Notebookcheck Logo

Ready or Not》评测:笔记本电脑和台式机基准测试

流派精品。

在经历了数月甚至数年的早期接入阶段之后,《Ready or Not》1.0 版本终于发布了。这款战术射击游戏让人不禁想起《特警 4》等经典游戏,而且由于采用了虚幻引擎,它还拥有令人惊叹的视觉效果。
Gaming Laptop / Notebook Desktop Gamecheck

测试系统

华硕 ROG Zephyrus M16(RTX 4090)
华硕 ROG Zephyrus M16(RTX 4090)
Razer Blade 16 Mid 23(RTX 4080)
Razer Blade 16 Mid 23(RTX 4080)
XMG Pro 15 E23(RTX 4070)
XMG Pro 15 E23(RTX 4070)
Razer Blade 14 Mid 23(RTX 4060)
Razer Blade 14 Mid 23(RTX 4060)
Medion Erazer Scout E20(RTX 4050)
Medion Erazer Scout E20(RTX 4050)
华硕 ROG Strix Scar 17(RTX 3080 Ti)
华硕 ROG Strix Scar 17(RTX 3080 Ti)
华硕 TUF Gaming Advantage A16(RX 7600S 和 780M)
华硕 TUF Gaming Advantage A16(RX 7600S 和 780M)
安静静音底座 802(RTX 4080 和 RX 7900 XT)
安静静音底座 802(RTX 4080 和 RX 7900 XT)
飞利浦 Evnia 8000 系列 41.5 英寸 UHD OLED 游戏显示器
飞利浦 Evnia 8000 系列 41.5 英寸 UHD OLED 游戏显示器

我们目前使用这些设备进行游戏基准测试。点击单张照片可进入相应制造商的网站。有关设备规格的更多详情,请参阅文章末尾。

技术

如前所述,《Ready or Not》基于流行的虚幻引擎。虽然它 "只 "使用了 UE4 而不是较新的 UE5,但这款游戏仍拥有良好甚至非常出色的视觉效果。正如您在我们的截图中看到的那样,游戏具有清晰的纹理、迷人的光照和较高的物体密度。尽管团队规模相对较小,但每个关卡的制作都充满了爱与关注。

就绪与否
就绪与否
就绪与否
就绪与否
就绪与否
就绪与否

不过,有时纹理需要一段时间才能正常加载(尤其是在较弱的设备上),这可能会让人有点烦。开发人员还可以改进有时出现的掉帧(尤其是刚加载完时)以及游戏总体上较差的最低 FPS 速率。此外,游戏的控制(碰撞检测等)也常常显得相当笨拙。即使是战术射击游戏,你也不得不喜欢它相当迟缓的移动速度。另一方面,这款游戏拥有一流的(武器)音效,一些大型工作室可以将其作为范例。

就绪与否
就绪与否
就绪与否
就绪与否
就绪与否
就绪与否

图形选项既漂亮又丰富。虽然基本选项卡仍然易于管理,而且相对来说不够美观(见截图),但高级选项卡中有近 20 个设置选项。升级爱好者可以期待 FSR 和 DLSS 的出现。另一个不错的功能是,无需重启游戏即可应用更改,而且还有一些方便的预设。启动游戏时,你还可以选择 DirectX 11 或 DirectX 12(我们的基准测试是在 DX12 模式下进行的)。

就绪与否
就绪与否
就绪与否

基准

我们使用单人菜单的练习模式作为基准序列。如下视频所示,我们沿着固定路线跑了不到 30 秒,并使用 CapFrameX 工具记录了帧率。由于这是一款第一人称游戏,我们建议至少达到 40 FPS,尽管游戏的节奏很悠闲。

成果


全高清(1,920 x 1,080)

事实证明,虚幻引擎的要求并不高,从我们最近对 决赛.在 1,920 x 1,080 像素和高细节的组合下,即使是一台 Radeon 780M也能突破 40 FPS 大关,尽管最低 FPS 速率并不高。目前的中端 GPU 如 GeForce RTX 4050等目前的中端 GPU 在史诗级预设下也没有大问题--除了之前提到的掉帧问题。

