Notebookcheck Logo
Teaser

摩托罗拉 Razr 50 智能手机评测--最经济实惠的翻盖手机配备第二块大显示屏

偷工减料还管用吗?

虽然上一代产品的外部显示屏仍然很小,但摩托罗拉 Razr 50 显示,即使价格不到 1,000 欧元(约合 1,109 美元),也不必如此。除此以外,大部分内容都与上一代产品保持一致,那么,这是否足以构成一次成功的更新呢?
Florian Schmitt, 👁 Florian Schmitt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
5G Android ARM Foldable Smartphone

摩托罗拉 Razr 50(国际上也叫 "Razr 2024")是一款可折叠智能手机,它的短壳一侧是折叠的,让我们想起了过去的翻盖手机。

这似乎也是摩托罗拉的初衷,因为在 2000 年前后,Razr 手机确实销售火爆。去年,摩托罗拉重新推出的 Razr 智能手机系列也取得了相当大的成功。Razr Razr 40是当时较为经济实惠的机型,只能满足于摄像头旁边一个非常小的 1.5 英寸外部显示屏。

在本次测试中,我们将对 Razr 50 的后续机型进行更详细的测试,摩托罗拉已经改变了这一状况。制造商为这款智能手机配备了一个外置显示屏,其大小几乎与价格更高的 Razr 50 Ultra.这使得这款价格更实惠的机型更具吸引力,让您甚至无需展开智能手机即可完成许多任务。

Motorola Razr 50 (Razr 50 Series)
Processor
MediaTek Dimensity 7300X 8 x 2 - 2.5 GHz, Cortex-A78 / A55
Graphics adapter
Memory
8 GB 
Display
6.90 inch 20:9, 2640 x 1080 pixel 413 PPI, capacitive touchscreen, P-OLED, HDR (HDR10+), 1-165Hz refresh rate, 300Hz sampling rate; second screen: 3.63", 1066x1056 pixel, P-OLED, capacitive touchscreen, Gorilla glass Victus, HDR (HDR10+), 1-120Hz refresh rate, 120Hz sampling rate, glossy: yes, 165 Hz
Storage
256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash, 256 GB 
, 205 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: audio via USB-C, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Sensors: accelerometer, proximity, gyro, compass, barometer
Networking
Wi-Fi 6E (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz), Bluetooth 5.4, 2G (850/​900/​1800/​1900), 3G (B1/​B2/​B4/​B5/​B8), 4G (B1/​B2/​B3/​B4/​B5/​B7/​B8/​B12/​B13/​B17/​B18/​B19/​B20/​B25/​B26/​B28/​B32/​B38/​B39/​B40/​B41/​B42/​B43/​B66/​B71), 5G (n1/​n2/​n3/​n5/​n7/​n8/​n20/​n26/​n28/​n38/​n40/​n41/​n66/​n71/​n77/​n78), Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 7.3 x 171.3 x 74
Battery
4200 mAh Lithium-Ion, 30W charging (Motorola TurboPower), 15W wireless charging (Qi)
Charging
wireless charging, fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 14
Camera
Primary Camera: 50 MPix f/​1.7, phase comparison AF (All-pixel AF), OIS, LED flash, videos @2160p/​30fps (camera 1); 13.0MP, f/​2.2, phase comparison-AF, wide angle lens, macro lens (camera 2)
Secondary Camera: 32 MPix f/​2.4, videos @2160p/​30fps
Additional features
Speakers: stereo speakers (hybrid) , Keyboard: onscreen, USB cable, SIM tool, silicone bumper, 24 Months Warranty, SAR: 0.84W/​kg Head, 1.39W/​kg Body; IPX8-certified, fanless, waterproof
Weight
188 g
Price
899 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating
Version
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Price
76.7 %v8
09 / 2024
Motorola Razr 50
Dimensity 7300X, Mali-G615 MP2
188 g256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.90"2640x1080
86.4 %
v7 (old)
v7 (old)
07 / 2023
Motorola Razr 40
SD 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644
188.6 g256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.90"2640x1080
84.7 %v8
09 / 2024
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5G
SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750
187 g512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash6.70"2640x1080
85.4 %
v7 (old)
v7 (old)
05 / 2024
Nubia Flip 5G
SD 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644
214 g256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.90"2790x1188
86.3 %
v7 (old)
v7 (old)
02 / 2024
Oppo Find N3 Flip
Dimensity 9200, Immortalis-G715 MP11
201 g256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash6.80"2520x1080

表壳 - 高品质人造皮革

乍一看,这款手机的外壳与前代产品相比变化很大。这并不是指重量上的微小变化或厚度上的略微纤薄。大猩猩胜利女神玻璃覆盖的显示屏区域现在占据了正面的折叠部分,而在前代产品中,我们看到的主要是人造革。有趣的是,外部显示屏上方略宽的新设计与去年的顶级机型几乎完全一致,即 Razr 40 Ultra.

即使折叠起来,摩托罗拉 Razr 50 的手感也非常舒适,人造革表面(考拉灰为人造麂皮)给人一种非常优质的感觉。我们的测试机采用泼水橙色,你还可以选择浅棕色的沙滩沙作为第三种颜色。这次没有再像去年那样与潘通公司合作推出颜色,但香味包装依然保留。

铰链看起来非常牢固,操作起来也很方便,单手也能翻开手机。同时,它还能让智能手机在许多位置都保持稳定。例如,它还可以保持 "帐篷 "位置,让你可以将手机竖立起来。

可以轻微扭转铰链上下两半部分,使两半部分明显移动。虽然这本身并没有什么问题,但却破坏了原本非常稳定的触感。

现在,手机壳的防护等级达到 IPX8,可以浸入淡水中。

尺寸比较

171.3 mm 74 mm 7.3 mm 188 g170.8 mm 74 mm 7.4 mm 188.6 g170 mm 76 mm 7.3 mm 214 g166.4 mm 75.8 mm 7.8 mm 201 g165.1 mm 71.9 mm 6.9 mm 187 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g

设备 - 本可以提供更多设备

目前,只有配备 8 GB 内存和 256 GB 存储空间的版本在欧洲销售,而在国际上,你还可以买到配备 512 GB 存储空间和 12 GB 内存的机型。与前代产品相比,价格保持不变。

该机没有 microSD 插槽,SIM 卡托盘只能容纳一张 Nano SIM 卡。不过,由于还可以在设备上存储 eSIM 卡,因此仍然可以实现双 SIM 卡操作。

