我们的实际WLAN测试中，Blade 15实现了4:53小时的运行时间，几乎没有任何竞争对手可以跟上7:20小时的速度。华硕ROG Strix Scar 15，而微星Vector GP66 尽管电池容量较小（65Wh对80Wh），但也能提供更长的运行时间。

Battery Runtime

Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)		8h 04min
WiFi Websurfing		4h 53min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		5h 56min
Load (maximum brightness)		2h 02min

	Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, 80 Wh	Razer Blade 15 2022 i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, 80 Wh	SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti) i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, 93 Wh	Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS R9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, 90 Wh	MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, 99.9 Wh	MSI Vector GP66 12UGS i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, 65 Wh	Average of class Gaming
Battery Runtime		0%	47%	19%	-5%	-12%	8%
Reader / Idle	484			668 38%	467 -4%	473 -2%	565 ?(155 - 1290, n=67, last 2 years) 17%
H.264	356		413 16%				409 ?(129 - 837, n=79, last 2 years) 15%
WiFi v1.3	293	292 0%	403 38%	440 50%	324 11%	342 17%	376 ?(85 - 889, n=152, last 2 years) 28%
Load	122		228 87%	85 -30%	96 -21%	61 -50%	85.6 ?(41 - 173, n=117, last 2 years) -30%

Pros

+ 快速显示，最大亮度适中

+ 高游戏性能

+ 良好的做工

+ 紧凑的外壳和电源

+ 快速的SD卡读卡器

Cons

- 表面温度高

- 扬声器与该价位的产品不相称

- 没有先进的Optimus（只有QHD型号）。

判决书

在审查中。Razer Blade 15 Spring 2022。评测设备由德国Razer公司提供。

刀片15是一款非常紧凑且制作精良的笔记本电脑。连接性与英特尔和Nvidia的新芯片一样现代，并通过快速的SD读卡器得到了很好的完善。显示屏提供了令人难以置信的平滑视觉表现和体面的最大亮度，但与QHD型号不同的是，高级优化功能有所欠缺，色彩空间覆盖率可以更好一点。然而，考虑到目标群体，后者是可以接受的。

在 "平衡 "模式下的基准测试给出了一个有趣的画面。在实践中，性能往往是绰绰有余的，噪音水平也明显降低。然而，机箱的表面仍然发热非常强烈。

如果你正在寻找一个时尚、紧凑的游戏笔记本电脑，并有一个特别快的显示屏，那就不要再找了。然而，对温度敏感的用户应该在这里保持警惕。

另一个批评点是扬声器。许多便宜的笔记本电脑提供更好的声音。

华硕的ROG Strix Scar 15是Razer Blade 15的一个不太紧凑、基于AMD的替代品，电池运行时间更长。对于经常外出并需要大量性能的用户来说，Razer Blade 15可能仍然是正确的选择。

价格和可用性

我们配置的Razer Blade 15目前在B&H Photo Video有售。售价为3,699.99美元，或通过Razer官方网站以同样的价格出售。

Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 - 05/04/2022 v7 ^(old)
Marius Schell

Chassis

87 / 98 → 89%

Keyboard

83%

Pointing Device

88%

Connectivity

69 / 80 → 86%

Weight

62 / 10-66 → 94%

Battery

64 / 95 → 67%

Display

90%

Games Performance

96%

Application Performance

97%

Temperature

73 / 95 → 77%

Noise

86 / 90 → 96%

Audio

79%

Camera

43 / 85 → 50%

Average

78%

88%

Gaming - Weighted Average

Price comparison

Editor of the original article: Jacob Fisher - Translator - 1374 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2022

Translator: Ninh Ngoc Duy - Editorial Assistant - 463597 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008

contact me via: Facebook

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022评测 - 具有快速显示功能的紧凑型游戏笔记本电脑

Marius Schell, 2022-05- 5 (Update: 2022-05- 5)

潜在的竞争对手比较

箱子 - 结构紧凑，适合旅行

尺寸比较

硬件 - 具有现代连接功能的刀片15

SD卡阅读器

沟通

网络摄像头

维护

输入设备 - 大型点击板和整洁的键盘

键盘

触摸板

显示屏------快速面板，色彩光谱有限

Display Response Times

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

性能 - 拥有顶级硬件的Razer游戏笔记本

测试条件

处理器

Cinebench R15 Multi Sustained Load

系统性能

DPC延迟

存储设备

Sustained Read Performance: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

GPU

游戏性能

Witcher 3 FPS Diagram

排放 - 导热外壳

噪声

温度

压力测试

发言人

Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 audio analysis

Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro audio analysis

能源管理 - 没有运行时间记录

消耗功率

Power Consumption Witcher 3 / Stress test

{

电池寿命

Pros

Cons

判决书

价格和可用性

More articles related to this device

Price comparison