Ready or Not
    1920x1080 Low Preset     1920x1080 Medium Preset     1920x1080 High Preset     1920x1080 Epic Preset
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080, i9-13900K
Desktop-PC Asus ROG Strix Z790-F
382 (15.1min, 200P0.1, 274P1) fps ∼100%
369 (123.1min, 189.4P0.1, 247P1) fps ∼100%
330 (34.1min, 170P0.1, 210P1) fps ∼100%
AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT, i9-13900K
Desktop-PC Asus ROG Strix Z790-F
268 (11.2min, 95.4P0.1, 184.9P1) fps ∼70%
263 (99.6min, 124.3P0.1, 171P1) fps ∼71%
253 (21.1min, 127.2P0.1, 183.5P1) fps ∼77%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16
217 (12.3min, 57.1P0.1, 131.7P1) fps ∼57%
208 (34.8min, 56.6P0.1, 114.8P1) fps ∼56%
203 (29.2min, 54.8P0.1, 119P1) fps ∼62%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX
Razer Blade 16 Mid 23
226 (11.4min, 38.1P0.1, 125.4P1) fps ∼59%
219 (32min, 51.5P0.1, 117P1) fps ∼59%
202 (26.9min, 55.9P0.1, 122.7P1) fps ∼61%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733ZX
232 (13.3min, 41.5P0.1, 127.2P1) fps ∼61%
208 (26.8min, 41.4P0.1, 107P1) fps ∼56%
161.8 (26.5min, 59.4P0.1, 92.6P1) fps ∼49%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX
XMG Pro 15 E23
220 (8.34min, 30.6P0.1, 141.3P1) fps ∼58%
208 (23.6min, 65.4P0.1, 118.4P1) fps ∼56%
161.5 (18.4min, 72P0.1, 103.8P1) fps ∼49%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, R9 7940HS
Razer Blade 14 Mid 23
191.6 (13.4min, 40.5P0.1, 118.8P1) fps ∼50%
173.4 (29.2min, 56.7P0.1, 103.1P1) fps ∼47%
133.7 (9.22min, 29.6P0.1, 83.1P1) fps ∼41%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H
Medion Erazer Scout E20
198.1 (11.6min, 35.1P0.1, 120.5P1) fps ∼52%
155.4 (10min, 33.1P0.1, 83.7P1) fps ∼42%
107.1 (14.7min, 37.8P0.1, 65.6P1) fps ∼32%
AMD Radeon RX 7600S, R9 7940HS
Asus TUF Gaming Advantage A16
176.6 (12.6min, 51.9P0.1, 124.2P1) fps ∼46%
151 (36.4min, 75.9P0.1, 103.4P1) fps ∼41%
104.8 (10.8min, 41P0.1, 75.7P1) fps ∼32%
AMD Radeon 780M, R9 7940HS
Asus TUF Gaming Advantage A16
52.7 (15.5min, 18.3P0.1, 21.2P1) fps ∼100%
44.8 (15.8min, 16.4P0.1, 21.4P1) fps ∼12%
43.4 (9.29min, 15.8P0.1, 21.6P1) fps ∼12%
25 (10.5min, 10.6P0.1, 13.1P1) fps ∼8%

QHD (2,560 x 1,440)

对于 QHD 来说,中档机型也足够了。从 Radeon RX 7600S以上,以 2,560 x 1,440 像素和最高设置运行游戏时,平均 FPS 可超过 60。

Ready or Not
    2560x1440 Epic Preset
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080, i9-13900K
Desktop-PC Asus ROG Strix Z790-F
218 (112.6min, 129.5P0.1, 144.5P1) fps ∼100%
AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT, i9-13900K
Desktop-PC Asus ROG Strix Z790-F
173.1 (36.5min, 106P0.1, 136.4P1) fps ∼79%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16
141.1 (22.8min, 30.4P0.1, 74.7P1) fps ∼65%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX
Razer Blade 16 Mid 23
128 (15.9min, 27.3P0.1, 80.7P1) fps ∼59%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733ZX
102.9 (27.8min, 55.1P0.1, 62.1P1) fps ∼47%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX
XMG Pro 15 E23
95.6 (20.2min, 38.9P0.1, 55.1P1) fps ∼44%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, R9 7940HS
Razer Blade 14 Mid 23
83.6 (20.4min, 26.6P0.1, 52.5P1) fps ∼38%
AMD Radeon RX 7600S, R9 7940HS
Asus TUF Gaming Advantage A16
62.3 (28.6min, 33.7P0.1, 43.1P1) fps ∼29%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H
Medion Erazer Scout E20
56.6 (13min, 22P0.1, 30.6P1) fps ∼26%

超高清(3,840 x 2,160)

只有 4K 才能将小麦从谷壳中分离出来。使用史诗级预设时,您可能无法避免需要高端组件。从 GeForce RTX 4070以上的设备都能带来可接受的性能。激活 DLSS(质量)后,情况看起来会轻松一些。理论上,RTX 4050 已经可以提供足够的性能。