遗憾的是,USB 2.0 连接也没有改变,无法通过电缆将视频信号传输到外部显示器,只能进行相对较慢的数据传输。

可使用 NFC 进行非接触式支付。

左:SIM 卡插槽
左:SIM 卡插槽
右侧:待机键、音量键、麦克风
右侧:待机键、音量键、麦克风
底部:2 个麦克风、USB-C 端口、扬声器
底部:2 个麦克风、USB-C 端口、扬声器
顶部:2 个麦克风
顶部:2 个麦克风

软件 - 更新承诺一般

该软件基于Android 14。虽然摩托罗拉用自己的 Hello UX 对Android 进行了修改,但Android 的基本结构在很大程度上保持不变,因为制造商将大部分特殊功能放入了自己的应用程序中。

其中最重要的是 Moto 应用程序,它控制着众多功能。此外,还有用于安全功能的 Moto Secure 和用于数字健康的 Moto Unplugged。虽然也有一些来自第三方供应商的广告应用程序,但你可以顺利卸载它们。

在我们的测试机上,安全更新是从 2024 年 8 月开始的,也就是本次测试时的最新版本。摩托罗拉承诺提供 3 年的操作系统更新,即Android 17,以及直到 2028 年 6 月的安全更新。其他制造商在这方面的承诺更多,更新时间更长。此外,根据我们的经验,摩托罗拉并不是提供Android 新操作系统版本最快的制造商之一。

可持续性

通过安全更新,摩托罗拉在可持续发展方面的表现只能算一般。遗憾的是,很难找到有关摩托罗拉设备在生产和使用过程中二氧化碳消耗的信息。尽管搜索了一段时间,我们还是无法在互联网上找到有关 Razr 50 在这方面的任何信息。

包装内的所有物品均由硬纸板制成,便于回收利用。包装上也没有使用任何油基油墨。

特别是可折叠智能手机的维修仍然非常困难。摩托罗拉基本上与 iFixit 合作提供了一个自修中心,你也可以在这里获得替换零件。不过,目前 Razr 手机还没有任何条目。

通信和全球导航卫星系统 - 定位精度高

Razr 50 的 WiFi 6E 支持使用较少使用的 6 GHz 频段在 WLAN 网络中通信,从而避免了其他频段的过载。在使用华硕 ROG Rapture AXE11000 参考路由器进行的测试中,这款智能手机的速度不及同类设备,也跟不上前代产品的速度:

我们测得的数据接收速度平均为 923 Mbit/s。虽然千兆网络连接的使用率相当高,但那些希望在内部网络中获得更高速度的用户最好还是选择其他可折叠智能手机。整体而言,传输速率相对稳定。

无线局域网的信号强度在路由器附近达到最大,网站在这里加载速度很快。在 10 米距离内,穿过三面墙,我们仍能接收到 3/4 的信号,网站加载速度稍慢。

Razr 50 可以在移动通信网络中使用多个频段进行通信,包括 4G 和 5G 网络。这意味着你在不同地点旅行时访问移动互联网应该不会遇到任何问题。

在测试期间,我们还反复进行了接收信号的随机测试,以便与其他高端智能手机进行比较。虽然您不得不接受 Razr 50 在接收质量上的一些小妥协,但我们从未完全失去过接收信号。

Networking
Motorola Razr 50
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
691 (min: 524) MBit/s ∼38%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
923 (min: 880) MBit/s ∼50%
Motorola Razr 40
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1483 (min: 1278) MBit/s ∼82%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1050 (min: 961) MBit/s ∼57%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5G
iperf3 receive AXE11000
623 (min: 320) MBit/s ∼63%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
723 (min: 659) MBit/s ∼76%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1816 (min: 900) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1501 (min: 1447) MBit/s ∼81%
Nubia Flip 5G
iperf3 receive AXE11000
986 (min: 846) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
954 (min: 472) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1759 (min: 1696) MBit/s ∼97%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1844 (min: 1767) MBit/s ∼100%
Oppo Find N3 Flip
iperf3 receive AXE11000
920 (min: 904) MBit/s ∼93%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
850 (min: 594) MBit/s ∼89%
Average of class Smartphone
iperf3 receive AXE11000
714 (min: 34.8) MBit/s ∼72%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
729 (min: 40.5) MBit/s ∼76%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1451 (min: 229) MBit/s ∼80%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1368 (min: 668) MBit/s ∼74%
050100150200250300350400450500550600650700750800850900Tooltip
Motorola Razr 50; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø690 (524-750)
Motorola Razr 50; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø923 (880-950)
户外 GPS 测试
户外 GPS 测试
可用的卫星网络
可用的卫星网络

所有大型卫星网络都支持定位,但没有 SBAS 来提供更精确的定位。

在室外移动时,智能手机可以快速定位我们的位置,精确度可达 3 米(约 10 英尺)。这是一个不错的选择。为了进一步了解它的定位能力,我们带着摩托罗拉 Razr 50 踏上了习惯的自行车之旅,同时还带上了 Garmin Venu 2 智能手表作为对比。

两款设备记录的路线长度相差不到 10 米(约 33 英尺)。虽然这最初听起来不错,但仍有可能是偶然的。观察详细的路线记录,我们会发现翻盖手机经常将我们置于实际路线的一侧,例如进入一些前院。相比之下,它在古城狭窄的小巷中的导航却非常准确,在过桥时也能做到非常精确。

总的来说,我们可以推荐 Razr 50 作为导航设备,但也有一些设备比它更精确。

摩托罗拉 Razr 50 定位 - 概述
摩托罗拉 Razr 50 定位 - 概述
摩托罗拉 Razr 50 定位 - 转折点
摩托罗拉 Razr 50 定位 - 转折点
摩托罗拉 Razr 50 定位 - 桥接
摩托罗拉 Razr 50 定位 - 桥接
Garmin Venu 2 定位 - 概述
Garmin Venu 2 定位 - 概述
Garmin Venu 2 定位 - 转折点
Garmin Venu 2 定位 - 转折点
Garmin Venu 2 定位 - 桥接
Garmin Venu 2 定位 - 桥接

电话功能和语音质量 - 清晰度一般

摩托罗拉使用谷歌的电话应用程序,这是Android 的标准。这意味着许多用户(包括使用其他制造商智能手机的用户)都会熟悉它。它提供了所有必要的功能,而且设计清晰。

使用智能手机内部听筒和麦克风的通话质量相当不错。尽管我们的谈话对象听起来并不绝对清晰,而且最大音量还可以再大一些,但我们还是可以很容易地听懂谈话对象所说的话。我们自己的声音也传递得相当清晰。

免提通话则不那么令人信服。有时音量会更小,通话对方的声音听起来很刺耳,或者麦克风只能记录我们大声说话时的声音。

照相机 - 中高档

用内置相机自拍
用内置相机自拍
用主摄像头拍摄的自拍照
用主摄像头拍摄的自拍照

与前代产品相比 摩托罗拉 Razr 40的主摄像头失去了部分分辨率,现在最大可用像素仅为 5000 万。除此之外,光圈和设备细节保持不变,包括光学防抖和录制 4K 视频。

乍一看,Razr 50 使用这枚镜头拍摄的照片还算可以接受,但有些细节可能看起来比较浑浊或粗糙。如果周围光线较暗,智能手机能使图像充分变亮,并显示出良好的锐度。不过,我们测试图片中蜡烛火焰的橙色光线有点过于突出。

录制全 4K 画质的视频最高只能达到 30 帧/秒,但您也可以选择 60 帧/秒的全高清分辨率。在快速移动相机时,我们有时会感觉取景器图像跟不上,几毫秒后才显示出来。自动对焦和曝光调整工作可靠而迅速。

在 1300 万像素超广角摄像头方面,摩托罗拉采用了与前代产品相同的模式。在更高质量的图像传感器中,照明效果会更好,但细节显示却很模糊。但该摄像头仍然非常适合广角抓拍风景。

非常实用的是,您可以将 Razr 像摄像机一样半折叠使用,这样可以更稳定地握住它。此外,在外部显示屏上也能看到图像,例如在拍摄自己时会非常有用。

内部显示屏上方的摄像头也保持不变。与去年的 Razr 40一样,采用了 3200 万像素摄像头。如果需要,它还可以录制 4K 视频。自拍的图像质量可以接受,但该摄像头很难照亮黑暗的环境。

为了进行对比,我们还用主摄像头进行了自拍,由于 Razr 50 采用了灵活的外壳,自拍很容易实现。在拍照时,你甚至可以在显示屏上看到自己。我们注意到,较暗的图像区域在这里显示的细节稍多一些,图像整体也更加清晰。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Hauptkamera PflanzeHauptkamera UmgebungHauptkamera Low LightUltraweitwinkelkamera

我们在测试实验室对主摄像头在可控光线条件下的图像质量进行了再次检测。在全棚照明条件下,我们发现色彩还原略显奇怪,其中一些我们在测试图像中已经注意到了:强烈的红色显得偏粉,棕色则带有明显的绿色调。文字也不总是很清晰。

ColorChecker
8.8 ∆E
7.3 ∆E
9 ∆E
7.3 ∆E
5.8 ∆E
3.1 ∆E
7.9 ∆E
10.3 ∆E
9.1 ∆E
3.4 ∆E
7.7 ∆E
2.4 ∆E
8.1 ∆E
8.4 ∆E
10.2 ∆E
2.9 ∆E
7.1 ∆E
7.3 ∆E
13.4 ∆E
6.8 ∆E
6.6 ∆E
3.8 ∆E
3.5 ∆E
6.1 ∆E
ColorChecker Motorola Razr 50: 6.94 ∆E min: 2.43 - max: 13.42 ∆E
ColorChecker
29.4 ∆E
54.3 ∆E
39.3 ∆E
36.8 ∆E
44.9 ∆E
62 ∆E
52.9 ∆E
35.2 ∆E
43.1 ∆E
28.4 ∆E
64.5 ∆E
63.5 ∆E
31.4 ∆E
47.7 ∆E
36.9 ∆E
75.6 ∆E
43.6 ∆E
43.4 ∆E
90.9 ∆E
70.6 ∆E
52 ∆E
37 ∆E
24.5 ∆E
14 ∆E
ColorChecker Motorola Razr 50: 46.74 ∆E min: 14.02 - max: 90.92 ∆E

配件和保修 - 不包括充电器

摩托罗拉 Razr 50 的包装盒不包括充电器,只有一根充电线和 SIM 卡工具。

制造商为在欧盟购买的智能手机提供 24 个月的保修服务。如果直接从制造商处购买,则可免费获得一年的显示屏破裂保护。此外,您还可以购买 2 年或 3 年的意外保护。不过,为了确保获得最优惠的价格,您还应将其与其他智能手机保险进行比较。

输入设备和操作 - 顺利登录

Razr 50 内部的可折叠触摸屏每秒最多可扫描 300 次触摸输入,让您可以非常准确地操作,不会有任何明显的延迟。铰链中央的折痕在 Razr 50 上几乎不再明显,至少在我们相对较新的测试机上是这样。

外部显示屏的采样率为 120 Hz,因此每秒扫描 120 次。它也很容易浏览,但有些控制区域相当小。

音量键和待机键位于显示屏右侧。指纹识别器与待机键集成在一起,非常实用,无论在打开还是关闭状态下都能轻松触及。它对保存的指纹响应非常可靠,解锁智能手机时不会再有任何延迟。还可以使用内置摄像头或外置主摄像头进行二维人脸识别。

键盘 - 横向
键盘 - 横向
键盘 - 纵向
键盘 - 纵向

显示屏 - 两个高质量 OLED 屏幕

子像素网格
子像素网格

Razr 50 的内部显示屏采用 P-OLED 面板,对角线为 6.9 英寸,分辨率为 2640x1080 像素。除了 165 Hz 的最大刷新率略有提高外,它的显示效果基本与 Razr 40的显示屏。

不过,据制造商称,新显示屏的亮度也将大大提高,可达 3,000 cd/m²。我们使用光谱光度计和 CalMAN 软件进行了测试。在一个小的照明区域(APL18)上测得的亮度为 1,965 cd/m²,亮度虽然不是很高,但仍然令人印象深刻。如果显示区域较小,亮度可能会更高,但这在实际应用中已不再重要,因为单个非常亮的像素并不会产生什么 HDR 效果。

在全白显示区域,屏幕的亮度也比上一代产品更高:平均亮度为 1,122 cd/m²,足以实现出色的 HDR 效果。另一方面,三星和努比亚的竞争对手则达到了更高的亮度。