Ready or Not
    3840x2160 Epic Preset     3840x2160 Epic Preset + Quality DLSS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080, i9-13900K
Desktop-PC Asus ROG Strix Z790-F
98.9 (52.8min, 53.5P0.1, 55.1P1) fps ∼100%
205 (97.1min, 119.6P0.1, 136.2P1) fps ∼100%
AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT, i9-13900K
Desktop-PC Asus ROG Strix Z790-F
80.3 (30.5min, 35.8P0.1, 49.5P1) fps ∼81%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16
65.2 (9.69min, 15.1P0.1, 37.5P1) fps ∼66%
128.2 (26.5min, 30.5P0.1, 62.7P1) fps ∼63%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX
Razer Blade 16 Mid 23
60.4 (10.6min, 12.4P0.1, 34.3P1) fps ∼61%
119.2 (14min, 35.3P0.1, 63.3P1) fps ∼58%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733ZX
48.4 (13.2min, 20.8P0.1, 26.9P1) fps ∼49%
95.2 (12.4min, 35.7P0.1, 56.6P1) fps ∼46%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX
XMG Pro 15 E23
40.6 (8.07min, 15.3P0.1, 21.4P1) fps ∼41%
87.6 (38.6min, 49.4P0.1, 51.9P1) fps ∼43%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, R9 7940HS
Razer Blade 14 Mid 23
35.6 (6.16min, 8.53P0.1, 15.8P1) fps ∼36%
75.5 (24.3min, 27.3P0.1, 44.3P1) fps ∼37%
AMD Radeon RX 7600S, R9 7940HS
Asus TUF Gaming Advantage A16
26.6 (9.7min, 10.5P0.1, 14.6P1) fps ∼27%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H
Medion Erazer Scout E20
26 (11.1min, 12.2P0.1, 13.2P1) fps ∼26%
53.6 (14.4min, 20.2P0.1, 27P1) fps ∼26%

Overview

Show Restrictions
PosModel< PrevNext >Ready or Not
 Ready or Not (2023)
low
1920x1080
Low Preset
med.
1920x1080
Medium Preset
high
1920x1080
High Preset
ultra
1920x1080
Epic Preset
QHD
2560x1440
Epic Preset
4K DLSS
3840x2160
Epic Preset + Quality DLSS
4K
3840x2160
Epic Preset
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090
336
356
336
323
263
243
132.4
AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX
519
445
425
314
225
104.2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080
382
369
330
218
205
98.9
AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT
268
263
253
173.1
80.3
AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT
335
325
322
254
159.3
70.5
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
289
191.8n2
183n2
179.05n2
142.7n2
128.2
65.2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Super
451n2
393.5n2
372n2
329n2
215.5n2
185.85n2
97.7n2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090
461n2
369.5n2
332.5n2
256n2
163.65n2
148.8n2
73.85n2
AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT
422
364
343
246
146.9
64.4
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
267
176.8n2
170.25n2
135.1n3
112.5n3
119.2
60.4
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 12 GB
366
308
236
149.9
71.9
AMD Radeon RX 6800
279
277
262
187
114.7
50.4
AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT
281
277
269
183.6
109.9
48.4
NVIDIA Titan RTX
289
283
256
183.8
109.2
101.7
46.4
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti
297
293
263
201
124.7
115.7
58.7
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
232
208
170.3n2
103.35n2
95.2
47.6n2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
220
201.1n2
147.75n2
90.2n2
87.6
40.6
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070
294
259
187
115.6
53.6
AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT
239
233
228
151.8
93.1
40.1
PosModel< PrevNext >Ready or Not
low med. high ultra QHD 4K DLSS 4K
AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT
231
214
228
148.9
87.8
38.1
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
176.9n2
158.05n2
137.45n2
108.5n3
82.6n3
70.55n2
38n3
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
271
260
228
164.3
99.6
92.3
33.2
Intel Arc A770
202
198.3
190.6
134.9
86.6
38
AMD Radeon RX 7600
212
194.7
194.5
133.6
76.7
33.8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
218
172n2
160.5n2
132.6n2
83.6
75.5
35.6
AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT
194.5
188.7
181.2
118.6
69.4
30.3
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
210
189.1
174.8
131.3
82
75.1
37.2
AMD Radeon RX 7600M XT
172.9
155.3
150.4
100.2
76.7
33.3
Intel Arc A750
185
173.1
166.8
118.5
73.9
31.9
NVIDIA Titan X Pascal
209
184
164.3
105.7
62.6
26.4
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super (Desktop)
227
206
187.4
122.1
68.9
65.4
29.4
AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT (Desktop)
176.4
162
150.3
102.5
61.8
28.1
AMD Radeon RX 7600M
162.6
127.4
89.3
53.2
22.9
AMD Radeon RX 7600S
176.6
151
104.8
62.3
26.6
Intel Arc A580
202
173.6
163.5
113.5
68.3
29.2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Super (Desktop)
204
182
159.6
107.8
61.5
57.9
26.2
AMD Radeon RX 6600
161.6
153.7
141.7
95.4
54.7
23.8
AMD Radeon RX 5700 (Desktop)
156.3
143.1
133.2
93
55.7
25.2
AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT (Desktop)
147.7
139.1
127.5
83.3
50.2
21.6
PosModel< PrevNext >Ready or Not
low med. high ultra QHD 4K DLSS 4K
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Super (Desktop)
144.2
128.2
112.5
69.6
39.2
9.5
AMD Radeon RX 6500 XT
81.1
68.7
50.4
36.1
23.1
6.2
AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT (Desktop)
107.1
95
91.8
57.1
34.3
15
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
173.2n2
144.8n2
101.1n2
56.6
53.6
26
Intel Arc A730M
128.7
112.9
93.6
69.3
42.8
15
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
143
105.6
101.4
74.4
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 (Desktop)
138.8
113.7
107.6
63.7
35.3
10.9
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Super (Desktop)
118.1
100.8
94.7
49
26.8
5.6
AMD Radeon 890M
75.3
59.8
43.8
27.5
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
129.6
97.2
85.1
64
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile
86.2
70.9n2
45.7
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
60.4
46.9
45.8
32.5
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
120.7
86.1
74.5
51.5
Intel Arc Graphics 140V
74.3
56.5
37.6
24.3
Intel Arc Graphics 130V
52.5
40.8
26.5
19.9
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
83.5
71.3
63.5
41.3
Intel Arc A380
85.7
70.3
68
43.8
Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU
62.7
48.3
44.5
34.5
Intel Arc A310
102.2
75.6
58.3
34.6
AMD Radeon 880M
59.4
47.3
33.7
21.6
PosModel< PrevNext >Ready or Not
low med. high ultra QHD 4K DLSS 4K
AMD Radeon 780M
54.9n2
49.25n2
47.45n2
29.55n2
20.5
9.2
NVIDIA GeForce MX350
41.5
37
32
14.7
NVIDIA GeForce MX250
34.8
27.8
26.5
14.4
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
23.4
20.9
20.4
13.2
Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)
19.8
16.9
Intel UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
23.1
19.6
18.9
12.1
Intel UHD Graphics 770
25.5
20.2
19.4
AMD Radeon 740M
34.3
27.3
18.2
11.1
AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
20.7
18.3
17.4
11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
11.7
Intel UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
9.74
AMD Radeon R5 M255
9.59
AMD Radeon RX Vega 3
11.1
(-) * Smaller values are better. / n123 Number of benchmarks for this median value / * Approximate position