外部显示屏的亮度为 982 cd/m²,亮度也相当高,能够令人信服地显示 HDR 内容。

1143
cd/m²
1130
cd/m²
1128
cd/m²
1126
cd/m²
1116
cd/m²
1118
cd/m²
1111
cd/m²
1112
cd/m²
1111
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 1143 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 1121.7 cd/m² Minimum: 2.56 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 97 %
Center on Battery: 1116 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.02 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 1.7 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
105.2% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.123
994
cd/m²
978
cd/m²
984
cd/m²
999
cd/m²
989
cd/m²
976
cd/m²
978
cd/m²
969
cd/m²
978
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with outer display X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 999 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 982.8 cd/m² Minimum: 1.7 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 97 %
Center on Battery: 989 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.82 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 4.9 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
98.6% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.089
Motorola Razr 50
P-OLED, 2640x1080, 6.9"
Motorola Razr 40
P-OLED, 2640x1080, 6.9"
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5G
Dynamic AMOLED 2X, 2640x1080, 6.7"
Nubia Flip 5G
OLED, 2790x1188, 6.9"
Oppo Find N3 Flip
AMOLED, 2520x1080, 6.8"
Screen
-1%
-45%
19%
12%
Brightness middle
1116
982
-12%
1210
8%
1164
4%
922
-17%
Brightness
1122
1002
-11%
1221
9%
1172
4%
932
-17%
Brightness Distribution
97
85
-12%
98
1%
97
0%
96
-1%
Black Level *
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
1.02
0.93
9%
3.1
-204%
0.7
31%
0.7
31%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
2.54
2.52
1%
4.2
-65%
1.5
41%
1.8
29%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
1.7
1.4
18%
2
-18%
1.1
35%
0.9
47%
Gamma
2.123 104%
2.188 101%
2.05 107%
2.2 100%
2.24 98%
CCT
6510 100%
6480 100%
6666 98%
6482 100%
6569 99%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 90 Hz
Amplitude: 12 %

The display backlight flickers at 90 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 90 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8746 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

最低亮度
最低亮度
25% 亮度
25% 亮度
50% 亮度
50% 亮度
75% 亮度
75% 亮度
100% 亮度
100% 亮度

在固定变焦级别和各种亮度设置下的测量系列

对于这两款显示器,我们测量到的闪烁频率为 90 赫兹(最低亮度)。这接近显示器的刷新率。变化率为 12%,振幅也保持在限制范围内。不过,对屏幕敏感的用户如果在观看屏幕后出现头痛或其他问题,还是应该在购买前检查一下智能手机的显示屏。

内屏色彩还原干净,几乎没有明显的色彩空间偏差。外屏似乎有轻微的绿色色调,尤其是在明亮的灰色调和白色时,但除此之外,它也能准确显示色彩。

卡尔曼灰度
卡尔曼灰度
CalMAN 色彩精度
CalMAN 色彩精度
CalMAN sRGB 色彩空间
CalMAN sRGB 色彩空间
CalMAN AdobeRGB 色彩空间
CalMAN AdobeRGB 色彩空间
CalMAN DCI P3 色彩空间
CalMAN DCI P3 色彩空间
卡尔曼色彩空间饱和度
卡尔曼色彩空间饱和度
CalMAN 灰度 - 外部显示
CalMAN 灰度 - 外部显示
CalMAN 色彩精度 - 外部显示
CalMAN 色彩精度 - 外部显示
CalMAN sRGB 色彩空间 - 外部显示器
CalMAN sRGB 色彩空间 - 外部显示器
CalMAN 饱和度 - 外部显示
CalMAN 饱和度 - 外部显示

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
1.3 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.6 ms rise
↘ 0.7 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 4 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
13.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 1.1 ms rise
↘ 12.1 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 23 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

由于亮度高,这两款显示屏在户外也能轻松使用。除了太阳光直接反射到显示屏上的情况外,高亮度往往能掩盖反光。

从各个角度看,视角都非常稳定和宽广。

视角
视角
室外使用
室外使用

性能 - 今年几乎没有新东西

使用 联发科 Dimensity 7300X这次,摩托罗拉采用了专门为可折叠智能手机优化的 SoC。在我们最初的处理器和系统基准测试中,它与摩托罗拉 Razr 40 相比无法显示出真正的性能优势。 摩托罗拉 Razr 40高通骁龙 7 代 1.在大多数情况下,它在对比测试中的表现与摩托罗拉 Razr 40 不相伯仲,有时甚至略有落后。只有在 Procyon AI 测试中,它才能与许多其他 SoC 相比取得明显优势。

在日常操作中,它的性能足以保证流畅运行,大多数应用程序也能顺利运行。另一方面,我们的测试设备无法对抗 高通骁龙 8 代 3中的 三星Galaxy Z Flip6 5G.

Geekbench 6.3
Single-Core
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
2072 Points +98%
Oppo Find N3 Flip
MediaTek Dimensity 9200, Immortalis-G715 MP11, 12288
1460 Points +39%
Average of class Smartphone
  (193 - 3479, n=161, last 2 years)
1446 Points +38%
Motorola Razr 40
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 8192
1056 Points +1%
Motorola Razr 50
MediaTek Dimensity 7300X, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192
1047 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7300X
  ()
1047 Points 0%
Nubia Flip 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 8192
1016 Points -3%
Multi-Core
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
6354 Points +114%
Average of class Smartphone
  (845 - 10401, n=161, last 2 years)
4028 Points +35%
Oppo Find N3 Flip
MediaTek Dimensity 9200, Immortalis-G715 MP11, 12288
3799 Points +28%
Motorola Razr 40
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 8192
3064 Points +3%
Motorola Razr 50
MediaTek Dimensity 7300X, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192
2973 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7300X
  ()
2973 Points 0%
Nubia Flip 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 8192
2885 Points -3%
Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Oppo Find N3 Flip
MediaTek Dimensity 9200, Immortalis-G715 MP11, 12288
1107 Points +40%
Average of class Smartphone
  (126 - 2437, n=172, last 2 years)
995 Points +26%
Motorola Razr 50
MediaTek Dimensity 7300X, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192
789 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7300X
  ()
789 Points 0%
Motorola Razr 40
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 8192
775 Points -2%
Multi-Core
Oppo Find N3 Flip
MediaTek Dimensity 9200, Immortalis-G715 MP11, 12288
3494 Points +23%
Average of class Smartphone
  (473 - 6687, n=172, last 2 years)
3312 Points +17%
Motorola Razr 40
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 8192
2931 Points +3%
Motorola Razr 50
MediaTek Dimensity 7300X, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192
2832 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7300X
  ()
2832 Points 0%
Antutu v10 - Total Score
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
1492419 Points +130%
Oppo Find N3 Flip
MediaTek Dimensity 9200, Immortalis-G715 MP11, 12288
1432115 Points +121%
Average of class Smartphone
  (142748 - 3015111, n=98, last 2 years)
1232320 Points +90%
Motorola Razr 50
MediaTek Dimensity 7300X, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192
648947 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7300X
  ()
648947 Points 0%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
18121 Points +30%
Motorola Razr 50
MediaTek Dimensity 7300X, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192
13946 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7300X
  ()
13946 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4609 - 24088, n=190, last 2 years)
12976 Points -7%
Motorola Razr 40
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 8192
12278 Points -12%
Nubia Flip 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 8192
11666 Points -16%
Oppo Find N3 Flip
MediaTek Dimensity 9200, Immortalis-G715 MP11, 12288
9920 Points -29%
CrossMark - Overall
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
1444 Points +96%
Average of class Smartphone
  (187 - 1517, n=157, last 2 years)
884 Points +20%
Motorola Razr 50
MediaTek Dimensity 7300X, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192
738 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7300X
  ()
738 Points 0%
Nubia Flip 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 8192
683 Points -7%
Motorola Razr 40
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 8192
667 Points -10%
Oppo Find N3 Flip
MediaTek Dimensity 9200, Immortalis-G715 MP11, 12288
Points -100%
BaseMark OS II
Overall
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
9267 Points +106%
Oppo Find N3 Flip
MediaTek Dimensity 9200, Immortalis-G715 MP11, 12288
7488 Points +66%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1196 - 11976, n=151, last 2 years)
6297 Points +40%
Nubia Flip 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 8192
4805 Points +7%
Motorola Razr 40
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 8192
4698 Points +4%
Motorola Razr 50
MediaTek Dimensity 7300X, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192
4508 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7300X
  ()
4508 Points 0%
System
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
15600 Points +99%
Nubia Flip 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 8192
10293 Points +31%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2368 - 16475, n=151, last 2 years)
10163 Points +29%
Oppo Find N3 Flip
MediaTek Dimensity 9200, Immortalis-G715 MP11, 12288
9997 Points +27%
Motorola Razr 40
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 8192
9463 Points +20%
Motorola Razr 50
MediaTek Dimensity 7300X, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192
7858 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7300X
  ()
7858 Points 0%
Memory
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
9230 Points +106%
Oppo Find N3 Flip
MediaTek Dimensity 9200, Immortalis-G715 MP11, 12288
7411 Points +65%
Average of class Smartphone
  (962 - 12716, n=151, last 2 years)
6767 Points +51%
Motorola Razr 40
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 8192
4859 Points +8%
Nubia Flip 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 8192
4856 Points +8%
Motorola Razr 50
MediaTek Dimensity 7300X, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192
4484 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7300X
  ()
4484 Points 0%
Graphics
Oppo Find N3 Flip
MediaTek Dimensity 9200, Immortalis-G715 MP11, 12288
26484 Points +207%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
26269 Points +204%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1017 - 58651, n=151, last 2 years)
16908 Points +96%
Motorola Razr 50
MediaTek Dimensity 7300X, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192
8634 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7300X
  ()
8634 Points 0%
Nubia Flip 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 8192
7680 Points -11%
Motorola Razr 40
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 8192
7630 Points -12%
Web
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
1950 Points +44%
Oppo Find N3 Flip
MediaTek Dimensity 9200, Immortalis-G715 MP11, 12288
1602 Points +18%
Average of class Smartphone
  (841 - 2145, n=151, last 2 years)
1564 Points +15%
Motorola Razr 40
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 8192
1389 Points +2%
Nubia Flip 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 8192
1389 Points +2%
Motorola Razr 50
MediaTek Dimensity 7300X, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192
1357 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7300X
  ()
1357 Points 0%
UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Oppo Find N3 Flip
MediaTek Dimensity 9200, Immortalis-G715 MP11, 12288
40276 Points +43%
Motorola Razr 50
MediaTek Dimensity 7300X, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192
28103 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7300X
  ()
28103 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1267 - 74958, n=143, last 2 years)
16841 Points -40%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
15793 Points -44%
Motorola Razr 40
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 8192
9816 Points -65%
AImark - Score v3.x
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
239813 Points +1651%
Motorola Razr 40
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644, 8192
47384 Points +246%
Oppo Find N3 Flip
MediaTek Dimensity 9200, Immortalis-G715 MP11, 12288
30444 Points +122%
Average of class Smartphone
  (82 - 307528, n=135, last 2 years)
25873 Points +89%
Motorola Razr 50
MediaTek Dimensity 7300X, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192
13694 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7300X
  ()
13694 Points 0%