 

Legend
5Stutters – This game is very likely to stutter and have poor frame rates. Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, average frame rates are expected to fall below 25fps
May Stutter – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, stutters and poor frame rates are expected.
30Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 25fps
40Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 35fps
60Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 58fps
May Run Fluently – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, fluent frame rates are expected.
?Uncertain – This graphics card experienced unexpected performance issues during testing for this game. A slower card may be able to achieve better and more consistent frame rates than this particular GPU running the same benchmark scene.
Uncertain – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game and no reliable interpolation can be made based on the performances of surrounding cards of the same class or family.
The value in the fields displays the average frame rate of all values in the database. Move your cursor over the value to see individual results.

Test system details

笔记本电脑 显卡 处理器 内存
华硕 ROG Zephyrus M16 NvidiaGeForce RTX 4090 @150 W TGP (16 GB GDDR6X) Intel Core i9-13900H 2 x 16 GB DDR5
Razer Blade 16 Mid 23 NvidiaGeForce RTX 4080 @175 W TGP (12 GB GDDR6X) Intel Core i9-13950HX 2 x 16 GB DDR5
XMG Pro 15 E23 NvidiaGeForce RTX 4070 @140 W TGP (8 GB GDDR6) Intel Core i9-13900HX 2 x 16 GB DDR5
Razer Blade 14 Mid 23 NvidiaGeForce RTX 4060 @140 W TGP (8 GB GDDR6) AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS 2 x 8 GB DDR5
Medion Erazer Scout E20 NvidiaGeForce RTX 4050 @100 W TGP (6 GB GDDR6) Intel Core i7-13700H 2 x 8 GB DDR5
华硕 ROG Strix Scar 17 NvidiaGeForce RTX 3080 Ti @150 W TGP (16 GB GDDR6) Intel Core i9-12900H 2 x 16 GB DDR5
华硕 TUF Gaming Advantage A16 AMD Radeon RX 7600S (8 GB GDDR6) & AMD Radeon 780M AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS 2 x 8 GB DDR5
塔式电脑 显卡 处理器 内存
华硕 ROG Strix Z790-F NvidiaGeForce RTX 4080 (16 GB GDDR6X)
AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT (20 GB GDDR6)
Intel Core i9-13900K 2 x 24 GB DDR5 G.Skill
4K 显示器 操作系统 Nvidia 驱动程序 AMD 驱动程序
Philips Evnia 42M2N8900 Windows 11 ForceWare 546.33 Adrenalin 23.12.1
Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > Ready or Not》评测:笔记本电脑和台式机基准测试
Florian Glaser, 2023-12-22 (Update: 2024-08-15)