在图形处理器方面,摩托罗拉 Razr 50 与前代产品的差异也微乎其微。在获得中上游性能的同时,三星的对比设备却能遥遥领先。

在下面的章节中,我们还将仔细分析 SoC 选择对游戏性能的影响。

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5G
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
4739 Points +456%
Oppo Find N3 Flip
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3454 Points +305%
Motorola Razr 50
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300X, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
852 Points
Motorola Razr 40
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
833 Points -2%
Nubia Flip 5G
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
825 Points -3%
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5G
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
4912 Points +467%
Oppo Find N3 Flip
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3116 Points +259%
Motorola Razr 50
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300X, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
867 Points
Motorola Razr 40
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
830 Points -4%
Nubia Flip 5G
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
819 Points -6%
3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5G
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
18949 Points +498%
Oppo Find N3 Flip
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
12831 Points +305%
Motorola Razr 50
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300X, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3169 Points
Motorola Razr 40
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3143 Points -1%
Nubia Flip 5G
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3136 Points -1%
3DMark / Wild Life Score
Motorola Razr 50
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300X, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3175 Points
Motorola Razr 40
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3148 Points -1%
Nubia Flip 5G
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3124 Points -2%
3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5G
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1268 Points +263%
Motorola Razr 50
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300X, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
349 Points
3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Score
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5G
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1333 Points +283%
Motorola Razr 50
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300X, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
348 Points
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5G
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps +32%
Motorola Razr 40
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
110 fps +21%
Motorola Razr 50
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300X, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
91 fps
Oppo Find N3 Flip
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps -34%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5G
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
451 fps +299%
Oppo Find N3 Flip
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
306 fps +171%
Motorola Razr 40
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
148 fps +31%
Motorola Razr 50
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300X, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
113 fps
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5G
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps +74%
Motorola Razr 40
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
73 fps +6%
Motorola Razr 50
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300X, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
69 fps
Oppo Find N3 Flip
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps -13%
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5G
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
312 fps +280%
Oppo Find N3 Flip
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
156 fps +90%
Motorola Razr 40
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
87 fps +6%
Motorola Razr 50
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300X, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
82 fps
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5G
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps +114%
Oppo Find N3 Flip
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps +7%
Motorola Razr 50
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300X, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
56 fps
Motorola Razr 40
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
38 fps -32%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5G
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
245 fps +338%
Oppo Find N3 Flip
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
112 fps +100%
Motorola Razr 50
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300X, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
56 fps
Motorola Razr 40
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
52 fps -7%
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5G
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
115 fps +342%
Oppo Find N3 Flip
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
50 fps +92%
Motorola Razr 40
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
30 fps +15%
Motorola Razr 50
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300X, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
26 fps
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5G
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
127 fps +285%
Oppo Find N3 Flip
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
58 fps +76%
Motorola Razr 40
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
38 fps +15%
Motorola Razr 50
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300X, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
33 fps
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5G
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
105 fps +425%
Oppo Find N3 Flip
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
59 fps +195%
Motorola Razr 40
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
21 fps +5%
Motorola Razr 50
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300X, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
20 fps
Nubia Flip 5G
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
18 fps -10%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5G
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
67 fps +379%
Oppo Find N3 Flip
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
42 fps +200%
Nubia Flip 5G
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
17 fps +21%
Motorola Razr 40
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
15 fps +7%
Motorola Razr 50
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300X, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
14 fps
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5G
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps +287%
Oppo Find N3 Flip
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps +94%
Motorola Razr 40
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
33 fps +6%
Motorola Razr 50
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300X, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
31 fps
Nubia Flip 5G
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
29 fps -6%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5G
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
201 fps +429%
Oppo Find N3 Flip
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
101 fps +166%
Nubia Flip 5G
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
46 fps +21%
Motorola Razr 40
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
41 fps +8%
Motorola Razr 50
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300X, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
38 fps
GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5G
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
40 fps +556%
Oppo Find N3 Flip
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
20 fps +228%
Nubia Flip 5G
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
7.5 fps +23%
Motorola Razr 40
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
7 fps +15%
Motorola Razr 50
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300X, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
6.1 fps

尽管在大型网站上加载图片时可能需要不时等待,但使用 Razr 50 上网冲浪总体上还是相当流畅的。其他一些翻盖手机的速度甚至要快得多。

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5G (Chrome 127)
167.118 Points +94%
Oppo Find N3 Flip (Edge 121)
125 Points +45%
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=161, last 2 years)
120.4 Points +39%
Motorola Razr 40 (Chrome 114)
115.756 Points +34%
Motorola Razr 50 (Chrome 128)
86.336 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7300X ()
86.3 Points 0%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5G (Chrome 127)
281 runs/min +261%
Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 569, n=146, last 2 years)
136.2 runs/min +75%
Oppo Find N3 Flip (Edge 121)
103 runs/min +32%
Motorola Razr 50 (Chrome 128)
77.9 runs/min
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7300X ()
77.9 runs/min 0%
Motorola Razr 40 (Chrome 114)
69.7 runs/min -11%
Speedometer 3.0 - Score
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5G (Chrome 127)
13 runs/min +138%
Average of class Smartphone (1.03 - 34, n=58, last 2 years)
10.7 runs/min +96%
Motorola Razr 50 (Chrome 128)
5.46 runs/min
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7300X ()
5.46 runs/min 0%
WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5G (Chrome 127)
181 Points +141%
Oppo Find N3 Flip (Edge 121)
134 Points +79%
Oppo Find N3 Flip (Chrome 121)
22 Points -71%
Average of class Smartphone (22 - 271, n=152, last 2 years)
113.8 Points +52%
Motorola Razr 50 (Chrome 128)
75 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7300X ()
75 Points 0%
Motorola Razr 40 (Chrome 114)
69 Points -8%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5G (Chrome 127)
72835 Points +145%
Oppo Find N3 Flip (Edge 121)
45823 Points +54%
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=203, last 2 years)
37161 Points +25%
Motorola Razr 40 (Chrome 114)
34300 Points +15%
Motorola Razr 50 (Chrome 128)
29718 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7300X ()
29718 Points 0%
Nubia Flip 5G (Chrome 124)
22047 Points -26%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Motorola Razr 50 (Chrome 128)
1614.1 ms *
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7300X ()
1614 ms * -0%
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=160, last 2 years)
1568 ms * +3%
Motorola Razr 40 (Chrome 114)
1208.2 ms * +25%
Oppo Find N3 Flip (Edge 121)
917.8 ms * +43%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5G (Chrome 127)
574.7 ms * +64%

* ... smaller is better

在存储方面,摩托罗拉继续使用 UFS 2.2 闪存,但它已无法与更先进的 UFS 4.0 存储系统相媲美,尤其是在写入较大文件时。三星 三星Galaxy Z Flip6 5G就使用了 UFS 4.0。在写入较小的文件时,差异就不那么明显了,尽管仍然很明显。

有时,复制文件需要等待更长的时间,加载时间也不如使用更先进存储设备的设备快。

Motorola Razr 50Motorola Razr 40Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5GNubia Flip 5GOppo Find N3 FlipAverage 256 GB UFS 2.2 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-3%
135%
-3%
171%
-15%
41%
Sequential Read 256KB
989.1
955.8
-3%
3930.68
297%
967.4
-2%
3794
284%
Sequential Write 256KB
837.3
804.3
-4%
2603.84
211%
766.69
-8%
2965
254%
694 ?(369 - 913, n=32)
-17%
Random Read 4KB
284.4
290.8
2%
445.5
57%
263.87
-7%
411
45%
Random Write 4KB
276.8
257.5
-7%
202.97
-27%
295.55
7%
558
102%

游戏 - 一个普通的游戏平台

在游戏方面,与前代产品相比,新的 SoC 无法显示出任何真正的优势,甚至在一款游戏中的表现还略逊一筹。

在我们测试的所有游戏中,都能达到 30 fps,而且相当稳定。你甚至可以选择较高的设置,仍然可以获得相当流畅的游戏体验。只有《源氏冲击》在开始时需要几秒钟来加载所有资产。在此之前,可能还会出现一些卡顿,但这并不是所有智能手机都会出现的情况。

在《PUBG Mobile》中,低设置下甚至可以达到 60 帧/秒,但在《暗黑破坏神 永生不朽》中,最高只能达到 30 帧/秒左右。Razr 40 在这里仍能达到 40 帧左右。

我们使用

GameBench 软件来测量帧率。.

PUBG Mobile
PUBG Mobile
暗黑破坏神不朽
暗黑破坏神不朽
051015202530354045505560Tooltip
Motorola Razr 50; Genshin Impact; lowest 120 fps: Ø29.8 (27-31)
Motorola Razr 50; Genshin Impact; highest 120 fps: Ø29.3 (21-31)
Motorola Razr 50; PUBG Mobile; Smooth: Ø58.6 (43-60)
Motorola Razr 50; PUBG Mobile; HD: Ø39.3 (29-41)
Motorola Razr 50; Diablo Immortal; Medium Mobile Low: Ø29.7 (22-32)
Motorola Razr 50; Diablo Immortal; Ultra Mobile Very High; 3.0.3: Ø29.6 (25-32)

排放 - 负载时不节流

温度

智能手机的温度很高,尤其是上半部分(带外部显示屏的部分),因为 SoC 就安装在这里。

经过较长时间的负载后,我们测得这里的室温高达 46.9 °C(116.4 °F)。在炎热的环境中,最高温度可能会更高。这一点非常明显,长时间使用手机时甚至会感觉略微不适。

另一方面,SoC 并没有受到高温的影响。3DMark 的压力测试表明,性能几乎不会因此而降低。

Max. Load
 46.5 °C35.6 °C32.5 °C 
 46.9 °C37.9 °C32.5 °C 
 46.1 °C35.7 °C32.5 °C 
Maximum: 46.9 °C
Average: 38.5 °C
33 °C40 °C42.1 °C
32.2 °C39.3 °C43.1 °C
32.4 °C39.4 °C42.8 °C
Maximum: 43.1 °C
Average: 38.3 °C
Power Supply (max.)  40.9 °C | Room Temperature 22 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 38.5 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 46.9 °C / 116 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 43.1 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.3 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

3DMark Steel Nomad Stress Test

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Nubia Flip 5G
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.5 % 0%
Motorola Razr 50
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300X, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.2 %
Motorola Razr 40
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
80.8 % -19%
Oppo Find N3 Flip
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
58.9 % -41%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5G
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
43.6 % -56%
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Motorola Razr 50
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300X, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.6 %
Nubia Flip 5G
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
98.7 % -1%
Motorola Razr 40
Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
84.9 % -15%
Oppo Find N3 Flip
Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
50.3 % -49%
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5G
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
37.7 % -62%
Solar Bay Stress Test Stability
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5G
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
56.6 %
Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability
Motorola Razr 50
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300X, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.1 %
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5G
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
49.7 % -50%
0510152025303540455055606570758085Tooltip
Motorola Razr 50 Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300X, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø5.15 (5.14-5.16)
Motorola Razr 40 Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø4.65 (4.22-4.97)
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5G Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø13.5 (10.8-28.5)
Nubia Flip 5G Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø4.96 (4.91-4.98)
Oppo Find N3 Flip Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø13.3 (9.44-18.8)
Motorola Razr 50 Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300X, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø18.9 (18.8-19)
Motorola Razr 40 Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø17.3 (15.2-18.8)
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5G Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø44.5 (37.7-86.5)
Nubia Flip 5G Adreno 644, SD 7 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø18.8 (18.7-18.8)
Oppo Find N3 Flip Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø46.5 (37.4-63.5)
Oppo Find N3 Flip Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.5: Ø10.2 (9.14-19.8)
Oppo Find N3 Flip Immortalis-G715 MP11, Dimensity 9200, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.5: Ø11.1 (9.19-19.9)
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5G Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.5: Ø14.4 (12.7-22.5)
Motorola Razr 50 Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300X, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.0.0.15: Ø2.59 (2.58-2.6)
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5G Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.0.0.15: Ø6.95 (5.81-11.7)
热图 - 背面
热图 - 背面
热图 - 正面
热图 - 正面

发言人

听筒与底部边缘的专用扬声器相结合,可以在打开模式下产生一些立体声效果。与前代产品一样,最大音量相当低沉,但声音频谱整体上很有吸引力,可以很好地再现音乐和电影声音。

要将声音输出到外部设备,您可以选择使用 USB-C 端口或蓝牙。如果选择无线连接,在选择终端时不必特别小心,因为 Razr 50 支持几乎所有可用的无线音频编解码器,从 AAC 到 LDAC 和 aptX,直至 Opus 和 LDHC。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2034.843.52534.740.83124.632.54026.533502932.3633124.68017.521.310016.9261251832.716021.236.420021.640.32502248.631523.552.640016.45650017.560.663017.558.980016.358100015.363.2125012.867.2160011.271.9200011.271.7250011.873.3315012.271400012.765500013.165630013.668.5800014.569.81000015.272.11250015.974.31600016.755.4SPL26.881.5N0.947.1median 15.9median 63.2Delta310.828.640.325.937.423.437.427.336.736.237.625.436.616.638.616.939.914.741.713.149.615.147.914.351.611.655.51058.69.168.211.169.49.171.811.875.51576.411.375.1127612.377.912.782.112.684.213.183.413.483.513.577.113.569.613.663.713.660.324.791.60.686.3median 13.1median 71.81.310.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseMotorola Razr 50Oppo Find N3 Flip
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Motorola Razr 50 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.1% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 49% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 43% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 67% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 26% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Oppo Find N3 Flip audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (91.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.1% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 8.5% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 27% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 64% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 47% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 44% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电池寿命 - 支持无线充电

耗电量

经过 Metrahit Energy 的测量,我们可以称 Razr 50 为省电:在不执行任何特殊任务的情况下,开机时的最低耗电量为 0.6 瓦,这是一个非常不错的数值。

即使执行一些简单的任务,该值也几乎不会增加,只有在非常高负荷的情况下,耗电量才能达到 10.2 瓦。

通过数据线可为智能手机充电,最高功率可达 30 瓦。虽然没有附带相应的充电器,但 Razr 在使用我们测试过的任何充电器时都没有问题。不过,如果购买充电器,最好选择兼容 Power Delivery 的充电器。

整个充电过程大约需要 1:30 小时。无线充电速度有所提高,现在的功率为 15 瓦。还支持反向充电。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.1 / 0.2 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 0.6 / 0.9 / 1.4 Watt
Load midlight 6.4 / 10.2 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Motorola Razr 50
4200 mAh
Motorola Razr 40
4200 mAh
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5G
4000 mAh
Oppo Find N3 Flip
4300 mAh
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7300X
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
5%
4%
-36%
0%
-25%
Idle Minimum *
0.6
0.8
-33%
0.51
15%
0.77
-28%
0.6 ?()
-0%
Idle Average *
0.9
1.2
-33%
1.18
-31%
1.68
-87%
0.9 ?()
-0%
Idle Maximum *
1.4
1.4
-0%
1.21
14%
1.72
-23%
1.4 ?()
-0%
Load Average *
6.4
3.5
45%
6.23
3%
8.45
-32%
6.4 ?()
-0%
Load Maximum *
10.2
5.5
46%
8.01
21%
11.05
-8%
10.2 ?()
-0%

* ... smaller is better

Power Consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

012345678910Tooltip
Motorola Razr 50; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø5.59 (2.47-10.2)
Motorola Razr 50; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.706 (0.553-1.312)

Power Consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

01234567Tooltip
Motorola Razr 50; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø6.63 (6.38-7.13)
Motorola Razr 50; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.706 (0.553-1.312)

电池寿命

电池容量与 Razr 40电池容量仍为 4,200 毫安时。

在您需要寻找插座或充电板之前,您可以上网近 13 个小时。在观看存储在智能手机上的电影时,电池可持续使用近 16:37 小时,这对于观看一部迷你剧集甚至一整季的剧集来说都是足够的。

其他一些翻盖手机的电池续航时间更长,例如 三星Galaxy Z Flip6的电池容量甚至更小。虽然电池续航时间足以满足日常使用,但仍无法与一般的高端智能手机相媲美。

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
24h 34min
WiFi Websurfing
12h 55min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
16h 37min
Load (maximum brightness)
4h 48min
Motorola Razr 50
4200 mAh
Motorola Razr 40
4200 mAh
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6 5G
4000 mAh
Nubia Flip 5G
4310 mAh
Oppo Find N3 Flip
4300 mAh
Battery Runtime
-1%
20%
23%
11%
Reader / Idle
1474
1452
-1%
H.264
997
1052
6%
WiFi v1.3
775
743
-4%
929
20%
951
23%
857
11%
Load
288
274
-5%

Pros

+ 大型外部显示屏
+ 两个非常明亮的 OLED 屏幕
+ 几乎看不出显示屏折痕
+ 稳固而优雅的外壳
+ 支持 eSIM 卡
+ 翻盖设计,使用灵活
+ 无线充电
+ 在负载情况下几乎不会出现节流现象

Cons

- 相机图像质量一般
- 较旧的 UFS 2.2 存储系统
- 相比之下,价格不再那么实惠
- 只有 USB 2.0 接口
- 发热明显

结论 - 在这一点上,其他人也成功地做到了经济实惠

测试摩托罗拉 Razr 50
测试摩托罗拉 Razr 50

去年 Razr 40为翻盖手机的普及迈出了一大步。今年,Razr 50 配备了更大的外置显示屏,表明在不提高价格的情况下进一步改进这一概念是可能的。显示屏尺寸的增大使您可以直接在外部显示屏上执行许多任务,即使某些控制按钮变得相当小。

手机外壳的设计依然出色,软件与灵活的翻盖设计相结合,提供了诸如摄像机模式等强大功能。另一方面,摩托罗拉的更新政策还有待改进,在这一点上,其他制造商在这方面显然超过了摩托罗拉。

另外一个问题是,自去年以来,市场形势明显发生了变化:三星 三星Galaxy Z Flip6 5G经历了一次无与伦比的降价,使其价格比 Razr 50 更便宜,尽管它提供了目前更快的 SoC 和更好的设备。因此,为了证明其价格合理,我们的测试机必须提供一些重要的额外更新。

但这些更新几乎找不到:新处理器的性能实际上与 Razr 40相机拍摄的照片也不错,但更多的是中档水平。USB 2.0 端口和(在欧洲)最多 8 GB 的内存和 256 GB 的存储空间,以及缓慢的 WiFi 数据传输速率,这些设备仍然相当平庸。无线充电功能在翻盖手机中也不再是独一无二的。

此外,还有更实惠的竞争对手,如 努比亚翻盖手机等价格更低的竞争对手,它们能以更低的价格提供不错的设备。

因此,摩托罗拉 Razr 50 面临着压力,即使它仍然是一款优秀的技术产品,制造商也必须在下一代产品中表现出更大的努力,才能在竞争激烈的翻盖手机市场中脱颖而出。

如果你正在寻找一款性能不错但价格不高、配备大尺寸副显示屏的翻盖手机,不妨看看摩托罗拉 Razr 50。但目前也有一些高品质的替代产品,其中一些价格甚至更低。

价格和供应情况

在美国和许多其他国家,摩托罗拉 Razr 50 以摩托罗拉 Razr 2024 的名义销售。可直接从购买解锁版摩托罗拉手机,价格约为 700 美元。亚马逊也以相同的价格出售。在美国,您可以从一些服务提供商购买,价格甚至低 100 美元。.

请注意,我们已经更新了评级系统,第 8 版的结果与第 7 版的结果不具可比性。您可以在 这里.

Motorola Razr 50 - 09/13/2024 v8
Florian Schmitt

Chassis
86%
Keyboard
65 / 75 → 87%
Pointing Device
93%
Connectivity
44 / 69 → 63%
Weight
89%
Battery
89%
Display
90%
Games Performance
13 / 55 → 24%
Application Performance
60 / 85 → 71%
AI Performance
30%
Temperature
87%
Noise
100%
Audio
67 / 90 → 74%
Camera
71%
Average
61%
77%
Smartphone - Weighted Average
CO2 Emissions
No Data
Materials
15%
Packaging
90%
Power Use
96.2%
Repairability
0%
Software Updates
50%
Recycle Logo Total Sustainability Score: 41.9%

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 摩托罗拉 Razr 50 智能手机评测--最经济实惠的翻盖手机配备第二块大显示屏
Florian Schmitt, 2024-09-15 (Update: 2024-09-15)